From ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Tue Apr 30 05:09:25 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953C321F9AD5 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 05:09:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.208 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.208 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.391, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Av6NJzce30X for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 05:09:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98C0921F9A4D for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 05:09:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F1A786DAB2 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 12:09:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20BBE86D333 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 05:31:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rfc-editor.org ([2001:1890:126c::1:2f]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1UX39p-0009Sv-O7 for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 05:31:18 +0000 Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 948A8B1E005; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 22:30:45 -0700 (PDT) To: mills@udel.edu, jrmii@isc.org, jack.burbank@jhuapl.edu, william.kasch@jhuapl.edu, brian@innovationslab.net, ted.lemon@nominum.com, odonoghue@isoc.org From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20130430053045.948A8B1E005@rfc-editor.org> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 22:30:45 -0700 (PDT) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:1890:126c::1:2f X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: wwwrun@rfc-editor.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 12:09:01 +0000 Cc: crrodriguez@opensuse.org, ntpwg@lists.ntp.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [ntpwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5905 (3608) X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0956353738155273515==" Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Sender: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org --===============0956353738155273515== Content-Type: text/plain The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5905, "Network Time Protocol Version 4: Protocol and Algorithms Specification". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5905&eid=3608 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Cristian Rodríguez Section: A.2. Original Text ------------- /* * Read command line options and initialize system variables. * The reference implementation measures the precision specific * to each machine by measuring the clock increments to read the * system clock. */ memset(&s, sizeof(s), 0); ..... /* * Initialize local clock variables */ memset(&c, sizeof(c), 0); Corrected Text -------------- /* * Read command line options and initialize system variables. * The reference implementation measures the precision specific * to each machine by measuring the clock increments to read the * system clock. */ memset(&s, 0. sizeof(s)); ... /* * Initialize local clock variables */ memset(&c, 0, sizeof(c)); Notes ----- Paramters 2 and 3 of the memset functions are inverted everywhere in the example code, not just in section A2 Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5905 (draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-proto-13) -------------------------------------- Title : Network Time Protocol Version 4: Protocol and Algorithms Specification Publication Date : June 2010 Author(s) : D. Mills, J. Martin, Ed., J. Burbank, W. Kasch Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Network Time Protocol Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG --===============0956353738155273515== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ntpwg mailing list ntpwg@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg --===============0956353738155273515==--