Subject: RE: [AAA-WG]: Diameter Base Application ID values

From: <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 07:27:29 +0200

Hi Yoshihiro,

> On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 03:07:21PM +0200, 
> [email-masked] wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Currently, we have the application IDs as follows in the 
> Diameter base spec:
> > 
> > NASREQ                        1 [NASREQ]
> > Mobile-IP                     4 [DIAMMIP]
> > Diameter Base Accounting      5
> > Relay                         0xffffffff
> > 
> > Would anyone complain if they were modified to:
> > 
> > Diameter Base Accounting      0
> > NASREQ                        1 [NASREQ]
> > Mobile-IP                     2 [DIAMMIP]
> > Relay                         0xffffffff
> 
> I have one question.  
> 
> Which Application ID value should be included in Diameter headers 
> for messages that are common to all applications but not ACR/ACA?
> For example, my implementation is using 0 for CER/CEA.

Actually, I was thinking the same thing. So we would have:

 Common		0
 NASREQ                       1 [NASREQ]
 Mobile-IP                      2 [DIAMMIP]
 Base Accounting           3
 Relay                            0xffffffff

John