From nobody Tue May 17 04:50:32 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E83612D867; Tue, 17 May 2016 04:50:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.22 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tubrOglmrBhc; Tue, 17 May 2016 04:50:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (asmtp5.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82DBF12D88E; Tue, 17 May 2016 04:49:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u4HBnmxl025490; Tue, 17 May 2016 12:49:48 +0100 Received: from 950129200 (jplon-nat12.juniper.net [193.110.55.12]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u4HBnh24025353 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 17 May 2016 12:49:46 +0100 From: "Adrian Farrel" To: "'Loa Andersson'" , , , References: <57173521.8030906@pi.nu> In-Reply-To: <57173521.8030906@pi.nu> Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 12:49:42 +0100 Message-ID: <03a301d1b032$367f49a0$a37ddce0$@olddog.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQKoGlDH3LdBR6J/zl6nuOFqWrQikp4QLJoQ Content-Language: en-gb X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.0.0.1202-22326.006 X-TM-AS-Result: No--14.735-10.0-31-10 X-imss-scan-details: No--14.735-10.0-31-10 X-TMASE-MatchedRID: HXSqh3WYKftm1pXqgYWmDgRH1Nr7oERdI0ZIn3NG5Q34JyR+b5tvoL2e oZAgUs+FMpdM7GeJ31eFHxrFVu8uTZHy7oM4lvOncFEiuPxHjsWeimGtNywjttp1biJhIyNR47t D0xLQ0uduuBQngKeoeCKzrtZ6nLpgDQ5jam+jpkpmvZ4BRIIeO43FHSia5GbNgrAXgr/AjP0xHp KjmSUgsyY+xseIO4dYliXG6TWiBAD7OgBbxHXmXxzwnpmtY/+rfS0Ip2eEHny+qryzYw2E8M894 3oc3p3sq7rFUcuGp/EgBwKKRHe+r5D6OD+tc9otJpcwDSoaJmVyn/AEI+Wy8Y/gOBBTnEaq/TDy GwBkCtM= Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Bier] status of draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 11:50:30 -0000 Well, why not? But then again, just because we know how to encapsulate it doesn't mean we know what it is! Wouldn't it make some sense to advance the normatively referenced draft-ietf-bier-architecture first? Not saying that the use cases and problem statement I-Ds have to advance first as well, but they do seem fundamental. Why is this I-D currently on the Standards Track? The charter doesn't let us do that. Is there an intent to re-charter or rebrand this document? Thanks, Adrian > -----Original Message----- > From: BIER [mailto:bier-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson > Sent: 20 April 2016 08:52 > To: bier@ietf.org; bier-chairs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bier-mpls- > encapsulation@ietf.org > Subject: [Bier] status of draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation > > WG, wg-charis, authors, > > I've re-read draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation and think it is ready > for wglc! Anything that stops us from going ahead? Plese notify the > mpls wg when the wglc is started. > > /Loa > -- > > > Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com > Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu > Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 > > _______________________________________________ > BIER mailing list > BIER@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier From nobody Tue May 17 06:55:26 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B0912D60C; Tue, 17 May 2016 06:55:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UWLv99DoO_EB; Tue, 17 May 2016 06:55:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yw0-x22b.google.com (mail-yw0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECBDE12D60B; Tue, 17 May 2016 06:55:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yw0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id j74so15989929ywg.1; Tue, 17 May 2016 06:55:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=00h/KHB3vNGXhN0Zuauho7RquZXguIjjWoOCO63OgiE=; b=QI0LsVA37VGoAP8AjtwRLPnqS/CEIZ9PKDkxP0bjHqyEDCcmSmnM/he7wB1mn2RRF6 KpXYc8WzRdmqoRBikokIu5RrwmWw2Y9q/aRD7dPV6+ynTLWnTIR54TLipu8hedqZPmz+ 0/3Cq0EUpU/dUb+pw6rTsXVMDi2q3iz4tuFSoS5HR5/bc/z7FQtjR7WVI4ZUfU80GIsC y/Ts0ysshxhakUYUJ2jVD64JPp1SHA3hxN/hV05WIabGVTaurnFMOYz8CNnVBs++Z9gV b6k1XHmE0K5Z6s1bWqbyH13gsZfPHL9+SKn6RPURRwjWkRI6JLGQOqmSOBVmmRieeZHK 3mqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=00h/KHB3vNGXhN0Zuauho7RquZXguIjjWoOCO63OgiE=; b=VoogCCJukA49hllyVoJvRylltcyw5xzJR9QRzBqNv4cwHqAMbv+UsYjNlHtDAvZP8c od/zat2tuTsgQRNHsUeH98xlZ92puwVR2BP3rQd0fqHJuNTYIiyBhfEBT9aX5pbgQm6O viy01pBwr+noBjmIQnK9ddIDGoGDm87onNlLhYU/RWzsvR75D7G8T1ri69pguzH44jQj rHZQHrplQm3FC3oriwWc5gA6ehUgdomC88kj8jLKWphTl34ytxsJpp1sPbKD+Gkl6DNi r6fFXyvGjMe5Z06a96UXBKYHB61TqsZrLotuUi2seN/NXoOaOwOZckoIWli+SNOoplPj ahoQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWWXo11t5P5IGv8Ha4TARrms7HqcL0pX70Gwgkg0R7xzaad/RXVQrhcvhU5e/ag9ADHFYNykpU0UzGlhg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.37.108.69 with SMTP id h66mr686837ybc.102.1463493322260; Tue, 17 May 2016 06:55:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.13.217.85 with HTTP; Tue, 17 May 2016 06:55:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <03a301d1b032$367f49a0$a37ddce0$@olddog.co.uk> References: <57173521.8030906@pi.nu> <03a301d1b032$367f49a0$a37ddce0$@olddog.co.uk> Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 09:55:22 -0400 Message-ID: From: Alia Atlas To: Adrian Farrel Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1148b4409ac75a05330a1785 Archived-At: Cc: draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation@ietf.org, bier-chairs@ietf.org, "bier@ietf.org" , Loa Andersson Subject: Re: [Bier] status of draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 13:55:25 -0000 --001a1148b4409ac75a05330a1785 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 This draft (draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation) should certainly be Experimental now. I do look forward to work on a deployment experiment draft as described in the charter. Regards, Alia On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 7:49 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote: > Well, why not? > > But then again, just because we know how to encapsulate it doesn't mean we > know > what it is! > > Wouldn't it make some sense to advance the normatively referenced > draft-ietf-bier-architecture first? > > Not saying that the use cases and problem statement I-Ds have to advance > first > as well, but they do seem fundamental. > > Why is this I-D currently on the Standards Track? The charter doesn't let > us do > that. Is there an intent to re-charter or rebrand this document? > > Thanks, > Adrian > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: BIER [mailto:bier-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson > > Sent: 20 April 2016 08:52 > > To: bier@ietf.org; bier-chairs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bier-mpls- > > encapsulation@ietf.org > > Subject: [Bier] status of draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation > > > > WG, wg-charis, authors, > > > > I've re-read draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation and think it is ready > > for wglc! Anything that stops us from going ahead? Plese notify the > > mpls wg when the wglc is started. > > > > /Loa > > -- > > > > > > Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com > > Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu > > Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > BIER mailing list > > BIER@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier > > _______________________________________________ > BIER mailing list > BIER@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier > --001a1148b4409ac75a05330a1785 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This draft (draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation) should cer= tainly be Experimental now.

I do look forward to work on a deploymen= t experiment draft as described in the charter.

Regards,
Alia
=

On Tue, May= 17, 2016 at 7:49 AM, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> = wrote:
Well, why not?

But then again, just because we know how to encapsulate it doesn't mean= we know
what it is!

Wouldn't it make some sense to advance the normatively referenced
draft-ietf-bier-architecture first?

Not saying that the use cases and problem statement I-Ds have to advance fi= rst
as well, but they do seem fundamental.

Why is this I-D currently on the Standards Track? The charter doesn't l= et us do
that. Is there an intent to re-charter or rebrand this document?

Thanks,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: BIER [mailto:bier-bounc= es@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson
> Sent: 20 April 2016 08:52
> To: bier@ietf.org; bier-chairs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bier-mpls- > encapsulation@ietf.org > Subject: [Bier] status of draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation
>
> WG, wg-charis, authors,
>
> I've re-read draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation and think it is re= ady
> for wglc! Anything that stops us from going ahead? Plese notify the > mpls wg when the wglc is started.
>
> /Loa
> --
>
>
> Loa Andersson=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
> Senior MPLS Expert=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 loa@pi.= nu
> Huawei Technologies (consultant)=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0phone: +46 739 81 21 64=
>
> _______________________________________________
> BIER mailing list
> BIER@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier

_______________________________________________
BIER mailing list
BIER@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier

--001a1148b4409ac75a05330a1785-- From nobody Tue May 24 13:30:38 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bier@ietf.org Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946E712D1DC; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:30:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: IETF Secretariat To: , , X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.21.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160524203036.14056.62449.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 13:30:36 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [Bier] The BIER WG has placed draft-kumarzheng-bier-ping in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued" X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 20:30:36 -0000 The BIER WG has placed draft-kumarzheng-bier-ping in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by A. Przygienda) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kumarzheng-bier-ping/ From nobody Tue May 24 13:32:07 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bier@ietf.org Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 812C912D552; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:32:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: IETF Secretariat To: , , X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.21.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160524203205.14141.86608.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 13:32:05 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [Bier] The BIER WG has placed draft-mirsky-bier-pmmm-oam in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued" X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 20:32:06 -0000 The BIER WG has placed draft-mirsky-bier-pmmm-oam in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by A. Przygienda) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-bier-pmmm-oam/ From nobody Tue May 24 13:32:33 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bier@ietf.org Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016A712D1B1; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:32:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: IETF Secretariat To: , , X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.21.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160524203232.14096.69299.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 13:32:32 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [Bier] The BIER WG has placed draft-mirsky-bier-path-mtu-discovery in state "Candidate for WG Adoption" X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 20:32:32 -0000 The BIER WG has placed draft-mirsky-bier-path-mtu-discovery in state Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by A. Przygienda) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-bier-path-mtu-discovery/ From nobody Tue May 24 13:36:21 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3CFB12D187 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:36:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S6EcHnY3h34E for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:36:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-io0-x22e.google.com (mail-io0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 612E612D19F for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:36:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 190so19826319iow.1 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:36:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=AkEaQqINqBVsMbjlv/oNu0HI8FAXB6M2IhgEldvqjAE=; b=lwibXbWiz0ig/PRZaeZWy1F+cXIlhX56yGEvsvZsSHyfdrDgIWDuyN/72a4dLS3RVf eXaIyZkf3YYi4C3Qv/kSkd54EdEt3m1qWPnIGZ062c6OzCPky9ZDfHK1XbaikjPChTfk dfGQvic9okua/CGoXPncE4kyOPwTgiYWP3dTL3PYiWnjIEi5pHwEovSrwXsxVnwevusx kB1cbUunXA99tprlf7CjQ1t9cuW8Sh5G1KUELf/rlnp1iCFqkZbWwtpYS/HR+p8n7SlU K5/fVSO3qTfVx8+UpLgG9O1PyzHN/NpWKSlkAzy2rttwEzXR5Vn8bifW6peKMnXTbf0v DwLg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=AkEaQqINqBVsMbjlv/oNu0HI8FAXB6M2IhgEldvqjAE=; b=M6hvSxfMJMYE2iKMsPjDd9A4PX3vkbPA6F28AsXXtLoUp/Cw95OXdi7wLvTfXMNk9C unSkNyxlgDre5DjIp/vKVGBO/jvrGUE7Qh5r8jNhB8JaLBbXyAnshEDP1K/+GlJqyUHt 8nWOpZ+tOTLC8pWr8Aw+MkoiMSuhojsF3fcTizrQhv3oXfYfz/yJdVhTXl2M0NGornHx 5S2YFxFkvoGJDSbGswJgVEyiJIUiQAPDXwOHMuv2kluQQKSDzhyBF34yTy37X86iclRH mB2J0ejzhw3vBT/Wh3a8Q9RgwGXhIZG2oq9FKMSlXXMuWLdOkY0N5hHk9gtZQeDoRcTG uSow== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI9F592GwnujFUSmOyjw7EYP29yR9h7ed7PIw4xyxE/77GPHiw4fnMtOa13Tx0l1rWe2heNWFQPfdpCkA== X-Received: by 10.107.9.86 with SMTP id j83mr716754ioi.50.1464122176681; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:36:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.131.156 with HTTP; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:35:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Tony Przygienda Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 13:35:37 -0700 Message-ID: To: "bier@ietf.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f89e03fdfb805339c82b1 Archived-At: Subject: [Bier] Calls for adoption issued ... X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 20:36:19 -0000 --001a113f89e03fdfb805339c82b1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Based on last meeting minutes & request for call by authors, the following drafts have been called for WG adoption: draft-mirsky-bier-path-mtu-discovery-01 draft-kumarzheng-bier-ping-02 draft-mirsky-bier-pmmm-oam-01 thanks --- tony --001a113f89e03fdfb805339c82b1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Based= on last meeting minutes & request for call by authors, the following d= rafts have been called for WG adoption:=C2=A0


draft-mirsky-bier-path-mtu-discovery-01




draft-kumarzheng-bier-ping= -02



draft-mirsky-bie= r-pmmm-oam-01


<= p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt">thanks


--- tony=C2=A0


--001a113f89e03fdfb805339c82b1-- From nobody Tue May 24 13:47:11 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B751F12D1DC for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:47:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dq9yDqLXVgW7 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:47:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-io0-x230.google.com (mail-io0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9086612D187 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:47:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io0-x230.google.com with SMTP id 190so19998954iow.1 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:47:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=calt9jqDCfqKQgzHAyVSqgjKMsDu5pK21GwPi0NcBoI=; b=iYXsDmbCC3a5Zjimt9RJVYBVfEJH9UaLh2AByxildZZMCUTrlzSLcm/w1m52NbGZnV V+WqW+ofVrPIM0LP0Gi9u0IWKU8Wp4WMi5Wk9Q4DjC/4ErxgTJMQaKGC94zHAzzeMqd+ GonIqkwjRBnRnu049zar9X1Fg9/YQBlZDcqWv0EbKCVK//nckdNp13NpEsAivD6pakQh 9bh2SCcYrDXmGvv/NPdLRPRAEHk7ilaqrDzeXDAS3rp+Pc3vQGUjo7WlsVctwUoaQiJV UIINmfpVE6m/DuXGLaVFqx4sxbi2NgR83CZsLRK+hOB4lRGrMJLcrV1aA6qhpRzYoLCz 5jdA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=calt9jqDCfqKQgzHAyVSqgjKMsDu5pK21GwPi0NcBoI=; b=NfkDhxQit/GyGc7RHilbzGnrHElADEzA4YYtEKKlQGg4Kowp/DqxAGSJPWTu2Za4E5 05b87ukgDNUgGQCPHwKmLydZmbYlm3soLSCavdhFjzvk01Xga/mSdDezclQoT84k0SMy YddWtH13+wprMlO/Jw0pvpFBwSkVEAmt1As8OTX1t52S2O5dR3tLX1q1RYrf319uqc0w QVjpWDynbFJTtwoo4XOOYtUwxgn0tRgqXqR6uvKPk+vQH9RtSULB6jNid691e65oyLoe 35AWy8od5pD8DKSiTfVeNNIrZWcjtayXGfwz5ixVLo4W9VjhwBPGUbcRZiZhRex304a0 pR/g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIX2JzXjA8CgpAvzcLUKx+3T6FB1+4XiDCKSAqig1jcVvnd+cJEW/kV/T0ZRTm025CHTxkfMYlK847XlQ== X-Received: by 10.107.9.86 with SMTP id j83mr751787ioi.50.1464122827889; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:47:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.131.156 with HTTP; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:46:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Tony Przygienda Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 13:46:28 -0700 Message-ID: To: "bier@ietf.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f89e010951505339ca9a5 Archived-At: Subject: [Bier] WG Adoption call for Yang model ? X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 20:47:10 -0000 --001a113f89e010951505339ca9a5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 The Yang model has been updated based on the WG comments and with that, the minutes indicate we had a good consensus to adopt the work. Any strong objections I call it for WG adoption in version -04 ? -- tony --001a113f89e010951505339ca9a5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The Y= ang model has been updated based on the WG comments and with that, the minu= tes indicate we had a good consensus to adopt the work.=C2=A0
Any strong objections I call it for WG adoption in version -04 = ?=C2=A0

-- tony=C2=A0
--001a113f89e010951505339ca9a5-- From nobody Thu May 26 18:29:58 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bier@ietf.org Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B757412B038; Thu, 26 May 2016 18:29:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: IETF Secretariat To: , , X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.21.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160527012956.14473.86376.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 18:29:56 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [Bier] The BIER WG has placed draft-chh-bier-bier-yang in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued" X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 01:29:57 -0000 The BIER WG has placed draft-chh-bier-bier-yang in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by A. Przygienda) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chh-bier-bier-yang/ From nobody Mon May 30 09:02:18 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B0012D0DB for ; Mon, 30 May 2016 09:02:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.921 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n8Gs4IWc3Ap0 for ; Mon, 30 May 2016 09:02:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E3B312D0A8 for ; Mon, 30 May 2016 09:02:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712umx4.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.245.210.45]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id A88DCE4A8672A for ; Mon, 30 May 2016 16:02:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.42]) by fr712umx4.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO-o) with ESMTP id u4UG2BFb010622 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 30 May 2016 16:02:12 GMT Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.112]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u4UG25uE024724 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 30 May 2016 18:02:09 +0200 Received: from [135.224.193.115] (135.239.27.41) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Mon, 30 May 2016 18:02:07 +0200 Message-ID: <574C63FE.3070102@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 18:02:06 +0200 From: Martin Vigoureux User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <574C626E.2070801@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <574C626E.2070801@alcatel-lucent.com> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <574C626E.2070801@alcatel-lucent.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [135.239.27.41] Archived-At: Subject: [Bier] Fwd: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-dolganow-bess-mvpn-expl-track-02 X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: BESS List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 16:02:17 -0000 Working Group, this is a heads-up on a poll we have just launched in bess. Please use the bess mailing list to express your opinion. Thank you -m -------- Message transféré -------- Sujet : [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-dolganow-bess-mvpn-expl-track-02 Date : Mon, 30 May 2016 17:55:26 +0200 De : Martin Vigoureux Pour : bess@ietf.org Copie à : draft-dolganow-bess-mvpn-expl-track@tools.ietf.org Hello working group, This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-dolganow-bess-mvpn-expl-track-02 [1] as a Working Group Document. Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, please also state the reasons). This poll runs until *the 13th of June*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. No IPR has been disclosed against this Document If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thank you Martin & Thomas bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dolganow-bess-mvpn-expl-track _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess