From 558-mailing-list-admin@catarina.usc.edu Wed Jan 1 08:12:21 2003 Received: from catarina.usc.edu (catarina.usc.edu [204.57.0.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA03779 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 08:12:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from catarina.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by catarina.usc.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h01DDHL88357 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 05:13:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from 558-mailing-list-admin@catarina.usc.edu) Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2003 05:13:17 -0800 Message-ID: <20030101131317.84524.12600.Mailman@catarina.usc.edu> Subject: catarina.usc.edu mailing list memberships reminder From: mailman-owner@catarina.usc.edu To: pim-archive@ietf.org X-No-Archive: yes X-Ack: no Sender: 558-mailing-list-admin@catarina.usc.edu Errors-To: 558-mailing-list-admin@catarina.usc.edu X-BeenThere: 558-mailing-list@catarina.usc.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk This is a reminder, sent out once a month, about your catarina.usc.edu mailing list memberships. It includes your subscription info and how to use it to change it or unsubscribe from a list. You can visit the URLs to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. In addition to the URL interfaces, you can also use email to make such changes. For more info, send a message to the '-request' address of the list (for example, pim-request@catarina.usc.edu) containing just the word 'help' in the message body, and an email message will be sent to you with instructions. If you have questions, problems, comments, etc, send them to mailman-owner@catarina.usc.edu. Thanks! Passwords for pim-archive@lists.ietf.org: List Password // URL ---- -------- pim@catarina.usc.edu kimoit http://catarina.usc.edu/mailman/options/pim/pim-archive%40lists.ietf.org From pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu Tue Jan 7 17:45:19 2003 Received: from catarina.usc.edu (catarina.usc.edu [204.57.0.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA01781 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2003 17:45:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from catarina.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by catarina.usc.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h07MfSL79563; Tue, 7 Jan 2003 14:41:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu) Received: from po4.wam.umd.edu (po4.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.166]) by catarina.usc.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h07MchL79522 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2003 14:38:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ayan@Glue.umd.edu) Received: from Glue.umd.edu (IDENT:ayan@unicorn.isr.umd.edu [128.8.111.30]) by po4.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA12009 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2003 17:41:22 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E1B5756.D75D6264@Glue.umd.edu> From: Ayan Roy-Chowdhury X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.7 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pim@catarina.usc.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [pim] PIM publications related to satellite and security Sender: pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu Errors-To: pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu X-BeenThere: pim@catarina.usc.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 17:40:23 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I have been searching for publications that relate PIM-SM (and also PIM-DM) to broadcast networks, but have been unsuccessful so far. Would appreciate it if anyone could give me some pointers. Also on security for PIM-SM, apart from the drafts that are available on the SMUG website. Thanks, Ayan -- Ayan Roy-Chowdhury Electrical and Computer Engineering Institute for Systems Research University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 Office: (301)405 6561 _______________________________________________ pim mailing list pim@catarina.usc.edu http://catarina.usc.edu/mailman/listinfo/pim From pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu Wed Jan 8 08:40:53 2003 Received: from catarina.usc.edu (catarina.usc.edu [204.57.0.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA18993 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 08:40:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from catarina.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by catarina.usc.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h08Db2L88696; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 05:37:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu) Received: from xmxpita.excite.com (nn5.excitenetwork.com [207.159.120.59]) by catarina.usc.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h08DZbL88664 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 05:35:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from smiley_raj@excite.com) Received: by xmxpita.excite.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 261271E498; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 08:38:16 -0500 (EST) To: pim@catarina.usc.edu Received: from [203.197.138.201] by xprdmailfe24.nwk.excite.com via HTTP; Wed, 08 Jan 2003 08:38:16 EST X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: ID = 60d69fc2429ac082130bd7435bf518fd Reply-To: smiley_raj@excite.com From: "smiley_raj@excite.com" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: smiley_raj@excite.com X-Mailer: PHP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20030108133816.261271E498@xmxpita.excite.com> Subject: [pim] doubt regarding sending the UpStream (S, G) RPT prune. Sender: pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu Errors-To: pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu X-BeenThere: pim@catarina.usc.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 08:38:16 -0500 (EST) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I have the following doubt. Section 4.5.8 says when a router is going to send a Join(*, G), it should use the following pseudocode, for each (S, G) for which it has state, to decide whether to include Prune(S, G, rpt). Does it mean that (S, G) RPT prunes are sent along with (*, G) Join messages only. What happens if a router has only (*, *, RP) state and also (S, G) state with SPT bit set? Shouldn’t this router also send (S, G) RPT prune towards the RP. And in the down stream state machine of (S, G) RPT, why is (*, *, RP) join not consider to transit to temp pruned state. It was considered in the New-v3 draft. Why was it dropped in the later drafts? Can you please explain from the perspective of macros to see if iam missing anything. :-( regards & TIA rajesh. _______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! _______________________________________________ pim mailing list pim@catarina.usc.edu http://catarina.usc.edu/mailman/listinfo/pim From pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu Wed Jan 15 10:45:29 2003 Received: from catarina.usc.edu (catarina.usc.edu [204.57.0.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA00535 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:45:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from catarina.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by catarina.usc.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h0FFcSL03375; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 07:38:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu) Received: from mail.iskon.hr (inje.iskon.hr [213.191.128.16]) by catarina.usc.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h0FFZtL03337 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 07:35:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vladimir.semencic@amphinicy.hr) Received: (qmail 9780 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2003 16:39:32 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO VLADI) (213.191.147.57) by mail.iskon.hr with SMTP; 15 Jan 2003 16:39:32 +0100 From: "Vladimir Semencic" To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal Subject: [pim] Multicast packets not forwarding between subnets (linux) Sender: pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu Errors-To: pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu X-BeenThere: pim@catarina.usc.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:39:08 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit My problem might be trivial for those experienced users. I've found questions like mine on the net but no answers. WHAT I WANT TO DO: Have a Linux Box "boxB1" route multicast traffic from subnet A to subnet B. No tunnels (for now) are needed. Subnets configuration: --------- --------- --eth0-| boxA |-eth1--------------------eth1-|gateway|--eth0------Internet | --------- --------- | 172.16.2.1 192.168.1.13 | | | | ROUTER 172.16.4.2 | --------- --------- --eth0-| boxB1 |-eth1-----------eth0-| boxB2 | --------- --------- 172.16.3.1 172.16.4.1 I've done following. - installed RH 7.3 on each machine - compiled kernel with support for multicasting - have ip_forwarding enabled - iptables firewall rules ACCEPT everything - installed routing dameon (tries both mrouted 3.9b3 and pimd-2.1.0-alpha29.13) - enabled multicasting on all interfaces I wanted to test multicasting with iperf, so what I did is: boxA: iperf -c 224.0.50.50 -u boxB2: iperf -s -B 224.0.50.50 -u boxB1 is runnung routing dameon. From debug info of the (both) routing dameon I can see that both boxes have joined the group, but no traffic is received on boxB2 (I did try connecting them directly and that works, but it's not what I want :))) But it shows that multicasting is enabled at least. In one document I've read that Multicast routing will not forward a packet unless the source of the packet passes a reverse path forwarding check. Is this the reason why I packets are not forwarded or something else I've missed. OK. Here are the routing tables for those boxes: Sorry for the huge message but I'm stuck. [boxB1 - routing daemon] ------------------------ # route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 172.16.4.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 172.16.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 172.16.3.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo 224.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 172.16.2.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 # ip a s 1: lo: mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope host lo 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100 link/ether 00:30:00:04:b9:34 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 172.16.3.1/24 brd 172.16.3.255 scope global eth0 3: eth1: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100 link/ether 00:30:00:04:b9:33 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 172.16.4.1/24 brd 172.16.4.255 scope global eth1 4: gre0@NONE: mtu 1476 qdisc noop link/gre 0.0.0.0 brd 0.0.0.0 5: tunl0@NONE: mtu 1480 qdisc noop link/ipip 0.0.0.0 brd 0.0.0.0 52: pimreg@NONE: mtu 1472 qdisc noqueue link/pimreg # route -n [boxA - iperf client] ---------------------- Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 172.16.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 172.16.3.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo 224.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 172.16.3.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 # ip a s 1: lo: mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope host lo 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100 link/ether 00:30:00:04:b9:cc brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 172.16.2.1/24 brd 172.16.2.255 scope global eth0 3: eth1: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100 link/ether 00:30:00:04:b9:cb brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.1.135/24 brd 172.16.2.255 scope global eth1 4: gre0@NONE: mtu 1476 qdisc noop link/gre 0.0.0.0 brd 0.0.0.0 6: tunl0@NONE: mtu 1480 qdisc noop link/ipip 0.0.0.0 brd 0.0.0.0 [boxB2 - iperf server] ---------------------- # route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 172.16.4.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo 224.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 172.16.4.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 # ip a s 1: lo: mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope host lo 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100 link/ether 00:e0:4c:6c:36:d7 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 172.16.4.2/24 brd 172.16.4.255 scope global eth0 3: eth1: mtu 1500 qdisc noop qlen 100 link/ether 00:40:f4:1e:10:bf brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff tnx a lot vladi _______________________________________________ pim mailing list pim@catarina.usc.edu http://catarina.usc.edu/mailman/listinfo/pim From pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu Fri Jan 17 05:31:37 2003 Received: from catarina.usc.edu (catarina.usc.edu [204.57.0.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA17574 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 05:31:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from catarina.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by catarina.usc.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h0HAQoL33668; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 02:26:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu) Received: from xover.netplane.com (fwout.maker.com [12.27.183.253] (may be forged)) by catarina.usc.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h0HAOCL33631 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 02:24:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sarveshwarb@netplane.com) Received: by XOVER.dedham.mindspeed.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <4B0HTJGS>; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 05:28:02 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Bandi, Sarveshwar" To: pim@catarina.usc.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: [pim] Query on per-interface(S,G) assert state-machine Sender: pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu Errors-To: pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu X-BeenThere: pim@catarina.usc.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 05:30:06 -0500 Hi All, In the per-interface(S,G) assert state-machine (Figure 10), In the set of actions A6, if I is the RPF_Interface(S) then we set the SPTBit(S,G). I guess, this is because someone on the upstream is forwarding data on the SPT. Now If this assert winner' state changes and stops forwarding data on the SPT, is it not possible that he would become the assert loser? And a result end up sending an inferior assert which might lead to us deleting the assert information. Isnt it incorrect to leave the SPT bit set? Why isnt there a mention of reseting this SPT bit? Is this implicitly done else where in the draft??? Could someone please clarify.... thanks in advance, Regards, Sarvesh Sarveshwar Bandi Senior Member, Technical Staff Netplane Network Technologies (India) Pvt. Ltd. http://www.netplane.com Ph: +91-40-355 3709/10/11/12 Extn: 1126 Fax: +91-40-355 3713 _______________________________________________ pim mailing list pim@catarina.usc.edu http://catarina.usc.edu/mailman/listinfo/pim From pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu Tue Jan 28 19:23:27 2003 Received: from catarina.usc.edu (catarina.usc.edu [204.57.0.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA12347 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 19:23:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from catarina.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by catarina.usc.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h0T0GGL38897; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 16:16:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu) Received: from protocolusa.com (host.protocolusa.com [65.118.24.3]) by catarina.usc.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h0T0BvL38836 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 16:11:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from oaboubakary@protocolusa.com) Received: (qmail 27135 invoked by uid 5412); 29 Jan 2003 00:17:38 -0000 Received: from oaboubakary@protocolusa.com by electron by uid 0 with qmail-scanner-1.15 (uvscan: v4.1.60/v4244. Clear:. Processed in 0.490163 secs); 29 Jan 2003 00:17:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO protocolusa.com) ([o0e8TFJcrLe40PX76ZJLGOtyltZ8TB05]@[127.0.0.1]) (envelope-sender ) by 127.0.0.1 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 29 Jan 2003 00:17:37 -0000 Received: from 142.137.26.200 (SquirrelMail authenticated user oaboubakary) by webmail.protocolusa.com with HTTP; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 18:17:37 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <32964.142.137.26.200.1043799457.squirrel@webmail.protocolusa.com> From: To: X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.8) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [pim] PIMD on Linux Red Hat 8.0 Sender: pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu Errors-To: pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu X-BeenThere: pim@catarina.usc.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 18:17:37 -0600 (CST) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello, _______________________________________________ pim mailing list pim@catarina.usc.edu http://catarina.usc.edu/mailman/listinfo/pim From pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu Tue Jan 28 19:35:05 2003 Received: from catarina.usc.edu (catarina.usc.edu [204.57.0.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA12643 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 19:35:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from catarina.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by catarina.usc.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h0T0TPL39094; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 16:29:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu) Received: from protocolusa.com (host.protocolusa.com [65.118.24.3]) by catarina.usc.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h0T0R0L39047 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 16:27:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from oaboubakary@protocolusa.com) Received: (qmail 29232 invoked by uid 5412); 29 Jan 2003 00:32:41 -0000 Received: from oaboubakary@protocolusa.com by electron by uid 0 with qmail-scanner-1.15 (uvscan: v4.1.60/v4244. Clear:. Processed in 0.474571 secs); 29 Jan 2003 00:32:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO protocolusa.com) ([JAe7V3cazFC4o/jNIR0XwzNE0MJQt/K9]@[127.0.0.1]) (envelope-sender ) by 127.0.0.1 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 29 Jan 2003 00:32:40 -0000 Received: from 142.137.26.200 (SquirrelMail authenticated user oaboubakary) by webmail.protocolusa.com with HTTP; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 18:32:40 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <32968.142.137.26.200.1043800360.squirrel@webmail.protocolusa.com> From: To: X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.8) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [pim] PIMD on Linux RedHat 8.0/7.3 Sender: pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu Errors-To: pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu X-BeenThere: pim@catarina.usc.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 18:32:40 -0600 (CST) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello, Could someone tell me if Pimd is working fine on Linux RH 8.0/7.3 ? I installed pimd-2.1.0-alpha29.13 on 3 Linux boxes using RH 8.0 distribution. When running Pimd, I am able to see that the most common functionnalities of PIM-SM setup are working. I see that through the debug options. However, as soon as the source start sending packets, the PC on which the source is directly connected freezes and I have my CAPS Lock as well my Scroll Lock lights that are blinking. I thought the issue was related to RH 8.0, so I installed an older version of RH, that is 7.3, however the same issue keeps occuring. While debugging using CTRL+ALT+F10 window, the following error message was shown: <0> Kernel Panic: Aiee, killing interrupt handler ! In interupt handler . not syncing. thanks, Abou oaboubakary@protocolusa.com _______________________________________________ pim mailing list pim@catarina.usc.edu http://catarina.usc.edu/mailman/listinfo/pim From pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu Fri Jan 31 20:15:31 2003 Received: from catarina.usc.edu (catarina.usc.edu [204.57.0.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA24254 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 20:15:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from catarina.usc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by catarina.usc.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1118Op92944; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 17:08:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu) Received: from mailhost.iprg.nokia.com (mailhost.iprg.nokia.com [205.226.5.12]) by catarina.usc.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h0VJslp89284 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 11:54:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Rahul.Bahadur@nokia.com) Received: from darkstar.iprg.nokia.com (darkstar.iprg.nokia.com [205.226.5.69]) by mailhost.iprg.nokia.com (8.9.3/8.9.3-GLGS) with ESMTP id MAA05870 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 12:00:46 -0800 (PST) X-Delivered-For: Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com (8.11.0/8.11.0-DARKSTAR) id h0VK0ki27668 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 12:00:46 -0800 X-mProtect: <200301312000> Nokia Silicon Valley Messaging Protection Received: from UNKNOWN (172.19.74.62, claiming to be "dadhcp-172019074062.americas.nokia.com") by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com smtpdCOgukm; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 12:00:44 PST From: Rahul Bahadur To: pim@catarina.usc.edu Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Message-Id: <1044043243.1652.68.camel@dadhcp-172019074062.americas.nokia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: [pim] BSR draft? Sender: pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu Errors-To: pim-admin@catarina.usc.edu X-BeenThere: pim@catarina.usc.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: 31 Jan 2003 12:00:43 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit A question and a comment about the BSR draft: 1) Has a new draft been published or is one in the pipeline? The last one I know of is draft-ietf-pim-sm-bsr-02.txt(11/01). 2) Although section 3 of the above-mentioned draft describes the acceptance of BSR messages unicast to the router when in "Accept Any" state, I don't see a comment about sending the current RP-set to a new neighbor when the local router is the DR. Maybe this needs to be added? Thanks, Rahul _______________________________________________ pim mailing list pim@catarina.usc.edu http://catarina.usc.edu/mailman/listinfo/pim