From nobody Thu Oct 1 01:07:52 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE8F11B2BA3; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 01:07:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BI6chrSqPcsT; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 01:07:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72B601B2BA0; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 01:07:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 260F4BF51EF97; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 08:07:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.112]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t9187kO8002488 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 1 Oct 2015 10:07:47 +0200 Received: from [135.224.213.224] (135.239.27.41) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 10:07:46 +0200 Message-ID: <560CE9D1.7020406@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 10:07:45 +0200 From: Martin Vigoureux User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: BESS , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [135.239.27.41] Archived-At: Subject: [bess] IPR disclosure notification on spbm-evpn X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 08:07:51 -0000 Former L2VPN WG participants, it was brought to my attention that you were possibly not aware of IPR existing against draft-...-spbm-evpn at the times you supported the document (Adoption: 10/2013; WGLC: 10/2014) even if it had been disclosed prior to adoption (05/2013). This could be due to a lack of an explicit notification towards the WG about this IPR disclosure. So please have a look at the IPR disclosure [1] and express your opinion if any. Thank you Martin (as shepherd) --- [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2085/ From nobody Thu Oct 1 02:32:29 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB701A049A; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 02:32:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x3vuiqziowZ5; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 02:32:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD07C1A0AF1; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 02:32:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (unknown [112.205.86.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28C2318013DA; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 11:32:23 +0200 (CEST) To: Martin Vigoureux , BESS , pals@ietf.org References: <560CE9D1.7020406@alcatel-lucent.com> From: Loa Andersson Message-ID: <560CFD9D.4030208@pi.nu> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 17:32:13 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <560CE9D1.7020406@alcatel-lucent.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] IPR disclosure notification on spbm-evpn X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 09:32:29 -0000 Martin, I remember checking back when we were doing the wglc, I had no concerns, I can't see that that would have changed. /Loa PS It would be good to have a table explaining what the different IPR disclosures actully means. On 2015-10-01 16:07, Martin Vigoureux wrote: > Former L2VPN WG participants, > > it was brought to my attention that you were possibly not aware of IPR > existing against draft-...-spbm-evpn at the times you supported the > document (Adoption: 10/2013; WGLC: 10/2014) even if it had been > disclosed prior to adoption (05/2013). > > This could be due to a lack of an explicit notification towards the WG > about this IPR disclosure. > > So please have a look at the IPR disclosure [1] and express your opinion > if any. > > Thank you > > Martin (as shepherd) > > --- > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2085/ > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Fri Oct 2 02:52:20 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88931A0393 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 02:52:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z6Dv9oNasLen for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 02:52:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACA4C1A038E for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 02:52:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 068CE3050BB26 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 09:52:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t929qFww023332 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:52:15 +0200 Received: from [135.224.199.116] (135.239.27.39) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:52:15 +0200 Message-ID: <560E53CE.2090202@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:52:14 +0200 From: Martin Vigoureux User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: BESS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [135.239.27.39] Archived-At: Subject: [bess] Implementations of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-extranet-02 ? X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 09:52:19 -0000 WG, please let us know of any implementation (or plan of) you are aware of for draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-extranet-02 Thank you M&T From nobody Fri Oct 2 03:29:41 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818D21AD355 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 03:29:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4vZ2hI0lmZK9 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 03:29:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8E751AD353 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 03:29:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 2E1585960D85F for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 10:29:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t92ATZIh023240 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 12:29:35 +0200 Received: from [135.224.199.116] (135.239.27.40) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 12:29:35 +0200 Message-ID: <560E5C8E.8000002@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 12:29:34 +0200 From: Martin Vigoureux User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [135.239.27.40] Archived-At: Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 10:29:40 -0000 Hello working group, This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover [1] as a working group item. Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). This poll runs until the *16th of October*. Currently there is no IPR disclosed against this document. *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author and contributor. If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thank you, Martin & Thomas bess chairs [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover From nobody Fri Oct 2 06:20:11 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A3D1A6EDB for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 06:20:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wG7cdFJWK_nt for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 06:20:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias243.francetelecom.com [80.12.204.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 734231A3BA4 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 06:20:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omfeda07.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.200]) by omfeda13.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id E6F95190976 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 15:20:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Exchangemail-eme1.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.1.183]) by omfeda07.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id A8C56158091 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 15:20:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.193.71.12] (10.197.38.1) by PEXCVZYH02.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.114.1.183) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 15:20:06 +0200 To: References: <560E5C8E.8000002@alcatel-lucent.com> From: Organization: Orange Message-ID: <18692_1443792006_560E8486_18692_7636_2_560E8486.1060201@orange.com> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 15:20:06 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <560E5C8E.8000002@alcatel-lucent.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.197.38.1] X-PMX-Version: 6.2.1.2478543, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.10.2.121516 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 13:20:09 -0000 Martin Vigoureux: > > *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond > to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any > relevant IPR. > The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from > each author and contributor. > If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please > explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet > been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Not aware of any such IPR. Best, -Thomas _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. From nobody Fri Oct 2 06:43:53 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78BD81B2B78 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 06:43:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1qTh-qdMrEg7 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 06:43:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0741.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:741]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 025061B2B76 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 06:43:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BN3PR0501MB1249.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.183.140) by BN3PR0501MB1251.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.183.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.280.20; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 13:43:28 +0000 Received: from BN3PR0501MB1249.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.183.140]) by BN3PR0501MB1249.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.183.140]) with mapi id 15.01.0280.017; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 13:43:28 +0000 From: Robert Kebler To: Martin Vigoureux , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover Thread-Index: AQHQ/P1KifshY0EQskmIaJGClN8bap5YNU0g Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 13:43:28 +0000 Message-ID: References: <560E5C8E.8000002@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <560E5C8E.8000002@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rkebler@juniper.net; x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14] x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR0501MB1251; 5:JeVeTFuQiCgJsWWDadOnT8kqOPdoGvxljRD+qfUgA4lW9x1YTL2DXcjoedD7xoVbDmxGoKzXB0aByCgWPXSOoafpqaG1LMSaLOC6C4dCofmSkzEN8A1qM4umsIG2BWfPFE1Y1M5gozxtw2STOc4tNA==; 24:QHs/t+sfMzt0a7/L1MyG4gslfk+NCBW6AtCu3aVfAZUIJJU3NkHi3qynn6WoILgW/W/9omn/6s1bOh1BQ76VD26Ttztpi3RVBixX3P5TRLE=; 20:EiKe915pBvx5CMiim4v40vZCBATBbIVHlfvHGceUPtm8u5aUTo3qzOUa3WwHSls5p7U6oBdICnWmIMz/lLHB+w== x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1251; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(520078)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1251; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1251; x-forefront-prvs: 0717E25089 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(199003)(13464003)(377454003)(189002)(5007970100001)(77096005)(102836002)(99286002)(68736005)(105586002)(5001860100001)(10400500002)(15975445007)(92566002)(2900100001)(76576001)(4001540100001)(5003600100002)(5001830100001)(5002640100001)(77156002)(5001770100001)(5008740100001)(2950100001)(66066001)(33656002)(19580395003)(101416001)(54356999)(5004730100002)(64706001)(19580405001)(81156007)(87936001)(106356001)(189998001)(106116001)(74316001)(5001960100002)(62966003)(97736004)(2501003)(86362001)(107886002)(11100500001)(50986999)(230783001)(40100003)(46102003)(122556002)(76176999); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1251; H:BN3PR0501MB1249.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 02 Oct 2015 13:43:28.3307 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR0501MB1251 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 13:43:52 -0000 I support as a co-author. I'm not aware of any such IPR. > -----Original Message----- > From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux > Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 6:30 AM > To: bess@ietf.org > Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover >=20 > Hello working group, >=20 > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-morin-bess-mvpn- > fast-failover [1] as a working group item. >=20 > Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or > not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). >=20 > This poll runs until the *16th of October*. >=20 > Currently there is no IPR disclosed against this document. >=20 > *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that > applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in > compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for > more details). >=20 > *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond > to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant > IPR. >=20 > The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from > each author and contributor. >=20 > If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please > explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet > been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. >=20 > Thank you, >=20 > Martin & Thomas > bess chairs >=20 > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover >=20 > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Fri Oct 2 07:01:03 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91CF31A00BE for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 07:01:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CPQtJFaglU9h for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 07:01:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0721.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:721]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0DED1A00CA for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 07:00:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from CY1PR0501MB1721.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.163.140.158) by CY1PR0501MB1724.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.163.140.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.280.20; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 14:00:38 +0000 Received: from CY1PR0501MB1721.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.140.158]) by CY1PR0501MB1721.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.140.158]) with mapi id 15.01.0280.017; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 14:00:38 +0000 From: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" To: Martin Vigoureux , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover Thread-Index: AQHQ/P1J7eLmBeJq+USmZVfjvxsnl55YO0Nw Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 14:00:38 +0000 Message-ID: References: <560E5C8E.8000002@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <560E5C8E.8000002@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=zzhang@juniper.net; x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.12] x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY1PR0501MB1724; 5:RGBWXlciPclNIyMtVsbJm4KSmmJzVzafTc0pSNqhcPT2Ji5zVlf2lfX9K/7p/knaaf3HPU5Rc4oHAqcJB0TbdQlDDYOxGhra2fkZ/I2rBZssJ1Db7RukRYapxug/3C0OkQUpNVMNpQ8tzqVXjJGYFg==; 24:v6010q08pTHDS59cULRxGPQNFlzQCgSfO0ZWuFN8MmbW8YAJ/Rz02ryHQe93dfsXlqpgh463mq7I0qdAyQrclbAZ7rRxPV8410pc+fN26Rs=; 20:odLaXqZ3Q6ZcLhMUZZo8zqQCxqmZLTU1+O/Q8nBktWbOBKdvylY8ZeOOHW3ngQZLZMu3fjJvRq5fTa0LEyuyyg== x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CY1PR0501MB1724; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(520078)(8121501046)(3002001); SRVR:CY1PR0501MB1724; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CY1PR0501MB1724; x-forefront-prvs: 0717E25089 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(189002)(199003)(13464003)(5002640100001)(5008740100001)(87936001)(106116001)(2501003)(50986999)(101416001)(64706001)(99286002)(5004730100002)(86362001)(33656002)(230783001)(66066001)(189998001)(5007970100001)(11100500001)(68736005)(92566002)(10400500002)(76176999)(74316001)(5003600100002)(102836002)(46102003)(81156007)(107886002)(54356999)(40100003)(5001770100001)(2950100001)(15975445007)(62966003)(19580395003)(122556002)(77096005)(5001860100001)(106356001)(19580405001)(4001540100001)(97736004)(105586002)(2900100001)(5001830100001)(76576001)(5001960100002)(77156002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR0501MB1724; H:CY1PR0501MB1721.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 02 Oct 2015 14:00:38.0459 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1PR0501MB1724 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 14:01:02 -0000 Support. > -----Original Message----- > From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux > Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 6:30 AM > To: bess@ietf.org > Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover >=20 > Hello working group, >=20 > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting > draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover [1] as a working group item. >=20 > Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or > not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). >=20 > This poll runs until the *16th of October*. >=20 > Currently there is no IPR disclosed against this document. >=20 > *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that > applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in > compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for > more details). >=20 > *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond > to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant > IPR. >=20 > The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from > each author and contributor. >=20 > If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please > explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet > been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. >=20 > Thank you, >=20 > Martin & Thomas > bess chairs >=20 > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover >=20 > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Fri Oct 2 07:02:09 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1687A1A00E9 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 07:02:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.377 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.377 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vjk-ylAvRUxf for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 07:02:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qk0-x244.google.com (mail-qk0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AA1C1A00E7 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 07:02:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qkfr4 with SMTP id r4so4297159qkf.2 for ; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 07:02:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Kwm8NEw/P8K6/5DxUaoXKhnf7rAOIWPh/dt3rweAEOo=; b=KaxKuKZzSIeTCQcOSHgqmv9DQbgXtdRZaZ2WGJzFubTcsK0YRunTndRqewxtwrqt7e SvB6EgNtDEM9yMsciJqYvD+iN6bADBz3msmGcrsD8tW/OPtQLYUWHHS3LBVovHY4E4OX BB9AGHgOtn+LSkj9fQ1nSBva5+mFmrdwaM3/XjSRRTmrJQpGYuoZjKD7a6MwAstQQV/o gAt22eZAjPsJtaHwODocmbyn+7ufRA3Yk3HQToO/leqp60kgF9lSd0MikxuB329Gtygf lUnLZgcIaqJad25SBnL3848p5ArayCDp9bfXTVxvYuMpUx4nG/gua8n5Up4EWfBkh9EQ Lglg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.55.33.35 with SMTP id h35mr9297373qkh.71.1443794522520; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 07:02:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.102.133 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 07:02:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 16:02:02 +0200 Message-ID: From: Markus Z To: BESS@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11406a02a4c12905211f9b58 Archived-At: Subject: [bess] unsubscribe X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 14:02:08 -0000 --001a11406a02a4c12905211f9b58 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 unsubscribe On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Robert Kebler wrote: > I support as a co-author. > > I'm not aware of any such IPR. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux > > Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 6:30 AM > > To: bess@ietf.org > > Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover > > > > Hello working group, > > > > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-morin-bess-mvpn- > > fast-failover [1] as a working group item. > > > > Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or > > not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). > > > > This poll runs until the *16th of October*. > > > > Currently there is no IPR disclosed against this document. > > > > *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that > > applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in > > compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for > > more details). > > > > *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond > > to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant > > IPR. > > > > The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from > > each author and contributor. > > > > If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please > > explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet > > been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > > > Thank you, > > > > Martin & Thomas > > bess chairs > > > > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover > > > > _______________________________________________ > > BESS mailing list > > BESS@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > -- Markus Zielonka phone sip:zille@iptel.org --001a11406a02a4c12905211f9b58 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
unsubscribe

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Robert Kebler <rkebler@= juniper.net> wrote:
I suppo= rt as a co-author.

I'm not aware of any such IPR.





> -----Original Message-----
> From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounc= es@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux
> Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 6:30 AM
> To: bess@ietf.org
> Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover=
>
> Hello working group,
>
> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-morin-bess-mvpn- > fast-failover [1] as a working group item.
>
> Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or<= br> > not (in the later case, please also state the reasons).
>
> This poll runs until the *16th of October*.
>
> Currently there is no IPR disclosed against this document.
>
> *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that > applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in
> compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for=
> more details).
>
> *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond=
> to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevan= t
> IPR.
>
> The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from<= br> > each author and contributor.
>
> If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please
> explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet > been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Martin & Thomas
> bess chairs
>
> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/= draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover
>
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess



--
Markus Zielonka

phone=C2=A0 sip:zille@iptel.org
--001a11406a02a4c12905211f9b58-- From nobody Fri Oct 2 09:39:41 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E581B2CF9 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 09:39:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K7_2KM0JeVuN for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 09:39:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpgre-esg-01.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69B0E1B2CCD for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 09:39:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.122]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 2ABD9147BEA17 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 16:39:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712wxchhub03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.74]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t92GdZot012269 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 18:39:36 +0200 Received: from FR711WXCHMBA07.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.3.17]) by FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 18:39:35 +0200 From: "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" To: "VIGOUREUX, MARTIN (MARTIN)" , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover Thread-Index: AQHQ/P1EcRuYh82FfU6aIW4WHVSKvp5YZ92A Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 16:39:35 +0000 Message-ID: References: <560E5C8E.8000002@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <560E5C8E.8000002@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.150911 x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 16:39:40 -0000 Tm90IGF3YXJlIG9mIElQUiByZWxhdGVkIHRvIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQNCg0KDQoNCk9uIDAyLzEwLzE1 IDEyOjI5LCAiQkVTUyBvbiBiZWhhbGYgb2YgTWFydGluIFZpZ291cmV1eCIgPGJlc3MtYm91bmNl c0BpZXRmLm9yZyBvbiBiZWhhbGYgb2YgbWFydGluLnZpZ291cmV1eEBhbGNhdGVsLWx1Y2VudC5j b20+IHdyb3RlOg0KDQo+SGVsbG8gd29ya2luZyBncm91cCwNCj4NCj5UaGlzIGVtYWlsIHN0YXJ0 cyBhIHR3by13ZWVrIHBvbGwgb24gYWRvcHRpbmcNCj5kcmFmdC1tb3Jpbi1iZXNzLW12cG4tZmFz dC1mYWlsb3ZlciBbMV0gYXMgYSB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwIGl0ZW0uDQo+DQo+UGxlYXNlIHNlbmQg Y29tbWVudHMgdG8gdGhlIGxpc3QgYW5kIHN0YXRlIGlmIHlvdSBzdXBwb3J0IGFkb3B0aW9uIG9y DQo+bm90IChpbiB0aGUgbGF0ZXIgY2FzZSwgcGxlYXNlIGFsc28gc3RhdGUgdGhlIHJlYXNvbnMp Lg0KPg0KPlRoaXMgcG9sbCBydW5zIHVudGlsIHRoZSAqMTZ0aCBvZiBPY3RvYmVyKi4NCj4NCj5D dXJyZW50bHkgdGhlcmUgaXMgbm8gSVBSIGRpc2Nsb3NlZCBhZ2FpbnN0IHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQu DQo+DQo+KkNvaW5jaWRlbnRhbGx5Kiwgd2UgYXJlIGFsc28gcG9sbGluZyBmb3Iga25vd2xlZGdl IG9mIGFueSBJUFIgdGhhdCANCj5hcHBsaWVzIHRvIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQsIHRvIGVuc3VyZSB0aGF0 IElQUiBoYXMgYmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQgaW4gDQo+Y29tcGxpYW5jZSB3aXRoIElFVEYgSVBSIHJ1 bGVzIChzZWUgUkZDcyAzOTc5LCA0ODc5LCAzNjY5IGFuZCA1Mzc4IGZvciANCj5tb3JlIGRldGFp bHMpLg0KPg0KPipJZiB5b3UgYXJlIGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhIGRvY3VtZW50IGF1dGhvciBvciBjb250 cmlidXRvciogcGxlYXNlIHJlc3BvbmQgDQo+dG8gdGhpcyBlbWFpbCBhbmQgaW5kaWNhdGUgd2hl dGhlciBvciBub3QgeW91IGFyZSBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgcmVsZXZhbnQgSVBSLg0KPg0KPlRoZSBk cmFmdCB3aWxsIG5vdCBiZSBhZG9wdGVkIHVudGlsIGEgcmVzcG9uc2UgaGFzIGJlZW4gcmVjZWl2 ZWQgZnJvbSANCj5lYWNoIGF1dGhvciBhbmQgY29udHJpYnV0b3IuDQo+DQo+SWYgeW91IGFyZSBu b3QgbGlzdGVkIGFzIGFuIGF1dGhvciBvciBjb250cmlidXRvciwgdGhlbiBwbGVhc2UgDQo+ZXhw bGljaXRseSByZXNwb25kIG9ubHkgaWYgeW91IGFyZSBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQgaGFz IG5vdCB5ZXQgDQo+YmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQgaW4gY29uZm9ybWFuY2Ugd2l0aCBJRVRGIHJ1bGVz Lg0KPg0KPlRoYW5rIHlvdSwNCj4NCj5NYXJ0aW4gJiBUaG9tYXMNCj5iZXNzIGNoYWlycw0KPg0K PlsxXSBodHRwczovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2h0bWwvZHJhZnQtbW9yaW4tYmVzcy1tdnBuLWZh c3QtZmFpbG92ZXINCj4NCj5fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fXw0KPkJFU1MgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQo+QkVTU0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KPmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3 LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vYmVzcw0K From nobody Fri Oct 2 15:04:58 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC011A8A3C for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 15:04:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XdFTLhAk_SVn for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 15:04:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpgre-esg-01.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B4F61A8A1B for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 15:04:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.122]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 806CCB4C64CEF for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 22:04:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t92M4qXs013916 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Sat, 3 Oct 2015 00:04:52 +0200 Received: from FR711WXCHMBA01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.1.183]) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.111]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Sat, 3 Oct 2015 00:04:52 +0200 From: "Rabadan, Jorge (Jorge)" To: "VIGOUREUX, MARTIN (MARTIN)" , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover Thread-Index: AQHQ/V5cGFLKjJaVRECKcx8rl+r5EA== Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 22:04:51 +0000 Message-ID: <6273125B-332D-47C4-B722-332553328A31@alcatel-lucent.com> References: <560E5C8E.8000002@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <560E5C8E.8000002@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.150923 x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.38] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 22:04:56 -0000 U3VwcG9ydCBmb3IgV0cgYWRvcHRpb24uDQoNClRoeA0KSm9yZ2UNCg0KDQoNCg0KT24gMTAvMi8x NSwgNjoyOSBBTSwgIkJFU1Mgb24gYmVoYWxmIG9mIE1hcnRpbiBWaWdvdXJldXgiIDxiZXNzLWJv dW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmcgb24gYmVoYWxmIG9mIG1hcnRpbi52aWdvdXJldXhAYWxjYXRlbC1sdWNl bnQuY29tPiB3cm90ZToNCg0KPkhlbGxvIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXAsDQo+DQo+VGhpcyBlbWFpbCBz dGFydHMgYSB0d28td2VlayBwb2xsIG9uIGFkb3B0aW5nDQo+ZHJhZnQtbW9yaW4tYmVzcy1tdnBu LWZhc3QtZmFpbG92ZXIgWzFdIGFzIGEgd29ya2luZyBncm91cCBpdGVtLg0KPg0KPlBsZWFzZSBz ZW5kIGNvbW1lbnRzIHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0IGFuZCBzdGF0ZSBpZiB5b3Ugc3VwcG9ydCBhZG9wdGlv biBvcg0KPm5vdCAoaW4gdGhlIGxhdGVyIGNhc2UsIHBsZWFzZSBhbHNvIHN0YXRlIHRoZSByZWFz b25zKS4NCj4NCj5UaGlzIHBvbGwgcnVucyB1bnRpbCB0aGUgKjE2dGggb2YgT2N0b2JlciouDQo+ DQo+Q3VycmVudGx5IHRoZXJlIGlzIG5vIElQUiBkaXNjbG9zZWQgYWdhaW5zdCB0aGlzIGRvY3Vt ZW50Lg0KPg0KPipDb2luY2lkZW50YWxseSosIHdlIGFyZSBhbHNvIHBvbGxpbmcgZm9yIGtub3ds ZWRnZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQgDQo+YXBwbGllcyB0byB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0LCB0byBlbnN1cmUg dGhhdCBJUFIgaGFzIGJlZW4gZGlzY2xvc2VkIGluIA0KPmNvbXBsaWFuY2Ugd2l0aCBJRVRGIElQ UiBydWxlcyAoc2VlIFJGQ3MgMzk3OSwgNDg3OSwgMzY2OSBhbmQgNTM3OCBmb3IgDQo+bW9yZSBk ZXRhaWxzKS4NCj4NCj4qSWYgeW91IGFyZSBsaXN0ZWQgYXMgYSBkb2N1bWVudCBhdXRob3Igb3Ig Y29udHJpYnV0b3IqIHBsZWFzZSByZXNwb25kIA0KPnRvIHRoaXMgZW1haWwgYW5kIGluZGljYXRl IHdoZXRoZXIgb3Igbm90IHlvdSBhcmUgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IHJlbGV2YW50IElQUi4NCj4NCj5U aGUgZHJhZnQgd2lsbCBub3QgYmUgYWRvcHRlZCB1bnRpbCBhIHJlc3BvbnNlIGhhcyBiZWVuIHJl Y2VpdmVkIGZyb20gDQo+ZWFjaCBhdXRob3IgYW5kIGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9yLg0KPg0KPklmIHlvdSBh cmUgbm90IGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhbiBhdXRob3Igb3IgY29udHJpYnV0b3IsIHRoZW4gcGxlYXNlIA0K PmV4cGxpY2l0bHkgcmVzcG9uZCBvbmx5IGlmIHlvdSBhcmUgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IElQUiB0aGF0 IGhhcyBub3QgeWV0IA0KPmJlZW4gZGlzY2xvc2VkIGluIGNvbmZvcm1hbmNlIHdpdGggSUVURiBy dWxlcy4NCj4NCj5UaGFuayB5b3UsDQo+DQo+TWFydGluICYgVGhvbWFzDQo+YmVzcyBjaGFpcnMN Cj4NCj5bMV0gaHR0cHM6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LW1vcmluLWJlc3MtbXZw bi1mYXN0LWZhaWxvdmVyDQo+DQo+X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX18NCj5CRVNTIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KPkJFU1NAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj5odHRwczov L3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2Jlc3MNCg== From nobody Mon Oct 5 00:28:24 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA84B1B4B38 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 00:28:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.977 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6KzP2UHKsgEC for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 00:28:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-io0-f181.google.com (mail-io0-f181.google.com [209.85.223.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D4111B4B28 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 00:28:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by iofh134 with SMTP id h134so176534947iof.0 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:28:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=z1XuGrZe8UbfVK4Yitn8hnAdlFckdAWw4XgjqInthg8=; b=byYsbWoujx4/jjWbJ9eILfMyRn0uiag27xNe9mt7uzaZbc8LAlRCXBsa2N7FI7tohJ wp2TBUVLrqFYHLL3gxBYf380oj1D+2ZVom9GzkW3QoZKZdOaYCGWLT+5+hvuKmWSITu2 kHEUPOlkcZjZK0zFKHhanCHzinQReJzlCGUDUNw8jvD4RSMJ21KGq96vVrSShV0o987o LeejWochLxCIxYC5jwbJNV/HeTmt6uXjgHRtRrkneJOl7MADpBjnTugRKjfA2i7SKZLl BpBeffbzH3YRlTvzSGQSzvga/YHFQ8vyVIy3P0kYJvxJX52aQBkkzNpSuVvynF7LA9si pg5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm2FyMEoC0z7WyzLTHX6lERCrbTyqUjGZ5fdWNsTqjIzbxrBleQaAfzRA0YUm7xs+dCJxYi MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.138.213 with SMTP id c82mr25877151ioj.179.1444030100723; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:28:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.65.155 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 00:28:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <560E5C8E.8000002@alcatel-lucent.com> References: <560E5C8E.8000002@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 03:28:20 -0400 Message-ID: From: Nabeel Cocker To: Martin Vigoureux Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ed2a032f52f0521567520 Archived-At: Cc: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 07:28:23 -0000 --001a113ed2a032f52f0521567520 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 support.. Nabeel On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Martin Vigoureux < martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: > Hello working group, > > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting > draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover [1] as a working group item. > > Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or > not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). > > This poll runs until the *16th of October*. > > Currently there is no IPR disclosed against this document. > > *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that > applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance > with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond to > this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. > > The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each > author and contributor. > > If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly > respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in > conformance with IETF rules. > > Thank you, > > Martin & Thomas > bess chairs > > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > --001a113ed2a032f52f0521567520 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
support..

Nabeel

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 6:29= AM, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.c= om> wrote:
Hello working gr= oup,

This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover [1] as a working group item.

Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or
not (in the later case, please also state the reasons).

This poll runs until the *16th of October*.

Currently there is no IPR disclosed against this document.

*Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies= to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IE= TF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

*If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond to t= his email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each = author and contributor.

If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly r= espond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in = conformance with IETF rules.

Thank you,

Martin & Thomas
bess chairs

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft= -morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

--001a113ed2a032f52f0521567520-- From nobody Mon Oct 5 00:28:38 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB09F1B4B28 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 00:28:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aI9hajJgwvvU for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 00:28:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias91.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CBA01B4B6B for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 00:28:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omfedm07.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.3]) by omfedm13.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 6A7D5324207; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 09:28:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Exchangemail-eme1.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.1.183]) by omfedm07.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 49EC44C06D; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 09:28:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.193.71.12] (10.197.38.1) by PEXCVZYH02.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.114.1.183) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 09:28:30 +0200 To: , , , , References: <11235_1442303016_55F7CC28_11235_334_2_55F7CC27.9020002@orange.com> From: Organization: Orange Message-ID: <15187_1444030111_5612269F_15187_570_1_5612269E.9040106@orange.com> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 09:28:30 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <11235_1442303016_55F7CC28_11235_334_2_55F7CC27.9020002@orange.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.197.38.1] X-PMX-Version: 6.2.1.2478543, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.9.8.131516 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-singh-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 07:28:37 -0000 Authors of draft-singh-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags, working group, The support base for this proposal is not large. Before adopting this draft, we would like hear people actually experiencing pain related to not solving this issue and hear about implementations in actual products. Let's consider this poll for adoption open until we hear more. Best, Thomas/Martin thomas.morin@orange.com : > Hello working group, > > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting > draft-singh-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags-01 [1] as a working group item. > > Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or > not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). > > This poll runs until **September 29th**. > > > *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that > applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in > compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 > and 5378 for more details). > > ==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please > respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any > relevant IPR. > > The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from > each author and contributor. > > If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please > explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet > been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > Thank you, > > Martin & Thomas > bess chairs > > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-singh-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. From nobody Mon Oct 5 06:10:36 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B751ACD3E; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 06:10:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ULTq_TTZJjx2; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 06:10:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8031A1ACA; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 06:10:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.4.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151005131034.25011.14794.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 06:10:34 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-pe-ce-01.txt X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 13:10:36 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled Services Working Group of the IETF. Title : BGP as an MVPN PE-CE Protocol Authors : Keyur Patel Eric C. Rosen Yakov Rekhter Filename : draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-pe-ce-01.txt Pages : 12 Date : 2015-10-05 Abstract: When a Service Provider offers BGP/MPLS IP VPN service to its customers, RFCs 6513 and 6514 describe protocols and procedures that the Service Provider can use in order to carry the customer's IP multicast traffic from one customer site to others. BGP can be used to carry customer multicast routing information from one Provider Edge (PE) router to another, but it is assumed that PIM is running on the interface between a Customer Edge (CE) router and a PE router. This document specifies protocols and procedures that, under certain conditions, allow customer multicast routing information to carried between PE and CE via BGP. This can eliminate the need to run PIM on the PE-CE interfaces, potentially eliminating the need to run PIM on the PE routers at all. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-pe-ce/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-pe-ce-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-pe-ce-01 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Mon Oct 5 12:22:52 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259491B4333; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:22:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oflEG9k3th5m; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:22:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D5A1B4169; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:22:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.4.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151005192247.594.10875.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 12:22:47 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn-02.txt X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 19:22:49 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled Services Working Group of the IETF. Title : Shortest Path Bridging, MAC Mode Support over EVPN Authors : Dave Allan Jeff Tantsura Don Fedyk Ali Sajassi Filename : draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn-02.txt Pages : 11 Date : 2015-10-05 Abstract: This document describes how Ethernet Shortest Path Bridging MAC mode (802.1aq) can be combined with EVPN to interwork with PBB-PEs as described in the PBB-EVPN solution. This is achieved via operational isolation of each Ethernet network attached an EVPN core while supporting full interworking between the different variations of Ethernet networks. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Tue Oct 6 03:23:16 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D348C1B3F3E for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 03:23:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BJBfnQnjeQzt for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 03:23:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C8491B3F40 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 03:23:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 70B46EB73573B for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 10:23:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.112]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t96ANAR8030055 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 12:23:10 +0200 Received: from [135.224.203.57] (135.239.27.41) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 12:23:10 +0200 Message-ID: <5613A10D.7030107@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 12:23:09 +0200 From: Martin Vigoureux User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "bess@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [135.239.27.41] Archived-At: Subject: [bess] Slots requests for BESS WG session - IETF 94 - Yokohama X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 10:23:15 -0000 All, it is time we start building the BESS WG agenda for Yokohama. The IETF agenda is available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/94/agenda.html Please note that it is still a preliminary agenda. The BESS WG session (2h) is currently scheduled on Thursday, 5th of November, Afternoon session I 13:00-15:00 (local time) Please send us your request for a presentation slot, indicating: draft name, speaker and desired duration (covering presentation + discussion) Please send the requests no later than the 18th of October Thank you M&T _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Tue Oct 6 06:01:44 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED561A9244 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 06:01:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mt2crbOBkVWU for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 06:01:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias92.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A95051A916B for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 06:01:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omfedm07.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.3]) by omfedm12.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 7FB9F18C32B; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 15:01:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.31.32]) by omfedm07.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 4D1C34C08C; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 15:01:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::65de:2f08:41e6:ebbe]) by OPEXCLILM32.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::8924:188:2124:a046%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 15:01:32 +0200 From: To: Martin Vigoureux , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover Thread-Index: AQHQ/P1DIcH2i2iy20mKAhrrDyO+dp5edD5A Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 13:01:31 +0000 Message-ID: <23459_1444136492_5613C62C_23459_729_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF9216720920@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> References: <560E5C8E.8000002@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <560E5C8E.8000002@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.5] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-PMX-Version: 6.2.1.2478543, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.10.6.90315 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 13:01:43 -0000 Support ! -----Original Message----- From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 12:30 To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover Hello working group, This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-fa= ilover [1] as a working group item. Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or not (= in the later case, please also state the reasons). This poll runs until the *16th of October*. Currently there is no IPR disclosed against this document. *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies= to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IE= TF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond to t= his email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each = author and contributor. If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly r= espond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in = conformance with IETF rules. Thank you, Martin & Thomas bess chairs [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess ___________________________________________________________________________= ______________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confiden= tielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu= ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages el= ectroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou = falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged inf= ormation that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and dele= te this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been = modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. From nobody Wed Oct 7 14:11:21 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137CD1B30C1 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 14:11:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lqes-EIHj2VJ for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 14:11:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com (mail-wi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18DF01B30F8 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 14:11:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so1806338wic.1 for ; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 14:11:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=1LFWOpK3oUBvM0FzL9X224+Ha073tcbYdvx2HjV3Cp0=; b=FLxsNfFnGf5Bl2c/CbttyUSMMCrC27eX6Fka7/cA9ZXXYITQ6rV/jZ7lJLuszJzbDC xFSfcsH5xt1E55mZWh+Fm+ODF/rQL8HyM4blp2SJWFSDMT05ZCQYCM8qDG0pAoL/L2eL 0uuXwtKdgMs0dta2jSt3vK9XIYZVkrd73GPZABwpA5e3Ac3mhR/dSPSzYpzvwUoGxd2K i3N29XNPmA/3Cn0mej7Czl8a3gPLPpdlb5KXPNxys9au8tIB8+0VJGcxbfnuMBH6D3MJ adU4sDrlrgXsk8PxILsl4F8vvMCkCKjvAiC+I1RQDZD6OWBYXq7Bl7oEDKaSuCb+66kh uwyQ== X-Received: by 10.180.182.84 with SMTP id ec20mr4303542wic.42.1444252269599; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 14:11:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.47.148 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 14:10:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Sami Boutros Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 17:10:50 -0400 Message-ID: To: bess@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6250a87ee06305218a2ffb Archived-At: Subject: [bess] Seeking Feedback on evpn-auto-provisoning X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 21:11:20 -0000 --047d7b6250a87ee06305218a2ffb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, The draft propose an EVPN route based on the FSOL packets to be sent to a controller in a data center network, to trigger a push of the related L2/L3 service configuration to be provisioned on the PE/NVE and on the switch ports. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boutros-bess-evpn-auto-provisoning-00 Thanks, Sami --047d7b6250a87ee06305218a2ffb Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

The draft propose an EVPN route base= d on the FSOL packets to be sent to a controller in a data center network, to tri= gger a push of the related L2/L3 service configuration to be provisioned on the PE/NVE and on the switch ports.
Thanks,
=
Sami
--047d7b6250a87ee06305218a2ffb-- From nobody Wed Oct 7 14:14:23 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481041B3082 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 14:14:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ohst67_ps9A1 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 14:14:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com (mail-wi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7B721B3076 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 14:14:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so1970412wic.0 for ; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 14:14:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=asuGr6fP419B21y0Xzdi+LSSl9qLax9XjjVwOBZuuqo=; b=gZ3w/ECvVptPIStuThP9CcQ3V+1FS6HGHpGqvP6q8QFUPqOIaXq9cgQk4hQGao5G6+ Euq7S/Q7JpVB7zqkGrSb6yJcf8bOi6WjwtPitaTH/ZpaL64G7wl05d52xc5dlTchFld+ 1JaJdhv3LhoZmkAVKdkDHVRCavVz1yw11c3oQSFlzDjSXqEMjkCDSKfR2OGQT6s8HgEV sPdpfbf3Knpp5zl53IVDDWKw6q9B0mQedYELMM6z8ZBQH1053Tc+aON2GD82ipubjjuT NeczBUg5YLa3wGlocbeinb++8CoP1PJcdMHp8T/mLMxBhOvMfaGjauqy6W/TjwFfzZFC gQbQ== X-Received: by 10.180.182.84 with SMTP id ec20mr4316102wic.42.1444252459151; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 14:14:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.47.148 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 14:13:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Sami Boutros Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 17:13:59 -0400 Message-ID: To: bess@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6250a8cb392405218a3a81 Archived-At: Subject: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 21:14:22 -0000 --047d7b6250a8cb392405218a3a81 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, The draft proposes a dynamic mechanism to terminate the VPWS transport service at a service PE into an overlay L2 or L3 service based on a single side provisioning at the access PE. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boutros-bess-evpn-vpws-service-edge-gateway-01 Thanks, Sami --047d7b6250a8cb392405218a3a81 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

The draft proposes a dynamic mechani= sm to terminate the VPWS transport service at a service PE into an overlay = L2 or L3 service based on a single side provisioning at the access PE.
<= div>
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boutros-bess-ev= pn-vpws-service-edge-gateway-01

Thanks,

=
Sami
--047d7b6250a8cb392405218a3a81-- From nobody Wed Oct 7 14:56:38 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA7EB1AD0A1 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 14:56:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id epVj7IHYryLD for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 14:56:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ADF61A1F20 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 14:56:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=294; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1444254994; x=1445464594; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=so+Ei4QjLBEgSwbCzujbi4ZB0bWRtF4tZLnB+DzyzT4=; b=l4QOV7x6PsOztf77X+e21UCW4xqfMQuEsfunaKa3fmE0VVK+fEexuv5h A++VfCj5CzZYVtu6kPNqM0wUXDuE6LwjezK5NLVqUNbUj2CInSd8rYH2Q A5d5g3OGN0TQJRo7DDo6iy30glM3+2tmnLhYTl46O2Cf0NcerXWI5Qz1t U=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AeCADQkxVW/5xdJa1egyeBSL8ogxOCCmYZgUk8EAEBAQEBAQGBCoQpBDo/EgE+QicEDogzwk0BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXhnMBgg+He4MhgRQFlgUBjRabdzgrhAKHV4EGAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,651,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="38915100" Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Oct 2015 21:56:33 +0000 Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t97LuXjQ026835 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 7 Oct 2015 21:56:33 GMT Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 16:56:33 -0500 Received: from xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com (173.37.183.76) by xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 16:56:33 -0500 Received: from xmb-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.8.83]) by xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([173.37.183.76]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 16:56:33 -0500 From: "Sami Boutros (sboutros)" To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Jorge)" Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement-02 Thread-Index: AQHRAUsHOQGZNDMoUE6nfnEOsEHMjg== Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 21:56:32 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [173.36.7.27] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <4C5ED0CC8D16F74A967B6ABA7DABAFEE@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: BESS Subject: [bess] draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement-02 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 21:56:35 -0000 Hi Jorge, In some of the use case sections in the draft, there is no mention of the l= abel/VNI that will be associated with RT-5. As well if the router-mac will be associated with RT-5 and the GW-IP will b= e set, why do we need to advertise those again in RT-2?=20 Thanks, Sami= From nobody Wed Oct 7 15:31:21 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E001B2A29 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 15:31:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LX6IPYRnc8cJ for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 15:31:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EECB91B2A24 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 15:31:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=965; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1444257079; x=1445466679; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=2Xcrk9/Opdp5u5WniEKy7knbDnWRoTSzfQIdTg2W788=; b=YFplSs6wak5sOpn7FPSvNdf4MI27DDwOZiJ/7LNBji5ylwMJKfLe0wuA +W6hW8/eVs3nj7VoWaMaDe8p9M9JCbxdH6U9xocwtPGg4K9cYxjCl+nki 5MtTn+53qvZL8zvSae3ZHyJX03aNEmtjw0J+mnLBl3lIRfVzQKdXK4ZzB c=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AtAwA7nBVW/5JdJa1egydUbga9QAENgVoXCoJyggpmGYE/OBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEJwEBBAEBATc0CxIBCDY3CycEDgWILg3CNAEBAQEBAQEDAQEBAQEBAQEBFQSLcYUNhDUFlgUBjRabdx8BAUKEAnGGZoEGAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,651,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="195392029" Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Oct 2015 22:31:18 +0000 Received: from XCH-ALN-015.cisco.com (xch-aln-015.cisco.com [173.36.7.25]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t97MVIIe029035 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 7 Oct 2015 22:31:18 GMT Received: from xch-aln-015.cisco.com (173.36.7.25) by XCH-ALN-015.cisco.com (173.36.7.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 17:31:17 -0500 Received: from xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com (173.37.183.77) by xch-aln-015.cisco.com (173.36.7.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 17:31:17 -0500 Received: from xmb-aln-x13.cisco.com ([169.254.15.15]) by xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([173.37.183.77]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 17:31:17 -0500 From: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" To: "Sami Boutros (sboutros)" , "Rabadan, Jorge (Jorge)" Thread-Topic: [bess] draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement-02 Thread-Index: AQHRAU/hOfTDSxOtxEOT+DNmX9qgEw== Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 22:31:16 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.5.150821 x-originating-ip: [173.36.7.26] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <28E0896CE5BABA4DA57D28C92B492AA5@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: BESS Subject: Re: [bess] draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement-02 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 22:31:20 -0000 Sami, There are intended for different scenarios. When a subnet is sitting behind a TS, there is no need to advertise label/VNI in RT5 for that subnet because it gets resolved via label/VNI associated with RT2 for that TS. In other scenarios, where subnet gets directly advertised by PE (e.g., no indirection and no RT2), then label/VNI for that subnet gets advertised in RT5. Cheers, Ali On 10/7/15, 2:56 PM, "BESS on behalf of Sami Boutros (sboutros)" wrote: >Hi Jorge, > >In some of the use case sections in the draft, there is no mention of the >label/VNI that will be associated with RT-5. >As well if the router-mac will be associated with RT-5 and the GW-IP will >be set, why do we need to advertise those again in RT-2? > >Thanks, > >Sami >_______________________________________________ >BESS mailing list >BESS@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Thu Oct 8 01:02:41 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E301A8A23 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 01:02:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TLOqPBoCGj0O for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 01:02:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FDAA1A8749 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 01:02:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 0429AB3FAB3CA; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 08:02:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.112]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t98823eO020708 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 8 Oct 2015 10:02:34 +0200 Received: from FR711WXCHMBA01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.1.183]) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.112]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 10:01:58 +0200 From: "Rabadan, Jorge (Jorge)" To: Sami Boutros , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway Thread-Index: AQHRAUUsWm2xRgSmQUqXFeY+jQylkZ5hPKsA Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 08:01:58 +0000 Message-ID: <1EDE9B87-E9DB-4BBA-A41C-AB138380E451@alcatel-lucent.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.150923 x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 08:02:40 -0000 U2FtaSwNCg0KSSBhbHJlYWR5IHNlbnQgeW91IGEgZmV3IGNvbW1lbnRzIGZvciByZXYgMC4gDQpJ 4oCZbGwgcGFzdGUgdGhlbSBoZXJlICh3aXRoIC8qW0pPUkdFXSovKSBmb3IgdGhpcyB2ZXJzaW9u IHRvby4NClRoYW5rcy4NCkpvcmdlDQoNCg0KLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0NCg0KDQpBYnN0cmFjdA0KDQogICBUaGlz IGRvY3VtZW50IGRlc2NyaWJlcyBob3cgYSBzZXJ2aWNlIG5vZGUgY2FuIGR5bmFtaWNhbGx5IHRl cm1pbmF0ZQ0KICAgRVZQTiB2aXJ0dWFsIHByaXZhdGUgd2lyZSB0cmFuc3BvcnQgc2VydmljZSAo VlBXUykgZnJvbSBhY2Nlc3Mgbm9kZXMNCiAgIGFuZCBvZmZlciBMYXllciAyLCBMYXllciAzIGFu ZCBFdGhlcm5ldCBWUE4gb3ZlcmxheSBzZXJ2aWNlcyB0bw0KICAgQ3VzdG9tZXIgZWRnZSBkZXZp Y2VzIGNvbm5lY3RlZCB0byB0aGUgYWNjZXNzIG5vZGVzLiBTZXJ2aWNlIG5vZGVzDQogICB1c2lu ZyBFVlBOIHdpbGwgYWR2ZXJ0aXNlIHRvIGFjY2VzcyBub2RlcyB0aGUgTDIsIEwzIGFuZCBFdGhl cm5ldCBWUE4NCiAgIG92ZXJsYXkgc2VydmljZXMgaXQgY2FuIG9mZmVyIGZvciB0aGUgdGVybWlu YXRlZCBFVlBOIFZQV1MgdHJhbnNwb3J0DQogICBzZXJ2aWNlLiBPbiBhbiBhY2Nlc3Mgbm9kZSBh biBvcGVyYXRvciBjYW4gc3BlY2lmeSB0aGUgTDIgb3IgTDMgb3INCiAgIEV0aGVybmV0IFZQTiBv dmVybGF5IHNlcnZpY2UgbmVlZGVkIGJ5IHRoZSBjdXN0b21lciBlZGdlIGRldmljZQ0KICAgY29u bmVjdGVkIHRvIHRoZSBhY2Nlc3Mgbm9kZSB0aGF0IHdpbGwgYmUgdHJhbnNwb3J0ZWQgb3ZlciB0 aGUgRVZQTi0NCiAgIFZQV1Mgc2VydmljZSBiZXR3ZWVuIGFjY2VzcyBub2RlIGFuZCBzZXJ2aWNl IG5vZGUuDQoNCi8qIFtKT1JHRV0gaXQgd291bGQgYmUgZ29vZCB0byBjbGVhcmx5IHN0YXRlIHRo ZSBiZW5lZml0IG9mIGRvaW5nIHRoaXMuDQpUaGUgbWFpbiBhZHZhbnRhZ2VzIHRoYXQgSSBzZWUg YXJlIHNlcnZpY2UgZXh0ZW5zaW9uIHdpdGggc2luZ2xlLXNpZGUNCnByb3Zpc2lvbmluZyAobm8g bmVlZCB0byBwcm92aXNpb24gbmV3IEFDcyBhdCB0aGUgc2VydmljZSBub2RlKS4gKi8NCg0KDQo8 c25pcD4NCg0KMSAgSW50cm9kdWN0aW9uDQoNCg0KLyogW0pPUkdFXSBtYXliZSB0aGlzIGxldmVs IG9mIGRldGFpbCBhdCB0aGUgaW50cm9kdWN0aW9uIGlzIGEgYml0DQpjb25mdXNpbmcuIEkgdGhp bmsgaXQgd291bGQgYmUgYmV0dGVyIHRvIHN0YXRlIHdoYXQgdGhlIGdvYWwgYW5kDQphZHZhbnRh Z2VzIGFyZSBpbiB0aGUgaW50cm9kdWN0aW9uIGFuZCBsZWF2ZSB0aGUgZGV0YWlscyBmb3IgdGhl IHNvbHV0aW9uDQpkZXNjcmlwdGlvbi4gKi8NCg0KDQo8c25pcD4NCi4uLg0KDQoNCg0KMi4yICBT Y2FsYWJpbGl0eQ0KDQogICAoUjJhKSBBIHNpbmdsZSBzZXJ2aWNlIG5vZGUgUEUgY2FuIGJlIGFz c29jaWF0ZWQgd2l0aCBtYW55IGFjY2Vzcw0KICAgbm9kZSBQRXMuIFRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgcmVx dWlyZW1lbnRzIGdpdmUgYSBxdWFudGl0YXRpdmUgbWVhc3VyZS4NCg0KICAgKFIyYikgQSBzZXJ2 aWNlIG5vZGUgUEUgTVVTVCBzdXBwb3J0IHRob3VzYW5kKHMpIGhlYWQtZW5kIGNvbm5lY3Rpb25z DQogICBmb3IgYSBhIGdpdmVuIGFjY2VzcyBub2RlIFBFIGNvbm5lY3RpbmcgdG8gZGlmZmVyZW50 IG92ZXJsYXkgVlJGDQogICBzZXJ2aWNlcyBvbiB0aGF0IHNlcnZpY2Ugbm9kZS4NCg0KICAgKFIy YykgQSBzZXJ2aWNlIG5vZGUgUEUgTVVTVCBzdXBwb3J0IHRob3VzYW5kKHMpIGhlYWQtZW5kIGNv bm5lY3Rpb25zDQogICB0byBtYW55IGFjY2VzcyBub2RlIFBFcy4NCg0KDQovKiBbSk9SR0VdIEl0 IGlzIGhhcmQgdG8gdW5kZXJzdGFuZC4uLiBzaG91bGQgdGhlIGZvbGxvd2luZyBiZSBiZXR0ZXI/ Og0KDQrigJwgKFIyYikgQSBzZXJ2aWNlIG5vZGUgUEUgTVVTVCBzdXBwb3J0IGhlYWQtZW5kIGZ1 bmN0aW9uYWxpdHkgZm9yDQp0aG91c2FuZHMgb2YgYWNjZXNzIG5vZGUgUEVzIHRoYXQgYXJlIGNv bm5lY3RlZCB0byBkaWZmZXJlbnQgVlJGcyBvbiB0aGUNCnNlcnZpY2Ugbm9kZS4NCiAgKFIyYykg QSBzZXJ2aWNlIG5vZGUgUEUgTVVTVCBzdXBwb3J0IGh1bmRyZWRzIG9mIHRob3VzYW5kcyBvZiBD RQ0KY29ubmVjdGlvbnMgdGhyb3VnaCB0aGUgYXR0YWNoZWQgYWNjZXNzIG5vZGVzLiINCiovDQoN Cg0KPHNuaXA+DQoNCg0KDQoyLjUgTXVsdGktaG9taW5nDQoNCiAgIFRCRA0KDQovKiBbSk9SR0Vd IFRoZSBzb2x1dGlvbiBzaG91bGQgZGVzY3JpYmUgaG93IHRvIGhhbmRsZSBtdWx0aS1ob21pbmcg YXQgdHdvDQpsZXZlbHM6DQotIEFjY2VzcyBub2RlIG11bHRpLWhvbWVkIHRvIDIgb3IgbW9yZSBT ZXJ2aWNlIG5vZGVzDQotIENFIG5vZGUgbXVsdGktaG9tZWQgdG8gMiBvciBtb3JlIGFjY2VzcyBu b2RlcyAodGhpcyBvbmUgc2hvdWxkIGJlDQphbGlnbmVkIHdpdGggdGhlIEVWUE4tVlBXUyBkcmFm dCkNCiovDQoNCg0KPHNuaXA+DQoNCg0KDQoNCjQgU29sdXRpb24gT3ZlcnZpZXcNCg0KDQogICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICstLS0tLS0tLS0rICAgICAgICAgKy0tLS0tLS0tLSsNCiAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgICAgICAgIHwgICAgICAgICB8ICAgICAgICAgfA0KICAgICAg Ky0tLS0rICAgKy0tLS0tKyB8IElQL01QTFMgfCArLS0tLS0rIHwgSVAvTVBMUyB8DQogICAgICB8 IENFIHwtLS18IFBFMSB8LXwgQWNjZXNzICB8LXwgUEUyIHwtfCBDb3JlICAgIHwNCiAgICAgICst LS0tKyAgICstLS0tLSsgfCBOZXR3b3JrIHwgKy0tLS0tKyB8IE5ldHdvcmsgfA0KICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICAgICAgICAgfCAgICAgICAgIHwgICAgICAgICB8DQogICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICstLS0tLS0tLS0rICAgICAgICAgKy0tLS0tLS0tLSsNCiAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgIDwtLS0tIEVWUE4tVlBXUyAtLS0tPjwtLS0tIElQL01BQyBWUkYgLS0tPg0KDQoNCiAg IEZpZ3VyZSAxOiBFVlBOLVZQV1MgU2VydmljZSBFZGdlIEdhdGV3YXkuDQogICBBTjogQWNjZXNz IG5vZGUNCiAgIFNFOiBTZXJ2aWNlIEVkZ2Ugbm9kZS4NCg0KICAgRVZQTi1WUFdTIFNlcnZpY2Ug RWRnZSBHYXRld2F5IE9wZXJhdGlvbg0KDQovKiBbSk9SR0VdIFNob3VsZCB0aGlzIGJlIHNlY3Rp b24gNC4xIG9uIGl0cyBvd24/ICovDQoNCg0KICAgQXQgdGhlIHNlcnZpY2UgZWRnZSBub2RlLCB0 aGUgRVZQTiBQZXItRVZJIEV0aGVybmV0IEEtRCByb3V0ZXMgd2lsbA0KICAgYmUgYWR2ZXJ0aXNl ZCB3aXRoIHRoZSBFU0kgc2V0IHRvIDAgYW5kIHRoZSBFdGhlcm5ldCB0YWctaWQgc2V0IHRvDQog ICAod2lsZGNhcmQgMHhGRkZGRkZGKS4gVGhlIEV0aGVybmV0IEEtRCByb3V0ZXMgd2lsbCBoYXZl IGEgdW5pcXVlIFJEDQogICBhbmQgd2lsbCBiZSBhc3NvY2lhdGVkIHdpdGggMiBCR1AgUlQocyks IG9uZSBSVCBjb3JyZXNwb25kaW5nIHRvIHRoZQ0KICAgdW5kZXJsYXkgRVZJIGkuZS4gdGhlIEVW UE4gVlBXUyB0cmFuc3BvcnQgc2VydmljZSB0aGF0J3MgY29uZmlndXJlZA0KICAgb25seSBhbW9u ZyB0aGUgc2VydmljZSBlZGdlIG5vZGVzLCBhbmQgb25lIGNvcnJlc3BvbmRpbmcgdG8gdGhlIEwy LA0KICAgTDMgb3IgRVZQTiBvdmVybGF5IHNlcnZpY2UuDQoNCiAgIEF0IHRoZSBhY2Nlc3Mgbm9k ZXMsIHRoZSBFVlBOIHBlci1FVkkgRXRoZXJuZXQgQS1EIHJvdXRlcyB3aWxsIGJlDQogICBhZHZl cnRpc2VkIGFzIGRlc2NyaWJlZCBpbiBbZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1iZXNzLWV2cG4tdnB3cyA8aHR0cHM6 Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LWlldGYtYmVzcy1ldnBuLXZwd3M+XSB3aXRoIHRo ZSBFU0kNCiAgIGZpZWxkIGlzIHNldCB0byAwIGFuZCBmb3Igc2luZ2xlIGhvbWVkIENFcyBhbmQg dG8gdGhlIENFJ3MgRVNJIGZvcg0KICAgbXVsdGktaG9tZWQgQ0UncyBhbmQgdGhlIEV0aGVybmV0 IFRhZyBmaWVsZCB3aWxsIGJlIHNldCB0byB0aGUgVlBXUw0KICAgc2VydmljZSBpbnN0YW5jZSBp ZGVudGlmaWVyIHRoYXQgaWRlbnRpZmllcyB0aGUgRVZQTCBvciBFUEwgc2VydmljZS4NCiAgIFRo ZSBFdGhlcm5ldC1BRCByb3V0ZSB3aWxsIGhhdmUgYSB1bmlxdWUgUkQgYW5kIHdpbGwgYmUgYXNz b2NpYXRlZA0KICAgd2l0aCBvbmUgQkdQIFJUIGNvcnJlc3BvbmRpbmcgdG8gdGhlIEwyLCBMMyBv ciBFVlBOIG92ZXJsYXkgc2VydmljZQ0KICAgdGhhdCB3aWxsIGJlIHRyYW5zcG9ydGVkIG92ZXIg dGhpcyBFVlBOIFZQV1MgdHJhbnNwb3J0IHNlcnZpY2UuDQoNCi8qIFtKT1JHRV0gV2hhdCBkbyB5 b3UgbWVhbiBieSBFVlBOIG92ZXJsYXkgc2VydmljZSBpbiB0aGlzIGNvbnRleHQ/IHdoeQ0KaXMg aXQgZGlmZmVyZW50IGZyb20gTDIgb3IgTDMgc2VydmljZT8gc2hvdWxkIHRoaXMgYmUgY2xhcmlm aWVkIGluIHRoZQ0KaW50cm9kdWN0aW9uPyANCkFsc28gYnkgTDIgYW5kIEwzIGFyZSB5b3UgcmVm ZXJyaW5nIHRvIHRoZSBlbmNhcHN1bGF0aW9uPyBpLmUuIEwyIG1lYW5zDQpldGhlcm5ldCBvdmVy IHRoZSBFVkkgbGFiZWwgYW5kIEwzIElQIG92ZXIgdGhlIEVWSSBsYWJlbD8gKi8NCg0KLyogW0pP UkdFXSBJZiB0aGUgc2VydmljZSBSVHMgYXJlIHRoZSBzYW1lIGluIHRoZSBhY2Nlc3MgYW5kIGNv cmUgbmV0d29yaywNClBFMiBzaG91bGQgaGF2ZSB0d28gZGlmZmVyZW50IHBlZXJpbmcgc2Vzc2lv bnMsIG9uZSB0byB0aGUgUlIgaW4gdGhlDQphY2Nlc3MgbmV0d29yayBhbmQgb25lIHRvIHRoZSBj b3JlIFJSLiBJcyB0aGF0IHRoZSBpbnRlbmQ/IGlmIHNvLCBpdCBtYXkNCmJlIGdvb2QgdG8gY2xh cmlmeSAqLw0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCiAgIFNlcnZpY2UgZWRnZSBub2RlcyBvbiB0aGUgdW5kZXJsYXkg RVZJIHdpbGwgZGV0ZXJtaW5lIHRoZSBwcmltYXJ5DQogICBzZXJ2aWNlIG5vZGUgdGVybWluYXRp bmcgdGhlIFZQV1MgdHJhbnNwb3J0IHNlcnZpY2UgYW5kIG9mZmVyaW5nIHRoZQ0KICAgTDIsIEwz IG9yIEV0aGVybmV0IFZQTiBzZXJ2aWNlIGJ5IHJ1bm5pbmcgdGhlIG9uIEhXUiBhbGdvcml0aG0g YXMNCiAgIGRlc2NyaWJlZCBpbiBbZHJhZnQtbW9oYW50eS1sMnZwbi1ldnBuLWRmLWVsZWN0aW9u IDxodHRwczovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2h0bWwvZHJhZnQtbW9oYW50eS1sMnZwbi1ldnBuLWRm LWVsZWN0aW9uPl0gdXNpbmcgd2VpZ2h0DQogICBbVlBXUyBzZXJ2aWNlIGlkZW50aWZpZXIsIFNl cnZpY2UgRWRnZSBOb2RlIElQIGFkZHJlc3NdLiBUaGlzIGVuc3VyZQ0KICAgdGhhdCBzZXJ2aWNl IG5vZGUocykgd2lsbCBjb25zaXN0ZW50bHkgcGljayB0aGUgcHJpbWFyeSBzZXJ2aWNlIG5vZGUN CiAgIGV2ZW4gYWZ0ZXIgc2VydmljZSBub2RlIGZhaWx1cmUuIFVwb24gcHJpbWFyeSBzZXJ2aWNl IG5vZGUgZmFpbHVyZSwNCiAgIGFsbCBvdGhlciByZW1haW5pbmcgc2VydmljZXMgbm9kZXMgd2ls bCBjaG9vc2UgYW5vdGhlciBzZXJ2aWNlIG5vZGUNCiAgIGNvcnJlY3RseSBhbmQgY29uc2lzdGVu dGx5Lg0KDQovKltKT1JHRV0gRm9sbG93aW5nIEVWUE4sIHRoZSBERiBlbGVjdGlvbiBpcyBiYXNl ZCBvbiB0aGUgZXhjaGFuZ2Ugb2YgRVMNCnJvdXRlcy4gSGVuY2UgdGhlIGFzc3VtcHRpb24gaXMg dGhhdCB0aGUgdHdvIHNlcnZpY2Ugbm9kZXMgc2hvdWxkDQphZHZlcnRpc2UgRVMgcm91dGVzIHdp dGggYSBzeXN0ZW0tbGV2ZWwgRVNJIGFuZCBhbiBBRCByb3V0ZSBwZXIgRVMgd2l0aA0KdGhlIHNh bWUgRVNJPyBUaGUgc2VydmljZSBub2RlIERGIGZvciBhIGdpdmVuIHNlcnZpY2Ugc2hvdWxkIHNl bmQgYW4gQUQgcGVyLUVWSSByb3V0ZSB3aXRoIHRoZSBQIGluZGljYXRpb24gaW4gdGhlIG5ldyBF QyBkZWZpbmVkIGluIEVWUE4tVlBXUy4gSSBiZWxpZXZlIGFsbCB0aGUNCmV4aXN0aW5nIHByb2Nl ZHVyZXMgc2hvdWxkIGJlIHVzZWQsIGFyZSB5b3UgZGVmaW5pbmcgbmV3IG9uZXM/ICovDQoNCg0K DQogICBTaW5nbGUtc2lkZWQgc2lnbmFsaW5nIG1lY2hhbmlzbSBpcyB1c2VkLiBUaGUgU2Vydmlj ZSBQRSBub2RlIHRoYXQgaXMNCiAgIGEgREYgZm9yIGFjY2VwdHMgdG8gdGVybWluYXRlIHRoZSBW UFdTIHRyYW5zcG9ydCBzZXJ2aWNlIGZyb20gYW4NCiAgIGFjY2VzcyBub2RlLCB0aGUgcHJpbWFy eSBzZXJ2aWNlIGVkZ2Ugbm9kZSBzaGFsbDotIER5bmFtaWNhbGx5IGNyZWF0ZQ0KICAgYW4gaW50 ZXJmYWNlIHRvIHRlcm1pbmF0ZSB0aGUgc2VydmljZSBhbmQgc2hhbGwgYXR0YWNoIHRoaXMgaW50 ZXJmYWNlDQogICB0byB0aGUgb3ZlcmxheSBWUE4gc2VydmljZSByZXF1aXJlZCBieSB0aGUgYWNj ZXNzIG5vZGUgdG8gc2VydmljZSBpdHMNCiAgIGN1c3RvbWVyIGVkZ2UgZGV2aWNlLi0gUmVzcG9u ZHMgdG8gdGhlIEV0aCBBLUQgcm91dGUgcGVyIEVWSSBmcm9tIHRoZQ0KICAgYWNjZXNzIG5vZGUg Ynkgc2VuZGluZyBpdHMgb3duIEV0aCBBLUQgcGVyIEVWSSByb3V0ZSBieSBzZXR0aW5nIHRoZQ0K ICAgc2FtZSBWUFdTIHNlcnZpY2UgaW5zdGFuY2UgSUQgYW5kIGRvd25zdHJlYW0gYXNzaWduZWQg TVBMUyBsYWJlbCB0bw0KICAgYmUgdXNlZCBieSB0aGUgYWNjZXNzIG5vZGUuDQoNCi8qIFtKT1JH RV0gTmVlZCB0byBjb3JyZWN0IHRoZSBmb3JtYXQ6IHRoZSB0d28gYnVsbGV0cyBtdXN0IGdvIGlu DQpkaWZmZXJlbnQgbGluZXMgKi8NCg0KDQoNCiAgPHNuaXA+DQoNCjQuMSBNdWx0aS1ob21pbmcN Cg0KLyogW0pPUkdFXSBob3cgYm91dCB0aGUgZm9sbG93aW5nIHNjZW5hcmlvOg0KDQpIZXJlIEFO MSBhbmQgQU4yIGhhdmUgYSBFU0kgZm9yIHRoZSBDRS4gUmVndWxhciBFVlBOLVZQV1MgcHJvY2Vk dXJlcw0Kc2hvdWxkIGFwcGx5Lg0KDQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICstLS0tLS0tLS0rICAgICAg ICAgKy0tLS0tLS0tLSsNCistLS0tKyAgICstLS0tLSsgfCAgICAgICAgIHwgKy0tLS0tKyB8ICAg ICAgICAgfA0KfCBDRSArLS0tKyBBTjEgKy0rICAgICAgICAgKy0rIFNFMiArLSsgICAgICAgICB8 DQorLS0rLSsgICArLS0tLS0rIHwgSVAvTVBMUyB8ICstLS0tLSsgfCBJUC9NUExTIHwNCiAgIHwg ICAgICAgICAgICAgfCBBY2Nlc3MgIHwgICAgICAgICB8IENvcmUgICAgfA0KICAgfCAgICAgKy0t LS0tKyB8IE5ldHdvcmsgfCArLS0tLS0rIHwgTmV0d29yayB8DQogICArLS0tLS0rIEFOMiArLSsg ICAgICAgICArLSsgU0UzICstKyAgICAgICAgIHwNCiAgICAgICAgICstLS0tLSsgfCAgICAgICAg IHwgKy0tLS0tKyB8ICAgICAgICAgfA0KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICArLS0tLS0tLS0tKyAgICAg ICAgICstLS0tLS0tLS0rDQogICAgICAgICAgICA8LS0tLS1FVlBOLVZQV1MtLS0tLT48LS0tLS1J UC9NQUMgVlJGLS0tLT4NCg0KKi8NCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCkZyb206ICBCRVNTIG9uIGJlaGFsZiBv ZiBTYW1pIEJvdXRyb3MNCkRhdGU6ICBXZWRuZXNkYXksIE9jdG9iZXIgNywgMjAxNSBhdCAxMTox MyBQTQ0KVG86ICAiYmVzc0BpZXRmLm9yZyINClN1YmplY3Q6ICBbYmVzc10gU2Vla2luZyBDb21t ZW50cyBmb3IgRVZQTi1WUFdTIFNlcnZpY2UgRWRnZSBHYXRld2F5DQoNCg0KSGksDQoNCg0KVGhl IGRyYWZ0IHByb3Bvc2VzIGEgZHluYW1pYyBtZWNoYW5pc20gdG8gdGVybWluYXRlIHRoZSBWUFdT IHRyYW5zcG9ydCBzZXJ2aWNlIGF0IGEgc2VydmljZSBQRSBpbnRvIGFuIG92ZXJsYXkgTDIgb3Ig TDMgc2VydmljZSBiYXNlZCBvbiBhIHNpbmdsZSBzaWRlIHByb3Zpc2lvbmluZyBhdCB0aGUgYWNj ZXNzIFBFLg0KDQpodHRwczovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2h0bWwvZHJhZnQtYm91dHJvcy1iZXNz LWV2cG4tdnB3cy1zZXJ2aWNlLWVkZ2UtZ2F0ZXdheS0wMQ0KDQoNClRoYW5rcywNCg0KDQpTYW1p DQoNCg== From nobody Thu Oct 8 03:08:16 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E621ACCF3 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 03:08:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.265 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C-P5qcAUX2rW for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 03:08:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F2DC1ACD95 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 03:08:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0049463.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049463.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.15.0.59/8.15.0.59) with SMTP id t98A4QdH043967; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 06:08:12 -0400 Received: from alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp7.sbc.com [144.160.229.24]) by m0049463.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 1xabd931qw-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 08 Oct 2015 06:08:12 -0400 Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t98A8BDh009329; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 06:08:11 -0400 Received: from mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.240]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t98A85Co009293 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Oct 2015 06:08:06 -0400 Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAD.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAD.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.148]) by mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Thu, 8 Oct 2015 10:07:49 GMT Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRCD.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.4.208]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAD.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.148]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 06:07:49 -0400 From: "UTTARO, JAMES" To: Sami Boutros , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway Thread-Index: AQHRAUUoB/yHNQHSxk+mR2V98vEGrJ5hX1tA Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 10:07:48 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.91.76.236] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B17A6910EEDD1F45980687268941550F0CD1F4F1MISOUT7MSGUSRCD_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2015-10-08_09:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1507310000 definitions=main-1510080130 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 10:08:15 -0000 --_000_B17A6910EEDD1F45980687268941550F0CD1F4F1MISOUT7MSGUSRCD_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 U2FtaSwNCg0KSW4gd2hhdCB3YXkgaXMgdGhpcyBkaWZmZXJlbnQgZnJvbSB0aGUgd29yayB3ZSBo YXZlIGJlZW4gZG9pbmcgb24gY3JlYXRpbmcgdGhlIGZsZXhpYmxlIGNyb3NzIGNvbm5lY3QgdGFi bGUgd2hpY2ggZW5hYmxlcyB0aG91c2FuZHMgb2YgUFdzIHRvIGJlIOKAnGxhbmRlZOKAnSBvbiBh IEwzL0wyL0ludGVybmV0IFBFPyBJcyB0aGlzIHNwZWNpZmljIHRvIGFsd2F5cyB1c2luZyBFVlBO IG9uIHRoZSBzZXJ2aWNlIFBFIHRvIGZhY2lsaXRhdGUgTDIvTDMgY2xvc2VkIHVzZXIgZ3JvdXBz Pw0KDQpUaGFua3MsDQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgSmltIFV0dGFybw0KDQpGcm9tOiBCRVNTIFtt YWlsdG86YmVzcy1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnXSBPbiBCZWhhbGYgT2YgU2FtaSBCb3V0cm9zDQpT ZW50OiBXZWRuZXNkYXksIE9jdG9iZXIgMDcsIDIwMTUgNToxNCBQTQ0KVG86IGJlc3NAaWV0Zi5v cmcNClN1YmplY3Q6IFtiZXNzXSBTZWVraW5nIENvbW1lbnRzIGZvciBFVlBOLVZQV1MgU2Vydmlj ZSBFZGdlIEdhdGV3YXkNCg0KSGksDQpUaGUgZHJhZnQgcHJvcG9zZXMgYSBkeW5hbWljIG1lY2hh bmlzbSB0byB0ZXJtaW5hdGUgdGhlIFZQV1MgdHJhbnNwb3J0IHNlcnZpY2UgYXQgYSBzZXJ2aWNl IFBFIGludG8gYW4gb3ZlcmxheSBMMiBvciBMMyBzZXJ2aWNlIGJhc2VkIG9uIGEgc2luZ2xlIHNp ZGUgcHJvdmlzaW9uaW5nIGF0IHRoZSBhY2Nlc3MgUEUuDQoNCmh0dHBzOi8vdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5v cmcvaHRtbC9kcmFmdC1ib3V0cm9zLWJlc3MtZXZwbi12cHdzLXNlcnZpY2UtZWRnZS1nYXRld2F5 LTAxDQpUaGFua3MsDQpTYW1pDQo= --_000_B17A6910EEDD1F45980687268941550F0CD1F4F1MISOUT7MSGUSRCD_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWwgeG1sbnM6dj0idXJuOnNjaGVtYXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTp2bWwiIHhtbG5zOm89InVy bjpzY2hlbWFzLW1pY3Jvc29mdC1jb206b2ZmaWNlOm9mZmljZSIgeG1sbnM6dz0idXJuOnNjaGVt YXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTpvZmZpY2U6d29yZCIgeG1sbnM6bT0iaHR0cDovL3NjaGVtYXMubWlj cm9zb2Z0LmNvbS9vZmZpY2UvMjAwNC8xMi9vbW1sIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcv VFIvUkVDLWh0bWw0MCI+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxtZXRhIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIg Y29udGVudD0idGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij4NCjxtZXRhIG5hbWU9IkdlbmVyYXRv ciIgY29udGVudD0iTWljcm9zb2Z0IFdvcmQgMTQgKGZpbHRlcmVkIG1lZGl1bSkiPg0KPHN0eWxl PjwhLS0NCi8qIEZvbnQgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8NCkBmb250LWZhY2UNCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6 Q2FsaWJyaTsNCglwYW5vc2UtMToyIDE1IDUgMiAyIDIgNCAzIDIgNDt9DQpAZm9udC1mYWNlDQoJ e2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OlRhaG9tYTsNCglwYW5vc2UtMToyIDExIDYgNCAzIDUgNCA0IDIgNDt9DQov KiBTdHlsZSBEZWZpbml0aW9ucyAqLw0KcC5Nc29Ob3JtYWwsIGxpLk1zb05vcm1hbCwgZGl2Lk1z b05vcm1hbA0KCXttYXJnaW46MGluOw0KCW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206LjAwMDFwdDsNCglmb250LXNp emU6MTIuMHB0Ow0KCWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4iLCJzZXJpZiI7fQ0KYTps aW5rLCBzcGFuLk1zb0h5cGVybGluaw0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtcHJpb3JpdHk6OTk7DQoJY29sb3I6 Ymx1ZTsNCgl0ZXh0LWRlY29yYXRpb246dW5kZXJsaW5lO30NCmE6dmlzaXRlZCwgc3Bhbi5Nc29I eXBlcmxpbmtGb2xsb3dlZA0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtcHJpb3JpdHk6OTk7DQoJY29sb3I6cHVycGxl Ow0KCXRleHQtZGVjb3JhdGlvbjp1bmRlcmxpbmU7fQ0Kc3Bhbi5FbWFpbFN0eWxlMTcNCgl7bXNv LXN0eWxlLXR5cGU6cGVyc29uYWwtcmVwbHk7DQoJZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IkNhbGlicmkiLCJzYW5z LXNlcmlmIjsNCgljb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEOw0KCWZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0OmJvbGQ7DQoJZm9udC1zdHls ZTppdGFsaWM7DQoJdGV4dC1kZWNvcmF0aW9uOm5vbmUgbm9uZTt9DQouTXNvQ2hwRGVmYXVsdA0K CXttc28tc3R5bGUtdHlwZTpleHBvcnQtb25seTsNCglmb250LWZhbWlseToiQ2FsaWJyaSIsInNh bnMtc2VyaWYiO30NCkBwYWdlIFdvcmRTZWN0aW9uMQ0KCXtzaXplOjguNWluIDExLjBpbjsNCglt YXJnaW46MS4waW4gMS4waW4gMS4waW4gMS4waW47fQ0KZGl2LldvcmRTZWN0aW9uMQ0KCXtwYWdl OldvcmRTZWN0aW9uMTt9DQotLT48L3N0eWxlPjwhLS1baWYgZ3RlIG1zbyA5XT48eG1sPg0KPG86 c2hhcGVkZWZhdWx0cyB2OmV4dD0iZWRpdCIgc3BpZG1heD0iMTAyNiIgLz4NCjwveG1sPjwhW2Vu ZGlmXS0tPjwhLS1baWYgZ3RlIG1zbyA5XT48eG1sPg0KPG86c2hhcGVsYXlvdXQgdjpleHQ9ImVk aXQiPg0KPG86aWRtYXAgdjpleHQ9ImVkaXQiIGRhdGE9IjEiIC8+DQo8L286c2hhcGVsYXlvdXQ+ PC94bWw+PCFbZW5kaWZdLS0+DQo8L2hlYWQ+DQo8Ym9keSBsYW5nPSJFTi1VUyIgbGluaz0iYmx1 ZSIgdmxpbms9InB1cnBsZSI+DQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJXb3JkU2VjdGlvbjEiPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9 Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PGI+PGk+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1p bHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1b3Q7O2NvbG9yOiMxRjQ5 N0QiPlNhbWksPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9pPjwvYj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9y bWFsIj48Yj48aT48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjExLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVv dDtDYWxpYnJpJnF1b3Q7LCZxdW90O3NhbnMtc2VyaWYmcXVvdDs7Y29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+PG86 cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9pPjwvYj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48 Yj48aT48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjExLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtDYWxp YnJpJnF1b3Q7LCZxdW90O3NhbnMtc2VyaWYmcXVvdDs7Y29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+SW4gd2hhdCB3 YXkgaXMgdGhpcyBkaWZmZXJlbnQgZnJvbSB0aGUgd29yayB3ZSBoYXZlIGJlZW4gZG9pbmcgb24g Y3JlYXRpbmcgdGhlIGZsZXhpYmxlIGNyb3NzIGNvbm5lY3QgdGFibGUgd2hpY2ggZW5hYmxlcyB0 aG91c2FuZHMgb2YgUFdzIHRvIGJlIOKAnGxhbmRlZOKAnQ0KIG9uIGEgTDMvTDIvSW50ZXJuZXQg UEU/IElzIHRoaXMgc3BlY2lmaWMgdG8gYWx3YXlzIHVzaW5nIEVWUE4gb24gdGhlIHNlcnZpY2Ug UEUgdG8gZmFjaWxpdGF0ZSBMMi9MMyBjbG9zZWQgdXNlciBncm91cHM/PG86cD48L286cD48L3Nw YW4+PC9pPjwvYj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48Yj48aT48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0i Zm9udC1zaXplOjExLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtDYWxpYnJpJnF1b3Q7LCZxdW90O3Nh bnMtc2VyaWYmcXVvdDs7Y29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9p PjwvYj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48Yj48aT48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1z aXplOjExLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtDYWxpYnJpJnF1b3Q7LCZxdW90O3NhbnMtc2Vy aWYmcXVvdDs7Y29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+VGhhbmtzLDxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvaT48L2I+ PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PGI+PGk+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZTox MS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1 b3Q7O2NvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPiZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZu YnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyBKaW0g VXR0YXJvPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9pPjwvYj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFs Ij48Yj48aT48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjExLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtD YWxpYnJpJnF1b3Q7LCZxdW90O3NhbnMtc2VyaWYmcXVvdDs7Y29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+PG86cD4m bmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9pPjwvYj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48Yj48 c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtUYWhvbWEmcXVv dDssJnF1b3Q7c2Fucy1zZXJpZiZxdW90OyI+RnJvbTo8L3NwYW4+PC9iPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJm b250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O1RhaG9tYSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5z LXNlcmlmJnF1b3Q7Ij4gQkVTUyBbbWFpbHRvOmJlc3MtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10NCjxiPk9u IEJlaGFsZiBPZiA8L2I+U2FtaSBCb3V0cm9zPGJyPg0KPGI+U2VudDo8L2I+IFdlZG5lc2RheSwg T2N0b2JlciAwNywgMjAxNSA1OjE0IFBNPGJyPg0KPGI+VG86PC9iPiBiZXNzQGlldGYub3JnPGJy Pg0KPGI+U3ViamVjdDo8L2I+IFtiZXNzXSBTZWVraW5nIENvbW1lbnRzIGZvciBFVlBOLVZQV1Mg U2VydmljZSBFZGdlIEdhdGV3YXk8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNv Tm9ybWFsIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxkaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1z b05vcm1hbCIgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MTIuMHB0Ij5IaSw8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4N CjwvZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+VGhlIGRyYWZ0IHByb3Bvc2VzIGEgZHluYW1p YyBtZWNoYW5pc20gdG8gdGVybWluYXRlIHRoZSBWUFdTIHRyYW5zcG9ydCBzZXJ2aWNlIGF0IGEg c2VydmljZSBQRSBpbnRvIGFuIG92ZXJsYXkgTDIgb3IgTDMgc2VydmljZSBiYXNlZCBvbiBhIHNp bmdsZSBzaWRlIHByb3Zpc2lvbmluZyBhdCB0aGUgYWNjZXNzIFBFLjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0K PGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiIHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOjEyLjBwdCI+ PGJyPg0KPGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cHM6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LWJvdXRyb3Mt YmVzcy1ldnBuLXZwd3Mtc2VydmljZS1lZGdlLWdhdGV3YXktMDEiPmh0dHBzOi8vdG9vbHMuaWV0 Zi5vcmcvaHRtbC9kcmFmdC1ib3V0cm9zLWJlc3MtZXZwbi12cHdzLXNlcnZpY2UtZWRnZS1nYXRl d2F5LTAxPC9hPjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05v cm1hbCIgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MTIuMHB0Ij5UaGFua3MsPG86cD48L286cD48L3A+ DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5TYW1pPG86cD48L286cD48L3A+ DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2JvZHk+DQo8L2h0bWw+DQo= --_000_B17A6910EEDD1F45980687268941550F0CD1F4F1MISOUT7MSGUSRCD_-- From nobody Thu Oct 8 09:24:06 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E63691A910F for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:23:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.51 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p4JX2qjQaMpy for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:23:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EF061A911A for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:23:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8395; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1444321427; x=1445531027; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:mime-version; bh=gmYnlTsUN8du7OHlymo2QLxuJdQIAIYjkj2Lg60XOxw=; b=WVrI0S8jXEW1nSlyPjVQvIAQ68b5assWwudK0WIXhAC89DIRZqCEmEX2 cvbkhjwNddyKWrnAKTuznS0OAiS9hoLehskm+hfdVig/LkFGn4GgyCvzT zVqw7U6CAXS+y3MuMnOXboZNRmwvVi+axPocHEYQfG9hZ6KD1zcIeo4Eb U=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CQAgAwmBZW/4kNJK1eglpNVG4GuSCEIgENgVojgnCCCn8CgUs4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQmAQEBBC1cAgEIEQMBAQEoByERFAkIAgQBEogZAxINvXgNhRgBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQETBItxglCCLA0KhC8FlgoBhReGDIF0lDGHSR8BAUKEAnGGZoEGAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,655,1437436800"; d="scan'208,217";a="195690500" Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Oct 2015 16:23:46 +0000 Received: from XCH-RCD-011.cisco.com (xch-rcd-011.cisco.com [173.37.102.21]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t98GNkPZ029437 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 8 Oct 2015 16:23:46 GMT Received: from xch-rcd-011.cisco.com (173.37.102.21) by XCH-RCD-011.cisco.com (173.37.102.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:23:45 -0500 Received: from xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com (173.37.183.80) by xch-rcd-011.cisco.com (173.37.102.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:23:45 -0500 Received: from xmb-aln-x13.cisco.com ([169.254.15.15]) by xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([173.37.183.80]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:23:45 -0500 From: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" To: "UTTARO, JAMES" , Sami Boutros , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway Thread-Index: AQHRAUUo6UcBgCrr6EGHhYLIkhe5cp5hs6UA///y3gA= Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 16:23:44 +0000 Message-ID: References: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.5.150821 x-originating-ip: [173.36.7.28] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D23BE487159DAFsajassiciscocom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 16:23:58 -0000 --_000_D23BE487159DAFsajassiciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jim, This work in a nutshell is about single-sided provisioning where you only n= eed to provision the P2P EVC on the Access-PE (and not on the service PE). = The Service-PE (S-PE) figures out (via EVPN signaling) what endpoint (e.g.,= VRF) the P2P EVC is intended for. Thus cutting network-wide provisioning f= or setting up P2P EVC in half. Cheers, Ali From: BESS > on behalf = of "UTTARO, JAMES" > Date: Thursday, October 8, 2015 at 3:07 AM To: Sami Boutros >, "= bess@ietf.org" > Subject: Re: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway Sami, In what way is this different from the work we have been doing on creating = the flexible cross connect table which enables thousands of PWs to be =93la= nded=94 on a L3/L2/Internet PE? Is this specific to always using EVPN on th= e service PE to facilitate L2/L3 closed user groups? Thanks, Jim Uttaro From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sami Boutros Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 5:14 PM To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway Hi, The draft proposes a dynamic mechanism to terminate the VPWS transport serv= ice at a service PE into an overlay L2 or L3 service based on a single side= provisioning at the access PE. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boutros-bess-evpn-vpws-service-edge-gatew= ay-01 Thanks, Sami --_000_D23BE487159DAFsajassiciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <3E2ED1C894581249A1870F21C46652D3@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Jim,

This work in a nutshell is about single-sided provisioning where you o= nly need to provision the P2P EVC on the Access-PE (and not on the service = PE). The Service-PE (S-PE) figures out (via EVPN signaling) what endpoint (= e.g., VRF) the P2P EVC is intended for. Thus cutting network-wide provisioning for setting up P2P EVC in half= .

Cheers,
Ali

From: BESS <bess-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "UTTAR= O, JAMES" <ju1738@att.com>=
Date: Thursday, October 8, 2015 at = 3:07 AM
To: Sami Boutros <boutros.sami@gmail.com>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bess] Seeking Comment= s for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway

Sami,

 <= /b>

In what way is this different= from the work we have been doing on creating the flexible cross connect ta= ble which enables thousands of PWs to be =93landed=94 on a L3/L2/Internet PE? Is this specific to always using E= VPN on the service PE to facilitate L2/L3 closed user groups?

 <= /b>

Thanks,=

     = ;           Jim Uttaro

 <= /b>

From: BESS [mai= lto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sami Boutros
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 5:14 PM
To: bess@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway<= o:p>

 

Hi,

The draft proposes a dynamic mechanism to terminate = the VPWS transport service at a service PE into an overlay L2 or L3 service= based on a single side provisioning at the access PE.

Thanks,

Sami

 --_000_D23BE487159DAFsajassiciscocom_-- From nobody Thu Oct 8 09:26:00 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5065C1A9123 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:25:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.265 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IIP83Qhx79n9 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:25:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED19C1A911D for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:25:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0048589.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0048589.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.15.0.59/8.15.0.59) with SMTP id t98GPcIW023299; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:25:53 -0400 Received: from alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp7.sbc.com [144.160.229.24]) by m0048589.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 1xaakw86d7-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 08 Oct 2015 12:25:53 -0400 Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t98GPppV027651; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:25:52 -0400 Received: from mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.241]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t98GPd4a027394 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:25:45 -0400 Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAC.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAC.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.147]) by mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Thu, 8 Oct 2015 16:25:22 GMT Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRCD.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.4.208]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAC.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.147]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:25:22 -0400 From: "UTTARO, JAMES" To: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" , Sami Boutros , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway Thread-Index: AQHRAUUoB/yHNQHSxk+mR2V98vEGrJ5hs6UA///y3gCAACKz8A== Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 16:25:21 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.65.138.24] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B17A6910EEDD1F45980687268941550F0CD1F796MISOUT7MSGUSRCD_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2015-10-08_12:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1507310000 definitions=main-1510080181 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 16:25:59 -0000 --_000_B17A6910EEDD1F45980687268941550F0CD1F796MISOUT7MSGUSRCD_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks... From: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) [mailto:sajassi@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 12:24 PM To: UTTARO, JAMES; Sami Boutros; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway Hi Jim, This work in a nutshell is about single-sided provisioning where you only n= eed to provision the P2P EVC on the Access-PE (and not on the service PE). = The Service-PE (S-PE) figures out (via EVPN signaling) what endpoint (e.g.,= VRF) the P2P EVC is intended for. Thus cutting network-wide provisioning f= or setting up P2P EVC in half. Cheers, Ali From: BESS > on behalf = of "UTTARO, JAMES" > Date: Thursday, October 8, 2015 at 3:07 AM To: Sami Boutros >, "= bess@ietf.org" > Subject: Re: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway Sami, In what way is this different from the work we have been doing on creating = the flexible cross connect table which enables thousands of PWs to be "land= ed" on a L3/L2/Internet PE? Is this specific to always using EVPN on the se= rvice PE to facilitate L2/L3 closed user groups? Thanks, Jim Uttaro From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sami Boutros Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 5:14 PM To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway Hi, The draft proposes a dynamic mechanism to terminate the VPWS transport serv= ice at a service PE into an overlay L2 or L3 service based on a single side= provisioning at the access PE. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boutros-bess-evpn-vpws-service-edge-gatew= ay-01 Thanks, Sami --_000_B17A6910EEDD1F45980687268941550F0CD1F796MISOUT7MSGUSRCD_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks…<= /o:p>

 

From: Ali Saja= ssi (sajassi) [mailto:sajassi@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 12:24 PM
To: UTTARO, JAMES; Sami Boutros; bess@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gate= way

 

 

Hi Jim,

 

This work in a nutshell is = about single-sided provisioning where you only need to provision the P2P EV= C on the Access-PE (and not on the service PE). The Service-PE (S-PE) figures out (via EVPN signaling) what endpoint (e.g., VRF) the P2P = EVC is intended for. Thus cutting network-wide provisioning for setting up = P2P EVC in half.

 

Cheers,

Ali

 

From: BESS <bess-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "UTTARO, JAMES&= quot; <ju1738@att.com>
Date: Thursday, October 8, 2015 at 3:07 AM
To: Sami Boutros <boutr= os.sami@gmail.com>, "bess@ietf= .org" <bess@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gate= way

 

Sami,

 

In what way is this= different from the work we have been doing on creating the flexible cross = connect table which enables thousands of PWs to be “landed” on a L3/L2/Internet PE? Is this specific to always using EVPN on the servi= ce PE to facilitate L2/L3 closed user groups?

 

Thanks,<= /b>

   &= nbsp;            Jim= Uttaro

 

From: BESS [mailto:bess-= bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sami Boutros
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 5:14 PM
To: bess@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway<= /span>

 =

Hi,

The draft proposes a dyn= amic mechanism to terminate the VPWS transport service at a service PE into= an overlay L2 or L3 service based on a single side provisioning at the acc= ess PE.

Thanks,

Sami

--_000_B17A6910EEDD1F45980687268941550F0CD1F796MISOUT7MSGUSRCD_-- From nobody Thu Oct 8 09:33:17 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43A31A9118 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:33:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xSAqIGVq5KND for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com (mail-wi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 153CC1A9123 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wicge5 with SMTP id ge5so33657543wic.0 for ; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 09:33:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=q4gMxPvDCsxzz6esTVrwK9vXxVfI2tp7+ycHJ1WLE0s=; b=xMWWrcdhBpLRyfUDqmZtI7Oj17Ju+3t3uTQPkQX7UmgNGWcNwBNhYnNyks5GKAxnQs 7bxbvcGHVs5HPQY//8J+jVQC2D+479a2WwaRfZ7ZVPcvMkG5gbonD5vBibhj0XxPRTR0 7pRFUXNhOp4LHhWuPas57aHOwpfZ1C/81cM70sv7z/JvGN0RcAcpt/txz4dZtmzrdrym 2md3PXKFs3gAMuGrFTbD+xWbGEOVCeahkBdKx8vAehd41mj5ZWjqsL6jRceXiji0L22S BwTuLnelun85CDYg+cNirp3pVA4JR52P+lwsE2mJZSb4xBDOMCEw0+LYjqggPPpVlI6b /3mA== X-Received: by 10.180.182.84 with SMTP id ec20mr5421243wic.42.1444321992710; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 09:33:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.47.148 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:32:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Sami Boutros Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:32:53 -0400 Message-ID: To: "UTTARO, JAMES" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6250a851208f05219a6bea Archived-At: Cc: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 16:33:16 -0000 --047d7b6250a851208f05219a6bea Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jim, You bring a good point in how we can extend this single sided provisioning at access PE, with the muxing of thousands of L2/L3 services to the same VPWS instance at the access, given that we don't provision anything at the service PE. We need to think more about this. Thanks, Sami On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 6:07 AM, UTTARO, JAMES wrote: > *Sami,* > > > > *In what way is this different from the work we have been doing on > creating the flexible cross connect table which enables thousands of PWs = to > be =E2=80=9Clanded=E2=80=9D on a L3/L2/Internet PE? Is this specific to a= lways using EVPN > on the service PE to facilitate L2/L3 closed user groups?* > > > > *Thanks,* > > * Jim Uttaro* > > > > *From:* BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Sami Boutros > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 07, 2015 5:14 PM > *To:* bess@ietf.org > *Subject:* [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway > > > > Hi, > > The draft proposes a dynamic mechanism to terminate the VPWS transport > service at a service PE into an overlay L2 or L3 service based on a singl= e > side provisioning at the access PE. > > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boutros-bess-evpn-vpws-service-edge-gat= eway-01 > > Thanks, > > Sami > --047d7b6250a851208f05219a6bea Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Jim,

You bring a good = point in how we can extend this single sided provisioning at access PE, wit= h the muxing of thousands of L2/L3 services to the same VPWS instance at th= e access, given that we don't provision anything at the service PE.
=
We need to think more about this.

Thanks,

Sami

On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 6:07 AM, UTTARO, JAMES <ju1738@att.com> wrote:

Sami,=

=C2=A0

In what way is this= different from the work we have been doing on creating the flexible cross = connect table which enables thousands of PWs to be =E2=80=9Clanded=E2=80=9D on a L3/L2/Internet PE? Is this specific to always using EVPN on the servi= ce PE to facilitate L2/L3 closed user groups?<= /p>

=C2=A0

Thanks,

=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Ji= m Uttaro

=C2=A0

From: BESS [ma= ilto:bess-bounce= s@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sami Boutros
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 5:14 PM
To: bess@ietf.org=
Subject: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway<= u>

=C2=A0

Hi,

The draft proposes a dynamic mechanism to terminate = the VPWS transport service at a service PE into an overlay L2 or L3 service= based on a single side provisioning at the access PE.

Thanks,=

Sami


--047d7b6250a851208f05219a6bea-- From nobody Thu Oct 8 10:00:02 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 908961A92EA for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 10:00:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.51 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mgXnkL58G9eH for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:59:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE3671A9253 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:59:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8409; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1444323598; x=1445533198; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=yMLMEhsPVMZhbrSiKEFuacgXRHBdHywd5BJxjeKXlgM=; b=MyJtyZO+2MoXVlmbTFNDBVsj2MosRRvH+BHDwMARBqeXUSoOuPVB3HCr j2/F8cFjpceyNTE9AWegO6MckMKDjGQS6FqQmNkHE7dF8fw6+fdiH+AAV AGm9alwyxZGDl41I3b9O4mGDPt5FL20pEL/rTE+V+29GrWUCAPFNnDZfe Y=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BuAgACoBZW/5FdJa1eglpNVG4GuSCEIgENgVojgnCCCn8CgUw4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQmAQEBBHkQAgEIEQMBAQEoByERFAkIAgQOBYgZAxINvgANhSABAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQETBItxglCCLA0EBgGELgWWCgGFF4YMgXSUMYdJHwEBQoQCcYZmgQYBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.17,655,1437436800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="35758948" Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Oct 2015 16:59:57 +0000 Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t98GxvNj025747 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 8 Oct 2015 16:59:57 GMT Received: from xch-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:59:56 -0500 Received: from xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com (173.36.12.84) by xch-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:59:56 -0500 Received: from xmb-aln-x13.cisco.com ([169.254.15.15]) by xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com ([173.36.12.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:59:56 -0500 From: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" To: Sami Boutros , "UTTARO, JAMES" Thread-Topic: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway Thread-Index: AQHRAUUo6UcBgCrr6EGHhYLIkhe5cp5hs6UAgABrl4D//5JKgA== Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 16:59:56 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.5.150821 x-originating-ip: [173.36.7.25] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D23BED19159DF5sajassiciscocom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 17:00:00 -0000 --_000_D23BED19159DF5sajassiciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Just a word of caution. The main value proposition of muxing tens of thousa= nds of VLANs/ACs within a single EVPN-VPWS service instance, was to have tr= ansparency with respect to BGP - i.e., just setup a single EVPN-VPWS serv= ice instance. If we try to signal the VLANs in BGP for single-sided provisi= oning, then we lose this transparency. Cheers, Ali From: BESS > on behalf = of Sami Boutros > Date: Thursday, October 8, 2015 at 9:32 AM To: "UTTARO, JAMES" > Cc: "bess@ietf.org" > Subject: Re: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway Hi Jim, You bring a good point in how we can extend this single sided provisioning = at access PE, with the muxing of thousands of L2/L3 services to the same VP= WS instance at the access, given that we don't provision anything at the se= rvice PE. We need to think more about this. Thanks, Sami On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 6:07 AM, UTTARO, JAMES > wrote: Sami, In what way is this different from the work we have been doing on creating = the flexible cross connect table which enables thousands of PWs to be =93la= nded=94 on a L3/L2/Internet PE? Is this specific to always using EVPN on th= e service PE to facilitate L2/L3 closed user groups? Thanks, Jim Uttaro From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On = Behalf Of Sami Boutros Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 5:14 PM To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway Hi, The draft proposes a dynamic mechanism to terminate the VPWS transport serv= ice at a service PE into an overlay L2 or L3 service based on a single side= provisioning at the access PE. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boutros-bess-evpn-vpws-service-edge-gatew= ay-01 Thanks, Sami --_000_D23BED19159DF5sajassiciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <3F20109336CF824091C0E410A8D519E1@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Just a word of caution. The main value proposition of muxing tens of t= housands of VLANs/ACs within a single EVPN-VPWS service instance, was to ha= ve transparency  with respect to BGP - i.e., just setup  a single= EVPN-VPWS service instance. If we try to signal the VLANs in BGP for single-sided provisioning, then we lose this t= ransparency.

Cheers,
Ali



From: BESS <bess-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Sami Boutro= s <boutros.sami@gmail.com&= gt;
Date: Thursday, October 8, 2015 at = 9:32 AM
To: "UTTARO, JAMES" <<= a href=3D"mailto:ju1738@att.com">ju1738@att.com>
Cc: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@i= etf.org>
Subject: Re: [bess] Seeking Comment= s for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway

Hi Jim,

You bring a good point in how we can extend this single sided provisioning = at access PE, with the muxing of thousands of L2/L3 services to the same VP= WS instance at the access, given that we don't provision anything at the se= rvice PE.

We need to think more about this.

Thanks,

Sami

On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 6:07 AM, UTTARO, JAMES <ju1738@att.com&= gt; wrote:

Sami,

 

In what way is this different= from the work we have been doing on creating the flexible cross connect ta= ble which enables thousands of PWs to be =93landed=94 on a L3/L2/Internet PE? Is this specific to always using E= VPN on the service PE to facilitate L2/L3 closed user groups?=

 

Thanks,<= /i>

     = ;           Jim Uttaro=

 

From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sami Boutros
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 5:14 PM
To: bess@ietf.org=
Subject: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway<= u>

 

Hi,

The draft proposes a dynamic mechanism to terminate = the VPWS transport service at a service PE into an overlay L2 or L3 service= based on a single side provisioning at the access PE.

Thanks,=

Sami


--_000_D23BED19159DF5sajassiciscocom_-- From nobody Thu Oct 8 19:45:49 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631071B2B57; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 19:45:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5bz_25_TbDLJ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 19:45:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796721B2B5B; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 19:45:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.4.2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151009024518.19472.21534.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 19:45:18 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system-05.txt X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 02:45:48 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled Services Working Group of the IETF. Title : BGP-signaled end-system IP/VPNs. Authors : Pedro Marques Luyuan Fang Nischal Sheth Maria Napierala Nabil Bitar Filename : draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system-05.txt Pages : 30 Date : 2015-10-08 Abstract: This document describes a solution in which the control plane protocol specified in BGP/MPLS IP VPNs is used and extended via the XMPP protocol to provide a Virtual Network service to end-systems. These end-systems may be used to provide network services or may directly host end-to-end applications. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system-05 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system-05 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Thu Oct 8 22:46:56 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54CDE1B3517 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 22:46:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DKeYVHx-0yV6 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 22:46:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpgre-esg-01.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B125B1B3518 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 22:46:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.122]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 5433ABEA6DFD8; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 05:46:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712wxchhub03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.74]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t995kpWv003684 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 9 Oct 2015 07:46:51 +0200 Received: from FR711WXCHMBA01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.1.183]) by FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 07:46:51 +0200 From: "Rabadan, Jorge (Jorge)" To: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" , "Sami Boutros (sboutros)" Thread-Topic: [bess] draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement-02 Thread-Index: AQHRAU/hOfTDSxOtxEOT+DNmX9qgE55iqSIA Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 05:46:50 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.150923 x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.39] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <8B62DB86751C7A448465AF92C8E311A0@exchange.lucent.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: BESS Subject: Re: [bess] draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement-02 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 05:46:55 -0000 U2FtaSwNCg0KQmVzaWRlcyB3aGF0IEFsaSBzYXlzLCBmb3IgeW91ciBzZWNvbmQgcXVlc3Rpb24g bm90ZSB0aGF0IGluIHRoZSB1c2UtY2FzZSA1LjQgd2UgYXJlIGV4cGxpY2l0bHkgYXZvaWRpbmcg R1ctSVAgbm9uLXplcm8gcGx1cyByb3V0ZXLigJlzIG1hYyBpbiB0aGUgc2FtZSB1cGRhdGU6DQoN CiJUaGUgUm91dGVyJ3MgTUFDIEV4dGVuZGVkIENvbW11bml0eSBNVVNUIGJlIHNlbnQgaWYgdGhl IGFzc29jaWF0ZWQNCiAgICAgICAgICBSVC01J3MgR1cgSVAgQWRkcmVzcyBpcyB6ZXJvLuKAnQ0K DQoNClRoYW5rcy4NCkpvcmdlDQoNCg0KDQpPbiAxMC84LzE1LCAxMjozMSBBTSwgIkFsaSBTYWph c3NpIChzYWphc3NpKSIgPHNhamFzc2lAY2lzY28uY29tPiB3cm90ZToNCg0KPg0KPlNhbWksDQo+ DQo+VGhlcmUgYXJlIGludGVuZGVkIGZvciBkaWZmZXJlbnQgc2NlbmFyaW9zLiBXaGVuIGEgc3Vi bmV0IGlzIHNpdHRpbmcNCj5iZWhpbmQgYSBUUywgdGhlcmUgaXMgbm8gbmVlZCB0byBhZHZlcnRp c2UgbGFiZWwvVk5JIGluIFJUNSBmb3IgdGhhdA0KPnN1Ym5ldCBiZWNhdXNlIGl0IGdldHMgcmVz b2x2ZWQgdmlhIGxhYmVsL1ZOSSBhc3NvY2lhdGVkIHdpdGggUlQyIGZvciB0aGF0DQo+VFMuIElu IG90aGVyIHNjZW5hcmlvcywgd2hlcmUgc3VibmV0IGdldHMgZGlyZWN0bHkgYWR2ZXJ0aXNlZCBi eSBQRSAoZS5nLiwNCj5ubyBpbmRpcmVjdGlvbiBhbmQgbm8gUlQyKSwgdGhlbiBsYWJlbC9WTkkg Zm9yIHRoYXQgc3VibmV0IGdldHMgYWR2ZXJ0aXNlZA0KPmluIFJUNS4NCj4NCj5DaGVlcnMsDQo+ QWxpDQo+DQo+T24gMTAvNy8xNSwgMjo1NiBQTSwgIkJFU1Mgb24gYmVoYWxmIG9mIFNhbWkgQm91 dHJvcyAoc2JvdXRyb3MpIg0KPjxiZXNzLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmcgb24gYmVoYWxmIG9mIHNi b3V0cm9zQGNpc2NvLmNvbT4gd3JvdGU6DQo+DQo+PkhpIEpvcmdlLA0KPj4NCj4+SW4gc29tZSBv ZiB0aGUgdXNlIGNhc2Ugc2VjdGlvbnMgaW4gdGhlIGRyYWZ0LCB0aGVyZSBpcyBubyBtZW50aW9u IG9mIHRoZQ0KPj5sYWJlbC9WTkkgdGhhdCB3aWxsIGJlIGFzc29jaWF0ZWQgd2l0aCBSVC01Lg0K Pj5BcyB3ZWxsIGlmIHRoZSByb3V0ZXItbWFjIHdpbGwgYmUgYXNzb2NpYXRlZCB3aXRoIFJULTUg YW5kIHRoZSBHVy1JUCB3aWxsDQo+PmJlIHNldCwgd2h5IGRvIHdlIG5lZWQgdG8gYWR2ZXJ0aXNl IHRob3NlIGFnYWluIGluIFJULTI/DQo+Pg0KPj5UaGFua3MsDQo+Pg0KPj5TYW1pDQo+Pl9fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQo+PkJFU1MgbWFpbGlu ZyBsaXN0DQo+PkJFU1NAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj4+aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9s aXN0aW5mby9iZXNzDQo+DQo= From nobody Fri Oct 9 01:40:04 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952231A8946; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 01:40:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f75sBBZn2KQS; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 01:40:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08AFF1A893E; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 01:40:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.4.2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151009084002.10399.7555.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 01:40:02 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-01.txt X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 08:40:03 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled Services Working Group of the IETF. Title : Virtual Subnet: A BGP/MPLS IP VPN-based Subnet Extension Solution Authors : Xiaohu Xu Robert Raszuk Christian Jacquenet Truman Boyes Brendan Fee Filename : draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-01.txt Pages : 14 Date : 2015-10-09 Abstract: This document describes a BGP/MPLS IP VPN-based subnet extension solution referred to as Virtual Subnet, which can be used for building Layer3 network virtualization overlays within and/or between data centers. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-01 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Sun Oct 11 19:41:56 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC3B1B2FEE; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 19:41:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RaavDQV6zpfp; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 19:41:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E1E1B2FE4; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 19:41:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.4.2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151012024149.21561.2615.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 19:41:49 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-02.txt X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 02:41:50 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled Services Working Group of the IETF. Title : Virtual Subnet: A BGP/MPLS IP VPN-based Subnet Extension Solution Authors : Xiaohu Xu Robert Raszuk Christian Jacquenet Truman Boyes Brendan Fee Filename : draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-02.txt Pages : 14 Date : 2015-10-11 Abstract: This document describes a BGP/MPLS IP VPN-based subnet extension solution referred to as Virtual Subnet, which can be used for building Layer3 network virtualization overlays within and/or between data centers. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Mon Oct 12 02:46:53 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D291AC3BB for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 02:46:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JJ011bxLT0Pa for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 02:46:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C85311AC3B8 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 02:46:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 85A0BB0997C6F for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 09:46:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t9C9klNO018059 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 11:46:48 +0200 Received: from [135.224.218.118] (135.239.27.40) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 11:46:47 +0200 Message-ID: <561B8186.50303@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 11:46:46 +0200 From: Martin Vigoureux User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <5613A10D.7030107@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <5613A10D.7030107@alcatel-lucent.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [135.239.27.40] Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] Slots requests for BESS WG session - IETF 94 - Yokohama X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 09:46:52 -0000 All, the BESS slot has been confirmed as originally scheduled: Thursday, 5th of November, Afternoon session I 13:00-15:00 (local time) This is a reminder to send slot requests. Thank you Regards Martin Le 06/10/2015 12:23, Martin Vigoureux a écrit : > All, > > it is time we start building the BESS WG agenda for Yokohama. > The IETF agenda is available at: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/94/agenda.html > Please note that it is still a preliminary agenda. > > The BESS WG session (2h) is currently scheduled on > Thursday, 5th of November, Afternoon session I 13:00-15:00 (local time) > > Please send us your request for a presentation slot, indicating: > draft name, speaker and desired duration (covering presentation + > discussion) > > Please send the requests no later than the 18th of October > Thank you > > M&T > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > > From nobody Mon Oct 12 08:43:07 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953BB1A871B; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:43:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lOu6-vdtL6zv; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:43:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 709B81A870F; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:43:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.4.2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151012154304.14621.2211.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:43:04 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-extranet-03.txt X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:43:05 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled Services Working Group of the IETF. Title : Extranet Multicast in BGP/IP MPLS VPNs Authors : Yakov Rekhter Eric C. Rosen Rahul Aggarwal Yiqun Cai Thomas Morin Filename : draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-extranet-03.txt Pages : 60 Date : 2015-10-12 Abstract: Previous RFCs specify the procedures necessary to allow IP multicast traffic to travel from one site to another within a BGP/MPLS IP VPN (Virtual Private Network). However, it is sometimes desirable to allow multicast traffic whose source is in one VPN to be received by systems that are in another VPN. This is known as a "Multicast VPN (MVPN) extranet". This document updates RFCs 6513, 6514, and 6625 by specifying the procedures that are necessary in order to provide MVPN extranet service. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-extranet/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-extranet-03 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-extranet-03 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Mon Oct 12 10:17:50 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28EC91A8A45; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:17:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4nz_y-_IPpfY; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:17:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4F51A8A3C; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:17:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.5.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151012171737.32518.44283.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:17:37 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-03.txt X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 17:17:49 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled Services Working Group of the IETF. Title : E-TREE Support in EVPN & PBB-EVPN Authors : Ali Sajassi Samer Salam Sami Boutros Jim Uttaro Filename : draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-03.txt Pages : 16 Date : 2015-10-12 Abstract: The Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF) has defined a rooted-multipoint Ethernet service known as Ethernet Tree (E-Tree). [ETREE-FMWK] proposes a solution framework for supporting this service in MPLS networks. This document discusses how those functional requirements can be easily met with (PBB-)EVPN and how (PBB-)EVPN offers a more efficient implementation of these functions. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-03 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-03 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Tue Oct 13 06:40:49 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A440D1B3D70 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 06:40:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ceYsUfsv_mHB for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 06:40:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpgre-esg-01.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40F751B3D6E for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 06:40:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.122]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 8E18F3CD8DB10 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:40:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t9DDebum026321 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 15:40:43 +0200 Received: from [135.224.195.90] (135.239.27.38) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 15:40:10 +0200 Message-ID: <561D09B4.6040800@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 15:40:04 +0200 From: Martin Vigoureux User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: BESS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [135.239.27.38] Archived-At: Subject: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-multicast-damping-01 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:40:47 -0000 Hello Working Group, This email starts a Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-multicast-damping-01 [1] which is considered mature and ready for a final working group review. Please read the document if you haven't read the most recent version yet, and send your comments to the list, no later than *27th of October*. *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-bess-multicast-damping, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor of draft-ietf-bess-multicast-damping-01 please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. Thank you, M&T [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-multicast-damping-01 From nobody Wed Oct 14 05:29:31 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77BC1A1BCC; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 05:29:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.906 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FS_REPLICA=0.994] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4lorquAEQRjU; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 05:29:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC97B1A1BBB; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 05:29:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Benoit Claise" To: "The IESG" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.5.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151014122927.7913.33041.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 05:29:27 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication@ietf.org, warren@kumari.net, aretana@cisco.com, Thomas Morin , bess-chairs@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-03: (with COMMENT) X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:29:30 -0000 Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-03: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Here is Warren Kumari's OPS DIR review. Summary: Ready, typo / grammar nits. General: I found this document to be very dense. At some point my brain started dribbling out my ears and I largely gave up on trying to understand the mechanism. This seems to be very much a niche application, and my IP multicast and deep MPLS knowledge isn't up to the level of finding issues with the logic. Nits: Abstract: This document specifiess how [O] specifiess [P] specifies [R] spelling 1: Introduction: With these two methods, all PEs of a particular VPN are separated [O] all PEs [P] all PEs (Provider Edge router) [R] first use of acronym. The document does say it assumed familiarity with terminology from [RFC5015], [RFC6513], [RFC6514], and [RFC7582], but this is before that, and also expanding PE here will help people understand if they want to continue reading... From nobody Wed Oct 14 08:38:51 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629FF1ACC85; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 08:38:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.906 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FS_REPLICA=0.994] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8lThFb7OeDVb; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 08:38:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F11E1ACC7F; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 08:38:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Barry Leiba" To: "The IESG" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.5.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151014153847.18568.74992.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 08:38:47 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: aretana@cisco.com, draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication@ietf.org, bess-chairs@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org, Thomas Morin Subject: [bess] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-03: (with COMMENT) X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 15:38:48 -0000 Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-03: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- A very small point, and not a big deal: The abstract says, "This specification updates RFC 6514," presumably to meet the I-D nits question. But it doesn't say what, specifically, is updated, and I don't get that clearly from reading the rest of the document either (I presume that someone who knows 6514 well would understand; I think the explanation is in the paragraph in the introduction that mentions Ingress Replication tunnels, and there's a paragraph in the middle of Section 3.1...). Can the sentence be expanded just a little (keeping it as one sentence) to summarise what the update is? I'm thinking along the line of, "This specification updates RFC 6514 by [changing the procedures with respect to [whatever]]." From nobody Wed Oct 14 09:47:26 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E00231ACEA6; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 09:47:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9AEa3jaEiL9H; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 09:47:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87AD91A6F62; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 09:44:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CCO05213; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:44:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from DFWEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.130) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 17:44:41 +0100 Received: from DFWEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.50]) by dfweml703-chm ([10.193.5.130]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 09:44:32 -0700 From: Lucy yong To: "bess@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-03.txt Thread-Index: AQHRBRH6Ho15VprW1U6Iqc3hhEfGsJ5rHvdg Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:44:31 +0000 Message-ID: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D571FCBC9@dfweml701-chm> References: <20151012171737.32518.44283.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20151012171737.32518.44283.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.47.156.158] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D571FCBC9dfweml701chm_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-03.txt X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:47:25 -0000 --_000_2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D571FCBC9dfweml701chm_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ali, et al This version has quite changes. Could you summarize what have been changed = for what reason? I had some comments while ago, https://mailarchive.ietf.o= rg/arch/msg/bess/TnGmg2SYNGrc0DMCClVHrYLyX6Y Does this version address them? Few comments to this version: * Section 3.3.1 does not mention if the MAC learning needs to learn= the MAC's root role or leaf role for the scenario described in section 2.3= . How does PE2 (in figure 3) advertise the learned MAC? * The content in Section 3.3.1 starting from the second paragraph t= o the end is useful, but does not belong to this section. Maybe move to sec= tion 3.2 or other place? * In section 5.1, the E-TREE Extended Community is re-defined. To a= dvertise MAC/IP from a root AC, BGP must not insert this extended community= because the community is for the leaf indication. It is better to explicit= ly state it. In fact, the simpler logic can be: when this extended communit= y is advertised along with MAC/IP advertisement route, it means that the MA= C is originated by a leaf otherwise means the MAC is originated by a root; = when this extended community is advertised along with the Ethernet A-D per = ES route, it means that the ES has leaf role and a valid label should be en= coded in the label field in the EC. The flag is not necessary. * The draft suggests for a PE to allocate a single Leaf label for a= ll single-homed ESs on the PE. If we allocates one extended MPLS label as o= f the Leaf Label, all PE will use the same label on the leaf BUM packets to= indicate a leaf origination. IMO: this is simpler method. Regards, Lucy -----Original Message----- From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf= .org Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 12:18 PM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-03.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled Services Working Group of the = IETF. Title : E-TREE Support in EVPN & PBB-EVPN Authors : Ali Sajassi Samer Salam Sami Boutros Jim Uttaro Filename : draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-03.txt Pages : 16 Date : 2015-10-12 Abstract: The Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF) has defined a rooted-multipoint Ethernet service known as Ethernet Tree (E-Tree). [ETREE-FMWK] proposes a solution framework for supporting this service in MPLS networks. This document discusses how those functional requirements can be easily met with (PBB-)EVPN and how (PBB-)EVPN offers a more efficient implementation of these functions. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-03 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-03 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submissio= n until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess --_000_2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D571FCBC9dfweml701chm_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Ali, et al

 

This version has quite changes. Could you summari= ze what have been changed for what reason? I had some comments while ago, &= nbsp;https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/TnGmg2SYNGrc0DMCClV= HrYLyX6Y

Does this version address them?

 

Few comments to this version:

·         Section 3.3.1 does not mention if the MAC le= arning needs to learn the MAC’s root role or leaf role for the scenar= io described in section 2.3. How does PE2 (in figure 3) advertise the learn= ed MAC?

·         The content in Section 3.3.1 starting from t= he second paragraph to the end is useful, but does not belong to this secti= on. Maybe move to section 3.2 or other place?

·         In section 5.1, the E-TREE Extended Communit= y is re-defined. To advertise MAC/IP from a root AC, BGP must not insert th= is extended community because the community is for the leaf indication. It = is better to explicitly state it. In fact, the simpler logic can be: when this extended community is adverti= sed along with MAC/IP advertisement route, it means that the MAC is origina= ted by a leaf otherwise means the MAC is originated by a root; when this ex= tended community is advertised along with the Ethernet A-D per ES route, it means that the ES has leaf role and= a valid label should be encoded in the label field in the EC. The flag is = not necessary.

·         The draft suggests for a PE to allocate a si= ngle Leaf label for all single-homed ESs on the PE. If we allocates one ext= ended MPLS label as of the Leaf Label, all PE will use the same label on th= e leaf BUM packets to indicate a leaf origination. IMO: this is simpler method.

 

Regards,

Lucy

 

-----Original Message-----
From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf= .org
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 12:18 PM
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: bess@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-03.txt

 

 

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-lin= e Internet-Drafts directories.

This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled Serv= ices Working Group of the IETF.

 

        Title&= nbsp;          : E-TREE Suppor= t in EVPN & PBB-EVPN

        Author= s         : Ali Sajassi<= /p>

        &= nbsp;           &nbs= p;     Samer Salam

        &= nbsp;           &nbs= p;     Sami Boutros

        &= nbsp;           &nbs= p;     Jim Uttaro

      Filename &nbs= p;      : draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-03.txt

      Pages  &= nbsp;        : 16

      Date  &n= bsp;         : 2015-10-12

 

Abstract:

   The Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF) has d= efined a rooted-multipoint

   Ethernet service known as Ethernet T= ree (E-Tree).  [ETREE-FMWK]

   proposes a solution framework for su= pporting this service in MPLS

   networks. This document discusses ho= w those functional requirements

   can be easily met with (PBB-)EVPN an= d how (PBB-)EVPN offers a more

   efficient implementation of these fu= nctions.

 

 

 

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft i= s:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree/<= o:p>

 

There's also a htmlized version available at:

= https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-03

 

A diff from the previous version is available at:=

https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-03

 

 

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes = from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are availab= le at tools.ietf.org.

 

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous F= TP at:

<= span style=3D"color:windowtext;text-decoration:none">ftp://ftp.ietf.org/int= ernet-drafts/

 

_______________________________________________

BESS mailing list

BESS@ietf.org

https://www.iet= f.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

--_000_2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D571FCBC9dfweml701chm_-- From nobody Wed Oct 14 14:42:59 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C66B1A8A3E; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:42:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.904 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FS_REPLICA=0.994, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qNNEdS_CzI1A; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:42:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163211A89A8; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:42:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Alia Atlas" To: "The IESG" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.6.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151014214257.13541.38146.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:42:57 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: aretana@cisco.com, draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication@ietf.org, bess-chairs@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org, thomas.morin@orange.com Subject: [bess] Alia Atlas' No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-03: (with COMMENT) X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 21:42:58 -0000 Alia Atlas has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-03: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This is not an easy document to read. If it gave reasons, examples, and explained what it was accomplishing with the information exchanged, that would probably help. From nobody Thu Oct 15 04:57:26 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613921B2C59; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 04:57:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.906 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FS_REPLICA=0.994] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iO_q3G7D3onf; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 04:57:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD1C1B2C4D; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 04:57:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Brian Haberman" To: "The IESG" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.6.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151015115724.452.84688.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 04:57:24 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: aretana@cisco.com, draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication@ietf.org, bess-chairs@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org, thomas.morin@orange.com Subject: [bess] Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-03: (with COMMENT) X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:57:25 -0000 Brian Haberman has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-03: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I have to agree with Alia's comments and Warren's review. Very dense. No clear justification. No examples. From nobody Thu Oct 15 05:28:02 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311751B30DD; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 05:28:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.906 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FS_REPLICA=0.994] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X1WKMCpsiZ6R; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 05:28:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B5241B2FFC; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 05:28:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Stephen Farrell" To: "The IESG" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.6.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151015122800.29043.89618.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 05:28:00 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: aretana@cisco.com, draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication@ietf.org, bess-chairs@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org, thomas.morin@orange.com Subject: [bess] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-03: (with COMMENT) X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 12:28:01 -0000 Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-03: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I have one less and two more serious comments... - Less seriously, "MP2MP tunnel" seems like a strange use of language, I wondered if it might be better to call these an MP2MP warren (as in rabbit warren, and of course bearing in mind the ops-dir review:-) - More seriously, this is another draft that simply has too many acronyms and uses those too densely. For example, I just find it really hard to believe that "If a PE, say PEx, is connected to a site of a given VPN, and PEx's next hop interface to some C-RPA is a VRF interface, then PEx MUST advertises a (C-*,C-*-BIDIR) S-PMSI A-D route, regardless of whether it has any local Bidir-PIM join states corresponding to the C-RPA learned from its CEs" is a useful sentence to implementers. IMO enough folks have commented on this aspect that the wg would be wise to seriously consider the readibility of their output. I've worked on enough EU-funded projects that had write-only documents to be worried if the IETF starts to produce those. (This is not a discuss since I've been assured that this is not a problem for implementers, and while I do accept that, I also continue to worry about it.) - I am simply not in a position to evaluate section 4. And nor was the assigned secdir reviewer. The same point about density and that making any secdir review hard to impossible was noted by the secdir reviewer for draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir. I don't think it'd be valid for me to put on a discuss on the basis that nothing this complex has "no new security issues" but it was tempting. Overall, I think it would be best if this were returned to the wg asking for significant improvement in clarity for readers. From nobody Thu Oct 15 05:34:14 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8561B2D81 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 05:34:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.911 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0PBZs0E4126y for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 05:34:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpgre-esg-01.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72F191B2FFA for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 05:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.122]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id DB2B5E4A21658 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 12:34:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t9FCY6Jf024874 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:34:08 +0200 Received: from [135.224.193.50] (135.239.27.39) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:34:06 +0200 Message-ID: <561F9D3E.7000708@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:34:06 +0200 From: Martin Vigoureux User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <560E5C8E.8000002@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <560E5C8E.8000002@alcatel-lucent.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [135.239.27.39] Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 12:34:12 -0000 Authors, we are 1 day before the deadline and I am missing feedbacks on IPR from: Kanwar, Ray, Praveen, Jayant, Pradeep, Clayton, Nehal, and Rahul. So please, do reply. In the meantime, additional positions wrt the document are welcome from the WG participants. -m Le 02/10/2015 12:29, Martin Vigoureux a écrit : > Hello working group, > > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting > draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover [1] as a working group item. > > Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or > not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). > > This poll runs until the *16th of October*. > > Currently there is no IPR disclosed against this document. > > *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that > applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in > compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for > more details). > > *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond > to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant > IPR. > > The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from > each author and contributor. > > If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please > explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet > been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > Thank you, > > Martin & Thomas > bess chairs > > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > > From nobody Thu Oct 15 06:00:30 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF201B3161; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 06:00:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -13.517 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.517 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FS_REPLICA=0.994, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ihPzDjZDAQJ7; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 06:00:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73B191B315E; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 06:00:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=798; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1444914027; x=1446123627; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=FRYDUmYVB0WeX2+mVaZMwKGRsgjkodegVQWwu1T5TXA=; b=g3/Q2GwAAos6rTEYEsOdaOP4v+vgAvaAolwXc09E1DSxCy7bgJLOE+VD 0Wy2lD7Il2GP+E+UfggrWyjUQ7Mz1opCRU35PZJZ1YakMJ6ifru2BteEU cS0W8KaxL2z6WnJNlBt8yT8ZOWGuLpZbsYlasI1qBJwyRxjP1yV2wNa8m U=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D2AQApoh9W/5ldJa1egyaBQga5FoQhAQ2BWYYcAoE2OBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEJwEBBDo/EAIBCDYFCzIlAgQBDQWILsMMAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARmGdgGEfYUNB4QuAQSSVoNFAY0anA4BHwEBQoIRHRaBP3GEYYEGAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,685,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="37807310" Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Oct 2015 13:00:26 +0000 Received: from XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (xch-rcd-002.cisco.com [173.37.102.12]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9FD0PWr022595 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:00:25 GMT Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (173.37.102.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 08:00:11 -0500 Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 08:00:10 -0500 From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" To: Stephen Farrell , The IESG Thread-Topic: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-03: (with COMMENT) Thread-Index: AQHRB0ToQajlNGt+GU+qt9EgHsjK655slRkA Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:00:10 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20151015122800.29043.89618.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20151015122800.29043.89618.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.3] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <8B04F5C82113774FA6F9405291FB0D26@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication@ietf.org" , "bess-chairs@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" , "thomas.morin@orange.com" Subject: Re: [bess] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-03: (with COMMENT) X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:00:28 -0000 On 10/15/15, 8:28 AM, "Stephen Farrell" wrote: Stephen (and everyone else): >IMO enough folks have commented on this aspect >that the wg would be wise to seriously consider the >readibility of their output...(This is not a discuss since >I've been assured that this is not a problem for implementers, >and while I do accept that, I also continue to worry about >it.) You're right, enough people have commented on the readability of the bess work. As I said in other threads, I don't believe that to be an issue with the implementation and development of the work in the WG. However, it is becoming an issue for appropriate reviews outside the WG. I'll work with the Chairs (and authors) on the clarity of upcoming documents. Thanks! Alvaro. From nobody Thu Oct 15 09:46:26 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB2941B3278; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:46:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uzFpumW8OO2S; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:46:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE1F1B2B62; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:46:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.6.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151015164623.30208.14321.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:46:23 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-02.txt X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 16:46:24 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled Services Working Group of the IETF. Title : VPWS support in EVPN Authors : Sami Boutros Ali Sajassi Samer Salam John Drake Jeff Tantsura Dirk Steinberg Thomas Beckhaus Jorge Rabadan Filename : draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-02.txt Pages : 15 Date : 2015-10-15 Abstract: This document describes how EVPN can be used to support virtual private wire service (VPWS) in MPLS/IP networks. EVPN enables the following characteristics for VPWS: single-active as well as all- active multi-homing with flow-based load-balancing, eliminates the need for single-segment and multi-segment PW signaling, and provides fast protection using data-plane prefix independent convergence upon node or link failure. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Thu Oct 15 13:57:31 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2A11A1B23 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:57:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.798 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hmg_fnloV3IE for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:57:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0714.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:714]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37AAB1A010C for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:57:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from CY1PR0501MB1098.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.144.140) by CY1PR0501MB1241.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.225.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.293.16; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 20:57:22 +0000 Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=erosen@juniper.net; Received: from [172.29.36.57] (66.129.241.14) by CY1PR0501MB1098.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.144.140) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.293.16; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 20:57:21 +0000 To: Martin Vigoureux , References: <560E5C8E.8000002@alcatel-lucent.com> From: Eric C Rosen Message-ID: <56201328.6080604@juniper.net> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 16:57:12 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <560E5C8E.8000002@alcatel-lucent.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [66.129.241.14] X-ClientProxiedBy: CO1PR06CA039.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.160.29) To CY1PR0501MB1098.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.160.144.140) X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; CY1PR0501MB1098; 2:pIR+wQY2KVss58412vhoYt3xlFDNgbkOcZoVRaY+6btzur5tOSFUXve2nyQ7efs+oKyKJbJVGEsydn5of5udw6dgXXvJ9lE3UFLo6rekbU5eCYFQw4fzqlesvy6I9KN0iTiRe+5SgE7QiGDDaKdeePAsf12KACQ3SGUhqK6OR8s=; 3:Z5Ce7+62/oPnaBrDpLEWksixPsV+ATI9A+kZ/qgFpjh22UStt1ihfj8a5l2VHFfPh6KaZQZCcd9my46TV9Y1rY8lpMeH8bpyQ/LwuROL90BbiWV466if1bA5uQ2v2WVR6BLIMrgMsOZnYauAXF3nOA==; 25:3++LkvWVOU1cBm4uNMVcYSgzPBUwrmhcosJsVyd/3g6s0Mj81oibZQDaddeDtpxxDoZDybu7YV5IsDfH1FY+iYbYn25HobjFA5XSsK5hCknYvkZfonS3onz1fj+flSFVcacPn4EqV0mSzwILV+BP7pvl4GzWBfDjJKQ69+JJ/uw8l1NRxecKY3itPQ4vIfUy+gLsa0c+YrUkBC/zxq4wvSbpWpP0OSn6cWzXbuNnrxDw/CChimUBHDytmSbWzrxPFr1pJNISQG2GlkAvCXxNGg== X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CY1PR0501MB1098; X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; CY1PR0501MB1098; 20: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; 4:FlU0xWx75OWv0znUkoR8uyRPiXEAlOt2xFbLAXsmxgp4S+d/uIb0RW2N9/ImKpjNumDDEVn1iorP20dqHPZwpD5Nz0jqI50hOitfIziZRhx72WEJ74uSlzhC1OZHC6HF9t8w2q3d8GfYzezMKqzhKw1pT3LhoZuIKP7QMNsEtyvFXXAV0BNY9GrLt/rG9oZxai0kyMmHi/94qpk+c2mDdmawbbalaLGGRyqTDYFzVeOJt8HboqyYduBM+7+LueSfUztdxKqOkCnZr4MZCZ4gXmZqGhlZwp5l5MTgTKdcB2mjYDwCraR3DyRIWUUW8h+SA/+oOCJIJ20Jr6/uz5SY4LCRfcYFqWTp6v5yzWTh5QY= X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(520078)(3002001); SRVR:CY1PR0501MB1098; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CY1PR0501MB1098; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0730093765 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(6049001)(189002)(199003)(106356001)(558084003)(36756003)(54356999)(99136001)(76176999)(64126003)(40100003)(92566002)(65956001)(66066001)(46102003)(47776003)(86362001)(65816999)(5004730100002)(23746002)(2950100001)(50986999)(5007970100001)(42186005)(65806001)(64706001)(107886002)(5001960100002)(5001770100001)(105586002)(87266999)(59896002)(87976001)(189998001)(5008740100001)(4001350100001)(83506001)(230783001)(122386002)(97736004)(117636001)(101416001)(81156007)(77096005)(50466002)(62816006); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR0501MB1098; H:[172.29.36.57]; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: =?Windows-1252?Q?1; CY1PR0501MB1098; 23:WRLyGQxZrXvHrcX9TZpnD9JwQEIx/PbYU8S?= =?Windows-1252?Q?4sbA4tsGVYPN6iY4mbdM2XHUvMr1EvlcLEfwVFGvzjUFBXaANw9hW7iG?= =?Windows-1252?Q?sUUI4D6/rb1lgI1cBREUC3uQjLehbUagyzYpL7O1ysNaY+xjvNdjZMDv?= =?Windows-1252?Q?coNf7l7b09QYQB5/hvxcxQTArqvtY6KT2NRyFSkz8I0qO8fQlhbJbot+?= =?Windows-1252?Q?sla0rKlKSUYdiOMRWv1xhFx3VPYHjfxPpoRCuKQOy7d9hzJgdBLkRv8w?= =?Windows-1252?Q?fN8heJo/ux2rEXhxXjmggin2DcPJxAqKtWBZuLSYnEWT4l9S07nPUygu?= =?Windows-1252?Q?kY8tfxod+GYW8B/9oVkz+T1EAlEBOUrqUZq0QQHg/IRxIUd3hwCHV2tz?= =?Windows-1252?Q?kl49hxo9/0LjmvCGPWoyLOpzQ6LNbF+7k2Tk4f83oC/c6d/gSOeXJGI9?= =?Windows-1252?Q?QYvCZFMID6uSqj7xT2h5ubw9W+dgf80F0pN9tbR7V9KPqZhnoz25i8sU?= =?Windows-1252?Q?9j+V3mGqyHMtoJA7z2hCGO1hD4W9i0yRedI0838OGhsRkaYceTqisOre?= =?Windows-1252?Q?tM6307efEuBizatpF10zfkyRgfNhUaXbpbONRKgmhSRPQS3dMJ0TM2+H?= =?Windows-1252?Q?U0/L7OHzjjWzjc4x3SjXBIXcQ61sq58arXu79ergAAS11cknftFaFFJB?= =?Windows-1252?Q?0oP7XKy5GN4j5Bk5u7g70CKqKRN3l8aXFiQbvL3O1WbXfkJcSOu5nDjO?= =?Windows-1252?Q?mbmIpmpcDK5j3Jap6K8bjZKoAmcBMK4YXc2tFgioRhCRyXGaEMZx1MM7?= =?Windows-1252?Q?KZpEq2GpuOUEKzGYm57QykgVjS/bwu1QjtlftO3i8EG8jy6ggwEneOfl?= =?Windows-1252?Q?HPN0+kAG1TUJkAzBtNmulfIY698+xV5xu2Jjc2OvSxmmH7wzoW7TiLPU?= =?Windows-1252?Q?0MXHuXcxDV83xyGHdKgFChY+uudlCAjUn34igaYuiHAD56xYH6xbalDU?= =?Windows-1252?Q?i5+fACJbt5g6qz14K9VwRBP4xpjE8tnidxWe64DvY7UzXAnguRo36CWE?= =?Windows-1252?Q?HODO/W1stda4/6Vxytd2NU0QnTMqhdCc57FQa0i0pExq3NiyOPEmJO8m?= =?Windows-1252?Q?coiFz6XtDfgA+sZeaJUh2nacDMBO+B44v3W5eZO0DhDSanhfDcQhdCH0?= =?Windows-1252?Q?O8nSfRklQ+bY3EKXvJOl5kaHZVSmTHxH/BEt31LQGqVZR/Q7tm5rm8Wp?= =?Windows-1252?Q?cdXhaqSXicHhXqN8hxkjnOhfRV5hbSO2l34SDsufP1202iSrfsyHmdBy?= =?Windows-1252?Q?28T8x7qdIzVV3Z8v4A5fW1V97i6CnPnFAypnMTrCce92a5Uw=3D?= X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; CY1PR0501MB1098; 5:WRgxwJtIgTmSLQ0jlVeRfTDtAG8774EEhnUofQPVS7rQAWEwjWapqHdZAEUBfv0iecgapMAM+U6LmW8CZoqG6EVGrKszD0ji9fs71h6C34rekL45eo1LOTxRudXngFhMCULJQdyih1hH2yUyInPnzA==; 24:TLY6yWfWKApf+EoQHWGyQD7gQO/2nWXjUaCputD5OCA8Voxqy30tooMAiyJkKTTVV1plQmNDh12rxXNkmYNuy6ZCT3i/xUbUKESIocX5eYU=; 20:0BDupGEfqsy7wWzisEgadF+Tntt5HyKxWFL6BAeQ6zx/sr1Wv0SzLIVxNjHBzlx5HiQUtB6x/ItpwIxt8QBalA== SpamDiagnosticOutput: 1:23 SpamDiagnosticMetadata: NSPM X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Oct 2015 20:57:21.4127 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1PR0501MB1098 X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; CY1PR0501MB1241; 2:D9SuKLXvGuvrxzJ6EI0dXnYqx9o+ROBsWCVowG5+D9hPSpwmqGCgPSSBlgQd5XVcIPVRXZt9sX3pcAjRAaTrLPsAa9u6qmj5q8mcL1Oc1AwoBYRL7wUhhU+DGsMWIEJKSudTxg3pMQT9WXgnieq0hDqpaHLKki19jnVAz1S5fCk=; 23:ktZRVMPKc0qfA3k5Eyy5rP+XYAI5j2jV1TaNKbqobONW792Uarh2zfQDcgkL6RYaJtrN0nPK89iIz3zd2es0bzZG5jqWMgRmsnkG9ORy3RXuXSdwACiWrgEfLD7Fc8bnkv9AkMLdYkcBCDAIp8r+RLNuL+48yb9cdmD6tHZ72Le8F+WDLqeHPk5dBHeSS11x X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 20:57:31 -0000 I support the adoption of this draft by the WG. From nobody Thu Oct 15 14:59:41 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA4841A7008; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:59:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fMGn1tuErZ6m; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:59:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5802B1A6FF5; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:59:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.6.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151015215936.26605.654.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:59:36 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-ir-02.txt X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 21:59:37 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled Services Working Group of the IETF. Title : Ingress Replication Tunnels in Multicast VPN Authors : Eric C. Rosen Karthik Subramanian Zhaohui Zhang Filename : draft-ietf-bess-ir-02.txt Pages : 22 Date : 2015-10-15 Abstract: RFCs 6513, 6514, and other RFCs describe procedures by which a Service Provider may offer Multicast VPN service to its customers. These procedures create point-to-multipoint (P2MP) or multipoint-to- multipoint trees across the Service Provider's backbone. One type of P2MP tree that may be used is known as an "Ingress Replication (IR) tunnel". In an IR tunnel, a parent node need not be "directly connected" to its child nodes. When a parent node has to send a multicast data packet to its child nodes, it does not use layer 2 multicast, IP multicast, or MPLS multicast to do so. Rather, it makes n individual copies, and then unicasts each copy, through an IP or MPLS unicast tunnel, to exactly one child node. While the prior MVPN specifications allow the use of IR tunnels, those specifications are not always very clear or explicit about how the MVPN protocol elements and procedures are applied to IR tunnels. This document updates RFCs 6513 and 6514 by adding additional details that are specific to the use of IR tunnels. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-ir/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-ir-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-ir-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Thu Oct 15 16:03:24 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6B51A6FCE for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 16:03:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.911 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57Fhhr9-7dnF for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 16:03:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-01.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAB541A6FCD for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 16:03:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from us70tusmtp2.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.5.2.64]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id C94F6BC1687D1 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 23:03:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from US70TWXCHHUB03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70twxchhub03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.35]) by us70tusmtp2.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t9FN3HGJ022560 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 23:03:17 GMT Received: from US70TWXCHMBA10.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.4.234]) by US70TWXCHHUB03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.5.2.35]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:03:16 -0400 From: "Muley, Praveen V (Praveen)" To: "VIGOUREUX, MARTIN (MARTIN)" , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover Thread-Index: AQHQ/P1EcRuYh82FfU6aIW4WHVSKvp5YZ92AgBTY+uA= Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 23:03:15 +0000 Message-ID: <22069265D1B36949926E9422EBF3B88173DC0E0A@US70TWXCHMBA10.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> References: <560E5C8E.8000002@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.5.27.16] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 23:03:23 -0000 Not aware of IPR related to this draft On 02/10/15 12:29, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" wrote: >Hello working group, > >This email starts a two-week poll on adopting=20 >draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover [1] as a working group item. > >Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or=20 >not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). > >This poll runs until the *16th of October*. > >Currently there is no IPR disclosed against this document. > >*Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that=20 >applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in=20 >compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for=20 >more details). > >*If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond=20 >to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IP= R. > >The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from=20 >each author and contributor. > >If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please=20 >explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet=20 >been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > >Thank you, > >Martin & Thomas >bess chairs > >[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover > >_______________________________________________ >BESS mailing list >BESS@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Thu Oct 15 17:31:13 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85F21A8AD7 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:31:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OspHDhsVGXRj for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:31:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ABBC1A8AD6 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:31:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=245; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1444955471; x=1446165071; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Pr3bcTTbP6she8I5rKmF6vGebvZAIM+kAYTb7R5bOxk=; b=d3Hh2lYLWkK0tOIBNW8dvL3OmFD+hAuEkq76W6LeiGXJPDPRA4R+DoVp tUTFA5hMCtthO+BoBRcxLH8P76kJ8Vu8PrKY1NoCLcUIUJ2hMCc4nHDya c5tZbOYdcU1tII5JDV1z5b9eHNA1owgp1UW5ihscbx9xin0IP9sXgstNX A=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AZAgDuQyBW/4gNJK1egyaBSL1AAQ2BWYYUgTw4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQtOjMeAT5CJwSIQaBNoygBAQEBBgEBAQEBAQEbhnYBgg+LHIEUBZYdAXmMIZwPAR8BAUKEA4VSgQYBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,687,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="41565519" Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Oct 2015 00:31:11 +0000 Received: from XCH-RCD-015.cisco.com (xch-rcd-015.cisco.com [173.37.102.25]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9G0VAkf015989 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:31:10 GMT Received: from xch-rcd-015.cisco.com (173.37.102.25) by XCH-RCD-015.cisco.com (173.37.102.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:30:55 -0500 Received: from xch-rcd-015.cisco.com ([173.37.102.25]) by XCH-RCD-015.cisco.com ([173.37.102.25]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:30:55 -0500 From: "Sami Boutros (sboutros)" To: BESS Thread-Topic: Feedback on draft-boutros-bess-vxlan-evpn-00.txt Thread-Index: AQHRB6nrEbzduoFDM0mq8wDoO1Db2w== Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:30:55 +0000 Message-ID: <7A07B449-3FB0-4FB3-A827-98381B65904F@cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.154.212.88] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <481109BDD692294C8CD221DFFF6028F1@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: [bess] Feedback on draft-boutros-bess-vxlan-evpn-00.txt X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:31:12 -0000 Hi, The draft has been around for almost 3 years and it is about interconnectin= g VXLAN or NVGRE networks with data plane mac learning via EVPN, the draft = is informational and describe as well some useful use cases. Thanks, Sami= From nobody Fri Oct 16 07:36:16 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9AB1B2C7A; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 07:36:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.906 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FS_REPLICA=0.994] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O5LPUHj18ysU; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 07:36:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8139E1B2C70; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 07:36:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.6.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151016143611.6564.38630.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 07:36:11 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-04.txt X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 14:36:12 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled Services Working Group of the IETF. Title : Simulating "Partial Mesh of MP2MP P-Tunnels" with Ingress Replication Authors : Zhaohui Zhang Yakov Rekhter Andrew Dolganow Filename : draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-04.txt Pages : 12 Date : 2015-10-16 Abstract: RFC 6513 (Multicast in MPLS/BGP IP VPNs) describes a method to support bidirectional customer multicast flows using a partial mesh of Multipoint-to-Multipoint (MP2MP) tunnels. This document specifies how a partial mesh of MP2MP tunnels can be simulated using Ingress Replication. This solution enables a Service Provider to use Ingress Replication to offer transparent bidirectional multicast service to its VPN customers. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-04 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-04 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Fri Oct 16 08:55:29 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7253E1B3292; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 08:55:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0-Umxx3pIR2q; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 08:55:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318C61B323E; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 08:55:24 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.6.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151016155524.15557.75469.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 08:55:24 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com, The IESG , aretana@cisco.com, bess-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [bess] Protocol Action: 'Shortest Path Bridging, MAC Mode Support over EVPN' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn-02.txt) X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 15:55:25 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Shortest Path Bridging, MAC Mode Support over EVPN' (draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn-02.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the BGP Enabled Services Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Alvaro Retana, Alia Atlas and Deborah Brungard. A URL of this Internet Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn/ Technical Summary This document describes how Ethernet Shortest Path Bridging MAC Mode (802.1aq) can be combined with EVPN in a way that interworks with PBB-PEs as described in the PBB-EVPN solution. This is achieved via operational isolation of each Ethernet network subtending an EVPN core while supporting full interworking between the different variations of Ethernet networks. Working Group Summary This document is a product of the L2VPN Working Group and was handed out to the BESS Working Group at the time of the closure of L2VPN. Document Quality The Document is focused, well written, and provides the necessary information. The WG has been polled on the existence (or plans) of implementations. The Document Shepherd is aware of one implementation plan. Personnel Martin Vigoureux is the Document Shepherd Alvaro Retana is the Responsible AD From nobody Sat Oct 17 02:13:59 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98361A9239 for ; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 02:13:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1akrHYKLWeZ3 for ; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 02:13:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpgre-esg-01.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 622F91A924C for ; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 02:13:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.122]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 9D47AC741C4FE; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 09:13:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.112]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t9H9DtqA003340 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 17 Oct 2015 11:13:55 +0200 Received: from FR711WXCHMBA07.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.3.17]) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.112]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 11:13:55 +0200 From: "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" To: "VIGOUREUX, MARTIN (MARTIN)" , "BESS@ietf.org" , Thomas Morin Thread-Topic: draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover Thread-Index: AQHRCLwlcMgj3LrPpkW2hA6YqmHqEA== Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 09:13:54 +0000 Message-ID: <4FE032A5-DC55-4562-A3C6-029AC0020FD5@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.151008 x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.41] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4FE032A5DC554562A3C6029AC0020FD5alcatellucentcom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: [bess] draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 09:13:59 -0000 --_000_4FE032A5DC554562A3C6029AC0020FD5alcatellucentcom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 V2UgZm91bmQgb3V0IHRoYXQgdGhlcmUgZXhpc3QgSVBSIHJlbGF0ZWQgdG8gdGhpcyBkcmFmdC4g V2UgYXJlIGluIHRoZSBwcm9jZXNzIG9mIGRpc2Nsb3NpbmcgdGhpcyBhc2FwLg0K --_000_4FE032A5DC554562A3C6029AC0020FD5alcatellucentcom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <2E7A51A6C355E440BDE2E378B2DB24DC@exchange.lucent.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWw+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxtZXRhIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIgY29udGVudD0i dGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij4NCjwvaGVhZD4NCjxib2R5IHN0eWxlPSJ3b3JkLXdy YXA6IGJyZWFrLXdvcmQ7IC13ZWJraXQtbmJzcC1tb2RlOiBzcGFjZTsgLXdlYmtpdC1saW5lLWJy ZWFrOiBhZnRlci13aGl0ZS1zcGFjZTsgY29sb3I6IHJnYigwLCAwLCAwKTsgZm9udC1zaXplOiAx NHB4OyBmb250LWZhbWlseTogQ2FsaWJyaSwgc2Fucy1zZXJpZjsiPg0KPGRpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8 ZGl2PldlIGZvdW5kIG91dCB0aGF0IHRoZXJlIGV4aXN0IElQUiByZWxhdGVkIHRvIHRoaXMgZHJh ZnQuIFdlIGFyZSBpbiB0aGUgcHJvY2VzcyBvZiBkaXNjbG9zaW5nIHRoaXMgYXNhcC48L2Rpdj4N CjxkaXY+DQo8ZGl2IGlkPSJNQUNfT1VUTE9PS19TSUdOQVRVUkUiPjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8 L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9ib2R5Pg0KPC9odG1sPg0K --_000_4FE032A5DC554562A3C6029AC0020FD5alcatellucentcom_-- From nobody Mon Oct 19 10:25:51 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietf.org Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85E21A8AE5; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:25:45 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.6.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151019172545.19707.82734.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:25:45 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication@ietf.org, The IESG , aretana@cisco.com, thomas.morin@orange.com, bess-chairs@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [bess] Protocol Action: 'Simulating "Partial Mesh of MP2MP P-Tunnels" with Ingress Replication' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-04.txt) X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 17:25:46 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Simulating "Partial Mesh of MP2MP P-Tunnels" with Ingress Replication' (draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-04.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the BGP Enabled Services Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Alvaro Retana, Alia Atlas and Deborah Brungard. A URL of this Internet Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication/ Technical Summary This specifies an alternate technique than what has already been described to transport Bidir-PIM multicast traffic of a multicast VPN across a provider network. RFC 6513 described a method to support bidirectional C-flow using "Partial Mesh of MP2MP P-Tunnels". This document describes how partial mesh of MP2MP P-Tunnels can be simulated with Ingress Replication, instead of a real MP2MP tunnel. This enables a Service Provider to use Ingress Replication to offer transparent BIDIR-PIM service to its VPN customers. Working Group Summary No controversy or rough consensus decisions. Document Quality The document is of good technical quality. There is no known implementation yet, but one vendor has mentioned plans for implementing these specs. Personnel Thomas Morin is the doc shepherd. Alvaro Retana is the responsible AD. From nobody Mon Oct 19 13:08:03 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03DD51A906D for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:07:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.51 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aBoLOggOhzKq for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:07:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08C7F1A8F3C for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:07:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5275; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1445285270; x=1446494870; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=j0r0Ynv4tS0NXDDnMEOpmR98OLViSR0AdfcQF6bc/zw=; b=KG383xGOlukUMb3g1dobAYHjKb1FxVz2vJoLcZrBGa4YAe1+tCLIFjYt KzWUbdhxuqhsRzvdLOgVlLjdYkLh6deO4IHCXPSWXwN0jpbcxafcMimQW GCCNlI1Qvc18bHmVmMAkEnv9I85nVY6uBdqmbZ6HP7bMw1ggIkcfXB9To 8=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D9AQAiTSVW/5tdJa1egmlNVG8GuWiEIQENgVojhXuBPjgUAQEBAQEBAX8LhDSBCwGBACcEiEMNoW+iXgEBAQcBAQEBARoEhneKB4Q5BY0SiREBhRiIBJwXAR8BAUKEA3IBhGCBBgEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,703,1437436800"; d="scan'208,217";a="198999004" Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Oct 2015 20:07:49 +0000 Received: from XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (xch-aln-004.cisco.com [173.36.7.14]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9JK7n9u026788 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:07:49 GMT Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (173.36.7.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:07:31 -0500 Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:07:31 -0500 From: "Parag Jain (paragj)" To: "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Seeking Comments on LSP-Ping Mechanisms for EVPN and PBB-EVPN (Revision 02) Thread-Index: AQHRCqnJ1XhOonEG0U6JOG+cYtYIbg== Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:07:31 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.1.150515 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [161.44.213.57] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D24AC53B13FC9paragjciscocom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: [bess] Seeking Comments on LSP-Ping Mechanisms for EVPN and PBB-EVPN (Revision 02) X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:07:52 -0000 --_000_D24AC53B13FC9paragjciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Seeking comments on the following draft. The version 01 of the draft was pr= esented at IETF 93. EVPN RT-5 support has been added in this new version. Name: draft-jain-bess-evpn-lsp-ping Revision: 02 Title: LSP-Ping Mechanisms for EVPN and PBB-EVPN Document date: 2015-10-16 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 14 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jain-bess-evpn-l= sp-ping-02.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jain-bess-evpn-lsp-p= ing/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jain-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-0= 2 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-jain-bess-evpn-ls= p-ping-02 Abstract: LSP-Ping is a widely deployed Operation, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) mechanism in MPLS networks. This document describes mechanisms for detecting data-plane failures using LSP Ping in MPLS based EVPN and PBB-EVPN networks. Thanks Parag --_000_D24AC53B13FC9paragjciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi

Seeking comments on the following draft. The version 01 of the dr= aft was presented at IETF 93. EVPN RT-5 support has been added in this new = version.

Name: d= raft-jain-bess-evpn-lsp-ping
Revision= : 02
Title: L= SP-Ping Mechanisms for EVPN and PBB-EVPN
Document= date: 2015-10-16
Group: I= ndividual Submission
Pages: 1= 4

Abstract= :
 &n= bsp; LSP-Ping is a widely deployed Operation, Administration, and
 &n= bsp; Maintenance (OAM) mechanism in MPLS networks.  This document=
 &n= bsp; describes mechanisms for detecting data-plane failures using LSP Ping<= /div>
 &n= bsp; in MPLS based EVPN and PBB-EVPN networks.

Thanks
Parag
--_000_D24AC53B13FC9paragjciscocom_-- From nobody Mon Oct 19 13:40:01 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F921ACC88 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:39:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q6N-1VGV-2VB for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:39:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qk0-x22f.google.com (mail-qk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 155041ACD02 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:39:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qkcy65 with SMTP id y65so24843093qkc.0 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:39:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=pPTi+ttNXWVBenXcrvx9MwKG3DoVBM20GpI7qsXoE4Y=; b=O93F4J/X1uYBb0M2cR8ub6iefRA1yconJ/75OiRAjt4SpoAg/ytHsFsYJSeuRbHLZR AAQ2RX5SehAtt7M+z4PoKiy8zsClu1Q52LtfF4dZ2aPo9UT8LqHZMRe5yMHgBEavd7rZ CfYA3Hlbe9ThwT3Zwq064VUg1k5pWAYyKBwX3RlBTS3UguZx4qBybkA6eWBDIkCh0e4x uztR97HD4THDb14krm88kzjA1NX//blBnr00IJvJ2re9xPEVHPstBDzXTmci0ANV20rO lPqw39JjohpkyC5Chcba+P4DvXJc+QVI+rz6sByMNK7Z+xQJstsOqvY6dNIp+RMrYn+8 vyjw== X-Received: by 10.194.239.167 with SMTP id vt7mr34053652wjc.110.1445287159969; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:39:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.37.71 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:39:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1EDE9B87-E9DB-4BBA-A41C-AB138380E451@alcatel-lucent.com> References: <1EDE9B87-E9DB-4BBA-A41C-AB138380E451@alcatel-lucent.com> From: Sami Boutros Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:39:00 -0700 Message-ID: To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Jorge)" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013c60c0c4bbb305227b23f2 Archived-At: Cc: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:39:41 -0000 --089e013c60c0c4bbb305227b23f2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jorge, > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Abstract > > This document describes how a service node can dynamically terminate > EVPN virtual private wire transport service (VPWS) from access nodes > and offer Layer 2, Layer 3 and Ethernet VPN overlay services to > Customer edge devices connected to the access nodes. Service nodes > using EVPN will advertise to access nodes the L2, L3 and Ethernet VPN > overlay services it can offer for the terminated EVPN VPWS transport > service. On an access node an operator can specify the L2 or L3 or > Ethernet VPN overlay service needed by the customer edge device > connected to the access node that will be transported over the EVPN- > VPWS service between access node and service node. > > /* [JORGE] it would be good to clearly state the benefit of doing this. > The main advantages that I see are service extension with single-side > provisioning (no need to provision new ACs at the service node). */ > > Sami: will update the abstract. > > > > 1 Introduction > > > /* [JORGE] maybe this level of detail at the introduction is a bit > confusing. I think it would be better to state what the goal and > advantages are in the introduction and leave the details for the solution > description. */ > > > Sami: will update. > > ... > > > > 2.2 Scalability > > (R2a) A single service node PE can be associated with many access > node PEs. The following requirements give a quantitative measure. > > (R2b) A service node PE MUST support thousand(s) head-end connections > for a a given access node PE connecting to different overlay VRF > services on that service node. > > (R2c) A service node PE MUST support thousand(s) head-end connections > to many access node PEs. > > > /* [JORGE] It is hard to understand... should the following be better?: > > =E2=80=9C (R2b) A service node PE MUST support head-end functionality for > thousands of access node PEs that are connected to different VRFs on the > service node. > (R2c) A service node PE MUST support hundreds of thousands of CE > connections through the attached access nodes." > */ > > Sami: will update. > > > > > > 2.5 Multi-homing > > TBD > > /* [JORGE] The solution should describe how to handle multi-homing at two > levels: > - Access node multi-homed to 2 or more Service nodes > - CE node multi-homed to 2 or more access nodes (this one should be > aligned with the EVPN-VPWS draft) > */ > > Sami: Please have a look at the updated section in 01, as for the CE node agreed that it should be aligned with EVPN-VPWS, and hence no need to mention anything about it in the draft. > > > > > > > 4 Solution Overview > > > +---------+ +---------+ > | | | | > +----+ +-----+ | IP/MPLS | +-----+ | IP/MPLS | > | CE |---| PE1 |-| Access |-| PE2 |-| Core | > +----+ +-----+ | Network | +-----+ | Network | > | | | | > +---------+ +---------+ > <---- EVPN-VPWS ----><---- IP/MAC VRF ---> > > > Figure 1: EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway. > AN: Access node > SE: Service Edge node. > > EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway Operation > > /* [JORGE] Should this be section 4.1 on its own? */ > Sami: sure will do. > > > At the service edge node, the EVPN Per-EVI Ethernet A-D routes will > be advertised with the ESI set to 0 and the Ethernet tag-id set to > (wildcard 0xFFFFFFF). The Ethernet A-D routes will have a unique RD > and will be associated with 2 BGP RT(s), one RT corresponding to the > underlay EVI i.e. the EVPN VPWS transport service that's configured > only among the service edge nodes, and one corresponding to the L2, > L3 or EVPN overlay service. > > At the access nodes, the EVPN per-EVI Ethernet A-D routes will be > advertised as described in [draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws < > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws>] with the ESI > field is set to 0 and for single homed CEs and to the CE's ESI for > multi-homed CE's and the Ethernet Tag field will be set to the VPWS > service instance identifier that identifies the EVPL or EPL service. > The Ethernet-AD route will have a unique RD and will be associated > with one BGP RT corresponding to the L2, L3 or EVPN overlay service > that will be transported over this EVPN VPWS transport service. > > /* [JORGE] What do you mean by EVPN overlay service in this context? why > is it different from L2 or L3 service? should this be clarified in the > introduction? > Also by L2 and L3 are you referring to the encapsulation? i.e. L2 means > ethernet over the EVI label and L3 IP over the EVI label? */ > > /* [JORGE] If the service RTs are the same in the access and core network= , > PE2 should have two different peering sessions, one to the RR in the > access network and one to the core RR. Is that the intend? if so, it may > be good to clarify */ > > Sami:Can you please look at the updated version 01 and see what comments still apply? > > > > > Service edge nodes on the underlay EVI will determine the primary > service node terminating the VPWS transport service and offering the > L2, L3 or Ethernet VPN service by running the on HWR algorithm as > described in [draft-mohanty-l2vpn-evpn-df-election < > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mohanty-l2vpn-evpn-df-election>] using > weight > [VPWS service identifier, Service Edge Node IP address]. This ensure > that service node(s) will consistently pick the primary service node > even after service node failure. Upon primary service node failure, > all other remaining services nodes will choose another service node > correctly and consistently. > > /*[JORGE] Following EVPN, the DF election is based on the exchange of ES > routes. Hence the assumption is that the two service nodes should > advertise ES routes with a system-level ESI and an AD route per ES with > the same ESI? The service node DF for a given service should send an AD > per-EVI route with the P indication in the new EC defined in EVPN-VPWS. I > believe all the > existing procedures should be used, are you defining new ones? */ > > > Sami: Please have a look at 01. > > Single-sided signaling mechanism is used. The Service PE node that is > a DF for accepts to terminate the VPWS transport service from an > access node, the primary service edge node shall:- Dynamically create > an interface to terminate the service and shall attach this interface > to the overlay VPN service required by the access node to service its > customer edge device.- Responds to the Eth A-D route per EVI from the > access node by sending its own Eth A-D per EVI route by setting the > same VPWS service instance ID and downstream assigned MPLS label to > be used by the access node. > > /* [JORGE] Need to correct the format: the two bullets must go in > different lines */ > > > Sure will do. > > > > 4.1 Multi-homing > > /* [JORGE] how bout the following scenario: > > Here AN1 and AN2 have a ESI for the CE. Regular EVPN-VPWS procedures > should apply. > > +---------+ +---------+ > +----+ +-----+ | | +-----+ | | > | CE +---+ AN1 +-+ +-+ SE2 +-+ | > +--+-+ +-----+ | IP/MPLS | +-----+ | IP/MPLS | > | | Access | | Core | > | +-----+ | Network | +-----+ | Network | > +-----+ AN2 +-+ +-+ SE3 +-+ | > +-----+ | | +-----+ | | > +---------+ +---------+ > <-----EVPN-VPWS-----><-----IP/MAC VRF----> > > */ > > > Sami: Exactly, regular EVPN VPWS should apply, and hence why do we need t= o mention it? Thanks, Sami > > > > > From: BESS on behalf of Sami Boutros > Date: Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 11:13 PM > To: "bess@ietf.org" > Subject: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway > > > Hi, > > > The draft proposes a dynamic mechanism to terminate the VPWS transport > service at a service PE into an overlay L2 or L3 service based on a singl= e > side provisioning at the access PE. > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boutros-bess-evpn-vpws-service-edge-gat= eway-01 > > > Thanks, > > > Sami > > --089e013c60c0c4bbb305227b23f2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Jorge,


--------------------------------------------------------------


Abstract

=C2=A0 =C2=A0This document describes how a service node can dynamically ter= minate
=C2=A0 =C2=A0EVPN virtual private wire transport service (VPWS) from access= nodes
=C2=A0 =C2=A0and offer Layer 2, Layer 3 and Ethernet VPN overlay services t= o
=C2=A0 =C2=A0Customer edge devices connected to the access nodes. Service n= odes
=C2=A0 =C2=A0using EVPN will advertise to access nodes the L2, L3 and Ether= net VPN
=C2=A0 =C2=A0overlay services it can offer for the terminated EVPN VPWS tra= nsport
=C2=A0 =C2=A0service. On an access node an operator can specify the L2 or L= 3 or
=C2=A0 =C2=A0Ethernet VPN overlay service needed by the customer edge devic= e
=C2=A0 =C2=A0connected to the access node that will be transported over the= EVPN-
=C2=A0 =C2=A0VPWS service between access node and service node.

/* [JORGE] it would be good to clearly state the benefit of doing this.
The main advantages that I see are service extension with single-side
provisioning (no need to provision new ACs at the service node). */


Sami: will update the abstract.

<snip>

1=C2=A0 Introduction


/* [JORGE] maybe this level of detail at the introduction is a bit
confusing. I think it would be better to state what the goal and
advantages are in the introduction and leave the details for the solution description. */



Sami: will update.
=C2=A0
=
<snip>
...



2.2=C2=A0 Scalability

=C2=A0 =C2=A0(R2a) A single service node PE can be associated with many acc= ess
=C2=A0 =C2=A0node PEs. The following requirements give a quantitative measu= re.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0(R2b) A service node PE MUST support thousand(s) head-end conn= ections
=C2=A0 =C2=A0for a a given access node PE connecting to different overlay V= RF
=C2=A0 =C2=A0services on that service node.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0(R2c) A service node PE MUST support thousand(s) head-end conn= ections
=C2=A0 =C2=A0to many access node PEs.


/* [JORGE] It is hard to understand... should the following be better?:

=E2=80=9C (R2b) A service node PE MUST support head-end functionality for thousands of access node PEs that are connected to different VRFs on the service node.
=C2=A0 (R2c) A service node PE MUST support hundreds of thousands of CE
connections through the attached access nodes."
*/


Sami: will update.

<snip>



2.5 Multi-homing

=C2=A0 =C2=A0TBD

/* [JORGE] The solution should describe how to handle multi-homing at two levels:
- Access node multi-homed to 2 or more Service nodes
- CE node multi-homed to 2 or more access nodes (this one should be
aligned with the EVPN-VPWS draft)
*/


Sami: Please have a look at the update= d section in 01, as for the CE node agreed that it should be aligned with E= VPN-VPWS, and hence no need to mention anything about it in the draft.
=

<snip>




4 Solution Overview


=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0+---------+=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0+---------+
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0|=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0|=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0|=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0|
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 +----+=C2=A0 =C2=A0+-----+ | IP/MPLS | +-----+ | IP/MP= LS |
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 | CE |---| PE1 |-| Access=C2=A0 |-| PE2 |-| Core=C2=A0= =C2=A0 |
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 +----+=C2=A0 =C2=A0+-----+ | Network | +-----+ | Netwo= rk |
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0|=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0|=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0|=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0|
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0+---------+=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0+---------+
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 <---- EVP= N-VPWS ----><---- IP/MAC VRF --->


=C2=A0 =C2=A0Figure 1: EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway.
=C2=A0 =C2=A0AN: Access node
=C2=A0 =C2=A0SE: Service Edge node.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway Operation

/* [JORGE] Should this be section 4.1 on its own? */
<= br>
Sami: sure will do.


=C2=A0 =C2=A0At the service edge node, the EVPN Per-EVI Ethernet A-D routes= will
=C2=A0 =C2=A0be advertised with the ESI set to 0 and the Ethernet tag-id se= t to
=C2=A0 =C2=A0(wildcard 0xFFFFFFF). The Ethernet A-D routes will have a uniq= ue RD
=C2=A0 =C2=A0and will be associated with 2 BGP RT(s), one RT corresponding = to the
=C2=A0 =C2=A0underlay EVI i.e. the EVPN VPWS transport service that's c= onfigured
=C2=A0 =C2=A0only among the service edge nodes, and one corresponding to th= e L2,
=C2=A0 =C2=A0L3 or EVPN overlay service.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0At the access nodes, the EVPN per-EVI Ethernet A-D routes will= be
=C2=A0 =C2=A0advertised as described in [draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vp= ws>] with the ESI
=C2=A0 =C2=A0field is set to 0 and for single homed CEs and to the CE's= ESI for
=C2=A0 =C2=A0multi-homed CE's and the Ethernet Tag field will be set to= the VPWS
=C2=A0 =C2=A0service instance identifier that identifies the EVPL or EPL se= rvice.
=C2=A0 =C2=A0The Ethernet-AD route will have a unique RD and will be associ= ated
=C2=A0 =C2=A0with one BGP RT corresponding to the L2, L3 or EVPN overlay se= rvice
=C2=A0 =C2=A0that will be transported over this EVPN VPWS transport service= .

/* [JORGE] What do you mean by EVPN overlay service in this context? why is it different from L2 or L3 service? should this be clarified in the
introduction?
Also by L2 and L3 are you referring to the encapsulation? i.e. L2 means
ethernet over the EVI label and L3 IP over the EVI label? */

/* [JORGE] If the service RTs are the same in the access and core network,<= br> PE2 should have two different peering sessions, one to the RR in the
access network and one to the core RR. Is that the intend? if so, it may be good to clarify */


Sami:Can you please look at the update= d version 01 and see what comments still apply?




=C2=A0 =C2=A0Service edge nodes on the underlay EVI will determine the prim= ary
=C2=A0 =C2=A0service node terminating the VPWS transport service and offeri= ng the
=C2=A0 =C2=A0L2, L3 or Ethernet VPN service by running the on HWR algorithm= as
=C2=A0 =C2=A0described in [draft-mohanty-l2vpn-evpn-df-election <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mohanty= -l2vpn-evpn-df-election>] using weight
=C2=A0 =C2=A0[VPWS service identifier, Service Edge Node IP address]. This = ensure
=C2=A0 =C2=A0that service node(s) will consistently pick the primary servic= e node
=C2=A0 =C2=A0even after service node failure. Upon primary service node fai= lure,
=C2=A0 =C2=A0all other remaining services nodes will choose another service= node
=C2=A0 =C2=A0correctly and consistently.

/*[JORGE] Following EVPN, the DF election is based on the exchange of ES routes. Hence the assumption is that the two service nodes should
advertise ES routes with a system-level ESI and an AD route per ES with
the same ESI? The service node DF for a given service should send an AD per= -EVI route with the P indication in the new EC defined in EVPN-VPWS. I beli= eve all the
existing procedures should be used, are you defining new ones? */



Sami: Please have a look at 01.
=C2= =A0

=C2=A0 =C2=A0Single-sided signaling mechanism is used. The Service PE node = that is
=C2=A0 =C2=A0a DF for accepts to terminate the VPWS transport service from = an
=C2=A0 =C2=A0access node, the primary service edge node shall:- Dynamically= create
=C2=A0 =C2=A0an interface to terminate the service and shall attach this in= terface
=C2=A0 =C2=A0to the overlay VPN service required by the access node to serv= ice its
=C2=A0 =C2=A0customer edge device.- Responds to the Eth A-D route per EVI f= rom the
=C2=A0 =C2=A0access node by sending its own Eth A-D per EVI route by settin= g the
=C2=A0 =C2=A0same VPWS service instance ID and downstream assigned MPLS lab= el to
=C2=A0 =C2=A0be used by the access node.

/* [JORGE] Need to correct the format: the two bullets must go in
different lines */



Sure will do.
=C2=A0

=C2=A0 <snip>

4.1 Multi-homing

/* [JORGE] how bout the following scenario:

Here AN1 and AN2 have a ESI for the CE. Regular EVPN-VPWS procedures
should apply.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0+---------+= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0+---------+
+----+=C2=A0 =C2=A0+-----+ |=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0| +-----+ |= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0|
| CE +---+ AN1 +-+=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0+-+ SE2 +-+=C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0|
+--+-+=C2=A0 =C2=A0+-----+ | IP/MPLS | +-----+ | IP/MPLS |
=C2=A0 =C2=A0|=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0| Access=C2= =A0 |=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0| Core=C2=A0 =C2=A0 |
=C2=A0 =C2=A0|=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0+-----+ | Network | +-----+ | Network | =C2=A0 =C2=A0+-----+ AN2 +-+=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0+-+ SE3 +-+= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0|
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0+-----+ |=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0| +-----+ |=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0|
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0+---------+= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0+---------+
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 <-----EVPN-VPWS-----><--= ---IP/MAC VRF---->

*/


Sami: Exactly, regular EVPN VPWS should apply, and he= nce why do we need to mention it?

Thanks,

Sami




From:=C2=A0 BESS on behalf of Sami Boutros
Date:=C2=A0 Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 11:13 PM
To:=C2=A0 "bess@ietf.org" Subject:=C2=A0 [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway


Hi,


The draft proposes a dynamic mechanism to terminate the VPWS transport serv= ice at a service PE into an overlay L2 or L3 service based on a single side= provisioning at the access PE.

https://tools.ietf.o= rg/html/draft-boutros-bess-evpn-vpws-service-edge-gateway-01


Thanks,


Sami


--089e013c60c0c4bbb305227b23f2-- From nobody Mon Oct 19 15:17:13 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietf.org Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D83F41B2CE6; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:17:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.6.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151019221708.30261.19853.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:17:08 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-02.txt X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 22:17:09 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled Services Working Group of the IETF. Title : A Network Virtualization Overlay Solution using EVPN Authors : Ali Sajassi John Drake Nabil Bitar Aldrin Isaac James Uttaro Wim Henderickx Filename : draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-02.txt Pages : 27 Date : 2015-10-19 Abstract: This document describes how Ethernet VPN (EVPN) [RFC7432] can be used as an Network Virtualization Overlay (NVO) solution and explores the various tunnel encapsulation options over IP and their impact on the EVPN control-plane and procedures. In particular, the following encapsulation options are analyzed: VXLAN, NVGRE, and MPLS over GRE. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Mon Oct 19 15:21:24 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietf.org Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6A21B2D9D; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:21:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.6.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151019222114.26845.16439.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:21:14 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-01.txt X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 22:21:15 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled Services Working Group of the IETF. Title : Integrated Routing and Bridging in EVPN Authors : Ali Sajassi Samer Salam Samir Thoria Yakov Rekhter John E. Drake Lucy Yong Linda Dunbar Filename : draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-01.txt Pages : 26 Date : 2015-10-19 Abstract: EVPN provides an extensible and flexible multi-homing VPN solution for intra-subnet connectivity among hosts/VMs over an MPLS/IP network. However, there are scenarios in which inter-subnet forwarding among hosts/VMs across different IP subnets is required, while maintaining the multi-homing capabilities of EVPN. This document describes an Integrated Routing and Bridging (IRB) solution based on EVPN to address such requirements. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-01 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Mon Oct 19 23:21:36 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDEE51A1A9F for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 23:21:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gSTu0UgXKOp5 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 23:21:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEE8F1A1AF0 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 23:21:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1974; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1445322085; x=1446531685; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=BmKihoZriYGQxbu9a/Y3zMRfD+LzvNUoMss9+NsO3GE=; b=jJ3x5PQVw6NpiJ/1SNJ9XfsLe8GHdrkZPb7xOZFrYtI138ayZE2Z5jn+ GNPPK+FpWliZKWq717n1lyWTHYnQJ4ejPdgGf6XFMjFFGd4kn0EuFCcZA rYtG/EZQjBr57KUj2Q+mT5BUpc53mJvf8N3Hsbg5IFPCSs7vdrVW86RfY 4=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ABAgB23CVW/5xdJa1egzZUbwa+EAENgVoXCoV9AoFBOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqELgEBBAEBAWsLEAIBCEYnCyUCBAENBYgwDcRgAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFASLdYUNAgWELgWNEjmIWAGFGIgEgViEPJIZg24BHwEBQoQDcgGEYIEGAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,706,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="42642834" Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Oct 2015 06:21:25 +0000 Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9K6LPcx030092 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 20 Oct 2015 06:21:25 GMT Received: from xch-aln-005.cisco.com (173.36.7.15) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 01:21:06 -0500 Received: from xch-aln-005.cisco.com ([173.36.7.15]) by XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com ([173.36.7.15]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 01:21:06 -0500 From: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" To: Martin Vigoureux , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Slots requests for BESS WG session - IETF 94 - Yokohama Thread-Index: AQHRACEJksH4EbQaZ0W5aiUt/Qw1Op5n+WAAgAvj6YA= Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 06:21:06 +0000 Message-ID: References: <5613A10D.7030107@alcatel-lucent.com> <561B8186.50303@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <561B8186.50303@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.5.150821 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.19.76.53] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: <9447C8508EFF4C448E9BE6A26C6F6830@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "Ali Sajassi \(sajassi\)" Subject: Re: [bess] Slots requests for BESS WG session - IETF 94 - Yokohama X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 06:21:32 -0000 Hi Martin, I=B9d like to request the following slots: 1) draft: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-00.txt speaker: Ali Sajassi Duration: 10 min 2) draft: draft-sajassi-bess-pbb-evpn-anycast-ip-tunnels-00.txt speaker: Ali Sajassi Duration: 10 min 3) draft: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-l3vpn-multihoming-00.txt speaker: Ali Sajassi Duration: 10 min 4)=20 draft: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-02 speaker: Jakob Hietz Duration: 10 min Regards, Ali On 10/12/15, 2:46 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" wrote: >All, > >the BESS slot has been confirmed as originally scheduled: >Thursday, 5th of November, Afternoon session I 13:00-15:00 (local time) > >This is a reminder to send slot requests. > >Thank you >Regards > >Martin > >Le 06/10/2015 12:23, Martin Vigoureux a =E9crit : >> All, >> >> it is time we start building the BESS WG agenda for Yokohama. >> The IETF agenda is available at: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/94/agenda.html >> Please note that it is still a preliminary agenda. >> >> The BESS WG session (2h) is currently scheduled on >> Thursday, 5th of November, Afternoon session I 13:00-15:00 (local time) >> >> Please send us your request for a presentation slot, indicating: >> draft name, speaker and desired duration (covering presentation + >> discussion) >> >> Please send the requests no later than the 18th of October >> Thank you >> >> M&T >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BESS mailing list >> BESS@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BESS mailing list >> BESS@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess >> >> > >_______________________________________________ >BESS mailing list >BESS@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Mon Oct 19 23:35:23 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D66A1A1B66 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 23:35:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.51 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h7Ta2-Cuc5V6 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 23:35:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2E781A1B48 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 23:35:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1833; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1445322919; x=1446532519; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=0lUgQuE1YmuyXbMR5X/wYUafXhEi3TmREhfOhH2TaSU=; b=UrVbIkdt1UKg4fNFZG8DLxzWsGoC0zFIOOs6jyWwOmQFY5e+4E+8uGF+ scCFPbrPH/LLwzOLStE/Exnr4cjaPOGuvICmVT5rp05NRbhf9wQRqyrY0 m8Ua0IsHcOBGtg2DzoiNUFjsadGhV+OGZpuWzZy2teBpQvdpfmxuWR6Nl I=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D/AQDw3yVW/4YNJK1egmlNgUm+EAENgVqGHoFEOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEMAR5EgEMAXMnBAENiDXEcAEBAQEBAQEDAQEBAQEBAQEbi3WFDYQ1BZYjAXmHD4UUj0SMVwEfAQFChAOFU4EGAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,706,1437436800"; d="scan'208,217";a="199882004" Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 20 Oct 2015 06:35:19 +0000 Received: from XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (xch-aln-001.cisco.com [173.36.7.11]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9K6ZJoh023260 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 20 Oct 2015 06:35:19 GMT Received: from xch-aln-005.cisco.com (173.36.7.15) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 01:35:01 -0500 Received: from xch-aln-005.cisco.com ([173.36.7.15]) by XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com ([173.36.7.15]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 01:35:00 -0500 From: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" To: Martin Vigoureux , "thomas.morin@orange.com" Thread-Topic: Request for WG LC Thread-Index: AQHRCwFyhLxMuRdrsEK+/J+RaXNdZg== Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 06:35:00 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.5.150821 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.19.76.53] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D24B2EB415B9C6sajassiciscocom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] Request for WG LC X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 06:35:21 -0000 --_000_D24B2EB415B9C6sajassiciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Martin, Thomas: The authors of the following drafts would like to request for WG LC in the = order they are listed here. 1) draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-02 2) draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-01 3) draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-03.txt Regards, Ali --_000_D24B2EB415B9C6sajassiciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1245BAC055FAE244958E36610BC843BF@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Martin, Thomas:

The authors of the followi= ng drafts would like to request for WG LC in the order they are listed here= .

1) draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overla= y-02

2) draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subne= t-forwarding-01

3) draft-ietf-bess-evpn= -etree-03.txt

Regards,
Ali
--_000_D24B2EB415B9C6sajassiciscocom_-- From nobody Wed Oct 21 03:59:07 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D7D1A87CB for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 03:59:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.911 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QfDYmNgMFWlH for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 03:58:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E6B21A87C4 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 03:58:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 2A0789305DA85 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:58:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.112]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t9LAwd3a027899 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:58:51 +0200 Received: from [135.238.176.55] (135.239.27.38) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:58:44 +0200 Message-ID: <56276FE4.4030300@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:58:44 +0200 From: Martin Vigoureux User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: BESS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [135.239.27.38] Archived-At: Subject: [bess] Draft agenda for BESS @IETF94 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:59:05 -0000 Hi everyone, You can find our *draft* agenda at: https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/agenda/agenda-94-bess Note well that this agenda is subject to change. Do no hesitate to send us your feedback and comments. M&T From nobody Wed Oct 21 06:35:55 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADAA61A878E for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 06:35:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.911 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vgTcMP7vEpaI for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 06:35:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6B761A8778 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 06:35:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 61018E4B6AF4C for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:35:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.112]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t9LDZM1G024386 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 15:35:45 +0200 Received: from [135.238.176.55] (135.239.27.41) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 15:35:32 +0200 Message-ID: <562794A4.7020306@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 15:35:32 +0200 From: Martin Vigoureux User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: BESS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [135.239.27.41] Archived-At: Subject: [bess] Presentation material for BESS in Yokohama X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: "bess-chairs@ietf.org" List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:35:53 -0000 Hello, Please send to *both Thomas and I* your presentation material before Sunday the 1st of November at midnight, local time, at the latest. Please make sure it is consistent with the time allocated to it in the agenda: https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/agenda/agenda-94-bess Thank you M&T From nobody Wed Oct 21 06:39:10 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE8131A8712 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 06:39:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.41 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.41 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IXHASH_X1=1.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vzw_ybjuQRlZ for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 06:39:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F3661A01EC for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 06:39:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 13C822368F95B for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:39:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.112]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t9LDcnA2001677 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 15:39:04 +0200 Received: from FR711WXCHMBA07.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.3.17]) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.112]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 15:38:51 +0200 From: "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" To: "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: IPR related to draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover Thread-Index: AQHRDAXRAs+bMMVRGEyt7B/swwhX9A== Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:38:50 +0000 Message-ID: <2DC8453E-92D0-4E65-AB63-FF1D03B0280F@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.151008 x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.41] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2DC8453E92D04E65AB63FF1D03B0280Falcatellucentcom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: [bess] IPR related to draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:39:08 -0000 --_000_2DC8453E92D04E65AB63FF1D03B0280Falcatellucentcom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 QXR0YWNoZWQgaXMgdGhlIElQUiB3ZSBkaXNjbG9zZWQgcmVjZXRubHkgcmVsYXRlZCB0byB0aGlz IGRyYWZ0Og0KDQpodHRwczovL2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2lwci8yNjk3Lw0KaHR0cHM6 Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9pcHIvMjY5Ni8NCg0KDQo= --_000_2DC8453E92D04E65AB63FF1D03B0280Falcatellucentcom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWw+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxtZXRhIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIgY29udGVudD0i dGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij4NCjwvaGVhZD4NCjxib2R5IHN0eWxlPSJ3b3JkLXdy YXA6IGJyZWFrLXdvcmQ7IC13ZWJraXQtbmJzcC1tb2RlOiBzcGFjZTsgLXdlYmtpdC1saW5lLWJy ZWFrOiBhZnRlci13aGl0ZS1zcGFjZTsgY29sb3I6IHJnYigwLCAwLCAwKTsgZm9udC1zaXplOiAx NHB4OyBmb250LWZhbWlseTogQ2FsaWJyaSwgc2Fucy1zZXJpZjsiPg0KPGRpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8 ZGl2PkF0dGFjaGVkIGlzIHRoZSBJUFIgd2UgZGlzY2xvc2VkIHJlY2V0bmx5IHJlbGF0ZWQgdG8g dGhpcyBkcmFmdDo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+PGJyPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBzdHlsZT0i Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IENvbnNvbGFzOyI+PGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cHM6Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRm Lm9yZy9pcHIvMjY5Ny8iPmh0dHBzOi8vZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaXByLzI2OTcvPC9h PjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IENvbnNvbGFzOyI+PGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0 cHM6Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9pcHIvMjY5Ni8iPmh0dHBzOi8vZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIu aWV0Zi5vcmcvaXByLzI2OTYvPC9hPjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2IHN0eWxlPSJmb250LWZh bWlseTogQ29uc29sYXM7Ij48YnI+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXYgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiBD b25zb2xhczsiPjxicj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxkaXYgaWQ9Ik1BQ19PVVRMT09LX1NJR05B VFVSRSI+PC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2JvZHk+DQo8L2h0bWw+DQo= --_000_2DC8453E92D04E65AB63FF1D03B0280Falcatellucentcom_-- From nobody Wed Oct 21 08:44:20 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9291A90A0 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 08:44:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xm6n7121oi5q for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 08:44:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A106B1A9095 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 08:44:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from us70uusmtp4.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.5.2.66]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 3FCBFBEC8FE5 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 15:44:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from US70UWXCHHUB02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70uwxchhub02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.49]) by us70uusmtp4.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t9LFiEwl005103 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 15:44:14 GMT Received: from SG70XWXCHHUB02.zap.alcatel-lucent.com (135.253.2.47) by US70UWXCHHUB02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (135.5.2.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:44:13 -0400 Received: from SG70YWXCHMBA08.zap.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.8.119]) by SG70XWXCHHUB02.zap.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.253.2.47]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 23:44:10 +0800 From: "Singh, Kanwar (Kanwar)" To: "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: IPR related to draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover Thread-Index: AQHRDAXRAs+bMMVRGEyt7B/swwhX9J52Fhag Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 15:44:09 +0000 Message-ID: <86AA02A13EFDC94AACC733E1F8B7BC09461C3F@SG70YWXCHMBA08.zap.alcatel-lucent.com> References: <2DC8453E-92D0-4E65-AB63-FF1D03B0280F@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <2DC8453E-92D0-4E65-AB63-FF1D03B0280F@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.253.19.16] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_86AA02A13EFDC94AACC733E1F8B7BC09461C3FSG70YWXCHMBA08zap_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] IPR related to draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 15:44:19 -0000 --_000_86AA02A13EFDC94AACC733E1F8B7BC09461C3FSG70YWXCHMBA08zap_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SVBSIGRpc2Nsb3N1cmVzIHJlbGF0ZWQgdG8gYWJvdmUgZHJhZnQgY2FuIGJlIGZvdW5kIGF0IGZv bGxvd2luZyBsb2NhdGlvbjotDQoNCmh0dHBzOi8vZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaXByLzI2 OTcvDQpodHRwczovL2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2lwci8yNjk2Lw0KDQpUaGFua3MsDQpL YW53YXINCg0KRnJvbTogQkVTUyBbbWFpbHRvOmJlc3MtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10gT24gQmVo YWxmIE9mIEhlbmRlcmlja3gsIFdpbSAoV2ltKQ0KU2VudDogV2VkbmVzZGF5LCBPY3RvYmVyIDIx LCAyMDE1IDY6MzkgQU0NClRvOiBiZXNzQGlldGYub3JnDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBbYmVzc10gSVBSIHJl bGF0ZWQgdG8gZHJhZnQtbW9yaW4tYmVzcy1tdnBuLWZhc3QtZmFpbG92ZXINCg0KQXR0YWNoZWQg aXMgdGhlIElQUiB3ZSBkaXNjbG9zZWQgcmVjZXRubHkgcmVsYXRlZCB0byB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0Og0K DQpodHRwczovL2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2lwci8yNjk3Lw0KaHR0cHM6Ly9kYXRhdHJh Y2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9pcHIvMjY5Ni8NCg0KDQo= --_000_86AA02A13EFDC94AACC733E1F8B7BC09461C3FSG70YWXCHMBA08zap_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWwgeG1sbnM6dj0idXJuOnNjaGVtYXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTp2bWwiIHhtbG5zOm89InVy bjpzY2hlbWFzLW1pY3Jvc29mdC1jb206b2ZmaWNlOm9mZmljZSIgeG1sbnM6dz0idXJuOnNjaGVt YXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTpvZmZpY2U6d29yZCIgeG1sbnM6bT0iaHR0cDovL3NjaGVtYXMubWlj cm9zb2Z0LmNvbS9vZmZpY2UvMjAwNC8xMi9vbW1sIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcv VFIvUkVDLWh0bWw0MCI+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxtZXRhIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIg Y29udGVudD0idGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij4NCjxtZXRhIG5hbWU9IkdlbmVyYXRv ciIgY29udGVudD0iTWljcm9zb2Z0IFdvcmQgMTIgKGZpbHRlcmVkIG1lZGl1bSkiPg0KPHN0eWxl PjwhLS0NCi8qIEZvbnQgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8NCkBmb250LWZhY2UNCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6 IkNhbWJyaWEgTWF0aCI7DQoJcGFub3NlLTE6MiA0IDUgMyA1IDQgNiAzIDIgNDt9DQpAZm9udC1m YWNlDQoJe2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OkNhbGlicmk7DQoJcGFub3NlLTE6MiAxNSA1IDIgMiAyIDQgMyAy IDQ7fQ0KQGZvbnQtZmFjZQ0KCXtmb250LWZhbWlseTpUYWhvbWE7DQoJcGFub3NlLTE6MiAxMSA2 IDQgMyA1IDQgNCAyIDQ7fQ0KQGZvbnQtZmFjZQ0KCXtmb250LWZhbWlseTpDb25zb2xhczsNCglw YW5vc2UtMToyIDExIDYgOSAyIDIgNCAzIDIgNDt9DQovKiBTdHlsZSBEZWZpbml0aW9ucyAqLw0K cC5Nc29Ob3JtYWwsIGxpLk1zb05vcm1hbCwgZGl2Lk1zb05vcm1hbA0KCXttYXJnaW46MGluOw0K CW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206LjAwMDFwdDsNCglmb250LXNpemU6MTIuMHB0Ow0KCWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5 OiJUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4iLCJzZXJpZiI7fQ0KYTpsaW5rLCBzcGFuLk1zb0h5cGVybGluaw0K CXttc28tc3R5bGUtcHJpb3JpdHk6OTk7DQoJY29sb3I6Ymx1ZTsNCgl0ZXh0LWRlY29yYXRpb246 dW5kZXJsaW5lO30NCmE6dmlzaXRlZCwgc3Bhbi5Nc29IeXBlcmxpbmtGb2xsb3dlZA0KCXttc28t c3R5bGUtcHJpb3JpdHk6OTk7DQoJY29sb3I6cHVycGxlOw0KCXRleHQtZGVjb3JhdGlvbjp1bmRl cmxpbmU7fQ0Kc3Bhbi5FbWFpbFN0eWxlMTcNCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXR5cGU6cGVyc29uYWwtcmVw bHk7DQoJZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IkNhbGlicmkiLCJzYW5zLXNlcmlmIjsNCgljb2xvcjojMUY0OTdE O30NCi5Nc29DaHBEZWZhdWx0DQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS10eXBlOmV4cG9ydC1vbmx5Ow0KCWZvbnQt c2l6ZToxMC4wcHQ7fQ0KQHBhZ2UgV29yZFNlY3Rpb24xDQoJe3NpemU6OC41aW4gMTEuMGluOw0K CW1hcmdpbjoxLjBpbiAxLjBpbiAxLjBpbiAxLjBpbjt9DQpkaXYuV29yZFNlY3Rpb24xDQoJe3Bh Z2U6V29yZFNlY3Rpb24xO30NCi0tPjwvc3R5bGU+PCEtLVtpZiBndGUgbXNvIDldPjx4bWw+DQo8 bzpzaGFwZWRlZmF1bHRzIHY6ZXh0PSJlZGl0IiBzcGlkbWF4PSIxMDI2IiAvPg0KPC94bWw+PCFb ZW5kaWZdLS0+PCEtLVtpZiBndGUgbXNvIDldPjx4bWw+DQo8bzpzaGFwZWxheW91dCB2OmV4dD0i ZWRpdCI+DQo8bzppZG1hcCB2OmV4dD0iZWRpdCIgZGF0YT0iMSIgLz4NCjwvbzpzaGFwZWxheW91 dD48L3htbD48IVtlbmRpZl0tLT4NCjwvaGVhZD4NCjxib2R5IGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIiBsaW5rPSJi bHVlIiB2bGluaz0icHVycGxlIj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9IldvcmRTZWN0aW9uMSI+DQo8cCBjbGFz cz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjExLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTom cXVvdDtDYWxpYnJpJnF1b3Q7LCZxdW90O3NhbnMtc2VyaWYmcXVvdDs7Y29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+ SVBSIGRpc2Nsb3N1cmVzIHJlbGF0ZWQgdG8gYWJvdmUgZHJhZnQgY2FuIGJlIGZvdW5kIGF0IGZv bGxvd2luZyBsb2NhdGlvbjotPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05v cm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2Fs aWJyaSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1b3Q7O2NvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPjxvOnA+Jm5i c3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBz dHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjVwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTpDb25zb2xhcztjb2xvcjpibGFjayI+ PGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cHM6Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9pcHIvMjY5Ny8iPmh0dHBzOi8v ZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaXByLzI2OTcvPC9hPjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4N CjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuNXB0O2ZvbnQt ZmFtaWx5OkNvbnNvbGFzO2NvbG9yOmJsYWNrIj48YSBocmVmPSJodHRwczovL2RhdGF0cmFja2Vy LmlldGYub3JnL2lwci8yNjk2LyI+aHR0cHM6Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9pcHIvMjY5 Ni88L2E+PG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4g c3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC41cHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6Q29uc29sYXM7Y29sb3I6YmxhY2si PjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFu IHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0NhbGlicmkmcXVvdDss JnF1b3Q7c2Fucy1zZXJpZiZxdW90Oztjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEIj5UaGFua3MsPG86cD48L286cD48 L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZTox MS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1 b3Q7O2NvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPkthbndhcjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0K PHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1m YW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1b3Q7O2NvbG9yOiMx RjQ5N0QiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxkaXY+DQo8ZGl2IHN0eWxlPSJi b3JkZXI6bm9uZTtib3JkZXItdG9wOnNvbGlkICNCNUM0REYgMS4wcHQ7cGFkZGluZzozLjBwdCAw aW4gMGluIDBpbiI+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48Yj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1z aXplOjEwLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtUYWhvbWEmcXVvdDssJnF1b3Q7c2Fucy1zZXJp ZiZxdW90OyI+RnJvbTo8L3NwYW4+PC9iPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0O2Zv bnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O1RhaG9tYSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1b3Q7Ij4gQkVT UyBbbWFpbHRvOmJlc3MtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10NCjxiPk9uIEJlaGFsZiBPZiA8L2I+SGVu ZGVyaWNreCwgV2ltIChXaW0pPGJyPg0KPGI+U2VudDo8L2I+IFdlZG5lc2RheSwgT2N0b2JlciAy MSwgMjAxNSA2OjM5IEFNPGJyPg0KPGI+VG86PC9iPiBiZXNzQGlldGYub3JnPGJyPg0KPGI+U3Vi amVjdDo8L2I+IFtiZXNzXSBJUFIgcmVsYXRlZCB0byBkcmFmdC1tb3Jpbi1iZXNzLW12cG4tZmFz dC1mYWlsb3ZlcjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFz cz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxkaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4N CjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuNXB0O2ZvbnQt ZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0NhbGlicmkmcXVvdDssJnF1b3Q7c2Fucy1zZXJpZiZxdW90Oztjb2xvcjpi bGFjayI+QXR0YWNoZWQgaXMgdGhlIElQUiB3ZSBkaXNjbG9zZWQgcmVjZXRubHkgcmVsYXRlZCB0 byB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0OjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNs YXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuNXB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5 OiZxdW90O0NhbGlicmkmcXVvdDssJnF1b3Q7c2Fucy1zZXJpZiZxdW90Oztjb2xvcjpibGFjayI+ PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNs YXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuNXB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5 OkNvbnNvbGFzO2NvbG9yOmJsYWNrIj48YSBocmVmPSJodHRwczovL2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYu b3JnL2lwci8yNjk3LyI+aHR0cHM6Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9pcHIvMjY5Ny88L2E+ PG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1h bCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC41cHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6Q29uc29sYXM7Y29s b3I6YmxhY2siPjxhIGhyZWY9Imh0dHBzOi8vZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaXByLzI2OTYv Ij5odHRwczovL2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2lwci8yNjk2LzwvYT48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwv c3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxz cGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuNXB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OkNvbnNvbGFzO2NvbG9yOmJs YWNrIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFz cz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjVwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTpD b25zb2xhcztjb2xvcjpibGFjayI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+ DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2JvZHk+DQo8L2h0bWw+DQo= --_000_86AA02A13EFDC94AACC733E1F8B7BC09461C3FSG70YWXCHMBA08zap_-- From nobody Wed Oct 21 10:17:36 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2F61AD2F2 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:17:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kmo5VoZXcxs6 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:17:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpgre-esg-01.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D5BD1B2ABF for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:17:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.122]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 466556C3CDCA5 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:17:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712wxchhub03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.74]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t9LHHVHP007205 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 19:17:31 +0200 Received: from FR711WXCHMBA07.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.3.17]) by FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 19:17:31 +0200 From: "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" To: "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: RE : [bess] draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover Thread-Index: AQHRCLwlcMgj3LrPpkW2hA6YqmHqEJ51zVwAgABd5ID//+AhgIAAKguA///fkoCAACJFAA== Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:17:30 +0000 Message-ID: <4B07E599-5C75-43AF-8793-64D73875ACE1@alcatel-lucent.com> References: <4FE032A5-DC55-4562-A3C6-029AC0020FD5@alcatel-lucent.com> <56278BF4.4070602@orange.com> <0FC5BAB9-F467-4E2F-A9DB-F9D4834D1B9A@alcatel-lucent.com> <7697_1445445628_5627BFFC_7697_4182_1_rmljtho91r9jb3kg06kkok8j.1445445598305@email.android.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.151008 x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.41] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4B07E5995C7543AF879364D73875ACE1alcatellucentcom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:17:35 -0000 --_000_4B07E5995C7543AF879364D73875ACE1alcatellucentcom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 QmVzaWRlcyB0aGUgYmVsb3cgSVBSIEkgYW0gbm90IGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBvdGhlciBJUCByZWxh dGVkIHRvIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQNCg0KaHR0cHM6Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9pcHIvMjY5 Ny8NCmh0dHBzOi8vZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaXByLzI2OTYvDQo= --_000_4B07E5995C7543AF879364D73875ACE1alcatellucentcom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWw+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxtZXRhIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIgY29udGVudD0i dGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij4NCjwvaGVhZD4NCjxib2R5IHN0eWxlPSJ3b3JkLXdy YXA6IGJyZWFrLXdvcmQ7IC13ZWJraXQtbmJzcC1tb2RlOiBzcGFjZTsgLXdlYmtpdC1saW5lLWJy ZWFrOiBhZnRlci13aGl0ZS1zcGFjZTsgY29sb3I6IHJnYigwLCAwLCAwKTsgZm9udC1zaXplOiAx NHB4OyBmb250LWZhbWlseTogQ2FsaWJyaSwgc2Fucy1zZXJpZjsiPg0KPGRpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8 ZGl2PkJlc2lkZXMgdGhlIGJlbG93IElQUiBJIGFtIG5vdCBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgb3RoZXIgSVAg cmVsYXRlZCB0byB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0PC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj48YnI+DQo8 L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8ZGl2IHN0eWxlPSJmb250LWZhbWlseTogQ29uc29sYXM7Ij48YSBocmVm PSJodHRwczovL2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2lwci8yNjk3LyI+aHR0cHM6Ly9kYXRhdHJh Y2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9pcHIvMjY5Ny88L2E+PC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2IHN0eWxlPSJmb250LWZhbWls eTogQ29uc29sYXM7Ij48YSBocmVmPSJodHRwczovL2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2lwci8y Njk2LyI+aHR0cHM6Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9pcHIvMjY5Ni88L2E+PC9kaXY+DQo8 L2Rpdj4NCjwvYm9keT4NCjwvaHRtbD4NCg== --_000_4B07E5995C7543AF879364D73875ACE1alcatellucentcom_-- From nobody Wed Oct 21 11:59:57 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081971A92AE for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:59:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XP7J2mWo9L5k for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:59:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D3901A92AB for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:59:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from us70uusmtp4.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.5.2.66]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 91E03A3B655FE for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:59:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from US70UWXCHHUB02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70uwxchhub02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.49]) by us70uusmtp4.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t9LIxpAW019187 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:59:51 GMT Received: from SG70YWXCHHUB04.zap.alcatel-lucent.com (135.253.2.38) by US70UWXCHHUB02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (135.5.2.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:59:50 -0400 Received: from SG70YWXCHMBA08.zap.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.8.119]) by SG70YWXCHHUB04.zap.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.253.2.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 02:59:21 +0800 From: "Singh, Kanwar (Kanwar)" To: "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover Thread-Index: AQHRCLwlcMgj3LrPpkW2hA6YqmHqEJ51zVwAgABd5ID//+AhgIAAKguA///fkoCAACJFAIAABeSg Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:59:20 +0000 Message-ID: <86AA02A13EFDC94AACC733E1F8B7BC09462016@SG70YWXCHMBA08.zap.alcatel-lucent.com> References: <4FE032A5-DC55-4562-A3C6-029AC0020FD5@alcatel-lucent.com> <56278BF4.4070602@orange.com> <0FC5BAB9-F467-4E2F-A9DB-F9D4834D1B9A@alcatel-lucent.com> <7697_1445445628_5627BFFC_7697_4182_1_rmljtho91r9jb3kg06kkok8j.1445445598305@email.android.com> <4B07E599-5C75-43AF-8793-64D73875ACE1@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <4B07E599-5C75-43AF-8793-64D73875ACE1@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.253.19.18] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_86AA02A13EFDC94AACC733E1F8B7BC09462016SG70YWXCHMBA08zap_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:59:56 -0000 --_000_86AA02A13EFDC94AACC733E1F8B7BC09462016SG70YWXCHMBA08zap_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 QmVzaWRlIHRoZSBiZWxvdyBJUFIsIEkgYW0gbm90IGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBvdGhlciBJUCByZWxh dGVkIHRvIHRoZSBkcmFmdC4NCg0KaHR0cHM6Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9pcHIvMjY5 Ny8NCmh0dHBzOi8vZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaXByLzI2OTYvDQoNClRoYW5rcywNCkth bndhcg0KDQpGcm9tOiBCRVNTIFttYWlsdG86YmVzcy1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnXSBPbiBCZWhh bGYgT2YgSGVuZGVyaWNreCwgV2ltIChXaW0pDQpTZW50OiBXZWRuZXNkYXksIE9jdG9iZXIgMjEs IDIwMTUgMTA6MTggQU0NClRvOiBiZXNzQGlldGYub3JnDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogW2Jlc3NdIGRy YWZ0LW1vcmluLWJlc3MtbXZwbi1mYXN0LWZhaWxvdmVyDQoNCkJlc2lkZXMgdGhlIGJlbG93IElQ UiBJIGFtIG5vdCBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgb3RoZXIgSVAgcmVsYXRlZCB0byB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0DQoN Cmh0dHBzOi8vZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaXByLzI2OTcvDQpodHRwczovL2RhdGF0cmFj a2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2lwci8yNjk2Lw0K --_000_86AA02A13EFDC94AACC733E1F8B7BC09462016SG70YWXCHMBA08zap_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWwgeG1sbnM6dj0idXJuOnNjaGVtYXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTp2bWwiIHhtbG5zOm89InVy bjpzY2hlbWFzLW1pY3Jvc29mdC1jb206b2ZmaWNlOm9mZmljZSIgeG1sbnM6dz0idXJuOnNjaGVt YXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTpvZmZpY2U6d29yZCIgeG1sbnM6eD0idXJuOnNjaGVtYXMtbWljcm9z b2Z0LWNvbTpvZmZpY2U6ZXhjZWwiIHhtbG5zOm09Imh0dHA6Ly9zY2hlbWFzLm1pY3Jvc29mdC5j b20vb2ZmaWNlLzIwMDQvMTIvb21tbCIgeG1sbnM9Imh0dHA6Ly93d3cudzMub3JnL1RSL1JFQy1o dG1sNDAiPg0KPGhlYWQ+DQo8bWV0YSBodHRwLWVxdWl2PSJDb250ZW50LVR5cGUiIGNvbnRlbnQ9 InRleHQvaHRtbDsgY2hhcnNldD11dGYtOCI+DQo8bWV0YSBuYW1lPSJHZW5lcmF0b3IiIGNvbnRl bnQ9Ik1pY3Jvc29mdCBXb3JkIDEyIChmaWx0ZXJlZCBtZWRpdW0pIj4NCjxzdHlsZT48IS0tDQov KiBGb250IERlZmluaXRpb25zICovDQpAZm9udC1mYWNlDQoJe2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJDYW1icmlh IE1hdGgiOw0KCXBhbm9zZS0xOjIgNCA1IDMgNSA0IDYgMyAyIDQ7fQ0KQGZvbnQtZmFjZQ0KCXtm b250LWZhbWlseTpDYWxpYnJpOw0KCXBhbm9zZS0xOjIgMTUgNSAyIDIgMiA0IDMgMiA0O30NCkBm b250LWZhY2UNCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6VGFob21hOw0KCXBhbm9zZS0xOjIgMTEgNiA0IDMgNSA0 IDQgMiA0O30NCkBmb250LWZhY2UNCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6Q29uc29sYXM7DQoJcGFub3NlLTE6 MiAxMSA2IDkgMiAyIDQgMyAyIDQ7fQ0KLyogU3R5bGUgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8NCnAuTXNvTm9y bWFsLCBsaS5Nc29Ob3JtYWwsIGRpdi5Nc29Ob3JtYWwNCgl7bWFyZ2luOjBpbjsNCgltYXJnaW4t Ym90dG9tOi4wMDAxcHQ7DQoJZm9udC1zaXplOjEyLjBwdDsNCglmb250LWZhbWlseToiVGltZXMg TmV3IFJvbWFuIiwic2VyaWYiO30NCmE6bGluaywgc3Bhbi5Nc29IeXBlcmxpbmsNCgl7bXNvLXN0 eWxlLXByaW9yaXR5Ojk5Ow0KCWNvbG9yOmJsdWU7DQoJdGV4dC1kZWNvcmF0aW9uOnVuZGVybGlu ZTt9DQphOnZpc2l0ZWQsIHNwYW4uTXNvSHlwZXJsaW5rRm9sbG93ZWQNCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXBy aW9yaXR5Ojk5Ow0KCWNvbG9yOnB1cnBsZTsNCgl0ZXh0LWRlY29yYXRpb246dW5kZXJsaW5lO30N CnNwYW4uRW1haWxTdHlsZTE3DQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS10eXBlOnBlcnNvbmFsLXJlcGx5Ow0KCWZv bnQtZmFtaWx5OiJDYWxpYnJpIiwic2Fucy1zZXJpZiI7DQoJY29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RDt9DQouTXNv Q2hwRGVmYXVsdA0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtdHlwZTpleHBvcnQtb25seTsNCglmb250LXNpemU6MTAu MHB0O30NCkBwYWdlIFdvcmRTZWN0aW9uMQ0KCXtzaXplOjguNWluIDExLjBpbjsNCgltYXJnaW46 MS4waW4gMS4waW4gMS4waW4gMS4waW47fQ0KZGl2LldvcmRTZWN0aW9uMQ0KCXtwYWdlOldvcmRT ZWN0aW9uMTt9DQotLT48L3N0eWxlPjwhLS1baWYgZ3RlIG1zbyA5XT48eG1sPg0KPG86c2hhcGVk ZWZhdWx0cyB2OmV4dD0iZWRpdCIgc3BpZG1heD0iMTAyNiIgLz4NCjwveG1sPjwhW2VuZGlmXS0t PjwhLS1baWYgZ3RlIG1zbyA5XT48eG1sPg0KPG86c2hhcGVsYXlvdXQgdjpleHQ9ImVkaXQiPg0K PG86aWRtYXAgdjpleHQ9ImVkaXQiIGRhdGE9IjEiIC8+DQo8L286c2hhcGVsYXlvdXQ+PC94bWw+ PCFbZW5kaWZdLS0+DQo8L2hlYWQ+DQo8Ym9keSBsYW5nPSJFTi1VUyIgbGluaz0iYmx1ZSIgdmxp bms9InB1cnBsZSI+DQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJXb3JkU2VjdGlvbjEiPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05v cm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2Fs aWJyaSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1b3Q7O2NvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPkJlc2lkZSB0 aGUgYmVsb3cgSVBSLCBJIGFtIG5vdCBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgb3RoZXIgSVAgcmVsYXRlZCB0byB0 aGUgZHJhZnQuPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNw YW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90 OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1b3Q7O2NvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+ PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6 MTAuNXB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OkNvbnNvbGFzO2NvbG9yOmJsYWNrIj48YSBocmVmPSJodHRwczov L2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2lwci8yNjk3LyI+aHR0cHM6Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRm Lm9yZy9pcHIvMjY5Ny88L2E+PG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05v cm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC41cHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6Q29uc29sYXM7 Y29sb3I6YmxhY2siPjxhIGhyZWY9Imh0dHBzOi8vZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaXByLzI2 OTYvIj5odHRwczovL2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2lwci8yNjk2LzwvYT48bzpwPjwvbzpw Pjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXpl OjExLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtDYWxpYnJpJnF1b3Q7LCZxdW90O3NhbnMtc2VyaWYm cXVvdDs7Y29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xh c3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6 JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1b3Q7O2NvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0Qi PlRoYW5rcyw8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3Bh biBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjExLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtDYWxpYnJpJnF1b3Q7 LCZxdW90O3NhbnMtc2VyaWYmcXVvdDs7Y29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+S2Fud2FyPG86cD48L286cD48 L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZTox MS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1 b3Q7O2NvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxkaXY+DQo8 ZGl2IHN0eWxlPSJib3JkZXI6bm9uZTtib3JkZXItdG9wOnNvbGlkICNCNUM0REYgMS4wcHQ7cGFk ZGluZzozLjBwdCAwaW4gMGluIDBpbiI+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48Yj48c3BhbiBz dHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtUYWhvbWEmcXVvdDssJnF1 b3Q7c2Fucy1zZXJpZiZxdW90OyI+RnJvbTo8L3NwYW4+PC9iPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNp emU6MTAuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O1RhaG9tYSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlm JnF1b3Q7Ij4gQkVTUyBbbWFpbHRvOmJlc3MtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10NCjxiPk9uIEJlaGFs ZiBPZiA8L2I+SGVuZGVyaWNreCwgV2ltIChXaW0pPGJyPg0KPGI+U2VudDo8L2I+IFdlZG5lc2Rh eSwgT2N0b2JlciAyMSwgMjAxNSAxMDoxOCBBTTxicj4NCjxiPlRvOjwvYj4gYmVzc0BpZXRmLm9y Zzxicj4NCjxiPlN1YmplY3Q6PC9iPiBSZTogW2Jlc3NdIGRyYWZ0LW1vcmluLWJlc3MtbXZwbi1m YXN0LWZhaWxvdmVyPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxwIGNs YXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPGRpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8ZGl2 Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC41cHQ7Zm9u dC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1b3Q7O2NvbG9y OmJsYWNrIj5CZXNpZGVzIHRoZSBiZWxvdyBJUFIgSSBhbSBub3QgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IG90aGVy IElQIHJlbGF0ZWQgdG8gdGhpcyBkcmFmdDxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0K PC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0i Zm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjVwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtDYWxpYnJpJnF1b3Q7LCZxdW90O3Nh bnMtc2VyaWYmcXVvdDs7Y29sb3I6YmxhY2siPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4N CjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0i Zm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjVwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTpDb25zb2xhcztjb2xvcjpibGFjayI+PGEgaHJl Zj0iaHR0cHM6Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9pcHIvMjY5Ny8iPmh0dHBzOi8vZGF0YXRy YWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaXByLzI2OTcvPC9hPjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2 Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAu NXB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OkNvbnNvbGFzO2NvbG9yOmJsYWNrIj48YSBocmVmPSJodHRwczovL2Rh dGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2lwci8yNjk2LyI+aHR0cHM6Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9y Zy9pcHIvMjY5Ni88L2E+PG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwv ZGl2Pg0KPC9ib2R5Pg0KPC9odG1sPg0K --_000_86AA02A13EFDC94AACC733E1F8B7BC09462016SG70YWXCHMBA08zap_-- From nobody Thu Oct 22 02:17:55 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B06411A00E4 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 02:17:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oNAw9LNU3Djm for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 02:17:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16A391A00F4 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 02:17:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BZD40864; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 09:17:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nkgeml409-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.40) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 10:17:40 +0100 Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.75]) by nkgeml409-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.40]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:17:35 +0800 From: Haoweiguo To: "sajassi@cisco.com" Thread-Topic: Comments on "draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-00" Thread-Index: AdEMpjj259K5iE8ETHms059lGH4czQ== Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 09:17:35 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.135.23.94] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DD5FC8DE455C3348B94340C0AB5517334F8D2D28nkgeml501mbschi_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Cc: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] Comments on "draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-00" X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 09:17:53 -0000 --_000_DD5FC8DE455C3348B94340C0AB5517334F8D2D28nkgeml501mbschi_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ali, I have read through the draft, i think the procedures is fine for IGMP/MLD = proxy. However, this draft doesn't consider multicast router scenario, bett= er to be added. Scenario 1: An EVPN PE acts as multicast router and runs PIM protocol with the= outside multicast routers. Scenario 2: An EVPN PE connects to a multicast router on port1, no IGMP receiv= er on the port. The PE sends IGMP/MLD to the multicast router. In both scenarios, the EVPN PE should announce its role through the extende= d route type6 to indicate it connects to a multicast router or acts as mult= icast router itself. Other EVPN PEs having local multicast source should forward the multicast t= raffic to the PE announcing multicast router role, the PE announcing multic= ast router role should not be pruned for all multicast traffic. For the PE connecting to a multicast router, it should translate EVPN rout= e type-6 message to IGMP/MLD message, it's already described in your draft.= For the PE acting as multicast router, it should translate EVPN route type= -6 message to PIM protocol, this part has not been covered in your draft, b= etter to be added. Thanks, weiguo --_000_DD5FC8DE455C3348B94340C0AB5517334F8D2D28nkgeml501mbschi_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Ali,

I have read through the draft, i think= the procedures is fine for IGMP/MLD proxy. However, this draft doesn't con= sider multicast router scenario, better to be added.

Scenario 1:

      &n= bsp;  An EVPN PE acts as multicast router and runs PIM protocol with t= he outside multicast routers.

Scenario 2:

      &n= bsp;  An EVPN PE connects to a multicast router on port1, no IGMP rece= iver on the port.  The PE sends IGMP/MLD to the multicast router.=

 

In both scenarios, the EVPN= PE should announce its role through the extended route type6 to indicate i= t connects to a multicast router or acts as multicast router itself.

Other EVPN PEs having local multicast = source should forward the multicast traffic to the PE announcing multicast = router role, the PE announcing multicast router role should not be pruned f= or all multicast traffic.

For the PE connecting to a multicast router, it s= hould translate  EVPN route type-6 message to IGMP/MLD message, it's a= lready described in your draft. For the PE acting as multicast router, it should translate= EVPN route type-6 message to PIM protocol, this part has not been covered = in your draft, better to be added.

 

Thanks,

weiguo

--_000_DD5FC8DE455C3348B94340C0AB5517334F8D2D28nkgeml501mbschi_-- From nobody Thu Oct 22 08:35:10 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26AC1B38E0 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 08:31:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.194 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.194 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id acnbL-_gCOXd for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 08:31:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from r-mail2.rd.orange.com (r-mail2.rd.orange.com [217.108.152.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8AD1B38DA for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 08:31:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from r-mail2.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 035FF16C00F; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:31:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.194.32.11]) by r-mail2.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF46116C006; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:31:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.193.71.12] (10.193.71.12) by FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (10.194.32.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:31:24 +0200 From: Thomas Morin To: Organization: Orange Message-ID: <5629014C.30508@orange.com> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:31:24 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc@tools.ietf.org Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 15:31:30 -0000 Hello working group, This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc-03 [1] as a working group item. Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). This poll runs until **November 13th**. (3 weeks to account for the busy IETF week) *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). ==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author and contributor. If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thank you, Martin & Thomas bess chairs [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc-03 From nobody Thu Oct 22 16:22:15 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietf.org Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 191CB1B3014; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:22:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: IETF Secretariat To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.7.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151022232213.7481.58674.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:22:13 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: bess@ietf.org, ipr-announce@ietf.org Subject: [bess] IPR Disclosure Alcatel-Lucent's Statement about IPR related to draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 23:22:13 -0000 Dear Thomas Morin, Robert Kebler: An IPR disclosure that pertains to your Internet-Draft entitled "Multicast VPN fast upstream failover" (draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover) was submitted to the IETF Secretariat on and has been posted on the "IETF Page of Intellectual Property Rights Disclosures" (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2696/). The title of the IPR disclosure is "Alcatel-Lucent's Statement about IPR related to draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover" Thank you IETF Secretariat From nobody Thu Oct 22 16:35:52 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C701A8AD4 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:35:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.609 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.609 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YJzWmergFsrJ for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:35:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SNT004-OMC1S4.hotmail.com (snt004-omc1s4.hotmail.com [65.55.90.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D52FC1A8ACA for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:35:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SNT147-W5 ([65.55.90.9]) by SNT004-OMC1S4.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:35:48 -0700 X-TMN: [EWslKM9m0Z7KIIn7drVxiS+f9PbBO0R0] X-Originating-Email: [jkotalwar@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_0c8b8ac7-134e-479d-8b3e-1250550c6023_" From: Jayant To: "bess@ietf.org" Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:35:47 -0700 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <86AA02A13EFDC94AACC733E1F8B7BC09462016@SG70YWXCHMBA08.zap.alcatel-lucent.com> References: <4FE032A5-DC55-4562-A3C6-029AC0020FD5@alcatel-lucent.com>, <56278BF4.4070602@orange.com>, <0FC5BAB9-F467-4E2F-A9DB-F9D4834D1B9A@alcatel-lucent.com>, <7697_1445445628_5627BFFC_7697_4182_1_rmljtho91r9jb3kg06kkok8j.1445445598305@email.android.com>, , , <4B07E599-5C75-43AF-8793-64D73875ACE1@alcatel-lucent.com>, <86AA02A13EFDC94AACC733E1F8B7BC09462016@SG70YWXCHMBA08.zap.alcatel-lucent.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Oct 2015 23:35:48.0327 (UTC) FILETIME=[61520770:01D10D22] Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 23:35:50 -0000 --_0c8b8ac7-134e-479d-8b3e-1250550c6023_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Besides the below IPR=2C I am not aware of any other IP related to the draf= t. https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2697/https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2= 696/ From: kanwar.singh@alcatel-lucent.com To: bess@ietf.org Date: Wed=2C 21 Oct 2015 18:59:20 +0000 Subject: Re: [bess] draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Beside the below IPR=2C I am not aware of any other IP related to the draft= .=0A= =0A= https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2697/=0A= https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2696/=0A= =0A= Thanks=2C=0A= Kanwar=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org]=0A= On Behalf Of Henderickx=2C Wim (Wim) =0A= Sent: Wednesday=2C October 21=2C 2015 10:18 AM =0A= To: bess@ietf.org =0A= Subject: Re: [bess] draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Besides the below IPR I am not aware of any other IP related to this draft= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2697/=0A= =0A= =0A= https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2696/=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= _______________________________________________=0A= BESS mailing list=0A= BESS@ietf.org=0A= https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess = --_0c8b8ac7-134e-479d-8b3e-1250550c6023_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Besides the below IPR=2C I am not aware of any oth= er IP related to the draft.
 =3B

From: kanwar.singh@alcatel-lucent.com
To: bess@ietf.org
Date: We= d=2C 21 Oct 2015 18:59:20 +0000
Subject: Re: [bess] draft-morin-bess-mvp= n-fast-failover

=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A=
=0A=

Besid= e the below IPR=2C I am not aware of any other IP related to the draft.

=0A=

 = =3B

=0A=

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2697/

=0A=

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2696/

=0A=

 = =3B

=0A=

Thank= s=2C

=0A=

Kanwa= r

=0A=

 = =3B

=0A=
=0A=
=0A=

From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org]=0A= On Behalf Of Henderickx=2C Wim (Wim)
=0A= Sent: Wednesday=2C October 21=2C 2015 10:18 AM
=0A= To: bess@ietf.org
=0A= Subject: Re: [bess] draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover

= =0A=
=0A=
=0A=

 =3B

=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
=0A=

Besides= the below IPR I am not aware of any other IP related to this draft<= /p>=0A=

=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
=0A=

 = =3B

=0A=
=0A= =0A=
=0A= =0A= =0A=
_______________________________________________=0A= BESS mailing list=0A= BESS@ietf.org=0A= https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
= --_0c8b8ac7-134e-479d-8b3e-1250550c6023_-- From nobody Thu Oct 22 16:41:01 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C79121A8F4C for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:41:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lfrXZPyv9sgh for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:40:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6263B1A8BC1 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:40:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from us70uusmtp4.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.5.2.66]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 6A66C131A6B9 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 23:40:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from US70TWXCHHUB04.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70twxchhub04.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.36]) by us70uusmtp4.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t9MNesF6010416 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 23:40:54 GMT Received: from US70TWXCHMBA08.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.2.106]) by US70TWXCHHUB04.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.5.2.36]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 19:40:54 -0400 From: "Jain, Pradeep G (Pradeep)" To: "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover Thread-Index: AQHRCLwlcMgj3LrPpkW2hA6YqmHqEJ51zVwAgABd5ID//+AhgIAAKguA///fkoCAACJFAIAABeSggAI5L4D//75LwA== Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 23:40:53 +0000 Message-ID: <7D375B103ED4354D878B54138F7A8B1A0101CA36F3@US70TWXCHMBA08.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> References: <4FE032A5-DC55-4562-A3C6-029AC0020FD5@alcatel-lucent.com>, <56278BF4.4070602@orange.com>, <0FC5BAB9-F467-4E2F-A9DB-F9D4834D1B9A@alcatel-lucent.com>, <7697_1445445628_5627BFFC_7697_4182_1_rmljtho91r9jb3kg06kkok8j.1445445598305@email.android.com>, , , <4B07E599-5C75-43AF-8793-64D73875ACE1@alcatel-lucent.com>, <86AA02A13EFDC94AACC733E1F8B7BC09462016@SG70YWXCHMBA08.zap.alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.5.27.16] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7D375B103ED4354D878B54138F7A8B1A0101CA36F3US70TWXCHMBA0_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 23:41:00 -0000 --_000_7D375B103ED4354D878B54138F7A8B1A0101CA36F3US70TWXCHMBA0_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Besides the below IPR, I am not aware of any other IP related to the draft. https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2697/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2696/ Regards Pradeep From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jayant Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 4:36 PM To: bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover Besides the below IPR, I am not aware of any other IP related to the draft. https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2697/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2696/ ________________________________ From: kanwar.singh@alcatel-lucent.com To: bess@ietf.org Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:59:20 +0000 Subject: Re: [bess] draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover Beside the below IPR, I am not aware of any other IP related to the draft. https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2697/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2696/ Thanks, Kanwar From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Henderickx, Wim (Wim= ) Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 10:18 AM To: bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover Besides the below IPR I am not aware of any other IP related to this draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2697/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2696/ _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf= .org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess --_000_7D375B103ED4354D878B54138F7A8B1A0101CA36F3US70TWXCHMBA0_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Besides the below IPR, I am not aware of any other IP = related to the draft.

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2697/

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2696/

 

Regards<= /o:p>

Pradeep<= /o:p>

 

 <= /p>

 <= /p>

From: BESS [ma= ilto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jayant
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 4:36 PM
To: bess@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover

 

Besides the below IPR, I am not aware of any other IP = related to the draft.

 

 

From: kanwar.singh@alcatel-luc= ent.com
To: bess@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:59:20 +0000
Subject: Re: [bess] draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover

Beside the below IPR, I a= m not aware of any other IP related to the draft.

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2697/

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2696/

 

Thanks,

Kanwar

 

From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 10:18 AM
To: bess@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover

 

Besides the below IPR I am = not aware of any other IP related to this draft

 =


_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org ht= tps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

--_000_7D375B103ED4354D878B54138F7A8B1A0101CA36F3US70TWXCHMBA0_-- From nobody Thu Oct 22 23:40:46 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BAA91B2CAF for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 23:40:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bK1WjbUs4BIk for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 23:40:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FBD11B2CA9 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 23:40:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2948; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1445582442; x=1446792042; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=KAnQVA5URhRw8UXKLDHyG8BSgjNKGBvrci31thoqDv0=; b=iaxgDv1iEtdMVMkhtHHCJoTY1rwXb1Z1tNPP9iaC4RY17pFiOu4L1INX bf4z6sK2yp4ZFRUGRvdPx85x5ymAEC6xowSSnvJkUK6633rWqOvG5qA9i KiGZAgHxe/rCS28vumcCCnmeUaRlzS6LXhutTbmnQBG73qiSGT90A/P+t 8=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D7AQCe1SlW/5JdJa1bA4M2VG8Gvh8BDYFZIYV8AhyBKDgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhDIBAQEEIxFFDAICAgEIEQQBAQMCERIDAgICGRcUAQgIAgQBDQUIiCgNsk+ScQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgEgR6FVYR+hCoKBwErBAcLEAcGBAiCV4FFBZYrAYUYh36BX0iDd5YOAR8BAUKCFhiBVXIBhHkJFyOBBgEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,185,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="200333911" Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Oct 2015 06:40:42 +0000 Received: from XCH-ALN-017.cisco.com (xch-aln-017.cisco.com [173.36.7.27]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9N6efUC010829 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 23 Oct 2015 06:40:41 GMT Received: from xch-aln-017.cisco.com (173.36.7.27) by XCH-ALN-017.cisco.com (173.36.7.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 01:40:20 -0500 Received: from xch-aln-017.cisco.com ([173.36.7.27]) by XCH-ALN-017.cisco.com ([173.36.7.27]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 01:40:20 -0500 From: "Muhammad Durrani (mdurrani)" To: Thomas Morin , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc Thread-Index: AQHRDN64wzXXTLHLZk2QDFVXVFrzBZ54oK+A Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 06:40:20 +0000 Message-ID: References: <5629014C.30508@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <5629014C.30508@orange.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.24.232.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 06:40:44 -0000 SSBhbSBub3QgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IElQUiB0aGF0IGFwcGxpZXMgdG8gdGhpcyBkcmFmdC4NCg0K UmVnYXJkcywNCk11aGFtbWFkIER1cnJhbmkNClBSSU5DSVBBTCBFTkdJTkVFUi5FTkdJTkVFUklO Rw0KbWR1cnJhbmlAY2lzY28uY29tDQpQaG9uZTogKzEgNDA4IDUyNyA2OTIxDQpDaXNjbyBTeXN0 ZW1zIExpbWl0ZWQNCg0KDQoNCg0KVVMNCkNpc2NvLmNvbQ0KDQoNCg0KDQoNClRoaW5rIGJlZm9y ZSB5b3UgcHJpbnQuDQpUaGlzIGVtYWlsIG1heSBjb250YWluIGNvbmZpZGVudGlhbCBhbmQgcHJp dmlsZWdlZCBtYXRlcmlhbCBmb3IgdGhlIHNvbGUgdXNlIG9mIHRoZSBpbnRlbmRlZCByZWNpcGll bnQuIEFueSByZXZpZXcsIHVzZSwgZGlzdHJpYnV0aW9uIG9yIGRpc2Nsb3N1cmUgYnkgb3RoZXJz IGlzIHN0cmljdGx5IHByb2hpYml0ZWQuIElmIHlvdSBhcmUgbm90IHRoZSBpbnRlbmRlZCByZWNp cGllbnQgKG9yIGF1dGhvcml6ZWQgdG8gcmVjZWl2ZSBmb3IgdGhlIHJlY2lwaWVudCksIHBsZWFz ZSBjb250YWN0IHRoZSBzZW5kZXIgYnkgcmVwbHkgZW1haWwgYW5kIGRlbGV0ZSBhbGwgY29waWVz IG9mIHRoaXMgbWVzc2FnZS4NCkZvciBjb3Jwb3JhdGUgbGVnYWwgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24gZ28gdG86 DQpodHRwOi8vd3d3LmNpc2NvLmNvbS93ZWIvYWJvdXQvZG9pbmdfYnVzaW5lc3MvbGVnYWwvY3Jp L2luZGV4Lmh0bWwNCg0KDQoNCi0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQpGcm9tOiBUaG9t YXMgTW9yaW4gW21haWx0bzp0aG9tYXMubW9yaW5Ab3JhbmdlLmNvbV0gDQpTZW50OiBUaHVyc2Rh eSwgT2N0b2JlciAyMiwgMjAxNSA4OjMxIEFNDQpUbzogYmVzc0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KQ2M6IGRyYWZ0 LWhhby1iZXNzLWludGVyLW52bzMtdnBuLW9wdGlvbmNAdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcNClN1YmplY3Q6 IFBvbGwgZm9yIGFkb3B0aW9uOiBkcmFmdC1oYW8tYmVzcy1pbnRlci1udm8zLXZwbi1vcHRpb25j DQoNCkhlbGxvIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXAsDQoNClRoaXMgZW1haWwgc3RhcnRzIGEgdHdvLXdlZWsg cG9sbCBvbiBhZG9wdGluZw0KZHJhZnQtaGFvLWJlc3MtaW50ZXItbnZvMy12cG4tb3B0aW9uYy0w MyBbMV0gYXMgYSB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwIGl0ZW0uDQoNClBsZWFzZSBzZW5kIGNvbW1lbnRzIHRv IHRoZSBsaXN0IGFuZCBzdGF0ZSBpZiB5b3Ugc3VwcG9ydCBhZG9wdGlvbiBvciBub3QgKGluIHRo ZSBsYXRlciBjYXNlLCBwbGVhc2UgYWxzbyBzdGF0ZSB0aGUgcmVhc29ucykuDQoNClRoaXMgcG9s bCBydW5zIHVudGlsICoqTm92ZW1iZXIgMTN0aCoqLg0KKDMgd2Vla3MgdG8gYWNjb3VudCBmb3Ig dGhlIGJ1c3kgSUVURiB3ZWVrKQ0KDQoNCipDb2luY2lkZW50YWxseSosIHdlIGFyZSBhbHNvIHBv bGxpbmcgZm9yIGtub3dsZWRnZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQgYXBwbGllcyB0byB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0 LCB0byBlbnN1cmUgdGhhdCBJUFIgaGFzIGJlZW4gZGlzY2xvc2VkIGluIGNvbXBsaWFuY2Ugd2l0 aCBJRVRGIElQUiBydWxlcyAoc2VlIFJGQ3MgMzk3OSwgNDg3OSwgMzY2OSBhbmQgNTM3OCBmb3Ig bW9yZSBkZXRhaWxzKS4NCg0KPT0+ICpJZiogeW91IGFyZSBsaXN0ZWQgYXMgYSBkb2N1bWVudCBh dXRob3Igb3IgY29udHJpYnV0b3IgcGxlYXNlIHJlc3BvbmQgdG8gdGhpcyBlbWFpbCBhbmQgaW5k aWNhdGUgd2hldGhlciBvciBub3QgeW91IGFyZSBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgcmVsZXZhbnQgSVBSLg0K DQpUaGUgZHJhZnQgd2lsbCBub3QgYmUgYWRvcHRlZCB1bnRpbCBhIHJlc3BvbnNlIGhhcyBiZWVu IHJlY2VpdmVkIGZyb20gZWFjaCBhdXRob3IgYW5kIGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9yLg0KDQpJZiB5b3UgYXJl IG5vdCBsaXN0ZWQgYXMgYW4gYXV0aG9yIG9yIGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9yLCB0aGVuIHBsZWFzZSBleHBs aWNpdGx5IHJlc3BvbmQgb25seSBpZiB5b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgdGhhdCBoYXMg bm90IHlldCBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3NlZCBpbiBjb25mb3JtYW5jZSB3aXRoIElFVEYgcnVsZXMuDQoN ClRoYW5rIHlvdSwNCg0KTWFydGluICYgVGhvbWFzDQpiZXNzIGNoYWlycw0KDQpbMV0gaHR0cHM6 Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LWhhby1iZXNzLWludGVyLW52bzMtdnBuLW9wdGlv bmMtMDMNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0K From nobody Fri Oct 23 08:01:10 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D35D51A1DBD for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 08:01:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nDW8v67zUfDh for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 08:01:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34D971A1BF6 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 08:01:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CCY28964; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 15:01:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from DFWEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.72) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:01:00 +0100 Received: from DFWEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.50]) by dfweml702-chm ([10.193.5.72]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 08:00:54 -0700 From: Lucy yong To: Thomas Morin , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc Thread-Index: AQHRDN7F1uISSeRJZEmY4pEtUdIXGp55LCaQ Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 15:00:53 +0000 Message-ID: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D571FFEE1@dfweml701-chm> References: <5629014C.30508@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <5629014C.30508@orange.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.47.146.215] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Cc: "draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 15:01:10 -0000 U3VwcG9ydCEgVGhpcyBpcyBhIHVzZWZ1bC9lZmZlY3QgbWV0aG9kIGZvciBEQ0kuDQoNCkkgYW0g bm90IGF3YXJlIG9mIGFuIElQUiByZWxhdGVkIHRvIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQuDQoNCkx1Y3kNCg0KLS0t LS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCkZyb206IFRob21hcyBNb3JpbiBbbWFpbHRvOnRob21h cy5tb3JpbkBvcmFuZ2UuY29tXSANClNlbnQ6IFRodXJzZGF5LCBPY3RvYmVyIDIyLCAyMDE1IDEw OjMxIEFNDQpUbzogYmVzc0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KQ2M6IGRyYWZ0LWhhby1iZXNzLWludGVyLW52bzMt dnBuLW9wdGlvbmNAdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcNClN1YmplY3Q6IFBvbGwgZm9yIGFkb3B0aW9uOiBk cmFmdC1oYW8tYmVzcy1pbnRlci1udm8zLXZwbi1vcHRpb25jDQoNCkhlbGxvIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3Jv dXAsDQoNClRoaXMgZW1haWwgc3RhcnRzIGEgdHdvLXdlZWsgcG9sbCBvbiBhZG9wdGluZw0KZHJh ZnQtaGFvLWJlc3MtaW50ZXItbnZvMy12cG4tb3B0aW9uYy0wMyBbMV0gYXMgYSB3b3JraW5nIGdy b3VwIGl0ZW0uDQoNClBsZWFzZSBzZW5kIGNvbW1lbnRzIHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0IGFuZCBzdGF0ZSBp ZiB5b3Ugc3VwcG9ydCBhZG9wdGlvbiBvciBub3QgKGluIHRoZSBsYXRlciBjYXNlLCBwbGVhc2Ug YWxzbyBzdGF0ZSB0aGUgcmVhc29ucykuDQoNClRoaXMgcG9sbCBydW5zIHVudGlsICoqTm92ZW1i ZXIgMTN0aCoqLg0KKDMgd2Vla3MgdG8gYWNjb3VudCBmb3IgdGhlIGJ1c3kgSUVURiB3ZWVrKQ0K DQoNCipDb2luY2lkZW50YWxseSosIHdlIGFyZSBhbHNvIHBvbGxpbmcgZm9yIGtub3dsZWRnZSBv ZiBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQgYXBwbGllcyB0byB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0LCB0byBlbnN1cmUgdGhhdCBJUFIg aGFzIGJlZW4gZGlzY2xvc2VkIGluIGNvbXBsaWFuY2Ugd2l0aCBJRVRGIElQUiBydWxlcyAoc2Vl IFJGQ3MgMzk3OSwgNDg3OSwgMzY2OSBhbmQgNTM3OCBmb3IgbW9yZSBkZXRhaWxzKS4NCg0KPT0+ ICpJZiogeW91IGFyZSBsaXN0ZWQgYXMgYSBkb2N1bWVudCBhdXRob3Igb3IgY29udHJpYnV0b3Ig cGxlYXNlIHJlc3BvbmQgdG8gdGhpcyBlbWFpbCBhbmQgaW5kaWNhdGUgd2hldGhlciBvciBub3Qg eW91IGFyZSBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgcmVsZXZhbnQgSVBSLg0KDQpUaGUgZHJhZnQgd2lsbCBub3Qg YmUgYWRvcHRlZCB1bnRpbCBhIHJlc3BvbnNlIGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlY2VpdmVkIGZyb20gZWFjaCBh dXRob3IgYW5kIGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9yLg0KDQpJZiB5b3UgYXJlIG5vdCBsaXN0ZWQgYXMgYW4gYXV0 aG9yIG9yIGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9yLCB0aGVuIHBsZWFzZSBleHBsaWNpdGx5IHJlc3BvbmQgb25seSBp ZiB5b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgdGhhdCBoYXMgbm90IHlldCBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3Nl ZCBpbiBjb25mb3JtYW5jZSB3aXRoIElFVEYgcnVsZXMuDQoNClRoYW5rIHlvdSwNCg0KTWFydGlu ICYgVGhvbWFzDQpiZXNzIGNoYWlycw0KDQpbMV0gaHR0cHM6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1s L2RyYWZ0LWhhby1iZXNzLWludGVyLW52bzMtdnBuLW9wdGlvbmMtMDMNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0K DQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0K From nobody Fri Oct 23 12:42:36 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE271A8A46 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 12:42:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qMt4F4ZY_6TB for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 12:42:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0119.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 033751A8A41 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 12:42:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=jPGgXNULAOQ8shhYRnDikUlcvCwU+wkXZF+60Cx+xlM=; b=HpyWv/9R1zuMAH7nNWlaTBez1Fh8w6LUKAEPAKADFBQYtLVNOeZH3KOjmSD2rKcRmjeVCql3YqsePo+BIAVenhEbzioKNwNhlBulo5qo/K4z2bl8AjMNYyFdm3bq8uLu2Vx/fS6mip6S9jXJ+b23MHNXDmAktNun3lBLYhJnllY= Received: from BY2PR0301MB0696.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.160.63.150) by BY2PR0301MB0695.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.160.63.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.306.13; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 19:42:27 +0000 Received: from BY2PR0301MB0696.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.63.150]) by BY2PR0301MB0696.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.63.150]) with mapi id 15.01.0300.010; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 19:42:27 +0000 From: Osama Zia To: Thomas Morin , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc Thread-Index: AQHRDN7BFugHVjnS30W7x+qwPmuyY555e+vg Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 19:42:27 +0000 Message-ID: References: <5629014C.30508@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <5629014C.30508@orange.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=osamaz@microsoft.com; x-originating-ip: [167.220.2.75] x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2PR0301MB0695; 5:Pp14oef6U0mokSW7FnBho8FKTw71OWnqWTkiGz1QGNZ/a0jD5ooej6779USeIpp0tZM1cZFFM+cxuE2OG0wAsXmfR+XFGNQMAvsAerrEpOrFVt44PC3rlS0SIhUOIrBf0jv2ttyvJ4lpOgf7NtXz+w==; 24:FWb9SRpInZzz7rTBi4zyYR3heiOFf2wnIRxDn+07Z4HeNoz0BqfZgcPbS+45PCAa5+9xCDGxYSR94SV485sCBjhoaVCHJ+SgVy0HEPx/vO8=; 20:nwFpyjr+O9OoZU3EE5yVi/PzsrSvqyKlTkzqNc2H6DZDWRM9exjKE8R6gGvv6gslxW+gT8i58DUAE2IV33Q9PQ== x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0695; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(189930954265078); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425024)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(520078)(5005006)(3002001)(102215026)(61426024)(61427024); SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0695; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0695; x-forefront-prvs: 0738AF4208 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(199003)(189002)(164054003)(13464003)(102836002)(2950100001)(86612001)(77096005)(54356999)(2900100001)(575784001)(106116001)(76176999)(10290500002)(10400500002)(230783001)(92566002)(50986999)(122556002)(8990500004)(105586002)(99286002)(76576001)(106356001)(5005710100001)(15975445007)(33656002)(5001770100001)(66066001)(86362001)(19580395003)(19580405001)(10090500001)(81156007)(101416001)(5003600100002)(74316001)(5008740100001)(189998001)(11100500001)(5002640100001)(40100003)(5001960100002)(87936001)(2501003)(5007970100001)(5004730100002)(97736004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0695; H:BY2PR0301MB0696.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 Oct 2015 19:42:27.3369 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR0301MB0695 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 19:42:35 -0000 U3VwcG9ydC4gSSBhbSBub3QgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IFBSLg0KDQpUaGFua3MsDQpPc2FtYQ0KDQot LS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQ0KRnJvbTogVGhvbWFzIE1vcmluIFttYWlsdG86dGhv bWFzLm1vcmluQG9yYW5nZS5jb21dIA0KU2VudDogVGh1cnNkYXksIE9jdG9iZXIgMjIsIDIwMTUg ODozMSBBTQ0KVG86IGJlc3NAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCkNjOiBkcmFmdC1oYW8tYmVzcy1pbnRlci1udm8z LXZwbi1vcHRpb25jQHRvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBQb2xsIGZvciBhZG9wdGlvbjog ZHJhZnQtaGFvLWJlc3MtaW50ZXItbnZvMy12cG4tb3B0aW9uYw0KDQpIZWxsbyB3b3JraW5nIGdy b3VwLA0KDQpUaGlzIGVtYWlsIHN0YXJ0cyBhIHR3by13ZWVrIHBvbGwgb24gYWRvcHRpbmcNCmRy YWZ0LWhhby1iZXNzLWludGVyLW52bzMtdnBuLW9wdGlvbmMtMDMgWzFdIGFzIGEgd29ya2luZyBn cm91cCBpdGVtLg0KDQpQbGVhc2Ugc2VuZCBjb21tZW50cyB0byB0aGUgbGlzdCBhbmQgc3RhdGUg aWYgeW91IHN1cHBvcnQgYWRvcHRpb24gb3Igbm90IChpbiB0aGUgbGF0ZXIgY2FzZSwgcGxlYXNl IGFsc28gc3RhdGUgdGhlIHJlYXNvbnMpLg0KDQpUaGlzIHBvbGwgcnVucyB1bnRpbCAqKk5vdmVt YmVyIDEzdGgqKi4NCigzIHdlZWtzIHRvIGFjY291bnQgZm9yIHRoZSBidXN5IElFVEYgd2VlaykN Cg0KDQoqQ29pbmNpZGVudGFsbHkqLCB3ZSBhcmUgYWxzbyBwb2xsaW5nIGZvciBrbm93bGVkZ2Ug b2YgYW55IElQUiB0aGF0IGFwcGxpZXMgdG8gdGhpcyBkcmFmdCwgdG8gZW5zdXJlIHRoYXQgSVBS IGhhcyBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3NlZCBpbiBjb21wbGlhbmNlIHdpdGggSUVURiBJUFIgcnVsZXMgKHNl ZSBSRkNzIDM5NzksIDQ4NzksIDM2NjkgYW5kIDUzNzggZm9yIG1vcmUgZGV0YWlscykuDQoNCj09 PiAqSWYqIHlvdSBhcmUgbGlzdGVkIGFzIGEgZG9jdW1lbnQgYXV0aG9yIG9yIGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9y IHBsZWFzZSByZXNwb25kIHRvIHRoaXMgZW1haWwgYW5kIGluZGljYXRlIHdoZXRoZXIgb3Igbm90 IHlvdSBhcmUgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IHJlbGV2YW50IElQUi4NCg0KVGhlIGRyYWZ0IHdpbGwgbm90 IGJlIGFkb3B0ZWQgdW50aWwgYSByZXNwb25zZSBoYXMgYmVlbiByZWNlaXZlZCBmcm9tIGVhY2gg YXV0aG9yIGFuZCBjb250cmlidXRvci4NCg0KSWYgeW91IGFyZSBub3QgbGlzdGVkIGFzIGFuIGF1 dGhvciBvciBjb250cmlidXRvciwgdGhlbiBwbGVhc2UgZXhwbGljaXRseSByZXNwb25kIG9ubHkg aWYgeW91IGFyZSBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQgaGFzIG5vdCB5ZXQgYmVlbiBkaXNjbG9z ZWQgaW4gY29uZm9ybWFuY2Ugd2l0aCBJRVRGIHJ1bGVzLg0KDQpUaGFuayB5b3UsDQoNCk1hcnRp biAmIFRob21hcw0KYmVzcyBjaGFpcnMNCg0KWzFdIGh0dHBzOi8vbmEwMS5zYWZlbGlua3MucHJv dGVjdGlvbi5vdXRsb29rLmNvbS8/dXJsPWh0dHBzJTNhJTJmJTJmdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmclMmZo dG1sJTJmZHJhZnQtaGFvLWJlc3MtaW50ZXItbnZvMy12cG4tb3B0aW9uYy0wMyZkYXRhPTAxJTdj MDElN2Nvc2FtYXolNDBtaWNyb3NvZnQuY29tJTdjNjY0YmY0YjRlMDg2NDE4MzczYTEwOGQyZGFm NWUyOWUlN2M3MmY5ODhiZjg2ZjE0MWFmOTFhYjJkN2NkMDExZGI0NyU3YzEmc2RhdGE9UE9NSFdw Y2lNbzBXTVF2YmlJaW5HUXBuVmtLV0N5N3IzaDNHT09JTmJoWSUzZA0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoN Cg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQo= From nobody Mon Oct 26 12:28:48 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C83B1B5164 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:28:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rgTyQznFyN-N for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:28:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0146.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD4141B5161 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:28:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from CO1PR05MB457.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.72.141) by BY2PR0501MB1829.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.163.155.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.306.13; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 19:28:42 +0000 Received: from CO1PR05MB457.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.4.133]) by CO1PR05MB457.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.4.133]) with mapi id 15.01.0306.003; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 19:28:42 +0000 From: Ravi Singh To: "EXT - thomas.morin@orange.com" , "bess@ietf.org" , "draft-singh-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags@tools.ietf.org" , Kireeti Kompella , "senad.palislamovic@alcatel-lucent.com" Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-singh-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags Thread-Index: AQHQ74pDNeta7cG52Ee/xjJ5NEKM655cn8gAgCHFyfA= Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 19:28:40 +0000 Message-ID: References: <11235_1442303016_55F7CC28_11235_334_2_55F7CC27.9020002@orange.com> <15187_1444030111_5612269F_15187_570_1_5612269E.9040106@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <15187_1444030111_5612269F_15187_570_1_5612269E.9040106@orange.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ravis@juniper.net; x-originating-ip: [66.129.239.11] x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2PR0501MB1829; 5:xIHXeYIGjkSW56a23uHFIgOg6ZHDID/RYA4lM0zhqzhLGgtDx78ZV2jUs7ISq5/RN4U1mjCqf9HwZSVhqfIIrm/7/ISR+H5UWIX8J8rqoU9TBxiq9VQos8yDc7mHo/o+KENCyHVSR4Z/r0eB14Pyjg==; 24:LwpdbQalegp19OzWBouJitjWjbWcPjmRhqjIfsAxPgO8Rh3fZOk2pUodmUdjbiPQHNeLJT3R+9yVqeFBcPwk+uDr6wI9WwcQzKIGRE/t4qs=; 20:mc4+OWu9gu4DFnyX9aqK2hrYUBWLTldRfT3GOF0bryfgLypUwlBwgzvcsH/jr59G349c8dU8QBR6uYZm9suHDA== x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR0501MB1829; x-ld-processed: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4,ExtAddr x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(138986009662008); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(520078)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(102215026); SRVR:BY2PR0501MB1829; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR0501MB1829; x-forefront-prvs: 0741C77572 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(199003)(377454003)(13464003)(189002)(5008740100001)(2201001)(40100003)(76176999)(66066001)(87936001)(19580395003)(19580405001)(5003600100002)(122556002)(54356999)(50986999)(86362001)(101416001)(1941001)(2950100001)(5001960100002)(5001770100001)(5890100001)(102836002)(97736004)(15975445007)(11100500001)(230783001)(92566002)(74316001)(76576001)(5004730100002)(107886002)(106356001)(2900100001)(189998001)(105586002)(5002640100001)(99286002)(106116001)(2501003)(561944003)(33656002)(10400500002)(81156007)(5007970100001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR0501MB1829; H:CO1PR05MB457.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 26 Oct 2015 19:28:40.8208 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR0501MB1829 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-singh-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 19:28:46 -0000 SGkgVGhvbWFzLCBNYXJ0aW4NCj4gQmVmb3JlIGFkb3B0aW5nIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQsIHdlIHdvdWxk IGxpa2UgaGVhciBwZW9wbGUgYWN0dWFsbHkgZXhwZXJpZW5jaW5nIHBhaW4NCj4gcmVsYXRlZCB0 byBub3Qgc29sdmluZyB0aGlzIGlzc3VlIGFuZCBoZWFyIGFib3V0IGltcGxlbWVudGF0aW9ucyBp biBhY3R1YWwNCj4gcHJvZHVjdHMuDQoNCkluIGEgbmV0d29yayB3aGVyZSBzb21lIEJHUC1WUExT IFBFcyBoYXZlIGFiaWxpdHkgdG8gaW5zZXJ0IENXIGFuZCBzb21lIGRvIG5vdCwgbm90IGltcGxl bWVudGluZyBzZWN0aW9uIDMgaGFzIHBvdGVudGlhbCB0byBjYXVzZSB0aGUgUFcgdG8gbm90IGNv bWUgdXAgb3IgY2F1c2UgZHJvcHBlZCBwYWNrZXRzIChkZXBlbmRpbmcgb24gaW1wbGVtZW50YXRp b24pLg0KU2VjdGlvbiAzIG9mIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQgaXMgaW1wbGVtZW50ZWQgaW4gSnVuT1MuIFNl ZSBsYXN0IHBhcmFncmFwaCBvbg0KaHR0cDovL3d3dy5qdW5pcGVyLm5ldC90ZWNocHVicy9lbl9V Uy9qdW5vczE0LjEvdG9waWNzL2NvbmNlcHQvdnBscy1iZ3AtY29udHJvbC13b3JkLW92ZXJ2aWV3 Lmh0bWwNClRoaXMgd2FzIGltcGxlbWVudGVkIGluIHJlc3BvbnNlIHRvIGEgc3BlY2lmaWMtbmV0 d29yay1kZXBsb3ltZW50LWlzc3VlLg0KDQpUaGUga2V5IGFzcGVjdCBvZiBSRkM0NzYxIHRoYXQg bmVjZXNzaXRhdGVzIHRoZSB0ZXh0IG9mIHNlY3Rpb24gMyBvZiB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0IGlzIHRoYXQg dGhlIE5MUkktYWR2ZXJ0aXNpbmctUEUgaXMgcHJlZGljYXRpbmcgb24gYWxsIG90aGVyIFBFcyBp biB0aGUgc2FtZSBWUExTLCB0aGF0IHRoZXkgbXVzdCBvciBtdXN0LW5vdCBpbnNlcnQgdGhlIENX LCBmb3IgZXhhbXBsZSwgcmVnYXJkbGVzcyBvZiB3aGV0aGVyIHRoZXkgaGF2ZSB0aGUgY2FwYWJp bGl0eSBvciBub3QuIFtTZWUgaHR0cHM6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL3JmYzQ3NjEjc2Vj dGlvbi0zLjIuNF0NClRoaXMgaXMgaW4gY29udHJhc3QgdG8gdGhlIHByb3Bvc2VkIG1vZGlmaWNh dGlvbiAoZm9yIGEgZGlmZmVyZW50IHB1cnBvc2UpIHdoZXJlIHRoaXMgUEUgaXMganVzdCBhZHZl cnRpc2luZyBpdHMgYWJpbGl0eSAoaHR0cHM6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LWll dGYtYmVzcy1mYXQtcHctYmdwLTAwI3NlY3Rpb24tMikNCg0KVGhlIHByb3Bvc2VkIHRleHQgaW4g c2VjdGlvbiAzIHByb3ZpZGVzIGEgd2F5IGFyb3VuZCBwcmVzdW1wdGlvbiBvZiBvdGhlci1QRXMn IGFiaWxpdGllcy4NClNlY3Rpb24gNCBwcm92aWRlcyBhbiBleHRlbnNpb24gb2YgdGhlIHNhbWUg aW50ZW50IGZvciBhIGRlcGxveW1lbnQgd2hlcmUgdGhlIHRyYW5zcG9ydCBMU1AgbWF5YmUgYSBw Mm1wIExTUC4NClNlY3Rpb24gNSBnZW5lcmFsaXplcyB0aGUgcHJldmlvdXMgc2VjdGlvbnMgYXMg ZGVwbG95ZWQgdG8gbXVsdGktaG9taW5nIHNjZW5hcmlvcy4NCg0KQm90aCBwMm1wIGFuZCBtdWx0 aS1ob21pbmcgaGF2ZSBzb21lIGRlcGxveW1lbnRzIGFuZCBtYXkgcnVuIGludG8gdGhlIGlzc3Vl Lg0KDQpSZWdhcmRzDQpSYXZpDQoNCg0KDQo+IC0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQo+ IEZyb206IHRob21hcy5tb3JpbkBvcmFuZ2UuY29tIFttYWlsdG86dGhvbWFzLm1vcmluQG9yYW5n ZS5jb21dDQo+IFNlbnQ6IE1vbmRheSwgT2N0b2JlciA1LCAyMDE1IDEyOjI5IEFNDQo+IFRvOiBi ZXNzQGlldGYub3JnOyBkcmFmdC1zaW5naC1iZXNzLWJncC12cGxzLWNvbnRyb2wtZmxhZ3NAdG9v bHMuaWV0Zi5vcmc7IFJhdmkNCj4gU2luZ2ggPHJhdmlzQGp1bmlwZXIubmV0PjsgS2lyZWV0aSBL b21wZWxsYSA8a2lyZWV0aUBqdW5pcGVyLm5ldD47DQo+IHNlbmFkLnBhbGlzbGFtb3ZpY0BhbGNh dGVsLWx1Y2VudC5jb20NCj4gU3ViamVjdDogUmU6IFtiZXNzXSBQb2xsIGZvciBhZG9wdGlvbjog ZHJhZnQtc2luZ2gtYmVzcy1iZ3AtdnBscy1jb250cm9sLWZsYWdzDQo+IA0KPiBBdXRob3JzIG9m IGRyYWZ0LXNpbmdoLWJlc3MtYmdwLXZwbHMtY29udHJvbC1mbGFncywgd29ya2luZyBncm91cCwN Cj4gDQo+IFRoZSBzdXBwb3J0IGJhc2UgZm9yIHRoaXMgcHJvcG9zYWwgaXMgbm90IGxhcmdlLg0K PiBCZWZvcmUgYWRvcHRpbmcgdGhpcyBkcmFmdCwgd2Ugd291bGQgbGlrZSBoZWFyIHBlb3BsZSBh Y3R1YWxseSBleHBlcmllbmNpbmcgcGFpbg0KPiByZWxhdGVkIHRvIG5vdCBzb2x2aW5nIHRoaXMg aXNzdWUgYW5kIGhlYXIgYWJvdXQgaW1wbGVtZW50YXRpb25zIGluIGFjdHVhbA0KPiBwcm9kdWN0 cy4NCj4gDQo+IExldCdzIGNvbnNpZGVyIHRoaXMgcG9sbCBmb3IgYWRvcHRpb24gb3BlbiB1bnRp bCB3ZSBoZWFyIG1vcmUuDQo+IA0KPiBCZXN0LA0KPiANCj4gVGhvbWFzL01hcnRpbg0KPiANCj4g DQo+IHRob21hcy5tb3JpbkBvcmFuZ2UuY29tIDoNCj4gPiBIZWxsbyB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwLA0K PiA+DQo+ID4gVGhpcyBlbWFpbCBzdGFydHMgYSB0d28td2VlayBwb2xsIG9uIGFkb3B0aW5nDQo+ ID4gZHJhZnQtc2luZ2gtYmVzcy1iZ3AtdnBscy1jb250cm9sLWZsYWdzLTAxIFsxXSBhcyBhIHdv cmtpbmcgZ3JvdXAgaXRlbS4NCj4gPg0KPiA+IFBsZWFzZSBzZW5kIGNvbW1lbnRzIHRvIHRoZSBs aXN0IGFuZCBzdGF0ZSBpZiB5b3Ugc3VwcG9ydCBhZG9wdGlvbiBvcg0KPiA+IG5vdCAoaW4gdGhl IGxhdGVyIGNhc2UsIHBsZWFzZSBhbHNvIHN0YXRlIHRoZSByZWFzb25zKS4NCj4gPg0KPiA+IFRo aXMgcG9sbCBydW5zIHVudGlsICoqU2VwdGVtYmVyIDI5dGgqKi4NCj4gPg0KPiA+DQo+ID4gKkNv aW5jaWRlbnRhbGx5Kiwgd2UgYXJlIGFsc28gcG9sbGluZyBmb3Iga25vd2xlZGdlIG9mIGFueSBJ UFIgdGhhdA0KPiA+IGFwcGxpZXMgdG8gdGhpcyBkcmFmdCwgdG8gZW5zdXJlIHRoYXQgSVBSIGhh cyBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3NlZCBpbg0KPiA+IGNvbXBsaWFuY2Ugd2l0aCBJRVRGIElQUiBydWxlcyAo c2VlIFJGQ3MgMzk3OSwgNDg3OSwgMzY2OSBhbmQgNTM3OCBmb3INCj4gPiBtb3JlIGRldGFpbHMp Lg0KPiA+DQo+ID4gPT0+ICpJZiogeW91IGFyZSBsaXN0ZWQgYXMgYSBkb2N1bWVudCBhdXRob3Ig b3IgY29udHJpYnV0b3IgcGxlYXNlDQo+ID4gcmVzcG9uZCB0byB0aGlzIGVtYWlsIGFuZCBpbmRp Y2F0ZSB3aGV0aGVyIG9yIG5vdCB5b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueQ0KPiA+IHJlbGV2YW50IElQ Ui4NCj4gPg0KPiA+IFRoZSBkcmFmdCB3aWxsIG5vdCBiZSBhZG9wdGVkIHVudGlsIGEgcmVzcG9u c2UgaGFzIGJlZW4gcmVjZWl2ZWQgZnJvbQ0KPiA+IGVhY2ggYXV0aG9yIGFuZCBjb250cmlidXRv ci4NCj4gPg0KPiA+IElmIHlvdSBhcmUgbm90IGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhbiBhdXRob3Igb3IgY29udHJp YnV0b3IsIHRoZW4gcGxlYXNlDQo+ID4gZXhwbGljaXRseSByZXNwb25kIG9ubHkgaWYgeW91IGFy ZSBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQgaGFzIG5vdCB5ZXQNCj4gPiBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3NlZCBp biBjb25mb3JtYW5jZSB3aXRoIElFVEYgcnVsZXMuDQo+ID4NCj4gPiBUaGFuayB5b3UsDQo+ID4N Cj4gPiBNYXJ0aW4gJiBUaG9tYXMNCj4gPiBiZXNzIGNoYWlycw0KPiA+DQo+ID4gWzFdDQo+ID4g aHR0cHM6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LXNpbmdoLWJlc3MtYmdwLXZwbHMtY29u dHJvbC1mbGFncw0KPiA+DQo+ID4NCj4gPg0KPiA+DQo+ID4NCj4gPg0KPiA+DQo+ID4NCj4gPg0K PiA+DQo+ID4NCj4gPg0KPiA+DQo+ID4NCj4gPg0KPiA+DQo+ID4NCj4gPg0KPiA+DQo+ID4NCj4g Pg0KPiA+DQo+IA0KPiANCj4gX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KPiBfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCj4gDQo+IENlIG1lc3NhZ2UgZXQgc2VzIHBp ZWNlcyBqb2ludGVzIHBldXZlbnQgY29udGVuaXIgZGVzIGluZm9ybWF0aW9ucw0KPiBjb25maWRl bnRpZWxsZXMgb3UgcHJpdmlsZWdpZWVzIGV0IG5lIGRvaXZlbnQgZG9uYyBwYXMgZXRyZSBkaWZm dXNlcywgZXhwbG9pdGVzIG91DQo+IGNvcGllcyBzYW5zIGF1dG9yaXNhdGlvbi4gU2kgdm91cyBh dmV6IHJlY3UgY2UgbWVzc2FnZSBwYXIgZXJyZXVyLCB2ZXVpbGxleiBsZQ0KPiBzaWduYWxlciBh IGwnZXhwZWRpdGV1ciBldCBsZSBkZXRydWlyZSBhaW5zaSBxdWUgbGVzIHBpZWNlcyBqb2ludGVz LiBMZXMgbWVzc2FnZXMNCj4gZWxlY3Ryb25pcXVlcyBldGFudCBzdXNjZXB0aWJsZXMgZCdhbHRl cmF0aW9uLCBPcmFuZ2UgZGVjbGluZSB0b3V0ZQ0KPiByZXNwb25zYWJpbGl0ZSBzaSBjZSBtZXNz YWdlIGEgZXRlIGFsdGVyZSwgZGVmb3JtZSBvdSBmYWxzaWZpZS4gTWVyY2kuDQo+IA0KPiBUaGlz IG1lc3NhZ2UgYW5kIGl0cyBhdHRhY2htZW50cyBtYXkgY29udGFpbiBjb25maWRlbnRpYWwgb3Ig cHJpdmlsZWdlZA0KPiBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiB0aGF0IG1heSBiZSBwcm90ZWN0ZWQgYnkgbGF3OyB0 aGV5IHNob3VsZCBub3QgYmUgZGlzdHJpYnV0ZWQsIHVzZWQNCj4gb3IgY29waWVkIHdpdGhvdXQg YXV0aG9yaXNhdGlvbi4NCj4gSWYgeW91IGhhdmUgcmVjZWl2ZWQgdGhpcyBlbWFpbCBpbiBlcnJv ciwgcGxlYXNlIG5vdGlmeSB0aGUgc2VuZGVyIGFuZCBkZWxldGUgdGhpcw0KPiBtZXNzYWdlIGFu ZCBpdHMgYXR0YWNobWVudHMuDQo+IEFzIGVtYWlscyBtYXkgYmUgYWx0ZXJlZCwgT3JhbmdlIGlz IG5vdCBsaWFibGUgZm9yIG1lc3NhZ2VzIHRoYXQgaGF2ZSBiZWVuDQo+IG1vZGlmaWVkLCBjaGFu Z2VkIG9yIGZhbHNpZmllZC4NCj4gVGhhbmsgeW91Lg0KDQo= From nobody Tue Oct 27 08:59:39 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B03ED1A9050 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 08:59:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.055 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.055 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ki8IxceTFk6J for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 08:59:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (hhc-web3.hickoryhill-consulting.com [64.9.205.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 804641A9107 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 08:59:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=74.43.47.177; From: "Susan Hares" To: "'Thomas Morin'" , References: <5629014C.30508@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <5629014C.30508@orange.com> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:59:29 -0400 Message-ID: <034701d110d0$76908600$63b19200$@ndzh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQHoo+MLUgKsp1miRtiAVnqOQoZOwZ5QUnaw Content-Language: en-us X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com Archived-At: Cc: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:59:38 -0000 Support as a co-author. I am not aware of any IPR relating to this = draft.=20 This option provides a highly scalable option for stitching NV03 = networks and MPLS/IP VPN for those devices which can provide = transport-layer stitching.=20 Sue Hares -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Morin [mailto:thomas.morin@orange.com]=20 Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 11:31 AM To: bess@ietf.org Cc: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc@tools.ietf.org Subject: Poll for adoption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc Hello working group, This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc-03 [1] as a working group item. Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or = not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). This poll runs until **November 13th**. (3 weeks to account for the busy IETF week) *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that = applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in = compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for = more details). =3D=3D> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please = respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any = relevant IPR. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from = each author and contributor. If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please = explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet = been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thank you, Martin & Thomas bess chairs [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc-03 From nobody Tue Oct 27 14:39:12 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D181A0390; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:39:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.51 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sCshU2ZD8DVm; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:39:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F28E1A1A43; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:39:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=21522; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1445981947; x=1447191547; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=CROVCLiDLr+6+ootjc6SumpzEoVFsHkXnF6AgCh0lMk=; b=kwqhZWv2QiJGI4wRpE/T5tUK6YsxRij51b4pD+tApuWBk/EL2ODAU9Wy 45Wxb9hUmFcCVx6DHl1tjDt9WjCW5XIsrd7dk3THiq0/6KFHTplzJx2+E L5Q5TvUCOyawRZlXWKyQNdPeOZpTYchA5FTGn/CxYZbDn2THkSW/48zrG U=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AYAgDd7S9W/4sNJK1egmlNgUm/BAENgVqDQ4JXgUg4FAEBAQEBAQF/C4Q1BHkSAYEAJwQOIIgVxW4BAQEBAQUBAQEBAR6GdwGJP0uENQWSY4NVAY0jgVmEP4MkiiaITwEfAQFCghYYgVaFWoEGAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,207,1444694400"; d="scan'208,217";a="202304753" Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Oct 2015 21:39:06 +0000 Received: from XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (xch-aln-004.cisco.com [173.36.7.14]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9RLd6pR027028 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 27 Oct 2015 21:39:06 GMT Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (173.36.7.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 16:38:42 -0500 Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 16:38:42 -0500 From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" To: "draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-02 Thread-Index: AQHREP/Zw7GhT2VtVUq2Og/eUCmx3g== Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 21:38:42 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.82.218.18] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D2556735E667Baretanaciscocom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "bess-chairs@ietf.org" , "VIGOUREUX, MARTIN \(MARTIN\)" , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-02 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 21:39:10 -0000 --_000_D2556735E667Baretanaciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear authors: I just finished reading this document. All of what is described in this document is straight forward, so much so t= hat it requires no change to existing technology, which makes me think that= users/operators have been able to do this all along. Is that correct? Is= there anything special that was missing that this document brings to light= ? Being one of several possible solutions for "network virtualization overlay= s within and/or between data centers", I'm wondering about the value of pub= lishing what amounts to a set of use cases without even discussing when the= ir use would be suitable (declared out of scope). I reviewed the discussio= ns on the lists (l3vpn/bess) and can clearly see why the Shepherd character= ized the document as "could have been considered controversial". Had I rev= iewed the document at adoption time I probably would have ended up in the r= ough side of the consensus. There's obviously no need to revisit the topic= of what do to with this document since clearly the WG Chairs believe there= is consensus to publish. I do have some other comments (below). In general some of the text could be= made easier to read (see some nits below). I would like to see my comment= about rfc2119 language addressed (and an update published) before starting= the IETF Last Call. Thanks! Alvaro. Major: 1. The use of rfc2119 keywords is not required. Note that in general th= ese keywords "MUST only be used where it is actually required for interoper= ation", but you're using them to apparently express requirements w/out spec= ific guidance or to restate what is normal network operation . For example= : * In Section 3.3. (CE Host Discovery) the text reads: "PE routers SH= OULD be able to discover their local CE hosts=85 PE routers could accomplis= h local CE host discovery by=85ARP or ND=85LLDP=85VDP), or even interaction= with the data center orchestration system=85" There is no specific mechan= ism mandated that supports the use of "SHOULD". * In Section 3.4. (ARP/ND Proxy): "PE routers SHOULD only respond to= an ARP request or Neighbor Solicitation (NS) message for a target host whe= n it has a best route for that target host in the associated VRF and the ou= tgoing interface of that best route is different from the one over which th= e ARP request or NS message is received." Isn't this how proxy ARP already= works? Am I missing something that requires the use of "SHOULD" in this d= ocument? * Section 4.3. (TTL and Traceroute) describes a limitation and then = says "=85unless special TTL processing for such case has been implemented (= e.g., if the source and destination addresses=85belong to the same extended= subnet, neither ingress nor egress PE routers SHOULD decrement the TTL=85T= TL of such packet SHOULD NOT be copied into the TTL of the transport=85" I= n this case the rfc2119 keywords are used as part of an example (e.g.)..whi= ch doesn't really support the use of "SHOULD/SHOULD NOT". Is the intent to= specify this "special processing" in this document? If so, why "SHOULD" a= nd not "MUST"? Algo, given that the text appears in the Limitations sectio= n, if you're mandating the "special processing" then it wouldn't be a limit= ation anymore.. Minor: 1. I think that RFC4761, 4762, 4659, 5798 and 6513 should be Information= al references. 2. You first use "VS" in Section 3.6. I'm assuming this is related to "= virtual subnet", but there's no explicit association. 3. Multicast. Section 3.2. (Multicast) says that for "IP multicast betw= een CE hosts of the same virtual subnet, MVPN technologies [RFC6513] could = be directly used without any change". I'm assuming that you're not referri= ng to link-local multicast (between hosts on the same subnet) because later= (Section 4.2) you say that "link-local multicast traffic cannot be support= ed". Please clarify in 3.2 what type of multicast you're talking about, an= d/or which you're not. 4. Section 4.3. (TTL and Traceroute). What does this mean: "traceroute = output would reflect the fact that these two hosts belonging to the same su= bnet are actually connected via an virtual subnet emulated by ARP proxy, ra= ther than a normal LAN"? I think I know, but please be specific in the tex= t. Nits: 1. Section 1. (Introduction) * s/commonly used in those situations/commonly used in situations * There are a couple of very long sentences that could be simplified= =97 they make sense, but other reviewers may not capture the essence. Jus= t a suggestion * OLD> * * As a result, the traffic from a cloud user (i.e., a VPN user) w= hich * is destined for a given server located at one data center * location of such extended subnet may arrive at another data * center location firstly according to the subnet route, and then * be forwarded to the location where the service is actually * located. This suboptimal routing would obviously result in an * unnecessary consumption of the bandwidth resource between data * centers. Furthermore, in the case where the traditional VPLS * technology [RFC4761] [RFC4762] is used for data center * interconnect and default gateways of different data center * locations are configured within the same virtual router * redundancy group, the returning traffic from that server to the * cloud user may be forwarded at layer2 to a default gateway * located at one of the remote data center premises, rather than * the one placed at the local data center location. This * suboptimal routing would also unnecessarily consume the bandwid= th * resource between data centers * NEW> * * As a result, the traffic between a specific user and server, in= different * data centers, may first be routed through a third data center. * This suboptimal routing would obviously result in an * unnecessary consumption of the bandwidth resource between data * centers. Furthermore, in the case where traditional VPLS * technology [RFC4761] [RFC4762] is used for data center * interconnect, return traffic from a server may be forwarded to = a * default gateway located in a different data center due to the c= onfiguration * in a virtual router redundancy group. This * suboptimal routing would also unnecessarily consume the bandwid= th * resource between data centers. 2. Please be consistent on how "Layer 2" and "Layer 3" is used..it is no= t consistent now. My personal preference is "Layer x". 3. s/CE hosts/hosts 4. s/ARP proxy/an ARP proxy 5. Missing references: "Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP)", "VSI Dis= covery and Configuration Protocol (VDP)" --_000_D2556735E667Baretanaciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <644195AABE0EB340B3C7116DAB75C15F@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear authors:

I just finished reading this document.  

All of what is described in this document is straight forward, so much so t= hat it requires no change to existing technology, which makes me think that= users/operators have been able to do this all along.  Is that correct= ?  Is there anything special that was missing that this document brings to light?  

Being one of several possible solutions for "= network virtualization overlays within an= d/or between data centers", I'm wondering about the value of publishing what amounts to = a set of use cases without even discussing when their use would be suitable= (declared out of scope).  I reviewed the discussions on the lists (l3vpn/bess) and can clearly see why the Shepherd= characterized the document as "could have been considered controversi= al".  Had I reviewed the document at adoption time I probably wou= ld have ended up in the rough side of the consensus.  There's obviously no need to revisit the topic of what do to with th= is document since clearly the WG Chairs believe there is consensus to publi= sh.

I do have some other comments (below). In general some of the text could be= made easier to read (see some nits below).  I would like to see my co= mment about rfc2119 language addressed (and an update published) before sta= rting the IETF Last Call.

Thanks!

Alvaro.


Major:
  1. The use = of rfc2119 keywords is not required.  Note that in general these keywo= rds "MUST only be used where = it is actually required for interoperation", but you're using them to apparently exp= ress requirements w/out specific guidance or to restate what is normal netw= ork operation .  For example:
    • In Section 3.3. (CE Host Discovery) the text reads: "PE ro= uters SHOULD be able to discover their local CE hosts=85 PE routers could a= ccomplish local CE host discovery by=85ARP or ND=85LLDP=85VDP), or even interaction with the data center orchestration system=85" &nb= sp;There is no specific mechanism mandated that supports the use of "S= HOULD".
    • In Section 3.4. (ARP/ND Proxy): "PE routers SHOULD only respond t= o an ARP request or Neighbor Solicitation (NS) message for a target host wh= en it has a best route for that target host in the associated VRF and the o= utgoing interface of that best route is different from the one over which the ARP request or NS message is received." &= nbsp;Isn't this how proxy ARP already works?  Am I missing something t= hat requires the use of "SHOULD" in this document?
    • Section 4.3. (TTL and Traceroute) d= escribes a limitation and then says "=85unless special TTL processing for such case has been imp= lemented (e.g., if the source and destination addresses=85belong to the same extended subnet, neither ingress nor egress PE routers SHOULD = decrement the TTL=85TTL of such packet SHOULD NOT be copied into the TTL of the transport=85"=  In this case the rfc2119 keywords are used as part of an example (e.= g.)..which doesn't really support the use of "SHOULD/SHOULD NOT".=  Is the intent to specify this "special processing" in this document?  If so, why "SHOULD" and not "MUST"= ;?  Algo, given that the text appears in the Limitations section, if y= ou're mandating the "special processing" then it wouldn't be a li= mitation anymore..
Minor:
  1. I think that RFC4761, 4762, 4659, 5798 and 6513 should be Informational ref= erences.
  2. You first use "VS" in Section 3.6.  I'm assuming this is rel= ated to "virtual subnet", but there's no explicit association.
  3. Multicast.  Section 3.2. = (Multicast) says that for "IP multicast between CE hosts of the same virtual subnet,&nbs= p;MVPN technologies [RFC6513] could be directly used without any change".  I'm assuming that you're = not referring to link-local multicast (between hosts on the same subnet) be= cause later (Section 4.2) you say that "link-local multicast traffic cannot be supported".  Please clarify in 3.2 what type o= f multicast you're talking about, and/or which you're not.
  4. <= span style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-s= ize: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none;"= >Section 4.3. (TTL and Tracer= oute).  What does this mean: "traceroute output would reflect the fact that these two hosts belonging to the same subnet are act= ually connected via an virtual subnet emulated by ARP proxy, rather than a normal LAN"?  I think I know, but please be specific in th= e text.

Nits:
  1. Section 1. (Introduction)
    • s/commonly used in those situations/commonly used in situations
    • There are a couple of very long sentences that could be simplified =97 they= make sense, but other reviewers may not capture the essence.  Just a = suggestion
      • OLD>
      • As a result, the traffic from a cloud u= ser (i.e., a VPN user) which
      • is destined for a given server located at one data center
        • location of such extended subnet may arr= ive at another data
      • center= location firstly according to the subnet route, and then
      • be forwarded to the location where the serv= ice is actually
      • located. &= nbsp;This suboptimal routing would obviously result in an
      • unnecessary consumption of the bandwidth re= source between data
      • center= s.  Furthermore, in the case where the traditional VPLS
        • technology [RFC4761] [RF= C4762] is used for data center
      • interconnect and default gateways of different data center
        • =
      • locations are configured within the s= ame virtual router
      • redunda= ncy group, the returning traffic from that server to the
      • cloud user may be forwarded at layer2 to a d= efault gateway
      • located at = one of the remote data center premises, rather than
      • the one placed at the local data center location.=  This
      • suboptimal rou= ting would also unnecessarily consume the bandwidth
      • resource between data centers
      • NEW>
      • As a result, the traffic between a specific user and s= erver, in different 
      • data centers, may first be routed through= a third data center.
      • This suboptimal routing would obviously resul= t in an
      • unnecessary consumption of the bandwidth resource between d= ata
      • centers.  Furthermore, in the case where traditional VPLS<= /li>
      • technology [RFC4761] [RFC4762] is used for data center
      • inte= rconnect, return traffic from a server may be forwarded to a
      • defaul= t gateway located in a different data center due to the configuration
        • <= li>in a virtual router redundancy group.  This
      • suboptimal rout= ing would also unnecessarily consume the bandwidth
      • resource between= data centers.
  2. Please be consistent on how "Layer 2" and "Layer 3" is = used..it is not consistent now.  My personal preference is "Layer= x".
  3. s/CE hosts/hosts
  4. s/ARP proxy/an ARP proxy
  5. Mis= sing references:  "Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP)", "VSI Discovery and Configuration = Protocol (VDP)"
--_000_D2556735E667Baretanaciscocom_-- From nobody Wed Oct 28 02:38:17 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9891B3761 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 02:38:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P9ZhPV7c9TEG for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 02:38:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SNT004-OMC1S6.hotmail.com (snt004-omc1s6.hotmail.com [65.55.90.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07DB31B375A for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 02:38:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SNT148-W54 ([65.55.90.9]) by SNT004-OMC1S6.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Wed, 28 Oct 2015 02:38:10 -0700 X-TMN: [jt6oeKmnP8/9Gxv0TAKwzFdXm7U8FW1nyaUQ6zhre1Y=] X-Originating-Email: [gurong_cmcc@outlook.com] Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_0e424ccc-a299-4943-b5a3-d3a68a1d7059_" From: =?gb2312?B?ucvI1g==?= To: "bess@ietf.org" Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:38:10 +0000 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Oct 2015 09:38:10.0735 (UTC) FILETIME=[5BF093F0:01D11164] Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:38:16 -0000 --_0e424ccc-a299-4943-b5a3-d3a68a1d7059_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SSBzdXBwb3J0IHRoZSBhZG9wdGlvbi4gIEZyb20gdGhlIGRyYWZ0LCBhIGdvb2QgdHJhbnNwb3J0 IGxheWVyIHN0aXRjaGluZyBzb2x1dGlvbiBmb3IgSVAgb3ZlcmxheSBhbmQgTVBMUyBvdmVybGF5 IG5ldHdvcmsgaXMgcHJvdmlkZWQsIEkgdGhpbmsgaXQgc2VlbXMgdG8gYmUgdmFsdWFibGUuDQpC ZXNpZGVzLCBJJ20gbm90IGF3YXJlIGFueSBJUFIgYWJvdXQgdGhpcy4gDQpHdSBSb25nZ3Vyb25n X2NtY2NAb3V0bG9vay5jb21ndXJvbmdAY2hpbmFtb2JpbGUuY29tDQoNCiJTdXNhbiBIYXJlcyIg PHNoYXJlc0BuZHpoLmNvbT4gVHVlLCAyNyBPY3RvYmVyIDIwMTUgMTU6NTkgVVRDU2hvdyBoZWFk ZXJTdXBwb3J0IGFzIGEgY28tYXV0aG9yLiAgIEkgYW0gbm90IGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgcmVs YXRpbmcgdG8gdGhpcyBkcmFmdC4gCgpUaGlzIG9wdGlvbiBwcm92aWRlcyBhIGhpZ2hseSBzY2Fs YWJsZSBvcHRpb24gIGZvciBzdGl0Y2hpbmcgTlYwMyBuZXR3b3JrcyBhbmQgTVBMUy9JUCBWUE4g Zm9yIHRob3NlIGRldmljZXMgd2hpY2ggY2FuIHByb3ZpZGUgdHJhbnNwb3J0LWxheWVyIHN0aXRj aGluZy4gCgpTdWUgSGFyZXMKCi0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tCkZyb206IFRob21h cyBNb3JpbiBbbWFpbHRvOnRob21hcy5tb3JpbkBvcmFuZ2UuY29tXSAKU2VudDogVGh1cnNkYXks IE9jdG9iZXIgMjIsIDIwMTUgMTE6MzEgQU0KVG86IGJlc3NAaWV0Zi5vcmcKQ2M6IGRyYWZ0LWhh by1iZXNzLWludGVyLW52bzMtdnBuLW9wdGlvbmNAdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcKU3ViamVjdDogUG9s bCBmb3IgYWRvcHRpb246IGRyYWZ0LWhhby1iZXNzLWludGVyLW52bzMtdnBuLW9wdGlvbmMKCkhl bGxvIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXAsCgpUaGlzIGVtYWlsIHN0YXJ0cyBhIHR3by13ZWVrIHBvbGwgb24g YWRvcHRpbmcKZHJhZnQtaGFvLWJlc3MtaW50ZXItbnZvMy12cG4tb3B0aW9uYy0wMyBbMV0gYXMg YSB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwIGl0ZW0uCgpQbGVhc2Ugc2VuZCBjb21tZW50cyB0byB0aGUgbGlzdCBh bmQgc3RhdGUgaWYgeW91IHN1cHBvcnQgYWRvcHRpb24gb3Igbm90IChpbiB0aGUgbGF0ZXIgY2Fz ZSwgcGxlYXNlIGFsc28gc3RhdGUgdGhlIHJlYXNvbnMpLgoKVGhpcyBwb2xsIHJ1bnMgdW50aWwg KipOb3ZlbWJlciAxM3RoKiouCigzIHdlZWtzIHRvIGFjY291bnQgZm9yIHRoZSBidXN5IElFVEYg d2VlaykKCgoqQ29pbmNpZGVudGFsbHkqLCB3ZSBhcmUgYWxzbyBwb2xsaW5nIGZvciBrbm93bGVk Z2Ugb2YgYW55IElQUiB0aGF0IGFwcGxpZXMgdG8gdGhpcyBkcmFmdCwgdG8gZW5zdXJlIHRoYXQg SVBSIGhhcyBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3NlZCBpbiBjb21wbGlhbmNlIHdpdGggSUVURiBJUFIgcnVsZXMg KHNlZSBSRkNzIDM5NzksIDQ4NzksIDM2NjkgYW5kIDUzNzggZm9yIG1vcmUgZGV0YWlscykuCgo9 PT4gKklmKiB5b3UgYXJlIGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhIGRvY3VtZW50IGF1dGhvciBvciBjb250cmlidXRv ciBwbGVhc2UgcmVzcG9uZCB0byB0aGlzIGVtYWlsIGFuZCBpbmRpY2F0ZSB3aGV0aGVyIG9yIG5v dCB5b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSByZWxldmFudCBJUFIuCgpUaGUgZHJhZnQgd2lsbCBub3Qg YmUgYWRvcHRlZCB1bnRpbCBhIHJlc3BvbnNlIGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlY2VpdmVkIGZyb20gZWFjaCBh dXRob3IgYW5kIGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9yLgoKSWYgeW91IGFyZSBub3QgbGlzdGVkIGFzIGFuIGF1dGhv ciBvciBjb250cmlidXRvciwgdGhlbiBwbGVhc2UgZXhwbGljaXRseSByZXNwb25kIG9ubHkgaWYg eW91IGFyZSBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQgaGFzIG5vdCB5ZXQgYmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQg aW4gY29uZm9ybWFuY2Ugd2l0aCBJRVRGIHJ1bGVzLgoKVGhhbmsgeW91LAoKTWFydGluICYgVGhv bWFzCmJlc3MgY2hhaXJzCgpbMV0gaHR0cHM6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LWhh by1iZXNzLWludGVyLW52bzMtdnBuLW9wdGlvbmMtMDMgCQkgCSAgIAkJICA= --_0e424ccc-a299-4943-b5a3-d3a68a1d7059_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWw+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxzdHlsZT48IS0tDQouaG1tZXNzYWdlIFANCnsNCm1hcmdpbjowcHg7 DQpwYWRkaW5nOjBweA0KfQ0KYm9keS5obW1lc3NhZ2UNCnsNCmZvbnQtc2l6ZTogMTJwdDsNCmZv bnQtZmFtaWx5Os6iyO3RxbraDQp9DQotLT48L3N0eWxlPjwvaGVhZD4NCjxib2R5IGNsYXNzPSdo bW1lc3NhZ2UnPjxkaXYgZGlyPSdsdHInPjxkaXY+SSBzdXBwb3J0IHRoZSBhZG9wdGlvbi4gJm5i c3A7RnJvbSB0aGUgZHJhZnQsPHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZTogMTJwdDsiPiZuYnNwO2Eg Z29vZCB0cmFuc3BvcnQgbGF5ZXIgc3RpdGNoaW5nIHNvbHV0aW9uIGZvciBJUCBvdmVybGF5IGFu ZCBNUExTIG92ZXJsYXkgbmV0d29yayBpcyBwcm92aWRlZCwgSSB0aGluayBpdCBzZWVtcyB0byBi ZSB2YWx1YWJsZS48L3NwYW4+PC9kaXY+PGRpdj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOiAxMnB0 OyI+PGJyPjwvc3Bhbj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2PjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6IDEycHQ7Ij5C ZXNpZGVzLCBJJ20gbm90IGF3YXJlIGFueSBJUFIgYWJvdXQgdGhpcy4mbmJzcDs8L3NwYW4+PC9k aXY+PGRpdj48YnI+PC9kaXY+PGRpdj5HdSBSb25nPC9kaXY+PGRpdj5ndXJvbmdfY21jY0BvdXRs b29rLmNvbTwvZGl2PjxkaXY+Z3Vyb25nQGNoaW5hbW9iaWxlLmNvbTwvZGl2PjxkaXY+PGJyPjwv ZGl2PjxkaXY+PGgxIHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW46IDBweDsgcGFkZGluZzogMHB4OyBib3JkZXI6IDBw eDsgZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IFRhaG9tYSwgVmVyZGFuYSwgQXJpYWwsIHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7IGZvbnQt c2l6ZTogMS41ZW07IGZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0OiBpbmhlcml0OyBsaW5lLWhlaWdodDogaW5oZXJpdDsg dmVydGljYWwtYWxpZ246IGJhc2VsaW5lOyBiYWNrZ3JvdW5kLWNvbG9yOiByZ2IoMjU1LCAyNTUs IDI1NSk7Ij48YnI+PC9oMT48cCBpZD0ibXNnLWluZm8iIGNsYXNzPSJkYXJrZ3JheSIgc3R5bGU9 ImJvcmRlcjogMHB4OyBmb250LWZhbWlseTogVGFob21hLCBWZXJkYW5hLCBBcmlhbCwgc2Fucy1z ZXJpZjsgZm9udC1zaXplOiAxMnB4OyBsaW5lLWhlaWdodDogMThweDsgdmVydGljYWwtYWxpZ246 IGJhc2VsaW5lOyBjb2xvcjogcmdiKDEwMiwgMTAyLCAxMDIpOyBiYWNrZ3JvdW5kLWNvbG9yOiBy Z2IoMjU1LCAyNTUsIDI1NSk7Ij48c3BhbiBpZD0ibXNnLWZyb20iIGNsYXNzPSJwaXBlIiBzdHls ZT0ibWFyZ2luOiAwcHggMC41ZW0gMHB4IDBweDsgcGFkZGluZzogMHB4IDAuOGVtIDBweCAwcHg7 IGJvcmRlci13aWR0aDogMHB4IDFweCAwcHggMHB4OyBib3JkZXItcmlnaHQtc3R5bGU6IHNvbGlk OyBib3JkZXItcmlnaHQtY29sb3I6IHJnYigyMjEsIDIyMSwgMjIxKTsgZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IGlu aGVyaXQ7IGZvbnQtc2l6ZTogaW5oZXJpdDsgZm9udC1zdHlsZTogaW5oZXJpdDsgZm9udC12YXJp YW50OiBpbmhlcml0OyBmb250LXdlaWdodDogaW5oZXJpdDsgbGluZS1oZWlnaHQ6IGluaGVyaXQ7 IHZlcnRpY2FsLWFsaWduOiBiYXNlbGluZTsiPiJTdXNhbiBIYXJlcyIgJmx0O3NoYXJlc0BuZHpo LmNvbSZndDs8L3NwYW4+Jm5ic3A7PHNwYW4gaWQ9Im1zZy1kYXRlIiBjbGFzcz0icGlwZSIgc3R5 bGU9Im1hcmdpbjogMHB4IDAuNWVtIDBweCAwcHg7IHBhZGRpbmc6IDBweCAwLjhlbSAwcHggMHB4 OyBib3JkZXItd2lkdGg6IDBweCAxcHggMHB4IDBweDsgYm9yZGVyLXJpZ2h0LXN0eWxlOiBzb2xp ZDsgYm9yZGVyLXJpZ2h0LWNvbG9yOiByZ2IoMjIxLCAyMjEsIDIyMSk7IGZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiBp bmhlcml0OyBmb250LXNpemU6IGluaGVyaXQ7IGZvbnQtc3R5bGU6IGluaGVyaXQ7IGZvbnQtdmFy aWFudDogaW5oZXJpdDsgZm9udC13ZWlnaHQ6IGluaGVyaXQ7IGxpbmUtaGVpZ2h0OiBpbmhlcml0 OyB2ZXJ0aWNhbC1hbGlnbjogYmFzZWxpbmU7Ij5UdWUsIDI3IE9jdG9iZXIgMjAxNSAxNTo1OSBV VEM8L3NwYW4+PGEgaWQ9InRvZ2dsZSIgaHJlZj0iaHR0cHM6Ly9tYWlsYXJjaGl2ZS5pZXRmLm9y Zy9hcmNoL3NlYXJjaC8/ZW1haWxfbGlzdD1iZXNzIyIgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbjogMHB4OyBwYWRk aW5nOiAwcHg7IGJvcmRlcjogMHB4OyBmb250LWZhbWlseTogaW5oZXJpdDsgZm9udC1zaXplOiBp bmhlcml0OyBmb250LXN0eWxlOiBpbmhlcml0OyBmb250LXZhcmlhbnQ6IGluaGVyaXQ7IGZvbnQt d2VpZ2h0OiBpbmhlcml0OyBsaW5lLWhlaWdodDogaW5oZXJpdDsgdmVydGljYWwtYWxpZ246IGJh c2VsaW5lOyBjb2xvcjogcmdiKDkxLCAxMjgsIDE3OCk7IHRleHQtZGVjb3JhdGlvbjogbm9uZTsi PlNob3cgaGVhZGVyPC9hPjwvcD48ZGl2IGlkPSJtc2ctcGF5bG9hZCIgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbjog MS41ZW0gMHB4IDBweDsgcGFkZGluZzogMHB4OyBib3JkZXI6IDBweDsgZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IFRh aG9tYSwgVmVyZGFuYSwgQXJpYWwsIHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7IGZvbnQtc2l6ZTogMTJweDsgbGluZS1o ZWlnaHQ6IDE4cHg7IHZlcnRpY2FsLWFsaWduOiBiYXNlbGluZTsgYmFja2dyb3VuZC1jb2xvcjog cmdiKDI1NSwgMjU1LCAyNTUpOyI+PHByZSBjbGFzcz0id29yZHdyYXAiIHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4t dG9wOiAwcHg7IG1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206IDBweDsgcGFkZGluZzogMHB4OyBib3JkZXI6IDBweDsg Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IENvdXJpZXIsICdDb3VyaWVyIE5ldycsIG1vbm9zcGFjZTsgZm9udC1zaXpl OiBpbmhlcml0OyBmb250LXN0eWxlOiBpbmhlcml0OyBmb250LXZhcmlhbnQ6IGluaGVyaXQ7IGZv bnQtd2VpZ2h0OiBpbmhlcml0OyBsaW5lLWhlaWdodDogaW5oZXJpdDsgdmVydGljYWwtYWxpZ246 IGJhc2VsaW5lOyB3aGl0ZS1zcGFjZTogcHJlLXdyYXA7IHdvcmQtd3JhcDogYnJlYWstd29yZDsi PlN1cHBvcnQgYXMgYSBjby1hdXRob3IuICAgSSBhbSBub3QgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IElQUiByZWxh dGluZyB0byB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0LiAKClRoaXMgb3B0aW9uIHByb3ZpZGVzIGEgaGlnaGx5IHNjYWxh YmxlIG9wdGlvbiAgZm9yIHN0aXRjaGluZyBOVjAzIG5ldHdvcmtzIGFuZCBNUExTL0lQIFZQTiBm b3IgdGhvc2UgZGV2aWNlcyB3aGljaCBjYW4gcHJvdmlkZSB0cmFuc3BvcnQtbGF5ZXIgc3RpdGNo aW5nLiAKClN1ZSBIYXJlcwoKLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0KRnJvbTogVGhvbWFz IE1vcmluIFttYWlsdG86dGhvbWFzLm1vcmluQG9yYW5nZS5jb21dIApTZW50OiBUaHVyc2RheSwg T2N0b2JlciAyMiwgMjAxNSAxMTozMSBBTQpUbzogYmVzc0BpZXRmLm9yZwpDYzogZHJhZnQtaGFv LWJlc3MtaW50ZXItbnZvMy12cG4tb3B0aW9uY0B0b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZwpTdWJqZWN0OiBQb2xs IGZvciBhZG9wdGlvbjogZHJhZnQtaGFvLWJlc3MtaW50ZXItbnZvMy12cG4tb3B0aW9uYwoKSGVs bG8gd29ya2luZyBncm91cCwKClRoaXMgZW1haWwgc3RhcnRzIGEgdHdvLXdlZWsgcG9sbCBvbiBh ZG9wdGluZwpkcmFmdC1oYW8tYmVzcy1pbnRlci1udm8zLXZwbi1vcHRpb25jLTAzIFsxXSBhcyBh IHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXAgaXRlbS4KClBsZWFzZSBzZW5kIGNvbW1lbnRzIHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0IGFu ZCBzdGF0ZSBpZiB5b3Ugc3VwcG9ydCBhZG9wdGlvbiBvciBub3QgKGluIHRoZSBsYXRlciBjYXNl LCBwbGVhc2UgYWxzbyBzdGF0ZSB0aGUgcmVhc29ucykuCgpUaGlzIHBvbGwgcnVucyB1bnRpbCAq Kk5vdmVtYmVyIDEzdGgqKi4KKDMgd2Vla3MgdG8gYWNjb3VudCBmb3IgdGhlIGJ1c3kgSUVURiB3 ZWVrKQoKCipDb2luY2lkZW50YWxseSosIHdlIGFyZSBhbHNvIHBvbGxpbmcgZm9yIGtub3dsZWRn ZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQgYXBwbGllcyB0byB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0LCB0byBlbnN1cmUgdGhhdCBJ UFIgaGFzIGJlZW4gZGlzY2xvc2VkIGluIGNvbXBsaWFuY2Ugd2l0aCBJRVRGIElQUiBydWxlcyAo c2VlIFJGQ3MgMzk3OSwgNDg3OSwgMzY2OSBhbmQgNTM3OCBmb3IgbW9yZSBkZXRhaWxzKS4KCj09 Jmd0OyAqSWYqIHlvdSBhcmUgbGlzdGVkIGFzIGEgZG9jdW1lbnQgYXV0aG9yIG9yIGNvbnRyaWJ1 dG9yIHBsZWFzZSByZXNwb25kIHRvIHRoaXMgZW1haWwgYW5kIGluZGljYXRlIHdoZXRoZXIgb3Ig bm90IHlvdSBhcmUgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IHJlbGV2YW50IElQUi4KClRoZSBkcmFmdCB3aWxsIG5v dCBiZSBhZG9wdGVkIHVudGlsIGEgcmVzcG9uc2UgaGFzIGJlZW4gcmVjZWl2ZWQgZnJvbSBlYWNo IGF1dGhvciBhbmQgY29udHJpYnV0b3IuCgpJZiB5b3UgYXJlIG5vdCBsaXN0ZWQgYXMgYW4gYXV0 aG9yIG9yIGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9yLCB0aGVuIHBsZWFzZSBleHBsaWNpdGx5IHJlc3BvbmQgb25seSBp ZiB5b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgdGhhdCBoYXMgbm90IHlldCBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3Nl ZCBpbiBjb25mb3JtYW5jZSB3aXRoIElFVEYgcnVsZXMuCgpUaGFuayB5b3UsCgpNYXJ0aW4gJmFt cDsgVGhvbWFzCmJlc3MgY2hhaXJzCgpbMV0gaHR0cHM6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2Ry YWZ0LWhhby1iZXNzLWludGVyLW52bzMtdnBuLW9wdGlvbmMtMDM8L3ByZT48L2Rpdj48L2Rpdj4g CQkgCSAgIAkJICA8L2Rpdj48L2JvZHk+DQo8L2h0bWw+ --_0e424ccc-a299-4943-b5a3-d3a68a1d7059_-- From nobody Wed Oct 28 08:38:51 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E575F1A8AC2 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 08:38:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mTOpibfSECMx for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 08:38:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81EEB1A8AE6 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 08:38:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4441; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1446046692; x=1447256292; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=by6TtQqsMcEWtI9Hvcfw5h48c8KdBguG0wiw+gMGBZU=; b=Z01Hwg64EZjhFaH5hy5tsQRiJnE1Xvl4WQFa9OJxc0iOu4/2jr8uaoto R4I4zBsMRP/nEHA8OJtbvRahAlIbxfagtrfV807D6+pwM6hwug6Pq16+A cw1zAD4EDSgAPA9rKDu7JneiSH88l1uj+A2EjJLYU5E2dv7Gi8+XyHXHJ E=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AcAgDK6jBW/5NdJa1egzZUbwa/CQENgVoXDIV4AoE7OBQBAQEBAQEBfwuENgEBBAEBATc0GwIBCC0JECcLJQIEE4gwDcV6AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYBIZ3AYR9hC0QAgFSBQqEJAWSZYNYAYUbiAiBWYQ/kiyDbwEfAQFCghEdgVZyAYQzBzyBBgEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,210,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="202576097" Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2015 15:38:11 +0000 Received: from XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (xch-aln-001.cisco.com [173.36.7.11]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9SFcB6h007045 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 15:38:11 GMT Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:37:46 -0500 Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:37:46 -0500 From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" To: "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover Thread-Index: AQHQ/P1Eo4f03M4yuEqMOe57tcwdYJ6BRBGA Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 15:37:46 +0000 Message-ID: References: <560E5C8E.8000002@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <560E5C8E.8000002@alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.24.39.87] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 15:38:50 -0000 bess WG: As those of you following this thread may have already noticed, no IPR had been disclosed related to this document, or any of the documents it replaces ([1] and [2]), at the time this adoption poll started..nor by the time the poll was to end on Oct/16. On Oct/17 the WG received a note about IPR found (from one of the contributors) [3]; the corresponding disclosure was communicated to the WG on Oct/22 [4]. At the same time a similar disclosure [5] was also submitted for [2]. It is not uncommon for IPR disclosures to be submitted related to work in the IETF. However, it is expected that such disclosures are "made as soon as reasonably possible after the Contribution is published" [RFC3979]. That clearly did not happen in this case! Because of the above, and due to authorship and affiliation, the WG Chairs have decided to recuse themselves from the process of adoption of this document. They have asked me to take it on. I want to then explicitly make the WG aware of the existing IPR claims related to this document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2696/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2697/ Given the recent disclosure, this poll for adoption is extended for another 2 weeks (ending on November 11, 2015). Please express your opinion is support of adoption (or not) on the list. Even though we needed to reset the process, please keep in mind from rfc3979: It should also be noted that the validity and enforceability of any IPR may be challenged for legitimate reasons, and the mere existence of an IPR disclosure should not automatically be taken to mean that the disclosed IPR is valid or enforceable. Although the IETF can make no actual determination of validity, enforceability or applicability of any particular IPR claim, it is reasonable that a working group will take into account on their own opinions of the validity, enforceability or applicability of Intellectual Property Rights in their evaluation of alternative technologies. To clarify: the IETF (including us as a WG) cannot determine whether the disclosures are valid, enforceable or even applicable..but you can use your own criteria when deciding whether to support adoption or not. Also, with the new IPR baseline, I need all the authors and contributors to explicitly reply to this message stating whether you know (or not) of any additional IPR. [If any of you have already sent such statement to the WG, there's no need to send it again.] Thanks! Alvaro. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-morin-l3vpn-mvpn-fast-failover/ [2]=20 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jain-mvpn-bfd-fast-upstream-failover / [3] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/uvOZm_K0iKV9btnSK95qVR5wgIk [4] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/-7TnzEqxfLHqsfFdX6yjHcaVBx8 [5]=20 https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipr-announce/current/msg01326.html On 10/2/15, 5:29 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" wrote: >Hello working group, > >This email starts a two-week poll on adopting >draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover [1] as a working group item. > >Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or >not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). > >This poll runs until the *16th of October*. > >Currently there is no IPR disclosed against this document. > >*Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that >applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in >compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for >more details). > >*If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please respond >to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant >IPR. > >The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from >each author and contributor. > >If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please >explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet >been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > >Thank you, > >Martin & Thomas >bess chairs > >[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover > >_______________________________________________ >BESS mailing list >BESS@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Sat Oct 31 05:46:43 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2E61AD377 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 05:46:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.46 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SXfpAG7Ko5DZ for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 05:46:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E5911AD34F for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 05:46:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CDI51879; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 12:46:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.39) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 12:46:35 +0000 Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.75]) by nkgeml408-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.39]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 20:46:29 +0800 From: Haoweiguo To: =?gb2312?B?ucvI1g==?= , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc Thread-Index: AQHREWRbF06gR8C56UO49qZRkcsQnZ6CDjWa Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 12:46:29 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.194.185.145] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DD5FC8DE455C3348B94340C0AB5517334F8D51D2nkgeml501mbschi_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 12:46:42 -0000 --_000_DD5FC8DE455C3348B94340C0AB5517334F8D51D2nkgeml501mbschi_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 U3VwcG9ydCB0aGUgYWRvcHRpb24gYXMgYSBjby1hdXRob3IuIFRoaXMgZHJhZnQgaXMgdmVyeSB1 c2VmdWwgZm9yIE5WTzMgZGF0YSBjZW50ZXIgbmV0d29yayBhY2Nlc3MgYW5kIGludGVyY29ubmVj dGlvbi4NCg0KQmVzaWRlcyB0aGUgZGlzY2xvc2VkIElQUiwgaSBkb24ndCBrbm93IG90aGVyIHJl bGF0ZWQgSVBScy4NCg0KVGhhbmtzLA0KDQp3ZWlndW8NCg0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX18NCkZyb206IEJFU1MgW2Jlc3MtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10gb24gYmVoYWxm IG9mILnLyNYgW2d1cm9uZ19jbWNjQG91dGxvb2suY29tXQ0KU2VudDogV2VkbmVzZGF5LCBPY3Rv YmVyIDI4LCAyMDE1IDE3OjM4DQpUbzogYmVzc0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KU3ViamVjdDogUmU6IFtiZXNz XSBQb2xsIGZvciBhZG9wdGlvbjogZHJhZnQtaGFvLWJlc3MtaW50ZXItbnZvMy12cG4tb3B0aW9u Yw0KDQpJIHN1cHBvcnQgdGhlIGFkb3B0aW9uLiAgRnJvbSB0aGUgZHJhZnQsIGEgZ29vZCB0cmFu c3BvcnQgbGF5ZXIgc3RpdGNoaW5nIHNvbHV0aW9uIGZvciBJUCBvdmVybGF5IGFuZCBNUExTIG92 ZXJsYXkgbmV0d29yayBpcyBwcm92aWRlZCwgSSB0aGluayBpdCBzZWVtcyB0byBiZSB2YWx1YWJs ZS4NCg0KQmVzaWRlcywgSSdtIG5vdCBhd2FyZSBhbnkgSVBSIGFib3V0IHRoaXMuDQoNCkd1IFJv bmcNCmd1cm9uZ19jbWNjQG91dGxvb2suY29tDQpndXJvbmdAY2hpbmFtb2JpbGUuY29tDQoNCg0K DQoiU3VzYW4gSGFyZXMiIDxzaGFyZXNAbmR6aC5jb20+IFR1ZSwgMjcgT2N0b2JlciAyMDE1IDE1 OjU5IFVUQ1Nob3cgaGVhZGVyPGh0dHBzOi8vbWFpbGFyY2hpdmUuaWV0Zi5vcmcvYXJjaC9zZWFy Y2gvP2VtYWlsX2xpc3Q9YmVzcyM+DQoNClN1cHBvcnQgYXMgYSBjby1hdXRob3IuICAgSSBhbSBu b3QgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IElQUiByZWxhdGluZyB0byB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0Lg0KDQpUaGlzIG9wdGlv biBwcm92aWRlcyBhIGhpZ2hseSBzY2FsYWJsZSBvcHRpb24gIGZvciBzdGl0Y2hpbmcgTlYwMyBu ZXR3b3JrcyBhbmQgTVBMUy9JUCBWUE4gZm9yIHRob3NlIGRldmljZXMgd2hpY2ggY2FuIHByb3Zp ZGUgdHJhbnNwb3J0LWxheWVyIHN0aXRjaGluZy4NCg0KU3VlIEhhcmVzDQoNCi0tLS0tT3JpZ2lu YWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQpGcm9tOiBUaG9tYXMgTW9yaW4gW21haWx0bzp0aG9tYXMubW9yaW5A b3JhbmdlLmNvbV0NClNlbnQ6IFRodXJzZGF5LCBPY3RvYmVyIDIyLCAyMDE1IDExOjMxIEFNDQpU bzogYmVzc0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KQ2M6IGRyYWZ0LWhhby1iZXNzLWludGVyLW52bzMtdnBuLW9wdGlv bmNAdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcNClN1YmplY3Q6IFBvbGwgZm9yIGFkb3B0aW9uOiBkcmFmdC1oYW8t YmVzcy1pbnRlci1udm8zLXZwbi1vcHRpb25jDQoNCkhlbGxvIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXAsDQoNClRo aXMgZW1haWwgc3RhcnRzIGEgdHdvLXdlZWsgcG9sbCBvbiBhZG9wdGluZw0KZHJhZnQtaGFvLWJl c3MtaW50ZXItbnZvMy12cG4tb3B0aW9uYy0wMyBbMV0gYXMgYSB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwIGl0ZW0u DQoNClBsZWFzZSBzZW5kIGNvbW1lbnRzIHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0IGFuZCBzdGF0ZSBpZiB5b3Ugc3Vw cG9ydCBhZG9wdGlvbiBvciBub3QgKGluIHRoZSBsYXRlciBjYXNlLCBwbGVhc2UgYWxzbyBzdGF0 ZSB0aGUgcmVhc29ucykuDQoNClRoaXMgcG9sbCBydW5zIHVudGlsICoqTm92ZW1iZXIgMTN0aCoq Lg0KKDMgd2Vla3MgdG8gYWNjb3VudCBmb3IgdGhlIGJ1c3kgSUVURiB3ZWVrKQ0KDQoNCipDb2lu Y2lkZW50YWxseSosIHdlIGFyZSBhbHNvIHBvbGxpbmcgZm9yIGtub3dsZWRnZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBS IHRoYXQgYXBwbGllcyB0byB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0LCB0byBlbnN1cmUgdGhhdCBJUFIgaGFzIGJlZW4g ZGlzY2xvc2VkIGluIGNvbXBsaWFuY2Ugd2l0aCBJRVRGIElQUiBydWxlcyAoc2VlIFJGQ3MgMzk3 OSwgNDg3OSwgMzY2OSBhbmQgNTM3OCBmb3IgbW9yZSBkZXRhaWxzKS4NCg0KPT0+ICpJZiogeW91 IGFyZSBsaXN0ZWQgYXMgYSBkb2N1bWVudCBhdXRob3Igb3IgY29udHJpYnV0b3IgcGxlYXNlIHJl c3BvbmQgdG8gdGhpcyBlbWFpbCBhbmQgaW5kaWNhdGUgd2hldGhlciBvciBub3QgeW91IGFyZSBh d2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgcmVsZXZhbnQgSVBSLg0KDQpUaGUgZHJhZnQgd2lsbCBub3QgYmUgYWRvcHRl ZCB1bnRpbCBhIHJlc3BvbnNlIGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlY2VpdmVkIGZyb20gZWFjaCBhdXRob3IgYW5k IGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9yLg0KDQpJZiB5b3UgYXJlIG5vdCBsaXN0ZWQgYXMgYW4gYXV0aG9yIG9yIGNv bnRyaWJ1dG9yLCB0aGVuIHBsZWFzZSBleHBsaWNpdGx5IHJlc3BvbmQgb25seSBpZiB5b3UgYXJl IGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgdGhhdCBoYXMgbm90IHlldCBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3NlZCBpbiBjb25m b3JtYW5jZSB3aXRoIElFVEYgcnVsZXMuDQoNClRoYW5rIHlvdSwNCg0KTWFydGluICYgVGhvbWFz DQpiZXNzIGNoYWlycw0KDQpbMV0gaHR0cHM6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LWhh by1iZXNzLWludGVyLW52bzMtdnBuLW9wdGlvbmMtMDMNCg== --_000_DD5FC8DE455C3348B94340C0AB5517334F8D51D2nkgeml501mbschi_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Support the adoption as a co-author. T= his draft is very useful for NVO3 data center network access and interconne= ction.

Besides the disclosed IPR, i don't kno= w other related IPRs.

Thanks,

weiguo

From: BESS [bess-bounces@ietf.org] on beha= lf of =B9=CB=C8=D6 [gurong_cmcc@outlook.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 17:38
To: bess@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn= -optionc

I support the adoption.  From the draft, a good transport layer stitching solution for IP overlay and M= PLS overlay network is provided, I think it seems to be valuable.

Besides, I'm not aware any IPR about t= his. 

Gu Rong
gurong_cmcc@outlook.com
gurong@chinamobile.com


"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Tue, 27 October 2015 15:59 UTCShow header

Support as a co-author.   I am not =
aware of any IPR relating to this draft.=20

This option provides a highly scalable option  for stitching NV03 networks =
and MPLS/IP VPN for those devices which can provide transport-layer stitchi=
ng.=20

Sue Hares

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Morin [mailto:thomas.morin@orange.com]=20
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 11:31 AM
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Poll for adoption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc

Hello working group,

This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc-03 [1] as a working group item.

Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or not (=
in the later case, please also state the reasons).

This poll runs until **November 13th**.
(3 weeks to account for the busy IETF week)


*Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies=
 to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IE=
TF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

=3D=3D> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please r=
espond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relev=
ant IPR.

The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each =
author and contributor.

If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly r=
espond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in =
conformance with IETF rules.

Thank you,

Martin & Thomas
bess chairs

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc-03
--_000_DD5FC8DE455C3348B94340C0AB5517334F8D51D2nkgeml501mbschi_-- From nobody Sat Oct 31 17:27:02 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2641B485A for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 17:27:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.76 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.76 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id coLhg8TMajqn for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 17:26:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F65A1B483F for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 17:26:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CDI81967; Sun, 01 Nov 2015 00:26:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from DFWEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.130) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Sun, 1 Nov 2015 00:26:53 +0000 Received: from DFWEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.50]) by dfweml703-chm ([10.193.5.130]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 17:26:42 -0700 From: Linda Dunbar To: "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc Thread-Index: AQHREWRb3u3VhF7xpkSMZ9/Us2R4lJ6CDjWagAODvWGAAMMEkA== Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2015 00:26:42 +0000 Message-ID: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F657D78428@dfweml701-chm> References: , In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.194.185.182] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F657D78428dfweml701chm_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2015 00:27:00 -0000 --_000_4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F657D78428dfweml701chm_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 U3VwcG9ydCwNCg0KTGluZGEgRHVuYmFyDQoNCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fDQpGcm9tOiBCRVNTIFtiZXNzLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmddIG9uIGJlaGFsZiBvZiC5y8jW IFtndXJvbmdfY21jY0BvdXRsb29rLmNvbV0NClNlbnQ6IFdlZG5lc2RheSwgT2N0b2JlciAyOCwg MjAxNSAxNzozOA0KVG86IGJlc3NAaWV0Zi5vcmc8bWFpbHRvOmJlc3NAaWV0Zi5vcmc+DQpTdWJq ZWN0OiBSZTogW2Jlc3NdIFBvbGwgZm9yIGFkb3B0aW9uOiBkcmFmdC1oYW8tYmVzcy1pbnRlci1u dm8zLXZwbi1vcHRpb25jDQpJIHN1cHBvcnQgdGhlIGFkb3B0aW9uLiAgRnJvbSB0aGUgZHJhZnQs IGEgZ29vZCB0cmFuc3BvcnQgbGF5ZXIgc3RpdGNoaW5nIHNvbHV0aW9uIGZvciBJUCBvdmVybGF5 IGFuZCBNUExTIG92ZXJsYXkgbmV0d29yayBpcyBwcm92aWRlZCwgSSB0aGluayBpdCBzZWVtcyB0 byBiZSB2YWx1YWJsZS4NCg0KQmVzaWRlcywgSSdtIG5vdCBhd2FyZSBhbnkgSVBSIGFib3V0IHRo aXMuDQoNCkd1IFJvbmcNCmd1cm9uZ19jbWNjQG91dGxvb2suY29tPG1haWx0bzpndXJvbmdfY21j Y0BvdXRsb29rLmNvbT4NCmd1cm9uZ0BjaGluYW1vYmlsZS5jb208bWFpbHRvOmd1cm9uZ0BjaGlu YW1vYmlsZS5jb20+DQoNCg0KIlN1c2FuIEhhcmVzIiA8c2hhcmVzQG5kemguY29tPG1haWx0bzpz aGFyZXNAbmR6aC5jb20+PiBUdWUsIDI3IE9jdG9iZXIgMjAxNSAxNTo1OSBVVENTaG93IGhlYWRl cjxodHRwczovL21haWxhcmNoaXZlLmlldGYub3JnL2FyY2gvc2VhcmNoLz9lbWFpbF9saXN0PWJl c3M+DQoNClN1cHBvcnQgYXMgYSBjby1hdXRob3IuICAgSSBhbSBub3QgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IElQ UiByZWxhdGluZyB0byB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0Lg0KDQoNCg0KVGhpcyBvcHRpb24gcHJvdmlkZXMgYSBo aWdobHkgc2NhbGFibGUgb3B0aW9uICBmb3Igc3RpdGNoaW5nIE5WMDMgbmV0d29ya3MgYW5kIE1Q TFMvSVAgVlBOIGZvciB0aG9zZSBkZXZpY2VzIHdoaWNoIGNhbiBwcm92aWRlIHRyYW5zcG9ydC1s YXllciBzdGl0Y2hpbmcuDQoNCg0KDQpTdWUgSGFyZXMNCg0KDQoNCi0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVz c2FnZS0tLS0tDQoNCkZyb206IFRob21hcyBNb3JpbiBbbWFpbHRvOnRob21hcy5tb3JpbkBvcmFu Z2UuY29tXQ0KDQpTZW50OiBUaHVyc2RheSwgT2N0b2JlciAyMiwgMjAxNSAxMTozMSBBTQ0KDQpU bzogYmVzc0BpZXRmLm9yZzxtYWlsdG86YmVzc0BpZXRmLm9yZz4NCg0KQ2M6IGRyYWZ0LWhhby1i ZXNzLWludGVyLW52bzMtdnBuLW9wdGlvbmNAdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmc8bWFpbHRvOmRyYWZ0LWhh by1iZXNzLWludGVyLW52bzMtdnBuLW9wdGlvbmNAdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmc+DQoNClN1YmplY3Q6 IFBvbGwgZm9yIGFkb3B0aW9uOiBkcmFmdC1oYW8tYmVzcy1pbnRlci1udm8zLXZwbi1vcHRpb25j DQoNCg0KDQpIZWxsbyB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwLA0KDQoNCg0KVGhpcyBlbWFpbCBzdGFydHMgYSB0 d28td2VlayBwb2xsIG9uIGFkb3B0aW5nDQoNCmRyYWZ0LWhhby1iZXNzLWludGVyLW52bzMtdnBu LW9wdGlvbmMtMDMgWzFdIGFzIGEgd29ya2luZyBncm91cCBpdGVtLg0KDQoNCg0KUGxlYXNlIHNl bmQgY29tbWVudHMgdG8gdGhlIGxpc3QgYW5kIHN0YXRlIGlmIHlvdSBzdXBwb3J0IGFkb3B0aW9u IG9yIG5vdCAoaW4gdGhlIGxhdGVyIGNhc2UsIHBsZWFzZSBhbHNvIHN0YXRlIHRoZSByZWFzb25z KS4NCg0KDQoNClRoaXMgcG9sbCBydW5zIHVudGlsICoqTm92ZW1iZXIgMTN0aCoqLg0KDQooMyB3 ZWVrcyB0byBhY2NvdW50IGZvciB0aGUgYnVzeSBJRVRGIHdlZWspDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KKkNvaW5j aWRlbnRhbGx5Kiwgd2UgYXJlIGFsc28gcG9sbGluZyBmb3Iga25vd2xlZGdlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIg dGhhdCBhcHBsaWVzIHRvIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQsIHRvIGVuc3VyZSB0aGF0IElQUiBoYXMgYmVlbiBk aXNjbG9zZWQgaW4gY29tcGxpYW5jZSB3aXRoIElFVEYgSVBSIHJ1bGVzIChzZWUgUkZDcyAzOTc5 LCA0ODc5LCAzNjY5IGFuZCA1Mzc4IGZvciBtb3JlIGRldGFpbHMpLg0KDQoNCg0KPT0+ICpJZiog eW91IGFyZSBsaXN0ZWQgYXMgYSBkb2N1bWVudCBhdXRob3Igb3IgY29udHJpYnV0b3IgcGxlYXNl IHJlc3BvbmQgdG8gdGhpcyBlbWFpbCBhbmQgaW5kaWNhdGUgd2hldGhlciBvciBub3QgeW91IGFy ZSBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgcmVsZXZhbnQgSVBSLg0KDQoNCg0KVGhlIGRyYWZ0IHdpbGwgbm90IGJl IGFkb3B0ZWQgdW50aWwgYSByZXNwb25zZSBoYXMgYmVlbiByZWNlaXZlZCBmcm9tIGVhY2ggYXV0 aG9yIGFuZCBjb250cmlidXRvci4NCg0KDQoNCklmIHlvdSBhcmUgbm90IGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhbiBh dXRob3Igb3IgY29udHJpYnV0b3IsIHRoZW4gcGxlYXNlIGV4cGxpY2l0bHkgcmVzcG9uZCBvbmx5 IGlmIHlvdSBhcmUgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IElQUiB0aGF0IGhhcyBub3QgeWV0IGJlZW4gZGlzY2xv c2VkIGluIGNvbmZvcm1hbmNlIHdpdGggSUVURiBydWxlcy4NCg0KDQoNClRoYW5rIHlvdSwNCg0K DQoNCk1hcnRpbiAmIFRob21hcw0KDQpiZXNzIGNoYWlycw0KDQoNCg0KWzFdIGh0dHBzOi8vdG9v bHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaHRtbC9kcmFmdC1oYW8tYmVzcy1pbnRlci1udm8zLXZwbi1vcHRpb25jLTAz DQo= --_000_4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F657D78428dfweml701chm_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Support,

 <= /p>

Linda Dunbar

 <= /p>

From: BESS [bess-bounces@ietf.org]= on behalf of =B9=CB=C8=D6 [gurong_cmcc@outlook.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 17:38
To: bess@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn= -optionc

I support the adoption. &= nbsp;From the draft, a good transport layer stitchin= g solution for IP overlay and MPLS overlay network is provided, I think it seems to be va= luable.

 <= /p>

Besides, I'm not aware any IPR about this= . 

 <= /p>

Gu Rong=

 <= /p>

 

"Susan Hares" <shar= es@ndzh.com> Tue, 27 October 2015 15:59 UTCShow header

Support as a co-aut=
hor.   I am not aware of any IPR relating to this draft. 
 
This option provide=
s a highly scalable option  for stitching NV03 networks and MPLS/IP VP=
N for those devices which can provide transport-layer stitching. 
 
Sue Hares
 
-----Original Messa=
ge-----
From: Thomas Morin =
[mailto:thomas.morin@orange.com<=
/a>] 
Sent: Thursday, Oct=
ober 22, 2015 11:31 AM
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: draft-hao-bess-int=
er-nvo3-vpn-optionc@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Poll for a=
doption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc
 
Hello working group=
,
 
This email starts a=
 two-week poll on adopting
draft-hao-bess-inte=
r-nvo3-vpn-optionc-03 [1] as a working group item.
 
Please send comment=
s to the list and state if you support adoption or not (in the later case, =
please also state the reasons).
 
This poll runs unti=
l **November 13th**.
(3 weeks to account=
 for the busy IETF week)
 
 
*Coincidentally*, w=
e are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to this draft, to =
ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see R=
FCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
 
=3D=3D> *If* you=
 are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this emai=
l and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.=

 
The draft will not =
be adopted until a response has been received from each author and contribu=
tor.
 
If you are not list=
ed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you =
are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IE=
TF rules.
 
Thank you,
 
Martin & Thomas=

bess chairs
 
[1] https://t=
ools.ietf.org/html/draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc-03<=
/span>
--_000_4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F657D78428dfweml701chm_-- From nobody Sat Oct 31 18:06:41 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E323E1ACDD5 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 18:06:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LVJUozq_Nird for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 18:06:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0748D1ACDD2 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 18:06:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CDI83095; Sun, 01 Nov 2015 01:06:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.218.25.36) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Sun, 1 Nov 2015 01:06:31 +0000 Received: from SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.206]) by SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.225]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 18:06:27 -0700 From: Quintin zhao To: "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc Thread-Index: AQHREWRbqPy4oPlVL06npmlOKRLr/J6CDjWagAODvWGAAMMEkIAACfew Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2015 01:06:26 +0000 Message-ID: <11208E03C9803E4CB4C3D898F153D6C03910EA03@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com> References: , <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F657D78428@dfweml701-chm> In-Reply-To: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F657D78428@dfweml701-chm> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.194.185.22] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_11208E03C9803E4CB4C3D898F153D6C03910EA03SJCEML701CHMchi_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2015 01:06:40 -0000 --_000_11208E03C9803E4CB4C3D898F153D6C03910EA03SJCEML701CHMchi_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Support. This draft is a practical solution for VPN network and NVO3 inter= -connection. Quintin Zhao ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---------- "Susan Hares" > Tue, 27 October 201= 5 15:59 UTCShow header Support as a co-author. I am not aware of any IPR relating to this draft. This option provides a highly scalable option for stitching NV03 networks = and MPLS/IP VPN for those devices which can provide transport-layer stitchi= ng. Sue Hares -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Morin [mailto:thomas.morin@orange.com] Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 11:31 AM To: bess@ietf.org Cc: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc@tools.ietf.org Subject: Poll for adoption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc Hello working group, This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc-03 [1] as a working group item. Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or not (= in the later case, please also state the reasons). This poll runs until **November 13th**. (3 weeks to account for the busy IETF week) *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies= to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IE= TF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). =3D=3D> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please resp= ond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant= IPR. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each = author and contributor. If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly r= espond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in = conformance with IETF rules. Thank you, Martin & Thomas bess chairs [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc-03 --_000_11208E03C9803E4CB4C3D898F153D6C03910EA03SJCEML701CHMchi_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Support.  This draft is a practical= solution for VPN network and NVO3 inter-connection.

 

Quintin Zhao

 <= /p>

--------------------------------= -----------------------------------------------------

"Susan Hares"= ; <shares@ndzh.com> Tue, 27 October 2015 15:59 UTCShow header

Support as a co-aut=
hor.   I am not aware of any IPR relating to this draft. 
 
This option provide=
s a highly scalable option  for stitching NV03 networks and MPLS/IP VP=
N for those devices which can provide transport-layer stitching. 
 
Sue Hares
 
-----Original Messa=
ge-----
From: Thomas Morin =
[mailto:thomas.morin@orange.com<=
/a>] 
Sent: Thursday, Oct=
ober 22, 2015 11:31 AM
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: draft-hao-bess-int=
er-nvo3-vpn-optionc@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Poll for a=
doption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc
 
Hello working group=
,
 
This email starts a=
 two-week poll on adopting
draft-hao-bess-inte=
r-nvo3-vpn-optionc-03 [1] as a working group item.
 
Please send comment=
s to the list and state if you support adoption or not (in the later case, =
please also state the reasons).
 
This poll runs unti=
l **November 13th**.
(3 weeks to account=
 for the busy IETF week)
 
 
*Coincidentally*, w=
e are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to this draft, to =
ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see R=
FCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
 
=3D=3D> *If* you=
 are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this emai=
l and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.=

 
The draft will not =
be adopted until a response has been received from each author and contribu=
tor.
 
If you are not list=
ed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you =
are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IE=
TF rules.
 
Thank you,
 
Martin & Thomas=

bess chairs
 
[1] https://t=
ools.ietf.org/html/draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc-03<=
/span>

--_000_11208E03C9803E4CB4C3D898F153D6C03910EA03SJCEML701CHMchi_-- From nobody Sat Oct 31 19:35:33 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53CB81B52E3 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 19:35:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.422 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.422 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mcpFRQX81pWU for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 19:35:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35B271B52E2 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 19:35:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CDI86340; Sun, 01 Nov 2015 02:35:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.34) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Sun, 1 Nov 2015 02:31:39 +0000 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.203]) by nkgeml403-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.34]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Sun, 1 Nov 2015 10:31:31 +0800 From: Zhuangshunwan To: Thomas Morin , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc Thread-Index: AQHRDN+F6rsQcAT66UK095UocMLNUp6GfkiQ Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2015 02:31:31 +0000 Message-ID: <19AB2A007F56DB4E8257F949A2FB9858A97D0506@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <5629014C.30508@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <5629014C.30508@orange.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.194.185.23] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Cc: "draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2015 02:35:32 -0000 U3VwcG9ydC4NClRoaXMgZHJhZnQgcHJvdmlkZXMgYSBoaWdobHkgc2NhbGFibGUgaW50ZXItYXMg b3B0aW9uIGJldHdlZW4gTlZPMyBuZXR3b3JrIGFuZCBNUExTL0lQIFZQTiBuZXR3b3JrLg0KDQpT aHVud2FuDQoNCi0tLS0t08q8/tStvP4tLS0tLQ0Kt6K8/sjLOiBCRVNTIFttYWlsdG86YmVzcy1i b3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnXSC0+rHtIFRob21hcyBNb3Jpbg0Kt6LLzcqxvOQ6IDIwMTXE6jEw1MIy MsjVIDIzOjMxDQrK1bz+yMs6IGJlc3NAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCrOty806IGRyYWZ0LWhhby1iZXNzLWlu dGVyLW52bzMtdnBuLW9wdGlvbmNAdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcNCtb3zOI6IFtiZXNzXSBQb2xsIGZv ciBhZG9wdGlvbjogZHJhZnQtaGFvLWJlc3MtaW50ZXItbnZvMy12cG4tb3B0aW9uYw0KDQpIZWxs byB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwLA0KDQpUaGlzIGVtYWlsIHN0YXJ0cyBhIHR3by13ZWVrIHBvbGwgb24g YWRvcHRpbmcNCmRyYWZ0LWhhby1iZXNzLWludGVyLW52bzMtdnBuLW9wdGlvbmMtMDMgWzFdIGFz IGEgd29ya2luZyBncm91cCBpdGVtLg0KDQpQbGVhc2Ugc2VuZCBjb21tZW50cyB0byB0aGUgbGlz dCBhbmQgc3RhdGUgaWYgeW91IHN1cHBvcnQgYWRvcHRpb24gb3Igbm90IChpbiB0aGUgbGF0ZXIg Y2FzZSwgcGxlYXNlIGFsc28gc3RhdGUgdGhlIHJlYXNvbnMpLg0KDQpUaGlzIHBvbGwgcnVucyB1 bnRpbCAqKk5vdmVtYmVyIDEzdGgqKi4NCigzIHdlZWtzIHRvIGFjY291bnQgZm9yIHRoZSBidXN5 IElFVEYgd2VlaykNCg0KDQoqQ29pbmNpZGVudGFsbHkqLCB3ZSBhcmUgYWxzbyBwb2xsaW5nIGZv ciBrbm93bGVkZ2Ugb2YgYW55IElQUiB0aGF0IGFwcGxpZXMgdG8gdGhpcyBkcmFmdCwgdG8gZW5z dXJlIHRoYXQgSVBSIGhhcyBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3NlZCBpbiBjb21wbGlhbmNlIHdpdGggSUVURiBJ UFIgcnVsZXMgKHNlZSBSRkNzIDM5NzksIDQ4NzksIDM2NjkgYW5kIDUzNzggZm9yIG1vcmUgZGV0 YWlscykuDQoNCj09PiAqSWYqIHlvdSBhcmUgbGlzdGVkIGFzIGEgZG9jdW1lbnQgYXV0aG9yIG9y IGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9yIHBsZWFzZSByZXNwb25kIHRvIHRoaXMgZW1haWwgYW5kIGluZGljYXRlIHdo ZXRoZXIgb3Igbm90IHlvdSBhcmUgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IHJlbGV2YW50IElQUi4NCg0KVGhlIGRy YWZ0IHdpbGwgbm90IGJlIGFkb3B0ZWQgdW50aWwgYSByZXNwb25zZSBoYXMgYmVlbiByZWNlaXZl ZCBmcm9tIGVhY2ggYXV0aG9yIGFuZCBjb250cmlidXRvci4NCg0KSWYgeW91IGFyZSBub3QgbGlz dGVkIGFzIGFuIGF1dGhvciBvciBjb250cmlidXRvciwgdGhlbiBwbGVhc2UgZXhwbGljaXRseSBy ZXNwb25kIG9ubHkgaWYgeW91IGFyZSBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQgaGFzIG5vdCB5ZXQg YmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQgaW4gY29uZm9ybWFuY2Ugd2l0aCBJRVRGIHJ1bGVzLg0KDQpUaGFuayB5 b3UsDQoNCk1hcnRpbiAmIFRob21hcw0KYmVzcyBjaGFpcnMNCg0KWzFdIGh0dHBzOi8vdG9vbHMu aWV0Zi5vcmcvaHRtbC9kcmFmdC1oYW8tYmVzcy1pbnRlci1udm8zLXZwbi1vcHRpb25jLTAzDQoN Cg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQpCRVNTIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KQkVTU0BpZXRm Lm9yZw0KaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9iZXNzDQo=