Robust Linear Models¶

[1]:

%matplotlib inline

[2]:

import numpy as np
import statsmodels.api as sm
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from statsmodels.sandbox.regression.predstd import wls_prediction_std

Estimation¶

Load data:

[3]:

data = sm.datasets.stackloss.load(as_pandas=False)
data.exog = sm.add_constant(data.exog)

Huber’s T norm with the (default) median absolute deviation scaling

[4]:

huber_t = sm.RLM(data.endog, data.exog, M=sm.robust.norms.HuberT())
hub_results = huber_t.fit()
print(hub_results.params)
print(hub_results.bse)
print(hub_results.summary(yname='y',
            xname=['var_%d' % i for i in range(len(hub_results.params))]))

[-41.02649835   0.82938433   0.92606597  -0.12784672]
[9.79189854 0.11100521 0.30293016 0.12864961]
                    Robust linear Model Regression Results
==============================================================================
Dep. Variable:                      y   No. Observations:                   21
Model:                            RLM   Df Residuals:                       17
Method:                          IRLS   Df Model:                            3
Norm:                          HuberT
Scale Est.:                       mad
Cov Type:                          H1
Date:                Sun, 17 Jan 2021
Time:                        14:02:15
No. Iterations:                    19
==============================================================================
                 coef    std err          z      P>|z|      [0.025      0.975]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
var_0        -41.0265      9.792     -4.190      0.000     -60.218     -21.835
var_1          0.8294      0.111      7.472      0.000       0.612       1.047
var_2          0.9261      0.303      3.057      0.002       0.332       1.520
var_3         -0.1278      0.129     -0.994      0.320      -0.380       0.124
==============================================================================

If the model instance has been used for another fit with different fit parameters, then the fit options might not be the correct ones anymore .

Huber’s T norm with ‘H2’ covariance matrix

[5]:

hub_results2 = huber_t.fit(cov="H2")
print(hub_results2.params)
print(hub_results2.bse)

[-41.02649835   0.82938433   0.92606597  -0.12784672]
[9.08950419 0.11945975 0.32235497 0.11796313]

Andrew’s Wave norm with Huber’s Proposal 2 scaling and ‘H3’ covariance matrix

[6]:

andrew_mod = sm.RLM(data.endog, data.exog, M=sm.robust.norms.AndrewWave())
andrew_results = andrew_mod.fit(scale_est=sm.robust.scale.HuberScale(), cov="H3")
print('Parameters: ', andrew_results.params)

Parameters:  [-40.8817957    0.79276138   1.04857556  -0.13360865]

See help(sm.RLM.fit) for more options and module sm.robust.scale for scale options

Comparing OLS and RLM¶

Artificial data with outliers:

[7]:

nsample = 50
x1 = np.linspace(0, 20, nsample)
X = np.column_stack((x1, (x1-5)**2))
X = sm.add_constant(X)
sig = 0.3   # smaller error variance makes OLS<->RLM contrast bigger
beta = [5, 0.5, -0.0]
y_true2 = np.dot(X, beta)
y2 = y_true2 + sig*1. * np.random.normal(size=nsample)
y2[[39,41,43,45,48]] -= 5   # add some outliers (10% of nsample)

Example 1: quadratic function with linear truth¶

Note that the quadratic term in OLS regression will capture outlier effects.

[8]:

res = sm.OLS(y2, X).fit()
print(res.params)
print(res.bse)
print(res.predict())

[ 5.01328612  0.52691095 -0.01320474]
[0.45367797 0.07004176 0.00619761]
[ 4.68316765  4.94993036  5.21229333  5.47025655  5.72382002  5.97298375
  6.21774773  6.45811197  6.69407646  6.9256412   7.15280619  7.37557144
  7.59393695  7.8079027   8.01746871  8.22263497  8.42340149  8.61976826
  8.81173529  8.99930256  9.1824701   9.36123788  9.53560592  9.70557421
  9.87114276 10.03231155 10.18908061 10.34144991 10.48941947 10.63298929
 10.77215935 10.90692967 11.03730025 11.16327108 11.28484216 11.40201349
 11.51478508 11.62315692 11.72712902 11.82670137 11.92187397 12.01264682
 12.09901993 12.1809933  12.25856691 12.33174079 12.40051491 12.46488929
 12.52486392 12.5804388 ]

Estimate RLM:

[9]:

resrlm = sm.RLM(y2, X).fit()
print(resrlm.params)
print(resrlm.bse)

[ 4.94739086e+00  5.13310289e-01 -2.77887757e-03]
[0.1158262  0.017882   0.00158228]

Draw a plot to compare OLS estimates to the robust estimates:

[10]:

fig = plt.figure(figsize=(12,8))
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax.plot(x1, y2, 'o',label="data")
ax.plot(x1, y_true2, 'b-', label="True")
prstd, iv_l, iv_u = wls_prediction_std(res)
ax.plot(x1, res.fittedvalues, 'r-', label="OLS")
ax.plot(x1, iv_u, 'r--')
ax.plot(x1, iv_l, 'r--')
ax.plot(x1, resrlm.fittedvalues, 'g.-', label="RLM")
ax.legend(loc="best")

[10]:

<matplotlib.legend.Legend at 0x7f544a333bb0>

../../../_images/examples_notebooks_generated_robust_models_0_18_1.png

Example 2: linear function with linear truth¶

Fit a new OLS model using only the linear term and the constant:

[11]:

X2 = X[:,[0,1]]
res2 = sm.OLS(y2, X2).fit()
print(res2.params)
print(res2.bse)

[5.54551795 0.39486356]
[0.39242678 0.03381308]