From wdec@cisco.com Thu Sep 5 04:58:57 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D10D411E8178 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 04:58:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -110.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fD2xrwRdfhTn for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 04:58:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C1321E80B2 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 04:58:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2738; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1378382329; x=1379591929; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=fIpQlJ36e1flRkan1sAZ9qo2XzdR3bWgtwl9WbUCLR8=; b=HjRezJVB3XSBMUyWFpcwzvh7gW8QaN8xWkQnbCAwmMHKDybfyOBZV942 QatB/CxQFK04Cek4+ctpU3kQFXndu5rsHZle/NRkm3QgXpdx4GfVoWW87 9WGWk+XoUvtDQlLkjKyK9AIfHCyY3AxL0xsGZqfJICubkDiEKXRFEfWnM A=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: An8FAGxxKFKtJV2d/2dsb2JhbABbgkNENVG5BohBgSgWdIImAQQdXBIBDAEdVicEDg2Hegy6Q48vMYMkgQADmSSQN4Mggio X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,846,1371081600"; d="scan'208,217";a="255745471" Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Sep 2013 11:58:48 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com [173.36.12.87]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r85Bwmpm024957 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 5 Sep 2013 11:58:48 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x05.cisco.com ([169.254.11.38]) by xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com ([173.36.12.87]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 06:58:48 -0500 From: "Wojciech Dec (wdec)" To: "ancp@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-11 Thread-Index: AQHOqi9Ht0ftoae/nUOa6N2ejV2p3A== Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 11:58:47 +0000 Message-ID: <19F346EB777BEE4CB77DA1A2C56F20B31FFDEB58@xmb-aln-x05.cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616 x-originating-ip: [10.61.101.95] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_19F346EB777BEE4CB77DA1A2C56F20B31FFDEB58xmbalnx05ciscoc_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [ANCP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-11 X-BeenThere: ancp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Access Node Control Protocol working group mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 11:58:57 -0000 --_000_19F346EB777BEE4CB77DA1A2C56F20B31FFDEB58xmbalnx05ciscoc_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All, Starting from today we would like to initiate a week Working Group Last Cal= l for the following draft: Access Node Control Protocol (ANCP) MIB module for Access Nodes http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-11 Accordingly, please review these documents and bring any remaining issues, = or issues whose resolution is not satisfactory, to the attention of the Wor= king Group on this list and/or by using the issue tracker tool. Please note that both of these parts has recently been substantially rewrit= ten by Roy, just as I rewrote p6 a while back. As such, we're treating thos= e changes as a proposal from the editors to the Working Group, to be confir= med. Please review carefully with this in mind. To give people ample time to review, we'll have a 3-week WGLC, ending on Se= ptember 27. Regards, Wojciech and Matthew. --_000_19F346EB777BEE4CB77DA1A2C56F20B31FFDEB58xmbalnx05ciscoc_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 
Hi All,

Starting from today =
we would like to initiate a week Working Group Last Call for the following =
draft:


Access Node Control Protocol (ANCP) MIB module for A=
ccess Nodes
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-11
Accordingly, please review these documents and bring any r=
emaining issues, or issues whose resolution is not satisfactory, to the att=
ention of the Working Group on this list and/or by using the issue tracker =
tool.

Please note that both of these parts has recently been substantially rewrit=
ten by Roy, just as I rewrote p6 a while back. As such, we're treating thos=
e changes as a proposal from the editors to the Working Group, to be confir=
med. Please review carefully with this in mind.

To give people ample time to review, we'll have a 3-week WGLC, ending on Se=
ptember 27. 
Regards,
Wojciech and Matthew.
--_000_19F346EB777BEE4CB77DA1A2C56F20B31FFDEB58xmbalnx05ciscoc_-- From tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com Thu Sep 19 04:53:08 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903C821F943C for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 04:53:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.199 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.400, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 86QKuhjm1ERu for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 04:53:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ie0-f177.google.com (mail-ie0-f177.google.com [209.85.223.177]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B8A21F9433 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 04:53:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id qd12so14130494ieb.8 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 04:52:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BRbXIMswM6Y6zdESkLa3fwf1gWfu7Z31/78rqwEjx9k=; b=MoEq+U04vsStBvpXr5Y0z4wJ48w91YBqgZJxfkUTk8pZhBXiDtqOB94hhFBArdikzc WDQWGXB0sGXRoXIAQg3pqV0EogalhFLnO9wptXuNAJ2ubwDw/3Ukfgn1dYgCFm1PzvAU YtQmKWClJFzF40Z2Ugbe4VaFt0IkKWXrS3Amht25m4UwB5rRSdfj8kQOWBCF0xF7bG4+ HZdRw2Yr25j0qxUmYyLF2SXh1Gz1vWSkaUNPmD3tkhfJ1FNWYSSMHh0owYDKb+2wVRz0 X9t3tPJ4LyqITWT2+j2bdI5Aok3XhcD9Q+/kuEonHyPSPcB1KQd3+5iRaMqQ8o9OeK5p 3exA== X-Received: by 10.50.55.40 with SMTP id o8mr932642igp.25.1379591568458; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 04:52:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.73] (dsl-173-206-79-23.tor.primus.ca. [173.206.79.23]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p5sm2719086igj.10.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 19 Sep 2013 04:52:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <523AE58F.8050001@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 07:52:47 -0400 From: Tom Taylor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Wojciech Dec (wdec)" References: <19F346EB777BEE4CB77DA1A2C56F20B31FFDEB58@xmb-aln-x05.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <19F346EB777BEE4CB77DA1A2C56F20B31FFDEB58@xmb-aln-x05.cisco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "ancp@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [ANCP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-11 X-BeenThere: ancp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Access Node Control Protocol working group mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 11:53:08 -0000 On 05/09/2013 7:58 AM, Wojciech Dec (wdec) wrote: > Hi All, > > Starting from today we would like to initiate a week Working Group > Last Call for the following draft: > > Access Node Control Protocol (ANCP) MIB module for Access Nodes > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-11 > > Accordingly, please review these documents and bring any remaining > issues, or issues whose resolution is not satisfactory, to the > attention of the Working Group on this list and/or by using the issue > tracker tool. > > Please note that both of these parts has recently been substantially > rewritten by Roy, just as I rewrote p6 a while back. As such, we're > treating those changes as a proposal from the editors to the Working > Group, to be confirmed. Please review carefully with this in mind. > > To give people ample time to review, we'll have a 3-week WGLC, ending > on September 27. > > Regards, > > Wojciech and Matthew. > I have reviewed the latest version of this document. There are a couple instances of non-native English syntax, but not enough to worry about. In general the document looks good to go. I have one question regarding the ancpAnSessionUp notification. The index to the session tables is ancpAnSessionConfigSessionId. How, then, does one retrieve the data associated with the ancpAnCurrentSessionAnInstance, which is buried in the ancpAnCurrentSessionTabl? Is it necessary to walk the complete ancpAnCurrentSessionTable (well, on the average, half the table) applying a filter?