From nobody Tue Aug 2 17:38:58 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F2B12D80B for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 17:38:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zFonYQGiO7ot for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 17:38:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68CC412B03D for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 17:38:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712umx3.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.245.210.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 3424C3EA8451C; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 00:38:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.122]) by fr712umx3.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO-o) with ESMTP id u730cqpI016149 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 3 Aug 2016 00:38:53 GMT Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.112]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u730bfc0003935 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 3 Aug 2016 02:38:52 +0200 Received: from FR711WXCHMBA03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.3.126]) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.112]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 02:38:16 +0200 From: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US)" To: "Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR)" , "thomas.morin@orange.com" Thread-Topic: New Version for draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df - ready for WG adoption call Thread-Index: AQHR7R9S0GTt3iTJV0OXx4ctXEjoeQ== Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 00:38:15 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.18.0.160707 x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.41] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] New Version for draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df - ready for WG adoption call X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 00:38:57 -0000 VGhvbWFzLCBNYXJ0aW4sIGFsbCwNCg0KV2Ugd291bGQgbGlrZSB0byBicmluZyB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0 4oCZcyBuZXcgdmVyc2lvbiB0byBldmVyeW9uZeKAmXMgYXR0ZW50aW9uLg0KVGhlIHJldiAwNCB3 YXMgYWxyZWFkeSBpbiB0aGUgcXVldWUgZm9yIFdHIGFkb3B0aW9uIGNhbGxzLCBob3dldmVyIHdl IG5vdyBiZWxpZXZlIHRoaXMgdmVyc2lvbiBpcyBpbiAoZXZlbikgYmV0dGVyIHNoYXBlIGZvciBX RyBhZG9wdGlvbiwgd2l0aCB0aGUgYWRkaXRpb24gb2YgYSBuZXcgY28tYXV0aG9yIGFuZCBoZXIg Y29udHJpYnV0aW9uLiBUaGUgZHJhZnQgY292ZXJzIG5vdyB0aGUgdmxhbi1hd2FyZSBidW5kbGUg c2VydmljZSBpbnRlcmZhY2Ugc2NlbmFyaW8uDQoNCldlIGFwcHJlY2lhdGUgYW55IGZlZWRiYWNr Lg0KVGhhbmsgeW91Lg0KSm9yZ2UNCg0KDQoNCk9uIDgvMi8xNiwgNToyNSBQTSwgImludGVybmV0 LWRyYWZ0c0BpZXRmLm9yZyIgPGludGVybmV0LWRyYWZ0c0BpZXRmLm9yZz4gd3JvdGU6DQoNCiAg ICANCiAgICBBIG5ldyB2ZXJzaW9uIG9mIEktRCwgZHJhZnQtcmFiYWRhbi1iZXNzLWV2cG4tYWMt ZGYtMDUudHh0DQogICAgaGFzIGJlZW4gc3VjY2Vzc2Z1bGx5IHN1Ym1pdHRlZCBieSBKb3JnZSBS YWJhZGFuIGFuZCBwb3N0ZWQgdG8gdGhlDQogICAgSUVURiByZXBvc2l0b3J5Lg0KICAgIA0KICAg IE5hbWU6CQlkcmFmdC1yYWJhZGFuLWJlc3MtZXZwbi1hYy1kZg0KICAgIFJldmlzaW9uOgkwNQ0K ICAgIFRpdGxlOgkJQUMtSW5mbHVlbmNlZCBEZXNpZ25hdGVkIEZvcndhcmRlciBFbGVjdGlvbiBm b3IgRVZQTg0KICAgIERvY3VtZW50IGRhdGU6CTIwMTYtMDgtMDINCiAgICBHcm91cDoJCUluZGl2 aWR1YWwgU3VibWlzc2lvbg0KICAgIFBhZ2VzOgkJMTANCiAgICBVUkw6ICAgICAgICAgICAgaHR0 cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaW50ZXJuZXQtZHJhZnRzL2RyYWZ0LXJhYmFkYW4tYmVzcy1ldnBu LWFjLWRmLTA1LnR4dA0KICAgIFN0YXR1czogICAgICAgICBodHRwczovL2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmll dGYub3JnL2RvYy9kcmFmdC1yYWJhZGFuLWJlc3MtZXZwbi1hYy1kZi8NCiAgICBIdG1saXplZDog ICAgICAgaHR0cHM6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LXJhYmFkYW4tYmVzcy1ldnBu LWFjLWRmLTA1DQogICAgRGlmZjogICAgICAgICAgIGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL3JmY2Rp ZmY/dXJsMj1kcmFmdC1yYWJhZGFuLWJlc3MtZXZwbi1hYy1kZi0wNQ0KICAgIA0KICAgIEFic3Ry YWN0Og0KICAgICAgIFRoZSBEZXNpZ25hdGVkIEZvcndhcmRlciAoREYpIGluIEVWUE4gbmV0d29y a3MgaXMgdGhlIFBFIHJlc3BvbnNpYmxlDQogICAgICAgZm9yIHNlbmRpbmcgbXVsdGljYXN0LCBi cm9hZGNhc3QgYW5kIHVua25vd24gdW5pY2FzdCB0cmFmZmljIHRvIGENCiAgICAgICBtdWx0aS1o b21lZCBDRSwgb24gYSBnaXZlbiBFdGhlcm5ldCBUYWcgb24gYSBwYXJ0aWN1bGFyIEV0aGVybmV0 DQogICAgICAgU2VnbWVudCAoRVMpLiBUaGUgREYgaXMgc2VsZWN0ZWQgYmFzZWQgb24gdGhlIGxp c3Qgb2YgUEVzIHRoYXQNCiAgICAgICBhZHZlcnRpc2UgdGhlIEV0aGVybmV0IFNlZ21lbnQgSWRl bnRpZmllciAoRVNJKSB0byB0aGUgRVZQTiBuZXR3b3JrLg0KICAgICAgIFdoaWxlIFBFIG5vZGUg b3IgbGluayBmYWlsdXJlcyB0cmlnZ2VyIHRoZSBERiByZS1lbGVjdGlvbiBmb3IgYSBnaXZlbg0K ICAgICAgIDxFU0ksIEVWST4sIGluZGl2aWR1YWwgQXR0YWNobWVudCBDaXJjdWl0IChBQykgb3Ig TUFDLVZSRiBmYWlsdXJlcyBkbw0KICAgICAgIG5vdCB0cmlnZ2VyIHN1Y2ggREYgcmUtZWxlY3Rp b24gYW5kIHRoZSB0cmFmZmljIG1heSB0aGVyZWZvcmUgYmUNCiAgICAgICBwZXJtYW5lbnRseSBp bXBhY3RlZCwgZXZlbiB0aG91Z2ggdGhlcmUgaXMgYW4gYWx0ZXJuYXRpdmUgcGF0aC4gVGhpcw0K ICAgICAgIGRvY3VtZW50IGltcHJvdmVzIHRoZSBERiBlbGVjdGlvbiBhbGdvcml0aG0gc28gdGhh dCB0aGUgQUMgc3RhdHVzIGNhbg0KICAgICAgIGluZmx1ZW5jZSB0aGUgcmVzdWx0IG9mIHRoZSBl bGVjdGlvbiBhbmQgdGhpcyB0eXBlIG9mICJsb2dpY2FsIg0KICAgICAgIGZhaWx1cmVzIGNhbiBi ZSBwcm90ZWN0ZWQgdG9vLg0KICAgIA0KICAgIA0KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICANCiAgICANCiAgICANCiAgICBQbGVhc2Ugbm90ZSB0aGF0IGl0IG1heSB0YWtlIGEgY291cGxl IG9mIG1pbnV0ZXMgZnJvbSB0aGUgdGltZSBvZiBzdWJtaXNzaW9uDQogICAgdW50aWwgdGhlIGh0 bWxpemVkIHZlcnNpb24gYW5kIGRpZmYgYXJlIGF2YWlsYWJsZSBhdCB0b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy4N CiAgICANCiAgICBUaGUgSUVURiBTZWNyZXRhcmlhdA0KICAgIA0KICAgIA0KDQo= From nobody Wed Aug 3 00:21:40 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietf.org Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE78D12D98A; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 00:21:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.29.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160803072137.11004.50327.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 00:21:37 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-03.txt X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 07:21:38 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS of the IETF. Title : FIB Reduction in Virtual Subnet Authors : Xiaohu Xu Christian Jacquenet Truman Boyes Brendan Fee Wim Henderickx Filename : draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-03.txt Pages : 7 Date : 2016-08-03 Abstract: Virtual Subnet is a BGP/MPLS IP VPN-based subnet extension solution which is intended for building Layer3 network virtualization overlays within and/or between data centers. This document describes a mechanism for reducing the FIB size of PE routers in the Virtual Subnet context. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-03 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-03 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Wed Aug 3 00:44:40 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietf.org Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881A312D876; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 00:44:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.29.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160803074435.11031.54208.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 00:44:35 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04.txt X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 07:44:35 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS of the IETF. Title : FIB Reduction in Virtual Subnet Authors : Xiaohu Xu Christian Jacquenet Truman Boyes Brendan Fee Wim Henderickx Filename : draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04.txt Pages : 7 Date : 2016-08-03 Abstract: Virtual Subnet is a BGP/MPLS IP VPN-based subnet extension solution which is intended for building Layer3 network virtualization overlays within and/or between data centers. This document describes a mechanism for reducing the FIB size of PE routers in the Virtual Subnet context. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Fri Aug 5 12:45:06 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietf.org Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C1212D559; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 12:45:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.29.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160805194505.31206.68202.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 12:45:05 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-ir-04.txt X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 19:45:05 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS of the IETF. Title : Ingress Replication Tunnels in Multicast VPN Authors : Eric C. Rosen Karthik Subramanian Zhaohui Zhang Filename : draft-ietf-bess-ir-04.txt Pages : 23 Date : 2016-08-05 Abstract: RFCs 6513, 6514, and other RFCs describe procedures by which a Service Provider may offer Multicast VPN service to its customers. These procedures create point-to-multipoint (P2MP) or multipoint-to- multipoint trees across the Service Provider's backbone. One type of P2MP tree that may be used is known as an "Ingress Replication (IR) tunnel". In an IR tunnel, a parent node need not be "directly connected" to its child nodes. When a parent node has to send a multicast data packet to its child nodes, it does not use layer 2 multicast, IP multicast, or MPLS multicast to do so. Rather, it makes n individual copies, and then unicasts each copy, through an IP or MPLS unicast tunnel, to exactly one child node. While the prior MVPN specifications allow the use of IR tunnels, those specifications are not always very clear or explicit about how the MVPN protocol elements and procedures are applied to IR tunnels. This document updates RFCs 6513 and 6514 by adding additional details that are specific to the use of IR tunnels. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-ir/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-ir-04 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-ir-04 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Fri Aug 12 02:59:18 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A5D12D145 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 02:59:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.62 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l7z2wQNsL-a0 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 02:59:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2E8912D134 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 02:59:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u7C9x331007275; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 10:59:03 +0100 Received: from 950129200 ([79.141.128.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u7C9x1W0007255 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 12 Aug 2016 10:59:02 +0100 From: "Adrian Farrel" To: Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 10:59:00 +0100 Message-ID: <00fa01d1f480$26ac91d0$7405b570$@olddog.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AdH0gAtq/6T0z4hDS0eaz39o1JCuhg== Content-Language: en-gb X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.0.0.1202-22508.006 X-TM-AS-Result: No-1.504-10.0-31-10 X-imss-scan-details: No-1.504-10.0-31-10 X-TMASE-MatchedRID: Yph5m/Tn4dWRTfgfKCWeWpmug812qIbznophrTcsI7abKItl61J/ycnj LTA/UDoAq61alUC6VkfkwjHXXC/4I66NVEWSRWyb73/QF9xGWmnnYt9u3Qvea1GssD+uEu+vOp9 USNlV/XxSuhP0Hq3otHbiGZbKDdpWed9K8bAS6IijG/YG/Do1EPhFSsz1P4wQsJ/jxlXnd3dp9x HuM9AfUiKeUbONtgeTe1ZwdZI0d19N0ny++z73BA== Archived-At: Cc: Qin Wu Subject: [bess] L3SM is last calling the L3VPN Service Model X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 09:59:17 -0000 H Bess, You may be interested to review and comment on https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model/ (sending your comments to the L3SM list). if you need context about what a service model is, then you may find https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-opsawg-service-model-explained/ helpful. Thanks, Adrian From nobody Mon Aug 15 11:08:13 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietf.org Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7891A12D0B2; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 11:08:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.29.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <147128449149.31650.2697109409772516465.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 11:08:11 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-ir-05.txt X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:08:11 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS of the IETF. Title : Ingress Replication Tunnels in Multicast VPN Authors : Eric C. Rosen Karthik Subramanian Zhaohui Zhang Filename : draft-ietf-bess-ir-05.txt Pages : 22 Date : 2016-08-15 Abstract: RFCs 6513, 6514, and other RFCs describe procedures by which a Service Provider may offer Multicast VPN service to its customers. These procedures create point-to-multipoint (P2MP) or multipoint-to- multipoint trees across the Service Provider's backbone. One type of P2MP tree that may be used is known as an "Ingress Replication (IR) tunnel". In an IR tunnel, a parent node need not be "directly connected" to its child nodes. When a parent node has to send a multicast data packet to its child nodes, it does not use layer 2 multicast, IP multicast, or MPLS multicast to do so. Rather, it makes n individual copies, and then unicasts each copy, through an IP or MPLS unicast tunnel, to exactly one child node. While the prior MVPN specifications allow the use of IR tunnels, those specifications are not always very clear or explicit about how the MVPN protocol elements and procedures are applied to IR tunnels. This document updates RFCs 6513 and 6514 by adding additional details that are specific to the use of IR tunnels. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-ir/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-ir-05 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-ir-05 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Tue Aug 16 05:23:39 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22DC412B032 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:23:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.781 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.781 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lD66yogwf7Ui for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:23:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from r-mail2.rd.orange.com (r-mail2.rd.orange.com [217.108.152.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F4112B026 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:23:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from r-mail2.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 551F15D8657; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:23:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.194.32.11]) by r-mail2.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CCA75D85F9; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:23:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.193.71.12] (10.193.71.12) by FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (10.194.32.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.301.0; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:23:34 +0200 To: References: From: Thomas Morin Organization: Orange Message-ID: <77bc10e8-77ae-1b50-fae4-6dcf4cb699b2@orange.com> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:23:34 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: draft-boutros-bess-vxlan-evpn@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-boutros-bess-vxlan-evpn-01 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:23:38 -0000 Hi everyone, As announced during Berlin meeting, considering the small support base, this document is not adopted. We will consider doing a call for adoption again when/if we hear more about the actual needs for such a solution. Thomas/Martin 2016-06-20, Thomas Morin: > Hello working group, > > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting > draft-boutros-bess-vxlan-evpn-01 [1] as a Working Group Document. > > Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, > please also state the reasons). > > This poll runs until *July 4th*. > > We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies > to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance > with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more > details). > > If you are listed as an Author or Contributor of this Document please > respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any > relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers > from all the Authors and Contributors. > > No IPR has been disclosed against this Document. > > If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please > explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet > been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > Thank you > > Martin & Thomas > bess chairs > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boutros-bess-vxlan-evpn-01 From nobody Tue Aug 16 05:37:29 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BED312D14F; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:37:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9u_yOlASo6FC; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:37:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4B5A12D104; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:37:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712umx4.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.245.210.45]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id BD49F75552901; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:37:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.42]) by fr712umx4.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO-o) with ESMTP id u7GCbJXC022874 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:37:19 GMT Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.112]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u7GCbGMX014699 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:37:19 +0200 Received: from [135.224.206.149] (135.239.27.39) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:37:16 +0200 Message-ID: <57B308FA.4090201@nokia.com> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:37:14 +0200 From: Martin Vigoureux User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [135.239.27.39] Archived-At: Cc: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates@ietf.org Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:37:27 -0000 Hello working group, This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 [1] as a Working Group Document. Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, please also state the reasons). This poll runs until *the 30th of August*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. No IPR has been disclosed against this Document If you are not listed as an Author or Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thank you Martin & Thomas bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates/ From nobody Tue Aug 16 05:38:08 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietf.org Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C34312D7B9; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:38:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: IETF Secretariat To: , , , X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.29.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <147135108717.22898.17181416943851209436.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:38:07 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [bess] The BESS WG has placed draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued" X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:38:07 -0000 The BESS WG has placed draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Martin Vigoureux) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates/ From nobody Tue Aug 16 05:42:30 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9605112D11E; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:42:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.781 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.781 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZC9opstuaA4o; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:42:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from r-mail2.rd.orange.com (r-mail2.rd.orange.com [217.108.152.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF7812D0C7; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:42:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from r-mail2.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 1125E5D8661; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:42:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.194.32.11]) by r-mail2.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8F75D85F9; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:42:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.193.71.12] (10.193.71.12) by FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (10.194.32.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.301.0; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:42:22 +0200 From: Thomas Morin To: Organization: Orange Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:42:22 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang@ietf.org Subject: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:42:28 -0000 Hello working group, This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang [1] as a working group item. Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). This poll runs until **August 30th**. *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). ==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author and contributor. If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thank you, Martin & Thomas bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang From nobody Tue Aug 16 05:43:13 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietf.org Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B8012D7BD; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:43:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: IETF Secretariat To: , , X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.29.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <147135139127.22871.9569126551649515191.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:43:11 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [bess] The BESS WG has placed draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued" X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:43:11 -0000 The BESS WG has placed draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Thomas Morin) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang/ From nobody Tue Aug 16 05:47:57 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14BD812D145; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:47:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GckjGGIM54Rt; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:47:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7064C12D144; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:47:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712umx3.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.245.210.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 7E09D4253978B; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:47:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.122]) by fr712umx3.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO-o) with ESMTP id u7GCll1V015079 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:47:47 GMT Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.112]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u7GCkeSe014915 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:47:47 +0200 Received: from [135.224.206.149] (135.239.27.39) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:47:34 +0200 Message-ID: <57B30B64.6040304@nokia.com> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:47:32 +0200 From: Martin Vigoureux User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: BESS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [135.239.27.39] Archived-At: Cc: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:47:56 -0000 Hello Working Group, This email starts a Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 [1]. ¤ Please read the document if you haven't read the most recent version yet, and send your comments to the list, no later than the *30th of August*. Note that this is *not only* a call for comments on the document, but also a call for support (or not) publishing this document as an Informational RFC. ¤ We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details) prior to moving forward. If you are listed as a document Author or Contributor of this document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. No IPR disclosure exists against this document. ¤ We are also polling for knowledge of implementations of part or all of what this document specifies. This information is expected as per [2]. Please inform the mailing list, or the chairs, or only one of the chairs. ¤ Finally, if someone wishes to volunteer to be Document Shepherd for this document, please let us know. Thank you M&T [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction/ [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw From nobody Tue Aug 16 05:50:33 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A12D712D7CE; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:50:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.619 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a31Ikiq6CsaP; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias92.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AC0512D0EE; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omfedm07.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.3]) by omfedm11.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id D1F6A3B4175; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:50:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.31.27]) by omfedm07.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id A4A5D4C071; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:50:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::60a9:abc3:86e6:2541]) by OPEXCLILM7C.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::8007:17b:c3b4:d68b%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:50:27 +0200 From: To: Martin Vigoureux , BESS Thread-Topic: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 Thread-Index: AQHR97xq3ol7/1GoLkeSoq2Mp5gHbKBLiZ7Q Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:50:26 +0000 Message-ID: <29257_1471351827_57B30C13_29257_1888_1_88132E969123D14D9BD844E1CD516EDE130CE29F@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> References: <57B30B64.6040304@nokia.com> In-Reply-To: <57B30B64.6040304@nokia.com> Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US Content-Language: fr-FR X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.1] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-PMX-Version: 6.2.1.2478543, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2016.6.17.114517 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:50:31 -0000 WG, I support the publication of draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-0= 4 as an Informational RFC. Being one of the authors, I'm also unaware of an= y IPR pertaining to this document. Cheers, Christian. -----Message d'origine----- De=A0: Martin Vigoureux [mailto:martin.vigoureux@nokia.com]=20 Envoy=E9=A0: mardi 16 ao=FBt 2016 14:48 =C0=A0: BESS Cc=A0: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction@ietf.org Objet=A0: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 Hello Working Group, This email starts a Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 [1]. =A4 Please read the document if you haven't read the most recent version ye= t, and send your comments to the list, no later than the *30th of August*. Note that this is *not only* a call for comments on the document, but also = a call for support (or not) publishing this document as an Informational RF= C. =A4 We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies t= o draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04, to ensure that IPR has b= een disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 = and 5378 for more details) prior to moving forward. If you are listed as a document Author or Contributor of this document plea= se respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any r= elevant undisclosed IPR. The document won't progress without answers from a= ll the Authors and Contributors. No IPR disclosure exists against this document. =A4 We are also polling for knowledge of implementations of part or all of = what this document specifies. This information is expected as per [2].=20 Please inform the mailing list, or the chairs, or only one of the chairs. =A4 Finally, if someone wishes to volunteer to be Document Shepherd for thi= s document, please let us know. Thank you M&T [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reducti= on/ [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw ___________________________________________________________________________= ______________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confiden= tielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu= ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages el= ectroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou = falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged inf= ormation that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and dele= te this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been = modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. From nobody Tue Aug 16 05:53:49 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E855A12D7BD for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:53:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.768 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.768 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2IunYtbsfLQb for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:53:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 360C512D5F8 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:53:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1844; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1471352026; x=1472561626; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=+uvle0mfaJlEf6x5ElvG/9Y2vCqbYhM+y/nPJPTcVls=; b=Xhfs6MdNDJjEwCkT9Nkjs8rDXMCDyM6k8V0m4rn8mv3dT33ORnXyrm5a 3AS0MCrMwttxYs4ZEfxcMl7znc+bz3vAE/bErTorRtz3t+d2DW0j5/RwF fGBEYnM6QeJaPIkIEYOIPG3P4RpI/cf+OIEQkN+uX2a9UcxRdR+kVs70r c=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DkAgCUC7NX/5hdJa1eg0VWfLlHgX0kh?= =?us-ascii?q?XkCgVQ4FAIBAQEBAQEBXieEXgEBBAEBARsdNAsFCwIBCBgeECcLJQIEDgUbiA4?= =?us-ascii?q?IDr4aAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFwWGKoF4CIJNhBIRARyDLIIvBZlBA?= =?us-ascii?q?YYdiHuBa4RciH6MOIN3AR42g3puhWGBNgEBAQ?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,529,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="311365551" Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Aug 2016 12:53:45 +0000 Received: from XCH-ALN-011.cisco.com (xch-aln-011.cisco.com [173.36.7.21]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7GCrjt9030933 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:53:45 GMT Received: from xch-aln-014.cisco.com (173.36.7.24) by XCH-ALN-011.cisco.com (173.36.7.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 07:53:44 -0500 Received: from xch-aln-014.cisco.com ([173.36.7.24]) by XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com ([173.36.7.24]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 07:53:44 -0500 From: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" To: Thomas Morin Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-boutros-bess-vxlan-evpn-01 Thread-Index: AQHR97kICQ9B5dPRfkiOHGIbCQeKWKBLiv9i Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:53:44 +0000 Message-ID: References: , <77bc10e8-77ae-1b50-fae4-6dcf4cb699b2@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <77bc10e8-77ae-1b50-fae4-6dcf4cb699b2@orange.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-boutros-bess-vxlan-evpn@tools.ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-boutros-bess-vxlan-evpn-01 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:53:49 -0000 I support the document. Belatedly :( Thanks, Jakob. > On Aug 16, 2016, at 5:23 AM, Thomas Morin wrote= : >=20 > Hi everyone, >=20 > As announced during Berlin meeting, considering the small support base, t= his document is not adopted. >=20 > We will consider doing a call for adoption again when/if we hear more abo= ut the actual needs for such a solution. >=20 > Thomas/Martin >=20 >=20 >=20 > 2016-06-20, Thomas Morin: >> Hello working group, >>=20 >> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting >> draft-boutros-bess-vxlan-evpn-01 [1] as a Working Group Document. >>=20 >> Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, >> please also state the reasons). >>=20 >> This poll runs until *July 4th*. >>=20 >> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies >> to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance >> with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more >> details). >>=20 >> If you are listed as an Author or Contributor of this Document please >> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any >> relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers >> from all the Authors and Contributors. >>=20 >> No IPR has been disclosed against this Document. >>=20 >> If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please >> explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet >> been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. >>=20 >> Thank you >>=20 >> Martin & Thomas >> bess chairs >>=20 >> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boutros-bess-vxlan-evpn-01 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Tue Aug 16 06:44:53 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5E912D615; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 06:44:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.922 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H5pgKpaDPV4x; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 06:44:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from NAM01-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn3nam01on0099.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.33.99]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56F6F12B047; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 06:44:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=hEFpmc8toip6QZAtaMCN+QC+43FBShz9XdfR6elVC1k=; b=HNSjc8tQrPx3VDHHRge8PFe2OkE8/tKWoM/KoGCfOrWlctf4ot5BM8c7GfNsRxYlxvXFa4Rp5a02zFL49xCn4VWxMp6bgDGUipz8XMtuAiL8coq5bfU13+QhlWz7isNILdXNOBEXlkH0odRpsJNC4HBqDB6Ru7j9ZIMoCLM9j60= Received: from SN1PR0501MB1821.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.163.131.144) by SN1PR0501MB1822.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.163.131.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA_P384) id 15.1.587.5; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:44:47 +0000 Received: from SN1PR0501MB1821.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.131.144]) by SN1PR0501MB1821.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.131.144]) with mapi id 15.01.0587.005; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:44:46 +0000 From: Jeff Haas To: "EXT - thomas.morin@orange.com" Thread-Topic: Call for adoption: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01 Thread-Index: AQHR98RZT1H0XhuY/0KSNuJwtelxhw== Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:44:46 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=jhaas@juniper.net; x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-originating-ip: [66.129.239.13] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f771b395-bb72-427b-92d4-08d3c5db7c59 x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SN1PR0501MB1822; 6:O/ZsDoGzOYxqNANz/q5OL93QSX1HtEVWnuU9gvTK8rFF3Q30lWrou4j4qnDeFLRwK2d9N5yRjUEougsGtAakNIfRePWvlrsSOsHP5L6InAZzbqLISF3aGesSI9Th68Pd5dYgtWL4nY3kTqo9Vcsjdl+MFXMHH5xmc+KrHZ58XoNm8BjY1Iq+jxh5iS4KZ/ATCSLrTp2JIknUw2/zrfF8Wm6YKEJOK74rnjsKOoQAczr1A/S7rWys1ho1o2Q7/LPdvQzb8FnVxeYnIKnHxxrArcS/4nfjmsIz06Fz4gXq6q6Trj2csSiDzieUr87eTu65S4HQKkcJE+8ray7C5swBJw==; 5:E3GEAkH6Py3YvH/Si6C56Bi8aZu8jmg/hDcnq2QfaSToaw1V+vnEhkmIYDXwjx+0vO/CQuU1D+yYQoyN7eWOLeJYewoa7Gp9ZZ2dAsdcok2NDSfAP9huEb7o3oL5NGJiCmzk8xmB6/VOQ2t067+RPA==; 24:yZ4O8Re++rv2mmMZHTMMSz+yuPM0RTk2XAbpH1cdyBS54PBD4MqXAUmrFd0bQ0FOjPSZTnIQbVQcJNk8u3hjkUeFth3wUfVzqerBSqxJ02o=; 7:9fTvz/DCgR2B7f14Ihe50uQ2RkC9zjCx1bm7MgBvjpkprHgrM9uXLjMO5roNuiIhNwoCkAX6NVyH7V+tr4o2bJK4Xh8ULtSEQgqEb0QhwcmbI9hmhP1lcqrFhpsJKLpH+4ZztwlWMy5zQl+0GVwfBwUKIDxnrocZIdMhLTUYqpG8Sld8YUtZUNuuRI5+AjheestBGkZ6FPZoeAKgAc78ppDyuViStqlVFsVgtzSCXG7Rh5y6C+HsYFPMQPX6Ho7I x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SN1PR0501MB1822; x-ld-processed: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4,ExtAddr x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105)(18271650672692); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040176)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026); SRVR:SN1PR0501MB1822; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SN1PR0501MB1822; x-forefront-prvs: 0036736630 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(24454002)(199003)(189002)(377454003)(82746002)(77096005)(15975445007)(19580395003)(36756003)(189998001)(97736004)(122556002)(87936001)(76176999)(110136002)(101416001)(33656002)(19580405001)(106356001)(2900100001)(2950100001)(66066001)(50986999)(54356999)(105586002)(102836003)(3846002)(68736007)(6116002)(99286002)(81166006)(81156014)(8676002)(7736002)(7846002)(305945005)(5002640100001)(8936002)(2906002)(4326007)(83716003)(10400500002)(586003)(86362001)(92566002)(3280700002)(230783001)(106116001)(3660700001)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:SN1PR0501MB1822; H:SN1PR0501MB1821.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <259FDCDC53CF15448130B3E0BE7B8D7D@namprd05.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Aug 2016 13:44:46.3686 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN1PR0501MB1822 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:44:52 -0000 I am not aware of any IPR on this draft. -- Jeff > On Aug 16, 2016, at 8:42 AM, Thomas Morin wrote= : >=20 > Hello working group, >=20 > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn= -yang [1] as a working group item. >=20 > Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or not= (in the later case, please also state the reasons). >=20 > This poll runs until **August 30th**. >=20 > *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that appli= es to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with = IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). >=20 > =3D=3D> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please re= spond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any releva= nt IPR. >=20 > The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from eac= h author and contributor. >=20 > If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly= respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed i= n conformance with IETF rules. >=20 > Thank you, >=20 > Martin & Thomas > bess chairs >=20 > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang >=20 From nobody Tue Aug 16 06:56:18 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA66212D5C8 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 06:56:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.779 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.779 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AC_BR_BONANZA=0.001, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6PDzRJtFB9Pt for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 06:56:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from r-mail2.rd.orange.com (r-mail2.rd.orange.com [217.108.152.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B96412B061 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 06:56:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from r-mail2.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 718AE5D8657; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:56:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.194.32.11]) by r-mail2.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688125D85F9; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:56:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.193.71.12] (10.193.71.12) by FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (10.194.32.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.301.0; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:56:14 +0200 To: Greg Mirsky , BESS References: <14687_1469186942_5792037E_14687_3711_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D09E30C11@OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> From: Thomas Morin Organization: Orange Message-ID: <5f128fb2-87db-ba49-98ae-6464cb6c9a29@orange.com> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:56:14 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------F1E9A00F1E10692E54D3580C" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] draft minutes from our session at IETF 96 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:56:17 -0000 --------------F1E9A00F1E10692E54D3580C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Greg, I've just uploaded updated minutes to address your comment. Best, -Thomas, as WG co-chair 2016-07-26, Greg Mirsky: > Hi Thomas, et. al, > my note is regarding the presentation and the discussion of > draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover. > Minutes state "some discussion on BFD boostraping and suggestion we > may want to have BFD WG aware". > I recall that I've used stronger than "may want" encouragement to > bring BFD-related work to attention of the BFD WG. In fact, I've > suggested that the work on bootstrapping p2mp BFD session belongs in > BFD WG. And shortly after the meeting BFD WG co-chair, Reshad Rahman, > concurred with my that comment on the mailing list. > Regards, Greg > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 4:29 AM, > wrote: > > HI everyone, > > The draft minutes of yesterday's session are here: > https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/minutes/minutes-96-bess > > Please read and suggest any relevant correction or adjustment. > These minutes will become final on September 12th. > > Best, > > -Thomas/Martin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------F1E9A00F1E10692E54D3580C Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi Greg,

I've just uploaded updated minutes to address your comment.

Best,

-Thomas, as WG co-chair


2016-07-26, Greg Mirsky:
Hi Thomas, et. al,
my note is regarding the presentation and the discussion of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover.
Minutes state "some discussion on BFD boostraping and suggestion we may want to have BFD WG aware".
I recall that I've used stronger than "may want" encouragement to bring BFD-related work to attention of the BFD WG. In fact, I've suggested that the work on bootstrapping p2mp BFD session belongs in BFD WG. And shortly after the meeting BFD WG co-chair, Reshad Rahman, concurred with my that comment on the mailing list.
Regards, Greg

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 4:29 AM, <thomas.morin@orange.com> wrote:
HI everyone,

The draft minutes of yesterday's session are here:
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/minutes/minutes-96-bess

Please read and suggest any relevant correction or adjustment.
These minutes will become final on September 12th.

Best,

-Thomas/Martin































































--------------F1E9A00F1E10692E54D3580C-- From nobody Tue Aug 16 09:01:14 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7EB112D8C6 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 09:01:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.998 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AC_BR_BONANZA=0.001, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RK7v7moa8alh for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 09:01:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yb0-x231.google.com (mail-yb0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A61212D8BF for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 09:00:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb0-x231.google.com with SMTP id a1so8099294ybi.0 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 09:00:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EHU+dhhouk5w6Zm6ssiPL6ZmkfFoZGyp1qYbRWgCRf8=; b=fm4gH5Tb4GAPZh3CGgAmxqC4CL+pwhk4wjWI3yx2mNpa2LpuAiOx7+D6yQt+f1d0Bh UsL+MKvAGSq8iOxMlGZYMMlvW2fASPJTQHN8uvjtCdsL5KYlAu4Xao9LgCfURDTobYN6 CKSS7zhrTjON9hNiM/H1mZGLdSxs9R4OOj8uLbxHUhTu31DsR01DRS0zc8bmK5rtajuV 1P+MNvzA5fsZO27+itP4uN4AEGYeabBs2woCtL16rMKqbNcskP06mgGKFZhYEVfslCNE a0idFFw+YaVSoFHE0C9vZfLq28ptjqAlAToyhEHiC/tTEHJrfoJlHf8FsXmAHQhaBRq+ 3OJw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EHU+dhhouk5w6Zm6ssiPL6ZmkfFoZGyp1qYbRWgCRf8=; b=jTCjQrIHMQD/jWv/y2t5d7KCWnbEGnxMxanKqU6kemyIm6l7hTU9tcQ4OfUte/YJFj +hIl/gRnk+WpPnfZCQpCbPW+UzM6FmPyxlfOv5swwibtA0BXpGsVQlwpGl9vCszilVTW qBNUbWh/Pykckqgkjvov1NMTPZBmPoAQMQBCz2i/Q8eMWbvTl3dWXeqX8pH3HkGWaV5Z 2358IvuiN+wE3Tmg8bfQA9JLZWp18eWpvRoS/ru3LXtL6kcsKbuzeMFzUF0bAKwBtjGl fsfYsfoafHE9VBojskUnmrzSwKdi38itQK6oovPWgOQ/Jf4V1DTzbzHN0ZcEYWlZqvIR IGXg== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutoxAWOAp0B4KYd9hNkVzdZcLu2bI7W4xqtovPcrt6eRdM+w2ZuqXbOO2K1J1RikEKazFLT4OPSJUSL8g== X-Received: by 10.37.109.195 with SMTP id i186mr18353618ybc.8.1471363251630; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 09:00:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.15.70 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 09:00:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5f128fb2-87db-ba49-98ae-6464cb6c9a29@orange.com> References: <14687_1469186942_5792037E_14687_3711_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D09E30C11@OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <5f128fb2-87db-ba49-98ae-6464cb6c9a29@orange.com> From: Greg Mirsky Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 09:00:51 -0700 Message-ID: To: Thomas Morin Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11415b90f2fa78053a327309 Archived-At: Cc: BESS Subject: Re: [bess] draft minutes from our session at IETF 96 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 16:01:13 -0000 --001a11415b90f2fa78053a327309 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Thank you, Thomas. It is clear and I agree with the update. Regards, Greg On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Thomas Morin wrote: > Hi Greg, > > I've just uploaded updated minutes to address your comment. > > Best, > > -Thomas, as WG co-chair > > > 2016-07-26, Greg Mirsky: > > Hi Thomas, et. al, > my note is regarding the presentation and the discussion of > draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover. > Minutes state "some discussion on BFD boostraping and suggestion we may > want to have BFD WG aware". > I recall that I've used stronger than "may want" encouragement to bring > BFD-related work to attention of the BFD WG. In fact, I've suggested that > the work on bootstrapping p2mp BFD session belongs in BFD WG. And shortly > after the meeting BFD WG co-chair, Reshad Rahman, concurred with my that > comment on the mailing list. > Regards, Greg > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 4:29 AM, wrote: > >> HI everyone, >> >> The draft minutes of yesterday's session are here: >> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/minutes/minutes-96-bess >> >> Please read and suggest any relevant correction or adjustment. >> These minutes will become final on September 12th. >> >> Best, >> >> -Thomas/Martin >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > --001a11415b90f2fa78053a327309 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thank you, Thomas. It is clear and I agree with the update= .

Regards, Greg
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Thomas Morin = <thomas.morin@orange.com> wrote:
=20 =20 =20
Hi Greg,

I've just uploaded updated minutes to address your comment.

Best,

-Thomas, as WG co-chair


2016-07-26, Greg Mirsky:
=20
Hi Thomas, et. al,
my note is regarding the presentation and the discussion of=C2=A0dra= ft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover.
Minutes = state "so= me discussion on BFD boostraping and suggestion we may want to have BFD WG = aware".
I recall= that I've used stronger than "may want" encouragement to bri= ng BFD-related work to attention of the BFD WG. In fact, I've suggested= that the work on bootstrapping p2mp BFD session belongs in BFD WG. And sho= rtly after the meeting BFD WG co-chair, Reshad Rahman, concurred with my th= at comment on the mailing list.
Regards,= Greg

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 4:29 AM, <thomas.morin@orange.com> wrote:
HI everyone,

The draft minutes of yesterday's session are here:
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/min= utes/minutes-96-bess

Please read and suggest any relevant correction or adjustment.
These minutes will become final on September 12th.

Best,

-Thomas/Martin
































































--001a11415b90f2fa78053a327309-- From nobody Tue Aug 16 10:56:35 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7AB12D90E; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:56:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id upejzmuDTJiX; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:56:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EB6E127071; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:56:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712umx4.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.245.210.45]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 11681E9E84468; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:56:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.42]) by fr712umx4.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO-o) with ESMTP id u7GHuTDn006365 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:56:30 GMT Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u7GHuTGV024293 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 19:56:29 +0200 Received: from FR711WXCHMBA03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.3.252]) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.111]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 19:56:29 +0200 From: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US)" To: "Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR)" , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 Thread-Index: AQHR97r8qRmHtPkOsUW96QBgUE/NWqBLSLAA Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:56:29 +0000 Message-ID: <02E8544D-704A-452A-95B4-FA60ACC5E7FF@nokia.com> References: <57B308FA.4090201@nokia.com> In-Reply-To: <57B308FA.4090201@nokia.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.19.0.160806 x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.38] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <687FE9C36E2688408274124852B30076@exchange.lucent.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:56:34 -0000 QXMgY29hdXRob3IsIEkgZnVsbHkgc3VwcG9ydCB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IGZvciBXRyBhZG9wdGlv bi4gSXQgaXMgdmVyeSBtdWNoIG5lZWRlZCB0byBrZWVwIGV4cGFuZGluZyB0aGUgdXNlLWNhc2Vz IG9mIEVWUE4gaW4gT3BlcmF0b3JzLg0KSeKAmW0gbm90IGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSByZWxldmFudCBJ UFIuDQoNClRoYW5rcy4NCkpvcmdlDQoNCg0KT24gOC8xNi8xNiwgNTozNyBBTSwgIk1hcnRpbiBW aWdvdXJldXgiIDxtYXJ0aW4udmlnb3VyZXV4QG5va2lhLmNvbT4gd3JvdGU6DQoNCiAgICBIZWxs byB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwLA0KICAgIA0KICAgIFRoaXMgZW1haWwgc3RhcnRzIGEgdHdvLXdlZWsg cG9sbCBvbiBhZG9wdGluZw0KICAgIGRyYWZ0LXp6aGFuZy1iZXNzLWV2cG4tYnVtLXByb2NlZHVy ZS11cGRhdGVzLTAzIFsxXSBhcyBhIFdvcmtpbmcgR3JvdXAgDQogICAgRG9jdW1lbnQuDQogICAg DQogICAgUGxlYXNlIHN0YXRlIG9uIHRoZSBsaXN0IGlmIHlvdSBzdXBwb3J0IGFkb3B0aW9uIG9y IG5vdCAoaW4gYm90aCBjYXNlcywgDQogICAgcGxlYXNlIGFsc28gc3RhdGUgdGhlIHJlYXNvbnMp Lg0KICAgIA0KICAgIFRoaXMgcG9sbCBydW5zIHVudGlsICp0aGUgMzB0aCBvZiBBdWd1c3QqLg0K ICAgIA0KICAgIFdlIGFyZSBhbHNvIHBvbGxpbmcgZm9yIGtub3dsZWRnZSBvZiBhbnkgdW5kaXNj bG9zZWQgSVBSIHRoYXQgYXBwbGllcw0KICAgIHRvIHRoaXMgRG9jdW1lbnQsIHRvIGVuc3VyZSB0 aGF0IElQUiBoYXMgYmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQgaW4gY29tcGxpYW5jZQ0KICAgIHdpdGggSUVURiBJ UFIgcnVsZXMgKHNlZSBSRkNzIDM5NzksIDQ4NzksIDM2NjkgYW5kIDUzNzggZm9yIG1vcmUNCiAg ICBkZXRhaWxzKS4NCiAgICBJZiB5b3UgYXJlIGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhbiBBdXRob3Igb3IgQ29udHJp YnV0b3Igb2YgdGhpcyBEb2N1bWVudCBwbGVhc2UNCiAgICByZXNwb25kIHRvIHRoaXMgZW1haWwg YW5kIGluZGljYXRlIHdoZXRoZXIgb3Igbm90IHlvdSBhcmUgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55DQogICAgcmVs ZXZhbnQgdW5kaXNjbG9zZWQgSVBSLiBUaGUgRG9jdW1lbnQgd29uJ3QgcHJvZ3Jlc3Mgd2l0aG91 dCBhbnN3ZXJzDQogICAgZnJvbSBhbGwgdGhlIEF1dGhvcnMgYW5kIENvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycy4NCiAg ICBObyBJUFIgaGFzIGJlZW4gZGlzY2xvc2VkIGFnYWluc3QgdGhpcyBEb2N1bWVudA0KICAgIA0K ICAgIElmIHlvdSBhcmUgbm90IGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhbiBBdXRob3Igb3IgQ29udHJpYnV0b3IsIHRo ZW4gcGxlYXNlIA0KICAgIGV4cGxpY2l0bHkgcmVzcG9uZCBvbmx5IGlmIHlvdSBhcmUgYXdhcmUg b2YgYW55IElQUiB0aGF0IGhhcyBub3QgeWV0IA0KICAgIGJlZW4gZGlzY2xvc2VkIGluIGNvbmZv cm1hbmNlIHdpdGggSUVURiBydWxlcy4NCiAgICANCiAgICBUaGFuayB5b3UNCiAgICANCiAgICBN YXJ0aW4gJiBUaG9tYXMNCiAgICBiZXNzIGNoYWlycw0KICAgIA0KICAgIFsxXSANCiAgICBodHRw czovL2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2RvYy9kcmFmdC16emhhbmctYmVzcy1ldnBuLWJ1bS1w cm9jZWR1cmUtdXBkYXRlcy8NCiAgICANCg0KDQo= From nobody Tue Aug 16 12:10:14 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF8D12D737 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:10:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nuagenetworks-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mQuqNK6_OuWm for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:10:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ua0-x234.google.com (mail-ua0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 718B912D6AA for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:10:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ua0-x234.google.com with SMTP id k90so137565402uak.1 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:10:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nuagenetworks-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3EglJrsImyrWlDZN5dl9s6bsdhAQDKFYRb8vTs8Uzno=; b=IbpI5t+eCF9PwpzBNxJuslyhqkuU2EEmlLNRtKQqr5Aidhxs69Ky2/M6J9CtJGh6HR 6J6jfsVgRWT3LIa8226ztVEGPTnbxjEhJrEqNVAYVgVdESy8FZFUKLMmOX9yWCjngJSb Z1Pdkj2g7o11Ls3N4D40OXtlTyPvLdR/MqyofQrjSVA12sBP7vqXnfJPd8tn6m0K/YR8 REZbmXshUKAoaDyFX2Gp0oImw5OdmnK7dWJwzhf9/PTbOJLYpbIiAo1FQKrWP6M1qQjZ 9p3kDgUHFrEToG/T0Hc2t4EC7t/CiybovLlWZ8WH8/PCCiBglmCXkpZuG0YTHkZJjnL2 ljkg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3EglJrsImyrWlDZN5dl9s6bsdhAQDKFYRb8vTs8Uzno=; b=BlCJgbJQc0yedGII5Yr4JRveh6E3W6eYNjECs6LdncY8MnSocRHRW52cxlz7vkt5TM 6bt7DUhfCSnbV+i4wzglZAgwzLUz554SH5B28T+PmtiImI46oGdCLadJWp6HvvtiIM+C 8jln3WFKcbbf0f7GejLdycQXXQ1eC9AmHS0Z9Y6SdmMij0qxPl4qtBYOMsyjeupm4i3j h5DDMfeAxZChYwjHBb9zo3zAz6iZq8Z6dnO6PZzG1yBl577HaBFCbzpzPTW3oUMAMCGR byurT6ldSZt+RSAHC5oXwQHx3buCshr8wyl9JBazq+/NYaMq/fgngRoWWwtcOC40DfKV 78HA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvrjn2Y/v/GtOPpn32SXhw2Iff1TI93dpOH0Y0OTV0wltF859/7KWgPZu3jPdeea3V/VvKudapTPZwMRmry X-Received: by 10.31.236.66 with SMTP id k63mr6896386vkh.48.1471374610459; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:10:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.176.81.124 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:10:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <57B308FA.4090201@nokia.com> References: <57B308FA.4090201@nokia.com> From: Nabeel Cocker Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:10:10 -0400 Message-ID: To: Martin Vigoureux Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0920fafd0361053a35186d Archived-At: Cc: "bess@ietf.org" , draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 19:10:13 -0000 --94eb2c0920fafd0361053a35186d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 support Thanks Nabeel On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Martin Vigoureux < martin.vigoureux@nokia.com> wrote: > Hello working group, > > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting > draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 [1] as a Working Group > Document. > > Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, > please also state the reasons). > > This poll runs until *the 30th of August*. > > We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies > to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance > with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more > details). > If you are listed as an Author or Contributor of this Document please > respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any > relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers > from all the Authors and Contributors. > No IPR has been disclosed against this Document > > If you are not listed as an Author or Contributor, then please explicitly > respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in > conformance with IETF rules. > > Thank you > > Martin & Thomas > bess chairs > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum- > procedure-updates/ > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > --94eb2c0920fafd0361053a35186d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
support

Thanks
Nabeel=C2=A0

On Tue,= Aug 16, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@noki= a.com> wrote:
Hello working= group,

This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 [1] as a Working Group= Document.

Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, ple= ase also state the reasons).

This poll runs until *the 30th of August*.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies
to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance
with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more
details).
If you are listed as an Author or Contributor of this Document please
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors.
No IPR has been disclosed against this Document

If you are not listed as an Author or Contributor, then please explicitly r= espond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in = conformance with IETF rules.

Thank you

Martin & Thomas
bess chairs

[1] https://datatracke= r.ietf.org/doc/draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates/<= br>
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

--94eb2c0920fafd0361053a35186d-- From nobody Tue Aug 16 13:03:32 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7FA112D0CE; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:03:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VqN7iAW8cYD9; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:03:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 514A812D0B6; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:03:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712umx4.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.245.210.45]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 13E26B7EA5946; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 20:03:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.42]) by fr712umx4.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO-o) with ESMTP id u7GK3Qht009396 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 20:03:26 GMT Received: from FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712wxchhub03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.74]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u7GK3QNV006088 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 22:03:26 +0200 Received: from FR711WXCHMBA07.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.3.202]) by FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 22:03:26 +0200 From: "Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)" To: "christian.jacquenet@orange.com" , "Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR)" , BESS Thread-Topic: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 Thread-Index: AQHR9/k/Os9eZ3c1FEOiKSsYRayC5A== Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 20:03:25 +0000 Message-ID: <62EF6A8A-2DCF-4A27-BA9A-D99D92A83A37@nokia.com> References: <57B30B64.6040304@nokia.com> <29257_1471351827_57B30C13_29257_1888_1_88132E969123D14D9BD844E1CD516EDE130CE29F@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> In-Reply-To: <29257_1471351827_57B30C13_29257_1888_1_88132E969123D14D9BD844E1CD516EDE130CE29F@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.151008 x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.41] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <485895B8946D1545885B5FE5DFF05974@exchange.lucent.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 20:03:31 -0000 U3VwcG9ydCBwdWJsaWNhdGlvbiBvZiBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbmFsIFJGQy4gQXMgY29hdXRob3Igbm90 IGF3YXJlIG9mIElQUiByZWxhdGVkIHRvIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQNCg0KDQoNCg0KT24gMTYvMDgvMTYg MTQ6NTAsICJCRVNTIG9uIGJlaGFsZiBvZiBjaHJpc3RpYW4uamFjcXVlbmV0QG9yYW5nZS5jb20i IDxiZXNzLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmcgb24gYmVoYWxmIG9mIGNocmlzdGlhbi5qYWNxdWVuZXRA b3JhbmdlLmNvbT4gd3JvdGU6DQoNCj5XRywNCj4NCj5JIHN1cHBvcnQgdGhlIHB1YmxpY2F0aW9u IG9mIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtYmVzcy12aXJ0dWFsLXN1Ym5ldC1maWItcmVkdWN0aW9uLTA0IGFzIGFu IEluZm9ybWF0aW9uYWwgUkZDLiBCZWluZyBvbmUgb2YgdGhlIGF1dGhvcnMsIEknbSBhbHNvIHVu YXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IElQUiBwZXJ0YWluaW5nIHRvIHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQuDQo+DQo+Q2hlZXJz LA0KPg0KPkNocmlzdGlhbi4NCj4NCj4tLS0tLU1lc3NhZ2UgZCdvcmlnaW5lLS0tLS0NCj5EZSA6 IE1hcnRpbiBWaWdvdXJldXggW21haWx0bzptYXJ0aW4udmlnb3VyZXV4QG5va2lhLmNvbV0gDQo+ RW52b3nDqSA6IG1hcmRpIDE2IGFvw7t0IDIwMTYgMTQ6NDgNCj7DgCA6IEJFU1MNCj5DYyA6IGRy YWZ0LWlldGYtYmVzcy12aXJ0dWFsLXN1Ym5ldC1maWItcmVkdWN0aW9uQGlldGYub3JnDQo+T2Jq ZXQgOiBXRyBMYXN0IENhbGwgZm9yIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtYmVzcy12aXJ0dWFsLXN1Ym5ldC1maWIt cmVkdWN0aW9uLTA0DQo+DQo+SGVsbG8gV29ya2luZyBHcm91cCwNCj4NCj5UaGlzIGVtYWlsIHN0 YXJ0cyBhIFdvcmtpbmcgR3JvdXAgTGFzdCBDYWxsIG9uDQo+ZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1iZXNzLXZpcnR1 YWwtc3VibmV0LWZpYi1yZWR1Y3Rpb24tMDQgWzFdLg0KPg0KPsKkIFBsZWFzZSByZWFkIHRoZSBk b2N1bWVudCBpZiB5b3UgaGF2ZW4ndCByZWFkIHRoZSBtb3N0IHJlY2VudCB2ZXJzaW9uIHlldCwg YW5kIHNlbmQgeW91ciBjb21tZW50cyB0byB0aGUgbGlzdCwgbm8gbGF0ZXIgdGhhbiB0aGUgKjMw dGggb2YgQXVndXN0Ki4NCj5Ob3RlIHRoYXQgdGhpcyBpcyAqbm90IG9ubHkqIGEgY2FsbCBmb3Ig Y29tbWVudHMgb24gdGhlIGRvY3VtZW50LCBidXQgYWxzbyBhIGNhbGwgZm9yIHN1cHBvcnQgKG9y IG5vdCkgcHVibGlzaGluZyB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IGFzIGFuIEluZm9ybWF0aW9uYWwgUkZDLg0K Pg0KPsKkIFdlIGFyZSBhbHNvIHBvbGxpbmcgZm9yIGtub3dsZWRnZSBvZiBhbnkgdW5kaXNjbG9z ZWQgSVBSIHRoYXQgYXBwbGllcyB0byBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWJlc3MtdmlydHVhbC1zdWJuZXQtZmli LXJlZHVjdGlvbi0wNCwgdG8gZW5zdXJlIHRoYXQgSVBSIGhhcyBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3NlZCBpbiBj b21wbGlhbmNlIHdpdGggSUVURiBJUFIgcnVsZXMgKHNlZSBSRkNzIDM5NzksIDQ4NzksIDM2Njkg YW5kIDUzNzggZm9yIG1vcmUgZGV0YWlscykgcHJpb3IgdG8gbW92aW5nIGZvcndhcmQuDQo+SWYg eW91IGFyZSBsaXN0ZWQgYXMgYSBkb2N1bWVudCBBdXRob3Igb3IgQ29udHJpYnV0b3Igb2YgdGhp cyBkb2N1bWVudCBwbGVhc2UgcmVzcG9uZCB0byB0aGlzIGVtYWlsIGFuZCBpbmRpY2F0ZSB3aGV0 aGVyIG9yIG5vdCB5b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSByZWxldmFudCB1bmRpc2Nsb3NlZCBJUFIu IFRoZSBkb2N1bWVudCB3b24ndCBwcm9ncmVzcyB3aXRob3V0IGFuc3dlcnMgZnJvbSBhbGwgdGhl IEF1dGhvcnMgYW5kIENvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycy4NCj5ObyBJUFIgZGlzY2xvc3VyZSBleGlzdHMgYWdh aW5zdCB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50Lg0KPg0KPsKkIFdlIGFyZSBhbHNvIHBvbGxpbmcgZm9yIGtub3ds ZWRnZSBvZiBpbXBsZW1lbnRhdGlvbnMgb2YgcGFydCBvciBhbGwgb2Ygd2hhdCB0aGlzIGRvY3Vt ZW50IHNwZWNpZmllcy4gVGhpcyBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBpcyBleHBlY3RlZCBhcyBwZXIgWzJdLiAN Cj5QbGVhc2UgaW5mb3JtIHRoZSBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QsIG9yIHRoZSBjaGFpcnMsIG9yIG9ubHkg b25lIG9mIHRoZSBjaGFpcnMuDQo+DQo+wqQgRmluYWxseSwgaWYgc29tZW9uZSB3aXNoZXMgdG8g dm9sdW50ZWVyIHRvIGJlIERvY3VtZW50IFNoZXBoZXJkIGZvciB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50LCBwbGVh c2UgbGV0IHVzIGtub3cuDQo+DQo+VGhhbmsgeW91DQo+TSZUDQo+DQo+DQo+WzFdDQo+aHR0cHM6 Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9kb2MvZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1iZXNzLXZpcnR1YWwtc3VibmV0 LWZpYi1yZWR1Y3Rpb24vDQo+WzJdIGh0dHBzOi8vbWFpbGFyY2hpdmUuaWV0Zi5vcmcvYXJjaC9t c2cvYmVzcy9jRzNYMXRUcWJfdlBDNHJnNTZTRWRranFEcHcNCj4NCj5fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQo+DQo+Q2Ug bWVzc2FnZSBldCBzZXMgcGllY2VzIGpvaW50ZXMgcGV1dmVudCBjb250ZW5pciBkZXMgaW5mb3Jt YXRpb25zIGNvbmZpZGVudGllbGxlcyBvdSBwcml2aWxlZ2llZXMgZXQgbmUgZG9pdmVudCBkb25j DQo+cGFzIGV0cmUgZGlmZnVzZXMsIGV4cGxvaXRlcyBvdSBjb3BpZXMgc2FucyBhdXRvcmlzYXRp b24uIFNpIHZvdXMgYXZleiByZWN1IGNlIG1lc3NhZ2UgcGFyIGVycmV1ciwgdmV1aWxsZXogbGUg c2lnbmFsZXINCj5hIGwnZXhwZWRpdGV1ciBldCBsZSBkZXRydWlyZSBhaW5zaSBxdWUgbGVzIHBp ZWNlcyBqb2ludGVzLiBMZXMgbWVzc2FnZXMgZWxlY3Ryb25pcXVlcyBldGFudCBzdXNjZXB0aWJs ZXMgZCdhbHRlcmF0aW9uLA0KPk9yYW5nZSBkZWNsaW5lIHRvdXRlIHJlc3BvbnNhYmlsaXRlIHNp IGNlIG1lc3NhZ2UgYSBldGUgYWx0ZXJlLCBkZWZvcm1lIG91IGZhbHNpZmllLiBNZXJjaS4NCj4N Cj5UaGlzIG1lc3NhZ2UgYW5kIGl0cyBhdHRhY2htZW50cyBtYXkgY29udGFpbiBjb25maWRlbnRp YWwgb3IgcHJpdmlsZWdlZCBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiB0aGF0IG1heSBiZSBwcm90ZWN0ZWQgYnkgbGF3 Ow0KPnRoZXkgc2hvdWxkIG5vdCBiZSBkaXN0cmlidXRlZCwgdXNlZCBvciBjb3BpZWQgd2l0aG91 dCBhdXRob3Jpc2F0aW9uLg0KPklmIHlvdSBoYXZlIHJlY2VpdmVkIHRoaXMgZW1haWwgaW4gZXJy b3IsIHBsZWFzZSBub3RpZnkgdGhlIHNlbmRlciBhbmQgZGVsZXRlIHRoaXMgbWVzc2FnZSBhbmQg aXRzIGF0dGFjaG1lbnRzLg0KPkFzIGVtYWlscyBtYXkgYmUgYWx0ZXJlZCwgT3JhbmdlIGlzIG5v dCBsaWFibGUgZm9yIG1lc3NhZ2VzIHRoYXQgaGF2ZSBiZWVuIG1vZGlmaWVkLCBjaGFuZ2VkIG9y IGZhbHNpZmllZC4NCj5UaGFuayB5b3UuDQo+DQo+X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCj5CRVNTIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KPkJFU1NAaWV0Zi5vcmcN Cj5odHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2Jlc3MNCg== From nobody Tue Aug 16 13:34:33 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7FC512D820 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:34:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.111 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.111 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=extremenetworks2com.onmicrosoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PhnWkYLHD__7 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:34:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-183.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-183.mimecast.com [63.128.21.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 458F812D5BF for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:34:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from USNC-CASHT-P2.corp.extremenetworks.com (usnc-casht-p2.extremenetworks.com [12.38.15.167]) (Using TLS) by us-smtp-1.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-116-ZdRuBLNDMtOBdWbn7cb_mw-1; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 16:34:24 -0400 Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (207.46.163.114) by nc-owamail.extremenetworks.com (10.6.17.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 16:34:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=EXTREMENETWORKS2COM.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-extremenetworks-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=jomC6IttMYkigqeY4pdlY3Tv3XtVw+tyyHc1PIeSWgY=; b=tRs+uDHNJwf2q6BuhIpbMUcjOSHHaVkRcj9WZ2v5SRqh/pIy01zZOErVn3nQg1XyUI9dvYfm7azFPBEl+op4zcfk2Oidz+ZgxPE+noTG6SEblSKL88mFPfd85+fGZAnxA65rjcl8mp3Qg9sC8PypQaXHEI6Bm7XRtOhxDjsdhFI= Received: from BLUPR0401MB1681.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.162.214.155) by BLUPR0401MB1684.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.162.214.158) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA_P384) id 15.1.557.21; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 20:34:20 +0000 Received: from BLUPR0401MB1681.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.214.155]) by BLUPR0401MB1681.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.214.155]) with mapi id 15.01.0557.022; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 20:34:20 +0000 From: Brendan Fee To: "Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)" , "christian.jacquenet@orange.com" , "Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR)" , BESS Thread-Topic: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 Thread-Index: AQHR9720lFXPrVCQuU2H1mrFbRK4nKBLigkAgAB4+oD//8WVAA== Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 20:34:20 +0000 Message-ID: References: <57B30B64.6040304@nokia.com> <29257_1471351827_57B30C13_29257_1888_1_88132E969123D14D9BD844E1CD516EDE130CE29F@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <62EF6A8A-2DCF-4A27-BA9A-D99D92A83A37@nokia.com> In-Reply-To: <62EF6A8A-2DCF-4A27-BA9A-D99D92A83A37@nokia.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-originating-ip: [134.141.2.72] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 28741fc8-1224-468f-1249-08d3c614b3db x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR0401MB1684; 6:p6jY7vvfjtN4mkjSrUKTddJDGHtq3RnhsglNizYGqegGQmC7xfOw2jcXQc6DrZxjs8WAOClQALcm65PHy3dgx+23ev+j5oh+GSlCwInoD7a3ggkLM0PuPQEqazS32bP3bvsTg11Frasi4fLrUQrgG6PFAaNbPLOrWnSnpumN4yS6Gr+//HrK3Nj/gLvBO9VGt6uKPaFzKqBP4WbWUOy+oPj9ypFcT+OfTDxJ7kH7OFIvtAKOQP9WAmXpt8QpNAnxaWO109MPOaGN9PqIm0wRHUpQZJVvMZqSComFipFSDZ4=; 5:iwDH0AQMrnGEF9urpIJeUsW8Fwc3YoNrEG3iM9tXDxMVKLLXC/4IEfC/pKeM/OYtd8/s7D0MaWiFORD8mV1yx9kUYMxQPA5sOPcuS6IY6jYjaJ4j05Cf3S8n8gjt7Hf0mdxrOq/FwtVmilL/2wvixg==; 24:jIVFfV1YYrXl8nClvk8yVa79FLcaJkVhpg2JZLVjGh2lRloEfMAPHEIxAKN89OPm2HlN1Mc5q0ILmkaMgbM/5ZCQovXyO8vojRcFuvo7IiM=; 7:yZ+elrXgczXrQgDeVdGDvMx+FMFtA1B9hp5k8ruxFworZMNMAhaGB8doYF2K9OPZSD0ilYaE4yvJD3/RCGyvMOEW0GlhmP3L8FL0ByPobGnKYUTU8icCvh0L9QKcE3g2lwQ7AJB6FommAPgyRqoEM7JyXQOp6+3Po4GekdneBbK65uIKwBkPAMiA78rmSWsMzV8z4NZl0DLiPsTZWCgUQBUrEshOzXUdVwLn1c2kmbqTLXSU14qqqA/N/gGpevfA x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR0401MB1684; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105)(82608151540597)(18271650672692); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040176)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046); SRVR:BLUPR0401MB1684; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR0401MB1684; x-forefront-prvs: 0036736630 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(7916002)(199003)(377454003)(24454002)(189002)(55784002)(7846002)(305945005)(8936002)(122556002)(10400500002)(7736002)(19580395003)(15975445007)(77096005)(189998001)(83716003)(66066001)(5002640100001)(86362001)(68736007)(105586002)(106356001)(3660700001)(33656002)(50986999)(76176999)(81156014)(81166006)(8676002)(101416001)(106116001)(92566002)(19580405001)(230783001)(2900100001)(2950100001)(99286002)(6116002)(11100500001)(3846002)(87936001)(36756003)(5001770100001)(586003)(102836003)(4326007)(2906002)(3280700002)(54356999)(82746002)(97736004)(5890100001)(2501003)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR0401MB1684; H:BLUPR0401MB1681.namprd04.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-ID: <11532DD5AD6F204A840B0CBAD6D5A9B3@namprd04.prod.outlook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Aug 2016 20:34:20.4362 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: fc8c2bf6-914d-4c1f-b352-46a9adb87030 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR0401MB1684 X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: BLUPR0401MB1684.namprd04.prod.outlook.com X-OriginatorOrg: extremenetworks.com X-CrossPremisesHeadersPromoted: USNC-CASHT-P2.corp.extremenetworks.com X-CrossPremisesHeadersFiltered: USNC-CASHT-P2.corp.extremenetworks.com X-MC-Unique: ZdRuBLNDMtOBdWbn7cb_mw-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 20:34:31 -0000 SSBhbHNvIHN1cHBvcnQgdGhlIHB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIG9mIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtYmVzcy12aXJ0dWFs LXN1Ym5ldC1maWItcmVkdWN0aW9uLTA0IGFzIGFuIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uYWwgUkZDLCBhbmQgYXMg Y29hdXRob3IgSSBhbiB1bmF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgcmVsYXRlZCB0byB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0DQoN ClRoYW5rcw0KDQpCcmVuZGFuIEZlZQ0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCk9uIDgvMTYvMTYsIDQ6MDMgUE0sICJI ZW5kZXJpY2t4LCBXaW0gKE5va2lhIC0gQkUpIiA8d2ltLmhlbmRlcmlja3hAbm9raWEuY29tPiB3 cm90ZToNCg0KPlN1cHBvcnQgcHVibGljYXRpb24gb2YgaW5mb3JtYXRpb25hbCBSRkMuIEFzIGNv YXV0aG9yIG5vdCBhd2FyZSBvZiBJUFIgcmVsYXRlZCB0byB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0DQo+DQo+DQo+DQo+ DQo+T24gMTYvMDgvMTYgMTQ6NTAsICJCRVNTIG9uIGJlaGFsZiBvZiBjaHJpc3RpYW4uamFjcXVl bmV0QG9yYW5nZS5jb20iIDxiZXNzLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmcgb24gYmVoYWxmIG9mIGNocmlz dGlhbi5qYWNxdWVuZXRAb3JhbmdlLmNvbT4gd3JvdGU6DQo+DQo+PldHLA0KPj4NCj4+SSBzdXBw b3J0IHRoZSBwdWJsaWNhdGlvbiBvZiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWJlc3MtdmlydHVhbC1zdWJuZXQtZmli LXJlZHVjdGlvbi0wNCBhcyBhbiBJbmZvcm1hdGlvbmFsIFJGQy4gQmVpbmcgb25lIG9mIHRoZSBh dXRob3JzLCBJJ20gYWxzbyB1bmF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgcGVydGFpbmluZyB0byB0aGlzIGRv Y3VtZW50Lg0KPj4NCj4+Q2hlZXJzLA0KPj4NCj4+Q2hyaXN0aWFuLg0KPj4NCj4+LS0tLS1NZXNz YWdlIGQnb3JpZ2luZS0tLS0tDQo+PkRlIDogTWFydGluIFZpZ291cmV1eCBbbWFpbHRvOm1hcnRp bi52aWdvdXJldXhAbm9raWEuY29tXQ0KPj5FbnZvecOpIDogbWFyZGkgMTYgYW/Du3QgMjAxNiAx NDo0OA0KPj7DgCA6IEJFU1MNCj4+Q2MgOiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWJlc3MtdmlydHVhbC1zdWJuZXQt ZmliLXJlZHVjdGlvbkBpZXRmLm9yZw0KPj5PYmpldCA6IFdHIExhc3QgQ2FsbCBmb3IgZHJhZnQt aWV0Zi1iZXNzLXZpcnR1YWwtc3VibmV0LWZpYi1yZWR1Y3Rpb24tMDQNCj4+DQo+PkhlbGxvIFdv cmtpbmcgR3JvdXAsDQo+Pg0KPj5UaGlzIGVtYWlsIHN0YXJ0cyBhIFdvcmtpbmcgR3JvdXAgTGFz dCBDYWxsIG9uDQo+PmRyYWZ0LWlldGYtYmVzcy12aXJ0dWFsLXN1Ym5ldC1maWItcmVkdWN0aW9u LTA0IFsxXS4NCj4+DQo+PsKkIFBsZWFzZSByZWFkIHRoZSBkb2N1bWVudCBpZiB5b3UgaGF2ZW4n dCByZWFkIHRoZSBtb3N0IHJlY2VudCB2ZXJzaW9uIHlldCwgYW5kIHNlbmQgeW91ciBjb21tZW50 cyB0byB0aGUgbGlzdCwgbm8gbGF0ZXIgdGhhbiB0aGUgKjMwdGggb2YgQXVndXN0Ki4NCj4+Tm90 ZSB0aGF0IHRoaXMgaXMgKm5vdCBvbmx5KiBhIGNhbGwgZm9yIGNvbW1lbnRzIG9uIHRoZSBkb2N1 bWVudCwgYnV0IGFsc28gYSBjYWxsIGZvciBzdXBwb3J0IChvciBub3QpIHB1Ymxpc2hpbmcgdGhp cyBkb2N1bWVudCBhcyBhbiBJbmZvcm1hdGlvbmFsIFJGQy4NCj4+DQo+PsKkIFdlIGFyZSBhbHNv IHBvbGxpbmcgZm9yIGtub3dsZWRnZSBvZiBhbnkgdW5kaXNjbG9zZWQgSVBSIHRoYXQgYXBwbGll cyB0byBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWJlc3MtdmlydHVhbC1zdWJuZXQtZmliLXJlZHVjdGlvbi0wNCwgdG8g ZW5zdXJlIHRoYXQgSVBSIGhhcyBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3NlZCBpbiBjb21wbGlhbmNlIHdpdGggSUVU RiBJUFIgcnVsZXMgKHNlZSBSRkNzIDM5NzksIDQ4NzksIDM2NjkgYW5kIDUzNzggZm9yIG1vcmUg ZGV0YWlscykgcHJpb3IgdG8gbW92aW5nIGZvcndhcmQuDQo+PklmIHlvdSBhcmUgbGlzdGVkIGFz IGEgZG9jdW1lbnQgQXV0aG9yIG9yIENvbnRyaWJ1dG9yIG9mIHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgcGxlYXNl IHJlc3BvbmQgdG8gdGhpcyBlbWFpbCBhbmQgaW5kaWNhdGUgd2hldGhlciBvciBub3QgeW91IGFy ZSBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgcmVsZXZhbnQgdW5kaXNjbG9zZWQgSVBSLiBUaGUgZG9jdW1lbnQgd29u J3QgcHJvZ3Jlc3Mgd2l0aG91dCBhbnN3ZXJzIGZyb20gYWxsIHRoZSBBdXRob3JzIGFuZCBDb250 cmlidXRvcnMuDQo+Pk5vIElQUiBkaXNjbG9zdXJlIGV4aXN0cyBhZ2FpbnN0IHRoaXMgZG9jdW1l bnQuDQo+Pg0KPj7CpCBXZSBhcmUgYWxzbyBwb2xsaW5nIGZvciBrbm93bGVkZ2Ugb2YgaW1wbGVt ZW50YXRpb25zIG9mIHBhcnQgb3IgYWxsIG9mIHdoYXQgdGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBzcGVjaWZpZXMu IFRoaXMgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24gaXMgZXhwZWN0ZWQgYXMgcGVyIFsyXS4NCj4+UGxlYXNlIGluZm9y bSB0aGUgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0LCBvciB0aGUgY2hhaXJzLCBvciBvbmx5IG9uZSBvZiB0aGUgY2hh aXJzLg0KPj4NCj4+wqQgRmluYWxseSwgaWYgc29tZW9uZSB3aXNoZXMgdG8gdm9sdW50ZWVyIHRv IGJlIERvY3VtZW50IFNoZXBoZXJkIGZvciB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50LCBwbGVhc2UgbGV0IHVzIGtu b3cuDQo+Pg0KPj5UaGFuayB5b3UNCj4+TSZUDQo+Pg0KPj4NCj4+WzFdDQo+Pmh0dHBzOi8vZGF0 YXRyYWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcvZG9jL2RyYWZ0LWlldGYtYmVzcy12aXJ0dWFsLXN1Ym5ldC1maWIt cmVkdWN0aW9uLw0KPj5bMl0gaHR0cHM6Ly9tYWlsYXJjaGl2ZS5pZXRmLm9yZy9hcmNoL21zZy9i ZXNzL2NHM1gxdFRxYl92UEM0cmc1NlNFZGtqcURwdw0KPj4NCj4+X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KPj4NCj4+Q2Ug bWVzc2FnZSBldCBzZXMgcGllY2VzIGpvaW50ZXMgcGV1dmVudCBjb250ZW5pciBkZXMgaW5mb3Jt YXRpb25zIGNvbmZpZGVudGllbGxlcyBvdSBwcml2aWxlZ2llZXMgZXQgbmUgZG9pdmVudCBkb25j DQo+PnBhcyBldHJlIGRpZmZ1c2VzLCBleHBsb2l0ZXMgb3UgY29waWVzIHNhbnMgYXV0b3Jpc2F0 aW9uLiBTaSB2b3VzIGF2ZXogcmVjdSBjZSBtZXNzYWdlIHBhciBlcnJldXIsIHZldWlsbGV6IGxl IHNpZ25hbGVyDQo+PmEgbCdleHBlZGl0ZXVyIGV0IGxlIGRldHJ1aXJlIGFpbnNpIHF1ZSBsZXMg cGllY2VzIGpvaW50ZXMuIExlcyBtZXNzYWdlcyBlbGVjdHJvbmlxdWVzIGV0YW50IHN1c2NlcHRp YmxlcyBkJ2FsdGVyYXRpb24sDQo+Pk9yYW5nZSBkZWNsaW5lIHRvdXRlIHJlc3BvbnNhYmlsaXRl IHNpIGNlIG1lc3NhZ2UgYSBldGUgYWx0ZXJlLCBkZWZvcm1lIG91IGZhbHNpZmllLiBNZXJjaS4N Cj4+DQo+PlRoaXMgbWVzc2FnZSBhbmQgaXRzIGF0dGFjaG1lbnRzIG1heSBjb250YWluIGNvbmZp ZGVudGlhbCBvciBwcml2aWxlZ2VkIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIHRoYXQgbWF5IGJlIHByb3RlY3RlZCBi eSBsYXc7DQo+PnRoZXkgc2hvdWxkIG5vdCBiZSBkaXN0cmlidXRlZCwgdXNlZCBvciBjb3BpZWQg d2l0aG91dCBhdXRob3Jpc2F0aW9uLg0KPj5JZiB5b3UgaGF2ZSByZWNlaXZlZCB0aGlzIGVtYWls IGluIGVycm9yLCBwbGVhc2Ugbm90aWZ5IHRoZSBzZW5kZXIgYW5kIGRlbGV0ZSB0aGlzIG1lc3Nh Z2UgYW5kIGl0cyBhdHRhY2htZW50cy4NCj4+QXMgZW1haWxzIG1heSBiZSBhbHRlcmVkLCBPcmFu Z2UgaXMgbm90IGxpYWJsZSBmb3IgbWVzc2FnZXMgdGhhdCBoYXZlIGJlZW4gbW9kaWZpZWQsIGNo YW5nZWQgb3IgZmFsc2lmaWVkLg0KPj5UaGFuayB5b3UuDQo+Pg0KPj5fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KPj5CRVNTIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KPj5C RVNTQGlldGYub3JnDQo+Pmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vYmVz cw0KDQpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KDQpESVNDTEFJTUVSOg0KVGhp cyBlLW1haWwgYW5kIGFueSBhdHRhY2htZW50cyB0byBpdCBtYXkgY29udGFpbiBjb25maWRlbnRp YWwgYW5kIHByb3ByaWV0YXJ5IG1hdGVyaWFsIGFuZCBpcyBzb2xlbHkgZm9yIHRoZSB1c2Ugb2Yg dGhlIGludGVuZGVkIHJlY2lwaWVudC4gQW55IHJldmlldywgdXNlLCBkaXNjbG9zdXJlLCBkaXN0 cmlidXRpb24gb3IgY29weWluZyBvZiB0aGlzIHRyYW5zbWl0dGFsIGlzIHByb2hpYml0ZWQgZXhj ZXB0IGJ5IG9yIG9uIGJlaGFsZiBvZiB0aGUgaW50ZW5kZWQgcmVjaXBpZW50LiBJZiB5b3UgaGF2 ZSByZWNlaXZlZCB0aGlzIHRyYW5zbWl0dGFsIGluIGVycm9yLCBwbGVhc2Ugbm90aWZ5IHRoZSBz ZW5kZXIgYW5kIGRlc3Ryb3kgdGhpcyBlLW1haWwgYW5kIGFueSBhdHRhY2htZW50cyBhbmQgYWxs IGNvcGllcywgd2hldGhlciBlbGVjdHJvbmljIG9yIHByaW50ZWQuDQo= From nobody Tue Aug 16 17:23:41 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B0F712D51D; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:23:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -105.448 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zNWFKWG43Rnt; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:23:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx5.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D3F12D56C; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:23:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.168.119]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTP id B17C43628C56B; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 08:23:32 +0800 (CST) Received: from mse01.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.3.20]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTP id BCF11ADFB63FB; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 08:23:32 +0800 (CST) Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse01.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id u7H0NRRx017605; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 08:23:27 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn) In-Reply-To: <57B308FA.4090201@nokia.com> To: Martin Vigoureux MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.4 March 27, 2005 Message-ID: From: zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 09:23:37 +0900 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.3FP6|November 21, 2013) at 2016-08-17 08:23:08, Serialize complete at 2016-08-17 08:23:08 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 000224F9C8258012_=" X-MAIL: mse01.zte.com.cn u7H0NRRx017605 Archived-At: Cc: BESS , bess@ietf.org, draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:23:39 -0000 This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 000224F9C8258012_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 U3VwcG9ydC4NCg0KVGhhbmtzLA0KU2FuZHkNCg0KIkJFU1MiIDxiZXNzLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5v cmc+INC009ogMjAxNi8wOC8xNiAyMDozNzoxNDoNCg0KPiBIZWxsbyB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwLA0K PiANCj4gVGhpcyBlbWFpbCBzdGFydHMgYSB0d28td2VlayBwb2xsIG9uIGFkb3B0aW5nDQo+IGRy YWZ0LXp6aGFuZy1iZXNzLWV2cG4tYnVtLXByb2NlZHVyZS11cGRhdGVzLTAzIFsxXSBhcyBhIFdv cmtpbmcgR3JvdXAgDQo+IERvY3VtZW50Lg0KPiANCj4gUGxlYXNlIHN0YXRlIG9uIHRoZSBsaXN0 IGlmIHlvdSBzdXBwb3J0IGFkb3B0aW9uIG9yIG5vdCAoaW4gYm90aCBjYXNlcywgDQo+IHBsZWFz ZSBhbHNvIHN0YXRlIHRoZSByZWFzb25zKS4NCj4gDQo+IFRoaXMgcG9sbCBydW5zIHVudGlsICp0 aGUgMzB0aCBvZiBBdWd1c3QqLg0KPiANCj4gV2UgYXJlIGFsc28gcG9sbGluZyBmb3Iga25vd2xl ZGdlIG9mIGFueSB1bmRpc2Nsb3NlZCBJUFIgdGhhdCBhcHBsaWVzDQo+IHRvIHRoaXMgRG9jdW1l bnQsIHRvIGVuc3VyZSB0aGF0IElQUiBoYXMgYmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQgaW4gY29tcGxpYW5jZQ0K PiB3aXRoIElFVEYgSVBSIHJ1bGVzIChzZWUgUkZDcyAzOTc5LCA0ODc5LCAzNjY5IGFuZCA1Mzc4 IGZvciBtb3JlDQo+IGRldGFpbHMpLg0KPiBJZiB5b3UgYXJlIGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhbiBBdXRob3Ig b3IgQ29udHJpYnV0b3Igb2YgdGhpcyBEb2N1bWVudCBwbGVhc2UNCj4gcmVzcG9uZCB0byB0aGlz IGVtYWlsIGFuZCBpbmRpY2F0ZSB3aGV0aGVyIG9yIG5vdCB5b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueQ0K PiByZWxldmFudCB1bmRpc2Nsb3NlZCBJUFIuIFRoZSBEb2N1bWVudCB3b24ndCBwcm9ncmVzcyB3 aXRob3V0IGFuc3dlcnMNCj4gZnJvbSBhbGwgdGhlIEF1dGhvcnMgYW5kIENvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycy4N Cj4gTm8gSVBSIGhhcyBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3NlZCBhZ2FpbnN0IHRoaXMgRG9jdW1lbnQNCj4gDQo+ IElmIHlvdSBhcmUgbm90IGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhbiBBdXRob3Igb3IgQ29udHJpYnV0b3IsIHRoZW4g cGxlYXNlIA0KPiBleHBsaWNpdGx5IHJlc3BvbmQgb25seSBpZiB5b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFu eSBJUFIgdGhhdCBoYXMgbm90IHlldCANCj4gYmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQgaW4gY29uZm9ybWFuY2Ug d2l0aCBJRVRGIHJ1bGVzLg0KPiANCj4gVGhhbmsgeW91DQo+IA0KPiBNYXJ0aW4gJiBUaG9tYXMN Cj4gYmVzcyBjaGFpcnMNCj4gDQo+IFsxXSANCj4gDQpodHRwczovL2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYu b3JnL2RvYy9kcmFmdC16emhhbmctYmVzcy1ldnBuLWJ1bS1wcm9jZWR1cmUtdXBkYXRlcy8NCj4g DQo+IF9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQo+IEJF U1MgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQo+IEJFU1NAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj4gaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcv bWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9iZXNzDQoNCg== --=_alternative 000224F9C8258012_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="GB2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 DQo8YnI+PGZvbnQgc2l6ZT0yIGZhY2U9InNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPlN1cHBvcnQuPC9mb250Pg0KPGJy Pg0KPGJyPjxmb250IHNpemU9MiBmYWNlPSJzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj5UaGFua3MsPC9mb250Pg0KPGJy Pjxmb250IHNpemU9MiBmYWNlPSJzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj5TYW5keTwvZm9udD4NCjxicj4NCjxicj48 Zm9udCBzaXplPTI+PHR0PiZxdW90O0JFU1MmcXVvdDsgJmx0O2Jlc3MtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9y ZyZndDsg0LTT2g0KMjAxNi8wOC8xNiAyMDozNzoxNDo8YnI+DQo8YnI+DQomZ3Q7IEhlbGxvIHdv cmtpbmcgZ3JvdXAsPGJyPg0KJmd0OyA8YnI+DQomZ3Q7IFRoaXMgZW1haWwgc3RhcnRzIGEgdHdv LXdlZWsgcG9sbCBvbiBhZG9wdGluZzxicj4NCiZndDsgZHJhZnQtenpoYW5nLWJlc3MtZXZwbi1i dW0tcHJvY2VkdXJlLXVwZGF0ZXMtMDMgWzFdIGFzIGEgV29ya2luZyBHcm91cA0KPGJyPg0KJmd0 OyBEb2N1bWVudC48YnI+DQomZ3Q7IDxicj4NCiZndDsgUGxlYXNlIHN0YXRlIG9uIHRoZSBsaXN0 IGlmIHlvdSBzdXBwb3J0IGFkb3B0aW9uIG9yIG5vdCAoaW4gYm90aCBjYXNlcywNCjxicj4NCiZn dDsgcGxlYXNlIGFsc28gc3RhdGUgdGhlIHJlYXNvbnMpLjxicj4NCiZndDsgPGJyPg0KJmd0OyBU aGlzIHBvbGwgcnVucyB1bnRpbCAqdGhlIDMwdGggb2YgQXVndXN0Ki48YnI+DQomZ3Q7IDxicj4N CiZndDsgV2UgYXJlIGFsc28gcG9sbGluZyBmb3Iga25vd2xlZGdlIG9mIGFueSB1bmRpc2Nsb3Nl ZCBJUFIgdGhhdCBhcHBsaWVzPGJyPg0KJmd0OyB0byB0aGlzIERvY3VtZW50LCB0byBlbnN1cmUg dGhhdCBJUFIgaGFzIGJlZW4gZGlzY2xvc2VkIGluIGNvbXBsaWFuY2U8YnI+DQomZ3Q7IHdpdGgg SUVURiBJUFIgcnVsZXMgKHNlZSBSRkNzIDM5NzksIDQ4NzksIDM2NjkgYW5kIDUzNzggZm9yIG1v cmU8YnI+DQomZ3Q7IGRldGFpbHMpLjxicj4NCiZndDsgSWYgeW91IGFyZSBsaXN0ZWQgYXMgYW4g QXV0aG9yIG9yIENvbnRyaWJ1dG9yIG9mIHRoaXMgRG9jdW1lbnQgcGxlYXNlPGJyPg0KJmd0OyBy ZXNwb25kIHRvIHRoaXMgZW1haWwgYW5kIGluZGljYXRlIHdoZXRoZXIgb3Igbm90IHlvdSBhcmUg YXdhcmUgb2YNCmFueTxicj4NCiZndDsgcmVsZXZhbnQgdW5kaXNjbG9zZWQgSVBSLiBUaGUgRG9j dW1lbnQgd29uJ3QgcHJvZ3Jlc3Mgd2l0aG91dCBhbnN3ZXJzPGJyPg0KJmd0OyBmcm9tIGFsbCB0 aGUgQXV0aG9ycyBhbmQgQ29udHJpYnV0b3JzLjxicj4NCiZndDsgTm8gSVBSIGhhcyBiZWVuIGRp c2Nsb3NlZCBhZ2FpbnN0IHRoaXMgRG9jdW1lbnQ8YnI+DQomZ3Q7IDxicj4NCiZndDsgSWYgeW91 IGFyZSBub3QgbGlzdGVkIGFzIGFuIEF1dGhvciBvciBDb250cmlidXRvciwgdGhlbiBwbGVhc2Ug PGJyPg0KJmd0OyBleHBsaWNpdGx5IHJlc3BvbmQgb25seSBpZiB5b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFu eSBJUFIgdGhhdCBoYXMgbm90IHlldA0KPGJyPg0KJmd0OyBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3NlZCBpbiBjb25m b3JtYW5jZSB3aXRoIElFVEYgcnVsZXMuPGJyPg0KJmd0OyA8YnI+DQomZ3Q7IFRoYW5rIHlvdTxi cj4NCiZndDsgPGJyPg0KJmd0OyBNYXJ0aW4gJmFtcDsgVGhvbWFzPGJyPg0KJmd0OyBiZXNzIGNo YWlyczxicj4NCiZndDsgPGJyPg0KJmd0OyBbMV0gPGJyPg0KJmd0OyBodHRwczovL2RhdGF0cmFj a2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2RvYy9kcmFmdC16emhhbmctYmVzcy1ldnBuLWJ1bS1wcm9jZWR1cmUtdXBk YXRlcy88YnI+DQomZ3Q7IDxicj4NCiZndDsgX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX188YnI+DQomZ3Q7IEJFU1MgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0PGJyPg0KJmd0OyBC RVNTQGlldGYub3JnPGJyPg0KJmd0OyBodHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3Rp bmZvL2Jlc3M8YnI+DQo8L3R0PjwvZm9udD4NCg== --=_alternative 000224F9C8258012_=-- From nobody Tue Aug 16 18:19:06 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E4C512B01A; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 18:19:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.468 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.468 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bwaBNvIxPQs4; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 18:19:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B781412D1C2; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 18:19:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CPN78662; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 01:19:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.73) by lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 02:18:59 +0100 Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by nkgeml412-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.73]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 09:17:28 +0800 From: Xuxiaohu To: Martin Vigoureux , BESS Thread-Topic: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 Thread-Index: AQHR97xwDz4DG6W160m5tv4cqdTZo6BMWksw Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 01:17:27 +0000 Message-ID: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE0D5813FA@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> References: <57B30B64.6040304@nokia.com> In-Reply-To: <57B30B64.6040304@nokia.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.184.181] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090206.57B3BB84.00AA, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: d36fa12562689bdb66da35b482da516e Archived-At: Cc: "draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 01:19:05 -0000 SSBzdXBwb3J0IHRoZSBwdWJsaWNhdGlvbiBvZiB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0IGFzIGFuIGluZm9ybWF0aW9u YWwgUkZDLCBhbmQgYXMgYSBjb2F1dGhvciBJJ20gbm90IGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgcmVsYXRl ZCB0byB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0Lg0KDQpCZXN0IHJlZ2FyZHMsDQpYaWFvaHUNCg0KLS0tLS3Tyrz+1K28 /i0tLS0tDQq3orz+yMs6IE1hcnRpbiBWaWdvdXJldXggW21haWx0bzptYXJ0aW4udmlnb3VyZXV4 QG5va2lhLmNvbV0gDQq3osvNyrG85DogMjAxNsTqONTCMTbI1SAyMDo0OA0KytW8/sjLOiBCRVNT DQqzrcvNOiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWJlc3MtdmlydHVhbC1zdWJuZXQtZmliLXJlZHVjdGlvbkBpZXRm Lm9yZw0K1vfM4jogV0cgTGFzdCBDYWxsIGZvciBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWJlc3MtdmlydHVhbC1zdWJu ZXQtZmliLXJlZHVjdGlvbi0wNA0KDQpIZWxsbyBXb3JraW5nIEdyb3VwLA0KDQpUaGlzIGVtYWls IHN0YXJ0cyBhIFdvcmtpbmcgR3JvdXAgTGFzdCBDYWxsIG9uDQpkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWJlc3Mtdmly dHVhbC1zdWJuZXQtZmliLXJlZHVjdGlvbi0wNCBbMV0uDQoNCqHoIFBsZWFzZSByZWFkIHRoZSBk b2N1bWVudCBpZiB5b3UgaGF2ZW4ndCByZWFkIHRoZSBtb3N0IHJlY2VudCB2ZXJzaW9uIHlldCwg YW5kIHNlbmQgeW91ciBjb21tZW50cyB0byB0aGUgbGlzdCwgbm8gbGF0ZXIgdGhhbiB0aGUgKjMw dGggb2YgQXVndXN0Ki4NCk5vdGUgdGhhdCB0aGlzIGlzICpub3Qgb25seSogYSBjYWxsIGZvciBj b21tZW50cyBvbiB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQsIGJ1dCBhbHNvIGEgY2FsbCBmb3Igc3VwcG9ydCAob3Ig bm90KSBwdWJsaXNoaW5nIHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgYXMgYW4gSW5mb3JtYXRpb25hbCBSRkMuDQoN CqHoIFdlIGFyZSBhbHNvIHBvbGxpbmcgZm9yIGtub3dsZWRnZSBvZiBhbnkgdW5kaXNjbG9zZWQg SVBSIHRoYXQgYXBwbGllcyB0byBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWJlc3MtdmlydHVhbC1zdWJuZXQtZmliLXJl ZHVjdGlvbi0wNCwgdG8gZW5zdXJlIHRoYXQgSVBSIGhhcyBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3NlZCBpbiBjb21w bGlhbmNlIHdpdGggSUVURiBJUFIgcnVsZXMgKHNlZSBSRkNzIDM5NzksIDQ4NzksIDM2NjkgYW5k IDUzNzggZm9yIG1vcmUgZGV0YWlscykgcHJpb3IgdG8gbW92aW5nIGZvcndhcmQuDQpJZiB5b3Ug YXJlIGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhIGRvY3VtZW50IEF1dGhvciBvciBDb250cmlidXRvciBvZiB0aGlzIGRv Y3VtZW50IHBsZWFzZSByZXNwb25kIHRvIHRoaXMgZW1haWwgYW5kIGluZGljYXRlIHdoZXRoZXIg b3Igbm90IHlvdSBhcmUgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IHJlbGV2YW50IHVuZGlzY2xvc2VkIElQUi4gVGhl IGRvY3VtZW50IHdvbid0IHByb2dyZXNzIHdpdGhvdXQgYW5zd2VycyBmcm9tIGFsbCB0aGUgQXV0 aG9ycyBhbmQgQ29udHJpYnV0b3JzLg0KTm8gSVBSIGRpc2Nsb3N1cmUgZXhpc3RzIGFnYWluc3Qg dGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudC4NCg0KoeggV2UgYXJlIGFsc28gcG9sbGluZyBmb3Iga25vd2xlZGdlIG9m IGltcGxlbWVudGF0aW9ucyBvZiBwYXJ0IG9yIGFsbCBvZiB3aGF0IHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgc3Bl Y2lmaWVzLiBUaGlzIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIGlzIGV4cGVjdGVkIGFzIHBlciBbMl0uIA0KUGxlYXNl IGluZm9ybSB0aGUgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0LCBvciB0aGUgY2hhaXJzLCBvciBvbmx5IG9uZSBvZiB0 aGUgY2hhaXJzLg0KDQqh6CBGaW5hbGx5LCBpZiBzb21lb25lIHdpc2hlcyB0byB2b2x1bnRlZXIg dG8gYmUgRG9jdW1lbnQgU2hlcGhlcmQgZm9yIHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQsIHBsZWFzZSBsZXQgdXMg a25vdy4NCg0KVGhhbmsgeW91DQpNJlQNCg0KDQpbMV0NCmh0dHBzOi8vZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIuaWV0 Zi5vcmcvZG9jL2RyYWZ0LWlldGYtYmVzcy12aXJ0dWFsLXN1Ym5ldC1maWItcmVkdWN0aW9uLw0K WzJdIGh0dHBzOi8vbWFpbGFyY2hpdmUuaWV0Zi5vcmcvYXJjaC9tc2cvYmVzcy9jRzNYMXRUcWJf dlBDNHJnNTZTRWRranFEcHcNCg== From nobody Wed Aug 17 10:36:44 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35FB12DB07; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:36:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.147 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.147 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sVJkbIIaapnz; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:36:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C75C12DB86; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:36:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.103] (81-236-221-144-no93.tbcn.telia.com [81.236.221.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8A26818013E2; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 19:36:30 +0200 (CEST) To: Eric C Rosen , Mach Chen , "draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis.all@ietf.org" , "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" References: <041801d1ecdb$317d1910$94774b30$@olddog.co.uk> <5d7fcd92-f663-50fc-4057-9827746886ca@juniper.net> From: Loa Andersson Message-ID: <6d39a0bf-df2d-8a33-3194-f693760683d8@pi.nu> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 19:36:28 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5d7fcd92-f663-50fc-4057-9827746886ca@juniper.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" , idr@ietf.org, bess-chairs@ietf.org, BESS , idr-chairs@ietf.org Subject: [bess] Question raised in the MPLS-RT review of draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 17:36:35 -0000 Eric, et.al., (copied also idr-chairs and idr-list + bess-chairs and bess-list) For those of you that are not subscribed to the mpls-list. - the mpls wg has started the initial steps for working group adoption, there are three steps -- mpls-rt review (what you see below is the follow-up discussion on that review) -- IPR poll, will be sent out soon -- working group adoption poll (wgap), that poll will be copied to the idr and bess. Hopefully we can that shortly. I'm sending this to mpls, idr and bess working group, since it has to do where things should be documented. On 2016-08-17 17:59, Eric C Rosen wrote: > Hi Mach, > > Thanks for your review. > > On 8/3/2016 4:51 AM, Mach Chen wrote: >> I have only one comment regarding to Section 5. IMHO, although it's >> informational, the description about the relationship between SAFI-1 >> and SAFI-4 routes should not belong to this document, it's a more >> common description that is not specific to this label binding process. >> I'd suggest to remove this section if there is no any other reasons. > > Differing interpretations about the relationship between SAFI-1 and > SAFI-4 are a very common source of interoperability problems among > implementations of different vendors. Thus I think it is very useful to > document this issue and to call attention to some of the differing > interpretations. I think this document is an appropriate place for this > information; even though this information is not about label binding, it > is about the semantics of SAFI-4. I agree that this needs to be documented! I can accept that it is done in draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis, but I would like to have all three wg's agree to this. I see a few alternatives - we could document this is in draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis; or - we could write a separate document - we could find another document where this has a better fit than in draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis - any other suggestion Let us know if you have an opinion. Please send your responses to the mpls wg mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). /Loa mpls wg-co-chair > > Eric -- Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 From nobody Wed Aug 17 10:41:35 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C11312DC4D; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:41:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.768 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.768 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 84dRXqUm1gGB; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:41:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1E8A12DA08; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:41:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1715; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1471455691; x=1472665291; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=wk/Cbn6DIO6Xvb2vjibJKR1pvF3+/HHis/T7VFChQMM=; b=bMnc31vUu1iq7/WrpQ6+BgSSB5cruwon5xZhg7ytQLyxvk8+4gFFIOxa O6cjm5hku4jtm6lokDc/LuTRs+0USQi2iLoVEe6fh8OGdjimW//zstAV+ D0cKzzPNKZkiVeovMdy4Ug9RLA/2e9/rdR29KUjK1HtiPj19vr1AVEJBq 0=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AnAgDPoLRX/5BdJa1bA4NEVnwHuTOBf?= =?us-ascii?q?SSFeQKBajgUAgEBAQEBAQFeJ4RfAQUdSRMOAgIBCA44GxclAgQBDQWIMQ69IAE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARwFhiWETYQSEQE9JoUUBY5Wim4Bhh+IfoFrT?= =?us-ascii?q?oQOiQKMO4N3AR42g3puhT43AX4BAQE?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,535,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="311359588" Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Aug 2016 17:41:30 +0000 Received: from XCH-RTP-009.cisco.com (xch-rtp-009.cisco.com [64.101.220.149]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7HHfUl7022656 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 17 Aug 2016 17:41:30 GMT Received: from xch-rtp-009.cisco.com (64.101.220.149) by XCH-RTP-009.cisco.com (64.101.220.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 13:41:29 -0400 Received: from xch-rtp-009.cisco.com ([64.101.220.149]) by XCH-RTP-009.cisco.com ([64.101.220.149]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 13:41:29 -0400 From: "Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)" To: Jeff Haas , "EXT - thomas.morin@orange.com" Thread-Topic: Call for adoption: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01 Thread-Index: AQHR+K6WroTu+BFaPU2HXCUhtn4zrQ== Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 17:41:29 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [161.44.212.147] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: <08B3E0BD77189E4E97E6DB4B3CC47293@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 17:41:33 -0000 Support and I don=B9t know any IPR. Regards, Patrice Patrice Brissette TECHNICAL LEADER.ENGINEERING pbrisset@cisco.com Phone: +1 613 254 3336 Cisco Systems Canada Co. / Les Systemes Cisco Canada CIE Canada Cisco.com On 2016-08-16, 9:44 AM, "Jeff Haas" wrote: >I am not aware of any IPR on this draft. > >-- Jeff > >> On Aug 16, 2016, at 8:42 AM, Thomas Morin >>wrote: >>=20 >> Hello working group, >>=20 >> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting >>draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang [1] as a working group item. >>=20 >> Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or >>not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). >>=20 >> This poll runs until **August 30th**. >>=20 >> *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that >>applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in >>compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for >>more details). >>=20 >> =3D=3D> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please >>respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any >>relevant IPR. >>=20 >> The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from >>each author and contributor. >>=20 >> If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please >>explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet >>been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. >>=20 >> Thank you, >>=20 >> Martin & Thomas >> bess chairs >>=20 >> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang >>=20 > From nobody Wed Aug 17 18:00:58 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietf.org Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 139A812D0BC; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 18:00:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Terry Manderson" To: "The IESG" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.29.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <147148205507.23719.4190270381697539075.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 18:00:55 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: aretana@cisco.com, thomas.morin@orange.com, bess-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bess-ir@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] Terry Manderson's Abstain on draft-ietf-bess-ir-05: (with COMMENT) X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 01:00:55 -0000 Terry Manderson has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-ir-05: Abstain When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-ir/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I have some concerns about this document that I don't believe can be easily fixed. This document is extremely hard to read and understand, and therefore comprehend if there are any implications to the information provided. I'm really not sure that this can be addressed here without a significant rewrite. (that might be because the topic itself is deep) A second is related to how the document positions itself. Its status is for Standards Track, yet in the introduction it says: In this document, we provide a clearer and more explicit conceptual model for IR P-tunnels, clarifying the relationship between an IR P-tunnel and the unicast tunnels that are used for data transmission along the IR P-tunnel. and This document does not provide any new protocol elements, or any fundamentally new procedures; its purpose is to make explicit just how a router is to use the protocol elements and procedures of [RFC6513] and [RFC6514] to identify an IR P-tunnel, to join an IR P-tunnel, and to prune itself from an IR P-tunnel. Which to me screamed out informational, while then updating 6513 and 6514. However there are parts of the document that imply a semantic change in the use of fields or labels. Eg sect 10, use of timers when switching Upstream Multicast Hop.. so strongly suggesting a standards position. It feels like this document started out to do one thing, eg clarify the model of IR P-Tunnels and then acquired an extended set of tasks in dealing with MPLS label allocation policies. As I can't see a way to make a clear assessment of this document, I am taking an ABSTAIN position, and I will not block publication. From nobody Thu Aug 18 04:38:09 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietf.org Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB0E12D0A3; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 04:38:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Deborah Brungard" To: "The IESG" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.29.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <147152028504.22042.1385029497241333936.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 04:38:05 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: aretana@cisco.com, thomas.morin@orange.com, bess-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bess-ir@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] Deborah Brungard's Yes on draft-ietf-bess-ir-05: (with COMMENT) X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 11:38:05 -0000 Deborah Brungard has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-ir-05: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-ir/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Considering the discussion among the IESG, I wanted to give a strong endorsement for this document. Yes, the document is "complex" to read as it updates RFC6513/6514, and both of these documents required the reader to have normatively understood many other RFCs. Yes, the subject is complex for a non-subject expert reader. This document provides the "additional details" to implement complex capabilities (e.g. multi-vendor interoperability make before break procedures) these vendors (and the WG as noted by the Acknowledgements and list discussion) have found lacked in clarity in the original RFCs. I thank the authors and WG for taking the time to write this RFC as this additional work on implementation aspects after an RFC is rubber-stamped is critical. On many of the questions raised, a good discussion can be found on the list, especially Thomas's and Eric's thread: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/AydZrp0Lf9fUohKrgVHG9kzbycY From nobody Thu Aug 18 19:30:46 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D7912D677; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:30:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.468 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.468 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z3vEyEnehKU2; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:30:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75F1112D61D; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:30:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CUQ22544; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 02:30:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.70) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.93) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 03:30:37 +0100 Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by nkgeml411-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.70]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 10:30:32 +0800 From: Zhuangshunwan To: Martin Vigoureux , BESS Thread-Topic: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 Thread-Index: AQHR97xutzEqdWborUKB+0Y9HjNPBqBPkjIA Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 02:30:32 +0000 Message-ID: <19AB2A007F56DB4E8257F949A2FB9858AA1F821C@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> References: <57B30B64.6040304@nokia.com> In-Reply-To: <57B30B64.6040304@nokia.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.86.254] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020202.57B66F4F.00B4, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 415395f5cb319ae1164819b157430be6 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 02:30:45 -0000 SSBoYXZlIHJlYWQgdGhpcyBkcmFmdCBhbmQgSSBzdXBwb3J0IGl0cyBwdWJsaWNhdGlvbiBhcyBh biBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbmFsIFJGQy4NCg0KQmVzdCBSZWdhcmRzLA0KU2h1bndhbg0KDQotLS0tLdPK vP7Urbz+LS0tLS0NCreivP7IyzogQkVTUyBbbWFpbHRvOmJlc3MtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10g tPqx7SBNYXJ0aW4gVmlnb3VyZXV4DQq3osvNyrG85DogMjAxNsTqONTCMTbI1SAyMDo0OA0KytW8 /sjLOiBCRVNTDQqzrcvNOiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWJlc3MtdmlydHVhbC1zdWJuZXQtZmliLXJlZHVj dGlvbkBpZXRmLm9yZw0K1vfM4jogW2Jlc3NdIFdHIExhc3QgQ2FsbCBmb3IgZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1i ZXNzLXZpcnR1YWwtc3VibmV0LWZpYi1yZWR1Y3Rpb24tMDQNCg0KSGVsbG8gV29ya2luZyBHcm91 cCwNCg0KVGhpcyBlbWFpbCBzdGFydHMgYSBXb3JraW5nIEdyb3VwIExhc3QgQ2FsbCBvbg0KZHJh ZnQtaWV0Zi1iZXNzLXZpcnR1YWwtc3VibmV0LWZpYi1yZWR1Y3Rpb24tMDQgWzFdLg0KDQqh6CBQ bGVhc2UgcmVhZCB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQgaWYgeW91IGhhdmVuJ3QgcmVhZCB0aGUgbW9zdCByZWNl bnQgdmVyc2lvbiB5ZXQsIGFuZCBzZW5kIHlvdXIgY29tbWVudHMgdG8gdGhlIGxpc3QsIG5vIGxh dGVyIHRoYW4gdGhlICozMHRoIG9mIEF1Z3VzdCouDQpOb3RlIHRoYXQgdGhpcyBpcyAqbm90IG9u bHkqIGEgY2FsbCBmb3IgY29tbWVudHMgb24gdGhlIGRvY3VtZW50LCBidXQgYWxzbyBhIGNhbGwg Zm9yIHN1cHBvcnQgKG9yIG5vdCkgcHVibGlzaGluZyB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IGFzIGFuIEluZm9y bWF0aW9uYWwgUkZDLg0KDQqh6CBXZSBhcmUgYWxzbyBwb2xsaW5nIGZvciBrbm93bGVkZ2Ugb2Yg YW55IHVuZGlzY2xvc2VkIElQUiB0aGF0IGFwcGxpZXMgdG8gZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1iZXNzLXZpcnR1 YWwtc3VibmV0LWZpYi1yZWR1Y3Rpb24tMDQsIHRvIGVuc3VyZSB0aGF0IElQUiBoYXMgYmVlbiBk aXNjbG9zZWQgaW4gY29tcGxpYW5jZSB3aXRoIElFVEYgSVBSIHJ1bGVzIChzZWUgUkZDcyAzOTc5 LCA0ODc5LCAzNjY5IGFuZCA1Mzc4IGZvciBtb3JlIGRldGFpbHMpIHByaW9yIHRvIG1vdmluZyBm b3J3YXJkLg0KSWYgeW91IGFyZSBsaXN0ZWQgYXMgYSBkb2N1bWVudCBBdXRob3Igb3IgQ29udHJp YnV0b3Igb2YgdGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBwbGVhc2UgcmVzcG9uZCB0byB0aGlzIGVtYWlsIGFuZCBp bmRpY2F0ZSB3aGV0aGVyIG9yIG5vdCB5b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSByZWxldmFudCB1bmRp c2Nsb3NlZCBJUFIuIFRoZSBkb2N1bWVudCB3b24ndCBwcm9ncmVzcyB3aXRob3V0IGFuc3dlcnMg ZnJvbSBhbGwgdGhlIEF1dGhvcnMgYW5kIENvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycy4NCk5vIElQUiBkaXNjbG9zdXJl IGV4aXN0cyBhZ2FpbnN0IHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQuDQoNCqHoIFdlIGFyZSBhbHNvIHBvbGxpbmcg Zm9yIGtub3dsZWRnZSBvZiBpbXBsZW1lbnRhdGlvbnMgb2YgcGFydCBvciBhbGwgb2Ygd2hhdCB0 aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IHNwZWNpZmllcy4gVGhpcyBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBpcyBleHBlY3RlZCBhcyBw ZXIgWzJdLiANClBsZWFzZSBpbmZvcm0gdGhlIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdCwgb3IgdGhlIGNoYWlycywg b3Igb25seSBvbmUgb2YgdGhlIGNoYWlycy4NCg0KoeggRmluYWxseSwgaWYgc29tZW9uZSB3aXNo ZXMgdG8gdm9sdW50ZWVyIHRvIGJlIERvY3VtZW50IFNoZXBoZXJkIGZvciB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50 LCBwbGVhc2UgbGV0IHVzIGtub3cuDQoNClRoYW5rIHlvdQ0KTSZUDQoNCg0KWzFdDQpodHRwczov L2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2RvYy9kcmFmdC1pZXRmLWJlc3MtdmlydHVhbC1zdWJuZXQt ZmliLXJlZHVjdGlvbi8NClsyXSBodHRwczovL21haWxhcmNoaXZlLmlldGYub3JnL2FyY2gvbXNn L2Jlc3MvY0czWDF0VHFiX3ZQQzRyZzU2U0Vka2pxRHB3DQoNCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQpCRVNTIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KQkVTU0BpZXRm Lm9yZw0KaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9iZXNzDQo= From nobody Thu Aug 18 19:40:51 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D9212D6B2; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:40:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.468 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.468 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id edouxsjv3kqB; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:40:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC54512D532; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:40:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CPS19734; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 02:40:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.73) by lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.199) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 03:40:36 +0100 Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by nkgeml412-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.73]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 10:40:29 +0800 From: Zhuangshunwan To: Thomas Morin , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Call for adoption: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01 Thread-Index: AQHR97uqqRpqE36uyEepUaSajvnkMKBPleoA Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 02:40:29 +0000 Message-ID: <19AB2A007F56DB4E8257F949A2FB9858AA1F8277@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.86.254] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020201.57B671AC.00B8, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 2048090a72b2b808dd497e51983ea925 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 02:40:51 -0000 U3VwcG9ydCBhbmQgSSBhbSBub3QgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IElQUiBvbiB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0Lg0KDQpC ZXN0IFJlZ2FyZHMsDQpTaHVud2FuDQoNCi0tLS0t6YKu5Lu25Y6f5Lu2LS0tLS0NCuWPkeS7tuS6 ujogVGhvbWFzIE1vcmluIFttYWlsdG86dGhvbWFzLm1vcmluQG9yYW5nZS5jb21dIA0K5Y+R6YCB 5pe26Ze0OiAyMDE25bm0OOaciDE25pelIDIwOjQyDQrmlLbku7bkuro6IGJlc3NAaWV0Zi5vcmcN CuaKhOmAgTogZHJhZnQtZGhqYWluLWJlc3MtYmdwLWwzdnBuLXlhbmdAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCuS4u+mi mDogQ2FsbCBmb3IgYWRvcHRpb246IGRyYWZ0LWRoamFpbi1iZXNzLWJncC1sM3Zwbi15YW5nLTAx DQoNCkhlbGxvIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXAsDQoNClRoaXMgZW1haWwgc3RhcnRzIGEgdHdvLXdlZWsg cG9sbCBvbiBhZG9wdGluZyBkcmFmdC1kaGphaW4tYmVzcy1iZ3AtbDN2cG4teWFuZyBbMV0gYXMg YSB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwIGl0ZW0uDQoNClBsZWFzZSBzZW5kIGNvbW1lbnRzIHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0 IGFuZCBzdGF0ZSBpZiB5b3Ugc3VwcG9ydCBhZG9wdGlvbiBvciBub3QgKGluIHRoZSBsYXRlciBj YXNlLCBwbGVhc2UgYWxzbyBzdGF0ZSB0aGUgcmVhc29ucykuDQoNClRoaXMgcG9sbCBydW5zIHVu dGlsICoqQXVndXN0IDMwdGgqKi4NCg0KKkNvaW5jaWRlbnRhbGx5Kiwgd2UgYXJlIGFsc28gcG9s bGluZyBmb3Iga25vd2xlZGdlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgdGhhdCBhcHBsaWVzIHRvIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQs IHRvIGVuc3VyZSB0aGF0IElQUiBoYXMgYmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQgaW4gY29tcGxpYW5jZSB3aXRo IElFVEYgSVBSIHJ1bGVzIChzZWUgUkZDcyAzOTc5LCA0ODc5LCAzNjY5IGFuZCA1Mzc4IGZvciBt b3JlIGRldGFpbHMpLg0KDQo9PT4gKklmKiB5b3UgYXJlIGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhIGRvY3VtZW50IGF1 dGhvciBvciBjb250cmlidXRvciBwbGVhc2UgcmVzcG9uZCB0byB0aGlzIGVtYWlsIGFuZCBpbmRp Y2F0ZSB3aGV0aGVyIG9yIG5vdCB5b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSByZWxldmFudCBJUFIuDQoN ClRoZSBkcmFmdCB3aWxsIG5vdCBiZSBhZG9wdGVkIHVudGlsIGEgcmVzcG9uc2UgaGFzIGJlZW4g cmVjZWl2ZWQgZnJvbSBlYWNoIGF1dGhvciBhbmQgY29udHJpYnV0b3IuDQoNCklmIHlvdSBhcmUg bm90IGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhbiBhdXRob3Igb3IgY29udHJpYnV0b3IsIHRoZW4gcGxlYXNlIGV4cGxp Y2l0bHkgcmVzcG9uZCBvbmx5IGlmIHlvdSBhcmUgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IElQUiB0aGF0IGhhcyBu b3QgeWV0IGJlZW4gZGlzY2xvc2VkIGluIGNvbmZvcm1hbmNlIHdpdGggSUVURiBydWxlcy4NCg0K VGhhbmsgeW91LA0KDQpNYXJ0aW4gJiBUaG9tYXMNCmJlc3MgY2hhaXJzDQoNClsxXSBodHRwczov L2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2RvYy9kcmFmdC1kaGphaW4tYmVzcy1iZ3AtbDN2cG4teWFu Zw0KDQo= From nobody Thu Aug 18 19:54:27 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DBCA12D6AC; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:54:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.468 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.468 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cVnUKZq2NbNt; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:54:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3826712D5BC; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:54:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CUQ24487; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 02:54:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.70) by lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 03:54:19 +0100 Received: from NKGEML514-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::40a8:f0d:c0f3:2ca5]) by nkgeml411-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.70]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 10:54:11 +0800 From: Lizhenbin To: Thomas Morin , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Call for adoption: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01 Thread-Index: AQHR97uqdh47gqOhRU2kCDCEndOzLaBPEISAgACJmRA= Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 02:54:11 +0000 Message-ID: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D8D4CD1BB@nkgeml514-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <19AB2A007F56DB4E8257F949A2FB9858AA1F8277@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <19AB2A007F56DB4E8257F949A2FB9858AA1F8277@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.76.77] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020205.57B674DC.00A2, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 336c0896deb456a343e8de839186a594 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 02:54:25 -0000 U3VwcG9ydCBhcyB0aGUgY28tYXV0aG9yIGFuZCBJIGFtIG5vdCBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSIG9u IHRoaXMgZHJhZnQuDQoNCkJlc3QgUmVnYXJkcywNClpoZW5iaW4oUm9iaW4pDQoNCg0KDQoNCi0t LS0t6YKu5Lu25Y6f5Lu2LS0tLS0NCuWPkeS7tuS6ujogVGhvbWFzIE1vcmluIFttYWlsdG86dGhv bWFzLm1vcmluQG9yYW5nZS5jb21dIA0K5Y+R6YCB5pe26Ze0OiAyMDE25bm0OOaciDE25pelIDIw OjQyDQrmlLbku7bkuro6IGJlc3NAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCuaKhOmAgTogZHJhZnQtZGhqYWluLWJlc3Mt YmdwLWwzdnBuLXlhbmdAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCuS4u+mimDogQ2FsbCBmb3IgYWRvcHRpb246IGRyYWZ0 LWRoamFpbi1iZXNzLWJncC1sM3Zwbi15YW5nLTAxDQoNCkhlbGxvIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXAsDQoN ClRoaXMgZW1haWwgc3RhcnRzIGEgdHdvLXdlZWsgcG9sbCBvbiBhZG9wdGluZyBkcmFmdC1kaGph aW4tYmVzcy1iZ3AtbDN2cG4teWFuZyBbMV0gYXMgYSB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwIGl0ZW0uDQoNClBs ZWFzZSBzZW5kIGNvbW1lbnRzIHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0IGFuZCBzdGF0ZSBpZiB5b3Ugc3VwcG9ydCBh ZG9wdGlvbiBvciBub3QgKGluIHRoZSBsYXRlciBjYXNlLCBwbGVhc2UgYWxzbyBzdGF0ZSB0aGUg cmVhc29ucykuDQoNClRoaXMgcG9sbCBydW5zIHVudGlsICoqQXVndXN0IDMwdGgqKi4NCg0KKkNv aW5jaWRlbnRhbGx5Kiwgd2UgYXJlIGFsc28gcG9sbGluZyBmb3Iga25vd2xlZGdlIG9mIGFueSBJ UFIgdGhhdCBhcHBsaWVzIHRvIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQsIHRvIGVuc3VyZSB0aGF0IElQUiBoYXMgYmVl biBkaXNjbG9zZWQgaW4gY29tcGxpYW5jZSB3aXRoIElFVEYgSVBSIHJ1bGVzIChzZWUgUkZDcyAz OTc5LCA0ODc5LCAzNjY5IGFuZCA1Mzc4IGZvciBtb3JlIGRldGFpbHMpLg0KDQo9PT4gKklmKiB5 b3UgYXJlIGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhIGRvY3VtZW50IGF1dGhvciBvciBjb250cmlidXRvciBwbGVhc2Ug cmVzcG9uZCB0byB0aGlzIGVtYWlsIGFuZCBpbmRpY2F0ZSB3aGV0aGVyIG9yIG5vdCB5b3UgYXJl IGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSByZWxldmFudCBJUFIuDQoNClRoZSBkcmFmdCB3aWxsIG5vdCBiZSBhZG9w dGVkIHVudGlsIGEgcmVzcG9uc2UgaGFzIGJlZW4gcmVjZWl2ZWQgZnJvbSBlYWNoIGF1dGhvciBh bmQgY29udHJpYnV0b3IuDQoNCklmIHlvdSBhcmUgbm90IGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhbiBhdXRob3Igb3Ig Y29udHJpYnV0b3IsIHRoZW4gcGxlYXNlIGV4cGxpY2l0bHkgcmVzcG9uZCBvbmx5IGlmIHlvdSBh cmUgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IElQUiB0aGF0IGhhcyBub3QgeWV0IGJlZW4gZGlzY2xvc2VkIGluIGNv bmZvcm1hbmNlIHdpdGggSUVURiBydWxlcy4NCg0KVGhhbmsgeW91LA0KDQpNYXJ0aW4gJiBUaG9t YXMNCmJlc3MgY2hhaXJzDQoNClsxXSBodHRwczovL2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2RvYy9k cmFmdC1kaGphaW4tYmVzcy1iZ3AtbDN2cG4teWFuZw0KDQpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KQkVTUyBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCkJFU1NAaWV0Zi5v cmcNCmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vYmVzcw0K From nobody Thu Aug 18 20:00:59 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CAF112D783; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 20:00:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.769 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.769 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cPNuAQ5hG3tC; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 20:00:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F26412D784; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 20:00:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1282; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1471575656; x=1472785256; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=ZWbuQK3OMdSlbASRhmMrZito31i/iibT+FY2QDJvZ4M=; b=csi9NnG4BNURJCTGGXbDJwYstQJU6G4C9A/y43SeK72tig+67riT7XYX 9Jhj9a8QE94ikFyWjYbVXF0Z0XRYcbZKo4OWe9Rt2wNMqWGV07xyK48WD wlll4qXjW8Fs+D82pMhaT1FmgF/PUWoGL8GlrdCnz2NKj5EPivXhF0wqw 8=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BMAgCWdbZX/5BdJa1eg0RWfAe3ZIF9J?= =?us-ascii?q?IV5AoFqOBQCAQEBAQEBAV4nhF8BBR0dPxACAQg2EDIlAgQBDQWIMQ68QwEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARcFhiqETYQSEQGFdwEEmUcBhh+IfoFrhFyJBZA0A?= =?us-ascii?q?R42g3pwhXc3fwEBAQ?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,543,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="312778892" Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Aug 2016 03:00:55 +0000 Received: from XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com (xch-aln-008.cisco.com [173.36.7.18]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7J30tRp015838 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 19 Aug 2016 03:00:55 GMT Received: from xch-rcd-007.cisco.com (173.37.102.17) by XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com (173.36.7.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 22:00:54 -0500 Received: from xch-rcd-007.cisco.com ([173.37.102.17]) by XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com ([173.37.102.17]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 22:00:54 -0500 From: "Dhanendra Jain (dhjain)" To: Thomas Morin , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Call for adoption: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01 Thread-Index: AQHR97unG9gYjPvlUEqPGmyIXvH0z6BPesqA Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 03:00:54 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.7.141117 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.154.201.32] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <6AD8DEE598733E49BE684A028FB188CE@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 03:00:58 -0000 Support and I am not aware of any IPR on this draft. Thanks, Dhanendra. On 8/16/16, 5:42 AM, "Thomas Morin" wrote: >Hello working group, > >This email starts a two-week poll on adopting >draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang [1] as a working group item. > >Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or >not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). > >This poll runs until **August 30th**. > >*Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that >applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in >compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for >more details). > >=3D=3D> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please >respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any >relevant IPR. > >The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from >each author and contributor. > >If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please >explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet >been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > >Thank you, > >Martin & Thomas >bess chairs > >[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang > From nobody Thu Aug 18 20:11:20 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D4F12D78B; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 20:11:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.468 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.468 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ODo4O6nDHpmn; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 20:11:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CC4F12D769; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 20:11:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CPS22864; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 03:11:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.72) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 04:11:13 +0100 Received: from SZXEMA510-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.224]) by SZXEMA413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.72]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:11:10 +0800 From: Mach Chen To: Martin Vigoureux , BESS Thread-Topic: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 Thread-Index: AQHR97xwBsxMbJ1eCUG3gdxYn9ShoaBPnTkQ Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 03:11:09 +0000 Message-ID: References: <57B30B64.6040304@nokia.com> In-Reply-To: <57B30B64.6040304@nokia.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.102.135] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A0B0202.57B678D2.00BE, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.3.224, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 3b4f17a0685d07ee6edc8d41b0c28ce8 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 03:11:19 -0000 Support the publication of this document! Best regards, Mach > -----Original Message----- > From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux > Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 8:48 PM > To: BESS > Cc: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction@ietf.org > Subject: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduc= tion-04 >=20 > Hello Working Group, >=20 > This email starts a Working Group Last Call on > draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 [1]. >=20 > =A4 Please read the document if you haven't read the most recent version = yet, > and send your comments to the list, no later than the *30th of August*. > Note that this is *not only* a call for comments on the document, but als= o a > call for support (or not) publishing this document as an Informational RF= C. >=20 > =A4 We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies= to > draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04, to ensure that IPR has b= een > disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 an= d > 5378 for more details) prior to moving forward. > If you are listed as a document Author or Contributor of this document pl= ease > respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any > relevant undisclosed IPR. The document won't progress without answers fro= m > all the Authors and Contributors. > No IPR disclosure exists against this document. >=20 > =A4 We are also polling for knowledge of implementations of part or all o= f what > this document specifies. This information is expected as per [2]. > Please inform the mailing list, or the chairs, or only one of the chairs. >=20 > =A4 Finally, if someone wishes to volunteer to be Document Shepherd for t= his > document, please let us know. >=20 > Thank you > M&T >=20 >=20 > [1] > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduc= tion/ > [2] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw >=20 > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Thu Aug 18 22:35:06 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DB912B04F; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 12:49:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.768 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.768 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y0fZ89CgI4DQ; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 12:49:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B89F712B069; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 12:49:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4320; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1471549745; x=1472759345; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=jAx/G4XUPSSrUl7CZxlGefsaSm5l+mqg6R2kZYGE6lA=; b=Iv5jdKRzUbykRgglyr41ccaVl0Lk86If/4JhmfacYW8SToaOvD4To1cv fiurMZr6D7KQUq4RLw0etOiOg6PJQaDxET2zmu/5YFKKhKq8LGtd7RDzK gDM35HiOusYC+QDpPS/1+BViEPKzV3Hug01GMXXxB1hAlCecbTPJCsfcg I=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BeAgDEELZX/4UNJK1dg0NWfAe3Y4F9J?= =?us-ascii?q?IV5AhyBVTgUAgEBAQEBAQFeJ4RfAQUBASERNwMEBw4CAgEIGAICJgICAhkMCxU?= =?us-ascii?q?QAgQBDQWIMQ6tI5AaAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFwUFfIl2hBIRATOCa?= =?us-ascii?q?oJaBYYPkzUBjBeDBoFrhFyJAow7g3cBHjaDem6Fdzd/AQEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,541,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="311902897" Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 18 Aug 2016 19:49:03 +0000 Received: from XCH-RTP-014.cisco.com (xch-rtp-014.cisco.com [64.101.220.154]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7IJn37w017446 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:49:03 GMT Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-014.cisco.com (64.101.220.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:49:02 -0400 Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:49:02 -0400 From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" To: Loa Andersson , Eric C Rosen , Mach Chen , "draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis.all@ietf.org" , "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [mpls] Question raised in the MPLS-RT review of draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis Thread-Index: AQHR+YmR0S/RSyfjp0yPMnkA4TqQ4Q== Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:49:02 +0000 Message-ID: References: <041801d1ecdb$317d1910$94774b30$@olddog.co.uk> <5d7fcd92-f663-50fc-4057-9827746886ca@juniper.net> <6d39a0bf-df2d-8a33-3194-f693760683d8@pi.nu> In-Reply-To: <6d39a0bf-df2d-8a33-3194-f693760683d8@pi.nu> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <89DD1181A6DA1A4289D0D4500128C2D7@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 22:35:04 -0700 Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" , "idr-chairs@ietf.org" , "bess-chairs@ietf.org" , BESS , "idr@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] [mpls] Question raised in the MPLS-RT review of draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:49:07 -0000 SGkgTG9hLCBldCBhbCwgDQoNClNpbmNlIEkgY29tbWVudGVkIG9uIHRoZSBNUExTLVJUIHJldmll dyB3aXRoIHJlc3BlY3QgdG8gdGhlIElEUi1zcGVjaWZpYw0KY29udGVudCwgdGhlcmUgbWF5IGJl IHNvbWUgY29uZnVzaW9uIGFzIHRvIHdoZXJlIEkgc3RhbmQgb24gdGhlIG93bmVyc2hpcA0Kb2Yg dGhpcyBkcmFmdC4gSeKAmXZlIHJldmlld2VkIHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgYW5kIGFncmVlIHdpdGgg dGhlIGFwcHJvYWNoDQpkZXNjcmliZWQgYmVsb3cuIEnigJltIGNvbnZpbmNlZCB3ZSB3aWxsIGdl dCB0aGUgcmlnaHQgbGV2ZWwgY3Jvc3MtV0cgcmV2aWV3DQphbG9uZyBhcyB3ZSByZWNvZ25pemUg dGhhdCBpdCBkb2VzIHNwYW4gbXVsdGlwbGUgV0dzLiBJIHdvdWxkIGV4cGVjdCB0aGF0DQp3ZeKA mWxsIGhhdmUgaW1wbGVtZW50YXRpb25zIGNvbmZvcm1pbmcgdG8gdGhlIGRyYWZ0IGluIHRoZSBu ZWFyIGZ1dHVyZS4NCg0KVGhhbmtzLA0KQWNlZQ0KDQpPbiA4LzE3LzE2LCAxOjM2IFBNLCAibXBs cyBvbiBiZWhhbGYgb2YgTG9hIEFuZGVyc3NvbiINCjxtcGxzLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmcgb24g YmVoYWxmIG9mIGxvYUBwaS5udT4gd3JvdGU6DQoNCj5FcmljLCBldC5hbC4sIChjb3BpZWQgYWxz byBpZHItY2hhaXJzIGFuZCBpZHItbGlzdCArIGJlc3MtY2hhaXJzIGFuZA0KPmJlc3MtbGlzdCkN Cj4NCj5Gb3IgdGhvc2Ugb2YgeW91IHRoYXQgYXJlIG5vdCBzdWJzY3JpYmVkIHRvIHRoZSBtcGxz LWxpc3QuDQo+DQo+LSB0aGUgbXBscyB3ZyBoYXMgc3RhcnRlZCB0aGUgaW5pdGlhbCBzdGVwcyBm b3Igd29ya2luZyBncm91cCBhZG9wdGlvbiwNCj4gICB0aGVyZSBhcmUgdGhyZWUgc3RlcHMNCj4g ICAtLSBtcGxzLXJ0IHJldmlldyAod2hhdCB5b3Ugc2VlIGJlbG93IGlzIHRoZSBmb2xsb3ctdXAg ZGlzY3Vzc2lvbiBvbg0KPiAgICAgIHRoYXQgcmV2aWV3KQ0KPiAgIC0tIElQUiBwb2xsLCB3aWxs IGJlIHNlbnQgb3V0IHNvb24NCj4gICAtLSB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwIGFkb3B0aW9uIHBvbGwgKHdn YXApLCB0aGF0IHBvbGwgd2lsbCBiZSBjb3BpZWQgdG8NCj4gICAgICB0aGUgaWRyIGFuZCBiZXNz LiBIb3BlZnVsbHkgd2UgY2FuIHRoYXQgc2hvcnRseS4NCj4NCj5JJ20gc2VuZGluZyB0aGlzIHRv IG1wbHMsIGlkciBhbmQgYmVzcyB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwLCBzaW5jZSBpdCBoYXMNCj50byBkbyB3 aGVyZSB0aGluZ3Mgc2hvdWxkIGJlIGRvY3VtZW50ZWQuDQo+DQo+DQo+T24gMjAxNi0wOC0xNyAx Nzo1OSwgRXJpYyBDIFJvc2VuIHdyb3RlOg0KPj4gSGkgTWFjaCwNCj4+DQo+PiBUaGFua3MgZm9y IHlvdXIgcmV2aWV3Lg0KPj4NCj4+IE9uIDgvMy8yMDE2IDQ6NTEgQU0sIE1hY2ggQ2hlbiB3cm90 ZToNCj4+PiBJIGhhdmUgb25seSBvbmUgY29tbWVudCByZWdhcmRpbmcgdG8gU2VjdGlvbiA1LiBJ TUhPLCBhbHRob3VnaCBpdCdzDQo+Pj4gaW5mb3JtYXRpb25hbCwgdGhlIGRlc2NyaXB0aW9uIGFi b3V0IHRoZSByZWxhdGlvbnNoaXAgYmV0d2VlbiBTQUZJLTENCj4+PiBhbmQgU0FGSS00IHJvdXRl cyBzaG91bGQgbm90IGJlbG9uZyB0byB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50LCBpdCdzIGEgbW9yZQ0KPj4+IGNv bW1vbiBkZXNjcmlwdGlvbiB0aGF0IGlzIG5vdCBzcGVjaWZpYyB0byB0aGlzIGxhYmVsIGJpbmRp bmcgcHJvY2Vzcy4NCj4+PiBJJ2Qgc3VnZ2VzdCB0byByZW1vdmUgdGhpcyBzZWN0aW9uIGlmIHRo ZXJlIGlzIG5vIGFueSBvdGhlciByZWFzb25zLg0KPj4NCj4+IERpZmZlcmluZyBpbnRlcnByZXRh dGlvbnMgYWJvdXQgdGhlIHJlbGF0aW9uc2hpcCBiZXR3ZWVuIFNBRkktMSBhbmQNCj4+IFNBRkkt NCBhcmUgYSB2ZXJ5IGNvbW1vbiBzb3VyY2Ugb2YgaW50ZXJvcGVyYWJpbGl0eSBwcm9ibGVtcyBh bW9uZw0KPj4gaW1wbGVtZW50YXRpb25zIG9mIGRpZmZlcmVudCB2ZW5kb3JzLiAgVGh1cyBJIHRo aW5rIGl0IGlzIHZlcnkgdXNlZnVsIHRvDQo+PiBkb2N1bWVudCB0aGlzIGlzc3VlIGFuZCB0byBj YWxsIGF0dGVudGlvbiB0byBzb21lIG9mIHRoZSBkaWZmZXJpbmcNCj4+IGludGVycHJldGF0aW9u cy4gIEkgdGhpbmsgdGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBpcyBhbiBhcHByb3ByaWF0ZSBwbGFjZSBmb3IgdGhp cw0KPj4gaW5mb3JtYXRpb247IGV2ZW4gdGhvdWdoIHRoaXMgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24gaXMgbm90IGFi b3V0IGxhYmVsIGJpbmRpbmcsIGl0DQo+PiBpcyBhYm91dCB0aGUgc2VtYW50aWNzIG9mIFNBRkkt NC4NCj4NCj5JIGFncmVlIHRoYXQgdGhpcyBuZWVkcyB0byBiZSBkb2N1bWVudGVkISBJIGNhbiBh Y2NlcHQgdGhhdCBpdCBpcyBkb25lDQo+aW4gZHJhZnQtcm9zZW4tbXBscy1yZmMzMTA3YmlzLCBi dXQgSSB3b3VsZCBsaWtlIHRvIGhhdmUgYWxsIHRocmVlIHdnJ3MNCj5hZ3JlZSB0byB0aGlzLiBJ IHNlZSBhIGZldyBhbHRlcm5hdGl2ZXMNCj4NCj4tIHdlIGNvdWxkIGRvY3VtZW50IHRoaXMgaXMg aW4gZHJhZnQtcm9zZW4tbXBscy1yZmMzMTA3YmlzOyBvcg0KPi0gd2UgY291bGQgd3JpdGUgYSBz ZXBhcmF0ZSBkb2N1bWVudA0KPi0gd2UgY291bGQgZmluZCBhbm90aGVyIGRvY3VtZW50IHdoZXJl IHRoaXMgaGFzIGEgYmV0dGVyIGZpdCB0aGFuIGluDQo+ICAgZHJhZnQtcm9zZW4tbXBscy1yZmMz MTA3YmlzDQo+LSBhbnkgb3RoZXIgc3VnZ2VzdGlvbg0KPg0KPkxldCB1cyBrbm93IGlmIHlvdSBo YXZlIGFuIG9waW5pb24uDQo+DQo+UGxlYXNlIHNlbmQgeW91ciByZXNwb25zZXMgdG8gdGhlIG1w bHMgd2cgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0IChtcGxzQGlldGYub3JnKS4NCj4NCj4vTG9hDQo+bXBscyB3Zy1j by1jaGFpcg0KPg0KPj4NCj4+IEVyaWMNCj4NCj4tLSANCj4NCj4NCj5Mb2EgQW5kZXJzc29uICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgZW1haWw6IGxvYUBtYWlsMDEuaHVhd2VpLmNvbQ0KPlNlbmlv ciBNUExTIEV4cGVydCAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgbG9hQHBpLm51DQo+SHVhd2Vp IFRlY2hub2xvZ2llcyAoY29uc3VsdGFudCkgICAgIHBob25lOiArNDYgNzM5IDgxIDIxIDY0DQo+ DQo+X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCj5tcGxz IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KPm1wbHNAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj5odHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWls bWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL21wbHMNCg0K From nobody Fri Aug 19 07:07:31 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D2912DA3C; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 07:07:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.922 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kuatrotechnology.onmicrosoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BFcr51TVaDuq; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 07:07:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from EUR03-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr40078.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.4.78]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B92FD12D59B; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kuatrotechnology.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-kuatrotech-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=1JQFA3cWiNC5xxVrk4dcJwuYQS6lZfXl11bvqvF0VUg=; b=H7R8OcAslr6c/cL9s42xz6zMVqWDoMZGdWVNCzBPLJ1UkE8LznJjW9i7wMcjHYnPbjPf5Fbgb9sJQMI1rETP3V653veXzcbtRuR5MXx5xMSyoHzbVR7WqtAvH2BVdk84Sa0WNFC14VvyLkOODasMO34vVIhWeEBibywzf9k6wUc= Received: from AM5PR0601MB2641.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.168.154.138) by AM5PR0601MB2643.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.168.154.140) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA_P384) id 15.1.557.21; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:59:59 +0000 Received: from AM5PR0601MB2641.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.168.154.138]) by AM5PR0601MB2641.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.168.154.138]) with mapi id 15.01.0557.022; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 14:00:00 +0000 From: Xufeng Liu To: Jeff Haas , "EXT - thomas.morin@orange.com" Thread-Topic: Call for adoption: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01 Thread-Index: AQHR97uohGEN7vlJ0U2UEgU58X3nY6BLmTsAgAS64SA= Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:59:59 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=xliu@kuatrotech.com; x-originating-ip: [114.245.176.195] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d07758dc-7c73-42ec-9291-08d3c8391c22 x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AM5PR0601MB2643; 6:GTImFbc1FG4Cw5jwkUgIZYf/QortqDPKkFzldrtX20en2jF9oVAAgExpb4AoezyKqQ9lAHI0U2sWO/4c0xTwxeAo5jv2WP8yQ4b0dUW+nt0Z5RO4+gUczvDEiFj4wtTnkamZ3oDXm+8QN8d/KQ20OSrN8+A74xXVFslHbNiKbx1jiu0EUKO8rz/G7VpxK7Rx+ZMDT+IHI8vzonfiN/EnyHai11LIzcXWwuwx5DR0QYFNF5YWdk/XuY2I3DozfKkV5Ssul1CYccqANtslCLCQMDG3zEjVxM8pJXZdZvMK81x19uqJTlhnipbDq0XuMWxv; 5:Z4IvdSvAckRkuNKbPxxR5+iYqh0oq/zbwWqjY6Qo3AK8eSjJKMVC+1fpUSBvein9BY72BbdwF2pwbso2cy4pGOeNpB0lvh3dagqeTa+25L6zzB7keTGPir3StszKaikXISKy6CG00fJAbTgWYVXRGA==; 24:KvwQmuOND5RnUZ5tRKDIw+qV022NDSUkHP1WTe3Rm4ESdUkOeaJE5Bw3WlFcQczLU9xZBTf/siKA8WYhXOQYd24chbVR3sCi93tpikzGh68=; 7:Q4DuEF/iJuRS8HM7JwUSgkVEOWVD4CIF9ArtNFVLyRnyxAcIydc1pefCR9p187gVvnszfiQwSpyUg3rHMu4cEud9ZRQXyCArt3b+RExEDVSqn+TPRO/Z5hLSCeQCw2yBGXdfOt6h4/ow7n4IifCQwEcf+qglRhBFbCWmJOYzGf8NxBAsWx0FMR8q7/5hmdf4L8wQ6WFDA+M9Qi2obvNajdBxj+4W6BvU2AcxrHaddP/YOeZQBp5s47F+Jxqp+yn/ x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:AM5PR0601MB2643; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105)(138986009662008)(18271650672692); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040176)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(6043046)(6042046); SRVR:AM5PR0601MB2643; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:AM5PR0601MB2643; x-forefront-prvs: 0039C6E5C5 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(7916002)(24454002)(377454003)(13464003)(189002)(199003)(4326007)(74316002)(9686002)(66066001)(50986999)(76176999)(7736002)(81166006)(54356999)(33656002)(68736007)(3280700002)(305945005)(92566002)(101416001)(7846002)(7696003)(97736004)(81156014)(8676002)(2900100001)(5001770100001)(2906002)(8666005)(10400500002)(3660700001)(106356001)(230783001)(19580405001)(3846002)(1941001)(19580395003)(76576001)(87936001)(122556002)(189998001)(6116002)(586003)(102836003)(2950100001)(15975445007)(5002640100001)(106116001)(86362001)(105586002)(8936002)(77096005)(7059030); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:AM5PR0601MB2643; H:AM5PR0601MB2641.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: kuatrotech.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: kuatrotech.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Aug 2016 13:59:59.8689 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 99314f4e-50ab-4d4e-a9c6-b21b0c887384 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM5PR0601MB2643 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 14:07:29 -0000 Support as the co-author, and I am not aware of any relevant IPR. Thanks, - Xufeng > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Haas [mailto:jhaas@juniper.net] > Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 9:45 AM > To: EXT - thomas.morin@orange.com > Cc: bess@ietf.org; draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang@ietf.org > Subject: Re: Call for adoption: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01 >=20 > I am not aware of any IPR on this draft. >=20 > -- Jeff >=20 > > On Aug 16, 2016, at 8:42 AM, Thomas Morin > wrote: > > > > Hello working group, > > > > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3v= pn- > yang [1] as a working group item. > > > > Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or n= ot (in > the later case, please also state the reasons). > > > > This poll runs until **August 30th**. > > > > *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that app= lies to > this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF= IPR > rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > > > =3D=3D> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please = respond to > this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. > > > > The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from e= ach > author and contributor. > > > > If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicit= ly respond > only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in confo= rmance > with IETF rules. > > > > Thank you, > > > > Martin & Thomas > > bess chairs > > > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang > > From nobody Fri Aug 19 09:10:04 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB6F12D125; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 09:10:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.738 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.738 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, RDNS_NONE=0.793] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3cN0DGfJ-gXr; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 09:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (unknown [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39AB112D119; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 09:10:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=184.157.82.170; From: "Susan Hares" To: "'Thomas Morin'" , References: <19AB2A007F56DB4E8257F949A2FB9858AA1F8277@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D8D4CD1BB@nkgeml514-mbx.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D8D4CD1BB@nkgeml514-mbx.china.huawei.com> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 12:08:54 -0400 Message-ID: <007601d1fa33$fc5303b0$f4f90b10$@ndzh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQKiIiAzyL8Hrr3NnUu7Rc/+/RRIPQE7fQetAZyYOyyemWKYIA== Content-Language: en-us X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com Archived-At: Cc: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 16:10:03 -0000 Support. I've read the document, and compared it against the bgp-model = draft. It is a good place to start. =20 Sue Hares=20 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Hello working group, This email starts a two-week poll on adopting = draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang [1] as a working group item. Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or = not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). This poll runs until **August 30th**. *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that = applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in = compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for = more details). =3D=3D> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please = respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any = relevant IPR. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from = each author and contributor. If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please = explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet = been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thank you, Martin & Thomas bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Fri Aug 19 12:41:29 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4CC612B01F; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 12:41:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.468 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.468 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e00WoahxTG64; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 12:41:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B14712D1A6; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 12:41:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CUR38061; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 19:41:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.218.25.35) by lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 20:41:21 +0100 Received: from SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.36]) by SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com ([10.218.25.35]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 12:41:15 -0700 From: Richard Li To: Martin Vigoureux , BESS Thread-Topic: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 Thread-Index: AQHR97xwM4V5b4ll1Eyt2a7vre/AkqBQsvlQ Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 19:41:14 +0000 Message-ID: References: <57B30B64.6040304@nokia.com> In-Reply-To: <57B30B64.6040304@nokia.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.213.49.31] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020205.57B760E3.0015, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.3.36, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: bb85887a231542926d00278772ac5684 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 19:41:28 -0000 After having read it, I believe that it is useful to the community. I support its publication as an informational RFC. Regards, Richard -----Original Message----- From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 5:48 AM To: BESS Cc: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reducti= on-04 Hello Working Group, This email starts a Working Group Last Call on=20 draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 [1]. =A4 Please read the document if you haven't read the most recent version yet, and send your comments to the list, no later than the *30th of August*. Note that this is *not only* a call for comments on the document, but=20 also a call for support (or not) publishing this document as an=20 Informational RFC. =A4 We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies=20 to draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04, to ensure that IPR=20 has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979,=20 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details) prior to moving forward. If you are listed as a document Author or Contributor of this document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not=20 you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The document won't=20 progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. No IPR disclosure exists against this document. =A4 We are also polling for knowledge of implementations of part or all of= =20 what this document specifies. This information is expected as per [2].=20 Please inform the mailing list, or the chairs, or only one of the chairs. =A4 Finally, if someone wishes to volunteer to be Document Shepherd for=20 this document, please let us know. Thank you M&T [1]=20 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reducti= on/ [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Fri Aug 19 16:32:42 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietf.org Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B6412B01A; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 16:32:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.29.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <147164956102.24281.9510067424267712807.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 16:32:41 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] I-D Action: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-02.txt X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 23:32:41 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS of the IETF. Title : Yang Data Model for BGP/MPLS L3 VPNs Authors : Dhanendra Jain Keyur Patel Patrice Brissette Zhenbin Li Shunwan Zhuang Xufeng Liu Jeffrey Haas Santosh Esale Bin Wen Filename : draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-02.txt Pages : 29 Date : 2016-08-19 Abstract: This document defines a YANG data model that can be used to configure and manage BGP Layer 3 VPNs. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Mon Aug 22 07:57:10 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietf.org Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F0A12D670; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 07:57:00 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.30.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <147187782093.8277.13343590403782585099.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 07:57:00 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, draft-ietf-bess-ir@ietf.org, aretana@cisco.com, thomas.morin@orange.com, bess-chairs@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org, The IESG Subject: [bess] Protocol Action: 'Ingress Replication Tunnels in Multicast VPN' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-bess-ir-05.txt) X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 14:57:01 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Ingress Replication Tunnels in Multicast VPN' (draft-ietf-bess-ir-05.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the BGP Enabled ServiceS Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Alvaro Retana, Alia Atlas and Deborah Brungard. A URL of this Internet Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-ir/ Technical Summary RFCs 6513, 6514, and other RFCs describe procedures by which a Service Provider may offer Multicast VPN service to its customers. These procedures create point-to-multipoint (P2MP) or multipoint-to- multipoint trees across the Service Provider's backbone. One type of P2MP tree that may be used is known as an "Ingress Replication (IR) tunnel". While the prior MVPN specifications allow the use of IR tunnels, those specifications are not always very clear or explicit about how the MVPN protocol elements and procedures are applied to IR tunnels. This document updates RFCs 6513 and 6514 by adding details that are specific to the use of IR tunnels. Working Group Summary There was consensus in the WG that a clarification document was needed to completement RFC6513/RFC6514. Document Quality This document started from implementation experience realated to IR in MVPN -- the clarifications in the document come from there. The document can be technically detailed and maybe even confusing to the uninitiated, but it has gone through multiple reviews and discussion in the bess WG by experts. Personnel Document Shepherd = Thomas Morin. Responsible AD = Alvaro Retana. From nobody Mon Aug 22 18:11:41 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1A712D0A6; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 18:11:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.922 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vstzoldyzQmm; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 18:11:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam01on0095.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.32.95]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0369512B015; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 18:11:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=kJd5sdb+5ZgGxqJtMdGYmMi5Tcvyv2Dnwegv7iAaYyo=; b=SgtSlBB4bv5nQIVaTNtQI1L15EfrQIK+QnDUhxqZNqQ0ify4WQ0n951gl4nUm2DAEc5EH7GLvqw8uKow3wqIpu2A/GGmURjWL+ezxon8nU2ruY+IMwckgd9dAi3D839tI+904hXotub87ntndYtm9vmfFe78NQ1cxmUuanJ19qk= Received: from DM5PR05MB3145.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.173.219.15) by DM5PR05MB3147.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.173.219.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA_P384) id 15.1.599.2; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 01:11:35 +0000 Received: from DM5PR05MB3145.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.219.15]) by DM5PR05MB3145.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.219.15]) with mapi id 15.01.0599.003; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 01:11:36 +0000 From: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" To: Martin Vigoureux , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 Thread-Index: AQHR97r0Jb/qcyltLUCBJZR5PfA+kaBVxqtw Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 01:11:36 +0000 Message-ID: References: <57B308FA.4090201@nokia.com> In-Reply-To: <57B308FA.4090201@nokia.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=zzhang@juniper.net; x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.11] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1bc2e929-d7fe-45c3-22db-08d3caf26e08 x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM5PR05MB3147; 6:J3yRP+iBCRCWhtiweRyxf1lkT0ELc1JJW4IEY4UaOiwT3ErvAOd2jDji+lWhNvVtAl+tIlWBUgKMlHVTVkx0sLHX1G5o5zVStMtZIzp1AhG2MRp7Fz/nBn86UR7eF6Kb7QHuYb6V7Jf4meLiQAOR7GbJ0l4iFC7+6Kre4Ya3FvETg9N0x6zGleGMeR9EZ8cASEG0xq16OARq9ahktBAHDF7CUJ5DezKiNPYdVyeTIQlllsnGMs5PCZf1e+dyX2/IRHoh7Q9CG96ZD8TiicBS51Rt4XPsr1O22FLCygcJcOc/a5qlK1NHbmFXdN1yhWOSZ95mTcRMnt3mO88QSztjlA==; 5:v5Ht5kx/YJmYvK2MhZyy7ipy4ObP03crqyzb1hVnQEjbQ0gAIS7DL3P0apoIN0HQSeU8vJyipkpsgyBQ2Vjaw73AXSBqj+wN9nMq2DcAb45AtCU3LKSLv0v+AjcjRLCXbdtSjuiH15izQ4YyHYRPIQ==; 24:zlWdznWSJFsMNaetggd8OEgASybuYpLX83mEpARPzkDLAJkjVMFRsVWZBsyC3vyz0ZRJT3WjKId2S7MQ/kIAwE1uiYhYj5V9MH+zfruGgmQ=; 7:axjC5EOUNEns+J1gQrmwtf13B2twjfVyDK/Pm9RJQwZetwBDPKrhxZ2tVCi8KRH3sGsMMzqRvmxy6GyMQmxazueX/yBrkhMZcI3S4dSYZaFPQiHTN0ed1NXBpMYuRmS4tSFZ39PZyFTbv+Zz4pnIgx/JF/X7Y0WUVtoXs1iR8gzDSFtXJSzSuzgm11c2DbJAxyotqK/st4NXZIxZiy1TN87c3Bs2NOdIaIMtnQiAEV70zLImMkAMRi1tBzUsZFbJ x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DM5PR05MB3147; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040176)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026); SRVR:DM5PR05MB3147; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM5PR05MB3147; x-forefront-prvs: 004395A01C x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(377454003)(13464003)(189002)(199003)(2501003)(105586002)(3660700001)(2906002)(3280700002)(54356999)(76176999)(99286002)(74316002)(2950100001)(50986999)(101416001)(106116001)(7736002)(305945005)(2900100001)(10400500002)(7846002)(86362001)(7696003)(87936001)(77096005)(97736004)(5001770100001)(5002640100001)(66066001)(15975445007)(19580395003)(6116002)(102836003)(586003)(19580405001)(122556002)(76576001)(3846002)(4326007)(106356001)(189998001)(81156014)(68736007)(5660300001)(230783001)(9686002)(33656002)(8936002)(15650500001)(92566002)(81166006); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR05MB3147; H:DM5PR05MB3145.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 Aug 2016 01:11:36.5244 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR05MB3147 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 01:11:40 -0000 As co-author, I support the adoption, and I am not aware of relevant IPRs. Thanks. Jeffrey > -----Original Message----- > From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux > Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 8:37 AM > To: bess@ietf.org > Cc: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates@ietf.org > Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure- > updates-03 >=20 > Hello working group, >=20 > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting > draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 [1] as a Working Group > Document. >=20 > Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, > please also state the reasons). >=20 > This poll runs until *the 30th of August*. >=20 > We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies > to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance > with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more > details). > If you are listed as an Author or Contributor of this Document please > respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any > relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers > from all the Authors and Contributors. > No IPR has been disclosed against this Document >=20 > If you are not listed as an Author or Contributor, then please > explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet > been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. >=20 > Thank you >=20 > Martin & Thomas > bess chairs >=20 > [1] > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure- > updates/ >=20 > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Tue Aug 23 07:03:54 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5641112D51A; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:03:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v9n8lNhikuHE; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pf0-x235.google.com (mail-pf0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF04312D781; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:03:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf0-x235.google.com with SMTP id x72so44154868pfd.2; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:03:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jVuhG9pfLwnWyVvvGfxmgrJG4E3jga1fwIIcJr4gI1M=; b=d1Ok0K9HRDjqcWf0v+9xToZjb38ZSFkPo/A51//UdKAzoBk7xOJWcQA7/CJjGJqTIX IPNfsNH8ni5IWhM1T74AixCpoLlNAdCPzMLRID1BJPWjlWcmfNbdQZWTTyOUOqhzLe13 cF+bhQMXCBb3r/STJcjRxMtgZoHyv52MpjdvUnJMz/HNZuiEWmPnan4thm+2cA22t/IK G3zpSZhflVsbRPdaFAoP5XbR5jzaMZA1l8lQVGoG06bgqOr6JmH/6G9gpzVCmDGe8Ayd tZweVaoiixF2Cxpd4J7eXHHQ9VvFDG+JCIEv1GwvtHkeww1zmtf9WeBh79h7JBgWuM2D 3A2w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jVuhG9pfLwnWyVvvGfxmgrJG4E3jga1fwIIcJr4gI1M=; b=ms/m9rZqKYxEZkCQ5sb4dpsYZBadPcFoJmYSP7D7NLOnt/3Nu8c+2rZTTHEU3uJ2km KtH4jOSYy7/sZgb8ssWqcYQckZHasPeS1Z8vmY4HDX2G/LwWE39pU9U2WzFE0YbNO91x /XybfV/GDXhPbf+HhKyz+A1pSyFn1tZn07pkAuDYASqm1N8DGB4TysNm+W6kzxHY0OSK UM32wDSSqSpEOUAmRqn2okC7kfmc3VstBTCbohAqQsM/tb6RyKMrOfaljm/eGhJmphdF +h5979+ZEH0VO6XdkdO705xBua2jqnEUSFB5CwfMIAs9tEFWn+kiy5hro3z8wAoVOgOD RuXA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouu2zSsoh8gXhXcLLUoX3UvtmXXxoTNdjS2AhB+9YIZxy0PKxizNNi6jCBvjK95Meg== X-Received: by 10.98.34.151 with SMTP id p23mr53839050pfj.102.1471961030221; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:03:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.20.2.136] ([118.140.169.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o80sm6149977pfa.67.2016.08.23.07.03.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:03:49 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.17.0.160611 Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:03:55 -0700 From: Jeff Tantsura To: "EXT - thomas.morin@orange.com" Message-ID: <75213100-00E1-49C4-A1FB-4F6E4B0104C0@gmail.com> Thread-Topic: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01 Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: "draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:03:53 -0000 Support, good start! Cheers, Jeff > On Aug 16, 2016, at 8:42 AM, Thomas Morin wrote: > > Hello working group, > > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang [1] as a working group item. > > Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or not (in the later case, please also state the reasons). > > This poll runs until **August 30th**. > > *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > ==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. > > The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author and contributor. > > If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > Thank you, > > Martin & Thomas > bess chairs > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang > _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Tue Aug 23 07:04:58 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2608212D959; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:04:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vdeFr1_NdN5O; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:04:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pf0-x22b.google.com (mail-pf0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22E3512D955; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:04:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id p64so44172461pfb.1; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:04:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gTEunOQi1ihxgGm3TWrVbqPWcisDcwH4lTVPDkpitsU=; b=j3JnULpNqv88ulN3zMDgu83viZGhZtWja4tr8LZqxsxA21hvnHcBIkPyZoCKp7y+vK +thw51B/uo76cBTHlMNOfnqF6jX0AYFD7+TQ7yrUW/cn3rDk6Arjibxlo9HXQWDSvpH6 C5kEo9+SIaW7UJn685Qi+VcIJTjrlv/pISwmyzx3FuoUnTqYHrlVsLA3BpS3Rq5AXm1U MvxmFoOoy6x2pI8VVg7MP4R+dUhxPVysk9epwJHgeKspyFRpLMmKkawarMbV5yGHSsfv B4VcAEA9kIh4hhL//eTKNfsknHbvi0jrfJkHpz+mt5vSW7MHrrbNrG9M/LRE3BFle3Yh 4YAg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gTEunOQi1ihxgGm3TWrVbqPWcisDcwH4lTVPDkpitsU=; b=Zi2+1WXzLNvtaPJU1f0cKukDPTIi1JpH2kO9j5RQkArdKgZmT4XBrUFmQEsIaKmthg SJ3tDsyGQgJeIX0kbGgEyGCrLIp6sSw97nlQK2sV4WC/W9cCMjsN6ajrQJUBN7BfN05d SF5S7dm+WVMhOSrQQTaksyMl6YHAso1WNCCVfz3FWO+n/6qGhkK5NTErFgQnHLmuPMHX JVUFS8XEj0P/hpc5ZjlOe4ec8+7nSTRSObLIp0mvoJ7MELNikgAMtGE8vmpmYdDBA4bf wWaRWziyYTIRW/8J22cylXNkcaKZypcxwodWvWb+FlkNjhv/jcVJOa59NvoonUyAiMNR iRAw== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvLWAZcwRsf1QYJlonS+s6qx2i/2adePYQq0g+s81c100udUSLfMhoErT7hAutKBQ== X-Received: by 10.98.192.12 with SMTP id x12mr53016559pff.54.1471961078723; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:04:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.20.2.136] ([118.140.169.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o80sm6149977pfa.67.2016.08.23.07.04.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:04:38 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.17.0.160611 Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:04:43 -0700 From: Jeff Tantsura To: Martin Vigoureux , BESS Message-ID: <2C921C46-4B85-487B-9661-38CEE8578452@gmail.com> Thread-Topic: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 References: <57B30B64.6040304@nokia.com> In-Reply-To: <57B30B64.6040304@nokia.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Archived-At: Cc: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:04:57 -0000 Yes/support =20 Cheers, Jeff =20 On 8/16/16, 05:47, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" wrote: Hello Working Group, This email starts a Working Group Last Call on=20 draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 [1]. =C2=A4 Please read the document if you haven't read the most recent version yet, and send your comments to the list, no later than the *30th of August*. Note that this is *not only* a call for comments on the document, but=20 also a call for support (or not) publishing this document as an=20 Informational RFC. =C2=A4 We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies=20 to draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04, to ensure that IPR=20 has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979,=20 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details) prior to moving forward. If you are listed as a document Author or Contributor of this document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not=20 you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The document won't=20 progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. No IPR disclosure exists against this document. =C2=A4 We are also polling for knowledge of implementations of part or all of=20 what this document specifies. This information is expected as per [2].=20 Please inform the mailing list, or the chairs, or only one of the chairs. =C2=A4 Finally, if someone wishes to volunteer to be Document Shepherd for=20 this document, please let us know. Thank you M&T [1]=20 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reducti= on/ [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Tue Aug 23 07:44:17 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E6612DA38; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:44:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.601 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S8i3mkvmTjm3; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:44:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1460312DB1A; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:23:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0083689.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0083689.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id u7NENlXC000841; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:23:53 -0400 Received: from alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp7.sbc.com [144.160.229.24]) by m0083689.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 250r6qg0j1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:23:52 -0400 Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7NENk4f002678; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:23:48 -0400 Received: from mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.240]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7NENdlr002289 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:23:41 -0400 Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAB.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAB.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.146]) by mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:23:22 GMT Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRCD.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.4.23]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAB.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.146]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:23:22 -0400 From: "UTTARO, JAMES" To: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" , Martin Vigoureux , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 Thread-Index: AQHR97r0Jb/qcyltLUCBJZR5PfA+kaBVxqtwgADdoHA= Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:23:21 +0000 Message-ID: References: <57B308FA.4090201@nokia.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.91.76.251] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-08-23_08:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1604210000 definitions=main-1608230144 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:44:15 -0000 Support Jim Uttaro -----Original Message----- From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zh= ang Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 9:12 PM To: Martin Vigoureux ; bess@ietf.org Cc: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure= -updates-03 As co-author, I support the adoption, and I am not aware of relevant IPRs. Thanks. Jeffrey > -----Original Message----- > From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux > Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 8:37 AM > To: bess@ietf.org > Cc: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates@ietf.org > Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure- > updates-03 >=20 > Hello working group, >=20 > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting > draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 [1] as a Working Group > Document. >=20 > Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, > please also state the reasons). >=20 > This poll runs until *the 30th of August*. >=20 > We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies > to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance > with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more > details). > If you are listed as an Author or Contributor of this Document please > respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any > relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers > from all the Authors and Contributors. > No IPR has been disclosed against this Document >=20 > If you are not listed as an Author or Contributor, then please > explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet > been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. >=20 > Thank you >=20 > Martin & Thomas > bess chairs >=20 > [1] > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure- > updates/ >=20 > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Thu Aug 25 10:37:58 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E0612D51A; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:37:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.922 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id waqOlLT4Nk1o; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:37:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from NAM03-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam03on0101.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.42.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CAC512D128; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:37:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=Ad3OQYc78Ck8gCARbGozP7vZnO5q8VUvEjgj0dwxGwc=; b=HvDeBEo48b+XOf9KLhTr7gYAqjGUGTCaUEHKzQPMa3e0mTHoouB9/QplOehTUWuWZr1zq9FtgkYRQ6fJ7wUz1D+Cgo4LtzUdUv6dHwpvOfE86CodO2/f14jF74x2Uv16fnV0jF5CGkRTnLpdbMmme2peCTbPUhYH7bJXNzm5I58= Received: from CY4PR05MB2853.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.169.183.11) by CY4PR05MB2854.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.169.183.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA_P384) id 15.1.599.8; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 17:37:32 +0000 Received: from CY4PR05MB2853.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.169.183.11]) by CY4PR05MB2853.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.169.183.11]) with mapi id 15.01.0599.008; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 17:37:32 +0000 From: Santosh Esale To: "EXT - thomas.morin@orange.com" , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Call for adoption: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01 Thread-Index: AQHR97umVXzPyrYgYEeQ0fq4cvxf1qBZigKA Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 17:37:32 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.6.160626 authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=sesale@juniper.net; x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-originating-ip: [66.129.239.12] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 6dec7b73-8062-4305-0a89-08d3cd0e7e5f x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY4PR05MB2854; 6:yhClGpokrXHT4fC7wWxQgkwAAlWwNQBoi8+kJXHYgh0neWTN8oQw9UdZOIz3xeyhRDOqdrIzpfzecijZ76FGRvSCAtZkTIZ2MwdP36ofYTTtJIpnKjaDTaX0L4Dy7ULL7BwtON/iVlNIZvBr4ty+9SnlnDCF+Dx+cZ4aNZu7p699sXve66I1+LlA2RPLZiMl0sR2FIG2sbYdEUjFwbjqGmtuaI6PePDy0W11VDfVvm05YadUSNUR7h45OmHAI6tcmz1lDC0TV4ma5wgQhVdwbU3a2qbmsAEWCOOUMeEGiEtrQMlqWzjQLvRBiwrDPCdovIT7l6AKtZyO2ZTMfT9cBA==; 5:+H2DNQ5DFXsurWVaydE47wZLhYv/spGTrdKNu7KSclCudMnLnbIUWsfabBBLu0kwWFPqfv+o/X6hd4xDJ3fcW9PJWLPFAb7RCIRzXex5+acyBDy6Nw/GuI5xK/GzGxd4xXAIjyS8KCGZOxrGRuaStzIJlXVbbWijs91pyX8QBtg=; 24:G1ms6QePYJsUCQ4qwSpDObcaRrfjjc+FYwVcS9TOZypk9Gtd/WaSinG/1+Z3S6qUiG9rgWAoGGD2OgYxqNG4SThn+RGpegOHK8p7HaU4Wsc=; 7:oksB2qASMKVPdzHVVTdrPbNEAntSXCkJcP7ykR84NmH/+2U4CKDD9Ewqa98F5bx6NbAlXrHK4Cq9v0cukVWXfTs3J8ZaunxhP3pfsYBgj5/R8cFF2JRffpglQsoGs2A7kHRvfNmnij+26XyBtQWxdr4nVvKYNK9PMlJrGgy+xXAwBGeuEtPNbTqX0ia6EEW6VL3++vrg24vfZytTqAiEcE0ryT5y7x9TQHFPvsMznbk4OxdpncUgJhQl3qLN7wFD x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CY4PR05MB2854; x-ld-processed: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4,ExtAddr x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105)(18271650672692); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040176)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026); SRVR:CY4PR05MB2854; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(304825118); SRVR:CY4PR05MB2854; x-forefront-prvs: 0045236D47 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(24454002)(199003)(377454003)(189002)(68736007)(8936002)(2906002)(2950100001)(2900100001)(81166006)(77096005)(3660700001)(7846002)(7736002)(11100500001)(4326007)(15975445007)(10400500002)(102836003)(6116002)(81156014)(92566002)(8676002)(2501003)(3846002)(5002640100001)(106116001)(305945005)(19580405001)(586003)(66066001)(50986999)(101416001)(86362001)(19580395003)(87936001)(230783001)(36756003)(189998001)(54356999)(76176999)(4001350100001)(106356001)(99286002)(105586002)(97736004)(3280700002)(83506001)(122556002)(5660300001)(5001770100001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CY4PR05MB2854; H:CY4PR05MB2853.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <87F4B4A55FB83847B86254B55D6FBAF0@namprd05.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 25 Aug 2016 17:37:32.1524 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY4PR05MB2854 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 17:37:57 -0000 U3VwcG9ydCBhcyBjby1hdXRob3IuIEkgYW0gbm90IGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgcmVsYXRlZCB0 byB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0Lg0KDQoNClRoYW5rcywNClNhbnRvc2gNCg0KT24gOC8xNi8xNiwgNTo0MiBB TSwgIlRob21hcyBNb3JpbiIgPHRob21hcy5tb3JpbkBvcmFuZ2UuY29tPiB3cm90ZToNCg0KPkhl bGxvIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXAsDQo+DQo+VGhpcyBlbWFpbCBzdGFydHMgYSB0d28td2VlayBwb2xs IG9uIGFkb3B0aW5nDQo+ZHJhZnQtZGhqYWluLWJlc3MtYmdwLWwzdnBuLXlhbmcgWzFdIGFzIGEg d29ya2luZyBncm91cCBpdGVtLg0KPg0KPlBsZWFzZSBzZW5kIGNvbW1lbnRzIHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0 IGFuZCBzdGF0ZSBpZiB5b3Ugc3VwcG9ydCBhZG9wdGlvbiBvcg0KPm5vdCAoaW4gdGhlIGxhdGVy IGNhc2UsIHBsZWFzZSBhbHNvIHN0YXRlIHRoZSByZWFzb25zKS4NCj4NCj5UaGlzIHBvbGwgcnVu cyB1bnRpbCAqKkF1Z3VzdCAzMHRoKiouDQo+DQo+KkNvaW5jaWRlbnRhbGx5Kiwgd2UgYXJlIGFs c28gcG9sbGluZyBmb3Iga25vd2xlZGdlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgdGhhdA0KPmFwcGxpZXMgdG8gdGhp cyBkcmFmdCwgdG8gZW5zdXJlIHRoYXQgSVBSIGhhcyBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3NlZCBpbg0KPmNvbXBs aWFuY2Ugd2l0aCBJRVRGIElQUiBydWxlcyAoc2VlIFJGQ3MgMzk3OSwgNDg3OSwgMzY2OSBhbmQg NTM3OCBmb3INCj5tb3JlIGRldGFpbHMpLg0KPg0KPj09PiAqSWYqIHlvdSBhcmUgbGlzdGVkIGFz IGEgZG9jdW1lbnQgYXV0aG9yIG9yIGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9yIHBsZWFzZQ0KPnJlc3BvbmQgdG8gdGhp cyBlbWFpbCBhbmQgaW5kaWNhdGUgd2hldGhlciBvciBub3QgeW91IGFyZSBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkN Cj5yZWxldmFudCBJUFIuDQo+DQo+VGhlIGRyYWZ0IHdpbGwgbm90IGJlIGFkb3B0ZWQgdW50aWwg YSByZXNwb25zZSBoYXMgYmVlbiByZWNlaXZlZCBmcm9tDQo+ZWFjaCBhdXRob3IgYW5kIGNvbnRy aWJ1dG9yLg0KPg0KPklmIHlvdSBhcmUgbm90IGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhbiBhdXRob3Igb3IgY29udHJp YnV0b3IsIHRoZW4gcGxlYXNlDQo+ZXhwbGljaXRseSByZXNwb25kIG9ubHkgaWYgeW91IGFyZSBh d2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQgaGFzIG5vdCB5ZXQNCj5iZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3NlZCBpbiBjb25m b3JtYW5jZSB3aXRoIElFVEYgcnVsZXMuDQo+DQo+VGhhbmsgeW91LA0KPg0KPk1hcnRpbiAmIFRo b21hcw0KPmJlc3MgY2hhaXJzDQo+DQo+WzFdIGh0dHBzOi8vZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcv ZG9jL2RyYWZ0LWRoamFpbi1iZXNzLWJncC1sM3Zwbi15YW5nDQo+DQoNCg== From nobody Thu Aug 25 14:22:24 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF2D12D5A3; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:22:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.922 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vM6gOSt-xjSI; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:22:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2nam02on0104.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.38.104]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 898E9126D74; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:22:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=NplNMD+uR2mBquhNGYnkWArw3mdTnJdg8jFC284kgcU=; b=OgNW0Dbk4KA8fHfeKY91qGSm2QxPpuRc3x7GpH7Z9u3WQ5xZ2zeYKKw0cBMrAmOLNYC/IlgD327kr4Gqp3bD4tmFFaQ0ON8PRUpRtEHhgKNANx0OpSfy+d7mxyHH7e3Go39So4N+u11fwA45u28jaV5T6kJvK+an+DKsipBJ10U= Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=erosen@juniper.net; Received: from [172.29.32.99] (66.129.241.12) by BY2PR05MB2183.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.166.112.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA_P384) id 15.1.599.8; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:22:17 +0000 To: Martin Vigoureux , References: <57B308FA.4090201@nokia.com> From: Eric C Rosen Message-ID: <47146bd3-9273-5c85-5d2a-77cd10e7881e@juniper.net> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 17:22:08 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <57B308FA.4090201@nokia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [66.129.241.12] X-ClientProxiedBy: CY1PR13CA0039.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (10.162.30.177) To BY2PR05MB2183.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.166.112.11) X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 3ca5ee77-7908-4ad9-d58e-08d3cd2de4b7 X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; BY2PR05MB2183; 2:KFBNJh+fdY5wN4M3F9s5IOyZfewkAMkQ0gJskikRFpZX762sNTkLQPGLdryNYIG/enJSRqntbT7kElbzDSJHUBBoRFgltF7qsKl3+eYq3cp5wqUuuYRuOciaRA16KCb+fIQXQcMoQDPh2Cjbtu7orWJmfO2lw+WkhIKlocKJQT8yo8G7aubgOZAazWSyUoQP; 3:QFh3HMg08qG+GtKIKOieQuGeiATdbA1UBjnUUw6HpOrqaySDN2l3UCvVl6sofA2N/Bm5D/S00B36hA8hiHJ8zaYcocxxjQma96EPxJ1CdfzCNYlWoDklz+iwvsfqm0Fs X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR05MB2183; X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; BY2PR05MB2183; 25: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; 31:yvJbQfwQQfbz91TdEhGC/90eZXOzcAbLwpZKGRWO9w+8jPkzNVu6IXDARXgC3OEI9AjPwFsmd1Wl+8L7sLLjlfT+O0jC/lTfeu7hW4oLnMoBVEt5FhDqXeSX+We0SEIS1vugzoDZXHZ7jqFlrFOvA+LcAboBmenZiTAsUrlL+kspnLs62KnOVVMOyVeA1ZOkAYHStf1DeCIb8WHcM2GgYB9iFJDHw0+xjreB0Sy0x0M= X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; BY2PR05MB2183; 20: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; 4:XDVg0v878rSNAM7b402WUFQHShjiz97dVgzYX4JKfGHZ1ilKo7owt5YfXLt6I+pjkr+QMv2ry7CrWdJqsMrE6qIquxlbx+T8TeD7ZqLeUndHzpRfNe/en0WEum0wyVPdRaoOsTmRhqp50mS+et8iRVLIJBjwUisT36DHVPqRGQX23hVhVtK9eB0iMAjrXuSjBLq3cOwlMaXXwcDZ3lhAjXLvZ/n40uoHLTUl4CdHUNdaoD0g9TXQMkx2U7ScYKVMZ4PkdvbWtOdmzPyEFNGnmHhnBsyqFMGktQn1jMEjkR9gBIVqE5vfpVQgbKeQ2VhnxRKvq18w90mvd1WAo+rNaa8DQeF+vtlC3UNJfC0rf70LXYqK1zQ6onpYIM3Lb0OCGVscyIXTKakMQPfWyTlhLv89o2NYAXybEXXPkxj4rUg= X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040176)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026); SRVR:BY2PR05MB2183; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR05MB2183; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0045236D47 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(4630300001)(6009001)(6049001)(7916002)(199003)(189002)(77096005)(3846002)(65956001)(5001770100001)(64126003)(7736002)(7846002)(83506001)(230783001)(97736004)(4001350100001)(36756003)(50466002)(66066001)(230700001)(92566002)(101416001)(50986999)(2906002)(2950100001)(106356001)(105586002)(305945005)(65806001)(76176999)(189998001)(86362001)(4326007)(42186005)(81166006)(8676002)(5660300001)(81156014)(33646002)(54356999)(68736007)(31696002)(586003)(47776003)(23746002)(6116002)(31686004)(65826006); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR05MB2183; H:[172.29.32.99]; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: =?Windows-1252?Q?1; BY2PR05MB2183; 23:1A279rFQxy0FO7TK+sWGn+ArwP1gmULlEVzAa?= =?Windows-1252?Q?7Q0OWjzYJcE0OciF8Xf1GJKESd8pgRG+u+EHpeFClbJGjdpAlwqL98oT?= =?Windows-1252?Q?FmjVU+x+gegQs6rrYgAm58eGuFUTvhKRGxZ7pO87xb+oGfLAv87eii0f?= =?Windows-1252?Q?fTIXxDtT6pkq8huiarLVAColYbwBfT3BD2SChYU449lHvJHBfBlyl+6F?= =?Windows-1252?Q?TT5SBOaTQ5myCY8FEfXyzSXWsXHTaCEVQxmcnP/YMmCfU2bMfLW+HaSI?= =?Windows-1252?Q?Tj8VqP0O94oka0+ca22Sf+a/BI8HaQ448eImLkus6dWyvkfkXRNMXkld?= =?Windows-1252?Q?tMSM3qTm8oDMf6mcrnVBiIoPf2htwhR6FkLGoCIq4sLX3jEhA8TWyHAJ?= =?Windows-1252?Q?FZ60YZUodwxYEu3jMCjRBNU0Ktr3lXJjOCYcBmXHyuFNOxJU8+mW8mFt?= =?Windows-1252?Q?CTcVHJHYwqi2okmZokyzKLuIKaI9vZYWtOsxoJR2aa9zDL/39G5jdlMq?= =?Windows-1252?Q?MuCurHYAS4HcxOXbuGiQz+KkIW3vaYe7Iztig11Bzp+Kw+rrVkkr8T5O?= =?Windows-1252?Q?6b5CCiZ4Ib3AHf88h5aPgCzJyopzihIPzK7EAUL/qwDcgdhxsbaNxnSh?= =?Windows-1252?Q?KvZ7IwMyPFqYIGEoBFfZEQCx9g2bz9eGZf7BHJF+iON1yhFRlRH6ab8A?= =?Windows-1252?Q?LVdk+Mqprsug5mogGLxaJNXa4VPF6Wt9Sn1FIkOTNvo2xqslK1dc/Osa?= =?Windows-1252?Q?qxoLMDmQzSLKuLSSpS/TZBi+Vn6HPiI8icGtgOdBRXPky2GUm9CWTbMX?= =?Windows-1252?Q?/ra9W6a1oT1U8HMCrUKfdKcTSevofQNUrlzhHUzdMrOUap+lz4QXcHQT?= =?Windows-1252?Q?UplZWJZN45jWtlpm91bOtrEmM9NCjyNeCX20Ubj5+W3qBDpqt38ROkx4?= =?Windows-1252?Q?FgtEErGh8fowbDKXehrTcj8JKohYvoqmBMI8ymdwjPYO2fB+sO2SKRgQ?= =?Windows-1252?Q?GjsOekGUHEvbpkgHBM1r+7FwbyyFg+qyU5NWyafkoos3GclfglbSrHIN?= =?Windows-1252?Q?WWxC9hHX542ddSXdlQMHq7f2dOCy4ObGOKwkhbShZAXmtXH5FXxNIDdo?= =?Windows-1252?Q?Ix2LCKT9JlQfiMU+tGywkAABDbUV7zteOdZs3528sj5cSTKRKXTvghAJ?= =?Windows-1252?Q?UAGiTCR2L6V3bMRymMKmcqKwqEVHoKpp6vhaATioS9DObeX2MTty4u77?= =?Windows-1252?Q?MXPITxA9dWIp5w8qt0pm/yc9VJy/4uznowrJkg=3D?= X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; BY2PR05MB2183; 6:OX5vZacMCoumvFC5szF6epP8AwYWdrOd2Xxwu9zp5N5JGeapgtAi/9uItUmQGkPz4BXIw9teMcGLsy/yHfnJh66/T7FSqRECGEXmn3Y+s3wwEU9jkx3WDh6fQwz5PlLUSkRCUUkQOR3ckXcHqjmmoZ7aOvO5iwSeZBy3slJZYg39zh8KpqGaZjKPJBlw+rCix31Fwwxh79eu5kEiYFGbVG2XqU036anGvVTMJkU7dpcEcEJyL6EGCKr4skRC8YMrBEr7wdWzMzoe6wHnKuWE3oUaq2AIzMsM9vQoJYF97LB7RtchS45PDY3Rmq4bco36k44A/HEN6AzDwgSjFq+PxA==; 5:HEGXoo2w6fAMY9cbxURatLoZ6kYrsamQiy+/W8qTTt24pUxRR7Qx8iYZfouLGOaxfTTpPWg50U3VPUo5JjycnMC87y0tXvwneDVEfZhO7HKLdBw45iJeikEIqe17S3RU6kQShNX8JhueHIAD6npDWA==; 24:gU038WgoxgUFgv/3sGgEPkTOUmoTU6wEQ0kv0UHSqNjismkU8hRTJ7vN/a5IWyFYw8ff0yRG0Rjces0wneIuvB74+jta+xJYdRl8Rn2zxMg=; 7:do9Iria9Jxidb+oEHG1g/Gbv9YF3/VeKjTUW63+RqTWr8Fb9Q3v2b1SS5L7J2s8BGXYGwAhEoS3G3MtEp2jc1ijKZt59BNrAgE7YZa74LdcWqmonjFJG6yhUiGPIE+tlwmbiZ+kx21L/SIAcxmCv467peH9kdXSsFQLKxZCKgdwAXxM3Nt01vTan/Q+c/lgmHKspS47/aUFrqYHDvg5vh7lXEmn4Q+FsA5LwYDzMsDaF7WzrORG7AsWqpiJi1wdf SpamDiagnosticOutput: 1:99 SpamDiagnosticMetadata: NSPM X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Aug 2016 21:22:17.6521 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR05MB2183 Archived-At: Cc: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:22:23 -0000 Support. MVPN has a number of multicast features that are valuable, but haven't yet been incorporated into EVPN. This draft takes a comprehensive look at the MVPN procedures that provide those features, and shows how to adapt them to EVPN. This seems quite valuable to me, and thus I think the WG should adopt this draft. From nobody Thu Aug 25 16:32:47 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F08612D0F5; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:32:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B_NSQDtbolBT; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:32:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pf0-x22c.google.com (mail-pf0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 525A312B056; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:32:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id h186so22059338pfg.3; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:32:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version; bh=XRCa8plbZLpdwYmFl1xnmsht7+d6HHjg9txJaQWhHAw=; b=gZ0pMzWwXmH/Zu+dU8Bm5HOQEtQotFWtDyRhbLQRF5+k7c6Rpc50ePNb1aTiY4STy3 XZGQGchRus4n4bW45ssahfhSCSgZMsSO6J5MLKoNdD1/jtSBXYJnfdQT/dvjYQkGWqWU ekaX8Zckb+iurq9Z3esDaVCIrKQrTG/dET2a17CqiQtARhenNVCTqGfzZJo3UuurY17R 1KaH+Yx8z0jXceNWvxlFfxQ4rD3AEqndrIW9msd7oYRfAZiIIc7eBA8TbIrguwYxHq9t gunKFPKE8wv85AhQyB150fWbXp6avpgDEbXhOodKWZZd6bvb8fSrwsL2txMPsFcwawtY viqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version; bh=XRCa8plbZLpdwYmFl1xnmsht7+d6HHjg9txJaQWhHAw=; b=WAPLShop/nks9pOvbscDzbXG42vlkxDcKZeD7xg4nuwvLk14NEyBEezKgy+gg4iBIJ pFDYQme/MW2izs0PbzLPLqiG9PfYoO++8az10psNZCcf//kId1cSZzmcIf1+x+3xzjjp 0kQQFW9PoEl7hYM8/HMWdPIqitEBtnL8QZt7xPoh9AJMCk1fO0CCuwD6PUMYvZ7wM2Kg zl/4DiDF6zEVWVogHoU28tglxjDQ3MhpLdCxte73O2SSDiKDoCIdc3ctrqVdaetUGPWR SvblF0/UjeyZQwHQY8uyz2GggCMi/BrVIr6XWPr7sLQhSV2q32q9obGnEl+/JFWIjCl2 s5aA== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPxdyQyeNMGNwReqo9y7yyJ7QG0bDXyubuhLxCkDnqll1EmtKsQwZTpocAGZ/a8tg== X-Received: by 10.98.109.1 with SMTP id i1mr394631pfc.32.1472167963883; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:32:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.outlook.com (ec2-52-33-250-21.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com. [52.33.250.21]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f6sm23370199pfa.17.2016.08.25.16.32.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:32:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 23:32:42 +0000 (UTC) From: Aldrin Isaac To: Martin Vigoureux , Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <57B308FA.4090201@nokia.com> References: <57B308FA.4090201@nokia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_740_921902648.1472167962207" X-Mailer: Outlook for iOS and Android Archived-At: Cc: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 23:32:46 -0000 ------=_Part_740_921902648.1472167962207 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Support as well. =C2=A0 On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:37 AM -0700, "Martin Vigoureux" wrote: Hello working group, This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 [1] as a Working Group=20 Document. Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases,=20 please also state the reasons). This poll runs until *the 30th of August*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. No IPR has been disclosed against this Document If you are not listed as an Author or Contributor, then please=20 explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet=20 been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thank you Martin & Thomas bess chairs [1]=20 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updat= es/ _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess ------=_Part_740_921902648.1472167962207 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Support as well.  





On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:37 AM -0700, "Martin Vigoureux" <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com> wrote:

Hello working group,

This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 [1] as a Working Group 
Document.

Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, 
please also state the reasons).

This poll runs until *the 30th of August*.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies
to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance
with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more
details).
If you are listed as an Author or Contributor of this Document please
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers
from all the Authors and Contributors.
No IPR has been disclosed against this Document

If you are not listed as an Author or Contributor, then please 
explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet 
been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Thank you

Martin & Thomas
bess chairs

[1] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates/

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
------=_Part_740_921902648.1472167962207-- From nobody Thu Aug 25 18:44:42 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23C212D19E; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:44:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sFOnZD1_PRwG; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:44:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pf0-x243.google.com (mail-pf0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 276E512D18C; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:44:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf0-x243.google.com with SMTP id h186so4048742pfg.2; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:44:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=DtQiarg1hVeni1l306Zov72eC+ui7atlWN4EvwCB5RI=; b=w442qEOTvYxAD9Ij7wxnD3ok761CtqUJUMYSTX/AVVT4Zx4yB/S5wbA1HE9BfNM7QC bjWXXk47RcK7JHq2AilysDu7X8b9gQ828vBD5mwlrroDVQWdUat9Z06ZRp3DErHIzgGd ipw+iOW+OYwdjBJBpJrkrcpxmxayVONX+0S8rBJ0TgXMdP0bJMd2KDIXDizu3Rv1q6FQ 7stR6N8CTuPLgahvjdz4UhnpP0bduP5PPE/8jkUxkdo3Q7wzrEMt2wMnQoDtD1HUXVga m5YistPfY10POBtwb+/GBv5tMR7LrZ0h8M9KGqrlvcHsKVYk5X8HEaIPKtHSy5Hb79Ev iZWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=DtQiarg1hVeni1l306Zov72eC+ui7atlWN4EvwCB5RI=; b=aVHoLDHPngwOznrmIXr8NbDEdnblAfPZWL9GBDsKhg3N8KoEl2/UW7uCFZy22T2mt4 cpG94As6b5RMxZ7ohea61vvmBjn2P4WW1Tj87HkrEMA7yePIxQm7xYeij7rXhHpNDQU3 RrCxQR9tH1OOuYuhh85v5+UihZnxKMUS9rEc+RCooUx0RhOy/IBKAQAURhTYtiRHzddH 7cFRzwgkNfwItsZEqYiNnKgB7gckpykEMBHDusaVv2BJu9QIzq4Nm7/ra3aTAdQS9Qdr 8KLfqYs3ed6yCRFKDClHaAEFnMNqfgUt7MzvOHKA5e79pFU6LSQ6NVg0T1bHahaJty8Q ftGg== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPcHg46y8efm4yjzzgvJ0fF7dIxw2rmb75OmK5PahcQD1FqKe68knkN86560Dmlgg== X-Received: by 10.98.67.193 with SMTP id l62mr1286142pfi.16.1472175878749; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:44:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.138.253] ([219.134.130.45]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ve9sm23742545pac.12.2016.08.25.18.44.37 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:44:38 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-FF079692-65F6-4D2B-8F50-E6A4D1B0436D Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jeff Tantsura Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:19:23 +0800 Message-Id: <3E5F8686-DB6F-4422-9752-C3F02F039A2B@gmail.com> References: <57B308FA.4090201@nokia.com> In-Reply-To: To: Martin Vigoureux X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13G35) Archived-At: Cc: bess@ietf.org, draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 01:44:41 -0000 --Apple-Mail-FF079692-65F6-4D2B-8F50-E6A4D1B0436D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes/support Regards, Jeff >=20 > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:37 AM -0700, "Martin Vigoureux" wrote: >=20 >> Hello working group, >>=20 >> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting >> draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 [1] as a Working Group=20= >> Document. >>=20 >> Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases,=20= >> please also state the reasons). >>=20 >> This poll runs until *the 30th of August*. >>=20 >> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies >> to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance >> with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more >> details). >> If you are listed as an Author or Contributor of this Document please >> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any >> relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers >> from all the Authors and Contributors. >> No IPR has been disclosed against this Document >>=20 >> If you are not listed as an Author or Contributor, then please=20 >> explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet=20 >> been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. >>=20 >> Thank you >>=20 >> Martin & Thomas >> bess chairs >>=20 >> [1]=20 >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-upd= ates/ >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> BESS mailing list >> BESS@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess --Apple-Mail-FF079692-65F6-4D2B-8F50-E6A4D1B0436D Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Yes/support

Regards,
Jeff

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:37 AM -0700, "Martin Vigoureux" <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com> wrote:

Hello working group,

This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 [1] as a Working Group 
Document.

Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, 
please also state the reasons).

This poll runs until *the 30th of August*.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies
to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance
with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more
details).
If you are listed as an Author or Contributor of this Document please
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers
from all the Authors and Contributors.
No IPR has been disclosed against this Document

If you are not listed as an Author or Contributor, then please 
explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet 
been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Thank you

Martin & Thomas
bess chairs

[1] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates/

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
--Apple-Mail-FF079692-65F6-4D2B-8F50-E6A4D1B0436D-- From nobody Thu Aug 25 21:47:46 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF78412D0A5; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:47:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GDVWsSXeSToI; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:47:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-it0-x22a.google.com (mail-it0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6018512D09E; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:47:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-it0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id x131so311656923ite.0; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:47:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=V1mjEY5OCp9LmS/fwZKcCs99UCwnku4ohfNmA0IOoDw=; b=L3JHFe2vneL8O3kjAurmteU0VwEkNC/5T25lHZ4+rdYdagKPZsUEkY8wJCF4h+2pzn JmPV7f1RKGAdMYNHzyCLWX4rjeqm2KBJ0g6GSRb4AXe9j7ms+jg5TmqvW7wVwqJT+V2n Iql2sutW+kLEZBFf5ADDHZmVihR8J436eRMopH9BLjyZTGW4CvJ9IZqudJQZ9tsTOeug Lins3qFxmAZrIZoKoSlFfunVQNai2vEAz38KkX3uCvM23v3DTXcxWYreHEFstOET2DZa D3qB9QwWkomOfnCmZMSAg8jHkWDGBkGQ8Vn/qW10T2P70qIpiov/uN8Wn7KV4umKah82 W+pA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=V1mjEY5OCp9LmS/fwZKcCs99UCwnku4ohfNmA0IOoDw=; b=Xe5pdQMigl5rQK8JHlkIVe/28whlrkOhJ4CUTbr+JCK7xElPNxpJgQmq7uUrByucX+ m1c5EWimbNQQCAA0Q/1DsI+YCAfIwScOhVQgVFcIr1I7Dh/iK8pVKaCkUHDixPJ7nBAq GTJ9d5lvsFcb3uMhk4EiIxzpLhKcEMFbLmyS3OvZ11VO3fjdA86L/reKbEKG2Y/vX07Q CKU6Quknncsm0BVxvwe0OD1iRUUh4WsJkSXfDRYyahJrXVcInuFRzKPahLPWaL9YdKmE PXhobAEL3VAaLwuWN6vSCx3r4ZMuWau7RdKsVQBgi/J87y9kqCC2DcMk9rtSNWkehfOS yyGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNF8BlXKc2iQYgkrCYl/lpQnasH4UeYAjKf64Y2YNGrbtTYxdv6sk9UbOHRoB0hHsvHTYksg+qdfaWUCA== X-Received: by 10.36.14.20 with SMTP id 20mr1510771ite.88.1472186862844; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:47:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.158.82 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:47:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3E5F8686-DB6F-4422-9752-C3F02F039A2B@gmail.com> References: <57B308FA.4090201@nokia.com> <3E5F8686-DB6F-4422-9752-C3F02F039A2B@gmail.com> From: Tony Przygienda Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:47:02 -0700 Message-ID: To: Jeff Tantsura Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1143840e00c2fe053af237f3 Archived-At: Cc: Martin Vigoureux , bess@ietf.org, draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 04:47:45 -0000 --001a1143840e00c2fe053af237f3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 support On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Jeff Tantsura wrote: > Yes/support > > Regards, > Jeff > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:37 AM -0700, "Martin Vigoureux" < > martin.vigoureux@nokia.com> wrote: > > Hello working group, >> >> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting >> draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 [1] as a Working Group >> Document. >> >> Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, >> please also state the reasons). >> >> This poll runs until *the 30th of August*. >> >> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies >> to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance >> with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more >> details). >> If you are listed as an Author or Contributor of this Document please >> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any >> relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers >> from all the Authors and Contributors. >> No IPR has been disclosed against this Document >> >> If you are not listed as an Author or Contributor, then please >> explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet >> been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. >> >> Thank you >> >> Martin & Thomas >> bess chairs >> >> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedur= e-updates/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BESS mailing listBESS@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess >> >> _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > > --=20 *We=E2=80=99ve heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could pr= oduce the complete works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, we know that is not true.* =E2=80=94Robert Wilensky --001a1143840e00c2fe053af237f3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+1 support

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Jeff Tantsura <j= efftant.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes/support

Regards,
Jeff
=

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:37 AM -0700, "Mar= tin Vigoureux" <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com> wr= ote:

Hello working group,

This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 [1] as a Working Group=
=20
Document.

Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases,=20
please also state the reasons).

This poll runs until *the 30th of August*.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies
to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance
with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more
details).
If you are listed as an Author or Contributor of this Document please
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers
from all the Authors and Contributors.
No IPR has been disclosed against this Document

If you are not listed as an Author or Contributor, then please=20
explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet=20
been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Thank you

Martin & Thomas
bess chairs

[1]=20
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/dra=
ft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates/

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
ht=
tps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
___________________= ____________________________
BESS mailing list<= br>BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess=

______________________________= _________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess




--
=
We=E2=80=99ve heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards c= ould produce the complete works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet= , we know that is not true.
= =E2=80=94Robert Wilensky
--001a1143840e00c2fe053af237f3-- From nobody Fri Aug 26 00:05:58 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6513F128E19; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:05:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.069 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.069 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wphBAUZmFbpK; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:05:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 386DF127077; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:05:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=770; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1472195155; x=1473404755; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=Mc1UvLksvBRDFWs5BCdcWUT2tmml/OmUQHcS2OI6ucs=; b=IV6BnCfRRKYte4LFwQLTZOvh4ET2e/HsYyTVLBWWUWWPy97lcoLWeccr zqvQprS+BkAOoKNr1xoNeOdGw6Y8VXD0bnGyOaTMnmKhiN/1ZqDd5fuPx 6xyaQ726ttp0NwTliDHR7yGSuYFacgSRD4RZDfmkVEoxkt2Yd4vZH+ia+ U=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BDAgCB6b9X/4UNJK1dg0EBAQEBAR5Wf?= =?us-ascii?q?Ae4GoIBJIV5AoFVOBQBAgEBAQEBAQFeJ4RiAQUBATg0CxACAQg2ECcLJQIEAQ0?= =?us-ascii?q?FiDgOv2MBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXBYYuhE2KHAEEmUwBjyiPUpA7A?= =?us-ascii?q?R42hBxwhU1/AQEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,580,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="314905392" Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 26 Aug 2016 07:05:54 +0000 Received: from XCH-RCD-012.cisco.com (xch-rcd-012.cisco.com [173.37.102.22]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7Q75svo031130 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:05:54 GMT Received: from xch-rcd-012.cisco.com (173.37.102.22) by XCH-RCD-012.cisco.com (173.37.102.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 02:05:53 -0500 Received: from xch-rcd-012.cisco.com ([173.37.102.22]) by XCH-RCD-012.cisco.com ([173.37.102.22]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 02:05:53 -0500 From: "Swadesh Agrawal (swaagraw)" To: Eric C Rosen , Martin Vigoureux , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 Thread-Index: AQHR/xbLpLVlcE+w3kuhpukxSJbW3KBasNqA Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:05:53 +0000 Message-ID: References: <57B308FA.4090201@nokia.com> <47146bd3-9273-5c85-5d2a-77cd10e7881e@juniper.net> In-Reply-To: <47146bd3-9273-5c85-5d2a-77cd10e7881e@juniper.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.8.150116 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.24.121.228] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <40FBFE8FEDC56E488BF22478D02C5052@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:05:56 -0000 Why we need to copy MVPN procedures in EVPN. Why not enable MVPN safi and enhance it for any EVPN specific requiremnt. Also going in this direction may require to add 5,6 and 7 routes as well in future. Regards Swadesh On 8/25/16, 2:22 PM, "Eric C Rosen" wrote: >Support. > >MVPN has a number of multicast features that are valuable, but haven't >yet been incorporated into EVPN. This draft takes a comprehensive look >at the MVPN procedures that provide those features, and shows how to >adapt them to EVPN. This seems quite valuable to me, and thus I think >the WG should adopt this draft. > >_______________________________________________ >BESS mailing list >BESS@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Fri Aug 26 06:59:14 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1695412D85B; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 06:59:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S8pmKb54PKN1; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 06:59:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam01on0131.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.32.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0440C12D847; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 06:46:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=NheX4zDfZVsEGeRNZDkX9iYMpGvy8X16WguVX0G6mSc=; b=PodWP4N/el8L9cRtUrHt47SWZRsMIsEGPW9HGTzsWt5AKDnNoqD4LNJGUf/iANDqlKL4dKWFBPHIqtLw+0VVD9eDFN1B8xVV6fvLOuITpdl4kvUFlH898EJccBJ+I9adQfU885tulPLeTMxzI28qo1S75rOizuCFg3+P5v8JmJ0= Received: from BN6PR05MB2963.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.173.18.148) by BN6PR05MB2963.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.173.18.148) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA_P384) id 15.1.599.2; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 13:46:39 +0000 Received: from BN6PR05MB2963.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.18.148]) by BN6PR05MB2963.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.18.148]) with mapi id 15.01.0599.008; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 13:46:39 +0000 From: Sudhin Jacob To: "bmwg@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: REG: Draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kishjac-bmwg-evpntest/ Thread-Index: AdH/n9bHs133tIA9R5GK2RG3tve7hA== Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 13:46:39 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=sjacob@juniper.net; x-originating-ip: [116.197.184.14] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 88abfb02-dca8-467f-7119-08d3cdb767d7 x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN6PR05MB2963; 6:K+HDG07sVtsxHNyDKgb8yhWMYSMlXH/9HY/xNWtWloHA1laVag0JPCwaZTAVtDpqJlyGCBHq1r3ZCo1+ATB4EiYV68e7hzwW4hJA7yuvH9O6s1XCJRHO3kBCdbBCNI1y3FLDrhVfXPAbp51ENsiffVt21ryUU87pYs9K/7Lbr/UPeOkdpVvBiUowbTKR7IUtIW7qXdEjHtX+iegwWW1f7002357XeqcqwhyP6TMdhIZRCMXwGHTYyDVYFhrER1znWY2pNi1DalCbmdnx69Lh5uxQ9tUftQTSkPVrRqxdZIcNcegGu9H3bPNLlJZUqH5F+RLoC/8eCi08EPx2PkVuMw==; 5:MwEBI2NjTjE2bprKNUFIBtedLUTCSYi+FCMhqsNOIIesEPrPuG3q7kLtsRJJk9J89fmh8yN+SjewPw/23MTKVeLkryKvKWneZj0BfrxhzrispDEWdoEhmY2Wj96KxZmmvAPs9iWSQ5VQfArXhGmG7Q==; 24:B8+uQ6uAq6X32hVgX3JsXLIhGblgbusZSWR7F0cScdo/3PpV0MVNjaJj6IgDLr+D6Qjx7MY7cPI612wrOm0Cv1RLqKtHeLhTkvlSdhpnqSs=; 7:FUdzzz77fKSMjW6+vmOi1ZMlxdYuR3CwN4ZiQ7Ux5wJGhhXBhQE9f6lR2YGrGae9oK9e0KqRIki5ClyhlCCFEChWOpAXEttTD2f7kU6PeQAK9I6USoMyYhAf7UOAk1nRMEYfxRzHuYVjB3fsGVTBd2AlU6OAG6dV6gGjF8GMd8fM5x47uG3U2TwuUc4Zzff4AUBWkCM9ss7u5tw1o+Mfz4woT2lYu31rVX4VBCxjUBsqNqU175hKhjb8mi24rJjS x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN6PR05MB2963; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105)(21748063052155); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040176)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026); SRVR:BN6PR05MB2963; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN6PR05MB2963; x-forefront-prvs: 00462943DE x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(53754006)(199003)(189002)(54356999)(3660700001)(7696003)(7736002)(6116002)(5660300001)(2351001)(68736007)(19580395003)(8936002)(87936001)(5002640100001)(1730700003)(3280700002)(81166006)(2906002)(101416001)(81156014)(305945005)(33656002)(86362001)(229853001)(50986999)(92566002)(2900100001)(3846002)(189998001)(102836003)(110136002)(15975445007)(450100001)(586003)(77096005)(9686002)(66066001)(122556002)(230783001)(97736004)(10400500002)(2501003)(7846002)(8676002)(11100500001)(105586002)(106356001)(4326007)(99286002)(76576001)(5640700001)(74316002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN6PR05MB2963; H:BN6PR05MB2963.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BN6PR05MB2963FB62BBC7DA0864204930C2EC0BN6PR05MB2963namp_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 26 Aug 2016 13:46:39.2572 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR05MB2963 Archived-At: Cc: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] REG: Draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kishjac-bmwg-evpntest/ X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 13:59:09 -0000 --_000_BN6PR05MB2963FB62BBC7DA0864204930C2EC0BN6PR05MB2963namp_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All, I have uploaded draft after incorporating the comments received by IETF 96.= Kindly review it and let us know the feedback for adoption. Regards, Sudhin --_000_BN6PR05MB2963FB62BBC7DA0864204930C2EC0BN6PR05MB2963namp_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi All,
 
I have uploaded draft after incorporating the comments received by IET= F 96. Kindly review it and let us know the feedback for adoption.
&nbs= p;
Regards,
Sudhin
&nbs= p;
 --_000_BN6PR05MB2963FB62BBC7DA0864204930C2EC0BN6PR05MB2963namp_-- From nobody Sun Aug 28 19:08:48 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9838012D0F5; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 19:08:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.922 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9IQXeSzqttLK; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 19:08:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from NAM03-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm3nam03on0109.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.41.109]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A59412D0E1; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 19:08:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=5VfeTiP1MiNFHygzmFYzNZs+grAVh8XwafQLw9HmnHg=; b=QT7T9lmX8Ar8OgF8esCwXl0bLjZal2yi/TzoecEdkAamRRoxyA8NzUSTw50QU9eLXw3UleucqRzgtkgDZTwo1GJgrDp9POOaUMzIZNS7xu/e2YsZAJNsKyBNuC6HtChUprKC1SeATMG0D1wzZCGLbrtTZlpKGYxRP5JGdIbG4kU= Received: from DM5PR05MB3145.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.173.219.15) by DM5PR05MB3148.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.173.219.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA_P384) id 15.1.599.2; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 02:08:41 +0000 Received: from DM5PR05MB3145.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.219.15]) by DM5PR05MB3145.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.219.15]) with mapi id 15.01.0599.008; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 02:08:38 +0000 From: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" To: "Swadesh Agrawal (swaagraw)" , Eric Rosen , Martin Vigoureux , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 Thread-Index: AQHR/xbFfCPq5Uf5cEuX52pcqjLuZ6Ba0mOAgARhkTA= Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 02:08:38 +0000 Message-ID: References: <57B308FA.4090201@nokia.com> <47146bd3-9273-5c85-5d2a-77cd10e7881e@juniper.net> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=zzhang@juniper.net; x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 63b01f8d-c4bd-4f4b-4fe5-08d3cfb16461 x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM5PR05MB3148; 6:2u1BP6PvsI3i6yq3WXbzb3EUHDpKhQ+m07p2QwEvps88+hXn/iCUbsUV4A5R+fHePvaw+jc1OY1FPhSbekEEMTUFx64jAYQlgGzgqr3Rm+JwFA3x7pIseiiMU0KvoJefL18GsaK6iz5ZzkrQe6aK0d2CAiujJcPtPnEefHu5VPyKDOq7vMDZGd+3RdxoHDh4DqPDDNMd4T5WcAKAx5Q4YtYv7i49fY8CBDz0hlIcltPR6k01eZPCR4/kFHlFaeaVbSDpWWSBp5sgaRFod+4qTumMZCqNodhzDtLjii8VA9gbrKjnDfR3QC9Gkqva6CF1riz1m8GJjqANIht6rRu4RA==; 5:wOcGo8SauSpVkbUBa+z/6Qq6uem1xYF+K2FT2HiI5mEl53a/qY9UcwF0egieTCGR5bBaWMjOyEzj47MsvUQc5Q/fukVOaUIpcb+RrwQ/QLTy0v6JBm/yZif3A5X6DqtFpHDcFDuAGcPUmc5s57+Ygw==; 24:a73KJF+EqIItsJrA4ZQr6HCVnFDMBSyANdZS99y5qW/sswAqz/oUzbutINFQuQ8tID1Hc1rxRG+YDPRx+rNW15S5jZc+bBsKjbAjUssvRUY=; 7:5AkKDkg87F95rD/IzGBFS2cllDdufKg7SQGu4xPCKDW/h3baqIbpqjIp2INvKxvdaNoLAdlEP9yQLxgMyyU7SDhOPYsWrTY1F7W1uzy6AKenkztjHLwZlK0HvlfkHAEjpxp4EL/NHS/KD2e5LEhhDJgEzl2X1rY1S57YmJ1rcebC7hcARp0fze6xwooC69SNtohXr6XiVGaabAgmHeibNtd/0iHJojpsvu9/1dbWajjeoQDcaOfpcchPny2TLL32 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DM5PR05MB3148; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(138986009662008)(82608151540597)(95692535739014); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040176)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026); SRVR:DM5PR05MB3148; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM5PR05MB3148; x-forefront-prvs: 0049B3F387 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(377454003)(24454002)(189002)(199003)(13464003)(1941001)(102836003)(2950100001)(8936002)(97736004)(189998001)(7736002)(9686002)(5001770100001)(86362001)(3846002)(68736007)(7846002)(15650500001)(66066001)(2906002)(5002640100001)(101416001)(33656002)(230783001)(74316002)(5660300001)(7696003)(106356001)(305945005)(3660700001)(10400500002)(15975445007)(122556002)(2501003)(586003)(6116002)(105586002)(50986999)(8676002)(3280700002)(77096005)(99286002)(76176999)(87936001)(92566002)(81166006)(4326007)(106116001)(19580395003)(19580405001)(2900100001)(81156014)(76576001)(54356999); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR05MB3148; H:DM5PR05MB3145.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 Aug 2016 02:08:38.8571 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR05MB3148 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 02:08:46 -0000 Hi Swadesh, "Enable MVPN safi and enhance it for EVPN" is not a trivial thing that can = be cleanly done on top of MVPN. You'd end up complicating MVPN procedures a= lot for EVPN specific things. Instead, we can apply the same principles to= EVPN safi and procedures, and that's what this draft is about. BTW, we don't yet see the need of the equivalent of MVPN type-5 routes for = EVPN. Draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy already proposed SMET route wh= ich is very similar to MVPN type-6/7 (to be exact, a combination of type-4/= 6/7). That is explained in draft-zzhang-bess-mvpn-evpn-cmcast-enhancements. Jeffrey > -----Original Message----- > From: Swadesh Agrawal (swaagraw) [mailto:swaagraw@cisco.com] > Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 3:06 AM > To: Eric Rosen ; Martin Vigoureux > ; bess@ietf.org > Cc: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum- > procedure-updates-03 >=20 > Why we need to copy MVPN procedures in EVPN. Why not enable MVPN safi and > enhance it for any EVPN specific requiremnt. Also going in this direction > may require to add 5,6 and 7 routes as well in future. >=20 > Regards > Swadesh >=20 > On 8/25/16, 2:22 PM, "Eric C Rosen" wrote: >=20 > >Support. > > > >MVPN has a number of multicast features that are valuable, but haven't > >yet been incorporated into EVPN. This draft takes a comprehensive look > >at the MVPN procedures that provide those features, and shows how to > >adapt them to EVPN. This seems quite valuable to me, and thus I think > >the WG should adopt this draft. > > > >_______________________________________________ > >BESS mailing list > >BESS@ietf.org > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Mon Aug 29 07:49:30 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A6312D77D; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 07:49:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.081 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.081 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PJ2JcJKHnsNP; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 07:49:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from r-mail2.rd.orange.com (r-mail2.rd.orange.com [217.108.152.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8655C12D771; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 07:49:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from r-mail2.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 90A8F5D86CE; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 16:49:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.194.32.11]) by r-mail2.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814EB5D85E7; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 16:49:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.193.71.12] (10.193.71.12) by FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (10.194.32.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.301.0; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 16:49:17 +0200 From: Thomas Morin Organization: Orange To: , Loa Andersson , "George Swallow" , Eric Rosen , BESS Message-ID: <3323ddae-c96f-49a4-2dec-1bfc4ed857dc@orange.com> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 16:49:18 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------72752E55DD16402556D3E6FA" Archived-At: Cc: Martin Vigoureux Subject: [bess] shepherd review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:49:28 -0000 --------------72752E55DD16402556D3E6FA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Here is the review I did while preparing the shepherd write-up for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree . There is one thing that stands out: the document uses the most significant bit of the "PMSI Tunnel Attribute" Tunnel Type field, which cant't be done I think without updating the structure of the corresponding registry (RFC7385). I suggest how that can be done at the end of this review (a few people Cc'd for this reason). Please find my comments below... [...] > 2 E-Tree Scenarios and EVPN / PBB-EVPN Support > > In this section, we will categorize support for E-Tree into three > different scenarios, depending on the nature of the site association > (Root/Leaf) per PE or per Ethernet Segment: > > - Leaf OR Root site(s) per PE > > - Leaf OR Root site(s) per AC > > - Leaf OR Root site(s) per MAC > > 2.1 Scenario 1: Leaf OR Root site(s) per PE > > In this scenario, a PE may receive traffic from either Root sites OR > Leaf sites for a given MAC-VRF/bridge table, but not both > concurrently. In other words, a given EVI on a PE is either > associated with a root or leaf. s/with a root or leaf/with roots or leaves/ ? > The PE may have both Root and Leaf s/both Root and Leaf/both Roots and Leaves/ ? > sites albeit for different EVIs. > > +---------+ +---------+ > | PE1 | | PE2 | > +---+ | +---+ | +------+ | +---+ | +---+ > |CE1+---ES1----+--+ | | | MPLS | | | +--+----ES2-----+CE2| > +---+ (Root) | |MAC| | | /IP | | |MAC| | (Leaf) +---+ > | |VRF| | | | | |VRF| | > | | | | | | | | | | +---+ > | | | | | | | | +--+----ES3-----+CE3| > | +---+ | +------+ | +---+ | (Leaf) +---+ > +---------+ +---------+ > > Figure 1: Scenario 1 > > In such scenario, an EVPN PE implementation MAY provide E-TREE > service using topology constraint among the PEs belonging to the same "topology constraint" is a bit opaque as a term, perhaps "using tailored BGP RT import/export policies" would be more descriptive (assuming I understood your intent) > EVI. The purpose of this topology constraint is to avoid having PEs > with only Leaf sites importing and processing BGP MAC routes from > each other. To support such topology constrain in EVPN, two BGP > Route-Targets (RTs) are used for every EVPN Instance (EVI): one RT is > associated with the Root sites and the other is associated with the > Leaf sites. On a per EVI basis, every PE exports the single RT > associated with its type of site(s). Furthermore, a PE with Root > site(s) imports both Root and Leaf RTs, whereas a PE with Leaf > site(s) only imports the Root RT. The text seems to imply that the above is sufficient to deliver the service, but I fail to see what would prevent Leaf-to-Leaf traffic between Leaves bound to the same MAC-VRF (ES2 and ES3 in firgure1). Shouldn't the text mention the use of a split-horizon in Leaf MAC-VRFs ? (assuming the previous point is resolved:) With this mechanism above, isn't it possible to have on a given PE, for a single E-TREE EVI, both Leaves and Roots, as long as distinct MAC-VRFs are used (one for Leaves and one for Roots) ? (it seems to me that the assymetric import/export RT would do what is needed to build an E-TREE, we would just have a particular case where a Leaf MAC-VRF and a Root MAC-VRF for a given E-TREE end up on a single PE) If this is not possible, I think the text should explain why. > If the number of EVIs is very large > (e.g., more than 64K), then RT type 0 as defined in [RFC4360] SHOULD > be used; otherwise, RT type 2 is sufficient [RFC7153]. This is not specific to E-VPN E-TREE, or even to E-VPN, why mention that ? > > 2.2 Scenario 2: Leaf OR Root site(s) per AC > > In this scenario, a PE receives traffic from either Root OR Leaf > sites (but not both) on a given Attachment Circuit (AC) of an EVI. In > other words, an AC (ES or ES/VLAN) is either associated with a Root > or Leaf (but not both). s/with a Root or Leaf/with Roots or Leaves/ ? > > +---------+ +---------+ > | PE1 | | PE2 | > +---+ | +---+ | +------+ | +---+ | +---+ > |CE1+-----ES1----+--+ | | | | | | +--+---ES2/AC1--+CE2| > +---+ (Leaf) | |MAC| | | MPLS | | |MAC| | (Leaf) +---+ > | |VRF| | | /IP | | |VRF| | > | | | | | | | | | | +---+ > | | | | | | | | +--+---ES2/AC2--+CE3| > | +---+ | +------+ | +---+ | (Root) +---+ > +---------+ +---------+ > > Figure 2: Scenario 2 > > In this scenario, if there are PEs with only root (or leaf) sites per > EVI, then the RT constrain procedures described in section 2.1 can > also be used here. However, when a Root site is added to a Leaf PE, > then that PE needs to process MAC routes from all other Leaf PEs and > add them to its forwarding table. This is the case in 2.1 as well, isn't it ? > For this scenario, if for a given > EVI, the majority of PEs will eventually have both Leaf and Root > sites attached, even though they may start as Root-only or Leaf-only > PEs, then it is recommended to use a single RT per EVI and avoid > additional configuration and operational overhead. Why this recommendation ? Even with a majority of PEs having both Leaves and Roots, there can remain (up to 49% of) PEs having only Leaves, which will uselessly have all routes to other Leaves. So "it is recommended" above, deserves to be explained more, I think. > > 2.3 Scenario 3: Leaf OR Root site(s) per MAC > > In this scenario, a PE may receive traffic from both Root AND Leaf > sites on a given Attachment Circuit (AC) of an EVI. Since an > Attachment Circuit (ES or ES/VLAN) carries traffic from both Root and > Leaf sites, the granularity at which Root or Leaf sites are > identifies s/identifies/identified/ > is on a per MAC address. This scenario is considered in > this draft for EVPN service with only known unicast traffic - i.e., > there is no BUM traffic. "there is no BUM" is quite a bold claim ! := Maybe the text should say "no BUM traffic is supported (BUM traffic will be dropped)" ? (possibly "BUM traffic from Leaves will be dropped" would be sufficient ?) > > +---------+ +---------+ > | PE1 | | PE2 | > +---+ | +---+ | +------+ | +---+ | +---+ > |CE1+-----ES1----+--+ | | | | | | +--+---ES2/AC1--+CE2| > +---+ (Root) | | E | | | MPLS | | | E | | (Leaf/Root)+---+ > | | V | | | /IP | | | V | | > | | I | | | | | | I | | +---+ > | | | | | | | | +--+---ES2/AC2--+CE3| > | +---+ | +------+ | +---+ | (Leaf) +---+ > +---------+ +---------+ > > Figure 3: Scenario 3 > > 3 Operation for EVPN > > [RFC7432] defines the notion of ESI MPLS label used for split-horizon > filtering of BUM traffic at the egress PE. Such egress filtering > capabilities can be leveraged in provision of E-TREE services as seen > shortly. In other words, [RFC7432] has inherent capability to support > E-TREE services without defining any new BGP routes but by just > defining a new BGP Extended Community for leaf indication as shown > later in this document. > > 3.1 Known Unicast Traffic > > Since in EVPN, MAC learning is performed in control plane via > advertisement of BGP routes, the filtering needed by E-TREE service > for known unicast traffic can be performed at the ingress PE, thus > providing very efficient filtering and avoiding sending known unicast > traffic over MPLS/IP core to be filtered at the egress PE as done in > traditional E-TREE solutions (e.g., E-TREE for VPLS). > > To provide such ingress filtering for known unicast traffic, a PE > MUST indicate to other PEs what kind of sites (root or leaf) its MAC > addresses are associated with by advertising a leaf indication flag > (via an Extended Community) along with each of its MAC/IP > Advertisement route. The lack of such flag indicates that the MAC > address is associated with a root site. > This scheme applies to all > scenarios described in section 2. > > Furthermore, for multi-homing scenario of section 2.2, where an AC is > either root or leaf (but not both), the PE MAY advertise leaf > indication along with the Ethernet A-D per EVI route. This > advertisement is used for sanity checking in control-plane to ensure > that there is no discrepancy in configuration among different PEs of > the same redundancy group. For example, if a leaf site is multi-homed > to PE1 an PE2, and PE1 advertises the Ethernet A-D per EVI > corresponding to this leaf site with the leaf-indication flag but PE2 > does not, then the receiving PE notifies the operator of such > discrepancy and ignore the leaf-indication flag on PE1. In other > words, in case of discrepancy, the multi-homing for that pair of PEs > is assumed to be in default "root" mode for that or EVI/VLAN>. The leaf indication flag on Ethernet A-D per EVI route > tells the receiving PEs that all MAC addresses associated with this > or are from a leaf site. Therefore, if a > PE receives a leaf indication for an AC via the Ethernet A-D per EVI > route but doesn't receive a leaf indication in the corresponding MAC > route, "MAC route" --> "MAC/IP Advertisement route" ? > then it notify the operator and ignore the leaf indication on s/notify/notifies/ > the Ethernet A-D per EVI route. The procedure above should I think be rephrased to provide unambiguous interpretation in the case where a given MAC is being announced in more than one MAC/IP advertisement route, possibly carrying a different leaf indication (and even possibly from different ESes, or from PEs not advertising Ethernet A-D route). > > Tagging MAC addresses with a leaf indication enables remote PEs to > perform ingress filtering for known unicast traffic - i.e., on the > ingress PE, the MAC destination address lookup yields, in addition to > the forwarding adjacency, a flag which indicates whether the target > MAC is associated with a Leaf site or not. Ditto, more or less: the procedure above should I think be rephrased to provide unambiguous interpretation in the case where a given MAC is being announced in more than one MAC/IP advertisement route, possibly carrying a different leaf indication. > The ingress PE cross- > checks this flag with the status of the originating AC, and if both > are Leafs, then the packet is not forwarded. > > To support the above ingress filtering functionality, a new E-TREE > Extended Community with a Leaf indication flag is introduced [section > 5.2]. This new Extended Community MUST be advertised with MAC/IP > Advertisement route and MAY be advertised with an Ethernet A-D per > EVI route as described above. > > 3.2 BUM Traffic > > For BUM traffic, it is not possible to perform filtering on the > ingress PE, as is the case with known unicast, because of the multi- > destination nature of the traffic. Saying "it is not possible" without more explanation is not very useful (the reader may think about using RPF-like techniques on the egress PE). It seems to me more reasonable to formulate things in terms of "This specification does not provide support for filtering BUM traffic on the ingress PE", and avoid a sentence like the one above. > As such, the solution relies on > egress filtering. In order to apply the proper egress filtering, > which varies based on whether a packet is sent from a Leaf AC or a > root AC, the MPLS-encapsulated frames MUST be tagged with an > indication when they originated from a Leaf AC. In other words, leaf > indication for BUM traffic is done at the granularity of AC. This can > be achieved in EVPN through the use of a MPLS label where it can be > used to either identify the Ethernet segment of origin per [RFC7432] > (i.e., ESI label) or it can be used to indicate that the packet is > originated from a leaf site (Leaf label). > > BUM traffic sent over a P2MP LSP or ingress replication, may need to > carry an upstream assigned or downstream assigned MPLS label > (respectively) for the purpose of egress filtering to indicate to the > egress PEs whether this packet is originated from a leaf AC. > > The main difference between downstream and upstream assigned MPLS > label is that in case of downstream assigned not all egress PE > devices need to receive the label just like ingress replication > procedures defined in [RFC7432]. > > There are four scenarios to consider as follow. s/follow/follows/ > In all these > scenarios, the imposition PE imposes the right MPLS label associated s/the imposition PE imposes/the ingress PE imposes/ ? > with the originated Ethernet Segment (ES) depending on whether the > Ethernet frame originated from a Root or a Leaf site on that Ethernet > Segment (ESI or Leaf label). > The mechanism by which the PE identifies > whether a given frame originated from a Root or a Leaf site on the > segment is based on the Ethernet Tag associated with the frame (e.g., > whether the frame received on a leaf or a root AC). First comment: it seems that the formulation should also support the case where an AC does not use .1q. (side comment: doing the identification based on the source MAC address would seem to allow BUM in the context of 2.3; it is out of the scope of my review to extend the scope of these specs, but I'm curious why it is not proposed....) > Other mechanisms > for identifying whether an ingress AC is a root or leaf is beyond the > scope of this document. > > 3.2.1 BUM traffic originated from a single-homed site on a leaf AC > > In this scenario, the ingress PE adds a special MPLS label indicating > a Leaf site. This special Leaf MPLS label, used for single-homing > scenarios, is not on a per ES basis but rather on a per PE basis - > i.e., a single Leaf MPLS label is used for all single-homed ES's on > that PE. This Leaf label is advertised to other PE devices, using a > new EVPN Extended Community called E-TREE Extended Community (section > 5.1) along with an Ethernet A-D per ES route with ESI of zero and a > set of Route Targets (RTs) corresponding to all EVIs on the PE with > at least one leaf site per EVI. The set of Ethernet A-D per ES routes > may be needed if the number of Route Targets (RTs) that need to be > sent exceed the limit on a single route per [RFC7432]. The ESI for > the Ethernet A-D per ES route is set to zero to indicate single-homed > sites. > > When a PE receives this special Leaf label in the data path, it > blocks the packet if the destination AC is of type Leaf; otherwise, > it forwards the packet. > > 3.2.2 BUM traffic originated from a single-homed site on a root AC > > In this scenario, the ingress PE does not add any ESI or Leaf label > and it operates per [RFC7432] procedures. > > 3.2.3 BUM traffic originated from a multi-homed site on a leaf AC > > In this scenario, it is assumed that While different ACs (VLANs) on s/While/while/ > the same ES could have different root/leaf designation (some being > roots and some being leaves), the same VLAN does have the same > root/leaf designation on all PEs on the same ES. Furthermore, it is > assumed that there is no forwarding among subnets - ie, the service > is EVPN L2 and not EVPN IRB. IRB use case is outside the scope of > this document. > > In such scenarios, If a multicast packet is originated from a leaf s/multicast/multicast or broadcast/ ? > AC, then it only needs to carry Leaf label described in section > 3.2.1. This label is sufficient in providing the necessary egress > filtering of BUM traffic from getting sent to leaf ACs including the > leaf AC on the same Ethernet Segment. > > 3.2.4 BUM traffic originated from a multi-homed site on a root AC > > In this scenario, both the ingress and egress PE devices follows the > procedure defined in [RFC7432] for adding and/or processing an ESI > MPLS label. > > 3.3 E-TREE Traffic Flows for EVPN > > Per [RFC7387], a generic E-Tree service supports all of the following > traffic flows: > > - Ethernet Unicast from Root to Roots & Leaf > - Ethernet Unicast from Leaf to Root > - Ethernet Broadcast/Multicast from Root to Roots & Leafs > - Ethernet Broadcast/Multicast from Leaf to Roots > > A particular E-Tree service may need to support all of the above > types of flows or only a select subset, depending on the target > application. In the case where unicast flows need not be supported, > the L2VPN PEs can avoid performing any MAC learning function. > > In the subsections that follow, we will describe the operation of > EVPN to support E-Tree service with and without MAC learning. > > 3.3.1 E-Tree with MAC Learning > > The PEs implementing an E-Tree service must perform MAC learning when > unicast traffic flows must be supported among Root and Leaf sites. In > this case, the PE with Root sites performs MAC learning in the data- s/the PE with Root sites/the PEs with Root sites/ ? (or "PE(s)"...) > path over the Ethernet Segments, and advertises reachability in EVPN > MAC Advertisement routes. These routes will be imported by all PEs > for that EVI (i.e., PEs that have Leaf sites as well as PEs that have > Root sites). Similarly, the PEs with Leaf sites perform MAC learning > in the data-path over their Ethernet Segments, and advertise > reachability in EVPN MAC Advertisement routes. For the scenario > described in section 2.1 (or possibly section 2.2), these routes are > imported only by PEs with at least one Root site in the EVI - i.e., a > PE with only Leaf sites will not import these routes. PEs with Root > and/or Leaf sites may use the Ethernet A-D routes for aliasing (in > the case of multi-homed segments) and for mass MAC withdrawal per > [RFC7432]. > > To support multicast/broadcast from Root to Leaf sites, either a P2MP > tree rooted at the PE(s) with the Root site(s) or ingress replication > can be used. The multicast tunnels are set up through the exchange of > the EVPN Inclusive Multicast route, as defined in [RFC7432]. > > To support multicast/broadcast from Leaf to Root sites, ingress > replication should be sufficient for most scenarios where there are > only a few Roots (typically two). Therefore, in a typical scenario, a > root PE needs to support both a P2MP tunnel in transmit direction > from itself to leaf PEs and at the same time it needs to support > ingress-replication tunnels in receive direction from leaf PEs to > itself. In order to signal this efficiently from the root PE, a new > composite tunnel type is defined per section 5.3. This new composite > tunnel type is advertised by the root PE to simultaneously indicate a > P2MP tunnel in transmit direction and an ingress-replication tunnel > in the receive direction for the BUM traffic. > > If the number of Roots is large, P2MP tunnels originated at the PEs > with Leaf sites may be used and thus there will be no need to use the > modified PMSI tunnel attribute in section 5.2 for composite tunnel > type. > > 3.3.2 E-Tree without MAC Learning > > The PEs implementing an E-Tree service need not perform MAC learning > when the traffic flows between Root and Leaf sites are only multicast > or broadcast. In this case, the PEs do not exchange EVPN MAC > Advertisement routes. Instead, the Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag > (IMET) routes are used to support BUM traffic. It's nicer to avoid "acronym soup" when possible. Here the acronym is used only once... Using "Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag route" in these two places is ok I think. > > The fields of the IMET route are populated per the procedures defined > in [RFC7432], and the multicast tunnel setup criteria are as > described in the previous section. > > Just as in the previous section, if the number of PEs with root sites > are only a few and thus ingress replication is desired from leaf PEs > to these root PEs, then the modified PMSI attribute as defined in > section 5.3 should be used. > > 4 Operation for PBB-EVPN > > In PBB-EVPN, the PE advertises a Root/Leaf indication along with each > B-MAC Advertisement route, to indicate whether the associated B-MAC > address corresponds to a Root or a Leaf site. Just like the EVPN > case, the new E-TREE Extended Community defined in section [5.1] is > advertised with each MAC Advertisement route. > > In the case where a multi-homed Ethernet Segment has both Root and > Leaf sites attached, two B-MAC addresses are advertised: one B-MAC > address is per ES as specified in [RFC7623] and implicitly denoting > Root, and the other B-MAC address is per PE and explicitly denoting > Leaf. The former B-MAC address is not advertised with the E-TREE > extended community but the latter B-MAC denoting Leaf is advertised > with the new E-TREE extended community where "Leaf-indication" flag > is set. In such multi-homing scenarios where and Ethernet Segment has > both Root and Leaf ACs, it is assumed that While different ACs > (VLANs) on the same ES could have different root/leaf designation > (some being roots and some being leaves), the same VLAN does have the > same root/leaf designation on all PEs on the same ES. Furthermore, it > is assumed that there is no forwarding among subnets - ie, the > service is L2 and not IRB. IRB use case is outside the scope of this > document. > > The ingress PE uses the right B-MAC source address depending on > whether the Ethernet frame originated from the Root or Leaf AC on > that Ethernet Segment. The mechanism by which the PE identifies > whether a given frame originated from a Root or Leaf site on the > segment is based on the Ethernet Tag associated with the frame. Other > mechanisms of identification, beyond the Ethernet Tag, are outside > the scope of this document. > > Furthermore, a PE advertises two special global B-MAC addresses: one > for Root and another for Leaf, and tags the Leaf one as such in the > MAC Advertisement route. These B-MAC addresses are used as source > addresses for traffic originating from single-homed segments. The B- > MAC address used for indicating Leaf sites can be the same for both > single-homed and multi-homed segments. > > 4.1 Known Unicast Traffic > > For known unicast traffic, the PEs perform ingress filtering: On the > ingress PE, the C-MAC destination address lookup yields, in addition > to the target B-MAC address and forwarding adjacency, a flag which > indicates whether the target B-MAC is associated with a Root or a > Leaf site. The ingress PE cross-checks this flag with the status of > the originating site, and if both are a Leaf, then the packet is not > forwarded. > > 4.2 BUM Traffic > > For BUM traffic, the PEs must perform egress filtering. When a PE > receives a MAC advertisement route (which will be used as a source B- > MAC), it updates its Ethernet Segment egress filtering function The "its Ethernet Segment egress filtering function" phrase makes it sounds like we're talking about a wellknown function defined somewhere. If this is indeed the case, providing a reference would be in order. If not, then explaining what this function is would be required. (Are you talking about doing something similar to what 3.2 specifies for the non-PBB procedures ?) > (based on the source B-MAC address), as follows: > > - If the MAC Advertisement route indicates that the advertised B-MAC > is a Leaf, and the local Ethernet Segment is a Leaf as well, then the > source B-MAC address is added to the B-MAC filtering list. Implicitly we can guess that this "filtering list" is a list of things to include, rather than a list of things to include, but the text should I think be explicit. > > - Otherwise, the B-MAC filtering list is not updated. > > When the egress PE receives the packet, it examines the B-MAC source > address to check whether it should filter or forward the frame. Note > that this uses the same filtering logic as baseline [RFC7623] and > does not require any additional flags in the data-plane. > > The PE places all Leaf Ethernet Segments of a given bridge domain in > a single split-horizon group in order to prevent intra-PE forwarding > among Leaf segments. As per a previous comment: isn't this something that should be common between the EVPN and the PBB-EVPN procedures ? > This split-horizon function applies to BUM > traffic. Does it mean "only" ? (if yes, please be explicit, and if no, adding "as well" or something like that would be better) > 4.3 E-Tree without MAC Learning > > In scenarios where the traffic of interest is only Multicast and/or > broadcast, the PEs implementing an E-Tree service do not need to do > any MAC learning. In such scenarios the filtering must be performed > on egress PEs. For PBB-EVPN, the handling of such traffic is per > section 4.2 without C-MAC learning part of it at both ingress and > egress PEs. > > 5 BGP Encoding > > This document defines two new BGP Extended Community for EVPN. > > 5.1 E-TREE Extended Community > > This Extended Community is a new transitive Extended Community having > a Type field value of 0x06 (EVPN) and the Sub-Type 0x05. It is used > for leaf indication of known unicast and BUM traffic. For BUM > traffic, the Leaf Label field is set to a valid MPLS label and this > EC is advertised along with Ethernet A-D per ES route with an ESI of > zero to enable egress filtering on disposition PEs per section 3.2.1 > and 3.2.3. There is no need to send ESI Label Extended Community when > sending Ethernet A-D per ES route with an ESI of zero. For known > unicast traffic, the Leaf flag bit is set to one and this EC is > advertised along with MAC/IP Advertisement route per section 3.1. > > The E-TREE Extended Community is encoded as an 8-octet value as > follows: > > 0 1 2 3 > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Type=0x06 | Sub-Type=0x05 | Flags(1 Octet)| Reserved=0 | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Reserved=0 | Leaf Label | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > The low-order bit of the Flags octet is defined as the "Leaf- > Indication" bit. A value of one indicates a Leaf AC/Site. > > When this EC is advertised along with MAC/IP Advertisement route (for > known unicast traffic), the Leaf-Indication flag MUST be set to one > and Leaf Label is set to zero. The received PE should ignore Leaf > Label and only processes Leaf-Indication flag. A value of zero for > Leaf-Indication flag is invalid when sent along with MAC/IP > advertisement route and an error should be logged. > > When this EC is advertised along with Ethernet A-D per ES route (with > ESI of zero) for BUM traffic, the Leaf Label MUST be set to a valid > MPLS label and the Leaf-Indication flag should be set to zero. The > received PE should ignore the Leaf-Indication flag. A non-valid MPLS > label when sent along with the Ethernet A-D per ES route, should be > logged as an error. > > 5.2 PMSI Tunnel Attribute > > [RFC6514] defines PMSI Tunnel attribute which is an optional > transitive attribute with the following format: > > +---------------------------------+ > | Flags (1 octet) | > +---------------------------------+ > | Tunnel Type (1 octets) | > +---------------------------------+ > | MPLS Label (3 octets) | > +---------------------------------+ > | Tunnel Identifier (variable) | > +---------------------------------+ > > This draft uses all the fields per existing definition except for the > following modifications to the Tunnel Type and Tunnel Identifier: > > When receiver ingress-replication label is needed, the high-order bit > of the tunnel type field (C bit - Composite tunnel bit) is set while > the remaining low-order seven bits indicate the tunnel type as > before. When this C bit is set, the "tunnel identifier" field would > begin with a three-octet label, followed by the actual tunnel > identifier for the transmit tunnel. PEs that don't understand the > new meaning of the high-order bit would treat the tunnel type as an > invalid tunnel type. For the PEs that do understand the new meaning > of the high-order, if ingress replication is desired when sending BUM > traffic, the PE will use the the label in the Tunnel Identifier field > when sending its BUM traffic. I think we should have some text to unambiguously state that: "Using the Composite flag for Tunnel Types 0x00 'no tunnel information present' and 0x06 'Ingress Replication' is invalid, and should be treated as an invalid tunnel type on reception". Additionally, since RFC7385 has created a registry for PMSI Tunnel attribute tunnel types, taking the most significant bit from this field can't be done without a significant change of how this registry is organized (because now you can't take value in 0x7b-0x7f without colliding into values which are Experimental or Reserved). Achieving the above requires an update of RFC7385, so I would suggest adding an 8.1 section saying this: --- The "P-Multicast Service Interface Tunnel (PMSI Tunnel) Tunnel Types" registry in the "Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Parameters" registry needs to be updated to reflect the use of the most significant bit to advertise the use of "composite tunnels" (section 5.2). For this purpose, this document updates RFC7385. The registry is to be updated, by removing the entries for 0xFB-0xFE and 0x0F, and replacing them by: - 0x7B-0x7E Reserved for Experimental Use [this document] - 0x7F Reserved [this document] - 0x80-0xFF Not Allocatable, corresponds to Composite tunnel types [this document] The allocation policy for values 0x00 to 0x7A is IETF Review [RFC5226 ]. The range for experimental use is now 0x7B-0x7E, and value in this range are not to be assigned. The status of 0x7F may only be changed through Standards Action [RFC5226 ]. ---- Additionally to this section 8.1: - the document header needs to specify "Updates: RFC7385" . - the following can be added to the abstract (because reviewer often want to see in the abstract the explanation for why an RFC is updated): "This document makes use of the most significant bit of the scope governed by the IANA registry created by RFC7385, and hence updates that RFC accordingly." > 6 Acknowledgement > > We would like to thank Dennis Cai, Antoni Przygienda, and Jeffrey > Zhang for their valuable comments. > > 7 Security Considerations > > Since this draft uses the EVPN constructs of [RFC7432] and [RFC7623], > the same security considerations in these drafts are also applicable > here. Furthermore, this draft provides additional security check by > allowing sites (or ACs) of an EVPN instance to be designated as > "Root" or "Leaf" and preventing any traffic exchange among "Leaf" > sites of that VPN through ingress filtering for known unicast traffic > and egress filtering for BUM traffic. > > 8 IANA Considerations > > This document requests the allocation of value 5 in the "EVPN > Extended Community Sub-Types" registry defined in [RFC7153] and > modification of the registry as follow: The text above should be reformulated to reflect the fact that IANA has already allocated the value: "IANA has allocated value 5 in the "EVPN Extended Community Sub-Types" registry defined in [RFC7153] as follow:" > > SUB-TYPE VALUE NAME Reference > 0x05 E-TREE Extended Community This document > Thanks, -Thomas --------------72752E55DD16402556D3E6FA Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi,

Here is the review I did while preparing the shepherd write-up for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree .

There is one thing that stands out: the document uses the most significant bit of the "PMSI Tunnel Attribute" Tunnel Type  field, which cant't be done I think without updating the structure of the corresponding registry (RFC7385).  I suggest how that can be done at the end of this review (a few people Cc'd for this reason).

Please find my comments below...

[...]

2  E-Tree Scenarios and EVPN / PBB-EVPN Support

   In this section, we will categorize support for E-Tree into three
   different scenarios, depending on the nature of the site association
   (Root/Leaf) per PE or per Ethernet Segment:

   - Leaf OR Root site(s) per PE

   - Leaf OR Root site(s) per AC

   - Leaf OR Root site(s) per MAC

2.1 Scenario 1: Leaf OR Root site(s) per PE


   In this scenario, a PE may receive traffic from either Root sites OR
   Leaf sites for a given MAC-VRF/bridge table, but not both
   concurrently. In other words, a given EVI on a PE is either
   associated with a root or leaf.

s/with a root or leaf/with roots or leaves/ ?


The PE may have both Root and Leaf

s/both Root and Leaf/both Roots and Leaves/ ?


   sites albeit for different EVIs.


                   +---------+            +---------+
                   |   PE1   |            |   PE2   |
    +---+          |  +---+  |  +------+  |  +---+  |            +---+
    |CE1+---ES1----+--+   |  |  | MPLS |  |  |   +--+----ES2-----+CE2|
    +---+  (Root)  |  |MAC|  |  |  /IP |  |  |MAC|  |   (Leaf)   +---+
                   |  |VRF|  |  |      |  |  |VRF|  |
                   |  |   |  |  |      |  |  |   |  |            +---+
                   |  |   |  |  |      |  |  |   +--+----ES3-----+CE3|
                   |  +---+  |  +------+  |  +---+  |   (Leaf)   +---+
                   +---------+            +---------+

   Figure 1: Scenario 1

   In such scenario, an EVPN PE implementation MAY provide E-TREE
   service using topology constraint among the PEs belonging to the same

"topology constraint" is a bit opaque as a term, perhaps "using tailored BGP RT import/export policies" would be more descriptive (assuming I understood your intent)


   EVI. The purpose of this topology constraint is to avoid having PEs
   with only  Leaf sites importing and processing BGP MAC routes from
   each other. To support such topology constrain in EVPN, two BGP
   Route-Targets (RTs) are used for every EVPN Instance (EVI): one RT is
   associated with the Root sites and the other is associated with the
   Leaf sites. On a per EVI basis, every PE exports the single RT
   associated with its type of site(s). Furthermore, a PE with Root
   site(s) imports both Root and Leaf RTs, whereas a PE with Leaf
   site(s) only imports the Root RT.

The text seems to imply that the above is sufficient to deliver the service, but I fail to see what would prevent Leaf-to-Leaf traffic between Leaves bound to the same MAC-VRF (ES2 and ES3 in firgure1).  Shouldn't the text mention the use of a split-horizon in Leaf MAC-VRFs ?

(assuming the previous point is resolved:)

With this mechanism above, isn't it possible to have on a given PE, for a single E-TREE EVI, both Leaves and Roots, as long as distinct MAC-VRFs are used (one for Leaves and one for Roots) ?   (it seems to me that the assymetric import/export RT would do what is needed to build an E-TREE, we would just have a particular case where a Leaf MAC-VRF and a Root MAC-VRF for a given E-TREE end up on a single PE)

If this is not possible, I think the text should explain why.


If the number of EVIs is very large
   (e.g., more than 64K), then RT type 0 as defined in [RFC4360] SHOULD
   be used; otherwise, RT type 2 is sufficient [RFC7153].

This is not specific to E-VPN E-TREE, or even to E-VPN, why mention that ?



2.2 Scenario 2: Leaf OR Root site(s) per AC

   In this scenario, a PE receives traffic from either Root OR Leaf
   sites (but not both) on a given Attachment Circuit (AC) of an EVI. In
   other words, an AC (ES or ES/VLAN) is either associated with a Root
   or Leaf (but not both).

s/with a Root or Leaf/with Roots or Leaves/ ?




                     +---------+            +---------+
                     |   PE1   |            |   PE2   |
    +---+            |  +---+  |  +------+  |  +---+  |            +---+
    |CE1+-----ES1----+--+   |  |  |      |  |  |   +--+---ES2/AC1--+CE2|
    +---+    (Leaf)  |  |MAC|  |  | MPLS |  |  |MAC|  |   (Leaf)   +---+
                     |  |VRF|  |  |  /IP |  |  |VRF|  |
                     |  |   |  |  |      |  |  |   |  |            +---+
                     |  |   |  |  |      |  |  |   +--+---ES2/AC2--+CE3|
                     |  +---+  |  +------+  |  +---+  |   (Root)   +---+
                     +---------+            +---------+

   Figure 2: Scenario 2

   In this scenario, if there are PEs with only root (or leaf) sites per
   EVI, then the RT constrain procedures described in section 2.1 can
   also be used here. However, when a Root site is added to a Leaf PE,
   then that PE needs to process MAC routes from all other Leaf PEs and
   add them to its forwarding table.

This is the case in 2.1 as well, isn't it ?


For this scenario, if for a given
   EVI, the majority of PEs will eventually have both Leaf and Root
   sites attached, even though they may start as Root-only or Leaf-only
   PEs, then it is recommended to use a single RT per EVI and avoid
   additional configuration and operational overhead.

Why this recommendation ?
Even with a majority of PEs having both Leaves and Roots, there can remain (up to 49% of) PEs having only Leaves, which will uselessly have all routes to other Leaves.

So "it is recommended" above, deserves to be explained more, I think.




2.3 Scenario 3: Leaf OR Root site(s) per MAC

   In this scenario, a PE may receive traffic from both Root AND Leaf
   sites on a given Attachment Circuit (AC) of an EVI. Since an
   Attachment Circuit (ES or ES/VLAN) carries traffic from both Root and
   Leaf sites, the granularity at which Root or Leaf sites are
   identifies

s/identifies/identified/


is on a per MAC address. This scenario is considered in
   this draft for EVPN service with only known unicast traffic - i.e.,
   there is no BUM traffic.

"there is no BUM" is quite a bold claim ! :=

Maybe the text should say "no BUM traffic is supported (BUM traffic will be dropped)" ?

(possibly "BUM traffic from Leaves will be dropped" would be sufficient ?)



                     +---------+            +---------+
                     |   PE1   |            |   PE2   |
    +---+            |  +---+  |  +------+  |  +---+  |            +---+
    |CE1+-----ES1----+--+   |  |  |      |  |  |   +--+---ES2/AC1--+CE2|
    +---+    (Root)  |  | E |  |  | MPLS |  |  | E |  | (Leaf/Root)+---+
                     |  | V |  |  |  /IP |  |  | V |  |
                     |  | I |  |  |      |  |  | I |  |            +---+
                     |  |   |  |  |      |  |  |   +--+---ES2/AC2--+CE3|
                     |  +---+  |  +------+  |  +---+  |   (Leaf)   +---+
                     +---------+            +---------+

   Figure 3: Scenario 3

3 Operation for EVPN

   [RFC7432] defines the notion of ESI MPLS label used for split-horizon
   filtering of BUM traffic at the egress PE. Such egress filtering
   capabilities can be leveraged in provision of E-TREE services as seen
   shortly. In other words, [RFC7432] has inherent capability to support
   E-TREE services without defining any new BGP routes but by just
   defining a new BGP Extended Community for leaf indication as shown
   later in this document.

3.1 Known Unicast Traffic

   Since in EVPN, MAC learning is performed in control plane via
   advertisement of BGP routes, the filtering needed by E-TREE service
   for known unicast traffic can be performed at the ingress PE, thus
   providing very efficient filtering and avoiding sending known unicast
   traffic over MPLS/IP core to be filtered at the egress PE as done in
   traditional E-TREE solutions (e.g., E-TREE for VPLS).

   To provide such ingress filtering for known unicast traffic, a PE
   MUST indicate to other PEs what kind of sites (root or leaf) its MAC
   addresses are associated with by advertising a leaf indication flag
   (via an Extended Community) along with each of its MAC/IP
   Advertisement route. The lack of such flag indicates that the MAC
   address is associated with a root site.



  This scheme applies to all
   scenarios described in section 2.

   Furthermore, for multi-homing scenario of section 2.2, where an AC is
   either root or leaf (but not both), the PE MAY advertise leaf
   indication along with the Ethernet A-D per EVI route. This
   advertisement is used for sanity checking in control-plane to ensure
   that there is no discrepancy in configuration among different PEs of
   the same redundancy group. For example, if a leaf site is multi-homed
   to PE1 an PE2, and PE1 advertises the Ethernet A-D per EVI
   corresponding to this leaf site with the leaf-indication flag but PE2
   does not, then the receiving PE notifies the operator of such
   discrepancy and ignore the leaf-indication flag on PE1. In other
   words, in case of discrepancy, the multi-homing for that pair of PEs
   is assumed to be in default "root" mode for that <ESI, EVI> or <ESI,
   EVI/VLAN>. The leaf indication flag on Ethernet A-D per EVI route
   tells the receiving PEs that all MAC addresses associated with this
   <ESI, EVI> or <ESI, EVI/VLAN> are from a leaf site. Therefore, if a
   PE receives a leaf indication for an AC via the Ethernet A-D per EVI
   route but doesn't receive a leaf indication in the corresponding MAC
   route,

"MAC route" --> "MAC/IP Advertisement route" ?



then it notify the operator and ignore the leaf indication on

s/notify/notifies/

   the Ethernet A-D per EVI route.


The procedure above should I think be rephrased to provide unambiguous interpretation in the case where a given MAC is being announced in more than one MAC/IP advertisement route, possibly carrying a different leaf indication (and even possibly from different ESes, or from PEs not advertising Ethernet A-D route).



   Tagging MAC addresses with a leaf indication enables remote PEs to
   perform ingress filtering for known unicast traffic - i.e., on the
   ingress PE, the MAC destination address lookup yields, in addition to
   the forwarding adjacency, a flag which indicates whether the target
   MAC is associated with a Leaf site or not.

Ditto, more or less: the procedure above should I think be rephrased to provide unambiguous interpretation in the case where a given MAC is being announced in more than one MAC/IP advertisement route, possibly carrying a different leaf indication.

The ingress PE cross-
   checks this flag with the status of the originating AC, and if both
   are Leafs, then the packet is not forwarded.




   To support the above ingress filtering functionality, a new E-TREE
   Extended Community with a Leaf indication flag is introduced [section
   5.2]. This new Extended Community MUST be advertised with MAC/IP
   Advertisement route and MAY be advertised with an Ethernet A-D per
   EVI route as described above.

3.2 BUM Traffic

   For BUM traffic, it is not possible to perform filtering on the
   ingress PE, as is the case with known unicast, because of the multi-
   destination nature of the traffic.

Saying "it is not possible" without more explanation is not very useful (the reader may think about using RPF-like techniques on the egress PE).
It seems to me more reasonable to formulate things in terms of "This specification does not provide support for filtering BUM traffic on the ingress PE", and avoid a sentence like the one above.

As such, the solution relies on
   egress filtering. In order to apply the proper egress filtering,
   which varies based on whether a packet is sent from a Leaf AC or a
   root AC, the MPLS-encapsulated frames MUST be tagged with an
   indication when they originated from a Leaf AC. In other words, leaf
   indication for BUM traffic is done at the granularity of AC. This can
   be achieved in EVPN through the use of a MPLS label where it can be
   used to either identify the Ethernet segment of origin per [RFC7432]
   (i.e., ESI label) or it can be used to indicate that the packet is
   originated from a leaf site (Leaf label).

   BUM traffic sent over a P2MP LSP or ingress replication, may need to
   carry an upstream assigned or downstream assigned MPLS label
   (respectively) for the purpose of egress filtering to indicate to the
   egress PEs whether this packet is originated from a leaf AC.

   The main difference between downstream and upstream assigned MPLS
   label is that in case of downstream assigned not all egress PE
   devices need to receive the label just like ingress replication
   procedures defined in [RFC7432].

   There are four scenarios to consider as follow.

s/follow/follows/

In all these
   scenarios, the imposition PE imposes the right MPLS label associated

s/the imposition PE imposes/the ingress PE imposes/ ?

   with the originated Ethernet Segment (ES) depending on whether the
   Ethernet frame originated from a Root or a Leaf site on that Ethernet
   Segment (ESI or Leaf label).

The mechanism by which the PE identifies
   whether a given frame originated from a Root or a Leaf site on the
   segment is based on the Ethernet Tag associated with the frame (e.g.,
   whether the frame received on a leaf or a root AC).

First comment: it seems that the formulation should also support the case where an AC does not use .1q.

(side comment: doing the identification based on the source MAC address would seem to allow BUM in the context of 2.3; it is out of the scope of my review to extend the scope of these specs, but I'm curious why it is not proposed....)

Other mechanisms
   for identifying whether an ingress AC is a root or leaf is beyond the
   scope of this document.

3.2.1 BUM traffic originated from a single-homed site on a leaf AC

   In this scenario, the ingress PE adds a special MPLS label indicating
   a Leaf site. This special Leaf MPLS label, used for single-homing
   scenarios, is not on a per ES basis but rather on a per PE basis -
   i.e., a single Leaf MPLS label is used for all single-homed ES's on
   that PE. This Leaf label is advertised to other PE devices, using a
   new EVPN Extended Community called E-TREE Extended Community (section
   5.1) along with an Ethernet A-D per ES route with ESI of zero and a
   set of Route Targets (RTs) corresponding to all EVIs on the PE with
   at least one leaf site per EVI. The set of Ethernet A-D per ES routes
   may be needed if the number of Route Targets (RTs) that need to be
   sent exceed the limit on a single route per [RFC7432]. The ESI for
   the Ethernet A-D per ES route is set to zero to indicate single-homed
   sites.

   When a PE receives this special Leaf label in the data path, it
   blocks the packet if the destination AC is of type Leaf; otherwise,
   it forwards the packet.

3.2.2 BUM traffic originated from a single-homed site on a root AC

   In this scenario, the ingress PE does not add any ESI or Leaf label
   and it operates per [RFC7432] procedures.

3.2.3 BUM traffic originated from a multi-homed site on a leaf AC

   In this scenario, it is assumed that While different ACs (VLANs) on

s/While/while/

   the same ES could have different root/leaf designation (some being
   roots and some being leaves), the same VLAN does have the same
   root/leaf designation on all PEs on the same ES. Furthermore, it is
   assumed that there is no forwarding among subnets - ie, the service
   is EVPN L2 and not EVPN IRB. IRB use case is outside the scope of
   this document.

   In such scenarios,  If a multicast packet is originated from a leaf

s/multicast/multicast or broadcast/ ?

   AC, then it only needs to carry Leaf label described in section
   3.2.1. This label is sufficient in providing the necessary egress
   filtering of BUM traffic from getting sent to leaf ACs including the
   leaf AC on the same Ethernet Segment.

3.2.4 BUM traffic originated from a multi-homed site on a root AC

   In this scenario, both the ingress and egress PE devices follows the
   procedure defined in [RFC7432] for adding and/or processing an ESI
   MPLS label.

3.3 E-TREE Traffic Flows for EVPN

   Per [RFC7387], a generic E-Tree service supports all of the following
   traffic flows:

        - Ethernet Unicast from Root to Roots & Leaf
        - Ethernet Unicast from Leaf to Root
        - Ethernet Broadcast/Multicast from Root to Roots & Leafs
        - Ethernet Broadcast/Multicast from Leaf to Roots

   A particular E-Tree service may need to support all of the above
   types of flows or only a select subset, depending on the target
   application. In the case where unicast flows need not be supported,
   the L2VPN PEs can avoid performing any MAC learning function.

   In the subsections that follow, we will describe the operation of
   EVPN to support E-Tree service with and without MAC learning.

3.3.1 E-Tree with MAC Learning

   The PEs implementing an E-Tree service must perform MAC learning when
   unicast traffic flows must be supported among Root and Leaf sites. In
   this case, the PE with Root sites performs MAC learning in the data-

s/the PE with Root sites/the PEs with Root sites/ ?
(or "PE(s)"...)

   path over the Ethernet Segments, and advertises reachability in EVPN
   MAC Advertisement routes. These routes will be imported by all PEs
   for that EVI (i.e., PEs that have Leaf sites as well as PEs that have
   Root sites). Similarly, the PEs with Leaf sites perform MAC learning
   in the data-path over their Ethernet Segments, and advertise
   reachability in EVPN MAC Advertisement routes. For the scenario
   described in section 2.1 (or possibly section 2.2), these routes are
   imported only by PEs with at least one Root site in the EVI - i.e., a
   PE with only Leaf sites will not import these routes. PEs with Root
   and/or Leaf sites may use the Ethernet A-D routes for aliasing (in
   the case of multi-homed segments) and for mass MAC withdrawal per
   [RFC7432].

   To support multicast/broadcast from Root to Leaf sites, either a P2MP
   tree rooted at the PE(s) with the Root site(s) or ingress replication
   can be used. The multicast tunnels are set up through the exchange of
   the EVPN Inclusive Multicast route, as defined in [RFC7432].

   To support multicast/broadcast from Leaf to Root sites, ingress
   replication should be sufficient for most scenarios where there are
   only a few Roots (typically two). Therefore, in a typical scenario, a
   root PE needs to support both a P2MP tunnel in transmit direction
   from itself to leaf PEs and at the same time it needs to support
   ingress-replication tunnels in receive direction from leaf PEs to
   itself. In order to signal this efficiently from the root PE, a new
   composite tunnel type is defined per section 5.3.  This new composite
   tunnel type is advertised by the root PE to simultaneously indicate a
   P2MP tunnel in transmit direction and an ingress-replication tunnel
   in the receive direction for the BUM traffic.

   If the number of Roots is large, P2MP tunnels originated at the PEs
   with Leaf sites may be used and thus there will be no need to use the
   modified PMSI tunnel attribute in section 5.2 for composite tunnel
   type.

3.3.2 E-Tree without MAC Learning

   The PEs implementing an E-Tree service need not perform MAC learning
   when the traffic flows between Root and Leaf sites are only multicast
   or broadcast. In this case, the PEs do not exchange EVPN MAC
   Advertisement routes. Instead, the Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag
   (IMET) routes are used to support BUM traffic.

It's nicer to avoid "acronym soup" when possible.
Here the acronym is used only once... Using  "Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag route" in these two places is ok I think.


   The fields of the IMET route are populated per the procedures defined
   in [RFC7432], and the multicast tunnel setup criteria are as
   described in the previous section.

   Just as in the previous section, if the number of PEs with root sites
   are only a few and thus ingress replication is desired from leaf PEs
   to these root PEs, then the modified PMSI attribute as defined in
   section 5.3 should be used.

4 Operation for PBB-EVPN

   In PBB-EVPN, the PE advertises a Root/Leaf indication along with each
   B-MAC Advertisement route, to indicate whether the associated B-MAC
   address corresponds to a Root or a Leaf site. Just like the EVPN
   case, the new E-TREE Extended Community defined in section [5.1] is
   advertised with each MAC Advertisement route.

   In the case where a multi-homed Ethernet Segment has both Root and
   Leaf sites attached, two B-MAC addresses are advertised: one B-MAC
   address is per ES as specified in [RFC7623] and implicitly denoting
   Root, and the other B-MAC address is per PE and explicitly denoting
   Leaf. The former B-MAC address is not advertised with the E-TREE
   extended community but the latter B-MAC denoting Leaf is advertised
   with the new E-TREE extended community where "Leaf-indication" flag
   is set. In such multi-homing scenarios where and Ethernet Segment has
   both Root and Leaf ACs, it is assumed that While different ACs
   (VLANs) on the same ES could have different root/leaf designation
   (some being roots and some being leaves), the same VLAN does have the
   same root/leaf designation on all PEs on the same ES. Furthermore, it
   is assumed that there is no forwarding among subnets - ie, the
   service is L2 and not IRB. IRB use case is outside the scope of this
   document.

   The ingress PE uses the right B-MAC source address depending on
   whether the Ethernet frame originated from the Root or Leaf AC on
   that Ethernet Segment. The mechanism by which the PE identifies
   whether a given frame originated from a Root or Leaf site on the
   segment is based on the Ethernet Tag associated with the frame. Other
   mechanisms of identification, beyond the Ethernet Tag, are outside
   the scope of this document.

   Furthermore, a PE advertises two special global B-MAC addresses: one
   for Root and another for Leaf, and tags the Leaf one as such in the
   MAC Advertisement route. These B-MAC addresses are used as source
   addresses for traffic originating from single-homed segments. The B-
   MAC address used for indicating Leaf sites can be the same for both
   single-homed and multi-homed segments.

4.1 Known Unicast Traffic

   For known unicast traffic, the PEs perform ingress filtering: On the
   ingress PE, the C-MAC destination address lookup yields, in addition
   to the target B-MAC address and forwarding adjacency, a flag which
   indicates whether the target B-MAC is associated with a Root or a
   Leaf site. The ingress PE cross-checks this flag with the status of
   the originating site, and if both are a Leaf, then the packet is not
   forwarded.

4.2 BUM Traffic

   For BUM traffic, the PEs must perform egress filtering. When a PE
   receives a MAC advertisement route (which will be used as a source B-
   MAC), it updates its Ethernet Segment egress filtering function

The "its Ethernet Segment egress filtering function" phrase makes it sounds like we're talking about a wellknown function defined somewhere.
If this is indeed the case, providing a reference would be in order.
If not, then explaining what this function is would be required.

(Are you talking about doing something similar to what 3.2 specifies for the non-PBB procedures ?)

   (based on the source B-MAC address), as follows:

   - If the MAC Advertisement route indicates that the advertised B-MAC
   is a Leaf, and the local Ethernet Segment is a Leaf as well, then the
   source B-MAC address is added to the B-MAC filtering list.

Implicitly we can guess that this "filtering list" is a list of things to include, rather than a list of things to include, but the text should I think be explicit.


   - Otherwise, the B-MAC filtering list is not updated.

   When the egress PE receives the packet, it examines the B-MAC source
   address to check whether it should filter or forward the frame. Note
   that this uses the same filtering logic as baseline [RFC7623] and
   does not require any additional flags in the data-plane.

   The PE places all Leaf Ethernet Segments of a given bridge domain in
   a single split-horizon group in order to prevent intra-PE forwarding
   among Leaf segments.

As per a previous comment: isn't this something that should be common between the EVPN and the PBB-EVPN procedures ?

This split-horizon function applies to BUM
   traffic.

Does it mean "only" ?
(if yes, please be explicit, and if no, adding "as well" or something like that would be better)


4.3 E-Tree without MAC Learning

   In scenarios where the traffic of interest is only Multicast and/or
   broadcast, the PEs implementing an E-Tree service do not need to do
   any MAC learning. In such scenarios the filtering must be performed
   on egress PEs. For PBB-EVPN, the handling of such traffic is per
   section 4.2 without C-MAC learning part of it at both ingress and
   egress PEs.

5 BGP Encoding

   This document defines two new BGP Extended Community for EVPN.

5.1 E-TREE Extended Community

   This Extended Community is a new transitive Extended Community having
   a Type field value of 0x06 (EVPN) and the Sub-Type 0x05. It is used
   for leaf indication of known unicast and BUM traffic. For BUM
   traffic, the Leaf Label field is set to a valid MPLS label and this
   EC is advertised along with Ethernet A-D per ES route with an ESI of
   zero to enable egress filtering on disposition PEs per section 3.2.1
   and 3.2.3. There is no need to send ESI Label Extended Community when
   sending Ethernet A-D per ES route with an ESI of zero. For known
   unicast traffic, the Leaf flag bit is set to one and this EC is
   advertised along with MAC/IP Advertisement route per section 3.1.

   The E-TREE Extended Community is encoded as an 8-octet value as
   follows:

        0                   1                   2                   3
        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       | Type=0x06     | Sub-Type=0x05 | Flags(1 Octet)|  Reserved=0   |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |  Reserved=0   |           Leaf Label                          |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   The low-order bit of the Flags octet is defined as the "Leaf-
   Indication" bit. A value of one indicates a Leaf AC/Site.

   When this EC is advertised along with MAC/IP Advertisement route (for
   known unicast traffic), the Leaf-Indication flag MUST be set to one
   and Leaf Label is set to zero. The received PE should ignore Leaf
   Label and only processes Leaf-Indication flag. A value of zero for
   Leaf-Indication flag is invalid when sent along with MAC/IP
   advertisement route and an error should be logged.

   When this EC is advertised along with Ethernet A-D per ES route (with
   ESI of zero) for BUM traffic, the Leaf Label MUST be set to a valid
   MPLS label and the Leaf-Indication flag should be set to zero. The
   received PE should ignore the Leaf-Indication flag. A non-valid MPLS
   label when sent along with the Ethernet A-D per ES route, should be
   logged as an error.

5.2 PMSI Tunnel Attribute

   [RFC6514] defines PMSI Tunnel attribute which is an optional
   transitive attribute with the following format:

         +---------------------------------+
         |  Flags (1 octet)                |
         +---------------------------------+
         |  Tunnel Type (1 octets)         |
         +---------------------------------+
         |  MPLS Label (3 octets)          |
         +---------------------------------+
         |  Tunnel Identifier (variable)   |
         +---------------------------------+

   This draft uses all the fields per existing definition except for the
   following modifications to the Tunnel Type and Tunnel Identifier:

   When receiver ingress-replication label is needed, the high-order bit
   of the tunnel type field (C bit - Composite tunnel bit) is set while
   the remaining low-order seven bits indicate the tunnel type as
   before. When this C bit is set, the "tunnel identifier" field would
   begin with a three-octet label, followed by the actual tunnel
   identifier for the transmit tunnel.  PEs that don't understand the
   new meaning of the high-order bit would treat the tunnel type as an
   invalid tunnel type. For the PEs that do understand the new meaning
   of the high-order, if ingress replication is desired when sending BUM
   traffic, the PE will use the the label in the Tunnel Identifier field
   when sending its BUM traffic.

I think we should have some text to unambiguously state that: "Using the Composite flag for Tunnel Types 0x00 'no tunnel information present' and 0x06 'Ingress Replication' is invalid, and should be treated as an invalid tunnel type on reception".

Additionally, since RFC7385 has created a registry for PMSI Tunnel attribute tunnel types, taking the most significant bit from this field can't be done without a significant change of how this registry is organized  (because now you can't take value in 0x7b-0x7f without colliding into values which are Experimental or Reserved).

Achieving the above requires an update of RFC7385, so I would suggest adding an 8.1 section saying this:

---
The "P-Multicast Service Interface Tunnel (PMSI Tunnel) Tunnel Types" registry in the "Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Parameters" registry needs to be updated to reflect the use of the most significant bit to advertise the use of "composite tunnels" (section 5.2).
 
For this purpose, this document updates RFC7385.

The registry is to be updated, by removing the entries for 0xFB-0xFE and 0x0F, and replacing them by:
- 0x7B-0x7E Reserved for Experimental Use [this document]
- 0x7F  Reserved [this document]
- 0x80-0xFF Not Allocatable, corresponds to Composite tunnel types [this document]

The allocation policy for values 0x00 to 0x7A is IETF Review [RFC5226].
The range for experimental use is now 0x7B-0x7E, and value in this range are not to be assigned.
The status of 0x7F may only be changed through Standards Action [RFC5226].

----
 
Additionally to this section 8.1:
- the document header needs to specify "Updates: RFC7385" .
- the following can be added to the abstract (because reviewer often want to see in the abstract the explanation for why an RFC is updated): "This document makes use of the most significant bit of the scope governed by the IANA registry created by RFC7385, and hence updates that RFC accordingly."




6  Acknowledgement

   We would like to thank Dennis Cai, Antoni Przygienda, and Jeffrey
   Zhang for their valuable comments.

7  Security Considerations

   Since this draft uses the EVPN constructs of [RFC7432] and [RFC7623],
   the same security considerations in these drafts are also applicable
   here. Furthermore, this draft provides additional security check by
   allowing sites (or ACs) of an EVPN instance to be designated as
   "Root" or "Leaf" and preventing any traffic exchange among "Leaf"
   sites of that VPN through ingress filtering for known unicast traffic
   and egress filtering for BUM traffic.

8  IANA Considerations

   This document requests the allocation of value 5 in the "EVPN
   Extended Community Sub-Types" registry defined in [RFC7153] and
   modification of the registry as follow:

The text above should be reformulated to reflect the fact that IANA has already allocated the value: "IANA has allocated value 5 in the "EVPN Extended Community Sub-Types" registry defined in [RFC7153] as follow:"


         SUB-TYPE VALUE     NAME                        Reference
         0x05               E-TREE Extended Community   This document


Thanks,

-Thomas






--------------72752E55DD16402556D3E6FA-- From nobody Mon Aug 29 08:21:33 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA5712D78B; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 08:21:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.081 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.081 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HjFVtMJPgKmc; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 08:21:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from r-mail2.rd.orange.com (r-mail2.rd.orange.com [217.108.152.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F34812D78A; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 08:21:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from r-mail2.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A5C55D86CE; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 17:21:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.194.32.11]) by r-mail2.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D615D86C5; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 17:21:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.193.71.12] (10.193.71.12) by FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (10.194.32.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.301.0; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 17:21:29 +0200 To: , BESS References: <3323ddae-c96f-49a4-2dec-1bfc4ed857dc@orange.com> From: Thomas Morin Organization: Orange Message-ID: <8f3588e1-6008-cb7b-656d-81b6765cef76@orange.com> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 17:21:29 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3323ddae-c96f-49a4-2dec-1bfc4ed857dc@orange.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------18B21E51CB68C9DA3544CA4E" Archived-At: Cc: Martin Vigoureux Subject: Re: [bess] shepherd review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 15:21:32 -0000 --------------18B21E51CB68C9DA3544CA4E Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit My previous email was missing comments on the References section... > 9 References > > 9.1 Normative References > > [KEYWORDS] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate > Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. > > [RFC7432] Sajassi et al., "BGP MPLS Based Ethernet VPN", February, > 2015. > > [RFC7623] Sajassi et al., "Provider Backbone Bridging Combined with > Ethernet VPN (PBB-EVPN)", September, 2015. RFC7385 will have to be added to the list. > > 9.2 Informative References > > [RFC7387] Key et al., "A Framework for E-Tree Service over MPLS > Network", October 2014. > > > > [RFC7153] Rosen et al., "IANA Registries for BGP Extended > Communities", March, 2014. This should be I think under Normative References. > > [RFC6514] Aggarwal et al., "BGP Encodings and Procedures for > Multicast in MPLS/BGP IP VPNs", February, 2012. Ditto. -Thomas --------------18B21E51CB68C9DA3544CA4E Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
My previous email was missing comments on the References section...

9  References

9.1  Normative References

   [KEYWORDS] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC7432] Sajassi et al., "BGP MPLS Based Ethernet VPN", February,
              2015.

   [RFC7623] Sajassi et al., "Provider Backbone Bridging Combined with
              Ethernet VPN (PBB-EVPN)", September, 2015.

RFC7385 will have to be added to the list.


9.2  Informative References

   [RFC7387] Key et al., "A Framework for E-Tree Service over MPLS
   Network", October 2014.
 



   [RFC7153] Rosen et al., "IANA Registries for BGP Extended
   Communities",  March, 2014.

This should be I think under Normative References.


   [RFC6514] Aggarwal et al., "BGP Encodings and Procedures for
   Multicast in MPLS/BGP IP VPNs",  February, 2012.

Ditto.

-Thomas
--------------18B21E51CB68C9DA3544CA4E-- From nobody Mon Aug 29 08:31:20 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B82ED12D792; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 08:31:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.082 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.082 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6fRUfb2JAi0l; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 08:31:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from r-mail1.rd.orange.com (r-mail1.rd.orange.com [217.108.152.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BCE412D77F; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 08:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from r-mail1.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 443C5A4413C; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 17:31:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.194.32.11]) by r-mail1.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D930A4413A; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 17:31:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.193.71.12] (10.193.71.12) by FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (10.194.32.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.301.0; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 17:31:12 +0200 To: , References: <21327_1465820739_575EA643_21327_4044_5_0939dd8f-9715-7994-124b-f945085c7312@orange.com> From: Thomas Morin Organization: Orange Message-ID: Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 17:31:12 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <21327_1465820739_575EA643_21327_4044_5_0939dd8f-9715-7994-124b-f945085c7312@orange.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 15:31:19 -0000 Hi working group, authors, A quick update on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay, as mentioned during BESS meeting in Berlin: - the door for comments is still open to have more reviews on this important document - reminder to authors: the outcome of the discussion right before/during WGLC haven't yet been incorporated in a revision Best, -Thomas thomas.morin@orange.com : > Hello Working Group, > > (Please read carefully, this e-mail contains new elements compared to > WG LCs we were doing in a still recent past.) > > This email starts a Working Group Last Call on > draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay [1]. > > * Please read the document if you haven't read the most recent > version yet, and send your comments to the list, no later than > *27th of June*. > > Note that this is *not only* a call for comments on the document, but > also a call for support (or not) publishing this document as a > Proposed Standard RFC. > > * We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that > applies to draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-04, to ensure that IPR has > been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, > 3669 and 5378 for more details) prior to moving forward. > If you are listed as a document Author or Contributor of > this document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not > you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The document won't > progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. > > * We are also polling for knowledge of implementations of part or all > of what this document specifies. This information is expected as per > [2]. Please inform the mailing list, the chairs, or only one of the > chairs. > > * Finally, if you want to volunteer to be Document Shepherd for this > document, please let us know. > > Thank you, > > Thomas/Martin > > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay > [2] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw From nobody Mon Aug 29 22:23:04 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9AD912D11A; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 22:23:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.769 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.769 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fj-hAW-H53kx; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 22:23:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1570312D10E; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 22:22:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CQK31413; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 05:22:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from DFWEML701-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.175) by lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.182) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 06:22:57 +0100 Received: from DFWEML501-MBB.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.179]) by dfweml701-cah.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.175]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 22:22:50 -0700 From: Lucy yong To: Martin Vigoureux , BESS Thread-Topic: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 Thread-Index: AQHR97xwDz4DG6W160m5tv4cqdTZo6BMWkswgBSzEPA= Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 05:22:49 +0000 Message-ID: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D572C63F3@dfweml501-mbb> References: <57B30B64.6040304@nokia.com> <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE0D5813FA@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE0D5813FA@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.45.7.15] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020204.57C51832.009A, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 3b4f17a0685d07ee6edc8d41b0c28ce8 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 05:23:03 -0000 U3VwcG9ydCENCg0KTHVjeSANCi0tLS0t08q8/tStvP4tLS0tLQ0Kt6K8/sjLOiBNYXJ0aW4gVmln b3VyZXV4IFttYWlsdG86bWFydGluLnZpZ291cmV1eEBub2tpYS5jb21dIA0Kt6LLzcqxvOQ6IDIw MTbE6jjUwjE2yNUgMjA6NDgNCsrVvP7IyzogQkVTUw0Ks63LzTogZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1iZXNzLXZp cnR1YWwtc3VibmV0LWZpYi1yZWR1Y3Rpb25AaWV0Zi5vcmcNCtb3zOI6IFdHIExhc3QgQ2FsbCBm b3IgZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1iZXNzLXZpcnR1YWwtc3VibmV0LWZpYi1yZWR1Y3Rpb24tMDQNCg0KSGVs bG8gV29ya2luZyBHcm91cCwNCg0KVGhpcyBlbWFpbCBzdGFydHMgYSBXb3JraW5nIEdyb3VwIExh c3QgQ2FsbCBvbg0KZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1iZXNzLXZpcnR1YWwtc3VibmV0LWZpYi1yZWR1Y3Rpb24t MDQgWzFdLg0KDQqh6CBQbGVhc2UgcmVhZCB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQgaWYgeW91IGhhdmVuJ3QgcmVh ZCB0aGUgbW9zdCByZWNlbnQgdmVyc2lvbiB5ZXQsIGFuZCBzZW5kIHlvdXIgY29tbWVudHMgdG8g dGhlIGxpc3QsIG5vIGxhdGVyIHRoYW4gdGhlICozMHRoIG9mIEF1Z3VzdCouDQpOb3RlIHRoYXQg dGhpcyBpcyAqbm90IG9ubHkqIGEgY2FsbCBmb3IgY29tbWVudHMgb24gdGhlIGRvY3VtZW50LCBi dXQgYWxzbyBhIGNhbGwgZm9yIHN1cHBvcnQgKG9yIG5vdCkgcHVibGlzaGluZyB0aGlzIGRvY3Vt ZW50IGFzIGFuIEluZm9ybWF0aW9uYWwgUkZDLg0KDQqh6CBXZSBhcmUgYWxzbyBwb2xsaW5nIGZv ciBrbm93bGVkZ2Ugb2YgYW55IHVuZGlzY2xvc2VkIElQUiB0aGF0IGFwcGxpZXMgdG8gZHJhZnQt aWV0Zi1iZXNzLXZpcnR1YWwtc3VibmV0LWZpYi1yZWR1Y3Rpb24tMDQsIHRvIGVuc3VyZSB0aGF0 IElQUiBoYXMgYmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQgaW4gY29tcGxpYW5jZSB3aXRoIElFVEYgSVBSIHJ1bGVz IChzZWUgUkZDcyAzOTc5LCA0ODc5LCAzNjY5IGFuZCA1Mzc4IGZvciBtb3JlIGRldGFpbHMpIHBy aW9yIHRvIG1vdmluZyBmb3J3YXJkLg0KSWYgeW91IGFyZSBsaXN0ZWQgYXMgYSBkb2N1bWVudCBB dXRob3Igb3IgQ29udHJpYnV0b3Igb2YgdGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBwbGVhc2UgcmVzcG9uZCB0byB0 aGlzIGVtYWlsIGFuZCBpbmRpY2F0ZSB3aGV0aGVyIG9yIG5vdCB5b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFu eSByZWxldmFudCB1bmRpc2Nsb3NlZCBJUFIuIFRoZSBkb2N1bWVudCB3b24ndCBwcm9ncmVzcyB3 aXRob3V0IGFuc3dlcnMgZnJvbSBhbGwgdGhlIEF1dGhvcnMgYW5kIENvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycy4NCk5v IElQUiBkaXNjbG9zdXJlIGV4aXN0cyBhZ2FpbnN0IHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQuDQoNCqHoIFdlIGFy ZSBhbHNvIHBvbGxpbmcgZm9yIGtub3dsZWRnZSBvZiBpbXBsZW1lbnRhdGlvbnMgb2YgcGFydCBv ciBhbGwgb2Ygd2hhdCB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IHNwZWNpZmllcy4gVGhpcyBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBp cyBleHBlY3RlZCBhcyBwZXIgWzJdLiANClBsZWFzZSBpbmZvcm0gdGhlIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdCwg b3IgdGhlIGNoYWlycywgb3Igb25seSBvbmUgb2YgdGhlIGNoYWlycy4NCg0KoeggRmluYWxseSwg aWYgc29tZW9uZSB3aXNoZXMgdG8gdm9sdW50ZWVyIHRvIGJlIERvY3VtZW50IFNoZXBoZXJkIGZv ciB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50LCBwbGVhc2UgbGV0IHVzIGtub3cuDQoNClRoYW5rIHlvdQ0KTSZUDQoN Cg0KWzFdDQpodHRwczovL2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2RvYy9kcmFmdC1pZXRmLWJlc3Mt dmlydHVhbC1zdWJuZXQtZmliLXJlZHVjdGlvbi8NClsyXSBodHRwczovL21haWxhcmNoaXZlLmll dGYub3JnL2FyY2gvbXNnL2Jlc3MvY0czWDF0VHFiX3ZQQzRyZzU2U0Vka2pxRHB3DQpfX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KQkVTUyBtYWlsaW5nIGxp c3QNCkJFU1NAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8v YmVzcw0K From nobody Mon Aug 29 22:23:43 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7128112D11B; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 22:23:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.769 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.769 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38GsdR79sdUN; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 22:23:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3A5112D11A; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 22:23:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CQK31470; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 05:23:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from DFWEML702-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.176) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.93) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 06:23:37 +0100 Received: from DFWEML501-MBB.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.179]) by dfweml702-cah.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.176]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 22:23:31 -0700 From: Lucy yong To: "'Thomas Morin'" , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01 Thread-Index: AQKiIiAzyL8Hrr3NnUu7Rc/+/RRIPQE7fQetAZyYOyyemWKYIIAQlaJw Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 05:23:30 +0000 Message-ID: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D572C6406@dfweml501-mbb> References: <19AB2A007F56DB4E8257F949A2FB9858AA1F8277@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D8D4CD1BB@nkgeml514-mbx.china.huawei.com> <007601d1fa33$fc5303b0$f4f90b10$@ndzh.com> In-Reply-To: <007601d1fa33$fc5303b0$f4f90b10$@ndzh.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.45.7.15] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020204.57C5185B.007E, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: c987c0f588b39aa1169ac0ada6156ab4 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 05:23:42 -0000 Support! Lucy =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Hello working group, This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-y= ang [1] as a working group item. Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or not (= in the later case, please also state the reasons). This poll runs until **August 30th**. *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies= to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IE= TF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). =3D=3D> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please resp= ond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant= IPR. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each = author and contributor. If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly r= espond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in = conformance with IETF rules. Thank you, Martin & Thomas bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Tue Aug 30 01:46:02 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA4DE12D8A7; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 01:46:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.782 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.782 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62abMVNU6M7u; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 01:45:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p-mail1.rd.orange.com (p-mail1.rd.orange.com [161.106.1.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 730BA127A91; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 01:45:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p-mail1.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 975117CC004; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:45:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.194.32.11]) by p-mail1.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC297CC001; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:45:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.193.71.12] (10.193.71.12) by FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (10.194.32.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.301.0; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:45:54 +0200 From: Thomas Morin To: Organization: Orange Message-ID: Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:45:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df@ietf.org Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 08:46:01 -0000 Hello working group, This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df-05 [1] as a Working Group document. Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, please also state the reasons). This poll runs until *September 14th*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). **If you are listed as an author or contributor** of this document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The document won't progress without answers from all the authors and contributors. At this date, no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thank you Martin & Thomas bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df From nobody Tue Aug 30 01:46:13 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietf.org Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE8D12D8DE; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 01:46:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: IETF Secretariat To: , , X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.31.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <147254677050.23663.4362924523677112581.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 01:46:10 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [bess] The BESS WG has placed draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued" X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 08:46:11 -0000 The BESS WG has placed draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Thomas Morin) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df/ From nobody Tue Aug 30 02:08:57 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22F3812D12F; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 02:08:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.769 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.769 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HWyXH4krPVnL; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 02:08:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B15D12D8BA; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 02:08:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CVI67401; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 09:08:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.73) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:08:49 +0100 Received: from NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.6]) by nkgeml412-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.73]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 17:08:36 +0800 From: Zhuangshunwan To: Thomas Morin , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Call for adoption: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01 Thread-Index: AQHR97uqqRpqE36uyEepUaSajvnkMKBhTFNQ Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 09:08:36 +0000 Message-ID: <19AB2A007F56DB4E8257F949A2FB9858C8785678@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.86.254] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020203.57C54D22.0210, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.5.6, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 336c0896deb456a343e8de839186a594 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 09:08:55 -0000 DQpTdXBwb3J0IGFuZCBJIGFtIG5vdCBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSIG9uIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQuDQoN CkJlc3QgUmVnYXJkcywNCg0KLVNodW53YW4NCg0KLS0tLS3pgq7ku7bljp/ku7YtLS0tLQ0K5Y+R 5Lu25Lq6OiBUaG9tYXMgTW9yaW4gW21haWx0bzp0aG9tYXMubW9yaW5Ab3JhbmdlLmNvbV0gDQrl j5HpgIHml7bpl7Q6IDIwMTblubQ45pyIMTbml6UgMjA6NDINCuaUtuS7tuS6ujogYmVzc0BpZXRm Lm9yZw0K5oqE6YCBOiBkcmFmdC1kaGphaW4tYmVzcy1iZ3AtbDN2cG4teWFuZ0BpZXRmLm9yZw0K 5Li76aKYOiBDYWxsIGZvciBhZG9wdGlvbjogZHJhZnQtZGhqYWluLWJlc3MtYmdwLWwzdnBuLXlh bmctMDENCg0KSGVsbG8gd29ya2luZyBncm91cCwNCg0KVGhpcyBlbWFpbCBzdGFydHMgYSB0d28t d2VlayBwb2xsIG9uIGFkb3B0aW5nIGRyYWZ0LWRoamFpbi1iZXNzLWJncC1sM3Zwbi15YW5nIFsx XSBhcyBhIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXAgaXRlbS4NCg0KUGxlYXNlIHNlbmQgY29tbWVudHMgdG8gdGhl IGxpc3QgYW5kIHN0YXRlIGlmIHlvdSBzdXBwb3J0IGFkb3B0aW9uIG9yIG5vdCAoaW4gdGhlIGxh dGVyIGNhc2UsIHBsZWFzZSBhbHNvIHN0YXRlIHRoZSByZWFzb25zKS4NCg0KVGhpcyBwb2xsIHJ1 bnMgdW50aWwgKipBdWd1c3QgMzB0aCoqLg0KDQoqQ29pbmNpZGVudGFsbHkqLCB3ZSBhcmUgYWxz byBwb2xsaW5nIGZvciBrbm93bGVkZ2Ugb2YgYW55IElQUiB0aGF0IGFwcGxpZXMgdG8gdGhpcyBk cmFmdCwgdG8gZW5zdXJlIHRoYXQgSVBSIGhhcyBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3NlZCBpbiBjb21wbGlhbmNl IHdpdGggSUVURiBJUFIgcnVsZXMgKHNlZSBSRkNzIDM5NzksIDQ4NzksIDM2NjkgYW5kIDUzNzgg Zm9yIG1vcmUgZGV0YWlscykuDQoNCj09PiAqSWYqIHlvdSBhcmUgbGlzdGVkIGFzIGEgZG9jdW1l bnQgYXV0aG9yIG9yIGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9yIHBsZWFzZSByZXNwb25kIHRvIHRoaXMgZW1haWwgYW5k IGluZGljYXRlIHdoZXRoZXIgb3Igbm90IHlvdSBhcmUgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IHJlbGV2YW50IElQ Ui4NCg0KVGhlIGRyYWZ0IHdpbGwgbm90IGJlIGFkb3B0ZWQgdW50aWwgYSByZXNwb25zZSBoYXMg YmVlbiByZWNlaXZlZCBmcm9tIGVhY2ggYXV0aG9yIGFuZCBjb250cmlidXRvci4NCg0KSWYgeW91 IGFyZSBub3QgbGlzdGVkIGFzIGFuIGF1dGhvciBvciBjb250cmlidXRvciwgdGhlbiBwbGVhc2Ug ZXhwbGljaXRseSByZXNwb25kIG9ubHkgaWYgeW91IGFyZSBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQg aGFzIG5vdCB5ZXQgYmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQgaW4gY29uZm9ybWFuY2Ugd2l0aCBJRVRGIHJ1bGVz Lg0KDQpUaGFuayB5b3UsDQoNCk1hcnRpbiAmIFRob21hcw0KYmVzcyBjaGFpcnMNCg0KWzFdIGh0 dHBzOi8vZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcvZG9jL2RyYWZ0LWRoamFpbi1iZXNzLWJncC1sM3Zw bi15YW5nDQoNCg== From nobody Tue Aug 30 04:11:10 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A0C12D0B6; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 04:11:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.921 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JjJ4tJoxK4oQ; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 04:11:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-us.alcatel-lucent.com (us-hpswa-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.18.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D88B126B6D; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 04:11:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from us70uumx4.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.245.18.16]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id F3F077E313BE3; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:11:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from us70uusmtp4.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70uusmtp4.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.66]) by us70uumx4.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u7UBB53I022545 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:11:05 GMT Received: from US70UWXCHHUB01.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70uwxchhub01.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.48]) by us70uusmtp4.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u7UBA23V026829 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:11:05 GMT Received: from US70UWXCHMBA03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.9.143]) by US70UWXCHHUB01.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.5.2.48]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 07:10:34 -0400 From: "Dolganow, Andrew (Nokia - SG)" To: Thomas Morin Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df Thread-Index: AQHSApsTJxiwZhMFCEWubUyXsnxG/qBhWQum Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:10:33 +0000 Message-ID: <7E0BD267-64E8-4B48-948F-E81E493AD856@nokia.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-CA X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:11:09 -0000 Support Andrew Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 30, 2016, at 4:47 PM, Thomas Morin wrote= : >=20 > Hello working group, >=20 > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting > draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df-05 [1] as a Working Group document. >=20 > Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, p= lease also state the reasons). >=20 > This poll runs until *September 14th*. >=20 > We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to = this document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IET= F IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). >=20 > **If you are listed as an author or contributor** of this document please= respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any rel= evant undisclosed IPR. The document won't progress without answers from all= the authors and contributors. >=20 > At this date, no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. >=20 > If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly= respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed i= n conformance with IETF rules. >=20 > Thank you >=20 > Martin & Thomas > bess chairs >=20 > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df >=20 > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Tue Aug 30 10:00:45 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD48612D1B8; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:00:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1p0KU-aX7Tzh; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:00:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pf0-x236.google.com (mail-pf0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B62612D181; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:00:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf0-x236.google.com with SMTP id x72so9712213pfd.2; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:00:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6eSyhDcnDuiD2MvCnJfVHDsQzHUriwqYdtf5Tm4FSI4=; b=g0bI5AugYdUWi+LnVBk/qoJicy44/G5Njc7Nv7fcJgh/fbGI4JAD3HqWB+4prmJ7Lh xX7m7Z3HPYQ9rdGx6YgcdqKiKSkZMIT1pIuv6NFbWxSkD5k8epWrkfQskoVkCzLT/3jc xfWVJ6lQHdP5h0jx4Jhdc7VoKrG1n7g3tBknCKptaVSCYHzIY7iarrW1TfJpLZ3CHrtG i7i1Vb1n/3MSHouiv908eU8iF/aNS2jEAzvTjY5ccgMUVPi2VzwHmhJT4i1Nt5/wUh1d N+CQhFUcW+5ElyejNJ9y6ZhSnwn5GLztn3fa7zzHvXmVSNlpQbpjSF6WrmnADjvfujrL vqHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6eSyhDcnDuiD2MvCnJfVHDsQzHUriwqYdtf5Tm4FSI4=; b=MwW/NAAnKYNdOL3fCMR/6JD8rIR62q7ZlDNbi3MwPzurBHRkhd3hfYFiJhxel8iV+H t6sNm4z8XYtpXJaocNW5UNSfBJE/IP+961cQfOzNZXHEUSLwKwsQSzICpRQENVw3mVcd V+mvpcgz0N2I7gPrE/1HFrpTCbUfGvnwsALChBrDXjn/FRYVNXXP1ypeuWyjKbozM5up GqW79O99pjPpnMZ9kQNjkW11FxDh5TqYXzy5FU2LityP15Avg6HL/75XtHh2FNqtfGnf jMpARc9s6KvnCkG1dw4ZzOCUa8tRWZ1VnLUd360zXbORnPKpx6+cO7MltyNMIbsrvT39 NfQg== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNt8rx7FSkzcc1lkXJapJ8OTlzaHzHGBFcj2hzjOpRlvnCtCHTCHxqskEh+TfuEXg== X-Received: by 10.98.134.77 with SMTP id x74mr7938454pfd.21.1472576437068; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:00:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.254.3] (107-1-141-74-ip-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [107.1.141.74]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ro14sm58655762pab.32.2016.08.30.10.00.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:00:36 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.17.0.160611 Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:01:09 -0700 From: Jeff Tantsura To: Thomas Morin Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: "draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 17:00:43 -0000 Yes/support Cheers, Jeff > On Aug 30, 2016, at 4:47 PM, Thomas Morin wrote: > > Hello working group, > > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting > draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df-05 [1] as a Working Group document. > > Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, please also state the reasons). > > This poll runs until *September 14th*. > > We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > **If you are listed as an author or contributor** of this document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The document won't progress without answers from all the authors and contributors. > > At this date, no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. > > If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > Thank you > > Martin & Thomas > bess chairs > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Tue Aug 30 10:35:35 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5832912D12E; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:35:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MnY8l4AvuUrF; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:35:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-us.alcatel-lucent.com (us-hpatc-esg-01.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.18.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C176A12D608; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:30:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from us70tumx1.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.245.18.13]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id D30CBA24BC8C6; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 17:30:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from us70tusmtp1.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70tusmtp1.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.63]) by us70tumx1.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u7UHUOtX023395 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 30 Aug 2016 17:30:24 GMT Received: from US70UWXCHHUB01.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70uwxchhub01.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.48]) by us70tusmtp1.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u7UHUOCS032516 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 30 Aug 2016 17:30:24 GMT Received: from US70TWXCHMBA10.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.4.189]) by US70UWXCHHUB01.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.5.2.48]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 13:30:24 -0400 From: "Oya Luengo, Roberto (Nokia - US)" To: Thomas Morin Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df Thread-Index: AQHSApr6Z4H7VZWxEEm9cezWb2ZUiKBhwyoW Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 17:30:23 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 17:35:33 -0000 Support > On Aug 30, 2016, at 1:46 AM, Thomas Morin wrote= : >=20 > Hello working group, >=20 > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting > draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df-05 [1] as a Working Group document. >=20 > Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, p= lease also state the reasons). >=20 > This poll runs until *September 14th*. >=20 > We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to = this document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IET= F IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). >=20 > **If you are listed as an author or contributor** of this document please= respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any rel= evant undisclosed IPR. The document won't progress without answers from all= the authors and contributors. >=20 > At this date, no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. >=20 > If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly= respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed i= n conformance with IETF rules. >=20 > Thank you >=20 > Martin & Thomas > bess chairs >=20 > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df >=20 > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Tue Aug 30 10:37:53 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4F812D6AB for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:37:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nuagenetworks-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uwHRN0pdtUS3 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:37:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ua0-x236.google.com (mail-ua0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E77BA12D6A5 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:37:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ua0-x236.google.com with SMTP id l94so45586608ual.0 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:37:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nuagenetworks-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SBmAAeoq+21oXwdAA27IP/lN9JOuqv311+uAWuI4PCI=; b=XU9oldI/SFwLiBtHG/o28Dx39tmtKNeIpsv7NfiNgAcwSgOIKeQ6X6VLuNz43c2ESB WkaqeVAtX7kAXLqTAsY3F3fdCrRFn++eBhWxdOb8Hq4RpNXo3u8erc7zmd//r1NACyzX c4W3bDKEFsNghHIfNGwqsFI1qVjqSlWYIsfmnwB+BFvs1US0tnCp9YyFuKJv/mFA6szE XelO39azMNScujMoEHT/5Ff1Tk3igDmqHcaI2G77vFW135hGtPiir9yCOvt6cfQuiC3s zlxAe680GxPc38gRZ8hVR9iOvaQI8zGqB085SXTwv6fT/geLWV9Sweg4BZ/OcrHAZtUQ 6hYA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SBmAAeoq+21oXwdAA27IP/lN9JOuqv311+uAWuI4PCI=; b=PNoJnXwGGXuwm+RrkB5fxTFSZDbfyf7WqaJdWwWUiltzytl89bQ1uhMRegnPwd9FqG En+Xm9KR1BVBJLPoFbloJDY8JIy7qBMChDRIf7uy+MAyu5k2NhieUyKqgwDycnddGrja GeeWVIAVT0TrBd8zz2Gb2wLzOxLNAQjOyy/Xrh2gqoczUwbgwDZC5PWP2IvjTKPz+zk5 Xkpe1+g9kQpMm0ggv0jQXI4HthFWnQfirVbaBu0pvwAkT/GwqpjTxzmhJFRsBOJ/qNbB b+8JB7gEJcPfS//VGHnCxt7b4t5BZo036sFGNsOUUEAPYif44F2W1rX0/FdAN3ti8Oj8 XaKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNK3CoKstM1C3jFXsZemCKk0v+B5scH/BLAnlmsPiPtRUnL2pbl8gTTu8pePqT5jPoybMk+G1KtpEbSY+Z2 X-Received: by 10.176.83.97 with SMTP id y30mr2394008uay.117.1472578668020; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:37:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.176.81.12 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:37:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Nabeel Cocker Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 13:37:47 -0400 Message-ID: To: Thomas Morin Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c1925e4695a23053b4d7043 Archived-At: Cc: draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df@ietf.org, "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 17:37:52 -0000 --94eb2c1925e4695a23053b4d7043 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 support thanks Nabeel On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:45 AM, Thomas Morin wrote: > Hello working group, > > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting > draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df-05 [1] as a Working Group document. > > Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, > please also state the reasons). > > This poll runs until *September 14th*. > > We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to > this document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with > IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > **If you are listed as an author or contributor** of this document please > respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any > relevant undisclosed IPR. The document won't progress without answers from > all the authors and contributors. > > At this date, no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. > > If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly > respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in > conformance with IETF rules. > > Thank you > > Martin & Thomas > bess chairs > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > --94eb2c1925e4695a23053b4d7043 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
support

thanks
Nabeel

On Tue, Aug 3= 0, 2016 at 4:45 AM, Thomas Morin <thomas.morin@orange.com> wrote:
Hello working group,

This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df-05 [1] as a Working Group document.

Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, ple= ase also state the reasons).

This poll runs until *September 14th*.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to th= is document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF = IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

**If you are listed as an author or contributor** of this document please r= espond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relev= ant undisclosed IPR. The document won't progress without answers from a= ll the authors and contributors.

At this date, no IPR has been disclosed against this Document.

If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly r= espond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in = conformance with IETF rules.

Thank you

Martin & Thomas
bess chairs

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

--94eb2c1925e4695a23053b4d7043-- From nobody Tue Aug 30 13:15:27 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03EC512D7F6; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 13:15:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fFN6B3StMKK8; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 13:15:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yw0-x229.google.com (mail-yw0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2EA212D58E; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 13:15:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yw0-x229.google.com with SMTP id u134so18372999ywg.3; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 13:15:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uInJdrTYXgJQXhmgFJIjYmiBmVZ+a4BlJvWsjasvp7E=; b=EglulD94IohVZYOmEjgO778dsGq8aMdAi7zIfzNWpufwIY80XqIyNydYz5dK4Vi9wq PRhkZO6JU22pYnS27cTm6h3gWi0pJf51/kN5ufPyZptMz1bFxRE5mH6hj7gjnV8U1Lj4 IYiTxh6UsuDv3cqbaO8CINzN1HmhGpkDOsWGBesNiRchluRbeOGOl1y6ZFu3sFIT3EKy Yxw7p3IMIp0NTSjYRVDU77/zMv25Y2o73AG9F/6yz00dPfkfcQtE6pDMDX9W5oKRCgkz gmbOk624zouhBu4too+/vRkQu3JYrTehNRrF0mBxIZOmWeWfX1gRF0+PFzMSNnAocjQS JXaw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uInJdrTYXgJQXhmgFJIjYmiBmVZ+a4BlJvWsjasvp7E=; b=LMJE4s/F78tVC6wy769ZVwWTh+LN0VK0JAxZppB/omiEBxI4H75RkdogHvsZjR5l0R 5EsHKkKmtZMWhBtbPL+eYaxUrbIWxUY0BRPkGE36I3l22Qcr8YFu9mWqz7Y9K/FyWuUR RaPApilBlzXPCmTFSkVDHwFPZZE2gpDeCUmvpW9c820GY+M6EK/UqtutiIgNMyET8RuU kB5IqDqMoIR430SPGkMndzN6FpCI1pq+btY3JiHdqqwtkWC6gvBINBirGJwbTX6bR9PO 5pKHr0OxD7y4QSn9MyNPEOXWvBecy7q5Pr8ozmfnGDRvOxYKr+Rzr6iiQbw6bUJijfcX yE7A== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNg63Cbm1yy1YfNAAcDONcdJBNC4ukABgTyg/ZVWlHApfxfoRsgST8QRjuUL4nFv/sGMYSxrkdeykdWmw== X-Received: by 10.129.93.86 with SMTP id r83mr5022861ywb.211.1472588123147; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 13:15:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Aldrin Isaac Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 20:15:12 +0000 Message-ID: To: Nabeel Cocker , Thomas Morin Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114d805cfb13f0053b4fa3aa Archived-At: Cc: draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df@ietf.org, "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 20:15:26 -0000 --001a114d805cfb13f0053b4fa3aa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Support. On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:38 AM Nabeel Cocker wrote: > support > > thanks > Nabeel > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:45 AM, Thomas Morin > wrote: > >> Hello working group, >> >> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting >> draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df-05 [1] as a Working Group document. >> >> Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, >> please also state the reasons). >> >> This poll runs until *September 14th*. >> >> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to >> this document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with >> IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). >> >> **If you are listed as an author or contributor** of this document please >> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any >> relevant undisclosed IPR. The document won't progress without answers from >> all the authors and contributors. >> >> At this date, no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. >> >> If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly >> respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in >> conformance with IETF rules. >> >> Thank you >> >> Martin & Thomas >> bess chairs >> >> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BESS mailing list >> BESS@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess >> > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > --001a114d805cfb13f0053b4fa3aa Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Support.
On Tue, Aug 30, 20= 16 at 10:38 AM Nabeel Cocker <nabeel@nuagenetworks.net> wrote:
support

thanks
Nabeel

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:45 AM, Thomas Morin <thom= as.morin@orange.com> wrote:
Hello working group,

This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df-05 [1] as a Working Group document.

Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, ple= ase also state the reasons).

This poll runs until *September 14th*.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to th= is document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF = IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

**If you are listed as an author or contributor** of this document please r= espond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relev= ant undisclosed IPR. The document won't progress without answers from a= ll the authors and contributors.

At this date, no IPR has been disclosed against this Document.

If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly r= espond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in = conformance with IETF rules.

Thank you

Martin & Thomas
bess chairs

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/d= raft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
--001a114d805cfb13f0053b4fa3aa-- From nobody Tue Aug 30 18:00:35 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC0812B030; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 18:00:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qfpQu_kHIdiU; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 18:00:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-co1nam03on0128.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.40.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B353112B051; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 18:00:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=38oVTueCXR2OIu6bpK5RMsPtK+nazbgtoaQYsPmvG5c=; b=StBQT5Q11Id9qmeJwXr+/QguMeoEjhIvv2m0En5b4l7xZQsTdu49qaXk75woPxujOxzZ9GwAeKOnamgsFv8Qv9bCFky01oDdPyfwEpWPajm5ky+Bf5CFiJYCACFCUQVkQWsZ1gX15uLAmubMg/7C8Gcz2rcEomVZ1zSFHqw+gw8= Received: from CO2PR05MB683.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.229.145) by CO2PR05MB684.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.229.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA_P384) id 15.1.609.3; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 01:00:28 +0000 Received: from CO2PR05MB683.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.229.145]) by CO2PR05MB683.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.229.145]) with mapi id 15.01.0609.006; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 01:00:28 +0000 From: Wen Lin To: Martin Vigoureux , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 Thread-Index: AQHR97r0tJGPDpM090OWmdyUl5t4E6BaYn0AgAexHwA= Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 01:00:28 +0000 Message-ID: References: <57B308FA.4090201@nokia.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.18.0.160709 authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=wlin@juniper.net; x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 25031d3f-1ad1-404d-11be-08d3d13a32f5 x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CO2PR05MB684; 6:4p4jwa/98QKlpOpWFHAoKH3durD9bddp3x5ZxhWLJzFpIGPTEeVwv5tmTWHtGZwULBpnDtoLXWQnFC8cQgPZyk/jBu6pAM1kz6xX/hdPdTDNmnms4JvgTdsWdfD6qhCy2RB5YoxWeohEnUUp3rF//7qL9rEmgZbz9jatxNJIMa2iP86L13lBoxCtTY48Epg4Ls9oV1z/Ja60MrGWHNlr3rFqCL/7gu0rnQV8tXEXzRH6j2FAXC2BGpzL0kHECr6Ty5xvX/JgSFMIZpOfBRlt009br8GSop9t2eaCVfPpFHz982MrBlk5nx8cNe4VN4sWp7G01OoUddippi4Lq/UuBA==; 5:s23VoJHlvz3K6Uqb2AkA/cSlUviVRKgV3+yWMcGklq1KNeUApS26ib86XRk11wOVDFY4rQGsl7Evgo6MS7z0tnyOI7mgJbVbFCfOTWPVIAOzD6NuefVDGl0dFpiF826EYDk3SLccfiI2j/o4rF07Vw==; 24:b4TAxuTqU8l0Tpvmn54MED+mME25auHyaJs10/dD918qMc7HOyEnoDktDKphUocwGH7UutVScd6RlVMUdeIb0wUIHgPM8648VgGzMaKptok=; 7:KAc95G1dnsfFovr4+auNu/FQcM7+DKcx0SJa5GrcIwH93A/zdu0drKRGCbGabKN658V9rNEtB0YrMIZ2kW+x+ZyGX4QPKF7N6S/jV5RCZIyx+W6r1kLbZFw5/n4ALgc50WQV6sj2WXHs5kqdyce0PLe5nQa3gQKDnzvx3LxvlED2wiFr526SgwP3o4H6qAJPtiBTnP4RcnIiAPLA8M0N/kP86shAr4g8sly7rdTvGa2VQlUapVQWcYVzOTQLxCwU x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO2PR05MB684; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105)(82608151540597)(21748063052155); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040176)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026); SRVR:CO2PR05MB684; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CO2PR05MB684; x-forefront-prvs: 00514A2FE6 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(7916002)(24454002)(189002)(199003)(377454003)(106116001)(106356001)(3280700002)(86362001)(5660300001)(16236675004)(3660700001)(36756003)(5002640100001)(2950100001)(2900100001)(102836003)(122556002)(82746002)(2501003)(11100500001)(83506001)(10400500002)(7846002)(81166006)(105586002)(8936002)(6116002)(99286002)(3846002)(7736002)(81156014)(83716003)(586003)(8676002)(4326007)(19300405004)(19580395003)(87936001)(19580405001)(68736007)(77096005)(2420400007)(189998001)(7110500001)(92566002)(15650500001)(15975445007)(66066001)(5001770100001)(97736004)(4001350100001)(19625215002)(76176999)(54356999)(2906002)(33656002)(10710500007)(101416001)(50986999)(230783001)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CO2PR05MB684; H:CO2PR05MB683.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A3D22C1EE25B473190405F50EAC24AD2junipernet_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 31 Aug 2016 01:00:28.1080 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO2PR05MB684 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 01:00:33 -0000 --_000_A3D22C1EE25B473190405F50EAC24AD2junipernet_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 U3VwcG9ydCBhcyBhIGNvLWF1dGhvci4gIEkgYW0gdW5hd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBScyByZWxhdGVk IHRvIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQuDQoNClRoYW5rcywNCldlbg0KDQpPbiBUdWUsIEF1ZyAxNiwgMjAxNiBh dCA1OjM3IEFNIC0wNzAwLCAiTWFydGluIFZpZ291cmV1eCIgPG1hcnRpbi52aWdvdXJldXhAbm9r aWEuY29tPG1haWx0bzptYXJ0aW4udmlnb3VyZXV4QG5va2lhLmNvbT4+IHdyb3RlOg0KDQpIZWxs byB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwLA0KDQoNCg0KVGhpcyBlbWFpbCBzdGFydHMgYSB0d28td2VlayBwb2xs IG9uIGFkb3B0aW5nDQoNCmRyYWZ0LXp6aGFuZy1iZXNzLWV2cG4tYnVtLXByb2NlZHVyZS11cGRh dGVzLTAzIFsxXSBhcyBhIFdvcmtpbmcgR3JvdXANCg0KRG9jdW1lbnQuDQoNCg0KDQpQbGVhc2Ug c3RhdGUgb24gdGhlIGxpc3QgaWYgeW91IHN1cHBvcnQgYWRvcHRpb24gb3Igbm90IChpbiBib3Ro IGNhc2VzLA0KDQpwbGVhc2UgYWxzbyBzdGF0ZSB0aGUgcmVhc29ucykuDQoNCg0KDQpUaGlzIHBv bGwgcnVucyB1bnRpbCAqdGhlIDMwdGggb2YgQXVndXN0Ki4NCg0KDQoNCldlIGFyZSBhbHNvIHBv bGxpbmcgZm9yIGtub3dsZWRnZSBvZiBhbnkgdW5kaXNjbG9zZWQgSVBSIHRoYXQgYXBwbGllcw0K DQp0byB0aGlzIERvY3VtZW50LCB0byBlbnN1cmUgdGhhdCBJUFIgaGFzIGJlZW4gZGlzY2xvc2Vk IGluIGNvbXBsaWFuY2UNCg0Kd2l0aCBJRVRGIElQUiBydWxlcyAoc2VlIFJGQ3MgMzk3OSwgNDg3 OSwgMzY2OSBhbmQgNTM3OCBmb3IgbW9yZQ0KDQpkZXRhaWxzKS4NCg0KSWYgeW91IGFyZSBsaXN0 ZWQgYXMgYW4gQXV0aG9yIG9yIENvbnRyaWJ1dG9yIG9mIHRoaXMgRG9jdW1lbnQgcGxlYXNlDQoN CnJlc3BvbmQgdG8gdGhpcyBlbWFpbCBhbmQgaW5kaWNhdGUgd2hldGhlciBvciBub3QgeW91IGFy ZSBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkNCg0KcmVsZXZhbnQgdW5kaXNjbG9zZWQgSVBSLiBUaGUgRG9jdW1lbnQg d29uJ3QgcHJvZ3Jlc3Mgd2l0aG91dCBhbnN3ZXJzDQoNCmZyb20gYWxsIHRoZSBBdXRob3JzIGFu ZCBDb250cmlidXRvcnMuDQoNCk5vIElQUiBoYXMgYmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQgYWdhaW5zdCB0aGlz IERvY3VtZW50DQoNCg0KDQpJZiB5b3UgYXJlIG5vdCBsaXN0ZWQgYXMgYW4gQXV0aG9yIG9yIENv bnRyaWJ1dG9yLCB0aGVuIHBsZWFzZQ0KDQpleHBsaWNpdGx5IHJlc3BvbmQgb25seSBpZiB5b3Ug YXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgdGhhdCBoYXMgbm90IHlldA0KDQpiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3NlZCBp biBjb25mb3JtYW5jZSB3aXRoIElFVEYgcnVsZXMuDQoNCg0KDQpUaGFuayB5b3UNCg0KDQoNCk1h cnRpbiAmIFRob21hcw0KDQpiZXNzIGNoYWlycw0KDQoNCg0KWzFdDQoNCmh0dHBzOi8vZGF0YXRy YWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcvZG9jL2RyYWZ0LXp6aGFuZy1iZXNzLWV2cG4tYnVtLXByb2NlZHVyZS11 cGRhdGVzLw0KDQoNCg0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX18NCg0KQkVTUyBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCg0KQkVTU0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KDQpodHRwczovL3d3 dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2Jlc3MNCg== --_000_A3D22C1EE25B473190405F50EAC24AD2junipernet_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <949FDD2C45C35548A4B26485F5D073B1@namprd05.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWwgeG1sbnM6bz0idXJuOnNjaGVtYXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTpvZmZpY2U6b2ZmaWNlIiB4 bWxuczp3PSJ1cm46c2NoZW1hcy1taWNyb3NvZnQtY29tOm9mZmljZTp3b3JkIiB4bWxuczptPSJo dHRwOi8vc2NoZW1hcy5taWNyb3NvZnQuY29tL29mZmljZS8yMDA0LzEyL29tbWwiIHhtbG5zPSJo dHRwOi8vd3d3LnczLm9yZy9UUi9SRUMtaHRtbDQwIj4NCjxoZWFkPg0KPG1ldGEgaHR0cC1lcXVp dj0iQ29udGVudC1UeXBlIiBjb250ZW50PSJ0ZXh0L2h0bWw7IGNoYXJzZXQ9dXRmLTgiPg0KPG1l dGEgbmFtZT0iVGl0bGUiIGNvbnRlbnQ9IiI+DQo8bWV0YSBuYW1lPSJLZXl3b3JkcyIgY29udGVu dD0iIj4NCjxtZXRhIG5hbWU9IkdlbmVyYXRvciIgY29udGVudD0iTWljcm9zb2Z0IFdvcmQgMTUg KGZpbHRlcmVkIG1lZGl1bSkiPg0KPHN0eWxlPjwhLS0NCi8qIEZvbnQgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8N CkBmb250LWZhY2UNCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IkNvdXJpZXIgTmV3IjsNCglwYW5vc2UtMToyIDcg MyA5IDIgMiA1IDIgNCA0O30NCkBmb250LWZhY2UNCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IkNhbWJyaWEgTWF0 aCI7DQoJcGFub3NlLTE6MiA0IDUgMyA1IDQgNiAzIDIgNDt9DQpAZm9udC1mYWNlDQoJe2ZvbnQt ZmFtaWx5OkNhbGlicmk7DQoJcGFub3NlLTE6MiAxNSA1IDIgMiAyIDQgMyAyIDQ7fQ0KLyogU3R5 bGUgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8NCnAuTXNvTm9ybWFsLCBsaS5Nc29Ob3JtYWwsIGRpdi5Nc29Ob3Jt YWwNCgl7bWFyZ2luOjBpbjsNCgltYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOi4wMDAxcHQ7DQoJZm9udC1zaXplOjEy LjBwdDsNCglmb250LWZhbWlseToiVGltZXMgTmV3IFJvbWFuIjt9DQphOmxpbmssIHNwYW4uTXNv SHlwZXJsaW5rDQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS1wcmlvcml0eTo5OTsNCgljb2xvcjpibHVlOw0KCXRleHQt ZGVjb3JhdGlvbjp1bmRlcmxpbmU7fQ0KYTp2aXNpdGVkLCBzcGFuLk1zb0h5cGVybGlua0ZvbGxv d2VkDQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS1wcmlvcml0eTo5OTsNCgljb2xvcjpwdXJwbGU7DQoJdGV4dC1kZWNv cmF0aW9uOnVuZGVybGluZTt9DQpwcmUNCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXByaW9yaXR5Ojk5Ow0KCW1zby1z dHlsZS1saW5rOiJIVE1MIFByZWZvcm1hdHRlZCBDaGFyIjsNCgltYXJnaW46MGluOw0KCW1hcmdp bi1ib3R0b206LjAwMDFwdDsNCglmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0Ow0KCWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJDb3Vy aWVyIE5ldyI7fQ0Kc3Bhbi5IVE1MUHJlZm9ybWF0dGVkQ2hhcg0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtbmFtZToi SFRNTCBQcmVmb3JtYXR0ZWQgQ2hhciI7DQoJbXNvLXN0eWxlLXByaW9yaXR5Ojk5Ow0KCW1zby1z dHlsZS1saW5rOiJIVE1MIFByZWZvcm1hdHRlZCI7DQoJZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6Q291cmllcjt9DQpz cGFuLkVtYWlsU3R5bGUxOQ0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtdHlwZTpwZXJzb25hbC1yZXBseTsNCglmb250 LWZhbWlseTpDYWxpYnJpOw0KCWNvbG9yOndpbmRvd3RleHQ7fQ0Kc3Bhbi5tc29JbnMNCgl7bXNv LXN0eWxlLXR5cGU6ZXhwb3J0LW9ubHk7DQoJbXNvLXN0eWxlLW5hbWU6IiI7DQoJdGV4dC1kZWNv cmF0aW9uOnVuZGVybGluZTsNCgljb2xvcjp0ZWFsO30NCi5Nc29DaHBEZWZhdWx0DQoJe21zby1z dHlsZS10eXBlOmV4cG9ydC1vbmx5Ow0KCWZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC4wcHQ7fQ0KQHBhZ2UgV29yZFNl Y3Rpb24xDQoJe3NpemU6NTk1LjBwdCA4NDIuMHB0Ow0KCW1hcmdpbjoxLjBpbiAxLjBpbiAxLjBp biAxLjBpbjt9DQpkaXYuV29yZFNlY3Rpb24xDQoJe3BhZ2U6V29yZFNlY3Rpb24xO30NCi0tPjwv c3R5bGU+DQo8L2hlYWQ+DQo8Ym9keSBiZ2NvbG9yPSJ3aGl0ZSIgbGFuZz0iRU4tVVMiIGxpbms9 ImJsdWUiIHZsaW5rPSJwdXJwbGUiPg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iV29yZFNlY3Rpb24xIj4NCjxwIGNs YXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5 OkNhbGlicmkiPlN1cHBvcnQgYXMgYSBjby1hdXRob3IuJm5ic3A7IEkgYW0gdW5hd2FyZSBvZiBh bnkgSVBScyByZWxhdGVkIHRvIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQuPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAg Y2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1p bHk6Q2FsaWJyaSI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05v cm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6Q2FsaWJyaSI+ VGhhbmtzLDxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFu IHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OkNhbGlicmkiPldlbjxvOnA+PC9v OnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNp emU6MTEuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OkNhbGlicmkiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwv cD4NCjxkaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiIHN0eWxlPSJtYXJn aW4tYm90dG9tOjEyLjBwdCI+T24gVHVlLCBBdWcgMTYsIDIwMTYgYXQgNTozNyBBTSAtMDcwMCwg JnF1b3Q7TWFydGluIFZpZ291cmV1eCZxdW90OyAmbHQ7PGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOm1hcnRpbi52 aWdvdXJldXhAbm9raWEuY29tIiB0YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+bWFydGluLnZpZ291cmV1eEBub2tp YS5jb208L2E+Jmd0OyB3cm90ZTo8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxibG9ja3F1b3RlIHN0eWxlPSJi b3JkZXI6bm9uZTtib3JkZXItbGVmdDpzb2xpZCAjQ0NDQ0NDIDEuMHB0O3BhZGRpbmc6MGluIDBp biAwaW4gNi4wcHQ7bWFyZ2luLWxlZnQ6NC44cHQ7bWFyZ2luLXJpZ2h0OjBpbiI+DQo8ZGl2Pg0K PHByZT5IZWxsbyB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwLDxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wcmU+DQo8cHJlPjxvOnA+Jm5i c3A7PC9vOnA+PC9wcmU+DQo8cHJlPlRoaXMgZW1haWwgc3RhcnRzIGEgdHdvLXdlZWsgcG9sbCBv biBhZG9wdGluZzxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wcmU+DQo8cHJlPmRyYWZ0LXp6aGFuZy1iZXNzLWV2cG4t YnVtLXByb2NlZHVyZS11cGRhdGVzLTAzIFsxXSBhcyBhIFdvcmtpbmcgR3JvdXAgPG86cD48L286 cD48L3ByZT4NCjxwcmU+RG9jdW1lbnQuPG86cD48L286cD48L3ByZT4NCjxwcmU+PG86cD4mbmJz cDs8L286cD48L3ByZT4NCjxwcmU+UGxlYXNlIHN0YXRlIG9uIHRoZSBsaXN0IGlmIHlvdSBzdXBw b3J0IGFkb3B0aW9uIG9yIG5vdCAoaW4gYm90aCBjYXNlcywgPG86cD48L286cD48L3ByZT4NCjxw cmU+cGxlYXNlIGFsc28gc3RhdGUgdGhlIHJlYXNvbnMpLjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wcmU+DQo8cHJl PjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9wcmU+DQo8cHJlPlRoaXMgcG9sbCBydW5zIHVudGlsICp0aGUg MzB0aCBvZiBBdWd1c3QqLjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wcmU+DQo8cHJlPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+ PC9wcmU+DQo8cHJlPldlIGFyZSBhbHNvIHBvbGxpbmcgZm9yIGtub3dsZWRnZSBvZiBhbnkgdW5k aXNjbG9zZWQgSVBSIHRoYXQgYXBwbGllczxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wcmU+DQo8cHJlPnRvIHRoaXMg RG9jdW1lbnQsIHRvIGVuc3VyZSB0aGF0IElQUiBoYXMgYmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQgaW4gY29tcGxp YW5jZTxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wcmU+DQo8cHJlPndpdGggSUVURiBJUFIgcnVsZXMgKHNlZSBSRkNz IDM5NzksIDQ4NzksIDM2NjkgYW5kIDUzNzggZm9yIG1vcmU8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcHJlPg0KPHBy ZT5kZXRhaWxzKS48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcHJlPg0KPHByZT5JZiB5b3UgYXJlIGxpc3RlZCBhcyBh biBBdXRob3Igb3IgQ29udHJpYnV0b3Igb2YgdGhpcyBEb2N1bWVudCBwbGVhc2U8bzpwPjwvbzpw PjwvcHJlPg0KPHByZT5yZXNwb25kIHRvIHRoaXMgZW1haWwgYW5kIGluZGljYXRlIHdoZXRoZXIg b3Igbm90IHlvdSBhcmUgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55PG86cD48L286cD48L3ByZT4NCjxwcmU+cmVsZXZh bnQgdW5kaXNjbG9zZWQgSVBSLiBUaGUgRG9jdW1lbnQgd29uJ3QgcHJvZ3Jlc3Mgd2l0aG91dCBh bnN3ZXJzPG86cD48L286cD48L3ByZT4NCjxwcmU+ZnJvbSBhbGwgdGhlIEF1dGhvcnMgYW5kIENv bnRyaWJ1dG9ycy48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcHJlPg0KPHByZT5ObyBJUFIgaGFzIGJlZW4gZGlzY2xv c2VkIGFnYWluc3QgdGhpcyBEb2N1bWVudDxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wcmU+DQo8cHJlPjxvOnA+Jm5i c3A7PC9vOnA+PC9wcmU+DQo8cHJlPklmIHlvdSBhcmUgbm90IGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhbiBBdXRob3Ig b3IgQ29udHJpYnV0b3IsIHRoZW4gcGxlYXNlIDxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wcmU+DQo8cHJlPmV4cGxp Y2l0bHkgcmVzcG9uZCBvbmx5IGlmIHlvdSBhcmUgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IElQUiB0aGF0IGhhcyBu b3QgeWV0IDxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wcmU+DQo8cHJlPmJlZW4gZGlzY2xvc2VkIGluIGNvbmZvcm1h bmNlIHdpdGggSUVURiBydWxlcy48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcHJlPg0KPHByZT48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwv bzpwPjwvcHJlPg0KPHByZT5UaGFuayB5b3U8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcHJlPg0KPHByZT48bzpwPiZu YnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvcHJlPg0KPHByZT5NYXJ0aW4gJmFtcDsgVGhvbWFzPG86cD48L286cD48L3By ZT4NCjxwcmU+YmVzcyBjaGFpcnM8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcHJlPg0KPHByZT48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwv bzpwPjwvcHJlPg0KPHByZT5bMV0gPG86cD48L286cD48L3ByZT4NCjxwcmU+aHR0cHM6Ly9kYXRh dHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9kb2MvZHJhZnQtenpoYW5nLWJlc3MtZXZwbi1idW0tcHJvY2VkdXJl LXVwZGF0ZXMvPG86cD48L286cD48L3ByZT4NCjxwcmU+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3ByZT4N CjxwcmU+X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX188bzpw PjwvbzpwPjwvcHJlPg0KPHByZT5CRVNTIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdDxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wcmU+DQo8 cHJlPkJFU1NAaWV0Zi5vcmc8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcHJlPg0KPHByZT5odHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRm Lm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2Jlc3M8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcHJlPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Js b2NrcXVvdGU+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvYm9keT4NCjwvaHRt bD4NCg== --_000_A3D22C1EE25B473190405F50EAC24AD2junipernet_-- From nobody Tue Aug 30 21:28:59 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D0D12D0CB; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 21:28:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.446 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.446 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YCX9HYnEyIAD; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 21:28:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B600B12B00A; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 21:28:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.143.109.35] (79.138.131.88.mobile.tre.se [79.138.131.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C303F18015A1; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 06:28:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Loa Andersson Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-4E4966C5-3D09-447D-9364-488CE5DB8C71 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Message-Id: <8A502F2D-E7EC-4497-9BF1-1295E1F21A02@pi.nu> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:28:43 +0800 References: To: idr@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13G35) Archived-At: Subject: [bess] Fwd: [mpls] Working Group adoption poll on draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 04:28:54 -0000 --Apple-Mail-4E4966C5-3D09-447D-9364-488CE5DB8C71 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Working Groups, Please note that the working group adoption poll for draft-rosen-mpls-rfc310= 7bis has been started in the mpls wg. Please send your comments to the mpls w= g mailing list (mpls@ietf.org).=20 /Loa mpls wg co-chair Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: > From: Loa Andersson > Date: 30 augusti 2016 08:10:13 GMT+8 > To: "mpls@ietf.org" > Cc: "draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis.all@ietf.org" , "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" > Subject: [mpls] Working Group adoption poll on draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis= >=20 > Working Group, >=20 > This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis > as an MPLS working group document. >=20 > Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working > group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical > motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that > the document should not be adopted as a working group document. >=20 > There are no IPR disclosures against this document. >=20 > All the authors has stated on the on the mpls wg mailing list that they > are not aware of any IPRs that relate to this document. >=20 > The working group adoption poll ends September 14, 2016. >=20 > /Loa >=20 > MPLS wg co-chair. > --=20 >=20 >=20 > Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com > Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu > Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls --Apple-Mail-4E4966C5-3D09-447D-9364-488CE5DB8C71 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Working Groups,

Please note that the w= orking group adoption poll for draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis has been started i= n the mpls wg. Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). 

/Loa
mpls wg co-chair

Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:

From:= Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
= Date: 30 augusti 2016 08:10:13 GMT+8
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ie= tf.org>
Cc: "draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis.= all@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@i= etf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.or= g>
Subject: [mpls] Working Group adoption poll on draft-= rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis

Working Group,

This is to star= t a two week poll on adopting draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis
as= an MPLS working group document.

Please sen= d your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
gr= oup mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Pleas= e give a technical
motivation for your support/not support, e= specially if you think that
the document should not be adopt= ed as a working group document.

There are n= o IPR disclosures against this document.

Al= l the authors has stated on the on the mpls wg mailing list that they=
are not aware of any IPRs that relate to this document.
=
The working group adoption poll ends September 14, 20= 16.

/Loa

M= PLS wg co-chair.
--


Loa Andersson         &nb= sp;            &= nbsp; email: loa@mail01.huawei= .com
Senior MPLS Expert      &n= bsp;            =        loa@p= i.nu
Huawei Technologies (consultant)    =  phone: +46 739 81 21 64

_____________= __________________________________
mpls mailing list<= br>mpls@ietf.org
= https://www.ietf.org/= mailman/listinfo/mpls
= --Apple-Mail-4E4966C5-3D09-447D-9364-488CE5DB8C71-- From nobody Wed Aug 31 02:25:07 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1240512D8C9; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 02:24:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.597 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r6DE0kzLCfFj; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 02:24:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3670A12D8C8; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 02:24:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id i5so78191936wmg.0; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 02:24:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=8ppgHyZmnC8zpYi+g0IOdjRUKtDLxTIBzmlxAAq/nL8=; b=j7DadHCRKfheck6gN5Z6eD6x1LmXmvehP3/VouNf8i8RH/ptTjX6rTCIbZD6GdX5Tq z8lXEsPTFm2Vnn19errlKKBmCG9zF1QuHOLHhuG2BhQ07HDG5uNRQGJPHOeJ3+znFUfZ iv4AMu1eBbcc+lkPGGaR8Tm0O1CQVeuFWNrwpW08yhrFUDtPwvX1YK1fcLf+wDR0r+Xk dpHpwi3k28vNOWEqMi76IIrNVcIs5pnZfrJOhs2nmJ3ZHrJesNkT4nrjyCZjMLXz6QYm Fs0n/Ri7/TPaPTX3TGobZ/CaD7gRhUIdoKoihDF+WXfd5gbI+ESsMX6BMTpUMkR61Z2u nPrQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8ppgHyZmnC8zpYi+g0IOdjRUKtDLxTIBzmlxAAq/nL8=; b=iFoxdGoiPg5eJ/YK60O1nYEXbkOQU6WC0BEPMwhz7wtp9nSsBRat5kCB9RtI+JtRGw /ElPVG/19JEdvrpIOAJnPSneuCqitpznbgVnEbO0GACxi/mNcbZfXxGr9/fvTUpOoWFk 42ZnpxKdNAEsU3tk+9ORjJpDyQzLKxt304nsnF5WbNhrsVBYC2KCS+p8A+lz95uCF5fa D7uW8XorEPe3dDwuyZt1xSGA5+IQuUgg4+Gjav+Z7J4yXxgPwBwRbZ74l2gERmNzKn12 N+4Zm4pYyQrhZPRum2+caSHRL9J7sX9SJbdn6YU742bAlev5TJRr7D3C3A+lFoCfr5b8 dNTw== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNxo3RG9dwbWCGk9NOFnjhZX2hH4DkC1bfV7FWIYAkYo2iz3L7QNWcnXHc8Y7rDhicM4+HMsg3G5XnWEQ== X-Received: by 10.194.89.228 with SMTP id br4mr7971214wjb.187.1472635495622; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 02:24:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.60.51 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 02:24:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8A502F2D-E7EC-4497-9BF1-1295E1F21A02@pi.nu> References: <8A502F2D-E7EC-4497-9BF1-1295E1F21A02@pi.nu> From: Robert Raszuk Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 11:24:54 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: E4g6pGvmRxeCp6mHJjq94JPtYwE Message-ID: To: Eric Rosen Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bf10ada99bf81053b5aab27 Archived-At: Cc: idr wg , "mpls@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" , Loa Andersson Subject: Re: [bess] [Idr] Fwd: [mpls] Working Group adoption poll on draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:24:59 -0000 --047d7bf10ada99bf81053b5aab27 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Eric, While adoption call is sort of encouragement for further input before I respond to Loa's mail I would like to get one additional answer from 3107bis authors and WGs members. Those who spend years in mpls deployment know quite well that the biggest issue with today's 3107 deployment is lack of the clear definition of its interaction with SAFI-1. While one would hope that 3107bis with new capability will clean this mess section 5 of your document rather sweeps it all under the carpet stating that it is just local policy. IMO it is not a matter of local policy nor it is implementation detail. Local policy can be to choose which RIB (or sequence of RIBs) should be used for resolution of specific SAFIs and not how to mix SAFI-1 with SAFI-4. It's not a local matter at all to have deployment resulting in inconsistent IBGP best paths across given domain. To me cleanest is to separate those two SAFIs completely from each other by the spec both in BGP (done) as well as local RIB and FIB/LFIB. Likewise I do not quite agree that SAFI-4 should be "convertible" to SAFI-1. And we all realize that opposite direction is rather hard. Another perhaps minor clarification would be to get an explicit confirmation that SAFI-4 can be recursive over SAFI-4 or for that matter SAFI-1 (MPLS in GRE or SR in IP). Thx, R. --047d7bf10ada99bf81053b5aab27 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Eric,

While adoption call is sort of encouragement for fur= ther input before I respond to Loa's mail I would like to get one addit= ional answer from 3107bis authors and WGs members.=C2=A0

Those who spend years in mpls deployment= know quite well that the biggest issue with today's 3107 deployment is= lack of the clear definition of its interaction with SAFI-1. While one wou= ld hope that 3107bis with new capability will clean this mess section 5 of = your document rather sweeps it all under the carpet stating that it is just= local policy. IMO it is not a matter of local policy nor it is implementat= ion detail.=C2=A0

Loca= l policy can be to choose which RIB (or sequence of RIBs) should be used fo= r resolution of specific SAFIs and not how to mix SAFI-1 with SAFI-4. It= 9;s not a local matter at all to have deployment resulting in inconsistent = IBGP best paths across given domain.=C2=A0

To me cleanest is to separate those two SAFIs complete= ly from each other by the spec both in BGP (done) as well as local RIB and = FIB/LFIB.=C2=A0

Likewi= se I do not quite agree that SAFI-4 should be "convertible" to SA= FI-1. And we all realize that opposite direction is rather hard.=C2=A0

Another perhaps minor clar= ification would be to get an explicit confirmation that SAFI-4 can be recur= sive over SAFI-4 or for that matter SAFI-1 (MPLS in GRE or SR in IP).=C2=A0=

Thx,
R.

--047d7bf10ada99bf81053b5aab27-- From nobody Wed Aug 31 07:37:30 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEA912DB8D; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 07:37:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.049 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.049 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kO5HmydG3n7n; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 07:37:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF7FC12DCAB; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 07:15:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=11345; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1472652905; x=1473862505; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=CvM5Q8KFKzcjkuzN9CMh0R/5Ca4qBk9jNLU2/cZ8cMA=; b=CgXq+qzV+2DFz5aLCvffLUZKYZJVD1kvPvmY8rqEEcmBi7s0nWjCDPxe b7Ap5N/VI7FosiybfbYgzz07KvJLWHM9jxVT/sd71kYrP2kVcKAQuGwOm dbIOFzA3zBnKF0aadac9T/H8A5y8KoJLow3oNUE9tEH94Vp6arS+W3j3b c=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0D4AgAY5sZX/5xdJa1dgxozAQEBAQEeg?= =?us-ascii?q?VMHg0CvUoUNggGGHQIcgS04FAECAQEBAQEBAV4nhGEBAQUjVhACAQgRAwECKAM?= =?us-ascii?q?CAgIwFAkIAgQBDQUbiCuuZI8jAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHIl5gQOEI?= =?us-ascii?q?wEBO4JigloFmVABjy+PV4xIg3gBHjaCeoE1cIRNgSB/AQEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,262,1470700800"; d="scan'208,217";a="147426382" Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 31 Aug 2016 14:15:04 +0000 Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7VEF2kl003951 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 31 Aug 2016 14:15:04 GMT Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 10:15:02 -0400 Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 10:15:02 -0400 From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" To: Robert Raszuk , Eric Rosen Thread-Topic: [mpls] [Idr] Fwd: Working Group adoption poll on draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis Thread-Index: AQHSA2mTmZjCk1nk8UG09DsTehNMO6BjHUgA Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 14:15:01 +0000 Message-ID: References: <8A502F2D-E7EC-4497-9BF1-1295E1F21A02@pi.nu> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D3EC5D037C805aceeciscocom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: idr wg , "bess@ietf.org" , "mpls@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] [mpls] [Idr] Fwd: Working Group adoption poll on draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 14:37:28 -0000 --_000_D3EC5D037C805aceeciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGkgUm9iZXJ0LA0KDQpDdXJyZW50bHksIGV2ZXJ5dGhpbmcgaW4gZHJhZnQtcm9zZW4tbXBscy1y ZmMzMTA3YmlzIGlzIHByZXR0eSBtdWNoIGJhY2t3YXJkIGNvbXBhdGlibGUgd2l0aCBvdXIgbW9y ZSB0aGFuIGEgZGVjYWRlIG9sZCBSRkMgMzEwNyBpbXBsZW1lbnRhdGlvbnMgYW5kIGRlcGxveW1l bnRzLiBXaGF0IHlvdSBhcmUgcHJvcG9zaW5nIGlzIG5vdCBhbmQgaGFzIGltcGxpY2F0aW9ucyBp biBib3RoIHRoZSBjb250cm9sIGFuZCBmb3J3YXJkaW5nIHBsYW5lcy4gSWYgeW91IHJlYWxseSBi ZWxpZXZlIHRoYXQgdGhpcyBpcyDigJx0aGUgYmlnZ2VzdCBpc3N1ZSIsIEnigJlkIHN1Z2dlc3Qg eW91IGFydGljdWxhdGUgaXQgaW4gYSBzZXBhcmF0ZSBkcmFmdCB3aXRoIGNvbmNyZXRlIHVzZSBj YXNlcyBmb3IgaGF2aW5nIHNlcGFyYXRlIElQIGFuZCBNUExTIHRvcG9sb2dpZXMgZm9yIHRoZSBz YW1lIHNldCBvZiBwcmVmaXhlcy4gVGhlbiB0aGUgV0dzIGNhbiBldmFsdWF0ZSB0aGUgcmVxdWly ZW1lbnQgYW5kIHByb3Bvc2VkIHNvbHV0aW9uIGluZGVwZW5kZW50IG9mIFJGQyAzMTA3IEJJUy4N Cg0KVGhhbmtzLA0KQWNlZQ0KDQpGcm9tOiBtcGxzIDxtcGxzLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmc8bWFp bHRvOm1wbHMtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZz4+IG9uIGJlaGFsZiBvZiBSb2JlcnQgUmFzenVrIDxy b2JlcnRAcmFzenVrLm5ldDxtYWlsdG86cm9iZXJ0QHJhc3p1ay5uZXQ+Pg0KRGF0ZTogV2VkbmVz ZGF5LCBBdWd1c3QgMzEsIDIwMTYgYXQgNToyNCBBTQ0KVG86IEVyaWMgQyBSb3NlbiA8ZXJvc2Vu QGp1bmlwZXIubmV0PG1haWx0bzplcm9zZW5AanVuaXBlci5uZXQ+Pg0KQ2M6IElEUiBMaXN0IDxp ZHJAaWV0Zi5vcmc8bWFpbHRvOmlkckBpZXRmLm9yZz4+LCAibXBsc0BpZXRmLm9yZzxtYWlsdG86 bXBsc0BpZXRmLm9yZz4iIDxtcGxzQGlldGYub3JnPG1haWx0bzptcGxzQGlldGYub3JnPj4sICJi ZXNzQGlldGYub3JnPG1haWx0bzpiZXNzQGlldGYub3JnPiIgPGJlc3NAaWV0Zi5vcmc8bWFpbHRv OmJlc3NAaWV0Zi5vcmc+Pg0KU3ViamVjdDogUmU6IFttcGxzXSBbSWRyXSBGd2Q6IFdvcmtpbmcg R3JvdXAgYWRvcHRpb24gcG9sbCBvbiBkcmFmdC1yb3Nlbi1tcGxzLXJmYzMxMDdiaXMNCg0KSGkg RXJpYywNCg0KV2hpbGUgYWRvcHRpb24gY2FsbCBpcyBzb3J0IG9mIGVuY291cmFnZW1lbnQgZm9y IGZ1cnRoZXIgaW5wdXQgYmVmb3JlIEkgcmVzcG9uZCB0byBMb2EncyBtYWlsIEkgd291bGQgbGlr ZSB0byBnZXQgb25lIGFkZGl0aW9uYWwgYW5zd2VyIGZyb20gMzEwN2JpcyBhdXRob3JzIGFuZCBX R3MgbWVtYmVycy4NCg0KVGhvc2Ugd2hvIHNwZW5kIHllYXJzIGluIG1wbHMgZGVwbG95bWVudCBr bm93IHF1aXRlIHdlbGwgdGhhdCB0aGUgYmlnZ2VzdCBpc3N1ZSB3aXRoIHRvZGF5J3MgMzEwNyBk ZXBsb3ltZW50IGlzIGxhY2sgb2YgdGhlIGNsZWFyIGRlZmluaXRpb24gb2YgaXRzIGludGVyYWN0 aW9uIHdpdGggU0FGSS0xLiBXaGlsZSBvbmUgd291bGQgaG9wZSB0aGF0IDMxMDdiaXMgd2l0aCBu ZXcgY2FwYWJpbGl0eSB3aWxsIGNsZWFuIHRoaXMgbWVzcyBzZWN0aW9uIDUgb2YgeW91ciBkb2N1 bWVudCByYXRoZXIgc3dlZXBzIGl0IGFsbCB1bmRlciB0aGUgY2FycGV0IHN0YXRpbmcgdGhhdCBp dCBpcyBqdXN0IGxvY2FsIHBvbGljeS4gSU1PIGl0IGlzIG5vdCBhIG1hdHRlciBvZiBsb2NhbCBw b2xpY3kgbm9yIGl0IGlzIGltcGxlbWVudGF0aW9uIGRldGFpbC4NCg0KTG9jYWwgcG9saWN5IGNh biBiZSB0byBjaG9vc2Ugd2hpY2ggUklCIChvciBzZXF1ZW5jZSBvZiBSSUJzKSBzaG91bGQgYmUg dXNlZCBmb3IgcmVzb2x1dGlvbiBvZiBzcGVjaWZpYyBTQUZJcyBhbmQgbm90IGhvdyB0byBtaXgg U0FGSS0xIHdpdGggU0FGSS00LiBJdCdzIG5vdCBhIGxvY2FsIG1hdHRlciBhdCBhbGwgdG8gaGF2 ZSBkZXBsb3ltZW50IHJlc3VsdGluZyBpbiBpbmNvbnNpc3RlbnQgSUJHUCBiZXN0IHBhdGhzIGFj cm9zcyBnaXZlbiBkb21haW4uDQoNClRvIG1lIGNsZWFuZXN0IGlzIHRvIHNlcGFyYXRlIHRob3Nl IHR3byBTQUZJcyBjb21wbGV0ZWx5IGZyb20gZWFjaCBvdGhlciBieSB0aGUgc3BlYyBib3RoIGlu IEJHUCAoZG9uZSkgYXMgd2VsbCBhcyBsb2NhbCBSSUIgYW5kIEZJQi9MRklCLg0KDQpMaWtld2lz ZSBJIGRvIG5vdCBxdWl0ZSBhZ3JlZSB0aGF0IFNBRkktNCBzaG91bGQgYmUgImNvbnZlcnRpYmxl IiB0byBTQUZJLTEuIEFuZCB3ZSBhbGwgcmVhbGl6ZSB0aGF0IG9wcG9zaXRlIGRpcmVjdGlvbiBp cyByYXRoZXIgaGFyZC4NCg0KQW5vdGhlciBwZXJoYXBzIG1pbm9yIGNsYXJpZmljYXRpb24gd291 bGQgYmUgdG8gZ2V0IGFuIGV4cGxpY2l0IGNvbmZpcm1hdGlvbiB0aGF0IFNBRkktNCBjYW4gYmUg cmVjdXJzaXZlIG92ZXIgU0FGSS00IG9yIGZvciB0aGF0IG1hdHRlciBTQUZJLTEgKE1QTFMgaW4g R1JFIG9yIFNSIGluIElQKS4NCg0KVGh4LA0KUi4NCg0K --_000_D3EC5D037C805aceeciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWw+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxtZXRhIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIgY29udGVudD0i dGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij4NCjwvaGVhZD4NCjxib2R5IHN0eWxlPSJ3b3JkLXdy YXA6IGJyZWFrLXdvcmQ7IC13ZWJraXQtbmJzcC1tb2RlOiBzcGFjZTsgLXdlYmtpdC1saW5lLWJy ZWFrOiBhZnRlci13aGl0ZS1zcGFjZTsgY29sb3I6IHJnYigwLCAwLCAwKTsgZm9udC1zaXplOiAx NHB4OyBmb250LWZhbWlseTogQ2FsaWJyaSwgc2Fucy1zZXJpZjsiPg0KPGRpdj5IaSBSb2JlcnQs Jm5ic3A7PC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pjxicj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj5DdXJyZW50bHksIGV2ZXJ5dGhp bmcgaW4gZHJhZnQtcm9zZW4tbXBscy1yZmMzMTA3YmlzIGlzIHByZXR0eSBtdWNoIGJhY2t3YXJk IGNvbXBhdGlibGUgd2l0aCBvdXIgbW9yZSB0aGFuIGEgZGVjYWRlIG9sZCBSRkMgMzEwNyBpbXBs ZW1lbnRhdGlvbnMgYW5kIGRlcGxveW1lbnRzLiBXaGF0IHlvdSBhcmUgcHJvcG9zaW5nIGlzIG5v dCBhbmQgaGFzIGltcGxpY2F0aW9ucyBpbiBib3RoIHRoZSBjb250cm9sIGFuZCBmb3J3YXJkaW5n IHBsYW5lcy4NCiBJZiB5b3UgcmVhbGx5IGJlbGlldmUgdGhhdCB0aGlzIGlzIOKAnHRoZSBiaWdn ZXN0IGlzc3VlJnF1b3Q7LCBJ4oCZZCBzdWdnZXN0IHlvdSBhcnRpY3VsYXRlIGl0IGluIGEgc2Vw YXJhdGUgZHJhZnQgd2l0aCBjb25jcmV0ZSB1c2UgY2FzZXMgZm9yIGhhdmluZyBzZXBhcmF0ZSBJ UCBhbmQgTVBMUyB0b3BvbG9naWVzIGZvciB0aGUgc2FtZSBzZXQgb2YgcHJlZml4ZXMuIFRoZW4g dGhlIFdHcyBjYW4gZXZhbHVhdGUgdGhlIHJlcXVpcmVtZW50IGFuZCBwcm9wb3NlZA0KIHNvbHV0 aW9uIGluZGVwZW5kZW50IG9mIFJGQyAzMTA3IEJJUy4mbmJzcDs8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+PGJyPg0K PC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2PlRoYW5rcyw8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+QWNlZTwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj48YnI+DQo8 L2Rpdj4NCjxzcGFuIGlkPSJPTEtfU1JDX0JPRFlfU0VDVElPTiI+DQo8ZGl2IHN0eWxlPSJmb250 LWZhbWlseTpDYWxpYnJpOyBmb250LXNpemU6MTFwdDsgdGV4dC1hbGlnbjpsZWZ0OyBjb2xvcjpi bGFjazsgQk9SREVSLUJPVFRPTTogbWVkaXVtIG5vbmU7IEJPUkRFUi1MRUZUOiBtZWRpdW0gbm9u ZTsgUEFERElORy1CT1RUT006IDBpbjsgUEFERElORy1MRUZUOiAwaW47IFBBRERJTkctUklHSFQ6 IDBpbjsgQk9SREVSLVRPUDogI2I1YzRkZiAxcHQgc29saWQ7IEJPUkRFUi1SSUdIVDogbWVkaXVt IG5vbmU7IFBBRERJTkctVE9QOiAzcHQiPg0KPHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0OmJvbGQi PkZyb206IDwvc3Bhbj5tcGxzICZsdDs8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86bXBscy1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYu b3JnIj5tcGxzLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmc8L2E+Jmd0OyBvbiBiZWhhbGYgb2YgUm9iZXJ0IFJh c3p1ayAmbHQ7PGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOnJvYmVydEByYXN6dWsubmV0Ij5yb2JlcnRAcmFzenVr Lm5ldDwvYT4mZ3Q7PGJyPg0KPHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0OmJvbGQiPkRhdGU6IDwv c3Bhbj5XZWRuZXNkYXksIEF1Z3VzdCAzMSwgMjAxNiBhdCA1OjI0IEFNPGJyPg0KPHNwYW4gc3R5 bGU9ImZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0OmJvbGQiPlRvOiA8L3NwYW4+RXJpYyBDIFJvc2VuICZsdDs8YSBocmVm PSJtYWlsdG86ZXJvc2VuQGp1bmlwZXIubmV0Ij5lcm9zZW5AanVuaXBlci5uZXQ8L2E+Jmd0Ozxi cj4NCjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXdlaWdodDpib2xkIj5DYzogPC9zcGFuPklEUiBMaXN0ICZs dDs8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86aWRyQGlldGYub3JnIj5pZHJAaWV0Zi5vcmc8L2E+Jmd0OywgJnF1 b3Q7PGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOm1wbHNAaWV0Zi5vcmciPm1wbHNAaWV0Zi5vcmc8L2E+JnF1b3Q7 ICZsdDs8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86bXBsc0BpZXRmLm9yZyI+bXBsc0BpZXRmLm9yZzwvYT4mZ3Q7 LCAmcXVvdDs8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86YmVzc0BpZXRmLm9yZyI+YmVzc0BpZXRmLm9yZzwvYT4m cXVvdDsgJmx0OzxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpiZXNzQGlldGYub3JnIj5iZXNzQGlldGYub3JnPC9h PiZndDs8YnI+DQo8c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC13ZWlnaHQ6Ym9sZCI+U3ViamVjdDogPC9zcGFu PlJlOiBbbXBsc10gW0lkcl0gRndkOiBXb3JraW5nIEdyb3VwIGFkb3B0aW9uIHBvbGwgb24gZHJh ZnQtcm9zZW4tbXBscy1yZmMzMTA3YmlzPGJyPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pjxicj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0K PGJsb2NrcXVvdGUgaWQ9Ik1BQ19PVVRMT09LX0FUVFJJQlVUSU9OX0JMT0NLUVVPVEUiIHN0eWxl PSJCT1JERVItTEVGVDogI2I1YzRkZiA1IHNvbGlkOyBQQURESU5HOjAgMCAwIDU7IE1BUkdJTjow IDAgMCA1OyI+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxkaXYgZGlyPSJsdHIiPg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iZ21h aWxfZGVmYXVsdCIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFsLGhlbHZldGljYSxzYW5zLXNlcmlm O2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpzbWFsbCI+DQpIaSBFcmljLDwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iZ21haWxfZGVm YXVsdCIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFsLGhlbHZldGljYSxzYW5zLXNlcmlmO2ZvbnQt c2l6ZTpzbWFsbCI+DQo8YnI+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9ImdtYWlsX2RlZmF1bHQiIHN0 eWxlPSJmb250LWZhbWlseTphcmlhbCxoZWx2ZXRpY2Esc2Fucy1zZXJpZjtmb250LXNpemU6c21h bGwiPg0KV2hpbGUgYWRvcHRpb24gY2FsbCBpcyBzb3J0IG9mIGVuY291cmFnZW1lbnQgZm9yIGZ1 cnRoZXIgaW5wdXQgYmVmb3JlIEkgcmVzcG9uZCB0byBMb2EncyBtYWlsIEkgd291bGQgbGlrZSB0 byBnZXQgb25lIGFkZGl0aW9uYWwgYW5zd2VyIGZyb20gMzEwN2JpcyBhdXRob3JzIGFuZCBXR3Mg bWVtYmVycy4mbmJzcDs8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9ImdtYWlsX2RlZmF1bHQiIHN0eWxlPSJm b250LWZhbWlseTphcmlhbCxoZWx2ZXRpY2Esc2Fucy1zZXJpZjtmb250LXNpemU6c21hbGwiPg0K PGJyPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJnbWFpbF9kZWZhdWx0IiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1mYW1p bHk6YXJpYWwsaGVsdmV0aWNhLHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7Zm9udC1zaXplOnNtYWxsIj4NClRob3NlIHdo byBzcGVuZCB5ZWFycyBpbiBtcGxzIGRlcGxveW1lbnQga25vdyBxdWl0ZSB3ZWxsIHRoYXQgdGhl IGJpZ2dlc3QgaXNzdWUgd2l0aCB0b2RheSdzIDMxMDcgZGVwbG95bWVudCBpcyBsYWNrIG9mIHRo ZSBjbGVhciBkZWZpbml0aW9uIG9mIGl0cyBpbnRlcmFjdGlvbiB3aXRoIFNBRkktMS4gV2hpbGUg b25lIHdvdWxkIGhvcGUgdGhhdCAzMTA3YmlzIHdpdGggbmV3IGNhcGFiaWxpdHkgd2lsbCBjbGVh biB0aGlzIG1lc3Mgc2VjdGlvbiA1DQogb2YgeW91ciBkb2N1bWVudCByYXRoZXIgc3dlZXBzIGl0 IGFsbCB1bmRlciB0aGUgY2FycGV0IHN0YXRpbmcgdGhhdCBpdCBpcyBqdXN0IGxvY2FsIHBvbGlj eS4gSU1PIGl0IGlzIG5vdCBhIG1hdHRlciBvZiBsb2NhbCBwb2xpY3kgbm9yIGl0IGlzIGltcGxl bWVudGF0aW9uIGRldGFpbC4mbmJzcDs8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9ImdtYWlsX2RlZmF1bHQi IHN0eWxlPSJmb250LWZhbWlseTphcmlhbCxoZWx2ZXRpY2Esc2Fucy1zZXJpZjtmb250LXNpemU6 c21hbGwiPg0KPGJyPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJnbWFpbF9kZWZhdWx0IiBzdHlsZT0i Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6YXJpYWwsaGVsdmV0aWNhLHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7Zm9udC1zaXplOnNtYWxsIj4N CkxvY2FsIHBvbGljeSBjYW4gYmUgdG8gY2hvb3NlIHdoaWNoIFJJQiAob3Igc2VxdWVuY2Ugb2Yg UklCcykgc2hvdWxkIGJlIHVzZWQgZm9yIHJlc29sdXRpb24gb2Ygc3BlY2lmaWMgU0FGSXMgYW5k IG5vdCBob3cgdG8gbWl4IFNBRkktMSB3aXRoIFNBRkktNC4gSXQncyBub3QgYSBsb2NhbCBtYXR0 ZXIgYXQgYWxsIHRvIGhhdmUgZGVwbG95bWVudCByZXN1bHRpbmcgaW4gaW5jb25zaXN0ZW50IElC R1AgYmVzdCBwYXRocyBhY3Jvc3MgZ2l2ZW4gZG9tYWluLiZuYnNwOzwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBjbGFz cz0iZ21haWxfZGVmYXVsdCIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFsLGhlbHZldGljYSxzYW5z LXNlcmlmO2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpzbWFsbCI+DQo8YnI+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9ImdtYWls X2RlZmF1bHQiIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LWZhbWlseTphcmlhbCxoZWx2ZXRpY2Esc2Fucy1zZXJpZjtm b250LXNpemU6c21hbGwiPg0KVG8gbWUgY2xlYW5lc3QgaXMgdG8gc2VwYXJhdGUgdGhvc2UgdHdv IFNBRklzIGNvbXBsZXRlbHkgZnJvbSBlYWNoIG90aGVyIGJ5IHRoZSBzcGVjIGJvdGggaW4gQkdQ IChkb25lKSBhcyB3ZWxsIGFzIGxvY2FsIFJJQiBhbmQgRklCL0xGSUIuJm5ic3A7PC9kaXY+DQo8 ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJnbWFpbF9kZWZhdWx0IiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6YXJpYWwsaGVsdmV0 aWNhLHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7Zm9udC1zaXplOnNtYWxsIj4NCjxicj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBjbGFz cz0iZ21haWxfZGVmYXVsdCIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFsLGhlbHZldGljYSxzYW5z LXNlcmlmO2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpzbWFsbCI+DQpMaWtld2lzZSBJIGRvIG5vdCBxdWl0ZSBhZ3JlZSB0 aGF0IFNBRkktNCBzaG91bGQgYmUgJnF1b3Q7Y29udmVydGlibGUmcXVvdDsgdG8gU0FGSS0xLiBB bmQgd2UgYWxsIHJlYWxpemUgdGhhdCBvcHBvc2l0ZSBkaXJlY3Rpb24gaXMgcmF0aGVyIGhhcmQu Jm5ic3A7PC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJnbWFpbF9kZWZhdWx0IiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1mYW1p bHk6YXJpYWwsaGVsdmV0aWNhLHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7Zm9udC1zaXplOnNtYWxsIj4NCjxicj4NCjwv ZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iZ21haWxfZGVmYXVsdCIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFs LGhlbHZldGljYSxzYW5zLXNlcmlmO2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpzbWFsbCI+DQpBbm90aGVyIHBlcmhhcHMg bWlub3IgY2xhcmlmaWNhdGlvbiB3b3VsZCBiZSB0byBnZXQgYW4gZXhwbGljaXQgY29uZmlybWF0 aW9uIHRoYXQgU0FGSS00IGNhbiBiZSByZWN1cnNpdmUgb3ZlciBTQUZJLTQgb3IgZm9yIHRoYXQg bWF0dGVyIFNBRkktMSAoTVBMUyBpbiBHUkUgb3IgU1IgaW4gSVApLiZuYnNwOzwvZGl2Pg0KPGRp diBjbGFzcz0iZ21haWxfZGVmYXVsdCIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFsLGhlbHZldGlj YSxzYW5zLXNlcmlmO2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpzbWFsbCI+DQo8YnI+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9 ImdtYWlsX2RlZmF1bHQiIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LWZhbWlseTphcmlhbCxoZWx2ZXRpY2Esc2Fucy1z ZXJpZjtmb250LXNpemU6c21hbGwiPg0KVGh4LDxicj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iZ21h aWxfZGVmYXVsdCIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFsLGhlbHZldGljYSxzYW5zLXNlcmlm O2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpzbWFsbCI+DQpSLjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iZ21haWxfZGVmYXVsdCIg c3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFsLGhlbHZldGljYSxzYW5zLXNlcmlmO2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpz bWFsbCI+DQo8YnI+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvYmxvY2txdW90 ZT4NCjwvc3Bhbj4NCjwvYm9keT4NCjwvaHRtbD4NCg== --_000_D3EC5D037C805aceeciscocom_-- From nobody Wed Aug 31 08:10:41 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0952F12D62A; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 08:10:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.597 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p8hIxlgjk1R2; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 08:10:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com (mail-wm0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FCB012DCB7; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 07:40:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id 1so44958813wmz.1; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 07:40:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=DtQ5YJ9lnCmuiCEeJPrq9bckvr1B0A+vJi0Or0e5PsU=; b=0HtzafiuUBJKP6aFGESp9BdNs+LqK03BhUFzZy+tv3/GGo1H31IDVRNpjVGrpkNQHe qF4CmEygfmGjJpXanVha6hP28D6zVAVd3uLbl5VS1PFYKgD8YIsNMhqUB3GsfmtDHSyC A/F7qgF/oELlsCzp04JuoDUVGpqWDCwoFzYRpoBcaef9mTVo6LYmAJkHg+16Ua2SgE9r gB/AJ/4vJN9gHIBBrZupSWSnrh64x0kO2rDFsu7SEEe1AwwqvYVINsNVhDWm55Q0Co1a NeXs2sl9fN/7/n3xGSmtJ8Xz+VanwgYQl3r17RdwtcpKZ8bNwVjfCfGQohg3MKifnH7G +EGg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DtQ5YJ9lnCmuiCEeJPrq9bckvr1B0A+vJi0Or0e5PsU=; b=f3MPG1WJui/a12qciH9MQfrv/npuDDD6FQB+XQjNOo2sE9gZWHXzfwGP7IQDt6az8Z unbo/yZedcwpH53QUbfgQHcxPR45k5Jc/Iq9PJDThQ8kTYEiGfHxzegdYqsyS9Y2zDm2 FgMWJRCbC1XnAGCtF8dmFibckf7GksSdGDq640acKaa2y+SjM/QhjDLBMLzv7qeZ/DI1 OZe4lc5RKWJitPVZZPGmYvxQj2DWI4caZOVTLfDdgpseUhtH7pW58inLXT+pTgNNNirB FA5Mi+Gl4D+pM8W8HQr5mps2QwnudEgduvYR9MxqI634sqnBIxGZqXiB4kMSaSjYAfm5 lstA== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOTP5gX7qF3l3HadcWuXhpfzpel/RUzBkbNIu4n3B4BcJTQBYuGiNEGiJDuTuGo5gxQF0DwFazD1D9dVA== X-Received: by 10.194.89.228 with SMTP id br4mr9322896wjb.187.1472654424286; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 07:40:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.60.51 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 07:40:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8A502F2D-E7EC-4497-9BF1-1295E1F21A02@pi.nu> From: Robert Raszuk Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:40:23 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: sz8SfHH0JA60m8ByIZNA0wGBzlw Message-ID: To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bf10adad64b5e053b5f1321 Archived-At: Cc: idr wg , "bess@ietf.org" , Eric Rosen , "mpls@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] [mpls] [Idr] Fwd: Working Group adoption poll on draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 15:10:40 -0000 --047d7bf10adad64b5e053b5f1321 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Acee, There is no issue for compatibility as new proposal has its new BGP capability hence there is no issue with deploying it gradually. Yes it requires new RIB work for those implementations which today use single RIB for both SAFI 1 and SAFI 4. FIB and LFIB are already separate. Each SAFI in BGP also normally has it's own separate tables. So if anything it requires a bit of cleanup work. Main motivation here would be to help new vendors to make the unified choice in how they will implement 3107bis so long term we get some consistent way SAFI 4 is delivered. And if now at the "bis" rfc is not a good time then what you are really advocating is to stay for years to come with such undefined randomness across implementations. Other then consistency I also see folks trying to use labeled BGP as controller to network device protocol to install labels. For that use case alone complete separation from SAFI 1 is very helpful. Thx, R. On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > Hi Robert, > > Currently, everything in draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis is pretty much > backward compatible with our more than a decade old RFC 3107 > implementations and deployments. What you are proposing is not and has > implications in both the control and forwarding planes. If you really > believe that this is =E2=80=9Cthe biggest issue", I=E2=80=99d suggest you= articulate it in > a separate draft with concrete use cases for having separate IP and MPLS > topologies for the same set of prefixes. Then the WGs can evaluate the > requirement and proposed solution independent of RFC 3107 BIS. > > Thanks, > Acee > > From: mpls on behalf of Robert Raszuk < > robert@raszuk.net> > Date: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 at 5:24 AM > To: Eric C Rosen > Cc: IDR List , "mpls@ietf.org" , " > bess@ietf.org" > Subject: Re: [mpls] [Idr] Fwd: Working Group adoption poll on > draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis > > Hi Eric, > > While adoption call is sort of encouragement for further input before I > respond to Loa's mail I would like to get one additional answer from > 3107bis authors and WGs members. > > Those who spend years in mpls deployment know quite well that the biggest > issue with today's 3107 deployment is lack of the clear definition of its > interaction with SAFI-1. While one would hope that 3107bis with new > capability will clean this mess section 5 of your document rather sweeps = it > all under the carpet stating that it is just local policy. IMO it is not = a > matter of local policy nor it is implementation detail. > > Local policy can be to choose which RIB (or sequence of RIBs) should be > used for resolution of specific SAFIs and not how to mix SAFI-1 with > SAFI-4. It's not a local matter at all to have deployment resulting in > inconsistent IBGP best paths across given domain. > > To me cleanest is to separate those two SAFIs completely from each other > by the spec both in BGP (done) as well as local RIB and FIB/LFIB. > > Likewise I do not quite agree that SAFI-4 should be "convertible" to > SAFI-1. And we all realize that opposite direction is rather hard. > > Another perhaps minor clarification would be to get an explicit > confirmation that SAFI-4 can be recursive over SAFI-4 or for that matter > SAFI-1 (MPLS in GRE or SR in IP). > > Thx, > R. > > --047d7bf10adad64b5e053b5f1321 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Acee,

There is no issue for compatibility as new proposal = has its new BGP capability hence there is no issue with deploying it gradua= lly.=C2=A0

Yes it requ= ires new RIB work for those implementations which today use single RIB for = both SAFI 1 and SAFI 4. FIB and LFIB are already separate. Each SAFI in BGP= also normally has it's own separate tables. So if anything it requires= a bit of cleanup work.=C2=A0

Main motivation here would be to help new vendors to make the unif= ied choice in how they will implement 3107bis so long term we get some cons= istent way SAFI 4 is delivered. And if now at the "bis" rfc is no= t a good time then what you are really advocating is to stay for years to c= ome with such undefined randomness across implementations.=C2=A0

Other then consistency I also se= e folks trying to use labeled BGP as controller to network device protocol = to install labels. For that use case alone complete separation from SAFI 1 = is very helpful.=C2=A0

Thx,
R.



On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com= > wrote:
Hi Robert,=C2=A0

Currently, everything in draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis is pretty much ba= ckward compatible with our more than a decade old RFC 3107 implementations = and deployments. What you are proposing is not and has implications in both= the control and forwarding planes. If you really believe that this is =E2=80=9Cthe biggest issue", I=E2= =80=99d suggest you articulate it in a separate draft with concrete use cas= es for having separate IP and MPLS topologies for the same set of prefixes.= Then the WGs can evaluate the requirement and proposed solution independent of RFC 3107 BIS.=C2=A0

Thanks,
Acee

From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> on beh= alf of Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 at= 5:24 AM
To: Eric C Rosen <erosen@juniper.net>
Cc: IDR List <idr@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [Idr] Fwd: Work= ing Group adoption poll on draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis

Hi Eric,

While adoption call is sort of encouragement for further input before I res= pond to Loa's mail I would like to get one additional answer from 3107b= is authors and WGs members.=C2=A0

Those who spend years in mpls deployment know quite well that the biggest i= ssue with today's 3107 deployment is lack of the clear definition of it= s interaction with SAFI-1. While one would hope that 3107bis with new capab= ility will clean this mess section 5 of your document rather sweeps it all under the carpet stating that it is = just local policy. IMO it is not a matter of local policy nor it is impleme= ntation detail.=C2=A0

Local policy can be to choose which RIB (or sequence of RIBs) should be use= d for resolution of specific SAFIs and not how to mix SAFI-1 with SAFI-4. I= t's not a local matter at all to have deployment resulting in inconsist= ent IBGP best paths across given domain.=C2=A0

To me cleanest is to separate those two SAFIs completely from each other by= the spec both in BGP (done) as well as local RIB and FIB/LFIB.=C2=A0

Likewise I do not quite agree that SAFI-4 should be "convertible"= to SAFI-1. And we all realize that opposite direction is rather hard.=C2= =A0

Another perhaps minor clarification would be to get an explicit confirmatio= n that SAFI-4 can be recursive over SAFI-4 or for that matter SAFI-1 (MPLS = in GRE or SR in IP).=C2=A0

Thx,
R.

--047d7bf10adad64b5e053b5f1321-- From nobody Wed Aug 31 16:41:06 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD70912D74E; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:41:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.068 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.068 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PXiz7e0pmsyH; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:40:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54E5112D743; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:40:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=24281; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1472686859; x=1473896459; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=bZxW4XbQzLbooaITQpYLX3X/ouxSrCOnHIjCoYrbqF8=; b=NsNv+dVIhKi/kZfu9RyCFI6l4C7B4zDm6e+40FcBtzhb58Jtnintf0re llqXoVRncMHNRn3uLBJhhGH3d3VW3B2KVgUOtbcLCv3B58NHKJYLs5fGj ZrwlyciNBoXuVnYj+uNDnFobFbGA+Aakui1iWoGUmUBM6I/8BsIAFBRcR o=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DGAgDtacdX/4cNJK1dgx0zAQEBAQEeg?= =?us-ascii?q?VMHq2yHKIUNggGGHAIcgS04FAECAQEBAQEBAV4nhGEBAQUjVhACAQgRAwECKAM?= =?us-ascii?q?CAgIfERQJCAIEDgUbiBMDF659iTYNgy8BAQEBAQEBAwEBAQEBAQEBAR6JeYEDg?= =?us-ascii?q?kOBYAEBO4JigloFmRw0AYxdglOPV4g/hAmDeAEeNoJ8gTVwhE2BIH8BAQE?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,264,1470700800"; d="scan'208,217";a="143997263" Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 31 Aug 2016 23:40:58 +0000 Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7VNevkK027951 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 31 Aug 2016 23:40:57 GMT Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 19:40:57 -0400 Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 19:40:56 -0400 From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" To: Robert Raszuk Thread-Topic: [mpls] [Idr] Fwd: Working Group adoption poll on draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis Thread-Index: AQHSA2mTmZjCk1nk8UG09DsTehNMO6BjHUgAgABKKICAAFP3AA== Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 23:40:56 +0000 Message-ID: References: <8A502F2D-E7EC-4497-9BF1-1295E1F21A02@pi.nu> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D3ECD8487C9C7aceeciscocom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: idr wg , "bess@ietf.org" , Eric Rosen , "mpls@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] [mpls] [Idr] Fwd: Working Group adoption poll on draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 23:41:02 -0000 --_000_D3ECD8487C9C7aceeciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGkgUm9iZXJ0LA0KDQpGcm9tOiA8cnJhc3p1a0BnbWFpbC5jb208bWFpbHRvOnJyYXN6dWtAZ21h aWwuY29tPj4gb24gYmVoYWxmIG9mIFJvYmVydCBSYXN6dWsgPHJvYmVydEByYXN6dWsubmV0PG1h aWx0bzpyb2JlcnRAcmFzenVrLm5ldD4+DQpEYXRlOiBXZWRuZXNkYXksIEF1Z3VzdCAzMSwgMjAx NiBhdCAxMDo0MCBBTQ0KVG86IEFjZWUgTGluZGVtIDxhY2VlQGNpc2NvLmNvbTxtYWlsdG86YWNl ZUBjaXNjby5jb20+Pg0KQ2M6IEVyaWMgQyBSb3NlbiA8ZXJvc2VuQGp1bmlwZXIubmV0PG1haWx0 bzplcm9zZW5AanVuaXBlci5uZXQ+PiwgSURSIExpc3QgPGlkckBpZXRmLm9yZzxtYWlsdG86aWRy QGlldGYub3JnPj4sICJtcGxzQGlldGYub3JnPG1haWx0bzptcGxzQGlldGYub3JnPiIgPG1wbHNA aWV0Zi5vcmc8bWFpbHRvOm1wbHNAaWV0Zi5vcmc+PiwgImJlc3NAaWV0Zi5vcmc8bWFpbHRvOmJl c3NAaWV0Zi5vcmc+IiA8YmVzc0BpZXRmLm9yZzxtYWlsdG86YmVzc0BpZXRmLm9yZz4+DQpTdWJq ZWN0OiBSZTogW21wbHNdIFtJZHJdIEZ3ZDogV29ya2luZyBHcm91cCBhZG9wdGlvbiBwb2xsIG9u IGRyYWZ0LXJvc2VuLW1wbHMtcmZjMzEwN2Jpcw0KDQpIaSBBY2VlLA0KDQpUaGVyZSBpcyBubyBp c3N1ZSBmb3IgY29tcGF0aWJpbGl0eSBhcyBuZXcgcHJvcG9zYWwgaGFzIGl0cyBuZXcgQkdQIGNh cGFiaWxpdHkgaGVuY2UgdGhlcmUgaXMgbm8gaXNzdWUgd2l0aCBkZXBsb3lpbmcgaXQgZ3JhZHVh bGx5Lg0KDQpUaGUgY3VycmVudCBjYXBhYmlsaXR5IGlzIHNwZWNpZmljIHRvIHN1cHBvcnQgb2Yg bXVsdGlwbGUgbGFiZWxzIC0gbm90IHlvdXIgcGFyb2NoaWFsIHZpZXcgb24gdGhlIGludGVyYWN0 aW9uIGJldHdlZW4gU0FGSXMuIEFyZSB5b3Ugc3VnZ2VzdGluZyBhIHNlY29uZCBjYXBhYmlsaXR5 PyBBbGwgdGhlIG1vcmUgcmVhc29uIGZvciBhIHNlcGFyYXRlIGRyYWZ0Lg0KDQoNClllcyBpdCBy ZXF1aXJlcyBuZXcgUklCIHdvcmsgZm9yIHRob3NlIGltcGxlbWVudGF0aW9ucyB3aGljaCB0b2Rh eSB1c2Ugc2luZ2xlIFJJQiBmb3IgYm90aCBTQUZJIDEgYW5kIFNBRkkgNC4gRklCIGFuZCBMRklC IGFyZSBhbHJlYWR5IHNlcGFyYXRlLiBFYWNoIFNBRkkgaW4gQkdQIGFsc28gbm9ybWFsbHkgaGFz IGl0J3Mgb3duIHNlcGFyYXRlIHRhYmxlcy4gU28gaWYgYW55dGhpbmcgaXQgcmVxdWlyZXMgYSBi aXQgb2YgY2xlYW51cCB3b3JrLg0KDQpTbyB5b3UgYXJlIHNheWluZyBTQUZJIDQgd291bGQgb25s eSBhcHBseSB0byBJTE0gYW5kIG5vdCBOSExGRSB3aGVuIHRoZSBzYW1lIHByZWZpeCBpcyBhZHZl cnRpc2VkIGluIGJvdGggU0FGSSAxIGFuZCBTQUZJIDQ/IE1heWJlIEkgYW0gbWlzc2luZyBzb21l dGhpbmcgYnV0IEkgZG9u4oCZdCBzZWUgdGhhdCB0aGlzIGlzIHVzZWZ1bCBkZXBsb3ltZW50LiBJ biBhbnkgZXZlbnQsIHRoZSBub24tYmFja3dhcmQgY29tcGF0aWJsZSBiZWhhdmlvciB5b3UgYXJl IHByb3Bvc2luZyB3b3VsZCBiZSBiZXR0ZXIgc2VydmVkIGluIGEgc2VwYXJhdGUgZHJhZnQgdGhh biB0byBidXJkZW4gUkZDIDMxMDcgQklTLg0KDQoNCk1haW4gbW90aXZhdGlvbiBoZXJlIHdvdWxk IGJlIHRvIGhlbHAgbmV3IHZlbmRvcnMgdG8gbWFrZSB0aGUgdW5pZmllZCBjaG9pY2UgaW4gaG93 IHRoZXkgd2lsbCBpbXBsZW1lbnQgMzEwN2JpcyBzbyBsb25nIHRlcm0gd2UgZ2V0IHNvbWUgY29u c2lzdGVudCB3YXkgU0FGSSA0IGlzIGRlbGl2ZXJlZC4gQW5kIGlmIG5vdyBhdCB0aGUgImJpcyIg cmZjIGlzIG5vdCBhIGdvb2QgdGltZSB0aGVuIHdoYXQgeW91IGFyZSByZWFsbHkgYWR2b2NhdGlu ZyBpcyB0byBzdGF5IGZvciB5ZWFycyB0byBjb21lIHdpdGggc3VjaCB1bmRlZmluZWQgcmFuZG9t bmVzcyBhY3Jvc3MgaW1wbGVtZW50YXRpb25zLg0KDQpJIGFncmVlIHdpdGggdGhlIGN1cnJlbnQg ZHJhZnQgdGhhdCBpdCBzaG91bGQgYmUgbG9jYWwgcG9saWN5LiBJIGRvbuKAmXQgdGhpbmsgeW91 IGNhbiBhc3N1bWUgdGhhdCBldmVyeW9uZSBhZ3JlZXMgdGhhdCB0aGlzIHNob3VsZCBiZSBzcGVj aWZpZWQgYW5kIHRoYXQgeW91ciB2aWV3IG9uIGhvdyBpdCBzaG91bGQgd29yayBpcyBjb25zZW5z dXMuIEhlbmNlLCBwdXQgaXQgaW4gYSBzZXBhcmF0ZSBkcmFmdC4NCg0KDQpPdGhlciB0aGVuIGNv bnNpc3RlbmN5IEkgYWxzbyBzZWUgZm9sa3MgdHJ5aW5nIHRvIHVzZSBsYWJlbGVkIEJHUCBhcyBj b250cm9sbGVyIHRvIG5ldHdvcmsgZGV2aWNlIHByb3RvY29sIHRvIGluc3RhbGwgbGFiZWxzLiBG b3IgdGhhdCB1c2UgY2FzZSBhbG9uZSBjb21wbGV0ZSBzZXBhcmF0aW9uIGZyb20gU0FGSSAxIGlz IHZlcnkgaGVscGZ1bC4NCg0KWW91IGhhdmUgYm90aCBJTE0gYW5kIE5ITEZFIHRvIGNvbnNpZGVy IGhlcmUuIEkgbG9vayBmb3J3YXJkIHRvIHJldmlld2luZyB5b3VyIGRyYWZ0IG9uIHRoaXMgdG9w aWMuIElmIHRoZXJlIGlzIGNvbnNlbnN1cywgbWVyZ2VyIHdpdGggdGhlIGRyYWZ0IHVuZGVyIFdH IGFkb3B0aW9uIGNhbiBiZSBjb25zaWRlcmVkLg0KDQpUaGFua3MsDQpBY2VlDQoNCg0KDQoNClRo eCwNClIuDQoNCg0KDQpPbiBXZWQsIEF1ZyAzMSwgMjAxNiBhdCA0OjE1IFBNLCBBY2VlIExpbmRl bSAoYWNlZSkgPGFjZWVAY2lzY28uY29tPG1haWx0bzphY2VlQGNpc2NvLmNvbT4+IHdyb3RlOg0K SGkgUm9iZXJ0LA0KDQpDdXJyZW50bHksIGV2ZXJ5dGhpbmcgaW4gZHJhZnQtcm9zZW4tbXBscy1y ZmMzMTA3YmlzIGlzIHByZXR0eSBtdWNoIGJhY2t3YXJkIGNvbXBhdGlibGUgd2l0aCBvdXIgbW9y ZSB0aGFuIGEgZGVjYWRlIG9sZCBSRkMgMzEwNyBpbXBsZW1lbnRhdGlvbnMgYW5kIGRlcGxveW1l bnRzLiBXaGF0IHlvdSBhcmUgcHJvcG9zaW5nIGlzIG5vdCBhbmQgaGFzIGltcGxpY2F0aW9ucyBp biBib3RoIHRoZSBjb250cm9sIGFuZCBmb3J3YXJkaW5nIHBsYW5lcy4gSWYgeW91IHJlYWxseSBi ZWxpZXZlIHRoYXQgdGhpcyBpcyDigJx0aGUgYmlnZ2VzdCBpc3N1ZSIsIEnigJlkIHN1Z2dlc3Qg eW91IGFydGljdWxhdGUgaXQgaW4gYSBzZXBhcmF0ZSBkcmFmdCB3aXRoIGNvbmNyZXRlIHVzZSBj YXNlcyBmb3IgaGF2aW5nIHNlcGFyYXRlIElQIGFuZCBNUExTIHRvcG9sb2dpZXMgZm9yIHRoZSBz YW1lIHNldCBvZiBwcmVmaXhlcy4gVGhlbiB0aGUgV0dzIGNhbiBldmFsdWF0ZSB0aGUgcmVxdWly ZW1lbnQgYW5kIHByb3Bvc2VkIHNvbHV0aW9uIGluZGVwZW5kZW50IG9mIFJGQyAzMTA3IEJJUy4N Cg0KVGhhbmtzLA0KQWNlZQ0KDQpGcm9tOiBtcGxzIDxtcGxzLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmc8bWFp bHRvOm1wbHMtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZz4+IG9uIGJlaGFsZiBvZiBSb2JlcnQgUmFzenVrIDxy b2JlcnRAcmFzenVrLm5ldDxtYWlsdG86cm9iZXJ0QHJhc3p1ay5uZXQ+Pg0KRGF0ZTogV2VkbmVz ZGF5LCBBdWd1c3QgMzEsIDIwMTYgYXQgNToyNCBBTQ0KVG86IEVyaWMgQyBSb3NlbiA8ZXJvc2Vu QGp1bmlwZXIubmV0PG1haWx0bzplcm9zZW5AanVuaXBlci5uZXQ+Pg0KQ2M6IElEUiBMaXN0IDxp ZHJAaWV0Zi5vcmc8bWFpbHRvOmlkckBpZXRmLm9yZz4+LCAibXBsc0BpZXRmLm9yZzxtYWlsdG86 bXBsc0BpZXRmLm9yZz4iIDxtcGxzQGlldGYub3JnPG1haWx0bzptcGxzQGlldGYub3JnPj4sICJi ZXNzQGlldGYub3JnPG1haWx0bzpiZXNzQGlldGYub3JnPiIgPGJlc3NAaWV0Zi5vcmc8bWFpbHRv OmJlc3NAaWV0Zi5vcmc+Pg0KU3ViamVjdDogUmU6IFttcGxzXSBbSWRyXSBGd2Q6IFdvcmtpbmcg R3JvdXAgYWRvcHRpb24gcG9sbCBvbiBkcmFmdC1yb3Nlbi1tcGxzLXJmYzMxMDdiaXMNCg0KSGkg RXJpYywNCg0KV2hpbGUgYWRvcHRpb24gY2FsbCBpcyBzb3J0IG9mIGVuY291cmFnZW1lbnQgZm9y IGZ1cnRoZXIgaW5wdXQgYmVmb3JlIEkgcmVzcG9uZCB0byBMb2EncyBtYWlsIEkgd291bGQgbGlr ZSB0byBnZXQgb25lIGFkZGl0aW9uYWwgYW5zd2VyIGZyb20gMzEwN2JpcyBhdXRob3JzIGFuZCBX R3MgbWVtYmVycy4NCg0KVGhvc2Ugd2hvIHNwZW5kIHllYXJzIGluIG1wbHMgZGVwbG95bWVudCBr bm93IHF1aXRlIHdlbGwgdGhhdCB0aGUgYmlnZ2VzdCBpc3N1ZSB3aXRoIHRvZGF5J3MgMzEwNyBk ZXBsb3ltZW50IGlzIGxhY2sgb2YgdGhlIGNsZWFyIGRlZmluaXRpb24gb2YgaXRzIGludGVyYWN0 aW9uIHdpdGggU0FGSS0xLiBXaGlsZSBvbmUgd291bGQgaG9wZSB0aGF0IDMxMDdiaXMgd2l0aCBu ZXcgY2FwYWJpbGl0eSB3aWxsIGNsZWFuIHRoaXMgbWVzcyBzZWN0aW9uIDUgb2YgeW91ciBkb2N1 bWVudCByYXRoZXIgc3dlZXBzIGl0IGFsbCB1bmRlciB0aGUgY2FycGV0IHN0YXRpbmcgdGhhdCBp dCBpcyBqdXN0IGxvY2FsIHBvbGljeS4gSU1PIGl0IGlzIG5vdCBhIG1hdHRlciBvZiBsb2NhbCBw b2xpY3kgbm9yIGl0IGlzIGltcGxlbWVudGF0aW9uIGRldGFpbC4NCg0KTG9jYWwgcG9saWN5IGNh biBiZSB0byBjaG9vc2Ugd2hpY2ggUklCIChvciBzZXF1ZW5jZSBvZiBSSUJzKSBzaG91bGQgYmUg dXNlZCBmb3IgcmVzb2x1dGlvbiBvZiBzcGVjaWZpYyBTQUZJcyBhbmQgbm90IGhvdyB0byBtaXgg U0FGSS0xIHdpdGggU0FGSS00LiBJdCdzIG5vdCBhIGxvY2FsIG1hdHRlciBhdCBhbGwgdG8gaGF2 ZSBkZXBsb3ltZW50IHJlc3VsdGluZyBpbiBpbmNvbnNpc3RlbnQgSUJHUCBiZXN0IHBhdGhzIGFj cm9zcyBnaXZlbiBkb21haW4uDQoNClRvIG1lIGNsZWFuZXN0IGlzIHRvIHNlcGFyYXRlIHRob3Nl IHR3byBTQUZJcyBjb21wbGV0ZWx5IGZyb20gZWFjaCBvdGhlciBieSB0aGUgc3BlYyBib3RoIGlu IEJHUCAoZG9uZSkgYXMgd2VsbCBhcyBsb2NhbCBSSUIgYW5kIEZJQi9MRklCLg0KDQpMaWtld2lz ZSBJIGRvIG5vdCBxdWl0ZSBhZ3JlZSB0aGF0IFNBRkktNCBzaG91bGQgYmUgImNvbnZlcnRpYmxl IiB0byBTQUZJLTEuIEFuZCB3ZSBhbGwgcmVhbGl6ZSB0aGF0IG9wcG9zaXRlIGRpcmVjdGlvbiBp cyByYXRoZXIgaGFyZC4NCg0KQW5vdGhlciBwZXJoYXBzIG1pbm9yIGNsYXJpZmljYXRpb24gd291 bGQgYmUgdG8gZ2V0IGFuIGV4cGxpY2l0IGNvbmZpcm1hdGlvbiB0aGF0IFNBRkktNCBjYW4gYmUg cmVjdXJzaXZlIG92ZXIgU0FGSS00IG9yIGZvciB0aGF0IG1hdHRlciBTQUZJLTEgKE1QTFMgaW4g R1JFIG9yIFNSIGluIElQKS4NCg0KVGh4LA0KUi4NCg0KDQo= --_000_D3ECD8487C9C7aceeciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWw+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxtZXRhIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIgY29udGVudD0i dGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij4NCjwvaGVhZD4NCjxib2R5IHN0eWxlPSJ3b3JkLXdy YXA6IGJyZWFrLXdvcmQ7IC13ZWJraXQtbmJzcC1tb2RlOiBzcGFjZTsgLXdlYmtpdC1saW5lLWJy ZWFrOiBhZnRlci13aGl0ZS1zcGFjZTsgY29sb3I6IHJnYigwLCAwLCAwKTsgZm9udC1zaXplOiAx NHB4OyBmb250LWZhbWlseTogQ2FsaWJyaSwgc2Fucy1zZXJpZjsiPg0KPGRpdj5IaSBSb2JlcnQs Jm5ic3A7PC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pjxicj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPHNwYW4gaWQ9Ik9MS19TUkNfQk9EWV9T RUNUSU9OIj4NCjxkaXYgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OkNhbGlicmk7IGZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMXB0 OyB0ZXh0LWFsaWduOmxlZnQ7IGNvbG9yOmJsYWNrOyBCT1JERVItQk9UVE9NOiBtZWRpdW0gbm9u ZTsgQk9SREVSLUxFRlQ6IG1lZGl1bSBub25lOyBQQURESU5HLUJPVFRPTTogMGluOyBQQURESU5H LUxFRlQ6IDBpbjsgUEFERElORy1SSUdIVDogMGluOyBCT1JERVItVE9QOiAjYjVjNGRmIDFwdCBz b2xpZDsgQk9SREVSLVJJR0hUOiBtZWRpdW0gbm9uZTsgUEFERElORy1UT1A6IDNwdCI+DQo8c3Bh biBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC13ZWlnaHQ6Ym9sZCI+RnJvbTogPC9zcGFuPiZsdDs8YSBocmVmPSJtYWls dG86cnJhc3p1a0BnbWFpbC5jb20iPnJyYXN6dWtAZ21haWwuY29tPC9hPiZndDsgb24gYmVoYWxm IG9mIFJvYmVydCBSYXN6dWsgJmx0OzxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpyb2JlcnRAcmFzenVrLm5ldCI+ cm9iZXJ0QHJhc3p1ay5uZXQ8L2E+Jmd0Ozxicj4NCjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXdlaWdodDpi b2xkIj5EYXRlOiA8L3NwYW4+V2VkbmVzZGF5LCBBdWd1c3QgMzEsIDIwMTYgYXQgMTA6NDAgQU08 YnI+DQo8c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC13ZWlnaHQ6Ym9sZCI+VG86IDwvc3Bhbj5BY2VlIExpbmRl bSAmbHQ7PGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOmFjZWVAY2lzY28uY29tIj5hY2VlQGNpc2NvLmNvbTwvYT4m Z3Q7PGJyPg0KPHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0OmJvbGQiPkNjOiA8L3NwYW4+RXJpYyBD IFJvc2VuICZsdDs8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86ZXJvc2VuQGp1bmlwZXIubmV0Ij5lcm9zZW5AanVu aXBlci5uZXQ8L2E+Jmd0OywgSURSIExpc3QgJmx0OzxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzppZHJAaWV0Zi5v cmciPmlkckBpZXRmLm9yZzwvYT4mZ3Q7LCAmcXVvdDs8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86bXBsc0BpZXRm Lm9yZyI+bXBsc0BpZXRmLm9yZzwvYT4mcXVvdDsgJmx0OzxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzptcGxzQGll dGYub3JnIj5tcGxzQGlldGYub3JnPC9hPiZndDssDQogJnF1b3Q7PGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOmJl c3NAaWV0Zi5vcmciPmJlc3NAaWV0Zi5vcmc8L2E+JnF1b3Q7ICZsdDs8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86 YmVzc0BpZXRmLm9yZyI+YmVzc0BpZXRmLm9yZzwvYT4mZ3Q7PGJyPg0KPHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZv bnQtd2VpZ2h0OmJvbGQiPlN1YmplY3Q6IDwvc3Bhbj5SZTogW21wbHNdIFtJZHJdIEZ3ZDogV29y a2luZyBHcm91cCBhZG9wdGlvbiBwb2xsIG9uIGRyYWZ0LXJvc2VuLW1wbHMtcmZjMzEwN2Jpczxi cj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj48YnI+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxibG9ja3F1b3RlIGlkPSJNQUNfT1VUTE9P S19BVFRSSUJVVElPTl9CTE9DS1FVT1RFIiBzdHlsZT0iQk9SREVSLUxFRlQ6ICNiNWM0ZGYgNSBz b2xpZDsgUEFERElORzowIDAgMCA1OyBNQVJHSU46MCAwIDAgNTsiPg0KPGRpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8 ZGl2IGRpcj0ibHRyIj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9ImdtYWlsX2RlZmF1bHQiIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LWZh bWlseTphcmlhbCxoZWx2ZXRpY2Esc2Fucy1zZXJpZjtmb250LXNpemU6c21hbGwiPg0KSGkgQWNl ZSw8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9ImdtYWlsX2RlZmF1bHQiIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LWZhbWlseTph cmlhbCxoZWx2ZXRpY2Esc2Fucy1zZXJpZjtmb250LXNpemU6c21hbGwiPg0KPGJyPg0KPC9kaXY+ DQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJnbWFpbF9kZWZhdWx0IiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6YXJpYWwsaGVs dmV0aWNhLHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7Zm9udC1zaXplOnNtYWxsIj4NClRoZXJlIGlzIG5vIGlzc3VlIGZv ciBjb21wYXRpYmlsaXR5IGFzIG5ldyBwcm9wb3NhbCBoYXMgaXRzIG5ldyBCR1AgY2FwYWJpbGl0 eSBoZW5jZSB0aGVyZSBpcyBubyBpc3N1ZSB3aXRoIGRlcGxveWluZyBpdCBncmFkdWFsbHkuJm5i c3A7PC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Jsb2NrcXVvdGU+DQo8L3NwYW4+ DQo8ZGl2Pjxicj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj5UaGUgY3VycmVudCBjYXBhYmlsaXR5IGlzIHNwZWNp ZmljIHRvIHN1cHBvcnQgb2YgbXVsdGlwbGUgbGFiZWxzIC0gbm90IHlvdXIgcGFyb2NoaWFsIHZp ZXcgb24gdGhlIGludGVyYWN0aW9uIGJldHdlZW4gU0FGSXMuIEFyZSB5b3Ugc3VnZ2VzdGluZyBh IHNlY29uZCBjYXBhYmlsaXR5PyBBbGwgdGhlIG1vcmUgcmVhc29uIGZvciBhIHNlcGFyYXRlIGRy YWZ0LiZuYnNwOzwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj48YnI+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxzcGFuIGlkPSJPTEtfU1JDX0JP RFlfU0VDVElPTiI+DQo8YmxvY2txdW90ZSBpZD0iTUFDX09VVExPT0tfQVRUUklCVVRJT05fQkxP Q0tRVU9URSIgc3R5bGU9IkJPUkRFUi1MRUZUOiAjYjVjNGRmIDUgc29saWQ7IFBBRERJTkc6MCAw IDAgNTsgTUFSR0lOOjAgMCAwIDU7Ij4NCjxkaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBkaXI9Imx0ciI+DQo8 ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJnbWFpbF9kZWZhdWx0IiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6YXJpYWwsaGVsdmV0 aWNhLHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7Zm9udC1zaXplOnNtYWxsIj4NCjxicj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBjbGFz cz0iZ21haWxfZGVmYXVsdCIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFsLGhlbHZldGljYSxzYW5z LXNlcmlmO2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpzbWFsbCI+DQpZZXMgaXQgcmVxdWlyZXMgbmV3IFJJQiB3b3JrIGZv ciB0aG9zZSBpbXBsZW1lbnRhdGlvbnMgd2hpY2ggdG9kYXkgdXNlIHNpbmdsZSBSSUIgZm9yIGJv dGggU0FGSSAxIGFuZCBTQUZJIDQuIEZJQiBhbmQgTEZJQiBhcmUgYWxyZWFkeSBzZXBhcmF0ZS4g RWFjaCBTQUZJIGluIEJHUCBhbHNvIG5vcm1hbGx5IGhhcyBpdCdzIG93biBzZXBhcmF0ZSB0YWJs ZXMuIFNvIGlmIGFueXRoaW5nIGl0IHJlcXVpcmVzIGEgYml0IG9mIGNsZWFudXAgd29yay4mbmJz cDs8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvYmxvY2txdW90ZT4NCjwvc3Bhbj4N CjxkaXY+PGJyPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2PlNvIHlvdSBhcmUgc2F5aW5nIFNBRkkgNCB3b3VsZCBv bmx5IGFwcGx5IHRvIElMTSBhbmQgbm90IE5ITEZFIHdoZW4gdGhlIHNhbWUgcHJlZml4IGlzIGFk dmVydGlzZWQgaW4gYm90aCBTQUZJIDEgYW5kIFNBRkkgND8gTWF5YmUgSSBhbSBtaXNzaW5nIHNv bWV0aGluZyBidXQgSSBkb27igJl0IHNlZSB0aGF0IHRoaXMgaXMgdXNlZnVsIGRlcGxveW1lbnQu IEluIGFueSBldmVudCwgdGhlIG5vbi1iYWNrd2FyZCBjb21wYXRpYmxlIGJlaGF2aW9yDQogeW91 IGFyZSBwcm9wb3Npbmcgd291bGQgYmUgYmV0dGVyIHNlcnZlZCBpbiBhIHNlcGFyYXRlIGRyYWZ0 IHRoYW4gdG8gYnVyZGVuIFJGQyAzMTA3IEJJUy4mbmJzcDs8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+PGJyPg0KPC9k aXY+DQo8c3BhbiBpZD0iT0xLX1NSQ19CT0RZX1NFQ1RJT04iPg0KPGJsb2NrcXVvdGUgaWQ9Ik1B Q19PVVRMT09LX0FUVFJJQlVUSU9OX0JMT0NLUVVPVEUiIHN0eWxlPSJCT1JERVItTEVGVDogI2I1 YzRkZiA1IHNvbGlkOyBQQURESU5HOjAgMCAwIDU7IE1BUkdJTjowIDAgMCA1OyI+DQo8ZGl2Pg0K PGRpdj4NCjxkaXYgZGlyPSJsdHIiPg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iZ21haWxfZGVmYXVsdCIgc3R5bGU9 ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFsLGhlbHZldGljYSxzYW5zLXNlcmlmO2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpzbWFsbCI+ DQo8YnI+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9ImdtYWlsX2RlZmF1bHQiIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LWZh bWlseTphcmlhbCxoZWx2ZXRpY2Esc2Fucy1zZXJpZjtmb250LXNpemU6c21hbGwiPg0KTWFpbiBt b3RpdmF0aW9uIGhlcmUgd291bGQgYmUgdG8gaGVscCBuZXcgdmVuZG9ycyB0byBtYWtlIHRoZSB1 bmlmaWVkIGNob2ljZSBpbiBob3cgdGhleSB3aWxsIGltcGxlbWVudCAzMTA3YmlzIHNvIGxvbmcg dGVybSB3ZSBnZXQgc29tZSBjb25zaXN0ZW50IHdheSBTQUZJIDQgaXMgZGVsaXZlcmVkLiBBbmQg aWYgbm93IGF0IHRoZSAmcXVvdDtiaXMmcXVvdDsgcmZjIGlzIG5vdCBhIGdvb2QgdGltZSB0aGVu IHdoYXQgeW91IGFyZSByZWFsbHkgYWR2b2NhdGluZyBpcw0KIHRvIHN0YXkgZm9yIHllYXJzIHRv IGNvbWUgd2l0aCBzdWNoIHVuZGVmaW5lZCByYW5kb21uZXNzIGFjcm9zcyBpbXBsZW1lbnRhdGlv bnMuJm5ic3A7PC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Jsb2NrcXVvdGU+DQo8 L3NwYW4+DQo8ZGl2Pjxicj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj5JIGFncmVlIHdpdGggdGhlIGN1cnJlbnQg ZHJhZnQgdGhhdCBpdCBzaG91bGQgYmUgbG9jYWwgcG9saWN5LiBJIGRvbuKAmXQgdGhpbmsgeW91 IGNhbiBhc3N1bWUgdGhhdCBldmVyeW9uZSBhZ3JlZXMgdGhhdCB0aGlzIHNob3VsZCBiZSBzcGVj aWZpZWQgYW5kIHRoYXQgeW91ciB2aWV3IG9uIGhvdyBpdCBzaG91bGQgd29yayBpcyBjb25zZW5z dXMuIEhlbmNlLCBwdXQgaXQgaW4gYSBzZXBhcmF0ZSBkcmFmdC4mbmJzcDs8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+ PGJyPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8c3BhbiBpZD0iT0xLX1NSQ19CT0RZX1NFQ1RJT04iPg0KPGJsb2NrcXVv dGUgaWQ9Ik1BQ19PVVRMT09LX0FUVFJJQlVUSU9OX0JMT0NLUVVPVEUiIHN0eWxlPSJCT1JERVIt TEVGVDogI2I1YzRkZiA1IHNvbGlkOyBQQURESU5HOjAgMCAwIDU7IE1BUkdJTjowIDAgMCA1OyI+ DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxkaXYgZGlyPSJsdHIiPg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iZ21haWxfZGVmYXVs dCIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFsLGhlbHZldGljYSxzYW5zLXNlcmlmO2ZvbnQtc2l6 ZTpzbWFsbCI+DQo8YnI+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9ImdtYWlsX2RlZmF1bHQiIHN0eWxl PSJmb250LWZhbWlseTphcmlhbCxoZWx2ZXRpY2Esc2Fucy1zZXJpZjtmb250LXNpemU6c21hbGwi Pg0KT3RoZXIgdGhlbiBjb25zaXN0ZW5jeSBJIGFsc28gc2VlIGZvbGtzIHRyeWluZyB0byB1c2Ug bGFiZWxlZCBCR1AgYXMgY29udHJvbGxlciB0byBuZXR3b3JrIGRldmljZSBwcm90b2NvbCB0byBp bnN0YWxsIGxhYmVscy4gRm9yIHRoYXQgdXNlIGNhc2UgYWxvbmUgY29tcGxldGUgc2VwYXJhdGlv biBmcm9tIFNBRkkgMSBpcyB2ZXJ5IGhlbHBmdWwuJm5ic3A7PC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2 Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Jsb2NrcXVvdGU+DQo8L3NwYW4+DQo8ZGl2Pjxicj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRp dj5Zb3UgaGF2ZSBib3RoIElMTSBhbmQgTkhMRkUgdG8gY29uc2lkZXIgaGVyZS4gSSBsb29rIGZv cndhcmQgdG8gcmV2aWV3aW5nIHlvdXIgZHJhZnQgb24gdGhpcyB0b3BpYy4gSWYgdGhlcmUgaXMg Y29uc2Vuc3VzLCBtZXJnZXIgd2l0aCB0aGUgZHJhZnQgdW5kZXIgV0cgYWRvcHRpb24gY2FuIGJl IGNvbnNpZGVyZWQuJm5ic3A7PC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pjxicj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj5UaGFua3Ms PC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2PkFjZWUmbmJzcDs8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+PGJyPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pjxi cj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj48YnI+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxzcGFuIGlkPSJPTEtfU1JDX0JPRFlfU0VD VElPTiI+DQo8YmxvY2txdW90ZSBpZD0iTUFDX09VVExPT0tfQVRUUklCVVRJT05fQkxPQ0tRVU9U RSIgc3R5bGU9IkJPUkRFUi1MRUZUOiAjYjVjNGRmIDUgc29saWQ7IFBBRERJTkc6MCAwIDAgNTsg TUFSR0lOOjAgMCAwIDU7Ij4NCjxkaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBkaXI9Imx0ciI+DQo8ZGl2IGNs YXNzPSJnbWFpbF9kZWZhdWx0IiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6YXJpYWwsaGVsdmV0aWNhLHNh bnMtc2VyaWY7Zm9udC1zaXplOnNtYWxsIj4NCjxicj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iZ21h aWxfZGVmYXVsdCIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFsLGhlbHZldGljYSxzYW5zLXNlcmlm O2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpzbWFsbCI+DQpUaHgsPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJnbWFpbF9kZWZhdWx0 IiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6YXJpYWwsaGVsdmV0aWNhLHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7Zm9udC1zaXpl OnNtYWxsIj4NClIuPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJnbWFpbF9kZWZhdWx0IiBzdHlsZT0iZm9u dC1mYW1pbHk6YXJpYWwsaGVsdmV0aWNhLHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7Zm9udC1zaXplOnNtYWxsIj4NCjxi cj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iZ21haWxfZGVmYXVsdCIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5 OmFyaWFsLGhlbHZldGljYSxzYW5zLXNlcmlmO2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpzbWFsbCI+DQo8YnI+DQo8L2Rp dj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iZ21haWxfZXh0cmEiPjxicj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9Imdt YWlsX3F1b3RlIj5PbiBXZWQsIEF1ZyAzMSwgMjAxNiBhdCA0OjE1IFBNLCBBY2VlIExpbmRlbSAo YWNlZSkgPHNwYW4gZGlyPSJsdHIiPg0KJmx0OzxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzphY2VlQGNpc2NvLmNv bSIgdGFyZ2V0PSJfYmxhbmsiPmFjZWVAY2lzY28uY29tPC9hPiZndDs8L3NwYW4+IHdyb3RlOjxi cj4NCjxibG9ja3F1b3RlIGNsYXNzPSJnbWFpbF9xdW90ZSIgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbjowIDAgMCAu OGV4O2JvcmRlci1sZWZ0OjFweCAjY2NjIHNvbGlkO3BhZGRpbmctbGVmdDoxZXgiPg0KPGRpdiBz dHlsZT0id29yZC13cmFwOmJyZWFrLXdvcmQ7Y29sb3I6cmdiKDAsMCwwKTtmb250LXNpemU6MTRw eDtmb250LWZhbWlseTpDYWxpYnJpLHNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPg0KPGRpdj5IaSBSb2JlcnQsJm5ic3A7 PC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pjxicj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj5DdXJyZW50bHksIGV2ZXJ5dGhpbmcgaW4g ZHJhZnQtcm9zZW4tbXBscy1yZmMzMTA3YmlzIGlzIHByZXR0eSBtdWNoIGJhY2t3YXJkIGNvbXBh dGlibGUgd2l0aCBvdXIgbW9yZSB0aGFuIGEgZGVjYWRlIG9sZCBSRkMgMzEwNyBpbXBsZW1lbnRh dGlvbnMgYW5kIGRlcGxveW1lbnRzLiBXaGF0IHlvdSBhcmUgcHJvcG9zaW5nIGlzIG5vdCBhbmQg aGFzIGltcGxpY2F0aW9ucyBpbiBib3RoIHRoZSBjb250cm9sIGFuZCBmb3J3YXJkaW5nIHBsYW5l cy4NCiBJZiB5b3UgcmVhbGx5IGJlbGlldmUgdGhhdCB0aGlzIGlzIOKAnHRoZSBiaWdnZXN0IGlz c3VlJnF1b3Q7LCBJ4oCZZCBzdWdnZXN0IHlvdSBhcnRpY3VsYXRlIGl0IGluIGEgc2VwYXJhdGUg ZHJhZnQgd2l0aCBjb25jcmV0ZSB1c2UgY2FzZXMgZm9yIGhhdmluZyBzZXBhcmF0ZSBJUCBhbmQg TVBMUyB0b3BvbG9naWVzIGZvciB0aGUgc2FtZSBzZXQgb2YgcHJlZml4ZXMuIFRoZW4gdGhlIFdH cyBjYW4gZXZhbHVhdGUgdGhlIHJlcXVpcmVtZW50IGFuZCBwcm9wb3NlZA0KIHNvbHV0aW9uIGlu ZGVwZW5kZW50IG9mIFJGQyAzMTA3IEJJUy4mbmJzcDs8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+PGJyPg0KPC9kaXY+ DQo8ZGl2PlRoYW5rcyw8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+QWNlZTwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj48YnI+DQo8L2Rpdj4N CjxzcGFuPg0KPGRpdiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6Q2FsaWJyaTtmb250LXNpemU6MTFwdDt0 ZXh0LWFsaWduOmxlZnQ7Y29sb3I6YmxhY2s7Qk9SREVSLUJPVFRPTTptZWRpdW0gbm9uZTtCT1JE RVItTEVGVDptZWRpdW0gbm9uZTtQQURESU5HLUJPVFRPTTowaW47UEFERElORy1MRUZUOjBpbjtQ QURESU5HLVJJR0hUOjBpbjtCT1JERVItVE9QOiNiNWM0ZGYgMXB0IHNvbGlkO0JPUkRFUi1SSUdI VDptZWRpdW0gbm9uZTtQQURESU5HLVRPUDozcHQiPg0KPHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0 OmJvbGQiPkZyb206IDwvc3Bhbj5tcGxzICZsdDs8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86bXBscy1ib3VuY2Vz QGlldGYub3JnIiB0YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+bXBscy1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnPC9hPiZndDsg b24gYmVoYWxmIG9mIFJvYmVydCBSYXN6dWsgJmx0OzxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpyb2JlcnRAcmFz enVrLm5ldCIgdGFyZ2V0PSJfYmxhbmsiPnJvYmVydEByYXN6dWsubmV0PC9hPiZndDs8YnI+DQo8 c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC13ZWlnaHQ6Ym9sZCI+RGF0ZTogPC9zcGFuPldlZG5lc2RheSwgQXVn dXN0IDMxLCAyMDE2IGF0IDU6MjQgQU08YnI+DQo8c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC13ZWlnaHQ6Ym9s ZCI+VG86IDwvc3Bhbj5FcmljIEMgUm9zZW4gJmx0OzxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzplcm9zZW5AanVu aXBlci5uZXQiIHRhcmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIj5lcm9zZW5AanVuaXBlci5uZXQ8L2E+Jmd0Ozxicj4N CjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXdlaWdodDpib2xkIj5DYzogPC9zcGFuPklEUiBMaXN0ICZsdDs8 YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86aWRyQGlldGYub3JnIiB0YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+aWRyQGlldGYub3Jn PC9hPiZndDssICZxdW90OzxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzptcGxzQGlldGYub3JnIiB0YXJnZXQ9Il9i bGFuayI+bXBsc0BpZXRmLm9yZzwvYT4mcXVvdDsgJmx0OzxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzptcGxzQGll dGYub3JnIiB0YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+bXBsc0BpZXRmLm9yZzwvYT4mZ3Q7LCAmcXVvdDs8YSBo cmVmPSJtYWlsdG86YmVzc0BpZXRmLm9yZyIgdGFyZ2V0PSJfYmxhbmsiPmJlc3NAaWV0Zi5vcmc8 L2E+JnF1b3Q7DQogJmx0OzxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpiZXNzQGlldGYub3JnIiB0YXJnZXQ9Il9i bGFuayI+YmVzc0BpZXRmLm9yZzwvYT4mZ3Q7PGJyPg0KPHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0 OmJvbGQiPlN1YmplY3Q6IDwvc3Bhbj5SZTogW21wbHNdIFtJZHJdIEZ3ZDogV29ya2luZyBHcm91 cCBhZG9wdGlvbiBwb2xsIG9uIGRyYWZ0LXJvc2VuLW1wbHMtcmZjMzEwN2Jpczxicj4NCjwvZGl2 Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9Img1Ij4NCjxkaXY+PGJyPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8YmxvY2txdW90 ZSBzdHlsZT0iQk9SREVSLUxFRlQ6I2I1YzRkZiA1IHNvbGlkO1BBRERJTkc6MCAwIDAgNTtNQVJH SU46MCAwIDAgNSI+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxkaXYgZGlyPSJsdHIiPg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0i Z21haWxfZGVmYXVsdCIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFsLGhlbHZldGljYSxzYW5zLXNl cmlmO2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpzbWFsbCI+DQpIaSBFcmljLDwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iZ21haWxf ZGVmYXVsdCIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFsLGhlbHZldGljYSxzYW5zLXNlcmlmO2Zv bnQtc2l6ZTpzbWFsbCI+DQo8YnI+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9ImdtYWlsX2RlZmF1bHQi IHN0eWxlPSJmb250LWZhbWlseTphcmlhbCxoZWx2ZXRpY2Esc2Fucy1zZXJpZjtmb250LXNpemU6 c21hbGwiPg0KV2hpbGUgYWRvcHRpb24gY2FsbCBpcyBzb3J0IG9mIGVuY291cmFnZW1lbnQgZm9y IGZ1cnRoZXIgaW5wdXQgYmVmb3JlIEkgcmVzcG9uZCB0byBMb2EncyBtYWlsIEkgd291bGQgbGlr ZSB0byBnZXQgb25lIGFkZGl0aW9uYWwgYW5zd2VyIGZyb20gMzEwN2JpcyBhdXRob3JzIGFuZCBX R3MgbWVtYmVycy4mbmJzcDs8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9ImdtYWlsX2RlZmF1bHQiIHN0eWxl PSJmb250LWZhbWlseTphcmlhbCxoZWx2ZXRpY2Esc2Fucy1zZXJpZjtmb250LXNpemU6c21hbGwi Pg0KPGJyPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJnbWFpbF9kZWZhdWx0IiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1m YW1pbHk6YXJpYWwsaGVsdmV0aWNhLHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7Zm9udC1zaXplOnNtYWxsIj4NClRob3Nl IHdobyBzcGVuZCB5ZWFycyBpbiBtcGxzIGRlcGxveW1lbnQga25vdyBxdWl0ZSB3ZWxsIHRoYXQg dGhlIGJpZ2dlc3QgaXNzdWUgd2l0aCB0b2RheSdzIDMxMDcgZGVwbG95bWVudCBpcyBsYWNrIG9m IHRoZSBjbGVhciBkZWZpbml0aW9uIG9mIGl0cyBpbnRlcmFjdGlvbiB3aXRoIFNBRkktMS4gV2hp bGUgb25lIHdvdWxkIGhvcGUgdGhhdCAzMTA3YmlzIHdpdGggbmV3IGNhcGFiaWxpdHkgd2lsbCBj bGVhbiB0aGlzIG1lc3Mgc2VjdGlvbiA1DQogb2YgeW91ciBkb2N1bWVudCByYXRoZXIgc3dlZXBz IGl0IGFsbCB1bmRlciB0aGUgY2FycGV0IHN0YXRpbmcgdGhhdCBpdCBpcyBqdXN0IGxvY2FsIHBv bGljeS4gSU1PIGl0IGlzIG5vdCBhIG1hdHRlciBvZiBsb2NhbCBwb2xpY3kgbm9yIGl0IGlzIGlt cGxlbWVudGF0aW9uIGRldGFpbC4mbmJzcDs8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9ImdtYWlsX2RlZmF1 bHQiIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LWZhbWlseTphcmlhbCxoZWx2ZXRpY2Esc2Fucy1zZXJpZjtmb250LXNp emU6c21hbGwiPg0KPGJyPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJnbWFpbF9kZWZhdWx0IiBzdHls ZT0iZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6YXJpYWwsaGVsdmV0aWNhLHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7Zm9udC1zaXplOnNtYWxs Ij4NCkxvY2FsIHBvbGljeSBjYW4gYmUgdG8gY2hvb3NlIHdoaWNoIFJJQiAob3Igc2VxdWVuY2Ug b2YgUklCcykgc2hvdWxkIGJlIHVzZWQgZm9yIHJlc29sdXRpb24gb2Ygc3BlY2lmaWMgU0FGSXMg YW5kIG5vdCBob3cgdG8gbWl4IFNBRkktMSB3aXRoIFNBRkktNC4gSXQncyBub3QgYSBsb2NhbCBt YXR0ZXIgYXQgYWxsIHRvIGhhdmUgZGVwbG95bWVudCByZXN1bHRpbmcgaW4gaW5jb25zaXN0ZW50 IElCR1AgYmVzdCBwYXRocyBhY3Jvc3MgZ2l2ZW4gZG9tYWluLiZuYnNwOzwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBj bGFzcz0iZ21haWxfZGVmYXVsdCIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFsLGhlbHZldGljYSxz YW5zLXNlcmlmO2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpzbWFsbCI+DQo8YnI+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9Imdt YWlsX2RlZmF1bHQiIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LWZhbWlseTphcmlhbCxoZWx2ZXRpY2Esc2Fucy1zZXJp Zjtmb250LXNpemU6c21hbGwiPg0KVG8gbWUgY2xlYW5lc3QgaXMgdG8gc2VwYXJhdGUgdGhvc2Ug dHdvIFNBRklzIGNvbXBsZXRlbHkgZnJvbSBlYWNoIG90aGVyIGJ5IHRoZSBzcGVjIGJvdGggaW4g QkdQIChkb25lKSBhcyB3ZWxsIGFzIGxvY2FsIFJJQiBhbmQgRklCL0xGSUIuJm5ic3A7PC9kaXY+ DQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJnbWFpbF9kZWZhdWx0IiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6YXJpYWwsaGVs dmV0aWNhLHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7Zm9udC1zaXplOnNtYWxsIj4NCjxicj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBj bGFzcz0iZ21haWxfZGVmYXVsdCIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFsLGhlbHZldGljYSxz YW5zLXNlcmlmO2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpzbWFsbCI+DQpMaWtld2lzZSBJIGRvIG5vdCBxdWl0ZSBhZ3Jl ZSB0aGF0IFNBRkktNCBzaG91bGQgYmUgJnF1b3Q7Y29udmVydGlibGUmcXVvdDsgdG8gU0FGSS0x LiBBbmQgd2UgYWxsIHJlYWxpemUgdGhhdCBvcHBvc2l0ZSBkaXJlY3Rpb24gaXMgcmF0aGVyIGhh cmQuJm5ic3A7PC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJnbWFpbF9kZWZhdWx0IiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1m YW1pbHk6YXJpYWwsaGVsdmV0aWNhLHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7Zm9udC1zaXplOnNtYWxsIj4NCjxicj4N CjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iZ21haWxfZGVmYXVsdCIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFy aWFsLGhlbHZldGljYSxzYW5zLXNlcmlmO2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpzbWFsbCI+DQpBbm90aGVyIHBlcmhh cHMgbWlub3IgY2xhcmlmaWNhdGlvbiB3b3VsZCBiZSB0byBnZXQgYW4gZXhwbGljaXQgY29uZmly bWF0aW9uIHRoYXQgU0FGSS00IGNhbiBiZSByZWN1cnNpdmUgb3ZlciBTQUZJLTQgb3IgZm9yIHRo YXQgbWF0dGVyIFNBRkktMSAoTVBMUyBpbiBHUkUgb3IgU1IgaW4gSVApLiZuYnNwOzwvZGl2Pg0K PGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iZ21haWxfZGVmYXVsdCIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFsLGhlbHZl dGljYSxzYW5zLXNlcmlmO2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpzbWFsbCI+DQo8YnI+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXYgY2xh c3M9ImdtYWlsX2RlZmF1bHQiIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LWZhbWlseTphcmlhbCxoZWx2ZXRpY2Esc2Fu cy1zZXJpZjtmb250LXNpemU6c21hbGwiPg0KVGh4LDxicj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0i Z21haWxfZGVmYXVsdCIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFsLGhlbHZldGljYSxzYW5zLXNl cmlmO2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpzbWFsbCI+DQpSLjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iZ21haWxfZGVmYXVs dCIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFsLGhlbHZldGljYSxzYW5zLXNlcmlmO2ZvbnQtc2l6 ZTpzbWFsbCI+DQo8YnI+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvYmxvY2tx dW90ZT4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L3NwYW4+PC9kaXY+DQo8L2Jsb2NrcXVvdGU+DQo8L2Rp dj4NCjxicj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvYmxvY2txdW90ZT4NCjwvc3Bhbj4N CjwvYm9keT4NCjwvaHRtbD4NCg== --_000_D3ECD8487C9C7aceeciscocom_-- From nobody Wed Aug 31 16:52:39 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFFB612D7AF; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:52:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.068 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.068 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rDNx39XTEdNC; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:52:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0869312D1A4; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:52:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10681; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1472687555; x=1473897155; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=nUqpz3hEvORryrgvKGcKqF4zoz33pm4zl7+vnZ8dZxI=; b=HFlqMjO6tyaHNJ7gf/i12SXqMqLTp2aUO/76ZfoADQMvGYtu8Iy3gDBn uI3e1ZCrb+P8xaG09S+Tm1eSm5HU3H1oXXP0usLmj1cml5Ku6ZXIJCrsg aUvli7JcTLPnZxGZUIraSPi8LIo3Ar9+sRGzl3pSofrVxTjP8pBvTrPLV c=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DHAgCObMdX/5NdJa1dgx0zAQEBAQEeV?= =?us-ascii?q?3wHsxSFDYIBJIV4AhyBLTgUAQIBAQEBAQEBXieEYQEBBQEBIUgDGQICAQgRAwE?= =?us-ascii?q?CKAMCAgIZDAsUCQgCBAESiEgOrl+McgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARcFB?= =?us-ascii?q?Yp3hBIRASIRCRaCTIJaBZlQAY8wgW2EXYkNjEiDeAEeNoJ8gTVwhE2BIH8BAQE?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,264,1470700800"; d="scan'208,217";a="142184941" Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 31 Aug 2016 23:52:34 +0000 Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7VNqXbI008632 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 31 Aug 2016 23:52:34 GMT Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 19:52:32 -0400 Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 19:52:33 -0400 From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" To: Loa Andersson , "idr@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Idr] Fwd: [mpls] Working Group adoption poll on draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis Thread-Index: AQHSA+K9B0JSxsuCGk2Zx4Q7BFcHng== Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 23:52:32 +0000 Message-ID: References: <8A502F2D-E7EC-4497-9BF1-1295E1F21A02@pi.nu> In-Reply-To: <8A502F2D-E7EC-4497-9BF1-1295E1F21A02@pi.nu> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D3ECE5BF7CA53aceeciscocom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [bess] [Idr] Fwd: [mpls] Working Group adoption poll on draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 23:52:37 -0000 --_000_D3ECE5BF7CA53aceeciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SW4gY2FzZSBpdCBpcyBub3Qgb2J2aW91cywgSSBzdXBwb3J0IE1QTFMgV0cgYWRvcHRpb24gb2Yg dGhlIHN1YmplY3QgZHJhZnQgaW4gaXRzIGN1cnJlbnQgZm9ybSA7XikuIEkgYWxyZWFkeSBzdXBw b3J0ZWQgaXQgb24gdGhlIE1QTFMgbGlzdC4NClRoYW5rcywNCkFjZWUNCg0KRnJvbTogSWRyIDxp ZHItYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZzxtYWlsdG86aWRyLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmc+PiBvbiBiZWhh bGYgb2YgTG9hIEFuZGVyc3NvbiA8bG9hQHBpLm51PG1haWx0bzpsb2FAcGkubnU+Pg0KRGF0ZTog V2VkbmVzZGF5LCBBdWd1c3QgMzEsIDIwMTYgYXQgMTI6MjggQU0NClRvOiBJRFIgTGlzdCA8aWRy QGlldGYub3JnPG1haWx0bzppZHJAaWV0Zi5vcmc+PiwgImJlc3NAaWV0Zi5vcmc8bWFpbHRvOmJl c3NAaWV0Zi5vcmc+IiA8YmVzc0BpZXRmLm9yZzxtYWlsdG86YmVzc0BpZXRmLm9yZz4+DQpTdWJq ZWN0OiBbSWRyXSBGd2Q6IFttcGxzXSBXb3JraW5nIEdyb3VwIGFkb3B0aW9uIHBvbGwgb24gZHJh ZnQtcm9zZW4tbXBscy1yZmMzMTA3YmlzDQoNCldvcmtpbmcgR3JvdXBzLA0KDQpQbGVhc2Ugbm90 ZSB0aGF0IHRoZSB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwIGFkb3B0aW9uIHBvbGwgZm9yIGRyYWZ0LXJvc2VuLW1w bHMtcmZjMzEwN2JpcyBoYXMgYmVlbiBzdGFydGVkIGluIHRoZSBtcGxzIHdnLiBQbGVhc2Ugc2Vu ZCB5b3VyIGNvbW1lbnRzIHRvIHRoZSBtcGxzIHdnIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdCAobXBsc0BpZXRmLm9y ZzxtYWlsdG86bXBsc0BpZXRmLm9yZz4pLg0KDQovTG9hDQptcGxzIHdnIGNvLWNoYWlyDQoNClNl bnQgZnJvbSBteSBpUGhvbmUNCg0KQmVnaW4gZm9yd2FyZGVkIG1lc3NhZ2U6DQoNCkZyb206IExv YSBBbmRlcnNzb24gPGxvYUBwaS5udTxtYWlsdG86bG9hQHBpLm51Pj4NCkRhdGU6IDMwIGF1Z3Vz dGkgMjAxNiAwODoxMDoxMyBHTVQrOA0KVG86ICJtcGxzQGlldGYub3JnPG1haWx0bzptcGxzQGll dGYub3JnPiIgPG1wbHNAaWV0Zi5vcmc8bWFpbHRvOm1wbHNAaWV0Zi5vcmc+Pg0KQ2M6ICJkcmFm dC1yb3Nlbi1tcGxzLXJmYzMxMDdiaXMuYWxsQGlldGYub3JnPG1haWx0bzpkcmFmdC1yb3Nlbi1t cGxzLXJmYzMxMDdiaXMuYWxsQGlldGYub3JnPiIgPGRyYWZ0LXJvc2VuLW1wbHMtcmZjMzEwN2Jp cy5hbGxAaWV0Zi5vcmc8bWFpbHRvOmRyYWZ0LXJvc2VuLW1wbHMtcmZjMzEwN2Jpcy5hbGxAaWV0 Zi5vcmc+PiwgIm1wbHMtY2hhaXJzQGlldGYub3JnPG1haWx0bzptcGxzLWNoYWlyc0BpZXRmLm9y Zz4iIDxtcGxzLWNoYWlyc0BpZXRmLm9yZzxtYWlsdG86bXBscy1jaGFpcnNAaWV0Zi5vcmc+Pg0K U3ViamVjdDogW21wbHNdIFdvcmtpbmcgR3JvdXAgYWRvcHRpb24gcG9sbCBvbiBkcmFmdC1yb3Nl bi1tcGxzLXJmYzMxMDdiaXMNCg0KV29ya2luZyBHcm91cCwNCg0KVGhpcyBpcyB0byBzdGFydCBh IHR3byB3ZWVrIHBvbGwgb24gYWRvcHRpbmcgZHJhZnQtcm9zZW4tbXBscy1yZmMzMTA3YmlzDQph cyBhbiBNUExTIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXAgZG9jdW1lbnQuDQoNClBsZWFzZSBzZW5kIHlvdXIgY29t bWVudHMgKHN1cHBvcnQvbm90IHN1cHBvcnQpIHRvIHRoZSBtcGxzIHdvcmtpbmcNCmdyb3VwIG1h aWxpbmcgbGlzdCAobXBsc0BpZXRmLm9yZzxtYWlsdG86bXBsc0BpZXRmLm9yZz4pLiBQbGVhc2Ug Z2l2ZSBhIHRlY2huaWNhbA0KbW90aXZhdGlvbiBmb3IgeW91ciBzdXBwb3J0L25vdCBzdXBwb3J0 LCBlc3BlY2lhbGx5IGlmIHlvdSB0aGluayB0aGF0DQp0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQgc2hvdWxkIG5vdCBi ZSBhZG9wdGVkIGFzIGEgd29ya2luZyBncm91cCBkb2N1bWVudC4NCg0KVGhlcmUgYXJlIG5vIElQ UiBkaXNjbG9zdXJlcyBhZ2FpbnN0IHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQuDQoNCkFsbCB0aGUgYXV0aG9ycyBo YXMgc3RhdGVkIG9uIHRoZSBvbiB0aGUgbXBscyB3ZyBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QgdGhhdCB0aGV5DQph cmUgbm90IGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBJUFJzIHRoYXQgcmVsYXRlIHRvIHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQuDQoN ClRoZSB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwIGFkb3B0aW9uIHBvbGwgZW5kcyBTZXB0ZW1iZXIgMTQsIDIwMTYu DQoNCi9Mb2ENCg0KTVBMUyB3ZyBjby1jaGFpci4NCi0tDQoNCg0KTG9hIEFuZGVyc3NvbiAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGVtYWlsOiBsb2FAbWFpbDAxLmh1YXdlaS5jb208bWFpbHRvOmxv YUBtYWlsMDEuaHVhd2VpLmNvbT4NClNlbmlvciBNUExTIEV4cGVydCAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgbG9hQHBpLm51PG1haWx0bzpsb2FAcGkubnU+DQpIdWF3ZWkgVGVjaG5vbG9naWVz IChjb25zdWx0YW50KSAgICAgcGhvbmU6ICs0NiA3MzkgODEgMjEgNjQNCg0KX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCm1wbHMgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQpt cGxzQGlldGYub3JnPG1haWx0bzptcGxzQGlldGYub3JnPg0KaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcv bWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9tcGxzDQo= --_000_D3ECE5BF7CA53aceeciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <47FA3DA1FCA4404E8269473AF00D0961@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWw+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxtZXRhIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIgY29udGVudD0i dGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij4NCjwvaGVhZD4NCjxib2R5IHN0eWxlPSJ3b3JkLXdy YXA6IGJyZWFrLXdvcmQ7IC13ZWJraXQtbmJzcC1tb2RlOiBzcGFjZTsgLXdlYmtpdC1saW5lLWJy ZWFrOiBhZnRlci13aGl0ZS1zcGFjZTsgY29sb3I6IHJnYigwLCAwLCAwKTsgZm9udC1zaXplOiAx NHB4OyBmb250LWZhbWlseTogQ2FsaWJyaSwgc2Fucy1zZXJpZjsiPg0KPGRpdj5JbiBjYXNlIGl0 IGlzIG5vdCBvYnZpb3VzLCBJIHN1cHBvcnQgTVBMUyBXRyBhZG9wdGlvbiBvZiB0aGUgc3ViamVj dCBkcmFmdCBpbiBpdHMgY3VycmVudCBmb3JtIDteKS4gSSBhbHJlYWR5IHN1cHBvcnRlZCBpdCBv biB0aGUgTVBMUyBsaXN0LiZuYnNwOzwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj5UaGFua3MsPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2PkFj ZWU8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+PGJyPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8c3BhbiBpZD0iT0xLX1NSQ19CT0RZX1NFQ1RJ T04iPg0KPGRpdiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6Q2FsaWJyaTsgZm9udC1zaXplOjExcHQ7IHRl eHQtYWxpZ246bGVmdDsgY29sb3I6YmxhY2s7IEJPUkRFUi1CT1RUT006IG1lZGl1bSBub25lOyBC T1JERVItTEVGVDogbWVkaXVtIG5vbmU7IFBBRERJTkctQk9UVE9NOiAwaW47IFBBRERJTkctTEVG VDogMGluOyBQQURESU5HLVJJR0hUOiAwaW47IEJPUkRFUi1UT1A6ICNiNWM0ZGYgMXB0IHNvbGlk OyBCT1JERVItUklHSFQ6IG1lZGl1bSBub25lOyBQQURESU5HLVRPUDogM3B0Ij4NCjxzcGFuIHN0 eWxlPSJmb250LXdlaWdodDpib2xkIj5Gcm9tOiA8L3NwYW4+SWRyICZsdDs8YSBocmVmPSJtYWls dG86aWRyLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmciPmlkci1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnPC9hPiZndDsgb24g YmVoYWxmIG9mIExvYSBBbmRlcnNzb24gJmx0OzxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpsb2FAcGkubnUiPmxv YUBwaS5udTwvYT4mZ3Q7PGJyPg0KPHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0OmJvbGQiPkRhdGU6 IDwvc3Bhbj5XZWRuZXNkYXksIEF1Z3VzdCAzMSwgMjAxNiBhdCAxMjoyOCBBTTxicj4NCjxzcGFu IHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXdlaWdodDpib2xkIj5UbzogPC9zcGFuPklEUiBMaXN0ICZsdDs8YSBocmVm PSJtYWlsdG86aWRyQGlldGYub3JnIj5pZHJAaWV0Zi5vcmc8L2E+Jmd0OywgJnF1b3Q7PGEgaHJl Zj0ibWFpbHRvOmJlc3NAaWV0Zi5vcmciPmJlc3NAaWV0Zi5vcmc8L2E+JnF1b3Q7ICZsdDs8YSBo cmVmPSJtYWlsdG86YmVzc0BpZXRmLm9yZyI+YmVzc0BpZXRmLm9yZzwvYT4mZ3Q7PGJyPg0KPHNw YW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0OmJvbGQiPlN1YmplY3Q6IDwvc3Bhbj5bSWRyXSBGd2Q6IFtt cGxzXSBXb3JraW5nIEdyb3VwIGFkb3B0aW9uIHBvbGwgb24gZHJhZnQtcm9zZW4tbXBscy1yZmMz MTA3YmlzPGJyPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pjxicj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGJsb2NrcXVvdGUgaWQ9Ik1B Q19PVVRMT09LX0FUVFJJQlVUSU9OX0JMT0NLUVVPVEUiIHN0eWxlPSJCT1JERVItTEVGVDogI2I1 YzRkZiA1IHNvbGlkOyBQQURESU5HOjAgMCAwIDU7IE1BUkdJTjowIDAgMCA1OyI+DQo8ZGl2Pg0K PGRpdiBkaXI9ImF1dG8iPg0KPGRpdj5Xb3JraW5nIEdyb3Vwcyw8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXYgaWQ9IkFw cGxlTWFpbFNpZ25hdHVyZSI+PGJyPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2IGlkPSJBcHBsZU1haWxTaWduYXR1 cmUiPlBsZWFzZSBub3RlIHRoYXQgdGhlIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXAgYWRvcHRpb24gcG9sbCBmb3Ig ZHJhZnQtcm9zZW4tbXBscy1yZmMzMTA3YmlzIGhhcyBiZWVuIHN0YXJ0ZWQgaW4gdGhlIG1wbHMg d2cuIFBsZWFzZSBzZW5kIHlvdXIgY29tbWVudHMgdG8gdGhlIG1wbHMgd2cgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0 ICg8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86bXBsc0BpZXRmLm9yZyI+bXBsc0BpZXRmLm9yZzwvYT4pLiZuYnNw OzwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBpZD0iQXBwbGVNYWlsU2lnbmF0dXJlIj48YnI+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXYg aWQ9IkFwcGxlTWFpbFNpZ25hdHVyZSI+L0xvYTwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBpZD0iQXBwbGVNYWlsU2ln bmF0dXJlIj5tcGxzIHdnIGNvLWNoYWlyPGJyPg0KPGJyPg0KU2VudCBmcm9tIG15IGlQaG9uZTwv ZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj48YnI+DQpCZWdpbiBmb3J3YXJkZWQgbWVzc2FnZTo8YnI+DQo8YnI+DQo8L2Rp dj4NCjxibG9ja3F1b3RlIHR5cGU9ImNpdGUiPg0KPGRpdj48Yj5Gcm9tOjwvYj4gTG9hIEFuZGVy c3NvbiAmbHQ7PGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOmxvYUBwaS5udSI+bG9hQHBpLm51PC9hPiZndDs8YnI+ DQo8Yj5EYXRlOjwvYj4gMzAgYXVndXN0aSAyMDE2IDA4OjEwOjEzIEdNVCYjNDM7ODxicj4NCjxi PlRvOjwvYj4gJnF1b3Q7PGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOm1wbHNAaWV0Zi5vcmciPm1wbHNAaWV0Zi5v cmc8L2E+JnF1b3Q7ICZsdDs8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86bXBsc0BpZXRmLm9yZyI+bXBsc0BpZXRm Lm9yZzwvYT4mZ3Q7PGJyPg0KPGI+Q2M6PC9iPiAmcXVvdDs8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86ZHJhZnQt cm9zZW4tbXBscy1yZmMzMTA3YmlzLmFsbEBpZXRmLm9yZyI+ZHJhZnQtcm9zZW4tbXBscy1yZmMz MTA3YmlzLmFsbEBpZXRmLm9yZzwvYT4mcXVvdDsgJmx0OzxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpkcmFmdC1y b3Nlbi1tcGxzLXJmYzMxMDdiaXMuYWxsQGlldGYub3JnIj5kcmFmdC1yb3Nlbi1tcGxzLXJmYzMx MDdiaXMuYWxsQGlldGYub3JnPC9hPiZndDssICZxdW90OzxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzptcGxzLWNo YWlyc0BpZXRmLm9yZyI+bXBscy1jaGFpcnNAaWV0Zi5vcmc8L2E+JnF1b3Q7DQogJmx0OzxhIGhy ZWY9Im1haWx0bzptcGxzLWNoYWlyc0BpZXRmLm9yZyI+bXBscy1jaGFpcnNAaWV0Zi5vcmc8L2E+ Jmd0Ozxicj4NCjxiPlN1YmplY3Q6PC9iPiA8Yj5bbXBsc10gV29ya2luZyBHcm91cCBhZG9wdGlv biBwb2xsIG9uIGRyYWZ0LXJvc2VuLW1wbHMtcmZjMzEwN2JpczwvYj48YnI+DQo8YnI+DQo8L2Rp dj4NCjwvYmxvY2txdW90ZT4NCjxibG9ja3F1b3RlIHR5cGU9ImNpdGUiPg0KPGRpdj48c3Bhbj5X b3JraW5nIEdyb3VwLDwvc3Bhbj48YnI+DQo8c3Bhbj48L3NwYW4+PGJyPg0KPHNwYW4+VGhpcyBp cyB0byBzdGFydCBhIHR3byB3ZWVrIHBvbGwgb24gYWRvcHRpbmcgZHJhZnQtcm9zZW4tbXBscy1y ZmMzMTA3YmlzPC9zcGFuPjxicj4NCjxzcGFuPmFzIGFuIE1QTFMgd29ya2luZyBncm91cCBkb2N1 bWVudC48L3NwYW4+PGJyPg0KPHNwYW4+PC9zcGFuPjxicj4NCjxzcGFuPlBsZWFzZSBzZW5kIHlv dXIgY29tbWVudHMgKHN1cHBvcnQvbm90IHN1cHBvcnQpIHRvIHRoZSBtcGxzIHdvcmtpbmc8L3Nw YW4+PGJyPg0KPHNwYW4+Z3JvdXAgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0ICg8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86bXBsc0Bp ZXRmLm9yZyI+bXBsc0BpZXRmLm9yZzwvYT4pLiBQbGVhc2UgZ2l2ZSBhIHRlY2huaWNhbDwvc3Bh bj48YnI+DQo8c3Bhbj5tb3RpdmF0aW9uIGZvciB5b3VyIHN1cHBvcnQvbm90IHN1cHBvcnQsIGVz cGVjaWFsbHkgaWYgeW91IHRoaW5rIHRoYXQ8L3NwYW4+PGJyPg0KPHNwYW4+dGhlIGRvY3VtZW50 IHNob3VsZCBub3QgYmUgYWRvcHRlZCBhcyBhIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXAgZG9jdW1lbnQuPC9zcGFu Pjxicj4NCjxzcGFuPjwvc3Bhbj48YnI+DQo8c3Bhbj5UaGVyZSBhcmUgbm8gSVBSIGRpc2Nsb3N1 cmVzIGFnYWluc3QgdGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudC48L3NwYW4+PGJyPg0KPHNwYW4+PC9zcGFuPjxicj4N CjxzcGFuPkFsbCB0aGUgYXV0aG9ycyBoYXMgc3RhdGVkIG9uIHRoZSBvbiB0aGUgbXBscyB3ZyBt YWlsaW5nIGxpc3QgdGhhdCB0aGV5PC9zcGFuPjxicj4NCjxzcGFuPmFyZSBub3QgYXdhcmUgb2Yg YW55IElQUnMgdGhhdCByZWxhdGUgdG8gdGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudC48L3NwYW4+PGJyPg0KPHNwYW4+ PC9zcGFuPjxicj4NCjxzcGFuPlRoZSB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwIGFkb3B0aW9uIHBvbGwgZW5kcyBT ZXB0ZW1iZXIgMTQsIDIwMTYuPC9zcGFuPjxicj4NCjxzcGFuPjwvc3Bhbj48YnI+DQo8c3Bhbj4v TG9hPC9zcGFuPjxicj4NCjxzcGFuPjwvc3Bhbj48YnI+DQo8c3Bhbj5NUExTIHdnIGNvLWNoYWly Ljwvc3Bhbj48YnI+DQo8c3Bhbj4tLSA8L3NwYW4+PGJyPg0KPHNwYW4+PC9zcGFuPjxicj4NCjxz cGFuPjwvc3Bhbj48YnI+DQo8c3Bhbj5Mb2EgQW5kZXJzc29uICZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZu YnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNw OyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZu YnNwO2VtYWlsOiA8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86bG9hQG1haWwwMS5odWF3ZWkuY29tIj4NCmxvYUBt YWlsMDEuaHVhd2VpLmNvbTwvYT48L3NwYW4+PGJyPg0KPHNwYW4+U2VuaW9yIE1QTFMgRXhwZXJ0 ICZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZu YnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNw OyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOzxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpsb2FA cGkubnUiPmxvYUBwaS5udTwvYT48L3NwYW4+PGJyPg0KPHNwYW4+SHVhd2VpIFRlY2hub2xvZ2ll cyAoY29uc3VsdGFudCkgJm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7cGhvbmU6ICYjNDM7NDYgNzM5 IDgxIDIxIDY0PC9zcGFuPjxicj4NCjxzcGFuPjwvc3Bhbj48YnI+DQo8c3Bhbj5fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXzwvc3Bhbj48YnI+DQo8c3Bhbj5t cGxzIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdDwvc3Bhbj48YnI+DQo8c3Bhbj48YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86bXBsc0Bp ZXRmLm9yZyI+bXBsc0BpZXRmLm9yZzwvYT48L3NwYW4+PGJyPg0KPHNwYW4+PGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0 cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9tcGxzIj5odHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRm Lm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL21wbHM8L2E+PC9zcGFuPjxicj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9ibG9j a3F1b3RlPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvYmxvY2txdW90ZT4NCjwvc3Bhbj4NCjwvYm9keT4N CjwvaHRtbD4NCg== --_000_D3ECE5BF7CA53aceeciscocom_-- From nobody Wed Aug 31 18:41:36 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6169212D78D; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 18:41:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.448 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E1Tl9ADggvSQ; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 18:41:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailrelay22.naist.jp (mailrelay22.naist.jp [IPv6:2001:200:16a:50::91]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9FFE12D89B; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 18:39:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailpost22.naist.jp (mailscan22.naist.jp [163.221.80.59]) by mailrelay22.naist.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49EDC2A7; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:39:37 +0900 (JST) Received: from naist-wavenet124-244.naist.jp (naist-wavenet124-244.naist.jp [163.221.124.244]) by mailpost22.naist.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30E5A2A6; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:39:37 +0900 (JST) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3BE43784-5D92-4982-B3B2-5832A3E63565" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) From: Marius Georgescu In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:39:36 +0900 Message-Id: <45482D45-3528-4779-B820-65C267777A33@is.naist.jp> References: To: Sudhin Jacob X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) X-TM-AS-MML: No X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1392-8.0.0.1202-22548.004 X-TM-AS-Result: No--10.612-5.0-31-10 X-imss-scan-details: No--10.612-5.0-31-10 X-TMASE-MatchedRID: y0LiLrpAiCqPvrMjLFD6eB5+URxv1WlBGcfGM6EiL4ZScXQMxepe+zmU QE0H1wVioDXxJNSw0wMkJA0oLWybYw7WYEeNmTZnkE7MrqaPYs2FBoWoxESWCfpy1dQbrq3E4tJ 1U/a1mfks98e1CBonTPtot0BX37EWOg4q4lJPNt8AWFA94fzR/zGZtPrBBPZrbXSaqChLKctnkE suGK0jPw8I07MxO6suUgas0VXX1YQHcwuOcL6OnfHkpkyUphL9X5TqQagR07drKNt7ipQiY71qf qj3ukkvNLrw4qvvPTxrJ+z6MUAArTp281S6OuSvHPCema1j/6t8yGO3dvk8/QJ1vk7thYuGUdfE Kc10rU4vcgUibwrcmjBRo1ocFJvbRezVZvE21Usvj6wHfIGxyZ03C0fPk8xKFLXUWU5hGiGlc5x sI5B5rZw4OPYmb2xzM3qKTAmesCNTGXOWPWl+0UOZWaJBszmqL3CpqoxHGN6zZf8joBUxbEenfb +klTH6T92nUW38QIaEuF2kRKympd9bqYxZO1l05BgEdUqqANR9LQinZ4QefK9dKZJ2Vxiasuf7R WbvUtyJL2rLVqwNULL1D3ZkqVjazhcsGxgF64K8mofWgmFAh90lPMYxmDF1QG/6eTYmNkXUG2gi lbfNQNcxs/UIRu80Y/tA/ze/D6po2ZLmf3MJd2y6wivdO2nN7Rx6QHAKu704pGEEKuXomA== Archived-At: Cc: "bess@ietf.org" , "bmwg@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] [bmwg] REG: Draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kishjac-bmwg-evpntest/ X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 01:41:35 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_3BE43784-5D92-4982-B3B2-5832A3E63565 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hi Sudhin, Here are my comments for: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kishjac-bmwg-evpntest-02 = I think that including PBB-EVPN was a good start towards improving this = draft.=20 It also didn=E2=80=99t seem very difficult to do. My comments about your other draft = (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-01 = ), I think = stand here as well. -1- Better structure, clarity and proofreading. It is a bit hard from my = perspective to read the document as is.=20 I assume that an improved sections layout and an English check should = help. -2- Reporting format is not clear for the proposed benchmarks. -3- Traffic setup is clearer than the other draft, but maybe = specifically mentioning the Ethernet frames format, or some wording on = that, should help. As a plus, I would add the following. -4- =46rom the test setup/test diagram it is difficult to understand how = the test traffic is flowing from one element to the other. -5- EVPN setup. In one instance you say=20 =E2=80=9CAll four routers except CE are running mpls,[space after = comma]bgp " Some wording on how that should be set up, I think would help. Regards, Marius > On Aug 26, 2016, at 22:46, Sudhin Jacob wrote: >=20 > Hi All, > =20 > I have uploaded draft after incorporating the comments received by = IETF 96. Kindly review it and let us know the feedback for adoption. > =20 > Regards, > Sudhin > =20 > _______________________________________________ > bmwg mailing list > bmwg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg = --Apple-Mail=_3BE43784-5D92-4982-B3B2-5832A3E63565 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Hi Sudhin,

Here are my comments for:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kishjac-bmwg-evpntest-02<= /div>

I think that = including PBB-EVPN was a good start towards improving this = draft. 
It also didn=E2=80=99t seem very = difficult to do.

My comments about your other draft (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-01), = I think stand here as well.

-1- Better structure, clarity and proofreading. It is a bit = hard from my perspective to read the document as is. 
I assume that an improved sections layout and an English = check should help.

-2- Reporting format is not clear for the proposed = benchmarks.

-3- = Traffic setup is clearer than the other draft, but maybe specifically = mentioning the Ethernet frames format, or some wording on that, should = help.

As a = plus, I would add the following.

-4- =46rom the test setup/test diagram = it is difficult to understand how the test traffic is flowing from one = element to the other.

-5- EVPN setup.
In one instance you = say 
=E2=80=9CAll four  = routers except CE are running mpls,[space after = comma]bgp
"

Some wording on how that should be set = up, I think would help.

Regards,
Marius




On Aug 26, 2016, at 22:46, Sudhin Jacob <sjacob@juniper.net> = wrote:

Hi All,
 
I have uploaded draft after = incorporating the comments received by IETF 96. Kindly review it and let = us know the feedback for adoption.
 
Regards,
Sudhin
 
_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg

= --Apple-Mail=_3BE43784-5D92-4982-B3B2-5832A3E63565-- From nobody Wed Aug 31 20:51:40 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E84D12D0B2; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 20:51:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.921 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uzkmh7jCKMeI; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 20:51:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01on0113.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.34.113]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3725312D0AE; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 20:51:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=lAOTYuZTWLFQgWyeZLD3XZHUYlxK59MSa9wXBRk+VBA=; b=E7ssXDktid8YsK5pQhZIFiJL6If5jNtVLQW7B+Hs67fMAXX6V6nEDWiisxRVQu5qKTMx5YpuHAc9RBgovrCXa8X7NujDLIQ8hLDOQLEVPiriwnb/anQoZDgJ3AqkuUm6dwm5a7zlO4J2tqPLoS8+hkW7X53xfZx4O+Gv3crdt34= Received: from BN6PR05MB2963.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.173.18.148) by BN6PR05MB2963.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.173.18.148) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA_P384) id 15.1.609.3; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 03:51:32 +0000 Received: from BN6PR05MB2963.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.18.148]) by BN6PR05MB2963.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.18.148]) with mapi id 15.01.0609.006; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 03:51:32 +0000 From: Sudhin Jacob To: Marius Georgescu Thread-Topic: [bmwg] REG: Draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kishjac-bmwg-evpntest/ Thread-Index: AdH/n9bHs133tIA9R5GK2RG3tve7hAEUdt8AAASXF8A= Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 03:51:32 +0000 Message-ID: References: <45482D45-3528-4779-B820-65C267777A33@is.naist.jp> In-Reply-To: <45482D45-3528-4779-B820-65C267777A33@is.naist.jp> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=sjacob@juniper.net; x-originating-ip: [116.197.184.10] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 05ed0912-21f8-43ac-c759-08d3d21b4366 x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN6PR05MB2963; 6:3LtK1a5J8BQ1Y1sRRz3cbDoBuaDzN+zTEMlfrFUF/jKIG9McW2T4QZsHZkucqsUOUtnDJsixFMAGn24Rf7k2TIZcEvnBN+MbNRj+A0KaWkrO5xexeDvm2r9gC98ycM9ZPbcjhC91kDCoUq6yFd2GlwVgUUtDolYGY4HkjlwOYDKuHOQKmyyKsminuKjUf7CUrb6dZQVbyqWyHFVCQizoGZGuOSm1nOC9KUKrRJj1mPk+IA4r6hjTiBivYISW2i78DvnEBGUKBcuvujDc7dhQW92ihc3ngnrBMZGIYhmnnapoDcFdniuRjhI6MdiCvDB6Zkmiyyw8DtmUoLHdCFktyg==; 5:KptJWYfacfJWLWwsbNnuSd/0uwaMT+Cp3y+YemrN35f0AeJFlQI8wvu+cAlXTUCZot8VOjBsf0KZJpG1BFKwV6Me09D4vVugOaCJ3e8cI7mtVe1MLjMjRY6SgwsOyyn2pprtOQV7W6WvcfwwpmxIOA==; 24:AxOttTKDITepgHjpMiQADOqkjlVsdIYs+hs+utYauy1J7mVxRSuGRH0o2DHOsTFLEl1nWpVMCyl3j6d6y68NEGZA+EeZ048LD+hoZXck4pU=; 7:yg3/gfirryqwyVPaKVY3anSt3rJOeVV/6+q0HSwy1j45Lb+MY++YrXSh2hJVujk3KP/J4HiPG/UijYi+gU0mGzFw2G51Q8gmEpT8JcCh2v5WDdudJ2Kw93WxWdJdKykGAamzdeSLfOtFEbBy3Q/aQhqqdNi5xrrLGN/a45wca5eQnrjjpZKtGeMbL52RpC343ChCC9uz404gSvfDHUBzKuf12mcNbXXlH/drgJV6oP0lYEbl5UjFtPoX0VZlYR/Q x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN6PR05MB2963; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105)(138986009662008)(21748063052155)(211171220733660); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040176)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026); SRVR:BN6PR05MB2963; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN6PR05MB2963; x-forefront-prvs: 0052308DC6 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(7916002)(51914003)(189002)(24454002)(53754006)(51444003)(199003)(377454003)(230783001)(5002640100001)(106356001)(7696003)(7736002)(92566002)(68736007)(7906003)(74316002)(189998001)(122556002)(16236675004)(6116002)(5660300001)(19609705001)(102836003)(3846002)(110136002)(586003)(15975445007)(77096005)(7846002)(19617315012)(790700001)(11100500001)(97736004)(8676002)(86362001)(3280700002)(3660700001)(4326007)(105586002)(76576001)(2950100001)(33656002)(19625215002)(19580405001)(19580395003)(9326002)(54356999)(8936002)(9686002)(2906002)(50986999)(81166006)(76176999)(87936001)(81156014)(2900100001)(101416001)(99286002)(10400500002)(19300405004)(66066001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN6PR05MB2963; H:BN6PR05MB2963.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BN6PR05MB29635EF711BA9DDFC7E94A4EC2E20BN6PR05MB2963namp_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Sep 2016 03:51:32.3829 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR05MB2963 Archived-At: Cc: "bess@ietf.org" , "bmwg@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] [bmwg] REG: Draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kishjac-bmwg-evpntest/ X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 03:51:39 -0000 --_000_BN6PR05MB29635EF711BA9DDFC7E94A4EC2E20BN6PR05MB2963namp_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGkgTWFyaXVzLA0KDQpUaGFua3MgZm9yIHRoZSBjb21tZW50LiBNdWNoIGFwcHJlY2lhdGVkLiBJ IHdpbGwgaW5jb3Jwb3JhdGUgYWxsIHlvdXIgZmluZGluZ3MuDQoNClJlZ2FyZHMsDQpTdWRoaW4N Cg0KRnJvbTogTWFyaXVzIEdlb3JnZXNjdSBbbWFpbHRvOmxpdml1bWFyaXVzLWdAaXMubmFpc3Qu anBdDQpTZW50OiBUaHVyc2RheSwgU2VwdGVtYmVyIDEsIDIwMTYgNzoxMCBBTQ0KVG86IFN1ZGhp biBKYWNvYiA8c2phY29iQGp1bmlwZXIubmV0Pg0KQ2M6IGJtd2dAaWV0Zi5vcmc7IGJlc3NAaWV0 Zi5vcmcNClN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBbYm13Z10gUkVHOiBEcmFmdCBodHRwczovL2RhdGF0cmFja2Vy LmlldGYub3JnL2RvYy9kcmFmdC1raXNoamFjLWJtd2ctZXZwbnRlc3QvDQoNCkhpIFN1ZGhpbiwN Cg0KSGVyZSBhcmUgbXkgY29tbWVudHMgZm9yOg0KaHR0cHM6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1s L2RyYWZ0LWtpc2hqYWMtYm13Zy1ldnBudGVzdC0wMg0KDQpJIHRoaW5rIHRoYXQgaW5jbHVkaW5n IFBCQi1FVlBOIHdhcyBhIGdvb2Qgc3RhcnQgdG93YXJkcyBpbXByb3ZpbmcgdGhpcyBkcmFmdC4N Ckl0IGFsc28gZGlkbuKAmXQgc2VlbSB2ZXJ5IGRpZmZpY3VsdCB0byBkby4NCg0KTXkgY29tbWVu dHMgYWJvdXQgeW91ciBvdGhlciBkcmFmdCAoaHR0cHM6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2Ry YWZ0LWphY3ByYS1ibXdnLXBtdGVzdC0wMSksIEkgdGhpbmsgc3RhbmQgaGVyZSBhcyB3ZWxsLg0K DQotMS0gQmV0dGVyIHN0cnVjdHVyZSwgY2xhcml0eSBhbmQgcHJvb2ZyZWFkaW5nLiBJdCBpcyBh IGJpdCBoYXJkIGZyb20gbXkgcGVyc3BlY3RpdmUgdG8gcmVhZCB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQgYXMgaXMu DQpJIGFzc3VtZSB0aGF0IGFuIGltcHJvdmVkIHNlY3Rpb25zIGxheW91dCBhbmQgYW4gRW5nbGlz aCBjaGVjayBzaG91bGQgaGVscC4NCg0KLTItIFJlcG9ydGluZyBmb3JtYXQgaXMgbm90IGNsZWFy IGZvciB0aGUgcHJvcG9zZWQgYmVuY2htYXJrcy4NCg0KLTMtIFRyYWZmaWMgc2V0dXAgaXMgY2xl YXJlciB0aGFuIHRoZSBvdGhlciBkcmFmdCwgYnV0IG1heWJlIHNwZWNpZmljYWxseSBtZW50aW9u aW5nIHRoZSBFdGhlcm5ldCBmcmFtZXMgZm9ybWF0LCBvciBzb21lIHdvcmRpbmcgb24gdGhhdCwg c2hvdWxkIGhlbHAuDQoNCkFzIGEgcGx1cywgSSB3b3VsZCBhZGQgdGhlIGZvbGxvd2luZy4NCg0K LTQtIEZyb20gdGhlIHRlc3Qgc2V0dXAvdGVzdCBkaWFncmFtIGl0IGlzIGRpZmZpY3VsdCB0byB1 bmRlcnN0YW5kIGhvdyB0aGUgdGVzdCB0cmFmZmljIGlzIGZsb3dpbmcgZnJvbSBvbmUgZWxlbWVu dCB0byB0aGUgb3RoZXIuDQoNCi01LSBFVlBOIHNldHVwLg0KSW4gb25lIGluc3RhbmNlIHlvdSBz YXkNCuKAnEFsbCBmb3VyICByb3V0ZXJzIGV4Y2VwdCBDRSBhcmUgcnVubmluZyBtcGxzLFtzcGFj ZSBhZnRlciBjb21tYV1iZ3ANCiINCg0KU29tZSB3b3JkaW5nIG9uIGhvdyB0aGF0IHNob3VsZCBi ZSBzZXQgdXAsIEkgdGhpbmsgd291bGQgaGVscC4NCg0KUmVnYXJkcywNCk1hcml1cw0KDQoNCg0K DQpPbiBBdWcgMjYsIDIwMTYsIGF0IDIyOjQ2LCBTdWRoaW4gSmFjb2IgPHNqYWNvYkBqdW5pcGVy Lm5ldDxtYWlsdG86c2phY29iQGp1bmlwZXIubmV0Pj4gd3JvdGU6DQoNCkhpIEFsbCwNCg0KSSBo YXZlIHVwbG9hZGVkIGRyYWZ0IGFmdGVyIGluY29ycG9yYXRpbmcgdGhlIGNvbW1lbnRzIHJlY2Vp dmVkIGJ5IElFVEYgOTYuIEtpbmRseSByZXZpZXcgaXQgYW5kIGxldCB1cyBrbm93IHRoZSBmZWVk YmFjayBmb3IgYWRvcHRpb24uDQoNClJlZ2FyZHMsDQpTdWRoaW4NCg0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCmJtd2cgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQpibXdn QGlldGYub3JnPG1haWx0bzpibXdnQGlldGYub3JnPg0KaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFp bG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9ibXdnDQoNCg== --_000_BN6PR05MB29635EF711BA9DDFC7E94A4EC2E20BN6PR05MB2963namp_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWwgeG1sbnM6dj0idXJuOnNjaGVtYXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTp2bWwiIHhtbG5zOm89InVy bjpzY2hlbWFzLW1pY3Jvc29mdC1jb206b2ZmaWNlOm9mZmljZSIgeG1sbnM6dz0idXJuOnNjaGVt YXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTpvZmZpY2U6d29yZCIgeG1sbnM6bT0iaHR0cDovL3NjaGVtYXMubWlj cm9zb2Z0LmNvbS9vZmZpY2UvMjAwNC8xMi9vbW1sIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcv VFIvUkVDLWh0bWw0MCI+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxtZXRhIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIg Y29udGVudD0idGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij4NCjxtZXRhIG5hbWU9IkdlbmVyYXRv ciIgY29udGVudD0iTWljcm9zb2Z0IFdvcmQgMTUgKGZpbHRlcmVkIG1lZGl1bSkiPg0KPHN0eWxl PjwhLS0NCi8qIEZvbnQgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8NCkBmb250LWZhY2UNCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6 SGVsdmV0aWNhOw0KCXBhbm9zZS0xOjIgMTEgNiA0IDIgMiAyIDIgMiA0O30NCkBmb250LWZhY2UN Cgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IkNhbWJyaWEgTWF0aCI7DQoJcGFub3NlLTE6MiA0IDUgMyA1IDQgNiAz IDIgNDt9DQpAZm9udC1mYWNlDQoJe2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OkNhbGlicmk7DQoJcGFub3NlLTE6MiAx NSA1IDIgMiAyIDQgMyAyIDQ7fQ0KLyogU3R5bGUgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8NCnAuTXNvTm9ybWFs LCBsaS5Nc29Ob3JtYWwsIGRpdi5Nc29Ob3JtYWwNCgl7bWFyZ2luOjBpbjsNCgltYXJnaW4tYm90 dG9tOi4wMDAxcHQ7DQoJZm9udC1zaXplOjEyLjBwdDsNCglmb250LWZhbWlseToiVGltZXMgTmV3 IFJvbWFuIixzZXJpZjt9DQphOmxpbmssIHNwYW4uTXNvSHlwZXJsaW5rDQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS1w cmlvcml0eTo5OTsNCgljb2xvcjpibHVlOw0KCXRleHQtZGVjb3JhdGlvbjp1bmRlcmxpbmU7fQ0K YTp2aXNpdGVkLCBzcGFuLk1zb0h5cGVybGlua0ZvbGxvd2VkDQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS1wcmlvcml0 eTo5OTsNCgljb2xvcjpwdXJwbGU7DQoJdGV4dC1kZWNvcmF0aW9uOnVuZGVybGluZTt9DQpwLm1z b25vcm1hbDAsIGxpLm1zb25vcm1hbDAsIGRpdi5tc29ub3JtYWwwDQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS1uYW1l Om1zb25vcm1hbDsNCgltc28tbWFyZ2luLXRvcC1hbHQ6YXV0bzsNCgltYXJnaW4tcmlnaHQ6MGlu Ow0KCW1zby1tYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tLWFsdDphdXRvOw0KCW1hcmdpbi1sZWZ0OjBpbjsNCglmb250 LXNpemU6MTIuMHB0Ow0KCWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4iLHNlcmlmO30NCnNw YW4uRW1haWxTdHlsZTE4DQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS10eXBlOnBlcnNvbmFsLXJlcGx5Ow0KCWZvbnQt ZmFtaWx5OiJDYWxpYnJpIixzYW5zLXNlcmlmOw0KCWNvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0Q7fQ0KLk1zb0NocERl ZmF1bHQNCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXR5cGU6ZXhwb3J0LW9ubHk7DQoJZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjBwdDt9 DQpAcGFnZSBXb3JkU2VjdGlvbjENCgl7c2l6ZTo4LjVpbiAxMS4waW47DQoJbWFyZ2luOjEuMGlu IDEuMGluIDEuMGluIDEuMGluO30NCmRpdi5Xb3JkU2VjdGlvbjENCgl7cGFnZTpXb3JkU2VjdGlv bjE7fQ0KLS0+PC9zdHlsZT48IS0tW2lmIGd0ZSBtc28gOV0+PHhtbD4NCjxvOnNoYXBlZGVmYXVs dHMgdjpleHQ9ImVkaXQiIHNwaWRtYXg9IjEwMjYiIC8+DQo8L3htbD48IVtlbmRpZl0tLT48IS0t W2lmIGd0ZSBtc28gOV0+PHhtbD4NCjxvOnNoYXBlbGF5b3V0IHY6ZXh0PSJlZGl0Ij4NCjxvOmlk bWFwIHY6ZXh0PSJlZGl0IiBkYXRhPSIxIiAvPg0KPC9vOnNoYXBlbGF5b3V0PjwveG1sPjwhW2Vu ZGlmXS0tPg0KPC9oZWFkPg0KPGJvZHkgbGFuZz0iRU4tVVMiIGxpbms9ImJsdWUiIHZsaW5rPSJw dXJwbGUiPg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iV29yZFNlY3Rpb24xIj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwi PjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0NhbGlicmkm cXVvdDssc2Fucy1zZXJpZjtjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEIj5IaSBNYXJpdXMsPG86cD48L286cD48L3Nw YW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4w cHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90OyxzYW5zLXNlcmlmO2NvbG9yOiMxRjQ5 N0QiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxz cGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0NhbGlicmkmcXVv dDssc2Fucy1zZXJpZjtjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEIj5UaGFua3MgZm9yIHRoZSBjb21tZW50LiBNdWNo IGFwcHJlY2lhdGVkLiBJIHdpbGwgaW5jb3Jwb3JhdGUgYWxsIHlvdXIgZmluZGluZ3MuPG86cD48 L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQt c2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90OyxzYW5zLXNlcmlmO2Nv bG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29O b3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0Nh bGlicmkmcXVvdDssc2Fucy1zZXJpZjtjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEIj5SZWdhcmRzLDxvOnA+PC9vOnA+ PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6 MTEuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0NhbGlicmkmcXVvdDssc2Fucy1zZXJpZjtjb2xvcjoj MUY0OTdEIj5TdWRoaW48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFs Ij48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjExLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtDYWxpYnJp JnF1b3Q7LHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7Y29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+ PC9wPg0KPGRpdj4NCjxkaXYgc3R5bGU9ImJvcmRlcjpub25lO2JvcmRlci10b3A6c29saWQgI0Ux RTFFMSAxLjBwdDtwYWRkaW5nOjMuMHB0IDBpbiAwaW4gMGluIj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3Jt YWwiPjxiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0Nh bGlicmkmcXVvdDssc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+RnJvbTo8L3NwYW4+PC9iPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250 LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0NhbGlicmkmcXVvdDssc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+ IE1hcml1cyBHZW9yZ2VzY3UgW21haWx0bzpsaXZpdW1hcml1cy1nQGlzLm5haXN0LmpwXQ0KPGJy Pg0KPGI+U2VudDo8L2I+IFRodXJzZGF5LCBTZXB0ZW1iZXIgMSwgMjAxNiA3OjEwIEFNPGJyPg0K PGI+VG86PC9iPiBTdWRoaW4gSmFjb2IgJmx0O3NqYWNvYkBqdW5pcGVyLm5ldCZndDs8YnI+DQo8 Yj5DYzo8L2I+IGJtd2dAaWV0Zi5vcmc7IGJlc3NAaWV0Zi5vcmc8YnI+DQo8Yj5TdWJqZWN0Ojwv Yj4gUmU6IFtibXdnXSBSRUc6IERyYWZ0IGh0dHBzOi8vZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcvZG9j L2RyYWZ0LWtpc2hqYWMtYm13Zy1ldnBudGVzdC88bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8L2Rp dj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3A+DQo8 cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5IaSBTdWRoaW4sPG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAg Y2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8 cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5IZXJlIGFyZSBteSBjb21tZW50cyBmb3I6PG86cD48L286cD48 L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48YSBocmVmPSJodHRwczov L3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2h0bWwvZHJhZnQta2lzaGphYy1ibXdnLWV2cG50ZXN0LTAyIj5odHRw czovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2h0bWwvZHJhZnQta2lzaGphYy1ibXdnLWV2cG50ZXN0LTAyPC9h PjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PG86 cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5J IHRoaW5rIHRoYXQgaW5jbHVkaW5nJm5ic3A7UEJCLUVWUE4gd2FzIGEgZ29vZCBzdGFydCB0b3dh cmRzIGltcHJvdmluZyB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0LiZuYnNwOzxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8 ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+SXQgYWxzbyBkaWRu4oCZdCBzZWVtIHZlcnkgZGlm ZmljdWx0IHRvIGRvLjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1z b05vcm1hbCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0i TXNvTm9ybWFsIj5NeSBjb21tZW50cyBhYm91dCB5b3VyIG90aGVyIGRyYWZ0ICg8YSBocmVmPSJo dHRwczovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2h0bWwvZHJhZnQtamFjcHJhLWJtd2ctcG10ZXN0LTAxIj5o dHRwczovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2h0bWwvZHJhZnQtamFjcHJhLWJtd2ctcG10ZXN0LTAxPC9h PiksIEkgdGhpbmsgc3RhbmQgaGVyZSBhcyB3ZWxsLjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8 ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4N CjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj4tMS0gQmV0dGVyIHN0cnVjdHVyZSwgY2xhcml0 eSBhbmQgcHJvb2ZyZWFkaW5nLiBJdCBpcyBhIGJpdCBoYXJkIGZyb20gbXkgcGVyc3BlY3RpdmUg dG8gcmVhZCB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQgYXMgaXMuJm5ic3A7PG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4N CjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5JIGFzc3VtZSB0aGF0IGFuIGltcHJvdmVkIHNl Y3Rpb25zIGxheW91dCBhbmQgYW4gRW5nbGlzaCBjaGVjayBzaG91bGQgaGVscC48bzpwPjwvbzpw PjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9v OnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+LTItIFJlcG9ydGlu ZyBmb3JtYXQgaXMgbm90IGNsZWFyIGZvciB0aGUgcHJvcG9zZWQgYmVuY2htYXJrcy48bzpwPjwv bzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7 PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+LTMtIFRyYWZm aWMgc2V0dXAgaXMgY2xlYXJlciB0aGFuIHRoZSBvdGhlciBkcmFmdCwgYnV0IG1heWJlIHNwZWNp ZmljYWxseSBtZW50aW9uaW5nIHRoZSBFdGhlcm5ldCBmcmFtZXMgZm9ybWF0LCBvciBzb21lIHdv cmRpbmcgb24gdGhhdCwgc2hvdWxkIGhlbHAuPG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+ DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRp dj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPkFzIGEgcGx1cywgSSB3b3VsZCBhZGQgdGhlIGZvbGxv d2luZy48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwi PjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1h bCI+LTQtIEZyb20gdGhlIHRlc3Qgc2V0dXAvdGVzdCBkaWFncmFtIGl0IGlzIGRpZmZpY3VsdCB0 byB1bmRlcnN0YW5kIGhvdyB0aGUgdGVzdCB0cmFmZmljIGlzIGZsb3dpbmcgZnJvbSBvbmUgZWxl bWVudCB0byB0aGUgb3RoZXIuPG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFz cz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNs YXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPi01LSBFVlBOIHNldHVwLjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8 ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+SW4gb25lIGluc3RhbmNlIHlvdSBzYXkmbmJzcDs8 bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPuKAnDxz cGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0Ij5BbGwgZm91ciZuYnNwOyByb3V0ZXJzIGV4Y2Vw dCBDRSBhcmUgcnVubmluZyBtcGxzLFtzcGFjZSBhZnRlciBjb21tYV1iZ3A8L3NwYW4+PG86cD48 L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj4mcXVvdDs8bzpw PjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxvOnA+Jm5i c3A7PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+U29tZSB3 b3JkaW5nIG9uIGhvdyB0aGF0IHNob3VsZCBiZSBzZXQgdXAsIEkgdGhpbmsgd291bGQgaGVscC48 bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxvOnA+ Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+UmVn YXJkcyw8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwi Pk1hcml1czxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1h bCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9y bWFsIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48 bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PG86cD4m bmJzcDs8L286cD48L3A+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPGJsb2NrcXVvdGUgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi10b3A6NS4w cHQ7bWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbTo1LjBwdCI+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+T24g QXVnIDI2LCAyMDE2LCBhdCAyMjo0NiwgU3VkaGluIEphY29iICZsdDs8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86 c2phY29iQGp1bmlwZXIubmV0Ij5zamFjb2JAanVuaXBlci5uZXQ8L2E+Jmd0OyB3cm90ZTo8bzpw PjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286 cD48L3A+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJm b250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtBcmlhbCZxdW90OyxzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj5IaSBBbGwsPG86cD48L286 cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4g c3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0FyaWFsJnF1b3Q7LHNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPiZuYnNwOzxv OnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwi PjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtBcmlhbCZxdW90OyxzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj5J IGhhdmUgdXBsb2FkZWQgZHJhZnQgYWZ0ZXIgaW5jb3Jwb3JhdGluZyB0aGUgY29tbWVudHMgcmVj ZWl2ZWQgYnkgSUVURiA5Ni4gS2luZGx5IHJldmlldyBpdCBhbmQgbGV0IHVzIGtub3cgdGhlIGZl ZWRiYWNrIGZvciBhZG9wdGlvbi48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+ DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjExLjBwdDtmb250 LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtDYWxpYnJpJnF1b3Q7LHNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPiZuYnNwOzwvc3Bhbj48c3Bh biBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7QXJpYWwmcXVvdDssc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+PG86cD48 L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNw YW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0FyaWFsJnF1b3Q7LHNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPlJlZ2Fy ZHMsPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05v cm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0FyaWFsJnF1b3Q7LHNhbnMtc2Vy aWYiPlN1ZGhpbjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNz PSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZx dW90O0NhbGlicmkmcXVvdDssc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+Jm5ic3A7PC9zcGFuPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJm b250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtBcmlhbCZxdW90OyxzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bh bj48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNp emU6OS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7SGVsdmV0aWNhJnF1b3Q7LHNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPl9f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fPGJyPg0KYm13ZyBt YWlsaW5nIGxpc3Q8YnI+DQo8L3NwYW4+PGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOmJtd2dAaWV0Zi5vcmciPjxz cGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6OS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7SGVsdmV0aWNhJnF1 b3Q7LHNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPmJtd2dAaWV0Zi5vcmc8L3NwYW4+PC9hPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250 LXNpemU6OS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7SGVsdmV0aWNhJnF1b3Q7LHNhbnMtc2VyaWYi Pjxicj4NCjwvc3Bhbj48YSBocmVmPSJodHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3Rp bmZvL2Jtd2ciPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6OS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7 SGVsdmV0aWNhJnF1b3Q7LHNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4v bGlzdGluZm8vYm13Zzwvc3Bhbj48L2E+PG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvYmxvY2tx dW90ZT4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3A+ DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9ib2R5Pg0KPC9odG1sPg0K --_000_BN6PR05MB29635EF711BA9DDFC7E94A4EC2E20BN6PR05MB2963namp_--