
From ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org  Wed Sep 12 07:58:06 2012
Return-Path: <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28DB521F8604 for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 07:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.789
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.789 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.810, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o23M8VD5UjKX for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 07:58:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD22421F8602 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 07:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06ED386D564 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:58:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1013A86D333 for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:57:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1TBoNm-000Dcd-Kz for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:57:39 +0000
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id A021AB1E002; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 07:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
To: brian@innovationslab.net, mills@udel.edu, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, brian@innovationslab.net, odonoghue@isoc.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20120912145422.A021AB1E002@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 07:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:1890:123a::1:2f
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: wwwrun@rfc-editor.org
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org)
Cc: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, lyh20042008@sina.com
Subject: [ntpwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5906 (3345)
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
Sender: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5906,
"Network Time Protocol Version 4: Autokey Specification".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5906&eid=3345

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: liyh <lyh20042008@sina.com>

Section: 5

Original Text
-------------
 Certificate exchange.[...]Completion of this exchange lights the VAL bit as described below.

Corrected Text
--------------
Certificate exchange.[...]Completion of this exchange lights the CERT bit as described below.

Notes
-----


Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5906 (draft-ietf-ntp-autokey-08)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Network Time Protocol Version 4: Autokey Specification
Publication Date    : June 2010
Author(s)           : B. Haberman, Ed., D. Mills
Category            : INFORMATIONAL
Source              : Network Time Protocol
Area                : Internet
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG
_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg

From ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org  Wed Sep 12 08:03:24 2012
Return-Path: <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D24C21F8535 for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.845
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.845 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.754, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bpk3tTzzqM8R for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:03:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99FDC21F8534 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:03:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4AB86DAE5 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:03:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F98286D333 for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:03:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1TBoTF-000DgI-NG for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:03:18 +0000
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id B48BAB1E002; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
To: brian@innovationslab.net, mills@udel.edu, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, brian@innovationslab.net, odonoghue@isoc.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20120912150001.B48BAB1E002@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:1890:123a::1:2f
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: wwwrun@rfc-editor.org
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org)
Cc: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, lyh20042008@sina.com
Subject: [ntpwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5906 (3346)
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
Sender: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5906,
"Network Time Protocol Version 4: Autokey Specification".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5906&eid=3346

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: liyh <lyh20042008@sina.com>

Section: 5

Original Text
-------------
Identity exchange.[...] Completion of this exchange lights the IFF bit as described below.

Corrected Text
--------------
Identity exchange.[...] Completion of this exchange lights the VRFY bit as described below.

Notes
-----


Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5906 (draft-ietf-ntp-autokey-08)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Network Time Protocol Version 4: Autokey Specification
Publication Date    : June 2010
Author(s)           : B. Haberman, Ed., D. Mills
Category            : INFORMATIONAL
Source              : Network Time Protocol
Area                : Internet
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG
_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg

From ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org  Wed Sep 12 08:15:41 2012
Return-Path: <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2D521F8618 for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:15:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.898
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.701, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l-WISKmtdt-h for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:15:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC54421F8613 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:15:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B7B86D55F for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:15:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF5D86D333 for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:15:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1TBof6-000Dlk-4F for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:15:32 +0000
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 34B15B1E002; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
To: brian@innovationslab.net, mills@udel.edu, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, brian@innovationslab.net, odonoghue@isoc.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20120912151215.34B15B1E002@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:1890:123a::1:2f
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: wwwrun@rfc-editor.org
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org)
Cc: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, lyh20042008@sina.com
Subject: [ntpwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5906 (3347)
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
Sender: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5906,
"Network Time Protocol Version 4: Autokey Specification".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5906&eid=3347

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: liyh <lyh20042008@sina.com>

Section: 5

Original Text
-------------
Cookie exchange.  The request includes the public key of the server.The response includes the server cookie encrypted with this key.

Corrected Text
--------------
I don't know.

Notes
-----
how to decrypt?

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5906 (draft-ietf-ntp-autokey-08)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Network Time Protocol Version 4: Autokey Specification
Publication Date    : June 2010
Author(s)           : B. Haberman, Ed., D. Mills
Category            : INFORMATIONAL
Source              : Network Time Protocol
Area                : Internet
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG
_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg

From ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org  Wed Sep 12 08:17:56 2012
Return-Path: <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2430921F8594 for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.949
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.650, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1blgN-ICqWm8 for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:17:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F45221F84B6 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:17:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3981C86DAE9 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:17:55 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F22BE86D333 for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:17:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1TBohK-000DnY-BH for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:17:50 +0000
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id F11D1B1E003; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
To: brian@innovationslab.net, mills@udel.edu, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, brian@innovationslab.net, odonoghue@isoc.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20120912151434.F11D1B1E003@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:1890:123a::1:2f
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: wwwrun@rfc-editor.org
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org)
Cc: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, lyh20042008@sina.com
Subject: [ntpwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5906 (3348)
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
Sender: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5906,
"Network Time Protocol Version 4: Autokey Specification".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5906&eid=3348

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: liyh <lyh20042008@sina.com>

Section: 5

Original Text
-------------
Autokey exchange.[...]Completion of this exchange lights the AUT bit as described below.

Corrected Text
--------------
Autokey exchange.[...]Completion of this exchange lights the AUTO bit as described below.

Notes
-----


Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5906 (draft-ietf-ntp-autokey-08)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Network Time Protocol Version 4: Autokey Specification
Publication Date    : June 2010
Author(s)           : B. Haberman, Ed., D. Mills
Category            : INFORMATIONAL
Source              : Network Time Protocol
Area                : Internet
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG
_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg

From ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org  Wed Sep 12 08:27:38 2012
Return-Path: <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B347C21F84E6 for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.998
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.601, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ohwcNV+j+ovH for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0987921F84FD for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972F686DAA9 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:27:37 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2DD86D333 for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:27:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1TBoqf-000Ds3-2W for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:27:30 +0000
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 39A25B1E002; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:24:13 -0700 (PDT)
To: brian@innovationslab.net, mills@udel.edu, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, brian@innovationslab.net, odonoghue@isoc.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20120912152413.39A25B1E002@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:24:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:1890:123a::1:2f
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: wwwrun@rfc-editor.org
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org)
Cc: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, lyh20042008@sina.com
Subject: [ntpwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5906 (3349)
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
Sender: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5906,
"Network Time Protocol Version 4: Autokey Specification".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5906&eid=3349

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: liyh <lyh20042008@sina.com>

Section: 5

Original Text
-------------
Leapseconds exchange.  [...]Completion of this exchange lights the LPT bit as described below.

Corrected Text
--------------
Leapseconds exchange.  [...]Completion of this exchange lights the LEAP bit as described below.

Notes
-----
refer to 11.1

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5906 (draft-ietf-ntp-autokey-08)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Network Time Protocol Version 4: Autokey Specification
Publication Date    : June 2010
Author(s)           : B. Haberman, Ed., D. Mills
Category            : INFORMATIONAL
Source              : Network Time Protocol
Area                : Internet
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG
_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg
