Subject: Re: [Bier] Call for WG adoption: draft-chenvgovindan-bier-bgp-ls-bier-ext-01

From: Greg Shepherd <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:08:55 -0800

WG,

Looks like we have strong support for WG adoption of this draft. Authors,
please update the name in tools and status as a WG doc.

Thanks,
Greg

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang <[email-masked]
> wrote:

> I support the adoption, but the document should clearly describe the use
> case.
>
>
>
> The IGP extensions for BIER signals the following information:
>
>
>
> -          BFR-IDs
>
> -          BIER labels (in the form of label ranges)
>
>
>
> On the surface, it seems to be useful to feed the information to a
> controller (hence the support for adoption). However, in an environment
> where a controller is collecting the information, most likely the
> controller itself (or some siblings) is allocating the BFR-IDs? It’s not
> clear how the collected label ranges could be used either.
>
>
>
> I assume there is a good use case for this – just need to be documented,
> sooner than later.
>
>
>
> Jeffrey
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Greg Shepherd <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> BIER WG,
>
>
>
> This message begins the call for adoption of:
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chenvgovindan-bier-bgp-ls-bier-ext/
>
>
>
> Please read and reply to this thread. End of call will be Dec 22, 2016
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chairs.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BIER mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BIER mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier
>
>