From nobody Tue Jul 4 14:39:01 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A8712EA7F for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 14:39:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o1jY4YLwjCfH for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 14:38:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qk0-x229.google.com (mail-qk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF32A127B57 for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 14:38:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id v143so92481616qkb.0 for ; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 14:38:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=iXTvaKAOgeawTRr7/4s7BGR0JM8ReDnr3rMKUM0brLc=; b=B1c6/3CsB6Vxbl7mpyVQzaBZ4T/qzCMjEGYNF0sUkNQkycjM9gdwbO6QSJcShT45R3 XMLhtGkvM3vlz+qYdjZgUAaIVJv6ggq9YjSBsQ3uMSCukC8kme9eAEw3EOZEt5sQWD2B x1Ta46R3OBnGqFDmO88zcJ0r1owwND1gIFjOc+I2Ilhuka5SvfzDB8+DB9yFkrFSrAIC oZb2Yb1xD508rSyWtHcQhcR6A+vh/mNtvLsX6pZ4+BQjmAQUZM/mApHP92CuxRLJakxS jmbm697mmeoHNEJvK8B15nL4fNQoS+czIQHaFnfNYKu1tJzHxv1CTpwXKewRaxa+aR/2 nVhw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iXTvaKAOgeawTRr7/4s7BGR0JM8ReDnr3rMKUM0brLc=; b=lf+PE1bYCoyQq4vHp42In4FIyjMpNnqGVoxN3SFfKurK8acEUCi9Z1DsWZGdDKK5jm 9ZXW+KJMjEdOCSIanJeHzbScazT6ABlhgOknZbLbSskZPNRlETBjbpC7Rb+9KEskLPVl ski7iwUqInMuk8EtwgaAlWSBKwx2j4MTQ/a5c7qfFh4q+QkAdyzspL5xzX5kYv9NCttb pyJ+baMcLtJRCJ8Hule8lU5EQto4d0oWGB6EqcP6SbcCbbXI+aoveGalzKsIBxewzTPE htMG+a5dpNNrXzuz92vJNY2unaxceB3ti2QoymK+5F0u1OEyZCgdzP9YsWH4Ul7cJ7+a 121w== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOw3FzWABrIiWVaiXu5mrcXEh8lBJYk5cn3qzQM5+nLQgSjjSanw h9crQY7JJRGyktsn2PgOngr7qivw0Q== X-Received: by 10.55.20.36 with SMTP id e36mr51289101qkh.1.1499204337071; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 14:38:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.55.26.151 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 14:38:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: "Mohit P. Tahiliani" Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 03:08:36 +0530 Message-ID: To: Kuhn Nicolas Cc: "aqm@ietf.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1144c902f4faa4055384b5a7" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [aqm] Design and Implementation of RFC 7928 for ns-3 X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 21:39:00 -0000 --001a1144c902f4faa4055384b5a7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Dear All, The paper "Design and Implementation of AQM Evaluation Suite for ns-3" is now available online at [1]. Hope it helps. Regards, Mohit P. Tahiliani [1] https://doi.org/10.1145/3067665.3067674 P.S.: Thank you Nicolas for sharing the links of this project in the group. On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:26 PM, Kuhn Nicolas wrote: > Dear all, > > > > For your information, a paper implementing the AQM evaluation guidelines > in ns-3 has recently been published. > > The project is described in [1] and [2]; the source code is available in > [3]. > > Thanks a lot to the authors! > > > > Cheers, > > > > Nico > > > > [1] https://aqm-eval-suite.github.io/ > > [2] Ankit Deepak, K. S. Shravya, and Mohit P. Tahiliani. 2017. Design and > Implementation of AQM Evaluation Suite for ns-3. In Proceedings of the > Workshop on ns-3 (WNS3 '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 87-94. DOI: > https://doi.org/10.1145/3067665.3067674 > > [3] https://github.com/aqm-eval-suite/ns-3-dev-git > > > > _______________________________________________ > aqm mailing list > aqm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm > > --001a1144c902f4faa4055384b5a7 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear All,

The paper &quo= t;Design and Implementation of AQM Evaluation Suite for ns-3" is now a= vailable online at [1].

Hope it helps.
<= br>
Regards,
Mohit P. Tahiliani

[1]=C2=A0https://doi.= org/10.1145/3067665.3067674

P.S.: Thank yo= u Nicolas for sharing the links of this project in the group.

On Thu, May 18, 201= 7 at 10:26 PM, Kuhn Nicolas <Nicolas.Kuhn@cnes.fr> wrote:=

Dear all,<= /p>

=C2=A0

For your information, a paper i= mplementing the AQM evaluation guidelines in ns-3 has recently been publish= ed.

The project is described in [1]= and [2]; the source code is available in [3].

Thanks a lot to the authors!=

=C2=A0

Cheers,

=C2=A0

Nico

=C2=A0

[1] https://aqm-eval-suite.github.io/=

[2] Ank= it Deepak, K. S. Shravya, and Mohit P. Tahiliani. 2017. Design and Implemen= tation of AQM Evaluation Suite for ns-3. In Proceedings of the Workshop on = ns-3 (WNS3 '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 87-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3067665.3067674

[3] https://github.com/aqm-eval-suite/ns-3-dev-git

=C2=A0


_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
aqm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm


--001a1144c902f4faa4055384b5a7-- From nobody Thu Jul 6 08:49:46 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60361317CE for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 08:49:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.003 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7sk23cyyBwDc for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 08:49:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.taht.net (mail.taht.net [176.58.107.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EA4A1317CB for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 08:49:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nemesis.taht.net (unknown [IPv6:2603:3024:1536:86f0:2e0:4cff:fec1:1206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.taht.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5836C213CC for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 15:49:37 +0000 (UTC) From: Dave Taht To: aqm@ietf.org Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 08:49:35 -0700 Message-ID: <871sptbm5s.fsf@nemesis.taht.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Archived-At: Subject: [aqm] codel and fq_codel drafts X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 15:49:44 -0000 It appears that the codel draft is still not done? I am not attending this ietf, but if there is any way to to incent the authors to finish this up - feeding 'em beer and cookies, or strapping 'em to a chair with bungie cords in front of a laptop - or all three! I'd be *very* supportive. From nobody Thu Jul 6 10:20:44 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5873212EC32 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 10:20:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48Mg2A5wktSu for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 10:20:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-it0-x229.google.com (mail-it0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7000C13168B for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 10:20:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-it0-x229.google.com with SMTP id m68so9039858ith.1 for ; Thu, 06 Jul 2017 10:20:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1suklkpUayQqt3GVMFVMd7+dRP00Aqvz/n95LToJpEE=; b=jukcjnIfqFUxsEnwObMKb3tkvA71N3DIJVqrP7U6L8V8ARPp/4vtCiWslqfPt9GRJa oh2Kx6ebRRGpvaFIqGSvWfHF5RH8pPkv82iBuFLbmtdZW9xpOmVutPfzPm9XWwfAoTNG NtO9J/OCvrpFjK7Hnv1iLWYJGPI3Gs4jcBqDI9xD/6SBtV1Qv4xKtqJYf1v+2OSG509q Yey2Br2KyDapx77RfdUZe/c+xCAX5lXJWWndXSgEnFqxZbRVbopbxzX3Ku3xYxGli/QL 40FQR+5t0TsUrTStBPCE96W04NIb/wsW5AmTkQX4mYRgWQMt1LxtaZso7ys72IJmHCkt PY2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1suklkpUayQqt3GVMFVMd7+dRP00Aqvz/n95LToJpEE=; b=Tw3wmTmDaNIRdwn2xUSegRJjBibMcLdwQn3ncQAIAfDYcXGWeldfxNaKbW2HOGcxJh WvGTdOURhbdv/nZ7jm+wnQblQcvNVVFB1ha0fO3I5VMRsx21qU3InEL1fcPxKnfsTsEW QsZw1j+WUp4DXXBZodW1a0bXN8pXI3PsEqVtfTFt44MIvOOQVMEVQ386sSe8xm3OpPPa xG0Z4+fThn5xtyNWEeJssfOnHdbwwnAKVeglYUBHeaUzlWIjYckfJ7nDlM7ZIXUuwdxO H2H5/6//+l7NHk4fyL6QAhvLpP08slZ+IAH3d0YeEUPedlHkIS0XCv6VcjEN07YYzTvT xhBA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113CEMFXi/W64thDNjTYIQ3sZUF7GtDWh2xQvoJXLBW+mCvkR4Wo /KfVOLqnDqod8iL5xoZdJQ== X-Received: by 10.36.39.13 with SMTP id g13mr507106ita.87.1499361640575; Thu, 06 Jul 2017 10:20:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.104] (cpe-76-188-215-129.neo.res.rr.com. [76.188.215.129]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y69sm456731itb.20.2017.07.06.10.20.39 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Jul 2017 10:20:39 -0700 (PDT) To: aqm@ietf.org References: <871sptbm5s.fsf@nemesis.taht.net> From: Wesley Eddy Message-ID: <71935ee6-6550-1582-9c65-e69689825f8b@mti-systems.com> Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 13:20:30 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <871sptbm5s.fsf@nemesis.taht.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [aqm] codel and fq_codel drafts X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 17:20:43 -0000 On 7/6/2017 11:49 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > It appears that the codel draft is still not done? > > I am not attending this ietf, but if there is any way to to incent the > authors to finish this up - feeding 'em beer and cookies, or strapping > 'em to a chair with bungie cords in front of a laptop - or all three! > I'd be *very* > supportive. It's passed the IESG balloting and approved, but (I believe) waiting on the editors to make some improvements that were noted during the IESG review, described here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-codel/ballot/ From nobody Thu Jul 6 17:08:27 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15BFE12EC4A for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 17:08:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XRvfDMe6-8cY for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 17:08:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pg0-x22f.google.com (mail-pg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 594FF129482 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 17:08:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id k14so8448261pgr.0 for ; Thu, 06 Jul 2017 17:08:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=QUiz8zCEtfzBWcNcfrVEjb1renNKR75qc7fAgMBp2Yk=; b=LeuIlb+1As1SzTU/o9xWMM1qNAEWQgbR26SfWb3Vlz8Qd+1LHAmeMDg+lIL/S3S8PV YMC4hBARIFmadD8yG7EX9A5MnUZ/M4HqkjAnmCFgwl+NywQV7dz+VWi3UMhHHfPvxeCv JY5MotvkwhRB8KLZMtxyoGSz5QKd4RWssbKc19dj6VUWqRgEdyzyks7LwGH7J2uMwqRY YoV3ZGtnwYujryuO/DzBeXAMddWmxl8/yqzrin8ZkX3x1j5PrXaoGYBT+3qNeL5Jv8Sn 7bOc17UUWg3ykkraTOrnbIRQrZNOMRYckBxDt19WugnNUI+O5vQwbGpOjMyzZd/3HQBD KFcw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QUiz8zCEtfzBWcNcfrVEjb1renNKR75qc7fAgMBp2Yk=; b=QqoDAW8sNws+OZtNZDeXHAYxUBOM0nNFjKhkGX6+sApyY9SaRlifsH8E1EUlcWVsb7 XscNxbzdE06F5vbfyMI5XXAzkJWQwV6tAQ6gagnNp0fAc6oTxYbkwmNP5mpiFW0I2ArK cHXcD7An6AHVmqqAWnvZ4hgPgFm7Hf4gOWycfk0QVSDWm3cB9RjvtIbMwogw/fmeMWcz s4h1+8pNWE4x65zS1/VWWM+j1TX0bZpA+kADemy38eLwqmqDEicgsjmh26la3z0WNogT B373ezAcmMdvRmtrjsNiEOaRU+hExVlV7cIg3i9+xzJb8+3k/mjHJ6nXYddUbAhjjikA NSgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110MH7R9P/2sHLFhTmKPsCdo9AMPXkHxhbpmq/RF8M5CyeLiR6jW fcY6Ul4ADwSqI1NZlRxmbo553mFmBgGOq54= X-Received: by 10.84.232.207 with SMTP id x15mr31946537plm.173.1499386103807; Thu, 06 Jul 2017 17:08:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.153.19 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 17:08:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <71935ee6-6550-1582-9c65-e69689825f8b@mti-systems.com> References: <871sptbm5s.fsf@nemesis.taht.net> <71935ee6-6550-1582-9c65-e69689825f8b@mti-systems.com> From: Jana Iyengar Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 17:08:23 -0700 Message-ID: To: Wesley Eddy Cc: aqm@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403043621c6197f610553af0806" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [aqm] codel and fq_codel drafts X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:08:26 -0000 --f403043621c6197f610553af0806 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" This is on my head. I was hoping to get it done before the drafts deadline, but other work took precedence. I'll get it done soon. Sigh. Cookies not required, but strapping me down with a good tea cannot hurt :-) On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Wesley Eddy wrote: > On 7/6/2017 11:49 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > >> It appears that the codel draft is still not done? >> >> I am not attending this ietf, but if there is any way to to incent the >> authors to finish this up - feeding 'em beer and cookies, or strapping >> 'em to a chair with bungie cords in front of a laptop - or all three! >> I'd be *very* >> supportive. >> > > > It's passed the IESG balloting and approved, but (I believe) waiting on > the editors to make some improvements that were noted during the IESG > review, described here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-codel/ballot/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > aqm mailing list > aqm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm > --f403043621c6197f610553af0806 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This is on my head. I was hoping to get it done before the= drafts deadline, but other work took precedence. I'll get it done soon= . Sigh.

Cookies not required, but strapping me down with a goo= d tea cannot hurt :-)


On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 10:20 AM, W= esley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> wrote:
On 7/6/2017 11:49 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
It appears that the codel draft is still not done?

I am not attending this ietf, but if there is any way to to incent the
authors to finish this up - feeding 'em beer and cookies, or strapping<= br> 'em to a chair with bungie cords in front of a laptop - or all three! I'd be *very*
supportive.


 It's passed the IESG balloting and approved, but (I believe) waiting on= the editors to make some improvements that were noted during the IESG revi= ew, described here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/d= raft-ietf-aqm-codel/ballot/



_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
aqm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm

--f403043621c6197f610553af0806--