From nobody Wed Jul 23 15:01:37 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39171A0394 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:01:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yaTVEvwRQ-3K for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:01:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hoemail1.alcatel.com (hoemail1.alcatel.com [192.160.6.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC80A1B29A2 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:01:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-122.lucent.com [135.239.2.122]) by hoemail1.alcatel.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id s6NM1Mp3006665 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 17:01:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s6NM1L7O018901 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:01:21 +0200 Received: from FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.7.71]) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.111]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:01:21 +0200 From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" To: "bfcpbis@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-01 Thread-Index: Ac+mwaFt+wxUSKuiQLm5dOFQmtDeVg== Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 22:01:20 +0000 Message-ID: <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B20F42E@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.41] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/rEmeHlrUbkMuCpyGtqq9-X2Qpu4 Subject: [bfcpbis] draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-01 X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 22:01:35 -0000 This has recently been posted. Prior to WGLC we would like to get some reviews. I believe at the last meeting Christer Holmberg agreed to do a review. Additionally Charles Eckel has also volunteered to review it. We could do with a couple more volunteers. So please step up. What we are looking for primarily is to ensure that the document has covera= ge of all aspects that it should cover, and that there are no open issues w= here we need further technical discussion; if there are, we need to initiat= e that technical discussion. Any comments at this point are of course welcome outside this scope. Ideally we are looking to complete these reviews and any discussion within = the next month or so, and then run into WGLC. Regards Keith= From nobody Thu Jul 24 15:15:07 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB601A0111 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:15:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.502 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ABqPnbFS8CQX for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:15:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03D6F1A00DE for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:15:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1038; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1406240103; x=1407449703; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=nTWPlIAdBLcr/9w7eMIWGzYZJiiguVxkEhyYlYqiPt4=; b=G1GcpWIsbs1dWC36lPl7QUJrEECATk29QoIiEnNOt7vFjrm0Sr1GD3GL CuP9PsoWfgGJAOwkPieMfGNzQEyjRIe0q32d1yWV9IFkfLXImm6EY83dB WFhII1GBdQBlVrGoncBrMWyR+sUv1vs9a5+rWgDbGz7pLiS3rzJvT6xEz E=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiAHAPiE0VOtJV2P/2dsb2JhbABYgw5SVwEDyTmIVhZ3hAqBCwGBACcEiFUNmF6mZReUGAWKL5EHgVKSc4NIbAGBRA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,727,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="342678063" Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Jul 2014 22:15:02 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com [173.37.183.89]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6OMF2JO001309 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 22:15:02 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.3.252]) by xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([173.37.183.89]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 17:15:02 -0500 From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" To: "bfcpbis@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: comments on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-01 Thread-Index: AQHPp4y2rzTeh9BQv0GMsxTrXbhoqg== Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 22:15:01 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030 x-originating-ip: [10.21.92.159] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/OBJKU2u3KTY9nvJjITJasP3HMc0 Subject: [bfcpbis] comments on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-01 X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 22:15:05 -0000 The updated draft looks good to me. It addresses my previous comments. I have one additional suggestion regarding the resolution of one of my comments. Section 1 was changed to read as follows: "This specification defines a new WebSocket sub-protocol (as defined in section 1.9 in [RFC6455] ) for transporting BFCP messages between a WebSocket client and server, a new reliable and boundary preserving transport for BFCP which in turn runs on top of TCP and can be optionally secured with TLS.=B2 I think it would be more clear as follows: "This specification defines a new WebSocket sub-protocol (as defined in section 1.9 in [RFC6455] ) for transporting BFCP messages between a WebSocket client and server. This sub-protocol provides a reliable and boundary preserving transport for BFCP when it is run on top of TCP. It is not meant for transport of BFCP when it is run on top of UDP. Cheers, Charles From nobody Tue Jul 29 03:27:03 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB2A1A0320 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 03:27:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FBuiORpnahGw for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 03:26:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-x22d.google.com (mail-lb0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F5731A00FA for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 03:26:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id p9so6696666lbv.4 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 03:26:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=i/LUFf8+pnKkea0HBSV+jVCUUqex39WRCHfc04JhaPM=; b=CX0dAc10taZiKGp4nF3934tKhb8JrnT8GsQBSSYn6t5BZcmOcRVmyIcaxP+E5YgZbT E+CQz83QKqQzkFQy6YxgDmCfd/p3X1Vn04iEsv2WY/NvB7w2kqtbrNjAsnaIdkwlHMIY L00RGJKF8qqkc5Ch5JIaGowa5kp0Gu4aR+1u7R/kH1TEXYF89RW0rh6C7Ez02Zso155o rm9aF4lYMPsnFznk6jK2Ec7JkIK6ThVlYnrS+HgPdBqn0Cuvqmf/c8xpCo5mhilKr3mB KaZjTb1sYR1/xOQX/y3KKDeuOtnvC9+noiL67J11nzPH56+se027MjnKE4RWIgUNL4Gm 6DXg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.157.68 with SMTP id wk4mr1175081lbb.85.1406629615544; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 03:26:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.99.72 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 03:26:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 12:26:55 +0200 Message-ID: From: Victor Pascual Avila To: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/8lUnrTmoLXgtbN-6s39jcPsQlEA Cc: "bfcpbis@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] comments on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-01 X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 10:27:00 -0000 Charles, thanks for your comment. Current text, as in version -01 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-01), reads as follows: This specification defines a new WebSocket sub- protocol (as defined in section 1.9 in [RFC6455]) for transporting BFCP messages between a WebSocket client and server. This sub- protocol provides a reliable and boundary preserving transport for BFCP when run on top of TCP. Since WebSocket is a reliable transport, the extensions defined in [I-D.ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis] for sending BFCP over unreliable transports are not applicable. Cheers, -Victor On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) wrote: > The updated draft looks good to me. It addresses my previous comments. I > have one additional suggestion regarding the resolution of one of my > comments. > > Section 1 was changed to read as follows: > "This specification defines a new WebSocket sub-protocol (as defined in > section 1.9 in [RFC6455] > ) for transporting > BFCP messages between a WebSocket client and server, a new reliable and > boundary preserving transport for BFCP which in turn runs on top of TCP > and can be optionally secured with TLS.=C2=B2 > > I think it would be more clear as follows: > > "This specification defines a new WebSocket sub-protocol (as defined in > section 1.9 in [RFC6455] > ) for transporting > BFCP messages between a WebSocket client and server. This sub-protocol > provides a reliable and boundary preserving transport for BFCP when it is > run on top of TCP. It is not meant for transport of BFCP when it is run o= n > top of UDP. > > Cheers, > Charles > > _______________________________________________ > bfcpbis mailing list > bfcpbis@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis --=20 Victor Pascual =C3=81vila From nobody Wed Jul 30 16:16:11 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E351A0345 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:15:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.502 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qN5GmTu_jtMB for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:15:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EBEC1A03A8 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:15:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3346; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1406762153; x=1407971753; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=W5wV8nKqWftrclBjpbt1yEp/WQAop691QN+fKYbt+nk=; b=klKdVne7z+4U+9w3nnregsRDu/RICDxqEkINAVBG1pYA8Oe9sRPPzR91 OHC6oyk0LS1Hny8NqVFrMcDle8pNfyZ2kGfTsJVaB6P9Se4Bl7gr/cBk6 CsWtFLtyHtBUH53npNbh6q9BW7MnDBBbIohmSWdu5J3otVh+kQhYIvKdt 8=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai4FAMd72VOtJA2F/2dsb2JhbABZgw5SVwSCdMdyHgqGeFMBGXcWd4QEAQEBAwEBASAROgsQAgEIGAICJgICAh8GCxUQAgQOBYguAxENqFqQUw2HDheBLItzgi0HgnmBUQWZX4IFgVKMXIYlg0lsAYFE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,768,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="65315802" Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2014 23:15:52 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com [173.36.12.82]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6UNFqIs017980 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 30 Jul 2014 23:15:52 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.3.252]) by xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com ([173.36.12.82]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 18:15:52 -0500 From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" To: Victor Pascual Avila Thread-Topic: [bfcpbis] comments on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-01 Thread-Index: AQHPp4y2rzTeh9BQv0GMsxTrXbhoqpu3M/WAgAHz0QA= Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 23:15:51 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030 x-originating-ip: [10.21.102.251] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <75570BA942F9DB448DEAE9519C962D68@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/3DWphfVTP9wkCB0poQQ3ukf-qUI Cc: "bfcpbis@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] comments on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-01 X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 23:15:59 -0000 U29ycnkgYWJvdXQgdGhhdCBWaWN0b3IuIEkgYWNjaWRlbnRhbGx5IHJldmlld2VkIGFuIGludGVy bWVkaWF0ZSB2ZXJzaW9uDQpwcmlvciB0byB2ZXJzaW9uIC0wMS4gVGhlIHRleHQgaW4gdmVyc2lv biAtMDEgbG9va3MgZmluZSB0byBtZS4NCg0KQ2hlZXJzLA0KQ2hhcmxlcw0KDQpPbiA3LzI5LzE0 LCA2OjI2IEFNLCAiVmljdG9yIFBhc2N1YWwgQXZpbGEiDQo8dmljdG9yLnBhc2N1YWwuYXZpbGFA Z21haWwuY29tPiB3cm90ZToNCg0KPkNoYXJsZXMsDQo+DQo+dGhhbmtzIGZvciB5b3VyIGNvbW1l bnQuIEN1cnJlbnQgdGV4dCwgYXMgaW4gdmVyc2lvbiAtMDENCj4oaHR0cDovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYu b3JnL2h0bWwvZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1iZmNwYmlzLWJmY3Atd2Vic29ja2V0LTAxKSwNCj5yZWFkcyBh cyBmb2xsb3dzOg0KPg0KPlRoaXMgc3BlY2lmaWNhdGlvbiBkZWZpbmVzIGEgbmV3IFdlYlNvY2tl dCBzdWItDQo+ICAgcHJvdG9jb2wgKGFzIGRlZmluZWQgaW4gc2VjdGlvbiAxLjkgaW4gW1JGQzY0 NTVdKSBmb3IgdHJhbnNwb3J0aW5nDQo+ICAgQkZDUCBtZXNzYWdlcyBiZXR3ZWVuIGEgV2ViU29j a2V0IGNsaWVudCBhbmQgc2VydmVyLiAgVGhpcyBzdWItDQo+ICAgcHJvdG9jb2wgcHJvdmlkZXMg YSByZWxpYWJsZSBhbmQgYm91bmRhcnkgcHJlc2VydmluZyB0cmFuc3BvcnQgZm9yDQo+ICAgQkZD UCB3aGVuIHJ1biBvbiB0b3Agb2YgVENQLiAgU2luY2UgV2ViU29ja2V0IGlzIGEgcmVsaWFibGUN Cj4gICB0cmFuc3BvcnQsIHRoZSBleHRlbnNpb25zIGRlZmluZWQgaW4gW0ktRC5pZXRmLWJmY3Bi aXMtcmZjNDU4MmJpc10NCj4gICBmb3Igc2VuZGluZyBCRkNQIG92ZXIgdW5yZWxpYWJsZSB0cmFu c3BvcnRzIGFyZSBub3QgYXBwbGljYWJsZS4NCj4NCj5DaGVlcnMsDQo+LVZpY3Rvcg0KPg0KPk9u IEZyaSwgSnVsIDI1LCAyMDE0IGF0IDEyOjE1IEFNLCBDaGFybGVzIEVja2VsIChlY2tlbGN1KQ0K PjxlY2tlbGN1QGNpc2NvLmNvbT4gd3JvdGU6DQo+PiBUaGUgdXBkYXRlZCBkcmFmdCBsb29rcyBn b29kIHRvIG1lLiBJdCBhZGRyZXNzZXMgbXkgcHJldmlvdXMgY29tbWVudHMuIEkNCj4+IGhhdmUg b25lIGFkZGl0aW9uYWwgc3VnZ2VzdGlvbiByZWdhcmRpbmcgdGhlIHJlc29sdXRpb24gb2Ygb25l IG9mIG15DQo+PiBjb21tZW50cy4NCj4+DQo+PiBTZWN0aW9uIDEgd2FzIGNoYW5nZWQgdG8gcmVh ZCBhcyBmb2xsb3dzOg0KPj4gIlRoaXMgc3BlY2lmaWNhdGlvbiBkZWZpbmVzIGEgbmV3IFdlYlNv Y2tldCBzdWItcHJvdG9jb2wgKGFzIGRlZmluZWQgaW4NCj4+IHNlY3Rpb24gMS45IGluIFtSRkM2 NDU1XQ0KPj4gPGh0dHA6Ly94bWwycmZjLmlldGYub3JnL2NnaS1iaW4veG1sMnJmYy5jZ2kjUkZD NjQ1NT4pIGZvciB0cmFuc3BvcnRpbmcNCj4+IEJGQ1AgbWVzc2FnZXMgYmV0d2VlbiBhIFdlYlNv Y2tldCBjbGllbnQgYW5kIHNlcnZlciwgYSBuZXcgcmVsaWFibGUgYW5kDQo+PiBib3VuZGFyeSBw cmVzZXJ2aW5nIHRyYW5zcG9ydCBmb3IgQkZDUCB3aGljaCBpbiB0dXJuIHJ1bnMgb24gdG9wIG9m IFRDUA0KPj4gYW5kIGNhbiBiZSBvcHRpb25hbGx5IHNlY3VyZWQgd2l0aCBUTFMuwrINCj4+DQo+ PiBJIHRoaW5rIGl0IHdvdWxkIGJlIG1vcmUgY2xlYXIgYXMgZm9sbG93czoNCj4+DQo+PiAiVGhp cyBzcGVjaWZpY2F0aW9uIGRlZmluZXMgYSBuZXcgV2ViU29ja2V0IHN1Yi1wcm90b2NvbCAoYXMg ZGVmaW5lZCBpbg0KPj4gc2VjdGlvbiAxLjkgaW4gW1JGQzY0NTVdDQo+PiA8aHR0cDovL3htbDJy ZmMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvY2dpLWJpbi94bWwycmZjLmNnaSNSRkM2NDU1PikgZm9yIHRyYW5zcG9ydGlu Zw0KPj4gQkZDUCBtZXNzYWdlcyBiZXR3ZWVuIGEgV2ViU29ja2V0IGNsaWVudCBhbmQgc2VydmVy LiBUaGlzIHN1Yi1wcm90b2NvbA0KPj4gcHJvdmlkZXMgYSByZWxpYWJsZSBhbmQgYm91bmRhcnkg cHJlc2VydmluZyB0cmFuc3BvcnQgZm9yIEJGQ1Agd2hlbiBpdA0KPj5pcw0KPj4gcnVuIG9uIHRv cCBvZiBUQ1AuIEl0IGlzIG5vdCBtZWFudCBmb3IgdHJhbnNwb3J0IG9mIEJGQ1Agd2hlbiBpdCBp cyBydW4NCj4+b24NCj4+IHRvcCBvZiBVRFAuDQo+Pg0KPj4gQ2hlZXJzLA0KPj4gQ2hhcmxlcw0K Pj4NCj4+IF9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQo+ PiBiZmNwYmlzIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KPj4gYmZjcGJpc0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KPj4gaHR0cHM6Ly93 d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9iZmNwYmlzDQo+DQo+DQo+DQo+LS0gDQo+Vmlj dG9yIFBhc2N1YWwgw4F2aWxhDQo+DQo+X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCj5iZmNwYmlzIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KPmJmY3BiaXNAaWV0Zi5vcmcN Cj5odHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2JmY3BiaXMNCg0K