From rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org Mon May 5 04:00:15 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtg-dir-archive@megatron.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-rtg-dir-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A073A6C81; Mon, 5 May 2008 04:00:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D103A6C24 for ; Mon, 5 May 2008 04:00:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id corOmyI-WZ5y for ; Mon, 5 May 2008 04:00:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from runaway.fenron.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:117:128:230:48ff:fe92:8e81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D7A28C0F3 for ; Mon, 5 May 2008 04:00:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from runaway.fenron.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by runaway.fenron.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m45B02KP030863 for ; Mon, 5 May 2008 04:00:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@runaway.fenron.com) Received: (from fenner@localhost) by runaway.fenron.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m45B02wJ030862 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 5 May 2008 04:00:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner) Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 04:00:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200805051100.m45B02wJ030862@runaway.fenron.com> From: fenner@fenron.com (Bill Fenner) To: rtg-dir@ietf.org (Routing Area Directorate) Subject: IESG agenda for 2008-05-08 telechat. X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Routing Area Directorate List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org IESG Agenda Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2008-05-08). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Administrivia 1.1 Roll Call 1.2 Bash the Agenda 1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat 1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat 2. Protocol Actions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?" 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Item Area Date The Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) RAI tel Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) Parameter Registry (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 12 draft-ietf-iptel-tel-reg-05.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Jonathan Rosenberg is Proto Shepherd Token: Jon Peterson RAI Instant Message Disposition Notification (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 12 draft-ietf-simple-imdn-07.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Jon Peterson RTG PIM Bootstrap Router MIB (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 12 draft-ietf-pim-bsr-mib-05.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: David Ward RTG Layer 1 VPN Basic Mode (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 12 draft-ietf-l1vpn-basic-mode-04.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: David Ward MPLS Upstream Label Assignment and RTG Context-Specific Label Space (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 12 draft-ietf-mpls-upstream-label-05.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ross Callon RTG MPLS Multicast Encapsulations (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 12 draft-ietf-mpls-multicast-encaps-09.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ross Callon RTG OSPF Based Layer 1 VPN Auto-Discovery (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 12 draft-ietf-l1vpn-ospf-auto-discovery-05.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: David Ward Specification for the Derivation of Root Keys SEC from an Extended Master Session Key (EMSK) (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 12 draft-ietf-hokey-emsk-hierarchy-05.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: proto shepherd is Charles Clancy Token: Tim Polk RTG BGP-based Auto-Discovery for Layer-1 VPNs (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 12 draft-ietf-l1vpn-bgp-auto-discovery-04.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: David Ward RTG LDP extension for Inter-Area LSP (Proposed Standard) - 10 of 12 draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-interarea-03.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ross Callon APP IMAP CONVERT extension (Proposed Standard) - 11 of 12 draft-ietf-lemonade-convert-18.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Eric Burger is the document shepherd Token: Chris Newman TSV User-Defined Errors for RSVP (Proposed Standard) - 12 of 12 draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-user-error-spec-07.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Magnus Westerlund 2.1.2 Returning Item Area Date RTG OSPF for IPv6 (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1 draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-update-21.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: David Ward 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Item Area Date APP Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (Draft Standard) - 1 of 1 draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Lisa Dusseault 2.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.1.1 New Item Area Date OPS Guidelines for IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX) Testing (Informational) - 1 of 2 draft-ietf-ipfix-testing-05.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Nevil Brownlee is the PROTO shepherd Token: Dan Romascanu OPS IPv6 Unicast Address Assignment Considerations (Informational) - 2 of 2 draft-ietf-v6ops-addcon-07.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ron Bonica 3.1.2 Returning Item NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.2.1 New Item Area Date The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) GEN P-Served-User Private-Header (P-Header) (Informational) - 1 of 2 draft-vanelburg-sipping-served-user-05.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Jon Peterson GEN Experience of implementing NETCONF over SOAP (Informational) - 2 of 2 draft-iijima-netconf-soap-implementation-07.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Dan Romascanu 3.2.2 Returning Item Area Date INT SAVA Testbed and Experiences to Date (Experimental) - 1 of 1 draft-wu-sava-testbed-experience-04.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Jari Arkko 3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG , but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd. Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document. 3.3.1 New Item Area Date GEN Three-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 1 of 1 Licklider Transmission Protocol - Specification (Experimental) - 1 of 1 draft-irtf-dtnrg-ltp-09.txt Note: Recommend RFC 3932 response #1: The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work. Licklider Transmission Protocol - Security Extensions (Experimental) draft-irtf-dtnrg-ltp-extensions-07.txt Note: Recommend RFC 3932 response #1: The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work. Licklider Transmission Protocol - Motivation (Informational) draft-irtf-dtnrg-ltp-motivation-06.txt Note: Recommend RFC 3932 response #1: The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work. Token: Russ Housley 3.3.2 Returning Item NONE 3.3.3 For Action Area Date SEC Syntax for binding documents with time stamps (Informational) - 1 of 1 draft-santoni-timestampeddata-03.txt Token: Tim Polk 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review Area Date INT Apr 28 Source Address Validation Improvements (savi) - 1 of 2 Token: Jari RAI May 1 Data for Reachability of Inter/ tra-NetworK SIP (drinks) - 2 of 2 Token: Jon 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review Area Date OPS Apr 30 RADIUS EXTensions (radext) - 1 of 1 Token: Dan 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 5. IAB News We Can Use 6. Management Issues 6.1 Should default welcome message for IETF lists have the Note Well (Cullen Jennings) 7. Working Group News From rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org Mon May 19 04:00:08 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtg-dir-archive@megatron.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-rtg-dir-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE3D3A6916; Mon, 19 May 2008 04:00:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065D628C15A for ; Mon, 19 May 2008 04:00:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L+MhWYtP1Jvp for ; Mon, 19 May 2008 04:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from runaway.fenron.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:117:128:230:48ff:fe92:8e81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CD33A6916 for ; Mon, 19 May 2008 04:00:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from runaway.fenron.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by runaway.fenron.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4JB01XH076572 for ; Mon, 19 May 2008 04:00:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@runaway.fenron.com) Received: (from fenner@localhost) by runaway.fenron.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m4JB01kK076571 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 19 May 2008 04:00:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner) Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 04:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200805191100.m4JB01kK076571@runaway.fenron.com> From: fenner@fenron.com (Bill Fenner) To: rtg-dir@ietf.org (Routing Area Directorate) Subject: IESG agenda for 2008-05-22 telechat. X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Routing Area Directorate List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org IESG Agenda Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2008-05-22). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Administrivia 1.1 Roll Call 1.2 Bash the Agenda 1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat 1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat 2. Protocol Actions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?" 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Item Area Date TSV TCP Friendly Rate Control (TFRC): Protocol Specification (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 9 draft-ietf-dccp-rfc3448bis-06.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Document shepherd: Gorry Fairhurst (gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk). Token: Lars Eggert GEN Two-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 2 of 9 Rights Contributors provide to the IETF Trust (BCP) - 2 of 9 draft-ietf-ipr-3978-incoming-09.txt Advice to the Trustees of the IETF Trust on Rights to be Granted in IETF Documents (Informational) draft-ietf-ipr-outbound-rights-06.txt Token: Russ Housley SEC Multiple Signatures in S/MIME (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 9 draft-ietf-smime-multisig-05.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Tim Polk RTG MPLS Multicast Encapsulations (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 9 draft-ietf-mpls-multicast-encaps-09.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ross Callon Specification for the Derivation of Root Keys SEC from an Extended Master Session Key (EMSK) (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 9 draft-ietf-hokey-emsk-hierarchy-05.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: proto shepherd is Charles Clancy Token: Tim Polk RTG Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP) (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 9 draft-ietf-pce-pcep-12.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ross Callon RTG LDP extension for Inter-Area LSP (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 9 draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-interarea-03.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ross Callon A Backward Recursive PCE-based Computation (BRPC) Procedure To Compute Shortest RTG Constrained Inter-domain Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 9 draft-ietf-pce-brpc-09.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ross Callon Resource ReSerVation Protovol (RSVP) TSV Extensions for Emergency Services (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 9 draft-ietf-tsvwg-emergency-rsvp-08.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Magnus Westerlund 2.1.2 Returning Item NONE 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Item Area Date APP Internet Message Format (Draft Standard) - 1 of 1 draft-resnick-2822upd-06.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Lisa Dusseault 2.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.1.1 New Item Area Date OPS IPv6 Unicast Address Assignment Considerations (Informational) - 1 of 1 draft-ietf-v6ops-addcon-07.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ron Bonica 3.1.2 Returning Item NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.2.1 New Item Area Date APP Atom Bidirectional Attribute (Experimental) - 1 of 2 draft-snell-atompub-bidi-06.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Lisa Dusseault INT SAVA Testbed and Experiences to Date (Experimental) - 2 of 2 draft-wu-sava-testbed-experience-06.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Jari Arkko 3.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG , but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd. Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document. 3.3.1 New Item NONE 3.3.2 Returning Item NONE 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review NONE 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval Area Date INT Apr 28 Source Address Validation Improvements (savi) - 1 of 2 Token: Jari RAI May 1 Data for Reachability of Inter/ tra-NetworK SIP (drinks) - 2 of 2 Token: Jon 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review Area Date SEC May 5 EAP Method Update (emu) - 1 of 1 Token: Pasi 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval Area Date OPS Apr 30 RADIUS EXTensions (radext) - 1 of 2 Token: Dan INT May 4 Mobility EXTensions for IPv6 (mext) - 2 of 2 Token: Jari 5. IAB News We Can Use 6. Management Issues 6.1 Request to approve an additional port numbers experts (Michelle Cotton) 7. Working Group News