From nobody Fri Mar 18 08:58:35 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: 6tisch-security@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: 6tisch-security@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1263512D860 for <6tisch-security@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:49:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.521 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L4qXU7rL4yoj for <6tisch-security@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:49:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8925D12D68E for <6tisch-security@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:49:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3304; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1458316143; x=1459525743; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=X5gq0x2AgBX23F8kXsvRKzH+QJWGMshq88jMmJAHQHU=; b=J24f3cNAaTTDTLVQvYzmWJdMbQYqM1u4E2zb2ENnhqKAfV9b+kxnINGa 4FmnbPsK2EWwyXJug7Sp7HyXANWcVHDyQW4GuTUQNWjkGx/mB3pgyd2Tc kcVidslhegi+PX2hCHG42XBytuk8UIydO39yg82t+nrgAJnpDjXxR3dCy Y=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AdAgBNIuxW/4MNJK1egnlMU3i1KIRuA?= =?us-ascii?q?Q2Bb4c9OBQBAQEBAQEBZBwLhEgtXgEMdCYBBBuIH6FWnzkBAQEBBgEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?Zhh6OVgWTBIRTAY18gWyESohYjwUBHgEBQoNlik9+AQEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.24,355,1454976000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="87994129" Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 18 Mar 2016 15:49:02 +0000 Received: from XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (xch-rcd-004.cisco.com [173.37.102.14]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u2IFn2bS006421 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <6tisch-security@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:02 GMT Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:49:02 -0500 Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:49:02 -0500 From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" To: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org> Thread-Topic: No interim next week - security call? Thread-Index: AdGBLE5t2lbT+LpHTTqFQoINsk7g7w== Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:48:35 +0000 Deferred-Delivery: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:48:16 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.55.22.5] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_e287113ddc684e5aa5b993dcc3755e71XCHRCD001ciscocom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:58:34 -0700 Subject: [6tisch-security] No interim next week - security call? X-BeenThere: 6tisch-security@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Extended Design Team for 6TiSCH security architecture <6tisch-security.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:05 -0000 --_000_e287113ddc684e5aa5b993dcc3755e71XCHRCD001ciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear all As discussed at the last interim, we do not plan to host an interim call ne= xt Friday. And as you know, we are now chartered to work on security/join process, whi= ch has started but was somewhat dormant in the recent months. So if people are interested to use the time slot of the bi weekly for an in= formal BoF to resync and kick off the new work, the chairs be happy to make= that happen. Please let us know! Pascal --_000_e287113ddc684e5aa5b993dcc3755e71XCHRCD001ciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear all

 

As discussed at the last interim, we do not plan to = host an interim call next Friday.

And as you know, we are now chartered to work on sec= urity/join process, which has started but was somewhat dormant in the recen= t months.

So if people are interested to use the time slot of = the bi weekly for an informal BoF to resync and kick off the new work, the = chairs be happy to make that happen.

 

Please let us know!

 

Pascal

--_000_e287113ddc684e5aa5b993dcc3755e71XCHRCD001ciscocom_--