From nobody Thu Sep  8 09:30:39 2016
Return-Path: <marilia.hirano@icann.org>
X-Original-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76FC12B095 for <behave@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed,  7 Sep 2016 16:09:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <nAw4tx7Gxyq8>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Improper folded header field made up entirely of whitespace (char 20 hex): Subject: IANA 2016 customer survey\n 
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.729
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.729 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nAw4tx7Gxyq8 for <behave@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed,  7 Sep 2016 16:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp02.icann.org (smtp01.icann.org [192.0.46.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C696912B010 for <behave@ietf.org>; Wed,  7 Sep 2016 16:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imgmt2.lax.icann.org (imgmt2.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp02.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3470E454B for <behave@ietf.org>; Wed,  7 Sep 2016 23:09:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by imgmt2.lax.icann.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u87N9PSO000497 for <behave@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 23:09:25 GMT
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 23:09:25 GMT
Message-Id: <201609072309.u87N9PSO000497@imgmt2.lax.icann.org>
From: Marilia Hirano <marilia.hirano@icann.org>
To: behave@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/behave/P2A2FVYLObpH_Z4vsj-mrVP_KH0>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 09:30:37 -0700
Subject: [BEHAVE] IANA 2016 customer survey
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/behave/>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 23:09:28 -0000

Dear IANA Customer,

ICANN strives to continuously improve its delivery of the IANA functions.
We have engaged Ebiquity, an independent research firm to run our 2016
customer survey and judy.bromley@ebiquityinsights.com will send you an
invitation to participate early next week.
 
Ebiquity is committed to protecting the confidentiality of all respondents
in line with the Code of Conduct of ESOMAR and CASRO. This means data is
reported to ICANN in aggregate, so that all opinions are confidential and
not attributed to any specific individual.
  
Also, based on your feedback from last year, Ebiquity has upgraded its
SSL/TLS certificate to SHA-2 (256-bit encryption).
   
We appreciate your time and helping us improve the delivery of the IANA
functions.
    
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at
marilia.hirano@icann.org.
	 
Sincerely,
	  
Marilia Hirano


From nobody Wed Sep 28 07:52:18 2016
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1BD12B0F6 for <behave@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 07:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.918
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.316, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pV39CSi3VmkE for <behave@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 07:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEAEE12B0D5 for <behave@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 07:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id A66B1B825B8; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 07:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
To: rohan@ekabal.com, philip_matthews@magma.ca, jdrosen@jdrosen.net, spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com, ietf@kuehlewind.net, dwing@cisco.com, dthaler@microsoft.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20160928145214.A66B1B825B8@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 07:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/behave/EPMhHlHBQyVwnIH9OZBZkZKufOA>
Cc: cochiriac@luxoft.com, behave@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [BEHAVE] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5766 (4815)
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/behave/>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 14:52:17 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5766,
"Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN): Relay Extensions to Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5766&eid=4815

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Costin <cochiriac@luxoft.com>

Section: 11.2.

Original Text
-------------
 The channel number is in the range 0x4000 through 0x7FFE
      (inclusive);

Corrected Text
--------------
 The channel number is in the range 0x4000 through 0x7FFF
      (inclusive);

Notes
-----
It seems in the rest of the channel numbers allowed range definitions the values are 0x4000 through 0x7FFF. See: 11.  Channels, 18.  IANA Considerations.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5766 (draft-ietf-behave-turn-16)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN): Relay Extensions to Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)
Publication Date    : April 2010
Author(s)           : R. Mahy, P. Matthews, J. Rosenberg
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance
Area                : Transport
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG