Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] New Version Notification for draft-sullivan-domain-origin-assert-01.txt

From: Andrew Sullivan <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:21:41 -0400

Dear colleagues,

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 01:47:25PM -0700, [email-masked] wrote:
> 
> Filename:	 draft-sullivan-domain-origin-assert
> Revision:	 01
> Title:		 Asserting DNS Administrative Boundaries Within DNS Zones
> Creation date:	 2012-07-16
> WG ID:		 Individual Submission
> Number of pages: 16
> URL:             http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sullivan-domain-origin-assert-01.txt
> Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sullivan-domain-origin-assert
> Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sullivan-domain-origin-assert-01
> Diff:            http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-sullivan-domain-origin-assert-01

I uploaded a revision of the above draft; the -00 was discussed on
this list some time ago.  This version attempts to deal with a number
of concerns people raised.  Other highlights:

      *  Changed the mnemonic from BOUND to AREALM
      *  Added ports and scheme to the RRTYPE
      *  Added some motivating text and suggestions about what can be
         done with the new RRTYPE
      *  Removed use of "origin" term, because it was confusing.  The
         document filename preserves "origin" in the name in order that
         the tracker doesn't lose the change history, but that's just a
         vestige.
      *  Removed references to cross-document information sharing and
         ECMAScript.  I don't understand the issues there, but Maciej
         Stachowiak convinced me that they're different enough that this
         mechanism probably won't work.

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
[email-masked]