From ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Thu Jan 2 01:28:13 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F1C1AE457 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 01:28:13 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.737 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.737 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zvjJKdXCb0Td for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 01:28:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 628471AE44E for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 01:28:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFDC86DAA8 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 09:28:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDDA086D4E3 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 09:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx0a-0016f401.pphosted.com ([67.231.148.174]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1VyeZ9-0004KK-TR for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:27:48 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0045849.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0016f401.pphosted.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s029RkU2010989 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 01:27:47 -0800 Received: from sc-owa02.marvell.com ([199.233.58.137]) by mx0a-0016f401.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 1h4y84rtsh-18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 01:27:46 -0800 Received: from YK-HUB01.marvell.com (10.4.102.51) by sc-owa02.marvell.com (10.93.76.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.327.1; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 01:27:43 -0800 Received: from IL-MB01.marvell.com ([10.4.102.53]) by YK-HUB01.marvell.com ([10.4.102.51]) with mapi; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 11:27:39 +0200 From: Tal Mizrahi To: "ntpwg@lists.ntp.org" Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 11:27:37 +0200 Thread-Topic: Reposted draft-mizrahi-ntp-extension-field Thread-Index: Ac8HnLI/AZ+431dCSlS+g5gVERQuag== Message-ID: <74470498B659FA4687F0B0018C19A89C01D438F58498@IL-MB01.marvell.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.11.87, 1.0.14, 0.0.0000 definitions=2014-01-02_04:2014-01-01, 2014-01-02, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1305240000 definitions=main-1401020011 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.231.148.174 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: talmi@marvell.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org) Subject: [ntpwg] Reposted draft-mizrahi-ntp-extension-field X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1453076757159397108==" Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Sender: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org --===============1453076757159397108== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_74470498B659FA4687F0B0018C19A89C01D438F58498ILMB01marve_" --_000_74470498B659FA4687F0B0018C19A89C01D438F58498ILMB01marve_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, We have reposted the draft to avoid expiration. No updates compared to the = previous draft. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mizrahi-ntp-extension-field-03 Thanks, Tal. --_000_74470498B659FA4687F0B0018C19A89C01D438F58498ILMB01marve_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

 

We have re= posted the draft to avoid expiration. No updates compared to the previous d= raft.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-= mizrahi-ntp-extension-field-03

=  

Thanks,

Tal.=

 

= --_000_74470498B659FA4687F0B0018C19A89C01D438F58498ILMB01marve_-- --===============1453076757159397108== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ntpwg mailing list ntpwg@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg --===============1453076757159397108==-- From ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Fri Jan 3 09:06:30 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D33A1AE00D for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 09:06:30 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.738 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.738 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c-voHe6ogpHK for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 09:06:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F341AE00C for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 09:06:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B541986DABD for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 17:06:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE8A86D643 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 17:06:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ietf.org ([2001:1900:3001:11::2c]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Vz8CA-000Nyi-U1 for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 17:06:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C74571AE009 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 09:06:04 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fR51UcIrhe6J; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 09:06:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527621ADFE0; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 09:06:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.90.p1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140103170603.16193.81426.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 09:06:03 -0800 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:1900:3001:11::2c X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: internet-drafts@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org) Cc: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Subject: [ntpwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-extension-field-00.txt X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Sender: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Network Time Protocol Working Group of the IETF. Title : Using NTP Extension Fields without Authentication Authors : Tal Mizrahi Danny Mayer Filename : draft-ietf-ntp-extension-field-00.txt Pages : 9 Date : 2014-01-03 Abstract: The Network Time Protocol Version 4 (NTPv4) defines the optional usage of extension fields. An extension field is an optional field that resides at the end of the NTP header, and can be used to add optional capabilities or additional information that is not conveyed in the standard NTP header. The current definition of extension fields in NTPv4 is somewhat ambiguous regarding the connection between extension fields and the presence of a Message Authentication Code (MAC). This draft clarifies the usage of extension fields in the presence and in the absence of a MAC, while maintaining interoperability with existing implementations. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ntp-extension-field/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ntp-extension-field-00 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ ntpwg mailing list ntpwg@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg From ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Mon Jan 6 07:42:30 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590A21AE041 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 07:42:30 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.738 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.738 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mR8_mj-TN9sy for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 07:42:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064601AE038 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 07:42:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC18E86DADB for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 15:42:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C883086D9B1 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 15:42:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp138.ord.emailsrvr.com ([173.203.6.138]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1W0CJS-000710-FM for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 15:42:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp22.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 61A2C2004A8 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 10:41:52 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp22.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: odonoghue-AT-isoc.org) with ESMTPSA id F25C22003CD for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 10:41:51 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <52CACEBF.3050908@isoc.org> Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 10:41:51 -0500 From: Karen O'Donoghue Organization: ISOC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: NTP Working Group X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 173.203.6.138 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: odonoghue@isoc.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org) Subject: [ntpwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-ntp-extension-field X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: odonoghue@isoc.org List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Sender: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Folks, This message initiates a two week WGLC (closing on 20 January) on the following document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ntp-extension-field/ While this is a -00 working group document, the individual submission document has been around since Oct 2012 and has had two revisions based on wg feedback. Please review and comment on the mailing list. Thanks, Karen _______________________________________________ ntpwg mailing list ntpwg@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg From ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Tue Jan 7 07:06:10 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFFB11ADEB1 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 07:06:10 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.738 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.738 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cfUamlg474Fp for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 07:06:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A001ADE72 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 07:06:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D32A186DB0D for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 15:06:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD5F86DAAE for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 15:05:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [198.22.153.36] (helo=[10.2.64.160]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1W0YE0-000Iii-05 for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 15:05:48 +0000 Message-ID: <52CC17AE.60409@ntp.org> Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 10:05:18 -0500 From: Danny Mayer Organization: NTP User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org References: <52CACEBF.3050908@isoc.org> In-Reply-To: <52CACEBF.3050908@isoc.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.22.153.36 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mayer@ntp.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org) Subject: Re: [ntpwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-ntp-extension-field X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mayer@ntp.org List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Sender: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Approve. Though I am co-author! :) Danny On 1/6/2014 10:41 AM, Karen O'Donoghue wrote: > Folks, > > This message initiates a two week WGLC (closing on 20 January) on the > following document: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ntp-extension-field/ > > While this is a -00 working group document, the individual submission > document has been > around since Oct 2012 and has had two revisions based on wg feedback. > > Please review and comment on the mailing list. > > Thanks, > Karen > > > _______________________________________________ > ntpwg mailing list > ntpwg@lists.ntp.org > http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg > > _______________________________________________ ntpwg mailing list ntpwg@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg From ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Mon Jan 13 21:52:14 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F901AE1E1 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 21:52:14 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.437 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, TVD_SPACE_RATIO=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6fmiJpXKiSUR for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 21:52:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC041AE1E7 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 21:52:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615CF86D76F for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 05:52:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Received: from stenn.ntp.org (stenn.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::30]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D7C86D422 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 05:51:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.ntp.org ([::1] helo=stenn.ntp.org) by stenn.ntp.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1W2wuc-0002fl-3i for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 05:51:42 +0000 From: Harlan Stenn To: NTP Working Group In-reply-to: <52CACEBF.3050908@isoc.org> References: <52CACEBF.3050908@isoc.org> Comments: In-reply-to Karen O'Donoghue message dated "Mon, 06 Jan 2014 10:41:51 -0500." X-Mailer: MH-E 7.4.2; nmh 1.5; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22) Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 1.8) Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 05:51:42 +0000 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [ntpwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-ntp-extension-field X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Sender: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Approve. -- Harlan Stenn http://networktimefoundation.org - be a member! _______________________________________________ ntpwg mailing list ntpwg@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg From ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Mon Jan 13 22:31:15 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230B01ADF0E for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:31:15 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.338 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.338 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8AaKcvOiIdU1 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:31:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236AA1AD672 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:31:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EBE286D77E for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 06:31:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB4186D422 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 06:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.65]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1W2xWV-000FB5-1q for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 06:30:53 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=S78UBiLBpcHeObyU60MXqcwp6Ou3TO3s60JkUEZOKQWcvrjtU5O5289VD5M1BTQV; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [67.180.134.155] (helo=[192.168.0.4]) by elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1W2xWO-0003xr-Ea for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 01:30:44 -0500 Message-ID: <52D4D9A5.60506@earthlink.net> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:31:01 -0800 From: TGLASSEY User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org References: <20131202044734.B78E0406060@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net> In-Reply-To: <20131202044734.B78E0406060@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net> X-ELNK-Trace: 01b7a7e171bdf5911aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79d6626f808e9dfa9c941186d1955dd8b3350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 67.180.134.155 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.86.89.65 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tglassey@earthlink.net X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org) Subject: Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ogud-dhc-udp-time-option-01.txt X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Sender: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org On 12/1/2013 8:47 PM, Hal Murray wrote: > Does DNS using DNSSEC return a specific error code for time-invalid? Or just > a generic didn't-work? It will depend on the implementation. > > How close does the time have to be for DNSSEC to work? Again it will depend on the implementation. Kerberos tickets for cross mounting a microsoft file system can be made to expire in a short enough time frame that this could cause issues. > > Could this problem be solved by setting up a bank of NTP servers at well > known IP Addresses? Say, one next to each root DNS server. This is why a NTP proxy would be a good tool. > If you tried to > do that, I'd expect a serious problem would be overload because idiots would > try to use them for normal NTP use rather than just getting off the ground. You guys host one right? So you know... We see insane levels of use. Most all of us in the ITS program do. > It might be possible to discourage that by making them return crappy time. No - that's not really an acceptable trust thing. > > > ted.lemon@nominum.com said: >> As for the home router use model, it may be that what you really want is for >> the home router to query for an FQDN-only DHCP option from the ISP DHCP >> server, and then resolve that FQDN and respond to DHCP clients on the >> homenet with an IP address. Since the FQDN is not hard-coded, and the IP >> address is (one hopes) resolved either at query time or when its TTL >> expires, this ought to prevent a repeat of the firmware burn-in incident. > Most ISPs already provide DNS servers for their customers. How do their IP > address get setup in home routers? DHCP in most instances. > Could NTP servers piggyback on that > mechanism if ISPs also provided NTP servers? > Sure and from the perspective of the Cable or provider who does control the last mile they just run their own perimeter or edge based services and configure them in with DHCP. Again the client never sees it. > > > -- ------------- Personal Email - Disclaimers Apply _______________________________________________ ntpwg mailing list ntpwg@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg From ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Tue Jan 14 00:28:35 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98211ACCF6 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 00:28:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.438 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PEMV3uQW9t0c for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 00:28:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22BC21ACCE9 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 00:28:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1981A86DAB7 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 08:28:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8907286D422; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 08:28:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.bs.ptb.de ([192.53.103.106]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1W2zM3-000FyE-5j; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 08:28:13 +0000 Received: from mx1.bs.ptb.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id A3704D0920E; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 09:28:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from rose.bs.ptb.de (rose.bs.ptb.de [141.25.85.201]) by mx1.bs.ptb.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFF1D09206; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 09:28:04 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <52CACEBF.3050908@isoc.org> References: <52CACEBF.3050908@isoc.org> X-KeepSent: 2CE569A7:E2AD936C-C1257C60:002E7EDE; type=4; name=$KeepSent To: odonoghue@isoc.org X-Mailer: IBM Notes Release 9.0.1 October 14, 2013 Message-ID: From: dieter.sibold@ptb.de Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 09:28:02 +0100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ROSE/PTB(Release 8.5.3FP6|November 21, 2013) at 01/14/2014 09:28:04 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.53.103.106 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg-bounces+dieter.sibold=ptb.de@lists.ntp.org, ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: dieter.sibold@ptb.de X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org) Cc: NTP Working Group , ntpwg-bounces+dieter.sibold=ptb.de@lists.ntp.org Subject: Re: [ntpwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-ntp-extension-field X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Sender: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Approve. ---------------------------------- Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Dr. Dieter Sibold Q.42 - Serversysteme und Datenhaltung QM-Verantwortlicher der Stelle IT-Infrastruktur Bundesallee 100 D-38116 Braunschweig Tel: +49-531-592-84 20 E-Mail: dieter.sibold@ptb.de Von: Karen O'Donoghue An: NTP Working Group Datum: 06.01.2014 16:42 Betreff: [ntpwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-ntp-extension-field Gesendet von: ntpwg-bounces+dieter.sibold=ptb.de@lists.ntp.org Folks, This message initiates a two week WGLC (closing on 20 January) on the following document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ntp-extension-field/ While this is a -00 working group document, the individual submission document has been around since Oct 2012 and has had two revisions based on wg feedback. Please review and comment on the mailing list. Thanks, Karen _______________________________________________ ntpwg mailing list ntpwg@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg _______________________________________________ ntpwg mailing list ntpwg@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg From ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Sun Jan 19 16:16:33 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8E81A000A for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 16:16:33 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.835 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.835 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TSAUATgdI_8A for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 16:16:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA0D1A0002 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 16:16:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B3586D5A9 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 00:16:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847CC86D4E1 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 00:16:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-gw11.han.skanova.net ([81.236.55.20]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1W52X9-0007xx-Mc for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 00:16:08 +0000 Received-SPF: none (smtp-gw11.han.skanova.net: domain rubidium.dyndns.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) identity=mailfrom; receiver=smtp-gw11.han.skanova.net; client_ip=81.226.54.139; envelope-from=magnus@rubidium.dyndns.org; helo=magda-gw; Received: from magda-gw (81.226.54.139) by smtp-gw11.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) id 528206B601B47688 for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:16:00 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.10] (knapptop [192.168.0.10]) by magda-gw (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C63A0580005 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:15:59 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <52DC6ABD.2@rubidium.dyndns.org> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:15:57 +0100 From: Magnus Danielson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131103 Icedove/17.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org References: <52CACEBF.3050908@isoc.org> In-Reply-To: <52CACEBF.3050908@isoc.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 81.236.55.20 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: magnus@rubidium.dyndns.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org) Subject: Re: [ntpwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-ntp-extension-field X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Sender: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org On 01/06/2014 04:41 PM, Karen O'Donoghue wrote: > Folks, > > This message initiates a two week WGLC (closing on 20 January) on the > following document: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ntp-extension-field/ > > While this is a -00 working group document, the individual submission > document has been > around since Oct 2012 and has had two revisions based on wg feedback. > > Please review and comment on the mailing list. Approve PS. Solves a nasty problem and looks like a clean solution. Cheers, Magnus _______________________________________________ ntpwg mailing list ntpwg@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg From ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Mon Jan 20 11:05:34 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6901A0259 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:05:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.435 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.435 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UdxK8xKa0iSb for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:05:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A7C1A0251 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:05:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0454186DAB5 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:05:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B9786D4E1 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:05:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from uillean.fuaim.com ([206.197.161.140]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1W5K9v-000IGl-PK for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:05:20 +0000 Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E47880F3 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:05:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from 102521215.rudm1.ra.johnshopkins.edu (addr16212925014.ippl.jhmi.edu [162.129.250.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9DDB130003 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:05:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52DD7378.3010106@innovationslab.net> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:05:28 -0500 From: Brian Haberman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org References: <52CACEBF.3050908@isoc.org> In-Reply-To: <52CACEBF.3050908@isoc.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 206.197.161.140 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: brian@innovationslab.net X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org) Subject: Re: [ntpwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-ntp-extension-field X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8962648178883944189==" Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Sender: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --===============8962648178883944189== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="f011Gwuus7FoBF2euwp8FloO1navhkT3x" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --f011Gwuus7FoBF2euwp8FloO1navhkT3x Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Do we have any implementation experience for this draft? If so, I would like to see that added to the draft. Regards, Brian On 1/6/14 10:41 AM, Karen O'Donoghue wrote: > Folks, >=20 > This message initiates a two week WGLC (closing on 20 January) on the > following document: >=20 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ntp-extension-field/ >=20 > While this is a -00 working group document, the individual submission > document has been > around since Oct 2012 and has had two revisions based on wg feedback. >=20 > Please review and comment on the mailing list. >=20 > Thanks, > Karen >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > ntpwg mailing list > ntpwg@lists.ntp.org > http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg --f011Gwuus7FoBF2euwp8FloO1navhkT3x Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJS3XN4AAoJEBOZRqCi7goqM1wIAJW15aNCFdC3XvMA+nHIqKPS CvMav1fCtgI4dIUlaEWYrfePDcY1yi8nu5W5TSwfRk8vK2NUpIAIoqejT8Rm74HV foeefDYCI3oeVWILG6S10c1wmMO0z8klNi/jqDb3khm+aIGbwkmgWfBN7GEZj2mC u8g8Rts29qzKqQH511CfeuROayrsrT2Qn5c1PWmoEAQnOlLWf+JbiiMyeW7cLv+/ KAqAz4aZss25FKQ5DSZK4QNksXI83tTOGkiA5TPzYRLMjNmkBXoUZUPymrWcHMoz jxoQWl0y1XbQFO26+k8rupm/Ly5WnbekCNQKI7SPzJrkVFnYdUM6fxYHEqkNGPE= =fCm1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --f011Gwuus7FoBF2euwp8FloO1navhkT3x-- --===============8962648178883944189== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ntpwg mailing list ntpwg@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg --===============8962648178883944189==-- From ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Mon Jan 20 11:59:29 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56D61A0169 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:59:29 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.435 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.435 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IDNlOdPobS99 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:59:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ECD41A01A0 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:59:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A108586D77F for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:59:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7528F86D4E1 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:59:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pool-173-76-224-232.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([173.76.224.232] helo=[192.168.1.5]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1W5L0B-000IWT-V6; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:59:21 +0000 Message-ID: <52DD7FF2.1090101@ntp.org> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:58:42 -0500 From: Danny Mayer Organization: NTP User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Haberman , ntpwg@lists.ntp.org References: <52CACEBF.3050908@isoc.org> <52DD7378.3010106@innovationslab.net> In-Reply-To: <52DD7378.3010106@innovationslab.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 173.76.224.232 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: brian@innovationslab.net, ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mayer@ntp.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org) Subject: Re: [ntpwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-ntp-extension-field X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mayer@ntp.org List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Sender: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org Not that I'm aware of. This is more of a clarification of RFC5905 than a change. I need to look at the reference implementation to see if it conforms. Danny On 1/20/2014 2:05 PM, Brian Haberman wrote: > Do we have any implementation experience for this draft? If so, I > would like to see that added to the draft. > > Regards, Brian > > On 1/6/14 10:41 AM, Karen O'Donoghue wrote: >> Folks, >> >> This message initiates a two week WGLC (closing on 20 January) >> on the following document: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ntp-extension-field/ >> >> While this is a -00 working group document, the individual >> submission document has been around since Oct 2012 and has had >> two revisions based on wg feedback. >> >> Please review and comment on the mailing list. >> >> Thanks, Karen >> >> >> _______________________________________________ ntpwg mailing >> list ntpwg@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg > > > > _______________________________________________ ntpwg mailing list > ntpwg@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg > _______________________________________________ ntpwg mailing list ntpwg@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg