From nobody Tue Mar 8 15:52:42 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874103A1BE1 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 15:52:40 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.907 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20210112.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U3jIIbWCbMNh for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 15:52:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qt1-x82d.google.com (mail-qt1-x82d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1184B3A1BDE for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 15:52:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt1-x82d.google.com with SMTP id c4so610380qtx.1 for ; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 15:52:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2N1riklOU+GQmkmih2Ny8+d4t2DW8rZoiaQanNVH4NE=; b=lEsjuQ43UxOSZ1Tkz8Da3wV4i9dbE8AIn3KNP+EwUt9SDMEBlndq9EVXHV91iGWgEX iqcRRVm+zpBCTFTiA9nvm2OUeoKuuirERRWZiISWwlx9rxjwDVv/ZB/VbQE3dslzLEXC 4oCmRuhnjdmvuGy0saWit2tvcM2xmFsJ8u/gXX0Ptnyutt/759iZ7oWB3nxo/xGcAiTO 1ECa25uNzkcJUy51TwbCHQFJ+2nXfbcfGWOm3ezMoyrvk3LheoI1yfrtlF8Ipe/G7Zpu qyAnTYKPBP5qDpu9kVrQ4iuWVt7KHxoDjdgcK2giTM8HiyxRwARzgmDjkqcDZAhKoU4W Pbpg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2N1riklOU+GQmkmih2Ny8+d4t2DW8rZoiaQanNVH4NE=; b=GK+Sxo3Ui/B/ENAFz/T4KQeWv379N066tnFMdu112BnBHjVcncm3jff1/XsZBA1yeT W9Kv8L7lijr3Etp5w/DsFGgOIY5SVqpVmIC+waWL4WikgqVjwje/ZMdNFVkWvAnzgYQg OpiOwrkpViEatX+/juPLJQ/iYUaBhZMepWimtKIMeEtfZsxCjorRP5eVQGgVRKmrzCDI XjfEM7TCB4n2tcLg7KxDceb08QcWaupyRUmY9hdLpxztuuBTq8tBwPJcqW83cnWVYGNu 80Yr4LnIJcbA4ERoQwrZYGdJk4MKYumfCDJiS5xaQSMG2NSltHqjkHke3kafjHyeLfKd xiuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530IofW+LmGM3V0KgUQQBs09KA7E/43n1CEtNDE6L+iMsP/9qlwd kO+5MJDFcGzoME/vhNUVsNhgWjALc3zAnIO3/mZmSNE0az8S4g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw03V9eiDdHwquORoIC8vL36HO5IK9OGoMIfioex8Blbxl6Pv3qRbsCmCq2Cm76+eBZbTGCNZ4nzH1lualilnE= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4e82:0:b0:2e1:a1e1:b5c with SMTP id 2-20020ac84e82000000b002e1a1e10b5cmr41780qtp.122.1646783556356; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 15:52:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Richard Barnes Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 18:52:25 -0500 Message-ID: To: sframe@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e61f9b05d9bdaccc" Archived-At: Subject: [Sframe] PRs! X-BeenThere: sframe@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Media Frames List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 23:52:41 -0000 --000000000000e61f9b05d9bdaccc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hey all, It doesn't look like we have a slot at IETF 113, but this still seemed like a propitious time to re-energize this group. I've started doing a review of the spec, and just posted PRs on the first two, non-normative sections: https://github.com/eomara/sframe/pull/72 https://github.com/eomara/sframe/pull/73 Feedback welcome! There should obviously be more as I continue working through the spec. It seems like we should probably have a virtual interim at some point to discuss these. Also, I think we agreed to adopt the draft, so should the authors resubmit as draft-ietf-sframe-protocol? Cheers, --Richard --000000000000e61f9b05d9bdaccc Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hey all,

It doesn't look= like we have a slot at IETF 113, but this still seemed like a propitious t= ime to re-energize this group.=C2=A0 I've started doing a review of the= spec, and just posted PRs on the first two, non-normative sections:
<= div>
https://github.com/eomara/sframe/pull/73<= /div>

Feedback welcome!=C2=A0 There should obviously be = more as I continue working through the spec.

I= t seems like we should probably have a virtual interim at some point to dis= cuss these.

Also, I think we agreed to adopt the d= raft, so should the authors resubmit as draft-ietf-sframe-protocol?

Cheers,
--Richard
--000000000000e61f9b05d9bdaccc-- From nobody Thu Mar 10 00:43:16 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA2D33A0AA3 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:43:14 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.906 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cosmosoftware-io.20210112.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5PD5SvJgmXzl for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:43:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pg1-x530.google.com (mail-pg1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85C2C3A02BC for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:43:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x530.google.com with SMTP id o26so4148841pgb.8 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:43:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cosmosoftware-io.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Oak0tPNVMGEGb3WGi8lgTdFvzDUcgIAlmlwt26gv3mc=; b=ojnrLnYSu6/rNQ4G2TuuiDrgD2XcLYzuMT0wDv3JtVdHyd0FJkRGAR6iOe1KbgKFPr 7jbPRTKL36Jfb8NXtog2x7i/lcxwEgmm3APL2pBhxSveUtQzPPzZk2lDp+DA7USZNmAp WdTSvQJ3v7TVEnQ2Dp65PVdk1RF4rcuJX4x9RJ6p0mwcgWSQE//3fjI1Sef4B0E7tTH5 n39iAQ/9+zz7AdFm+jgbPPhXm55NFdl9bjjPwj4Bdi5n939atOaeU1et7Stt7LVOZIgH 0WjrAXpp7jGSfUyMs2oYp48wVfF1O/zgZheHfrLpPkOgoOVeIIy3lQwfecKfYGgZ7KTf gEBw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Oak0tPNVMGEGb3WGi8lgTdFvzDUcgIAlmlwt26gv3mc=; b=SwMn2/OIGbRsR68A/LH6qrCaUc52cMd7IVRIDSCDXiTY62dGW4B0BSVnBklVd5ozdP VupkWaJDMGFi3NhduDp8JlTHRVfEVg/njALZjs0XQaIKFP1dFkAEQLzJJBUi5yXjazi+ mBrmP/Lu4/8JBQaCxLfFBnZsyFMCFDe7uKkcHc58r/oV0bGtgC+g6jtsRP+iyb7Jk1OM t7bxMoQ5H04slnpCANVLvLkALaicVhJyBtO9WmQzp1cgtCaH2RmjeEcleDhYweRQIlB5 FYTRR6Vo5Pa/zaUNAGBGng9RG/aGvZgDJq+YYgu+t6IvH83YhZmUQHUH4BK2vM+lTuag Cwew== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530esGsaoTWurKw6UbqfSKe3EIQSNkDE+e06KT3Hdv+gyeS2ul84 VOxiWULirzzfzgs3m2hu7v+mzWXrkRubNP2hJ4MXR7dBwXk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyWUan/MA3UOrsvwmif7V3dm4PUiYAUlPmD9Lu93KHWcqCGHm/Rncs8jERlMlxFRfM0FxlOErcKSFtMHrJSPMQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:15d5:b0:4f0:fbeb:6007 with SMTP id o21-20020a056a0015d500b004f0fbeb6007mr3939795pfu.17.1646901789320; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:43:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Sergio Garcia Murillo Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 09:42:58 +0100 Message-ID: To: Richard Barnes Cc: sframe@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000022093205d9d93445" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Sframe] PRs! X-BeenThere: sframe@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Media Frames List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 08:43:15 -0000 --00000000000022093205d9d93445 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Richard, Thanks for the PR, I think that the editorial changes are ok, but I have a concern regarding if we should try first to split the draft, one containing the SFrame/SPacket description and usage, and another one to only specify how the encryption process works for a given blob regardless it is SFrame or SPacket. Although I guess we can just merge the PRs and then do the split too. Best regards Sergio On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 12:52 AM Richard Barnes wrote: > Hey all, > > It doesn't look like we have a slot at IETF 113, but this still seemed > like a propitious time to re-energize this group. I've started doing a > review of the spec, and just posted PRs on the first two, non-normative > sections: > > https://github.com/eomara/sframe/pull/72 > https://github.com/eomara/sframe/pull/73 > > Feedback welcome! There should obviously be more as I continue working > through the spec. > > It seems like we should probably have a virtual interim at some point to > discuss these. > > Also, I think we agreed to adopt the draft, so should the authors resubmit > as draft-ietf-sframe-protocol? > > Cheers, > --Richard > -- > Sframe mailing list > Sframe@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe > --00000000000022093205d9d93445 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Richard,

Thanks=C2=A0for the PR, I t= hink that the editorial changes are ok, but I have a concern regarding if w= e should try first to split the draft, one containing the SFrame/SPacket de= scription=C2=A0and usage, and another one to only specify how the encryptio= n process=C2=A0works for=C2=A0 a given blob regardless=C2=A0it is SFrame or= SPacket. Although I guess we can just merge the PRs and then do the split = too.=C2=A0

Best regards
Sergio

On W= ed, Mar 9, 2022 at 12:52 AM Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> wrote:
Hey all,

It does= n't look like we have a slot at IETF 113, but this still seemed like a = propitious time to re-energize this group.=C2=A0 I've started doing a r= eview of the spec, and just posted PRs on the first two, non-normative sect= ions:

https://github.com/eomara/sframe/pull/72

Fe= edback welcome!=C2=A0 There should obviously be more as I continue working = through the spec.

It seems like we should prob= ably have a virtual interim at some point to discuss these.

<= /div>
Also, I think we agreed to adopt the draft, so should the authors= resubmit as draft-ietf-sframe-protocol?

Cheers,
--Richard
--
Sframe mailing list
Sframe@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe
--00000000000022093205d9d93445--