From bridge-mib-bounces@ietf.org Sat Jan 20 05:01:23 2007 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H8D2E-0006U0-3s; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 05:01:18 -0500 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7pm6-0008Or-MZ for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 04:11:06 -0500 Received: from daisy.midascomm.com ([203.196.171.90]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7pm4-0004y2-7U for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 04:11:06 -0500 Received: from daisy.midascomm.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by daisy.midascomm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l0J9A6wN026227; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:40:09 +0530 Received: from 192.168.14.204 (SquirrelMail authenticated user pjoseph); by daisy.midascomm.com with HTTP; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:40:13 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <1251.192.168.14.204.1169197813.squirrel@192.168.14.204> Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:40:13 +0530 (IST) From: pjoseph@midascomm.com To: mick_seaman@ieee.org, stds-802-1@ieee.org, rstplib-users@lists.sourceforge.net, bridge-mib@ietf.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Midascomm.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Midascomm.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: pjoseph@midascomm.com X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 05:01:17 -0500 Cc: Subject: [Bridge-mib] Doubt on 802.1w (max age) X-BeenThere: bridge-mib@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Bridge MIB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bridge-mib-bounces@ietf.org Hi, Setup: 6 manageable switches are connected in linear fashion with root brdige at top . In the root bridge ,max-age ,hellotime and forward-delay is configured as 6 ,1 and 4 . Issue : In the sixth bridge ,learned value of max-age,hello time and forward delay is found as 6 ,1 and 4.But the role of the port connected to switch 6 alone is switching between F/R (Root) and F/D (Designated ) We r using the source forge rstp source code for all 6 switches From 802.1w standard,I calculated the rcvdinfowhile timer value for the port connected to sixth switch as 1 (Calculation done from updtRcvdInfoWhile()) .When port of switch 6 recieves BPDU for every hello time (1 sec) port role switches to F/R and on expiry of rcvdInfoWhile timer expiry ( 1 sec ) port role switches to F/D . What do you think about it ? _______________________________________________ Bridge-mib mailing list Bridge-mib@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib From bridge-mib-bounces@ietf.org Sat Jan 20 05:01:23 2007 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H8D2E-0006UN-7w; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 05:01:18 -0500 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7xwS-0000Ri-C6 for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:54:20 -0500 Received: from smtp114.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.198.213]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7xwC-0004BC-Eh for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:54:20 -0500 Received: (qmail 33299 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2007 17:14:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO MICKHPDESK) (mickseaman@sbcglobal.net@75.18.207.20 with login) by smtp114.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Jan 2007 17:14:59 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: .FM1FMQVM1mCuyHd0t.fH65QnaqbBzcdR05QNMicvRN5PoC9X2aGgo1aOY4g5U5dlYwgxQb7NpMH.IAajG.5LPdmGluTaV.2f2UL3HQ6From bridge-mib-bounces@ietf.org Sat Jan 20 05:01:23 2007 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H8D2E-0006U0-3s; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 05:01:18 -0500 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7pm6-0008Or-MZ for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 04:11:06 -0500 Received: from daisy.midascomm.com ([203.196.171.90]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7pm4-0004y2-7U for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 04:11:06 -0500 Received: from daisy.midascomm.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by daisy.midascomm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l0J9A6wN026227; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:40:09 +0530 Received: from 192.168.14.204 (SquirrelMail authenticated user pjoseph); by daisy.midascomm.com with HTTP; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:40:13 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <1251.192.168.14.204.1169197813.squirrel@192.168.14.204> Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:40:13 +0530 (IST) From: pjoseph@midascomm.com To: mick_seaman@ieee.org, stds-802-1@ieee.org, rstplib-users@lists.sourceforge.net, bridge-mib@ietf.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Midascomm.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Midascomm.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: pjoseph@midascomm.com X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 05:01:17 -0500 Cc: Subject: [Bridge-mib] Doubt on 802.1w (max age) X-BeenThere: bridge-mib@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Bridge MIB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bridge-mib-bounces@ietf.org Hi, Setup: 6 manageable switches are connected in linear fashion with root brdige at top . In the root bridge ,max-age ,hellotime and forward-delay is configured as 6 ,1 and 4 . Issue : In the sixth bridge ,learned value of max-age,hello time and forward delay is found as 6 ,1 and 4.But the role of the port connected to switch 6 alone is switching between F/R (Root) and F/D (Designated ) We r using the source forge rstp source code for all 6 switches From 802.1w standard,I calculated the rcvdinfowhile timer value for the port connected to sixth switch as 1 (Calculation done from updtRcvdInfoWhile()) .When port of switch 6 recieves BPDU for every hello time (1 sec) port role switches to F/R and on expiry of rcvdInfoWhile timer expiry ( 1 sec ) port role switches to F/D . What do you think about it ? _______________________________________________ Bridge-mib mailing list Bridge-mib@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib From bridge-mib-bounces@ietf.org Sat Jan 20 05:01:23 2007 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H8D2E-0006UN-7w; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 05:01:18 -0500 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7xwS-0000Ri-C6 for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:54:20 -0500 Received: from smtp114.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.198.213]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7xwC-0004BC-Eh for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:54:20 -0500 Received: (qmail 33299 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2007 17:14:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO MICKHPDESK) (mickseaman@sbcglobal.net@75.18.207.20 with login) by smtp114.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Jan 2007 17:14:59 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: .FM1FMQVM1mCuyHd0t.fH65QnaqbBzcdR05QNMicvRN5PoC9X2aGgo1aOY4g5U5dlYwgxQb7NpMH.IAajG.5LPdmGluTaV.2f2UL3HQ6XRZQiMxpySI- Message-ID: <00b901c73bed$58526030$6401a8c0@MICKHPDESK> From: "Mick Seaman" To: , , , References: <1251.192.168.14.204.1169197813.squirrel@192.168.14.204> Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:14:56 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 22bbb45ef41b733eb2d03ee71ece8243 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 05:01:17 -0500 Cc: Subject: [Bridge-mib] Re: Doubt on 802.1w (max age) X-BeenThere: bridge-mib@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Bridge MIB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1912512471==" Errors-To: bridge-mib-bounces@ietf.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============1912512471== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00B6_01C73BAA.495D5140" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00B6_01C73BAA.495D5140 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable What I think about it is that you have Max Age set too low - I would = suggest at least 8 in this scenario. The disputed procedure (I hope the = code is to 1D-2004 with the two late editorial errors fixed as per the = Vision sim release notes, alternately see 1Q-2005MSTP code which has = these fixes) will stop there being a loop. Mick ----- Original Message -----=20 From: pjoseph@midascomm.com=20 To: mick_seaman@ieee.org ; stds-802-1@ieee.org ; = rstplib-users@lists.sourceforge.net ; bridge-mib@ietf.org=20 Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 1:10 AM Subject: Doubt on 802.1w (max age) Hi, Setup: 6 manageable switches are connected in linear fashion with root = brdige at top . In the root bridge ,max-age ,hellotime and forward-delay is configured as 6 ,1 and 4 . Issue : In the sixth bridge ,learned value of max-age,hello time and = forward delay is found as 6 ,1 and 4.But the role of the port connected to switch 6 alone is switching between F/R (Root) and F/D (Designated ) We r using the source forge rstp source code for all 6 switches From 802.1w standard,I calculated the rcvdinfowhile timer value = for the port connected to sixth switch as 1 (Calculation done from updtRcvdInfoWhile()) .When port of switch 6 recieves BPDU for every hello time (1 sec) port role switches to F/R and on expiry of rcvdInfoWhile timer expiry ( 1 sec ) port role switches to F/D . What do you think about it ? ------=_NextPart_000_00B6_01C73BAA.495D5140 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
What I think about it is that you have = Max Age set=20 too low - I would suggest at least 8 in this scenario. The disputed = procedure (I=20 hope the code is to 1D-2004 with the two late editorial errors fixed as = per the=20 Vision sim release notes, alternately see 1Q-2005MSTP code which has = these=20 fixes) will stop there being a loop.
 
Mick
From: "Mick Seaman" To: , , , References: <1251.192.168.14.204.1169197813.squirrel@192.168.14.204> Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:14:56 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 22bbb45ef41b733eb2d03ee71ece8243 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 05:01:17 -0500 Cc: Subject: [Bridge-mib] Re: Doubt on 802.1w (max age) X-BeenThere: bridge-mib@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Bridge MIB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1912512471==" Errors-To: bridge-mib-bounces@ietf.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============1912512471== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00B6_01C73BAA.495D5140" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00B6_01C73BAA.495D5140 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable What I think about it is that you have Max Age set too low - I would = suggest at least 8 in this scenario. The disputed procedure (I hope the = code is to 1D-2004 with the two late editorial errors fixed as per the = Vision sim release notes, alternately see 1Q-2005MSTP code which has = these fixes) will stop there being a loop. Mick ----- Original Message -----=20 From: pjoseph@midascomm.com=20 To: mick_seaman@ieee.org ; stds-802-1@ieee.org ; = rstplib-users@lists.sourceforge.net ; bridge-mib@ietf.org=20 Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 1:10 AM Subject: Doubt on 802.1w (max age) Hi, Setup: 6 manageable switches are connected in linear fashion with root = brdige at top . In the root bridge ,max-age ,hellotime and forward-delay is configured as 6 ,1 and 4 . Issue : In the sixth bridge ,learned value of max-age,hello time and = forward delay is found as 6 ,1 and 4.But the role of the port connected to switch 6 alone is switching between F/R (Root) and F/D (Designated ) We r using the source forge rstp source code for all 6 switches From 802.1w standard,I calculated the rcvdinfowhile timer value = for the port connected to sixth switch as 1 (Calculation done from updtRcvdInfoWhile()) .When port of switch 6 recieves BPDU for every hello time (1 sec) port role switches to F/R and on expiry of rcvdInfoWhile timer expiry ( 1 sec ) port role switches to F/D . What do you think about it ? ------=_NextPart_000_00B6_01C73BAA.495D5140 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
What I think about it is that you have = Max Age set=20 too low - I would suggest at least 8 in this scenario. The disputed = procedure (I=20 hope the code is to 1D-2004 with the two late editorial errors fixed as = per the=20 Vision sim release notes, alternately see 1Q-2005MSTP code which has = these=20 fixes) will stop there being a loop.
 
Mick
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 pjoseph@midascomm.com
To: mick_seaman@ieee.org ; stds-802-1@ieee.org ; rstplib-users@lists.s= ourceforge.net=20 ; bridge-mib@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 = 1:10=20 AM
Subject: Doubt on 802.1w (max = age)


Hi,

Setup:
     6 = manageable=20 switches are connected in linear fashion with root brdige
at top . = In the=20 root bridge ,max-age ,hellotime and forward-delay = is
configured  as 6=20 ,1 and 4 .


Issue :
    In the sixth = bridge=20 ,learned value of max-age,hello time and forward
delay is found as = 6 ,1 and=20 4.But the role of the port connected to
switch 6 alone is switching = between=20 F/R (Root) and F/D (Designated )



    We = r using=20 the source forge rstp source code for all 6 = switches
   =20 From 802.1w standard,I calculated the  rcvdinfowhile timer value=20 for
the port connected to sixth switch as 1 (Calculation done=20 from
updtRcvdInfoWhile()) .When port of switch 6 recieves = BPDU  for=20 every
hello time (1 sec) port role switches to F/R and on expiry=20 of
rcvdInfoWhile timer expiry ( 1 sec ) port role switches to F/D=20 .

   What do you think about it=20 ?


------=_NextPart_000_00B6_01C73BAA.495D5140-- --===============1912512471== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Bridge-mib mailing list Bridge-mib@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib --===============1912512471==-- 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 pjoseph@midascomm.com
To: mick_seaman@ieee.org ; stds-802-1@ieee.org ; rstplib-users@lists.s= ourceforge.net=20 ; bridge-mib@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 = 1:10=20 AM
Subject: Doubt on 802.1w (max = age)


Hi,

Setup:
     6 = manageable=20 switches are connected in linear fashion with root brdige
at top . = In the=20 root bridge ,max-age ,hellotime and forward-delay = is
configured  as 6=20 ,1 and 4 .


Issue :
    In the sixth = bridge=20 ,learned value of max-age,hello time and forward
delay is found as = 6 ,1 and=20 4.But the role of the port connected to
switch 6 alone is switching = between=20 F/R (Root) and F/D (Designated )



    We = r using=20 the source forge rstp source code for all 6 = switches
   =20 From 802.1w standard,I calculated the  rcvdinfowhile timer value=20 for
the port connected to sixth switch as 1 (Calculation done=20 from
updtRcvdInfoWhile()) .When port of switch 6 recieves = BPDU  for=20 every
hello time (1 sec) port role switches to F/R and on expiry=20 of
rcvdInfoWhile timer expiry ( 1 sec ) port role switches to F/D=20 .

   What do you think about it=20 ?


------=_NextPart_000_00B6_01C73BAA.495D5140-- --===============1912512471== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Bridge-mib mailing list Bridge-mib@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib --===============1912512471==--