From wwwrun@rfc-editor.org Tue Sep 7 09:21:59 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8CB3A6A5E; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 09:21:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.336 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.336 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.265, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id as4qoCUITm9T; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 09:21:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2f]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0152A3A6A4D; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 09:21:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 96AA1E06A6; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 09:22:26 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20100907162226.96AA1E06A6@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 09:22:26 -0700 (PDT) Cc: autoconf@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [Autoconf] RFC 5889 on IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:21:59 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 5889 Title: IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks Author: E. Baccelli, Ed., M. Townsley, Ed. Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: September 2010 Mailbox: Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr, mark@townsley.net Pages: 8 Characters: 14918 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model-03.txt URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5889.txt This document describes a model for configuring IP addresses and subnet prefixes on the interfaces of routers which connect to links with undetermined connectivity properties. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes. This document is a product of the Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html. For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html. Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC From alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com Wed Sep 8 12:37:00 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C813A69A8 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 12:37:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.636 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.636 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.613, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qZntNC2aKlfI for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 12:36:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr (smtp1-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3D13A69E0 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 12:36:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [82.239.213.32]) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35AFD94012E for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 21:37:17 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C87E5EB.5060608@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:37:15 +0200 From: Alexandru Petrescu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; fr; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100825 Thunderbird/3.1.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: autoconf@ietf.org References: <20100907162226.96AA1E06A6@rfc-editor.org> In-Reply-To: <20100907162226.96AA1E06A6@rfc-editor.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100908-1, 08/09/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [Autoconf] RFC 5889 on IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:37:00 -0000 AUTOCONF group, I am happy this is a Request For Comments! The title sounds good, it could be read as "an" addressing model. It doesn't say exclusively "Router" as it may have shadowed the notion of end system being configured. The text on link-local addresses reads good, balanced between the initial reluctance of lls and the acceptance they could be unique globally when that bit is ok. Alex Le 07/09/2010 18:22, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org a écrit : > > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. > > > RFC 5889 > > Title: IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks Author: E. > Baccelli, Ed., M. Townsley, Ed. Status: Informational Stream: > IETF Date: September 2010 Mailbox: > Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr, mark@townsley.net Pages: 8 > Characters: 14918 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None > > I-D Tag: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model-03.txt > > URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5889.txt > > This document describes a model for configuring IP addresses and > subnet prefixes on the interfaces of routers which connect to links > with undetermined connectivity properties. This document is not an > Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for > informational purposes. > > This document is a product of the Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration > Working Group of the IETF. > > > INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet > community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. > Distribution of this memo is unlimited. > > This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To > subscribe or unsubscribe, see > http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist > > For searching the RFC series, see > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html. For downloading RFCs, see > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html. > > Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the > author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. > Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are > for unlimited distribution. > > > The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC > > > _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing > list Autoconf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf > From ryuji.wakikawa@gmail.com Thu Sep 16 17:16:30 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514493A6A89 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:16:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jbG3-nrqA3Tz for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:16:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pw0-f44.google.com (mail-pw0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8723A6999 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:16:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pwi1 with SMTP id 1so860791pwi.31 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:16:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:references:to:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer; bh=1Rb98U1iUoM5CGXPgl2IECt/9mF2XetmeHoFCmRJ5X8=; b=PExlewqPVu7A0Pj0hCZ3aSpi8oRJv1szjcP2lhsGnQTfTNeWnukqyDl5Z4jC8FBAQd 4DPGAYYBLqxdCT5L3V+26ylh2GHl6tvhQwafgr/O1mpPvR0D3JSMDH3D2oR9epEMJogR K/QsEjuwf16RFa5xGbAk/REAEXh2/MDVCInuc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:references :to:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=cKIrG/BN+2bGCPNUQp2Opfg/BR12jsLORCoQ86TPTQel3s8R/JRfHuKjY0/eBJ84Sf l6LxR1oKFJvY6/Y6foNW5Sm+Ut7u/cs+t/x+4nggTo3x7pq7odAFpNA7YvxAyXLt73PS Q4a0nvglfYMKw4itIn0gGD77W+SQUZmAv61KU= Received: by 10.142.223.2 with SMTP id v2mr3464919wfg.340.1284682613258; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:16:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.18.127] (adsl-99-49-9-50.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net [99.49.9.50]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v3sm1721680wfv.11.2010.09.16.17.16.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:16:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Ryuji Wakikawa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:16:50 -0700 References: <20100916232602.BE4603A69FC@core3.amsl.com> To: "Autoconf autoconf@ietf.org" Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Subject: [Autoconf] Fwd: NomCom 2010-2011: Call for More Nominations X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:16:30 -0000 FYI ryuji Begin forwarded message: > From: NomCom Chair > Date: 2010/09/16 16:26:02GMT-07:00 > To: IETF Announcement list > Subject: NomCom 2010-2011: Call for More Nominations=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > Hi Folks, >=20 > Nominations have slowed down dramatically, so this update is to enlist=20= > the community in an effort to pick up the pace.=20 >=20 > We are very far behind in nominations for all the open positions but = in=20 > particular we need nominations for the IESG and IAOC open positions.=20= > There have been no nominations received (other than for the = incumbents)=20 > in INT, RAI, and RTG, and only 1 for OPS. Likewise, in IAOC there = have=20 > been no nominations submitted other than the incumbent. >=20 > The acceptance rates of those nominated has also been very slow. In=20 > order to initiate the open list of willing nominees we are in need of = a=20 > reasonable number of acceptances, and due to the low number of = nominees=20 > and acceptances have delayed the start date for publishing the first=20= > open list to September 20. So if you have been nominated and are=20 > willing to serve, but have not yet confirmed this by email back to the=20= > NomCom, please do so as soon as possible. >=20 > We need Community input and participation! We cannot properly execute=20= > the task of selecting the best candidates for these positions with so=20= > few nominations and acceptances. So, please consider making=20 > nominations for the open positions, in particular those for which we=20= > have so few nominations =88 it takes just a few minutes of your time.=20= > Right now, we just need the names/email addresses. >=20 > Why do we need more nominations? Well, even if you think a willing > incumbent is doing a very good job and should be returned, his or her > ability to serve again might be impacted by unforeseen circumstances > between now and March. NomCom needs to consider multiple nominees to = be > prepared in the event one or more candidates is unable to serve come = next > March and to ensure we have chosen the best candidate.=20 >=20 > There are several ways you can help the IETF Nominating Committee. >=20 > - You may nominate yourself. > - You can nominate someone you know whom you think would do a good = job. >=20 > Do not worry about whether they might already be nominated. We would=20= > much prefer to receive the same nomination several times rather than=20= > miss a good person we should consider. >=20 > How to submit Nominations: > -------------------------- > The list of positions we need to fill, and the provided Job=20 > Descriptions, and forms for nominations, can be found in the call for=20= > nominations at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ann/nomcom/2468/=20 >=20 > You may enter a nomination by going to the following URL=20 > https://wiki.tools.ietf.org/group/nomcom/10/nominate >=20 > You may also nominate someone by sending an email to nomcom10@ietf.org=20= > and giving us their name, email address and the open position you are=20= > nominating them for. We will take care of the rest.=20 >=20 > If you are asked for a user name and password, use an existing ietf = login > and password. If you need a login and password, request one from the = tools > page at the following URL http://trac.tools.ietf.org/newlogin >=20 >=20 > Open List: > ---------- > As you already know, NomCom 2010-2011 will follow the policy for "Open=20= > Disclosure of Willing Nominees" described in RFC 5680. >=20 > Feedback Collection: > -------------------- > Once the open list is available, the entire community will be invited=20= > to provide feedback. I will send a further announcement requesting=20 > feedback on the nominees, describing how to submit feedback, and how = to=20 > view the open list of nominees.=20 >=20 > Thank you, >=20 > Thomas Walsh > Chair, NomCom 2010-2011 > nomcom-chair@ietf.org > twalsh@juniper.net >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > IETF-Announce mailing list > IETF-Announce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce From paul@marvell.com Fri Sep 24 17:33:19 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992C23A67FA for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:33:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pwq3xoRw5RXR for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:33:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na3sys009aog105.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog105.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.75]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 383E23A6AA5 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:33:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from source ([65.219.4.130]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob105.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTJ1Dbt0iHd/GuemDcaqTuravT0h2C4Up@postini.com; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:33:51 PDT Received: from SC-vEXCH2.marvell.com ([10.93.76.134]) by sc-owa02.marvell.com ([10.93.76.22]) with mapi; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:33:50 -0700 From: Paul Lambert To: Alexandru Petrescu , "autoconf@ietf.org" Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:32:22 -0700 Thread-Topic: [Autoconf] RFC 5889 on IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks Thread-Index: ActPjUkjpqFaKgTYR9CtDa9qkLF6EAMupxvg Message-ID: <7BAC95F5A7E67643AAFB2C31BEE662D013D9AE5390@SC-VEXCH2.marvell.com> References: <20100907162226.96AA1E06A6@rfc-editor.org> <4C87E5EB.5060608@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C87E5EB.5060608@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Autoconf] RFC 5889 on IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 00:33:19 -0000 > AUTOCONF group, >=20 > I am happy this is a Request For Comments! > > The title sounds good, it could be read as "an" addressing model. It > doesn't say exclusively "Router" as it may have shadowed the notion of > end system being configured. >=20 > The text on link-local addresses reads good, balanced between the > initial reluctance of lls and the acceptance they could be unique > globally when that bit is ok. I'm not unhappy with the draft - but I find it does not provide very much g= uidance or any solutions. Yes - link local does not work well. If we have an ad hoc (802.11 IBSS) ne= twork, what is the recommended way to assign an IPv4 address? Paul PS - sorry, for delay in comments to the list - I lurk very infrequently PPS - I'm working with a vendor consortium (Wi-Fi Alliance) on IBSS interop= erability - IP address assignment would be useful :-) From Chris.Dearlove@baesystems.com Mon Sep 27 02:19:23 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D253A6C55 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 02:19:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.641 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.641 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.042, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MKAYFLnNn2Xf for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 02:19:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ukmta3.baesystems.com (ukmta3.baesystems.com [20.133.40.55]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C5283A6A17 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 02:19:21 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,242,1283727600"; d="scan'208";a="89672391" Received: from unknown (HELO baemasodc004.greenlnk.net) ([10.108.36.11]) by Baemasodc001ir.sharelnk.net with ESMTP; 27 Sep 2010 10:19:59 +0100 Received: from glkms1102.GREENLNK.NET (glkms1102.greenlnk.net [10.108.36.193]) by baemasodc004.greenlnk.net (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id o8R9JwSD032029; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:19:58 +0100 Received: from GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET ([10.15.184.93]) by glkms1102.GREENLNK.NET with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:19:58 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:19:24 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7BAC95F5A7E67643AAFB2C31BEE662D013D9AE5390@SC-VEXCH2.marvell.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [Autoconf] RFC 5889 on IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks Thread-Index: ActPjUkjpqFaKgTYR9CtDa9qkLF6EAMupxvgAHdBkQA= References: <20100907162226.96AA1E06A6@rfc-editor.org><4C87E5EB.5060608@gmail.com> <7BAC95F5A7E67643AAFB2C31BEE662D013D9AE5390@SC-VEXCH2.marvell.com> From: "Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" To: "Paul Lambert" , "Alexandru Petrescu" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Sep 2010 09:19:58.0544 (UTC) FILETIME=[27D7B500:01CB5E25] Subject: Re: [Autoconf] RFC 5889 on IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:19:23 -0000 > I'm not unhappy with the draft - but I find it does > not provide very much guidance or any solutions. This makes no attempt to provide any solutions. That work should be starting now. ******************************************************************** This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or distribute its contents to any other person. ******************************************************************** From paul@marvell.com Mon Sep 27 13:08:30 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065E63A6B5B for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:08:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.392 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.392 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.207, BAYES_40=-0.185, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dX9D1aZ8dcRT for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:08:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na3sys009aog101.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog101.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.67]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 017B73A6B52 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:08:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from source ([65.219.4.130]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob101.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTKD5z8ORmNNQgEqez2LbxrPHEyfxZuwk@postini.com; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:09:08 PDT Received: from SC-vEXCH2.marvell.com ([10.93.76.134]) by sc-owa02.marvell.com ([10.93.76.22]) with mapi; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:08:47 -0700 From: Paul Lambert To: "Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" , Alexandru Petrescu , "autoconf@ietf.org" Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:07:15 -0700 Thread-Topic: [Autoconf] RFC 5889 on IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks Thread-Index: ActPjUkjpqFaKgTYR9CtDa9qkLF6EAMupxvgAHdBkQAAFqaxgA== Message-ID: <7BAC95F5A7E67643AAFB2C31BEE662D013DBF1BE54@SC-VEXCH2.marvell.com> References: <20100907162226.96AA1E06A6@rfc-editor.org><4C87E5EB.5060608@gmail.com> <7BAC95F5A7E67643AAFB2C31BEE662D013D9AE5390@SC-VEXCH2.marvell.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Autoconf] RFC 5889 on IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:08:30 -0000 Great. Glad to hear that .... will start to track more closely ... Paul =20 Paul A. Lambert | Marvell Semiconductor | +1 650-787-9141 > -----Original Message----- > From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK) [mailto:Chris.Dearlove@baesystems.com] > Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 2:19 AM > To: Paul Lambert; Alexandru Petrescu; autoconf@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [Autoconf] RFC 5889 on IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Network= s >=20 > > I'm not unhappy with the draft - but I find it does > > not provide very much guidance or any solutions. >=20 > This makes no attempt to provide any solutions. That > work should be starting now. >=20 > ******************************************************************** > This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended > recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended > recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender. > You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or > distribute its contents to any other person. > ********************************************************************