Subject: [Bier] 答复: Re: WGLC draft-ietf-bier-architecture-05

From: <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 09:27:35 +0800 (CST)

Support

Regards

Fangwei

原始邮件

发件人： ＜[email-masked]＞
收件人： ＜[email-masked]＞
抄送人： ＜[email-masked]＞
日 期 ：2017年05月08日 10:19
主 题 ：Re: [Bier] WGLC draft-ietf-bier-architecture-05

yes/support

Regards,
Greg

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Greg Shepherd ＜[email-masked]＞ wrote:

At WG meeting, IETF97 in Chicago, we decided to move forward to WGLC for some of our docs. We learned that even once published the IESG has a process to change the track of the RFC if the WG makes the case to move the work from Informational to Standards track. The feedback from operators is that RFC status was more important than track, and we won't be able to meet our charter requirements to change track without deployment experience and operator support.

This email starts a two week timer for feedback on the draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bier-architecture/

Please read and respond do this thread. EOWGLC - 20/5/17

Thank you,
Chairs

_______________________________________________
 BIER mailing list
 [email-masked]
 https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier