From psamp-bounces@ietf.org Thu Sep 11 02:15:02 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: psamp-text-archive@optimus.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-psamp-text-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275DC3A6904; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:15:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: psamp@ietf.org Delivered-To: psamp@core3.amsl.com Received: by core3.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 6E7663A6904; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:15:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart" Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20080911091501.6E7663A6904@core3.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:15:01 -0700 (PDT) Cc: psamp@ietf.org Subject: [PSAMP] I-D Action:draft-ietf-psamp-info-10.txt X-BeenThere: psamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "This mailing list is used for discussion within the IETF packet sampling \(PSAMP\) WG" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: psamp-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: psamp-bounces@ietf.org --NextPart A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Packet Sampling Working Group of the IETF. Title : Information Model for Packet Sampling Exports Author(s) : T. Dietz, et al. Filename : draft-ietf-psamp-info-10.txt Pages : 53 Date : 2008-09-11 This memo defines an information model for the Packet Sampling (PSAMP) protocol. It is used by the PSAMP protocol for encoding sampled packet data and information related to the Sampling process. As the PSAMP protocol is based on the IPFIX protocol, this information model is an extension to the IPFIX information model.Conventions used in this document The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-psamp-info-10.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the Internet-Draft. --NextPart Content-Type: Message/External-body; name="draft-ietf-psamp-info-10.txt"; site="ftp.ietf.org"; access-type="anon-ftp"; directory="internet-drafts" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <2008-09-11020238.I-D@ietf.org> --NextPart Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ PSAMP mailing list PSAMP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/psamp --NextPart-- From psamp-bounces@ietf.org Mon Sep 15 08:56:55 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: psamp-text-archive@optimus.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-psamp-text-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F06A3A6AFD; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 08:56:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: psamp@ietf.org Delivered-To: psamp@core3.amsl.com Received: by core3.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 30) id AE89D28C130; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 07:51:03 -0700 (PDT) X-idtracker: yes To: IETF-Announce From: The IESG Message-Id: <20080915145103.AE89D28C130@core3.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 07:51:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 08:56:53 -0700 Cc: psamp@ietf.org Subject: [PSAMP] Last Call: draft-ietf-psamp-info (Information Model for Packet Sampling Exports) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: psamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: "This mailing list is used for discussion within the IETF packet sampling \(PSAMP\) WG" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: psamp-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: psamp-bounces@ietf.org The IESG has received a request from the Packet Sampling WG (psamp) to consider the following document: - 'Information Model for Packet Sampling Exports ' as a Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2008-09-29. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. The file can be obtained via http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-psamp-info-10.txt IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=11074&rfc_flag=0 _______________________________________________ PSAMP mailing list PSAMP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/psamp From psamp-bounces@ietf.org Thu Sep 18 07:14:44 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: psamp-text-archive@optimus.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-psamp-text-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940DD3A696D; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:14:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: psamp@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: psamp@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC4C3A696D for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:14:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GQ8uV+6xfb55 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:14:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CA63A6895 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:14:36 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.32,422,1217808000"; d="scan'208";a="20172650" Received: from ams-dkim-2.cisco.com ([144.254.224.139]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Sep 2008 14:14:29 +0000 Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150]) by ams-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m8IEETMX012467; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:14:29 +0200 Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.71.48]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m8IEESsS012090; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:14:28 GMT Received: from [10.61.103.50] (dhcp-10-61-103-50.cisco.com [10.61.103.50]) by cisco.com (8.11.7p3+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id m8IEEN127836; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:14:23 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <48D26242.6050404@cisco.com> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:14:26 +0100 From: Paul Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-GB; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080702 SeaMonkey/1.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Dietz References: <804B13F8F3D94A4AB18B9B01ACB68FA101F5A5F9@EXCHSRV.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <489AB8F2.2050800@cisco.com> <547F018265F92642B577B986577D671C31737D@VENUS.office> In-Reply-To: <547F018265F92642B577B986577D671C31737D@VENUS.office> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=3348; t=1221747269; x=1222611269; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=paitken@cisco.com; z=From:=20Paul=20Aitken=20 |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[PSAMP]=20PSAMP-INFO=20IE=20realtiveErr or=3A=20Open=20Points |Sender:=20; bh=3RTsw8Hqge0GKa10I9pBUu+GSPJws2GHKVeksbUhJCs=; b=qxRj0vzJC4pVX/pWArWpLxzfaQQfyEilBRbDvmJjnTm0Qx9nAUq13E8EXC cFOcKtHmcqnMq+fXRq2K5+9OU8pDp7jhAwWAq3E0AMQevDsQlhJRkKWFsJTj oGicby28Rp; Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-2; header.From=paitken@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim2001 verified; ); Cc: psamp , Juergen Quittek , psamp-chairs@tools.ietf.org, "Zseby, Tanja" Subject: Re: [PSAMP] PSAMP-INFO IE realtiveError: Open Points X-BeenThere: psamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "This mailing list is used for discussion within the IETF packet sampling \(PSAMP\) WG" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: psamp-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: psamp-bounces@ietf.org Thomas, all, > as you may have noticed I just posted a new version of the draft. The > only open points I see are your concerns expressed in the attached > mail... > > If you'd like to have those issues included in the draft then please > suggest text for it. Thanks. See inline: >>>> absoluteError >>>> >>>> This Information Element specifies the maximum possible >>>> measurement error of the reported value for a given Information >>>> Element. The >> >> We should indicate how to connect the *Error values to specific >> fields, eg by using an option with the specific field as scope. >> Else, someone may put the *Error elements adjacent to the relative >> fields in the data record - which could work, but is open to >> misinterpretation. "absoluteError should be used in an option template scoped to the observation to which it refers. See section 3.4.2.1 of RFC 5102." >>>> absoluteError has the same unit as the information element it >>>> is associated to. The real value of the metric can differ by absoluteError >> >> "with" ------^^ ie, "has the same unit as the information element it is associated with". >>>> (positive or negative) from the measured value. This >>>> information element >>>> provides only the error for measured values. If an information element >>>> contains an estimated values (from sampling) the confidence boundaries >>>> and confidence level have to be provided instead. >> >> I would name the IEs: "the confidence boundaries and confidence >> level have to be provided instead (with the upperCILimit, >> lowerCILimit and confidenceLevel). Use the text provided above ^^^^ >>>> relativeError >>>> >>>> This Information Element specifies the maximum possible >>>> measurement error of the reported value for a given Information >>>> Element as percentage of the measured value. The real value of >>>> the metric can differ by relativeError percent (positive or >>>> negative) from the measured >>>> value. This information element provides only the error for >>>> measured values. If an information element contains an >>>> estimated values (from sampling) the confidence boundaries and >>>> confidence level have to be provided instead. >> >> Again, as above, I would specifically name the IEs for this. Use the same text as above. >> We should specify that upperCILimit, lowerCILimit and >> confidenceLevel are all required, and what to do if too few of them >> are provided. In these sections: 8.6.5. upperCILimit 8.6.6. lowerCILimit 8.6.7. confidenceLevel Add Note that the upperCILimit, lowerCILimit and confidenceLevel are all required to specify confidence, and should be disregarded unless all three are specified. >>>> The accuracy for an estimated information element (from >>>> sampling) SHOULD >>>> be reported with confidence limits and confidence >>>> level.[PSAMP-INFO] >> >> Agreed. I'd also like to add something indicating how this can be >> done, eg by using an option with the correct scope. "upperCILimit, lowerCILimit and confidenceLevel should all be used in an option template scoped to the observation to which they refer. See section 3.4.2.1 of RFC 5102." Cheers. -- Paul Aitken Cisco Systems Ltd, Edinburgh, Scotland. _______________________________________________ PSAMP mailing list PSAMP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/psamp From psamp-bounces@ietf.org Thu Sep 18 07:14:44 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: psamp-text-archive@optimus.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-psamp-text-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C963A6D6F; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:14:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: psamp@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: psamp@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1EFB3A6895 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:14:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HuhBpL69Mhxj for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:14:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36CAA3A68E8 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:14:35 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.32,422,1217808000"; d="scan'208";a="20172635" Received: from ams-dkim-2.cisco.com ([144.254.224.139]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Sep 2008 14:14:23 +0000 Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150]) by ams-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m8IEENoI012439; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:14:23 +0200 Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.71.48]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m8IEEMHs012058; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:14:22 GMT Received: from [10.61.103.50] (dhcp-10-61-103-50.cisco.com [10.61.103.50]) by cisco.com (8.11.7p3+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id m8IEEH127812; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:14:17 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <48D2623C.3070102@cisco.com> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:14:20 +0100 From: Paul Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-GB; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080702 SeaMonkey/1.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas.Dietz@nw.neclab.eu, psamp References: <20080911090238.B413B3A67F2@core3.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20080911090238.B413B3A67F2@core3.amsl.com> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=5426; t=1221747263; x=1222611263; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=paitken@cisco.com; z=From:=20Paul=20Aitken=20 |Subject:=20Re=3A=20New=20Version=20Notification=20for=20dr aft-ietf-psamp-info-10 |Sender:=20; bh=17XjZpT4gO2xjc6hPqeZ3CrYg0+uOrdOT8ZDnYBtcZM=; b=ClzbYgcGJvEsL8z4RX/wI+KFD+r1FBAWFUPk/aHCisMe58as/J57bDgMbQ 2BsA17LVfVUo90yaCfKVPDRTmVCl7MrP6BRXWAsWS/m4wfGBPESzDlPJKD5D fiuOKLKUAw; Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-2; header.From=paitken@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim2001 verified; ); Cc: psamp-chairs@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [PSAMP] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-psamp-info-10 X-BeenThere: psamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "This mailing list is used for discussion within the IETF packet sampling \(PSAMP\) WG" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: psamp-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: psamp-bounces@ietf.org Thomas, all, > A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-psamp-info-10.txt has been > successfuly submitted by Thomas Dietz and posted to the IETF > repository. Thanks for this. Here's some feedback: The table at the end of section 8 (right above the 8.1 title) is not wide enough to accommodate the full names of #318 and #319. These have been truncated, and should be fixed. Section "8.2.1. selectorAlgorithm": Further method identifiers may be added to the list below. It might be necessary to define new Information Elements to specify their parameters - full stop (period) is missing at the end. OLD The selectorAlgorithm registry is maintained by IANA and can be updated when specifications of the new method(s) and any new Information Elements are provided. New assignments for the PSAMP selectionAlgorithm will be administered by IANA, and subject to Expert Review [RFC5226]. The group of experts must double check the selection method definitions and Information Elements with already defined selection methods and Information Elements for completeness, accuracy and redundancy. Those experts will initially be drawn from the Working Group Chairs and document editors of the IPFIX and PSAMP Working Groups. NEW The selectorAlgorithm registry is maintained by IANA. New assignments for the registry will be administered by IANA, and subject to Expert Review [RFC5226]. The registry can be updated when specifications of the new method(s) and any new Information Elements are provided. The group of experts must double check the selectorAlgorithm definitions and Information Elements with already defined selectorAlgorithms and Information Elements for completeness, accuracy and redundancy. Those experts will initially be drawn from the Working Group Chairs and document editors of the IPFIX and PSAMP Working Groups. END OLD The following packet selection methods identifiers are defined in [I-D.ietf-psamp-info]: +----+------------------------+------------------------+ | ID | Method | Parameters | +----+------------------------+------------------------+ NEW The following selectorAlgorithm identifiers are defined here: +----+------------------------+------------------------+ | ID | Method | Parameters | +----+------------------------+------------------------+ END There is a broad variety of possible parameters that could be used Property match Filtering (5) but currently there are no agreed parameters specified. - Should say "*for* Property match Filtering". However, the information in the table above makes this paragraph redundant. ie, +----+------------------------+------------------------+ | 5 | Property match | no agreed parameters | | | Filtering | | +----+------------------------+------------------------+ Therefore, the paragraph should be removed. Section "8.3. Hash Configuration (326-334)" - It isn't immediately clear that "as well as in sections 3.8 and 7.1." does NOT refer to this document itself: OLD The following Information Elements can be used for describing the sampling configuration of a Selection Process. The individual parameters are explained in more detail in the [I-D.ietf-psamp-sample-tech] in section 6.2 as well as in sections 3.8 and 7.1. NEW The following Information Elements can be used for describing the sampling configuration of a Selection Process. The individual parameters are explained in more detail in sections 6.2, 3.8 and 7.1 of [I-D.ietf-psamp-sample-tech]. END Sections: 8.3.1. digestHashValue 8.3.2. hashIPPayloadOffset 8.3.3. hashIPPayloadSize 8.3.4. hashOutputRangeMin 8.3.5. hashOutputRangeMax 8.3.6. hashSelectedRangeMin 8.3.7. hashSelectedRangeMax 8.3.8. hashDigestOutput 8.3.9. hashInitialiserValue - It isn't immediately clear that "See also section 6.2" does NOT refer to this document itself: OLD See also section 6.2 as well sections 3.8 and 7.1 in [I-D.ietf- psamp-sample-tech]. NEW See also sections 6.2, 3.8 and 7.1 in [I-D.ietf-psamp-sample-tech]. END 10.2. PSAMP Related Considerations OLD Each new selection method MUST be assigned a unique value for the selectorAlgorithm Information Element. Its configuration parameter(s), along with the way to report it/them with an Options Template, MUST be clearly specified. The initial content of the selection method registry is found in section 8.2.1. NEW Each new selection method MUST be assigned a unique value in the selectorAlgorithm registry. Its configuration parameter(s), along with the way to report it/them with an Options Template, MUST be clearly specified. The initial content of the selectorAlgorithm registry is found in section 8.2.1. END Cheers. -- Paul Aitken Cisco Systems Ltd, Edinburgh, Scotland. _______________________________________________ PSAMP mailing list PSAMP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/psamp From psamp-bounces@ietf.org Sun Sep 21 07:02:01 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: psamp-text-archive@optimus.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-psamp-text-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C2573A6983; Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:02:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: psamp@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: psamp@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEEEB3A6983; Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:01:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.299 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AFvrdV7vUhPT; Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:01:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (odd-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.119]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B9D73A63C9; Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:01:58 -0700 (PDT) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.11.7p3+Sun/8.11.7) with ESMTP id m8LE29L05276; Sun, 21 Sep 2008 16:02:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.61.84.176] (ams3-vpn-dhcp5297.cisco.com [10.61.84.176]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.11.7p3+Sun/8.11.7) with ESMTP id m8LE1oA05781; Sun, 21 Sep 2008 16:02:08 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <48D653CE.1000403@cisco.com> Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:01:50 -0700 From: Benoit Claise User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ietf@ietf.org References: <20080915145103.AE89D28C130@core3.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20080915145103.AE89D28C130@core3.amsl.com> Cc: psamp@ietf.org Subject: Re: [PSAMP] Last Call: draft-ietf-psamp-info (Information Model for Packet Sampling Exports) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: psamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "This mailing list is used for discussion within the IETF packet sampling \(PSAMP\) WG" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: psamp-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: psamp-bounces@ietf.org Dear all, Because dataLinkFrameSize and dataLinkFrameSection have been removed, the editor renumbered all the I.E. assignments. That could generate some problems for existing implementations, if any. However, I can live with that. However, where there is a bigger problem is that IANA is working on the IPFIX registry right now and there is a clash It's a question of days (hopefully) before the registry official... See http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml selectorName is already assigned 335, so you'll have to free that one (currently upperCILimit) Proposal: 336 | lowerCILimit | 337 | upperCILimit | 338 | confidenceLevel | Regards, Benoit. > The IESG has received a request from the Packet Sampling WG (psamp) to > consider the following document: > > - 'Information Model for Packet Sampling Exports ' > as a Proposed Standard > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2008-09-29. Exceptionally, > comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please > retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > The file can be obtained via > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-psamp-info-10.txt > > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=11074&rfc_flag=0 > > _______________________________________________ > IETF-Announce mailing list > IETF-Announce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > _______________________________________________ PSAMP mailing list PSAMP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/psamp