From mmcbride7@gmail.com Wed Jan 4 22:16:52 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F96D21F87B5 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 22:16:52 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4zESUydzK+3T for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 22:16:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com (mail-ee0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9976921F8694 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 22:16:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by eekc14 with SMTP id c14so119940eek.31 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:16:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jGx1asv1F4MBhB0lG3YzEWPXdfCBHrhDKVRLAmrjYkk=; b=FpFwROeCi2n+6dYuI+aV47TOPLjaiiVcYg9tkJHO8TgroTLqZDFbX2HbCebZ/jeEgD bfhvLabR3i8e/NUovqcqFI/yQCjajhf9xuy8/acUD7PuArwF8w6yzcWB1lTG2cfGxxQX hCHHM80BTrU5d53Nh9xlnbzVk9Nx+wrUX5lWE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.8.205 with SMTP id i13mr178290ebi.149.1325744209074; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:16:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.7.66 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 22:16:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 22:16:49 -0800 Message-ID: From: Mike McBride To: pim@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [pim] call for adoption of draft-hou-pim-drlb-00 X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 06:16:52 -0000 draft-hou-pim-drlb-00 was presented to the wg during our most recent meeting in Taipei. There were 12 in favor of wg adoption and zero opposed. Please read the draft and speak up, either way, on the list within the next 14 days. http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-hou-pim-drlb-00.txt thanks, mike From internet-drafts@ietf.org Thu Jan 5 13:47:03 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0833D21F88C2; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 13:47:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.538 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.538 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.061, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l6fIJ4Rwk6gV; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 13:47:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D6E21F88B8; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 13:47:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 3.64p1 Message-ID: <20120105214702.16820.26161.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 13:47:02 -0800 Cc: pim@ietf.org Subject: [pim] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pim-pop-count-05.txt X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:47:03 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Protocol Independent Multicast Workin= g Group of the IETF. Title : Population Count Extensions to PIM Author(s) : Dino Farinacci Greg Shepherd Yiqun Cai Stig Venaas Filename : draft-ietf-pim-pop-count-05.txt Pages : 20 Date : 2012-01-05 This specification defines a method for providing multicast distribution-tree accounting data. Simple extensions to the PIM protocol allow a rough approximation of tree-based data in a scalable fashion. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pim-pop-count-05.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pim-pop-count-05.txt From Sundara.Moorthy@aricent.com Thu Jan 5 21:29:37 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A8221F888D for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 21:29:37 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.184 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.184 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uez1hhECC4KM for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 21:29:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from jaguar.aricent.com (jaguar.aricent.com [121.241.96.11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4765921F8591 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 21:29:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from jaguar.aricent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss71 (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAEAA36B2C for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:58:41 +0530 (IST) Received: from GUREXHT01.ASIAN.AD.ARICENT.COM (gurexht01.asian.ad.aricent.com [10.203.171.136]) by jaguar.aricent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9417E36B32 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:58:41 +0530 (IST) Received: from GUREXMB02.ASIAN.AD.ARICENT.COM ([10.203.171.132]) by GUREXHT01.ASIAN.AD.ARICENT.COM ([10.203.171.137]) with mapi; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:59:30 +0530 From: Sundara Moorthy M To: "'pim@ietf.org'" Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:59:30 +0530 Thread-Topic: Reg - PIMSM - Registration state machine Thread-Index: AczMNCSsGViJrHluSXy3mSbwTBSgtQ== Message-ID: <34AB0AF86DBB71498AE06389F3116EDA05F2BD3980@GUREXMB02.ASIAN.AD.ARICENT.COM> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_34AB0AF86DBB71498AE06389F3116EDA05F2BD3980GUREXMB02ASIA_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [pim] Reg - PIMSM - Registration state machine X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 05:29:37 -0000 --_000_34AB0AF86DBB71498AE06389F3116EDA05F2BD3980GUREXMB02ASIA_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi , I have doubt in PIM-SM Registration State machine. As per the state machine, there is a delay of random (30,90)seconds from on= e register packet to another. This is done to reduce the frequent register = packets at the rate of wire speed. But if there is a leave and then a join happens at RP immediately, the mca= st data flow gets delayed to a maximum of 90 seconds. There occurs a two kind of behavior. 1. When Join happens at the first time --> Here mcast data flows imm= ediately 2. When Join happens after a Leave -->Here it takes delay of random = (30, 90) seconds. Is this behavior acceptable? How can we correct the second behavior , So that mcast data flows immediate= ly after Join packet received by RP.? Thanks and Regards, Sundara Moorthy M =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D --_000_34AB0AF86DBB71498AE06389F3116EDA05F2BD3980GUREXMB02ASIA_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi ,

 

I have doubt in PIM-SM Registration State machine.

 

As per the state machine, there is a delay of random= (30,90)seconds from one register packet to another. This is done to reduce= the frequent register packets at the rate of wire speed.

 

But if there is a leave and then a join happens at R= P  immediately, the mcast data flow gets delayed to a maximum of 90 se= conds.

 

There occurs a two kind of behavior.

1.     &= nbsp; When Join happens at the first time  =E0 Here mcast data flows immediately

2.     &= nbsp; When Join happens after a Leave  =E0Here it takes delay of random (30, 90)= seconds. Is this behavior acceptable?

How can we correct the second behavior , So that mca= st data flows immediately after Join packet received by RP.?

 

 

Thanks and Regards,

Sundara Moorthy M

 





=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D
Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html
for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D
 --_000_34AB0AF86DBB71498AE06389F3116EDA05F2BD3980GUREXMB02ASIA_-- From rishabhp@gmail.com Sat Jan 7 06:36:23 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A3321F8558 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2012 06:36:23 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qnOv19brD0AO for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2012 06:36:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2059521F845E for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2012 06:36:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by iabz21 with SMTP id z21so4607645iab.31 for ; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 06:36:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=dQ3ez8d1a+YCnHjho0adGyA+XBxDheM1zpTOt9yqpPQ=; b=j4RPGnS/sA79OjlGGKJx8R37+itPVkbNVegndQeq1Ac1QA6up0TOARwIOKh9eiYUOL wN9ZVMqYJOuYhElR2qznlKe+DOPh0Wohfbo+jHot9Wd8znBvrME7wDT4yfCGl9nFE6nY L7lKqldbN+vr5N2FElyeYAQE4bG8JsA8VXWzA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.186.226 with SMTP id fn2mr11621174igc.25.1325946980667; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 06:36:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.147.11 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Jan 2012 06:36:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <34AB0AF86DBB71498AE06389F3116EDA05F2BD3980@GUREXMB02.ASIAN.AD.ARICENT.COM> References: <34AB0AF86DBB71498AE06389F3116EDA05F2BD3980@GUREXMB02.ASIAN.AD.ARICENT.COM> Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 06:36:20 -0800 Message-ID: From: Rishabh Parekh To: Sundara Moorthy M Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae934097dc610c104b5f11658 Cc: "pim@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [pim] Reg - PIMSM - Registration state machine X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 14:36:23 -0000 --14dae934097dc610c104b5f11658 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sundara, CouldRegister --> TRUE event of Register FSM in Section 4.4.1 implies that the first-hop DR should register encapsulate all packets from a directly connected source till the RP responds with a "Register-Stop". Of course, implementations can optimize this to avoid encapsulation overhead for every packet. In the case when there are no receivers at the RP ( (*,G)inherited olist is NULL), the RP would respond with a Register-Stop immediately but would create and maintain (S,G) state which is refreshed by Null Registers. Later, when a receiver joins the RP tree, inheritance from (*,G) to (S,G) state triggers a (S,G) Join which would bring multicast packets down to the RP and onto the RP tree. So the join latency for the late receiver is definitely not in the order of 30 to 90 seconds. Regards, -Rishabh On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Sundara Moorthy M < Sundara.Moorthy@aricent.com> wrote: > Hi ,**** > > ** ** > > I have doubt in PIM-SM Registration State machine.**** > > ** ** > > As per the state machine, there is a delay of random (30,90)seconds from > one register packet to another. This is done to reduce the frequent > register packets at the rate of wire speed.**** > > ** ** > > But if there is a leave and then a join happens at RP immediately, the > mcast data flow gets delayed to a maximum of 90 seconds.**** > > ** ** > > There occurs a two kind of behavior.**** > > **1. **When Join happens at the first time =E0 Here mcast data flo= ws > immediately**** > > **2. **When Join happens after a Leave =E0Here it takes delay of > random (30, 90) seconds. Is this behavior acceptable?**** > > How can we correct the second behavior , So that mcast data flows > immediately after Join packet received by RP.?**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Thanks and Regards,**** > > Sundara Moorthy M**** > > ** ** > > > > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html > for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication. > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > _______________________________________________ > pim mailing list > pim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim > > --14dae934097dc610c104b5f11658 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sundara,
CouldRegister --> TRUE event of Register FSM in Section 4.4.= 1 implies that the first-hop DR should register encapsulate all packets fro= m a directly connected source till the RP responds with a "Register-St= op". Of course, implementations can optimize this to avoid encapsulati= on overhead for every packet. In the case when there are no receivers at th= e RP ( (*,G)inherited olist is NULL), the RP would respond with a Register-= Stop immediately but would create and maintain (S,G) state which is refresh= ed by Null Registers. Later, when a receiver joins the RP tree, inheritance= from (*,G) to (S,G) state triggers a (S,G) Join which would bring multicas= t packets down to the RP and onto the RP tree. So the join latency for the = late receiver is definitely not in the order of 30 to 90 seconds.

Regards,
-Rishabh



On Thu, = Jan 5, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Sundara Moorthy M <Sundara.Moorthy@aricent.com> wrote:

Hi ,

=A0

I have doubt in PIM-SM Registration State machine.

=A0

As per the state machine, there is a delay of random= (30,90)seconds from one register packet to another. This is done to reduce= the frequent register packets at the rate of wire speed.

=A0

But if there is a leave and then a join happens at R= P =A0immediately, the mcast data flow gets delayed to a maximum of 90 secon= ds.

=A0

There occurs a two kind of behavior.

1.= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 When Join happens at the first time=A0 =E0 Here mcast data flows immediately

2.= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 When Join happens after a Leave =A0=E0Here it takes delay of random (30, 90) seconds= . Is this behavior acceptable?

How can we correct the second behavior , So that mca= st data flows immediately after Join packet received by RP.?<= /p>

=A0

=A0

Thanks and Regards,

Sundara Moorthy M

=A0





=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D
Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html
for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D

_______________________________________________
pim mailing list
pim@ietf.org
htt= ps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim


--14dae934097dc610c104b5f11658-- From adrian@olddog.co.uk Wed Jan 11 11:45:13 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C2F11E80A5; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:45:13 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.558 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.558 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.042, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pg2nn0fWG+2F; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:45:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (asmtp1.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.248]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBB011E8094; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:45:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0BJj222018644; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:45:04 GMT Received: from 950129200 (adsl-62-167-106-87.adslplus.ch [62.167.106.87]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0BJiZ1S018541 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:45:01 GMT From: "Adrian Farrel" To: Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:44:33 -0000 Message-ID: <01e501ccd099$826cbdc0$87463940$@olddog.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AczQl9asdu2ZH95fTcCmZnOyrwZSVg== Content-Language: en-gb Cc: draft-ietf-pim-port.all@tools.ietf.org, pim@ietf.org Subject: [pim] Approved draft-ietf-pim-port X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:45:14 -0000 Hi, All ballots have cleared. All notes (including an RFC editor Note) are in place. This draft is approved. Thanks, Adrian From iesg-secretary@ietf.org Wed Jan 11 12:09:31 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD70211E8073; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:09:30 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.455 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.455 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.144, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D9EJ3X4qpv4f; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:09:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D461211E80B2; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:09:29 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 3.64p1 Message-ID: <20120111200929.21039.52024.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:09:29 -0800 Cc: pim chair , pim mailing list , RFC Editor Subject: [pim] Document Action: 'A Reliable Transport Mechanism for PIM' to Experimental RFC (draft-ietf-pim-port-09.txt) X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 20:09:31 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'A Reliable Transport Mechanism for PIM' (draft-ietf-pim-port-09.txt) as an Experimental RFC This document is the product of the Protocol Independent Multicast Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Adrian Farrel and Stewart Bryant. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-port/ Technical Summary This document creates a simple incremental mechanism to provide reliable PIM message delivery in PIM version 2 for use with PIM Sparse-Mode (including Source-Specific Multicast) and Bidirectional PIM. The reliable transport mechanism will be used for Join-Prune message transmission only, and can use either TCP or SCTP as the transport protocol. Working Group Summary WG progress was smooth with a large number of comments from many people helping to form the document. Document Quality This is an Experimental document. At least one implementation exists. Personnel Mike McBride (mcbride@cisco.com) is the Document Shepherd. Adrian Farrel (adrian@olddog.co.uk) is the Responsible AD RFC Editor Note End of 3.1: OLD: TCP Connection ID AFI: The AFI value to describe the address-family of the address of the TCP Connection ID field. When this field is 0, a mechanism outside the scope of this document is used to obtain the addresses used to establish the TCP connection. NEW: TCP Connection ID AFI: The AFI value to describe the address-family of the address of the TCP Connection ID field. Note that this value does not need to match the address-family of the PIM Hello message that carries it. When this field is 0, a mechanism outside the scope of this document is used to obtain the addresses used to establish the TCP connection. End of 3.2: OLD: SCTP Connection ID AFI: The AFI value to describe the address- family of the address of the SCTP Connection ID field. When this field is 0, a mechanism outside the scope of this document is used to obtain the addresses used to establish the SCTP connection. NEW: SCTP Connection ID AFI: The AFI value to describe the address- family of the address of the SCTP Connection ID field. Note that this value does not need to match the address-family of the PIM Hello message that carries it. When this field is 0, a mechanism outside the scope of this document is used to obtain the addresses used to establish the SCTP connection. From iesg-secretary@ietf.org Wed Jan 11 14:36:27 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E0511E8074; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:36:27 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.469 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.469 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.130, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lnH+OIswuGSj; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:36:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC65511E809F; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:36:26 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 3.64p1 Message-ID: <20120111223626.28849.94739.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:36:26 -0800 Cc: pim chair , pim mailing list , RFC Editor Subject: [pim] CORRECTED Document Action: 'A Reliable Transport Mechanism for PIM' to Experimental RFC (draft-ietf-pim-port-09.txt) X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:36:27 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'A Reliable Transport Mechanism for PIM' (draft-ietf-pim-port-09.txt) as an Experimental RFC This document is the product of the Protocol Independent Multicast Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Adrian Farrel and Stewart Bryant. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-port/ Technical Summary This document creates a simple incremental mechanism to provide reliable PIM message delivery in PIM version 2 for use with PIM Sparse-Mode (including Source-Specific Multicast) and Bidirectional PIM. The reliable transport mechanism will be used for Join-Prune message transmission only, and can use either TCP or SCTP as the transport protocol. Working Group Summary WG progress was smooth with a large number of comments from many people helping to form the document. Document Quality This is an Experimental document. At least one implementation exists. Personnel Mike McBride (mmcbride7@gmail.com) is the Document Shepherd. Adrian Farrel (adrian@olddog.co.uk) is the Responsible AD RFC Editor Note End of 3.1: OLD: TCP Connection ID AFI: The AFI value to describe the address-family of the address of the TCP Connection ID field. When this field is 0, a mechanism outside the scope of this document is used to obtain the addresses used to establish the TCP connection. NEW: TCP Connection ID AFI: The AFI value to describe the address-family of the address of the TCP Connection ID field. Note that this value does not need to match the address-family of the PIM Hello message that carries it. When this field is 0, a mechanism outside the scope of this document is used to obtain the addresses used to establish the TCP connection. End of 3.2: OLD: SCTP Connection ID AFI: The AFI value to describe the address- family of the address of the SCTP Connection ID field. When this field is 0, a mechanism outside the scope of this document is used to obtain the addresses used to establish the SCTP connection. NEW: SCTP Connection ID AFI: The AFI value to describe the address- family of the address of the SCTP Connection ID field. Note that this value does not need to match the address-family of the PIM Hello message that carries it. When this field is 0, a mechanism outside the scope of this document is used to obtain the addresses used to establish the SCTP connection. From mmcbride7@gmail.com Wed Jan 11 23:08:10 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6ACE21F84FB for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:08:10 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81HUn4nCYSx0 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:08:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D21B721F8518 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:08:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by eaad11 with SMTP id d11so544455eaa.31 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:08:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cKauW0hXfvLAHnjEq84Tqf+VeyVAGQ3Ub1vHjjrvwjA=; b=FrBM1hHJ4m7+0zviPfjOfEwT53S9j3x1la5oCnHE5ruB9wQESxwCyIB+8iU1TkLq3n j2gsZ8gfbh0PnxETr/jX9N0rcAw+yEFk62naK1k7y8z5/fhoLA4pyC67DxlYsvWLQYQP utIVGVj7w2MfSeIMjGK8JdyoEnIuKbajGS+Hw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.14.129 with SMTP id g1mr570945eba.56.1326352087742; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:08:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.16.129 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:08:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120105214702.16820.26161.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> References: <20120105214702.16820.26161.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:08:07 -0800 Message-ID: From: Mike McBride To: pim@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [pim] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pim-pop-count-05.txt X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:08:11 -0000 During our wg meeting in Taipei, the wg voted 7-0 to progress this draft to the IESG as an experimental RFC. The wglc response was fairly weak, and included one objection, therefore I hesitated progressing the draft. However, given the response in the room, coupled with the wglc support, it appears we have consensus. Since Stig is an author, I will forward this document to the Routing ADs and will act as the document Shepherd. Please speak up if you have any concerns/questions with these actions. thanks, mike On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 1:47 PM, wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts direct= ories. This draft is a work item of the Protocol Independent Multicast Work= ing Group of the IETF. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Title =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 : Population Count Extensions to= PIM > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Author(s) =A0 =A0 =A0 : Dino Farinacci > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Greg Shepherd > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Yiqun Cai > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Stig Venaas > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Filename =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0: draft-ietf-pim-pop-count-05.txt > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Pages =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 : 20 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Date =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0: 2012-01-05 > > =A0 This specification defines a method for providing multicast > =A0 distribution-tree accounting data. =A0Simple extensions to the PIM > =A0 protocol allow a rough approximation of tree-based data in a scalable > =A0 fashion. > > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pim-pop-count-05.txt > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pim-pop-count-05.txt > > _______________________________________________ > pim mailing list > pim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim From Michael.McBride@huawei.com Wed Jan 18 18:22:54 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A2D11E80F9 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:22:54 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ydjDpg40-7HR for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:22:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972A311E80ED for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:22:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from huawei.com (szxga05-in [172.24.2.49]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LY000KX5X9CE5@szxga05-in.huawei.com> for pim@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:22:24 +0800 (CST) Received: from szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LY000359X9CIB@szxga05-in.huawei.com> for pim@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:22:24 +0800 (CST) Received: from szxeml210-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id AGM77178; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:22:24 +0800 Received: from SZXEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.93) by szxeml210-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.183) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:22:17 +0800 Received: from SZXEML536-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.99]) by szxeml406-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.93]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:22:15 +0800 Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 02:22:15 +0000 From: Michael McBride X-Originating-IP: [10.212.246.159] To: "pim@ietf.org" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_EkEAPT2xkc4dUqhCEzDGUQ)" Content-language: en-US Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Thread-topic: change of affiliation Thread-index: AczWUScQZMFi3pClTcO0TXs6qn87jA== X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: [pim] change of affiliation X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:57:21 -0000 --Boundary_(ID_EkEAPT2xkc4dUqhCEzDGUQ) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT The ADs requested I announce my change of affiliation to Huawei. Business as usual. Stig and I are still friends and he still drinks all the beer ;-) mike --Boundary_(ID_EkEAPT2xkc4dUqhCEzDGUQ) Content-type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

The ADs requested I announce my change of affiliation to Huawei. Business as usual. Stig and I are still friends and he still drinks all the beer ;-)

 

mike

--Boundary_(ID_EkEAPT2xkc4dUqhCEzDGUQ)-- From mmcbride7@gmail.com Tue Jan 24 09:31:09 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBADC11E808D for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:31:09 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MbX2Y5eAf07u for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:31:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com (mail-ee0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4670A11E8087 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:31:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by eekc1 with SMTP id c1so1976404eek.31 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:31:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=vR9WLPQtb+6C4M+ZjNRY13sVSY6SqfepJCAwF7/eGp4=; b=m9WEg3tnQFJ6469o/mg0T53jYs/KkMWJ0Zy1xLMVLjeQ24nBTb7OlaqqU6E4lN0ag4 xUHouoGHmK4wcXUX4Vi2W+5gunYIcAqaBGLz/dYWjEGqX3z0Ci9iY5XqouCFhuEJ4F9w 7AS21n2jwLj+I74Xo4rJKm7/hbhn6MpZeCpQ8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.97.13 with SMTP id s13mr4796672eef.56.1327426268370; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:31:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.16.67 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:31:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:31:08 -0800 Message-ID: From: Mike McBride To: pim@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [pim] call for adoption of draft-hou-pim-drlb-00 X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:31:10 -0000 No feedback on the list during the wglc. But we had a strong response during the pim meeting Taipei. Therefore I'm initiating an additional one week wglc. If you are opposed to wg adoption of this draft please speak up. Otherwise we will adopt. thanks, mike On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Mike McBride wrote: > draft-hou-pim-drlb-00 was presented to the wg during our most recent > meeting in Taipei. There were 12 in favor of wg adoption and zero > opposed. Please read the draft and speak up, either way, on the list > within the next 14 days. > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-hou-pim-drlb-00.txt > > thanks, > mike From mmcbride7@gmail.com Tue Jan 24 15:02:34 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B39C21F8617 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:02:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.109 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.490, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N319a22AGYiu for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:02:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E18621F8602 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:02:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by eaai13 with SMTP id i13so1933669eaa.31 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:02:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+4ANUZC+JEqr8cCfxU29D64VHcRCWPJcrSyBLMdOKMA=; b=UozvJptk+V6vFHgutNJMTzjPC5lABicrFvN1zlKINYM8eyDJ+JocNDSbf/9PITrIIr HpRYkLokmWtGgqSV0C+QlhslDFMRadz5lE7/dsyhhz7Fvbcf+nmxgCgeJ7epZif5Pk3u o7hyooQv5q8lIVDPQJMw9RZLcwV7jjzTyfSm4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.26.1 with SMTP id b1mr2650374ebc.124.1327446148611; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:02:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.16.67 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:02:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:02:28 -0800 Message-ID: From: Mike McBride To: pim@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [pim] draft-ietf-pim-ecmp-01 ready for wglc? X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:02:34 -0000 In the Taipei pim wg mtg, 4 were in favor and 0 against moving draft-ietf-pim-ecmp-01 to wglc. We plan to initiate a wglc for this draft on Monday February 6th. Please speak up, before the 6th, if you feel it is not ready for wglc. http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-pim-ecmp-01.txt thanks, mike From bill@cse.concordia.ca Sat Jan 28 09:36:54 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60CC321F8533 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 09:36:54 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.082 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.082 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.897, BAYES_40=-0.185, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DaExrWXtx-CK for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 09:36:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from oldperseverance.encs.concordia.ca (oldperseverance.encs.concordia.ca [132.205.96.94]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 572F021F852C for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 09:36:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (bill@grace.encs.concordia.ca [132.205.2.208]) by oldperseverance.encs.concordia.ca (envelope-from bill@cse.concordia.ca) (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id q0SHaK1L007718; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:36:20 -0500 Message-ID: <4F243217.7080003@cse.concordia.ca> Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:36:23 -0500 From: Bill Atwood Organization: Concordia University, Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike McBride , pim@ietf.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on oldperseverance.encs.concordia.ca at 2012/01/28 12:36:20 EST Subject: Re: [pim] draft-ietf-pim-ecmp-01 ready for wglc? X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 17:36:54 -0000 Technically, I have no issues with this draft. There are some English errors, a list of which I have sent to the authors directly. The document is ready for wglc, although I would prefer to see the errors corrected in another revision before wglc is called. Bill On 1/24/2012 6:02 PM, Mike McBride wrote: > In the Taipei pim wg mtg, 4 were in favor and 0 against moving > draft-ietf-pim-ecmp-01 to wglc. We plan to initiate a wglc for this > draft on Monday February 6th. Please speak up, before the 6th, if you > feel it is not ready for wglc. > > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-pim-ecmp-01.txt > > thanks, > mike > _______________________________________________ > pim mailing list > pim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim -- Dr. J.W. Atwood, Eng. tel: +1 (514) 848-2424 x3046 Distinguished Professor Emeritus fax: +1 (514) 848-2830 Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering Concordia University EV 3.185 email: bill@cse.concordia.ca 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. West http: //users.encs.concordia.ca/~bill Montreal, Quebec Canada H3G 1M8 From Michael.McBride@huawei.com Tue Jan 31 17:38:44 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C51E11E80B5 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:38:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ionckQt+lapz for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:38:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF80D11E809D for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:38:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from huawei.com (szxga03-in [172.24.2.9]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LYO00CJJXVA05@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for pim@ietf.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:37:59 +0800 (CST) Received: from szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LYO00566XVAJA@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for pim@ietf.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:37:58 +0800 (CST) Received: from szxeml214-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id AGR28637; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:37:20 +0800 Received: from SZXEML415-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.154) by szxeml214-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:36:51 +0800 Received: from SZXEML536-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.250]) by szxeml415-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.154]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:37:32 +0800 Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:37:13 +0000 From: Michael McBride In-reply-to: X-Originating-IP: [10.212.244.41] To: "pim@ietf.org" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en-US Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Thread-topic: [pim] call for adoption of draft-hou-pim-drlb-00 Thread-index: AQHM2r37mPgxCjJ4m0aCUJO3qgCuspYnTdbA X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected References: Subject: Re: [pim] call for adoption of draft-hou-pim-drlb-00 X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:38:44 -0000 Authors, please submit the draft as a pim wg document. Thanks, mike > -----Original Message----- > From: pim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Mike McBride > Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 9:31 AM > To: pim@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [pim] call for adoption of draft-hou-pim-drlb-00 > > No feedback on the list during the wglc. But we had a strong response > during the pim meeting Taipei. Therefore I'm initiating an additional > one week wglc. If you are opposed to wg adoption of this draft please > speak up. Otherwise we will adopt. > > thanks, > mike > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Mike McBride > wrote: > > draft-hou-pim-drlb-00 was presented to the wg during our most recent > > meeting in Taipei. There were 12 in favor of wg adoption and zero > > opposed. Please read the draft and speak up, either way, on the list > > within the next 14 days. > > > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-hou-pim-drlb-00.txt > > > > thanks, > > mike > _______________________________________________ > pim mailing list > pim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim