From nobody Sat May 2 00:37:03 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: expand-draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community.all@virtual.ietf.org Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 6F0431B2E38; Fri, 1 May 2015 12:40:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community.all@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community.all@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E521B2E30 for ; Fri, 1 May 2015 12:40:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -9.5 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ifqh5fVoFTFT for ; Fri, 1 May 2015 12:40:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E1E11B2E19 for ; Fri, 1 May 2015 12:40:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com ([173.37.142.95]:22682) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_128_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1YoGnW-0006Ly-FJ; Fri, 01 May 2015 12:40:32 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=859; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1430509230; x=1431718830; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=av28M9LoU4SHvy+HengLJR0P3dImlN1v4K2lhp7907c=; b=Zhh21O3fRquHeZG3zRg50Iq6o94uHU8dI9n8Zs+9oLzYa2iIueoTBA5h 8RppMyQ+Jw8lUFcF/uxXH5eIhZ7KZG0gmpB6SFqvAoBu48hf3vm2Y/lwl jNiQYpHe05ww4bUHlhoJG+FVYK+EnF5mLTB2hhDwaQprzVFRr0acUKOD8 c=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BPBACc1UNV/5NdJa1cgwxTXAXFTAmBVoYCAoFVOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEIQEBBDo/EAIBCDYQMiUBAQQOBRQGiBENxyMBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQETBIs4hQUHhC0BBI9LgiSECoZAgSODS4lhg16DUCODdG+BRIEBAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,351,1427760000"; d="scan'208";a="146245913" Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 May 2015 19:40:23 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com [173.37.183.86]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t41JeNfv015065 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 1 May 2015 19:40:23 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.9.76]) by xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com ([173.37.183.86]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 1 May 2015 14:40:23 -0500 From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" To: "draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community.all@tools.ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Status of draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community Thread-Index: AdBD8Vlu4e9Jq2IaTbGt/5gLq87JzhAXa7aA Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 19:40:22 +0000 Message-ID: References: <055b01d043f1$93d4cac0$bb7e6040$@olddog.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <055b01d043f1$93d4cac0$bb7e6040$@olddog.co.uk> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.4] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <74F9AF663F09ED48B28EC45E5932783D@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 173.37.142.95 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: bess-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community.all@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: aretana@cisco.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) Resent-To: draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community.all@ietf.org Resent-To: bess-chairs@ietf.org Resent-Message-Id: <20150501194032.4E1E11B2E19@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 12:40:32 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: aretana@cisco.com Archived-At: Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 02 May 2015 00:37:03 -0700 Cc: "bess-chairs@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Status of draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 19:40:34 -0000 [Took Adrian off.] Hi! Any ideas on when we might see the update? Thanks! Alvaro. On 2/8/15, 5:50 PM, "Adrian Farrel" wrote: >Hi authors, > >Good news /bad news :-) > >The IESG reviewed your document on Thursday on the telechat and approved >it for publication as an RFC. Well done. > >However, there are a few minor bits and pieces that need to be tidied up. >You can see it all in the datatracker at >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community/ball >ot/ > > It's a little more than I like to put in an RFC Editor note, so I've >marked the I-D as "Revised I-D needed". > >As soon as you post a revision, I'll pass it on to the RFC Editor. > >Please shout if you have any trouble working out what to do with the >various comments. > >Thanks for all the work. > >Adrian From nobody Mon May 4 18:47:01 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA961A92BB; Mon, 4 May 2015 18:46:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.912 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qTVTSGwaQXGb; Mon, 4 May 2015 18:46:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68251B2D78; Mon, 4 May 2015 18:46:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 7E8E9180476; Mon, 4 May 2015 18:45:27 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20150505014527.7E8E9180476@rfc-editor.org> Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 18:45:27 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, bess@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [bess] RFC 7543 on Covering Prefixes Outbound Route Filter for BGP-4 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 01:46:52 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 7543 Title: Covering Prefixes Outbound Route Filter for BGP-4 Author: H. Jeng, L. Jalil, R. Bonica, K. Patel, L. Yong Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: May 2015 Mailbox: hj2387@att.com, luay.jalil@verizon.com, rbonica@juniper.net, keyupate@cisco.com, lucy.yong@huawei.com Pages: 21 Characters: 38583 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-bess-orf-covering-prefixes-06.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7543 This document defines a new Outbound Route Filter (ORF) type, called the Covering Prefixes ORF (CP-ORF). CP-ORF is applicable in Virtual Hub-and-Spoke VPNs. It also is applicable in BGP/MPLS Ethernet VPN (EVPN) networks. This document is a product of the BGP Enabled Services Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC From nobody Thu May 7 13:06:19 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F7E1ACECE; Thu, 7 May 2015 13:06:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LoQROWhbO9Bk; Thu, 7 May 2015 13:06:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E64391ACE44; Thu, 7 May 2015 13:06:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.0.2.p2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20150507200617.27774.86633.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 13:06:17 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-extranet-02.txt X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 20:06:19 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled Services Working Group of the IETF. Title : Extranet Multicast in BGP/IP MPLS VPNs Authors : Yakov Rekhter Eric C. Rosen Rahul Aggarwal Yiqun Cai Thomas Morin Filename : draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-extranet-02.txt Pages : 59 Date : 2015-05-07 Abstract: Previous RFCs specify the procedures necessary to allow IP multicast traffic to travel from one site to another within a BGP/MPLS IP VPN (Virtual Private Network). However, it is sometimes desirable to allow multicast traffic whose source is in one VPN to be received by systems that are in another VPN. This is known as a "Multicast VPN (MVPN) extranet". This document updates RFCs 6513, 6514, and 6625 by specifying the procedures that are necessary in order to provide MVPN extranet service. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-extranet/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-extranet-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-extranet-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Mon May 11 06:43:52 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 861051A8886; Mon, 11 May 2015 06:43:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n_C4Tb6yBv8S; Mon, 11 May 2015 06:43:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F501A1F1D; Mon, 11 May 2015 06:43:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.0.2.p3 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20150511134349.11761.28024.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 06:43:49 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-ir-01.txt X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 13:43:50 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled Services Working Group of the IETF. Title : Ingress Replication Tunnels in Multicast VPN Authors : Eric C. Rosen Karthik Subramanian Zhaohui Zhang Filename : draft-ietf-bess-ir-01.txt Pages : 19 Date : 2015-05-11 Abstract: RFCs 6513, 6514, and other RFCs describe procedures by which a Service Provider may offer Multicast VPN service to its customers. These procedures create point-to-multipoint (P2MP) or multipoint-to- multipoint trees across the Service Provider's backbone. One type of P2MP tree that may be used is known as an "Ingress Replication (IR) tunnel". In an IR tunnel, a parent node need not be "directly connected" to its child nodes. When a parent node has to send a multicast data packet to its child nodes, it does not use layer 2 multicast, IP multicast, or MPLS multicast to do so. Rather, it makes n individual copies, and then unicasts each copy, through an IP or MPLS unicast tunnel, to exactly one child node. While the prior MVPN specifications allow the use of IR tunnels, those specifications are not always very clear or explicit about how the MVPN protocol elements and procedures are applied to IR tunnels. This document updates RFCs 6513 and 6514 by adding additional details that are specific to the use of IR tunnels. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-ir/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-ir-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-ir-01 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Tue May 12 00:04:46 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B28D1A1AE6 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 00:04:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wlL8bsZ22r-Y for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 00:04:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BA831A1AE3 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 00:04:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BVX96090; Tue, 12 May 2015 07:04:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nkgeml407-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.38) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 12 May 2015 08:04:40 +0100 Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.244]) by nkgeml407-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 12 May 2015 15:04:29 +0800 From: Haoweiguo To: "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-hao-bess-evpn-df-handshaking-02.txt Thread-Index: AQHQjIAnN350NtCaDk2HN0E4EAjy0p1357U+ Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 07:04:27 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20150512065151.3269.40943.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20150512065151.3269.40943.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.135.23.94] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Cc: Lucy yong , Liangqiandeng Subject: Re: [bess] New Version Notification for draft-hao-bess-evpn-df-handshaking-02.txt X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 07:04:45 -0000 Hi Folks, A new version of "Handshaking mechanism for DF election" is proposed. This = new version tries to more clearly articulate the dual DF issue and its cons= equences . A MHN usecase is provided, in this case, traffic disruption an= d MAC flip-flop issue will be induced in DF re-election transient period. Your futher suggestions are appriciated. Thanks, weiguo ________________________________________ From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [internet-drafts@ietf.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 14:51 To: Liangqiandeng; Lucy yong; Haoweiguo; Lucy yong; Liangqiandeng; Haoweigu= o Subject: New Version Notification for draft-hao-bess-evpn-df-handshaking-02= .txt A new version of I-D, draft-hao-bess-evpn-df-handshaking-02.txt has been successfully submitted by Weiguo Hao and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-hao-bess-evpn-df-handshaking Revision: 02 Title: Handshaking mechanism for DF election Document date: 2015-05-12 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 11 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hao-bess-evpn-df= -handshaking-02.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hao-bess-evpn-df-han= dshaking/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hao-bess-evpn-df-handshak= ing-02 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-hao-bess-evpn-df-= handshaking-02 Abstract: In [EVPN], in the DF re-election transient period, due to Ethernet Segment route transmission timer and timer clock discrepancy on each PEs, dual DF PEs will co-exist, traffic loop and disruption will be incurred. In MHN case, the consequences are particularly serious. Handshaking mechanism for DF election is introduced in this draft to resolve the problem. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submissio= n until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat= From nobody Thu May 14 01:01:44 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D46C1AC3FF for ; Thu, 14 May 2015 01:01:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1tdg3IY7AC-b for ; Thu, 14 May 2015 01:01:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1321E1B34F5 for ; Thu, 14 May 2015 01:01:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BSN29749; Thu, 14 May 2015 08:01:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.33) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 14 May 2015 09:01:33 +0100 Received: from NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.209]) by nkgeml402-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.33]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 14 May 2015 16:01:26 +0800 From: Xuxiaohu To: "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: one additional use case for L3VPN Prefix ORF (i.e., path optimization in hybrid cloud scenarios) Thread-Index: AdCOHCyRauvHPTcvTCqTiZvFp05OzA== Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 08:01:26 +0000 Message-ID: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE0832D034@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.99.55] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: [bess] one additional use case for L3VPN Prefix ORF (i.e., path optimization in hybrid cloud scenarios) X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 08:01:42 -0000 Hi all, In the hybrid cloud scenario where the private cloud (i.e., the on-premises= data center) is connected to the public cloud via service providers' L3VPN= , if a subnet in the public cloud is extended across multiple DC locations = (either via L3VPN or L2VPN), the L3VPN PE on the private cloud site could a= chieve path optimization by learning host routes originated from the public= cloud. However, it may not be advisable to learn all remote host routes fo= r the PE router due to the routing table scaling concern. With the L3VPN-prefix-ORF as defined in (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-= xu-bess-l3vpn-prefix-orf-01), the PE router now could learn remote host rou= tes on demand. For instance, the PE router could just learn those host rout= es for which there are a certain volume of traffic.=20 Best regards, Xiaohu From nobody Thu May 14 12:59:08 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E767B1A8A6B for ; Thu, 14 May 2015 12:59:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ypA7acMyR_DR for ; Thu, 14 May 2015 12:59:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0715.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::715]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7CF71A1B63 for ; Thu, 14 May 2015 12:59:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.162.224.27) by BLUPR05MB1988.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.162.224.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.160.19; Thu, 14 May 2015 19:58:44 +0000 Received: from BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.162.224.27]) by BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.162.224.27]) with mapi id 15.01.0160.009; Thu, 14 May 2015 19:58:44 +0000 From: Ronald Bonica To: "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: SDN/MPLS 2015 CFP Announcement Thread-Index: AdCOgEx0KvI/Wiu2R9i2LvAjbLWmIg== Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 19:58:44 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14] x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR05MB1988; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:BLUPR05MB1988; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR05MB1988; x-forefront-prvs: 0576145E86 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(2351001)(229853001)(2656002)(99286002)(2501003)(102836002)(15975445007)(33656002)(107886002)(5001960100002)(2900100001)(110136002)(15188555004)(46102003)(66066001)(50986999)(54356999)(74316001)(189998001)(92566002)(76576001)(122556002)(62966003)(77156002)(40100003)(19580395003)(87936001)(86362001)(19580405001)(450100001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR05MB1988; H:BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 May 2015 19:58:44.0615 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR05MB1988 Archived-At: Subject: [bess] SDN/MPLS 2015 CFP Announcement X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 19:59:07 -0000 Call for Presentation Abstract Proposals Now up at http://www.isocore.com/2= 015/cfp.htm Submissions Deadline: May 18 Isocore's 2015 International Conference, the 18th Annual event on new netwo= rking technologies will be held November 15-18, 2015, in Washington, DC. Th= is year, the overarching themes of the conference will be on Softwarization= (Integration of SDN and NFV), Programmatic Control, Security and Operation= al Experience of the Network and Services in Cloud, Data Centers and DevOps= environments. The conference Program Committee is soliciting presentation proposals seeki= ng original and unpublished work to continue the tradition initiated by thi= s conference in 1998 of covering cutting-edge topics. Presentations address= ing new technologies and operational experience are solicited from network = equipment vendors, service providers, the research community, government ag= encies, and enterprise users. In particular, submission in at least the fol= lowing topics areas are of interest * Cybersecurity, Security of the Cloud and Data Governance * Softwarization (Integration of SDN and NFV) of the Network and Services * Service Function Chaining * Mobile and Wireless Packet Infrastructure Please submit your abstracts to cfp2015@isocore.com Regards, Ron Bonica From nobody Sat May 16 13:53:33 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: expand-draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community.all@virtual.ietf.org Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id BB86F1B2FAE; Wed, 6 May 2015 14:41:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community.all@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community.all@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDE01B29A5 for ; Wed, 6 May 2015 14:41:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -9.5 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nHr2jqPAGvBA for ; Wed, 6 May 2015 14:41:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDD8A1B2D96 for ; Wed, 6 May 2015 14:41:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com ([173.37.86.74]:51246) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_128_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1Yq74j-0005EV-Vf; Wed, 06 May 2015 14:41:54 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1181; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1430948514; x=1432158114; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=IQp7stNAyA11fwUXqr/rQSKnFtVDYZadWE6oLjLgmdc=; b=k0nGa/rr88lgrSlbPnaRI9JrXd0tgqOESaJefanOZQxNa9GsWUX5/i+W bapk4Q6fX0X+Yor5FQdhpkk2uFWNtWu0tPpUOd3EFul4KrXHbZC9SC4Tt SrI+vSRtYH17GfGJvYWT6CggNivdIUpzVRec0W67pgSHMEv7Cw6QUxYxg I=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0B+BQBKiUpV/4QNJK1cgwxUXgbHQYYFAoEpTAEBAQEBAYELhCABAQEEOj8MBAIBCBEEAQELFBAyHQgBAQQBDQUIDAaIEg3FRgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARMEizmEVDEHBoMRgRYBBI93gjGEFIdog1aKAINsg1Mjg3ZvAYFDgQEBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,380,1427760000"; d="scan'208";a="417641070" Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 May 2015 21:41:44 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com [173.37.183.82]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t46LfhR1003610 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 6 May 2015 21:41:43 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x12.cisco.com ([169.254.2.170]) by xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([173.37.183.82]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 6 May 2015 16:41:43 -0500 From: "David Smith (djsmith)" To: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" , "draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community.all@tools.ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Status of draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community Thread-Index: AdBD8Vlu4e9Jq2IaTbGt/5gLq87JzhAXa7aAAP2KsoA= Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 21:41:43 +0000 Message-ID: <190333B4AEDA0F4FA72E61A2E7F298A6281CA442@xmb-rcd-x12.cisco.com> References: <055b01d043f1$93d4cac0$bb7e6040$@olddog.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.86.241.75] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 173.37.86.74 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: bess-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community.all@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: djsmith@cisco.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) Resent-To: draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community.all@ietf.org Resent-To: bess-chairs@ietf.org Resent-Message-Id: <20150506214154.DDD8A1B2D96@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 14:41:54 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: djsmith@cisco.com Archived-At: Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 16 May 2015 13:53:31 -0700 Cc: "bess-chairs@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Status of draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 21:41:56 -0000 Pradosh is working on so I'll defer to him. /dave -----Original Message----- From: Alvaro Retana (aretana)=20 Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 3:40 PM To: draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community.all@tools.ietf.org Cc: bess-chairs@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: Status of draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community [Took Adrian off.] Hi! Any ideas on when we might see the update? Thanks! Alvaro. On 2/8/15, 5:50 PM, "Adrian Farrel" wrote: >Hi authors, > >Good news /bad news :-) > >The IESG reviewed your document on Thursday on the telechat and=20 >approved it for publication as an RFC. Well done. > >However, there are a few minor bits and pieces that need to be tidied up. >You can see it all in the datatracker at=20 >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community/b >all >ot/ > > It's a little more than I like to put in an RFC Editor note, so I've=20 >marked the I-D as "Revised I-D needed". > >As soon as you post a revision, I'll pass it on to the RFC Editor. > >Please shout if you have any trouble working out what to do with the=20 >various comments. > >Thanks for all the work. > >Adrian From nobody Mon May 18 06:55:17 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085FE1A89C6; Mon, 18 May 2015 06:55:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZFJOHB48x5tX; Mon, 18 May 2015 06:55:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCCE01A8746; Mon, 18 May 2015 06:55:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.0.3 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20150518135511.28574.13522.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 06:55:11 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-global-table-mcast-01.txt X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 13:55:14 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled Services Working Group of the IETF. Title : Global Table Multicast with BGP-MVPN Procedures Authors : Zhaohui Zhang Lenny Giuliano Eric C. Rosen Karthik Subramanian Dante J. Pacella Jason Schiller Filename : draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-global-table-mcast-01.txt Pages : 21 Date : 2015-05-18 Abstract: RFC6513, RFC6514, and other RFCs describe protocols and procedures which a Service Provider (SP) may deploy in order offer Multicast Virtual Private Network (Multicast VPN or MVPN) service to its customers. Some of these procedures use BGP to distribute VPN- specific multicast routing information across a backbone network. With a small number of relatively minor modifications, the very same BGP procedures can also be used to distribute multicast routing information that is not specific to any VPN. Multicast that is outside the context of a VPN is known as "Global Table Multicast", or sometimes simply as "Internet multicast". In this document, we describe the modifications that are needed to use the MVPN BGP procedures for Global Table Multicast. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-global-table-mcast/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-global-table-mcast-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-global-table-mcast-01 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Mon May 18 20:26:37 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D354F1B2DF0 for ; Mon, 18 May 2015 20:26:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xsiOM5FG5Zoy for ; Mon, 18 May 2015 20:26:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFBF41B2DE7 for ; Mon, 18 May 2015 20:26:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BWF91221; Tue, 19 May 2015 03:26:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.34) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 19 May 2015 04:26:31 +0100 Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.89]) by nkgeml403-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.34]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 19 May 2015 11:26:21 +0800 From: Haoweiguo To: "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-02.txt Thread-Index: AQHQkeKjSPC8u8WdzEe1jgAiMw044p2CobRq Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 03:26:20 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20150519031911.31350.73414.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20150519031911.31350.73414.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.135.23.94] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Cc: Shahram Davari , Robert Raszuk , Andrew Qu , Lucy yong , Osama Zia , Luyuan Fang Subject: Re: [bess] New Version Notification for draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-02.txt X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 03:26:37 -0000 Hi Folks, A new version of "Inter-AS Option B between NVO3 and BGP/MPLS IP VPN networ= k" was posted. Main changes are in section 6. Comparison between RFC 4364 based solution = and NVE-NVA solution are described. Other some editiorial changes are also = made. Your further comments and suggestions are appreciated. Thanks, weiguo ________________________________________ From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [internet-drafts@ietf.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 11:19 To: Lucy yong; Shahram Davari; Andrew Qu; Luyuan Fang; Haoweiguo; Lucy yong= ; Luyuan Fang; Osama Zia; Robert Raszuk; Osama Zia; Shahram Davari; Andrew = Qu; Robert Raszuk; Haoweiguo Subject: New Version Notification for draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-02.txt A new version of I-D, draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-02.txt has been successfully submitted by Weiguo Hao and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn Revision: 02 Title: Inter-AS Option B between NVO3 and BGP/MPLS IP VPN network Document date: 2015-05-19 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 16 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hao-bess-inter-n= vo3-vpn-02.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-= vpn/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-0= 2 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-hao-bess-inter-nv= o3-vpn-02 Abstract: This draft describes the solution of inter-as option-B connection between NVO3 network and MPLS/IP VPN network. The ASBR located in NVO3 network is called ASBR-d, the control plane and data plane procedures at ASBR-d are specified in this document, there are some differences from traditional option-B ASBR defined in [RFC 4364]. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submissio= n until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat= From nobody Tue May 19 12:13:53 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2F6C1AD366 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 12:13:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Otbf5c2NU30r for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 12:13:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C2871AD2A9 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 12:13:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 7DC0BB1845EB6 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 19:13:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t4JJDNQW022100 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 21:13:23 +0200 Received: from [155.132.54.71] (135.239.27.39) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Tue, 19 May 2015 21:13:23 +0200 Message-ID: <555B8B52.90606@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 21:13:22 +0200 From: Martin Vigoureux User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: BESS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [135.239.27.39] Archived-At: Subject: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 19:13:52 -0000 Hello this email starts a Working Group Last Call on http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet which is considered mature and ready for a last working group review. Please read the document if you haven't read the most recent version yet, and send your comments to the list, no later than June the 2nd. *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not be moved forward until a response has been received from each author and contributor. If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thank you M&T From nobody Tue May 19 12:22:36 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA9A1A882E for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 12:22:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2FlHYwLJFFnR for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 12:22:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 332511A86EB for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 12:22:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 191006E81B58; Tue, 19 May 2015 19:22:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t4JJMV3m003869 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 19 May 2015 21:22:31 +0200 Received: from [155.132.54.71] (135.239.27.41) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Tue, 19 May 2015 21:22:30 +0200 Message-ID: <555B8D75.7010302@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 21:22:29 +0200 From: Martin Vigoureux User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [135.239.27.41] Archived-At: Cc: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree@tools.ietf.org Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 19:22:35 -0000 Hello working group, This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree [1] as a working group item. Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). This poll runs until **June the 2nd**. *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author and contributor. If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thank you, Martin & Thomas bess chairs [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree From nobody Tue May 19 12:24:55 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634A31A8ADD for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 12:24:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 45cAZdEmlxLR for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 12:24:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBAFE1A8A9C for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 12:24:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 5D93C648AB3D5; Tue, 19 May 2015 19:24:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t4JJOoAD007110 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 19 May 2015 21:24:50 +0200 Received: from FR711WXCHMBA07.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.3.17]) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.111]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 19 May 2015 21:24:50 +0200 From: "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" To: "VIGOUREUX, MARTIN (MARTIN)" , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree Thread-Index: AQHQkmkt+1qAvpLkPEu+S/lY9hDKq52DFz4A Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 19:24:50 +0000 Message-ID: References: <555B8D75.7010302@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <555B8D75.7010302@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/15.9.0.150408 x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.39] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 19:24:53 -0000 U3VwcG9ydCBhcyBjby1hdXRob3IsIG5vdCBhd2FyZSBvbiBJUFIgcmVsYXRlZCB0byB0aGlzIGRy YWZ0DQoNCg0KDQoNCk9uIDE5LzA1LzE1IDEyOjIyLCAiTWFydGluIFZpZ291cmV1eCIgPG1hcnRp bi52aWdvdXJldXhAYWxjYXRlbC1sdWNlbnQuY29tPiB3cm90ZToNCg0KPkhlbGxvIHdvcmtpbmcg Z3JvdXAsDQo+DQo+VGhpcyBlbWFpbCBzdGFydHMgYSB0d28td2VlayBwb2xsIG9uIGFkb3B0aW5n DQo+ZHJhZnQtc2FqYXNzaS1iZXNzLWV2cG4tZXRyZWUgWzFdIGFzIGEgd29ya2luZyBncm91cCBp dGVtLg0KPg0KPlBsZWFzZSBzZW5kIGNvbW1lbnRzIHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0IGFuZCBzdGF0ZSBpZiB5 b3Ugc3VwcG9ydCBhZG9wdGlvbiBvcg0KPm5vdCAoaW4gdGhlIGxhdGVyIGNhc2UsIHBsZWFzZSBh bHNvIHN0YXRlIHRoZSByZWFzb25zKS4NCj4NCj5UaGlzIHBvbGwgcnVucyB1bnRpbCAqKkp1bmUg dGhlIDJuZCoqLg0KPg0KPg0KPipDb2luY2lkZW50YWxseSosIHdlIGFyZSBhbHNvIHBvbGxpbmcg Zm9yIGtub3dsZWRnZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQgDQo+YXBwbGllcyB0byB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0LCB0 byBlbnN1cmUgdGhhdCBJUFIgaGFzIGJlZW4gZGlzY2xvc2VkIGluIA0KPmNvbXBsaWFuY2Ugd2l0 aCBJRVRGIElQUiBydWxlcyAoc2VlIFJGQ3MgMzk3OSwgNDg3OSwgMzY2OSBhbmQgNTM3OCBmb3Ig DQo+bW9yZSBkZXRhaWxzKS4NCj4NCj4qSWYgeW91IGFyZSBsaXN0ZWQgYXMgYSBkb2N1bWVudCBh dXRob3Igb3IgY29udHJpYnV0b3IqIHBsZWFzZSByZXNwb25kIA0KPnRvIHRoaXMgZW1haWwgYW5k IGluZGljYXRlIHdoZXRoZXIgb3Igbm90IHlvdSBhcmUgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IHJlbGV2YW50IElQ Ui4NCj4NCj5UaGUgZHJhZnQgd2lsbCBub3QgYmUgYWRvcHRlZCB1bnRpbCBhIHJlc3BvbnNlIGhh cyBiZWVuIHJlY2VpdmVkIGZyb20gDQo+ZWFjaCBhdXRob3IgYW5kIGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9yLg0KPg0K PklmIHlvdSBhcmUgbm90IGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhbiBhdXRob3Igb3IgY29udHJpYnV0b3IsIHRoZW4g cGxlYXNlIA0KPmV4cGxpY2l0bHkgcmVzcG9uZCBvbmx5IGlmIHlvdSBhcmUgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55 IElQUiB0aGF0IGhhcyBub3QgeWV0IA0KPmJlZW4gZGlzY2xvc2VkIGluIGNvbmZvcm1hbmNlIHdp dGggSUVURiBydWxlcy4NCj4NCj5UaGFuayB5b3UsDQo+DQo+TWFydGluICYgVGhvbWFzDQo+YmVz cyBjaGFpcnMNCj4NCj5bMV0gaHR0cHM6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LXNhamFz c2ktYmVzcy1ldnBuLWV0cmVlDQo+DQo+X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCj5CRVNTIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KPkJFU1NAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj5odHRw czovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2Jlc3MNCg== From nobody Tue May 19 12:35:27 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53351B29D3 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 12:35:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LlEYPFEp4gCs for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 12:35:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05F031B29AD for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 12:35:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from us70uusmtp3.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.5.2.65]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id E2DE634530A82; Tue, 19 May 2015 19:35:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from US70TWXCHHUB04.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70twxchhub04.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.36]) by us70uusmtp3.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t4JJYrkA002052 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 19 May 2015 15:35:22 -0400 Received: from US70TWXCHMBA10.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.4.234]) by US70TWXCHHUB04.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.5.2.36]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 19 May 2015 15:34:45 -0400 From: "OYA LUENGO, ROBERTO (ROBERTO)" To: "VIGOUREUX, MARTIN (MARTIN)" , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree Thread-Index: AQHQkmk5f7I8VDbfvEitVFoDliMvaJ2DfpaA Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 19:34:44 +0000 Message-ID: References: <555B8D75.7010302@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <555B8D75.7010302@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.2.140509 x-originating-ip: [135.5.27.18] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <8DA87681ECEA0C4FB73F25C47795FC4C@exchange.lucent.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 19:35:27 -0000 Support On 5/19/15, 12:22 PM, "Martin Vigoureux" wrote: >Hello working group, > >This email starts a two-week poll on adopting >draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree [1] as a working group item. > >Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or >not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). > >This poll runs until **June the 2nd**. > > >*Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that >applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in >compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for >more details). > >*If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond >to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant >IPR. > >The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from >each author and contributor. > >If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please >explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet >been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > >Thank you, > >Martin & Thomas >bess chairs > >[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree > >_______________________________________________ >BESS mailing list >BESS@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Tue May 19 13:21:09 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D731B31AA for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 13:21:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hoAT92TEgMVN for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 13:21:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpgre-esg-01.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01DF51B31A0 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 13:21:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.122]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 42885E1097807; Tue, 19 May 2015 20:21:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712wxchhub03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.74]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t4JKL23i006454 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 19 May 2015 22:21:03 +0200 Received: from FR711WXCHMBA03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.3.123]) by FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 19 May 2015 22:21:02 +0200 From: "Rabadan, Jorge (Jorge)" To: "VIGOUREUX, MARTIN (MARTIN)" , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree Thread-Index: AQHQkmkxGi1j1cIgl0assqmxD3px9Z2DJvCA Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 20:21:01 +0000 Message-ID: References: <555B8D75.7010302@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <555B8D75.7010302@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.9.150325 x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.39] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 20:21:08 -0000 U3VwcG9ydCBhcyBjby1hdXRob3IuDQpOb3QgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IElQUi4NClRoeA0KSm9yZ2UN Cg0KLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCkZyb206IE1hcnRpbiBWaWdvdXJldXggPG1h cnRpbi52aWdvdXJldXhAYWxjYXRlbC1sdWNlbnQuY29tPg0KRGF0ZTogVHVlc2RheSwgTWF5IDE5 LCAyMDE1IGF0IDEyOjIyIFBNDQpUbzogImJlc3NAaWV0Zi5vcmciIDxiZXNzQGlldGYub3JnPg0K Q2M6ICJkcmFmdC1zYWphc3NpLWJlc3MtZXZwbi1ldHJlZUB0b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZyINCjxkcmFm dC1zYWphc3NpLWJlc3MtZXZwbi1ldHJlZUB0b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZz4NClN1YmplY3Q6IFtiZXNz XSBQb2xsIGZvciBhZG9wdGlvbjogZHJhZnQtc2FqYXNzaS1iZXNzLWV2cG4tZXRyZWUNCg0KPkhl bGxvIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXAsDQo+DQo+VGhpcyBlbWFpbCBzdGFydHMgYSB0d28td2VlayBwb2xs IG9uIGFkb3B0aW5nDQo+ZHJhZnQtc2FqYXNzaS1iZXNzLWV2cG4tZXRyZWUgWzFdIGFzIGEgd29y a2luZyBncm91cCBpdGVtLg0KPg0KPlBsZWFzZSBzZW5kIGNvbW1lbnRzIHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0IGFu ZCBzdGF0ZSBpZiB5b3Ugc3VwcG9ydCBhZG9wdGlvbiBvcg0KPm5vdCAoaW4gdGhlIGxhdGVyIGNh c2UsIHBsZWFzZSBhbHNvIHN0YXRlIHRoZSByZWFzb25zKS4NCj4NCj5UaGlzIHBvbGwgcnVucyB1 bnRpbCAqKkp1bmUgdGhlIDJuZCoqLg0KPg0KPg0KPipDb2luY2lkZW50YWxseSosIHdlIGFyZSBh bHNvIHBvbGxpbmcgZm9yIGtub3dsZWRnZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQNCj5hcHBsaWVzIHRvIHRo aXMgZHJhZnQsIHRvIGVuc3VyZSB0aGF0IElQUiBoYXMgYmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQgaW4NCj5jb21w bGlhbmNlIHdpdGggSUVURiBJUFIgcnVsZXMgKHNlZSBSRkNzIDM5NzksIDQ4NzksIDM2NjkgYW5k IDUzNzggZm9yDQo+bW9yZSBkZXRhaWxzKS4NCj4NCj4qSWYgeW91IGFyZSBsaXN0ZWQgYXMgYSBk b2N1bWVudCBhdXRob3Igb3IgY29udHJpYnV0b3IqIHBsZWFzZSByZXNwb25kDQo+dG8gdGhpcyBl bWFpbCBhbmQgaW5kaWNhdGUgd2hldGhlciBvciBub3QgeW91IGFyZSBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgcmVs ZXZhbnQNCj5JUFIuDQo+DQo+VGhlIGRyYWZ0IHdpbGwgbm90IGJlIGFkb3B0ZWQgdW50aWwgYSBy ZXNwb25zZSBoYXMgYmVlbiByZWNlaXZlZCBmcm9tDQo+ZWFjaCBhdXRob3IgYW5kIGNvbnRyaWJ1 dG9yLg0KPg0KPklmIHlvdSBhcmUgbm90IGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhbiBhdXRob3Igb3IgY29udHJpYnV0 b3IsIHRoZW4gcGxlYXNlDQo+ZXhwbGljaXRseSByZXNwb25kIG9ubHkgaWYgeW91IGFyZSBhd2Fy ZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQgaGFzIG5vdCB5ZXQNCj5iZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3NlZCBpbiBjb25mb3Jt YW5jZSB3aXRoIElFVEYgcnVsZXMuDQo+DQo+VGhhbmsgeW91LA0KPg0KPk1hcnRpbiAmIFRob21h cw0KPmJlc3MgY2hhaXJzDQo+DQo+WzFdIGh0dHBzOi8vdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaHRtbC9kcmFm dC1zYWphc3NpLWJlc3MtZXZwbi1ldHJlZQ0KPg0KPl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQo+QkVTUyBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCj5CRVNTQGlldGYub3Jn DQo+aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9iZXNzDQoNCg== From nobody Tue May 19 13:33:14 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22481B322D for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 13:33:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8GOxiklawKDk for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 13:33:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usevmg20.ericsson.net (usevmg20.ericsson.net [198.24.6.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC0D21B322E for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 13:32:54 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c618062d-f79a96d000007fb1-14-555b455553ed Received: from EUSAAHC004.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.84]) by usevmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id B2.A7.32689.5554B555; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:14:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from EUSAAMB109.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.126]) by EUSAAHC004.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:32:53 -0400 From: Jeff Tantsura To: Martin Vigoureux , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree Thread-Index: AQHQkmkteiXAw/ogXEKUM5Ofw7Sod52DjtmA Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 20:32:51 +0000 Message-ID: References: <555B8D75.7010302@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <555B8D75.7010302@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.7.141117 x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.10] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <67D3AB788EBFDD45A469C43FEE6629C6@ericsson.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupikeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZXLonRDfUNTrUYM9pU4sVx2cyW+w5dpnV 4s6uL6wOzB6tz/ayeixZ8pPJ48vlz2wBzFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGT/PT2YtuM5Tcf6LfgPj Pq4uRg4OCQETif835LsYOYFMMYkL99azdTFycQgJHGWUaPlzkBnCWc4ocfDVFzaQKjYBA4n/ 346zgDSLCMRK/GoPAwkzCyRLdO9dzwQSFhZwkWg/oA4SFhFwlehpXc4OYRtJ7Pr9khnEZhFQ lZg9ZTcbSDmvgLnEs80pIGEhAUOJju8nwEo4gcq3rvwFZjMCnfb91BomiE3iEreezGeCOFlA Ysme88wQtqjEy8f/WEFsUQE9iZXXm9gg4koSk5aeY4Xo1ZFYsPsTG4RtLbHk/FFmCFtbYtnC 12A2r4CgxMmZT1gmMErMQrJuFpL2WUjaZyFpn4WkfQEj6ypGjtLi1LLcdCODTYzAyDsmwaa7 g3HPS8tDjAIcjEo8vA8SokKFWBPLiitzDzFKc7AoifN+MwwJFRJITyxJzU5NLUgtii8qzUkt PsTIxMEp1cA4LYVdwFf/6J0/2z+3nC8rNZ61suhMdnK4lIfX5WPRoVfeuqs7LShIXbvhuIzj VY40+9eKYtrvMufdTrBUjtshuUq4oSxk35TS3iUvM+o+/2ldOe20SXqXZPravarJTDNb0pJV XSf+db2Ul/xc8M/zKx8KprpYt2ru6mGXXNlRbMGbf8JvP78SS3FGoqEWc1FxIgDauf0LnQIA AA== Archived-At: Cc: "draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 20:33:12 -0000 Yes/support Cheers, Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Martin Vigoureux Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 at 12:22 PM To: "bess@ietf.org" Cc: "draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree@tools.ietf.org" Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree >Hello working group, > >This email starts a two-week poll on adopting >draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree [1] as a working group item. > >Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or >not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). > >This poll runs until **June the 2nd**. > > >*Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that >applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in >compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for >more details). > >*If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond >to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant >IPR. > >The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from >each author and contributor. > >If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please >explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet >been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > >Thank you, > >Martin & Thomas >bess chairs > >[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree > >_______________________________________________ >BESS mailing list >BESS@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Tue May 19 13:35:45 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127191B3232 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 13:35:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o5yqSFG2Xk34 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 13:35:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D39B1A037B for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 13:35:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1445; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1432067736; x=1433277336; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=v8Z8crdPpGG5BFgs23Y4S1pXdeSTUxyAm4qbceNmDwc=; b=UlFEdFZA0HuDNWktvWDgkEE8BX91lrBj8j+f87RMPOkjYyQ9w4EbfOjA tp7bpHchhofgAkzhWsxf3g7Fp5Dnt6gxUyPcWPWv3k0ZTCjvNDQCRqBbj A8fWUGCVjOmChRYElIfTKPJNEKju8KKIP+lEGWcORGl6IKB7uktVTrTAG Y=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BbBAANnltV/51dJa1cgxBUXgbFCQmBUAqFdgKBQjgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhCMBAQQBAQFrCxACAQhGJwslAgQBDQWILA3TVwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARMEizqEIhEBUQeELQWLdoZ2hDGGTYEng2mSACOBZoISb4EMOoEBAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,459,1427760000"; d="scan'208";a="151592591" Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 May 2015 20:35:17 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4JKZGRr026294 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 19 May 2015 20:35:17 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x13.cisco.com ([169.254.15.127]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 19 May 2015 15:35:16 -0500 From: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" To: Martin Vigoureux , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree Thread-Index: AQHQkmkuJQzCHXFHUUq53fjDHpjVz52DoEQA Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 20:35:15 +0000 Message-ID: References: <555B8D75.7010302@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <555B8D75.7010302@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.9.150325 x-originating-ip: [10.128.2.63] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: <40B0439F947D6E42BD35151F92EE7C87@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 20:35:38 -0000 Support as a co-author. Not aware of any IPR that hasn=B9t already been disclosed. Regards, Ali On 5/19/15, 12:22 PM, "Martin Vigoureux" wrote: >Hello working group, > >This email starts a two-week poll on adopting >draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree [1] as a working group item. > >Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or >not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). > >This poll runs until **June the 2nd**. > > >*Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that >applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in >compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for >more details). > >*If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond >to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant >IPR. > >The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from >each author and contributor. > >If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please >explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet >been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > >Thank you, > >Martin & Thomas >bess chairs > >[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree > >_______________________________________________ >BESS mailing list >BESS@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Tue May 19 13:44:44 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14DB1B3257 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 13:44:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lQRmvUZkXOSw for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 13:44:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C97C1B324E for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 13:44:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1698; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1432068282; x=1433277882; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=2lMdKrh6UjOE/HecIAtgUdPPwkIyrnDu6yQi5UELqP0=; b=gPtEzRlXtQIfTc+LUFIByoW4Qk2QSvmg6BpSquK9K71tzsB3ozxeTTW/ JajFh6iMvEUsWopwvDEvINr2TzPpUvTHoTorY1ZNVaHjnCf/2dYliKbEM ziHkqQeBdnxNEhTRkZ/EzfmByjBaxcVipSiwihcsQZf9UAJMa+QYKBYRv 4=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BcBABtn1tV/5RdJa1cgxBUUQ0GxQkJgVAKhXYCgUI4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQiAQEBAwEBAQFrCxACAQgYLicLJQIEDgWIJAgN00sBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQETBIs6hCIRAR4zB4MXgRYFi3aEOoI8hDGGTQGBJoNpkgAjgWaCEm+BDDqBAQEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,459,1427760000"; d="scan'208";a="151639844" Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 May 2015 20:44:41 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com [173.37.183.88]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4JKieOs013568 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 19 May 2015 20:44:40 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.8.191]) by xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([173.37.183.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 19 May 2015 15:44:40 -0500 From: "Sami Boutros (sboutros)" To: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree Thread-Index: AQHQkmkvadezsJf3GkWB7UFWyKPHVp2EFZ6AgAADB4A= Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 20:44:39 +0000 Message-ID: References: <555B8D75.7010302@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.154.212.198] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree@tools.ietf.org" , Martin Vigoureux , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 20:44:42 -0000 same here. Thanks, Sami On May 19, 2015, at 1:35 PM, Ali Sajassi (sajassi) wrot= e: >=20 >=20 > Support as a co-author. Not aware of any IPR that hasn=B9t already been > disclosed. >=20 > Regards, > Ali >=20 > On 5/19/15, 12:22 PM, "Martin Vigoureux" > wrote: >=20 >> Hello working group, >>=20 >> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting >> draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree [1] as a working group item. >>=20 >> Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or >> not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). >>=20 >> This poll runs until **June the 2nd**. >>=20 >>=20 >> *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that >> applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in >> compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for >> more details). >>=20 >> *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond >> to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant >> IPR. >>=20 >> The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from >> each author and contributor. >>=20 >> If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please >> explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet >> been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. >>=20 >> Thank you, >>=20 >> Martin & Thomas >> bess chairs >>=20 >> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> BESS mailing list >> BESS@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess >=20 From nobody Tue May 19 14:32:24 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2311B3351 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 14:32:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J_d7qWefdECF for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 14:32:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ig0-x232.google.com (mail-ig0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 972191B334A for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 14:32:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by igbpi8 with SMTP id pi8so87163520igb.1 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 14:32:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=DRZosDe+2Z1ZHEZTx9X5JVyopanJl9E9J94IjJksjmY=; b=SEmTsXR/DuaJMeFp0n/a/fhd5CdYEE2jrrIQJUVD465dWdoRO0yfqX3FluO9Byw67R MzJnutGEZ+SthQQP92gDp3eY6pfhTxMGjbOm0vzrYcJhGwCBrreH8KYm4+72ZeuY86US dWHBQX87uNDMyJv08bBVw78fEbqTEl19pMYGzIjK5fuivnAhplh23JHVcz9f9wM22PDt VPewtm9NsCkKUvk8vCmh8gvBs9PIa85a87Bp5dwn+jZ9kMih56LrOEV9CvMPebgl0Vur E4NdZMMRVPdO/3vBULTEEwT12FyIfZShK9cZv5wpeZ3Fravp1wDi6KTpBcIsq0cyC3yr qMwg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.27.6 with SMTP id p6mr24118369igg.46.1432071141088; Tue, 19 May 2015 14:32:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.45.6 with HTTP; Tue, 19 May 2015 14:32:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <555B8D75.7010302@alcatel-lucent.com> References: <555B8D75.7010302@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 17:32:21 -0400 Message-ID: From: Aldrin Isaac To: Martin Vigoureux Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b10ce47a873860516760bfd Archived-At: Cc: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree@tools.ietf.org, "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 21:32:23 -0000 --047d7b10ce47a873860516760bfd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Support as co-author. Unaware of any related IPR. Cheers, Aldrin On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Martin Vigoureux < martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: > Hello working group, > > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting > draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree [1] as a working group item. > > Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or > not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). > > This poll runs until **June the 2nd**. > > > *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that > applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance > with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond to > this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. > > The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each > author and contributor. > > If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly > respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in > conformance with IETF rules. > > Thank you, > > Martin & Thomas > bess chairs > > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > --047d7b10ce47a873860516760bfd Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Support as co-author.=C2=A0 Unaware of any related IPR.
Cheers,
Aldrin

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
Hello working group,

This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree [1] as a working group item.

Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or
not (in the later case, please also state the reasons).

This poll runs until **June the 2nd**.


*Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies= to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IE= TF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

*If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond to t= his email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each = author and contributor.

If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly r= espond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in = conformance with IETF rules.

Thank you,

Martin & Thomas
bess chairs

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree<= /a>

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
ht= tps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

--047d7b10ce47a873860516760bfd-- From nobody Tue May 19 17:00:53 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F2F1A6F02 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 17:00:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pt8GGWHy0Eq9 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 17:00:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F10B71A1A02 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 17:00:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1313; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1432080050; x=1433289650; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=fpPa27ZtO8t+qUCz/jbGVBe8YyJTYGd/i3z2wvvgBjc=; b=mAOiUb67z7oGb16uU22p4cSp9vx9HevrAzOmfIrbKc0K7pXFz92+oAJT 7Jy5PRoO6xWf1RiE+dEqu/bgSApFxLAQRW9KlGI4bSlDTcHQdjbMsHUCb Jx1ENnl6uoQHTUtUj3osTfb0sSMRbuywLnH3ZbgIWTm46FEdBJAcUU5Uo E=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ASBQDUzVtV/5FdJa1cgxBUXgbGbIV2AoFGTAEBAQEBAYELhCMCBDo/EgEINkIlAgQBDQWILA3JDAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARMEizqEIhEBUQeELQWSbIQxhk2BJ4NpkgAjgWaCEm+BDDqBAQEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,460,1427760000"; d="scan'208";a="13247373" Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 May 2015 00:00:49 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com [173.37.183.86]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4K00n9c002620 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 20 May 2015 00:00:49 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x13.cisco.com ([169.254.15.127]) by xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com ([173.37.183.86]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 19 May 2015 19:00:48 -0500 From: "Samer Salam (ssalam)" To: Martin Vigoureux , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree Thread-Index: AQHQkmkvKnLOa8JQekOSA6xw6OqGZZ2D2bKA Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 00:00:48 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <555B8D75.7010302@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206 x-originating-ip: [161.44.210.87] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 00:00:52 -0000 Support as co-author. I am not aware of any IPR that has not already been disclosed. Regards, Samer On 2015-05-19 12:22 PM, "Martin Vigoureux" wrote: >Hello working group, > >This email starts a two-week poll on adopting >draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree [1] as a working group item. > >Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or >not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). > >This poll runs until **June the 2nd**. > > >*Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that >applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in >compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for >more details). > >*If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond >to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant >IPR. > >The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from >each author and contributor. > >If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please >explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet >been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > >Thank you, > >Martin & Thomas >bess chairs > >[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree From nobody Tue May 19 17:31:48 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE0111ACD6F for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 17:31:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1eRLa3F6nGbw for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 17:31:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2B521A8773 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 17:31:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2135; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1432081905; x=1433291505; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=/EtLUeFWM6Rf62yQFfR+2Td+tOY4AGSEnmq2zW4USb8=; b=lq5DH/tOVV8ICuamOczX6qM7A2ny+cs0qBzwOhRXNza3i7jCwNlu8yMR XRxMNUim4OCmN0HNlBgROytHif1O9Dj0Y6fkgKwlrx/ergNDIHb1laYE1 XG/0L7CY+GsBIH18ODLGpuJKyo2dDQiYtBOhgcIuMrTkc03aVTepFvgrN 0=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AWBQDt1FtV/4QNJK1ZA4MQVF4GxCOCPwqFdgKBRkwBAQEBAQGBC4QjAQEEAQEBNywICw4CAgEINhAbDAslAgQBDQWILA2ne6JgAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFwSLNoQiEQErFhACBRGEHAWSbIQxhk2BJz6DK5IAI4FmghJvAYEEBxcjgQEBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,461,1427760000"; d="scan'208";a="417986249" Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 May 2015 00:31:44 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com [173.37.183.88]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4K0Vh0u006587 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 20 May 2015 00:31:44 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.4.198]) by xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([173.37.183.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 19 May 2015 19:31:43 -0500 From: "Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)" To: Martin Vigoureux , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree Thread-Index: AQHQkpRYyTVAdu2kgUyU5UcZHAQUhA== Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 00:31:43 +0000 Message-ID: References: <555B8D75.7010302@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <555B8D75.7010302@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.86.254.160] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 00:31:46 -0000 Support! Another important draft! Regards, Patrice Patrice Brissette TECHNICAL LEADER.ENGINEERING pbrisset@cisco.com Phone: +1 613 254 3336 Cisco Systems Canada Co. / Les Systemes Cisco Canada CIE Canada Cisco.com Think before you print.This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Please click here=20 for Company Registration Information. On 2015-05-19, 3:22 PM, "Martin Vigoureux" wrote: >Hello working group, > >This email starts a two-week poll on adopting >draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree [1] as a working group item. > >Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or >not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). > >This poll runs until **June the 2nd**. > > >*Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that >applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in >compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for >more details). > >*If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond >to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant >IPR. > >The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from >each author and contributor. > >If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please >explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet >been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > >Thank you, > >Martin & Thomas >bess chairs > >[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree > >_______________________________________________ >BESS mailing list >BESS@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Tue May 19 18:26:28 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089251B2ACB for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 18:26:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0GFOgcH2RjA6 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 18:26:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73C8C1B2AC0 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 18:26:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BWH02516; Wed, 20 May 2015 01:26:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.35) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 20 May 2015 02:25:39 +0100 Received: from NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.28]) by nkgeml404-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.35]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 20 May 2015 09:25:33 +0800 From: Xuxiaohu To: Martin Vigoureux , BESS Thread-Topic: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet Thread-Index: AQHQkmf3q/Qj1UAe70+HdjE4a9RJvp2EElaA Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 01:25:32 +0000 Message-ID: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE083344E7@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com> References: <555B8B52.90606@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <555B8B52.90606@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.99.55] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 01:26:27 -0000 I'm not aware of any relevant IPR. Best regards, Xiaohu > -----Original Message----- > From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux > Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 3:13 AM > To: BESS > Subject: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet >=20 > Hello >=20 > this email starts a Working Group Last Call on > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet > which is considered mature and ready for a last working group review. >=20 > Please read the document if you haven't read the most recent version yet,= and > send your comments to the list, no later than June the 2nd. >=20 > *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that appli= es to > this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF= IPR rules > (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). >=20 > *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond to= this > email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. >=20 > The draft will not be moved forward until a response has been received fr= om > each author and contributor. >=20 > If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly= respond > only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in confo= rmance > with IETF rules. >=20 >=20 > Thank you > M&T >=20 > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Wed May 20 01:52:02 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC761A1AE6 for ; Wed, 20 May 2015 01:52:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E2DMosOh2LBQ for ; Wed, 20 May 2015 01:51:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 637121A1A9F for ; Wed, 20 May 2015 01:51:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BST28341; Wed, 20 May 2015 08:51:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.32) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 20 May 2015 09:51:56 +0100 Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.89]) by nkgeml401-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.32]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 20 May 2015 16:51:44 +0800 From: Haoweiguo To: "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc-01.txt Thread-Index: AQHQktl1Mnx2G4aX7ke8tBXiECHZmp2EjWJP Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 08:51:44 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20150520084608.658.37680.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20150520084608.658.37680.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.135.23.94] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Cc: Osama Zia , Lucy yong Subject: Re: [bess] New Version Notification for draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc-01.txt X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 08:52:00 -0000 Hi Folks, A new version of "Inter-AS Option C between NVO3 and BGP/MPLS IP VPN networ= k" was posted. The main changes compared with previous ver-00 are as follows: 1. Section 6, add tunnel type in NLRI to cover various NVO3 tunnel encapsul= ation format. 2. Section 7. The process in NVE-NVA architect was modified. 3. Some other editorial changes. Your further comments and suggestions are appreciated. Thanks, weiguo ________________________________________ From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [internet-drafts@ietf.org] Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 16:46 To: Osama Zia; Lucy yong; Haoweiguo; Lucy yong; Osama Zia; Haoweiguo Subject: New Version Notification for draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc= -01.txt A new version of I-D, draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Weiguo Hao and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc Revision: 01 Title: Inter-AS Option C between NVO3 and BGP/MPLS IP VPN network Document date: 2015-05-20 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 14 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hao-bess-inter-n= vo3-vpn-optionc-01.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-= vpn-optionc/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-o= ptionc-01 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-hao-bess-inter-nv= o3-vpn-optionc-01 Abstract: This draft describes inter-as option-C solution between NVO3 network and MPLS/IP VPN network. BGP label routing information is extended to create multi-hop forwarding path between local NVE and remote PE. Also to ensure VPNv4 route exchange correctly between local NVE and remote PE, VN ID space should be partitioned, only the VN IDs of lower 1 Million can be used for interconnection with outer MPLS VPN network using option-C solution, the rest 15 Million VN IDs can only be used for intra DC. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submissio= n until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat= From nobody Wed May 20 18:35:17 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46EF1ACE35 for ; Wed, 20 May 2015 18:35:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KeT47YXItbQo for ; Wed, 20 May 2015 18:35:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E7BC1ACE24 for ; Wed, 20 May 2015 18:35:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BSU04495; Thu, 21 May 2015 01:35:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nkgeml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.36) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 21 May 2015 02:35:10 +0100 Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.89]) by nkgeml405-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.36]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 21 May 2015 09:35:04 +0800 From: Haoweiguo To: "thomas.morin@orange.com" , "martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com" Thread-Topic: Request for WG adoption of draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn Thread-Index: AdCTY52bOKZ/rs1fTn+ycDXdCSJCww== Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 01:35:04 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.135.23.94] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DD5FC8DE455C3348B94340C0AB5517334F86D6CFnkgeml501mbschi_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Cc: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] Request for WG adoption of draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 01:35:16 -0000 --_000_DD5FC8DE455C3348B94340C0AB5517334F86D6CFnkgeml501mbschi_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Thomas and Martin, Gentle Reminder to the chairs. Would you like to initiate WG adoption? Inter-as connection between NVO3 and MPLS/IP VPN network is a real and prac= tical issue, some data center and service provider operators expressed thei= r interest in the use of inter-as solution. Also a fair amount of discussion has taken place and clarifications were ma= de. draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-02 describes option-B solution, while draft-h= ao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc-01 describes option-C solution. We ask to ad= opt both of these two drafts. Look forward to hear your suggestions. Thanks, weiguo --_000_DD5FC8DE455C3348B94340C0AB5517334F86D6CFnkgeml501mbschi_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear Thomas and Martin,

 

Gentle Reminder to the chairs. =

Would you like to initiate WG adoption= ?


Inter-as connection between NVO3 and MPLS/IP VPN network is a real and prac= tical issue, some data center and service provider operators expressed thei= r interest in the use of inter-as solution.
Also a fair amount of discussion has taken place and clarifications were ma= de.
draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-02 describes option-B solution, while draft-h= ao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc-01 describes option-C solution. We ask to ad= opt both of these two drafts.

 

Look forward to hear your suggestions.=

 

Thanks,
weiguo

--_000_DD5FC8DE455C3348B94340C0AB5517334F86D6CFnkgeml501mbschi_-- From nobody Thu May 21 08:15:52 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69EA61A874A for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 08:15:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CNe3O6E1sEsB for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 08:15:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0782.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::782]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 842281A8700 for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 08:14:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.202.141) by BLUPR05MB564.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.202.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.166.22; Thu, 21 May 2015 15:14:37 +0000 Received: from BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.202.141]) by BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.202.141]) with mapi id 15.01.0166.017; Thu, 21 May 2015 15:14:36 +0000 From: John E Drake To: Martin Vigoureux , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree Thread-Index: AQHQkmkrC4TmHMAF8kWbKyb+hMoNwJ2GjM3A Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 15:14:35 +0000 Message-ID: References: <555B8D75.7010302@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <555B8D75.7010302@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=jdrake@juniper.net; x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.11] x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR05MB564; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:BLUPR05MB564; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR05MB564; x-forefront-prvs: 0583A86C08 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(189002)(199003)(51704005)(13464003)(5001960100002)(189998001)(5001830100001)(5001860100001)(106356001)(2950100001)(122556002)(40100003)(106116001)(33656002)(19580405001)(19580395003)(76576001)(230783001)(5001770100001)(74316001)(101416001)(76176999)(50986999)(54356999)(86362001)(64706001)(66066001)(87936001)(2656002)(2501003)(68736005)(102836002)(15975445007)(77096005)(97736004)(81156007)(92566002)(77156002)(62966003)(2900100001)(4001540100001)(46102003)(105586002)(99286002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR05MB564; H:BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 May 2015 15:14:35.5493 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR05MB564 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 15:15:46 -0000 Support Yours Irrespectively, John > -----Original Message----- > From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux > Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 3:22 PM > To: bess@ietf.org > Cc: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree@tools.ietf.org > Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree >=20 > Hello working group, >=20 > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etr= ee > [1] as a working group item. >=20 > Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or not= (in > the later case, please also state the reasons). >=20 > This poll runs until **June the 2nd**. >=20 >=20 > *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that appli= es to > this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF= IPR > rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). >=20 > *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond to > this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. >=20 > The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from eac= h > author and contributor. >=20 > If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly > respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed = in > conformance with IETF rules. >=20 > Thank you, >=20 > Martin & Thomas > bess chairs >=20 > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree >=20 > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Fri May 22 01:40:21 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E8721AD082 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 01:40:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z5snyGNu9Jxs for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 01:40:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias243.francetelecom.com [80.12.204.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02D721ACF08 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 01:40:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omfeda08.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.201]) by omfeda13.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 746CD19046B; Fri, 22 May 2015 10:40:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.31.27]) by omfeda08.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 5717838406B; Fri, 22 May 2015 10:40:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::60a9:abc3:86e6:2541]) by OPEXCLILM7C.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::8007:17b:c3b4:d68b%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Fri, 22 May 2015 10:39:59 +0200 From: To: "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet Thread-Index: AdCUaqo0wiwVbOwaRO6K5iDIERbC4g== Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 08:39:59 +0000 Message-ID: <29471_1432284014_555EEB6E_29471_7247_1_88132E969123D14D9BD844E1CD516EDE0F5C87B6@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US Content-Language: fr-FR X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.5] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-PMX-Version: 6.2.1.2478543, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.5.22.74216 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet@tools.ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 08:40:20 -0000 Hi, As a co-author of draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet, I think this document sh= ould be moved forward and I'm not aware of any IPR that pertains to this dr= aft. Cheers, Christian. > > -----Original Message----- > > From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin=20 > > Vigoureux > > Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 3:13 AM > > To: BESS > > Subject: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet > > > > Hello > > > > this email starts a Working Group Last Call on=20 > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet > > which is considered mature and ready for a last working group review. > > > > Please read the document if you haven't read the most recent version=20 > > yet, and send your comments to the list, no later than June the 2nd. > > > > *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that=20 > > applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in=20 > > compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378=20 > > for more > details). > > > > *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please=20 > > respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any = relevant IPR. > > > > The draft will not be moved forward until a response has been=20 > > received from each author and contributor. > > > > If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please=20 > > explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet=20 > > been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > > > > > Thank you > > M&T > > > > _______________________________________________ > > BESS mailing list > > BESS@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess ___________________________________________________________________________= ______________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confiden= tielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu= ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages el= ectroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou = falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged inf= ormation that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and dele= te this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been = modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. From nobody Fri May 22 05:19:02 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA141A8AB2 for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 19:14:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.991 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.991 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.439] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S2f2y0Mi_C1y for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 19:14:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 189corp.21cn.com (forptr.bnet.cn [183.61.185.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7AA21A8A8F for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 19:14:07 -0700 (PDT) HMM_SOURCE_IP: 10.64.15.12:41874.1663630676 HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000 HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP Received: from fanybPC (unknown [10.64.15.12]) by 189corp.21cn.com (HERMES) with ESMTP id 831933C008F; Fri, 22 May 2015 10:13:53 +0800 (CST) Received: from fanybPC ([14.18.146.162]) by zmentas2(MEDUSA 10.64.15.12) with ESMTP id 1432260833.102927 for bess@ietf.org ; Fri May 22 10:14:00 2015 0/X-Total-Score: 10: X-FILTER-SCORE: to=<83869494618a8695874f9093889996998a829089966189968298868a4f84908e>, score=<1432260840GxG6xGixG6ikmTM19xGxxGGjGBjG3jGB3sh+OZRjGjjG> X-REAL-FROM: fanyb@gsta.com X-Receive-IP: 14.18.146.162 fanyb@gsta.com Message-ID: <5705B08EA4AC406186C9CA707B6CCB45@fanybPC> From: "Fan Yongbing" To: References: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE08334574@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com> <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE08334979@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE08334979@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com> Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 10:13:50 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308 Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 22 May 2015 05:19:01 -0700 Cc: =?UTF-8?B?5b6QIOWwj+iZjg==?= Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 02:14:19 -0000 Hello， I am not aware of any relevant IPR about the document. 樊勇兵 博士 ------------------------------------------------------ 云计算研究所 中国电信广州研究院 Mobile：13316090609 ------------------------------------------------------ > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin > > Vigoureux > > Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 3:13 AM > > To: BESS > > Subject: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet > > > > Hello > > > > this email starts a Working Group Last Call on > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet > > which is considered mature and ready for a last working group review. > > > > Please read the document if you haven't read the most recent version > > yet, and send your comments to the list, no later than June the 2nd. > > > > *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that > > applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in > > compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for > > more details). > > > > *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond > > to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any > > relevant IPR. > > > > The draft will not be moved forward until a response has been received > > from each author and contributor. > > > > If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please > > explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet > > been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > > > > > Thank you > > M&T > > > > _______________________________________________ > > BESS mailing list > > BESS@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Fri May 22 06:24:09 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945F91B2BC6 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 06:19:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.576 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.576 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1O40q_1R0Ujf for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 06:19:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mgnj1.bloomberg.net (mgnj1.bloomberg.net [69.191.244.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33DD11B2BB8 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 06:19:01 -0700 (PDT) X-BB-Reception-Complete: 22 May 2015 09:18:59 -0400 X-IP-Listener: Outgoing Mail X-IP-MID: 1612691894 Received: from p057.bloomberg.com (HELO p057) ([10.126.157.205]) by mgnj1.bloomberg.net with SMTP; 22 May 2015 09:18:59 -0400 X-BLP-INETSVC: version=BLP_APP_S_INETSVC_1.0.1; host=mgnj1:25; conid=8 Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 13:18:59 -0000 From: "Truman Boyes (BLOOMBERG/ 731 LEX)" To: bess@ietf.org, christian.jacquenet@orange.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <555F2CC301C506D4003903B2_0_48193@p057> X-BLP-GUID: 555F2CC301C506D4003903B20000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="BOUNDARY_555F2CC301C506D4003903B2_0_36447_p057" Content-ID: Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 22 May 2015 06:24:07 -0700 Cc: draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] =?utf-8?q?WG_Last_Call_for_draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet?= X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Truman Boyes List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 13:19:03 -0000 --BOUNDARY_555F2CC301C506D4003903B2_0_36447_p057 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGksIGFzIGEgY28tYXV0aG9yIG9mIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQsIEkgdGhpbmsgdGhpcyBkcmFmdCBzaG91 bGQgYWxzbyBtb3ZlIGZvcndhcmQuIEkgYW0gbm90IGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgcmVsYXRpbmcg dG8gdGhpcyBkcmFmdC4gCgpUcnVtYW4KCkZyb206IGNocmlzdGlhbi5qYWNxdWVuZXRAb3Jhbmdl LmNvbSBBdDogTWF5IDIyIDIwMTUgMDQ6NDA6NTIKVG86IGJlc3NAaWV0Zi5vcmcKQ2M6IGRyYWZ0 LWlldGYtbDN2cG4tdmlydHVhbC1zdWJuZXRAdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcKU3ViamVjdDogUmU6W2Jl c3NdIFdHIExhc3QgQ2FsbCBmb3IgZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1sM3Zwbi12aXJ0dWFsLXN1Ym5ldAoKSGks CgpBcyBhIGNvLWF1dGhvciBvZiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWwzdnBuLXZpcnR1YWwtc3VibmV0LCBJIHRo aW5rIHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgc2hvdWxkIGJlIG1vdmVkIGZvcndhcmQgYW5kIEknbSBub3QgYXdh cmUgb2YgYW55IElQUiB0aGF0IHBlcnRhaW5zIHRvIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQuCgpDaGVlcnMsCgpDaHJp c3RpYW4uCj4gPiAtLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQo+ID4gRnJvbTogQkVTUyBbbWFp bHRvOmJlc3MtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10gT24gQmVoYWxmIE9mIE1hcnRpbiAKPiA+IFZpZ291 cmV1eAo+ID4gU2VudDogV2VkbmVzZGF5LCBNYXkgMjAsIDIwMTUgMzoxMyBBTQo+ID4gVG86IEJF U1MKPiA+IFN1YmplY3Q6IFtiZXNzXSBXRyBMYXN0IENhbGwgZm9yIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtbDN2cG4t dmlydHVhbC1zdWJuZXQKPiA+Cj4gPiBIZWxsbwo+ID4KPiA+IHRoaXMgZW1haWwgc3RhcnRzIGEg V29ya2luZyBHcm91cCBMYXN0IENhbGwgb24gCj4gPiBodHRwOi8vdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaHRt bC9kcmFmdC1pZXRmLWwzdnBuLXZpcnR1YWwtc3VibmV0Cj4gPiB3aGljaCBpcyBjb25zaWRlcmVk IG1hdHVyZSBhbmQgcmVhZHkgZm9yIGEgbGFzdCB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwIHJldmlldy4KPiA+Cj4g PiBQbGVhc2UgcmVhZCB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQgaWYgeW91IGhhdmVuJ3QgcmVhZCB0aGUgbW9zdCBy ZWNlbnQgdmVyc2lvbiAKPiA+IHlldCwgYW5kIHNlbmQgeW91ciBjb21tZW50cyB0byB0aGUgbGlz dCwgbm8gbGF0ZXIgdGhhbiBKdW5lIHRoZSAybmQuCj4gPgo+ID4gKkNvaW5jaWRlbnRhbGx5Kiwg d2UgYXJlIGFsc28gcG9sbGluZyBmb3Iga25vd2xlZGdlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgdGhhdCAKPiA+IGFw cGxpZXMgdG8gdGhpcyBkcmFmdCwgdG8gZW5zdXJlIHRoYXQgSVBSIGhhcyBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3Nl ZCBpbiAKPiA+IGNvbXBsaWFuY2Ugd2l0aCBJRVRGIElQUiBydWxlcyAoc2VlIFJGQ3MgMzk3OSwg NDg3OSwgMzY2OSBhbmQgNTM3OCAKPiA+IGZvciBtb3JlCj4gZGV0YWlscykuCj4gPgo+ID4gKklm IHlvdSBhcmUgbGlzdGVkIGFzIGEgZG9jdW1lbnQgYXV0aG9yIG9yIGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9yKiBwbGVh c2UgCj4gPiByZXNwb25kIHRvIHRoaXMgZW1haWwgYW5kIGluZGljYXRlIHdoZXRoZXIgb3Igbm90 IHlvdSBhcmUgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IHJlbGV2YW50IElQUi4KPiA+Cj4gPiBUaGUgZHJhZnQgd2ls bCBub3QgYmUgbW92ZWQgZm9yd2FyZCB1bnRpbCBhIHJlc3BvbnNlIGhhcyBiZWVuIAo+ID4gcmVj ZWl2ZWQgZnJvbSBlYWNoIGF1dGhvciBhbmQgY29udHJpYnV0b3IuCj4gPgo+ID4gSWYgeW91IGFy ZSBub3QgbGlzdGVkIGFzIGFuIGF1dGhvciBvciBjb250cmlidXRvciwgdGhlbiBwbGVhc2UgCj4g PiBleHBsaWNpdGx5IHJlc3BvbmQgb25seSBpZiB5b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgdGhh dCBoYXMgbm90IHlldCAKPiA+IGJlZW4gZGlzY2xvc2VkIGluIGNvbmZvcm1hbmNlIHdpdGggSUVU RiBydWxlcy4KPiA+Cj4gPgo+ID4gVGhhbmsgeW91Cj4gPiBNJlQKPiA+Cj4gPiBfX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXwo+ID4gQkVTUyBtYWlsaW5nIGxp c3QKPiA+IEJFU1NAaWV0Zi5vcmcKPiA+IGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlz dGluZm8vYmVzcwoKX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXwoKQ2UgbWVzc2FnZSBldCBzZXMgcGllY2VzIGpvaW50ZXMgcGV1 dmVudCBjb250ZW5pciBkZXMgaW5mb3JtYXRpb25zIGNvbmZpZGVudGllbGxlcyBvdSBwcml2aWxl Z2llZXMgZXQgbmUgZG9pdmVudCBkb25jCnBhcyBldHJlIGRpZmZ1c2VzLCBleHBsb2l0ZXMgb3Ug Y29waWVzIHNhbnMgYXV0b3Jpc2F0aW9uLiBTaSB2b3VzIGF2ZXogcmVjdSBjZSBtZXNzYWdlIHBh ciBlcnJldXIsIHZldWlsbGV6IGxlIHNpZ25hbGVyCmEgbCdleHBlZGl0ZXVyIGV0IGxlIGRldHJ1 aXJlIGFpbnNpIHF1ZSBsZXMgcGllY2VzIGpvaW50ZXMuIExlcyBtZXNzYWdlcyBlbGVjdHJvbmlx dWVzIGV0YW50IHN1c2NlcHRpYmxlcyBkJ2FsdGVyYXRpb24sCk9yYW5nZSBkZWNsaW5lIHRvdXRl IHJlc3BvbnNhYmlsaXRlIHNpIGNlIG1lc3NhZ2UgYSBldGUgYWx0ZXJlLCBkZWZvcm1lIG91IGZh bHNpZmllLiBNZXJjaS4KClRoaXMgbWVzc2FnZSBhbmQgaXRzIGF0dGFjaG1lbnRzIG1heSBjb250 YWluIGNvbmZpZGVudGlhbCBvciBwcml2aWxlZ2VkIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIHRoYXQgbWF5IGJlIHBy b3RlY3RlZCBieSBsYXc7CnRoZXkgc2hvdWxkIG5vdCBiZSBkaXN0cmlidXRlZCwgdXNlZCBvciBj b3BpZWQgd2l0aG91dCBhdXRob3Jpc2F0aW9uLgpJZiB5b3UgaGF2ZSByZWNlaXZlZCB0aGlzIGVt YWlsIGluIGVycm9yLCBwbGVhc2Ugbm90aWZ5IHRoZSBzZW5kZXIgYW5kIGRlbGV0ZSB0aGlzIG1l c3NhZ2UgYW5kIGl0cyBhdHRhY2htZW50cy4KQXMgZW1haWxzIG1heSBiZSBhbHRlcmVkLCBPcmFu Z2UgaXMgbm90IGxpYWJsZSBmb3IgbWVzc2FnZXMgdGhhdCBoYXZlIGJlZW4gbW9kaWZpZWQsIGNo YW5nZWQgb3IgZmFsc2lmaWVkLgpUaGFuayB5b3UuCgoK --BOUNDARY_555F2CC301C506D4003903B2_0_36447_p057 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWw+PGhlYWQ+PHRpdGxlPjwvdGl0bGU+PC9oZWFkPjxib2R5PjwhLS0gcnRlLXZlcnNpb24g MC4yIDk5NDc1NTE2MzcyOTQwMDhiNzdiY2UyNWViNjgzZGFjIC0tPjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9InJ0ZS1z dHlsZS1tYWludGFpbmVyIiBzdHlsZT0id2hpdGUtc3BhY2U6IHByZS13cmFwOyBmb250LXNpemU6 IHNtYWxsOyBmb250LWZhbWlseTogJ0NvdXJpZXIgTmV3JywgQ291cmllcjsgY29sb3I6IHJnYigw LCAwLCAwKTsiZGF0YS1jb2xvcj0iZ2xvYmFsLWRlZmF1bHQiIGJiZy1jb2xvcj0iZGVmYXVsdCIg ZGF0YS1iYi1mb250LXNpemU9Im1lZGl1bSIgYmJnLWZvbnQtc2l6ZT0ibWVkaXVtIiBiYmctZm9u dC1mYW1pbHk9ImZpeGVkLXdpZHRoIj5IaSwgYXMgYSBjby1hdXRob3Igb2YgdGhpcyBkcmFmdCwg SSB0aGluayB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0IHNob3VsZCBhbHNvIG1vdmUgZm9yd2FyZC4gSSBhbSBub3QgYXdh cmUgb2YgYW55IElQUiByZWxhdGluZyB0byB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0LiZuYnNwOzxkaXY+PGJyPjwvZGl2 PjxkaXYgc3R5bGU9IiI+VHJ1bWFuPGJyPjxicj48ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJydGUtc3R5bGUtbWFpbnRh aW5lciIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZTogc21hbGw7IGZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiAnQ291cmllciBOZXcn LCBDb3VyaWVyOyBjb2xvcjogcmdiKDAsIDAsIDApOyJiYmctY29sb3I9ImRlZmF1bHQiIGRhdGEt YmItZm9udC1zaXplPSJtZWRpdW0iIGJiZy1mb250LXNpemU9Im1lZGl1bSIgYmJnLWZvbnQtZmFt aWx5PSJmaXhlZC13aWR0aCI+PGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iYmJnLXJ0ZS1mb2xkLWNvbnRlbnQiIGRhdGEt aGVhZGVyPSJGcm9tOiBjaHJpc3RpYW4uamFjcXVlbmV0QG9yYW5nZS5jb20gQXQ6IE1heSAyMiAy MDE1IDA0OjQwOjUyImRhdGEtZGlnZXN0PSJGcm9tOiBjaHJpc3RpYW4uamFjcXVlbmV0QG9yYW5n ZS5jb20gQXQ6IE1heSAyMiAyMDE1IDA0OjQwOjUyInN0eWxlPSIiPjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9ImJiZy1y dGUtZm9sZC1zdW1tYXJ5Ij5Gcm9tOiBjaHJpc3RpYW4uamFjcXVlbmV0QG9yYW5nZS5jb20gQXQ6 IE1heSAyMiAyMDE1IDA0OjQwOjUyPC9kaXY+PGRpdj5UbzogPGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOmJlc3NA aWV0Zi5vcmciIHNwZWxsY2hlY2s9ImZhbHNlImJiZy1kZXN0aW5hdGlvbj0ibWFpbHRvOnJ0ZTpi aW5kIj5iZXNzQGlldGYub3JnPC9hPjxicj5DYzogPGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOmRyYWZ0LWlldGYt bDN2cG4tdmlydHVhbC1zdWJuZXRAdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmciIHNwZWxsY2hlY2s9ImZhbHNlIiBi YmctZGVzdGluYXRpb249Im1haWx0bzpydGU6YmluZCI+ZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1sM3Zwbi12aXJ0dWFs LXN1Ym5ldEB0b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZzwvYT48YnI+U3ViamVjdDogUmU6W2Jlc3NdIFdHIExhc3Qg Q2FsbCBmb3IgZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1sM3Zwbi12aXJ0dWFsLXN1Ym5ldDxicj48L2Rpdj48L2Rpdj48 YmxvY2txdW90ZSBzdHlsZT0iIj5IaSw8YnI+PGJyPkFzIGEgY28tYXV0aG9yIG9mIGRyYWZ0LWll dGYtbDN2cG4tdmlydHVhbC1zdWJuZXQsIEkgdGhpbmsgdGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBzaG91bGQgYmUg bW92ZWQgZm9yd2FyZCBhbmQgSSdtIG5vdCBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQgcGVydGFpbnMg dG8gdGhpcyBkcmFmdC48YnI+PGJyPkNoZWVycyw8YnI+PGJyPkNocmlzdGlhbi48YnI+Jmd0OyAm Z3Q7IC0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tPGJyPiZndDsgJmd0OyBGcm9tOiBCRVNTIFtt YWlsdG86PGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOmJlc3MtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZyJzcGVsbGNoZWNrPSJm YWxzZSIgYmJnLWRlc3RpbmF0aW9uPSJtYWlsdG86cnRlOmJpbmQiIHN0eWxlPSIiZGF0YS1kZXN0 aW5hdGlvbj0ibWFpbHRvOnJ0ZTpiaW5kIj5iZXNzLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmc8L2E+XSBPbiBC ZWhhbGYgT2YgTWFydGluIDxicj4mZ3Q7ICZndDsgVmlnb3VyZXV4PGJyPiZndDsgJmd0OyBTZW50 OiBXZWRuZXNkYXksIE1heSAyMCwgMjAxNSAzOjEzIEFNPGJyPiZndDsgJmd0OyBUbzogQkVTUzxi cj4mZ3Q7ICZndDsgU3ViamVjdDogW2Jlc3NdIFdHIExhc3QgQ2FsbCBmb3IgZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1s M3Zwbi12aXJ0dWFsLXN1Ym5ldDxicj4mZ3Q7ICZndDs8YnI+Jmd0OyAmZ3Q7IEhlbGxvPGJyPiZn dDsgJmd0Ozxicj4mZ3Q7ICZndDsgdGhpcyBlbWFpbCBzdGFydHMgYSBXb3JraW5nIEdyb3VwIExh c3QgQ2FsbCBvbiA8YnI+Jmd0OyAmZ3Q7IDxhIGhyZWY9Imh0dHA6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9o dG1sL2RyYWZ0LWlldGYtbDN2cG4tdmlydHVhbC1zdWJuZXQic3BlbGxjaGVjaz0iZmFsc2UiIGJi Zy1kZXN0aW5hdGlvbj0icnRlOmJpbmQiIHN0eWxlPSIiZGF0YS1kZXN0aW5hdGlvbj0icnRlOmJp bmQiPmh0dHA6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LWlldGYtbDN2cG4tdmlydHVhbC1z dWJuZXQ8L2E+PGJyPiZndDsgJmd0OyB3aGljaCBpcyBjb25zaWRlcmVkIG1hdHVyZSBhbmQgcmVh ZHkgZm9yIGEgbGFzdCB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwIHJldmlldy48YnI+Jmd0OyAmZ3Q7PGJyPiZndDsg Jmd0OyBQbGVhc2UgcmVhZCB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQgaWYgeW91IGhhdmVuJ3QgcmVhZCB0aGUgbW9z dCByZWNlbnQgdmVyc2lvbiA8YnI+Jmd0OyAmZ3Q7IHlldCwgYW5kIHNlbmQgeW91ciBjb21tZW50 cyB0byB0aGUgbGlzdCwgbm8gbGF0ZXIgdGhhbiBKdW5lIHRoZSAybmQuPGJyPiZndDsgJmd0Ozxi cj4mZ3Q7ICZndDsgKkNvaW5jaWRlbnRhbGx5Kiwgd2UgYXJlIGFsc28gcG9sbGluZyBmb3Iga25v d2xlZGdlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgdGhhdCA8YnI+Jmd0OyAmZ3Q7IGFwcGxpZXMgdG8gdGhpcyBkcmFm dCwgdG8gZW5zdXJlIHRoYXQgSVBSIGhhcyBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3NlZCBpbiA8YnI+Jmd0OyAmZ3Q7 IGNvbXBsaWFuY2Ugd2l0aCBJRVRGIElQUiBydWxlcyAoc2VlIFJGQ3MgMzk3OSwgNDg3OSwgMzY2 OSBhbmQgNTM3OCA8YnI+Jmd0OyAmZ3Q7IGZvciBtb3JlPGJyPiZndDsgZGV0YWlscykuPGJyPiZn dDsgJmd0Ozxicj4mZ3Q7ICZndDsgKklmIHlvdSBhcmUgbGlzdGVkIGFzIGEgZG9jdW1lbnQgYXV0 aG9yIG9yIGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9yKiBwbGVhc2UgPGJyPiZndDsgJmd0OyByZXNwb25kIHRvIHRoaXMg ZW1haWwgYW5kIGluZGljYXRlIHdoZXRoZXIgb3Igbm90IHlvdSBhcmUgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IHJl bGV2YW50IElQUi48YnI+Jmd0OyAmZ3Q7PGJyPiZndDsgJmd0OyBUaGUgZHJhZnQgd2lsbCBub3Qg YmUgbW92ZWQgZm9yd2FyZCB1bnRpbCBhIHJlc3BvbnNlIGhhcyBiZWVuIDxicj4mZ3Q7ICZndDsg cmVjZWl2ZWQgZnJvbSBlYWNoIGF1dGhvciBhbmQgY29udHJpYnV0b3IuPGJyPiZndDsgJmd0Ozxi cj4mZ3Q7ICZndDsgSWYgeW91IGFyZSBub3QgbGlzdGVkIGFzIGFuIGF1dGhvciBvciBjb250cmli dXRvciwgdGhlbiBwbGVhc2UgPGJyPiZndDsgJmd0OyBleHBsaWNpdGx5IHJlc3BvbmQgb25seSBp ZiB5b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgdGhhdCBoYXMgbm90IHlldCA8YnI+Jmd0OyAmZ3Q7 IGJlZW4gZGlzY2xvc2VkIGluIGNvbmZvcm1hbmNlIHdpdGggSUVURiBydWxlcy48YnI+Jmd0OyAm Z3Q7PGJyPiZndDsgJmd0Ozxicj4mZ3Q7ICZndDsgVGhhbmsgeW91PGJyPiZndDsgJmd0OyBNJmFt cDtUPGJyPiZndDsgJmd0Ozxicj4mZ3Q7ICZndDsgX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX188YnI+Jmd0OyAmZ3Q7IEJFU1MgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0PGJyPiZn dDsgJmd0OyA8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86QkVTU0BpZXRmLm9yZyJzcGVsbGNoZWNrPSJmYWxzZSIg YmJnLWRlc3RpbmF0aW9uPSJtYWlsdG86cnRlOmJpbmQiIHN0eWxlPSIiZGF0YS1kZXN0aW5hdGlv bj0ibWFpbHRvOnJ0ZTpiaW5kIj5CRVNTQGlldGYub3JnPC9hPjxicj4mZ3Q7ICZndDsgPGEgaHJl Zj0iaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9iZXNzIiBzcGVsbGNoZWNr PSJmYWxzZSJiYmctZGVzdGluYXRpb249InJ0ZTpiaW5kIiBzdHlsZT0iIiBkYXRhLWRlc3RpbmF0 aW9uPSJydGU6YmluZCI+aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9iZXNz PC9hPjxicj48YnI+X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXzxicj48YnI+Q2UgbWVzc2FnZSBldCBzZXMgcGllY2VzIGpvaW50 ZXMgcGV1dmVudCBjb250ZW5pciBkZXMgaW5mb3JtYXRpb25zIGNvbmZpZGVudGllbGxlcyBvdSBw cml2aWxlZ2llZXMgZXQgbmUgZG9pdmVudCBkb25jPGJyPnBhcyBldHJlIGRpZmZ1c2VzLCBleHBs b2l0ZXMgb3UgY29waWVzIHNhbnMgYXV0b3Jpc2F0aW9uLiBTaSB2b3VzIGF2ZXogcmVjdSBjZSBt ZXNzYWdlIHBhciBlcnJldXIsIHZldWlsbGV6IGxlIHNpZ25hbGVyPGJyPmEgbCdleHBlZGl0ZXVy IGV0IGxlIGRldHJ1aXJlIGFpbnNpIHF1ZSBsZXMgcGllY2VzIGpvaW50ZXMuIExlcyBtZXNzYWdl cyBlbGVjdHJvbmlxdWVzIGV0YW50IHN1c2NlcHRpYmxlcyBkJ2FsdGVyYXRpb24sPGJyPk9yYW5n ZSBkZWNsaW5lIHRvdXRlIHJlc3BvbnNhYmlsaXRlIHNpIGNlIG1lc3NhZ2UgYSBldGUgYWx0ZXJl LCBkZWZvcm1lIG91IGZhbHNpZmllLiBNZXJjaS48YnI+PGJyPlRoaXMgbWVzc2FnZSBhbmQgaXRz IGF0dGFjaG1lbnRzIG1heSBjb250YWluIGNvbmZpZGVudGlhbCBvciBwcml2aWxlZ2VkIGluZm9y bWF0aW9uIHRoYXQgbWF5IGJlIHByb3RlY3RlZCBieSBsYXc7PGJyPnRoZXkgc2hvdWxkIG5vdCBi ZSBkaXN0cmlidXRlZCwgdXNlZCBvciBjb3BpZWQgd2l0aG91dCBhdXRob3Jpc2F0aW9uLjxicj5J ZiB5b3UgaGF2ZSByZWNlaXZlZCB0aGlzIGVtYWlsIGluIGVycm9yLCBwbGVhc2Ugbm90aWZ5IHRo ZSBzZW5kZXIgYW5kIGRlbGV0ZSB0aGlzIG1lc3NhZ2UgYW5kIGl0cyBhdHRhY2htZW50cy48YnI+ QXMgZW1haWxzIG1heSBiZSBhbHRlcmVkLCBPcmFuZ2UgaXMgbm90IGxpYWJsZSBmb3IgbWVzc2Fn ZXMgdGhhdCBoYXZlIGJlZW4gbW9kaWZpZWQsIGNoYW5nZWQgb3IgZmFsc2lmaWVkLjxicj5UaGFu ayB5b3UuPGJyPjxicj48L2Jsb2NrcXVvdGU+PGJyPjwvZGl2PjwvZGl2PjwvZGl2PjwvYm9keT48 L2h0bWw+ --BOUNDARY_555F2CC301C506D4003903B2_0_36447_p057-- From nobody Fri May 22 07:16:17 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD26E1ABD39 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 07:16:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.055 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.055 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wSxgFuP0kURa for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 07:16:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (hhc-web3.hickoryhill-consulting.com [64.9.205.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 597971A010F for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 07:16:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=174.124.202.180; From: "Susan Hares" To: "'Martin Vigoureux'" , "'BESS'" References: <555B8B52.90606@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <555B8B52.90606@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 10:16:16 -0400 Message-ID: <010101d09499$de17c030$9a474090$@ndzh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQIyGtEa4ewKPbsuOD2eIfeqEer5bJzE/f9g Content-Language: en-us X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 14:16:15 -0000 Co-author - I am not aware of any relevant IPR. Sue Hares -----Original Message----- From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 3:13 PM To: BESS Subject: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet Hello this email starts a Working Group Last Call on http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet which is considered mature and ready for a last working group review. Please read the document if you haven't read the most recent version yet, and send your comments to the list, no later than June the 2nd. *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not be moved forward until a response has been received from each author and contributor. If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thank you M&T _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Fri May 22 07:52:30 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2291A0370 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 07:52:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k0SmfDBbYIEb for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 07:52:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p02c11o144.mxlogic.net (p02c11o144.mxlogic.net [208.65.144.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39B661A032D for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 07:52:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknown [12.38.15.167] (EHLO nc-owamail.extremenetworks.com) by p02c11o144.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-8.4.0-1) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 0a24f555.0.152807.00-395.400237.p02c11o144.mxlogic.net (envelope-from ); Fri, 22 May 2015 08:52:27 -0600 (MDT) X-MXL-Hash: 555f42ab58ba4556-df76764f1cfe78fa3fb77c7ca55017bab0326a1b Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (207.46.163.143) by nc-owamail.extremenetworks.com (10.6.17.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Fri, 22 May 2015 10:52:15 -0400 Received: from BY2PR04MB886.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.141.218.22) by BY2PR04MB886.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.141.218.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.166.22; Fri, 22 May 2015 14:52:14 +0000 Received: from BY2PR04MB886.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.218.22]) by BY2PR04MB886.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.218.22]) with mapi id 15.01.0166.017; Fri, 22 May 2015 14:52:14 +0000 From: "Fee, Brendan" To: Susan Hares , 'Martin Vigoureux' , 'BESS' Thread-Topic: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet Thread-Index: AQHQkmf7V35w0dFjcEWMfMye4fRf6Z2IDuoA///G/AA= Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 14:52:13 +0000 Message-ID: <97387B2D-D553-418A-AE21-18318D07DCE4@extremenetworks.com> References: <555B8B52.90606@alcatel-lucent.com> <010101d09499$de17c030$9a474090$@ndzh.com> In-Reply-To: <010101d09499$de17c030$9a474090$@ndzh.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-originating-ip: [134.141.2.72] x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR04MB886; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(520002)(3002001); SRVR:BY2PR04MB886; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR04MB886; x-forefront-prvs: 058441C12A x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(479174004)(377454003)(13464003)(189002)(199003)(51704005)(24454002)(230783001)(82746002)(122556002)(36756003)(106116001)(106356001)(5001860100001)(5001770100001)(5001830100001)(5001960100002)(107886002)(189998001)(19580395003)(19580405001)(54356999)(40100003)(86362001)(87936001)(97736004)(64706001)(2656002)(83716003)(76176999)(66066001)(1720100001)(68736005)(81156007)(62966003)(2900100001)(102836002)(101416001)(92566002)(105586002)(33656002)(50986999)(15975445007)(2950100001)(99286002)(46102003)(77096005)(77156002)(4001540100001)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR04MB886; H:BY2PR04MB886.namprd04.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: extremenetworks.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 May 2015 14:52:13.6594 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: fc8c2bf6-914d-4c1f-b352-46a9adb87030 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR04MB886 X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: BY2PR04MB886.namprd04.prod.outlook.com X-OriginatorOrg: extremenetworks.com X-CrossPremisesHeadersPromoted: USNC-CASHT-P2.corp.extremenetworks.com X-CrossPremisesHeadersFiltered: USNC-CASHT-P2.corp.extremenetworks.com X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.1 cv=JJsvsq6b c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=Aw90v3R6jAhFo4sSetqXCQ==] X-AnalysisOut: [:117 a=Aw90v3R6jAhFo4sSetqXCQ==:17 a=YZEKUtVfqfcA:10 a=FuN] X-AnalysisOut: [AaB_ZV_8A:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=vI_dY4G] X-AnalysisOut: [QAAAA:8 a=YlVTAMxIAAAA:8 a=UqCG9HQmAAAA:8 a=h1PgugrvaO0A:1] X-AnalysisOut: [0 a=1sjgXBK7AAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=SIshpv1ST3K27BeIjk8A] X-AnalysisOut: [:9 a=pRV5Esk06S427Pef:21 a=wXjfK39uihxnvXCQ:21 a=QEXdDO2ut] X-AnalysisOut: [3YA:10] X-Spam: [F=0.5000000000; CM=0.500; MH=0.500(2015052212); S=0.200(2014051901)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [12.38.15.167] Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 14:52:29 -0000 Q28tYXV0aG9yIC0gSSBhbSBub3QgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IHJlbGV2YW50IElQUi4NCg0KDQpCcmVu ZGFuIEZlZQ0KDQoNCg0KDQpPbiA1LzIyLzE1LCAxMDoxNiBBTSwgIlN1c2FuIEhhcmVzIiA8c2hh cmVzQG5kemguY29tPiB3cm90ZToNCg0KPkNvLWF1dGhvciAtIEkgYW0gbm90IGF3YXJlIG9mIGFu eSByZWxldmFudCBJUFIuDQo+DQo+U3VlIEhhcmVzDQo+DQo+LS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdl LS0tLS0NCj5Gcm9tOiBCRVNTIFttYWlsdG86YmVzcy1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnXSBPbiBCZWhh bGYgT2YgTWFydGluIFZpZ291cmV1eA0KPlNlbnQ6IFR1ZXNkYXksIE1heSAxOSwgMjAxNSAzOjEz IFBNDQo+VG86IEJFU1MNCj5TdWJqZWN0OiBbYmVzc10gV0cgTGFzdCBDYWxsIGZvciBkcmFmdC1p ZXRmLWwzdnBuLXZpcnR1YWwtc3VibmV0DQo+DQo+SGVsbG8NCj4NCj50aGlzIGVtYWlsIHN0YXJ0 cyBhIFdvcmtpbmcgR3JvdXAgTGFzdCBDYWxsIG9uDQo+aHR0cDovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2h0 bWwvZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1sM3Zwbi12aXJ0dWFsLXN1Ym5ldA0KPndoaWNoIGlzIGNvbnNpZGVyZWQg bWF0dXJlIGFuZCByZWFkeSBmb3IgYSBsYXN0IHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXAgcmV2aWV3Lg0KPg0KPlBs ZWFzZSByZWFkIHRoZSBkb2N1bWVudCBpZiB5b3UgaGF2ZW4ndCByZWFkIHRoZSBtb3N0IHJlY2Vu dCB2ZXJzaW9uIHlldCwNCj5hbmQgc2VuZCB5b3VyIGNvbW1lbnRzIHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0LCBubyBs YXRlciB0aGFuIEp1bmUgdGhlIDJuZC4NCj4NCj4qQ29pbmNpZGVudGFsbHkqLCB3ZSBhcmUgYWxz byBwb2xsaW5nIGZvciBrbm93bGVkZ2Ugb2YgYW55IElQUiB0aGF0IGFwcGxpZXMNCj50byB0aGlz IGRyYWZ0LCB0byBlbnN1cmUgdGhhdCBJUFIgaGFzIGJlZW4gZGlzY2xvc2VkIGluIGNvbXBsaWFu Y2Ugd2l0aCBJRVRGDQo+SVBSIHJ1bGVzIChzZWUgUkZDcyAzOTc5LCA0ODc5LCAzNjY5IGFuZCA1 Mzc4IGZvciBtb3JlIGRldGFpbHMpLg0KPg0KPipJZiB5b3UgYXJlIGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhIGRvY3Vt ZW50IGF1dGhvciBvciBjb250cmlidXRvciogcGxlYXNlIHJlc3BvbmQgdG8NCj50aGlzIGVtYWls IGFuZCBpbmRpY2F0ZSB3aGV0aGVyIG9yIG5vdCB5b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSByZWxldmFu dCBJUFIuDQo+DQo+VGhlIGRyYWZ0IHdpbGwgbm90IGJlIG1vdmVkIGZvcndhcmQgdW50aWwgYSBy ZXNwb25zZSBoYXMgYmVlbiByZWNlaXZlZCBmcm9tDQo+ZWFjaCBhdXRob3IgYW5kIGNvbnRyaWJ1 dG9yLg0KPg0KPklmIHlvdSBhcmUgbm90IGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhbiBhdXRob3Igb3IgY29udHJpYnV0 b3IsIHRoZW4gcGxlYXNlIGV4cGxpY2l0bHkNCj5yZXNwb25kIG9ubHkgaWYgeW91IGFyZSBhd2Fy ZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQgaGFzIG5vdCB5ZXQgYmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQgaW4NCj5jb25mb3Jt YW5jZSB3aXRoIElFVEYgcnVsZXMuDQo+DQo+DQo+VGhhbmsgeW91DQo+TSZUDQo+DQo+X19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCj5CRVNTIG1haWxpbmcg bGlzdA0KPkJFU1NAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj5odHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3Rp bmZvL2Jlc3MNCj4NCj5fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fXw0KPkJFU1MgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQo+QkVTU0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KPmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lmll dGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vYmVzcw0KDQpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fXw0KDQpESVNDTEFJTUVSOg0KVGhpcyBlLW1haWwgYW5kIGFueSBhdHRhY2htZW50cyB0 byBpdCBtYXkgY29udGFpbiBjb25maWRlbnRpYWwgYW5kIHByb3ByaWV0YXJ5IG1hdGVyaWFsIGFu ZCBpcyBzb2xlbHkgZm9yIHRoZSB1c2Ugb2YgdGhlIGludGVuZGVkIHJlY2lwaWVudC4gQW55IHJl dmlldywgdXNlLCBkaXNjbG9zdXJlLCBkaXN0cmlidXRpb24gb3IgY29weWluZyBvZiB0aGlzIHRy YW5zbWl0dGFsIGlzIHByb2hpYml0ZWQgZXhjZXB0IGJ5IG9yIG9uIGJlaGFsZiBvZiB0aGUgaW50 ZW5kZWQgcmVjaXBpZW50LiBJZiB5b3UgaGF2ZSByZWNlaXZlZCB0aGlzIHRyYW5zbWl0dGFsIGlu IGVycm9yLCBwbGVhc2Ugbm90aWZ5IHRoZSBzZW5kZXIgYW5kIGRlc3Ryb3kgdGhpcyBlLW1haWwg YW5kIGFueSBhdHRhY2htZW50cyBhbmQgYWxsIGNvcGllcywgd2hldGhlciBlbGVjdHJvbmljIG9y IHByaW50ZWQuDQo= From nobody Sat May 23 04:52:44 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586CA1A01F2 for ; Sat, 23 May 2015 04:52:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rGL6kd_pPqys for ; Sat, 23 May 2015 04:52:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC0FA1A01A9 for ; Sat, 23 May 2015 04:52:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [2.69.79.15] (2.69.79.15.mobile.tre.se [2.69.79.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A1B8180133E; Sat, 23 May 2015 13:52:36 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <556069FD.1010602@pi.nu> Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 13:52:29 +0200 From: Loa Andersson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "bess@ietf.org" , draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet@tools.ietf.org, bess-chairs@tools.ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: [bess] wglc review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 11:52:43 -0000 Authors, wg and chairs, I've read this document and think it is useful, and that we are almost ready to request publication. A couple of nits 0. The nits tool gives errors on 54 lines that are too long 1. The file name is still draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet-03, while updating after wglc is should be posted as draft-ietf-bess-virtual- subnet-03. 2. The document has 7 authors, please make sure that all of them meets the criterium that the RFC Editor sent out some weeks ago. "The intent of the author list in the document header and the Authors Addresses space in an RFC is to indicate who is responsible for the technical content of the document." 3. Does "across" in the abstract mean "within" or "between"? 4. The concept "L3VPN-based" is used at a number of places ... 5. The nits tool give warnings of "26 instances of lines with non-RFC5735-compliant IPv4 addresses". 6. First paragraph on page 12 says "both ingress and egress PE routers MUST NOT decrement the TTL", The meaning is unclear, can one of them do it or neither? 7. Do we need to consider IPv6? Other than this I think this very useful document is ready to be progressed. /Loa -- Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 From nobody Sat May 23 05:07:01 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E81BF1A19F2 for ; Sat, 23 May 2015 05:06:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vPfA5jVVGukm for ; Sat, 23 May 2015 05:06:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B7A21A03FF for ; Sat, 23 May 2015 05:06:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wicmx19 with SMTP id mx19so10906504wic.0 for ; Sat, 23 May 2015 05:06:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=LabSLbjLwAxz8QI7Er9c2OJzuaQNxd2YSinUoE+Xmes=; b=ErSkMzYmE3kISyPlYKoaVKXDtg0cQa2+RyqJflrxnrnl8G8UDvoYNuK47YxMMZseY/ fG1lTGevxdGjGQrDUptcGPCl+dgeRNrQgPjwDEccQbY+zxRmUzxh4yONzrWPRRMRc+3x DczoDgGrAYU4m7V2/5llJuDKACqtzf4OD3dWCuTOTsvRjx3SkopUxDDPHI3w3YGgT7jH xXSpkEPCmk3sab/ceyrMN/xPZywMFTbqML4rtW76cmEywe7IuJClgU9M/9lajQ/4gVC4 HBMxhCkjV2yANWOaOeSsY4+IyCVAQGXSBS76ZszF7txB/jPywQcClApeZwi/pFm9eW4P DrnA== X-Received: by 10.194.184.79 with SMTP id es15mr5100693wjc.112.1432382816261; Sat, 23 May 2015 05:06:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.65.135 with HTTP; Sat, 23 May 2015 05:06:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <556069FD.1010602@pi.nu> References: <556069FD.1010602@pi.nu> From: "Andrew G. Malis" Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 08:06:35 -0400 Message-ID: To: Loa Andersson Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b8738d0f21c150516be9c12 Archived-At: Cc: "bess-chairs@tools.ietf.org" , draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet@tools.ietf.org, "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] wglc review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 12:07:00 -0000 --047d7b8738d0f21c150516be9c12 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Loa, One small nit with your review - renaming a draft because the WG name changed resets the numbering to -00, so the next revision will be draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-00. However, the replaced-by information in the datatracker will make the progression clear. Cheers, Andy On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Loa Andersson wrote: > Authors, wg and chairs, > > I've read this document and think it is useful, and that we are almost > ready to request publication. > > A couple of nits > > 0. The nits tool gives errors on 54 lines that are too long > > 1. The file name is still draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet-03, while > updating after wglc is should be posted as draft-ietf-bess-virtual- > subnet-03. > > 2. The document has 7 authors, please make sure that all of them meets > the criterium that the RFC Editor sent out some weeks ago. > > "The intent of the author list in the document header and the Authors > Addresses space in an RFC is to indicate who is responsible for the > technical content of the document." > > 3. Does "across" in the abstract mean "within" or "between"? > > 4. The concept "L3VPN-based" is used at a number of places ... > > 5. The nits tool give warnings of "26 instances of lines with > non-RFC5735-compliant IPv4 addresses". > > 6. First paragraph on page 12 says "both ingress and egress PE routers > MUST NOT decrement the TTL", > The meaning is unclear, can one of them do it or neither? > > 7. Do we need to consider IPv6? > > Other than this I think this very useful document is ready to be > progressed. > > /Loa > > > -- > > > Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com > Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu > Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > --047d7b8738d0f21c150516be9c12 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Loa,

One small nit with your review - r= enaming a draft because the WG name changed resets the numbering to -00, so= the next revision will be=C2=A0draft-ietf-b= ess-virtual-subnet-00. However, the r= eplaced-by information in the datatracker will make the progression clear.<= /span>

Cheers,
Andy

On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:
Authors, wg and chairs,

I've read this document and think it is useful, and that we are almost<= br> ready to request publication.

A couple of nits

0. The nits tool gives errors on 54 lines that are too long

1. The file name is still draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet-03, while
=C2=A0 =C2=A0updating after wglc is should be posted as draft-ietf-bess-vir= tual-
=C2=A0 =C2=A0subnet-03.

2. The document has 7 authors, please make sure that all of them meets
=C2=A0 =C2=A0the criterium that the RFC Editor sent out some weeks ago.

"The intent of the author list in the document header and the Authors<= br> =C2=A0Addresses space in an RFC is to indicate who is responsible for the =C2=A0technical content of the document."

3. Does "across" in the abstract mean "within" or "= ;between"?

4. The concept "L3VPN-based" is used at a number of places ...
5. The nits tool give warnings of "26 instances of lines with
=C2=A0 =C2=A0non-RFC5735-compliant IPv4 addresses".

6. First paragraph on page 12 says "both ingress and egress PE routers=
=C2=A0 =C2=A0MUST NOT decrement the TTL",
=C2=A0 =C2=A0The meaning is unclear, can one of them do it or neither?

7. Do we need to consider IPv6?

Other than this I think this very useful document is ready to be
progressed.

/Loa


--


Loa Andersson=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
Senior MPLS Expert=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 loa@pi.nu
Huawei Technologies (consultant)=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0phone: +46 739= 81 21 64

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
ht= tps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

--047d7b8738d0f21c150516be9c12-- From nobody Sat May 23 06:33:35 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0077B1ACE16 for ; Sat, 23 May 2015 06:33:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.908 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 327RUFWHY1Jb for ; Sat, 23 May 2015 06:33:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 988D81ACE14 for ; Sat, 23 May 2015 06:33:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (81-236-221-144-no93.tbcn.telia.com [81.236.221.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3FDAD180133E; Sat, 23 May 2015 15:33:28 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-2E02E201-A11B-476B-A158-690F8BCC1244 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) From: Loa Andersson X-Mailer: iPad Mail (12F69) In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 15:33:27 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <556069FD.1010602@pi.nu> To: "Andrew G. Malis" Archived-At: Cc: "bess-chairs@tools.ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet@tools.ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] wglc review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 13:33:34 -0000 --Apple-Mail-2E02E201-A11B-476B-A158-690F8BCC1244 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andy, Yes you Are right, I forgot to change the revision number.=20 /Loa Sent from my iPad > On 23 May 2015, at 14:06, Andrew G. Malis wrote: >=20 > Loa, >=20 > One small nit with your review - renaming a draft because the WG name chan= ged resets the numbering to -00, so the next revision will be draft-ietf-bes= s-virtual-subnet-00. However, the replaced-by information in the datatracker= will make the progression clear. >=20 > Cheers, > Andy >=20 >> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Loa Andersson wrote: >> Authors, wg and chairs, >>=20 >> I've read this document and think it is useful, and that we are almost >> ready to request publication. >>=20 >> A couple of nits >>=20 >> 0. The nits tool gives errors on 54 lines that are too long >>=20 >> 1. The file name is still draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet-03, while >> updating after wglc is should be posted as draft-ietf-bess-virtual- >> subnet-03. >>=20 >> 2. The document has 7 authors, please make sure that all of them meets >> the criterium that the RFC Editor sent out some weeks ago. >>=20 >> "The intent of the author list in the document header and the Authors >> Addresses space in an RFC is to indicate who is responsible for the >> technical content of the document." >>=20 >> 3. Does "across" in the abstract mean "within" or "between"? >>=20 >> 4. The concept "L3VPN-based" is used at a number of places ... >>=20 >> 5. The nits tool give warnings of "26 instances of lines with >> non-RFC5735-compliant IPv4 addresses". >>=20 >> 6. First paragraph on page 12 says "both ingress and egress PE routers >> MUST NOT decrement the TTL", >> The meaning is unclear, can one of them do it or neither? >>=20 >> 7. Do we need to consider IPv6? >>=20 >> Other than this I think this very useful document is ready to be >> progressed. >>=20 >> /Loa >>=20 >>=20 >> --=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com >> Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu >> Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> BESS mailing list >> BESS@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess >=20 --Apple-Mail-2E02E201-A11B-476B-A158-690F8BCC1244 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Andy,

Yes you Are right, I forgot to ch= ange the revision number. 

/Loa

= Sent from my iPad

On 23 May 2015, at 14:06, Andrew G. Malis &l= t;agmalis@gmail.com> wrote:
<= br>
Loa,

=
One small nit with your review - renaming a draft because the WG name c= hanged resets the numbering to -00, so the next revision will be draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-00. However, the replaced-by information in the datatracker= will make the progression clear.

Cheers,
Andy

On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 7:52 AM,= Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:
Aut= hors, wg and chairs,

I've read this document and think it is useful, and that we are almost
ready to request publication.

A couple of nits

0. The nits tool gives errors on 54 lines that are too long

1. The file name is still draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet-03, while
   updating after wglc is should be posted as draft-ietf-bess-virt= ual-
   subnet-03.

2. The document has 7 authors, please make sure that all of them meets
   the criterium that the RFC Editor sent out some weeks ago.

"The intent of the author list in the document header and the Authors
 Addresses space in an RFC is to indicate who is responsible for the  technical content of the document."

3. Does "across" in the abstract mean "within" or "between"?

4. The concept "L3VPN-based" is used at a number of places ...

5. The nits tool give warnings of "26 instances of lines with
   non-RFC5735-compliant IPv4 addresses".

6. First paragraph on page 12 says "both ingress and egress PE routers
   MUST NOT decrement the TTL",
   The meaning is unclear, can one of them do it or neither?

7. Do we need to consider IPv6?

Other than this I think this very useful document is ready to be
progressed.

/Loa


--


Loa Andersson                  &= nbsp;     email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
Senior MPLS Expert                &n= bsp;         loa@pi.nu
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 8= 1 21 64

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
htt= ps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

= --Apple-Mail-2E02E201-A11B-476B-A158-690F8BCC1244-- From nobody Sun May 24 23:37:11 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A18E1B2AAC for ; Sun, 24 May 2015 23:37:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4jzyFvqHYxqJ for ; Sun, 24 May 2015 23:37:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E0D11B2AAA for ; Sun, 24 May 2015 23:37:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BSX54378; Mon, 25 May 2015 06:37:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.34) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 25 May 2015 07:37:02 +0100 Received: from NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.28]) by nkgeml403-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.34]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 25 May 2015 14:36:54 +0800 From: Xuxiaohu To: Loa Andersson , "bess@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet@tools.ietf.org" , "bess-chairs@tools.ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] wglc review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet Thread-Index: AQHQlU8B59mI471o6EmVuFtEa0hK6Z2MPKDA Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 06:36:54 +0000 Message-ID: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE08334CEF@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com> References: <556069FD.1010602@pi.nu> In-Reply-To: <556069FD.1010602@pi.nu> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.99.55] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] wglc review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 06:37:10 -0000 Hi Loa, Thanks a lot for your review. Please see my response inline. > -----Original Message----- > From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson > Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 7:52 PM > To: bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet@tools.ietf.org; > bess-chairs@tools.ietf.org > Subject: [bess] wglc review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet >=20 > Authors, wg and chairs, >=20 > I've read this document and think it is useful, and that we are almost re= ady to > request publication. >=20 > A couple of nits >=20 > 0. The nits tool gives errors on 54 lines that are too long Will fix it. > 1. The file name is still draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet-03, while > updating after wglc is should be posted as draft-ietf-bess-virtual- > subnet-03. Will post it as draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-00 when updating. > 2. The document has 7 authors, please make sure that all of them meets > the criterium that the RFC Editor sent out some weeks ago. >=20 > "The intent of the author list in the document header and the Authors > Addresses space in an RFC is to indicate who is responsible for the > technical content of the document." Will fix it. > 3. Does "across" in the abstract mean "within" or "between"? It means "between". Will replace it with "between". =20 > 4. The concept "L3VPN-based" is used at a number of places ... Will fix it. > 5. The nits tool give warnings of "26 instances of lines with > non-RFC5735-compliant IPv4 addresses". Will fix it by using IPv4 addresses belonging to 10.0.0.0/8 > 6. First paragraph on page 12 says "both ingress and egress PE routers > MUST NOT decrement the TTL", > The meaning is unclear, can one of them do it or neither? Is it OK to say "...neither ingress nor egress PE routers SHOULD decrement = the TTL..." > 7. Do we need to consider IPv6? IPv6 has been considered in this doc although the examples are IPv4-based. = See section 3.3 to 3.8.=20 > Other than this I think this very useful document is ready to be progress= ed. Thanks again for your review. Best regards, Xiaohu > /Loa >=20 >=20 > -- >=20 >=20 > Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com > Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu > Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Mon May 25 01:51:43 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0640B1A886E for ; Mon, 25 May 2015 01:51:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RKbpN47_LyI2 for ; Mon, 25 May 2015 01:51:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C69671A8869 for ; Mon, 25 May 2015 01:51:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.101] (81-236-221-144-no93.tbcn.telia.com [81.236.221.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6656318013E6; Mon, 25 May 2015 10:51:35 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5562E294.9030308@pi.nu> Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 10:51:32 +0200 From: Loa Andersson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Xuxiaohu , "bess@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet@tools.ietf.org" , "bess-chairs@tools.ietf.org" References: <556069FD.1010602@pi.nu> <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE08334CEF@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE08334CEF@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] wglc review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 08:51:42 -0000 Xiaohu, Tnx for the prompt reply (I've snipped everything we agreed on) On 2015-05-25 08:36, Xuxiaohu wrote: >> 6. First paragraph on page 12 says "both ingress and egress PE routers >> > MUST NOT decrement the TTL", >> > The meaning is unclear, can one of them do it or neither? > Is it OK to say "...neither ingress nor egress PE routers SHOULD decrement the TTL..." Yes that is fine with me. > >> >7. Do we need to consider IPv6? > IPv6 has been considered in this doc although the examples are IPv4-based. See section 3.3 to 3.8. > Yes - but it is rather implicit, can you make it explicit. I agree that both VRRP and ND carries a strong tradition from IPv6, but maybe one sentence in the Introduction explaining that the document is also applicable to IPv6 would be good. /Loa -- Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 From nobody Wed May 27 07:33:47 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485D31A89BB for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 07:33:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FRNpweHMLch5 for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 07:33:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0785.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:785]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CFBE1A89AC for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 07:33:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BLUPR0501MB1715.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.163.120.18) by BLUPR0501MB1715.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.163.120.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.172.22; Wed, 27 May 2015 14:33:22 +0000 Received: from BLUPR0501MB1715.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.163.120.18]) by BLUPR0501MB1715.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.163.120.18]) with mapi id 15.01.0172.012; Wed, 27 May 2015 14:33:22 +0000 From: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" To: "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree Thread-Index: AdCYigvA5CaaRwRJQ46jdzgH2BLR0g== Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 14:33:21 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=zzhang@juniper.net; x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14] x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR0501MB1715; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(520003)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:BLUPR0501MB1715; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR0501MB1715; x-forefront-prvs: 05891FB07F x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(199003)(189002)(106356001)(81156007)(4001540100001)(105586002)(64706001)(50986999)(66066001)(54356999)(230783001)(588024002)(5002640100001)(99286002)(68736005)(92566002)(189998001)(101416001)(97736004)(5001830100001)(5001860100001)(33656002)(86362001)(2900100001)(102836002)(46102003)(76576001)(2501003)(5001960100002)(555874004)(74316001)(2351001)(40100003)(77156002)(110136002)(62966003)(2656002)(107886002)(558084003)(122556002)(5001920100001)(450100001)(87936001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR0501MB1715; H:BLUPR0501MB1715.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 May 2015 14:33:21.6379 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR0501MB1715 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 14:33:46 -0000 Support. Jeffrey From nobody Wed May 27 13:51:48 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9378A1AC39E for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 13:51:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TVD_SPACE_RATIO=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OM0jKTYL6OrV for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 13:51:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0763.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::763]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9E901A8A4F for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 13:51:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BY1PR0501MB1240.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.160.200.139) by BY1PR0501MB1239.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.160.200.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.172.22; Wed, 27 May 2015 20:51:28 +0000 Received: from BY1PR0501MB1240.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.200.139]) by BY1PR0501MB1240.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.200.139]) with mapi id 15.01.0172.012; Wed, 27 May 2015 20:51:28 +0000 From: Wen Lin To: "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree Thread-Index: AQHQmL7mm1u+XtsGC0SLf1XXl62ymQ== Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 20:51:28 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.6.141106 authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=wlin@juniper.net; x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.13] x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1239; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(520003)(3002001); SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1239; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1239; x-forefront-prvs: 05891FB07F x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(189002)(199003)(2351001)(36756003)(105586002)(106116001)(87936001)(2501003)(2656002)(99286002)(230783001)(450100001)(92566002)(106356001)(68736005)(2900100001)(122556002)(77156002)(40100003)(15975445007)(102836002)(62966003)(66066001)(558084003)(46102003)(189998001)(19580405001)(19580395003)(101416001)(64706001)(83506001)(110136002)(5001960100002)(86362001)(107886002)(5001830100001)(4001350100001)(97736004)(81156007)(54356999)(4001540100001)(5001860100001)(5002640100001)(50986999); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1239; H:BY1PR0501MB1240.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 May 2015 20:51:28.1583 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY1PR0501MB1239 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 20:51:47 -0000 Support. Wen __________________________________________ >BESS mailing list >BESS@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Wed May 27 15:00:39 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05271ACD07 for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 15:00:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.601 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ujd4IYdBBL3e for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 15:00:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qk0-f180.google.com (mail-qk0-f180.google.com [209.85.220.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C2C81AC429 for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 15:00:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qkdn188 with SMTP id n188so14309122qkd.2 for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 15:00:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4hwLOk/EaILSZU1Y3+7pkzjVMSjRHkfQlfEtv8wrQ7c=; b=dSg/Xhpf9+DCuk8tz/UKbfIYxQP6dZOHaRzFFNHs1xmMYuy9xsEdOSElVNsWxsrCUa jOEid+LhbWHWCK/bo/ZFPqwxaJyPuD+iaxNCO79KeUJKGg60zWTachVEWd89kN0eTfHx EFXMIdGEh7/0h0n2L/EsPFdiPCOvuiJTtB2bS38XGOKBUtf7go32cJBGMfCpjgxgxY1g xvgbkOTjVCTMqBS+Qvr8bafsEcnpaxkijwRTYtLEfYczsm1KivCFKzJAM47nQNCOKJoz 5+d4/nF4XzUCWPMDzsJ+ZSB3jz25juCiOBU5FaOUwlP4bEFpDmwckF7qxKcNeMPlOLOU /XUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnZa7AR9x5DxQH/jltnLhxXXILGaX/JCPL7f9JMOj8aLhrPzrX1BU8R+YkUkdG3SARkNl9S X-Received: by 10.140.238.196 with SMTP id j187mr16724452qhc.6.1432764031425; Wed, 27 May 2015 15:00:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from desolation-2.local (68-115-154-254.static.hckr.nc.charter.com. [68.115.154.254]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x142sm153349qkx.28.2015.05.27.15.00.30 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 27 May 2015 15:00:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55663E7D.7050204@queuefull.net> Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 18:00:29 -0400 From: Benson Schliesser User-Agent: Postbox 4.0.1 (Macintosh/20150514) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Xuxiaohu References: <556069FD.1010602@pi.nu> <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE08334CEF@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE08334CEF@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: "bess-chairs@tools.ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet@tools.ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" , Loa Andersson Subject: Re: [bess] wglc review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 22:00:38 -0000 Just a minor point: Xuxiaohu wrote: >> 5. The nits tool give warnings of "26 instances of lines with >> > non-RFC5735-compliant IPv4 addresses". > > Will fix it by using IPv4 addresses belonging to 10.0.0.0/8 It may be more appropriate to use something like 192.0.2.0/24 per RFC5737 rather than RFC1918 space. -Benson From nobody Wed May 27 18:14:33 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 633041A8982 for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 18:14:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kiGAQiVL6zn3 for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 18:14:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CB261A8842 for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 18:14:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BWP04071; Thu, 28 May 2015 01:14:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nkgeml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.36) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 28 May 2015 02:14:28 +0100 Received: from NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.28]) by nkgeml405-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.36]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 28 May 2015 09:14:22 +0800 From: Xuxiaohu To: Benson Schliesser Thread-Topic: [bess] wglc review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet Thread-Index: AQHQlU8B59mI471o6EmVuFtEa0hK6Z2MPKDAgAOjvICAALgXEA== Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 01:14:22 +0000 Message-ID: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE08337673@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com> References: <556069FD.1010602@pi.nu> <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE08334CEF@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com> <55663E7D.7050204@queuefull.net> In-Reply-To: <55663E7D.7050204@queuefull.net> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.99.55] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Cc: "bess-chairs@tools.ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet@tools.ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" , Loa Andersson Subject: Re: [bess] wglc review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 01:14:32 -0000 Hi Benson, Thanks for your comment. I just noticed the following text in RFC5737: This document describes three IPv4 address blocks that are provided for use in documentation. The use of designated address ranges for documentation and examples reduces the likelihood of conflicts and confusion arising from the use of addresses assigned for some other purpose. [RFC1166] reserves the first of the three address blocks, 192.0.2.0/24. The other two address blocks have recently been allocated for this purpose, primarily to ease the writing of examples involving addresses from multiple networks. Other documentation ranges have been defined in the IETF, including the IPv6 documentation prefix [RFC3849] and example domain names [RFC2606]. Documentation also makes use of the ranges reserved in [RFC1918]. Does it mean it's appropriate to use the ranges reserved in [RFC1918] in do= cumentation as well, especially when demonstrating the VPN addresses? Best regards, Xiaohu > -----Original Message----- > From: Benson Schliesser [mailto:bensons@queuefull.net] > Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 6:00 AM > To: Xuxiaohu > Cc: Loa Andersson; bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet@tools.i= etf.org; > bess-chairs@tools.ietf.org > Subject: Re: [bess] wglc review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet >=20 > Just a minor point: >=20 > Xuxiaohu wrote: > >> 5. The nits tool give warnings of "26 instances of lines with > >> > non-RFC5735-compliant IPv4 addresses". > > > > Will fix it by using IPv4 addresses belonging to 10.0.0.0/8 >=20 > It may be more appropriate to use something like 192.0.2.0/24 per > RFC5737 rather than RFC1918 space. >=20 > -Benson From nobody Thu May 28 12:27:11 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 885311A7034; Thu, 28 May 2015 12:27:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qf9d6u3-nbwM; Thu, 28 May 2015 12:27:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27DEF1A702B; Thu, 28 May 2015 12:27:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.0.3.p1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20150528192705.21467.57684.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 12:27:05 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] I-D Action: draft-mapathak-interas-ab-02.txt X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 19:27:07 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled Services Working Group of the IETF. Title : Inter-AS Option D for BGP/MPLS IP VPN Authors : Manu Pathak Keyur Patel Arjun Sreekantiah Filename : draft-mapathak-interas-ab-02.txt Pages : 15 Date : 2015-05-28 Abstract: This document describes a new option known as an Inter-AS option D to the 'Multi-AS Backbones' section of [RFC4364]. This option combines VPN VRFs at the Autonomous System Border Router (ASBR) as described in 'Option A' with the distribution of labeled VPN-IP routes as described in 'Option B'. In addition, this option allows for a data plane consisting of two methods of traffic forwarding between attached ASBR pairs. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mapathak-interas-ab/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mapathak-interas-ab-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-mapathak-interas-ab-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Sun May 31 06:44:22 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5CAE1A1B4A; Sun, 31 May 2015 06:28:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id biIaVY3L3F0K; Sun, 31 May 2015 06:28:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com (mail-wi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD4E61A1A3E; Sun, 31 May 2015 06:28:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wifw1 with SMTP id w1so74746457wif.0; Sun, 31 May 2015 06:28:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=aSdi6kkNT+J6fWJmqR6RslG0Ri5O+VvE0jsK78xuiUU=; b=KL/woJLrUn897iYpH/JrM11uatL81suCApejWGJ4o5fjKS2i/GwcLYoxQ+VmBeZPc9 HS0mh27jWa+yTvKuWcNS2IQS58yKjQlIZnqcqn0eliuuhv6hQviiFP2GBj2KGPfXndyC Q6gj5a1HrJ76e367+EhzBvIZyMw5rHjhead+5f+MMmLgZwCgNvJQpt69kqApcMWLImAm j0uXXyxpTCKgPc28wAMhzRmC+y2kLuyPEpixO1HBSprOx4fZtfF1eFFVjG5g5xEs+E4+ SxymQHVsncMWC0UHdNN2D9B7aUAxVNEvLOyiWfMEtauA32HzC82WcGNpC7L23r/eqTxs HvmQ== X-Received: by 10.180.14.193 with SMTP id r1mr12073165wic.47.1433078886368; Sun, 31 May 2015 06:28:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.65.135 with HTTP; Sun, 31 May 2015 06:27:45 -0700 (PDT) From: "Andrew G. Malis" Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 09:27:45 -0400 Message-ID: To: "pals@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04138a9df508c4051760adb6 Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 31 May 2015 06:44:20 -0700 Cc: "Giles Heron \(giheron\)" , "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A \(ATTLABS\)" , rainsword , ostokes@extremenetworks.com, geraldine.calvignac@orange.com, Alia Atlas , "Fedyk, Don" , florin.balus@alcatel-lucent.com, "Bitar, Nabil N" , "Alvaro Retana \(aretana\)" , pranjal.dutta@alcatel-lucent.com, Stewart Bryant Subject: [bess] Question regarding RFC7361 implementations (received errata) X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 13:28:10 -0000 --f46d04138a9df508c4051760adb6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I'm sending this to the PALS and BESS lists in the hopes that it'll be seen by RFC 7361 implementors. I've forwarded a received errata report regarding RFC 7361 MAC Flush Parameters sub-TLVs. I agree with the errata report in that sub-TLVs can only have an 8-bit type number, as defined in section 5.1.1, which leads me to wonder if there are implementations, and if so, how the sub-TLVs were actually implemented. I'm also concerned about the effect on existing implementations as a result of verifying the errata report. Please respond on the PALS list, we'll try to keep the conversation there. And thanks to Rainsword for spotting the discrepancy and tracking down its source. In the absence of any responses, I plan to verify the errata report. Thanks, Andy ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: RFC Errata System Date: Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:04 AM Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7361 (4380) To: pranjal.dutta@alcatel-lucent.com, florin.balus@alcatel-lucent.com, ostokes@extremenetworks.com, geraldine.calvignac@orange.com, don.fedyk@hp.com, akatlas@gmail.com, db3546@att.com, aretana@cisco.com, giheron@cisco.com, nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7361, "LDP Extensions for Optimized MAC Address Withdrawal in a Hierarchical Virtual Private LAN Service (H-VPLS)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7361&eid=4380 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: rainsword Section: 5.2 Original Text ------------- At least one of the following sub-TLVs MUST be included in the MAC Flush Parameters TLV if the C-flag is set to 1: o PBB B-MAC List Sub-TLV: Type: 0x0407 Length: Value length in octets. At least one B-MAC address MUST be present in the list. Value: One or a list of 48-bit B-MAC addresses. These are the source B-MAC addresses associated with the B-VPLS instance that originated the MAC withdraw message. It will be used to identify the C-MAC(s) mapped to the B-MAC(s) listed in the sub-TLV. o PBB I-SID List Sub-TLV: Type: 0x0408 Length: Value length in octets. Zero indicates an empty I-SID list. An empty I-SID list means that the flushing applies to all the I-SIDs mapped to the B-VPLS indicated by the FEC TLV. Value: One or a list of 24-bit I-SIDs that represent the I-component FIB(s) where the MAC flushing needs to take place. Corrected Text -------------- At least one of the following sub-TLVs MUST be included in the MAC Flush Parameters TLV if the C-flag is set to 1: o PBB B-MAC List Sub-TLV: Type: 0x01 Length: Value length in octets. At least one B-MAC address MUST be present in the list. Value: One or a list of 48-bit B-MAC addresses. These are the source B-MAC addresses associated with the B-VPLS instance that originated the MAC withdraw message. It will be used to identify the C-MAC(s) mapped to the B-MAC(s) listed in the sub-TLV. o PBB I-SID List Sub-TLV: Type: 0x02 Length: Value length in octets. Zero indicates an empty I-SID list. An empty I-SID list means that the flushing applies to all the I-SIDs mapped to the B-VPLS indicated by the FEC TLV. Value: One or a list of 24-bit I-SIDs that represent the I-component FIB(s) where the MAC flushing needs to take place. Notes ----- Type definition was error. The PBB B-MAC List Sub-TLV abd I-SID List Sub-TLV are only support for one byte, as defined in section 5.1.1 MAC flush parameters TLV. This error was imported from draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-12. For this version, it submit the 2 sub-tlv to IANA for alloc id. But the two kinds tlv were sub-tlv, not LDP TLV Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7361 (draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-13) -------------------------------------- Title : LDP Extensions for Optimized MAC Address Withdrawal in a Hierarchical Virtual Private LAN Service (H-VPLS) Publication Date : September 2014 Author(s) : P. Dutta, F. Balus, O. Stokes, G. Calvignac, D. Fedyk Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG --f46d04138a9df508c4051760adb6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm sending this to the PALS and BESS lists in th= e hopes that it'll be seen by RFC 7361 implementors.=C2=A0
I've forwarded a received errata report regarding RFC 7361= MAC Flush Parameters sub-TLVs.

I agree with the e= rrata report in that sub-TLVs can only have an 8-bit type number, as define= d in section 5.1.1, which leads me to wonder if there are implementations, = and if so, how the sub-TLVs were actually implemented. I'm also concern= ed about the effect on existing implementations as a result of verifying th= e errata report.=C2=A0

Please respond on the PALS = list, we'll try to keep the conversation there. And thanks to Rainsword= for spotting the discrepancy and tracking down its source.

<= /div>
In the absence of any responses, I plan to verify the errata repo= rt.

Thanks,
Andy

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>=
Date: Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:04 AM
Subject: [Technical Errata= Reported] RFC7361 (4380)
To: pranjal.dutta@alcatel-lucent.com, florin.balus@alcatel-lucent.com, ostokes@extremenetworks.com, geraldine.calvignac@orange.com, don.fedyk@hp.com, akatlas@gmail.com, db3546@att.com, aretana@cisc= o.com, giheron@cisco.com, nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com
C= c: l2vpn@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org


The fol= lowing errata report has been submitted for RFC7361,
"LDP Extensions for Optimized MAC Address Withdrawal in a Hierarchical= Virtual Private LAN Service (H-VPLS)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc= =3D7361&eid=3D4380

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: rainsword <rai= nsword.wang@huawei.com>

Section: 5.2

Original Text
-------------
=C2=A0 =C2=A0At least one of the following sub-TLVs MUST be included in the= MAC
=C2=A0 =C2=A0Flush Parameters TLV if the C-flag is set to 1:

=C2=A0 =C2=A0o=C2=A0 PBB B-MAC List Sub-TLV:

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Type: 0x0407

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Length: Value length in octets.=C2=A0 At least one B-M= AC address MUST
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 be present in the list.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Value: One or a list of 48-bit B-MAC addresses.=C2=A0 = These are the
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 source B-MAC addresses associated with the B-VPLS inst= ance that
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 originated the MAC withdraw message.=C2=A0 It will be = used to identify
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 the C-MAC(s) mapped to the B-MAC(s) listed in the sub-= TLV.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0o=C2=A0 PBB I-SID List Sub-TLV:

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Type: 0x0408

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Length: Value length in octets.=C2=A0 Zero indicates a= n empty I-SID
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 list.=C2=A0 An empty I-SID list means that the flushin= g applies to all
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 the I-SIDs mapped to the B-VPLS indicated by the FEC T= LV.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Value: One or a list of 24-bit I-SIDs that represent t= he
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 I-component FIB(s) where the MAC flushing needs to tak= e place.

Corrected Text
--------------
=C2=A0 =C2=A0At least one of the following sub-TLVs MUST be included in the= MAC
=C2=A0 =C2=A0Flush Parameters TLV if the C-flag is set to 1:

=C2=A0 =C2=A0o=C2=A0 PBB B-MAC List Sub-TLV:

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Type: 0x01
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Length: Value length in octets.=C2=A0 At least one B-M= AC address MUST
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 be present in the list.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Value: One or a list of 48-bit B-MAC addresses.=C2=A0 = These are the
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 source B-MAC addresses associated with the B-VPLS inst= ance that
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 originated the MAC withdraw message.=C2=A0 It will be = used to identify
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 the C-MAC(s) mapped to the B-MAC(s) listed in the sub-= TLV.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0o=C2=A0 PBB I-SID List Sub-TLV:

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Type: 0x02
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Length: Value length in octets.=C2=A0 Zero indicates a= n empty I-SID
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 list.=C2=A0 An empty I-SID list means that the flushin= g applies to all
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 the I-SIDs mapped to the B-VPLS indicated by the FEC T= LV.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Value: One or a list of 24-bit I-SIDs that represent t= he
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 I-component FIB(s) where the MAC flushing needs to tak= e place.

Notes
-----
Type definition was error. The PBB B-MAC List Sub-TLV abd I-SID List Sub-TL= V are only support for one byte, as defined in section 5.1.1 MAC flush para= meters TLV.
This error was imported from draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-12. For this= version, it submit the 2 sub-tlv to IANA for alloc id. But the two kinds t= lv were sub-tlv, not LDP TLV

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, ple= ase
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.

--------------------------------------
RFC7361 (draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-13)
--------------------------------------
Title=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0: LDP Extension= s for Optimized MAC Address Withdrawal in a Hierarchical Virtual Private LA= N Service (H-VPLS)
Publication Date=C2=A0 =C2=A0 : September 2014
Author(s)=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0: P. Dutta, F. Balus, O. = Stokes, G. Calvignac, D. Fedyk
Category=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 : Layer 2 Virtual Pr= ivate Networks
Area=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 : Routing
Stream=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 : IETF
Verifying Party=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0: IESG


--f46d04138a9df508c4051760adb6-- From nobody Sun May 31 22:08:48 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4600E1A8733 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 22:08:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.277 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tIuV2W5aYhHP for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 22:08:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com (mail-wi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B92D11A8732 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 22:08:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wibut5 with SMTP id ut5so27406728wib.1 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 22:08:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=oi812PnnNB2xTh1R2/mt7QHgzmROe/N9OnggN89RY2A=; b=00L5SR8Fqh/dyX2WwEE1sQxxcm9g6tvEEj3BdZsf+6D+xFitkejlYXoRwUIDQP46OQ 4lXnnfYTlW+ylbiA/rLJfC0pNnhC3EFQGF5uXYhs40qBjqXsCSOnhurNvE88BXYVSM3k e7oeBlj4i5onLs28BikuQEwc17+tzeguJKqE+BzXFZ+TgaAT0bGub++Z3z8+y2K8+mr+ aWTJVG7Ei+whYpeA9OjVyhBFs4euIoaQxSYre9A/PUPEP8rK17heIbmpZ9BuLxZhfdEY V8NccAOriztkG863BUXJw7GEXLvniwwXO8CnMiCzlKPwF7GSYOiiJwlvZgbJHm/tzPNP Fdow== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.85.116 with SMTP id g20mr37748903wjz.154.1433135324480; Sun, 31 May 2015 22:08:44 -0700 (PDT) Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com Received: by 10.28.4.81 with HTTP; Sun, 31 May 2015 22:08:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <555B8B52.90606@alcatel-lucent.com> References: <555B8B52.90606@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 07:08:44 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: wrh0j5SveJtPwnNwkdxiXm5W4xY Message-ID: From: Robert Raszuk To: Martin Vigoureux Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bfcfd50ee4a3505176dd1fb Archived-At: Cc: BESS Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 05:08:47 -0000 --047d7bfcfd50ee4a3505176dd1fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Co-author - I am not aware of any relevant IPR. Robert Raszuk On Tuesday, May 19, 2015, Martin Vigoureux < martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: > Hello > > this email starts a Working Group Last Call on > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet > which is considered mature and ready for a last working group review. > > Please read the document if you haven't read the most recent version yet, > and send your comments to the list, no later than June the 2nd. > > *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that > applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance > with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond to > this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. > > The draft will not be moved forward until a response has been received > from each author and contributor. > > If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly > respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in > conformance with IETF rules. > > > Thank you > M&T > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > --047d7bfcfd50ee4a3505176dd1fb Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Co-au= thor - I am not aware of any relevant IPR.

Robert Rasz= uk

On Tuesday, May 19, 2015, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
Hello

this email starts a Working Group Last Call on
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet
which is considered mature and ready for a last working group review.

Please read the document if you haven't read the most recent version ye= t, and send your comments to the list, no later than June the 2nd.

*Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies= to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IE= TF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

*If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond to t= his email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
The draft will not be moved forward until a response has been received from= each author and contributor.

If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly r= espond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in = conformance with IETF rules.


Thank you
M&T

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
ht= tps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
--047d7bfcfd50ee4a3505176dd1fb--