From ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Tue Jan 8 04:34:10 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF8A21F8937 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 04:34:10 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xjio5IcCGAzT for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 04:34:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B670C21F892F for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 04:34:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B23C86DABC for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 12:34:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC6686D4E1 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 04:39:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f51.google.com ([209.85.214.51]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1TsQy5-000Nbi-Fh for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 04:39:19 +0000 Received: by mail-bk0-f51.google.com with SMTP id ik5so8957446bkc.10 for ; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 20:39:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=e8w8s9/+6Y5L2d3G4oJg2Kn/ob886V3ILnDqOuQzwjA=; b=YGgl88rZXNQaCaF55mshpTosSJIIE1FF3XA2pczbKhp5eRgYqQcjH0CIFQCwe/E/m9 6LdBYLX7yAj+P95nFnPI2yfGueeznsPJUJjileg9Wzv599jHTaBnYZ9Tul2YD70tKlmX wKHs7U1C+DSRRS5ocx7pF3Nn3LkeQD2nUG8D9TkJSxvdaQiVI723jEGk4OpOad2w+u4r q79Ua93uGK7kxBzsTQ3RoIvnLhHAIBHvab909/CwWNYJ1rTCQulOw4FJvzNmUyPPlyfi XTDqPcCQZhe6UNZBW5+QEzBG2CO5BGMv03fVAPXSlyG97K/4vi7xIvJsbpHYFcC7cgaF FlJg== Received: by 10.204.145.219 with SMTP id e27mr30880289bkv.140.1357619950276; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 20:39:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.41.195 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 20:38:50 -0800 (PST) From: Sanjeev Gupta Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 12:38:50 +0800 Message-ID: To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.214.51 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ghane0@gmail.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 12:33:51 +0000 Subject: [ntpwg] Is the NTP SNMP MIB still being worked on? X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6600430905392867223==" Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Sender: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org --===============6600430905392867223== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cd7b8e0503a04d2bf8651 --0015175cd7b8e0503a04d2bf8651 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I do not see recent postings on this. Is the MIB still being worked on? -- Sanjeev Gupta +65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane --0015175cd7b8e0503a04d2bf8651 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi,

I do not see recent postings on this.=A0 Is the MIB still being = worked on?=A0

--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 985512= 08=A0 =A0=A0 http://www.linked= in.com/in/ghane
--0015175cd7b8e0503a04d2bf8651-- --===============6600430905392867223== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ntpwg mailing list ntpwg@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg --===============6600430905392867223==-- From ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Tue Jan 8 05:35:00 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B100121F88AE for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 05:35:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.332 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.332 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.268, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2fY64TRQVWCS for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 05:35:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE0221F8837 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 05:34:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3ECE86DAAF for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 13:34:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B8D86D4E3 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 13:34:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from uillean.fuaim.com ([206.197.161.140]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1TsZKL-0005Qc-I2 for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 13:34:50 +0000 Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42424880AA for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 05:34:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from clemson.local (nat-gwifi.jhuapl.edu [128.244.87.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D314130019 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 05:34:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50EC2073.6070404@innovationslab.net> Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 08:34:43 -0500 From: Brian Haberman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org References: In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 206.197.161.140 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: brian@innovationslab.net X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org) Subject: Re: [ntpwg] Is the NTP SNMP MIB still being worked on? X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Sender: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org The MIB was published as RFC 5907. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5907 Regards, Brian On 1/7/13 11:38 PM, Sanjeev Gupta wrote: > Hi, > > I do not see recent postings on this. Is the MIB still being worked on? > > > > _______________________________________________ > ntpwg mailing list > ntpwg@lists.ntp.org > http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg > _______________________________________________ ntpwg mailing list ntpwg@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg From ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Thu Jan 24 01:14:47 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04FA121F85AD for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 01:14:47 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EGPIOlpqFfr3 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 01:14:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292D321F882E for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 01:14:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624BE86D773 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:14:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A00686D521 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp178.iad.emailsrvr.com ([207.97.245.178]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1TyIt2-000IgH-Dv for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:14:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp57.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 664D3F82DF; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 04:14:14 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp57.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: odonoghue-AT-isoc.org) with ESMTPSA id 449D5F82DB; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 04:14:14 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <5100FB66.2040202@isoc.org> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 04:14:14 -0500 From: Karen O'Donoghue Organization: ISOC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "tictoc@ietf.org" , NTP Working Group X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 207.97.245.178 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: odonoghue@isoc.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org) Subject: [ntpwg] =?windows-1252?q?IEEE_P1588=99_Study_Group_=28SG=29_Call_?= =?windows-1252?q?for_Participation?= X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: odonoghue@isoc.org List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Sender: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Folks, The kickoff of the IEEE 1588 activities that we discussed in November has been initiated. The first step is to develop a PAR. Details of the CFP are available at: http://standards.ieee.org/email/2013_01_cfp1588_web.html Regards, Karen _______________________________________________ ntpwg mailing list ntpwg@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg From ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Fri Jan 25 04:51:42 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A5021F88CA for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 04:51:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.519 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.780, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DcVhGBFea5FM for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 04:51:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF7421F87A6 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 04:51:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B1E86D784 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 12:51:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1644986D521 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:34:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail5.symmetricom.com ([69.25.98.10]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1TyRcg-0000FV-Os for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:34:03 +0000 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1359052437-05bdbc4d9e246580001-dac64w Received: from SJC-HUB-01.symmetricom.com ([192.168.10.171]) by mail5.symmetricom.com with ESMTP id duWCMnVQ6pEI6ZIG; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:33:57 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: darnold@symmetricom.com X-ASG-Whitelist: Client Received: from SJC-MBX-01.symmetricom.com ([169.254.1.133]) by SJC-HUB-01.symmetricom.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0289.001; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:33:56 -0800 From: Doug Arnold To: "odonoghue@isoc.org" , "tictoc@ietf.org" , NTP Working Group Thread-Topic: =?Windows-1252?Q?[TICTOC]_IEEE_P1588=99_Study_Group_(SG)_Call_for_Partici?= =?Windows-1252?Q?pation?= X-ASG-Orig-Subj: =?Windows-1252?Q?RE:_[TICTOC]_IEEE_P1588=99_Study_Group_(SG)_Call_for_Par?= =?Windows-1252?Q?ticipation?= Thread-Index: AQHN+hNIY9aCQ6Iz+kC2H5Igc4sM1JhYziDg Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:33:55 +0000 Message-ID: References: <5100FB66.2040202@isoc.org> In-Reply-To: <5100FB66.2040202@isoc.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.22.119] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Barracuda-Connect: UNKNOWN[192.168.10.171] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1359052437 X-Barracuda-URL: http://192.168.10.96:80/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at symmetricom.com X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 69.25.98.10 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: btv1==736c27320d5==darnold@symmetricom.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 12:51:19 +0000 Subject: Re: [ntpwg] =?windows-1252?q?=5BTICTOC=5D_IEEE_P1588=99_Study_Group_?= =?windows-1252?q?=28SG=29_Call_for_Participation?= X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Sender: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org I would like to see multipath PTP as part of the PAR. I encourage those of= you in TICTOC working on this to participate in the IEEE 1588 revision. //Doug Arnold -----Original Message----- From: tictoc-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tictoc-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of= Karen O'Donoghue Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 1:14 AM To: tictoc@ietf.org; NTP Working Group Subject: [TICTOC] IEEE P1588=99 Study Group (SG) Call for Participation Folks, The kickoff of the IEEE 1588 activities that we discussed in November = has been initiated. The first step is to develop a PAR. Details of the = CFP are available at: http://standards.ieee.org/email/2013_01_cfp1588_web.html Regards, Karen _______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list TICTOC@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc _______________________________________________ ntpwg mailing list ntpwg@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg