
From wwwrun@rfc-editor.org  Mon Apr 15 14:50:57 2013
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: bliss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bliss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C66621F9434; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.3
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_93=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1RfHBDBoT+YG; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1FD21F9418; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id A6236B1E002; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20130415215001.A6236B1E002@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:22:00 -0700
Cc: bliss@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [BLISS] RFC 6910 on Completion of Calls for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
X-BeenThere: bliss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Basic Level of Interoperability for SIP Services \(BLISS\) BoF" <bliss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bliss>, <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bliss>
List-Post: <mailto:bliss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss>, <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 21:50:57 -0000

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 6910

        Title:      Completion of Calls for the 
                    Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) 
        Author:     D. Worley, M. Huelsemann,
                    R. Jesske, D. Alexeitsev
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       April 2013
        Mailbox:    worley@ariadne.com, 
                    martin.huelsemann@telekom.de, 
                    r.jesske@telekom.de,
                    alexeitsev@teleflash.com
        Pages:      37
        Characters: 86166
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-bliss-call-completion-19.txt

        URL:        http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6910.txt

The "completion of calls" feature defined in this specification
allows the caller of a failed call to be notified when the callee
becomes available to receive a call.

For the realization of a basic solution without queuing, this
document references the usage of the dialog event package (RFC 4235)
that is described as 'Automatic Redial' in "Session Initiation                           
Protocol Service Examples" (RFC 5359).

For the realization of a more comprehensive solution with queuing,
this document introduces an architecture for implementing these
features in the Session Initiation Protocol where "completion of
calls" implementations associated with the caller's and callee's
endpoints cooperate to place the caller's request for completion of
calls into a queue at the callee's endpoint; when a caller's request
is ready to be serviced, re-attempt of the original, failed call is
then made.

The architecture is designed to interoperate well with existing
completion of calls solutions in other networks.

This document is a product of the Basic Level of Interoperability for SIP Services Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Internet
Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and
status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC

From ietf-ipr@ietf.org  Tue Apr 23 09:29:41 2013
Return-Path: <ietf-ipr@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: bliss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bliss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB4D21F96ED; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.388
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.212, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vw4Q4BTO-89o; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D074D21F96E4; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-ipr@ietf.org>
To: martin.huelsemann@telekom.de, r.jesske@telekom.de, alexeitsev@teleflash.com, worley@ariadne.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.44.p4
Message-ID: <20130423162940.17755.52818.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:29:40 -0700
Cc: ipr-announce@ietf.org, bliss@ietf.org
Subject: [BLISS] IPR Disclosure: Research In Motion, Limited's Statement about IPR related to RFC 6910 and	draft-ietf-bliss-call-completion-19
X-BeenThere: bliss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Basic Level of Interoperability for SIP Services \(BLISS\) BoF" <bliss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bliss>, <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bliss>
List-Post: <mailto:bliss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss>, <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:29:41 -0000

Dear Martin Huelsemann, Roland Jesske, Denis Alexeitsev, Dale R. Worley:

 An IPR disclosure that pertains to your RFC entitled "Completion of Calls =
for
the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)" (RFC6910) was submitted to the IETF
Secretariat on 2013-04-22 and has been posted on the "IETF Page of Intellec=
tual
Property Rights Disclosures" (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2057/). The =
title
of the IPR disclosure is "Research In Motion, Limited's Statement about IPR
related to RFC 6910 and draft-ietf-bliss-call-completion-19."");

The IETF Secretariat


From johnsonhammond2@hushmail.com  Sat Apr 27 10:13:59 2013
Return-Path: <johnsonhammond2@hushmail.com>
X-Original-To: bliss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bliss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7249621F92C0 for <bliss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 10:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G92pgfhpF7OP for <bliss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 10:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.hushmail.com (smtp2a.hushmail.com [65.39.178.237]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E4B721F9739 for <bliss@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 10:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.hushmail.com (smtp2a.hushmail.com [65.39.178.237]) by smtp2.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 82882E7C18 for <bliss@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 17:13:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w8.hushmail.com [65.39.178.52]) by smtp2.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for <bliss@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 17:13:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 4865614DBDE; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 17:13:58 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 13:13:58 -0400
To: bliss@ietf.org
From: johnsonhammond2@hushmail.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20130427171358.4865614DBDE@smtp.hushmail.com>
Subject: [BLISS] Biggest Fake Conference in Computer Science
X-BeenThere: bliss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Basic Level of Interoperability for SIP Services \(BLISS\) BoF" <bliss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bliss>, <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bliss>
List-Post: <mailto:bliss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss>, <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 18:07:07 -0000

Biggest Fake Conference in Computer Science


We are researchers from different parts of the world and conducted a study on  
the world’s biggest bogus computer science conference WORLDCOMP 
( http://sites.google.com/site/worlddump1 ) organized by Prof. Hamid Arabnia 
from University of Georgia, USA.


We submitted a fake paper to WORLDCOMP 2011 and again (the same paper 
with a modified title) to WORLDCOMP 2012. This paper had numerous 
fundamental mistakes. Sample statements from that paper include: 

(1). Binary logic is fuzzy logic and vice versa
(2). Pascal developed fuzzy logic
(3). Object oriented languages do not exhibit any polymorphism or inheritance
(4). TCP and IP are synonyms and are part of OSI model 
(5). Distributed systems deal with only one computer
(6). Laptop is an example for a super computer
(7). Operating system is an example for computer hardware


Also, our paper did not express any conceptual meaning.  However, it 
was accepted both the times without any modifications (and without 
any reviews) and we were invited to submit the final paper and a 
payment of $500+ fee to present the paper. We decided to use the 
fee for better purposes than making Prof. Hamid Arabnia (Chairman 
of WORLDCOMP) rich. After that, we received few reminders from 
WORLDCOMP to pay the fee but we never responded. 


We MUST say that you should look at the above website if you have any thoughts 
to submit a paper to WORLDCOMP.  DBLP and other indexing agencies have stopped 
indexing WORLDCOMP’s proceedings since 2011 due to its fakeness. See 
http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/conf/icai/index.html for of one of the 
conferences of WORLDCOMP and notice that there is no listing after 2010. See Section 2 of
http://sites.google.com/site/dumpconf for comments from well-known researchers 
about WORLDCOMP. 


The status of your WORLDCOMP papers can be changed from scientific
to other (i.e., junk or non-technical) at any time. Better not to have a paper than 
having it in WORLDCOMP and spoil the resume and peace of mind forever!


Our study revealed that WORLDCOMP is a money making business, 
using University of Georgia mask, for Prof. Hamid Arabnia. He is throwing 
out a small chunk of that money (around 20 dollars per paper published 
in WORLDCOMP’s proceedings) to his puppet (Mr. Ashu Solo or A.M.G. Solo) 
who publicizes WORLDCOMP and also defends it at various forums, using 
fake/anonymous names. The puppet uses fake names and defames other conferences
to divert traffic to WORLDCOMP. He also makes anonymous phone calls and tries to 
threaten the critiques of WORLDCOMP (See Item 7 of Section 5 of above website). 
That is, the puppet does all his best to get a maximum number of papers published 
at WORLDCOMP to get more money into his (and Prof. Hamid Arabnia’s) pockets. 


Monte Carlo Resort (the venue of WORLDCOMP for more than 10 years, until 2012) has 
refused to provide the venue for WORLDCOMP’13 because of the fears of their image 
being tarnished due to WORLDCOMP’s fraudulent activities. That is why WORLDCOMP’13 
is taking place at a different resort. WORLDCOMP will not be held after 2013. 


The draft paper submission deadline is over but still there are no committee 
members, no reviewers, and there is no conference Chairman. The only contact 
details available on WORLDCOMP’s website is just an email address! 

Let us make a direct request to Prof. Hamid arabnia: publish all reviews for 
all the papers (after blocking identifiable details) since 2000 conference. Reveal 
the names and affiliations of all the reviewers (for each year) and how many 
papers each reviewer had reviewed on average. We also request him to look at 
the Open Challenge (Section 6) at https://sites.google.com/site/moneycomp1 


Sorry for posting to multiple lists. Spreading the word is the only way to stop 
this bogus conference. Please forward this message to other mailing lists and people. 


We are shocked with Prof. Hamid Arabnia and his puppet’s activities 
http://worldcomp-fake-bogus.blogspot.com   Search Google using the 
keyword worldcomp fake for additional links.

