From mmcbride7@gmail.com Wed Apr 3 19:45:57 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A449C11E80A4 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 19:45:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xIm9M52h9lvE for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 19:45:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pb0-f43.google.com (mail-pb0-f43.google.com [209.85.160.43]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E028911E80A2 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 19:45:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pb0-f43.google.com with SMTP id md4so1192358pbc.16 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 19:45:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=1QUVRpPzi4QD54ZFz34cyvBMAzLmfrbbn8ASErRoRus=; b=BMJ0D3oupi7Oae+K9ovSHTW+THhfeR9CSnfwn25wf0YB4JLcSkGSruoOuXsGwMNI+O 057/sEQk7tq4LkalPed7E/qVnsCd+c4xjnuSIdwy9sNcToB2kMHuDmFSCAs+SOVMIyS3 SjNRA+54E0IUKaRST0HIOH/d24Snz/fCbLGXvdfx19mlJGDXq3JeR7uJfNcgynz2r+QS HtRG9i4Z6STExndQY7RXGDimklVc9zEhBlil8KbLNl92Ei+ySXiMuVV9qho8ld3SK+RS Z9Vc2jSd3ImxNMyV7LHHH/6guLFIkoTuk1SeRlxZC2Rbb5dQQN3FknRMkIamniUTNS/a H1sw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.67.2.68 with SMTP id bm4mr7115660pad.9.1365043556600; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 19:45:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.230.68 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 19:45:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 19:45:56 -0700 Message-ID: From: Mike McBride To: pim@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [pim] call for adoption: draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 02:45:57 -0000 In Orlando, there was 10-0 in favor of adopting draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 as Informational. Please respond to the list with opinions, either way, over the next week. This adoption call will end next Wednesday the 10th. thanks, mike http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01.txt From william.atwood@concordia.ca Wed Apr 3 19:50:48 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDFF221F8D94 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 19:50:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.745 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.745 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.854, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xaJhtL8n4m6U for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 19:50:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oldperseverance.encs.concordia.ca (oldperseverance.encs.concordia.ca [132.205.96.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A6121F8AF0 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 19:50:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (bill@poise.encs.concordia.ca [132.205.2.209]) by oldperseverance.encs.concordia.ca (envelope-from william.atwood@concordia.ca) (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id r342okZC002549 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 22:50:46 -0400 Message-ID: <515CEA8C.1090403@concordia.ca> Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 22:50:52 -0400 From: William Atwood Organization: Concordia University, Montreal User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pim@ietf.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on oldperseverance.encs.concordia.ca at 2013/04/03 22:50:46 EDT Subject: Re: [pim] call for adoption: draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 02:50:48 -0000 Yes. Bill On 03/04/2013 10:45 PM, Mike McBride wrote: > In Orlando, there was 10-0 in favor of adopting > draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 as Informational. Please > respond to the list with opinions, either way, over the next week. > This adoption call will end next Wednesday the 10th. > > thanks, > mike > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01.txt > _______________________________________________ > pim mailing list > pim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim -- Dr. J.W. Atwood, Eng. tel: +1 (514) 848-2424 x3046 Distinguished Professor Emeritus fax: +1 (514) 848-2830 Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering Concordia University EV 3.185 email:william.atwood@concordia.ca 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. West http://users.encs.concordia.ca/~bill Montreal, Quebec Canada H3G 1M8 From kehong@cisco.com Thu Apr 4 14:48:53 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 349DD21F8D8F for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 14:48:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SreHnemPUE30 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 14:48:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F2021F8B15 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 14:48:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5113; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1365112119; x=1366321719; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=HN1DbYDLgMZpVqdTmKwEEel+3SSq0RBEc4PezMLlEmQ=; b=BFaLI+Skn6+gN9wCpoFGogW4ma8EpBAblPeMLLEhe+zwP36hp9GYuEmw bydgVEthJDhl2/sGz+GftMbiJtbNWtNcIlbHWZQ+dCKME0qmJyLXymZZo 2nny2j7oPGlZXxhISLFYNLmXRcpj6AR/4oKVWJ5Y9bEgCTPRvYH4OeS7V A=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhgFAJD0XVGtJXHB/2dsb2JhbABAAxaCLEQ2wQmBBRZ0gh8BAQEEAQEBGkkIHQEIBA0DAQIBCh0uCxQJCAIEARIIAYgLDMFjjD+BGoERIAEXBguCTmEDmA6PbYMLgXM1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,411,1363132800"; d="scan'208,217";a="192230590" Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Apr 2013 21:48:33 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r34LmXcc011531 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 4 Apr 2013 21:48:33 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.6.244]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 16:48:33 -0500 From: "Kenny Hong (kehong)" To: "pim@ietf.org" , "william.atwood@concordia.ca" Thread-Topic: [pim] call for adoption: draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 Thread-Index: AQHOMX4mkGlNsdrz5ESpaQ6E99mj3w== Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 21:48:32 +0000 Message-ID: <1357EB5983138B468DA9AE25248F1975114D98DD@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <515DE8F2.4060205@cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206 x-originating-ip: [10.99.79.119] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1357EB5983138B468DA9AE25248F1975114D98DDxmbrcdx06ciscoc_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [pim] call for adoption: draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 21:48:53 -0000 --_000_1357EB5983138B468DA9AE25248F1975114D98DDxmbrcdx06ciscoc_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1. Support. Kenny Message: 2 Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 22:50:52 -0400 From: William Atwood To: pim@ietf.org Subject: Re: [pim] call for adoption: draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 Message-ID: <515CEA8C.1090403@concordia.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1 Yes. Bill On 03/04/2013 10:45 PM, Mike McBride wrote: > In Orlando, there was 10-0 in favor of adopting > draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 as Informational. Please > respond to the list with opinions, either way, over the next week. > This adoption call will end next Wednesday the 10th. > > thanks, > mike > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01.txt > _______________________________________________ > pim mailing list > pim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim -- Dr. J.W. Atwood, Eng. tel: +1 (514) 848-2424 x3046 Distinguished Professor Emeritus fax: +1 (514) 848-2830 Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering Concordia University EV 3.185 email:william.atwood@concordia.ca 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. West http://users.encs.concordia.ca/~bill Montreal, Quebec Canada H3G 1M8 ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ pim mailing list pim@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim End of pim Digest, Vol 108, Issue 1 *********************************** . --_000_1357EB5983138B468DA9AE25248F1975114D98DDxmbrcdx06ciscoc_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+1.  Support.

Kenny
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 22:50:52 -0400
From: William Atwood <william.atwood@concordia.ca>
To: pim@=
ietf.org
Subject: Re: [pim] call for adoption:
	draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01
Message-ID: <515CEA8C.1090403@concordia.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1

Yes.

  Bill

On 03/04/2013 10:45 PM, Mike McBride wrote:
> In Orlando, there was 10-0 in favor of adopting
> draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 as Informational. Please
> respond to the list with opinions, either way, over the next week.
> This adoption call will end next Wednesday the 10th.
>
> thanks,
> mike
>
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-asgha=
r-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01.txt
> _______________________________________________
> pim mailing list
> pim=
@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim

--=20
Dr. J.W. Atwood, Eng.             tel:   +1 (514) 848-2424 x3046
Distinguished Professor Emeritus  fax:   +1 (514) 848-2830
Department of Computer Science
   and Software Engineering
Concordia University EV 3.185     email:william.atwood@concord=
ia.ca
1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. West    http://users.encs.concordia.ca/~b=
ill
Montreal, Quebec Canada H3G 1M8



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
pim mailing list
pim@ietf=
.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim


End of pim Digest, Vol 108, Issue 1
***********************************
.


--_000_1357EB5983138B468DA9AE25248F1975114D98DDxmbrcdx06ciscoc_-- From dayyadev@cisco.com Thu Apr 4 14:49:54 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D0C21F8F5D for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 14:49:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6oX-w8UerSLG for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 14:49:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10DD921F8F0E for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 14:49:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=535; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1365112194; x=1366321794; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=zk/Kplf+3dq7tpblNVt0qaoAC3x4wIrHqE73yzpbu4s=; b=WjLEkCopBpi0ti7VjhRaZ01hC4u4d5wM/8tBvFNNYN7unZqunu+Tnp4P H3OaPtLu2EVr45Yl/L6Rg7ITaQ3on0Y7HSStynzP6uVSoLNfvJK0y5SrQ EN14+KLRLBcfiNMD1zwC9cxbp3gqg038MtVXgNnMJiEKyk5ao1cpPOGVR w=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiEFAJD0XVGtJXG+/2dsb2JhbABDgmUhNoJhviiBBRZ0giEBBAEBARodNB0BCCIUMQYLJQIEARIIAYd5Aw8BC7d7DYlbjEmCITiCX2EDlQ6NUoUbgwuCKA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,411,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="195009672" Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Apr 2013 21:49:51 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com [173.37.183.75]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r34LnoD4011819 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 4 Apr 2013 21:49:50 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com ([fe80::747b:83e1:9755:d453]) by xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([173.37.183.75]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 16:49:50 -0500 From: "DP Ayyadevara (dayyadev)" To: Mike McBride , "pim@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [pim] call for adoption: draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 Thread-Index: AQHOMN6M3xZF+k9UVk+gMIfIzLvSHJjGeWMA Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 21:48:44 +0000 Message-ID: <76EB67DE07905642800E3F23C2C51B5F0CE3ADA9@xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206 x-originating-ip: [10.21.145.33] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <9CBE8ADCFA2CEC4EAEA141F0EFAF30DA@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [pim] call for adoption: draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 21:49:54 -0000 +1 On 4/3/13 7:45 PM, "Mike McBride" wrote: >In Orlando, there was 10-0 in favor of adopting >draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 as Informational. Please >respond to the list with opinions, either way, over the next week. >This adoption call will end next Wednesday the 10th. > >thanks, >mike > >http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01.txt >_______________________________________________ >pim mailing list >pim@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim From jodahl@cisco.com Thu Apr 4 15:09:02 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD71021F93C7 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 15:09:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QHyWGQXI4IgJ for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 15:09:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00C2021F93CC for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 15:08:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=728; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1365113333; x=1366322933; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=kh2J6GUJGj5ltQDazCrgzhPYlqN51gpSIa8rxAKbdR8=; b=jzFlXLUGvXmBvjehm/8x1OsRpDdy3c5aZg8vpPOKBCNn9DfGDw507NOS fIyziUVTblh2wlm6q0JN+zPFnGE1A4DY45rdS96t9ZtsKCHM3iHmhCBWL 7kjFnGVhdhKiYzOXBakmgvREX3eIjkriFIt/kwSUySRw0fC1ClozhhGEL M=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiAFAO34XVGtJV2a/2dsb2JhbABDgwY2gmG+KIEFFnSCHwEBAQQdHVEBGQMBAgsUMREdCAIEEwgBh3kDDwygSJc0DYlbjEmBIIEBBjICBIJZYQOVDo1ShRuDC4FzNQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,411,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="195219095" Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Apr 2013 22:08:49 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com [173.36.12.79]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r34M8ncj028490 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 22:08:49 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x13.cisco.com ([169.254.3.165]) by xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com ([173.36.12.79]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 17:08:48 -0500 From: "Josh Dahl (jodahl)" To: "pim@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: call for adoption: draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 Thread-Index: AQHOMYD7QA+RARiEB0q96FStdQNd4g== Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 22:08:48 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.5.121010 x-originating-ip: [10.20.219.179] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [pim] call for adoption: draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 22:09:02 -0000 We have needed this for a while. Yes. Josh=20 > >Message: 1 >Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 19:45:56 -0700 >From: Mike McBride >To: pim@ietf.org >Subject: [pim] call for adoption: > draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 >Message-ID: > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1 > >In Orlando, there was 10-0 in favor of adopting >draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 as Informational. Please >respond to the list with opinions, either way, over the next week. >This adoption call will end next Wednesday the 10th. > >thanks, >mike > >http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01.txt > > From PCHuang@DIRECTV.com Fri Apr 5 11:41:23 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B910421F97F8 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 11:41:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RVgqQSWy5Phz for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 11:41:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.directv.com (mx1-out2.directv.com [147.21.65.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D7021F97C3 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 11:41:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from PMPEMPE007.LA.FRD.DIRECTV.com (147.22.118.137) by PMPEMPE002.prd.ext.directv.com (147.22.12.68) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 12:41:19 -0600 Received: from PMPEMPE009.LA.FRD.DIRECTV.com ([169.254.2.230]) by PMPEMPE007.LA.FRD.DIRECTV.com ([147.22.118.137]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 12:41:19 -0600 From: "Huang, Pang Chan (Daniel)" To: "pim@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Call for adoption: draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 (Mike McBride) Thread-Index: Ac4yLSZfWJOMiIa0RIaHhcN1ZBp3cw== Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 18:41:18 +0000 Message-ID: <8F922AF23379B44BB8E4E28CF2B2EB520490BF@PMPEMPE009.LA.FRD.DIRECTV.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.23.50.134] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8F922AF23379B44BB8E4E28CF2B2EB520490BFPMPEMPE009LAFRDDI_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-10.2.0.2087-7.000.1014-19774.001 X-TM-AS-Result: No--23.262500-0.000000-31 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No Subject: [pim] Call for adoption: draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 (Mike McBride) X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 18:44:34 -0000 --_000_8F922AF23379B44BB8E4E28CF2B2EB520490BFPMPEMPE009LAFRDDI_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All, After reviewing the draft (draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01), I'd ce= rtainly vote to approve the adoption. Hope to see this draft becomes a stan= dard very soon since it provides the feature we have been looking for for a= while. Best regards, Pang Chan (Daniel) Huang Principal Network Engineer, CCIE#21702 --_000_8F922AF23379B44BB8E4E28CF2B2EB520490BFPMPEMPE009LAFRDDI_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

All,

 

After reviewing the draft (draft-asghar-pim-explicit= -rpf-vector-01), I’d certainly vote to approve the adoption. Hope to = see this draft becomes a standard very soon since it provides the feature w= e have been looking for for a while.

 

Best regards,

Pang Chan (Daniel) Huang

Principal Network Engineer, CCIE#21702

--_000_8F922AF23379B44BB8E4E28CF2B2EB520490BFPMPEMPE009LAFRDDI_-- From agahian@yahoo.com Fri Apr 5 14:31:22 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E1521F98CD for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 14:31:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r7PZMPo-fO1p for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 14:31:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm40-vm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm40-vm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.229.181]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B034E21F98CB for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 14:31:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [98.138.226.178] by nm40.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2013 21:31:20 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.196] by tm13.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2013 21:31:20 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1054.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2013 21:31:20 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 573207.93452.bm@omp1054.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 93557 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Apr 2013 21:31:20 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1365197480; bh=krSfu1ApwmSmIakhSH04bgtrrsveukN87WGc12yujUs=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HMM2PoLF4qnOmzYdfIpo6hgwSrwzYrg9zQs0VcA/FCEdg6gnzc4dYARWbLsCzxQv1RcgVWkabEmhivFFmTk14zmWqH7DB/OxRg/AnbstvNBhLYMoovPk+9wXKGo1u0TAJb73JFROVySMrSM64/p0y8vkOC7Q2uPYJxgZPq+YfI4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=2i8FAYxMSt9F34DgkO66fzrSJ3VcA9LogujxpDir3HAMiKG86L4kr8nA+PBPz/QWqPnv2WHCmTD0Ce6UcpHDekneDnPvKRpjOSNjLMw9DH3TLdz9oDZtmfnRR289/tirvX/saAWuG6ONuKujR5X0nM+L7Md+I1tmOOJ+yfNcBFE=; X-YMail-OSG: gdtCbA0VM1kCJxrGrHm1nLXNaOjBLOP.BxyR_M4bUriJ6Z5 fCZbk5IXb1iC.WhQZ.ce7qXgLSUwrCA5zTJozqTEggy38CyPZySX71dC1YiM gZAxFBDDJEWkhvhE3tZxB6xnkcPCNcCDpgXlBAVcNXlGNykMXkNlpUF9skFL J0zEwJWL89VNo8YfXMmNuqvPipnYqWBh8w7WjcIzwxaqStzmEbLWlNDmrSuF F1JPL43DplMijvZXCOa05GwOvE2GDNKhTrWzgLDjPBr5dPABClsP3EuQazGH WkJenzIdRP5PqUQCCeSETx4VCh3pZs711xq88G5OrN7Fxysgj9KRIHwGvz_V CTdIRFXeGsTqWrCC8vATDGezkgTKTw8sApoNvxKKKoZfwNw1n4tN5K7hPMN. h4msbsxJ7WTAAxkBfq2INHrHWcSV3pp0meJEsS0q3ONieaITsQndJG1myE4c 7__84m8Z8_xTThM6AofcrTng_QgvlJeT3A1U8hCLR_kcwTpV679Z8m5h4hsk I4r4Fv7bHQoBFbLJUY1A- Received: from [54.240.196.185] by web124704.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 14:31:20 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, QWxsLMKgCgoKCkFmdGVyIHJldmlld2luZyB0aGUgZHJhZnQgKMKgZHJhZnQtYXNnaGFyLXBpbS1leHBsaWNpdC1ycGYtdmVjdG9yLTAxKSwgSSdkIGxpa2UgdG8gdm90ZSB0byBhcHByb3ZlIHRoZSBhZG9wdGlvbi4gSG9wZSB0byBzZWUgdGhhdMKgc3RhbmRhcmRpemVkwqBhcyBzb29uIGFzIHBvc3NpYmxlLgoKwqAKQmVzdCByZWdhcmRzLMKgCkthbWJpeiBBZ2FoaWFuCk5ldHdvcmsgRW5naW5lZXIgTS5FbmcuICwKQ0NJRSMyNTM0MQEwAQEBAQ-- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.140.532 References: <1365181068.63813.YahooMailNeo@web124702.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1365197480.83084.YahooMailNeo@web124704.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 14:31:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Kambiz Agahian To: "pim@ietf.org" In-Reply-To: <1365181068.63813.YahooMailNeo@web124702.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1128933012-1661495624-1365197480=:83084" Subject: [pim] Call for adoption: draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 (Mike McBride) X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: Kambiz Agahian List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 21:31:22 -0000 --1128933012-1661495624-1365197480=:83084 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All,=A0=0A=0A=0A=0AAfter reviewing the draft (=A0draft-asghar-pim-explicit-= rpf-vector-01), I'd like to vote to approve the adoption. Hope to see that= =A0standardized=A0as soon as possible.=0A=0A=A0=0ABest regards,=A0=0AKambiz= Agahian=0ANetwork Engineer M.Eng. ,=0ACCIE#25341 --1128933012-1661495624-1365197480=:83084 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
All,&nb= sp;

After= reviewing the draft ( draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01), I'd like to vote to= approve the adoption. Hope to see that standardized as soon as p= ossible.

=0A=0A
  =0A=0A
Best regards,&n= bsp;
=0A=0A
K= ambiz Agahian
=0A=0A
Network Engine= er M.Eng. ,=0ACCIE#25341

=


--1128933012-1661495624-1365197480=:83084-- From IPark@DIRECTV.com Fri Apr 5 14:44:45 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B5121F985E for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 14:44:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3lmjaDOwtFFm for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 14:44:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.directv.com (mx2-out2.directv.com [147.21.176.200]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07BCD21F9846 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 14:44:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DMPEMPE007.LA.FRD.DIRECTV.com (147.22.180.234) by DMPEMPE002.prd.ext.directv.com (147.22.129.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 15:44:44 -0600 Received: from DMPEMPE009.LA.FRD.DIRECTV.com ([169.254.2.226]) by DMPEMPE007.LA.FRD.DIRECTV.com ([147.22.180.234]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 15:44:44 -0600 From: "Park, Insik" To: "pim@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Call for adoption: draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 (Mike McBride) Thread-Index: Ac4yRsVv0vnXXNWhTEGyjYkVbYkxwg== Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 21:44:43 +0000 Message-ID: <0EBB817028706B41BCA5DE213B8BB73F024D49@DMPEMPE009.LA.FRD.DIRECTV.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.2.104.158] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0EBB817028706B41BCA5DE213B8BB73F024D49DMPEMPE009LAFRDDI_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-10.2.0.2087-7.000.1014-19774.002 X-TM-AS-Result: No--15.554600-0.000000-31 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No Subject: [pim] Call for adoption: draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 (Mike McBride) X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 21:46:09 -0000 --_000_0EBB817028706B41BCA5DE213B8BB73F024D49DMPEMPE009LAFRDDI_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, After reading this draft (draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01), I vote = to approve this adoption, which will help us tremendously in our network. = Looking forward to seeing it standardized. Best Regards, Insik Park Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 20653 --_000_0EBB817028706B41BCA5DE213B8BB73F024D49DMPEMPE009LAFRDDI_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

 

After reading this draft (draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01), I vote to app= rove this adoption, which will help us tremendously in our network.  L= ooking forward to seeing it standardized.

&= nbsp;

Best R= egards,
Insik Park

Sr. Ne= twork Engineer

CCIE# = 20653

--_000_0EBB817028706B41BCA5DE213B8BB73F024D49DMPEMPE009LAFRDDI_-- From jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com Fri Apr 5 14:49:45 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8690E21F9881 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 14:49:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.489 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.489 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.109, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, TVD_SPACE_RATIO=2.219] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AI+9fGvs6Dlc for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 14:49:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usevmg20.ericsson.net (usevmg20.ericsson.net [198.24.6.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7F421F987F for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 14:49:45 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c618062d-b7f0d6d00000097e-0c-515f46f8e7ea Received: from EUSAAHC006.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.90]) by usevmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 14.D1.02430.8F64F515; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 23:49:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from EUSAAMB109.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.126]) by EUSAAHC006.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.90]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 17:49:43 -0400 From: Jeff Tantsura To: "pim@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [pim] Call for adoption: draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 (Mike McBride) Thread-Index: Ac4yLSZfWJOMiIa0RIaHhcN1ZBp3cwAASveA Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 21:49:43 +0000 Message-ID: <60DEDD93F5E54B4AB55647B8B6C74839312F01@eusaamb109.ericsson.se> In-Reply-To: <8F922AF23379B44BB8E4E28CF2B2EB520490BF@PMPEMPE009.LA.FRD.DIRECTV.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.5.121010 x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.135] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_60DEDD93F5E54B4AB55647B8B6C74839312F01eusaamb109ericsso_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrJLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPlO4Pt/hAg99rpC2+PLzJ7MDosWTJ T6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujNl/H7EUfOOo6Dh8jr2BsYGji5GTQ0LARKK7qYUFwhaTuHBv PRuILSRwlFFixRPhLkYuIHsZo8Tild9YQRJsAgYS/78dB2sQEVCUaJ/bAhYXFoiT+PrpA3sX IwdQPF7i2JVYCNNIonu9MUgFi4CKxKGF/9hBbF4Bb4ldE2aA2ZwCwRITZ70DsxmBTvh+ag0T iM0sIC5x68l8JojTBCSW7DnPDGGLSrx8/A9sq6iAnkTbsTPsEHFlie9zHrFA9OZLXFk4iQVi l6DEyZlPWCYwisxCMnYWkrJZSMog4joSC3Z/YoOwtSWWLXzNDGOfOfAYqtdaYuXpFczIahYw cqxi5CgtTi3LTTcy2MQIjJ5jEmy6Oxj3vLQ8xCjNwaIkzhvkeiFASCA9sSQ1OzW1ILUovqg0 J7X4ECMTB6dUA6PULYkbSbPvi/p7tTHceftiykU5r5OTvXvXXfsobLZPuIZvr7H39eSc3T25 a7cIByr+al22bNlteQ6v06sfvL+7ktl4YjpbQqAo80YZq1cdJQFN1tXrFWvlwgvKAneYHTH6 +9Jiv+TEyrLLykqyjowR/w79CgxflvX+znSO/Za+RsdjrAs6TyixFGckGmoxFxUnAgCxoWDO bAIAAA== Subject: Re: [pim] Call for adoption: draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 (Mike McBride) X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 21:49:45 -0000 --_000_60DEDD93F5E54B4AB55647B8B6C74839312F01eusaamb109ericsso_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes/support Cheers, Jeff --_000_60DEDD93F5E54B4AB55647B8B6C74839312F01eusaamb109ericsso_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes/support

Cheers,
Jeff

--_000_60DEDD93F5E54B4AB55647B8B6C74839312F01eusaamb109ericsso_-- From tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com Sat Apr 6 07:38:50 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA6721F8A74 for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2013 07:38:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.907 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NZOAZyVthPQd for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2013 07:38:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ie0-x22a.google.com (mail-ie0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E609C21F8A6D for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2013 07:38:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id c11so5366361ieb.1 for ; Sat, 06 Apr 2013 07:38:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-antivirus:x-antivirus-status; bh=pbk1BhCdelyKr9FeKep8hQRRend/1jMTupRa7+3Q+Lo=; b=HaLQ9JCB7czMic96yjvPcRxCUMeSn0osAqx2Rbg3q9itwQfmD35s2VSS2uJZeRisUW XuUkNq91cg1PdXk/lOSh/mx563fkJ4QNaPeTiSg/JS7g1la8nWRkmKkNgaj/FG4/OY21 Ow//laJ30TdWbZSZFwX8AKRygP3oI03VlMpeGURBa+09+Bki4hjDbyXWChigd7QPWkyV TdO8aWkCGoR/h83Dp6zvf1fX1x2MqlHRNXchHKGYJUXMz1QJXK44mkaYNFbbKsoGk8tq 8qE+W7HJSQ0PC0NkVSEV6XDsNX/KOyO7a1KtkiOJDFENNV+cfX6f0rNLV4zQbVPbwlys vsUw== X-Received: by 10.50.5.180 with SMTP id t20mr2123956igt.80.1365259129510; Sat, 06 Apr 2013 07:38:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dsl-173-206-171-43.tor.primus.ca. [173.206.171.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dy5sm7710055igc.1.2013.04.06.07.38.48 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 06 Apr 2013 07:38:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51603379.308@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 10:38:49 -0400 From: Tom Taylor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike McBride References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130406-0, 06/04/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Cc: pim@ietf.org Subject: Re: [pim] call for adoption: draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 14:38:50 -0000 I confirm my support. On 03/04/2013 10:45 PM, Mike McBride wrote: > In Orlando, there was 10-0 in favor of adopting > draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 as Informational. Please > respond to the list with opinions, either way, over the next week. > This adoption call will end next Wednesday the 10th. > > thanks, > mike > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01.txt > _______________________________________________ > pim mailing list > pim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim > . > From agahian@yahoo.com Fri Apr 5 09:57:50 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6E221F982E for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 09:57:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qzYKG7fdNrNi for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 09:57:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm10-vm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm10-vm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.91.170]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C8C21F982D for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 09:57:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [98.138.90.56] by nm10.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2013 16:57:49 -0000 Received: from [98.138.87.3] by tm9.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2013 16:57:49 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2013 16:57:49 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 671843.84968.bm@omp1003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 64070 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Apr 2013 16:57:49 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1365181069; bh=b6q3x2ZkWWPyd5Vsvx5o3LiiJ4yK7TZMzDMQUSU5YwQ=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QWe9k8a18TlGf7BTX7oS9XEVkqdpE6dZTUUbKpyAEQ3mmwQBKGDMuSeQFN95jv/ryBomREfh3LAce604zRD/0cXwsYNAeNr4Qu6R/meTIeh7jp9W22cHSYM+qE1LYY/mMcpaH+F3ePq0TWtExX+ipGhO2bk0UrIFIqGXur96r5A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=5WDmECCRus8Q7LGEn4Qtuz31uM6zGulkJpKhg8rNcxZN+IiLWgNsz801m7fcrc22gJq9xo8Ka9gThaZoITI+/qwu19/WuazoTHCz+TXLyVVYjqAYbZb1oD+lA+XDMerCfGxOQtQ0AE/qNMnj/UplmCdn9+RJ0kLPRGHi/n8vOq0=; X-YMail-OSG: dgDiw5IVM1ny4CAW_.BSQmoLgtmAIZLe1FEVbW4DZYTfbxW lKRdSQ3tH.81uz9pnmhHX3gOzE0IfLc89TdrM3qWtkNTL9Q.p3tVrLBYUwIm FcIIw3tSsLumdI_kqlf.InAy3O9gWBdrG.fFH1OYlA7UjlO9YU9cxWt2DWYj DVp6c2.pPfes4UjIm4GA5br8O2ffWYeYTVKtQZXMsuDH9kDWpUZc3n0BDJre B9g51I6NJdfAYJZoG1l1PSos7ssHdvGDJ3BnwV24YkdlLxXyL1FWUgj1zuc2 sbAXu3KSwNBB9_cttCxkV20zIqXM_hnSegjUE6ocnzzh8C.iHuF2HDoyp1c0 7ntLuqN0RSyxHt98yuDU6FDJlymD4sCp1__wnLoEFhhhyuvvAAJDFo7gndoP jcfrnkk6FhlEFyrtnKwD43ZbqGZtK7DAN77Kh6CMzhuj.2gM9uH._wQehPwF ZYWjlicZTNC9JudS_qNaPlrZiyJiyloHKdLstjgz00NmSTiNkTE1YF30Q Received: from [54.240.196.185] by web124702.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 09:57:48 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, QWxsLMKgCgoKQWZ0ZXIgcmV2aWV3aW5nIHRoZSBkcmFmdCAowqBkcmFmdC1hc2doYXItcGltLWV4cGxpY2l0LXJwZi12ZWN0b3ItMDEpLCBJJ2QgbGlrZSB0byB2b3RlIHRvIGFwcHJvdmUgdGhlIGFkb3B0aW9uLiBIb3BlIHRvIHNlZSB0aGF0wqBzdGFuZGFyZGl6ZWTCoGFzIHNvb24gYXMgcG9zc2libGUuCgrCoApCZXN0IHJlZ2FyZHMswqAKS2FtYml6IEFnYWhpYW4KTmV0d29yayBFbmdpbmVlciBNLkVuZy4gLApDQ0lFIzI1MzQxCgEwAQEBAQ-- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.140.532 Message-ID: <1365181068.63813.YahooMailNeo@web124702.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 09:57:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Kambiz Agahian To: "pim@ietf.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-1269787621-801228995-1365181068=:63813" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 08:36:32 -0700 Subject: [pim] Call for adoption: draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 (Mike McBride) X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: Kambiz Agahian List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 17:08:13 -0000 ---1269787621-801228995-1365181068=:63813 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All,=A0=0A=0A=0AAfter reviewing the draft (=A0draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf= -vector-01), I'd like to vote to approve the adoption. Hope to see that=A0s= tandardized=A0as soon as possible.=0A=0A=A0=0ABest regards,=A0=0AKambiz Aga= hian=0ANetwork Engineer M.Eng. ,=0ACCIE#25341=0A ---1269787621-801228995-1365181068=:63813 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
All, 

<= span>After reviewing t= he draft ( draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01), I'd like to vote = to approve the adoption. Hope to see that standardized as soon as= possible.

=0A=0A
 
=0A=0A
Best regards, 
=0A= =0A
Kambiz Agahian
=0A=0A
Network Engineer M.Eng. ,=0A= CCIE#25341

=
---1269787621-801228995-1365181068=:63813-- From shahzad_ali@hotmail.com Sun Apr 7 14:35:47 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B1221F8F3A for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2013 14:35:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DS-rDCkq5CLY for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2013 14:35:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bay0-omc4-s4.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc4-s4.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.190.206]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD1E21F8F35 for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2013 14:35:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BAY172-W13 ([65.54.190.199]) by bay0-omc4-s4.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 7 Apr 2013 14:35:46 -0700 X-EIP: [Nr1sYxmPw975OptTuQMgIj7nG6c/m5G8] X-Originating-Email: [shahzad_ali@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_4466d588-1708-4d9a-a7dd-24bc5e8b878a_" From: Shahzad Ali To: "pim@ietf.org" , Shahzad Ali Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 21:35:46 +0000 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Apr 2013 21:35:46.0743 (UTC) FILETIME=[DD7F8470:01CE33D7] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 10:12:01 -0700 Subject: [pim] Call for adoption: draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 (Mike McBride) X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 21:38:11 -0000 --_4466d588-1708-4d9a-a7dd-24bc5e8b878a_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello All=2C=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= I have reviewed the draft (draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01) and=0A= I would like to vote to approve the adoption of this draft because we=0A= need it for a while. =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= I'm grateful its being standardized.=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Best Regards=2C=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Shahzad Ali=0A= =0A= Network Architect=2C CCIE 7466 = --_4466d588-1708-4d9a-a7dd-24bc5e8b878a_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello All=2C

=0A= =0A=

 =3B=0A= =0A=

I have reviewed t= he draft (draft-asghar-pim-expli= cit-rpf-vector-01) and=0A=  =3BI would like to vote to approve the adoption of this draft because = we=0A= need it for a while.

=0A= =0A=

 =3B=0A= =0A=

I'm grateful its = being standardized.

=0A= =0A=

 =3B=0A= =0A=

Best Regards=2C

=0A= =0A=

 =3B=0A= =0A=

Shahzad Ali<= /o:p>

=0A= =0A=

Network Architect= =2C CCIE 7466

= --_4466d588-1708-4d9a-a7dd-24bc5e8b878a_-- From mmcbride7@gmail.com Wed Apr 10 15:10:15 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F0721F9134 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:10:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jun-u3X7yKH7 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:10:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com (mail-pa0-f54.google.com [209.85.220.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87ED921F90AC for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:10:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id fa11so544963pad.13 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:10:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=qKxjtkxFdO8BQMN+Q+Pgesr1SMqAovVB8yIgtmMsGuY=; b=OsIU1t10XrvnILP8VthWOnmV0HSMd1xJH0QvAWYXqbKKiCadgvkfCbctOYRodtY1Ob hqSHBMNaFXUerVv3xKRO/c6mCIuUtpIDDz5lhqX6nhAzE5QMLkjZHUybD3Cc5Iky1BV5 XqPvyp84yrz7PI1i2kt2a7rBsXWmOCq1bmXclua0ncV9pdxfx0T/zl0JU9YL0Vd4p1/4 htwAF0FCg3Xme7FtmLPUNgnHCEArAvpQ7DQ8QtZPa1J9GBG2Lvq5ZIjqW5eGFYlhu/Qv Rp6ZI/SlJ8FMKRckYrJi2BzKbs9pkcQ/8UuKR55FYCwC6M+nhbZwTlgbktjBpRGDYcLj 8A5Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.178.37 with SMTP id cv5mr5157839pbc.213.1365631815360; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:10:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.132.105 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:10:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:10:15 -0700 Message-ID: From: Mike McBride To: pim@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [pim] call for adoption: draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:10:16 -0000 Thank you for the many responses. We have solid consensus to adopt this draft. Therefore pim is now the proud owner of a new wg document. We request that the authors submit a -00 pim wg draft. mike On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Mike McBride wrote: > In Orlando, there was 10-0 in favor of adopting > draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01 as Informational. Please > respond to the list with opinions, either way, over the next week. > This adoption call will end next Wednesday the 10th. > > thanks, > mike > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01.txt From stig@venaas.com Thu Apr 11 09:42:29 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A99621F8721 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:42:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.516 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.083, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6YEvdReudiL5 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:42:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ufisa.uninett.no (ufisa.uninett.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:2:158:38:152:126]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E9921F85F3 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:42:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.33.12.93] (128-107-239-233.cisco.com [128.107.239.233]) by ufisa.uninett.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 816DF8042 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:42:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5166E79E.5010902@venaas.com> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:41:02 -0700 From: Stig Venaas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pim@ietf.org References: <5112E923.4040709@venaas.com> <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E076B9@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com>, <0BF0FCC78340F147BE76A6F5762318A82284459D@BY2PRD0510MB389.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E0A0F3@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com>, <0BF0FCC78340F147BE76A6F5762318A82F8FDC80@BY2PRD0510MB389.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E19EB8@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com> In-Reply-To: <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E19EB8@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [pim] 2nd call for adoption of draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-01 as a pim wg work item X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:42:29 -0000 We did an adoption call for this document with only a few responses. Some comments were made and the document was just updated based on those. We had good support for adoption in the meeting and the process that this is part of. We would still like to do a quick adoption call on the list to see what people think though. This document contains the results from the implementation survey we did in order to advance RFC 4601 on the standards track. This message starts an adoption call for draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-01 available at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-01 Please respond by Friday April 19th whether you believe this document should be adopted, or provide any other comments you may have on the draft. Stig From bharat_joshi@infosys.com Thu Apr 11 10:23:35 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB0821F9339 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:23:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WUJ+P2RId7A3 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:23:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from KECGATE03.infosys.com (kecgate03.infosysconsulting.com [122.98.10.31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D8621F9330 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:23:32 -0700 (PDT) X-TM-IMSS-Message-ID: <68993238000ea98a@infosys.com> Received: from BLRKECHUB05.ad.infosys.com ([10.66.236.45]) by infosys.com ([122.98.10.31]) with ESMTP (TREND IMSS SMTP Service 7.1) id 68993238000ea98a ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 22:45:07 +0530 Received: from BLRKECHUB08.ad.infosys.com (10.66.236.138) by BLRKECHUB05.ad.infosys.com (10.66.236.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 22:52:52 +0530 Received: from BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com ([fe80::c43d:ba67:abc0:11c3]) by BLRKECHUB08.ad.infosys.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 22:52:52 +0530 From: Bharat Joshi To: Stig Venaas , "pim@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [pim] 2nd call for adoption of draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-01 as a pim wg work item Thread-Index: AQHONtOGKI6Zt4+95U6UZ7M0RtrRUpjRRG1n Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:22:51 +0000 Message-ID: <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E33E1D@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com> References: <5112E923.4040709@venaas.com> <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E076B9@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com>, <0BF0FCC78340F147BE76A6F5762318A82284459D@BY2PRD0510MB389.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E0A0F3@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com>, <0BF0FCC78340F147BE76A6F5762318A82F8FDC80@BY2PRD0510MB389.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E19EB8@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com>, <5166E79E.5010902@venaas.com> In-Reply-To: <5166E79E.5010902@venaas.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.37.13] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [pim] 2nd call for adoption of draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-01 as a pim wg work item X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:23:35 -0000 +1. Regards, Bharat ________________________________________ From: pim-bounces@ietf.org [pim-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Stig Venaa= s [stig@venaas.com] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:11 PM To: pim@ietf.org Subject: [pim] 2nd call for adoption of draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-surv= ey-report-01 as a pim wg work item We did an adoption call for this document with only a few responses. Some comments were made and the document was just updated based on those. We had good support for adoption in the meeting and the process that this is part of. We would still like to do a quick adoption call on the list to see what people think though. This document contains the results from the implementation survey we did in order to advance RFC 4601 on the standards track. This message starts an adoption call for draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-01 available at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-01 Please respond by Friday April 19th whether you believe this document should be adopted, or provide any other comments you may have on the draft. Stig _______________________________________________ pim mailing list pim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim **************** CAUTION - Disclaimer ***************** This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended sol= ely for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, p= lease notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you= are not to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other= person and any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys h= as taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for = any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry= out your own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserve= s the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from t= his e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on th= e Infosys e-mail system. ***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS*** From lenny@juniper.net Fri Apr 12 15:57:14 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A355721F8C3C for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:57:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GBkEeC3MwMq5 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exprod7og106.obsmtp.com (exprod7og106.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D1821F8BD0 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:57:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob106.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUWiRRhzzl9B+CTlOqtHewYoNm6NfbzKF@postini.com; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:57:14 PDT Received: from magenta.juniper.net (172.17.27.123) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:54:19 -0700 Received: from eng-mail01.juniper.net (eng-mail01.juniper.net [172.17.28.114]) by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id r3CMsI361816; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:54:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lenny@juniper.net) Received: by eng-mail01.juniper.net (Postfix, from userid 1709) id 2DC3E1145A; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:54:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eng-mail01.juniper.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2378811446; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:54:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:54:18 -0700 From: Leonard Giuliano To: Stig Venaas In-Reply-To: <5166E79E.5010902@venaas.com> Message-ID: <20130412155359.M27000@eng-mail01.juniper.net> References: <5112E923.4040709@venaas.com> <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E076B9@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com>, <0BF0FCC78340F147BE76A6F5762318A82284459D@BY2PRD0510MB389.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E0A0F3@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com>, <0BF0FCC78340F147BE76A6F5762318A82F8FDC80@BY2PRD0510MB389.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E19EB8@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com> <5166E79E.5010902@venaas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Cc: pim@ietf.org Subject: Re: [pim] 2nd call for adoption of draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-01 as a pim wg work item X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 22:57:14 -0000 I support adoption of this doc On Thu, 11 Apr 2013, Stig Venaas wrote: -) We did an adoption call for this document with only a few responses. -) Some comments were made and the document was just updated based on -) those. We had good support for adoption in the meeting and the process -) that this is part of. We would still like to do a quick adoption call -) on the list to see what people think though. -) -) This document contains the results from the implementation survey we -) did in order to advance RFC 4601 on the standards track. -) -) This message starts an adoption call for -) draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-01 available at -) http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-01 -) -) Please respond by Friday April 19th whether you believe this document -) should be adopted, or provide any other comments you may have on the -) draft. -) -) Stig -) -) _______________________________________________ -) pim mailing list -) pim@ietf.org -) https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim -) From william.atwood@concordia.ca Thu Apr 18 19:36:51 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E4521F935D for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:36:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pKlARQsWMpC6 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:36:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oldperseverance.encs.concordia.ca (oldperseverance.encs.concordia.ca [132.205.96.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09F3821F934B for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:36:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (bill@poise.encs.concordia.ca [132.205.2.209]) by oldperseverance.encs.concordia.ca (envelope-from william.atwood@concordia.ca) (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id r3J2amBp003597 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 22:36:48 -0400 Message-ID: <5170ADC8.6070801@concordia.ca> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 22:36:56 -0400 From: William Atwood Organization: Concordia University, Montreal User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pim@ietf.org References: <5112E923.4040709@venaas.com> <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E076B9@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com>, <0BF0FCC78340F147BE76A6F5762318A82284459D@BY2PRD0510MB389.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E0A0F3@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com>, <0BF0FCC78340F147BE76A6F5762318A82F8FDC80@BY2PRD0510MB389.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E19EB8@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com> <5166E79E.5010902@venaas.com> In-Reply-To: <5166E79E.5010902@venaas.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on oldperseverance.encs.concordia.ca at 2013/04/18 22:36:48 EDT Subject: Re: [pim] 2nd call for adoption of draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-01 as a pim wg work item X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 02:36:51 -0000 I support adoption of this draft. Bill On 11/04/2013 12:41 PM, Stig Venaas wrote: > We did an adoption call for this document with only a few responses. > Some comments were made and the document was just updated based on > those. We had good support for adoption in the meeting and the process > that this is part of. We would still like to do a quick adoption call > on the list to see what people think though. > > This document contains the results from the implementation survey we > did in order to advance RFC 4601 on the standards track. > > This message starts an adoption call for > draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-01 available at > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-01 > > Please respond by Friday April 19th whether you believe this document > should be adopted, or provide any other comments you may have on the > draft. > > Stig > > _______________________________________________ > pim mailing list > pim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim -- Dr. J.W. Atwood, Eng. tel: +1 (514) 848-2424 x3046 Distinguished Professor Emeritus fax: +1 (514) 848-2830 Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering Concordia University EV 3.185 email:william.atwood@concordia.ca 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. West http://users.encs.concordia.ca/~bill Montreal, Quebec Canada H3G 1M8 From tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com Fri Apr 19 05:28:41 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7898221F958B for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 05:28:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.976 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.624, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2BUqViAQtRoW for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 05:28:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ia0-x22c.google.com (mail-ia0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16E521F9545 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 05:28:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ia0-f172.google.com with SMTP id k38so3415520iah.3 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 05:28:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Pmc/t4R6ud3eYb7E114aGp5sWIFEB55PelHmum9ZkjU=; b=pt8lJsFnUhqxs83dgPFmrkx3pUXXtwUfLNAWnvMScEcp2WwgvrhoVGmeaiFLwBZt29 ebjiMvwkMBFp0iqqYrk3Kkh5kyo2BY+plcJUOtkaZRYiQvu1TonyyrSpxf1r3flz3PBD nqvtmcdxCCQ4aFmw/SSRuOtsVwWGPnZOI3oUx5ZbqS1HiWPF38vP38kCoV8iXeKk7ZPv n6KXmwi3dkRZgOl9ib0e30jJGrsVWVyiurPoXEG8oNFAxG15g0frmSSwgLh6ofVWF8bh m6/MMtZkt3itZLKuo7HvUXvrsyEy07ewNzSWSGnm/w1LTwxYRHa0WX+kcd3y697KtkzI Clqg== X-Received: by 10.50.56.4 with SMTP id w4mr1025207igp.50.1366374520494; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 05:28:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.65] (dsl-173-206-2-115.tor.primus.ca. [173.206.2.115]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ip2sm2550364igc.5.2013.04.19.05.28.39 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 19 Apr 2013 05:28:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51713878.2050501@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 08:28:40 -0400 From: Tom Taylor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pim@ietf.org References: <5112E923.4040709@venaas.com> <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E076B9@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com>, <0BF0FCC78340F147BE76A6F5762318A82284459D@BY2PRD0510MB389.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E0A0F3@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com>, <0BF0FCC78340F147BE76A6F5762318A82F8FDC80@BY2PRD0510MB389.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E19EB8@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com> <5166E79E.5010902@venaas.com> <5170ADC8.6070801@concordia.ca> In-Reply-To: <5170ADC8.6070801@concordia.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [pim] 2nd call for adoption of draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-01 as a pim wg work item X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 12:28:41 -0000 Me too. On 18/04/2013 10:36 PM, William Atwood wrote: > I support adoption of this draft. > > Bill > > > On 11/04/2013 12:41 PM, Stig Venaas wrote: >> We did an adoption call for this document with only a few responses. >> Some comments were made and the document was just updated based on >> those. We had good support for adoption in the meeting and the process >> that this is part of. We would still like to do a quick adoption call >> on the list to see what people think though. >> >> This document contains the results from the implementation survey we >> did in order to advance RFC 4601 on the standards track. >> >> This message starts an adoption call for >> draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-01 available at >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-01 >> >> Please respond by Friday April 19th whether you believe this document >> should be adopted, or provide any other comments you may have on the >> draft. >> >> Stig >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pim mailing list >> pim@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim > From Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com Fri Apr 19 07:04:23 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D01B21F8681 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 07:04:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vGSf4JOAVoLi for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 07:04:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3BB521F8619 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 07:04:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AQP73624; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:04:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:03:55 +0100 Received: from DFWEML407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.132) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 22:04:10 +0800 Received: from DFWEML513-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.156]) by dfweml407-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.132]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 07:04:04 -0700 From: Tina TSOU To: Tom Taylor Thread-Topic: [pim] 2nd call for adoption of draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-01 as a pim wg work item Thread-Index: AQHONtOdy86M6wYlDk+oPIa4o0P9QpjdVTUAgAClVAD//6VOmg== Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:04:02 +0000 Message-ID: <9A6C3A92-350B-4E5E-9F7B-66F7AC1068C8@huawei.com> References: <5112E923.4040709@venaas.com> <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E076B9@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com>, <0BF0FCC78340F147BE76A6F5762318A82284459D@BY2PRD0510MB389.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E0A0F3@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com>, <0BF0FCC78340F147BE76A6F5762318A82F8FDC80@BY2PRD0510MB389.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E19EB8@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com> <5166E79E.5010902@venaas.com> <5170ADC8.6070801@concordia.ca>,<51713878.2050501@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <51713878.2050501@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Cc: "pim@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [pim] 2nd call for adoption of draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-01 as a pim wg work item X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:04:23 -0000 Dear all, I support the adoption. Thank you, Tina On Apr 19, 2013, at 5:28 AM, "Tom Taylor" wrote= : > Me too. >=20 > On 18/04/2013 10:36 PM, William Atwood wrote: >> I support adoption of this draft. >>=20 >> Bill >>=20 >>=20 >> On 11/04/2013 12:41 PM, Stig Venaas wrote: >>> We did an adoption call for this document with only a few responses. >>> Some comments were made and the document was just updated based on >>> those. We had good support for adoption in the meeting and the process >>> that this is part of. We would still like to do a quick adoption call >>> on the list to see what people think though. >>>=20 >>> This document contains the results from the implementation survey we >>> did in order to advance RFC 4601 on the standards track. >>>=20 >>> This message starts an adoption call for >>> draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-01 available at >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-0= 1 >>>=20 >>> Please respond by Friday April 19th whether you believe this document >>> should be adopted, or provide any other comments you may have on the >>> draft. >>>=20 >>> Stig >>>=20 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> pim mailing list >>> pim@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim >>=20 > _______________________________________________ > pim mailing list > pim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim From stig@venaas.com Mon Apr 22 15:24:18 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27AF421F8A85 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:24:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.947 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.652, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mDBpAQqeae3a for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:24:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ufisa.uninett.no (ufisa.uninett.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:2:158:38:152:126]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505B621E803D for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:23:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.33.12.93] (128-107-239-233.cisco.com [128.107.239.233]) by ufisa.uninett.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 161518137; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:23:49 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5175B873.2040301@venaas.com> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:23:47 -0700 From: Stig Venaas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pim@ietf.org, draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report@tools.ietf.org References: <5112E923.4040709@venaas.com> <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E076B9@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com>, <0BF0FCC78340F147BE76A6F5762318A82284459D@BY2PRD0510MB389.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E0A0F3@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com>, <0BF0FCC78340F147BE76A6F5762318A82F8FDC80@BY2PRD0510MB389.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E19EB8@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com> <5166E79E.5010902@venaas.com> In-Reply-To: <5166E79E.5010902@venaas.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mike McBride Subject: Re: [pim] 2nd call for adoption of draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-01 as a pim wg work item X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 22:24:18 -0000 The last call has ended, and it is clear that we have good support for this document. The document is adopted. Authors, please submit the latest revision as draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-00 Stig On 4/11/2013 9:41 AM, Stig Venaas wrote: > We did an adoption call for this document with only a few responses. > Some comments were made and the document was just updated based on > those. We had good support for adoption in the meeting and the process > that this is part of. We would still like to do a quick adoption call > on the list to see what people think though. > > This document contains the results from the implementation survey we > did in order to advance RFC 4601 on the standards track. > > This message starts an adoption call for > draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-01 available at > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-01 > > Please respond by Friday April 19th whether you believe this document > should be adopted, or provide any other comments you may have on the > draft. > > Stig > > _______________________________________________ > pim mailing list > pim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim From stig@venaas.com Mon Apr 22 15:29:50 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA65521F9305 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:29:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.11 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.489, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FbY9GKDBuNum for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:29:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ufisa.uninett.no (ufisa.uninett.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:2:158:38:152:126]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4372F21F92C5 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:29:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.33.12.93] (128-107-239-234.cisco.com [128.107.239.234]) by ufisa.uninett.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0334A814B; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:29:48 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5175B9DB.3020403@venaas.com> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:29:47 -0700 From: Stig Venaas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pim@ietf.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mike McBride Subject: [pim] draft-ietf-pim-explicit-tracking pim 2nd wglc X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 22:29:51 -0000 We did a last call for this document in February, but we got hardly any responses, so it was hard for us chairs to know whether the WG indeed was happy with the latest revision. We are now attempting another last call. Please respond to this so that we can have some progress in the working group. We need to know whether you are happy with the current version, or if you have any issues that need to be addressed. This call ends Monday May 6th. Stig From stig@venaas.com Mon Apr 22 15:53:06 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EEAA21F9110 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:53:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.208 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.208 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.391, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ly0jixMlt2Sr for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:53:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ufisa.uninett.no (ufisa.uninett.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:2:158:38:152:126]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286D521E80A3 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:53:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.33.12.93] (128-107-239-234.cisco.com [128.107.239.234]) by ufisa.uninett.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE1B0814E for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:53:03 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5175BF4D.5020109@venaas.com> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:53:01 -0700 From: Stig Venaas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pim@ietf.org References: <5175B9DB.3020403@venaas.com> In-Reply-To: <5175B9DB.3020403@venaas.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [pim] draft-ietf-pim-explicit-tracking pim 2nd wglc X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 22:53:06 -0000 Here is my response as a WG member to the last call. The document looks good, but I see two possible issues. Section 3.1 seems to talk too much about implementation details. In particular the sentence "In order to simplify the implementation, the explicit tracking function MAY NOT keep the state of (S,G) joined with EXCLUDE filter mode." I think it's wrong here to say what the implementation MAY NOT do, in particular if it is just a simplification. Advice is OK, but not strict requirements for an internal implementation detail. The security considerations could be improved a bit. Potential issues of maintaining state are discussed, and a rate limit on membership information. First of all, I don't think it is a rate limit, it's should be a limit on the maximum amount of memberships at any time. I think. Further, it should be pointed out that an attack could either cause some members to not be tracked, or some members to not be able to join and receive. Stig From internet-drafts@ietf.org Tue Apr 23 22:32:22 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061B121F93E9; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 22:32:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.505 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.505 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.095, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BZfiPDm3pmGG; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 22:32:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC92A21F93E8; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 22:32:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.44.p4 Message-ID: <20130424053220.27317.85761.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 22:32:20 -0700 Cc: pim@ietf.org Subject: [pim] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-00.txt X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 05:32:22 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Protocol Independent Multicast Working Gr= oup of the IETF. Title : Survey Report on PIM-SM Implementations and Deployments Author(s) : Lianshu Zheng Zhaohui Zhang Rishabh Parekh Filename : draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-00.txt Pages : 15 Date : 2013-04-23 Abstract: This document provides supporting documentation to advance the Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM) protocol from IETF Proposed Standard to Internet Standard. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-00 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From stig@venaas.com Thu Apr 25 10:38:06 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B5E21F95F9 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:38:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.273 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.273 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.326, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AlTt-dgO-URl for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:38:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ufisa.uninett.no (ufisa.uninett.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:2:158:38:152:126]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0160421F961D for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:38:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.21.98.217] (128-107-239-234.cisco.com [128.107.239.234]) by ufisa.uninett.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A218480F4 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:38:00 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <51796AF5.6040702@venaas.com> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:42:13 -0700 From: Stig Venaas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pim@ietf.org References: <5175B9DB.3020403@venaas.com> In-Reply-To: <5175B9DB.3020403@venaas.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [pim] Please respond! Re: draft-ietf-pim-explicit-tracking pim 2nd wglc X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:38:06 -0000 Not many replies yet! We have one more week, please review this document. It will be hard for us to make progress if we don't get any responses. Stig On 22.04.2013 15:29, Stig Venaas wrote: > We did a last call for this document in February, but we got hardly any > responses, so it was hard for us chairs to know whether the WG indeed > was happy with the latest revision. > > We are now attempting another last call. Please respond to this so that > we can have some progress in the working group. We need to know whether > you are happy with the current version, or if you have any issues that > need to be addressed. > > This call ends Monday May 6th. > > Stig > > _______________________________________________ > pim mailing list > pim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim From Vsingh@directv.com Thu Apr 25 10:41:36 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20BB021F8E76 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:41:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.307 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yrdvbxUf8sMC for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:41:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.directv.com (mx1-out1.directv.com [147.21.65.99]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8277121F8E5D for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:41:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from PMPEMPE006.LA.FRD.DIRECTV.com (147.22.118.136) by PMPEMPE001.prd.ext.directv.com (147.22.12.67) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 11:41:34 -0600 Received: from PMPEMPE010.LA.FRD.DIRECTV.com ([169.254.3.211]) by PMPEMPE006.LA.FRD.DIRECTV.com ([147.22.118.136]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 11:41:34 -0600 From: "Singh, Vaibhav" CC: "pim@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [pim] 2nd call for adoption of draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-01 as a pim wg work item Thread-Index: AQHONtOZpOvHTwfUA0uvpLYIyQqDEZjdRHIAgAClVACAABqlAIAJRg+g Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:41:34 +0000 Message-ID: <23582FC085FDAA49A0D4405A8056D42C0689DA@PMPEMPE010.LA.FRD.DIRECTV.com> References: <5112E923.4040709@venaas.com> <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E076B9@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com>, <0BF0FCC78340F147BE76A6F5762318A82284459D@BY2PRD0510MB389.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E0A0F3@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com>, <0BF0FCC78340F147BE76A6F5762318A82F8FDC80@BY2PRD0510MB389.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E19EB8@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com> <5166E79E.5010902@venaas.com> <5170ADC8.6070801@concordia.ca>,<51713878.2050501@gmail.com> <9A6C3A92-350B-4E5E-9F7B-66F7AC1068C8@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <9A6C3A92-350B-4E5E-9F7B-66F7AC1068C8@huawei.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.23.50.113] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-10.2.0.2087-7.000.1014-19824.000 X-TM-AS-Result: No--21.918000-0.000000-31 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No Subject: Re: [pim] 2nd call for adoption of draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-01 as a pim wg work item X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:41:36 -0000 I support the adoption. Thanks, Vaibhav -----Original Message----- From: pim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tina = TSOU Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 7:04 AM To: Tom Taylor Cc: pim@ietf.org Subject: Re: [pim] 2nd call for adoption of draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-su= rvey-report-01 as a pim wg work item Dear all, I support the adoption. Thank you, Tina On Apr 19, 2013, at 5:28 AM, "Tom Taylor" wrote= : > Me too. >=20 > On 18/04/2013 10:36 PM, William Atwood wrote: >> I support adoption of this draft. >>=20 >> Bill >>=20 >>=20 >> On 11/04/2013 12:41 PM, Stig Venaas wrote: >>> We did an adoption call for this document with only a few responses. >>> Some comments were made and the document was just updated based on=20 >>> those. We had good support for adoption in the meeting and the=20 >>> process that this is part of. We would still like to do a quick=20 >>> adoption call on the list to see what people think though. >>>=20 >>> This document contains the results from the implementation survey we=20 >>> did in order to advance RFC 4601 on the standards track. >>>=20 >>> This message starts an adoption call for >>> draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-01 available at >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zzp-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-repor >>> t-01 >>>=20 >>> Please respond by Friday April 19th whether you believe this=20 >>> document should be adopted, or provide any other comments you may=20 >>> have on the draft. >>>=20 >>> Stig >>>=20 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> pim mailing list >>> pim@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim >>=20 > _______________________________________________ > pim mailing list > pim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim _______________________________________________ pim mailing list pim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim From Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com Thu Apr 25 14:30:34 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643DC21F96CD for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:30:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JygpDZ-ZNVXQ for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:30:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039DA21F96E5 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:30:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AQU64366; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 21:30:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 22:29:52 +0100 Received: from DFWEML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.134) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 22:30:27 +0100 Received: from DFWEML513-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.156]) by dfweml408-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.134]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:30:25 -0700 From: Tina TSOU To: Stig Venaas Thread-Topic: [pim] Please respond! Re: draft-ietf-pim-explicit-tracking pim 2nd wglc Thread-Index: AQHOQduwdWFxWyDP4E2zOyu5k1ZzaJjndHtN Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 21:30:24 +0000 Message-ID: <636F6772-109A-41C4-8674-14AE660FF496@huawei.com> References: <5175B9DB.3020403@venaas.com>,<51796AF5.6040702@venaas.com> In-Reply-To: <51796AF5.6040702@venaas.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Cc: "pim@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [pim] Please respond! Re: draft-ietf-pim-explicit-tracking pim 2nd wglc X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 21:30:34 -0000 Dear all, The current version looks good to me. Thank you, Tina On Apr 25, 2013, at 10:38 AM, "Stig Venaas" wrote: > Not many replies yet! We have one more week, please review this > document. It will be hard for us to make progress if we don't get > any responses. >=20 > Stig >=20 > On 22.04.2013 15:29, Stig Venaas wrote: >> We did a last call for this document in February, but we got hardly any >> responses, so it was hard for us chairs to know whether the WG indeed >> was happy with the latest revision. >>=20 >> We are now attempting another last call. Please respond to this so that >> we can have some progress in the working group. We need to know whether >> you are happy with the current version, or if you have any issues that >> need to be addressed. >>=20 >> This call ends Monday May 6th. >>=20 >> Stig >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> pim mailing list >> pim@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim >=20 > _______________________________________________ > pim mailing list > pim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim From gaoxlh@gmail.com Thu Apr 25 17:29:22 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031D921F9745 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:29:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.463 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g8hEd438KND1 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:29:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pd0-f177.google.com (mail-pd0-f177.google.com [209.85.192.177]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8A821F9147 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:29:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pd0-f177.google.com with SMTP id p11so2088061pdj.8 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:29:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:cc:references:subject:message-id:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+PJ07HAPE0IfdFCmxAOLY545bLhB+led8SQ0ZOZfpKI=; b=JLHesOJDn3PNoCr/7tp8adm85Ifj6j3gD516am2/07QpuxzhMjlT32EtLPSNyyLxgs zoASTUvSQ/duVFNcebPN0Bj7QAmDYbTZ0ILU97rrVblZEnNxlu/bngOx7hKNx6ckwnCT jkl5/leVRv0IgkKv8cJ3tv5wkIfNK+RA/8AgHuLD+azN65+TdNm6Hi2pmJXGPlZRFyap /1NEUK8LOpkESSamrB6e32y5c7GZwOa4e6oVSwy62gBSsmqOZFur2UZdjDwmMhV50Uc2 0uihNUWu42FudC24/XwTa2sU8qJJAR1eZXAbiM3SrLa9RKKGdTeSnxphxCsUg/VCTwdf tbnA== X-Received: by 10.66.222.228 with SMTP id qp4mr44175786pac.113.1366936161115; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:29:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from admin-PC ([221.130.41.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gi2sm9227361pbb.2.2013.04.25.17.29.18 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:29:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:29:14 +0800 From: "Shuai Gao" To: "Stig Venaas" References: , <5175B9DB.3020403@venaas.com>, <51796AF5.6040702@venaas.com> Message-ID: <201304260829123144603@gmail.com> X-mailer: Foxmail 6, 14, 103, 30 [cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Cc: pim Subject: Re: [pim] Please respond! Re: draft-ietf-pim-explicit-tracking pim 2ndwglc X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:29:22 -0000 RGVhciBGb2xrcywNCglJIHN1cHBvcnQgdGhlIGFkb3B0aW9uIG9mIHRoZSBjdXJyZW50IHZlcnNp b24uDQoNClJlZ2FyZHMsDQpTaHVhaQ0KCQ0KDQo9PT09PT09IDIwMTMtMDQtMjYgMDE6Mzg6MTcg xPrU2sC00MXW0NC0tcCjuj09PT09PT0NCg0KPk5vdCBtYW55IHJlcGxpZXMgeWV0ISBXZSBoYXZl IG9uZSBtb3JlIHdlZWssIHBsZWFzZSByZXZpZXcgdGhpcw0KPmRvY3VtZW50LiBJdCB3aWxsIGJl IGhhcmQgZm9yIHVzIHRvIG1ha2UgcHJvZ3Jlc3MgaWYgd2UgZG9uJ3QgZ2V0DQo+YW55IHJlc3Bv bnNlcy4NCj4NCj5TdGlnDQo+DQo+T24gMjIuMDQuMjAxMyAxNToyOSwgU3RpZyBWZW5hYXMgd3Jv dGU6DQo+PiBXZSBkaWQgYSBsYXN0IGNhbGwgZm9yIHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgaW4gRmVicnVhcnks IGJ1dCB3ZSBnb3QgaGFyZGx5IGFueQ0KPj4gcmVzcG9uc2VzLCBzbyBpdCB3YXMgaGFyZCBmb3Ig dXMgY2hhaXJzIHRvIGtub3cgd2hldGhlciB0aGUgV0cgaW5kZWVkDQo+PiB3YXMgaGFwcHkgd2l0 aCB0aGUgbGF0ZXN0IHJldmlzaW9uLg0KPj4NCj4+IFdlIGFyZSBub3cgYXR0ZW1wdGluZyBhbm90 aGVyIGxhc3QgY2FsbC4gUGxlYXNlIHJlc3BvbmQgdG8gdGhpcyBzbyB0aGF0DQo+PiB3ZSBjYW4g aGF2ZSBzb21lIHByb2dyZXNzIGluIHRoZSB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwLiBXZSBuZWVkIHRvIGtub3cg d2hldGhlcg0KPj4geW91IGFyZSBoYXBweSB3aXRoIHRoZSBjdXJyZW50IHZlcnNpb24sIG9yIGlm IHlvdSBoYXZlIGFueSBpc3N1ZXMgdGhhdA0KPj4gbmVlZCB0byBiZSBhZGRyZXNzZWQuDQo+Pg0K Pj4gVGhpcyBjYWxsIGVuZHMgTW9uZGF5IE1heSA2dGguDQo+Pg0KPj4gU3RpZw0KPj4NCj4+IF9f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQo+PiBwaW0gbWFp bGluZyBsaXN0DQo+PiBwaW1AaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj4+IGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxt YW4vbGlzdGluZm8vcGltDQo+DQo+X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX18NCj5waW0gbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQo+cGltQGlldGYub3JnDQo+aHR0cHM6Ly93 d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9waW0NCg0KPSA9ID0gPSA9ID0gPSA9ID0gPSA9 ID0gPSA9ID0gPSA9ID0gPSA9DQoJCQkNCg0KoaGhoaGhoaGhoaGhoaGhodbCDQrA8aOhDQogDQoJ CQkJIA0KU2h1YWkgR2FvDQpBc3NvY2lhdGUgUHJvZmVzc29yDQpOYXRpb25hbCBFbmdpbmVlcmlu ZyBMYWIgZm9yIE5leHQgR2VuZXJhdGlvbiBJbnRlcm5ldCBJbnRlcmNvbm5lY3Rpb24gRGV2aWNl cw0KQmVpamluZyBKaWFvdG9uZyBVbml2ZXJzaXR5DQpCZWlqaW5nLCBDaGluYSwgMTAwMDQ0DQpn YW94bGhAZ21haWwuY29tDQoyMDEzLTA0LTI2DQoNCg== From sfigueiredo@av.it.pt Fri Apr 26 02:47:56 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7475F21F9851 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 02:47:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.299 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LUkXvBijkZee for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 02:47:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from av.it.pt (mail.av.it.pt [193.136.92.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21B021F980A for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 02:47:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [213.22.3.34] (account sfigueiredo@av.it.pt HELO [192.168.0.103]) by av.it.pt (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.2) with ESMTPSA id 68915863; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:47:51 +0100 Message-ID: <517A4D45.4080108@av.it.pt> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:47:49 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9rgio?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stig Venaas References: <5175B9DB.3020403@venaas.com> <51796AF5.6040702@venaas.com> In-Reply-To: <51796AF5.6040702@venaas.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: pim@ietf.org Subject: Re: [pim] Please respond! Re: draft-ietf-pim-explicit-tracking pim 2nd wglc X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:47:56 -0000 Hi, I support the adoption of this draft. Regards, Sérgio Em 25/04/2013 18:42, Stig Venaas escreveu: > Not many replies yet! We have one more week, please review this > document. It will be hard for us to make progress if we don't get > any responses. > > Stig > > On 22.04.2013 15:29, Stig Venaas wrote: >> We did a last call for this document in February, but we got hardly any >> responses, so it was hard for us chairs to know whether the WG indeed >> was happy with the latest revision. >> >> We are now attempting another last call. Please respond to this so that >> we can have some progress in the working group. We need to know whether >> you are happy with the current version, or if you have any issues that >> need to be addressed. >> >> This call ends Monday May 6th. >> >> Stig >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pim mailing list >> pim@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim > > _______________________________________________ > pim mailing list > pim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim From seiljeon@av.it.pt Fri Apr 26 05:42:16 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F65B21F9888 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 05:42:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xxnN08JnUMFm for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 05:42:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from av.it.pt (mail.av.it.pt [193.136.92.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E76F21F983F for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 05:42:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [193.136.93.128] (account seiljeon@av.it.pt HELO SeilATNOG) by av.it.pt (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.2) with ESMTPSA id 68918383; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:42:13 +0100 From: "Seil Jeon" To: "'Stig Venaas'" References: <5175B9DB.3020403@venaas.com> <51796AF5.6040702@venaas.com> In-Reply-To: <51796AF5.6040702@venaas.com> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:42:14 +0100 Message-ID: <002601ce427b$7b05a060$7110e120$@av.it.pt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQFzod5Og4CnKW3dRG27lJA+jTQjbQHfvxYZAkYYgeSZfIOuUA== Content-Language: ko Cc: pim@ietf.org Subject: Re: [pim] Please respond! Re: draft-ietf-pim-explicit-tracking pim 2nd wglc X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:42:16 -0000 I think current shape of this document becomes stabilized and it is ready to go further. Therefore, I support the adoption of this draft. Regards, Seil -----Original Message----- From: pim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stig Venaas Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 6:42 PM To: pim@ietf.org Subject: [pim] Please respond! Re: draft-ietf-pim-explicit-tracking pim 2nd wglc Not many replies yet! We have one more week, please review this document. It will be hard for us to make progress if we don't get any responses. Stig On 22.04.2013 15:29, Stig Venaas wrote: > We did a last call for this document in February, but we got hardly > any responses, so it was hard for us chairs to know whether the WG > indeed was happy with the latest revision. > > We are now attempting another last call. Please respond to this so > that we can have some progress in the working group. We need to know > whether you are happy with the current version, or if you have any > issues that need to be addressed. > > This call ends Monday May 6th. > > Stig > > _______________________________________________ > pim mailing list > pim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim _______________________________________________ pim mailing list pim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim From lmcm@tid.es Fri Apr 26 05:42:20 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9C621F9913 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 05:42:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o6FPh4E14Wcp for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 05:42:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tidos.tid.es (tidos.tid.es [195.235.93.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B16E21F9910 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 05:42:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sbrightmailg01.hi.inet (sbrightmailg01.hi.inet [10.95.64.104]) by tid.hi.inet (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0MLV005W94MCEB@tid.hi.inet> for pim@ietf.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:42:17 +0200 (MEST) Received: from tid (tid.hi.inet [10.95.64.10]) by sbrightmailg01.hi.inet (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id B4.72.01293.9267A715; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:42:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from correo.tid.es (mailhost.hi.inet [10.95.64.100]) by tid.hi.inet (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0MLV005X84MHEB@tid.hi.inet> for pim@ietf.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:42:17 +0200 (MEST) Received: from EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet ([169.254.2.38]) by EX10-HTCAS8-MAD.hi.inet ([fe80::41c8:e965:8a6:de67%11]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:42:17 +0200 Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:42:02 +0000 From: LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO In-reply-to: <51796AF5.6040702@venaas.com> X-Originating-IP: [10.95.64.115] To: "pim@ietf.org" Message-id: <823234EF5C7C334998D973D822FF801B44F49997@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-language: es-ES Content-transfer-encoding: base64 Accept-Language: es-ES, en-US Thread-topic: [pim] Please respond! Re: draft-ietf-pim-explicit-tracking pim 2nd wglc Thread-index: AQHOQdum71zgtlGcfk6rA3GahJOkO5joaaCw X-AuditID: 0a5f4068-b7f006d00000050d-a6-517a762945fd X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrNLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXCFe/ApatZVhVo8LtN2OLLw5vMDoweS5b8 ZApgjOKySUnNySxLLdK3S+DK2LBMo2CNXMXKfedYGhhPyHYxcnJICJhI7JzwjA3CFpO4cG89 kM3FISSwkVHi3qkLzBDON0aJqcvuMEE4Gxgllj5bzAzSwiKgKvHq3wawdjYBQ4lZOyexgtjC AmESW/tXs4PYnAJaEutvNjFDrFCQ+HPuMQuILSKgKNE+twWonoODWcBU4m+DIUiYV8Bb4sKX RywQtqDEj8n3WCBK1CWmTMkFCTMLiEvM+TWRFcJWlJi2qIERxGYUkJVYef40I0i5iEC4xJPf dhCLjCQW/D8L9aOAxJI956GOEZV4+fgfK8RXExgltj2ZyDaBUXwWks2zEDbPQrJ5FpLNCxhZ VjGKFScVZaZnlOQmZuakGxjqZWTqZeallmxihERQxg7G5TtVDjEKcDAq8fDeiMgLFGJNLCuu zD3EKMHBrCTCmxpdFSjEm5JYWZValB9fVJqTWnyIkYmDU6qBkfuodsTuzT/3LdumosdUbNjW WbWn8IV1vP3BW37Sey+/4Tj54qrArc0syh9js+dqLz/VL+3fmPXF2Kqy7cW3Ga39+/fvv7aw uPCg18PL03ffVBetOizheWD53PgF8183Z3kc0got2GV6+/LBwxmzFnSpPrumkLHNio8nfm9H 47xDXxT3/5nzPkKJpTgj0VCLuag4EQCaKIymfgIAAA== References: <5175B9DB.3020403@venaas.com> <51796AF5.6040702@venaas.com> Subject: Re: [pim] Please respond! Re: draft-ietf-pim-explicit-tracking pim 2nd wglc X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:42:20 -0000 SGkgYWxsLA0KDQpJIHN1cHBvcnQgdGhlIGFkb3B0aW9uIG9mIHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQuDQoNCkkg aGF2ZSBqdXN0IHR3byBjb21tZW50cy4NCg0KT24gc2VjdGlvbiA2LCAiQ29tcGF0aWJpbGl0eSB3 aXRoIE9sZGVyIFZlcnNpb24gcHJvdG9jb2xzIiBpdCBzaG91bGQgYmUgY29udmVuaWVudCB0byBp bmNsdWRlIGFuIGV4cGxpY2l0IHJlZmVyZW5jZSBmb3IgdGhlIGJlaGF2aW9yIHRvIGJlIGZvbGxv d2VkIGZvciBkdWFsIHN0YWNrIGRldmljZXMuDQoNCk9uIHNlY3Rpb24gOCwgIlNlY3VyaXR5IENv bnNpZGVyYXRpb25zIiwgbGlua2luZyB3aXRoIFN0aWcncyBjb21tZW50IGFib3V0IHRoZSBtYXhp bXVtIGFtb3VudCBvZiBtZW1iZXJzaGlwcy4gSW4gbXkgdW5kZXJzdGFuZGluZywgd2hhdCBpdCBp cyBleHBsaWNpdGx5IGltcGFjdGluZyB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IGlzIHRoZSBudW1iZXIgb2YgbWVt YmVyc2hpcCBzdGF0ZSByZWdpc3RlcnMgdGhhdCBjYW4gYmUgdXBkYXRlZC9jcmVhdGVkIGR1ZSB0 byBtYXNzaXZlIHN1YnNjcmlwdGlvbnMuIFNvIEkgaWRlbnRpZmllZCB0d28gaXNzdWVzOiB3aGF0 IHRvIGRvIHdpdGggdGhlIHN1YnNjcmlwdGlvbiByZXF1ZXN0IGZyb20gdGhlIHBvaW50IG9mIHZp ZXcgb2Ygc2VydmljZSBkZWxpdmVyeSwgYW5kIHdoYXQgdG8gZG8gd2l0aCB0aGUgc3Vic2NyaXB0 aW9uIHJlcXVlc3QgZnJvbSB0aGUgcG9pbnQgb2YgdmlldyBvZiB0cmFja2luZy4gVGhlIGxhdHRl ciBpcyB0aGUgb25lIHJlbGV2YW50IGZvciB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50LiBTbyBwcm9iYWJseSB0aGUg ZGV2aWNlIG9uIGhpZ2ggbG9hZCBjb3VsZCBhdHRlbmQgdGhlIHN1YnNjcmlwdGlvbnMgYnV0IG5v dCByZWdpc3RlciB0aGUgY29ycmVzcG9uZGluZyBzdGF0ZSB0byBzYXZlIHJlc291cmNlcy4NCkZp bmFsbHkgaXQgaXMgbWVudGlvbmVkIHRoYXQgYSBwb3NzaWJsZSBsaW1pdCBjb3VsZCBiZSBlc3Rh Ymxpc2hlZCBmb3IgdGhlIGFtb3VudCBvZiBtZW1iZXJzaGlwIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIGEgZGV2aWNl IGNvdWxkIHN0b3JlIHBlciBob3N0LiBJbiB0aGUgY2FzZSB0aGF0IHRoZSBob3N0IGlzIGFjdGlu ZyBhcyBJR01QL01MRCBwcm94eSwgdGhlIG51bWJlciBvZiBwb3RlbnRpYWwgbWVtYmVyc2hpcCBz dGF0ZXMgY291bGQgYmUgaHVnZSwgc28gYSBwb3NzaWJsZSBpbmRpY2F0aW9uIG9mIHRoYXQgY291 bGQgYmUgaW5jbHVkZWQuDQoNClRoYW5rcywNCg0KQmVzdCByZWdhcmRzLA0KDQpMdWlzDQoNCi0t LS0tTWVuc2FqZSBvcmlnaW5hbC0tLS0tDQpEZTogcGltLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmcgW21haWx0 bzpwaW0tYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10gRW4gbm9tYnJlIGRlIFN0aWcgVmVuYWFzDQpFbnZpYWRv IGVsOiBqdWV2ZXMsIDI1IGRlIGFicmlsIGRlIDIwMTMgMTk6NDINClBhcmE6IHBpbUBpZXRmLm9y Zw0KQXN1bnRvOiBbcGltXSBQbGVhc2UgcmVzcG9uZCEgUmU6IGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtcGltLWV4cGxp Y2l0LXRyYWNraW5nIHBpbSAybmQgd2dsYw0KDQpOb3QgbWFueSByZXBsaWVzIHlldCEgV2UgaGF2 ZSBvbmUgbW9yZSB3ZWVrLCBwbGVhc2UgcmV2aWV3IHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQuIEl0IHdpbGwgYmUg aGFyZCBmb3IgdXMgdG8gbWFrZSBwcm9ncmVzcyBpZiB3ZSBkb24ndCBnZXQgYW55IHJlc3BvbnNl cy4NCg0KU3RpZw0KDQpPbiAyMi4wNC4yMDEzIDE1OjI5LCBTdGlnIFZlbmFhcyB3cm90ZToNCj4g V2UgZGlkIGEgbGFzdCBjYWxsIGZvciB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IGluIEZlYnJ1YXJ5LCBidXQgd2Ug Z290IGhhcmRseQ0KPiBhbnkgcmVzcG9uc2VzLCBzbyBpdCB3YXMgaGFyZCBmb3IgdXMgY2hhaXJz IHRvIGtub3cgd2hldGhlciB0aGUgV0cNCj4gaW5kZWVkIHdhcyBoYXBweSB3aXRoIHRoZSBsYXRl c3QgcmV2aXNpb24uDQo+DQo+IFdlIGFyZSBub3cgYXR0ZW1wdGluZyBhbm90aGVyIGxhc3QgY2Fs bC4gUGxlYXNlIHJlc3BvbmQgdG8gdGhpcyBzbw0KPiB0aGF0IHdlIGNhbiBoYXZlIHNvbWUgcHJv Z3Jlc3MgaW4gdGhlIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXAuIFdlIG5lZWQgdG8ga25vdw0KPiB3aGV0aGVyIHlv dSBhcmUgaGFwcHkgd2l0aCB0aGUgY3VycmVudCB2ZXJzaW9uLCBvciBpZiB5b3UgaGF2ZSBhbnkN Cj4gaXNzdWVzIHRoYXQgbmVlZCB0byBiZSBhZGRyZXNzZWQuDQo+DQo+IFRoaXMgY2FsbCBlbmRz IE1vbmRheSBNYXkgNnRoLg0KPg0KPiBTdGlnDQo+DQo+IF9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQo+IHBpbSBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCj4gcGltQGlldGYu b3JnDQo+IGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vcGltDQoNCl9fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQpwaW0gbWFpbGluZyBs aXN0DQpwaW1AaWV0Zi5vcmcNCmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8v cGltDQoNCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQoNCkVzdGUgbWVuc2FqZSBz ZSBkaXJpZ2UgZXhjbHVzaXZhbWVudGUgYSBzdSBkZXN0aW5hdGFyaW8uIFB1ZWRlIGNvbnN1bHRh ciBudWVzdHJhIHBvbMOtdGljYSBkZSBlbnbDrW8geSByZWNlcGNpw7NuIGRlIGNvcnJlbyBlbGVj dHLDs25pY28gZW4gZWwgZW5sYWNlIHNpdHVhZG8gbcOhcyBhYmFqby4NClRoaXMgbWVzc2FnZSBp cyBpbnRlbmRlZCBleGNsdXNpdmVseSBmb3IgaXRzIGFkZHJlc3NlZS4gV2Ugb25seSBzZW5kIGFu ZCByZWNlaXZlIGVtYWlsIG9uIHRoZSBiYXNpcyBvZiB0aGUgdGVybXMgc2V0IG91dCBhdDoNCmh0 dHA6Ly93d3cudGlkLmVzL0VTL1BBR0lOQVMvZGlzY2xhaW1lci5hc3B4DQo= From johnsonhammond1@hushmail.com Sat Apr 27 14:59:06 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762AE21F9778 for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 14:59:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.463 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.136, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id shBJjF+N9SOJ for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 14:59:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1.hushmail.com (smtp1a.hushmail.com [65.39.178.236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4356721F8930 for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 14:59:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1.hushmail.com (smtp1a.hushmail.com [65.39.178.236]) by smtp1.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id AB89530F1A for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 17:29:18 +0000 (UTC) X-hush-relay-time: 212 X-hush-relay-id: b1bd903faba185ee07e5a0ed3a1fde37 Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w5.hushmail.com [65.39.178.80]) by smtp1.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 17:29:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 7336BE6739; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 17:29:18 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 13:29:18 -0400 To: pim@ietf.org From: johnsonhammond1@hushmail.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20130427172918.7336BE6739@smtp.hushmail.com> Subject: [pim] Biggest Fake Conference in Computer Science X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 21:59:06 -0000 Biggest Fake Conference in Computer Science We are researchers from different parts of the world and conducted a study on the world’s biggest bogus computer science conference WORLDCOMP ( http://sites.google.com/site/worlddump1 ) organized by Prof. Hamid Arabnia from University of Georgia, USA. We submitted a fake paper to WORLDCOMP 2011 and again (the same paper with a modified title) to WORLDCOMP 2012. This paper had numerous fundamental mistakes. Sample statements from that paper include: (1). Binary logic is fuzzy logic and vice versa (2). Pascal developed fuzzy logic (3). Object oriented languages do not exhibit any polymorphism or inheritance (4). TCP and IP are synonyms and are part of OSI model (5). Distributed systems deal with only one computer (6). Laptop is an example for a super computer (7). Operating system is an example for computer hardware Also, our paper did not express any conceptual meaning. However, it was accepted both the times without any modifications (and without any reviews) and we were invited to submit the final paper and a payment of $500+ fee to present the paper. We decided to use the fee for better purposes than making Prof. Hamid Arabnia (Chairman of WORLDCOMP) rich. After that, we received few reminders from WORLDCOMP to pay the fee but we never responded. We MUST say that you should look at the above website if you have any thoughts to submit a paper to WORLDCOMP. DBLP and other indexing agencies have stopped indexing WORLDCOMP’s proceedings since 2011 due to its fakeness. See http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/conf/icai/index.html for of one of the conferences of WORLDCOMP and notice that there is no listing after 2010. See Section 2 of http://sites.google.com/site/dumpconf for comments from well-known researchers about WORLDCOMP. The status of your WORLDCOMP papers can be changed from scientific to other (i.e., junk or non-technical) at any time. Better not to have a paper than having it in WORLDCOMP and spoil the resume and peace of mind forever! Our study revealed that WORLDCOMP is a money making business, using University of Georgia mask, for Prof. Hamid Arabnia. He is throwing out a small chunk of that money (around 20 dollars per paper published in WORLDCOMP’s proceedings) to his puppet (Mr. Ashu Solo or A.M.G. Solo) who publicizes WORLDCOMP and also defends it at various forums, using fake/anonymous names. The puppet uses fake names and defames other conferences to divert traffic to WORLDCOMP. He also makes anonymous phone calls and tries to threaten the critiques of WORLDCOMP (See Item 7 of Section 5 of above website). That is, the puppet does all his best to get a maximum number of papers published at WORLDCOMP to get more money into his (and Prof. Hamid Arabnia’s) pockets. Monte Carlo Resort (the venue of WORLDCOMP for more than 10 years, until 2012) has refused to provide the venue for WORLDCOMP’13 because of the fears of their image being tarnished due to WORLDCOMP’s fraudulent activities. That is why WORLDCOMP’13 is taking place at a different resort. WORLDCOMP will not be held after 2013. The draft paper submission deadline is over but still there are no committee members, no reviewers, and there is no conference Chairman. The only contact details available on WORLDCOMP’s website is just an email address! Let us make a direct request to Prof. Hamid arabnia: publish all reviews for all the papers (after blocking identifiable details) since 2000 conference. Reveal the names and affiliations of all the reviewers (for each year) and how many papers each reviewer had reviewed on average. We also request him to look at the Open Challenge (Section 6) at https://sites.google.com/site/moneycomp1 Sorry for posting to multiple lists. Spreading the word is the only way to stop this bogus conference. Please forward this message to other mailing lists and people. We are shocked with Prof. Hamid Arabnia and his puppet’s activities http://worldcomp-fake-bogus.blogspot.com Search Google using the keyword worldcomp fake for additional links. From asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp Mon Apr 29 21:07:34 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B506221F9B9D for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 21:07:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZUxytdi27fCU for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 21:07:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (ns.sfc.wide.ad.jp [IPv6:2001:200:0:8803:203:178:142:143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD6021F9B5D for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 21:07:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [133.69.32.86]) by mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C11B2278089; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 13:07:31 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 13:07:32 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20130430.130732.146086312.asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp> To: stig@venaas.com From: Hitoshi Asaeda In-Reply-To: <5175BF4D.5020109@venaas.com> References: <5175B9DB.3020403@venaas.com> <5175BF4D.5020109@venaas.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 22.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: pim@ietf.org Subject: Re: [pim] draft-ietf-pim-explicit-tracking pim 2nd wglc X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 04:07:34 -0000 Hi Stig, > The document looks good, but I see two possible issues. Thanks for your review. > Section 3.1 seems to talk too much about implementation details. In > particular the sentence "In order to simplify the implementation, the > explicit tracking function MAY NOT keep the state of (S,G) joined with > EXCLUDE filter mode." > > I think it's wrong here to say what the implementation MAY NOT do, in > particular if it is just a simplification. Advice is OK, but not > strict requirements for an internal implementation detail. I understand. I'd replace "MAY NOT" to "may not". > The security considerations could be improved a bit. Potential issues > of > maintaining state are discussed, and a rate limit on membership > information. First of all, I don't think it is a rate limit, it's > should > be a limit on the maximum amount of memberships at any time. I think. I agree. I'd change the sentence in the security section as follws. In order to prevent abuse, a router enabling the explicit tracking function may need to limit a total amount of membership information the router can store and an amount of membership information the router can store per host. > Further, it should be pointed out that an attack could either cause > some > members to not be tracked, or some members to not be able to join and > receive. Whether report senders are malicious or not, the router can track their IP addresses (of course it assumes no address spoofing here, though). I'd say what the router should do is rate-limiting IGMP/MLD report transmissions per host. Do you agree on adding the following paragraph in the security section? A router may rate-limit State-Change Report messages per host. When the router enables rate-limiting per host, the router MAY ignore the received State-Change Report messages to minimize the processing overhead or prevent DoS attacks. The rate limit is left to the router's implementation. BTW, while the rate limit itself is left to the router's implementation, is it better to specify the default timer value for the rate-limiting function? Or it is not necessary to specify it (as it depends on the implementation)? Regards, -- Hitoshi Asaeda From asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp Mon Apr 29 21:18:56 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3B721F9B6E for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 21:18:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24Ji6yhsQFfn for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 21:18:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (ns.sfc.wide.ad.jp [IPv6:2001:200:0:8803:203:178:142:143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C8721F9B84 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 21:18:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [133.69.32.86]) by mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B24B3278087; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 13:18:53 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 13:18:54 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20130430.131854.66950082.asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp> To: lmcm@tid.es From: Hitoshi Asaeda In-Reply-To: <823234EF5C7C334998D973D822FF801B44F49997@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <5175B9DB.3020403@venaas.com> <51796AF5.6040702@venaas.com> <823234EF5C7C334998D973D822FF801B44F49997@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 22.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: pim@ietf.org Subject: Re: [pim] Please respond! Re: draft-ietf-pim-explicit-tracking pim 2nd wglc X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 04:18:56 -0000 Hi Luis, Thanks for your review. > On section 6, "Compatibility with Older Version protocols" it should > be convenient to include an explicit reference for the behavior to > be followed for dual stack devices. Ok, I'll add rfc3376 and 3810 as the references. > On section 8, "Security Considerations", linking with Stig's comment > about the maximum amount of memberships. In my understanding, what > it is explicitly impacting this document is the number of membership > state registers that can be updated/created due to massive > subscriptions. So I identified two issues: what to do with the > subscription request from the point of view of service delivery, and > what to do with the subscription request from the point of view of > tracking. The latter is the one relevant for this document. Exactly. This document is relevant to the latter one. > So probably the device on high load could attend the subscriptions but > not register the corresponding state to save resources. Agree. > Finally it is mentioned that a possible limit could be established > for the amount of membership information a device could store per > host. In the case that the host is acting as IGMP/MLD proxy, the > number of potential membership states could be huge, so a possible > indication of that could be included. Well, IMO, whether an IGMP/MLD proxy is attached or not, potentially the number of tracked member hosts can be huge in some situation. Nevertheless, I agree on adding rfc4605 as one potential example would be good. Thanks. Regards, -- Hitoshi Asaeda From bharat_joshi@infosys.com Tue Apr 30 02:06:56 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C4A21F9BE4 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 02:06:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I-VtnW0MHgG3 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 02:06:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kecgate06.infosys.com (kecgate06.infosys.com [122.98.14.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3418B21F9A93 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 02:06:50 -0700 (PDT) X-TM-IMSS-Message-ID: <3d65c0fe00092937@infosys.com> Received: from blrkechub01.ad.infosys.com ([10.66.236.41]) by infosys.com ([122.98.14.33]) with ESMTP (TREND IMSS SMTP Service 7.1) id 3d65c0fe00092937 ; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:41:15 +0530 Received: from BLRKECHUB09.ad.infosys.com (10.66.236.139) by blrkechub01.ad.infosys.com (10.66.236.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:36:14 +0530 Received: from BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com ([fe80::c43d:ba67:abc0:11c3]) by Blrkechub09.ad.infosys.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:36:13 +0530 From: Bharat Joshi To: Stig Venaas , "pim@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [pim] Please respond! Re: draft-ietf-pim-explicit-tracking pim 2nd wglc Thread-Index: AQHOQduqGQSf6F+FGk6WsRG8zxIhsJjufku8 Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:06:13 +0000 Message-ID: <35347FBF2796F94E936EE76C0E6047ED32E39BD4@BLRKECMBX13.ad.infosys.com> References: <5175B9DB.3020403@venaas.com>,<51796AF5.6040702@venaas.com> In-Reply-To: <51796AF5.6040702@venaas.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.200.132] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [pim] Please respond! Re: draft-ietf-pim-explicit-tracking pim 2nd wglc X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:06:56 -0000 Dear Hitoshi Asaeda, I know I am a bit late in reviewing this draft. I was really held = up with other things on my plate. Please find my questions/suggestions I have on this draft. Regards, Bharat 1. In Abstract, can we remove the usage of 'fast leave' and just keep 'sh= ortening leave latency'. A quick google search on 'fast leave' shows that= it is a known term in the context of IGMPv2 where a router does not send= the group specific query and stops forwarding multicast traffic for the = group on that interface. As here 'fast leave' is not referring to a simil= ar behavior, I suggest to use 'shortening leave latency' instead. 2. In second para of section 1, can we also mention that to avoid loss of= unsolicited reports, each unsolicited report is sent out at least robust= ness count times. After this, we can talk about queries as mentioned in t= his para. 3. In third par of section 1, first sentence seems complex to me. Multicast routers are capable of periodically maintaining the multicast membership state of downstream hosts attached to the same link by acquiring unsolicited report messages and synchronizing the actual membership state within the General Query timer interval (i.e., [Query Interval] value defined in [1][2].) Can we reword the above to as mentioned below or something on these lines= : Multicast routers learn multicast membership state of downstream hosts by unsolicited report messages. Multicast routers send periodic queries to keep the membership state synchronized by solicited report messages. 4. As its mentioned that 'explicit tracking function does not guarantee t= hat the membership state will always be perfectly synchronized', should t= he task 'Per-host accounting' using this function be really done? It may = give incorrect results and to some providers, accounting is very importan= t. Right? 5. Can you please elaborate on 'Maintaining multicast channel characteris= tics'? What channel characteristics we are referring here? Also how does = explicit tracking function helps in this? 6. In section 3.1, I did not get the need of "If there are no more receiv= ers maintained, the router may keep the membership state information with an empty receiver list.". Does this for any specific purpose? If so, can we add= this in the draft. 7. Should not 'Membership State Information' be deleted when the correspo= nding multicast channel times out in the router? The router should not be= maintaining this multicast channel state information forever. For exampl= e: if the last hosts who had joined a channel goes down without sending a= leave request. 8. In section 3.2, in first sentence, In accordance with [1] and [2], whenever a router receives the State- Change Report, it sends the corresponding Group-Specific or Group- and-Source Specific Query messages to confirm whether or not the report sender is the sole member host. Can we reword the above because router does not always send Group-Specifi= c or Group- and-Source Specific Query messages whenever it receives a State-Change Re= port? We can reword it to: In accordance with [1] and [2], whenever a router receives the State- Change Report, it might send the corresponding Group-Specific or Group- and-Source Specific Query messages to confirm whether or not the report sender was the sole member host. Please also note the change of 'is' to 'was' in the last part of the sent= ence. 9. In section 3.2, in para 3, "This is in order to confirm whether or not= the host is the sole member." -> "This is in order to confirm whether or not the h= ost was the sole member." 10. In section 3.3, second para, what I infer from the first sentence is = that router prunes the channel after LMQI and LLQI. This does not look co= rrect. Later in the same para, last sentence correct this by mentioning L= MQT and LLQT is the total time router wait after the first query is sent,= to prune the channel. Can we fix the first sentence here? 11. A similar issue exist when LMQC and LLQC is explained in the above pa= ra. 12. Last para of section 3.3 tries to describe how a lower values of LMQI= /LMQC then the default suggested, can shorten the leave latency. But it d= oes not clearly articulate how explicit tracking function helps if the tw= o parameters are configured to the lower values. Can we add some details = on that here? 13. In section 4, in 3rd para, in following sentence: The second case occurs when a router sends a specific query but does not receive a State-Change Report from a downstream host within an LMQT or LLQT period. I think when a host receives specific query, it generates a current-state report. Right? 14. As host membership protocols are unreliable, there will always be a p= ossibility of outdated membership state as packets may get lost. I am not= sure how does explicit tracking function lowers this possibility. 15. In section 4, last para seems to explain how to fix the outdated memb= ership state that is introduced because of explicit tracking function in = a router while the section header seems to suggest that explicit tracking= function can lower the possibility of outdated membership state. 16. In section 5, in first para, we established that a MLD report receive= d with unspecified source address is discarded then in second para, we me= ntion that no membership-state information is created for such a request.= So should we reword this to talk about only IGMP case here. 17. In section 6, in first para, its mentioned that explicit tracking doe= s not work with older version of protocol. If I am not mistaken, fast/imm= ediate leave implemented by some vendors do explicit tracking of the host= . While I agree that hosts does report suppression but that happens only = in case its a solicited report. First few (robustness count) unsolicited = reports are usually enough to track the host. 18. In section 6, should not we talk about how the membership state infor= mation is deleted when the version is lowered and the channel is no more = required. 19. If we can assume that the robustness count configured in a router tru= ly represents the robustness of that network and if a packet is sent this= many times, the intended destination will receive the packet at least on= ce, this whole draft can be simplified a lot. There is no need to generat= e group or group-source specific queries even when all the hosts have lef= t that channel. I am sure there is something I have missed because this i= s how fast/immediate leave is implemented for older version of protocols. ________________________________________ From: pim-bounces@ietf.org [pim-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Stig Venaa= s [stig@venaas.com] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 11:12 PM To: pim@ietf.org Subject: [pim] Please respond! Re: draft-ietf-pim-explicit-tracking pim 2= nd wglc Not many replies yet! We have one more week, please review this document. It will be hard for us to make progress if we don't get any responses. Stig On 22.04.2013 15:29, Stig Venaas wrote: > We did a last call for this document in February, but we got hardly any > responses, so it was hard for us chairs to know whether the WG indeed > was happy with the latest revision. > > We are now attempting another last call. Please respond to this so that > we can have some progress in the working group. We need to know whether > you are happy with the current version, or if you have any issues that > need to be addressed. > > This call ends Monday May 6th. > > Stig > > _______________________________________________ > pim mailing list > pim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim _______________________________________________ pim mailing list pim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim **************** CAUTION - Disclaimer ***************** This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended sol= ely for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, p= lease notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you= are not to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other= person and any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys h= as taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for = any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry= out your own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserve= s the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from t= his e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on th= e Infosys e-mail system. ***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***