
From Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com  Wed Feb 10 01:11:41 2010
Return-Path: <Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: saag@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3213A768B for <saag@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:11:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.358
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.358 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.241,  BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fX4ym2Zm9Dm9 for <saag@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:11:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mgw-mx09.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.105.134]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA993A768A for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:11:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vaebh106.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh106.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.32]) by mgw-mx09.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id o1A9CJjq019072 for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:12:36 -0600
Received: from vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.23]) by vaebh106.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);  Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:12:23 +0200
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.5]) by vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);  Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:12:15 +0200
Received: from NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.86]) by nok-am1mhub-01.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.5]) with mapi; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:58:51 +0100
From: <Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com>
To: <saag@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:58:50 +0100
Thread-Topic: Request for SAAG agenda items
Thread-Index: AcqqL0NO44LY4XZuQJCsYFmJyiIbHw==
Message-ID: <808FD6E27AD4884E94820BC333B2DB775841530946@NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Feb 2010 09:12:15.0665 (UTC) FILETIME=[23593A10:01CAAA31]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Subject: [saag] Request for SAAG agenda items
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/saag>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:11:42 -0000

Folks,

Tim and I are working on the agenda for SAAG at IETF77. =20
We would appreciate any suggestions!

Thanks,
Pasi

From tlr@w3.org  Thu Feb 11 10:14:47 2010
Return-Path: <tlr@w3.org>
X-Original-To: saag@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D8328C20B for <saag@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:14:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iUDyOmipNnHr for <saag@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:14:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jay.w3.org (ssh.w3.org [128.30.52.60]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5B33A753F for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:14:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=iCoaster.does-not-exist.org) by jay.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <tlr@w3.org>) id 1Nfda0-0003Cj-Af; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:15:56 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by iCoaster.does-not-exist.org with esmtp (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from <tlr@w3.org>) id KXOW2J-0011AH-P9; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:15:55 +0100
From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:15:55 +0100
Message-Id: <9939D772-66CC-4964-8C1F-CE96D4E14F72@w3.org>
To: saag@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Subject: [saag] W3C Last Call: XML Signature 1.1
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/saag>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:14:50 -0000

The W3C XML Security Working Group has released a Last Call Working =
Draft=20
for XML Signature 1.1:
  http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core1/

An explanation of the changes against the XML Signature 1.0 =
specification=20
(developed by a joint W3C/IETF Working Group at the time) is available:
  http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core1/explain.html

Changes are focused on the set of mandatory to implement algorithms and=20=

markup for relevant key material.

The Last Call period lasts until 18 March 2010; comments can be sent to=20=

public-xmlsec-comments@w3.org.  The next step in the W3C Recommendation =
Track=20
process is either a Candidate Recommendation phase to collect =
implementation
experience, or another Working Draft.  We plan to announce further last =
call=20
working drafts (if any) and the Call for Implementations that starts the=20=

Candidate Recommendation phase to the saag mailing list.

The WG continues its work on a similar set of changes to XML Encryption =
1.1;=20
that specification is progressing on a somewhat slower time scale than=20=

Signature 1.1.

Regards,
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>







