Subject: Re: [AAA-WG]: REMINDER: Call for issues on MIP, Base and Transport (fwd)

From: Bernard Aboba <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 16:58:57 -0800 (PST)

I would suggest that MIPv4 normative references to CMS be removed, if it
is expected that MIPv4 be approved for publication prior to when CMS is
ready. 

On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Greg Weber wrote:

> 
> Hi Bernard,
> Do dependencies between MIPv4 & CMS present a problem for
> submitting the drafts separately to IESG?  My understanding
> from the IETF-53 meeting was that after the coming last call,
> MIPv4 would be submitted, but CMS would not yet be ready.
> 
> Thanks,
> Greg
> 
> 
> Forwarded message:
> > From: Greg Weber <[email-masked]>
> > Subject: Re: [AAA-WG]: REMINDER: Call for issues on MIP, Base and Transport
> > Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 21:10:52 -0500 (EST)
> > Cc: [email-masked]
> > 
> > > 
> > > As noted at IETF 53, we will be bringing the MIP, Base and Transport
> > > documents to WG last call starting on April 2, 2002; the Last Call will
> > > run until April 16, 2002. 
> > 
> > A small process observation.  The MIPv4 draft has at least 
> > a couple of SHOULD references to the CMS draft.  One wonders 
> > how the IESG will be able to evaluate the former if the 
> > latter is not yet submitted...
> > 
> > Greg