
From nobody Wed Jun 17 12:02:49 2015
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66911A883E for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 12:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.15
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.15 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PLDd4ENK0FZb for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 12:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D06091A0024 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 12:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.201.11]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t5HJ2hjb012266; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 21:02:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from alma.local (p5DC7EA60.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.199.234.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3mBbPb48jDz99xN; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 21:02:43 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5581C452.7040204@tzi.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 21:02:42 +0200
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 4.0.1 (Macintosh/20150514)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cbor@ietf.org
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/ojnL55qe7H2cCaaBcSx_081drm4>
Cc: draft-jroatch-cbor-tags@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [Cbor] CBOR Tags for Typed Arrays
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:02:47 -0000

Welcome to the CBOR mailing list.
(I think this is actually the first non-administrative message on this
list -- most of the discussion around CBOR usage of course happens in
other places these days.)

I have taken the occasion of the publication of ECMAScript 2015 (a.k.a.
ES6) as an opportunity to update draft-jroatch-cbor-tags, CBOR Tags for
Typed Arrays.  I would like to push this forward soon.  I would
appreciate some feedback on this list on:

-- is this the right way to address the problem?
-- are the details right?
and possibly on:
-- what is the best way to progress this document?

There are a few other drafts with potential tag definitions lying
around, both in the I-D archive and on the laptops of people on the
list.  Maybe we can have a little CBOR team huddle in Prague about these
tags; updating them (and submitting them in the first place) before July
06 would help with that.

(There is also the CDDL draft; more about that when it has been updated
to -06.)

Grüße, Carsten

