From nobody Fri Oct 3 06:10:53 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA171A066C for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 06:10:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.667 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1AwA4NW6s9dz for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 06:10:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.25.95]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4050B1A02FF for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 06:10:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 12637 invoked by uid 0); 3 Oct 2014 13:10:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85) by gproxy1.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 3 Oct 2014 13:10:48 -0000 Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw4 with id yjAS1o00d2SSUrH01jAVBx; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 13:10:46 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=fdw+lSgF c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=u9EReRu7m0cA:10 a=HFCU6gKsb0MA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=gOEYrshuDR1r7z1BaWwA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=f4CDOrANxYrUtZ6K1yClLpFdkvGqw9YSW/YnZebx5Pc=; b=0rqi3E7uG/LXfD8/Tbc/Z3VujOaC+mE+4d9HgGv/rsGYbnkpQZSiORWnnb18jcQsJl6LoOZf/0uljBdo7sJbCUpqiQ1vKwoqzhoIbHLdq+IXG/gTuSqZuu8if68tYeLi; Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:50105 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1Xa2ct-0006MP-6Q; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 07:10:27 -0600 Message-ID: <542EA058.7030206@labn.net> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 09:10:48 -0400 From: Lou Berger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange@tools.ietf.org, "Bitar, Nabil N" References: <20140923115147.435.38773.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <050901cfd725$d84f2120$88ed6360$@olddog.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <050901cfd725$d84f2120$88ed6360$@olddog.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net} Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/BkiwHiA9cSnY2AtNmZBd02_-3AU Cc: ccamp@ietf.org Subject: Re: [CCAMP] FW: New Version Notification for draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 13:10:52 -0000 FYI - We're still waiting on one IPR response. (I believe from Nabil...) Lou On 9/23/2014 7:59 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote: > Hi, > > I had an exchange with Zafar to tidy up the text in 4.4 describing the UNI and to add some more references. > > Someone also pointed out that when we included material from draft-ceccadedios-ccamp-overlay-use-cases I added the authors of that document as contributors here, but I missed the contributors to that document. Sorry for that. Remedied in the new revision. > > Adrian > >> A new version of I-D, draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07.txt >> has been successfully submitted by Adrian Farrel and posted to the >> IETF repository. >> >> Name: draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange >> Revision: 07 >> Title: Problem Statement and Architecture for Information Exchange >> Between Interconnected Traffic Engineered Networks >> Document date: 2014-09-23 >> Group: Individual Submission >> Pages: 56 >> URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-farrel-interconnected-te- >> info-exchange-07.txt >> Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info- >> exchange/ >> Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info- >> exchange-07 >> Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info- >> exchange-07 >> >> Abstract: >> In Traffic Engineered (TE) systems, it is sometimes desirable to >> establish an end-to-end TE path with a set of constraints (such as >> bandwidth) across one or more network from a source to a destination. >> TE information is the data relating to nodes and TE links that is >> used in the process of selecting a TE path. The availability of TE >> information is usually limited to within a network (such as an IGP >> area) often referred to as a domain. >> >> In order to determine the potential to establish a TE path through a >> series of connected networks, it is necessary to have available a >> certain amount of TE information about each network. This need not >> be the full set of TE information available within each network, but >> does need to express the potential of providing TE connectivity. This >> subset of TE information is called TE reachability information. >> >> This document sets out the problem statement and architecture for the >> exchange of TE information between interconnected TE networks in >> support of end-to-end TE path establishment. For reasons that are >> explained in the document, this work is limited to simple TE >> constraints and information that determine TE reachability. >> >> >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >> >> The IETF Secretariat > > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp > > > From nobody Fri Oct 3 12:26:28 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5F01A6FB3 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:26:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.985 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.985 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 95OwOAxvLbWW for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:26:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com [209.65.160.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 321BF1A0034 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:26:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknown [144.160.229.24] (EHLO alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.2-0) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 068fe245.0.6655263.00-2266.18628083.nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com (envelope-from ); Fri, 03 Oct 2014 19:26:25 +0000 (UTC) X-MXL-Hash: 542ef86162403d2b-182bdf08956b48c667a28a826875b010e62fe676 Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s93JQNRF002554 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 15:26:24 -0400 Received: from mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.240]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s93JQD9D002427 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 15:26:17 -0400 Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAE.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAE.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.149]) by mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor) for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 19:26:02 GMT Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.5.211]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAE.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.149]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 15:26:02 -0400 From: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" To: "ccamp@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Poll on making draft-beeram-ccamp-network-assigned-upstream-label-03 WG document-closed Thread-Index: Ac/fP9UoqYNhAU5AQ36DRkrcsdX8uA== Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 19:26:01 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.16.234.240] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166B7077MISOUT7MSGUSRDE_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=JsdGWrEC c=1 sm=1 a=dhB6nF3YHL5t/Ixux6cINA==:17 a] X-AnalysisOut: [=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=3T6DJ_suu6wA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=zQP] X-AnalysisOut: [7CpKOAAAA:8 a=XIqpo32RAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=6395D88C4x] X-AnalysisOut: [ZvPChkB50A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=2TSDkfqdCjIA:10 a=lZB815d] X-AnalysisOut: [zVvQA:10 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=f7ccaxmNqhkpj] X-AnalysisOut: [HNWXGoA:9 a=gKO2Hq4RSVkA:10 a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K] X-AnalysisOut: [0A:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 a=4usfKmaPIjJ_yw6M:21] X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2014051901)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.229.24] Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/eM9zsxY8-J8qKeeqYN1BnhtAjb8 Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-beeram-ccamp-network-assigned-upstream-label-03 WG document-closed X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 19:26:27 -0000 --_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166B7077MISOUT7MSGUSRDE_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All, This poll is closed. The document is adopted. Authors, Please resubmit with name change only to draft-ietf-ccamp-network-assigned-= upstream-label. Thanks, Deborah and Lou From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of BRUNGARD, DEBORAH = A Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 11:04 AM To: ccamp@ietf.org Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-beeram-ccamp-network-assigned-upstrea= m-label-03 WG document ***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T *** Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information. All, This is start a two week poll on making draft-beeram-ccamp-network-assigned= -upstream-label-03 a ccamp working group document. Please send email to the= list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, pl= ease state your technical reservations with the document. The poll ends Friday, Sept. 26th. Thanks, Deborah and Lou --_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166B7077MISOUT7MSGUSRDE_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

All,

 <= /p>

This poll is closed. The = document is adopted.

 <= /p>

Authors,

Please resubmit with name= change only to draft-ietf-ccamp-network-assigned-upstream-label.

 <= /p>

Thanks,=

Deborah and Lou

 <= /p>

From: CCAMP [m= ailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 11:04 AM
To: ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-beeram-ccamp-network-assigned-= upstream-label-03 WG document

 

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of= AT&T ***
Reference http://cso= .att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.

All,

 

This is start a two week poll on making= draft-beeram-ccamp-network-assigned-upstream-label-03 a ccamp working grou= p document. Please send email to the list indicating “yes/supportR= 21; or “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your te= chnical reservations with the document.

 

The poll ends Friday, Sept. 26th.<= /o:p>

 

Thanks,

Deborah and Lou

 

--_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166B7077MISOUT7MSGUSRDE_-- From nobody Fri Oct 3 12:28:08 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E56EE1A1A15 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:28:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.985 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.985 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PfZiwjaCSPIu for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:28:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com [209.65.160.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63D901A88D8 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:28:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknown [144.160.229.24] (EHLO alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.2-0) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 1c8fe245.0.6660182.00-2243.18649099.nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (envelope-from ); Fri, 03 Oct 2014 19:28:02 +0000 (UTC) X-MXL-Hash: 542ef8c251da6f22-7723c19e53f3028cc8bebbd688659554cebe60f0 Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s93JS1uf004355 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 15:28:01 -0400 Received: from mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.240]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s93JRrTF004231 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 15:27:54 -0400 Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAD.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAD.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.148]) by mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor) for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 19:27:41 GMT Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.5.211]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAD.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.148]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 15:27:40 -0400 From: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" To: "ccamp@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Poll on making draft-long-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-05 WG document Thread-Index: Ac/UGzeytsrqn53lTu6kPfOxkadZ+QLJK5lw Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 19:27:39 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.16.234.240] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166B7089MISOUT7MSGUSRDE_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=eemKic4H c=1 sm=1 a=dhB6nF3YHL5t/Ixux6cINA==:17 a] X-AnalysisOut: [=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=3T6DJ_suu6wA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=zQP] X-AnalysisOut: [7CpKOAAAA:8 a=XIqpo32RAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=6395D88C4x] X-AnalysisOut: [ZvPChkB50A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=2TSDkfqdCjIA:10 a=lZB815d] X-AnalysisOut: [zVvQA:10 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=f7ccaxmNqhkpj] X-AnalysisOut: [HNWXGoA:9 a=gKO2Hq4RSVkA:10 a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K] X-AnalysisOut: [0A:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 a=Jbx3XuUvE6UD5jcH:21] X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2014051901)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.229.24] Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/QyHJrle4pLZGQ3iGUYzyvKpa4NY Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-long-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-05 WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 19:28:06 -0000 --_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166B7089MISOUT7MSGUSRDE_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All, This poll is closed. The document is adopted. Authors, Please resubmit with name change only to draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth= -availability. Thanks, Deborah and Lou From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of BRUNGARD, DEBORAH = A Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 11:06 AM To: ccamp@ietf.org Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-long-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availabi= lity-05 WG document ***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T *** Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information. All, This is start a two week poll on making draft-long-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-= availability-05 a ccamp working group document. Please send email to the li= st indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, pleas= e state your technical reservations with the document. The poll ends Friday, Sept. 26th. Thanks, Deborah and Lou --_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166B7089MISOUT7MSGUSRDE_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

All,

 <= /p>

This poll is closed. The = document is adopted.

 <= /p>

Authors,

Please resubmit with name= change only to draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability.=

 <= /p>

Thanks,=

Deborah and Lou

 <= /p>

 <= /p>

From: CCAMP [m= ailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 11:06 AM
To: ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-long-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-a= vailability-05 WG document

 

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of= AT&T ***
Reference http://cso= .att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.

All,

 

This is start a two week poll on making= draft-long-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-05 a ccamp working group d= ocument. Please send email to the list indicating “yes/support” or “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your te= chnical reservations with the document.

 

The poll ends Friday, Sept. 26th.<= /o:p>

 

Thanks,

Deborah and Lou

 

 

--_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166B7089MISOUT7MSGUSRDE_-- From nobody Fri Oct 3 12:29:49 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253FB1A1AEC for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:29:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.985 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.985 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qOA6wNxRlRQn for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:29:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com [209.65.160.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78E881A1ADE for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:29:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknown [144.160.229.24] (EHLO alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.2-0) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id f19fe245.0.6657472.00-2139.18634359.nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com (envelope-from ); Fri, 03 Oct 2014 19:29:36 +0000 (UTC) X-MXL-Hash: 542ef9204237c2bf-bc60b13501ef91ca6d32f65769de3250e44c7308 Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s93JTZBq006378 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 15:29:35 -0400 Received: from mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.241]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s93JTUEs006341 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 15:29:32 -0400 Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAA.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAA.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.145]) by mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor) for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 19:29:17 GMT Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.5.211]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAA.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.145]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 15:29:17 -0400 From: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" To: "ccamp@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Poll on making draft-long-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-04 WG document Thread-Index: Ac/UG7z+jminJl/RT+6Ooh3SiAjMtgLJF3wA Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 19:29:16 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.16.234.240] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166B7099MISOUT7MSGUSRDE_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=JsdGWrEC c=1 sm=1 a=dhB6nF3YHL5t/Ixux6cINA==:17 a] X-AnalysisOut: [=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=3T6DJ_suu6wA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=zQP] X-AnalysisOut: [7CpKOAAAA:8 a=XIqpo32RAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=6395D88C4x] X-AnalysisOut: [ZvPChkB50A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=2TSDkfqdCjIA:10 a=lZB815d] X-AnalysisOut: [zVvQA:10 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=f7ccaxmNqhkpj] X-AnalysisOut: [HNWXGoA:9 a=gKO2Hq4RSVkA:10 a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K] X-AnalysisOut: [0A:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 a=F97oSNKS0nsV2NtU:21] X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2014051901)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.229.24] Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/r6gPTsF9QSrbjh6_ctiXNwzggYE Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-long-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-04 WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 19:29:40 -0000 --_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166B7099MISOUT7MSGUSRDE_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All, This poll is closed. The document is adopted. Authors, Please resubmit with name change only to draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability= -extension. Thanks, Deborah and Lou From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of BRUNGARD, DEBORAH = A Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 11:10 AM To: ccamp@ietf.org Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-long-ccamp-ospf-availability-extensio= n-04 WG document ***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T *** Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information. All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-long-ccamp-ospf-availabili= ty-extension-04 a ccamp working group document. Please send email to the li= st indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, pleas= e state your technical reservations with the document. The poll ends Friday, Sept. 26th. Thanks, Deborah and Lou --_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166B7099MISOUT7MSGUSRDE_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

All,

 <= /p>

This poll is closed. The = document is adopted.

 <= /p>

Authors,

Please resubmit with name= change only to draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension.

 <= /p>

Thanks,=

Deborah and Lou

 <= /p>

 <= /p>

From: CCAMP [m= ailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 11:10 AM
To: ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-long-ccamp-ospf-availability-e= xtension-04 WG document

 

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of= AT&T ***
Reference http://cso= .att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.

All,

 

This is start of a two week poll on mak= ing draft-long-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-04 a ccamp working group d= ocument. Please send email to the list indicating “yes/support” or “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your te= chnical reservations with the document.

 

The poll ends Friday, Sept. 26th.<= /o:p>

 

Thanks,

Deborah and Lou

 

--_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166B7099MISOUT7MSGUSRDE_-- From nobody Fri Oct 3 12:32:19 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F67A1A1A79 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:32:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.985 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.985 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qHZ5YonwCxHU for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:32:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com [209.65.160.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6484C1A1A15 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:32:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknown [144.160.229.24] (EHLO alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.2-0) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id fb9fe245.0.6663148.00-2391.18657607.nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (envelope-from ); Fri, 03 Oct 2014 19:32:16 +0000 (UTC) X-MXL-Hash: 542ef9c02c31dd26-f7df0b5485969dcf4f9b61a0fc8be2be072cb2c3 Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s93JWFZ0013830 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 15:32:15 -0400 Received: from mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.241]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s93JWA86013739 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 15:32:11 -0400 Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAG.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAG.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.151]) by mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor) for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 19:32:00 GMT Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.5.211]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAG.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.151]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 15:32:00 -0400 From: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" To: "ccamp@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-info-05 WG document Thread-Index: Ac/UG6BQ41UNc7wRSS6Ia9NA9DFCoALJODSQ Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 19:31:59 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.16.234.240] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166B70A9MISOUT7MSGUSRDE_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=eemKic4H c=1 sm=1 a=dhB6nF3YHL5t/Ixux6cINA==:17 a] X-AnalysisOut: [=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=3T6DJ_suu6wA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=zQP] X-AnalysisOut: [7CpKOAAAA:8 a=XIqpo32RAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=6395D88C4x] X-AnalysisOut: [ZvPChkB50A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=2TSDkfqdCjIA:10 a=lZB815d] X-AnalysisOut: [zVvQA:10 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=f7ccaxmNqhkpj] X-AnalysisOut: [HNWXGoA:9 a=gKO2Hq4RSVkA:10 a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K] X-AnalysisOut: [0A:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 a=F97oSNKS0nsV2NtU:21] X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2014051901)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.229.24] Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/V4Zpnuq1dgrv38xCx3tcBmQXJrY Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-info-05 WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 19:32:18 -0000 --_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166B70A9MISOUT7MSGUSRDE_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All, This poll is closed. The document is adopted. Authors, Please resubmit with name change only to draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-iv-info. Thanks, Deborah and Lou From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of BRUNGARD, DEBORAH = A Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 11:09 AM To: ccamp@ietf.org Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-info-05 WG d= ocument ***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T *** Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information. All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-i= nfo-05 a ccamp working group document. Please send email to the list indica= ting "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state y= our technical reservations with the document. The poll ends Friday, Sept. 26th. Thanks, Deborah and Lou --_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166B70A9MISOUT7MSGUSRDE_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

All,

 <= /p>

This poll is closed. The = document is adopted.

 <= /p>

Authors,

Please resubmit with name= change only to draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-iv-info.

 <= /p>

Thanks,=

Deborah and Lou

 <= /p>

 <= /p>

From: CCAMP [m= ailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 11:09 AM
To: ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-info-= 05 WG document

 

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of= AT&T ***
Reference http://cso= .att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.

All,

 

This is start of a two week poll on mak= ing draft-martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-info-05 a ccamp working group document. = Please send email to the list indicating “yes/support” or “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your techn= ical reservations with the document.

 

The poll ends Friday, Sept. 26th.<= /o:p>

 

Thanks,

Deborah and Lou

 

--_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166B70A9MISOUT7MSGUSRDE_-- From nobody Fri Oct 3 13:06:34 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D861A1BEE for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 13:06:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.667 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wfieoErJ9e0k for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 13:06:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.25.95]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 108EE1A1BF2 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 13:06:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 21208 invoked by uid 0); 3 Oct 2014 20:06:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO CMOut01) (10.0.90.82) by gproxy1.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 3 Oct 2014 20:06:26 -0000 Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by CMOut01 with id yk6E1o0092SSUrH01k6HkQ; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 14:06:24 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=LbyvtFvi c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=u9EReRu7m0cA:10 a=HFCU6gKsb0MA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=EDIwDQaqJyODmDqy0ecA:9 a=77T_mgK8_5JlQou2:21 a=nXI_Qva4zxFcdvBP:21 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=FQUQoDuq/BRW7weX1C06DcbSPpk4ZS3qj0XERAlojVg=; b=HicBk64tNl2hcWLNjK3MZOZHbS5znLYWnXHBV15tg4mA+AgROb0Vw1olaYsHsIJmIOETiCaIqxajHoEqbFYbsDgQBYLVRXacPsdLYO2O9EiiCLdwy1xxZLscSkclUwoE; Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:33978 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1Xa97H-0001uU-35; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 14:06:15 -0600 Message-ID: <542F01CD.9020709@labn.net> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 16:06:37 -0400 From: Lou Berger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ro@tools.ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net} Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/TTCOgmjAWKxUCwAEjA1E-7_rvDg Cc: CCAMP Subject: [CCAMP] comments/questions on draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ro X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 20:06:31 -0000 Hi, At the last meeting it was mentioned that folks should take a look at draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ro in anticipation of an upcoming LC. Consequently, I took a re look at the document and have some comments/questions (for authors/contributors/WG/...): - You have a couple of editorial notes in the document, do these still apply or should they be dropped. - There are cases where you use 2114 language in lower case (e.g., section 3.1). As I've mentioned before on the list, such usage, even when correct, often leads to unneeded discussion during IESG review, I'd suggest avoiding lower cases usage wherever possible. That said, I think you have some cases where upper case was intended. - In section 3.1, 3.3 you are giving the definition for fields (length and type) that are defined in 3209. You should just point to that definition rather than seeming to provide the authoritative definition in this document. - In section 3.2, you are similarly doing this for the Attribute TLV defined in section 3 of 5420. Why not just include the reference and the (re)definition? - Section 4. Isn't recording applicable to required attributes as well? I.e.,why no R bit recording in section 4.1? - I think it would be good to have a compatibility section / discussion which should at least discuss how to deal with the now two ways to encode / record attribute flags. -- This document could replace (deprecate) the old way, but this document would then need to be an update to 5420... - The IANA section needs to be updated with the proper format. See RFC5226. draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-07 is good example (but don't include values and use the non-xml version of the registry links.) - Section 6 won't make it through the IESG. Again draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-07 is good example of recent language produced by the WG, and is a fine starting point. I think that's it. Lou From nobody Mon Oct 6 11:26:16 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD271A87AF; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 11:26:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MxdEM9hfsEVL; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 11:26:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A211A8790; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 11:26:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.6.3.p3 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20141006182611.1489.76810.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 11:26:11 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/dVriwWHLkHdpMH4l9q5-J09hDB0 Cc: ccamp@ietf.org Subject: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-iv-info-00.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 18:26:13 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Common Control and Measurement Plane Working Group of the IETF. Title : Information Model for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSONs) with Impairments Validation Authors : Giovanni Martinelli Xian Zhang Gabriele M. Galimberti Andrea Zanardi Domenico Siracusa Federico Pederzolli Young Lee Fatai Zhang Filename : draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-iv-info-00.txt Pages : 19 Date : 2014-10-06 Abstract: This document defines an information model to support Impairment- Aware (IA) Routing and Wavelength Assignment (RWA) functionality. This information model extends the information model for impairment- free RWA process in WSON to facilitate computation of paths where optical impairment constraints need to considered. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-iv-info/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-iv-info-00 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Tue Oct 7 06:46:38 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B55341ACD8E for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 06:46:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.986 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.986 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4jbiEnMBnRFC for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 06:46:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com [209.65.160.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4D821ACD85 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 06:45:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknown [144.160.229.24] (EHLO alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.2-0) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 59ee3345.0.670673.00-2272.1888465.nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (envelope-from ); Tue, 07 Oct 2014 13:45:57 +0000 (UTC) X-MXL-Hash: 5433ee954b82fbae-a339ab62467427880ef21816991ffc5bd6db340e Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s97DjuWc006670 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 09:45:56 -0400 Received: from mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.241]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s97Djo0I006601 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 09:45:51 -0400 Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAD.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAD.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.148]) by mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor) for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 13:45:34 GMT Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.5.211]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAD.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.148]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 09:45:34 -0400 From: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" To: "ccamp@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: New Non-WG Mailing List: Rtg-yang-coord Thread-Index: AQHP4bWJ9/iEAbMjo0az4YyzofJEkJwkplbg Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 13:45:33 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20141006223256.19159.32181.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20141006223256.19159.32181.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.16.234.240] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=dshs/Sc4 c=1 sm=1 a=dhB6nF3YHL5t/Ixux6cINA==:17 a] X-AnalysisOut: [=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=3T6DJ_suu6wA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=Ikc] X-AnalysisOut: [TkHD0fZMA:10 a=zQP7CpKOAAAA:8 a=XIqpo32RAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUA] X-AnalysisOut: [AAA:8 a=OUXY8nFuAAAA:8 a=0FD05c-RAAAA:8 a=6DXz7srDvSfroKcd] X-AnalysisOut: [jdUA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=6ZtORztK6OMA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:] X-AnalysisOut: [10 a=peF9eE_zjQwA:10 a=f7GxY0FH8QIA:10 a=L7Vv4tdXKz6sctWn:] X-AnalysisOut: [21 a=hvZu9EgKgYJDVM6v:21] X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2014051901)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.229.24] Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/DgMJamF5LJ49iLeUL0Sd_RsgAA4 Subject: [CCAMP] FW: New Non-WG Mailing List: Rtg-yang-coord X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 13:46:34 -0000 RllJLQ0KDQotLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQ0KRnJvbTogSUVURi1Bbm5vdW5jZSBb bWFpbHRvOmlldGYtYW5ub3VuY2UtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10gT24gQmVoYWxmIE9mIElFVEYg U2VjcmV0YXJpYXQNClNlbnQ6IE1vbmRheSwgT2N0b2JlciAwNiwgMjAxNCA2OjMzIFBNDQpUbzog SUVURiBBbm5vdW5jZW1lbnQgTGlzdA0KQ2M6IGpoYWFzQGp1bmlwZXIubmV0OyBqZWZmLnRhbnRz dXJhQGVyaWNzc29uLmNvbTsgcnRnLXlhbmctY29vcmRAaWV0Zi5vcmcNClN1YmplY3Q6IE5ldyBO b24tV0cgTWFpbGluZyBMaXN0OiBSdGcteWFuZy1jb29yZCANCg0KQSBuZXcgSUVURiBub24td29y a2luZyBncm91cCBlbWFpbCBsaXN0IGhhcyBiZWVuIGNyZWF0ZWQuDQoNCkxpc3QgYWRkcmVzczog cnRnLXlhbmctY29vcmRAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCkFyY2hpdmU6IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFp bC1hcmNoaXZlL3dlYi9ydGcteWFuZy1jb29yZC8NClRvIHN1YnNjcmliZTogaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cu aWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9ydGcteWFuZy1jb29yZA0KDQpQdXJwb3NlOg0KDQpU aGUgcnRnLXlhbmctY29vcmQgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0IHdpbGwgcHJvdmlkZSBhIGZvcnVtIGZvciBj b29yZGluYXRpb24gb2YgdGhlIGRldmVsb3BtZW50IG9mIFlBTkcgbW9kZWxzIGJlaW5nIHdvcmtl ZCBvbiBmb3IgUm91dGluZywgaW4gb3JkZXIgdG8gcHJvdmlkZSBhIGNvbnNpc3RlbnQgdmlldyB0 byB0aGUgTk1TLiBUaGUgaW50ZW5kZWQgcGFydGljaXBhbnRzIGFyZSBwZW9wbGUgYWN0aXZlIGlu IFJvdXRpbmcgd29ya2luZyBncm91cHMgYW5kIGludGVyZXN0ZWQgaW4gdGhlIGFzc29jaWF0ZWQg WUFORyBtb2RlbHMsIGFuZCBZQU5HIGV4cGVydHMgYXNzaXN0aW5nIHdpdGggUm91dGluZyBZQU5H IG1vZGVscy4gV2hpbGUgdGhpcyBsaXN0IHdpbGwgaGVscCB3aXRoIHRoZSBzeW5jaHJvbml6YXRp b24sIFdHcyB3aXRoIHJlc3BvbnNpYmlsaXR5IGZvciBjb3JlIHJvdXRpbmcgcHJvdG9jb2xzIGFy ZSBleHBlY3RlZCB0byBhbHNvIGJlIHJlc3BvbnNpYmxlIGZvciB0aGUgZGV2ZWxvcG1lbnQgb2Yg WUFORyBtb2RlbHMgZm9yIHRob3NlIA0KcHJvdG9jb2xzLiANCg0KDQpGb3IgYWRkaXRpb25hbCBp bmZvcm1hdGlvbiwgcGxlYXNlIGNvbnRhY3QgdGhlIGxpc3QgYWRtaW5pc3RyYXRvcnMuDQoNCg== From nobody Tue Oct 7 09:42:16 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D0B1ACE31 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 09:42:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.014 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.014 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3ZHHCj38MnVD for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 09:42:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server.isocore.com (server.isocore.com [192.163.204.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F9CE1A01F7 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 09:42:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [65.213.193.86] (port=59284 helo=adminPCR) by server.isocore.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XbXpr-0006D2-Pm for ccamp@ietf.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:42:04 +0000 From: "Shamjhana" To: References: In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 12:42:09 -0400 Organization: Isocore Message-ID: <008601cfe24d$a82e4ec0$f88aec40$@isocore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0087_01CFE22C.211E5C70" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQMmG7MN2wOC9WslksItp3rsxh3by5l4Y6ug Content-Language: en-us X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server.isocore.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - isocore.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server.isocore.com: authenticated_id: spokharel@isocore.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/30ehWTrt9K5ioIl8RWaMcGZucTs Subject: [CCAMP] Cloud & Data Center, WAN and Virtualization/NFV - SDN/MPLS 2014 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:42:13 -0000 This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0087_01CFE22C.211E5C70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, Don't miss the opportunity to find out about the future of networking for service providers and large enterprise entities. Only three weeks is left to SDN/MPLS 2014 Conference. Please make sure to register at your earliest opportunity: http://www.isocore.com/sdn-mpls/attendees.php The SDN/MPLS 2014 Conference program is available at: http://www.isocore.com/sdn-mpls/ Tutorials (Sunday): http://www.isocore.com/sdn-mpls/tutorials.htm Technical sessions (Mon- Wed): http://www.isocore.com/sdn-mpls/technical_sessions.htm Please note that the cutoff date for hotel reservations is almost a week away! After this date, the rooms may not be available for consecutive days reservations. http://www.isocore.com/sdn-mpls/hotel.htm ------=_NextPart_000_0087_01CFE22C.211E5C70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

 

Don’t miss = the opportunity to find out about the future of networking for service = providers and large enterprise entities.

 

Only three weeks = is left to SDN/MPLS 2014 Conference. Please make sure to register = at your earliest opportunity:

 <= /span>

http://www.isocore= .com/sdn-mpls/attendees.php

 <= /span>

The SDN/MPLS 2014 = Conference program is available at: http://www.isocore.com/sdn-mpls= /
 
Tutorials (Sunday): http://www.isocore= .com/sdn-mpls/tutorials.htm
Technical sessions (Mon- = Wed): http://ww= w.isocore.com/sdn-mpls/technical_sessions.htm =

 

Please note that = the cutoff date for hotel reservations is almost a week away! After this = date, 
the rooms may not be available for consecutive days = reservations. 

http://www.is= ocore.com/sdn-mpls/hotel.htm

------=_NextPart_000_0087_01CFE22C.211E5C70-- From nobody Wed Oct 8 04:18:22 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B988E1A0296 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 04:18:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.287 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.287 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V2Zo35ZbNnnK for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 04:18:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7317A1A0290 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 04:18:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2655; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1412767098; x=1413976698; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=sqghhL9SYpAUkiN1lZrQptBksIBTvllxFdwTvQO07YI=; b=W7UfWNu8ALC+0SX49XH9fs6y8Pwrmmag+M1b1WaY5gHxjynb/bbac1fO 4+mO3l9o9VKfUQqtpCADtPKQPYS2Q1GsKrWAWn4gPLxp8FPX6nxf95FWl t6iJn6MZj8G7IyvK+zmPo/C+/smWiKJdzQLA9hE9aDOISQdqqIE9SRq8B Y=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag4FAMUcNVStJA2L/2dsb2JhbABfgw5TUwUEyyKHSwKBCRYBe4QEAgQ6PQISAQgOKEIlAgQBDQUJiDUIBcINAReQETMHhEsFkXeEPocPgS08gwiRGYIggUNsgUiBAgEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,677,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="361572738" Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Oct 2014 11:18:17 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com [173.37.183.86]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s98BIGUr022712 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 8 Oct 2014 11:18:16 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x07.cisco.com ([169.254.2.136]) by xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com ([173.37.183.86]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 06:18:16 -0500 From: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" To: Pawel Brzozowski , "Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" , Haomian Zheng , "Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" , "Zafar Ali (zali)" , Xian Zhang Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03.txt Thread-Index: AQHP4uPQfqm9xBP1m0qIRWP6K9MFA5wmHhMA Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 11:18:16 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20141008103700.20395.53652.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.5.130515 x-originating-ip: [10.86.253.133] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/SIcS6ZPuzjZQoF1UWLxMP8xBejE Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] New Version Notification for draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 11:18:19 -0000 Hi WG, As per our action item from the Toronto IETF meeting, we had merged following two drafts into version-02 of this draft. draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-01 draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp-04 This revision version-03 has following changes: - Elaborated on LSP Reversion (Section 4.1.2) - Editing changes We like to request for WG adoption for this draft as there was a good support for the work in Toronto meeting. Thanks, Rakesh and authors On 2014-10-08 6:37 AM, "internet-drafts@ietf.org" wrote: > >A new version of I-D, draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03.txt >has been successfully submitted by Rakesh Gandhi and posted to the >IETF repository. > >Name: draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc >Revision: 03 >Title: RSVP-TE Signaling Procedure for GMPLS Restoration and Resource >Sharing- based LSP Setup and Teardown >Document date: 2014-10-08 >Group: Individual Submission >Pages: 19 >URL: =20 >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-shari >ng-proc-03.txt >Status: =20 >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing- >proc/ >Htmlized: =20 >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-0 >3 >Diff: =20 >http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharin= g- >proc-03 > >Abstract: > In transport networks, there are requirements where Generalized > Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) end-to-end recovery scheme > needs to employ restoration Label Switched Path (LSP) while keeping > resources for the working and/or restoration LSPs reserved in the > network after the failure occurs. This document reviews how the LSP > association is to be provided using Resource Reservation Protocol - > Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) signaling in the context of GMPLS end- > to-end recovery when using restoration LSP where failed LSP is not > torn down. > > This document compliments existing standards by explaining the > missing pieces of information during the RSVP-TE signaling procedure > in support of resource sharing-based LSP setup/teardown in > GMPLS-controlled circuit networks. No new procedures or mechanisms > are defined by this document, and it is strictly informative in > nature. > > =20 > =20 > > >Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >submission >until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > >The IETF Secretariat > From nobody Wed Oct 8 09:30:55 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6A21A8BBD; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 09:30:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uXyYOOKQJZ3t; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 09:30:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B728B1A030A; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 09:30:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.6.3.p4 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20141008163052.24084.9645.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 09:30:52 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/IRL4SCj2UUGwBmhsLpFYRVAX7pw Cc: ccamp@ietf.org Subject: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-00.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 16:30:53 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Common Control and Measurement Plane Working Group of the IETF. Title : OSPF Routing Extension for Links with Variable Discrete Bandwidth Authors : Hao Long Min Ye Greg Mirsky Himanshu Shah Alessandro D'Alessandro Filename : draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-00.txt Pages : 8 Date : 2014-10-08 Abstract: Packet switching network MAY contain links with variable discrete bandwidth, e.g., copper, radio, etc. The bandwidth of such link MAY change discretely in reaction to changing external environment. Availability is typically used for describing such links during network planning. This document describes an extension for OSPF routing for route computation in a Packet Switched Network (PSN) which contains links with variable discrete bandwidth by introducing an OPTIONAL Availability sub-TLV. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-00 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Wed Oct 8 13:38:56 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5CF81A030B; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 13:38:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JdfyNJ6oIOT1; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 13:38:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4961A02F8; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 13:38:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.6.3.p4 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20141008203853.13900.29855.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 13:38:53 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/rcIIbbHPRjn-0bu_e_CHKWUZTfs Cc: ccamp@ietf.org Subject: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-00.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 20:38:54 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Common Control and Measurement Plane Working Group of the IETF. Title : RSVP-TE Signaling Extension for Links with Variable Discrete Bandwidth Authors : Hao Long Min Ye Greg Mirsky Himanshu Shah Alessandro D'Alessandro Filename : draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-00.txt Pages : 11 Date : 2014-10-08 Abstract: Packet switching network MAY contain links with variable bandwidth, e.g., copper, radio, etc. The bandwidth of such link is sensitive to external environment. Availability is typically used for describing the link during network planning. This document describes an extension for RSVP-TE signaling for setting up a label switching path (LSP) in a Packet Switched Network (PSN) network which contains links with discretely variable bandwidth by introducing an Extended Ethernet Bandwidth Profile TLV and an OPTIONAL Availability sub_TLV in RSVP-TE signaling. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-00 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Fri Oct 10 11:07:28 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B425F1A6EE6 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:07:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Hl744f3CXdk for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:07:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qa0-x234.google.com (mail-qa0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3C9E1A19E2 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:07:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id dc16so1938293qab.25 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:07:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=hepSYGTaQxMXQUWHOKW80y9eGaFxvdiDW/tPCnzlWx4=; b=RZbCWluLFdL88UvFsxVm/zGaESpQUfy+Rk/WRPgZ2in+wyRgP6HPv1G5/9Iz3XUb67 aOyA53BI7HLV4SlEwej0vge+Pqk5ZyDCikrZTTdpzewWviyXYZ5m9C5nO6Lfp3t7Mckm oMgh6hB8ST0/FyzvkOUd7mXLpqnNTM7xwvW5tXp0AmyIAIGvcDOI1LBXVqxt5Z4HEN5b G60akLJhfYuzF9dL6h/HvTuPFEbmn6NXvRuNezJ72vTM00SlqZbPMIgwMC+X4o+DIAw2 QT/TYllCdTlFj5+BZi9SqhhhKp7yA7wx8/Yt5xhNTcshnjPdNR5JpNqXcv3O01yI7ZM9 jJ7w== X-Received: by 10.229.250.71 with SMTP id mn7mr10722976qcb.25.1412964440921; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:07:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.19.236 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:07:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20141010175657.31393.14863.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> References: <20141010175657.31393.14863.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> From: "Andrew G. Malis" Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:07:00 -0400 Message-ID: To: "ccamp@ietf.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11343aec94dd0d0505156b26 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/2C1o6nhB1Ebhnxui4YnCeU7CipI Cc: "draft-malis-ccamp-fast-lsps@tools.ietf.org" Subject: [CCAMP] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-malis-ccamp-fast-lsps-03.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:07:24 -0000 --001a11343aec94dd0d0505156b26 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 CCAMPers, This draft has been updated based upon received comments to date, please read and comment on the list. Thanks, Andy ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Date: Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 1:56 PM Subject: I-D Action: draft-malis-ccamp-fast-lsps-03.txt To: i-d-announce@ietf.org A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. Title : Requirements for Very Fast Setup of GMPLS LSPs Authors : Andrew G. Malis Ronald A. Skoog Haim Kobrinski George Clapp Vishnu Shukla Filename : draft-malis-ccamp-fast-lsps-03.txt Pages : 11 Date : 2014-10-10 Abstract: Establishment and control of Label Switch Paths (LSPs) have become mainstream tools of commercial and government network providers. One of the elements of further evolving such networks is scaling their performance in terms of LSP bandwidth and traffic loads, LSP intensity (e.g., rate of LSP creation, deletion, and modification), LSP set up delay, quality of service differentiation, and different levels of resilience. The goal of this document is to present target scaling objectives and the related protocol requirements for Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS). The document also summarizes key factors affecting current GMPLS signaling procedures in meeting these application scaling requirements. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-malis-ccamp-fast-lsps/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-malis-ccamp-fast-lsps-03 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-malis-ccamp-fast-lsps-03 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ I-D-Announce mailing list I-D-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt --001a11343aec94dd0d0505156b26 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
CCAMPers,

This draft has bee= n updated based upon received comments to date, please read and comment on = the list.

Thanks,
Andy

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 1:56 PM
Subject: I-D Action: draft-m= alis-ccamp-fast-lsps-03.txt
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org



A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies.


=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Title=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0:= Requirements for Very Fast Setup of GMPLS LSPs
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Authors=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0: Andr= ew G. Malis
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Ronald A. Skoog
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Haim Kobrinski
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 George Clapp
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Vishnu Shukla
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Filename=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 : draft-mal= is-ccamp-fast-lsps-03.txt
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Pages=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0:= 11
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Date=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 := 2014-10-10

Abstract:
=C2=A0 =C2=A0Establishment and control of Label Switch Paths (LSPs) have be= come
=C2=A0 =C2=A0mainstream tools of commercial and government network provider= s.=C2=A0 One
=C2=A0 =C2=A0of the elements of further evolving such networks is scaling t= heir
=C2=A0 =C2=A0performance in terms of LSP bandwidth and traffic loads, LSP =C2=A0 =C2=A0intensity (e.g., rate of LSP creation, deletion, and modificat= ion),
=C2=A0 =C2=A0LSP set up delay, quality of service differentiation, and diff= erent
=C2=A0 =C2=A0levels of resilience.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0The goal of this document is to present target scaling objecti= ves and
=C2=A0 =C2=A0the related protocol requirements for Generalized Multi-Protoc= ol
=C2=A0 =C2=A0Label Switching (GMPLS).=C2=A0 The document also summarizes ke= y factors
=C2=A0 =C2=A0affecting current GMPLS signaling procedures in meeting these<= br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0application scaling requirements.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-malis-ccamp-fast-ls= ps/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-malis-ccamp-fast-lsps-03<= br>
A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-malis-ccamp-f= ast-lsps-03


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submissio= n
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp= .ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list
I-D-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d= -announce
Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
or = ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt

--001a11343aec94dd0d0505156b26-- From nobody Fri Oct 10 11:34:40 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F2EC1ACE2C for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:34:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.985 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.985 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Q2upjWXnkPb for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:34:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com [209.65.160.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B71D21ACDD0 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:33:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknown [144.160.229.24] (EHLO alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.2-0) with ESMTP id 49628345.2baa4dc75940.2777009.00-2415.7819077.nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (envelope-from ); Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:33:56 +0000 (UTC) X-MXL-Hash: 54382694730aaffa-3b20dba93efe8d100b72b1e2be962b2a3cf9c14c Received: from unknown [144.160.229.24] (EHLO alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.2-0) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id d7628345.0.2776776.00-2121.7818411.nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (envelope-from ); Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:33:35 +0000 (UTC) X-MXL-Hash: 5438267f25f46319-e945b7480eb515d72f7c3845dda01e65f3fccc9d Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9AIXWAL007662; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:33:32 -0400 Received: from mlpi407.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi407.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.239]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9AIXNGM007481 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:33:24 -0400 Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAD.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAD.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.148]) by mlpi407.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:33:19 GMT Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.5.211]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAD.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.148]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:33:19 -0400 From: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" To: "zhangfei7@huawei.com" , "jingrq@ctbri.com.cn" , "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) (rgandhi@cisco.com)" , "yang.fan240347@gmail.com" , "jiang weilian (jiang.weilian@gmail.com)" Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.txt Thread-Index: Ac/kuKF0sVPxEmbAT8m4Y5RGZ0DNQQ== Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:33:18 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.70.144.140] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166BAF6AMISOUT7MSGUSRDE_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=YZoKEXtf c=1 sm=1 a=dhB6nF3YHL5t/Ixux6cINA==:17 a] X-AnalysisOut: [=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=ubGf1KvACEEA:10 a=ZJj_8Q674SUA:10 a=BLc] X-AnalysisOut: [eEmwcHowA:10 a=zQP7CpKOAAAA:8 a=XIqpo32RAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUA] X-AnalysisOut: [AAA:8 a=ccc8i8lWbWQxareQMRoA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=iDqBOVF] X-AnalysisOut: [fFh74sVzVdIQA:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 a=-uRQ] X-AnalysisOut: [39dPubetiGLY:21] X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2014051901)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.229.24] Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/cR7Cv8Hzf4wBhzhikJmz5fVtpGc Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" , "ccamp-ads@tools.ietf.org" Subject: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:34:39 -0000 --_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166BAF6AMISOUT7MSGUSRDE_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP) In preparation of this document for Last Call: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ex= t-associated-lsp-11.txt? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see R= FCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please answer the ab= ove by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware = of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until= a response has been received from each author and listed contributor. If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author or co= ntributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which= encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an = IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or = discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please s= ee the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wik= i/IntellectualProperty Thank you, CCAMP WG Chairs PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your respons= e. --_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166BAF6AMISOUT7MSGUSRDE_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP)
 
In preparation of this document for Last Call:
 
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvp= te-ext-associated-lsp-11.txt?
 
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (= see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
 
If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please answer t= he above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are a= ware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage = until a response has been received from each author and listed contributor.
 
If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author = or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules = which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others o= n an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undisc= losed IPR.  For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and= http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/w= iki/IntellectualProperty
 
Thank you,
CCAMP WG Chairs
 
PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your re= sponse.
 
 
 --_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166BAF6AMISOUT7MSGUSRDE_-- From nobody Sun Oct 12 08:01:43 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3552B1A1B91 for ; Sun, 12 Oct 2014 06:43:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c7W0XxgtGcSv for ; Sun, 12 Oct 2014 06:43:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omzsmtpe03.verizonbusiness.com (omzsmtpe03.verizonbusiness.com [199.249.25.208]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32D641A1BAA for ; Sun, 12 Oct 2014 06:43:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=verizon.com; i=nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1413121431; x=1444657431; h=from:to:cc:date:subject:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=r5kU3x35lZ+Gqo6QwuO/ze07l9pACseLDRfHX9AwJ6U=; b=OCRdsI9fjFq3NmWw9tWp1CXLCMbCgvJhVozmwrB30Q1x5k9rz87FYJAE NZCSHcNSuo8e32mVDvyUvokv4Lt/5ILLvEnItYMh19NcwVhJyPkC0YqQK K2UT2GTO6LYi1uTeeGAEFoVNgqgfpcXlN9nsrBhYR7Y9PcECes62yJZKg U=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi01.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.143]) by omzsmtpe03.verizonbusiness.com with ESMTP; 12 Oct 2014 13:43:49 +0000 From: "Bitar, Nabil N" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,704,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="877369147" Received: from fldp1lumxc7hb05.verizon.com (HELO FLDP1LUMXC7HB05.us.one.verizon.com) ([166.68.75.87]) by fldsmtpi01.verizon.com with ESMTP; 12 Oct 2014 13:43:49 +0000 Received: from fldp1lumxc7v63.us.one.verizon.com ([169.254.3.86]) by FLDP1LUMXC7HB05.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.75.87]) with mapi; Sun, 12 Oct 2014 09:43:49 -0400 To: VICTOR LOPEZ ALVAREZ , Lou Berger , "draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange@tools.ietf.org" , "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A (ATTLABS)" Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 09:42:03 -0400 Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange Thread-Index: AQHP18qm2VhlgXY21Ua2ikYf238MapwslQac Message-ID: References: <53CFA132.40807@labn.net>, In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/6NgOjBY56DpblDH1gaNhtmzAIvE X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 08:01:42 -0700 Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 13:43:54 -0000 Hi, No, I am not of any IPR that applies to this draft. Thanks, Nabil ________________________________________ From: VICTOR LOPEZ ALVAREZ [victor.lopezalvarez@telefonica.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 3:39 AM To: Lou Berger; draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange@tools.ietf.org= ; BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A (ATTLABS) Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-e= xchange Hi, No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft Victor El 23/07/14 13:49, "Lou Berger" escribi=F3: > >Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP) > >As part of the preparation for WG document adoption poll: > >Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? > > Please state either: > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" > or > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > >If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules >(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? > >If yes to the above, please state either: > > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" > or > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > >If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think > appropriate. > >If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the >above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are >aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next >stage until a response has been received from each author and listed >contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THE DOCUMENT. > >If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author or >contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules >which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of >others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any > contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more >information, please see the RFCs listed above and >http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. > >Thank you, >CCAMP WG Chairs > >PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your >response. > >_______________________________________________ >CCAMP mailing list >CCAMP@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, pu= ede contener informaci=F3n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclus= ivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario ind= icado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci=F3n, divulgaci=F3n y/o= copia sin autorizaci=F3n puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislaci= =F3n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo = comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v=EDa y proceda a su destrucci=F3n. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidenti= al information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named = above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are= hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this co= mmunication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission = in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you h= ave received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat=E1rio= , pode conter informa=E7=E3o privilegiada ou confidencial e =E9 para uso ex= clusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n=E3o =E9 vossa senhoria o des= tinat=E1rio indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza=E7=E3o, div= ulga=E7=E3o e/ou c=F3pia sem autoriza=E7=E3o pode estar proibida em virtude= da legisla=E7=E3o vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe = que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destru= i=E7=E3o From nobody Mon Oct 13 12:10:51 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15D741A897D for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 12:10:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.286 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.286 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7hOdusvA1_u7 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 12:10:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 486031A8952 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 12:10:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7271; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1413227435; x=1414437035; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=fP0G9Mcto6OHNJr7eHCa3/vbTX7N27GLDEGZkn+Mgi4=; b=hcnVPfzXKj7cMqUqMnWRJ4DyxJO9raJ5BXaqd+QmJJbpypBSm5CxKTqm 6WEP1ypZ8aXlyHkmPdoE5i8I6CmIByfL/Rsqyl+j0Q80LvHFVTWCzDAZl gPdt6fvexWkJEx7Yk6WdXktxdJ031/KZ2Jwl8VVCmCYA42I7gmgaZtsyd I=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhYFANsiPFStJV2b/2dsb2JhbABbgkhGU1gEhB7FHoFth00CgR4WAX2EAgECBC1HBRIBCBEDAQIoKBEUCQgBAQQBDQWIKgMRDb41DYYuAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF44TJ4EpEQElBxMNBAcCBIRFBZF5hEKEf4IRgS48gwqKSYJWg36Dd2wBgQ45gQIBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,712,1406592000"; d="scan'208,217";a="359818873" Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Oct 2014 19:10:34 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com [173.37.183.82]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9DJAXLf013616 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 13 Oct 2014 19:10:33 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x07.cisco.com ([169.254.2.136]) by xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([173.37.183.82]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 14:10:33 -0500 From: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" To: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" , "zhangfei7@huawei.com" , "jingrq@ctbri.com.cn" , "yang.fan240347@gmail.com" , "jiang weilian (jiang.weilian@gmail.com)" Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.txt Thread-Index: Ac/kuKF0sVPxEmbAT8m4Y5RGZ0DNQQCaRlKA Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 19:10:32 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.5.130515 x-originating-ip: [10.86.243.12] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D0619B4F3D5BErgandhiciscocom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/nFDfdZy5c2RSBi-O3EgXKpBGu78 Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" , "ccamp-ads@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 19:10:42 -0000 --_000_D0619B4F3D5BErgandhiciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi WG, Chairs, An IPR that applies to this draft has been disclosed: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2139/ I am not aware of any other IPR that applies to this draft. Thanks, Rakesh From: , DEBORAH BRUNGARD > Date: Friday, 10 October, 2014 2:33 PM To: "zhangfei7@huawei.com" >, "jingrq@ctbri.com.cn" >, Rakesh Gandhi <= rgandhi@cisco.com>, "yang.fan240347@gmail.com" >, "jiang weilian (jiang.weilian@gmail.com)" > Cc: CCAMP >, "ccamp-ads@tools.ietf.or= g" > Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-ls= p-11.txt Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP) In preparation of this document for Last Call: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ex= t-associated-lsp-11.txt? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see R= FCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please answer the ab= ove by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware = of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until= a response has been received from each author and listed contributor. If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author or co= ntributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which= encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an = IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or = discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please s= ee the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wik= i/IntellectualProperty Thank you, CCAMP WG Chairs PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your respons= e. --_000_D0619B4F3D5BErgandhiciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi WG, Chairs,

An IPR that applies to this draft has been disclosed:



I am not aware of any other IPR that applies to this draft.

Thanks,
Rakesh



From: <BRUNGARD>, DEBORAH BRU= NGARD <db3546@att.com>
Date: Friday, 10 October, 2014 2:33= PM
To: "zhangfei7@huawei.com" <zhangfei7@huawei.com>, "jingrq@ctbri.com.cn" <jingrq@ctbri.com.cn>, Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi@cisco.com>, "yang.fan240347@gm= ail.com" <yang.fan2= 40347@gmail.com>, "jiang weilian (jiang.weilian@gmail.com)" <jiang.weilian@gmail.com= >
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>, "ccamp-ads@tools.ietf.org" <ccamp-ads@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-iet= f-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.txt

Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP)
 
In preparation of this document for Last Call:
 
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvp= te-ext-associated-lsp-11.txt?
 
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (= see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
 
If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please answer t= he above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are a= ware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage = until a response has been received from each author and listed contributor.
 
If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author = or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules = which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others o= n an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undis= closed IPR.  For more information, please see the RFCs listed above an= d http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wi= ki/IntellectualProperty
 
Thank you,
CCAMP WG Chairs
 
PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your re= sponse.
 
 
 --_000_D0619B4F3D5BErgandhiciscocom_-- From nobody Mon Oct 13 18:21:04 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 497B41A1A79 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 18:20:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.536 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.536 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zev-ANaiBgcq for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 18:20:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78E331A1A7E for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 18:20:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BNP54117; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 01:20:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nkgeml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.36) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 02:20:48 +0100 Received: from NKGEML509-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.251]) by nkgeml405-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.36]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 09:20:44 +0800 From: "Zhangfei (Philip)" To: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" , "jingrq@ctbri.com.cn" , "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) (rgandhi@cisco.com)" , "yang.fan240347@gmail.com" , "jiang weilian (jiang.weilian@gmail.com)" Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.txt Thread-Index: Ac/kuKF0sVPxEmbAT8m4Y5RGZ0DNQQCjpV7g Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 01:20:44 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.138.68.68] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AF82500E245ACF498991B9F5FFCC6DB2BEC340nkgeml509mbxchina_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/ReM11SQtT2OXB-wdfI3Yi2mg-q4 Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" , "ccamp-ads@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 01:20:57 -0000 --_000_AF82500E245ACF498991B9F5FFCC6DB2BEC340nkgeml509mbxchina_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGkgV0dlcnMsIENoYWlycywNCg0KQXMgYSBjby1hdXRob3Igb2YgdGhpcyBkcmFmdA0KDQpJIGFt IG5vdCBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgb3RoZXIgSVBSIHRoYXQgYXBwbGllcyB0byB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0Lg0K DQpCLlIuDQoNCkZlaQ0KDQq3orz+yMs6IEJSVU5HQVJELCBERUJPUkFIIEEgW21haWx0bzpkYjM1 NDZAYXR0LmNvbV0NCreiy83KsbzkOiAyMDE0xOoxMNTCMTHI1SAyOjMzDQrK1bz+yMs6IFpoYW5n ZmVpIChQaGlsaXApOyBqaW5ncnFAY3RicmkuY29tLmNuPG1haWx0bzpqaW5ncnFAY3RicmkuY29t LmNuPjsgUmFrZXNoIEdhbmRoaSAocmdhbmRoaSkgKHJnYW5kaGlAY2lzY28uY29tPG1haWx0bzpy Z2FuZGhpQGNpc2NvLmNvbT4pOyB5YW5nLmZhbjI0MDM0N0BnbWFpbC5jb208bWFpbHRvOnlhbmcu ZmFuMjQwMzQ3QGdtYWlsLmNvbT47IGppYW5nIHdlaWxpYW4gKGppYW5nLndlaWxpYW5AZ21haWwu Y29tPG1haWx0bzpqaWFuZy53ZWlsaWFuQGdtYWlsLmNvbT4pDQqzrcvNOiBjY2FtcEBpZXRmLm9y ZzxtYWlsdG86Y2NhbXBAaWV0Zi5vcmc+OyBjY2FtcC1hZHNAdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmc8bWFpbHRv OmNjYW1wLWFkc0B0b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZz4NCtb3zOI6IFJlZ2FyZGluZyBJUFIgb24gZHJhZnQt aWV0Zi1jY2FtcC1tcGxzLXRwLXJzdnB0ZS1leHQtYXNzb2NpYXRlZC1sc3AtMTEudHh0DQoNCkF1 dGhvcnMsIENvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycywgKENDQU1QKQ0KDQpJbiBwcmVwYXJhdGlvbiBvZiB0aGlzIGRv Y3VtZW50IGZvciBMYXN0IENhbGw6DQoNCkFyZSB5b3UgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IElQUiB0aGF0IGFw cGxpZXMgdG8gZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1jY2FtcC1tcGxzLXRwLXJzdnB0ZS1leHQtYXNzb2NpYXRlZC1s c3AtMTEudHh0Pw0KDQpJZiBzbywgaGFzIHRoaXMgSVBSIGJlZW4gZGlzY2xvc2VkIGluIGNvbXBs aWFuY2Ugd2l0aCBJRVRGIElQUiBydWxlcyAoc2VlIFJGQ3MgMzk3OSwgNDg3OSwgMzY2OSBhbmQg NTM3OCBmb3IgbW9yZSBkZXRhaWxzKT8NCg0KSWYgeW91IGFyZSBsaXN0ZWQgYXMgYSBkb2N1bWVu dCBhdXRob3Igb3IgY29udHJpYnV0b3IsIHBsZWFzZSBhbnN3ZXIgdGhlIGFib3ZlIGJ5IHJlc3Bv bmRpbmcgdG8gdGhpcyBlbWFpbCByZWdhcmRsZXNzIG9mIHdoZXRoZXIgb3Igbm90IHlvdSBhcmUg YXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IHJlbGV2YW50IElQUi4gVGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCB3aWxsIG5vdCBhZHZhbmNl IHRvIHRoZSBuZXh0IHN0YWdlIHVudGlsIGEgcmVzcG9uc2UgaGFzIGJlZW4gcmVjZWl2ZWQgZnJv bSBlYWNoIGF1dGhvciBhbmQgbGlzdGVkIGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9yLg0KDQpJZiB5b3UgYXJlIG9uIHRo ZSBDQ0FNUCBXRyBlbWFpbCBsaXN0IGJ1dCBhcmUgbm90IGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhbiBhdXRob3Igb3Ig Y29udHJpYnV0b3IsIHdlIHJlbWluZCB5b3Ugb2YgeW91ciBvYmxpZ2F0aW9ucyB1bmRlciB0aGUg SUVURiBJUFIgcnVsZXMgd2hpY2ggZW5jb3VyYWdlcyB5b3UgdG8gbm90aWZ5IHRoZSBJRVRGIGlm IHlvdSBhcmUgYXdhcmUgb2YgSVBSIG9mIG90aGVycyBvbiBhbiBJRVRGIGNvbnRyaWJ1dGlvbiwg b3IgdG8gcmVmcmFpbiBmcm9tIHBhcnRpY2lwYXRpbmcgaW4gYW55IGNvbnRyaWJ1dGlvbiBvciBk aXNjdXNzaW9uIHJlbGF0ZWQgdG8geW91ciB1bmRpc2Nsb3NlZCBJUFIuICBGb3IgbW9yZSBpbmZv cm1hdGlvbiwgcGxlYXNlIHNlZSB0aGUgUkZDcyBsaXN0ZWQgYWJvdmUgYW5kIGh0dHA6Ly90cmFj LnRvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2dyb3VwL2llc2cvdHJhYy93aWtpL0ludGVsbGVjdHVhbFByb3BlcnR5 DQoNClRoYW5rIHlvdSwNCkNDQU1QIFdHIENoYWlycw0KDQpQUyBQbGVhc2UgaW5jbHVkZSBhbGwg bGlzdGVkIGluIHRoZSBoZWFkZXJzIG9mIHRoaXMgbWVzc2FnZSBpbiB5b3VyIHJlc3BvbnNlLg0K DQoNCg== --_000_AF82500E245ACF498991B9F5FFCC6DB2BEC340nkgeml509mbxchina_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi WG= ers, Chairs,

 <= /o:p>

As a co-auth= or of this draft

 <= /o:p>

I am not awa= re of any other IPR that applies to this draft.

 <= /o:p>

B.R.

 <= /o:p>

Fei

 = ;

=B7=A2=BC=FE=C8=CB: BRUNGAR= D, DEBORAH A [mailto:db3546@att.com]
=B7=A2= =CB=CD=CA=B1=BC=E4: 2014=C4=EA10=D4=C211=C8=D5 2:33
=CA=D5=BC=FE=C8=CB: Zhangfei (Philip); jingrq@ctbri.com.cn; Rakesh Gand= hi (rgandhi) (rgandhi@cisco.com); yang.fan240347@gmail.com; j= iang weilian (jiang.weilian@gmai= l.com)
=B3=AD=CB=CD: ccamp@ietf.org; ccamp-ads@t= ools.ietf.org
=D6=F7=CC=E2: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.tx= t

 

Authors, Contributors, (= CCAMP)

 =

In preparation of this d= ocument for Last Call:

 =

Are you aware of any IPR= that applies to draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.txt?=

 =

If so, has this IPR been= disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and= 5378 for more details)?

 =

If you are listed as a d= ocument author or contributor, please answer the above by responding to thi= s email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a res= ponse has been received from each author and listed contributor.=

 =

If you are on the CCAMP = WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you= of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contri= bution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion = related to your undisclosed IPR.  For more information, please see the= RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty<= /a>

 =

Thank you,

CCAMP WG Chairs

 =

PS Please include all li= sted in the headers of this message in your response.

 =

 =

--_000_AF82500E245ACF498991B9F5FFCC6DB2BEC340nkgeml509mbxchina_-- From nobody Mon Oct 13 20:19:04 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B8F1A6F3C for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 20:18:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kso4qo8lKohT for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 20:18:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pa0-x229.google.com (mail-pa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B49E11A6F3A for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 20:18:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id eu11so6975195pac.14 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 20:18:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=in-reply-to:references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:date:to:cc:message-id; bh=zHvJi1NUSQ118XA2U/eOpax48x5VpBz4TGY4xHDUiCU=; b=zDH+i1Z9bpKyetIsV9PPiV+f++Sm+0CurR1LAlDHVyKervOnVhazZ+xsdDccrakip0 lqeEliJfJP7d5nlxT/XOEkLsxrx3lhSuuQVtCWeenpL6Wb1K7hioq9Z3SX9IlGMz+sOr E8lAGCJit24M1vSxn0kwy9qrJSPsoA+aut2kzt86R4NWUZkU8N/IawmQdn3TM10mAUGu wOmOVSrCqwQOpBB/gFb6JLtwKxFwG+IwMmz4Q8616JRcQO/qf6NFhydjZMscHg6vw2sI tizMGrTkb5umIAyrhnnOQ/GEuwTsb+lwGaO/rr4ICJC4sudxmwCysqTnbSZIY4vBdnqV fuaA== X-Received: by 10.66.244.104 with SMTP id xf8mr2153738pac.92.1413256736285; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 20:18:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.6.19.245] ([117.136.45.117]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o5sm5352688pdc.24.2014.10.13.20.18.53 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Oct 2014 20:18:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: X-Blue-Identity: !l=284&o=2229&fo=10213&pl=136&po=0&qs=PREFIX&f=HTML&n=jiang%20weilian&e=jiang.weilian%40gmail.com&m=!%3AYWFkMmE5YzUtZDYwYy00NGU2LTgzZTItN2EwNGY3ZDA4ZTZk%3ASU5CT1g%3D%3AMTMwNTQ%3D%3AANSWERED&p=134&q=SHOW User-Agent: Blue for Android MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----X0HN6C6YYLK5DV8E21Z3DTDIHHSOP5" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: jiang weilian Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:18:49 +0800 To: "Zhangfei (Philip)" Message-ID: <396403b6-a216-4e06-9739-8f3f682d3be2@email.bluemailapp.com> Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/WJS-9zTDLdoge0E8J-eTVziC0Xw Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" , "jingrq@ctbri.com.cn" , "ccamp-ads@tools.ietf.org" , "yang.fan240347@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 03:18:59 -0000 ------X0HN6C6YYLK5DV8E21Z3DTDIHHSOP5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 å‘自 Blue Mail Hi WGers, Chairs,   As a co-author of this draft   I am not aware of any other IPR that applies to this draft.   Thanks  weilian 2014-10-14 9:20, 9:20，在 "Zhangfei (Philip)" 已写: >Hi WGers, Chairs, > >As a co-author of this draft > >I am not aware of any other IPR that applies to this draft. > >B.R. > >Fei > >å‘件人: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A [mailto:db3546@att.com] >å‘é€æ—¶é—´: 2014å¹´10月11æ—¥ 2:33 >收件人: Zhangfei (Philip); >jingrq@ctbri.com.cn; Rakesh Gandhi >(rgandhi) (rgandhi@cisco.com); >yang.fan240347@gmail.com; jiang >weilian (jiang.weilian@gmail.com) >抄é€: ccamp@ietf.org; >ccamp-ads@tools.ietf.org >主题: Regarding IPR on >draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.txt > >Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP) > >In preparation of this document for Last Call: > >Are you aware of any IPR that applies to >draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.txt? > >If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules >(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? > >If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please answer >the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you >are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the >next stage until a response has been received from each author and >listed contributor. > >If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author >or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR >rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR >of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in >any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For >more information, please see the RFCs listed above and >http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty > >Thank you, >CCAMP WG Chairs > >PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your >response. ------X0HN6C6YYLK5DV8E21Z3DTDIHHSOP5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


发自 Blue Mail
Hi WGers, Chairs,
 
As a co-author of this draft
 
I am not aware of any other IPR that applies to this draft.
 
Thanks
 weilian

2014-10-14, 9:20，在 "Zhangfei (Philip)" <zhangfei7@huawei.com> 已写:

Hi WGers, Chairs,

 

As a co-author of this draft

 

I am not aware of any other IPR that applies to this draft.

 

B.R.

 

Fei

 

å‘件人: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A [mailto:db3546@att.com]
å‘é€æ—¶é—´: 2014å¹´10月11æ—¥ 2:33
收件人: Zhangfei (Philip); jingrq@ctbri.com.cn; Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) (rgandhi@cisco.com); yang.fan240347@gmail.com; jiang weilian (jiang.weilian@gmail.com)
抄é€: ccamp@ietf.org; ccamp-ads@tools.ietf.org
主题: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.txt

 

Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP)

 

In preparation of this document for Last Call:

 

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.txt?

 

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

 

If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and listed contributor.

 

If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR.  For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty

 

Thank you,

CCAMP WG Chairs

 

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response.

 

 

------X0HN6C6YYLK5DV8E21Z3DTDIHHSOP5-- From nobody Tue Oct 14 03:49:24 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463591A802E for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 03:49:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rPoTAg4n2E4N for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 03:49:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A7701A802B for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 03:49:19 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-f791c6d00000617b-bd-543cffad42e8 Received: from ESESSHC019.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 72.46.24955.DAFFC345; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 12:49:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ESESSMB301.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.79]) by ESESSHC019.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 12:49:17 +0200 From: Daniele Ceccarelli To: "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" Thread-Topic: IETF 91 - CCAMP slots request Thread-Index: Ac/nnHgRWs23fK5sQUyzTRjoQufDLQ== Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:49:16 +0000 Message-ID: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE481279E733@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.17] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE481279E733ESESSMB301erics_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrGLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje7a/zYhBm2d6hZP5txgcWD0WLLk J1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxtWuBsaCO9UVDy/eZmpgXJnXxcjJISFgIrHlTycThC0mceHe erYuRi4OIYGjjBLXDl9kgnAWM0p0LGwBcjg42ASsJJ4c8gFpEBHQldi78ToziC0soCax9WYH K0RcW+Lp5/1Qtp5Ee9tPNhCbRUBVYvXWpYwgNq+Ar8S62+3sIDajgKzEhN2LwOLMAuISt57M hzpIQGLJnvPMELaoxMvH/1hBTpAQUJRY3i8HUZ4v8WvrUjaIkYISJ2c+YZnAKDQLyaRZSMpm ISmDiOtILNj9iQ3C1pZYtvA1M4x95sBjJmTxBYzsqxhFi1OLk3LTjYz1Uosyk4uL8/P08lJL NjECI+Lglt+qOxgvv3E8xCjAwajEw7ug2SZEiDWxrLgy9xCjNAeLkjjvwnPzgoUE0hNLUrNT UwtSi+KLSnNSiw8xMnFwSjUwype9+ly//MGi+Y8O77xpVdD9dfrskLWOWd91Ep6vFUs+Mll8 jUX6pMsei05wTVqwr+bf4elbmp6VJUy6XCJwzsbK8qHBATfDB1L9Pte2cD1cJn83ZHqG3naN c/KT+G2m8UY9MllqEngvrGXR3FY271+F6+IcPi9JsTnMx37ueX7rrzV8k35f3afEUpyRaKjF XFScCAABoFt/aQIAAA== Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/wpO24oPeTTK_psN_LO9cUW3NLSU Subject: [CCAMP] IETF 91 - CCAMP slots request X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:49:22 -0000 --_000_4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE481279E733ESESSMB301erics_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear CCAMP, IETF 91 meeting is approaching and it's time to start collecting agenda slo= ts requests. Keeping this in mind: WG Draft authors are expected to present if there are open issues to discus= s, or to send status to the list *1 week* prior to the WG meeting if not p= resenting. Status includes review of: any recent changes, any open discussi= ons or issues, and planned next steps. Agenda Requests: - To submit a request, please fill the survey at the following link: http:/= /www.surveygizmo.com/s3/1846224/IETF-91-CCAMP-slot-requests - Please fill the survey no later than Thursday, October 23rd. Presentations: If you are presenting slides please make sure you send them to all *indi= viduals* listed above (Chairs, Secretary and exclude CCAMP) no later than = Sunday, November 9th. Reminder about a few important dates: * 2014-10-27 (Monday): Internet Draft submission cut-off (for all draft= s, including -00) by UTC 23:59, upload using IETF ID Submission Tool. * 2014-10-27 (Monday): Draft Working Group agendas due by UTC 23:59, up= load using IETF Meeting Materials Management Tool. * 2014-11-03 (Monday): Revised Working Group agendas due by UTC 23:59, = upload using IETF Meeting Materials Management Tool. * 2014-11-09 - 2014-11-14: 91st IETF Meeting in Honolulu, HI, USA. BR Daniele & CCAMP chairs --_000_4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE481279E733ESESSMB301erics_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear CCAMP,

 

IETF 91 meeting is approaching and it’s time t= o start collecting agenda slots requests.

 

Keeping this in mind:

WG Draft authors are expected to present if there= are open issues to discuss, or to send status to the list  *1 week* p= rior to the WG meeting if not presenting. Status includes review of: any re= cent changes, any open discussions or issues, and planned next steps.

 

Agenda Requests:

- To submit a request, please fill the sur= vey at the following link: http://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/1846224/IETF-91-CCAMP-slot-requests

- Please fill the survey no later than Thursda= y, October 23rd.

 

Presentations:

  If you are presenting slides please make s= ure you send them to  all *individuals* listed above (Chairs, Secretar= y and exclude CCAMP) no later  than Sunday, November 9th.

&= nbsp;

Reminder about a few important dates:

BR

Daniele & CCAMP cha= irs

 

 

--_000_4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE481279E733ESESSMB301erics_-- From nobody Wed Oct 15 07:51:21 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996701A873D for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 07:51:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -13.911 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, J_CHICKENPOX_31=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id va5kRjES0q4v for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 07:51:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E9651A870C for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 07:51:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8744; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1413384674; x=1414594274; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=VTkNd8t8Dpa4JA3E3/6Y+UVuLvvRLRgniKqWXdCEys4=; b=ZemNmR1n51BSL1yuiYzoh+v65uBLKySBYOrCFoLbwcz9kCnk+Ar/5lZN YhkRs9i9blvuUrVGK5m/M70K2mBAB6bOGQZgcSSOFdjeLOuH1uXvI7l14 xO5XxdO0XXdOmvHzp1C/OlhIKq0brUET4tEMXbFBq5m0vjCUgWS7vUu+9 g=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag4FADGJPlStJV2S/2dsb2JhbABbgw5TWATLdQyHSwKBFBYBfYQCAQEBAgIBAQFoAxcGARYDAwECASMyCx0IAgQBEgmINQ3IOgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARqPbBEBVwaERQWRf4REgXaFG4EwPIMKigyDGoN+gjSBQ2wBgQ45gQIBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,724,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="87197156" Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Oct 2014 14:51:13 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com [173.36.12.81]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9FEpDA1022103 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 15 Oct 2014 14:51:13 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.138]) by xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com ([173.36.12.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:51:13 -0500 From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" To: Lou Berger , CCAMP , "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" Thread-Topic: Request for comments and adoption for draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3 and draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02.txt Thread-Index: AQHP6Id2rhkmRXDdYU2qeIkM9HgRoQ== Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 14:51:13 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616 x-originating-ip: [10.86.243.20] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/-ReqkPJ9xCGRBSEVMoV-qyyBFCs Subject: [CCAMP] Request for comments and adoption for draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3 and draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 14:51:18 -0000 Dear WG and Chairs: We have addressed all comments received on these draft in the following versions.=20 http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02.txt http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type- g709v3-05.txt These are very slim documents to get code points for ODU1e, ODU3e1, and ODU3e2. There was also a pool on this work at IETF89. Copy and pasting the from minutes (http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/89/minutes/minutes-89-ccamp): >29 13:15 5 Title: RSVP-TE extension for additional >signal types in G.709 OTN >Draft: >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-0 >1 >Presenter: Zafar Ali, >http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/89/slides/slides-89-ccamp-29.pdf [poll] Is there interest in this work? [a reasonable number] Given this, we believe there is support from the WG in this work to start adoption poll. Any comments and a follow-up adoption poll will be greatly appreciated. Thanks Regards ... Zafar -----Original Message----- From: zali Date: Friday, August 29, 2014 12:39 PM To: "lberger@labn.net" Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" , "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Follow up to routing area reorg >Hi Lou:=20 > >Many thanks for your detailed comments and offline review. Much >appreciated. Based on the feedback. I have modified both documents as >follows: >http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02.tx >t >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type >- >g709v3-05.txt > > >Dear Chairs and the WG: > >These are very slim documents to get code points for ODU1e, ODU3e1, and >ODU3e2. We believe we have addressed all comments received from the WG. > >There was also a pool on this work at IETF89. Copy and pasting the from >minutes (http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/89/minutes/minutes-89-ccamp): > >> 29 13:15 5 Title: RSVP-TE extension for additional >>signal types in G.709 OTN >>Draft:=20 >>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3- >>0 >>1 >>Presenter: Zafar Ali, >>http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/89/slides/slides-89-ccamp-29.pdf > >[poll] Is there interest in this work? [a reasonable number] > > >Given this, we believe there is support from the WG in this work to start >adoption poll.=20 > >Any comments and a follow-up adoption poll will be greatly appreciated. > > >Thanks > >Regards ... Zafar > > >-----Original Message----- >From: "lberger@labn.net" >Date: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 6:26 PM >To: zali >Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" , "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" > >Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Follow up to routing area reorg > >>Hi Zafar, >> Considering you weren't at the meeting you got close to the >>discussed actions. From the raw minutes: >> >>> Lou: I suspect you mean "Standards Action" rather than "Unassigned" >>> Lou: Any comments from our AD - expect there are two areas where he >>> may comment >>> Adrian: The Experimental range looks large, also perhaps "Expert >>> Reivew" is better than "Experimental" >>> Adrian: the G.Supp43 values should be under Expert Review rather >>> than Experimental, as they're going to be around for too long to be >>> really experimental >>> Lou: Agreed, not sure why we (AD&Chair) focused on Experimental at >>> the last meeting, but Expert Reviews is clearly a better choice. >>> Authors, please make the change to allow for Expert review, consider >>> shrinking the experimental range and remove the private range. The >>> document should indicate that the expert (for the expert review) will >>> be appointed by the CCAMP WG chairs. >>> >>> Lou: The prior document should also request "Expert Review" values. >> >>So looking at the documents I think you have some actions to do before >>we can poll for adoption. Also, strictly speaking you no longer need to >>change the registry values, but rather just the registry assignment >>policy. This is all I'd personally recommend to do, but if you want to >>both change the registry policy and add an experimental range, this is >>your prerogative. To fix *just* the assignment problem (and keep things >>simple), I think you can do the following to >>draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry: >> >> 2. IANA Considerations >> >> IANA maintains the an "OTN Signal Type" subregistry to the >>"Generalized Multi-Protocol >> Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Parameters" registry. The registry >>currently is defined >> to use the Standards Action registration policy as defined by >>[RFC5226]. This document >> directs that both Standards Action and Specification Required >>policies, as defined in >> [RFC5226], be applied to this subregistry. When needed, the >>Designated Expert shall be >> identified by a CCAMP WG chair or, in the case the group is no >>longer active, by the IESG. >> >>and >> >> Update the intro and abstract text to be aligned with this text. >> >>For draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3 >> >>- I think trying to maintain alignment with the text of >>draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry >> provides no value, adds unnecessary dependent details, and should be >>dropped from the >> document. (Or do the extra work of updating it to match the changes >>and then rev this >> document every time the other changes.) >> >>- You no longer need to describe the range or suggest specific values. >> >>Unless I missed something, I believe that's it. >> >>Lou >> >>On 7/26/2014 10:59 AM, Zafar Ali (zali) wrote: >>> Hi Lou, Deborah, Adrian and the WG: >>> >>> The following two documents listed in the email has been updated based >>>on >>> the comments received from Chairs, ADs and the WG. Pointer to the >>>latest >>> version of the drafts are provided. >>> >>> 17 - draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry =3D=3D=3D> >>>=20 >>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subr >>>e >>>gi >>> stry-01.txt >>> 18 - draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3 =3D=3D=3D> >>>=20 >>>http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-0 >>>3 >>>.t >>> xt=20 >>> >>> >>> These are very slim documents to get code points for ODU1e, ODU3e1, and >>> ODU3e2. We believe there is support from the WG in this work to start >>> adoption poll.=20 >>> >>> Any comments and a follow-up adoption poll will be greatly appreciated. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Regards =A9 Zafar >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: "lberger@labn.net" >>> Date: Friday, July 25, 2014 11:17 AM >>> To: "ccamp@ietf.org" >>> Subject: [CCAMP] Follow up to routing area reorg >>> >>>> All, >>>> As described in yesterday's routing area meeting, see >>>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/90/slides/slides-90-rtgarea-3.ppt, our >>>> ADs have initiated some changes that will impact CCAMP. As presented, >>>> technology specific work will remain in ccamp. The other details of >>>> these changes will be flushed out as part of the forthcoming charter >>>> drafting / revising. >>>> >>>> As our AD's have stated, it is important that these changes do not >>>>stop >>>> us from making progress. In this week's meetings we discussed actions >>>> related to a number of individual drafts that we don't expect to be >>>> impacted by the changes. In particular, we discussed planned updates, >>>> and subsequent adoption polls, of the following drafts: >>>> >>>>> 11 - draft-martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-info >>>>> 12 - draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g-698-2-lmp >>>>> 13 - draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-mib >>>>> 17 - draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry >>>>> 18 - draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3 >>>> Please do your updates as discussed and we should be able to poll >>>>these >>>> documents, as planned. (Hopefully in time to allow for the discussed >>>> liaison to ITU-T.) >>>> >>>> Importantly, work on WG drafts should also continue as >>>>discussed/planned. >>>> >>>> We hope that this addresses the questions we received offline. If you >>>> still have questions, please feel free to send them to the list -- or >>>> privately if you prefer. >>>> >>>> Deborah and Lou >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> CCAMP mailing list >>>> CCAMP@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp >>> >> > From nobody Thu Oct 16 11:19:26 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA6D51A1A32; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:19:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LC8OT-ROK8gV; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:19:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (asmtp4.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1ACA11A0199; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:19:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s9GIJE7W021852; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 19:19:14 +0100 Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s9GIJCk8021842 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Oct 2014 19:19:13 +0100 From: "Adrian Farrel" To: "'CCAMP'" , , Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 19:19:08 +0100 Message-ID: <028e01cfe96d$ae0b58c0$0a220a40$@olddog.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac/pbaw1aHsTHPmgROqdF3p2VsF9QA== Content-Language: en-gb X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1576-7.5.0.1018-21032.002 X-TM-AS-Result: No--4.904-10.0-31-10 X-imss-scan-details: No--4.904-10.0-31-10 X-TMASE-MatchedRID: +zq3ScDhdVz243bLvnYxneLdprnA5EQRz5hzQnUnsHZA9Ad+70NukwaT alM8C773f5Vqqfad4pvUWPjkMGeZuEj+bWNtFbsn2Hdvv/MGE3V9LQinZ4QefL6qvLNjDYTwfyj BJDnutUhQSFbL1bvQASdET58jp62Slph5Erpfp880NeRFKdoAXdDgke9UroWa3BQLMX8eahc1zb 8qMsqVNO6pgZ0FbrwakU7Q86IOG58YSeH4gETaLLp6OACFzbL56Hq9RCTLxvsstHmcXeW1eBVSG W4LjW40FYnPSoXfG8ckhYHVA/r8kw== Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/BIrQN0xKOzHjytMkx_k9qeyVtXk Cc: routing-discussion@ietf.org, 'Alia Atlas' Subject: [CCAMP] Progress with forming TEAS working group X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 18:19:21 -0000 All, We have been working on a first draft of a charter for TEAS to split out "Traffic Engineering" from the current CCAMP and MPLS working groups. This will also necessitate new charters for CCAMP and MPLS, and a tiny tweak to PCE. Our plan is to get something with some rough agreement from the chairs of the various working groups and then to put it out for discussion. I hope that we will be able to assign some time in Honolulu to discuss any contentious issues that arise. However, note that the current working groups will meet a normal in Hawaii. Adrian and Alia From nobody Thu Oct 16 17:15:16 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905311A1B65; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:15:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.912 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JAQV1ezQu4T4; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:15:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D64D91A8737; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:15:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 0F8A5181C81; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:15:08 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20141017001508.0F8A5181C81@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:15:08 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/2aPOVErpeoHZAnj41wu5-RfVabw Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, ccamp@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [CCAMP] RFC 7369 on GMPLS RSVP-TE Extensions for Ethernet Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Configuration X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:15:15 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 7369 Title: GMPLS RSVP-TE Extensions for Ethernet Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Configuration Author: A. Takacs, B. Gero, H. Long Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: October 2014 Mailbox: attila.takacs@ericsson.com, balazs.peter.gero@ericsson.com, lonho@huawei.com Pages: 18 Characters: 38843 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-eth-oam-ext-13.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7369.txt The work related to GMPLS Ethernet Label Switching (GELS) extended GMPLS RSVP-TE to support the establishment of Ethernet Label Switching Paths (LSPs). IEEE Ethernet Connectivity Fault Management (CFM) specifies an adjunct Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) flow to check connectivity in Ethernet networks. CFM can also be used with Ethernet LSPs for fault detection and triggering recovery mechanisms. The ITU-T Y.1731 specification builds on CFM and specifies additional OAM mechanisms, including Performance Monitoring, for Ethernet networks. This document specifies extensions of the GMPLS RSVP-TE protocol to support the setup of the associated Ethernet OAM entities of Ethernet LSPs and defines the Ethernet technology-specific TLVs based on the GMPLS OAM Configuration Framework. This document supports, but does not modify, the IEEE and ITU-T OAM mechanisms. This document is a product of the Common Control and Measurement Plane Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC From nobody Fri Oct 17 20:00:02 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46E71A00FF for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 20:00:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.449 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B-mqGdgEXazh for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 19:59:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x241.google.com (mail-wi0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::241]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1F8A1A0075 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 19:59:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f193.google.com with SMTP id d1so808493wiv.4 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 19:59:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Ra9EF78W5SaBLBJkJdMrYhrxJUn8woPG0c0UWvNnoBg=; b=hyV2MJxs26N8IE7nFjCVcPlOhuSrDB2vB6B4MPjwjDEdN2WH85popMwalL+XxSseJV INSbBGpy2iGpOwwV6hoF/mJZtauVFdgk6YF91Of478SD3WcKBCnusOqBRs4gwlQ8ECY8 IIn+VnRZfiJaqFZfASh7rKEzFdy9y0lfvvn7VLiGDQdBOpYMoK9xVnLqSrNE85ilMGKH 6sD1/rDcNw46hoK7ODtZdo9x6n6mQkAteFsNXmp/ghyRCYUyIeCvonrU3eRlIWh2j/QW jPu4tvohFZBhsn5zlSLvZNJQcu0Yv7GaP564D66sXxoKzCV8OuRRC+bkLCjD0LHlpClV 9xpw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.39.241 with SMTP id s17mr3058843wik.35.1413601197290; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 19:59:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.115.7 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 19:59:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <396403b6-a216-4e06-9739-8f3f682d3be2@email.bluemailapp.com> References: <396403b6-a216-4e06-9739-8f3f682d3be2@email.bluemailapp.com> Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 10:59:57 +0800 Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?B?5p2o5biG?= To: jiang weilian Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c245f237f78d0505a9ad1b Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/zHw9QGSMwinrOzBTpJLe-yBLEc8 Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" , "jingrq@ctbri.com.cn" , "ccamp-ads@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 03:00:01 -0000 --001a11c245f237f78d0505a9ad1b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All I am not aware of any IPR that apples to this draft Fan (as a co-author) Thanks Fan 2014-10-14 11:18 GMT+08:00 jiang weilian : > > =E5=8F=91=E8=87=AA Blue Mail > Hi WGers, Chairs, > > As a co-author of this draft > > I am not aware of any other IPR that applies to this draft. > > Thanks > weilian > 2014-10-14, 9:20=EF=BC=8C=E5=9C=A8 "Zhangfei (Philip)" =E5=B7=B2=E5=86=99: > >> Hi WGers, Chairs, >> >> >> >> As a co-author of this draft >> >> >> >> I am not aware of any other IPR that applies to this draft. >> >> >> >> B.R. >> >> >> >> Fei >> >> >> >> *=E5=8F=91=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA:* BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A [mailto:db3546@att.c= om ] >> *=E5=8F=91=E9=80=81=E6=97=B6=E9=97=B4:* 2014=E5=B9=B410=E6=9C=8811=E6=97= =A5 2:33 >> *=E6=94=B6=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA:* Zhangfei (Philip); jingrq@ctbri.com.cn; R= akesh Gandhi (rgandhi) ( >> rgandhi@cisco.com); yang.fan240347@gmail.com; jiang weilian ( >> jiang.weilian@gmail.com) >> *=E6=8A=84=E9=80=81:* ccamp@ietf.org; ccamp-ads@tools.ietf.org >> *=E4=B8=BB=E9=A2=98:* Regarding IPR on >> draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.txt >> >> >> >> Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP) >> >> >> >> In preparation of this document for Last Call: >> >> >> >> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to >> draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.txt? >> >> >> >> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules >> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? >> >> >> >> If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please answer >> the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you a= re >> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next st= age >> until a response has been received from each author and listed contribut= or. >> >> >> >> If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author >> or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rul= es >> which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of other= s >> on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any >> contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more >> information, please see the RFCs listed above and >> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty >> >> >> >> Thank you, >> >> CCAMP WG Chairs >> >> >> >> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your >> response. >> >> >> >> >> >> --001a11c245f237f78d0505a9ad1b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi All

I am not aware of any IPR that a= pples to this draft

Fan (as a co-author)

Thanks

Fan

2014-10-14 11:18 GMT+08:00 = jiang weilian <jiang.weilian@gmail.com>:


=E5=8F=91=E8=87=AA Blue Mail
Hi WGers, Chairs,
=C2=A0
As a co-author of this draft
=C2=A0
I am not aware of any other IPR that applies to this draft.
=C2=A0
 Thanks
=C2=A0weilian

2014-10-14, 9:20=EF=BC=8C=E5=9C=A8 "Zhangfe= i (Philip)" <zhangfei7@huawei.com> =E5=B7=B2=E5=86=99:
=

Hi WG= ers, Chairs,

<= p>=C2=A0

As a co-auth= or of this draft

<= p>=C2=A0

I am not awa= re of any other IPR that applies to this draft.

<= p>=C2=A0

B.R.<= /p>

<= p>=C2=A0

Fei

=C2=A0

=E5=8F=91=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A [mailto:db3546@att.com]
= =E5=8F=91=E9=80=81=E6=97=B6=E9=97=B4: 2014=E5=B9=B410=E6=9C=8811=E6=97=A5 2:33
=E6=94=B6=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA: Zhangfei (Philip); jingrq@ctbri.com.c= n; Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) (rgandhi@cisco.com); yang.fan24034= 7@gmail.com; jiang weilian (jiang.weilian@gmail.com)
=E6=8A=84=E9=80=81: ccamp@ietf.org; ccamp-ads@tools.ietf.org
=E4=B8=BB=E9=A2=98: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp= -11.txt

=C2=A0

Authors, Contributors, (= CCAMP)

=C2=A0

=

In preparation of this d= ocument for Last Call:

=C2=A0

=

Are you aware of any IPR= that applies to draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.txt?=

=C2=A0

=

If so, has this IPR been= disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and= 5378 for more details)?

=C2=A0

=

If you are listed as a d= ocument author or contributor, please answer the above by responding to thi= s email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a res= ponse has been received from each author and listed contributor.

=

=C2=A0

=

If you are on the CCAMP = WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you= of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contri= bution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion = related to your undisclosed IPR.=C2=A0 For more information, please see the= RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/Int= ellectualProperty

=C2=A0

=

Thank you,

=

CCAMP WG Chairs

=C2=A0

=

PS Please include all li= sted in the headers of this message in your response.

<= /p>

=C2=A0

=

=C2=A0

=


--001a11c245f237f78d0505a9ad1b-- From nobody Mon Oct 20 00:43:56 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F231A6FD6; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:43:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OIEDGj7Zvi6L; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:43:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B188C1A6FD1; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:43:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.6.4 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20141020074350.21488.53873.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:43:50 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/pPVYM7xOFlvFOR8r8VJkMUNMyoA Cc: ccamp@ietf.org Subject: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 07:43:52 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Common Control and Measurement Plane Working Group of the IETF. Title : GMPLS RSVP-TE Extensions for Lock Instruct and Loopback Authors : Jie Dong Mach(Guoyi) Chen Zhenqiang Li Daniele Ceccarelli Filename : draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt Pages : 8 Date : 2014-10-20 Abstract: This document specifies extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) to support Lock Instruct (LI) and Loopback (LB) mechanisms for Label Switched Paths (LSPs). These mechanisms are applicable to technologies which use Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) as control plane. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Mon Oct 20 00:58:41 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BBB91A6FD6 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:58:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id czwHiODO4gRN for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:58:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDF041A0078 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:58:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BNV25039; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 07:58:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.35) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 08:58:35 +0100 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.22]) by nkgeml404-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.35]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 15:58:28 +0800 From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" To: "ccamp@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt Thread-Index: AQHP7DmxZe4di09DEUSAb36hmAw2LZw4nFYQ Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 07:58:27 +0000 Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733758033@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <20141020074350.21488.53873.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20141020074350.21488.53873.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.96.76] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/Xo_LgsplTUbg5IEoeW3VObu9eiA Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 07:58:39 -0000 Dear all,=20 The only change in this new version is:=20 - Update the references (one has become RFC) Your review and comments are highly appreciated. Many thanks, Jie > -----Original Message----- > From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > internet-drafts@ietf.org > Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 3:44 PM > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > Cc: ccamp@ietf.org > Subject: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt >=20 >=20 > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts direct= ories. > This draft is a work item of the Common Control and Measurement Plane > Working Group of the IETF. >=20 > Title : GMPLS RSVP-TE Extensions for Lock Instruct and > Loopback > Authors : Jie Dong > Mach(Guoyi) Chen > Zhenqiang Li > Daniele Ceccarelli > Filename : draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt > Pages : 8 > Date : 2014-10-20 >=20 > Abstract: > This document specifies extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol - > Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) to support Lock Instruct (LI) and > Loopback (LB) mechanisms for Label Switched Paths (LSPs). These > mechanisms are applicable to technologies which use Generalized > Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) as control plane. >=20 >=20 >=20 > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb/ >=20 > There's also a htmlized version available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04 >=20 > A diff from the previous version is available at: > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04 >=20 >=20 > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submiss= ion > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >=20 > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >=20 > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Mon Oct 20 14:27:15 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3A31ACEE2 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:27:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.209 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.209 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WkMh86hsfRLr for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:27:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com [209.65.160.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A60511ACEF5 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:27:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknown [144.160.229.24] (EHLO alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.2-0) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 42e75445.0.965367.00-2242.2688481.nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (envelope-from ); Mon, 20 Oct 2014 21:27:01 +0000 (UTC) X-MXL-Hash: 54457e252d426253-9a8b220f412eb193187f88d6caac5693ac77bf15 Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9KLR0UU007059 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:27:00 -0400 Received: from mlpi407.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi407.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.239]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9KLQs00007012 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:26:55 -0400 Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAC.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAC.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.147]) by mlpi407.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor) for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 21:26:41 GMT Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.5.237]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAC.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.147]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:26:41 -0400 From: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" To: "ccamp@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11 Thread-Index: Ac/srIE0Ej9pDRWXSnyNQai5S2fV4Q== Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 21:26:41 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.70.11.14] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166C9C58MISOUT7MSGUSRDE_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=X9rl3hve c=1 sm=1 a=dhB6nF3YHL5t/Ixux6cINA==:17 a] X-AnalysisOut: [=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=ubGf1KvACEEA:10 a=DeRuKWwG-P8A:10 a=BLc] X-AnalysisOut: [eEmwcHowA:10 a=zQP7CpKOAAAA:8 a=XIqpo32RAAAA:8 a=_I7ebpv3h] X-AnalysisOut: [bBJL0lvFdYA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=p6d3aaX9_fwA:10 a=uFT94w] X-AnalysisOut: [YN7moA:10 a=uoUyInhvcbQA:10 a=kCeDM9HxPf9TuStYYkkA:9 a=_W_] X-AnalysisOut: [S_7VecoQA:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 a=y7YGaj-AhLfDqbdh:21] X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2014051901)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.229.24] Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/CkvnxN8QgAuE7EWq-8Lfwo-OYWU Subject: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 21:27:13 -0000 --_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166C9C58MISOUT7MSGUSRDE_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All, This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-= rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11. This working group last call ends on Nov. 3rd. Please send your comments to= the CCAMP mailing list. As noted, there is one IPR disclosed. Thanks, Deborah (and Lou) --_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166C9C58MISOUT7MSGUSRDE_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
All,
 
This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpl= s-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.
 
This working group last call ends on Nov. 3rd. Please send your commen= ts to the CCAMP mailing list.
 
As noted, there is one IPR disclosed.
 
Thanks,
Deborah (and Lou)
 
 --_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166C9C58MISOUT7MSGUSRDE_-- From nobody Tue Oct 21 16:42:32 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B9331A8841 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:42:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.51 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hKwZQ9a1Ji9w for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:42:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44B7E1A883F for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:42:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=16924; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1413934949; x=1415144549; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=JUY3P8zpt1OJuvtR7foAMA6lWbAy3ccUBjsHHcSCzaU=; b=e3xDAyrTDKD8bjflRVPUai6ecLOzwHVMGRhDMVg6Cw4hJ7Rj97iANuWt JcPj5IeQ+hKASRyN8olRuOu1XrWJOJq5QqDWQTA7NpK+mxVkJsCwnTLyq PKAB7QyS5KJsgfLIbiBPGAvaXMM2XZGmrdh/uQz70q5od2xPHmAUN4JH7 c=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Am0FAOTuRlStJV2T/2dsb2JhbABcgkhGU1gEyxSBcIdNAoETFgF9hAIBAgQtRwUSAQgRAwECKCgRFAkIAQEEAQ0FiCsDEQ3ADg2GOAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAReOIieBLBEBJQcTEQYBAgSERQWPZYIchEaFAoIRgTA8gwyKUoJahAGDeGwBgQ45gQMBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,765,1406592000"; d="scan'208,217";a="365263592" Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Oct 2014 23:42:28 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com [173.36.12.76]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9LNgRMu015463 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 21 Oct 2014 23:42:27 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x07.cisco.com ([169.254.2.151]) by xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com ([173.36.12.76]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 18:42:27 -0500 From: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" To: Ruiquan Jing , "'BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A'" , "zhangfei7@huawei.com" , "yang.fan240347@gmail.com" , "'jiang weilian'" Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.txt Thread-Index: Ac/kuKF0sVPxEmbAT8m4Y5RGZ0DNQQCaRlKAAA6Hv1ABjUxbgA== Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 23:42:26 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <005501cfe75b$f01d0e70$d0572b50$@com.cn> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.5.130515 x-originating-ip: [10.86.246.90] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D06C66B73F7E3rgandhiciscocom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/n1Qqj6vUgGArefzZxZ0iMj02550 Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" , "ccamp-ads@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 23:42:31 -0000 --_000_D06C66B73F7E3rgandhiciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Ruiquan. Forwarding the email as it was not captured in the archive for some reason. Regards, Rakesh From: "jingrq@ctbri.com.cn" > Date: Monday, 13 October, 2014 11:07 PM To: Rakesh Gandhi >, DEBORAH BR= UNGARD >, "zhangfei7@huawei.com" = >, "yang.fan240347@gmail.com" >, 'jiang weilian' > Cc: CCAMP >, "ccamp-ads@tools.ietf.or= g" > Subject: RE: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associate= d-lsp-11.txt Hi WGers, Chairs, As a co-author of this draft I am not aware of any other IPR that applies to this draft. Best Regards Ruiquan (Rick) Jing China Telecom Beijing Research Institute From: , DEBORAH BRUNGARD > Date: Friday, 10 October, 2014 2:33 PM To: "zhangfei7@huawei.com" >, "jingrq@ctbri.com.cn" >, Rakesh Gandhi <= rgandhi@cisco.com>, "yang.fan240347@gmail.com" >, "jiang weilian (jiang.weilian@gmail.com)" > Cc: CCAMP >, "ccamp-ads@tools.ietf.or= g" > Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-ls= p-11.txt Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP) In preparation of this document for Last Call: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ex= t-associated-lsp-11.txt? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see R= FCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please answer the ab= ove by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware = of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until= a response has been received from each author and listed contributor. If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author or co= ntributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which= encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an = IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or = discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please s= ee the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wik= i/IntellectualProperty Thank you, CCAMP WG Chairs PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your respons= e. --_000_D06C66B73F7E3rgandhiciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <12CE48C13E22904D935AAE659E373308@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks Ruiquan.

Forwarding the email as it was not captured in the archive for some re= ason.

Regards,
Rakesh


From: "jingrq@ctbri.com.cn" <jingrq@ctbri.com.cn>
Date: Monday, 13 October, 2014 11:0= 7 PM
To: Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi@cisco.com>, DEBORAH BRUNGARD <db3546@att.com>, "zhangfei7@huawei.com" <zhangfei7@huawei.com>, "yang.fan240347@gmail.com= " <yang.fan240347@g= mail.com>, 'jiang weilian' <jiang.weilian@gmail.com>
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>, "ccamp-ads@tools.ietf.org" <ccamp-ads@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Regarding IPR on draft= -ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.txt

Hi WGers, Chairs,=

 

As a co-author of this draft=

 

I am not aware of any other = IPR that applies to this draft.

 =

Best Regards

Ruiquan (Rick)  Jing

China Telecom Beijing Research Ins= titute

 =

 =

 

 

From: <BRUNGARD>, DEBORAH BRUNGARD <db3546@att.com>
Date: Friday, 10 October, 2014 2:33 PM
To: "zhangfei7@huawei.c= om" <zhangfei7@huawei.c= om>, "jingrq@ctbri.com.c= n" <jingrq@ctbri.com.cn<= /a>>, Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi@cisco.com>, "yang.fan240347@gm= ail.com" <yang.fan2= 40347@gmail.com>, "jiang weilian (jiang.weilian@gmail.com)" <jiang.weilian@gmail.com= >
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org&g= t;, "ccamp-ads@tools.ietf.= org" <ccamp-ads@too= ls.ietf.org>
Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associ= ated-lsp-11.txt

 

Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP)=

 

In preparation of this documen= t for Last Call:

 

Are you aware of any IPR that = applies to draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.txt?<= /o:p>

 

If so, has this IPR been discl= osed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 = for more details)?

 

If you are listed as a documen= t author or contributor, please answer the above by responding to this emai= l regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stag= e until a response has been received from each author and listed contributo= r.

 

If you are on the CCAMP WG ema= il list but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of yo= ur obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others = on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contributi= on or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR.  For more informatio= n, please see the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty<= /a>

 

Thank you,

CCAMP WG Chairs

 

PS Please include all listed i= n the headers of this message in your response.

 

 

 --_000_D06C66B73F7E3rgandhiciscocom_-- From nobody Wed Oct 22 12:29:25 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA28C1AD38D for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 12:29:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.667 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S71MNbEK2ibb for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 12:29:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.18.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DE18E1AD39E for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 12:29:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 20095 invoked by uid 0); 22 Oct 2014 19:29:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO CMOut01) (10.0.90.82) by gproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 22 Oct 2014 19:29:06 -0000 Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by CMOut01 with id 6KUx1p0092SSUrH01KV0ZM; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:29:05 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Tr912lnh c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=u9EReRu7m0cA:10 a=HFCU6gKsb0MA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=v3Rn6Fmf3h3NMjylDYwA:9 a=mRt1ujnTtGtK7RPr:21 a=7Z8vz4l_fCuIgZ_r:21 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=rLM0qiOD6ChunvYeGGDC0DXe/RKAd6JPOXs00Wjyddg=; b=Ap4UX7sk+EVD0Mp7RZpi5XlsishD/H7EzYN6NS6008hXTlij1rnN/6w/VBS+g3aKTT8O2I3Ekn5KCvj1N/SWS+IkRTzDJOkauXbB2dvgkZqErgnSVsqUdVlfyNiUPtZT; Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:47414 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1Xh1ac-0003C3-5B; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:28:58 -0600 Message-ID: <544805C0.8060103@labn.net> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:30:08 -0400 From: Lou Berger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" , draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb@tools.ietf.org References: <20141020074350.21488.53873.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733758033@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733758033@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net} Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/cXiE0C94gTHDaBOv0YxivPRg2xM Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 19:29:10 -0000 Jie, Authors, I have a few comments: - Section 3.1, I think intermediate node behavior related to processing of the A is unchanged by this document so think you should drop the 3 lines that contain the phrase "... intermediate nodes ..." - Section 3.2 The section is not clear if the A bit processing occurs / completes before Loopback related processing begins or occurs coincidentally. (I read the last sentence of the first paragraph saying the former and the last sentence of the 2nd paragraph saying the latter.) Either way it should be clarified. Where is the Loopback (B) bit / Attribute Flag defined? This document, right? Then the document, needs to state so in this section and in the IANA section. Section 4, needs to be updated to follow RFC2360, See http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated= -lsp-10 for a recent example. - Also please cleanup your id-nits, see http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=3Dhttps://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-c= camp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt Lou On 10/20/2014 3:58 AM, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote: > Dear all,=20 > > The only change in this new version is:=20 > > - Update the references (one has become RFC) > > Your review and comments are highly appreciated. > > Many thanks, > Jie > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >> internet-drafts@ietf.org >> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 3:44 PM >> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org >> Cc: ccamp@ietf.org >> Subject: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt >> >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts dir= ectories. >> This draft is a work item of the Common Control and Measurement Plane= >> Working Group of the IETF. >> >> Title : GMPLS RSVP-TE Extensions for Lock Instruct a= nd >> Loopback >> Authors : Jie Dong >> Mach(Guoyi) Chen >> Zhenqiang Li >> Daniele Ceccarelli >> Filename : draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt >> Pages : 8 >> Date : 2014-10-20 >> >> Abstract: >> This document specifies extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol= - >> Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) to support Lock Instruct (LI) and >> Loopback (LB) mechanisms for Label Switched Paths (LSPs). These >> mechanisms are applicable to technologies which use Generalized >> Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) as control plane. >> >> >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb/ >> >> There's also a htmlized version available at: >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04 >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04 >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of subm= ission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CCAMP mailing list >> CCAMP@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp > From nobody Wed Oct 22 15:06:42 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E861A7031 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:06:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.232 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.232 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aW2bRxCK8oxP for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:06:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.39.168]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B745E1AD0C3 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:06:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 19842 invoked by uid 0); 22 Oct 2014 22:06:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO CMOut01) (10.0.90.82) by gproxy6.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 22 Oct 2014 22:06:37 -0000 Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by CMOut01 with id 6N6S1p0052SSUrH01N6Vqf; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 16:06:36 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Tr912lnh c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=u9EReRu7m0cA:10 a=HFCU6gKsb0MA:10 a=MGRxyiorQo4A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=_X-uKZgBjGTumMbn1toA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=rrZGSdOwft6tlHiyc3xyfrIWpaeytc/+rG+DXTDoJ4Y=; b=IjWrjEbN/IYIWsQbIfqqvMJi9kSt9cTKvsYarNRdoYmG+aQP+KEffQLfjIfr/Gj9nntYQtQOubETgs9KgdviM2BtdFsz1BplvlQGkGjvVcLH2oZpJD42qvmpgVretr/l; Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:34906 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1Xh430-0005Lk-Vb; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 16:06:27 -0600 Message-ID: <54482AAA.2040602@labn.net> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:07:38 -0400 From: Lou Berger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect@tools.ietf.org" References: <536AAB57.2090403@labn.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net} Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/do896Ffc6auLtc3b8WILd-9fhJ0 Cc: CCAMP Subject: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-07 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 22:06:40 -0000 Authors, I think we still have some unresolved comments from May: >> - you use "should not" in lower case in a few spots in this section. >> While I think your usage *is* correct, my experience is that someone >> (probably in the IESG) will tell you that these need to be in upper >> case at some point. Of course, they'll be wrong, and this will have >> to be explained. I suggest avoiding 2119 language in lower case where >> easily avoided. How about s/should not be/is not to be The above comment also applies to "must". Your current of 2119 language is a bit inconsistent. I think you should review current uses of 2119 language and ensure that such usage is limited to (protocol) mechanisms, behavior and interoperability. If doesn't the language is most likely informative in nature and should avoid 2119 conformance language. >> - The section is missing handling of RRO to big. Perhaps add it at ~line >> 330. > A few of new comments: - The current text of section 4.1 could be read as only one ID may be present in the SO. you should explain under what conditions multiple IDs are to be added. - Please provide a reference for "Confidential Path message. Segment (CPS)" - (should have caught this one before, i.e., is in old text) In Section 5.1 it looks like you are applying policy on both Path and Resv processing ("When a node receives a Resv message ... if local policy determines ...). Given the "SRLG Recording Rejected" PathErr required earlier in the section, is this really needed? Are you assuming separate upstream/downstream policies? (Which would seem to be overkill.) Covering a policy change race condition, something else? I suspect the policy processing text on resv isn't needed. Thanks, Lou From nobody Wed Oct 22 20:43:47 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 549341A1A9E for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:43:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LUcrSctRSZvQ for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:43:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEB371A886C for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:43:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BNY32870; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 03:43:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML410-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.41) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 04:43:38 +0100 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.22]) by nkgeml410-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.41]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 11:43:30 +0800 From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" To: Lou Berger , "draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb@tools.ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt Thread-Index: AQHP7DmxZe4di09DEUSAb36hmAw2LZw4nFYQgANiRwCAAQp7EA== Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 03:43:30 +0000 Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733759B2E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <20141020074350.21488.53873.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733758033@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <544805C0.8060103@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <544805C0.8060103@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.96.76] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/wpHHjvatP_VJYkNvEaQmqQY95lo Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 03:43:44 -0000 Hi Lou,=20 Thanks a lot for your review and comments, please see my replies inline: > Jie, Authors, > I have a few comments: >=20 > - Section 3.1, > I think intermediate node behavior related to processing of the A is unch= anged > by this document so think you should drop the 3 lines that contain the ph= rase "... > intermediate nodes ..." Agree the behavior of intermediate node is unchanged, will remove the descr= iptions about intermediate node behavior in a new revision.=20 > - Section 3.2 > The section is not clear if the A bit processing occurs / completes befor= e > Loopback related processing begins or occurs coincidentally. (I read the= last > sentence of the first paragraph saying the former and the last sentence o= f the > 2nd paragraph saying the latter.) Either way it should be clarified. The A bit (lock) processing needs to be completed before initiating loopbac= k request. The last sentence of the 2nd paragraph was to emphasize that whe= n signaling loopback, the A bit should be kept set to indicate the LSP is s= till in lock mode. We will rephrase the sentence to make it clearer. > Where is the Loopback (B) bit / Attribute Flag defined? This document, ri= ght? > Then the document, needs to state so in this section and in the IANA sect= ion. The Loopback bit was defined in the end of section 2 "Extensions to RSVP-TE= ". To make it clearer, will use subsections for each extension in the new r= evision. > Section 4, needs to be updated to follow RFC2360, See > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated= -lsp-1 > 0 > for a recent example. Thanks for pointing to this example. Will update the IANA section according= ly. > - Also please cleanup your id-nits, see > http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=3Dhttps://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-c= camp-rsvp-t > e-li-lb-04.txt Will clean this in the new revision. Best regards, Jie >=20 > Lou >=20 > On 10/20/2014 3:58 AM, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > The only change in this new version is: > > > > - Update the references (one has become RFC) > > > > Your review and comments are highly appreciated. > > > > Many thanks, > > Jie > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > >> internet-drafts@ietf.org > >> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 3:44 PM > >> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > >> Cc: ccamp@ietf.org > >> Subject: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt > >> > >> > >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > >> This draft is a work item of the Common Control and Measurement > >> Plane Working Group of the IETF. > >> > >> Title : GMPLS RSVP-TE Extensions for Lock Instruct > and > >> Loopback > >> Authors : Jie Dong > >> Mach(Guoyi) Chen > >> Zhenqiang Li > >> Daniele Ceccarelli > >> Filename : draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt > >> Pages : 8 > >> Date : 2014-10-20 > >> > >> Abstract: > >> This document specifies extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol= - > >> Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) to support Lock Instruct (LI) and > >> Loopback (LB) mechanisms for Label Switched Paths (LSPs). These > >> mechanisms are applicable to technologies which use Generalized > >> Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) as control plane. > >> > >> > >> > >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb/ > >> > >> There's also a htmlized version available at: > >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04 > >> > >> A diff from the previous version is available at: > >> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04 > >> > >> > >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > >> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.= ietf.org. > >> > >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> CCAMP mailing list > >> CCAMP@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp > > _______________________________________________ > > CCAMP mailing list > > CCAMP@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp > > >=20 From nobody Thu Oct 23 01:25:18 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 800A11A8911 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 01:25:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pT-oQ9Kkdw3D for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 01:25:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D3611A8907 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 01:25:13 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-f79e66d000000ff1-29-5448bb67114d Received: from ESESSHC023.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id FF.C7.04081.76BB8445; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:25:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ESESSMB301.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.4]) by ESESSHC023.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:25:10 +0200 From: Daniele Ceccarelli To: "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" Thread-Topic: IETF 91 - CCAMP slots request Thread-Index: Ac/nnHgRWs23fK5sQUyzTRjoQufDLQG/keSw Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:25:10 +0000 Message-ID: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48127B7C04@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> References: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE481279E733@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> In-Reply-To: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE481279E733@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.18] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48127B7C04ESESSMB301erics_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrPLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW76bo8Qg2tLFCyezLnB4sDosWTJ T6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujKX77rIXbCyr6Jlwg72BcXNmFyMnh4SAicSq0zOZIGwxiQv3 1rN1MXJxCAkcZZR4t3cLO4SziFGid8sNIIeDg03ASuLJIR+QBhEBXYm9G68zg9jCAloSr68c YYKIa0s8/byfFcI2kvhyZC4jiM0ioCrxaecfsHpeAV+J3XdnsYPYQkD26t6NLCA2p4CfRGvD A7B6RgFZiQm7F4HZzALiEreezIc6VEBiyZ7zzBC2qMTLx/9YIWxFiY+v9kHV50s07p4GtUtQ 4uTMJywTGEVmIRk1C0nZLCRlEHE9iRtTp7BB2NoSyxa+ZoawdSVm/DvEgiy+gJF9FaNocWpx Um66kZFealFmcnFxfp5eXmrJJkZgDB3c8ttgB+PL546HGAU4GJV4eBNmeoQIsSaWFVfmHmKU 5mBREuddeG5esJBAemJJanZqakFqUXxRaU5q8SFGJg5OqQbGthx7n4iWp871lzZ+27b9+eL9 b778+hD5tci6eevxKLcW/5a6LpF73UG9X8MSX+xVWneoM01T55awBpu0ibvgUr4JS6z3vKs5 opTDZ5f36qS4ld7HnauKG05PduUPfy+qMpf3H5/xwziWxouTM3z1lzw8NKdf4eR3xb/bGNU3 d37b7LBrx99zSizFGYmGWsxFxYkAhv2SJYICAAA= Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/7mmpPgkh6A6uU1Z_B0LkwYmd0HQ Subject: [CCAMP] FW: IETF 91 - CCAMP slots request X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:25:16 -0000 --_000_4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48127B7C04ESESSMB301erics_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Friendly reminder. Please note that the deadline for asking your CCAMP slots is today. BR Daniele & chairs From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Daniele Ceccarelli Sent: marted=EC 14 ottobre 2014 12:49 To: CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org) Subject: [CCAMP] IETF 91 - CCAMP slots request Dear CCAMP, IETF 91 meeting is approaching and it's time to start collecting agenda slo= ts requests. Keeping this in mind: WG Draft authors are expected to present if there are open issues to discus= s, or to send status to the list *1 week* prior to the WG meeting if not p= resenting. Status includes review of: any recent changes, any open discussi= ons or issues, and planned next steps. Agenda Requests: - To submit a request, please fill the survey at the following link: http:/= /www.surveygizmo.com/s3/1846224/IETF-91-CCAMP-slot-requests - Please fill the survey no later than Thursday, October 23rd. Presentations: If you are presenting slides please make sure you send them to all *indi= viduals* listed above (Chairs, Secretary and exclude CCAMP) no later than = Sunday, November 9th. Reminder about a few important dates: * 2014-10-27 (Monday): Internet Draft submission cut-off (for all draft= s, including -00) by UTC 23:59, upload using IETF ID Submission Tool. * 2014-10-27 (Monday): Draft Working Group agendas due by UTC 23:59, up= load using IETF Meeting Materials Management Tool. * 2014-11-03 (Monday): Revised Working Group agendas due by UTC 23:59, = upload using IETF Meeting Materials Management Tool. * 2014-11-09 - 2014-11-14: 91st IETF Meeting in Honolulu, HI, USA. BR Daniele & CCAMP chairs --_000_4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48127B7C04ESESSMB301erics_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Friendly reminder.

 

Please note that the d= eadline for asking your CCAMP slots is today.

 

BR
Daniele & chairs

 

From: CCAMP [m= ailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Daniele Ceccarelli
Sent: marted=EC 14 ottobre 2014 12:49
To: CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)
Subject: [CCAMP] IETF 91 - CCAMP slots request

 

Dear CCAMP,

 

IETF 91 meeting is approaching and it’s time t= o start collecting agenda slots requests.

 

Keeping this in mind:

WG Draft authors are expected to present if there= are open issues to discuss, or to send status to the list  *1 week* p= rior to the WG meeting if not presenting. Status includes review of: any re= cent changes, any open discussions or issues, and planned next steps.

 

Agenda Requests:

- To submit a request, please fill the sur= vey at the following link: http://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/1846224/IETF-91-CCAMP-slot-requests

- Please fill the survey no later than Thursda= y, October 23rd.

 

Presentations:

  If you are presenting slides please make s= ure you send them to  all *individuals* listed above (Chairs, Secretar= y and exclude CCAMP) no later  than Sunday, November 9th.

&= nbsp;

Reminder about a few important dates:

BR

Daniele & CCAMP cha= irs

 

 

--_000_4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48127B7C04ESESSMB301erics_-- From nobody Thu Oct 23 01:37:20 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7432E1A6F4C for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 01:37:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.51 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BVkNZYatxhoJ for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 01:37:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1765D1A00BA for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 01:37:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=25622; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414053437; x=1415263037; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=tVeGweAUWdjcLHh0j042INNxOQBA4qJzN0j9iG6383g=; b=LHerv2dw8+f1m2aTJ/HW3tXHPqCPMTwCCh+euS0kobwvkJayB2xSiwYo K7cQ1YtRO5kRXGRUd7337+V39PJXLxWfCcWIzpMe/gcAPdCYKIHwOqVA6 9C0rTbDaCL3DCToX0kPIO/mXeA/EfUpyu3cK6X9MmsM2c8BWEcpw0Zz7T Y=; X-Files: 273031C1-0F11-4D42-9226-D16B7CB14162[29].png : 1632 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai8FAEu9SFStJA2B/2dsb2JhbABcgkhGVFgEzHeHTQKBDhYBfYQCAQEBBAUTFRwwDgQBCBEDAQEBBgEBARgHCQUQAQMLDBQIAQgBAQQBDQQBBgiIMw3HfgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARcEkDcKDQQGAYRLBY9ngh6DX2eHEoExg0mNMoQBg3hsAYFHgQMBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,774,1406592000"; d="png'150?scan'150,208,217,150";a="89557571" Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Oct 2014 08:37:16 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com [173.36.12.75]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9N8bGS0025380 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:37:16 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.248]) by xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com ([173.36.12.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 03:37:15 -0500 From: "Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" To: Daniele Ceccarelli , "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] FW: IETF 91 - CCAMP slots request Thread-Index: Ac/nnHgRWs23fK5sQUyzTRjoQufDLQG/keSwAA8egoA= Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:37:15 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48127B7C04@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206 x-originating-ip: [10.148.213.45] Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="_004_D06E898C6A578ggalimbeciscocom_"; type="multipart/alternative" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/iJ_eoUeX-kg4LYB_rtDsIORiock Subject: Re: [CCAMP] FW: IETF 91 - CCAMP slots request X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:37:19 -0000 --_004_D06E898C6A578ggalimbeciscocom_ Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D06E898C6A578ggalimbeciscocom_" --_000_D06E898C6A578ggalimbeciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Daniele, I need one slot to present the drafts: - draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-mib-09 - draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g-698-2-lmp-09 - draft-dharini-netmod-g-698-2-yang-01 As the drafts will be presented in the same slot I'd need 10 minutes. Best Regards, Gabriele [http://www.cisco.com/swa/i/logo.gif] Gabriele Galimberti Technical Leader Cisco Photonics Srl via S.Maria Molgora, 48 C 20871 - Vimercate (MB) Italy www.cisco.com/global/IT/ ggalimbe@cisco.com Phone :+39 039 2091462 Mobile :+39 335 7481947 Fax :+39 039 2092049 From: Daniele Ceccarelli > Date: Thursday, October 23, 2014 10:25 AM To: "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" > Subject: [CCAMP] FW: IETF 91 - CCAMP slots request Friendly reminder. Please note that the deadline for asking your CCAMP slots is today. BR Daniele & chairs From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Daniele Ceccarelli Sent: marted=EC 14 ottobre 2014 12:49 To: CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org) Subject: [CCAMP] IETF 91 - CCAMP slots request Dear CCAMP, IETF 91 meeting is approaching and it=92s time to start collecting agenda s= lots requests. Keeping this in mind: WG Draft authors are expected to present if there are open issues to discus= s, or to send status to the list *1 week* prior to the WG meeting if not p= resenting. Status includes review of: any recent changes, any open discussi= ons or issues, and planned next steps. Agenda Requests: - To submit a request, please fill the survey at the following link: http:/= /www.surveygizmo.com/s3/1846224/IETF-91-CCAMP-slot-requests - Please fill the survey no later than Thursday, October 23rd. Presentations: If you are presenting slides please make sure you send them to all *indi= viduals* listed above (Chairs, Secretary and exclude CCAMP) no later than = Sunday, November 9th. Reminder about a few important dates: * 2014-10-27 (Monday): Internet Draft submission cut-off (for all draft= s, including -00) by UTC 23:59, upload using IETF ID Submission Tool. * 2014-10-27 (Monday): Draft Working Group agendas due by UTC 23:59, up= load using IETF Meeting Materials Management Tool. * 2014-11-03 (Monday): Revised Working Group agendas due by UTC 23:59, = upload using IETF Meeting Materials Management Tool. * 2014-11-09 - 2014-11-14: 91st IETF Meeting in Honolulu, HI, USA. BR Daniele & CCAMP chairs --_000_D06E898C6A578ggalimbeciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <8A44415BF8C3A14EB2F8E634CE2293BE@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Daniele, 

I need one slot to present the drafts:

- draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-mib-09
- draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g-698-2-lmp-09
- draft-dharini-netmod-g-698-2-yang-01

As the drafts will be presented in the same slot I'd need 10 minutes.<= /div>

Best Regards, 

Gabriele

3D"http://www.cisco.com/swa/i/l=



Gabriele Galimberti=
Technical Leader=
Cisco Photonics Srl



via S.Maria Molgora, 48 C<= /p>

20871 - Vimercate (MB)
Italy
www.cisco.com/global/IT/


ggalimbe@cisco.c= om
Phone :+39 039 2091462+39 335 7481947
Fax :+39 039 2092049













From: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.co= m>
Date: Thursday, October 23, 2014 10= :25 AM
To: "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: [CCAMP] FW: IETF 91 - CCAM= P slots request

Friendly reminder.

 

Please note that the d= eadline for asking your CCAMP slots is today.

 

BR
Daniele & chairs

 

From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Daniele Ceccarelli
Sent: marted=EC 14 ottobre 2014 12:49
To: CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)
Subject: [CCAMP] IETF 91 - CCAMP slots request

 

Dear CCAMP,

 

IETF 91 meeting is approaching and it=92s time to st= art collecting agenda slots requests.

 

Keeping this in mind:

WG Draft authors are expected to present if there= are open issues to discuss, or to send status to the list  *1 week* p= rior to the WG meeting if not presenting. Status includes review of: any re= cent changes, any open discussions or issues, and planned next steps.

 

Agenda Requests:

- To submit a request, please fill the sur= vey at the following link: http://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/1846224/IETF-91-CCAMP-slot-requests

- Please fill the survey no later than Thursda= y, October 23rd.

 

Presentations:

  If you are presenting slides please make s= ure you send them to  all *individuals* listed above (Chairs, Secretar= y and exclude CCAMP) no later  than Sunday, November 9th.

&= nbsp;

Reminder about a few important dates:

BR

Daniele & CCAMP chairs

 

 

 --_000_D06E898C6A578ggalimbeciscocom_-- --_004_D06E898C6A578ggalimbeciscocom_ Content-Type: image/png; name="273031C1-0F11-4D42-9226-D16B7CB14162[29].png" Content-Description: 273031C1-0F11-4D42-9226-D16B7CB14162[29].png Content-Disposition: inline; filename="273031C1-0F11-4D42-9226-D16B7CB14162[29].png"; size=1632; creation-date="Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:37:15 GMT"; modification-date="Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:37:15 GMT" Content-ID: <7BB771C2-D93E-4EDF-9E88-0D228660DB39> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAG4AAABJCAIAAABTkIQiAAAGJ0lEQVR4nO2be0xTVxzHv30gcHk5 bRmKyMCJrhDsNi0xzldikE2dZr5mSEnm/poylxi3ZAuOkhhjspANZ0zUhT9GyNwMzoHDSHD4GEGI QGtGAQ10iEyg1a1Cy50tdH9cd7kqRVp+5WHO54/m9HDOl3M+nHvP6W2QeTweMCiQT/YAXhyYSjKY SjKYSjKYSjKYSjKYSjKYSjKYSjKYSjKYSjKYSjKYSjKYSjKYSjKYSjImQWXLnXvTOt8bE62yxtz2 XfnvNea2aZo/CsoJ/n0lVxsqG5sBLNcsmI75ozDRq1KYp/A6HfNHgW07ZDCVZDCVZARQpa+HkqnW 3lcCpdLXQ8lUa+8HgToM+XoomWrt/SBQq9LXQ8lUa+8HBCqn+wdBqvzxqpzuHwQJ88d7r/yooBhA ZWOz8cSX4x/NtM5n50oymEoymEoyxqty3euvia9jqafKCXS+H4x329m66g3xdSz1VDmBzveD8apc rlnwUji3eP6cMdZT5QQ63w8I7pXexjFi/SgXlE85E5DvKxP9hQThBTUp+aMgm/h/Nmm5c49qIUxK vjcmQeWLCjtXksFUkhHYbeevy5fF8tw1a8g7jqWZ32PwlYCodPN8x5Wrt4qL79fXO81NADhNctL2 bTqDwTM4KFMoANQZDMa8PADa3NxlBw8KlQBsLa2N3x7ruVwldnx5zdoVhlxOrRoxn7daAYSo1Unb t2kPfDojPExs1lVb13Wh3FJRaa+plqujI15dmJC+LvH9XarFiwIxa3qVbp5vOHnK+Mk+aaXT3HS3 PlEHeAAZgCf3useVgK2l9dLuD+011dKOFnPTss8OcFBJ828eOjRk7R1uZu29W5+YMjAgqmy7WFGz f7/w9wAwZO21W3uNNdW3z/2y9puvA7E86VU+5TFsiVbJhUntAIBM9mxHz+Bge0WF2DJOn6WMiATw oLFxBje81hpOnmr4/Au5sx8AgoLCNMlKLsx+o04a1VVbdyljvbRGro4W1DtMxt/2ZmeUlJCvTWKV TqvtdmGh+FZbcDQxPR2AvaPjkd2O/1ffiLgGeHvrLaGs2rhpdX6+cFE7rbbgmVHSfMGjXB2dmpMj zVeGhgJw87z5+yIxNmFPdvL2rQCazpRYTp2Ay+U0N7Wf/kFlMFDOnFxlR1WVw2QUytqCo7p9Hwtl cQmI98QRhhIaEqWeLZRt58uqDXnzVq+ak6abGR8vzf/3TwsABAWl5uQ8ne/xAOjv6bEcPybUJ+zJ Xpv/lTIkBMDM5BR338POou8BWCoqddQqiQ9Dfd3dYjll1y7fhqJQxL79jvjWcvzYtZ07ft28pfmn M9J8t9MJQMlxI+TLZAAc3T1ihSZLL3gEwKlVSZmZCAoCwHfTf/UWwHOlcLn5xNylb264XqvauEms cZiM13buaLtYQZIfUIhVRsTEiOW28nJfu8sUitg03ZZzP2+4XqvNzRXr20vLPIODQr6S4wC4nU5v +cFRUWK560K50BHAo35He2kZXC4AyshIX8f2XIhVqlNTw5ZohXLD4cNtFyucVpvTarO1tHbV1gEQ JzYCHo+b5908LwNi03S63Fxxebr7Hg4NDQn5wa8kAIDL9Wy+m+cBRM6bF6fPEjoa8/JaSs46rbZ/ OjqMhYWdxY+3o+gVb9FOHOTbjmrxooVbNhtNRgAOk/FSxnpBx0BnZ2hc3HtlpR7vm/ig2327tOzu latRi5IA4MF92/myx6OMiJTL5cP55ia4XA6TsUqvn5WWJuZnFBYqQ0JmhIct2f2BsL0AuLZzx83l KwDYb9QJSzI4IVGTpaedOAJxrkzZm32/3SLORNQRGhc33MjL46g+c5O4+YpwmmRNll7c+oX8jpKz cmf/kLV3xPyYlSu1BUfF4630VBuckKg7ciQ2Tefv/LxCr5JTq1bn5/+xdKnl9I/SOUTMj4eXJSlU yuVyzJr91I/i9FlJmZnSmUvz/zaZhDPmEBceMT9e3IjkCsWyvXsiYmKai4qGl3ZU1Jx3NydlZi5Y n0412SdmEdDnlX48SpB2eW6vKfU4gz36JYM9rySDqSSDqSSDqSSDqSSDqSSDqSSDqSSDqSSDqSSD qSSDqSSDqSSDqSSDqSTjP8P5+2z4huMfAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC --_004_D06E898C6A578ggalimbeciscocom_-- From nobody Thu Oct 23 05:50:55 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6046C1A9049 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 05:50:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.667 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r08ENRRWvVIz for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 05:50:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.33.93]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 641E71A906A for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 05:50:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 17127 invoked by uid 0); 23 Oct 2014 12:50:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw2) (10.0.90.83) by gproxy8.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 23 Oct 2014 12:50:47 -0000 Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw2 with id 6cqa1p00n2SSUrH01cqduf; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 06:50:46 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=e5mVF8Z/ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=u9EReRu7m0cA:10 a=HFCU6gKsb0MA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=eZeLz9JS--apoSaYeJgA:9 a=-A9pmHbKkNeU3-lO:21 a=QncUx6dTiMyZlN0E:21 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=w9p9DbBziSkyMuM5m4LBXyYcvGLFxWvQDyx0ZuBvNkM=; b=Ca/4Z2QeNQEUZdBpFAj7B5wNuVO0kqHsoOxsegi5KNLi7KH3MKCX2p8oWi8D7ffQLtAWLT+Pd3wwtwzxrNFmD1kn9w6C9BHK5Gqbvi13krOavejGwEzID9yIN6SPSUQO; Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:49116 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XhHqd-0002VJ-CA; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 06:50:35 -0600 Message-ID: <5448F9E7.6050703@labn.net> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:51:51 -0400 From: Lou Berger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" , "draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb@tools.ietf.org" References: <20141020074350.21488.53873.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733758033@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <544805C0.8060103@labn.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733759B2E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733759B2E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net} Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/pBlQ57G6Lx0ULudeb4Jd0Yv-Yzo Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:50:50 -0000 Jie, Thank you for the quick response. See below for responses. It probably would also be worthwhile to add some words on when this extension should be used versus draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext .=20 On 10/22/2014 11:43 PM, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote: > Hi Lou,=20 > > Thanks a lot for your review and comments, please see my replies inline= : > >> Jie, Authors, >> I have a few comments: >> >> - Section 3.1, >> I think intermediate node behavior related to processing of the A is u= nchanged >> by this document so think you should drop the 3 lines that contain the= phrase "... >> intermediate nodes ..." > Agree the behavior of intermediate node is unchanged, will remove the d= escriptions about intermediate node behavior in a new revision.=20 > >> - Section 3.2 >> The section is not clear if the A bit processing occurs / completes be= fore >> Loopback related processing begins or occurs coincidentally. (I read = the last >> sentence of the first paragraph saying the former and the last sentenc= e of the >> 2nd paragraph saying the latter.) Either way it should be clarified. > The A bit (lock) processing needs to be completed before initiating loo= pback request. The last sentence of the 2nd paragraph was to emphasize th= at when signaling loopback, the A bit should be kept set to indicate the = LSP is still in lock mode. > We will rephrase the sentence to make it clearer. Great. Please include appropriate conformance language. >> Where is the Loopback (B) bit / Attribute Flag defined? This document,= right? >> Then the document, needs to state so in this section and in the IANA s= ection. > The Loopback bit was defined in the end of section 2 "Extensions to RSV= P-TE". To make it clearer, will use subsections for each extension in the= new revision. This is a good change to section 2. You might want to rename that section encodings or formats as the whole document is about rsvp-te extensions. You can take a look at section 4 of draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp as a recent example.=20 This said, you still need to mention where it is defined (e.g., in section 3.1, add "defined above" the first time you mention the bit) and add it to the IANA section. >> Section 4, needs to be updated to follow RFC2360, See >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associa= ted-lsp-1 >> 0 >> for a recent example. > Thanks for pointing to this example. Will update the IANA section accor= dingly. > >> - Also please cleanup your id-nits, see >> http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=3Dhttps://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-iet= f-ccamp-rsvp-t >> e-li-lb-04.txt > Will clean this in the new revision. Thanks, Lou > Best regards, > Jie > >> Lou >> >> On 10/20/2014 3:58 AM, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote: >>> Dear all, >>> >>> The only change in this new version is: >>> >>> - Update the references (one has become RFC) >>> >>> Your review and comments are highly appreciated. >>> >>> Many thanks, >>> Jie >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >>>> internet-drafts@ietf.org >>>> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 3:44 PM >>>> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org >>>> Cc: ccamp@ietf.org >>>> Subject: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt >>>> >>>> >>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. >>>> This draft is a work item of the Common Control and Measurement >>>> Plane Working Group of the IETF. >>>> >>>> Title : GMPLS RSVP-TE Extensions for Lock Instruct= >> and >>>> Loopback >>>> Authors : Jie Dong >>>> Mach(Guoyi) Chen >>>> Zhenqiang Li >>>> Daniele Ceccarelli >>>> Filename : draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt >>>> Pages : 8 >>>> Date : 2014-10-20 >>>> >>>> Abstract: >>>> This document specifies extensions to Resource Reservation Protoc= ol - >>>> Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) to support Lock Instruct (LI) and >>>> Loopback (LB) mechanisms for Label Switched Paths (LSPs). These >>>> mechanisms are applicable to technologies which use Generalized >>>> Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) as control plane. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb/ >>>> >>>> There's also a htmlized version available at: >>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04 >>>> >>>> A diff from the previous version is available at: >>>> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04= >>>> >>>> >>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >>>> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tool= s.ietf.org. >>>> >>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> CCAMP mailing list >>>> CCAMP@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CCAMP mailing list >>> CCAMP@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp >>> > From nobody Thu Oct 23 06:31:02 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EFF51A90BB; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 06:30:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JSQiMH3i2-0F; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 06:30:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC41C1A1A72; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 06:30:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.6.4.p1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20141023133057.29163.51618.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 06:30:57 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/yz6pkwH4pDp6AT0gS3Jcbbvgy0w Cc: ccamp@ietf.org Subject: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-08.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 13:30:59 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Common Control and Measurement Plane Working Group of the IETF. Title : RSVP-TE Extensions for Collecting SRLG Information Authors : Fatai Zhang Oscar Gonzalez de Dios Dan Li Cyril Margaria Matt Hartley Zafar Ali Filename : draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-08.txt Pages : 13 Date : 2014-10-23 Abstract: This document provides extensions for the Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) to support automatic collection of Shared Risk Link Group (SRLG) information for the TE link formed by a Label Switched Path (LSP). The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-08 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-08 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Thu Oct 23 07:00:09 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24CA1A903D for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 07:00:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.033 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.033 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LD6T7KKE0YAP for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 07:00:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.33.93]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B5A8C1A6FBF for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 07:00:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 22527 invoked by uid 0); 23 Oct 2014 14:00:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw2) (10.0.90.83) by gproxy8.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 23 Oct 2014 14:00:03 -0000 Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw2 with id 6dzv1p00m2SSUrH01dzyT7; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:00:02 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=e5mVF8Z/ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=u9EReRu7m0cA:10 a=HFCU6gKsb0MA:10 a=xuPBokJpitAA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=4lrLPWD7wNX300AQhKAA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=IDs2OYpfPjgA:10 a=jNUokh7J7iQA:10 a=sDcOLKYpg4UA:10 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=FJ6GesLqQDwd8fq42EBofkPujkkMRGbh4Nt6YVw+7XI=; b=jypNgqDQLqjptvhdheoWG182HLcFyIMxjOkdWf9BFWgWKx3rXtqKUlpQhWz+/ojPg3y+I+q1+LaDC1kO157yX1SP/o2I8fzbJHXmfpftr19WqrJ6DvdWPmpEVJORdtCK; Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:54518 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XhIvk-0007el-Gp for ccamp@ietf.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 07:59:56 -0600 Message-ID: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:01:14 -0400 From: Lou Berger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CCAMP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net} Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/fzRRxkb61q7WyDG8WmIQ9HCxSq0 Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 14:00:08 -0000 All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working group document. Please send email to the list indicating “yes/support” or “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with the document. The poll ends Thursday October 6th. Thanks, Deborah and Lou From nobody Thu Oct 23 08:46:41 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1F01ACCE1 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:46:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.911 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, GB_I_LETTER=-2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kS6QkF80gHfX for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:46:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpjc.telefonica.com (smtpjc.telefonica.com [81.47.204.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E94521ACC88 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:46:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpjc.telefonica.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D19D2F0444 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:46:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ESTGVMSP108.EUROPE.telefonica.corp (unknown [10.92.4.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtpjc.telefonica.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E33172F041E for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:46:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from emea01-db3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (10.92.5.139) by tls.telefonica.com (10.93.6.52) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:46:26 +0200 Received: from AMSPR06MB104.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.90.155) by AMSPR06MB102.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.90.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1054.13; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:46:25 +0000 Received: from AMSPR06MB104.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.126]) by AMSPR06MB104.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.126]) with mapi id 15.00.1054.004; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:46:24 +0000 From: OSCAR GONZALEZ DE DIOS To: CCAMP Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-08.txt Thread-Index: AQHP7sWfJ/X3eq40w027nihXv8Z8UJw99P6A Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:46:24 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20141023133058.29163.39190.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20141023133058.29163.39190.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: es-ES, en-US Content-Language: es-ES X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [195.235.92.26] x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:AMSPR06MB102; x-forefront-prvs: 0373D94D15 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(37854004)(189002)(199003)(51704005)(66654002)(377424004)(479174003)(77096002)(36756003)(230783001)(31966008)(20776003)(122556002)(120916001)(107886001)(106116001)(95666004)(105586002)(99396003)(64706001)(80022003)(106356001)(107046002)(76482002)(46102003)(87936001)(21056001)(86362001)(66066001)(19580405001)(19580395003)(85852003)(2656002)(4396001)(110136001)(92566001)(92726001)(76176999)(15202345003)(54356999)(83506001)(50986999)(15975445006)(101416001)(97736003)(85306004)(40100003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AMSPR06MB102; H:AMSPR06MB104.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: <37052424C6FCE14F974AA8DEC1EB4E89@eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: telefonica.com X-TM-AS-MML: No Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/o_X1Er3XzJcUI3HvHFqNcOBCp-Q Subject: [CCAMP] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-08.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:46:40 -0000 Dear CCAMP colleagues, We have just posted a new version of draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect The changes in this version are: 1) Early allocated code points added (see IANA Section) 2) Knits found by Dhruv=B9s review fixed. 3) Added a use case of the applicability of the SRLG Collection in the introduction provided by Dieter (many thanks to Dieter) 4) Reviewed use of RFC2119 language. All RFC2119 keywords are in CAPITAL LETTERS in the text now (whith the meaning of RFC 2119). The rest have been rephrased. In the next days we=B9ll post a new version to cover the remaining comments requested by Lou in yesterday=B9s email. Best Regards, =D3scar (on behalf of all draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect aut= hors) El 23/10/14 15:30, "internet-drafts@ietf.org" escribi=F3: > >A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-08.txt >has been successfully submitted by Oscar Gonzalez de Dios and posted to >the >IETF repository. > >Name: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect >Revision: 08 >Title: RSVP-TE Extensions for Collecting SRLG Information >Document date: 2014-10-23 >Group: ccamp >Pages: 13 >URL: >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect- >08.txt >Status: >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect/ >Htmlized: >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-08 >Diff: >http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-0= 8 > >Abstract: > This document provides extensions for the Resource ReserVation > Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) to support automatic > collection of Shared Risk Link Group (SRLG) information for the TE > link formed by a Label Switched Path (LSP). > > > > > >Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >submission >until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > >The IETF Secretariat > ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, pu= ede contener informaci=F3n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclus= ivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario ind= icado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci=F3n, divulgaci=F3n y/o= copia sin autorizaci=F3n puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislaci= =F3n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo = comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v=EDa y proceda a su destrucci=F3n. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidenti= al information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named = above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are= hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this co= mmunication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission = in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you h= ave received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat=E1rio= , pode conter informa=E7=E3o privilegiada ou confidencial e =E9 para uso ex= clusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n=E3o =E9 vossa senhoria o des= tinat=E1rio indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza=E7=E3o, div= ulga=E7=E3o e/ou c=F3pia sem autoriza=E7=E3o pode estar proibida em virtude= da legisla=E7=E3o vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe = que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destru= i=E7=E3o From nobody Thu Oct 23 09:19:14 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79C01ACD62 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:19:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.611 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.611 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kJnopKj_fzAC for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:19:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpjc.telefonica.com (smtpjc.telefonica.com [81.47.204.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8510C1AD0A8 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:19:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpjc.telefonica.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57CEFE02C6; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:19:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ESTGVMSP110.EUROPE.telefonica.corp (unknown [10.92.4.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtpjc.telefonica.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D770E03A4; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:19:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from emea01-db3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (10.92.5.139) by tls.telefonica.com (10.93.6.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:19:05 +0200 Received: from AMSPR06MB104.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.90.155) by AMSPR06MB102.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.90.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1054.13; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:19:03 +0000 Received: from AMSPR06MB104.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.126]) by AMSPR06MB104.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.126]) with mapi id 15.00.1054.004; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:19:03 +0000 From: OSCAR GONZALEZ DE DIOS To: Lou Berger , "draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect@tools.ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-07 Thread-Index: AQHP7t0PN3PpktMpCEyNgz1cY8QfLg== Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:19:03 +0000 Message-ID: References: <536AAB57.2090403@labn.net> <54482AAA.2040602@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54482AAA.2040602@labn.net> Accept-Language: es-ES, en-US Content-Language: es-ES X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [195.235.92.26] x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:AMSPR06MB102; x-forefront-prvs: 0373D94D15 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(51704005)(479174003)(199003)(45984002)(164054003)(189002)(76176999)(15975445006)(54356999)(50986999)(83506001)(85852003)(2656002)(4396001)(19580405001)(19580395003)(92566001)(92726001)(40100003)(101416001)(85306004)(97736003)(95666004)(105586002)(106116001)(230783001)(31966008)(20776003)(36756003)(77096002)(120916001)(122556002)(76482002)(46102003)(86362001)(66066001)(87936001)(21056001)(99396003)(106356001)(107046002)(80022003)(64706001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AMSPR06MB102; H:AMSPR06MB104.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: <405C870E49B6C2429D15C86B9B1A1F8F@eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: telefonica.com X-TM-AS-MML: No Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/VzAeEhm40O7gQq6yvyb9O0y51wM Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-07 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:19:13 -0000 Dear Lou, Thank you very much for the comments. We had some changes in draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-07 rea= dy since a couple of weeks ago that we did not find time to put together and complete. We have just sent this version. Some of your comments seems are already taken into account in this version. Summarizing: - Avoiding RFC 2119 language in lower case: done! In fact, it has b= een reviewed that all RFC 2119 keywords are used as they are supposed to. - Section is missing handling of RRO too big: To be added in next v= ersion - Text for multiple IDs: A sentence indicating multiple SRLG Ids ca= n be present added. Still need to add a text explaining the conditions to include multiple Ids. However, I think the conditions fit better in the procedure section. - Reference for CPS: Done! Added a whole paragraph explaining the collection with CPS, and reference added. - Removing policy processing in the resv. To be added in the next v= ersion. I hope we can be soon in Last Call.. =D3scar El 23/10/14 00:07, "Lou Berger" escribi=F3: >Authors, > I think we still have some unresolved comments from May: > >>> - you use "should not" in lower case in a few spots in this section. >>> While I think your usage *is* correct, my experience is that someone >>> (probably in the IESG) will tell you that these need to be in upper >>> case at some point. Of course, they'll be wrong, and this will have >>> to be explained. I suggest avoiding 2119 language in lower case where >>> easily avoided. How about s/should not be/is not to be > >The above comment also applies to "must". > >Your current of 2119 language is a bit inconsistent. I think you should >review current uses of 2119 language and ensure that such usage is >limited to (protocol) mechanisms, behavior and interoperability. If >doesn't the language is most likely informative in nature and should >avoid 2119 conformance language. > >>> - The section is missing handling of RRO to big. Perhaps add it at >>>~line >>> 330. >> > >A few of new comments: > >- The current text of section 4.1 could be read as only one ID may be >present in the SO. you should explain under what conditions multiple >IDs are to be added. > >- Please provide a reference for "Confidential Path message. Segment >(CPS)" > >- (should have caught this one before, i.e., is in old text) In Section >5.1 it looks like you are applying policy on both Path and Resv >processing ("When a node receives a Resv message ... if local policy >determines ...). Given the "SRLG Recording Rejected" PathErr required >earlier in the section, is this really needed? Are you assuming >separate upstream/downstream policies? (Which would seem to be >overkill.) Covering a policy change race condition, something else? I >suspect the policy processing text on resv isn't needed. > >Thanks, >Lou > >_______________________________________________ >CCAMP mailing list >CCAMP@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, pu= ede contener informaci=F3n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclus= ivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario ind= icado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci=F3n, divulgaci=F3n y/o= copia sin autorizaci=F3n puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislaci= =F3n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo = comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v=EDa y proceda a su destrucci=F3n. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidenti= al information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named = above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are= hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this co= mmunication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission = in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you h= ave received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat=E1rio= , pode conter informa=E7=E3o privilegiada ou confidencial e =E9 para uso ex= clusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n=E3o =E9 vossa senhoria o des= tinat=E1rio indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza=E7=E3o, div= ulga=E7=E3o e/ou c=F3pia sem autoriza=E7=E3o pode estar proibida em virtude= da legisla=E7=E3o vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe = que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destru= i=E7=E3o From nobody Thu Oct 23 09:27:13 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 189B51ACD5A for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:27:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.667 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9q45_u9vncFR for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:27:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.23.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 08C951ACCEC for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:27:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 9497 invoked by uid 0); 23 Oct 2014 16:27:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO CMOut01) (10.0.90.82) by gproxy4.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 23 Oct 2014 16:27:09 -0000 Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by CMOut01 with id 6gT41p00u2SSUrH01gT7eN; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:27:07 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Tr912lnh c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=u9EReRu7m0cA:10 a=HFCU6gKsb0MA:10 a=aFrKpjIqxRQA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=b_JuxzwvERQ9i2uLF7cA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=YoWkzJhGCSwcmuYcgGkGQmi14476iee6EvynCBnSKrY=; b=IXVu90pgKeByR0DnPorDpTOtnxdDbL0hFZQyrFhOv6cqdBcIDOPOE6Neye8aGhFEMkASvLtl/pGYbKb1z+k1PyOtR7Tcz8Wa0musfEu+6tqtPzFmrQdmoYe1/m94uK5a; Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:38054 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XhLE9-0003wz-Nc; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:27:05 -0600 Message-ID: <54492C57.5000409@labn.net> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:27:03 -0400 From: Lou Berger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Zafar Ali (zali)" , "Antonello Bonfanti (abonfant)" , Fatai Zhang Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net} Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/oSVNCUO5BmhJuN3FdgKvE3KEjV4 Cc: CCAMP Subject: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:27:12 -0000 Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP) As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? If yes to the above, please state either: "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" or "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and listed contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. Thank you, CCAMP WG Chairs PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response. From nobody Thu Oct 23 09:28:47 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 047C21A9155 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:28:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.667 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ftt-2Iy5jbe8 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:28:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.18.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 533021A9124 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:28:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 1764 invoked by uid 0); 23 Oct 2014 16:28:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85) by gproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 23 Oct 2014 16:28:37 -0000 Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw4 with id 6mUV1p0142SSUrH01mUYXT; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:28:36 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=fdw+lSgF c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=u9EReRu7m0cA:10 a=HFCU6gKsb0MA:10 a=-z-Dy3piH5wA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=b_JuxzwvERQ9i2uLF7cA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=YoWkzJhGCSwcmuYcgGkGQmi14476iee6EvynCBnSKrY=; b=kN6dkBKMatXaQfESPzGdth7TnlVQb5rgU1KIs/J3hRO3he7iJEWdGi5+cCikJ/mEVYxbemjShBlFF9pyb9q9lDIaISy1udMuDSUOa5P7eP/MrXzkLn7ss7BW0VEfTphK; Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:38162 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XhLFW-0004L4-Es; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:28:30 -0600 Message-ID: <54492CAC.1090605@labn.net> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:28:28 -0400 From: Lou Berger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Zafar Ali (zali)" , "Antonello Bonfanti (abonfant)" , Fatai Zhang Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net} Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/mlGIZdxLeu8OCNCxhk3Z5r98_aY Cc: CCAMP Subject: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:28:46 -0000 Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP) As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? If yes to the above, please state either: "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" or "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and listed contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. Thank you, CCAMP WG Chairs PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response. From nobody Thu Oct 23 09:32:39 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9EC11ACD91 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:32:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2IZ2DAXf7enS for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:32:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A2591ACDB8 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:31:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2169; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414081915; x=1415291515; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=HSubl2kWQ8kEk076UWCCMtS7DgTa79FQJpoS+ld6c1s=; b=l9mYCGlbVLH+1gmST3D+QWmpzNnLvyLSSgYjIHpLFioy8F7bB1dmkmJR zJd+VntoNtpMxzi0Vigp83yRJ0X2cK0uZrLIPw3/KFBkwa4xIkmG6OgXJ VpJt7oQ4yGuJgIWGc8jF1hjOEnPbNZ40Vn+VZrUxgbUvOun0r6/saoupn I=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnwUAKMsSVStJA2F/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UXLoWkmiHTQKBEhYBfYQCAQEBBHQFDAYBCA4DAwECYR0IAgQBDQWIQQ3IaQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEZjkqBLBEBUAcGhEUFkgWERocSgTE8gw2NMoQBg3hsAYEOOYEDAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,776,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="365838388" Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Oct 2014 16:31:54 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com [173.36.12.80]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9NGVrov030072 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:31:53 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.159]) by xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com ([173.36.12.80]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 11:31:53 -0500 From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" To: Lou Berger , "Antonello Bonfanti (abonfant)" , Fatai Zhang Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 Thread-Index: AQHP7t4zk+W9o2N1+k+edx0+bkWy35w98d8A Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:31:53 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <54492C57.5000409@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616 x-originating-ip: [10.86.255.208] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <58D5CC3C3CCCBF45826723A280534B02@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/mKL8-plmuCbmhrK07-IdfcQjaeQ Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:32:37 -0000 Hi-=20 No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Thanks Regards =8A Zafar -----Original Message----- From: "lberger@labn.net" Date: Thursday, October 23, 2014 12:27 PM To: zali , "Antonello Bonfanti (abonfant)" , Fatai Zhang Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 >Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP) > >As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption: > >Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? > > Please state either: > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" > or > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > >If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules >(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? > >If yes to the above, please state either: > > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" > or > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > >If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think > appropriate. > >If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the >above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are >aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next >stage until a response has been received from each author and listed >contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S >TO LINES. > >If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author or >contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules >which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of >others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any > contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more >information, please see the RFCs listed above and >http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. > >Thank you, >CCAMP WG Chairs > >PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your >response. From nobody Thu Oct 23 09:32:54 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F6BA1A924C for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:32:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FtvZHCfjO14n for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:32:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0A781ACD8B for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:32:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2167; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414081942; x=1415291542; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=qxFG3mp9YDvkP1nlC5oo4XCQNvRYJV9bmnpJYCHsJ/Q=; b=g2enrEtZYynULatVL0NwsNi+vOaiMNDhkYyFcX93KwHWI7SrDTkAiWvD FhVFGiyI8O4dizG+V+VA+Q7bkAR39AvEOu0ZmAqeUvTK0d0C2or0wrrcq PWoc/S6bo8BE3kW+0yEiKgopPxIN/sKIL3+2JiTFMQupUR6pzPlu682nH 8=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnwUABItSVStJV2c/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UXLoWkmiHTQKBEhYBfYQCAQEBBHQFDAYBCA4DAwECYR0IAgQBDQWIQQ3IawEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEZjkqBLBEBUAcGhEUFkgWERocSgTE8gw2NMoQBg3hsAYEOOYEDAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,776,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="365823233" Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Oct 2014 16:32:22 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com [173.37.183.86]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9NGWLYa019051 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:32:22 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.159]) by xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com ([173.37.183.86]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 11:32:21 -0500 From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" To: Lou Berger , "Antonello Bonfanti (abonfant)" , Fatai Zhang Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 Thread-Index: AQHP7t5oLOYg5w1PmkOmGBFb6//TKZw98f+A Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:32:20 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <54492CAC.1090605@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616 x-originating-ip: [10.86.255.208] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <556CBC0AA7841D4A92765730B7917519@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/98Zh-7BOQUVvI4jzI8V183tS2mk Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:32:52 -0000 Hi-=20 No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Thanks Regards =8A Zafar -----Original Message----- From: "lberger@labn.net" Date: Thursday, October 23, 2014 12:28 PM To: zali , "Antonello Bonfanti (abonfant)" , Fatai Zhang Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 >Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP) > >As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption: > >Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? > > Please state either: > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" > or > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > >If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules >(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? > >If yes to the above, please state either: > > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" > or > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > >If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think > appropriate. > >If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the >above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are >aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next >stage until a response has been received from each author and listed >contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S >TO LINES. > >If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author or >contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules >which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of >others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any > contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more >information, please see the RFCs listed above and >http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. > >Thank you, >CCAMP WG Chairs > >PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your >response. From nobody Thu Oct 23 09:43:00 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 594CF1ACD96 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:42:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.667 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rBKbT_w_D7Vo for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:42:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.39.168]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C37ED1ACD90 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:42:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 21142 invoked by uid 0); 23 Oct 2014 16:42:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85) by gproxy6.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 23 Oct 2014 16:42:56 -0000 Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw4 with id 6miq1p00f2SSUrH01mitT1; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:42:55 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=fdw+lSgF c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=u9EReRu7m0cA:10 a=HFCU6gKsb0MA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=_4QIzsyHuODXXJ0Ja7IA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=33rK67OTR_gA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=gbIAM9BJuBRFW6RbERbKRTy/pqR6w8b5+qKHWHz+TMc=; b=yba5Ha5qlqFEjPsx2p62GP1ZAjZ5zQbcGOnkvgSrnVDq+7+Nyw+kyZZXNZZI/cH7Subp2ibe+Nj/FMtbfSfE4VcgrBfSZrJ/1udMRSJoPIcNq7ab3CKuLbxZQZakMUlc; Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:39281 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XhLTP-0000Bd-1I; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:42:51 -0600 Message-ID: <54493009.5040305@labn.net> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:42:49 -0400 From: Lou Berger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OSCAR GONZALEZ DE DIOS , "draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect@tools.ietf.org" References: <536AAB57.2090403@labn.net> <54482AAA.2040602@labn.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net} Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/s2jdqER57W9aXQBYlvts36nD9Wg Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-07 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:42:59 -0000 Oscar, Much thanks. I expect that your next version (which addresses these and any other comments, perhaps even before HI) will be ready for LC. It probably would be good to review the changes with the WG in HI, particularly the completely new section 1.1. to ensure consensus -- perhaps even just 1 or 2 slides. Lou On 10/23/2014 12:19 PM, OSCAR GONZALEZ DE DIOS wrote: > Dear Lou, > > Thank you very much for the comments. > > We had some changes in draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-07 ready > since a couple of weeks ago that we did not find time to put together and > complete. We have just sent this version. Some of your comments seems are > already taken into account in this version. Summarizing: > > - Avoiding RFC 2119 language in lower case: done! In fact, it has been > reviewed that all RFC 2119 keywords are used as they are supposed to. > - Section is missing handling of RRO too big: To be added in next version > - Text for multiple IDs: A sentence indicating multiple SRLG Ids can be > present added. Still need to add a text explaining the conditions to > include multiple Ids. However, I think the conditions fit better in the > procedure section. > - Reference for CPS: Done! Added a whole paragraph explaining the > collection with CPS, and reference added. > - Removing policy processing in the resv. To be added in the next version. > > > I hope we can be soon in Last Call.. > > > Óscar > > El 23/10/14 00:07, "Lou Berger" escribió: > >> Authors, >> I think we still have some unresolved comments from May: >> >>>> - you use "should not" in lower case in a few spots in this section. >>>> While I think your usage *is* correct, my experience is that someone >>>> (probably in the IESG) will tell you that these need to be in upper >>>> case at some point. Of course, they'll be wrong, and this will have >>>> to be explained. I suggest avoiding 2119 language in lower case where >>>> easily avoided. How about s/should not be/is not to be >> The above comment also applies to "must". >> >> Your current of 2119 language is a bit inconsistent. I think you should >> review current uses of 2119 language and ensure that such usage is >> limited to (protocol) mechanisms, behavior and interoperability. If >> doesn't the language is most likely informative in nature and should >> avoid 2119 conformance language. >> >>>> - The section is missing handling of RRO to big. Perhaps add it at >>>> ~line >>>> 330. >> A few of new comments: >> >> - The current text of section 4.1 could be read as only one ID may be >> present in the SO. you should explain under what conditions multiple >> IDs are to be added. >> >> - Please provide a reference for "Confidential Path message. Segment >> (CPS)" >> >> - (should have caught this one before, i.e., is in old text) In Section >> 5.1 it looks like you are applying policy on both Path and Resv >> processing ("When a node receives a Resv message ... if local policy >> determines ...). Given the "SRLG Recording Rejected" PathErr required >> earlier in the section, is this really needed? Are you assuming >> separate upstream/downstream policies? (Which would seem to be >> overkill.) Covering a policy change race condition, something else? I >> suspect the policy processing text on resv isn't needed. >> >> Thanks, >> Lou >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CCAMP mailing list >> CCAMP@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. > > The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. > > Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição > From nobody Thu Oct 23 09:45:04 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F461ACD90 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:45:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.667 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J6vLOrh1SzAS for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:45:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gproxy5-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy5-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.38.55]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E068F1ACD6E for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:44:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 30016 invoked by uid 0); 23 Oct 2014 16:23:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO CMOut01) (10.0.90.82) by gproxy5.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 23 Oct 2014 16:23:45 -0000 Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by CMOut01 with id 6gPe1p00V2SSUrH01gPhj2; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:23:43 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Tr912lnh c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=u9EReRu7m0cA:10 a=HFCU6gKsb0MA:10 a=47y29FthlqAA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=b_JuxzwvERQ9i2uLF7cA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=YoWkzJhGCSwcmuYcgGkGQmi14476iee6EvynCBnSKrY=; b=swsGS6HkNFhSTA4LeL2+uvC9Vn3QwHXP3y8aQBbfi7R3GyXvO/MS235HNjJv0W/OknaGtljk/iDzg///9r77RDSRP9RWRBiDNxe9oMFKvj9Vz/VqnfIADMTfbLydVuom; Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:37774 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XhLAo-0002np-Du; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:23:39 -0600 Message-ID: <54492B81.4020402@labn.net> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:23:29 -0400 From: Lou Berger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Xian Zhang" , "Haomian Zheng" , "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" , "Zafar Ali (zali)" , "Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" , "Pawel Brzozowski" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net} Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/dgVzCR7UKF7xk-t3qtn0CCHEcIc Cc: CCAMP Subject: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:45:02 -0000 Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP) As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? If yes to the above, please state either: "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" or "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and listed contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. Thank you, CCAMP WG Chairs PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response. From nobody Thu Oct 23 12:24:49 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8541ACEAD for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:24:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OMDfq_FTxmpJ for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:24:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EA8B1ACEB3 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:24:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1879; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414092286; x=1415301886; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=9A+Rl+/KbpbTXhYLMxM6VXFLp06dwnUp2EiuWlwUP+0=; b=S//7z7xbIT7Bp9wzGLH+JtTcRbpFZEqst7BAn37h7o1O6S/iItwPB9Vy +Cd1Qx7b2e9n36ubLNo2T2YGW0nTtRYhSuUkNtuKkm0NnIT18kZM12D+T ahmMaEnUO3oXfz/nN2zxNAw0Fq2w1uV48XJ0Yr/Cx3Tsqo1T6pqGYMbQf g=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnoUAHJUSVStJA2E/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UXLoWkmiHTQKBExYBfYQDAgQ6OgUSAQgOKEIlAgQBDQWIQQ3IRAEBAQEBAQEBAgEBAQEBAQEBGo5KgSwRAVAHhEsFkgWERocSgTE8gw2NMoQBg3hsAYEOOYEDAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,776,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="365884440" Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Oct 2014 19:24:45 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com [173.37.183.83]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9NJOiRV000300 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 23 Oct 2014 19:24:44 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x07.cisco.com ([169.254.2.151]) by xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([173.37.183.83]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 14:24:44 -0500 From: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" To: Lou Berger , Xian Zhang , "Haomian Zheng" , "Zafar Ali (zali)" , "Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" , Pawel Brzozowski Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 Thread-Index: AQHP7t26lgpscqcNxk+gB6BO6Vh5Q5w+IQUA Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 19:24:43 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <54492B81.4020402@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.5.130515 x-originating-ip: [10.86.240.148] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/VbXS8UFQjO-nV4rjSv_y_BH4TXg Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 19:24:47 -0000 Hi Chairs, WG, No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Thanks, Rakesh On 2014-10-23 12:23 PM, "Lou Berger" wrote: >Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP) > >As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption: > >Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? > > Please state either: > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" > or > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > >If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules >(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? > >If yes to the above, please state either: > > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" > or > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > >If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think > appropriate. > >If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the >above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are >aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next >stage until a response has been received from each author and listed >contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S >TO LINES. > >If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author or >contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules >which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of >others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any > contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more >information, please see the RFCs listed above and >http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. > >Thank you, >CCAMP WG Chairs > >PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your >response. From nobody Thu Oct 23 14:46:50 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9D51ACEAB for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 14:46:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xxCD2L08y_ED for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 14:46:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31E0F1A0262 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 14:46:38 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f793d6d000005356-0a-5449773cee17 Received: from ESESSHC001.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 64.6F.21334.C3779445; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 23:46:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ESESSMB301.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.4]) by ESESSHC001.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.21]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 23:46:36 +0200 From: Daniele Ceccarelli To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP7smqscFNGkONe0C+a7gxi6QAxZw+N/JA Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 21:46:35 +0000 Message-ID: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48127B87B8@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> References: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.148] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrALMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvja5NuWeIweIjKhZP5txgsehofsvi wOSxZMlPJo8Pm5rZApiiuGxSUnMyy1KL9O0SuDJOX7nDWnCMreJYbxtbA+Mm1i5GTg4JAROJ yWeusUDYYhIX7q1n62Lk4hASOMoo0TbzEDuEs4hR4sLMV0AZDg42ASuJJ4d8QBpEBCwlpnS1 M4GEhQWSJV42xECEUyTaD/5mgrCNJB49Pc8GYrMIqEo0TJzNDmLzCvhKHHrzjhHEFhJQl/i2 5ymYzSmgIfHt0wWwXkYBWYkJuxeBxZkFxCVuPZnPBHGngMSSPeeZIWxRiZeP/0H9oiTRuOQJ K0S9nsSNqVPYIGxtiWULXzND7BWUODnzCcsERtFZSMbOQtIyC0nLLCQtCxhZVjGKFqcWF+em GxnrpRZlJhcX5+fp5aWWbGIERsnBLb91dzCufu14iFGAg1GJhzdhpkeIEGtiWXFl7iFGaQ4W JXHeRefmBQsJpCeWpGanphakFsUXleakFh9iZOLglGpgzL2Q4pz2dGX+9xB+L/tYu1gTv5Mb lRZeuhR9q+2xlcSRaV5cfT0pBW6eT51Ksr5GpDHvEDwnYuv2Ok2BnXV3/kwVxX/XfjVn39jL 5X/ikoShqLXd6gnPIkp1u7/wTdk+3/m5uMSpAhW9jZF5atzps12Mj1VJSZhv33J+UdZLMxe+ 28Uv71xQYinOSDTUYi4qTgQAt/uqjHMCAAA= Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/bpK9YerTZEYHNscHafYa3ro7YVA Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 21:46:40 -0000 Yes/support BR Daniele > -----Original Message----- > From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger > Sent: gioved=EC 23 ottobre 2014 16:01 > To: CCAMP > Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info- > exchange-07 a WG document >=20 > All, >=20 > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working group > document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/d= o > not support". If indicating no, please state your technical reservations = with > the document. >=20 > The poll ends Thursday October 6th. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Deborah and Lou >=20 > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Thu Oct 23 14:57:57 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4931A6EED for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 14:57:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F4KTbJGHTcTP for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 14:57:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0761.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::761]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90B021A1AF2 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 14:57:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.202.141) by BLUPR05MB563.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.202.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.6.9; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 21:57:29 +0000 Received: from BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.202.141]) by BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.202.141]) with mapi id 15.01.0006.000; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 21:57:29 +0000 From: John E Drake To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP7smqv9Cj3TwyL06g2AsoysgplZw+OuBw Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 21:57:28 +0000 Message-ID: References: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [66.129.239.10] x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR05MB563; x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-forefront-prvs: 0373D94D15 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(164054003)(189002)(377454003)(51704005)(199003)(13464003)(76576001)(54356999)(76176999)(50986999)(4396001)(107886001)(107046002)(97736003)(80022003)(99286002)(76482002)(99396003)(120916001)(95666004)(15975445006)(108616004)(46102003)(2656002)(87936001)(20776003)(230783001)(85852003)(85306004)(74316001)(86362001)(101416001)(106116001)(92566001)(31966008)(105586002)(122556002)(40100003)(21056001)(106356001)(66066001)(19580405001)(33646002)(19580395003)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR05MB563; H:BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/6y-p5DjYF6dtuv39teLpw1_K2fI Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 21:57:54 -0000 "yes/support" Yours Irrespectively, John > -----Original Message----- > From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 7:01 AM > To: CCAMP > Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-excha= nge- > 07 a WG document >=20 > All, >=20 > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working group > document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/d= o not > support". If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with= the > document. >=20 > The poll ends Thursday October 6th. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Deborah and Lou >=20 > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Thu Oct 23 14:59:48 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B61C21A1BBB for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 14:59:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.601 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ikeunUAyM-yM for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 14:59:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usevmg21.ericsson.net (usevmg21.ericsson.net [198.24.6.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A7D61A1BA5 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 14:59:43 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c6180641-f79916d00000623a-fc-54492029661c Received: from EUSAAHC008.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.96]) by usevmg21.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 84.17.25146.92029445; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:35:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from EUSAAMB103.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.120]) by EUSAAHC008.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.96]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:59:32 -0400 From: Gregory Mirsky To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP7smrUL0Pi1IlAU6ANmCH8EX8kJw+O5kA Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 21:59:31 +0000 Message-ID: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B865815@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> References: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.9] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrELMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPgq6mgmeIwfo78hZP5txgsehofsvi wOSxZMlPJo8Pm5rZApiiuGxSUnMyy1KL9O0SuDKWLzvCVDCZraJrzVP2BsY+1i5GTg4JAROJ to1nGCFsMYkL99azgdhCAkcZJZ5vKoSwlzNK/JviA2KzCRhJvNjYww5iiwhYSkzpamfqYuTg EBZIlnjZEAMRTpFoP/ibCcI2ktj+5zPYSBYBVYmNr54xg9i8Ar4S/688YoQYry7xbc9TMJtT QEPi26cLYL2MQOd8P7UGzGYWEJe49WQ+E8SZAhJL9pxnhrBFJV4+/gf1iqLEvv7p7BD1OhIL dn9ig7C1JZYtfA21V1Di5MwnLBMYRWchGTsLScssJC2zkLQsYGRZxchRWpxalptuZLiJERgJ xyTYHHcwLvhkeYhRgINRiYf3gYZHiBBrYllxZe4hRmkOFiVxXs3qecFCAumJJanZqakFqUXx RaU5qcWHGJk4OKUaGF2UWVbUSP+9PLtp3pqLRjyVMj2WYle/vlV8selW4b3ia/WqbYvdPk6c eUUryFJ8gpTkjQr5Sen/J/gmqP+c9srE5tS0Zx0mH2d21Hz9++f0ZKMfYRJf3PI2+YZ0N79r ETJed0Nq6cqLbot3/MpaKGIr69/D87poivfevYntP/Vya1Xn7s3aIKnEUpyRaKjFXFScCAAy O631ZQIAAA== Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/a9bk2-QUAu_Z53b9FN6_pAg8B2c Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 21:59:45 -0000 yes, support Regards, Greg -----Original Message----- From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 7:01 AM To: CCAMP Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchang= e-07 a WG document All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working group docum= ent. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not s= upport". If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with th= e document. The poll ends Thursday October 6th. Thanks, Deborah and Lou _______________________________________________ CCAMP mailing list CCAMP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Thu Oct 23 15:24:06 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCECD1A0264 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:24:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xcPhA1THiHIU for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:24:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAFFE1A1AF1 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:24:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=576; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414103040; x=1415312640; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=ClLm4BjsVbfs/Mz9Nba152opbXRmjKURlYwtahn5uxU=; b=laVTolCEQoObUOqG8x+dsRCMpgoy7NxvPt1FmtbREHQZ7/yYQ2TN+828 x7laXCut+TosSmsDbU49F+6vd+SyJiaVzmW16y4BaWQdnnV/lQaol8GaE vB4B6JoPfSmtd2T0bkHA++QipNXuEMgmXAmgCcNxHvLjs9Hc+JlK1s7w7 4=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgcFAB1/SVStJV2R/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UXMx1CodNAoERFgF9hAMBAQMBAQEBNzQLBQsCAQgOFBQQJwslAgQBDQUIiDEIDcgbAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEwSPdhEBHzEHgy2BHgWSBY0Jg0mIA4UvhAGCNIFEbIEPOYEDAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,777,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="365918044" Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Oct 2014 22:24:00 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com [173.37.183.80]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9NMO0ob030434 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 23 Oct 2014 22:24:00 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.7.227]) by xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([173.37.183.80]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:23:59 -0500 From: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP7sms6RauqWPNBk+C1AWbrUhKu5w+Qm9w Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 22:23:59 +0000 Message-ID: <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC14AE9A3D@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com> References: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.86.251.185] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/xBUrmRLY0luaU4EE60Mac38GJZo Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 22:24:04 -0000 Yes/support Cheers Matt > All, >=20 > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working group > document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/d= o > not support". If indicating no, please state your technical reservations > with the document. >=20 > The poll ends Thursday October 6th. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Deborah and Lou >=20 > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Thu Oct 23 15:24:48 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 499371A1B26 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:24:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.51 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3UmezBvvo8r2 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:24:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 947D21A0264 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:24:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5919; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414103075; x=1415312675; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=OFhzKbMrkoEL8ufHsEer9JIWQ6NSDp/LAMv9+A1rnZg=; b=Il47lOr/0nkDSmd2x7a9a5sivLHJr1RcMkiiKK/RCcbRxZiBdzgg/lAT j2k47KVMzBA9OSHXOwstRMwbL4wv8GF1FTS0MJ12f81pQU4srODfd+H03 0Ub6y/2LVgP2fDM/RX9WasAZK4F5qHKJzM9Qf7sMYECcnaHe2e3RvjYI0 w=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgYFACZ/SVStJA2B/2dsb2JhbABcgkhGVFzUTAKBERYBfYQDAQEELUELEAIBCCIkMiUBAQQBDQ2IOcgoAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF5AnMQeDLYEeAQSSBY0Jg0mNMoQBgjSBRII0gQMBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,777,1406592000"; d="scan'208,217";a="365886890" Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Oct 2014 22:24:34 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com [173.36.12.77]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9NMOYB5006142 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 23 Oct 2014 22:24:34 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.7.227]) by xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com ([173.36.12.77]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:24:34 -0500 From: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" To: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" , "ccamp@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11 Thread-Index: Ac/srIE0Ej9pDRWXSnyNQai5S2fV4QCY5L9w Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 22:24:33 +0000 Message-ID: <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC14AE9A52@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.86.251.185] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC14AE9A52xmbrcdx03ciscoc_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/AX9v349PT088zmt-jDp2fCGg0zE Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 22:24:38 -0000 --_000_9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC14AE9A52xmbrcdx03ciscoc_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Support Cheers Matt All, This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-= rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11. This working group last call ends on Nov. 3rd. Please send your comments to= the CCAMP mailing list. As noted, there is one IPR disclosed. Thanks, Deborah (and Lou) --_000_9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC14AE9A52xmbrcdx03ciscoc_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Support

 

Cheers

 

Matt

 

All,

 

This starts a two-week working group la= st call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.

 

This working group last call ends on No= v. 3rd. Please send your comments to the CCAMP mailing list.

 

As noted, there is one IPR disclosed.

 

Thanks,

Deborah (and Lou)

 

--_000_9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC14AE9A52xmbrcdx03ciscoc_-- From nobody Thu Oct 23 17:03:58 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426F31A8774 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:03:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vps3jlMrTBdq for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:03:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com (mail-wi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2892A1A1A9A for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:03:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id bs8so109477wib.15 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:03:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=iQKBvL+J5J3PbtunHez/UV9inbMI/MCHwvUu3KkraN4=; b=DHhXTvWCD4OM+b9e+ZmPYO+yTMZCFlkfEVUvBiLteDrz5Mpc6pmxahS0QnXEB3kCiQ Jy0bn9hRBJgJTnzzzBvgtFt3ZQw+PsUjmf+BtNeCyS7JhdxCgeeHDUHbDW3hAxcNnPYk pZQlVvVI+WQbYMLUKtr7twmg5z6nGJ45NzmUTLtyoGJhHoB+RVy57z8DETjSkl/+nJtQ 3bsTyJsHCj7loXOy2sRYfWTx2Ur2XGA1ALZ90DL67Vt2kKP30C9sn7vFJAHtVyTEQhfu yW65/TR7u2jEh89v0bWWiSDXccs8LcMFtgA+1DnYwincSFUaAlAxTnaprf6hlES0g2Q0 7InQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.96.10 with SMTP id do10mr408914wib.16.1414109031833; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.172.10 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:03:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> References: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 20:03:51 -0400 Message-ID: From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram To: Lou Berger Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044480c584269005061fea3c Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/1LRbND8wr1b6P6QQvdcekSig8GE Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:03:55 -0000 --f46d044480c584269005061fea3c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable yes/support -Pavan On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Lou Berger wrote: > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working group > document. Please send email to the list indicating =E2=80=9Cyes/support= =E2=80=9D or > =E2=80=9Cno/do not support=E2=80=9D. If indicating no, please state your = technical > reservations with the document. > > The poll ends Thursday October 6th. > > Thanks, > > Deborah and Lou > > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp > --f46d044480c584269005061fea3c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
yes/support

-Pavan

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:= 01 AM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
All,

This is start of a two week poll on making
draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working group
document. Please send email to the list indicating =E2=80=9Cyes/support=E2= =80=9D or
=E2=80=9Cno/do not support=E2=80=9D. If indicating no, please state your te= chnical
reservations with the document.

The poll ends Thursday October 6th.

Thanks,

Deborah and Lou

_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
h= ttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp

--f46d044480c584269005061fea3c-- From nobody Thu Oct 23 18:03:46 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CCC71AD60F for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:03:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OWaEXpqQrI5O for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:03:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F96F1A86E8 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:03:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BNZ27469; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 01:03:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.37) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 02:03:39 +0100 Received: from SZXEMA504-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.123]) by SZXEMA405-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.37]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:03:33 +0800 From: Fatai Zhang To: Lou Berger , "Zafar Ali (zali)" , "Antonello Bonfanti (abonfant)" Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 Thread-Index: AQHP7t4zuTP9qkC/zkuluWkdMVEd25w+bqdg Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 01:03:32 +0000 Message-ID: References: <54492C57.5000409@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54492C57.5000409@labn.net> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.66.72.159] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/bnhZn1e4kQO82LxF48gRiWfIvkw Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 01:03:45 -0000 Hi,=20 No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Best Regards Fatai -----Original Message----- From: Lou Berger [mailto:lberger@labn.net]=20 Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 12:27 AM To: Zafar Ali (zali); Antonello Bonfanti (abonfant); Fatai Zhang Cc: CCAMP Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP) As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? If yes to the above, please state either: "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" or "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and listed contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. Thank you, CCAMP WG Chairs PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response. From nobody Thu Oct 23 18:03:55 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFDDC1A86E8 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:03:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x8pA2wzb0IzP for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:03:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 545231AD60F for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BKW50024; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 01:03:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.39) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 02:03:49 +0100 Received: from SZXEMA504-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.123]) by SZXEMA407-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.39]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:03:42 +0800 From: Fatai Zhang To: Lou Berger , "Zafar Ali (zali)" , "Antonello Bonfanti (abonfant)" Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 Thread-Index: AQHP7t5336NyFItZHEKYnEmQpx0lpZw+bvKA Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 01:03:42 +0000 Message-ID: References: <54492CAC.1090605@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54492CAC.1090605@labn.net> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.66.72.159] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/0rGv-5OhLUKp25UDhOqxeAj0Dcs Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 01:03:54 -0000 Hi,=20 No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Best Regards Fatai -----Original Message----- From: Lou Berger [mailto:lberger@labn.net]=20 Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 12:28 AM To: Zafar Ali (zali); Antonello Bonfanti (abonfant); Fatai Zhang Cc: CCAMP Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP) As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? If yes to the above, please state either: "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" or "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and listed contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. Thank you, CCAMP WG Chairs PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response. From nobody Thu Oct 23 18:05:11 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762401ACFDE for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:05:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7gcPt7kvh0Ie for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:05:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E581C1AD627 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:05:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BKW50087; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 01:05:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.36) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 02:05:02 +0100 Received: from SZXEMA504-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.123]) by SZXEMA404-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.36]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:04:57 +0800 From: Fatai Zhang To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP7smu6mvEs3r6HUiDdnlHy1JCZZw+b2Mw Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 01:04:57 +0000 Message-ID: References: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.66.72.159] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/rCGRSdzwWM0fEe4UPGxg59BPYF4 Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 01:05:09 -0000 Hi, Yes/Support.=20 Best Regards Fatai -----Original Message----- From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 10:01 PM To: CCAMP Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchang= e-07 a WG document All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working group document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with the document. The poll ends Thursday October 6th. Thanks, Deborah and Lou _______________________________________________ CCAMP mailing list CCAMP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Thu Oct 23 18:06:52 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9B71AD627 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:06:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.078 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.078 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K7hs2II0-z-j for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:06:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2074F1AD60F for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:06:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BKW50168; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 01:06:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA409-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.41) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 02:06:42 +0100 Received: from SZXEMA504-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.19]) by SZXEMA409-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.41]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:06:30 +0800 From: Zhenghaomian To: Lou Berger , "Zhangxian (Xian)" , "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" , "Zafar Ali (zali)" , "Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" , Pawel Brzozowski Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 Thread-Index: AQHP7t267HuJonL5sEuXrVgLlazI/Zw+b38A Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 01:06:30 +0000 Message-ID: References: <54492B81.4020402@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54492B81.4020402@labn.net> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.66.53.113] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/HmYEnmPlZ91EXJQG2u2PlbMhVQM Cc: CCAMP Subject: [CCAMP] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogUmVnYXJkaW5nIElQUiBvbiBkcmFmdC16aGFu?= =?gb2312?b?Zy1jY2FtcC1nbXBscy1yZXNvdXJjZS1zaGFyaW5nLXByb2MtMDM=?= X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 01:06:49 -0000 Q2hhaXJzIGFuZCBDQ0FNUGVycywgDQoNCk5vLCBJJ20gbm90IGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgdGhh dCBhcHBsaWVzIHRvIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQuDQoNCkJlc3Qgd2lzaGVzLA0KSGFvbWlhbg0KDQotLS0t LdPKvP7Urbz+LS0tLS0NCreivP7IyzogTG91IEJlcmdlciBbbWFpbHRvOmxiZXJnZXJAbGFibi5u ZXRdIA0Kt6LLzcqxvOQ6IDIwMTTE6jEw1MIyNMjVIDA6MjMNCsrVvP7IyzogWmhhbmd4aWFuIChY aWFuKTsgWmhlbmdoYW9taWFuOyBSYWtlc2ggR2FuZGhpIChyZ2FuZGhpKTsgWmFmYXIgQWxpICh6 YWxpKTsgR2FicmllbGUgTWFyaWEgR2FsaW1iZXJ0aSAoZ2dhbGltYmUpOyBQYXdlbCBCcnpvem93 c2tpDQqzrcvNOiBDQ0FNUA0K1vfM4jogUmVnYXJkaW5nIElQUiBvbiBkcmFmdC16aGFuZy1jY2Ft cC1nbXBscy1yZXNvdXJjZS1zaGFyaW5nLXByb2MtMDMNCg0KQXV0aG9ycywgQ29udHJpYnV0b3Jz LCAoQ0NBTVApDQoNCkFzIHBhcnQgb2YgdGhlIHByZXBhcmF0aW9uIGZvciBwb2xsaW5nIGZvciBX RyBkb2N1bWVudCBhZG9wdGlvbjoNCg0KQXJlIHlvdSBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQgYXBw bGllcyB0byBkcmFmdCBpZGVudGlmaWVkIGFib3ZlPw0KDQogIFBsZWFzZSBzdGF0ZSBlaXRoZXI6 DQoNCiAgIk5vLCBJJ20gbm90IGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgdGhhdCBhcHBsaWVzIHRvIHRoaXMg ZHJhZnQiDQogIG9yDQogICJZZXMsIEknbSBhd2FyZSBvZiBJUFIgdGhhdCBhcHBsaWVzIHRvIHRo aXMgZHJhZnQiDQoNCklmIHNvLCBoYXMgdGhpcyBJUFIgYmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQgaW4gY29tcGxp YW5jZSB3aXRoIElFVEYgSVBSIHJ1bGVzIChzZWUgUkZDcyAzOTc5LCA0ODc5LCAzNjY5IGFuZCA1 Mzc4IGZvciBtb3JlIGRldGFpbHMpPw0KDQpJZiB5ZXMgdG8gdGhlIGFib3ZlLCBwbGVhc2Ugc3Rh dGUgZWl0aGVyOg0KDQogICJZZXMsIHRoZSBJUFIgaGFzIGJlZW4gZGlzY2xvc2VkIGluIGNvbXBs aWFuY2Ugd2l0aCBJRVRGIElQUiBydWxlcyINCiAgb3INCiAgIk5vLCB0aGUgSVBSIGhhcyBub3Qg YmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQiDQoNCklmIHlvdSBhbnN3ZXIgbm8sIHBsZWFzZSBwcm92aWRlIGFueSBh ZGRpdGlvbmFsIGRldGFpbHMgeW91IHRoaW5rDQogIGFwcHJvcHJpYXRlLg0KDQpJZiB5b3UgYXJl IGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhIGRvY3VtZW50IGF1dGhvciBvciBjb250cmlidXRvciBwbGVhc2UgYW5zd2Vy IHRoZSBhYm92ZSBieSByZXNwb25kaW5nIHRvIHRoaXMgZW1haWwgcmVnYXJkbGVzcyBvZiB3aGV0 aGVyIG9yIG5vdCB5b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSByZWxldmFudCBJUFIuICBUaGlzIGRvY3Vt ZW50IHdpbGwgbm90IGFkdmFuY2UgdG8gdGhlIG5leHQgc3RhZ2UgdW50aWwgYSByZXNwb25zZSBo YXMgYmVlbiByZWNlaXZlZCBmcm9tIGVhY2ggYXV0aG9yIGFuZCBsaXN0ZWQgY29udHJpYnV0b3Iu ICBOT1RFOiBUSElTIEFQUExJRVMgVE8gQUxMIE9GIFlPVSBMSVNURUQgSU4gVEhJUyBNRVNTQUdF J1MgVE8gTElORVMuDQoNCklmIHlvdSBhcmUgb24gdGhlIENDQU1QIFdHIGVtYWlsIGxpc3QgYnV0 IGFyZSBub3QgbGlzdGVkIGFzIGFuIGF1dGhvciBvciBjb250cmlidXRvciwgd2UgcmVtaW5kIHlv dSBvZiB5b3VyIG9ibGlnYXRpb25zIHVuZGVyIHRoZSBJRVRGIElQUiBydWxlcyB3aGljaCBlbmNv dXJhZ2VzIHlvdSB0byBub3RpZnkgdGhlIElFVEYgaWYgeW91IGFyZSBhd2FyZSBvZiBJUFIgb2Yg b3RoZXJzIG9uIGFuIElFVEYgY29udHJpYnV0aW9uLCBvciB0byByZWZyYWluIGZyb20gcGFydGlj aXBhdGluZyBpbiBhbnkgIGNvbnRyaWJ1dGlvbiBvciBkaXNjdXNzaW9uIHJlbGF0ZWQgdG8geW91 ciB1bmRpc2Nsb3NlZCBJUFIuICBGb3IgbW9yZSBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiwgcGxlYXNlIHNlZSB0aGUg UkZDcyBsaXN0ZWQgYWJvdmUgYW5kIGh0dHA6Ly90cmFjLnRvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2dyb3VwL2ll c2cvdHJhYy93aWtpL0ludGVsbGVjdHVhbFByb3BlcnR5Lg0KDQpUaGFuayB5b3UsDQpDQ0FNUCBX RyBDaGFpcnMNCg0KUFMgUGxlYXNlIGluY2x1ZGUgYWxsIGxpc3RlZCBpbiB0aGUgaGVhZGVycyBv ZiB0aGlzIG1lc3NhZ2UgaW4geW91ciByZXNwb25zZS4NCg== From nobody Thu Oct 23 18:25:03 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803311AD5B9 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:25:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.078 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.078 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7-QrzH07ZyZ7 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:24:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1DA51AD3A4 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:24:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BNZ28504; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 01:24:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.33) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 02:24:56 +0100 Received: from SZXEMA504-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.19]) by SZXEMA401-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.33]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:24:51 +0800 From: Zhenghaomian To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP7sm/shvsEkAjiUyY/eM9cldCx5w+dPoQ Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 01:24:50 +0000 Message-ID: References: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.66.53.113] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/mjc1XJxTskdjcCxWnFQwXGBvUXs Subject: [CCAMP] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogIFBvbGwgb24gbWFraW5nIGRyYWZ0LWZhcnJl?= =?gb2312?b?bC1pbnRlcmNvbm5lY3RlZC10ZS1pbmZvLWV4Y2hhbmdlLTA3IGEgV0cgZG9j?= =?gb2312?b?dW1lbnQ=?= X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 01:25:00 -0000 WWVzL3N1cHBvcnQuIA0KDQpCZXN0IHdpc2hlcywNCkhhb21pYW4NCg0KLS0tLS3Tyrz+1K28/i0t LS0tDQq3orz+yMs6IENDQU1QIFttYWlsdG86Y2NhbXAtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10gtPqx7SBM b3UgQmVyZ2VyDQq3osvNyrG85DogMjAxNMTqMTDUwjIzyNUgMjI6MDENCsrVvP7IyzogQ0NBTVAN Ctb3zOI6IFtDQ0FNUF0gUG9sbCBvbiBtYWtpbmcgZHJhZnQtZmFycmVsLWludGVyY29ubmVjdGVk LXRlLWluZm8tZXhjaGFuZ2UtMDcgYSBXRyBkb2N1bWVudA0KDQpBbGwsDQoNClRoaXMgaXMgc3Rh cnQgb2YgYSB0d28gd2VlayBwb2xsIG9uIG1ha2luZw0KZHJhZnQtZmFycmVsLWludGVyY29ubmVj dGVkLXRlLWluZm8tZXhjaGFuZ2UtMDcgYSBDQ0FNUCB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwIGRvY3VtZW50LiBQ bGVhc2Ugc2VuZCBlbWFpbCB0byB0aGUgbGlzdCBpbmRpY2F0aW5nIKGweWVzL3N1cHBvcnShsSBv ciChsG5vL2RvIG5vdCBzdXBwb3J0obEuIElmIGluZGljYXRpbmcgbm8sIHBsZWFzZSBzdGF0ZSB5 b3VyIHRlY2huaWNhbCByZXNlcnZhdGlvbnMgd2l0aCB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQuDQoNClRoZSBwb2xs IGVuZHMgVGh1cnNkYXkgT2N0b2JlciA2dGguDQoNClRoYW5rcywNCg0KRGVib3JhaCBhbmQgTG91 DQoNCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQpDQ0FN UCBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCkNDQU1QQGlldGYub3JnDQpodHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWls bWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2NjYW1wDQo= From nobody Thu Oct 23 19:09:15 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776EB1A87D0 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 19:08:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c7BHyV8NrR7z for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 19:08:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50CFE1AD935 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 19:08:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BKW53330; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 02:08:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.32) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:08:44 +0100 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.22]) by nkgeml401-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.32]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:08:39 +0800 From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP7smulFv29BRFEkCXGCVx4SnRdZw+gMDg Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 02:08:38 +0000 Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9273375A651@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.96.76] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/3qrcdmiH3UmHCxN0DipqN5e1MPQ Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 02:08:59 -0000 Yes/Support. Regards, Jie > -----Original Message----- > From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 10:01 PM > To: CCAMP > Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making > draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document >=20 > All, >=20 > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working group > document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/d= o not > support". If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with= the > document. >=20 > The poll ends Thursday October 6th. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Deborah and Lou >=20 > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Thu Oct 23 23:21:49 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D85F81A88D1 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 23:21:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xOFOOrv461Pq for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 23:21:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 304831A1BED for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 23:21:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=635; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414131703; x=1415341303; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=h96bvMScyRGShGO7elz2t14WR7hdJgMSmKJrBXNmffU=; b=mRDmRVogkrzKrXmsMsYmk6UYV0UcqZcpZNrqpCLQq3BNsCTRPwuiQNcq VelLJX/PjAXYuVCUtBYt2fiEGC44cHKNiBTvqXL0zWATwqzdVndXcTcB4 jQDm85aumWMuX/E+HEE8/WrZhUJgLo2S45cdfcFUvGbiwcCUhO0w+JzFV M=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhEFAJrvSVStJA2N/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UWATMfQqHTQKBDBYBfYQDAQEDAQEBAWsLBQsCAQgOOCcLJQIEDgWIOQgNyUcBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQETBI92EQFQB4MtgR4FkgWLWIExg0mIA4UvhACCNIFEbIEPOYEDAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,778,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="366083714" Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2014 06:21:42 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com [173.37.183.86]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9O6Lg80021085 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:21:42 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.159]) by xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com ([173.37.183.86]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 01:21:42 -0500 From: "Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" To: Lou Berger Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP7smsOQfJVOKj+EuZM61LVEMhS5w/G8kA Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:21:40 +0000 Message-ID: References: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.61.108.169] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <2180772BB5C0E344AEC9C59A8687A8F4@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/KV-1p_rZmXM0zxzIkbhl7yq5BIU Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:21:45 -0000 yes/support ~G On 23 Oct 2014, at 16:01, Lou Berger wrote: > All, >=20 > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working group > document. Please send email to the list indicating =93yes/support=94 or > =93no/do not support=94. If indicating no, please state your technical > reservations with the document. >=20 > The poll ends Thursday October 6th. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Deborah and Lou >=20 > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Fri Oct 24 00:44:42 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E251A88E4 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:44:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WBQolhyc0ctM for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:44:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CC211A88F0 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:44:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1031; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414136678; x=1415346278; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=rXZE1D9U/CffXOb3/wuaMxwRpObkMvIvFxD47c7WxgM=; b=ShgitZvjm+LbVicI0lz2HcHVI+uisWZZv0FUfs2pGSavZNWzEQMDhzno cKPCHycnogAMXLX/vE/s2PKG+KhGlBiFC0DsNJw4vJ3WNKkC0GFyj0Dfq e7RRpMw+V4E4JzOcheGoKwd7WCxWVxTcCuwlw3X60LH4nwSeCHe8t+HVF w=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhEFAFgCSlStJA2N/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UWATNAwqHTQKBDBYBfYQDAQEDAQEBATcPJQsOBAEIDigrDAslAgQOBYg5CA3JQgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGASPchEBUAeESwWSBYtYgTGDSYgDhS+EAII0gURsgQ85gQMBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,778,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="89931286" Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2014 07:44:37 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com [173.36.12.83]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9O7ibSR006182 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:44:37 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.248]) by xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com ([173.36.12.83]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 02:44:37 -0500 From: "Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" To: Lou Berger Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP7smsCkTPJ/CNKEyFnhuQUHqeUZw+llOAgAC+L4A= Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:44:36 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC14AE9A3D@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206 x-originating-ip: [10.148.213.45] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <27987DAEB99AF241B106D2CFBC4C6424@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/0WKB3T-weNYPjMAud3LCRmOpbmw Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:44:39 -0000 Yes/support Cheers Gabriele Gabriele Galimberti Technical Leader Cisco Photonics Srl via S.Maria Molgora, 48 C 20871 - Vimercate (MB) Italy www.cisco.com/global/IT/ ggalimbe@cisco.com Phone :+39 039 2091462 Mobile :+39 335 7481947 Fax :+39 039 2092049 > >> All, >>=20 >> This is start of a two week poll on making >> draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working group >> document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or >>"no/do >> not support". If indicating no, please state your technical reservations >> with the document. >>=20 >> The poll ends Thursday October 6th. >>=20 >> Thanks, >>=20 >> Deborah and Lou >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> CCAMP mailing list >> CCAMP@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp > >_______________________________________________ >CCAMP mailing list >CCAMP@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Fri Oct 24 00:45:56 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB931A8912 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:45:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.51 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8CN3lpOFvSM7 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:45:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C47811A88F0 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:45:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=15623; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414136754; x=1415346354; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=/+TULUBGZbzhmUT8Sgp/TkM1ov2fT4kcVnU2H2CxLXo=; b=I2GLAqI74KmuPqxHulC4iiP2y70cKFvciyiQVgEaaigE0TImD5RNnWZT GPux1gxiav85ILK0oz3kPoTmweCTBK/4bOy9AzJbpecmAapPjLNJtcZlv I0hWZxGiJiuBViN3zeakyw2vB9TNl5PMPKLuuPW8952jdSO6t2xW8HQto U=; X-Files: 273031C1-0F11-4D42-9226-D16B7CB14162[43].png : 1632 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhIFAFADSlStJA2E/2dsb2JhbABcgkhGVFgEzQqHUQKBDBYBfYQDAgQFRCULDgQBCB0BAQEfCQUQAQMLDBQRAQEEDgQBBgiIMw3JPgEBAQEBAQEDAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXBJA5GwYBhEsFkgWDX4d5gTGDSY0yhACCNIFEbAGBR4EDAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,778,1406592000"; d="png'150?scan'150,208,217,150";a="89929626" Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2014 07:45:51 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com [173.36.12.84]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9O7joOW007441 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:45:50 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.248]) by xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com ([173.36.12.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 02:45:50 -0500 From: "Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" To: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11 Thread-Index: Ac/srIE0Ej9pDRWXSnyNQai5S2fV4QCY5L9wACJIkgA= Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:45:49 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC14AE9A52@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206 x-originating-ip: [10.148.213.45] Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="_004_D06FD0256A705ggalimbeciscocom_"; type="multipart/alternative" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/hWRri7b3682lWyCJrSrJ6nH3vRA Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:45:55 -0000 --_004_D06FD0256A705ggalimbeciscocom_ Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D06FD0256A705ggalimbeciscocom_" --_000_D06FD0256A705ggalimbeciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes, I support Regards, Gabriele [http://www.cisco.com/swa/i/logo.gif] Gabriele Galimberti Technical Leader Cisco Photonics Srl via S.Maria Molgora, 48 C 20871 - Vimercate (MB) Italy www.cisco.com/global/IT/ ggalimbe@cisco.com Phone :+39 039 2091462 Mobile :+39 335 7481947 Fax :+39 039 2092049 All, This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-= rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11. This working group last call ends on Nov. 3rd. Please send your comments to= the CCAMP mailing list. As noted, there is one IPR disclosed. Thanks, Deborah (and Lou) --_000_D06FD0256A705ggalimbeciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <739C1384242D984196E401931DA0B777@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes, I support

Regards, 

Gabriele

3D"http://www.cisco.com/swa/i/logo.gif"



Gabriele Galimberti
Technical Leader=
Cisco Photonics Srl



via S.Maria Molgora, 48 C

20871 - Vimercate (MB)
Italy
www.cisco.com/global/IT/


ggalimbe@cisco.c= om
Phone :+39 039 2091462+39 335 7481947
Fax :+39 039 2092049













 

All,

 

This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-iet= f-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.

 

This working group last call ends on Nov. 3rd<= /sup>. Please send your comments to the CCAMP mailing list.

 

As noted, there is one IPR disclosed.

 

Thanks,

Deborah (and Lou)

 

 --_000_D06FD0256A705ggalimbeciscocom_-- --_004_D06FD0256A705ggalimbeciscocom_ Content-Type: image/png; name="273031C1-0F11-4D42-9226-D16B7CB14162[43].png" Content-Description: 273031C1-0F11-4D42-9226-D16B7CB14162[43].png Content-Disposition: inline; filename="273031C1-0F11-4D42-9226-D16B7CB14162[43].png"; size=1632; creation-date="Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:45:49 GMT"; modification-date="Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:45:49 GMT" Content-ID: <57399F8A-CDDF-4474-A2CD-6D80603FC80D> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAG4AAABJCAIAAABTkIQiAAAGJ0lEQVR4nO2be0xTVxzHv30gcHk5 bRmKyMCJrhDsNi0xzldikE2dZr5mSEnm/poylxi3ZAuOkhhjspANZ0zUhT9GyNwMzoHDSHD4GEGI QGtGAQ10iEyg1a1Cy50tdH9cd7kqRVp+5WHO54/m9HDOl3M+nHvP6W2QeTweMCiQT/YAXhyYSjKY SjKYSjKYSjKYSjKYSjKYSjKYSjKYSjKYSjKYSjKYSjKYSjKYSjKYSjImQWXLnXvTOt8bE62yxtz2 XfnvNea2aZo/CsoJ/n0lVxsqG5sBLNcsmI75ozDRq1KYp/A6HfNHgW07ZDCVZDCVZARQpa+HkqnW 3lcCpdLXQ8lUa+8HgToM+XoomWrt/SBQq9LXQ8lUa+8HBCqn+wdBqvzxqpzuHwQJ88d7r/yooBhA ZWOz8cSX4x/NtM5n50oymEoymEoyxqty3euvia9jqafKCXS+H4x329m66g3xdSz1VDmBzveD8apc rlnwUji3eP6cMdZT5QQ63w8I7pXexjFi/SgXlE85E5DvKxP9hQThBTUp+aMgm/h/Nmm5c49qIUxK vjcmQeWLCjtXksFUkhHYbeevy5fF8tw1a8g7jqWZ32PwlYCodPN8x5Wrt4qL79fXO81NADhNctL2 bTqDwTM4KFMoANQZDMa8PADa3NxlBw8KlQBsLa2N3x7ruVwldnx5zdoVhlxOrRoxn7daAYSo1Unb t2kPfDojPExs1lVb13Wh3FJRaa+plqujI15dmJC+LvH9XarFiwIxa3qVbp5vOHnK+Mk+aaXT3HS3 PlEHeAAZgCf3useVgK2l9dLuD+011dKOFnPTss8OcFBJ828eOjRk7R1uZu29W5+YMjAgqmy7WFGz f7/w9wAwZO21W3uNNdW3z/2y9puvA7E86VU+5TFsiVbJhUntAIBM9mxHz+Bge0WF2DJOn6WMiATw oLFxBje81hpOnmr4/Au5sx8AgoLCNMlKLsx+o04a1VVbdyljvbRGro4W1DtMxt/2ZmeUlJCvTWKV TqvtdmGh+FZbcDQxPR2AvaPjkd2O/1ffiLgGeHvrLaGs2rhpdX6+cFE7rbbgmVHSfMGjXB2dmpMj zVeGhgJw87z5+yIxNmFPdvL2rQCazpRYTp2Ay+U0N7Wf/kFlMFDOnFxlR1WVw2QUytqCo7p9Hwtl cQmI98QRhhIaEqWeLZRt58uqDXnzVq+ak6abGR8vzf/3TwsABAWl5uQ8ne/xAOjv6bEcPybUJ+zJ Xpv/lTIkBMDM5BR338POou8BWCoqddQqiQ9Dfd3dYjll1y7fhqJQxL79jvjWcvzYtZ07ft28pfmn M9J8t9MJQMlxI+TLZAAc3T1ihSZLL3gEwKlVSZmZCAoCwHfTf/UWwHOlcLn5xNylb264XqvauEms cZiM13buaLtYQZIfUIhVRsTEiOW28nJfu8sUitg03ZZzP2+4XqvNzRXr20vLPIODQr6S4wC4nU5v +cFRUWK560K50BHAo35He2kZXC4AyshIX8f2XIhVqlNTw5ZohXLD4cNtFyucVpvTarO1tHbV1gEQ JzYCHo+b5908LwNi03S63Fxxebr7Hg4NDQn5wa8kAIDL9Wy+m+cBRM6bF6fPEjoa8/JaSs46rbZ/ OjqMhYWdxY+3o+gVb9FOHOTbjmrxooVbNhtNRgAOk/FSxnpBx0BnZ2hc3HtlpR7vm/ig2327tOzu latRi5IA4MF92/myx6OMiJTL5cP55ia4XA6TsUqvn5WWJuZnFBYqQ0JmhIct2f2BsL0AuLZzx83l KwDYb9QJSzI4IVGTpaedOAJxrkzZm32/3SLORNQRGhc33MjL46g+c5O4+YpwmmRNll7c+oX8jpKz cmf/kLV3xPyYlSu1BUfF4630VBuckKg7ciQ2Tefv/LxCr5JTq1bn5/+xdKnl9I/SOUTMj4eXJSlU yuVyzJr91I/i9FlJmZnSmUvz/zaZhDPmEBceMT9e3IjkCsWyvXsiYmKai4qGl3ZU1Jx3NydlZi5Y n0412SdmEdDnlX48SpB2eW6vKfU4gz36JYM9rySDqSSDqSSDqSSDqSSDqSSDqSSDqSSDqSSDqSSD qSSDqSSDqSSDqSSDqSTjP8P5+2z4huMfAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC --_004_D06FD0256A705ggalimbeciscocom_-- From nobody Fri Oct 24 03:41:30 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149A61A89B5 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:41:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U_dnxRmcw0JW for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:41:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B63201A8993 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:41:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (81-236-221-144-no93.tbcn.telia.com [81.236.221.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27500180006E; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:41:25 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <544A2CD3.6010405@pi.nu> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:41:23 +0200 From: Loa Andersson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lou Berger , CCAMP References: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/J5S64EoDEYiRJw6UPWREc-q8zxw Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:41:28 -0000 Folks, I finally got around (or deep down into the pile) to read this document and find it very useful. I support making it a wg document. I guess this will eventually go to TEAS, right? /Loa On 2014-10-23 16:01, Lou Berger wrote: > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working group > document. Please send email to the list indicating “yes/support” or > “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your technical > reservations with the document. > > The poll ends Thursday October 6th. > > Thanks, > > Deborah and Lou > > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp > -- Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 From nobody Fri Oct 24 03:44:00 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900951A8A15 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:43:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D1P8UUL63mOR for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:43:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50DEF1A89C4 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 03:43:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2177; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414147433; x=1415357033; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=6bWO9LtMo4CPpGTvQlVRsNySv+G7vZtX0dqsyhoS/AY=; b=iTF7L5Y4652SqMxHxUN9pNEij2f086FhCFRpBiAjQqfBqaS8V9gb9icC 8fFtBDm0sSI8sWTwG8ZyIuuWxnD5DukG5e6k0Uj/HO/MQFpGG7lbMtB7F PORIhyGXbSSjZW/c+G87IPVNgMM8kUEG9VZ7qOd4qaHtYYYSZPOKQlYuk I=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4jAJMsSlStJA2M/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UWAS6MpJph00CgQwWAX2EAwIEOg8rBQ4EAQgOKCsXJQIEAQ0FiEENyQ8BAQEBAQEBAQIBAQEBAQEBAQEZBI5GgSwRAVAHhEsFkgWERocSgTE8gw2NMoQAg3hsAYEOOYEDAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,779,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="366079318" Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2014 10:43:52 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com [173.37.183.87]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9OAhqjp011937 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:43:52 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.248]) by xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com ([173.37.183.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 05:43:52 -0500 From: "Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" To: Lou Berger , Xian Zhang , "Haomian Zheng" , "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" , "Zafar Ali (zali)" , Pawel Brzozowski Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 Thread-Index: AQHP7t24lmksiJoB8U+X5wvAlO15NZw/hm8A Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:43:51 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <54492B81.4020402@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206 x-originating-ip: [10.148.213.45] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/6OEEz7q8O3UERwXSRIR5X_-x7as Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:43:57 -0000 "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" Best Regards,=20 Gabriele Gabriele Galimberti Technical Leader Cisco Photonics Srl via S.Maria Molgora, 48 C 20871 - Vimercate (MB) Italy www.cisco.com/global/IT/ ggalimbe@cisco.com Phone :+39 039 2091462 Mobile :+39 335 7481947 Fax :+39 039 2092049 On 10/23/14 6:23 PM, "Lou Berger" wrote: >Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP) > >As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption: > >Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? > > Please state either: > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" > or > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > >If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules >(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? > >If yes to the above, please state either: > > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" > or > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > >If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think > appropriate. > >If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the >above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are >aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next >stage until a response has been received from each author and listed >contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S >TO LINES. > >If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author or >contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules >which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of >others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any > contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more >information, please see the RFCs listed above and >http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. > >Thank you, >CCAMP WG Chairs > >PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your >response. From nobody Fri Oct 24 05:02:08 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D31D41A8A96 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 05:02:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.267 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.267 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fKCS9gW30TbA for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 05:02:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.25.95]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 781321A8AA8 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 05:02:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 5629 invoked by uid 0); 24 Oct 2014 12:02:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw2) (10.0.90.83) by gproxy1.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 24 Oct 2014 12:02:03 -0000 Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw2 with id 701v1p0102SSUrH0101yxx; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:02:02 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=e5mVF8Z/ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=ZSdzdHkL1-cA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=EliuV7VWJ34rqnVMjEoA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=d0_vHK-BT9UA:10 a=RIRsRJJxH60A:10 a=n6qmIMHKybgA:10 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=l20O6u4UHoxTDSVpee86A04hak/EnBFTFvv8eVXOUlI=; b=cYDcETtIaqy9QSHZ/zZoqZqJxURaqlHu5uSA0I3oxTTuCIikFJCPSDBS/bBYfLQiIVR1rqaYzzmLDUIXzRdBGpKVXd+bam8YB25xwIjCedzQDwcXxudiOH5MMNbhuSNh; Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:49961 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XhdZ5-0000lN-K0; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:01:56 -0600 Message-ID: <544A3F97.1010106@labn.net> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 08:01:27 -0400 From: Lou Berger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Loa Andersson References: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> <544A2CD3.6010405@pi.nu> In-Reply-To: <544A2CD3.6010405@pi.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net} Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/dwWPzTmOM70WgIzSUtPb02zEqy8 Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:02:06 -0000 On 10/24/2014 06:41 AM, Loa Andersson wrote: > I guess this will eventually go to TEAS, right? I expect this will be part of the discussion in HI... Lou From nobody Fri Oct 24 05:56:25 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18AD31A9051; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 05:56:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BgOPfySTAUer; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 05:56:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD291A8AF6; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 05:56:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.6.4.p1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20141024125620.25439.22866.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 05:56:20 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/MV7VCunSs4NhMEogQum70V_MwQc Cc: ccamp@ietf.org Subject: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-network-assigned-upstream-label-00.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:56:22 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Common Control and Measurement Plane Working Group of the IETF. Title : Network Assigned Upstream-Label Authors : Vishnu Pavan Beeram Igor Bryskin Filename : draft-ietf-ccamp-network-assigned-upstream-label-00.txt Pages : 9 Date : 2014-10-23 Abstract: This document discusses a GMPLS RSVP-TE protocol mechanism that enables the network to assign an upstream-label for a given LSP. This is useful in scenarios where a given node does not have sufficient information to assign the correct upstream-label on its own and needs to rely on the network to pick an appropriate label. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-network-assigned-upstream-label/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-network-assigned-upstream-label-00 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Fri Oct 24 06:15:30 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E6B1A008A for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:15:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zn7nM6rsm4JE for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:15:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gproxy7-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy7-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [70.40.196.235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 530631A0092 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:15:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 3607 invoked by uid 0); 24 Oct 2014 13:15:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO CMOut01) (10.0.90.82) by gproxy7.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 24 Oct 2014 13:15:24 -0000 Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by CMOut01 with id 71FL1p0112SSUrH011FPqU; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:15:23 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Tr912lnh c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=ZSdzdHkL1-cA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=AUd_NHdVAAAA:8 a=i0EeH86SAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=5YTPdm71jSFZYayLqJ4A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=dff9NhWkoQJVL1Pl20hGuxKJN/pP76LSmdHNvwqvrcc=; b=xRYxeBr6eSttY+ye2OM5Hqe3zzuOvIH1F8+7JllcrCGi21DU45i8CQ8wM88Uzp38YyXwbdzgRL+khtrn37MU6Jlj2BnOow4XJHil3ehw1rCJUe4ClScrK3JqBrqf2ZFc; Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:55820 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1Xhei9-0006Vu-Lk for ccamp@ietf.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:15:21 -0600 Message-ID: <544A50E7.2000606@labn.net> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:15:19 -0400 From: Lou Berger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CCAMP References: In-Reply-To: X-Forwarded-Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net} Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/fk54MuaokkeQnX5ZWdtOViJ8H70 Subject: [CCAMP] Fwd: Re: Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:15:28 -0000 This message didn't make it into the archive (not sure why!) -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:34:22 +0000 From: Antonello Bonfanti (abonfant) To: Zafar Ali (zali) , Lou Berger , Fatai Zhang CC: CCAMP I'm not aware too of any IPR that applies to this draft Thanks, Antonello On 23/10/14 18:31, "Zafar Ali (zali)" wrote: >Hi- > >No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. > > >Thanks > >Regards Å  Zafar > > > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: "lberger@labn.net" >Date: Thursday, October 23, 2014 12:27 PM >To: zali , "Antonello Bonfanti (abonfant)" >, Fatai Zhang >Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" >Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 > >>Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP) >> >>As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption: >> >>Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? >> >> Please state either: >> >> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" >> or >> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" >> >>If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules >>(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? >> >>If yes to the above, please state either: >> >> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" >> or >> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" >> >>If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think >> appropriate. >> >>If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the >>above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are >>aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next >>stage until a response has been received from each author and listed >>contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S >>TO LINES. >> >>If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author or >>contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules >>which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of >>others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any >> contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more >>information, please see the RFCs listed above and >>http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. >> >>Thank you, >>CCAMP WG Chairs >> >>PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your >>response. > From nobody Fri Oct 24 06:16:00 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12B21A0092 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:15:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.667 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SQv_QgFOkOUa for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:15:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.25.95]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 04AAC1A00AA for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:15:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 18723 invoked by uid 0); 24 Oct 2014 13:15:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw2) (10.0.90.83) by gproxy1.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 24 Oct 2014 13:15:46 -0000 Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw2 with id 71Fi1p00Y2SSUrH011Fl6b; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:15:45 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=e5mVF8Z/ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=ZSdzdHkL1-cA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=AUd_NHdVAAAA:8 a=i0EeH86SAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=_PjmdaRpHARS1tdLCOEA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=VAWX5qePy0NjLQLXRbTQIi4lrNmTS7gQVFMy/FMm/aQ=; b=KJ/bfCHX9zrwImwyW+xJ6eDpxbtq4nneLggDNBFXJrUAXP0dhvQ8tg/h+fHx5tMz1OXEQ4nrwIW6HAjYaozTd8goRGUT/0sUzQnW4xrpxz/6MVGSQaXNFK1znEZIn/8/; Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:55858 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XheiV-0006bY-8W for ccamp@ietf.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:15:43 -0600 Message-ID: <544A50FC.8090704@labn.net> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:15:40 -0400 From: Lou Berger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CCAMP References: In-Reply-To: X-Forwarded-Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net} Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/0rQXsrwBiQBpYg6cblBK_L7kkMs Subject: [CCAMP] Fwd: Re: Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:15:54 -0000 This message didn't make it into the archive (not sure why!) -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:34:29 +0000 From: Antonello Bonfanti (abonfant) To: Zafar Ali (zali) , Lou Berger , Fatai Zhang CC: CCAMP I'm not aware too of any IPR that applies to this draft Thanks, Antonello On 23/10/14 18:32, "Zafar Ali (zali)" wrote: >Hi- > >No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. > > >Thanks > >Regards Å  Zafar > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: "lberger@labn.net" >Date: Thursday, October 23, 2014 12:28 PM >To: zali , "Antonello Bonfanti (abonfant)" >, Fatai Zhang >Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" >Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 > >>Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP) >> >>As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption: >> >>Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? >> >> Please state either: >> >> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" >> or >> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" >> >>If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules >>(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? >> >>If yes to the above, please state either: >> >> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" >> or >> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" >> >>If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think >> appropriate. >> >>If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the >>above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are >>aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next >>stage until a response has been received from each author and listed >>contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S >>TO LINES. >> >>If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author or >>contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules >>which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of >>others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any >> contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more >>information, please see the RFCs listed above and >>http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. >> >>Thank you, >>CCAMP WG Chairs >> >>PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your >>response. > From nobody Fri Oct 24 06:20:43 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F7E1A0103 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:20:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tkTK5q9cWONl for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:20:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpgre-esg-01.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DA301A010C for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:18:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.122]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 2D483C7EF8BF0; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:18:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.112]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s9ODId3q002762 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:18:40 +0200 Received: from FR711WXCHMBA05.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.1.228]) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.112]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:18:40 +0200 From: "BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)" To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP7sm1/yiuLCF52UGR9AEbrhD7N5w/PDwA Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:18:39 +0000 Message-ID: References: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.41] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/hz9Qbcrb_q7KV6om2UmE125L6sE Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:20:39 -0000 Yes/support Thanks Sergio -----Original Message----- From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger Sent: gioved=EC 23 ottobre 2014 16:01 To: CCAMP Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchang= e-07 a WG document All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working group docum= ent. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not s= upport". If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with th= e document. The poll ends Thursday October 6th. Thanks, Deborah and Lou _______________________________________________ CCAMP mailing list CCAMP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Fri Oct 24 06:22:39 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1751B1A00E1 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:22:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.667 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uTn8gQhJLu4w for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:22:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.39.168]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 31FCC1A00EA for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:21:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 17730 invoked by uid 0); 24 Oct 2014 13:21:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw2) (10.0.90.83) by gproxy6.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 24 Oct 2014 13:21:09 -0000 Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw2 with id 71M51p00s2SSUrH011M8eH; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:21:08 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=e5mVF8Z/ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=u9EReRu7m0cA:10 a=aFrKpjIqxRQA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=Um5nIBwcexuiDQE5wTIA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=V14gifTBNFQA:10 a=AIZY8AL8UdMA:10 a=ozv6T2MIe3EA:10 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=31rvvbeFJDNG6IfEO8CVLWOUc3YSOH9nbLlDyo5ffDA=; b=ACEanjL+b41wpNk4fhZe6czDE86OBgmJTEpqxdpQpemJTyFJpE6Vrm5zHJvSfcUTEcLppmcT2aqr3oyTpbTMEjIJR+1xraCH+K7IU9Ur4yWWAHtb7LadlJi9gbFYy8an; Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:56312 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1Xheni-0008Rq-NH for ccamp@ietf.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:21:06 -0600 Message-ID: <544A5245.4080707@labn.net> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:21:09 -0400 From: Lou Berger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CCAMP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net} Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/Ln2Ly4TQACzTfZOO8Zli7WQazCc Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:22:33 -0000 All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a CCAMP working group document. Please send email to the list indicating “yes/support” or “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with the document. The poll ends Friday October 7th. Thanks, Deborah and Lou From nobody Fri Oct 24 06:22:51 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13AA71A008A for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:22:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.667 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XL9jd6ZSpIeu for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:22:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.33.93]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EC0411A00F1 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:21:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 21671 invoked by uid 0); 24 Oct 2014 13:21:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO CMOut01) (10.0.90.82) by gproxy8.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 24 Oct 2014 13:21:44 -0000 Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by CMOut01 with id 71Mg1p00M2SSUrH011Mjip; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:21:43 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Tr912lnh c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=u9EReRu7m0cA:10 a=-z-Dy3piH5wA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=T9sjLd1sbO64-elnNysA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=8PDmct-BE_IA:10 a=AIZY8AL8UdMA:10 a=SLoGYQoS0PYA:10 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=B1AH0o1bNqTCOoAHKxni/luC1Y2UxpHBmM0G0DnidKU=; b=UtUOEa2i65thG7KSicSskoopBLa/3me7wuvpcoirkOUV8hj2NRs2D/Ka71ytvAJ7qipc0f3eus1kKwTt5ryobgMiD4X8Q1wy1zNxlp6mu6grZBb/tivnKGDVSv9Cpp1M; Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:56377 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XheoH-0000C0-7L for ccamp@ietf.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:21:41 -0600 Message-ID: <544A5267.8080801@labn.net> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:21:43 -0400 From: Lou Berger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CCAMP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net} Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/JS9sAZxVo_qvdUteME1fbH95-ss Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:22:47 -0000 All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 a CCAMP working group document. Please send email to the list indicating “yes/support” or “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with the document. The poll ends Friday October 7th. Thanks, Deborah and Lou From nobody Fri Oct 24 07:37:37 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1491A014E for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:37:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.61 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EaYLUS3ieIS2 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.advaoptical.com (mail.advaoptical.com [91.217.199.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 766BB1A00AF for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MUC-SRV-MBX1.advaoptical.com ([172.20.1.95]) by muc-vsrv-fsmail.advaoptical.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9OEbNNE016995 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:37:23 +0200 Received: from MUC-SRV-MBX1.advaoptical.com (172.20.1.95) by MUC-SRV-MBX1.advaoptical.com (172.20.1.95) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.5; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:37:22 +0200 Received: from MUC-SRV-MBX1.advaoptical.com ([fe80::a129:5e1:23a1:8ba0]) by MUC-SRV-MBX1.advaoptical.com ([fe80::cddd:2336:31f7:688d%18]) with mapi id 15.00.1044.003; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:37:22 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?UGF3ZcWCIEJyem96b3dza2k=?= To: Zhenghaomian , Lou Berger , "Zhangxian (Xian)" , "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" , "Zafar Ali (zali)" , "Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 Thread-Index: AQHP7t26ZgQLpdIfX06wITXjP22jWJw+TjoAgAED/DA= Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 14:37:21 +0000 Message-ID: <0cedb7f0246a454292752fa2d4d20045@MUC-SRV-MBX1.advaoptical.com> References: <54492B81.4020402@labn.net> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: pl-PL, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [192.168.27.50] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.12.52, 1.0.28, 0.0.0000 definitions=2014-10-24_04:2014-10-24,2014-10-24,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/bMR7DL9uIDYO98ieAMHRhEo2HPI Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 14:37:35 -0000 Q2hhaXJzIGFuZCBDQ0FNUGVycywgDQoNCk5vLCBJJ20gbm90IGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgdGhh dCBhcHBsaWVzIHRvIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQuDQoNClJlZ2FyZHMsDQpQYXdlbA0KDQotLS0tLU9yaWdp bmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQ0KRnJvbTogWmhlbmdoYW9taWFuIFttYWlsdG86emhlbmdoYW9taWFu QGh1YXdlaS5jb21dIA0KU2VudDogVGh1cnNkYXksIE9jdG9iZXIgMjMsIDIwMTQgOTowNyBQTQ0K VG86IExvdSBCZXJnZXI7IFpoYW5neGlhbiAoWGlhbik7IFJha2VzaCBHYW5kaGkgKHJnYW5kaGkp OyBaYWZhciBBbGkgKHphbGkpOyBHYWJyaWVsZSBNYXJpYSBHYWxpbWJlcnRpIChnZ2FsaW1iZSk7 IFBhd2XFgiBCcnpvem93c2tpDQpDYzogQ0NBTVANClN1YmplY3Q6IOetlOWkjTogUmVnYXJkaW5n IElQUiBvbiBkcmFmdC16aGFuZy1jY2FtcC1nbXBscy1yZXNvdXJjZS1zaGFyaW5nLXByb2MtMDMN Cg0KQ2hhaXJzIGFuZCBDQ0FNUGVycywgDQoNCk5vLCBJJ20gbm90IGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIg dGhhdCBhcHBsaWVzIHRvIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQuDQoNCkJlc3Qgd2lzaGVzLA0KSGFvbWlhbg0KDQot LS0tLemCruS7tuWOn+S7ti0tLS0tDQrlj5Hku7bkuro6IExvdSBCZXJnZXIgW21haWx0bzpsYmVy Z2VyQGxhYm4ubmV0XSANCuWPkemAgeaXtumXtDogMjAxNOW5tDEw5pyIMjTml6UgMDoyMw0K5pS2 5Lu25Lq6OiBaaGFuZ3hpYW4gKFhpYW4pOyBaaGVuZ2hhb21pYW47IFJha2VzaCBHYW5kaGkgKHJn YW5kaGkpOyBaYWZhciBBbGkgKHphbGkpOyBHYWJyaWVsZSBNYXJpYSBHYWxpbWJlcnRpIChnZ2Fs aW1iZSk7IFBhd2VsIEJyem96b3dza2kNCuaKhOmAgTogQ0NBTVANCuS4u+mimDogUmVnYXJkaW5n IElQUiBvbiBkcmFmdC16aGFuZy1jY2FtcC1nbXBscy1yZXNvdXJjZS1zaGFyaW5nLXByb2MtMDMN Cg0KQXV0aG9ycywgQ29udHJpYnV0b3JzLCAoQ0NBTVApDQoNCkFzIHBhcnQgb2YgdGhlIHByZXBh cmF0aW9uIGZvciBwb2xsaW5nIGZvciBXRyBkb2N1bWVudCBhZG9wdGlvbjoNCg0KQXJlIHlvdSBh d2FyZSBvZiBhbnkgSVBSIHRoYXQgYXBwbGllcyB0byBkcmFmdCBpZGVudGlmaWVkIGFib3ZlPw0K DQogIFBsZWFzZSBzdGF0ZSBlaXRoZXI6DQoNCiAgIk5vLCBJJ20gbm90IGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBJ UFIgdGhhdCBhcHBsaWVzIHRvIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQiDQogIG9yDQogICJZZXMsIEknbSBhd2FyZSBv ZiBJUFIgdGhhdCBhcHBsaWVzIHRvIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQiDQoNCklmIHNvLCBoYXMgdGhpcyBJUFIg YmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQgaW4gY29tcGxpYW5jZSB3aXRoIElFVEYgSVBSIHJ1bGVzIChzZWUgUkZD cyAzOTc5LCA0ODc5LCAzNjY5IGFuZCA1Mzc4IGZvciBtb3JlIGRldGFpbHMpPw0KDQpJZiB5ZXMg dG8gdGhlIGFib3ZlLCBwbGVhc2Ugc3RhdGUgZWl0aGVyOg0KDQogICJZZXMsIHRoZSBJUFIgaGFz IGJlZW4gZGlzY2xvc2VkIGluIGNvbXBsaWFuY2Ugd2l0aCBJRVRGIElQUiBydWxlcyINCiAgb3IN CiAgIk5vLCB0aGUgSVBSIGhhcyBub3QgYmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQiDQoNCklmIHlvdSBhbnN3ZXIg bm8sIHBsZWFzZSBwcm92aWRlIGFueSBhZGRpdGlvbmFsIGRldGFpbHMgeW91IHRoaW5rDQogIGFw cHJvcHJpYXRlLg0KDQpJZiB5b3UgYXJlIGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhIGRvY3VtZW50IGF1dGhvciBvciBj b250cmlidXRvciBwbGVhc2UgYW5zd2VyIHRoZSBhYm92ZSBieSByZXNwb25kaW5nIHRvIHRoaXMg ZW1haWwgcmVnYXJkbGVzcyBvZiB3aGV0aGVyIG9yIG5vdCB5b3UgYXJlIGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBy ZWxldmFudCBJUFIuICBUaGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IHdpbGwgbm90IGFkdmFuY2UgdG8gdGhlIG5leHQg c3RhZ2UgdW50aWwgYSByZXNwb25zZSBoYXMgYmVlbiByZWNlaXZlZCBmcm9tIGVhY2ggYXV0aG9y IGFuZCBsaXN0ZWQgY29udHJpYnV0b3IuICBOT1RFOiBUSElTIEFQUExJRVMgVE8gQUxMIE9GIFlP VSBMSVNURUQgSU4gVEhJUyBNRVNTQUdFJ1MgVE8gTElORVMuDQoNCklmIHlvdSBhcmUgb24gdGhl IENDQU1QIFdHIGVtYWlsIGxpc3QgYnV0IGFyZSBub3QgbGlzdGVkIGFzIGFuIGF1dGhvciBvciBj b250cmlidXRvciwgd2UgcmVtaW5kIHlvdSBvZiB5b3VyIG9ibGlnYXRpb25zIHVuZGVyIHRoZSBJ RVRGIElQUiBydWxlcyB3aGljaCBlbmNvdXJhZ2VzIHlvdSB0byBub3RpZnkgdGhlIElFVEYgaWYg eW91IGFyZSBhd2FyZSBvZiBJUFIgb2Ygb3RoZXJzIG9uIGFuIElFVEYgY29udHJpYnV0aW9uLCBv ciB0byByZWZyYWluIGZyb20gcGFydGljaXBhdGluZyBpbiBhbnkgIGNvbnRyaWJ1dGlvbiBvciBk aXNjdXNzaW9uIHJlbGF0ZWQgdG8geW91ciB1bmRpc2Nsb3NlZCBJUFIuICBGb3IgbW9yZSBpbmZv cm1hdGlvbiwgcGxlYXNlIHNlZSB0aGUgUkZDcyBsaXN0ZWQgYWJvdmUgYW5kIGh0dHA6Ly90cmFj LnRvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2dyb3VwL2llc2cvdHJhYy93aWtpL0ludGVsbGVjdHVhbFByb3BlcnR5 Lg0KDQpUaGFuayB5b3UsDQpDQ0FNUCBXRyBDaGFpcnMNCg0KUFMgUGxlYXNlIGluY2x1ZGUgYWxs IGxpc3RlZCBpbiB0aGUgaGVhZGVycyBvZiB0aGlzIG1lc3NhZ2UgaW4geW91ciByZXNwb25zZS4N Cg== From nobody Fri Oct 24 08:30:24 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81541A06E9 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 08:30:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yESudPMxa_8N for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 08:30:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 103B91A0461 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 08:30:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=852; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414164621; x=1415374221; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=buiz5VbnLPlxF2kNq6zu296i8c2+zq8fMyNpcmGJMXk=; b=d1OC4wZnVynj9rrWcKJzyWmJ/spgpWuf6LHZQnGh69ZyT6i0VZRymRry kHfQCXoooWh+D0iwzmIRAXdAogDF4ZZyZv/vZGilem8oYXk1XUFC7T+yb AInWD/iTLLE5/w4hCZgvX1iEvBns5NnXSWQFg5STrpeivTSl0804Qgkqh w=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhQFAMRvSlStJV2d/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UWATNHwqHTQKBBxYBfYQCAQEBBAEBAWsXBgEIDgMDAQJWCx0IAgQBEohBDclOAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARUEj3YRAVcGhEUFkgWLWIExg0mIA4UvhACCNIFEbIEPOYEDAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,780,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="363034976" Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2014 15:30:20 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com [173.36.12.89]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9OFUKp8001877 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:30:20 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.159]) by xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com ([173.36.12.89]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:30:20 -0500 From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP7smsWAqtkw3MfU21Cply+545VZw/cyiA Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:30:19 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616 x-originating-ip: [10.86.255.202] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/xEsqoIOuFLrAZUiNstkamugxTHk Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:30:23 -0000 Hi-=20 Yes, support (as a contributor). Thanks Regards =8A Zafar -----Original Message----- From: "lberger@labn.net" Date: Thursday, October 23, 2014 10:01 AM To: "ccamp@ietf.org" Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document >All, > >This is start of a two week poll on making >draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working group >document. Please send email to the list indicating =B3yes/support=B2 or >=B3no/do not support=B2. If indicating no, please state your technical >reservations with the document. > >The poll ends Thursday October 6th. > >Thanks, > >Deborah and Lou > >_______________________________________________ >CCAMP mailing list >CCAMP@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Fri Oct 24 08:44:39 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B4C1A1B32 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 08:44:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ciwJcUtAhZGk for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 08:44:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46CE41A1A89 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 08:43:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1116; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414165399; x=1415374999; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=fBHKnTic8mBy8P2W5Te2Ql/HROpOLq/v0eVNBSW5s0o=; b=l5UYrB9HIL/clDIxE6tJGs+cVHA76fQfI2U5pVSvWZKPhNfn8CHXaZ/U 8/zJcLFZnL/uG2O9qo22HXwiVhYLrLSJUW/FV82c06J3dQtAjXQMOcTqz x9ixYk+OE8if2ji4trGuQE8Ihsqb6NnrRVhm4DVWdO76O579jTmPJMjvn E=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiAFAHxySlStJV2P/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UWATNHwqHTQKBBxYBcguEAgEBAQQBAQE3DyULDAIEAQgRAwECHysMCx0IAgQOBYhBDcllAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFwSPchEBUAcGhEUFkgWLWIExg0mNMoQAgjSBRGyBDzmBAwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,780,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="366109852" Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2014 15:43:18 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com [173.37.183.76]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9OFhIFg001787 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:43:18 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.248]) by xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([173.37.183.76]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:43:18 -0500 From: "Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" To: "lberger@labn.net" Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP742bkPypKbVnQUacYHF9A9USepw/skIAgAAmbwA= Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:43:18 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206 x-originating-ip: [10.148.213.45] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <4C444A3CA6729344A53A7D35342A579A@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/QRUSLM981I2L2InCF3Y74pP6Gqg Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:44:29 -0000 Yes/support Regards,=20 Gabriele Gabriele Galimberti Technical Leader Cisco Photonics Srl via S.Maria Molgora, 48 C 20871 - Vimercate (MB) Italy www.cisco.com/global/IT/ ggalimbe@cisco.com Phone :+39 039 2091462 Mobile :+39 335 7481947 Fax :+39 039 2092049 > >-----Original Message----- >From: "lberger@labn.net" >Date: Friday, October 24, 2014 9:21 AM >To: "ccamp@ietf.org" >Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making >draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a WG document > >>All, >> >>This is start of a two week poll on making >>draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a CCAMP working group >>document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or >>"no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your technical >>reservations with the document. >> >>The poll ends Friday October 7th. >> >>Thanks, >> >>Deborah and Lou >> >>_______________________________________________ >>CCAMP mailing list >>CCAMP@ietf.org >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp > From nobody Fri Oct 24 08:45:41 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68EF1A1B03 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 08:45:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qhp8xXv3RZUM for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 08:45:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02A871A1ABC for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 08:44:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1544; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414165463; x=1415375063; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=+hs5hkAM1fiPFt8hzWBLFWm5VS9eolnGQrsNac9cGFM=; b=V2DjHfUl4wPjfCpUyvmmLHD6XR4o5en/ZMhyfCDX7k9R5u/9o7hRx4Qr y7OnKvKkzQDQjxgooFvPcXO3fb5wKmiBNVpvaJTOAzACETvwku3fIrSJT Dz/+fhFpLpKsOq62dS5eZQXnSr4/p819I46hMUUK1/7MYyS3j++G5cIKn w=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aj4FAHxySlStJA2N/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UWASDAsodCodNAhtsFgFyC4QCAQEBBAEBATEVJQsMAgQBCBEDAQIFKAQZDAsdCAIEDgWIQQ2YCpxXBpR+AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFwSBIo5QEQE1GwcGgmuBWgWSBYtYgTGDSY0yhACCNIFEbIEPOYEDAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,780,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="90047378" Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2014 15:44:22 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com [173.37.183.88]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9OFiM1G017947 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:44:22 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.248]) by xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([173.37.183.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:44:22 -0500 From: "Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" To: "lberger@labn.net" Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP742f6hgdOFIMdkaO9QlzHj+DFJw/sgCAgAAm/QA= Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:44:21 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206 x-originating-ip: [10.148.213.45] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="euc-kr" Content-ID: <9314FED0B37ABC4FA48CD01EF3074ADA@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/INMhQDiLNRUI18F4tG9-F4V0zaY Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:45:40 -0000 WWVzL3N1cHBvcnQsDQoNClJlZ2FyZHMsIA0KDQpHYWJyaWVsZQ0KDQoNCg0KR2FicmllbGUgR2Fs aW1iZXJ0aQ0KVGVjaG5pY2FsIExlYWRlcg0KQ2lzY28gUGhvdG9uaWNzIFNybA0KDQoNCg0Kdmlh IFMuTWFyaWEgTW9sZ29yYSwgNDggQw0KMjA4NzEgLSBWaW1lcmNhdGUgKE1CKQ0KSXRhbHkNCnd3 dy5jaXNjby5jb20vZ2xvYmFsL0lULyA8aHR0cDovL3d3dy5jaXNjby5jb20vZ2xvYmFsL0lULz4N Cg0KZ2dhbGltYmVAY2lzY28uY29tDQpQaG9uZSA6KzM5IDAzOSAyMDkxNDYyDQpNb2JpbGUgOisz OSAzMzUgNzQ4MTk0Nw0KRmF4IDorMzkgMDM5IDIwOTIwNDkNCg0KDQo+DQo+DQo+LS0tLS1Pcmln aW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCj5Gcm9tOiAibGJlcmdlckBsYWJuLm5ldCIgPGxiZXJnZXJAbGFi bi5uZXQ+DQo+RGF0ZTogRnJpZGF5LCBPY3RvYmVyIDI0LCAyMDE0IDk6MjEgQU0NCj5UbzogImNj YW1wQGlldGYub3JnIiA8Y2NhbXBAaWV0Zi5vcmc+DQo+U3ViamVjdDogW0NDQU1QXSBQb2xsIG9u IG1ha2luZw0KPmRyYWZ0LWFsaS1jY2FtcC1hZGRpdGlvbmFsLXNpZ25hbC10eXBlLWc3MDl2My0w NSBhIFdHIGRvY3VtZW50DQo+DQo+PkFsbCwNCj4+DQo+PlRoaXMgaXMgc3RhcnQgb2YgYSB0d28g d2VlayBwb2xsIG9uIG1ha2luZw0KPj5kcmFmdC1hbGktY2NhbXAtYWRkaXRpb25hbC1zaWduYWwt dHlwZS1nNzA5djMtMDUgYSBDQ0FNUCB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwDQo+PmRvY3VtZW50LiBQbGVhc2Ug c2VuZCBlbWFpbCB0byB0aGUgbGlzdCBpbmRpY2F0aW5nIKn4eWVzL3N1cHBvcnSp9yBvcg0KPj6p +G5vL2RvIG5vdCBzdXBwb3J0qfcuIElmIGluZGljYXRpbmcgbm8sIHBsZWFzZSBzdGF0ZSB5b3Vy IHRlY2huaWNhbA0KPj5yZXNlcnZhdGlvbnMgd2l0aCB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQuDQo+Pg0KPj5UaGUg cG9sbCBlbmRzIEZyaWRheSBPY3RvYmVyIDd0aC4NCj4+DQo+PlRoYW5rcywNCj4+DQo+PkRlYm9y YWggYW5kIExvdQ0KPj4NCj4+X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX18NCj4+Q0NBTVAgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQo+PkNDQU1QQGlldGYub3JnDQo+Pmh0dHBz Oi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vY2NhbXANCj4NCg0K From nobody Fri Oct 24 09:34:36 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38BC1A6F3B; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:34:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JoBcEKsenln6; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:34:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A532B1A1BA4; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:34:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.6.4.p1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20141024163433.1007.17950.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:34:33 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/FygKnI6BBX182s0EuOTFsaeWwAs Cc: ccamp@ietf.org Subject: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ro-05.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:34:35 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Common Control and Measurement Plane Working Group of the IETF. Title : LSP Attribute in ERO Authors : Cyril Margaria Giovanni Martinelli Steve Balls Ben Wright Filename : draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ro-05.txt Pages : 12 Date : 2014-10-24 Abstract: RFC5420 extends RSVP-TE to specify or record generic attributes which apply to the whole of the path of an LSP. This document proposes an extension to the RSVP ERO and RRO objects to allow it to specify or record generic attributes which apply to a given hop. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ro/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ro-05 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ro-05 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Fri Oct 24 09:37:48 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B48371A6F97 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:37:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V4levdMQm2ms for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:37:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wg0-x22f.google.com (mail-wg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27A8C1A6F8D for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:37:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id x13so1469065wgg.18 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:37:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=YWYkVVipZjl+keZZK0YRt2XEX5nYRYL6LlugVgTUf4w=; b=0QEGekyYymmIOiPrqetipMMziXjsFpWS62H3tnArAM+koSHtzcRymxZ2pvfbi20eyc QSOTjuKMBzwohy+78h32MCslXtHSi5xYe5YwofAv88rSd69p7jRWC9l9/CI8cyVacbc+ 2B0miSnotmqk6sNM9fERPjDq1vCLFrVItuHWE8O/xjf4mLMOO4cl8eaOHImSeiiPVHPP vKXauv84Ezg3TzRNuoQVElfxn++xIzX5mffNPP4+JKfMSo8YiQjHQ81QbTZxcoZu5Xmc 3OPuwhyXM6qGOI1dPMvEi1uKcriH1bFJ5BcKNP4bqtYgVoC/DNQtoYuQSA6mDXi6xRsn uigA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.149.169 with SMTP id ub9mr5267154wib.73.1414168661639; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:37:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.170.134 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:37:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <542F01CD.9020709@labn.net> References: <542F01CD.9020709@labn.net> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:37:41 -0400 Message-ID: From: Cyril Margaria To: Lou Berger Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c38aeabac95605062dccab Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/cdcHAcTXj8NYYQQsN57-7Zf0hAc Cc: "" , CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] comments/questions on draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ro X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:37:46 -0000 --001a11c38aeabac95605062dccab Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, Thank you for the comments, we believe we did address all of them in the new version we posted: URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ro-05.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ro/ Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ro-05 please find answers to individual comments inline. Best Regards, Cyril On 3 October 2014 16:06, Lou Berger wrote: > Hi, > At the last meeting it was mentioned that folks should take a look > at > draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ro in anticipation of an upcoming LC. > Consequently, I took a re look at the document and have some > comments/questions (for authors/contributors/WG/...): > > - You have a couple of editorial notes in the document, do these still > apply or should they be dropped. > > They should be dropped, we cleaned-up the notes. > - There are cases where you use 2114 language in lower case (e.g., > section 3.1). As I've mentioned before on the list, such usage, even > when correct, often leads to unneeded discussion during IESG review, I'd > suggest avoiding lower cases usage wherever possible. That said, I > think you have some cases where upper case was intended. > > We changed the language to be RFC2114 compliant. > - In section 3.1, 3.3 you are giving the definition for fields (length > and type) that are defined in 3209. You should just point to that > definition rather than seeming to provide the authoritative definition > in this document. > > Agree > - In section 3.2, you are similarly doing this for the Attribute TLV > defined in section 3 of 5420. Why not just include the reference and > the (re)definition? > > Agree > - Section 4. Isn't recording applicable to required attributes as well? > I.e.,why no R bit recording in section 4.1? > > RFC5420 does not make that distinction in the RRO attribute subobject, In addition the R bit is known to the node that inserted that ERO subobject and the requiered presence of the attribute depends on the given attribute. For those reasons we did include the R bit in the RRO_HOP_ATTRIBUTE. If there is a use case for it, we will include it. > - I think it would be good to have a compatibility section / discussion > which should at least discuss how to deal with the now two ways to > encode / record attribute flags. -- This document could replace > (deprecate) the old way, but this document would then need to be an > update to 5420... > > We added a section on compatibility. We see that both are compatible, the RFC5420 one should be used to report if an RFC5420 attribute has been processed, a node is allowed to use RRO_HOP attribute to report a LSP attribute value, but this must be in addition to the RFC5420 RRO attribute recording. for ro attributes, the node SHOULD use the RRO_HOP and SHOULD NOT use the RFC5420 mechanism if no LSP_ATTRIBUTE is present. > - The IANA section needs to be updated with the proper format. See > RFC5226. draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-07 is good example (but > don't include values and use the non-xml version of the registry links.) > > We updated the IANA section to match more closely the register format. > - Section 6 won't make it through the IESG. Again > draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-07 is good example of recent > language produced by the WG, and is a fine starting point. > > We filled the Security section > I think that's it. > > Thanks again for your review. > Lou > > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp > --001a11c38aeabac95605062dccab Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

Thank you = for the comments, we believe we did address all of them in the new version = we posted:
URL:=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccam= p-lsp-attribute-ro-05.txt
Status:=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-= attribute-ro/
Htmlized:=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 http:/= /tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ro-05

= please find answers to individual comments inline.

Best Regard= s,
Cyril


On 3 October 2014 16:06, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>= wrote:
Hi,
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 At the last meeting it was mentioned that folks= should take a look at
draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ro in anticipation of an upcoming LC.
Consequently, I took a re look at the document and have some
comments/questions (for authors/contributors/WG/...):

- You have a couple of editorial notes in the document, do these still
apply or should they be dropped.

They should be dropped, we cleaned-up the notes.
=C2=A0
- There are cases where you use 2114 language in lower case (e.g.,
section 3.1).=C2=A0 As I've mentioned before on the list, such usage, e= ven
when correct, often leads to unneeded discussion during IESG review, I'= d
suggest avoiding lower cases usage wherever possible.=C2=A0 That said, I think you have some cases where upper case was intended.

=C2=A0
We changed the language to be R= FC2114 compliant.
=C2=A0

= =C2=A0
- In section 3.1, 3.3 you are giving the definition for fields (length
and type) that are defined in 3209.=C2=A0 You should just point to that
definition rather than seeming to provide the authoritative definition
in this document.

Agree
=C2=A0
- In section 3.2, you are similarly doing this for the Attribute TLV
defined in section 3 of 5420.=C2=A0 Why not just include the reference and<= br> the (re)definition?

Agree
=C2=A0
- Section 4. Isn't recording applicable to required=C2=A0 attributes as= well?
I.e.,why no R bit recording in section 4.1?

=C2=A0
RFC5420 does not make that dist= inction in the RRO attribute subobject,
In addition the R bit is known to the node that inserted that ERO=20 subobject=C2=A0 and the requiered presence of the attribute depends on the= =20 given attribute.
For those reasons we did include the R bit in the= RRO_HOP_ATTRIBUTE. If there is a use case for it, we will include it.
<= br>=C2=A0
- I think it would be good to have a compatibility section / discussion
which should at least discuss how to deal with the now two ways to
encode / record attribute flags. -- This document could replace
(deprecate) the old way, but this document would then need to be an
update to 5420...


We added a section on compatibility.
We see that both are compatible, the RFC5420 one should be use= d to report if an RFC5420 attribute has been processed, a node is allowed to use RRO_HOP=20 attribute to report a LSP attribute value, but this must be in addition=20 to the RFC5420 RRO attribute recording.

for ro attr= ibutes, the node SHOULD use the RRO_HOP and SHOULD NOT use the RFC5420 mech= anism if no LSP_ATTRIBUTE is present.

=C2=A0
- The IANA section needs to be updated with the proper format.=C2=A0 See RFC5226.=C2=A0 draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-07 is good example (bu= t
don't include values and use the non-xml version of the registry links.= )

We updated the IANA section to match more closely the= register format.

=C2=A0
- Section 6 won't make it through the IESG.=C2=A0 Again
draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-07 is good example of recent
language produced by the WG, and is a fine starting point.

We filled the Security section
=C2=A0
I think that's it.

Thanks again for your review.
=C2=A0
Lou

_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
h= ttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp

--001a11c38aeabac95605062dccab-- From nobody Fri Oct 24 10:52:04 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1CA51A89A4 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:52:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x2_0k-aSyyZ1 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:51:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A85F1A8A0C for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:51:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=614; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414173110; x=1415382710; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=ZtckvI/4IVBgbQ7iBAvTLBZaVpmH7MnBLzgG2D2iCg4=; b=RNGzxmcJHLaT8TQWTL2w1LLTtTMPO+AUjGduYlVMoKSPm1NfelUBibrg ++63En8ZHexBXPg9LLg/iEgnENW4KFC788j+NJJvBA2pow03cYedRTgyz 6xz2pGaxt8snHsNRdCaSDACDs6Ve9Y+M/FUjugBGkzNuDgnn/7jdVlTX5 c=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhMFAGiRSlStJA2B/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UWATNIAqHTQKBCBYBfYQDAQEEAQEBaxsCAQgOOCcLJQIEARKIQQ3LBQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARYEj3YRAVeESwWLJYRCgh6LWIExg0mNMoQAgjSBRGyBDzmBAwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,781,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="90082556" Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2014 17:51:49 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com [173.36.12.78]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9OHpnlX024966 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Oct 2014 17:51:49 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.3.231]) by xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com ([173.36.12.78]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:51:49 -0500 From: "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP742can3C3r7L8k6Dygxg+K2pTpw/mAgA Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 17:51:48 +0000 Message-ID: References: <544A5245.4080707@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <544A5245.4080707@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.5.141003 x-originating-ip: [10.86.244.170] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: <57FC0CA0C5395540ABF189C0C3C504E3@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/gUtTvDp41Tpro1kdrRq4d_W2Osw Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 17:52:01 -0000 Support. Regards, Tarek On 2014-10-24, 9:21 AM, "Lou Berger" wrote: >All, > >This is start of a two week poll on making >draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a CCAMP working group >document. Please send email to the list indicating =B3yes/support=B2 or >=B3no/do not support=B2. If indicating no, please state your technical >reservations with the document. > >The poll ends Friday October 7th. > >Thanks, > >Deborah and Lou > >_______________________________________________ >CCAMP mailing list >CCAMP@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Fri Oct 24 11:08:07 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20DD01A8A66 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:08:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ETBvKDX4sRtr for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:08:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DD7E1A8ABE for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:07:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=755; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414174077; x=1415383677; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=vsKHvxiG+YgLFvV38LY2GG+9bLKr/HCHufWPr+98T/c=; b=dBKMu0KGrMF2bujk96JOKi2qNC3q9bGZVPc7YxgF5G+iVKQqWfjO4rP+ /NwGhLK3v0XxylWaJhPjeNAuFKf+pKfChOKGud+8DS+EvKOCJurJC84RF +2Wu6CLx5mefX4PXZSQUHb2uAMDwucAPnN/OWEBRjjn1st0Ymq3udlC1U E=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhMFABeVSlStJV2d/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UWATNIAqHTQKBCBYBfYQDAQEEAQEBaxsCAQgOFCQnCyUCBAESCIg5DcsWAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEwSPdhEBHziDLYEeBYslhEKCHo0Jg0mNMoQAgjSBRGyBDzmBAwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,781,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="366184455" Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2014 18:07:44 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com [173.36.12.83]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9OI7hre030950 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Oct 2014 18:07:43 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x13.cisco.com ([169.254.3.22]) by xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com ([173.36.12.83]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:07:43 -0500 From: "Siva Sivabalan (msiva)" To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP742bqn2360pN+Ua90x/wcfcVpJw/2xQA//+weQA= Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 18:07:42 +0000 Message-ID: References: <544A5245.4080707@labn.net> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [161.44.213.44] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/XyHclxibCp7tJgQCfUEHqT8AZTM Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 18:08:04 -0000 Support. Thanks, Siva On 2014-10-24, 9:21 AM, "Lou Berger" wrote: >All, > >This is start of a two week poll on making >draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a CCAMP working group=20 >document. Please send email to the list indicating =B3yes/support=B2 or=20 >=B3no/do not support=B2. If indicating no, please state your technical=20 >reservations with the document. > >The poll ends Friday October 7th. > >Thanks, > >Deborah and Lou > >_______________________________________________ >CCAMP mailing list >CCAMP@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp _______________________________________________ CCAMP mailing list CCAMP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Fri Oct 24 12:14:22 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6301A0191 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:14:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hyoAAsz-S0g4 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:14:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A18CE1A1A06 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:14:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=896; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414178059; x=1415387659; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=30Os/GCRZ2crNB9QB5n30m/LwMgo1J5dpAsY1ZkMSaA=; b=IOHsmmEgHRMhv9BCHK/+u9piYgiuebUidtJdLaSMhnHeJzctXiWaNNRw +Kum4bEZFeXosRhXimBLWCaKneYRiy/thwM8wgFfLasLwhGU/61BBGYMw M1zbJfpGBYa+xkBKQU2sjFBVY0yLEfp0BJwUGFaLcpreDFT1EZtZDw6Ib A=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjIFAFCkSlStJV2R/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UWASDAsogCodNAhttFgF9hAMBAQQBAQExOh0BCA4KBCgEJQslAgQBEohBDZk7nFcGlQsBAQEBAQEBAQIBAQEBAQEBARYEgSaOUBEBHRgignGBWgWSBYtYgTGDSY0yhACCNIFEbIEPOYEDAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,781,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="90109945" Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2014 19:14:18 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com [173.36.12.79]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9OJEHQx028414 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Oct 2014 19:14:17 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x07.cisco.com ([169.254.2.151]) by xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com ([173.36.12.79]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 14:14:17 -0500 From: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" To: Lou Berger , CCAMP , DEBORAH BRUNGARD Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP742bFSWlZ8S8Z06Gq7Vgf4OYRZw/2xQA///T+QA= Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 19:14:16 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.5.130515 x-originating-ip: [10.86.242.56] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="euc-kr" Content-ID: <004271BEB08223478EF0146637BE3A9A@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/i3K_X3lQVxEj3f94UT6jS6FQ4q8 Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 19:14:20 -0000 SGkgV0csDQoNClllcy9zdXBwb3J0Lg0KDQoNClRoYW5rcywNClJha2VzaA0KDQoNCg0KPk9uIDIw MTQtMTAtMjQsIDk6MjEgQU0sICJMb3UgQmVyZ2VyIiA8bGJlcmdlckBsYWJuLm5ldD4gd3JvdGU6 DQo+DQo+PkFsbCwNCj4+DQo+PlRoaXMgaXMgc3RhcnQgb2YgYSB0d28gd2VlayBwb2xsIG9uIG1h a2luZw0KPj5kcmFmdC1hbGktY2NhbXAtb3RuLXNpZ25hbC10eXBlLXN1YnJlZ2lzdHJ5LTAyIGEg Q0NBTVAgd29ya2luZyBncm91cA0KPj5kb2N1bWVudC4gUGxlYXNlIHNlbmQgZW1haWwgdG8gdGhl IGxpc3QgaW5kaWNhdGluZyCp+Hllcy9zdXBwb3J0qfcgb3INCj4+qfhuby9kbyBub3Qgc3VwcG9y dKn3LiBJZiBpbmRpY2F0aW5nIG5vLCBwbGVhc2Ugc3RhdGUgeW91ciB0ZWNobmljYWwNCj4+cmVz ZXJ2YXRpb25zIHdpdGggdGhlIGRvY3VtZW50Lg0KPj4NCj4+VGhlIHBvbGwgZW5kcyBGcmlkYXkg T2N0b2JlciA3dGguDQo+Pg0KPj5UaGFua3MsDQo+Pg0KPj5EZWJvcmFoIGFuZCBMb3UNCj4+DQo+ Pl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQo+PkNDQU1Q IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KPj5DQ0FNUEBpZXRmLm9yZw0KPj5odHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9t YWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2NjYW1wDQoNCg== From nobody Fri Oct 24 12:16:34 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A5291A1A06 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:16:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VbXlrLdyKMdU for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:16:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4A661A0191 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:16:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=635; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414178191; x=1415387791; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=+JCW5M+XmAPE8sf0lrlL0OiiW/8bdINr71oSiTvHoLk=; b=Pse3Ak8yi7xE8138UqvEf0qnC1EFNbRhXJgVHETkP1KZtekbSD0tYhC2 neFZXdw6ud3H1A/Jy0cgvyE6dAw8xdbJmAVA6+4eAvuuYBb1zhfp4rBDH NDt9rMDtkS3VQOAc0Bu8M8HoZ7Gx3LxLWvQj3yY0C8BIatP/2SEyRu7Cf Y=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhIFAFCkSlStJV2T/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UWATNIgqHTQKBCBYBfYQDAQEEAQEBax0BCA5fCyUCBAESiEENyyMBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEWBI92EQFXhEsFiyWGYItYgTGDSY0yhACCNIFEbIEPOYEDAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,781,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="366280107" Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2014 19:16:30 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com [173.36.12.86]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9OJGUX8021709 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Oct 2014 19:16:30 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x07.cisco.com ([169.254.2.151]) by xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com ([173.36.12.86]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 14:16:30 -0500 From: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP742f9l3bFkydMUGHobHzyp3vpJw/r6sA Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 19:16:29 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <544A5267.8080801@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.5.130515 x-originating-ip: [10.86.242.56] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/nROG2dWDSt6Ut3FHth0SosEwxng Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 19:16:33 -0000 Hi WG, Yes/support. Thanks, Rakesh On 2014-10-24 9:21 AM, "Lou Berger" wrote: >All, > >This is start of a two week poll on making >draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 a CCAMP working group >document. Please send email to the list indicating =B3yes/support=B2 or >=B3no/do not support=B2. If indicating no, please state your technical >reservations with the document. > >The poll ends Friday October 7th. > >Thanks, > >Deborah and Lou > >_______________________________________________ >CCAMP mailing list >CCAMP@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Fri Oct 24 12:31:36 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8001A03A6 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:31:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KmyIZB-pCmjp for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:31:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 416231A0372 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:31:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=616; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414179094; x=1415388694; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=OM1aCPdM1r829kq3H7KcLeQ8c1mjKoa1ruhbQXLpkQU=; b=gschKrXgWaLcoac3cZfbFR0T5saZ9uaTRvZVg0AVSZ7ij/4I4AS2dsx4 AYHl+6uVpUEbX6xE/5MIshBtXUq0m3yzTGZUi9hRQgRwXreO+6vtpUQYf Gyncbi/GBb5w77vx2qdGezEfBiOw+TSi7t8CRiiEJxV093oQfiJh2dj1P U=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhMFAMqoSlStJV2Q/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UWATNIwqHTQKBCBYBfYQDAQEEAQEBaxsCAQgOOCcLJQIEARKIQQ3LHgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEVBI92EQFXhEsFiyWEQoIei1iBMYNJjTKEAII0gURsgQ85gQMBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,781,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="90098444" Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2014 19:31:33 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com [173.37.183.88]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9OJVX2F028478 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Oct 2014 19:31:33 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.3.231]) by xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([173.37.183.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 14:31:33 -0500 From: "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP742fmIJuG0ii3kiuJikabgPxiZw/s+SA Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 19:31:32 +0000 Message-ID: References: <544A5267.8080801@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <544A5267.8080801@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.5.141003 x-originating-ip: [10.86.244.170] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: <17F2299145B19B4E88D2ADA7BE679F94@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/BGPQOIA5T4pKrG0dGg_gcmX_Ids Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 19:31:35 -0000 Support. Regards, Tarek On 2014-10-24, 9:21 AM, "Lou Berger" wrote: >All, > >This is start of a two week poll on making >draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 a CCAMP working group >document. Please send email to the list indicating =B3yes/support=B2 or >=B3no/do not support=B2. If indicating no, please state your technical >reservations with the document. > >The poll ends Friday October 7th. > >Thanks, > >Deborah and Lou > >_______________________________________________ >CCAMP mailing list >CCAMP@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Fri Oct 24 12:32:55 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04B21A86F2 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:32:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.51 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hK6Z7c4WudAo for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:32:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54A461A86F0 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:32:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3214; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414179172; x=1415388772; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=dV4hXhKgmoxhmfZRkGN+kOJ6SU1kVD/azxoccs4IHfg=; b=WHsXcX0OCfUBKGKHmQC0Buz+lFbCDMf+Bx3UOwBxrd8v1IlxFWTv7/in Pf5EXEfn7lFqH/19Dg9Kv1i0xeQb56OHS/7gFY0+qwauWrb7+fNc8R/gY ExINz1krXOIT7YhmY8ciPVMc4GFUn4GxVL2LnphHNA4VSCZZITFijGZIP Y=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhEFAMqoSlStJA2G/2dsb2JhbABcgkhGgSwE1HoCgQgWAX2EAgEBAQQtQRsCAQgEDQMBAigHMhQJCAIEARKIQcsrAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARmQNBMYhEsFj2eCHotYgTGDSY0yhACCNIFEbIFIgQMBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.04,781,1406592000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="90113340" Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2014 19:32:51 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com [173.37.183.82]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9OJWpxI000778 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Oct 2014 19:32:51 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.3.231]) by xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([173.37.183.82]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 14:32:51 -0500 From: "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" To: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" , "ccamp@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11 Thread-Index: AQHP78FMCPAT6W+yQ022rw77cRDWRQ== Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 19:32:51 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.5.141003 x-originating-ip: [10.86.244.170] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D070217C1474ABtsaadciscocom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/shmS9LTbJdjqg-q9sLRs2TECKZU Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 19:32:54 -0000 --_000_D070217C1474ABtsaadciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Support. Regards, Tarek From: , DEBORAH A > Date: Monday, October 20, 2014 at 5:26 PM To: "ccamp@ietf.org" > Subject: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associ= ated-lsp-11 All, This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-= rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11. This working group last call ends on Nov. 3rd. Please send your comments to= the CCAMP mailing list. As noted, there is one IPR disclosed. Thanks, Deborah (and Lou) --_000_D070217C1474ABtsaadciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<to ccamp list now>

Support.

Regards,
Tarek

From: <BRUNGARD>, DEBORAH A &= lt;db3546@att.com>
Date: Monday, October 20, 2014 at 5= :26 PM
To: "ccamp@ietf.org" <cca= mp@ietf.org>
Subject: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on dr= aft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11

All,
 
This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpl= s-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.
 
This working group last call ends on Nov. 3rd. Please send your commen= ts to the CCAMP mailing list.
 
As noted, there is one IPR disclosed.
 
Thanks,
Deborah (and Lou)
 
 --_000_D070217C1474ABtsaadciscocom_-- From nobody Fri Oct 24 13:39:40 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60F7D1A70E2 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:39:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.209 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.209 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9MRvNPXkkl3C for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:39:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A3AD1A1A90 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:39:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BKX32668; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 20:39:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from DFWEML705-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.142) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 21:39:33 +0100 Received: from DFWEML706-CHM.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.225]) by dfweml705-chm ([10.193.5.142]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:39:31 -0700 From: Leeyoung To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP7smuOEZwHVRi+0uUU4i5YPT8LJw/t50A Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 20:39:30 +0000 Message-ID: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E1729C40575@dfweml706-chm> References: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.47.135.123] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/y0GNVWMCbS3v8WGvYzTODDfPDDs Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 20:39:38 -0000 Yes/support. Young -----Original Message----- From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 9:01 AM To: CCAMP Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchang= e-07 a WG document All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working group docum= ent. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not s= upport". If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with th= e document. The poll ends Thursday October 6th. Thanks, Deborah and Lou _______________________________________________ CCAMP mailing list CCAMP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Fri Oct 24 16:02:49 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBEF51A1B2D for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:02:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aA1yKQ_vSP7m for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:02:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0112.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 223E51A1AE1 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:02:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BN1PR08CA0032.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.242.217.160) by CO2PR0801MB0725.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.141.248.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.6.9; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 23:02:43 +0000 Received: from BN1AFFO11FD056.protection.gbl (2a01:111:f400:7c10::188) by BN1PR08CA0032.outlook.office365.com (2a01:111:e400:16::32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.6.9 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 23:02:42 +0000 Received: from sv-ex13-prd2.infinera.com (204.128.141.24) by BN1AFFO11FD056.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.58.53.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1049.20 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 23:02:41 +0000 Received: from SV-EX13-PRD1.infinera.com (10.100.103.228) by sv-ex13-prd2.infinera.com (10.100.103.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.847.32; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:01:53 -0700 Received: from SV-EX13-PRD1.infinera.com ([10.100.97.11]) by sv-ex13-prd1.infinera.com ([10.100.97.11]) with mapi id 15.00.0847.030; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:02:47 -0700 From: Rajan Rao To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP7smQTgsZ9+o7skit68SP4QKqbpw/354Q Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 23:02:46 +0000 Message-ID: References: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.100.99.93] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:204.128.141.24; CTRY:US; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(438002)(164054003)(189002)(13464003)(199003)(377454003)(20776003)(47776003)(64706001)(53416004)(108616004)(230783001)(85852003)(16796002)(4396001)(50986999)(80022003)(46406003)(50466002)(33646002)(97756001)(46102003)(106466001)(15975445006)(19580405001)(44976005)(76176999)(23726002)(87936001)(21056001)(54356999)(95666004)(2656002)(85306004)(19580395003)(107046002)(86362001)(107886001)(6806004)(106116001)(120916001)(76482002)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CO2PR0801MB0725; H:sv-ex13-prd2.infinera.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:outgoingmail2.infinera.com; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO2PR0801MB0725; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0374433C81 Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of infinera.com designates 204.128.141.24 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=204.128.141.24; helo=sv-ex13-prd2.infinera.com; Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 204.128.141.24) smtp.mailfrom=rrao@infinera.com; X-OriginatorOrg: infinera.com Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/DNtNGQc3MDq-TVBkIR2McRX8nH8 Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 23:02:48 -0000 Yes/support Thx Rajan -----Original Message----- From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 7:01 AM To: CCAMP Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchang= e-07 a WG document All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working group docum= ent. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not s= upport". If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with th= e document. The poll ends Thursday October 6th. Thanks, Deborah and Lou _______________________________________________ CCAMP mailing list CCAMP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Fri Oct 24 17:31:19 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B18491A0636 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 17:31:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.76 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.76 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id djtqNjjZt0St for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 17:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E02E81A1B4F for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 17:31:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BOA20963; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 00:31:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.35) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 01:31:10 +0100 Received: from NKGEML509-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.251]) by nkgeml404-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.35]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 08:31:05 +0800 From: "Zhangfei (Philip)" To: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" , "ccamp@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11 Thread-Index: Ac/srIE0Ej9pDRWXSnyNQai5S2fV4QDPl/DA Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 00:31:04 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.138.68.68] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AF82500E245ACF498991B9F5FFCC6DB2BEF4B7nkgeml509mbxchina_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/tH_YWVmeHWG2lPXwgnJjOoFf-G4 Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 00:31:17 -0000 --_000_AF82500E245ACF498991B9F5FFCC6DB2BEF4B7nkgeml509mbxchina_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 U3VwcG9ydA0KDQpBcyBhIGNvLWF1dGhvcg0KDQpCLlIuDQoNCkZlaQ0KDQq3orz+yMs6IENDQU1Q IFttYWlsdG86Y2NhbXAtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10gtPqx7SBCUlVOR0FSRCwgREVCT1JBSCBB DQq3osvNyrG85DogMjAxNMTqMTDUwjIxyNUgNToyNw0KytW8/sjLOiBjY2FtcEBpZXRmLm9yZw0K 1vfM4jogW0NDQU1QXSBXRyBMYXN0IENhbGwgb24gZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1jY2FtcC1tcGxzLXRwLXJz dnB0ZS1leHQtYXNzb2NpYXRlZC1sc3AtMTENCg0KQWxsLA0KDQpUaGlzIHN0YXJ0cyBhIHR3by13 ZWVrIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXAgbGFzdCBjYWxsIG9uIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtY2NhbXAtbXBscy10cC1y c3ZwdGUtZXh0LWFzc29jaWF0ZWQtbHNwLTExLg0KDQpUaGlzIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXAgbGFzdCBj YWxsIGVuZHMgb24gTm92LiAzcmQuIFBsZWFzZSBzZW5kIHlvdXIgY29tbWVudHMgdG8gdGhlIEND QU1QIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdC4NCg0KQXMgbm90ZWQsIHRoZXJlIGlzIG9uZSBJUFIgZGlzY2xvc2Vk Lg0KDQpUaGFua3MsDQpEZWJvcmFoIChhbmQgTG91KQ0KDQo= --_000_AF82500E245ACF498991B9F5FFCC6DB2BEF4B7nkgeml509mbxchina_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Support

 = ;

As a co-au= thor

 = ;

B.R.<= /o:p>

 = ;

Fei

 = ;

=B7=A2=BC=FE=C8=CB: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-b= ounces@ietf.org] =B4=FA=B1=ED = BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
=B7=A2=CB=CD= =CA=B1=BC=E4: 2014=C4=EA10=D4=C2= 21=C8=D5 5:27
=CA=D5=BC=FE=C8=CB: ccamp@ietf.org
=D6=F7=CC=E2: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-ls= p-11

 

All,

 =

This starts a two-week w= orking group last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-ls= p-11.

 =

This working group last = call ends on Nov. 3rd. Please send your comments to the CCAMP mailing list.

 =

As noted, there is one I= PR disclosed.

 =

Thanks,

Deborah (and Lou)

 =

--_000_AF82500E245ACF498991B9F5FFCC6DB2BEF4B7nkgeml509mbxchina_-- From nobody Fri Oct 24 20:45:40 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0DDD1A1B0E for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 20:45:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aNDf_WS8Ih-J for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 20:45:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDE2F1A1B21 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 20:45:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BOA29532; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 03:45:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.33) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 04:45:31 +0100 Received: from SZXEMA504-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.123]) by SZXEMA401-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.33]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 11:45:27 +0800 From: Fatai Zhang To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP742dX53KSH17YUuYZR0cICO7BJxALPPw Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 03:45:05 +0000 Message-ID: References: <544A5245.4080707@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <544A5245.4080707@labn.net> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.66.72.159] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/kesGuuMKFJ_LU5J0JyKqsPJTLkQ Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 03:45:37 -0000 Hi, Yes/Support. Best Regards Fatai -----Original Message----- From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 9:21 PM To: CCAMP Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry= -02 a WG document All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a CCAMP working group document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with the document. The poll ends Friday October 7th. Thanks, Deborah and Lou _______________________________________________ CCAMP mailing list CCAMP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Fri Oct 24 20:45:41 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B59D1A1B21 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 20:45:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O7Me4Skem15z for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 20:45:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDDE71A1B1C for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 20:45:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BOA29533; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 03:45:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.34) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 04:45:31 +0100 Received: from SZXEMA504-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.123]) by SZXEMA402-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.34]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 11:45:27 +0800 From: Fatai Zhang To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP742geJLM8pjj2ESGj9pQzn5LZpxALQ5Q Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 03:45:17 +0000 Message-ID: References: <544A5267.8080801@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <544A5267.8080801@labn.net> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.66.72.159] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/E76h2he5zGytNr06QDFgDrYfFeE Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 03:45:37 -0000 Hi, Yes/Support. Best Regards Fatai -----Original Message----- From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 9:22 PM To: CCAMP Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709= v3-05 a WG document All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 a CCAMP working group document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with the document. The poll ends Friday October 7th. Thanks, Deborah and Lou _______________________________________________ CCAMP mailing list CCAMP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Fri Oct 24 23:11:55 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9891A6FC2 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 23:11:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WX1AfSmkViHM for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 23:11:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 916FF1A1B30 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 23:11:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BOA35404; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 06:11:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nkgeml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.36) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 07:11:48 +0100 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.22]) by nkgeml405-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.36]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 14:11:44 +0800 From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" To: Lou Berger , "draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb@tools.ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt Thread-Index: AQHP7DmxZe4di09DEUSAb36hmAw2LZw4nFYQgANiRwCAAQp7EIAAGJKAgAM2mPA= Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 06:11:43 +0000 Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9273375C339@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <20141020074350.21488.53873.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733758033@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <544805C0.8060103@labn.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733759B2E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <5448F9E7.6050703@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <5448F9E7.6050703@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.96.76] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/ugSqoOqh05WRas5xj9jRLyQHujk Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 06:11:53 -0000 Hi Lou,=20 Thank you for your comments and suggestions. We will submit a new revision = to reflect them. Please see my replies inline: > Jie, > Thank you for the quick response. See below for responses. >=20 > It probably would also be worthwhile to add some words on when this > extension should be used versus draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext > . In some earlier version there used to be some words talking about draft-iet= f-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext and this draft, we will add some words back= in the new revision.=20 Basically draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext defines extensions for c= onfiguring pro-active MPLS-TP OAMs, while draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb is= about LI & LB provisioning, which belong to on-demand OAM functions. > >> - Section 3.1, > >> I think intermediate node behavior related to processing of the A is > >> unchanged by this document so think you should drop the 3 lines that c= ontain > the phrase "... > >> intermediate nodes ..." > > Agree the behavior of intermediate node is unchanged, will remove the > descriptions about intermediate node behavior in a new revision. > > > >> - Section 3.2 > >> The section is not clear if the A bit processing occurs / completes > >> before Loopback related processing begins or occurs coincidentally. > >> (I read the last sentence of the first paragraph saying the former > >> and the last sentence of the 2nd paragraph saying the latter.) Either= way it > should be clarified. > > The A bit (lock) processing needs to be completed before initiating loo= pback > request. The last sentence of the 2nd paragraph was to emphasize that whe= n > signaling loopback, the A bit should be kept set to indicate the LSP is s= till in lock > mode. > > We will rephrase the sentence to make it clearer. > Great. Please include appropriate conformance language. Will fix this in the new revision. > >> Where is the Loopback (B) bit / Attribute Flag defined? This document,= right? > >> Then the document, needs to state so in this section and in the IANA s= ection. > > The Loopback bit was defined in the end of section 2 "Extensions to RSV= P-TE". > To make it clearer, will use subsections for each extension in the new re= vision. >=20 > This is a good change to section 2. You might want to rename that section > encodings or formats as the whole document is about rsvp-te extensions. Y= ou > can take a look at section 4 of > draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp as a recent example. >=20 > This said, you still need to mention where it is defined (e.g., in sectio= n 3.1, add > "defined above" the first time you mention the bit) and add it to the IAN= A > section. > Will fix this in the new revision. Many thanks,=20 Jie > >> Section 4, needs to be updated to follow RFC2360, See > >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associ > >> ated-lsp-1 > >> 0 > >> for a recent example. > > Thanks for pointing to this example. Will update the IANA section accor= dingly. > > > >> - Also please cleanup your id-nits, see > >> http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=3Dhttps://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-iet= f > >> -ccamp-rsvp-t > >> e-li-lb-04.txt > > Will clean this in the new revision. >=20 > Thanks, > Lou >=20 > > Best regards, > > Jie > > > >> Lou > >> > >> On 10/20/2014 3:58 AM, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote: > >>> Dear all, > >>> > >>> The only change in this new version is: > >>> > >>> - Update the references (one has become RFC) > >>> > >>> Your review and comments are highly appreciated. > >>> > >>> Many thanks, > >>> Jie > >>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > >>>> internet-drafts@ietf.org > >>>> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 3:44 PM > >>>> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > >>>> Cc: ccamp@ietf.org > >>>> Subject: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > >> directories. > >>>> This draft is a work item of the Common Control and Measurement > >>>> Plane Working Group of the IETF. > >>>> > >>>> Title : GMPLS RSVP-TE Extensions for Lock Instruct > >> and > >>>> Loopback > >>>> Authors : Jie Dong > >>>> Mach(Guoyi) Chen > >>>> Zhenqiang Li > >>>> Daniele Ceccarelli > >>>> Filename : draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt > >>>> Pages : 8 > >>>> Date : 2014-10-20 > >>>> > >>>> Abstract: > >>>> This document specifies extensions to Resource Reservation Protoc= ol > - > >>>> Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) to support Lock Instruct (LI) and > >>>> Loopback (LB) mechanisms for Label Switched Paths (LSPs). These > >>>> mechanisms are applicable to technologies which use Generalized > >>>> Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) as control plane. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb/ > >>>> > >>>> There's also a htmlized version available at: > >>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04 > >>>> > >>>> A diff from the previous version is available at: > >>>> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > >>>> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at > tools.ietf.org. > >>>> > >>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > >>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> CCAMP mailing list > >>>> CCAMP@ietf.org > >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> CCAMP mailing list > >>> CCAMP@ietf.org > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp > >>> > > >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Sat Oct 25 01:12:15 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 261621A86EC; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 01:12:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f6hvbo23J2Y2; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 01:12:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7661A86E1; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 01:12:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.6.4.p1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20141025081208.10334.96953.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 01:12:08 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/6b5h_BIPIBpHR2GsDgYp5ZBsUPw Cc: ccamp@ietf.org Subject: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-05.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 08:12:11 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Common Control and Measurement Plane Working Group of the IETF. Title : GMPLS RSVP-TE Extensions for Lock Instruct and Loopback Authors : Jie Dong Mach(Guoyi) Chen Zhenqiang Li Daniele Ceccarelli Filename : draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-05.txt Pages : 9 Date : 2014-10-25 Abstract: This document specifies extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol- Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) to support Lock Instruct (LI) and Loopback (LB) mechanisms for Label Switched Paths (LSPs). These mechanisms are applicable to technologies which use Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) as control plane. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-05 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-05 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Sat Oct 25 06:05:28 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0DF1A889B for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 06:05:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vm2xz1tP0Rbb for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 06:05:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0129.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 901091A8874 for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 06:04:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from CY1PR0501MB1179.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.160.145.140) by CY1PR0501MB1179.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.160.145.140) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.6.9; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 13:04:49 +0000 Received: from CY1PR0501MB1179.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.145.140]) by CY1PR0501MB1179.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.145.140]) with mapi id 15.01.0006.000; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 13:04:49 +0000 From: Vallinayakam Somasundaram To: CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP7smqbzv5iDCeMEm79/TpOYU5c5xAyrCQ Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 13:04:48 +0000 Message-ID: <1339146656bd4e1ba79a59e1187f841b@CY1PR0501MB1179.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> References: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [116.197.184.19] x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CY1PR0501MB1179; x-forefront-prvs: 0375972289 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(164054003)(377454003)(51704005)(13464003)(189002)(199003)(19580405001)(92566001)(19580395003)(108616004)(85306004)(120916001)(101416001)(15975445006)(76482002)(85852003)(77096002)(87936001)(31966008)(21056001)(110136001)(230783001)(2656002)(97736003)(50986999)(76176999)(54356999)(33646002)(76576001)(86362001)(4396001)(46102003)(80022003)(106356001)(66066001)(99286002)(106116001)(105586002)(107886001)(64706001)(20776003)(107046002)(74316001)(95666004)(40100003)(122556002)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR0501MB1179; H:CY1PR0501MB1179.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/-TwYHKsuUnbrv2UagY3cq91Tn3g Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 13:05:23 -0000 Yes/support. Thanks Vallinayakam > -----Original Message----- > From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 7:31 PM > To: CCAMP > Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info- > exchange-07 a WG document >=20 > All, >=20 > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working group > document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/d= o > not support". If indicating no, please state your technical reservations = with > the document. >=20 > The poll ends Thursday October 6th. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Deborah and Lou >=20 > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Sun Oct 26 17:24:47 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD70B1A1B82 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:24:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.008 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.008 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T2utaVa7mw03 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:24:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp [192.51.44.36]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA4391A1B7A for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:24:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kw-mxauth.gw.nic.fujitsu.com (unknown [10.0.237.134]) by fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE5A3EE0AE for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:24:42 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.93]) by kw-mxauth.gw.nic.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916B7AC02C7 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:24:41 +0900 (JST) Received: from dm.kawasaki.flab.fujitsu.co.jp (dm.kawasaki.flab.fujitsu.co.jp [10.25.192.105]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 470AA1DB8038 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:24:41 +0900 (JST) X-SecurityPolicyCheck: OK by SHieldMailChecker v2.2.3 X-SHieldMailCheckerPolicyVersion: FJ-ISEC-20140219 Message-ID: <544D90B5.1090401@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:24:21 +0900 From: Yuji Tochio User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CCAMP References: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/Ii_vQ91xP9DfwmUWAj56zHvp7AI Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 00:24:45 -0000 Yes/support Regards, Yuji (2014/10/23 23:01), Lou Berger wrote: > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working group > document. Please send email to the list indicating $B!H(Byes/support$B!I(B or > $B!H(Bno/do not support$B!I(B. If indicating no, please state your technical > reservations with the document. > > The poll ends Thursday October 6th. > > Thanks, > > Deborah and Lou > > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp > From nobody Mon Oct 27 01:15:09 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9470D1A8A1D for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 01:14:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9aeTKPd9I4X6 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 01:14:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9F6F1A8A1B for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 01:14:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=633; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414397695; x=1415607295; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=DzD+auIi1GaQJe0k2wowzma6Ch3b+A1G0IJbucVK3zE=; b=itaET+quNjch7cUUIhPJCOMHMi4UDPk3hjzy7x45uceGygNeTXukn7gQ j0/n68V1VaV/2Rfwjrd5K2tVxEXra2fAlb9xpU3sRRLr2gfNjnQkm/G2q xOEhVcTXC4j/R5ay5NKNWo6nmUn/kSMhWGvcvCQUxPgTpoqALcLEQ44ke 4=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgsFAKb9TVStJV2T/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UWATNHAqHTQKBEBYBfYQDAQEDAQEBAWsLBQsCAQgOOCcLJQIEDgWIOAkNyGIBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQETBJAmEQFQB4MtgR4FkgeLWoExg0mIBYUvhACCNIFEbIEPOYEDAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,794,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="90582829" Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Oct 2014 08:14:54 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com [173.36.12.75]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9R8Es2w010666 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 27 Oct 2014 08:14:54 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.159]) by xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com ([173.36.12.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 03:14:54 -0500 From: "Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" To: Lou Berger Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP7smsOQfJVOKj+EuZM61LVEMhS5xD8msA Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 08:14:53 +0000 Message-ID: References: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.148.212.136] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <3B686D369B5D404E9202D46D0AECEB89@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/Yw9Hp9Jg3L2GS-n_ocSr2kyrIDw Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 08:14:59 -0000 yes/support ~G On 23 Oct 2014, at 16:01, Lou Berger wrote: > All, >=20 > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working group > document. Please send email to the list indicating =93yes/support=94 or > =93no/do not support=94. If indicating no, please state your technical > reservations with the document. >=20 > The poll ends Thursday October 6th. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Deborah and Lou >=20 > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Mon Oct 27 01:18:34 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA191A8A51 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 01:18:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lug4qg1PeGnF for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 01:18:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 762201A8A50 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 01:18:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=632; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414397898; x=1415607498; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=LOXC89l26voLk1m7dvXfBNV8jHGXS805cgMkyPSYRXw=; b=CFUZww1eVgo9zPzGrwCg+DkIi68PcfKLvls4LsdMLq6yTky+Go+qCyFj oEvGscWIaiJ9+R6x5ftX9b2iBTRa6usFtcLFVhzHjRcHbOolSZnYC8NuV DB3u2EeuIm7gUMJWYvPCOh9Ee+MGA4BmQ8tYWA7R+o8NIrKQ4FbANfJnS k=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgsFAIn/TVStJA2E/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UWATNHgqHTQKBEBYBfYQDAQEDAQEBAWsLBQsCAQgOOCcLJQIEDgWIOAkNyHIBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQETBJAmEQFQB4MtgR4FkgeLWoExg0mNNIQAgjSBRGyBDzmBAwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,794,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="363575106" Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Oct 2014 08:18:17 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com [173.37.183.78]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9R8IHPO018467 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 27 Oct 2014 08:18:17 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.159]) by xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([fe80::200:5efe:173.37.183.34%12]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 03:18:17 -0500 From: "Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" To: Lou Berger Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP742f8mTJLA+xIEWLncF6iMeRfJxD8dWA Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 08:18:17 +0000 Message-ID: <96F7F539-9CB8-45E0-BAC3-C403A2B20904@cisco.com> References: <544A5267.8080801@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <544A5267.8080801@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.148.212.136] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <8C67C979E8C2E2449F628AC4C733EB16@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/MiDbu031rnA6iOwlxXETQgnETPk Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 08:18:27 -0000 yes/support ~G On 24 Oct 2014, at 15:21, Lou Berger wrote: > All, >=20 > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 a CCAMP working group > document. Please send email to the list indicating =93yes/support=94 or > =93no/do not support=94. If indicating no, please state your technical > reservations with the document. >=20 > The poll ends Friday October 7th. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Deborah and Lou >=20 > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Mon Oct 27 01:19:59 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE221A8A52 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 01:19:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tk_inqfOyj0Y for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 01:19:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6E7C1A8A62 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 01:18:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=630; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414397938; x=1415607538; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=7kw/db1vABrYOzPFiHwYPFqqX1btHwx/xU+E3y2ppdM=; b=Ak9B35dhH1D/Z6yPa/50AbMsePo4ohH+ra0F605TpXc8kOOaMHAevgco qAOQPDeBCJTNHeS+rc4+EHsjen81roRCIU43xobbWpesmYaepq4t3GuRX H7UChzAlz8/AcnFreJxBtgXqchNY7g/d9/mXl7DBH6vAFOaunX0rlJXIs E=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgsFAN/+TVStJA2L/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UWATNHQqHTQKBEBYBfYQDAQEDAQEBAWsLBQsCAQgOOCcLJQIEDgWIOAkNyGwBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQETBJAmEQFQB4MtgR4FkgeLWoExg0mNNIQAgjSBRGyBDzmBAwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,794,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="366686492" Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Oct 2014 08:18:58 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com [173.37.183.84]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9R8Iwga030296 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 27 Oct 2014 08:18:58 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.159]) by xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([173.37.183.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 03:18:57 -0500 From: "Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" To: Lou Berger Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP742bwvphqjsUnEGcuyF/ki7LbpxD8gYA Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 08:18:57 +0000 Message-ID: <3F3D2E14-3AC6-4A63-A7BE-763B7D222BC7@cisco.com> References: <544A5245.4080707@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <544A5245.4080707@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.148.212.136] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/yiyDDvayN387TuKk_4mKW4EQuH0 Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 08:19:45 -0000 yes/support ~G On 24 Oct 2014, at 15:21, Lou Berger wrote: > All, >=20 > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a CCAMP working group > document. Please send email to the list indicating =93yes/support=94 or > =93no/do not support=94. If indicating no, please state your technical > reservations with the document. >=20 > The poll ends Friday October 7th. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Deborah and Lou >=20 > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Mon Oct 27 01:38:39 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82EFC1A0020 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 01:38:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Er8Y21q-t60r for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 01:38:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5BC31A007D for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 01:38:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2839; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414399115; x=1415608715; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=QQmdenB+9cfqwOxy2X0QxiDv8fUNnX0wEd3WJCNEey4=; b=TjgJQyquCTSVYoTWq2h0QZBCYgwymplO++ujMGg2T9zjXN+8mDDLh7Cr S4CmBhboCYmfZEdWbzqMWqv+5CAqbh5Z1XnvLVvB4h956w5f0APPL+Apx +S51PPPN1Ril3hsswrB+OWPNddJJMmrsnh+G8rX/dFpUtbH2gmy1QvGSe c=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApIFAL0DTlStJV2P/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UUwUEzSqHSwKBERYBcguEAwIEOg8uAg4EAQg2KxclAgQOBQmIOAgFyQMBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXBJBRMweESwWSB4RIhxKBMTyDDZE0g3hsgUiBAwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,794,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="90592746" Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Oct 2014 08:38:34 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com [173.37.183.75]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9R8cYvH009088 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 27 Oct 2014 08:38:34 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.248]) by xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([173.37.183.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 03:38:34 -0500 From: "Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" To: "ccamp@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-mib-09.txt Thread-Index: AQHP8b+kWzdsHKwagEeXpf4LB/GdU5xD8xwA Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 08:38:33 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20141027082545.29273.85604.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206 x-originating-ip: [10.148.213.45] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <413836FEC681904BA4114ACA3E4ADB40@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/CFFgKHYYV1GKgWXhQW7GbDmovz8 Subject: Re: [CCAMP] New Version Notification for draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-mib-09.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 08:38:37 -0000 Hi,=20 We have posted a new version of the draft reflecting the comments from the IETF-90 meeting. There are a lot of changes based on comments from colleagues participating in ITU-T (Kan, Ive and others) And making the draft closer to ITU recommendations. The authors appreciate further comments for the next ccamp. Thanks,=20 Gabriele Gabriele Galimberti Technical Leader Cisco Photonics Srl via S.Maria Molgora, 48 C 20871 - Vimercate (MB) Italy www.cisco.com/global/IT/ ggalimbe@cisco.com Phone :+39 039 2091462 Mobile :+39 335 7481947 Fax :+39 039 2092049 On 10/27/14 9:25 AM, "internet-drafts@ietf.org" wrote: > >A new version of I-D, draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-mib-09.txt >has been successfully submitted by Gabriele Galimberti and posted to the >IETF repository. > >Name: draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-mib >Revision: 09 >Title: An SNMP MIB extension to RFC3591 to manage optical interface >parameters of "G.698.2 single channel" in DWDM applications >Document date: 2014-10-27 >Group: Individual Submission >Pages: 23 >URL: =20 >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-mib >-09.txt >Status: =20 >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-mib/ >Htmlized: =20 >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-mib-09 >Diff: =20 >http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-mib-= 09 > >Abstract: > This memo defines a module of the Management Information Base (MIB) > used by Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) in TCP/IP- based > internet. In particular, it defines objects for managing single > channel optical interface parameters of DWDM applications, using the > approach specified in G.698.2 [ITU.G698.2] . This interface, > described in ITU-T G.872, G.709 and G.798, is one type of OTN multi- > vendor Intra-Domain Interface (IaDI). This RFC is an extension of > RFC3591 to support the optical parameters specified in ITU-T G.698.2 > and application identifiers specified in ITU-T G.874.1 [ITU.G874.1]. > Note that G.874.1 encompasses vendor-specific codes, which if used > would make the interface a single vendor IaDI and could still be > managed. > > The MIB module defined in this memo can be used for Optical > Parameters monitoring and/or configuration of the endpoints of the > multi-vendor IaDI based on the Black Link approach. > > =20 > =20 > > >Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >submission >until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > >The IETF Secretariat > From nobody Mon Oct 27 03:08:54 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E40081A8FD5 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 03:08:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fxc8QxPxOvPg for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 03:08:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpgre-esg-01.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F330A1A902F for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 03:08:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.122]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id B5B8698E041FF; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:08:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from destgsu0709.de.alcatel-lucent.com (slsv7at.de.alcatel-lucent.com [149.204.245.107]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s9RA8cVx008181 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:08:40 +0100 Received: from [149.204.107.17] (DESTGN0H466262.de.alcatel-lucent.com [149.204.107.17]) (authenticated bits=0) by destgsu0709.de.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s9RA8VuI010263 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:08:37 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <544E199F.4040007@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:08:31 +0100 From: Dieter Beller Organization: Alcatel-Lucent User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lou Berger , CCAMP References: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> X-SubSwitch: [CCAMP]; [CCAMP] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/iQPl6BvAzjODZGMv2MZh4jUMTUw Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:08:52 -0000 yes/support Thanks, Dieter On 23.10.2014 16:01, Lou Berger wrote: > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working group > document. Please send email to the list indicating “yes/support” or > “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your technical > reservations with the document. > > The poll ends Thursday October 6th. > > Thanks, > > Deborah and Lou > > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Mon Oct 27 08:33:58 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9635E1A88AF for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 08:33:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oFwZIF4jm6FF for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 08:33:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53BAD1A8889 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 08:33:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2312; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414424029; x=1415633629; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=oc3f3S3ego1Zl1mAKOPVLvXRmTSYsHpQOqgDlzGthAg=; b=DRSLCvPxGcBzDQ05sgnPtm0lJ/YLaxfNG+hhy7uCx+3wyd1kmdZNlQl1 OA573nXKvRNfD94SuE9w0EnjGIbQqzSCxbjVFCEhQSqd1RzlaiFUjyAMi h5I0SsS7iDH7hTRe4Ka+RRvBRoDoCSKoAn/vlowtW3jNcbwzwniDG9aNW k=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkAkAAllTlStJA2H/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UWAS6T5Jth00CgRwWAX2EAgEBAQR0BQwGAQgOAwMBAmEdCAIEAQ0FiEENy1ABAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGY51gTERASUrBwIEhEUFkgeESIcSgTE8gw2NNIQAg3hsAYEOOYEDAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,796,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="366800271" Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Oct 2014 15:33:48 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com [173.37.183.77]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9RFXlHR005378 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 27 Oct 2014 15:33:47 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.159]) by xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([173.37.183.77]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:33:47 -0500 From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" To: Lou Berger , Xian Zhang , "Haomian Zheng" , "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" , "Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" , Pawel Brzozowski Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 Thread-Index: AQHP7t2443AeiBphnkq5kX7uX5EEM5xEKwOA Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 15:33:46 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <54492B81.4020402@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616 x-originating-ip: [10.86.249.9] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/ZX5PdMyjBcKmuhKfMP5Rd3YNhB8 Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 15:33:55 -0000 Hi-=20 No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Thanks Regards =8A Zafar=20 -----Original Message----- From: "lberger@labn.net" Date: Thursday, October 23, 2014 12:23 PM To: Xian Zhang , Haomian Zheng , "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" , zali , "Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" , Pawel Brzozowski Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 >Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP) > >As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption: > >Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? > > Please state either: > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" > or > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > >If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules >(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? > >If yes to the above, please state either: > > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" > or > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > >If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think > appropriate. > >If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the >above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are >aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next >stage until a response has been received from each author and listed >contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S >TO LINES. > >If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author or >contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules >which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of >others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any > contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more >information, please see the RFCs listed above and >http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. > >Thank you, >CCAMP WG Chairs > >PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your >response. From nobody Mon Oct 27 09:51:30 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A768D1A1A31 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:51:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AUhlzzRKmDHc for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:51:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4974B1A1B0F for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:50:28 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-f791c6d00000617b-bc-544e77d21a3a Received: from ESESSHC003.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 2C.DD.24955.2D77E445; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 17:50:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from ESESSMB301.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.4]) by ESESSHC003.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.27]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 17:50:25 +0100 From: Daniele Ceccarelli To: "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" Thread-Topic: CCAMP agenda for IETF 91 Thread-Index: Ac/yBbuyvHuQVSDTQ6WhYpKHHWS0Dg== Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:50:25 +0000 Message-ID: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48127BDE01@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.16] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48127BDE01ESESSMB301erics_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrKLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje6lcr8Qg41L5C2ezLnBYnG5q5vd oqP5LYsDs8fL/jmMHkuW/GTy+LCpmS2AOYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoErY/nMSewFn8QrZjzrZG1g nCHaxcjJISFgItHasoMJwhaTuHBvPVsXIxeHkMARRokfe98yQziLGCXenuli7WLk4GATsJJ4 csgHpEFEQFdi78brzCA2s0C1xInd28EGCQsoSrz99ooFokZN4vjxV4wgrSICehLNj0tBTBYB VYnLH/VAKngFfCW275zBDmIzCshKTNi9iBFiorjErSfzoU4TkFiy5zwzhC0q8fLxP1YIW1Fi 59l2qAvyJV5O+8sOMVNQ4uTMJywTGIVnIRk1C0nZLCRlEHEdiQW7P7FB2NoSyxa+Zoaxzxx4 zIQsvoCRfRWjaHFqcVJuupGxXmpRZnJxcX6eXl5qySZGYDwd3PJbdQfj5TeOhxgFOBiVeHg/ 1PiGCLEmlhVX5h5ilOZgURLnXXhuXrCQQHpiSWp2ampBalF8UWlOavEhRiYOTqkGRtWbrH4q aXXhN/fsvvXy9vRFK84HmZ+MCijVP+ByJPJ01xeeTUrmwlMn3+3Z5RFpL/bxp9aMbJ4nAilC /C9Pz4s5XmA8zXpG0p1vcXa7D2Quuhp9wCdq3h/Gdq7Kf1+UXvizK/UVqX1Ojr4pkX90wYbw ruwd2/fGRkaHRX/VYapiVYia1bx+oxJLcUaioRZzUXEiAD505uqIAgAA Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/bIcFoZVyD1YYA9JlCDJBoXaFzuI Subject: [CCAMP] CCAMP agenda for IETF 91 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:51:20 -0000 --_000_4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48127BDE01ESESSMB301erics_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, the CCAMP agenda for the upcoming meeting has been uploaded and can be foun= d at: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/agenda/agenda-91-ccamp Please check if there is any mistake and if all the requests were met. Also= , please start sending your slides to me (ccing Lou and Deborah). BR Daniele + co-chairs --_000_4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48127BDE01ESESSMB301erics_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,

 

the CCAMP agenda for the upcoming meeting has been u= ploaded and can be found at: http:= //www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/agenda/agenda-91-ccamp

 

Please check if there is any mistake and if all the = requests were met. Also, please start sending your slides to me (ccing Lou = and Deborah).

 

BR
Daniele + co-chairs

--_000_4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48127BDE01ESESSMB301erics_-- From nobody Mon Oct 27 10:44:26 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81BD1A8715 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:43:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zYb3zk2HT1L6 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:43:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gproxy7-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy7-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [70.40.196.235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A910A1A8714 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:43:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 19088 invoked by uid 0); 27 Oct 2014 17:43:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85) by gproxy7.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 27 Oct 2014 17:43:53 -0000 Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw4 with id 8Pjp1p00w2SSUrH01Pjs0k; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 17:43:52 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=fdw+lSgF c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=u9EReRu7m0cA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=owPSFnHmqeyPyQLysKgA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=55DbcmCfkwa4BbScVXIhlEsaTiubyfe4l0tQFDRJQXw=; b=RBoDPoj0RuW1GB0EwzgelW8FL4NKSAr8z6/TBPNd0Q8GguB1eX4OVt57fjkpSdu77fa4eiUyNIsKI2AUJ0A2llqvtHfWCpdMQIuD4wcbJU/NzsJHlnd+jqUvqdeCrKiw; Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:55517 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XioKc-0001sU-4A for ccamp@ietf.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:43:50 -0600 Message-ID: <544E845E.8070105@labn.net> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:43:58 -0400 From: Lou Berger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CCAMP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net} Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/yIAWaq5aSioPHmM37O55fWi1R3M Subject: [CCAMP] 2 slides requested for all WG drafts X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 17:43:55 -0000 Editors/Authors of WG drafts / all, We'd like to do things a little differently in HI. We'd like to start out the session with going through all WG drafts* that are not otherwise on the agenda, covering two topics for each: (1) open issues and (2) next steps. We'd like 1 or 2 slides for each draft covering these points -- no title slides please! We will compile the slides, have scheduled a slot for there review, during which there opportunity for discussion as needed. (We/chairs will present slides, authors/editors/contributors should be prepared to respond to any questions.) These slides should be sent no later than end of day Sunday, Nov 9, so that we can compile and have them posted on the 10th. No slides will translate into us asking the WG if there is still interest in working on the topic. Thank you, Deborah and Lou (*) the list of drafts for which 1 or 2 slides are expected are: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-rsvp-te-ext draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label draft-ietf-ccamp-grid-property-lmp draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ro draft-ietf-ccamp-network-assigned-upstream-label draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb draft-ietf-ccamp-te-metric-recording draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-iv-info and presuming WG acceptance: draft-ietf-ccamp-interconnected-te-info-exchange draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3 draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry From nobody Mon Oct 27 11:03:41 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ACA31A88B4; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:59:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w9P4mo4iZ4US; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:59:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA341A8849; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:59:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.7.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20141027175935.17275.88736.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:59:35 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/RGV2zpnM3w3Y_QukN1YWs9fpdWA Cc: ccamp@ietf.org Subject: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-09.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 17:59:37 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Common Control and Measurement Plane Working Group of the IETF. Title : RSVP-TE Extensions for Collecting SRLG Information Authors : Fatai Zhang Oscar Gonzalez de Dios Dan Li Cyril Margaria Matt Hartley Zafar Ali Filename : draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-09.txt Pages : 13 Date : 2014-10-27 Abstract: This document provides extensions for the Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) to support automatic collection of Shared Risk Link Group (SRLG) information for the TE link formed by a Label Switched Path (LSP). The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-09 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-09 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Mon Oct 27 11:14:44 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7FE01A8784 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:14:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -12.612 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.612 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9go4xgDaAAxl for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:14:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 361B31A3BA3 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:14:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5888; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414433658; x=1415643258; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=jB8xYr0Mw/ObqyQefj73bR/vCyehfDYnnHxS9EkUq8k=; b=JO3cCGjW7zwGQHyLrA8xIZhlr6IauiqEnZKeqZ+awcKyUsfBqT580r93 a5vNzPMQDXXfhIbv0rWmjcLfpbdT8d2mAmV1fxw+XVVDESrK8qf17z3W6 c0EogBrtEYXgN3mnSb9Soy56Ya2JUZLUhTUdJdRWfpPR4RIk3mwV2KBNn M=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhcFAL6KTlStJA2B/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UWATNMAqHTQKBHRYBfYQCAQEBAwEBAQFrCwULAgEIDgoKCxknAgklAgQBDQUIiDAJDctCAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEwSQMCcxBwqDI4EeBYsmhmGJaIMjg0mDLYoHhACDeGyBBkKBAwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,797,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="366852229" Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Oct 2014 18:14:17 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com [173.37.183.82]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9RIEH3H022002 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 27 Oct 2014 18:14:17 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.7.227]) by xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([173.37.183.82]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:14:16 -0500 From: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" To: Lou Berger , OSCAR GONZALEZ DE DIOS , "draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect@tools.ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-07 Thread-Index: AQHP7t0PN3PpktMpCEyNgz1cY8QfLpw+NtqAgAYOsDA= Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 18:14:16 +0000 Message-ID: <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC14AF309F@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com> References: <536AAB57.2090403@labn.net> <54482AAA.2040602@labn.net> <54493009.5040305@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54493009.5040305@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [161.44.212.61] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/7nRPYwKnZOqKePvnFHVmcYAzstk Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-07 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 18:14:23 -0000 Lou, v-09 has just gone out. I think we've covered all the outstanding comments = from you - please let us know if that's not the case :) Cheers Matt > Oscar, > Much thanks. I expect that your next version (which addresses these > and any other comments, perhaps even before HI) will be ready for LC. It > probably would be good to review the changes with the WG in HI, > particularly the completely new section 1.1. to ensure consensus -- > perhaps even just 1 or 2 slides. >=20 > Lou >=20 > On 10/23/2014 12:19 PM, OSCAR GONZALEZ DE DIOS wrote: > > Dear Lou, > > > > Thank you very much for the comments. > > > > We had some changes in > > draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-07 ready since a couple of weeks > > ago that we did not find time to put together and complete. We have > > just sent this version. Some of your comments seems are already taken > into account in this version. Summarizing: > > > > - Avoiding RFC 2119 language in lower case: done! In fact, it > > has been reviewed that all RFC 2119 keywords are used as they are > supposed to. > > - Section is missing handling of RRO too big: To be added in > next version > > - Text for multiple IDs: A sentence indicating multiple SRLG > > Ids can be present added. Still need to add a text explaining the > > conditions to include multiple Ids. However, I think the conditions > > fit better in the procedure section. > > - Reference for CPS: Done! Added a whole paragraph explaining > > the collection with CPS, and reference added. > > - Removing policy processing in the resv. To be added in the > next version. > > > > > > I hope we can be soon in Last Call.. > > > > > > =D3scar > > > > El 23/10/14 00:07, "Lou Berger" escribi=F3: > > > >> Authors, > >> I think we still have some unresolved comments from May: > >> > >>>> - you use "should not" in lower case in a few spots in this section. > >>>> While I think your usage *is* correct, my experience is that > >>>> someone (probably in the IESG) will tell you that these need to be > >>>> in upper case at some point. Of course, they'll be wrong, and > >>>> this will have to be explained. I suggest avoiding 2119 language > >>>> in lower case where easily avoided. How about s/should not be/is > >>>> not to be > >> The above comment also applies to "must". > >> > >> Your current of 2119 language is a bit inconsistent. I think you > >> should review current uses of 2119 language and ensure that such > >> usage is limited to (protocol) mechanisms, behavior and > >> interoperability. If doesn't the language is most likely informative > >> in nature and should avoid 2119 conformance language. > >> > >>>> - The section is missing handling of RRO to big. Perhaps add it at > >>>> ~line 330. > >> A few of new comments: > >> > >> - The current text of section 4.1 could be read as only one ID may be > >> present in the SO. you should explain under what conditions multiple > >> IDs are to be added. > >> > >> - Please provide a reference for "Confidential Path message. Segment > >> (CPS)" > >> > >> - (should have caught this one before, i.e., is in old text) In > >> Section > >> 5.1 it looks like you are applying policy on both Path and Resv > >> processing ("When a node receives a Resv message ... if local policy > >> determines ...). Given the "SRLG Recording Rejected" PathErr required > >> earlier in the section, is this really needed? Are you assuming > >> separate upstream/downstream policies? (Which would seem to be > >> overkill.) Covering a policy change race condition, something else? I > >> suspect the policy processing text on resv isn't needed. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Lou > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> CCAMP mailing list > >> CCAMP@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp > > > > ________________________________ > > > > Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario= , > puede contener informaci=F3n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso > exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el > destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci=F3n, > divulgaci=F3n y/o copia sin autorizaci=F3n puede estar prohibida en virtu= d de > la legislaci=F3n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogam= os > que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v=EDa y proceda a su > destrucci=F3n. > > > > The information contained in this transmission is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution o= r > copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have receive= d > this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to > the sender that you have received this communication in error and then > delete it. > > > > Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu > > destinat=E1rio, pode conter informa=E7=E3o privilegiada ou confidencial= e =E9 > > para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n=E3o =E9 vossa > > senhoria o destinat=E1rio indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, > > utiliza=E7=E3o, divulga=E7=E3o e/ou c=F3pia sem autoriza=E7=E3o pode es= tar proibida > > em virtude da legisla=E7=E3o vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro= , > > rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e > > proceda a sua destrui=E7=E3o > > >=20 > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Mon Oct 27 11:25:51 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B6771A8BC2 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:25:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.667 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JKpRGd22ki5o for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:25:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.25.95]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 670481A90FF for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:22:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 13505 invoked by uid 0); 27 Oct 2014 18:22:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85) by gproxy1.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 27 Oct 2014 18:22:48 -0000 Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw4 with id 8QNg1p00M2SSUrH01QNjZY; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 18:22:47 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=fdw+lSgF c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=u9EReRu7m0cA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=PCi_J6wGlEnCf0jOvugA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=Hg15Viv33x54wVGHzN4LsEcBNnUSiQ2am5hElF8rzmI=; b=jYkneG4q/7E5vMECFSnsP/IL6lo5GurfXFf2ZWx9cg0gO2vdOvQoJBI0s7KSD8vAN7NfK2mcbx0N6bQL/kMkbzOSrH6GQRmw+VAtakp3Xtg+KsH0utkEgBS/IQS4Kwvb; Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:60862 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XiowC-0002pt-OG; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:22:40 -0600 Message-ID: <544E8D79.7010800@labn.net> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:22:49 -0400 From: Lou Berger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" , OSCAR GONZALEZ DE DIOS , "draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect@tools.ietf.org" References: <536AAB57.2090403@labn.net> <54482AAA.2040602@labn.net> <54493009.5040305@labn.net> <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC14AF309F@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC14AF309F@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net} Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/AsMfvrtNLfMZMn4OD8VPrPyXQ2U Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-07 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 18:25:19 -0000 Matt/Authors, Much thanks, I think this rev addresses my comments. Do you have any outstanding actions/plans on the draft or do you believe it is now ready for LC? Thanks, Lou On 10/27/2014 2:14 PM, Matt Hartley (mhartley) wrote: > Lou, > > v-09 has just gone out. I think we've covered all the outstanding comments from you - please let us know if that's not the case :) > > Cheers > > Matt > >> Oscar, >> Much thanks. I expect that your next version (which addresses these >> and any other comments, perhaps even before HI) will be ready for LC. It >> probably would be good to review the changes with the WG in HI, >> particularly the completely new section 1.1. to ensure consensus -- >> perhaps even just 1 or 2 slides. >> >> Lou >> >> On 10/23/2014 12:19 PM, OSCAR GONZALEZ DE DIOS wrote: >>> Dear Lou, >>> >>> Thank you very much for the comments. >>> >>> We had some changes in >>> draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-07 ready since a couple of weeks >>> ago that we did not find time to put together and complete. We have >>> just sent this version. Some of your comments seems are already taken >> into account in this version. Summarizing: >>> - Avoiding RFC 2119 language in lower case: done! In fact, it >>> has been reviewed that all RFC 2119 keywords are used as they are >> supposed to. >>> - Section is missing handling of RRO too big: To be added in >> next version >>> - Text for multiple IDs: A sentence indicating multiple SRLG >>> Ids can be present added. Still need to add a text explaining the >>> conditions to include multiple Ids. However, I think the conditions >>> fit better in the procedure section. >>> - Reference for CPS: Done! Added a whole paragraph explaining >>> the collection with CPS, and reference added. >>> - Removing policy processing in the resv. To be added in the >> next version. >>> >>> I hope we can be soon in Last Call.. >>> >>> >>> Óscar >>> >>> El 23/10/14 00:07, "Lou Berger" escribió: >>> >>>> Authors, >>>> I think we still have some unresolved comments from May: >>>> >>>>>> - you use "should not" in lower case in a few spots in this section. >>>>>> While I think your usage *is* correct, my experience is that >>>>>> someone (probably in the IESG) will tell you that these need to be >>>>>> in upper case at some point. Of course, they'll be wrong, and >>>>>> this will have to be explained. I suggest avoiding 2119 language >>>>>> in lower case where easily avoided. How about s/should not be/is >>>>>> not to be >>>> The above comment also applies to "must". >>>> >>>> Your current of 2119 language is a bit inconsistent. I think you >>>> should review current uses of 2119 language and ensure that such >>>> usage is limited to (protocol) mechanisms, behavior and >>>> interoperability. If doesn't the language is most likely informative >>>> in nature and should avoid 2119 conformance language. >>>> >>>>>> - The section is missing handling of RRO to big. Perhaps add it at >>>>>> ~line 330. >>>> A few of new comments: >>>> >>>> - The current text of section 4.1 could be read as only one ID may be >>>> present in the SO. you should explain under what conditions multiple >>>> IDs are to be added. >>>> >>>> - Please provide a reference for "Confidential Path message. Segment >>>> (CPS)" >>>> >>>> - (should have caught this one before, i.e., is in old text) In >>>> Section >>>> 5.1 it looks like you are applying policy on both Path and Resv >>>> processing ("When a node receives a Resv message ... if local policy >>>> determines ...). Given the "SRLG Recording Rejected" PathErr required >>>> earlier in the section, is this really needed? Are you assuming >>>> separate upstream/downstream policies? (Which would seem to be >>>> overkill.) Covering a policy change race condition, something else? I >>>> suspect the policy processing text on resv isn't needed. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Lou >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> CCAMP mailing list >>>> CCAMP@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, >> puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso >> exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el >> destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, >> divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de >> la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos >> que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su >> destrucción. >>> The information contained in this transmission is privileged and >> confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or >> entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended >> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or >> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received >> this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to >> the sender that you have received this communication in error and then >> delete it. >>> Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu >>> destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é >>> para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa >>> senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, >>> utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida >>> em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, >>> rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e >>> proceda a sua destruição >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> CCAMP mailing list >> CCAMP@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Mon Oct 27 11:41:43 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 801B71ACCFD for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:41:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.667 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QIyNb2Mmin3D for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:41:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.33.93]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 277771ACE76 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:38:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 10451 invoked by uid 0); 27 Oct 2014 18:37:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85) by gproxy8.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 27 Oct 2014 18:37:59 -0000 Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw4 with id 8Qdv1p00M2SSUrH01QdyXX; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 18:37:58 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=fdw+lSgF c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=u9EReRu7m0cA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=R93LHVwsjZ-F47kZ7GcA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=P/gwAlVvU2z3mJOa6X86dGwCdymyKRznaNUWr9nD/kA=; b=BlBLZl3c/kK2KRyylulf3229oGurfCQ/D8g6ova8CB7yKSN31ONmgZXp+lgo7SHS+QyUpiKWkhKI/BIcUfFSzwy5N/aY7zBxHb0IwqSDCnqfU9uRPc0ezlTotIFVajFN; Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:34210 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XipAx-0000Gk-NP; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:37:55 -0600 Message-ID: <544E910C.8080307@labn.net> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:38:04 -0400 From: Lou Berger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" , "draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb@tools.ietf.org" References: <20141020074350.21488.53873.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733758033@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <544805C0.8060103@labn.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733759B2E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <5448F9E7.6050703@labn.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9273375C339@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9273375C339@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net} Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/Y7cV-2Wky5Whd3Xx5H1CkHFvRTI Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 18:41:19 -0000 Jie/Authors, Thank you for the update, please see below for additional responses. WRT section 2.1. Extensions for Lock Instruct: - What extension is defined in this subsection. What do you think about replacing section 2.1 with something along the lines of? 2.1. Lock Instruct Indication In order to indicate the lock/unlock of the LSP, the A (Administratively down) bit in ADMIN_STATUS object [RFC3471] [RFC3473] is used.=20 On 10/25/2014 2:11 AM, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote: > Hi Lou,=20 > > Thank you for your comments and suggestions. We will submit a new revis= ion to reflect them. Please see my replies inline: > >> Jie, >> Thank you for the quick response. See below for responses. >> >> It probably would also be worthwhile to add some words on when this >> extension should be used versus draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-e= xt >> . > In some earlier version there used to be some words talking about draft= -ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext and this draft, we will add some word= s back in the new revision.=20 > > Basically draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext defines extensions f= or configuring pro-active MPLS-TP OAMs, while draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li= -lb is about LI & LB provisioning, which belong to on-demand OAM function= s. Hum, I'm not sure I would have gone this way. My recollection was that the intent of this document was to provide a generic (non-TP, specific) mechanisms for LI-LB. Do I have it wrong? >>>> - Section 3.1, >>>> I think intermediate node behavior related to processing of the A is= >>>> unchanged by this document so think you should drop the 3 lines that= contain >> the phrase "... >>>> intermediate nodes ..." >>> Agree the behavior of intermediate node is unchanged, will remove the= >> descriptions about intermediate node behavior in a new revision. >>>> - Section 3.2 >>>> The section is not clear if the A bit processing occurs / completes >>>> before Loopback related processing begins or occurs coincidentally. >>>> (I read the last sentence of the first paragraph saying the former >>>> and the last sentence of the 2nd paragraph saying the latter.) Eith= er way it >> should be clarified. >>> The A bit (lock) processing needs to be completed before initiating l= oopback >> request. The last sentence of the 2nd paragraph was to emphasize that = when >> signaling loopback, the A bit should be kept set to indicate the LSP i= s still in lock >> mode. >>> We will rephrase the sentence to make it clearer. >> Great. Please include appropriate conformance language. > Will fix this in the new revision. I think the following should be rephrased to include 2119 language: The loopback request is acceptable only when the LSP is already in lock mode. If this statement is true, shouldn't the following SHOULDs be MUSTs? The Administratively down (A) bit in ADMIN_STATUS object SHOULD be kept set to indicate that the LSP is still in lock mode. and The Administratively down (A) bit in ADMIN_STATUS object SHOULD be kept set to indicate the LSP is still in lock mode. and The Administratively down (A) Bit in ADMIN_STATUS Object SHOULD be kept set in the Resv message. It probably would be worthwhile to state that the Lock Instruct MAY be removed once the Loopback is cleared. Thanks, Lou =2E.. From nobody Mon Oct 27 11:45:01 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A1B41A1A58 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:44:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WOogZxLiCckI for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:44:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0124.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.124]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 678C61A8983 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:41:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BY2PR08CA056.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.141.248.174) by BL2PR08MB082.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.242.196.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.6.9; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 18:41:53 +0000 Received: from BN1AFFO11FD036.protection.gbl (2a01:111:f400:7c10::104) by BY2PR08CA056.outlook.office365.com (2a01:111:e400:2c5c::46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.6.9 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 18:41:52 +0000 Received: from sv-ex13-prd2.infinera.com (204.128.141.24) by BN1AFFO11FD036.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.58.52.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1049.20 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 18:41:52 +0000 Received: from SV-EX13-PRD1.infinera.com (10.100.103.228) by sv-ex13-prd2.infinera.com (10.100.103.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.847.32; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:41:53 -0700 Received: from SV-EX13-PRD1.infinera.com ([10.100.97.11]) by sv-ex13-prd1.infinera.com ([10.100.97.11]) with mapi id 15.00.0847.030; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:41:53 -0700 From: Khuzema Pithewan To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP7smQKjQtlq5EhkSrOrwrgTuVmJxETbgw Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 18:41:53 +0000 Message-ID: <8328e01f99b541158e95edaa6b03d0a1@sv-ex13-prd1.infinera.com> References: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.100.99.93] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:204.128.141.24; CTRY:US; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(438002)(13464003)(377454003)(164054003)(199003)(189002)(50986999)(4396001)(21056001)(85306004)(106466001)(87936001)(230783001)(85852003)(54356999)(33646002)(2656002)(76176999)(107046002)(108616004)(50466002)(99396003)(107886001)(46406003)(16796002)(47776003)(64706001)(31966008)(20776003)(46102003)(80022003)(76482002)(86362001)(19580405001)(106116001)(19580395003)(6806004)(92566001)(44976005)(97756001)(120916001)(15975445006)(53416004)(95666004)(23726002)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BL2PR08MB082; H:sv-ex13-prd2.infinera.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:outgoingmail2.infinera.com; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BL2PR08MB082; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0377802854 Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of infinera.com designates 204.128.141.24 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=204.128.141.24; helo=sv-ex13-prd2.infinera.com; Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 204.128.141.24) smtp.mailfrom=kpithewan@infinera.com; X-OriginatorOrg: infinera.com Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/YCXvW-Ws1iMl--iFBbz5m6w3ScQ Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 18:44:39 -0000 yes/support Khuzema -----Original Message----- From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 7:01 AM To: CCAMP Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchang= e-07 a WG document All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working group docum= ent. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not s= upport". If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with th= e document. The poll ends Thursday October 6th. Thanks, Deborah and Lou _______________________________________________ CCAMP mailing list CCAMP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Mon Oct 27 11:56:04 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9561ACF71; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:55:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aaPfUmjQx1Va; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:55:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D761ACF15; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:55:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.7.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20141027185515.18769.16299.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:55:15 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/X7m2F4RT_f6nneITk_QD1ypDS7c Cc: ccamp@ietf.org Subject: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-05.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 18:55:40 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Common Control and Measurement Plane Working Group of the IETF. Title : Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) Path Diversity using Exclude Route Authors : Zafar Ali George Swallow Fatai Zhang Dieter Beller Filename : draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-05.txt Pages : 27 Date : 2014-10-27 Abstract: RFC 4874 specifies methods by which path exclusions can be communicated during RSVP-TE signaling in networks where precise explicit paths are not computed by the LSP source node. This document specifies procedures for additional route exclusion subobject based on Paths currently existing or expected to exist within the network. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-05 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-05 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Mon Oct 27 12:24:47 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D41E1AD082 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:24:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.667 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7AnLSrmFWY24 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:24:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gproxy5-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy5-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.38.55]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 36EFA1AD04B for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:24:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 31094 invoked by uid 0); 27 Oct 2014 18:49:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw2) (10.0.90.83) by gproxy5.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 27 Oct 2014 18:49:03 -0000 Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw2 with id 8Jov1p00H2SSUrH01JoyGa; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:49:02 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=e5mVF8Z/ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=u9EReRu7m0cA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=gfioU3JDUWEIqbFtypAA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=dcIRE7wUZRMlVXjTuMV9Qd0nnWy/7gP4UfjcFqT6YRE=; b=XLIIr7LeLGKz0sZsOvJaZLd02PXooxmzwlHCuEQ0kGzDRDe9HN6ZBTOvjcp615bgNg5puZoGaxEfpR/qdoKrskTmG0x8xtXrtdeS68JzsJ+BgZREvtn/x8dZUWqXm/OJ; Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:35442 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XipLb-0004E5-Vq; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:48:56 -0600 Message-ID: <544E93A0.4060201@labn.net> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:49:04 -0400 From: Lou Berger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cyril Margaria References: <542F01CD.9020709@labn.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net} Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/o77XhWXSouDRTagcy7sLIq_qyMw Cc: "" , CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] comments/questions on draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ro X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 19:24:27 -0000 Cyril, Authors, Thank you for the update. See below for one response. Do you have any outstanding actions/plans on the draft or do you believe it is ready for LC? Thanks, Lou On 10/24/2014 12:37 PM, Cyril Margaria wrote: > > Hi, > > Thank you for the comments, we believe we did address all of them in > the new version we posted: > URL: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ro-05.txt > Status: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ro/ > Htmlized: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ro-05 > > please find answers to individual comments inline. > > Best Regards, > Cyril > > > On 3 October 2014 16:06, Lou Berger > wrote: > ... > > - Section 4. Isn't recording applicable to required attributes as > well? > I.e.,why no R bit recording in section 4.1? > > > RFC5420 does not make that distinction in the RRO attribute subobject, > In addition the R bit is known to the node that inserted that ERO > subobject and the requiered presence of the attribute depends on the > given attribute. > or those reasons we did include the R bit in the RRO_HOP_ATTRIBUTE. If > there is a use case for it, we will include it. I guess this could be argued either way. From a technical perspective, I think the information is useful and you're already carrying the bit. Then again, from the process standpoint, if no one else thinks this is needed, I don't want my comment to trigger the change. ... From nobody Mon Oct 27 16:06:59 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41DAE1A6EEC for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:06:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3EAo5S48u35g for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:06:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (asmtp4.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C1C21A6F3E for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:06:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s9RN6E9E009595; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 23:06:14 GMT Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s9RN6CTG009585 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Oct 2014 23:06:13 GMT From: "Adrian Farrel" To: References: <20141027205144.12725.44237.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20141027205144.12725.44237.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 23:06:17 -0000 Message-ID: <009401cff23a$9dc45b30$d94d1190$@olddog.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQHbTlsaCL8Zky9h3AkSKQ3jFOl4E5wt1/3g Content-Language: en-gb X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1576-7.5.0.1018-21058.002 X-TM-AS-Result: No--15.226-10.0-31-10 X-imss-scan-details: No--15.226-10.0-31-10 X-TMASE-MatchedRID: +f/wAVSGjujMy6K24fisqwRH1Nr7oERdHg7k13K467IcVJCT3tVgajQH jbP3CK3iT8IgaeHtAv2cYDri5qcf9Txz5tDhhD0GzNY33yIEF4YNmVMWD55fO+oWVODXAWfcWKo DKTsuRuR1L+X18ZczPR/Ne6ZdAvcMvn+AFle5KGKzI1v7J4hECteh/5dF8EfbmmzaGKIwUHa3DI h4Vmbze2Kk37oZZ9aqk8lvAGI6LOB6bMYbioM9qUhEDfw/93Bu31asM/gsp2kM74Nf6tTB9mdyk ZCztL0ZNHMhEijgb/TkpWQV3pqGf0qXm4MPqTr26qr9Nf6IzxNRWu4OwvLdhJsoi2XrUn/JyeMt MD9QOgCk8oKXKhRLPI2j49Ftap9EOwBXM346/+x1EKPI49otF9rmi6VP8f5wz1R5WHwCtAjnXc8 j5mDHvXKKeJdM2pUu Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/8qo3szEbL98DJNHwh3LS49g_9Rw Cc: 'CCAMP' Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-doolan-ccamp-proprietary-ac-00.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 23:06:54 -0000 Paul, I think you point out some problems that need solving or avoiding. Doesn't the problem with PCs go away if an Enterprise Number is included in the encoding? Adrian > -----Original Message----- > From: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > internet-drafts@ietf.org > Sent: 27 October 2014 20:52 > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > Subject: I-D Action: draft-doolan-ccamp-proprietary-ac-00.txt > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > > > Title : Concerns with the use of Proprietary Application Codes > Author : Paul Doolan > Filename : draft-doolan-ccamp-proprietary-ac-00.txt > Pages : 8 > Date : 2014-10-27 > > Abstract: > This document explains the terms Application Code and Application > Identifier and points out a danger that exists when proprietary > application codes are used. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-doolan-ccamp-proprietary-ac/ > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-doolan-ccamp-proprietary-ac-00 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > I-D-Announce mailing list > I-D-Announce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html > or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt From nobody Mon Oct 27 19:42:53 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956361A6EF0 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 19:42:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -12.06 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.06 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eGQrkL6JeLiw for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 19:42:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16E111A6EE1 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 19:42:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8967; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414464169; x=1415673769; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=y4ijZvvwDLFYzRy5I2/gQjFyacFCHeRtRSgZEbiGywc=; b=G2hfU3su8d8H6y9gZl6vp1aceHZoEKMMQ0nZ0GEulD8xCZwHYqgZzYxm CdNSK2wOeAAyPHk9SIVH+J6BbkgPjp+pcvAS3Kh5nB/OwFYiRgh8Jlyw2 8bhzj+XZ6QnoTfo4hfYWX0LVLJ0DPlBTkM6cZoKONOTEEfblkThhROc7d A=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiUGAIICT1StJV2R/2dsb2JhbABcgkhGgSwEgwLSQAIbgQEWAX2EAwIELUEdAQYCPwUEMBQRAgQBEohBmU6cWQiVFAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEZkG0hAYJzgVgBBJIHi1qBMYNJjTSEAII0gURsgUiBAwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,800,1406592000"; d="scan'208,217";a="366982449" Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2014 02:42:24 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com [173.37.183.88]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9S2gNnX020438 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 28 Oct 2014 02:42:23 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x07.cisco.com ([169.254.2.151]) by xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([173.37.183.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 21:42:23 -0500 From: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" To: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" , "ccamp@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11 Thread-Index: AQHP7+sCAHhcMDPR8U+LcwoFq+sSd5xE4oWA Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 02:42:23 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.5.130515 x-originating-ip: [10.86.249.112] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D0747A9A400B9rgandhiciscocom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/2T-x6wUh4OYSpj6pdIbT5JhlfLs Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 02:42:51 -0000 --_000_D0747A9A400B9rgandhiciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGkgV0csIENoYWlycywNCg0KU3VwcG9ydCAoYXMgYSBjby1hdXRob3IpLg0KDQpUaGFua3MsDQpS YWtlc2gNCg0KDQq3orz+yMs6IENDQU1QIFttYWlsdG86Y2NhbXAtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10g tPqx7SBCUlVOR0FSRCwgREVCT1JBSCBBDQq3osvNyrG85DogMjAxNMTqMTDUwjIxyNUgNToyNw0K ytW8/sjLOiBjY2FtcEBpZXRmLm9yZzxtYWlsdG86Y2NhbXBAaWV0Zi5vcmc+DQrW98ziOiBbQ0NB TVBdIFdHIExhc3QgQ2FsbCBvbiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWNjYW1wLW1wbHMtdHAtcnN2cHRlLWV4dC1h c3NvY2lhdGVkLWxzcC0xMQ0KDQpBbGwsDQoNClRoaXMgc3RhcnRzIGEgdHdvLXdlZWsgd29ya2lu ZyBncm91cCBsYXN0IGNhbGwgb24gZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1jY2FtcC1tcGxzLXRwLXJzdnB0ZS1leHQt YXNzb2NpYXRlZC1sc3AtMTEuDQoNClRoaXMgd29ya2luZyBncm91cCBsYXN0IGNhbGwgZW5kcyBv biBOb3YuIDNyZC4gUGxlYXNlIHNlbmQgeW91ciBjb21tZW50cyB0byB0aGUgQ0NBTVAgbWFpbGlu ZyBsaXN0Lg0KDQpBcyBub3RlZCwgdGhlcmUgaXMgb25lIElQUiBkaXNjbG9zZWQuDQoNClRoYW5r cywNCkRlYm9yYWggKGFuZCBMb3UpDQoNCg== --_000_D0747A9A400B9rgandhiciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="gb2312" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi WG, C= hairs,

Support (as a co-autho= r).

 

Thanks,=

Rakesh

 

=B7=A2=BC=FE=C8=CB: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] =B4=FA=B1=ED = BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
=B7=A2=CB=CD= =CA=B1=BC=E4: 2014=C4=EA10=D4=C2= 21=C8=D5 5:27
=CA=D5=BC=FE=C8=CB: ccamp@ietf.org
=D6=F7=CC=E2: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-ls= p-11

 

All,

 

This starts a two-week working group last ca= ll on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.

 

This working group last call ends on Nov. 3<= /span>rd. Please send your comments to the CCAMP mailing list.

 

As noted, there is one IPR disclosed.

 

Thanks,

Deborah (and Lou)

 

 --_000_D0747A9A400B9rgandhiciscocom_-- From nobody Mon Oct 27 19:45:51 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31B41A8831 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 19:45:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.739 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7THDay-G5-Qq for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 19:45:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 745841A87D1 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 19:45:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BOC63078; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 02:45:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA409-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.41) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 02:45:38 +0000 Received: from SZXEMA512-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.174]) by SZXEMA409-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.41]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:45:24 +0800 From: "Zhangxian (Xian)" To: Lou Berger , Zhenghaomian , "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" , "Zafar Ali (zali)" , "Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" , Pawel Brzozowski Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 Thread-Index: AQHP7t26KdImg2UdZUCalp9kY5C6ipxE1IdV Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 02:45:23 +0000 Message-ID: References: <54492B81.4020402@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54492B81.4020402@labn.net> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.46.22.94] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/KWIFIvIYxjkX5AQWQP9Vsd4Bdsk Cc: CCAMP Subject: [CCAMP] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogUmVnYXJkaW5nIElQUiBvbiBkcmFmdC16aGFu?= =?gb2312?b?Zy1jY2FtcC1nbXBscy1yZXNvdXJjZS1zaGFyaW5nLXByb2MtMDM=?= X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 02:45:43 -0000 Tm8sIEknbSBub3QgYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IElQUiB0aGF0IGFwcGxpZXMgdG8gdGhpcyBkcmFmdC4N Cg0KQ2hlZXJzLA0KWGlhbg0KDQpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fDQq3orz+yMs6IExvdSBCZXJnZXIgW2xiZXJnZXJAbGFibi5uZXRdDQq3osvNyrG85DogMjAx NMTqMTDUwjI0yNUgMDoyMw0KytW8/sjLOiBaaGFuZ3hpYW4gKFhpYW4pOyBaaGVuZ2hhb21pYW47 IFJha2VzaCBHYW5kaGkgKHJnYW5kaGkpOyBaYWZhciBBbGkgKHphbGkpOyBHYWJyaWVsZSBNYXJp YSBHYWxpbWJlcnRpIChnZ2FsaW1iZSk7IFBhd2VsIEJyem96b3dza2kNCrOty806IENDQU1QDQrW 98ziOiBSZWdhcmRpbmcgSVBSIG9uIGRyYWZ0LXpoYW5nLWNjYW1wLWdtcGxzLXJlc291cmNlLXNo YXJpbmctcHJvYy0wMw0KDQpBdXRob3JzLCBDb250cmlidXRvcnMsIChDQ0FNUCkNCg0KQXMgcGFy dCBvZiB0aGUgcHJlcGFyYXRpb24gZm9yIHBvbGxpbmcgZm9yIFdHIGRvY3VtZW50IGFkb3B0aW9u Og0KDQpBcmUgeW91IGF3YXJlIG9mIGFueSBJUFIgdGhhdCBhcHBsaWVzIHRvIGRyYWZ0IGlkZW50 aWZpZWQgYWJvdmU/DQoNCiAgUGxlYXNlIHN0YXRlIGVpdGhlcjoNCg0KICAiTm8sIEknbSBub3Qg YXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IElQUiB0aGF0IGFwcGxpZXMgdG8gdGhpcyBkcmFmdCINCiAgb3INCiAgIlll cywgSSdtIGF3YXJlIG9mIElQUiB0aGF0IGFwcGxpZXMgdG8gdGhpcyBkcmFmdCINCg0KSWYgc28s IGhhcyB0aGlzIElQUiBiZWVuIGRpc2Nsb3NlZCBpbiBjb21wbGlhbmNlIHdpdGggSUVURiBJUFIg cnVsZXMNCihzZWUgUkZDcyAzOTc5LCA0ODc5LCAzNjY5IGFuZCA1Mzc4IGZvciBtb3JlIGRldGFp bHMpPw0KDQpJZiB5ZXMgdG8gdGhlIGFib3ZlLCBwbGVhc2Ugc3RhdGUgZWl0aGVyOg0KDQogICJZ ZXMsIHRoZSBJUFIgaGFzIGJlZW4gZGlzY2xvc2VkIGluIGNvbXBsaWFuY2Ugd2l0aCBJRVRGIElQ UiBydWxlcyINCiAgb3INCiAgIk5vLCB0aGUgSVBSIGhhcyBub3QgYmVlbiBkaXNjbG9zZWQiDQoN CklmIHlvdSBhbnN3ZXIgbm8sIHBsZWFzZSBwcm92aWRlIGFueSBhZGRpdGlvbmFsIGRldGFpbHMg eW91IHRoaW5rDQogIGFwcHJvcHJpYXRlLg0KDQpJZiB5b3UgYXJlIGxpc3RlZCBhcyBhIGRvY3Vt ZW50IGF1dGhvciBvciBjb250cmlidXRvciBwbGVhc2UgYW5zd2VyIHRoZQ0KYWJvdmUgYnkgcmVz cG9uZGluZyB0byB0aGlzIGVtYWlsIHJlZ2FyZGxlc3Mgb2Ygd2hldGhlciBvciBub3QgeW91IGFy ZQ0KYXdhcmUgb2YgYW55IHJlbGV2YW50IElQUi4gIFRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgd2lsbCBub3QgYWR2 YW5jZSB0byB0aGUgbmV4dA0Kc3RhZ2UgdW50aWwgYSByZXNwb25zZSBoYXMgYmVlbiByZWNlaXZl ZCBmcm9tIGVhY2ggYXV0aG9yIGFuZCBsaXN0ZWQNCmNvbnRyaWJ1dG9yLiAgTk9URTogVEhJUyBB UFBMSUVTIFRPIEFMTCBPRiBZT1UgTElTVEVEIElOIFRISVMgTUVTU0FHRSdTDQpUTyBMSU5FUy4N Cg0KSWYgeW91IGFyZSBvbiB0aGUgQ0NBTVAgV0cgZW1haWwgbGlzdCBidXQgYXJlIG5vdCBsaXN0 ZWQgYXMgYW4gYXV0aG9yIG9yDQpjb250cmlidXRvciwgd2UgcmVtaW5kIHlvdSBvZiB5b3VyIG9i bGlnYXRpb25zIHVuZGVyIHRoZSBJRVRGIElQUiBydWxlcw0Kd2hpY2ggZW5jb3VyYWdlcyB5b3Ug dG8gbm90aWZ5IHRoZSBJRVRGIGlmIHlvdSBhcmUgYXdhcmUgb2YgSVBSIG9mDQpvdGhlcnMgb24g YW4gSUVURiBjb250cmlidXRpb24sIG9yIHRvIHJlZnJhaW4gZnJvbSBwYXJ0aWNpcGF0aW5nIGlu IGFueQ0KIGNvbnRyaWJ1dGlvbiBvciBkaXNjdXNzaW9uIHJlbGF0ZWQgdG8geW91ciB1bmRpc2Ns b3NlZCBJUFIuICBGb3IgbW9yZQ0KaW5mb3JtYXRpb24sIHBsZWFzZSBzZWUgdGhlIFJGQ3MgbGlz dGVkIGFib3ZlIGFuZA0KaHR0cDovL3RyYWMudG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvZ3JvdXAvaWVzZy90cmFj L3dpa2kvSW50ZWxsZWN0dWFsUHJvcGVydHkuDQoNClRoYW5rIHlvdSwNCkNDQU1QIFdHIENoYWly cw0KDQpQUyBQbGVhc2UgaW5jbHVkZSBhbGwgbGlzdGVkIGluIHRoZSBoZWFkZXJzIG9mIHRoaXMg bWVzc2FnZSBpbiB5b3VyDQpyZXNwb25zZS4= From nobody Mon Oct 27 23:31:19 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F12B1A0267 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 23:31:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.611 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.611 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_22=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aGHSFAH0Oj1Z for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 23:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A243B1A00FE for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 23:31:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BOC78611; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 06:31:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.34) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 06:31:10 +0000 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.22]) by nkgeml403-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.34]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:31:03 +0800 From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" To: Lou Berger , "draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb@tools.ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt Thread-Index: AQHP7DmxZe4di09DEUSAb36hmAw2LZw4nFYQgANiRwCAAQp7EIAAGJKAgAM2mPCAA3N3AIABIQLA Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 06:31:02 +0000 Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9273375DA63@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <20141020074350.21488.53873.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733758033@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <544805C0.8060103@labn.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733759B2E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <5448F9E7.6050703@labn.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9273375C339@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <544E910C.8080307@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <544E910C.8080307@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.96.76] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/A3FWbM3LgZRavymT0nLDERMDhy8 Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 06:31:16 -0000 Hi Lou,=20 Thanks a lot for your review and comments, please see my replies inline:=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Lou Berger [mailto:lberger@labn.net] > Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 2:38 AM > To: Dongjie (Jimmy); draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb@tools.ietf.org > Cc: ccamp@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt >=20 > Jie/Authors, >=20 > Thank you for the update, please see below for additional responses. >=20 > WRT section 2.1. Extensions for Lock Instruct: > - What extension is defined in this subsection. What do you think about > replacing section 2.1 with something along the lines of? >=20 > 2.1. Lock Instruct Indication >=20 > In order to indicate the lock/unlock of the LSP, the A > (Administratively down) bit in ADMIN_STATUS object [RFC3471] > [RFC3473] is used. >=20 Agree with your suggestion. This could make section 2.1 much clearer. > >> It probably would also be worthwhile to add some words on when this > >> extension should be used versus > >> draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext > >> > . > > In some earlier version there used to be some words talking about > draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext and this draft, we will add some > words back in the new revision. > > > > Basically draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext defines extensions f= or > configuring pro-active MPLS-TP OAMs, while draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb= is > about LI & LB provisioning, which belong to on-demand OAM functions. >=20 > Hum, I'm not sure I would have gone this way. My recollection was that t= he > intent of this document was to provide a generic (non-TP, specific) mecha= nisms > for LI-LB. Do I have it wrong? You are correct, the intent is to provide a generic LI-LB mechanism, this i= s specified in the 2nd paragraph of the Introduction section: " In general the LI and LB are useful Operations, Administration and Maintenance (OAM) functions for technologies which use Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) as control plane, e.g. time- division multiplexing, wavelength-division multiplexing and packet switching. It is natural to use and extend the GMPLS control plane protocol to provide a unified approach for LI and LB provisioning in all these technologies. " And the 3rd paragraph intends to talk about the scope of draft-ietf-ccamp-r= svp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext, which is for specific MPLS-TP proactive OAM configu= ration and does not cover the LI&LB functions: "[I-D.ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext] specifies the RSVP-TE extensions for the configuration of pro-active MPLS-TP OAM functions, such as Continuity Check (CC), Connectivity Verification (CV), Delay Measurement (DM) and Loss Measurement (LM). The provisioning of on- demand OAM functions such as LI and LB are not covered in that document." If you think the above paragraph is a little bit confusing, we can remove i= t in next revision. > >>>> - Section 3.1, > >>>> I think intermediate node behavior related to processing of the A > >>>> is unchanged by this document so think you should drop the 3 lines > >>>> that contain > >> the phrase "... > >>>> intermediate nodes ..." > >>> Agree the behavior of intermediate node is unchanged, will remove > >>> the > >> descriptions about intermediate node behavior in a new revision. > >>>> - Section 3.2 > >>>> The section is not clear if the A bit processing occurs / completes > >>>> before Loopback related processing begins or occurs coincidentally. > >>>> (I read the last sentence of the first paragraph saying the former > >>>> and the last sentence of the 2nd paragraph saying the latter.) > >>>> Either way it > >> should be clarified. > >>> The A bit (lock) processing needs to be completed before initiating > >>> loopback > >> request. The last sentence of the 2nd paragraph was to emphasize that > >> when signaling loopback, the A bit should be kept set to indicate the > >> LSP is still in lock mode. > >>> We will rephrase the sentence to make it clearer. > >> Great. Please include appropriate conformance language. > > Will fix this in the new revision. >=20 > I think the following should be rephrased to include 2119 language: > The loopback request is acceptable only when the LSP is already in lo= ck > mode. >=20 > If this statement is true, shouldn't the following SHOULDs be MUSTs? > The Administratively down (A) bit in > ADMIN_STATUS object SHOULD be kept set to indicate that the LSP is > still in lock mode. > and > The > Administratively down (A) bit in ADMIN_STATUS object SHOULD be kept > set to indicate the LSP is still in lock mode. > and > The Administratively down > (A) Bit in ADMIN_STATUS Object SHOULD be kept set in the Resv > message. >=20 > It probably would be worthwhile to state that the Lock Instruct MAY be > removed once the Loopback is cleared. Thanks for pointing out this. We will rephrase these sentences with appropr= iate 2119 language in next revision. Best regards, Jie > Thanks, > Lou >=20 > ... From nobody Tue Oct 28 07:24:42 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C531A8955 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 07:24:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.852 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.852 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iVmeHiRt64DN for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 07:24:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pd0-x236.google.com (mail-pd0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBFA11A8953 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 07:24:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pd0-f182.google.com with SMTP id fp1so769515pdb.41 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 07:24:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=xp+uWydOltQ3vdD8WqhYcpf147Nb3KGdv6kvQbP0i3U=; b=YCsRp4J3P4J+mU89edYR2fL02dJVv+UDy1MgR1XtfVK1O40e0xyCy0u4i9y4DbQpRu QB0zICXTgGNeoKDym0md19inWIrqjj3rjmwsgx+E/F5ZxD6ePOzpgVxAv1pmIxS94yiU sZ/bL4otmpK2cqiAHf0jNwCfyO3duAYLRpocm3ExCe4WyNr8ioKnTL65IXYlAnhaG+/p xnEAtgUiaCI+sj9v5s963y6zLaSZTnotZgRomHJopM2RE3LYBE54y/lMx7cTucoLjJf3 VixBIp0J85D1ArHgPfJU983LOufbTP4IQ6pwAaefZbEj2CuDjKb3jhIujtkCFOiB9yY7 60BA== X-Received: by 10.70.118.165 with SMTP id kn5mr1329281pdb.140.1414506277458; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 07:24:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([114.62.212.108]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pn4sm1856714pbb.12.2014.10.28.07.24.35 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Oct 2014 07:24:36 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-A15BCAAA-8355-40C3-8DD8-454EC9858010 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) From: "lizho.jin@gmail.com" X-Mailer: iPad Mail (12A405) In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:24:29 +0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: To: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/p7F36J3fregfxaoTG-lC7HTFh1w Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:24:39 -0000 --Apple-Mail-A15BCAAA-8355-40C3-8DD8-454EC9858010 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Support to advance the work. Regards Lizhong=20 > =D4=DA 2014=C4=EA10=D4=C221=C8=D5=A3=ACAM5:26=A3=ACBRUNGARD, DEBORAH A wrote =A3=BA >=20 > All, > =20 > This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp= -rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11. > =20 > This working group last call ends on Nov. 3rd. Please send your comments t= o the CCAMP mailing list. > =20 > As noted, there is one IPR disclosed. > =20 > Thanks, > Deborah (and Lou) > =20 --Apple-Mail-A15BCAAA-8355-40C3-8DD8-454EC9858010 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
Support to advance the w= ork.

Regards
Lizhong 

<= div>
=E5=9C=A8 2014=E5=B9=B410=E6=9C=8821=E6=97=A5=EF=BC=8CAM5:26=EF=BC=8C= BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A <db3546@att.com= > wrote =EF=BC=9A

=
All,
 
This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls= -tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.
 
This working group last call ends on Nov. 3rd. Please send your comments= to the CCAMP mailing list.
 
As noted, there is one IPR disclosed.
 
Thanks,
Deborah (and Lou)
 
= --Apple-Mail-A15BCAAA-8355-40C3-8DD8-454EC9858010-- From nobody Tue Oct 28 07:42:39 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088DD1A89E5 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 07:42:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yR1udUnA74-S for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 07:42:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAF6C1A89E0 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 07:42:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6697; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414507351; x=1415716951; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=k5dDfbwO4mSQ4eOcHfq/xRA+UDFe0ca9QyVBH9kBSoU=; b=j04mmC61lUCS/DbWzrAls8ESsbg8MV982wIiNUqRg/feXgPAClxsjXzH URFt1n3mqfx2mUyten07jyIk1IZSqGFue+jEl894AiLXnnd6ZPk5yy5oT kMj8JDWaIG+04Ox1ggdXzT754eK8KOI5ru2sh9SxwbM29ROjIp5U2NTku M=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgwFAMuqT1StJA2G/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UWATOMAqHTQKBGxYBfYQCAQEBAwEBAQFrCwULAgEIDgoKCxknAgklAgQBDQUIiDAJDclmAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEwSQMCcxBwqDI4EeBYsmhmGJaIMjg0mDLYoHhACDeGyBBkKBAwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,802,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="91033490" Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2014 14:42:30 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com [173.36.12.77]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9SEgTRZ016517 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:42:29 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.7.227]) by xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com ([173.36.12.77]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:42:29 -0500 From: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" To: Lou Berger , OSCAR GONZALEZ DE DIOS , "draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect@tools.ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-07 Thread-Index: AQHP7t0PN3PpktMpCEyNgz1cY8QfLpw+NtqAgAYOsDCAAFaUgIABACwA Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:42:29 +0000 Message-ID: <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC14AF4ECF@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com> References: <536AAB57.2090403@labn.net> <54482AAA.2040602@labn.net> <54493009.5040305@labn.net> <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC14AF309F@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com> <544E8D79.7010800@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <544E8D79.7010800@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [161.44.212.61] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/NDU6yeqgnYjjrK5LQJtxAlp-1AM Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-07 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:42:36 -0000 Lou, I'm not aware of anything else that needs doing prior to LC. Hopefully the = other authors will yell if they are :) However, as you said earlier, it might be an idea to present the changes th= at we've made since Toronto before we go to LC. Cheers Matt > Matt/Authors, > Much thanks, I think this rev addresses my comments. Do you have any > outstanding actions/plans on the draft or do you believe it is now ready > for LC? >=20 > Thanks, > Lou >=20 > On 10/27/2014 2:14 PM, Matt Hartley (mhartley) wrote: > > Lou, > > > > v-09 has just gone out. I think we've covered all the outstanding > > comments from you - please let us know if that's not the case :) > > > > Cheers > > > > Matt > > > >> Oscar, > >> Much thanks. I expect that your next version (which addresses > >> these and any other comments, perhaps even before HI) will be ready > >> for LC. It probably would be good to review the changes with the WG > >> in HI, particularly the completely new section 1.1. to ensure > >> consensus -- perhaps even just 1 or 2 slides. > >> > >> Lou > >> > >> On 10/23/2014 12:19 PM, OSCAR GONZALEZ DE DIOS wrote: > >>> Dear Lou, > >>> > >>> Thank you very much for the comments. > >>> > >>> We had some changes in > >>> draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-07 ready since a couple of > >>> weeks ago that we did not find time to put together and complete. We > >>> have just sent this version. Some of your comments seems are already > >>> taken > >> into account in this version. Summarizing: > >>> - Avoiding RFC 2119 language in lower case: done! In fact, > >>> it has been reviewed that all RFC 2119 keywords are used as they are > >> supposed to. > >>> - Section is missing handling of RRO too big: To be added in > >> next version > >>> - Text for multiple IDs: A sentence indicating multiple SRLG > >>> Ids can be present added. Still need to add a text explaining the > >>> conditions to include multiple Ids. However, I think the conditions > >>> fit better in the procedure section. > >>> - Reference for CPS: Done! Added a whole paragraph > >>> explaining the collection with CPS, and reference added. > >>> - Removing policy processing in the resv. To be added in the > >> next version. > >>> > >>> I hope we can be soon in Last Call.. > >>> > >>> > >>> =D3scar > >>> > >>> El 23/10/14 00:07, "Lou Berger" escribi=F3: > >>> > >>>> Authors, > >>>> I think we still have some unresolved comments from May: > >>>> > >>>>>> - you use "should not" in lower case in a few spots in this > section. > >>>>>> While I think your usage *is* correct, my experience is that > >>>>>> someone (probably in the IESG) will tell you that these need to > >>>>>> be in upper case at some point. Of course, they'll be wrong, > >>>>>> and this will have to be explained. I suggest avoiding 2119 > >>>>>> language in lower case where easily avoided. How about s/should > >>>>>> not be/is not to be > >>>> The above comment also applies to "must". > >>>> > >>>> Your current of 2119 language is a bit inconsistent. I think you > >>>> should review current uses of 2119 language and ensure that such > >>>> usage is limited to (protocol) mechanisms, behavior and > >>>> interoperability. If doesn't the language is most likely > >>>> informative in nature and should avoid 2119 conformance language. > >>>> > >>>>>> - The section is missing handling of RRO to big. Perhaps add it > >>>>>> at ~line 330. > >>>> A few of new comments: > >>>> > >>>> - The current text of section 4.1 could be read as only one ID may > >>>> be present in the SO. you should explain under what conditions > >>>> multiple IDs are to be added. > >>>> > >>>> - Please provide a reference for "Confidential Path message. > >>>> Segment (CPS)" > >>>> > >>>> - (should have caught this one before, i.e., is in old text) In > >>>> Section > >>>> 5.1 it looks like you are applying policy on both Path and Resv > >>>> processing ("When a node receives a Resv message ... if local > >>>> policy determines ...). Given the "SRLG Recording Rejected" PathErr > >>>> required earlier in the section, is this really needed? Are you > >>>> assuming separate upstream/downstream policies? (Which would seem > >>>> to be > >>>> overkill.) Covering a policy change race condition, something else? > >>>> I suspect the policy processing text on resv isn't needed. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Lou > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> CCAMP mailing list > >>>> CCAMP@ietf.org > >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp > >>> ________________________________ > >>> > >>> Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su > >>> destinatario, > >> puede contener informaci=F3n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso > >> exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el > >> destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, > >> utilizaci=F3n, divulgaci=F3n y/o copia sin autorizaci=F3n puede estar > >> prohibida en virtud de la legislaci=F3n vigente. Si ha recibido este > >> mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por > >> esta misma v=EDa y proceda a su destrucci=F3n. > >>> The information contained in this transmission is privileged and > >> confidential information intended only for the use of the individual > >> or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the > >> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > >> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. > >> If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. > >> Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this > >> communication in error and then delete it. > >>> Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu > >>> destinat=E1rio, pode conter informa=E7=E3o privilegiada ou confidenci= al e > >>> =E9 para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n=E3o =E9 > >>> vossa senhoria o destinat=E1rio indicado, fica notificado de que a > >>> leitura, utiliza=E7=E3o, divulga=E7=E3o e/ou c=F3pia sem autoriza=E7= =E3o pode > >>> estar proibida em virtude da legisla=E7=E3o vigente. Se recebeu esta > >>> mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por > >>> esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui=E7=E3o > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> CCAMP mailing list > >> CCAMP@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Tue Oct 28 07:43:12 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03711A89A6 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 07:43:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.51 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9n2AwgXruGyb for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 07:43:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26B061A8963 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 07:43:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4154; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414507386; x=1415716986; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=mwxm2gqTIOq8+CiUcw1tERvP4D+XH/5mt+6rM9X2aSg=; b=mNGBq3ByYOGH50agshtAhqidhUVA0zs6YXRS/ieYZkft/FxUyAi0+19w vn2iO7mOFotFN/+yNtpd0tUl0ZthWaAtAiZFdjscHCiAMwTbARLGp47w6 VhabDobMnev3sqVY/gpbSybeUF0vM7TU6FyjSDbcWy1bVx/7A1g0dU177 o=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgkFAEOrT1StJA2H/2dsb2JhbABcgkhGgSwE1gcCgRsWAX2EAgECBC1BHQEIBA0DAQIoORQJCAIEARKIQcl1AQEBAQEBAQMBAQEBAQEBARqQZBMYhEsFkgeLWoExg0mDLYoHhACCNIFEbIFIgQMBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.04,802,1406592000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="91046783" Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2014 14:43:00 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com [173.36.12.77]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9SEh0Mb020952 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:43:00 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.159]) by xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com ([173.36.12.77]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:42:59 -0500 From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" To: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" , "ccamp@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11 Thread-Index: AQHP78Fc6JrRwsob2EO1mfo6/hiUIZxFrWGA Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:42:59 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616 x-originating-ip: [10.86.254.203] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D0752456D51ECzaliciscocom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/358XRcxzASoQ1U1_5AmdH8utEK0 Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:43:08 -0000 --_000_D0752456D51ECzaliciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Chairs and the WG: I have read the document and its in a very good shape for moving forward. Thanks Regards =85 Zafar From: , DEBORAH A > Date: Monday, October 20, 2014 at 5:26 PM To: "ccamp@ietf.org" > Subject: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associ= ated-lsp-11 All, This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-= rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11. This working group last call ends on Nov. 3rd. Please send your comments to= the CCAMP mailing list. As noted, there is one IPR disclosed. Thanks, Deborah (and Lou) --_000_D0752456D51ECzaliciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <0971F760EA3AAE45B65326C97D43528C@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear Chairs and the WG: 

I have read the document and its in a very good shape for moving forwa= rd. 

Thanks

Regards =85 Zafar



From: <BRUNGARD>, DEBORAH A &= lt;db3546@att.com>
Date: Monday, October 20, 2014 at 5= :26 PM
To: "ccamp@ietf.org" <cca= mp@ietf.org>
Subject: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on dr= aft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11

All,
 
This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpl= s-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-11.
 
This working group last call ends on Nov. 3rd. Please send your commen= ts to the CCAMP mailing list.
 
As noted, there is one IPR disclosed.
 
Thanks,
Deborah (and Lou)
 
 --_000_D0752456D51ECzaliciscocom_-- From nobody Tue Oct 28 07:45:15 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F8F1A89FA for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 07:45:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J1ve5YhQ-ghn for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 07:45:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 857BB1A89C4 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 07:45:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=215; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414507511; x=1415717111; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=QDcUiSwJvSL3S08JM810MUe6fv2VHR3wSzjiBx7two4=; b=iNYiNq7Efgz7032j2lOo41fhA0rcbv28QoNxw4fK97t8hnPF690cVHus SHzpGXa2Epgm8m5guvvl3o0QemysLYcVbC36n4SeZUgSRr01Z1PQFAM6/ QaEI6UxuBVSyGWw4aH7bJwTRHu0nEmIf7ZmN7eNpBb4Kaphvps3XYr9Ea Q=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgQFAFKrT1StJA2B/2dsb2JhbABcgw6BMNYHAoEbFgF9hAMCBHkSAQh4JQIEAQ2IRsl0AQEBAQEBAQECAQEBAQEBAQEBARiRCAeESwEEj2mCHotali6DeII0gQMBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,802,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="367156027" Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2014 14:45:11 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com [173.36.12.82]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9SEjAe5016119 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:45:10 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.159]) by xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com ([173.36.12.82]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:45:10 -0500 From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" To: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" , Lou Berger , OSCAR GONZALEZ DE DIOS , "draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect@tools.ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-07 Thread-Index: AQHP7kR8SgKGs73z4k6BSxS7SqSFEZw+MWeAgAAGpICABmLgAIAAAmSAgAFUxYD//77kgA== Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:45:10 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC14AF4ECF@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616 x-originating-ip: [10.86.254.203] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <4E7D94A87B97134789EBDF5430D427ED@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/tUsClW8DuLBzADOGirmGa5gTjzU Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-07 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:45:14 -0000 >I'm not aware of anything else that needs doing prior to LC. Hopefully >the other authors will yell if they are :) > Hi:=20 I have the same understanding. Thanks Regards =8A Zafar > From nobody Tue Oct 28 09:52:59 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F7B1A8AF5 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:52:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.611 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.611 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YZI0btEZ45m3 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:52:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpjc.telefonica.com (smtpjc.telefonica.com [81.47.204.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CA9D1A89FF for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:49:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpjc.telefonica.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480B92D0402; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 17:49:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from ESTGVMSP108.EUROPE.telefonica.corp (unknown [10.92.4.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtpjc.telefonica.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 312D32D040D; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 17:49:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (10.92.5.139) by tls.telefonica.com (10.93.6.52) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 17:49:02 +0100 Received: from AMSPR06MB104.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.90.155) by AMSPR06MB102.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.90.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.6.9; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 16:49:01 +0000 Received: from AMSPR06MB104.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.166]) by AMSPR06MB104.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.166]) with mapi id 15.01.0006.000; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 16:49:01 +0000 From: OSCAR GONZALEZ DE DIOS To: "Zafar Ali (zali)" , "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" , Lou Berger , "draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect@tools.ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-07 Thread-Index: AQHP7t0PN3PpktMpCEyNgz1cY8QfLpw94wiAgAZi4ACAAAJkgIABVMWAgAAAwACAADNZgA== Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 16:49:01 +0000 Message-ID: References: <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC14AF4ECF@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: es-ES, en-US Content-Language: es-ES X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [195.235.92.26] x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:AMSPR06MB102; x-forefront-prvs: 0378F1E47A x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(979002)(6009001)(199003)(51704005)(479174003)(54164003)(189002)(20776003)(19580405001)(97736003)(64706001)(19580395003)(2656002)(92726001)(66066001)(92566001)(87936001)(85852003)(85306004)(76176999)(21056001)(77096002)(101416001)(50986999)(54356999)(36756003)(230783001)(4396001)(31966008)(99396003)(122556002)(40100003)(95666004)(106116001)(105586002)(46102003)(80022003)(120916001)(86362001)(83506001)(106356001)(76482002)(107046002)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AMSPR06MB102; H:AMSPR06MB104.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <9F0AB7617DBFE640A778AA2040052691@eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: telefonica.com X-TM-AS-MML: No Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/G-WEnyS-f9FwCM-Ld2R3NCpcql4 Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-07 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 16:52:56 -0000 Hi, I have the very same understanding. We have addressed among the authors all comments sent both in the mailing list and by private mails. Our thanks to all that have dedicated their time to review the document several times. I agree that a discussion in Hawai will be needed to check if all the changes are OK to go for last call. Note that the completely new section in the introduction is just a use case of the extensions provided in the document. So it is purely informational. When the inclusion of the text was suggested by Dieter, among the authors we thought it was very good to illustrate the need of the procedure. Of course, WG should decide whether we keep the proposed text or not. At least, we think it makes no harm and does not touch the normative section of the document. Best Regards, Oscar El 28/10/14 15:45, "Zafar Ali (zali)" escribi=C3=B3: > > >>I'm not aware of anything else that needs doing prior to LC. Hopefully >>the other authors will yell if they are :) >> > >Hi: > >I have the same understanding. > >Thanks > >Regards =C5=A0 Zafar > > > > > > >> > ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, pu= ede contener informaci=C3=B3n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exc= lusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario = indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci=C3=B3n, divulgaci= =C3=B3n y/o copia sin autorizaci=C3=B3n puede estar prohibida en virtud de = la legislaci=C3=B3n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le roga= mos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v=C3=ADa y proceda a= su destrucci=C3=B3n. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidenti= al information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named = above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are= hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this co= mmunication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission = in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you h= ave received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat=C3=A1= rio, pode conter informa=C3=A7=C3=A3o privilegiada ou confidencial e =C3=A9= para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n=C3=A3o =C3=A9 vo= ssa senhoria o destinat=C3=A1rio indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura= , utiliza=C3=A7=C3=A3o, divulga=C3=A7=C3=A3o e/ou c=C3=B3pia sem autoriza= =C3=A7=C3=A3o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla=C3=A7=C3=A3o vigent= e. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imedi= atamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui=C3=A7=C3=A3o From nobody Tue Oct 28 10:48:15 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057B11A90E0 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:48:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0pb4pMKFzrrR for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:48:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F31641A90E3 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:46:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4274; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414518417; x=1415728017; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=kQmzhX8yalWJ0e//SxhhsN4L1Pe4/SMXwmIASKHeTAY=; b=OZAJbtVdFvajmZ2bizZZBeA6G6sl0oCp5Izl6qe8fMGnNiIoVe56nMcv sgDO4EL9Ja6uexg9DmC7ekK2hHgfDWrl5PhHg0ZRp4mDNKogJ4R05J6W6 At3e9xfYJtmTh8suokUYoO6yuPGRrW+65bwVIldMIhnIhPMwV3+0Q8T+z E=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: At4FAHfVT1StJA2E/2dsb2JhbABcgw6BLASDAtMJAhuBAhYBAQEBAX2EAwEBAwEjEUUFCwIBBgIaAgYgAgICJwkVEAIEAQ0FCIgwCZcJnF+VEQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAReBLI8JIxYbB4J3NoEeAQSSC4lrgyODSYMvjg2DeGyBSIEDAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,804,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="367277929" Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2014 17:46:56 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com [173.37.183.87]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9SHkuJC031077 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 28 Oct 2014 17:46:56 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.7.227]) by xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com ([173.37.183.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 12:46:56 -0500 From: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" To: OSCAR GONZALEZ DE DIOS , "Zafar Ali (zali)" , Lou Berger , "draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect@tools.ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-07 Thread-Index: AQHP7t0PN3PpktMpCEyNgz1cY8QfLpw+NtqAgAYOsDCAAFaUgIABACwAgABVWQCAACKagP//urdw Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 17:46:55 +0000 Message-ID: <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC14AF5C73@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com> References: <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC14AF4ECF@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [161.44.212.61] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/zBlEb32eELyWgRTtQtNFPmvNQuw Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-07 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 17:48:12 -0000 PiBJIGFncmVlIHRoYXQgYSBkaXNjdXNzaW9uIGluIEhhd2FpIHdpbGwgYmUgbmVlZGVkIHRvIGNo ZWNrIGlmIGFsbCB0aGUNCj4gY2hhbmdlcyBhcmUgT0sgdG8gZ28gZm9yIGxhc3QgY2FsbC4gTm90 ZSB0aGF0IHRoZSBjb21wbGV0ZWx5IG5ldyBzZWN0aW9uDQo+IGluIHRoZSBpbnRyb2R1Y3Rpb24g aXMganVzdCBhIHVzZSBjYXNlIG9mIHRoZSBleHRlbnNpb25zIHByb3ZpZGVkIGluIHRoZQ0KPiBk b2N1bWVudC4gU28gaXQgaXMgcHVyZWx5IGluZm9ybWF0aW9uYWwuIFdoZW4gdGhlIGluY2x1c2lv biBvZiB0aGUgdGV4dA0KPiB3YXMgc3VnZ2VzdGVkIGJ5IERpZXRlciwgYW1vbmcgdGhlIGF1dGhv cnMgd2UgdGhvdWdodCBpdCB3YXMgdmVyeSBnb29kIHRvDQo+IGlsbHVzdHJhdGUgdGhlIG5lZWQg b2YgdGhlIHByb2NlZHVyZS4gT2YgY291cnNlLCBXRyBzaG91bGQgZGVjaWRlIHdoZXRoZXINCj4g d2Uga2VlcCB0aGUgcHJvcG9zZWQgdGV4dCBvciBub3QuIEF0IGxlYXN0LCB3ZSB0aGluayBpdCBt YWtlcyBubyBoYXJtIGFuZA0KPiBkb2VzIG5vdCB0b3VjaCB0aGUgbm9ybWF0aXZlIHNlY3Rpb24g b2YgdGhlIGRvY3VtZW50Lg0KDQpGV0lXLCB0aGUgbmV3IHNlY3Rpb24gaW4gdGhpcyBkcmFmdCB3 YXMgcHJldmlvdXNseSBwYXJ0IG9mIGRyYWZ0LWZlZHlrLWNjYW1wLXVuaS1leHRlbnNpb25zLCB3 aGljaCB3YXMgb25lIG9mIHRoZSBMU1AtZGl2ZXJzaXR5IGRyYWZ0cyBwcmVzZW50ZWQgYW5kIGV4 dGVuc2l2ZWx5IGRpc2N1c3NlZCBpbiBMb25kb24uIE11Y2ggb2YgdGhlIG1hdGVyaWFsIGZyb20g ZHJhZnQtZmVkeWstY2NhbXAtdW5pLWV4dGVuc2lvbnMgaGFzIG5vdyBiZWVuIG1vdmVkIHRvIGRy YWZ0LWlldGYtY2NhbXAtbHNwLWRpdmVyc2l0eSwgYnV0IHRoZSBnZW5lcmFsIGZlZWxpbmcgd2Fz IHRoYXQgdGhlIHNlY3Rpb24gcmVsYXRpbmcgdG8gdGhlIHVzZSBvZiBTUkxHcyB0byBhY2hpZXZl IGRpdmVyc2l0eSB3YXMgYSBtb3JlIG5hdHVyYWwgZml0IGluIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtY2NhbXAtcnN2 cC10ZS1zcmxnLWNvbGxlY3QuDQoNCkNoZWVycw0KDQpNYXR0DQoNCj4gDQo+IEJlc3QgUmVnYXJk cywNCj4gDQo+IE9zY2FyDQo+IA0KPiBFbCAyOC8xMC8xNCAxNTo0NSwgIlphZmFyIEFsaSAoemFs aSkiIDx6YWxpQGNpc2NvLmNvbT4gZXNjcmliacOzOg0KPiANCj4gPg0KPiA+DQo+ID4+SSdtIG5v dCBhd2FyZSBvZiBhbnl0aGluZyBlbHNlIHRoYXQgbmVlZHMgZG9pbmcgcHJpb3IgdG8gTEMuIEhv cGVmdWxseQ0KPiA+PnRoZSBvdGhlciBhdXRob3JzIHdpbGwgeWVsbCBpZiB0aGV5IGFyZSA6KQ0K PiA+Pg0KPiA+DQo+ID5IaToNCj4gPg0KPiA+SSBoYXZlIHRoZSBzYW1lIHVuZGVyc3RhbmRpbmcu DQo+ID4NCj4gPlRoYW5rcw0KPiA+DQo+ID5SZWdhcmRzIMWgIFphZmFyDQo+ID4NCj4gPg0KPiA+ DQo+ID4NCj4gPg0KPiA+DQo+ID4+DQo+ID4NCj4gDQo+IA0KPiBfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KPiANCj4gRXN0ZSBtZW5zYWplIHkgc3VzIGFkanVudG9zIHNlIGRpcmln ZW4gZXhjbHVzaXZhbWVudGUgYSBzdSBkZXN0aW5hdGFyaW8sDQo+IHB1ZWRlIGNvbnRlbmVyIGlu Zm9ybWFjacOzbiBwcml2aWxlZ2lhZGEgbyBjb25maWRlbmNpYWwgeSBlcyBwYXJhIHVzbw0KPiBl eGNsdXNpdm8gZGUgbGEgcGVyc29uYSBvIGVudGlkYWQgZGUgZGVzdGluby4gU2kgbm8gZXMgdXN0 ZWQuIGVsDQo+IGRlc3RpbmF0YXJpbyBpbmRpY2FkbywgcXVlZGEgbm90aWZpY2FkbyBkZSBxdWUg bGEgbGVjdHVyYSwgdXRpbGl6YWNpw7NuLA0KPiBkaXZ1bGdhY2nDs24geS9vIGNvcGlhIHNpbiBh dXRvcml6YWNpw7NuIHB1ZWRlIGVzdGFyIHByb2hpYmlkYSBlbiB2aXJ0dWQgZGUNCj4gbGEgbGVn aXNsYWNpw7NuIHZpZ2VudGUuIFNpIGhhIHJlY2liaWRvIGVzdGUgbWVuc2FqZSBwb3IgZXJyb3Is IGxlIHJvZ2Ftb3MNCj4gcXVlIG5vcyBsbyBjb211bmlxdWUgaW5tZWRpYXRhbWVudGUgcG9yIGVz dGEgbWlzbWEgdsOtYSB5IHByb2NlZGEgYSBzdQ0KPiBkZXN0cnVjY2nDs24uDQo+IA0KPiBUaGUg aW5mb3JtYXRpb24gY29udGFpbmVkIGluIHRoaXMgdHJhbnNtaXNzaW9uIGlzIHByaXZpbGVnZWQg YW5kDQo+IGNvbmZpZGVudGlhbCBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBpbnRlbmRlZCBvbmx5IGZvciB0aGUgdXNl IG9mIHRoZSBpbmRpdmlkdWFsIG9yDQo+IGVudGl0eSBuYW1lZCBhYm92ZS4gSWYgdGhlIHJlYWRl ciBvZiB0aGlzIG1lc3NhZ2UgaXMgbm90IHRoZSBpbnRlbmRlZA0KPiByZWNpcGllbnQsIHlvdSBh cmUgaGVyZWJ5IG5vdGlmaWVkIHRoYXQgYW55IGRpc3NlbWluYXRpb24sIGRpc3RyaWJ1dGlvbiBv cg0KPiBjb3B5aW5nIG9mIHRoaXMgY29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBpcyBzdHJpY3RseSBwcm9oaWJpdGVk LiBJZiB5b3UgaGF2ZSByZWNlaXZlZA0KPiB0aGlzIHRyYW5zbWlzc2lvbiBpbiBlcnJvciwgZG8g bm90IHJlYWQgaXQuIFBsZWFzZSBpbW1lZGlhdGVseSByZXBseSB0bw0KPiB0aGUgc2VuZGVyIHRo YXQgeW91IGhhdmUgcmVjZWl2ZWQgdGhpcyBjb21tdW5pY2F0aW9uIGluIGVycm9yIGFuZCB0aGVu DQo+IGRlbGV0ZSBpdC4NCj4gDQo+IEVzdGEgbWVuc2FnZW0gZSBzZXVzIGFuZXhvcyBzZSBkaXJp Z2VtIGV4Y2x1c2l2YW1lbnRlIGFvIHNldSBkZXN0aW5hdMOhcmlvLA0KPiBwb2RlIGNvbnRlciBp bmZvcm1hw6fDo28gcHJpdmlsZWdpYWRhIG91IGNvbmZpZGVuY2lhbCBlIMOpIHBhcmEgdXNvIGV4 Y2x1c2l2bw0KPiBkYSBwZXNzb2Egb3UgZW50aWRhZGUgZGUgZGVzdGluby4gU2UgbsOjbyDDqSB2 b3NzYSBzZW5ob3JpYSBvIGRlc3RpbmF0w6FyaW8NCj4gaW5kaWNhZG8sIGZpY2Egbm90aWZpY2Fk byBkZSBxdWUgYSBsZWl0dXJhLCB1dGlsaXphw6fDo28sIGRpdnVsZ2HDp8OjbyBlL291DQo+IGPD s3BpYSBzZW0gYXV0b3JpemHDp8OjbyBwb2RlIGVzdGFyIHByb2liaWRhIGVtIHZpcnR1ZGUgZGEg bGVnaXNsYcOnw6NvDQo+IHZpZ2VudGUuIFNlIHJlY2ViZXUgZXN0YSBtZW5zYWdlbSBwb3IgZXJy bywgcm9nYW1vcy1saGUgcXVlIG5vcyBvDQo+IGNvbXVuaXF1ZSBpbWVkaWF0YW1lbnRlIHBvciBl c3RhIG1lc21hIHZpYSBlIHByb2NlZGEgYSBzdWEgZGVzdHJ1acOnw6NvDQo= From nobody Wed Oct 29 12:18:10 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C09D1A88C6 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 12:18:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.067 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.067 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, J_CHICKENPOX_22=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MWiWnnI_8uhO for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 12:18:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.18.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DCA2C1A88C0 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 12:18:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 29729 invoked by uid 0); 29 Oct 2014 19:18:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO CMOut01) (10.0.90.82) by gproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 29 Oct 2014 19:18:03 -0000 Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by CMOut01 with id 97Hl1p00X2SSUrH017HoHt; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:18:02 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=F5TEKMRN c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=u9EReRu7m0cA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=Z1VIDDWEpZnKb029a_4A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=dH/iT1/aewSEURaTlOb0AU8Q1PwNdEkpwL4MRZaDdvk=; b=mxfYfKJZmw9uLIjR+Dwixl+wVfDjvRUpridT/NuoBMaZrK+And07t8KfSYE75dqBuOnXjIO8sCi2/opiII0hNbmhqtox1SOG3+tDK+mPQlrAPrxBksilTB4w5Vr8KJP2; Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:39879 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XjYkc-0004UU-BA; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:17:46 -0600 Message-ID: <54513D69.3030807@labn.net> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:18:01 -0400 From: Lou Berger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" , "draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb@tools.ietf.org" References: <20141020074350.21488.53873.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733758033@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <544805C0.8060103@labn.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733759B2E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <5448F9E7.6050703@labn.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9273375C339@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <544E910C.8080307@labn.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9273375DA63@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9273375DA63@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net} Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/Tr5p7r1Mz60xBb_8KzexBxFVYJ0 Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:18:08 -0000 Jie, Please see below. On 10/28/2014 2:31 AM, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote: > Hi Lou,=20 > > Thanks a lot for your review and comments, please see my replies inline= :=20 > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Lou Berger [mailto:lberger@labn.net] >> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 2:38 AM >> To: Dongjie (Jimmy); draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb@tools.ietf.org >> Cc: ccamp@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt= =2E.. >>> Basically draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext defines extensions= for >> configuring pro-active MPLS-TP OAMs, while draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li= -lb is >> about LI & LB provisioning, which belong to on-demand OAM functions. >> >> Hum, I'm not sure I would have gone this way. My recollection was tha= t the >> intent of this document was to provide a generic (non-TP, specific) me= chanisms >> for LI-LB. Do I have it wrong? > You are correct, the intent is to provide a generic LI-LB mechanism, th= is is specified in the 2nd paragraph of the Introduction section: > > " In general the LI and LB are useful Operations, Administration and= > Maintenance (OAM) functions for technologies which use Generalized > Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) as control plane, e.g. time-= > division multiplexing, wavelength-division multiplexing and packet > switching. It is natural to use and extend the GMPLS control plane > protocol to provide a unified approach for LI and LB provisioning in= > all these technologies. " > > And the 3rd paragraph intends to talk about the scope of draft-ietf-cca= mp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext, which is for specific MPLS-TP proactive OAM c= onfiguration and does not cover the LI&LB functions: > > "[I-D.ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext] specifies the RSVP-TE > extensions for the configuration of pro-active MPLS-TP OAM functions= , > such as Continuity Check (CC), Connectivity Verification (CV), Delay= > Measurement (DM) and Loss Measurement (LM). The provisioning of on-= > demand OAM functions such as LI and LB are not covered in that > document." > > If you think the above paragraph is a little bit confusing, we can remo= ve it in next revision. I've reread the section, and I think what you have is sufficient. It get's the points across, just had to reread it a few times... I see that you don't list the OAM Flows Enabled (M), OAM Alarms Enabled (O) bits defined in RFC7260. You should include these in your next revision. The omission makes we want to confirm my understanding of your intent. As I read this document, it is your intent that: generic lock instruct places no specific requirements on the existing flags-- OAM Flows Enabled (M), OAM Alarms Enabled (O), (protection) Lockout (L). You make this point implicitly by not using this flags. Is my understanding correct? =20 >>>>>> - Section 3.1, >>>>>> I think intermediate node behavior related to processing of the A >>>>>> is unchanged by this document so think you should drop the 3 lines= >>>>>> that contain >>>> the phrase "... >>>>>> intermediate nodes ..." >>>>> Agree the behavior of intermediate node is unchanged, will remove >>>>> the >>>> descriptions about intermediate node behavior in a new revision. >>>>>> - Section 3.2 >>>>>> The section is not clear if the A bit processing occurs / complete= s >>>>>> before Loopback related processing begins or occurs coincidentally= =2E >>>>>> (I read the last sentence of the first paragraph saying the former= >>>>>> and the last sentence of the 2nd paragraph saying the latter.) >>>>>> Either way it >>>> should be clarified. >>>>> The A bit (lock) processing needs to be completed before initiating= >>>>> loopback >>>> request. The last sentence of the 2nd paragraph was to emphasize tha= t >>>> when signaling loopback, the A bit should be kept set to indicate th= e >>>> LSP is still in lock mode. >>>>> We will rephrase the sentence to make it clearer. >>>> Great. Please include appropriate conformance language. >>> Will fix this in the new revision. >> I think the following should be rephrased to include 2119 language: >> The loopback request is acceptable only when the LSP is already in= lock >> mode. >> >> If this statement is true, shouldn't the following SHOULDs be MUSTs? >> The Administratively down (A) bit in >> ADMIN_STATUS object SHOULD be kept set to indicate that the LSP is >> still in lock mode. >> and >> The >> Administratively down (A) bit in ADMIN_STATUS object SHOULD be kep= t >> set to indicate the LSP is still in lock mode. >> and >> The Administratively down >> (A) Bit in ADMIN_STATUS Object SHOULD be kept set in the Resv >> message. >> >> It probably would be worthwhile to state that the Lock Instruct MAY be= >> removed once the Loopback is cleared. > Thanks for pointing out this. We will rephrase these sentences with app= ropriate 2119 language in next revision. great - thank you. Lou From nobody Wed Oct 29 12:38:15 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61ADB1A89FC for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 12:38:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.033 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.033 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TF5JcVkD_ZKH for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 12:38:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.23.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 540DC1A89FF for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 12:38:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 20160 invoked by uid 0); 29 Oct 2014 19:38:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85) by gproxy4.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 29 Oct 2014 19:38:02 -0000 Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw4 with id 9Ddz1p0032SSUrH01De2Sp; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:38:02 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=b7chvL2x c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=u9EReRu7m0cA:10 a=47y29FthlqAA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=ux_6WKK_zodEigNKwN4A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=h/RUox/p8Nvg6ERZO4S/avC9htEOyTvMsJsF5PpcDPE=; b=DJkVWuQm+JvWU3dZKmPugTR2A8DfQ6ZzSTTrWfc4BaT8txywcwcF7i+rWCEhdrcStgAOYuAtibjL0cbW67tw2v9mWzb7+ReuGjX75twRGAvnAkWJA/KK/JnU4wSqL21g; Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:41965 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XjZ4B-0003ap-BG for ccamp@ietf.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:37:59 -0600 Message-ID: <54514226.6050502@labn.net> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:38:14 -0400 From: Lou Berger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CCAMP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net} Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/TiaJesIwF_NBVtYniGKxDCzdATg Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:38:11 -0000 All, This is start of a three week poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a CCAMP working group document. The poll duration is extended due to the upcoming meeting. This is a bit of an atypical adoption call. We, the chairs, think this document requires work, but that it has reached the point that changes should be directed by the WG. Recall that the individual authors have already merged this document with draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp. Our questions to the WG are: 1) Do you think the WG should develop an informational document explaining how resource sharing works with the existing RSVP-TE RFCs/mechanisms? Please answer: "yes" or "no", elaborate if you wish. 2) Are you willing to contribute to this work, and if so how? Please answer: "no", "reviewer", "contribute text", or something else. 3) If you answered yes to #1, do support adoption of this document as the basis for the topic? Please answer: "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your objections to the document, keeping in mind that we expect the document to be revised as it works its way through wg process. Either way, also please feel free to identify changes you'd like to see made post WG adoption. Note, objections to the topic are covered under question 1. The poll ends Wednesday, November 19th. Thanks, Deborah and Lou From nobody Wed Oct 29 13:50:20 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C2271A8ADC for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:50:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P-13T9E6FXFc for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:50:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 760791A8AD9 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:50:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=835; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414615817; x=1415825417; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=A8iZ9XvuxiVttthsqxX9sBnhxNs127fXL56THNRrP50=; b=Dqn4v+7pAA5deoe9ONXCaTa/NPv6mdV2jFd4Du1tmGxmhJrK+uO/Otct qWWMqnFXEF2X7xGSWCtR3snmQuYaC04kp9dXoSiEfUpLvwP8gqsH3JxAn M1zVZcBIDpaL/TwjUmIiUvzAVfrHG9AoKxEnkcKiFW7DV9/RfZrmcY4fK I=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag4FAMZSUVStJA2F/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UWATOFwqHTQKBHhYBAQEBAX2EAgEBAQQBAQFrCwwGAQgOAwMBAlYLHQgCBAENBYhBDcgZAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEwSQLhEBUAcGhEUBBJINi12BMYNKjTyECYI0gURsgQ85gQMBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,279,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="367892704" Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Oct 2014 20:50:08 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com [173.36.12.89]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9TKo8i8018475 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 29 Oct 2014 20:50:08 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.159]) by xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com ([173.36.12.89]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:50:07 -0500 From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP742flnNWHwPZykmiiPjnmJ0FKJxHpcEA Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 20:50:07 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <544A5267.8080801@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616 x-originating-ip: [10.86.244.101] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <551A71B357B7594F8DBF9992A22BEEF2@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/6dZEPFM3cfNU5jY3P-7YZV_hcc4 Cc: "Antonello Bonfanti \(abonfant\)" Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 20:50:19 -0000 Yes, support (as co-author). Thanks Regards =8A Zafar -----Original Message----- From: "lberger@labn.net" Date: Friday, October 24, 2014 9:21 AM To: "ccamp@ietf.org" Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 a WG document >All, > >This is start of a two week poll on making >draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 a CCAMP working group >document. Please send email to the list indicating =B3yes/support=B2 or >=B3no/do not support=B2. If indicating no, please state your technical >reservations with the document. > >The poll ends Friday October 7th. > >Thanks, > >Deborah and Lou > >_______________________________________________ >CCAMP mailing list >CCAMP@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Wed Oct 29 13:50:24 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2491A8ADF for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:50:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sbdo_dEpdK8d for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:50:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1C0C1A8ADA for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:50:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=833; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414615819; x=1415825419; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=g8LPkxn2pE8POtV6sZMjjaLeUjdU8nnlQuH6nZV1GXU=; b=SfHD63gU15e8J1TenrSwJNyCrryRr1mXEcsNNYEy2/LCLJTWEUOw7Y0y ldswcOr3jb733IQ8Ipj135mHuZm1HvvZulkZIAd5TRH2yYA5d10NU3P2a Lscq57O+git2QS21Zas+ngoSE8SNwc4lgmcfgO9Q+EOTRQObKPwuNy07K c=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag4FAI5SUVStJA2I/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UWATOFwqHTQKBHhYBAQEBAX2EAgEBAQQBAQFrCwwGAQgOAwMBAlYLHQgCBAENBYhBDcgjAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEwSQLhEBUAcGhEUBBJINi12BMYNKjTyECYI0gURsgQ85gQMBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,279,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="91474390" Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Oct 2014 20:50:19 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com [173.37.183.80]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9TKoIpM026733 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 29 Oct 2014 20:50:18 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.159]) by xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([173.37.183.80]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:50:17 -0500 From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP742cr5M1XxAgOEWgmH0dOdjkD5xHpeAA Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 20:50:17 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <544A5245.4080707@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616 x-originating-ip: [10.86.244.101] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/as2W3Qg0u4vSZhbENjyaNAcO7TU Cc: "Antonello Bonfanti \(abonfant\)" Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 20:50:20 -0000 Yes, support (as co-author). Thanks Regards =8A Zafar -----Original Message----- From: "lberger@labn.net" Date: Friday, October 24, 2014 9:21 AM To: "ccamp@ietf.org" Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a WG document >All, > >This is start of a two week poll on making >draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a CCAMP working group >document. Please send email to the list indicating =B3yes/support=B2 or >=B3no/do not support=B2. If indicating no, please state your technical >reservations with the document. > >The poll ends Friday October 7th. > >Thanks, > >Deborah and Lou > >_______________________________________________ >CCAMP mailing list >CCAMP@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Wed Oct 29 18:18:51 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8051AC407 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:18:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.078 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.078 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nlRiQgmeid7x for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:18:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68EA01ACEEA for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:18:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BLB88110; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 01:18:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.36) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 01:18:40 +0000 Received: from SZXEMA504-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.19]) by SZXEMA404-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.36]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 09:18:34 +0800 From: Zhenghaomian To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP86/kzMN7O5TNOEG+D7yOgfk3qJxH1fHQ Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 01:18:32 +0000 Message-ID: References: <54514226.6050502@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54514226.6050502@labn.net> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.66.53.113] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/rWoPrKuPJQXL9iaa1s-zp86I6MM Subject: [CCAMP] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogIFBvbGwgb24gbWFraW5nIGRyYWZ0LXpoYW5n?= =?gb2312?b?LWNjYW1wLWdtcGxzLXJlc291cmNlLXNoYXJpbmctcHJvYy0wMyBhIFdHIGRv?= =?gb2312?b?Y3VtZW50?= X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 01:18:47 -0000 SGksIENDQU1QZXJzLA0KDQoxKSBZZXMsIEkgdGhpbmsgb25lIHN1Y2ggZG9jdW1lbnQgaXMgbmVj ZXNzYXJ5LCB0byBjb3ZlciB0aGUgcmVzdG9yYXRpb24gcHJvYmxlbSwgZXNwZWNpYWxseSB0aGUg b25lIHdpdGggcmVzb3VyY2Ugc2hhcmluZywgd2l0aCB0aGUgZXhpc3RpbmcgbWVjaGFuaXNtIChi YXNpY2FsbHkgUlNWUC1URSwgbWF5IGhhdmUgb3RoZXIgb3B0aW9ucyk7IA0KMikgWWVzLCBhcyBh biBpbmRpdmlkdWFsIGF1dGhvciwgSSB3b3VsZCBsaWtlIHRvIHdvcmsgd2l0aCBleHBlcnRzIGlu IENDQU1QIHRvIGNvbnRyaWJ1dGUgdGVjaG5pY2FsIGRpc2N1c3Npb25zIGFuZCB0ZXh0OyANCjMp IFllcy9TdXBwb3J0LiANCg0KQlRXLCBJIHdvdWxkIGxpa2UgdG8gc2F5IGl0IGlzIHJlYWxseSBh biAnaW5mb3JtYXRpb25hbCcgcG9sbCwgYSBsb3Qgb2YgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24gcmVxdWlyZWQ6KQ0K DQpCZXN0IHdpc2hlcywNCkhhb21pYW4NCg0KDQoNCi0tLS0t08q8/tStvP4tLS0tLQ0Kt6K8/sjL OiBDQ0FNUCBbbWFpbHRvOmNjYW1wLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmddILT6se0gTG91IEJlcmdlcg0K t6LLzcqxvOQ6IDIwMTTE6jEw1MIzMMjVIDM6MzgNCsrVvP7IyzogQ0NBTVANCtb3zOI6IFtDQ0FN UF0gUG9sbCBvbiBtYWtpbmcgZHJhZnQtemhhbmctY2NhbXAtZ21wbHMtcmVzb3VyY2Utc2hhcmlu Zy1wcm9jLTAzIGEgV0cgZG9jdW1lbnQNCg0KQWxsLA0KDQpUaGlzIGlzIHN0YXJ0IG9mIGEgdGhy ZWUgd2VlayBwb2xsIG9uIG1ha2luZw0KZHJhZnQtemhhbmctY2NhbXAtZ21wbHMtcmVzb3VyY2Ut c2hhcmluZy1wcm9jLTAzIGEgQ0NBTVAgd29ya2luZyBncm91cCBkb2N1bWVudC4gIFRoZSBwb2xs IGR1cmF0aW9uIGlzIGV4dGVuZGVkIGR1ZSB0byB0aGUgdXBjb21pbmcgbWVldGluZy4NCg0KVGhp cyBpcyBhIGJpdCBvZiBhbiBhdHlwaWNhbCBhZG9wdGlvbiBjYWxsLiAgV2UsIHRoZSBjaGFpcnMs IHRoaW5rIHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgcmVxdWlyZXMgd29yaywgYnV0IHRoYXQgaXQgaGFzIHJlYWNo ZWQgdGhlIHBvaW50IHRoYXQgY2hhbmdlcyBzaG91bGQgYmUgZGlyZWN0ZWQgYnkgdGhlIFdHLiAg UmVjYWxsIHRoYXQgdGhlIGluZGl2aWR1YWwgYXV0aG9ycyBoYXZlIGFscmVhZHkgbWVyZ2VkIHRo aXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgd2l0aCBkcmFmdC1nYW5kaGktY2NhbXAtZ21wbHMtcmVzdG9yYXRpb24tbHNw LiAgT3VyIHF1ZXN0aW9ucyB0byB0aGUgV0cgYXJlOg0KDQoxKSBEbyB5b3UgdGhpbmsgdGhlIFdH IHNob3VsZCBkZXZlbG9wIGFuIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uYWwgZG9jdW1lbnQNCiAgIGV4cGxhaW5pbmcg aG93IHJlc291cmNlIHNoYXJpbmcgd29ya3Mgd2l0aCB0aGUgZXhpc3RpbmcgUlNWUC1URQ0KICAg UkZDcy9tZWNoYW5pc21zPw0KDQogICBQbGVhc2UgYW5zd2VyOiAieWVzIiBvciAibm8iLCBlbGFi b3JhdGUgaWYgeW91IHdpc2guDQoNCjIpIEFyZSB5b3Ugd2lsbGluZyB0byBjb250cmlidXRlIHRv IHRoaXMgd29yaywgYW5kIGlmIHNvIGhvdz8NCg0KICAgUGxlYXNlIGFuc3dlcjogIm5vIiwgInJl dmlld2VyIiwgImNvbnRyaWJ1dGUgdGV4dCIsIG9yDQogICBzb21ldGhpbmcgZWxzZS4NCg0KMykg SWYgeW91IGFuc3dlcmVkIHllcyB0byAjMSwgZG8gc3VwcG9ydCBhZG9wdGlvbiBvZiB0aGlzIGRv Y3VtZW50DQogICBhcyB0aGUgYmFzaXMgZm9yIHRoZSB0b3BpYz8NCg0KICAgUGxlYXNlIGFuc3dl cjogInllcy9zdXBwb3J0IiBvciAibm8vZG8gbm90IHN1cHBvcnQiLg0KDQogICBJZiBpbmRpY2F0 aW5nIG5vLCBwbGVhc2Ugc3RhdGUgeW91ciBvYmplY3Rpb25zIHRvIHRoZSBkb2N1bWVudCwNCiAg IGtlZXBpbmcgaW4gbWluZCB0aGF0IHdlIGV4cGVjdCB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQgdG8gYmUgcmV2aXNl ZCBhcyBpdA0KICAgd29ya3MgaXRzIHdheSB0aHJvdWdoIHdnIHByb2Nlc3MuICBFaXRoZXIgd2F5 LCBhbHNvIHBsZWFzZSBmZWVsDQogICBmcmVlIHRvIGlkZW50aWZ5IGNoYW5nZXMgeW91J2QgbGlr ZSB0byBzZWUgbWFkZSBwb3N0IFdHIGFkb3B0aW9uLg0KDQogICBOb3RlLCBvYmplY3Rpb25zIHRv IHRoZSB0b3BpYyBhcmUgY292ZXJlZCB1bmRlciBxdWVzdGlvbiAxLg0KDQpUaGUgcG9sbCBlbmRz IFdlZG5lc2RheSwgTm92ZW1iZXIgMTl0aC4NCg0KVGhhbmtzLA0KDQpEZWJvcmFoIGFuZCBMb3UN Cg0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCkNDQU1Q IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KQ0NBTVBAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxt YW4vbGlzdGluZm8vY2NhbXANCg== From nobody Wed Oct 29 19:04:08 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE981ACFC4 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:04:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zd7AlV7_i6ii for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:04:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 174521ACFC5 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:03:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1797; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414634639; x=1415844239; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=o/CjbYIQXZ/l1gJneEz/8je/CTalof7GaCRh1TD/qcI=; b=XFCAXnn2MNajKExVmLBPsVLcu2ldoFeoWtRnQQAPMe4+qZScwTxanRaL vezvVhx/BUvO/d7KLYBOszRGZvhm9Av+ZDgUlJCKTc7WbbWg5qmBEs65M pmfAvRwWUM11mvyIdSVquwjgd+Z+b8EVV2l3yJ4/vK8IoblgyvW0l2wzB 8=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag0FAPGbUVStJV2P/2dsb2JhbABSCoMOVFgEziwKh00CgRkWAQEBAQF9hAMBAQQBAQE3NB0BCA4oNwslAgQBEohBDcgCAQEBAQEBAQECAQEBAQEBAQEWBJA0Y4RLBZINi12BMYNKjTyECYI0gURsgUiBAwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,282,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="364586372" Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Oct 2014 02:03:58 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com [173.37.183.84]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9U23vgS008746 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 02:03:57 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x07.cisco.com ([169.254.2.151]) by xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([173.37.183.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 21:03:57 -0500 From: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP86/kiGfYcDGGSEqHGHQbu7A1upxH9OcA Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 02:03:57 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <54514226.6050502@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.5.130515 x-originating-ip: [10.82.219.32] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <587CD5C33108F94AB7629DC3CF57EDE3@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/FCf3CFm_NUSYS08AxoEdoeMGHZM Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 02:04:05 -0000 Hi WG, Chairs, 1. Yes. 2. Yes, as a co-author. 3. Yes/Support. Thanks, Rakesh On 2014-10-29 3:38 PM, "Lou Berger" wrote: >All, > >This is start of a three week poll on making >draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a CCAMP working group >document. The poll duration is extended due to the upcoming meeting. > >This is a bit of an atypical adoption call. We, the chairs, think this >document requires work, but that it has reached the point that changes >should be directed by the WG. Recall that the individual authors have >already merged this document with >draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp. Our questions to the WG are: > >1) Do you think the WG should develop an informational document > explaining how resource sharing works with the existing RSVP-TE > RFCs/mechanisms? > > Please answer: "yes" or "no", elaborate if you wish. > >2) Are you willing to contribute to this work, and if so how? > > Please answer: "no", "reviewer", "contribute text", or > something else. > >3) If you answered yes to #1, do support adoption of this document > as the basis for the topic? > > Please answer: "yes/support" or "no/do not support". > > If indicating no, please state your objections to the document, > keeping in mind that we expect the document to be revised as it > works its way through wg process. Either way, also please feel > free to identify changes you'd like to see made post WG adoption. > > Note, objections to the topic are covered under question 1. > >The poll ends Wednesday, November 19th. > >Thanks, > >Deborah and Lou > >_______________________________________________ >CCAMP mailing list >CCAMP@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Wed Oct 29 19:41:39 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909AE1ACFE7 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:41:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.611 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.611 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_22=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8uQlgSz-15gQ for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93F1A1ACFE3 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:41:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BOE92326; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 02:41:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.37) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 02:41:32 +0000 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.22]) by nkgeml406-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.37]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:41:26 +0800 From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" To: Lou Berger , "draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb@tools.ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt Thread-Index: AQHP7DmxZe4di09DEUSAb36hmAw2LZw4nFYQgANiRwCAAQp7EIAAGJKAgAM2mPCAA3N3AIABIQLAgAIO0YCAAPoXEA== Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 02:41:25 +0000 Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9273375FB7E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <20141020074350.21488.53873.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733758033@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <544805C0.8060103@labn.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733759B2E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <5448F9E7.6050703@labn.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9273375C339@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <544E910C.8080307@labn.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9273375DA63@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <54513D69.3030807@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54513D69.3030807@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.96.76] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/8S-eFIO_8Kx80ayR5Uxo3_v3ZGs Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 02:41:38 -0000 Hi Lou,=20 Thanks for your comments, please see my replies inline: > Jie, > Please see below. >=20 > On 10/28/2014 2:31 AM, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote: > > Hi Lou, > > > > Thanks a lot for your review and comments, please see my replies inline= : > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Lou Berger [mailto:lberger@labn.net] > >> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 2:38 AM > >> To: Dongjie (Jimmy); draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb@tools.ietf.org > >> Cc: ccamp@ietf.org > >> Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: > >> draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt > ... > >>> Basically draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext defines > >>> extensions for > >> configuring pro-active MPLS-TP OAMs, while > >> draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb is about LI & LB provisioning, which be= long to > on-demand OAM functions. > >> > >> Hum, I'm not sure I would have gone this way. My recollection was > >> that the intent of this document was to provide a generic (non-TP, > >> specific) mechanisms for LI-LB. Do I have it wrong? > > You are correct, the intent is to provide a generic LI-LB mechanism, th= is is > specified in the 2nd paragraph of the Introduction section: > > > > " In general the LI and LB are useful Operations, Administration and > > Maintenance (OAM) functions for technologies which use Generalized > > Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) as control plane, e.g. time- > > division multiplexing, wavelength-division multiplexing and packet > > switching. It is natural to use and extend the GMPLS control plane > > protocol to provide a unified approach for LI and LB provisioning in > > all these technologies. " > > > > And the 3rd paragraph intends to talk about the scope of > draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext, which is for specific MPLS-TP > proactive OAM configuration and does not cover the LI&LB functions: > > > > "[I-D.ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext] specifies the RSVP-TE > > extensions for the configuration of pro-active MPLS-TP OAM functions= , > > such as Continuity Check (CC), Connectivity Verification (CV), Delay > > Measurement (DM) and Loss Measurement (LM). The provisioning of > on- > > demand OAM functions such as LI and LB are not covered in that > > document." > > > > If you think the above paragraph is a little bit confusing, we can remo= ve it in > next revision. >=20 > I've reread the section, and I think what you have is sufficient. It get= 's the > points across, just had to reread it a few times... Thanks. We tried to make the intent clear in the introduction, I guess now = you are OK with it.=20 > I see that you don't list the OAM Flows Enabled (M), OAM Alarms Enabled > (O) bits defined in RFC7260. You should include these in your next revis= ion. > The omission makes we want to confirm my understanding of > your intent. As I read this document, it is your intent that: generic > lock instruct places no specific requirements on the existing flags-- OAM= Flows > Enabled (M), OAM Alarms Enabled (O), (protection) Lockout (L). You make = this > point implicitly by not using this flags. >=20 > Is my understanding correct? We forgot to list the new Flags by mistake, will add them in next revision.= =20 Yes we intend to make the generic LI&LB not depend on the existing flags fo= r proactive TP OAM. Best regards, Jie > >>>>>> - Section 3.1, > >>>>>> I think intermediate node behavior related to processing of the A > >>>>>> is unchanged by this document so think you should drop the 3 > >>>>>> lines that contain > >>>> the phrase "... > >>>>>> intermediate nodes ..." > >>>>> Agree the behavior of intermediate node is unchanged, will remove > >>>>> the > >>>> descriptions about intermediate node behavior in a new revision. > >>>>>> - Section 3.2 > >>>>>> The section is not clear if the A bit processing occurs / > >>>>>> completes before Loopback related processing begins or occurs > coincidentally. > >>>>>> (I read the last sentence of the first paragraph saying the > >>>>>> former and the last sentence of the 2nd paragraph saying the > >>>>>> latter.) Either way it > >>>> should be clarified. > >>>>> The A bit (lock) processing needs to be completed before > >>>>> initiating loopback > >>>> request. The last sentence of the 2nd paragraph was to emphasize > >>>> that when signaling loopback, the A bit should be kept set to > >>>> indicate the LSP is still in lock mode. > >>>>> We will rephrase the sentence to make it clearer. > >>>> Great. Please include appropriate conformance language. > >>> Will fix this in the new revision. > >> I think the following should be rephrased to include 2119 language: > >> The loopback request is acceptable only when the LSP is already > >> in lock mode. > >> > >> If this statement is true, shouldn't the following SHOULDs be MUSTs? > >> The Administratively down (A) bit in > >> ADMIN_STATUS object SHOULD be kept set to indicate that the LSP is > >> still in lock mode. > >> and > >> The > >> Administratively down (A) bit in ADMIN_STATUS object SHOULD be > kept > >> set to indicate the LSP is still in lock mode. > >> and > >> The Administratively down > >> (A) Bit in ADMIN_STATUS Object SHOULD be kept set in the Resv > >> message. > >> > >> It probably would be worthwhile to state that the Lock Instruct MAY > >> be removed once the Loopback is cleared. > > Thanks for pointing out this. We will rephrase these sentences with > appropriate 2119 language in next revision. > great - thank you. >=20 > Lou >=20 From nobody Wed Oct 29 21:53:02 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36641AD00F for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 21:53:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.739 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j5JY6qmdiCNr for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 21:52:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFF751AD008 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 21:52:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BLC01121; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 04:52:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.33) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 04:52:56 +0000 Received: from SZXEMA512-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.174]) by SZXEMA401-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.33]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:52:49 +0800 From: "Zhangxian (Xian)" To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP86/kC83H9Iz4B0GBDFgH4krgB5xIEr2r Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 04:52:49 +0000 Message-ID: References: <54514226.6050502@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54514226.6050502@labn.net> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.46.111.246] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/8bUFi36Ez3Nr_lvW-VGx1_O1flA Subject: [CCAMP] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogIFBvbGwgb24gbWFraW5nIGRyYWZ0LXpoYW5n?= =?gb2312?b?LWNjYW1wLWdtcGxzLXJlc291cmNlLXNoYXJpbmctcHJvYy0wMyBhIFdHIGRv?= =?gb2312?b?Y3VtZW50?= X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 04:53:01 -0000 SGksIExvdSBhbmQgYWxsLCANCg0KIDE6IFllczsgaSB0aGluayB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IGZpbGwg dGhlIGdhcCB3aXRoIGN1cnJlbnQgcmVsZXZhbnQgUkZDcy9XR3Mgd2UgaGF2ZTsNCiAyOiBDb250 cmlidXRpbmcgdGV4dCBhcyBhdXRob3I7DQogMzogeWVzL3N1cHBvcnQ7DQoNClJlZ2FyZHMsDQpY aWFuDQoNCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCreivP7Iyzog Q0NBTVAgW2NjYW1wLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmddILT6se0gTG91IEJlcmdlciBbbGJlcmdlckBs YWJuLm5ldF0NCreiy83KsbzkOiAyMDE0xOoxMNTCMzDI1SAzOjM4DQrK1bz+yMs6IENDQU1QDQrW 98ziOiBbQ0NBTVBdIFBvbGwgb24gbWFraW5nIGRyYWZ0LXpoYW5nLWNjYW1wLWdtcGxzLXJlc291 cmNlLXNoYXJpbmctcHJvYy0wMyBhIFdHIGRvY3VtZW50DQoNCkFsbCwNCg0KVGhpcyBpcyBzdGFy dCBvZiBhIHRocmVlIHdlZWsgcG9sbCBvbiBtYWtpbmcNCmRyYWZ0LXpoYW5nLWNjYW1wLWdtcGxz LXJlc291cmNlLXNoYXJpbmctcHJvYy0wMyBhIENDQU1QIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXANCmRvY3VtZW50 LiAgVGhlIHBvbGwgZHVyYXRpb24gaXMgZXh0ZW5kZWQgZHVlIHRvIHRoZSB1cGNvbWluZyBtZWV0 aW5nLg0KDQpUaGlzIGlzIGEgYml0IG9mIGFuIGF0eXBpY2FsIGFkb3B0aW9uIGNhbGwuICBXZSwg dGhlIGNoYWlycywgdGhpbmsgdGhpcw0KZG9jdW1lbnQgcmVxdWlyZXMgd29yaywgYnV0IHRoYXQg aXQgaGFzIHJlYWNoZWQgdGhlIHBvaW50IHRoYXQgY2hhbmdlcw0Kc2hvdWxkIGJlIGRpcmVjdGVk IGJ5IHRoZSBXRy4gIFJlY2FsbCB0aGF0IHRoZSBpbmRpdmlkdWFsIGF1dGhvcnMgaGF2ZQ0KYWxy ZWFkeSBtZXJnZWQgdGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCB3aXRoDQpkcmFmdC1nYW5kaGktY2NhbXAtZ21wbHMt cmVzdG9yYXRpb24tbHNwLiAgT3VyIHF1ZXN0aW9ucyB0byB0aGUgV0cgYXJlOg0KDQoxKSBEbyB5 b3UgdGhpbmsgdGhlIFdHIHNob3VsZCBkZXZlbG9wIGFuIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uYWwgZG9jdW1lbnQN CiAgIGV4cGxhaW5pbmcgaG93IHJlc291cmNlIHNoYXJpbmcgd29ya3Mgd2l0aCB0aGUgZXhpc3Rp bmcgUlNWUC1URQ0KICAgUkZDcy9tZWNoYW5pc21zPw0KDQogICBQbGVhc2UgYW5zd2VyOiAieWVz IiBvciAibm8iLCBlbGFib3JhdGUgaWYgeW91IHdpc2guDQoNCjIpIEFyZSB5b3Ugd2lsbGluZyB0 byBjb250cmlidXRlIHRvIHRoaXMgd29yaywgYW5kIGlmIHNvIGhvdz8NCg0KICAgUGxlYXNlIGFu c3dlcjogIm5vIiwgInJldmlld2VyIiwgImNvbnRyaWJ1dGUgdGV4dCIsIG9yDQogICBzb21ldGhp bmcgZWxzZS4NCg0KMykgSWYgeW91IGFuc3dlcmVkIHllcyB0byAjMSwgZG8gc3VwcG9ydCBhZG9w dGlvbiBvZiB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50DQogICBhcyB0aGUgYmFzaXMgZm9yIHRoZSB0b3BpYz8NCg0K ICAgUGxlYXNlIGFuc3dlcjogInllcy9zdXBwb3J0IiBvciAibm8vZG8gbm90IHN1cHBvcnQiLg0K DQogICBJZiBpbmRpY2F0aW5nIG5vLCBwbGVhc2Ugc3RhdGUgeW91ciBvYmplY3Rpb25zIHRvIHRo ZSBkb2N1bWVudCwNCiAgIGtlZXBpbmcgaW4gbWluZCB0aGF0IHdlIGV4cGVjdCB0aGUgZG9jdW1l bnQgdG8gYmUgcmV2aXNlZCBhcyBpdA0KICAgd29ya3MgaXRzIHdheSB0aHJvdWdoIHdnIHByb2Nl c3MuICBFaXRoZXIgd2F5LCBhbHNvIHBsZWFzZSBmZWVsDQogICBmcmVlIHRvIGlkZW50aWZ5IGNo YW5nZXMgeW91J2QgbGlrZSB0byBzZWUgbWFkZSBwb3N0IFdHIGFkb3B0aW9uLg0KDQogICBOb3Rl LCBvYmplY3Rpb25zIHRvIHRoZSB0b3BpYyBhcmUgY292ZXJlZCB1bmRlciBxdWVzdGlvbiAxLg0K DQpUaGUgcG9sbCBlbmRzIFdlZG5lc2RheSwgTm92ZW1iZXIgMTl0aC4NCg0KVGhhbmtzLA0KDQpE ZWJvcmFoIGFuZCBMb3UNCg0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX18NCkNDQU1QIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KQ0NBTVBAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3 LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vY2NhbXA= From nobody Wed Oct 29 23:28:14 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821651A6FB1 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 23:28:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.611 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.611 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_22=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id whTSJazL6Psy for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 23:28:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3BEB1A03AB for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 23:28:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BOF07973; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 06:28:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nkgeml409-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.40) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 06:28:07 +0000 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.22]) by nkgeml409-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.40]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:28:02 +0800 From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" To: Lou Berger , "draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb@tools.ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt Thread-Index: AQHP7DmxZe4di09DEUSAb36hmAw2LZw4nFYQgANiRwCAAQp7EIAAGJKAgAM2mPCAA3N3AIABIQLAgAIO0YCAAPoXEIAAOgpQ Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 06:28:02 +0000 Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9273375FC71@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <20141020074350.21488.53873.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733758033@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <544805C0.8060103@labn.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733759B2E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <5448F9E7.6050703@labn.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9273375C339@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <544E910C.8080307@labn.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9273375DA63@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <54513D69.3030807@labn.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9273375FB7E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9273375FB7E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.96.76] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/VfmRK52rlEVXeAoV7qRBic3S0lI Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 06:28:12 -0000 Hi Lou,=20 Some updates on my replies:=20 > >... > > I see that you don't list the OAM Flows Enabled (M), OAM Alarms > > Enabled > > (O) bits defined in RFC7260. You should include these in your next rev= ision. > > The omission makes we want to confirm my understanding of > > your intent. As I read this document, it is your intent that: generic > > lock instruct places no specific requirements on the existing flags-- > > OAM Flows Enabled (M), OAM Alarms Enabled (O), (protection) Lockout > > (L). You make this point implicitly by not using this flags. > > > > Is my understanding correct? >=20 > We forgot to list the new Flags by mistake, will add them in next revisio= n. >=20 > Yes we intend to make the generic LI&LB not depend on the existing flags = for > proactive TP OAM. Sorry in previous mail I mixed up draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext = with RFC7260. While still our intent is that generic LI&LB has no specific = requirement on those existing flags.=20 Best regards, Jie >=20 > > >>>>>> - Section 3.1, > > >>>>>> I think intermediate node behavior related to processing of the > > >>>>>> A is unchanged by this document so think you should drop the 3 > > >>>>>> lines that contain > > >>>> the phrase "... > > >>>>>> intermediate nodes ..." > > >>>>> Agree the behavior of intermediate node is unchanged, will > > >>>>> remove the > > >>>> descriptions about intermediate node behavior in a new revision. > > >>>>>> - Section 3.2 > > >>>>>> The section is not clear if the A bit processing occurs / > > >>>>>> completes before Loopback related processing begins or occurs > > coincidentally. > > >>>>>> (I read the last sentence of the first paragraph saying the > > >>>>>> former and the last sentence of the 2nd paragraph saying the > > >>>>>> latter.) Either way it > > >>>> should be clarified. > > >>>>> The A bit (lock) processing needs to be completed before > > >>>>> initiating loopback > > >>>> request. The last sentence of the 2nd paragraph was to emphasize > > >>>> that when signaling loopback, the A bit should be kept set to > > >>>> indicate the LSP is still in lock mode. > > >>>>> We will rephrase the sentence to make it clearer. > > >>>> Great. Please include appropriate conformance language. > > >>> Will fix this in the new revision. > > >> I think the following should be rephrased to include 2119 language: > > >> The loopback request is acceptable only when the LSP is already > > >> in lock mode. > > >> > > >> If this statement is true, shouldn't the following SHOULDs be MUSTs= ? > > >> The Administratively down (A) bit in > > >> ADMIN_STATUS object SHOULD be kept set to indicate that the LSP i= s > > >> still in lock mode. > > >> and > > >> The > > >> Administratively down (A) bit in ADMIN_STATUS object SHOULD be > > kept > > >> set to indicate the LSP is still in lock mode. > > >> and > > >> The Administratively down > > >> (A) Bit in ADMIN_STATUS Object SHOULD be kept set in the Resv > > >> message. > > >> > > >> It probably would be worthwhile to state that the Lock Instruct MAY > > >> be removed once the Loopback is cleared. > > > Thanks for pointing out this. We will rephrase these sentences with > > appropriate 2119 language in next revision. > > great - thank you. > > > > Lou > > From nobody Thu Oct 30 05:01:11 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA6D1AD0A9 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 05:01:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.61 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H7IB_ZpAnV-s for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 05:01:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.advaoptical.com (mail.advaoptical.com [91.217.199.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A2B71A0007 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 05:01:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MUC-SRV-MBX2.advaoptical.com ([172.20.1.96]) by muc-vsrv-fsmail.advaoptical.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9UC14Lo002234 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 13:01:04 +0100 Received: from MUC-SRV-MBX1.advaoptical.com (172.20.1.95) by MUC-SRV-MBX2.advaoptical.com (172.20.1.96) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.5; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 13:01:04 +0100 Received: from MUC-SRV-MBX1.advaoptical.com ([fe80::a129:5e1:23a1:8ba0]) by MUC-SRV-MBX1.advaoptical.com ([fe80::cddd:2336:31f7:688d%18]) with mapi id 15.00.1044.003; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 13:01:03 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Brzozowski?= To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP86/jRULZdp8EHkW4xsRbnweXh5xIiojg Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:01:03 +0000 Message-ID: References: <54514226.6050502@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54514226.6050502@labn.net> Accept-Language: pl-PL, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [192.168.27.50] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.12.52, 1.0.28, 0.0.0000 definitions=2014-10-30_05:2014-10-30,2014-10-30,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/Edh88olRt2CQ1u0XjRh7dkfoKNI Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:01:09 -0000 All, 1. Yes. I believe that a single reference point for the current best practi= ces will be useful. 2. Yes, as a co-author. 3. Yes/Support. Regards, Pawel -----Original Message----- From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 3:38 PM To: CCAMP Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-pr= oc-03 a WG document All, This is start of a three week poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a CCAMP working group docu= ment. The poll duration is extended due to the upcoming meeting. This is a bit of an atypical adoption call. We, the chairs, think this doc= ument requires work, but that it has reached the point that changes should = be directed by the WG. Recall that the individual authors have already mer= ged this document with draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp. Our quest= ions to the WG are: 1) Do you think the WG should develop an informational document explaining how resource sharing works with the existing RSVP-TE RFCs/mechanisms? Please answer: "yes" or "no", elaborate if you wish. 2) Are you willing to contribute to this work, and if so how? Please answer: "no", "reviewer", "contribute text", or something else. 3) If you answered yes to #1, do support adoption of this document as the basis for the topic? Please answer: "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your objections to the document, keeping in mind that we expect the document to be revised as it works its way through wg process. Either way, also please feel free to identify changes you'd like to see made post WG adoption. Note, objections to the topic are covered under question 1. The poll ends Wednesday, November 19th. Thanks, Deborah and Lou _______________________________________________ CCAMP mailing list CCAMP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Thu Oct 30 05:55:44 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE03E1A003B for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 05:55:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.067 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.067 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, J_CHICKENPOX_22=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HkxVWajlnoxC for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 05:55:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.25.95]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 015AB1A0054 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 05:55:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 12606 invoked by uid 0); 30 Oct 2014 12:55:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO CMOut01) (10.0.90.82) by gproxy1.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 30 Oct 2014 12:55:37 -0000 Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by CMOut01 with id 9QvN1p00h2SSUrH01QvRMz; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 06:55:36 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=F5TEKMRN c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=u9EReRu7m0cA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=8t2rz4PNTsQQl-9iIyMA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=VbV4y3f55wMj0W/QDgxjeJ+aqt3wN6c+oxXEjZ3r4uE=; b=qgk4JVyB8AujHVHJLTKtp3qogI9E54cYTpWxtoG4Ahwzo2VPshTk8hI4eqbhcqb5Vp8OfrUS/nORisGBTpuGH9Sndauaqxdt1tmWdSHPUQbEHpsBhJqV+ZEFwGz1r0Sm; Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:48063 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XjpG7-0000Kf-HG; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 06:55:23 -0600 Message-ID: <54523539.60101@labn.net> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 08:55:21 -0400 From: Lou Berger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" , "draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb@tools.ietf.org" References: <20141020074350.21488.53873.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733758033@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <544805C0.8060103@labn.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733759B2E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <5448F9E7.6050703@labn.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9273375C339@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <544E910C.8080307@labn.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9273375DA63@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <54513D69.3030807@labn.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9273375FB7E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9273375FC71@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9273375FC71@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net} Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/R6uVsG6r4S1j6Ipun_zF4Epe3-A Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:55:41 -0000 Jie, See below. On 10/30/2014 2:28 AM, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote: >>> ... >>> > > I see that you don't list the OAM Flows Enabled (M), OAM Alarms >>> > > Enabled >>> > > (O) bits defined in RFC7260. You should include these in your next revision. >>> > > The omission makes we want to confirm my understanding of >>> > > your intent. As I read this document, it is your intent that: generic >>> > > lock instruct places no specific requirements on the existing flags-- >>> > > OAM Flows Enabled (M), OAM Alarms Enabled (O), (protection) Lockout >>> > > (L). You make this point implicitly by not using this flags. >>> > > >>> > > Is my understanding correct? >> > >> > We forgot to list the new Flags by mistake, will add them in next revision. >> > >> > Yes we intend to make the generic LI&LB not depend on the existing flags for >> > proactive TP OAM. > Sorry in previous mail I mixed up draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext with RFC7260. While still our intent is that generic LI&LB has no specific requirement on those existing flags. No problem. It sounds like the next version will resolve the (minor) open issues. Correct? Thanks, Lou From nobody Thu Oct 30 07:12:39 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520C61AD399 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 07:12:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tYKNxEUmmWLi for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 07:12:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ig0-x234.google.com (mail-ig0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BBA31AD3BD for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 07:11:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ig0-f180.google.com with SMTP id h3so5204833igd.1 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 07:11:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SaRmrRscaeozBRlVZMCDo00dlQ9xrRZgp8bp2s/4Vc4=; b=XvefATcd6TlSimVLZ5SLrs+cfID8bFHmyAO23RCQWNx7RTCHJmVN6/yKZc0+4TZG6X ZXt/5nbVuGD7jolxFqJpM3IosqWNBN9cCvB8Rl9Fu/bAiamZXtO5mO8idjhbywgtsJvo 3BCAztING0jNPPDzGaIQiSh04sZ1BWgYma6Ssdu+jdsGE/sOyglidGkZGB7iRouPyaS8 gJD/6beuZW4BVJMINrRrluZo837NI3gaairQgWEJNKihnq+Sw6ub9zhnMGpq6V2lCwFT laH1NHX519QXBTLaVVEq8ExaIpfiCTA0OJTUDYnQ2URbadXPBh9afb/7q3Wt2lcC9Uqo F2CA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.5.72 with SMTP id 8mr17009500icv.27.1414678316638; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 07:11:56 -0700 (PDT) Sender: dhruvdhody@gmail.com X-Google-Sender-Delegation: dhruvdhody@gmail.com Received: by 10.50.252.42 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 07:11:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> References: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 19:41:56 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: _NGUscaWJ4I23pS40p1O_r7hQUA Message-ID: From: Dhruv Dhody To: "ccamp@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/Dp_0zeiAB8VfRCPkpS8dhjhAOzQ Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:12:37 -0000 Yes/Support! Just a few comments... - Shouldnt the draft be on informational track? - In section 4.3 about PCE, some text about inter-layer PCE [RFC5623] should also be added. - In section 6, Building on Existing Protocols, could PCEP also play a role? The server PCE can provide abstract TE information to the abstraction layer PCE using the recent work in [1] and [2] in the deployments where PCEs are used. Guilty for shameless self-promotion :) - update reference to farrkingel-pce-questions Thanks! Dhruv [1]http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lee-pce-transporting-te-data/ [2]http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-te-data-extn/ On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Lou Berger wrote: > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working group > document. Please send email to the list indicating =E2=80=9Cyes/support= =E2=80=9D or > =E2=80=9Cno/do not support=E2=80=9D. If indicating no, please state your = technical > reservations with the document. > > The poll ends Thursday October 6th. > > Thanks, > > Deborah and Lou > > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Thu Oct 30 08:32:52 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F361AD4F8 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 08:32:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.79 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.79 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kgBSVMCn5GSg for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 08:32:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server.isocore.com (server.isocore.com [192.163.204.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3736E1AD498 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 08:32:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [65.213.193.38] (port=55583 helo=adminPCR) by server.isocore.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XjriQ-0002py-Rr for ccamp@ietf.org; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 15:32:47 +0000 From: "Shamjhana" To: Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:32:52 -0400 Message-ID: <014d01cff456$c50ef3d0$4f2cdb70$@isocore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_014E_01CFF435.3DFEDA70" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac/0Vr3EDXxaCY8JQd6dO7O2W9mPpQ== Content-Language: en-us X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server.isocore.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - isocore.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server.isocore.com: authenticated_id: spokharel@isocore.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/GXkbJJw86itSUi-Q9DVeMyIUfmQ Subject: [CCAMP] Cloud & Data Center, WAN and Virtualization/NFV - SDN/MPLS 2014 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 15:32:51 -0000 This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_014E_01CFF435.3DFEDA70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The SDN/MPLS 2014 Conference in Washington DC starts this Sunday, November 2. There are a limited number of seats still available. Come and learn about the future of networking. Register now at: http://www.isocore.com/sdn-mpls/attendees.php The SDN/MPLS 2014 Conference program is available at: http://www.isocore.com/sdn-mpls/ Tutorials (Sunday): http://www.isocore.com/sdn-mpls/tutorials.htm Technical sessions (Mon- Wed): http://www.isocore.com/sdn-mpls/technical_sessions.htm The hotel rooms are sold out! Thank you! ------=_NextPart_000_014E_01CFF435.3DFEDA70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The SDN/MPLS 2014 = Conference in Washington DC starts this Sunday, November 2. There = are a limited number of seats still available.

Come and =  learn about the future of networking.  Register now = at: http://www.isocor= e.com/sdn-mpls/attendees.php

 

The SDN/MPLS 2014 = Conference program is available at: http://www.isocore.com/sdn-mpls/Tutorials (Sunday): http://www.isocore.com/sdn-mpls/tutorials.htm 
Technical sessions (Mon- Wed): http://www.isocore.com/sdn-mpls/technical_sessions= .htm

 <= /span>

The hotel rooms = are sold out!

 

Thank = you!

 =

 =

------=_NextPart_000_014E_01CFF435.3DFEDA70-- From nobody Thu Oct 30 09:52:54 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52EB61A036B for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 09:52:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p7qfu4p7BttE for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 09:52:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41C2F1A036A for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 09:52:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2034; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414687966; x=1415897566; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=tLDM16mSQ5KtOnNLqCQn/wN4yYFsThXFEZ7L5h2ddUk=; b=i+Ryf5lLiKDKJDx8z4p242ka5xjnRTMqB1iVsSCgq6w3UhKwJnzT4pCh P88mJrT1Mavj2G4UUHBg4+MfdZ/zODnanfOdY8OT6nh6t8zZu8/NZSYOK 4B5LDAnkzeBepCwKP6VxlUvK9oeWCjodMOuHQsL06ZYPyHeH3/xWmn3kV c=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag4FAEBsUlStJA2I/2dsb2JhbABSCoMOVFgEzU4Kh00CgSQWAQEBAQF9hAIBAQEDAQEBAWsXBgEIDgMDAQJWCx0IAgQBEog4CQ3IWAEBAQEBAQEDAQEBAQEBAQEWBJA0YwaERQWSDYtdgTGDSo08hAiCNIFEbIFIgQMBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,286,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="367994955" Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Oct 2014 16:52:45 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com [173.36.12.84]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9UGqjqp023776 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 16:52:45 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.159]) by xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com ([173.36.12.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:52:45 -0500 From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP86/kZgaQ5vrRY0OsRPlSL9eDJZxI7neA Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 16:52:44 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <54514226.6050502@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616 x-originating-ip: [10.86.244.52] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <4072997A67F9B84ABE519FE34FC2F887@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/up3dFAksRR5a3zZU5NoebbFIK1U Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 16:52:52 -0000 Hi Lou and all-=20 1. Yes, there is a need. 2. Yes, already a co-author. 3. Yes, support.=20 Thanks Regards =8A Zafar -----Original Message----- From: "lberger@labn.net" Date: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 3:38 PM To: "ccamp@ietf.org" Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document >All, > >This is start of a three week poll on making >draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a CCAMP working group >document. The poll duration is extended due to the upcoming meeting. > >This is a bit of an atypical adoption call. We, the chairs, think this >document requires work, but that it has reached the point that changes >should be directed by the WG. Recall that the individual authors have >already merged this document with >draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp. Our questions to the WG are: > >1) Do you think the WG should develop an informational document > explaining how resource sharing works with the existing RSVP-TE > RFCs/mechanisms? > > Please answer: "yes" or "no", elaborate if you wish. > >2) Are you willing to contribute to this work, and if so how? > > Please answer: "no", "reviewer", "contribute text", or > something else. > >3) If you answered yes to #1, do support adoption of this document > as the basis for the topic? > > Please answer: "yes/support" or "no/do not support". > > If indicating no, please state your objections to the document, > keeping in mind that we expect the document to be revised as it > works its way through wg process. Either way, also please feel > free to identify changes you'd like to see made post WG adoption. > > Note, objections to the topic are covered under question 1. > >The poll ends Wednesday, November 19th. > >Thanks, > >Deborah and Lou > >_______________________________________________ >CCAMP mailing list >CCAMP@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Thu Oct 30 10:22:14 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB9691A0248 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:22:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m1b7KKzKYQEU for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:22:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wg0-x22b.google.com (mail-wg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CB661A0372 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:22:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id y10so1828232wgg.2 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:21:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=c7ERqavgWJAWqSQK+pfJdg+wsORpAgCDdja6keYhVAY=; b=QVXqhGCPoYNxcAPFUYCmHhUroYy8gROyOXg1w2SQiz+Lhfnbfxnc5g876riVD9DIbQ ua6K8pVg7EK/WAZhmeQIJh7ViFThBAysJCaGOl45RcBeaYmf2zwtKwZbGKFuET2ngWcG MexT2X7oKjDZyWZvwL2qFeMBiInZw/VtdgqXUj8VV8Oc9ISKN5wU6Q1JYEsdtMiWopVm cbfl/BSxcrM3MAKPp6Y7zxfTN2un4n1lNks67wa4TUPZXZJiApfpy7OLTlFEovuH621Q miojOWBzk+Fcry5RsMXPIhH+HQviBesw0F7A0j3pkJtt9gExYw4w0uOp2ggvli6lGx0v sXZQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.12.136 with SMTP id y8mr31406755wib.73.1414689718684; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:21:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.170.134 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:21:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> References: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 13:21:58 -0400 Message-ID: From: Cyril Margaria To: Lou Berger Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2aef82650bd0506a71ee7 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/10Tx8rlR9p6AFGOpFYdNRzfKZk8 Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 17:22:12 -0000 --001a11c2aef82650bd0506a71ee7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes/Support On 23 October 2014 10:01, Lou Berger wrote: > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working group > document. Please send email to the list indicating =E2=80=9Cyes/support= =E2=80=9D or > =E2=80=9Cno/do not support=E2=80=9D. If indicating no, please state your = technical > reservations with the document. > > The poll ends Thursday October 6th. > > Thanks, > > Deborah and Lou > > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp > --001a11c2aef82650bd0506a71ee7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes/Support

On 23 October 2014 10:01, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net= > wrote:
All,

This is start of a two week poll on making
draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working group
document. Please send email to the list indicating =E2=80=9Cyes/support=E2= =80=9D or
=E2=80=9Cno/do not support=E2=80=9D. If indicating no, please state your te= chnical
reservations with the document.

The poll ends Thursday October 6th.

Thanks,

Deborah and Lou

_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
h= ttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp

--001a11c2aef82650bd0506a71ee7-- From nobody Thu Oct 30 10:42:55 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A71761A19EA for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:42:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gud5UwPL1Xuh for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:42:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C87F91A19E5 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:42:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s9UHgoSM031972; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 17:42:50 GMT Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s9UHgn5W031961 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 17:42:50 GMT From: "Adrian Farrel" To: "'Dhruv Dhody'" , References: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 17:42:43 -0000 Message-ID: <08af01cff468$e93bf2f0$bbb3d8d0$@olddog.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQEKhfq5T2pTR8YeB9FdpIQ99zzFdQJOlr50ncFQxCA= Content-Language: en-gb X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1576-7.5.0.1018-21064.001 X-TM-AS-Result: No--24.415-10.0-31-10 X-imss-scan-details: No--24.415-10.0-31-10 X-TMASE-MatchedRID: QfHZjzml1E+nykMun0J1wuG5dRZCgxC3Pj366R4tj3XadW4iYSMjUae7 nmhJA6kzJmLqKu2yqdn97HpZMOKDkV2kuSHmn3uDA9lly13c/gGIlOAITLBQ5tJgDNnoqapaBYC WURewJ0mfSHEvL7oe/PrCaFPOHN9oSg2ZSwUn/Kt2cLm5pLq1v1+U6kGoEdO3ipSe9U1/foO5p6 xgf5MBjEXfhDPFgXf0wSfjByLqt7Hz7QpRLPbE+qm4PbloS2C3+KgiyLtJrSCyd65qZFFPkzpbf dTAcNXm585VzGMOFzABi3kqJOK62QtuKBGekqUpPjKoPgsq7cA= Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/dK-YHSLMlCUJN8WTsYYofc3RuXc Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 17:42:54 -0000 Thanks Dhruv, Noted and held for next update. I'll let the chairs think about which track this is on. Adrian > -----Original Message----- > From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody > Sent: 30 October 2014 14:12 > To: ccamp@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making = draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info- > exchange-07 a WG document >=20 > Yes/Support! >=20 > Just a few comments... >=20 > - Shouldnt the draft be on informational track? >=20 > - In section 4.3 about PCE, some text about inter-layer PCE [RFC5623] > should also be added. >=20 > - In section 6, Building on Existing Protocols, could PCEP also play a > role? The server PCE can provide abstract TE information to the > abstraction layer PCE using the recent work in [1] and [2] in the > deployments where PCEs are used. Guilty for shameless self-promotion > :) >=20 > - update reference to farrkingel-pce-questions >=20 > Thanks! > Dhruv >=20 > [1]http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lee-pce-transporting-te-data/ > = [2]http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-te-data-extn/ >=20 > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Lou Berger wrote: > > All, > > > > This is start of a two week poll on making > > draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working = group > > document. Please send email to the list indicating = =E2=80=9Cyes/support=E2=80=9D or > > =E2=80=9Cno/do not support=E2=80=9D. If indicating no, please state = your technical > > reservations with the document. > > > > The poll ends Thursday October 6th. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Deborah and Lou > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CCAMP mailing list > > CCAMP@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp >=20 > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Thu Oct 30 11:19:19 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA07D1A1A02 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:18:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0lto6wBhyyb1 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:18:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B97461A1A0E for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:18:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=553; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414693125; x=1415902725; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=m3IfkJ7fRICpuoKbR9R3jCWDtJTZS5PRnev9OC01iQE=; b=AMoKVVDylrEGg217YVF1yuq0Xgm8DWXv2Sn0fLWZtZGEe8FSfiOYdwvy 3V6WEBhX/PWlb7KiyhgezTNohiExU4scnJtJywJG8LE+J9tCH3kdevo5b iYZlgneBMU1qyVZIVtikV/ZuyZMvhD98CJ9NpwSgfG7ZhSzBP1mYBqp34 w=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah8FADGAUlStJA2H/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UWATNEQqHTQKBJBYBAQEBAX2EAwEBAwEBAQE3NAsFCwIBCA4UFBAnCyUCBAENBQiIMAkNyjcBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQETBJAtEQEfMQeDLYEeBZIQjRGDSo1BhAiCNIFEbIEPOYEDAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,287,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="91800587" Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Oct 2014 18:18:45 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com [173.37.183.81]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9UIIjh3008297 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 18:18:45 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.7.227]) by xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([173.37.183.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 13:18:44 -0500 From: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP742f80uYvyKmLUyNb02hykqCqJxI/LoA Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 18:18:44 +0000 Message-ID: <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC14AFBCB0@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com> References: <544A5267.8080801@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <544A5267.8080801@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [161.44.212.220] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/YKTPuHMrbHTSa-jnYKBbLTbLTn8 Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 18:18:53 -0000 Support > All, >=20 > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-05 a CCAMP working group > document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/d= o > not support". If indicating no, please state your technical reservations > with the document. >=20 > The poll ends Friday October 7th. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Deborah and Lou >=20 > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Thu Oct 30 11:19:25 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A481A1A0E for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:19:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3783KqmRLiNc for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:18:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 064311A1A11 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:18:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=551; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414693138; x=1415902738; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=kW+dwYQNKtGV8+qmo+OkCEshz/QLem31gHnETfYTkOs=; b=mDS1MF0D4JeRyxwSdEFO7IMRn1R42pFFXIj90vjYML/my2ThDMGufs7z GXOsJ3SFLatSjfExJFJGPPthqJ5GdI4dUwxxxxR+hbW4ms8QSRiOJ0HSX ouMRy/L3T4LA3ZZsbauEQoQcud5lePVIeXgA21fSsSysUxq+SIr0v77pD s=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah8FAG2AUlStJV2R/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UWATNEQqHTQKBJBYBAQEBAX2EAwEBAwEBAQE3NAsFCwIBCA4UFBAnCyUCBAENBQiIMAkNyjgBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQETBJAtEQEfMQeDLYEeBZIQjRGDSo1BhAiCNIFEbIEPOYEDAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,287,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="91856164" Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Oct 2014 18:18:57 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com [173.36.12.75]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9UIIuTS029935 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 18:18:56 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.7.227]) by xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com ([173.36.12.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 13:18:54 -0500 From: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP742bvnMrHn66s06f535byYoMHpxI/MuA Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 18:18:55 +0000 Message-ID: <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC14AFBCC1@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com> References: <544A5245.4080707@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <544A5245.4080707@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [161.44.212.220] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/EV75i2xd-SkSN0UlTl_pSutfO0Y Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 18:19:06 -0000 Support > All, >=20 > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 a CCAMP working group > document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/d= o > not support". If indicating no, please state your technical reservations > with the document. >=20 > The poll ends Friday October 7th. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Deborah and Lou >=20 > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Thu Oct 30 11:43:26 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F337A1A1A91 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:43:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.186 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.186 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mTxlLxTkX2Uw for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:43:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 103381A0104 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:43:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 447894F6DFBC; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 18:43:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from destgsu0709.de.alcatel-lucent.com (slsv7at.de.alcatel-lucent.com [149.204.245.107]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s9UIhEJg011320 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 19:43:15 +0100 Received: from [135.244.176.8] (beller.lra.lucent.com [135.244.176.8]) (authenticated bits=0) by destgsu0709.de.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s9UIhC0I012075 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 19:43:13 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <545286BF.3020307@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 19:43:11 +0100 From: Dieter Beller Organization: Alcatel-Lucent User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lou Berger , CCAMP References: <54514226.6050502@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54514226.6050502@labn.net> Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/UOH7OU340ecoM72sfPCVFCu2Rg8 Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 18:43:24 -0000 Hi Lou, all,
On 29.10.2014 20:38, Lou Berger wrote:
All,

This is start of a three week poll on making
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a CCAMP working group
document.  The poll duration is extended due to the upcoming meeting.

This is a bit of an atypical adoption call.  We, the chairs, think this
document requires work, but that it has reached the point that changes
should be directed by the WG.  Recall that the individual authors have
already merged this document with
draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp.  Our questions to the WG are:

1) Do you think the WG should develop an informational document
   explaining how resource sharing works with the existing RSVP-TE
   RFCs/mechanisms?

   Please answer: "yes" or "no", elaborate if you wish.
yes, for circuit switching technologies I see a need for such a document.

2) Are you willing to contribute to this work, and if so how?

   Please answer: "no", "reviewer", "contribute text", or
   something else.
reviewer

3) If you answered yes to #1, do support adoption of this document
   as the basis for the topic?

   Please answer: "yes/support" or "no/do not support".
yes/support


Thanks,
Dieter


   If indicating no, please state your objections to the document,
   keeping in mind that we expect the document to be revised as it
   works its way through wg process.  Either way, also please feel
   free to identify changes you'd like to see made post WG adoption.

   Note, objections to the topic are covered under question 1.

The poll ends Wednesday, November 19th.

Thanks,

Deborah and Lou

_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
From nobody Thu Oct 30 23:05:00 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7ED41A8AC1 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 23:04:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y8UGbq9AGSmM for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 23:04:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D648E1A8AC0 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 23:04:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BOG19482; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 06:04:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.39) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 06:04:55 +0000 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.22]) by nkgeml408-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.39]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 14:04:51 +0800 From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" To: Lou Berger , "draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb@tools.ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt Thread-Index: AQHP7DmxZe4di09DEUSAb36hmAw2LZw4nFYQgANiRwCAAQp7EIAAGJKAgAM2mPCAA3N3AIABIQLAgAIO0YCAAPoXEIAAOgpQ///zSoCAAaMroA== Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 06:04:50 +0000 Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733760577@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <20141020074350.21488.53873.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733758033@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <544805C0.8060103@labn.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733759B2E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <5448F9E7.6050703@labn.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9273375C339@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <544E910C.8080307@labn.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9273375DA63@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <54513D69.3030807@labn.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9273375FB7E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9273375FC71@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <54523539.60101@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54523539.60101@labn.net> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.96.76] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/hPUVj0ugusamwVYE1fCQGq9-lI8 Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 06:04:59 -0000 Hi Lou,=20 > It sounds like the next version will resolve the (minor) open issues. > Correct? Yes, we will submit the new revision once the submission system opens again= . Best regards, Jie From nobody Fri Oct 31 00:32:43 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FDB91A8AEA for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:32:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GESkNfDNSsR9 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:32:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ig0-x22e.google.com (mail-ig0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAF591A8AEB for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:32:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ig0-f174.google.com with SMTP id hn18so462111igb.7 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:32:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=mrg4R6svxWscjwx3dJTi07elqps1HsM9UaS0F2B4TG4=; b=NYohzvf85FlLtPeunG9vrgIwhZlY15Apm2rebAa8K9YoXY6vJAirGJR7zU6GeB0qhY bI1rTfrCwFimREMAagr/nWQ/K657q1ewMHLupaV8eFdCenkoSyvxGBlMO3DZhCiBFBTd KRouEM2xnVW5V/RFBZIdDFfZuBSl+Z5ORJrF+bs/Jrsn3dfiqQvH72z5GmXsHqFJeLEm epVbIDLkRGNd2rqKIFmdHXMYM1VvHi8KWRx94SjOvaxPMRxPbkgIzNMjoZ/lufGtudbj /PI1z7EIGamc3Br9uEYIN24TZxfU7yMIgEqv87IVz/d14aFtQFiOOSfbzKB0FrK15Iyu VzaA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.41.34 with SMTP id c2mr2075165igl.5.1414740758348; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:32:38 -0700 (PDT) Sender: dhruvdhody@gmail.com X-Google-Sender-Delegation: dhruvdhody@gmail.com Received: by 10.50.252.42 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:32:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20141027185515.18769.16299.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> References: <20141027185515.18769.16299.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:02:38 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: yi8crcZdyuCsttgY97-ejkNjnY8 Message-ID: From: Dhruv Dhody To: "ccamp@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/E_gDAZG1P2rumWg4ulltQt_ds7A Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-05.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 07:32:41 -0000 Hi Editors, Thanks for your work in this draft, here are a few comments - - sec 1.2 OLD: With this additional information, the source is able to signal the subsequent LSPs with the ERO set to {C, D, exclude Path Key(EXRS), loose Dst}. When the signaling message reaches node X, it can consult node U to expand the Path Key and know how to avoid the path of the first LSP. NEW: With this additional information, the source is able to signal the subsequent LSPs with the ERO set to {C, D, X, exclude Path Key(EXRS), loose Dst}. When the signaling message reaches node X, it can consult node U to expand the Path Key and know how to avoid the path of the first LSP. In this case, it is up to the node X to expand the path-key. OLD: This mechanism can work with all the Path-Key resolution mechanisms, as detailed in [RFC5553] section 3.1. A PCE, co- located or not, may be used to resolve the Path-Key, but the node (i.e., a Label Switching Router (LSR)) can also use the Path Key information to index a Path Segment previously supplied to it by the entity that originated the Path-Key, for example the LSR that inserted the Path-Key in the RRO or a management system. NEW: This mechanism can work with all the Path-Key resolution mechanisms, as detailed in section 3.1 of [RFC5553] including - o co- located PCE o an external PCE used to resolve the Path-Key o the node (i.e., a Label Switching Router (LSR)) using the Path Key information to index a Path Segment previously supplied to it by the entity that originated the Path-Key (for example the LSR that inserted the Path-Key in the RRO) o a management system To improve the readability! - sec 1.3 How is PAS related to Macro-SRLG [http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07#section-5.3.3.1]? At the end both are aiming to abstract the SRLG information. Can the network-assigned identifier also used for link or node-disjoint (using E-flags)? The current text only mention SRLG in description. - sec 2.1.1 The A-flags and E-flags should be specified by bit numbers rather 0x01, 0x02... Editorial Nits - Follow the latest RFC style guide [http://www.rfc-editor.org/styleguide.html] - Expand LSP, RSVP-TE on first use - sec 1 s/EN2 to EN3 going via CN4/EN2 to EN3 traversing CN4 - sec 1.2 OLD: The Path Key Subobject assigns an "identifier" to the key. NEW: The Path Key Subobject uses the Path key as an identifier. s/Figure 1: A Simple Multi-Domain Network/Figure 2: A Simple Multi-Domain Network - we used following terms ~ identifier allocated by the (core) network ~ CN ingress node (UNI-N) allocated Identifier ~ Network-Assigned Identifier ~ Path Affinity Set (PAS) identifier we can benefit from a single term for readability in the document. Regards, Dhruv On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:25 AM, wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the Common Control and Measurement Plane Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) Path Diversity using Exclude Route > Authors : Zafar Ali > George Swallow > Fatai Zhang > Dieter Beller > Filename : draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-05.txt > Pages : 27 > Date : 2014-10-27 > > Abstract: > RFC 4874 specifies methods by which path exclusions can be > communicated during RSVP-TE signaling in networks where precise > explicit paths are not computed by the LSP source node. This > document specifies procedures for additional route exclusion > subobject based on Paths currently existing or expected to exist > within the network. > > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity/ > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-05 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-05 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Fri Oct 31 01:50:00 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B4C1A7015 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 01:49:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2b2S5Hhk1jYB for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 01:49:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30E4A1A7008 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 01:49:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BLD27353; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 08:49:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA409-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.41) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 08:49:54 +0000 Received: from SZXEMA506-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.14]) by SZXEMA409-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.41]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 16:49:51 +0800 From: "Yemin (Amy)" To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP7smvopL/29fRW0+EDJAK+n0DppxJ8YTw Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 08:49:50 +0000 Message-ID: <9C5FD3EFA72E1740A3D41BADDE0B461F73DBC2E3@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> References: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.169.33.63] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/frgL2PGRxx2gCASNZNQVLxIb_og Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 08:49:59 -0000 Yes/Support. BR, Amy Ye -----Original Message----- From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 10:01 PM To: CCAMP Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchang= e-07 a WG document All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working group docum= ent. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not s= upport". If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with th= e document. The poll ends Thursday October 6th. Thanks, Deborah and Lou _______________________________________________ CCAMP mailing list CCAMP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Fri Oct 31 02:36:52 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81EFC1A8715 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 02:36:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3A31x_TuE5mt for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 02:36:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76E5A1A8714 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 02:36:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BOG39858; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 09:34:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.34) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 09:34:06 +0000 Received: from SZXEMA504-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.123]) by SZXEMA402-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.34]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 17:34:00 +0800 From: Fatai Zhang To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP86/puEdfI2tHg0O4BuZrwCVX75xJ8q3A Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 09:33:59 +0000 Message-ID: References: <54514226.6050502@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54514226.6050502@labn.net> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.66.72.159] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/SBAiMQJZGBPYn32nt2g7ycgX7AM Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 09:36:51 -0000 Hi all, 1) Yes, I think that it is useful to have this draft to make things much cl= earer. 2) Yes, would like to review and comment the text. 3) Yes/Support. Best Regards Fatai -----Original Message----- From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 3:38 AM To: CCAMP Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-pr= oc-03 a WG document All, This is start of a three week poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a CCAMP working group document. The poll duration is extended due to the upcoming meeting. This is a bit of an atypical adoption call. We, the chairs, think this document requires work, but that it has reached the point that changes should be directed by the WG. Recall that the individual authors have already merged this document with draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp. Our questions to the WG are: 1) Do you think the WG should develop an informational document explaining how resource sharing works with the existing RSVP-TE RFCs/mechanisms? Please answer: "yes" or "no", elaborate if you wish. 2) Are you willing to contribute to this work, and if so how? Please answer: "no", "reviewer", "contribute text", or something else. 3) If you answered yes to #1, do support adoption of this document as the basis for the topic? Please answer: "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your objections to the document, keeping in mind that we expect the document to be revised as it works its way through wg process. Either way, also please feel free to identify changes you'd like to see made post WG adoption. Note, objections to the topic are covered under question 1. The poll ends Wednesday, November 19th. Thanks, Deborah and Lou _______________________________________________ CCAMP mailing list CCAMP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Fri Oct 31 02:45:42 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6121A8703 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 02:45:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I70FaGWSxFHX for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 02:45:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 753951A8726 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 02:45:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 28343C3E42449; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 09:45:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.112]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s9V9jU4J013389 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 31 Oct 2014 10:45:30 +0100 Received: from FR711WXCHMBA05.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.1.228]) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.112]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 10:45:31 +0100 From: "BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)" To: Lou Berger , CCAMP Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document Thread-Index: AQHP86/qCZJDVtfG1kWflBoWkMcmHJxJ9t2w Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 09:45:29 +0000 Message-ID: References: <54514226.6050502@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <54514226.6050502@labn.net> Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/2F9z3M7n7ne1WtLGY5XroTGi6ik Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 09:45:41 -0000 Hi Lou, 1) Yes , I think it is a good work to clarify essential functionality. 2) reviewer 3) yes/support Thanks Sergio -----Original Message----- From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger Sent: mercoled=EC 29 ottobre 2014 20:38 To: CCAMP Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-pr= oc-03 a WG document All, This is start of a three week poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a CCAMP working group docu= ment. The poll duration is extended due to the upcoming meeting. This is a bit of an atypical adoption call. We, the chairs, think this doc= ument requires work, but that it has reached the point that changes should = be directed by the WG. Recall that the individual authors have already mer= ged this document with draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp. Our quest= ions to the WG are: 1) Do you think the WG should develop an informational document explaining how resource sharing works with the existing RSVP-TE RFCs/mechanisms? Please answer: "yes" or "no", elaborate if you wish. 2) Are you willing to contribute to this work, and if so how? Please answer: "no", "reviewer", "contribute text", or something else. 3) If you answered yes to #1, do support adoption of this document as the basis for the topic? Please answer: "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your objections to the document, keeping in mind that we expect the document to be revised as it works its way through wg process. Either way, also please feel free to identify changes you'd like to see made post WG adoption. Note, objections to the topic are covered under question 1. The poll ends Wednesday, November 19th. Thanks, Deborah and Lou _______________________________________________ CCAMP mailing list CCAMP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Fri Oct 31 02:52:34 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C74C11A8724 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 02:52:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.667 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LrCT3mcv3xIB for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 02:52:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.33.93]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E3801A8723 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 02:52:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 27026 invoked by uid 0); 31 Oct 2014 09:52:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO CMOut01) (10.0.90.82) by gproxy8.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 31 Oct 2014 09:52:28 -0000 Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by CMOut01 with id 9lsN1p00q2SSUrH01lsRJs; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 03:52:27 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=F5TEKMRN c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=f5113yIGAAAA:8 a=ORHgswgCnHsA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=vpPiZFLJv2MA:10 a=AEDFM0qtAAAA:8 a=Kxc86RRPl7DMxhOVtbMA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=hsdesolTJLQA:10 a=irfVY5M0j7YA:10 a=9Heni2ZNo_oA:10 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:To:From; bh=vxp2gLdAMmkX2vWV7uBXtck8mhpuM+bDETxEwE9wrjg=; b=RHjszkiUjjRHpg11MUimQFc1DOeWl4LWciXJVVK/5A9Ls6I7x/zfOyUs8X1dbdujEWYnMl30cWQzDefLqAB0FzMvp/cK/mUDh9TH1gsQqSlbD7NOJhREN0pg4hqyIAvI; Received: from [72.66.79.100] (port=37752 helo=[11.4.0.117]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1Xk8sZ-0000J7-PM; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 03:52:23 -0600 From: Lou Berger To: , "'Dhruv Dhody'" , Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 05:52:22 -0400 Message-ID: <149659eb038.27e9.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <08af01cff468$e93bf2f0$bbb3d8d0$@olddog.co.uk> References: <54490A2A.1080200@labn.net> <08af01cff468$e93bf2f0$bbb3d8d0$@olddog.co.uk> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 AquaMail/1.5.0.19 (build: 2100846) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 72.66.79.100 authed with lberger@labn.net} Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/zJO3CnGZER15zsQKYk0ORfAd-2s Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 09:52:33 -0000 On October 30, 2014 1:43:22 PM "Adrian Farrel" wrote: > Thanks Dhruv, > > Noted and held for next update. > Presumably the -01 rev of the draft. > I'll let the chairs think about which track this is on. > I expect that we will touch in this in the meeting - for this and all wg documents. Lou ... From nobody Fri Oct 31 06:03:34 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1881A8BB7 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 06:03:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rhCiB0Hhepbe for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 06:03:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ie0-x229.google.com (mail-ie0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5741A1A8BB1 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 06:03:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id tr6so1193461ieb.14 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 06:03:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=8+sxyIzWDOBVXX/AgF5RfSVdCqIKiKaUKYCJ2TyqTMI=; b=xmvPEkF2qXlpOr76IiP6+5IH1PQuvmi3dNMbumS+WmbuygGuGhvJc90rRj0gE/O6t9 8ZHxNou5u/Dt1FryXfZr2VWHRLgN8FjQQBSQ6vC+CX7k6Mgjql6vpjZBT7+aP+ERoRPo rFA1CWHJ4AH3yk6wEWH9EodHv1bF2nPAw/7uwp2nD26i0keu0mTp+uJrz22H6f7VsDmu qfNmo3HQoG0WpkZaeES8p85NnDe+MbI4egB9dQPieJXWprhhGekj5aw9LEVe6psoZgzY JKlHa6KQsvzMrjbHeGVF4uCIWklU72K/hRc7y/E3vbSDkP1o57CNgSEJFOlq7qy8KDfx PTPw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.164.129 with SMTP id d1mr28053538ioj.37.1414760607598; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 06:03:27 -0700 (PDT) Sender: dhruvdhody@gmail.com X-Google-Sender-Delegation: dhruvdhody@gmail.com Received: by 10.50.252.42 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 06:03:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <54514226.6050502@labn.net> References: <54514226.6050502@labn.net> Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 18:33:27 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: rumvd73YgNy1tRjccLar46H27Yk Message-ID: From: Dhruv Dhody To: Lou Berger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/DXO5CSb9uWbZkFFcIXRsPeaVM9c Cc: CCAMP Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:03:30 -0000 1) Yes 2) Reviewer 3) Yes/Support. Dhruv On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Lou Berger wrote: > All, > > This is start of a three week poll on making > draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a CCAMP working group > document. The poll duration is extended due to the upcoming meeting. > > This is a bit of an atypical adoption call. We, the chairs, think this > document requires work, but that it has reached the point that changes > should be directed by the WG. Recall that the individual authors have > already merged this document with > draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp. Our questions to the WG are: > > 1) Do you think the WG should develop an informational document > explaining how resource sharing works with the existing RSVP-TE > RFCs/mechanisms? > > Please answer: "yes" or "no", elaborate if you wish. > > 2) Are you willing to contribute to this work, and if so how? > > Please answer: "no", "reviewer", "contribute text", or > something else. > > 3) If you answered yes to #1, do support adoption of this document > as the basis for the topic? > > Please answer: "yes/support" or "no/do not support". > > If indicating no, please state your objections to the document, > keeping in mind that we expect the document to be revised as it > works its way through wg process. Either way, also please feel > free to identify changes you'd like to see made post WG adoption. > > Note, objections to the topic are covered under question 1. > > The poll ends Wednesday, November 19th. > > Thanks, > > Deborah and Lou > > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From nobody Fri Oct 31 10:05:28 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E04FC1A00E1 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 10:05:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.209 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.209 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lJSzIJWMF246 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 10:05:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com [209.65.160.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D78A61A00D6 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 10:05:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknown [144.160.229.24] (EHLO alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.2-0) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 351c3545.0.4917515.00-2090.13876031.nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com (envelope-from ); Fri, 31 Oct 2014 17:05:25 +0000 (UTC) X-MXL-Hash: 5453c15560728d02-f5804624b26aaf6fdd573df156f1dcafb5e67132 Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9VH5MJW008314; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:05:22 -0400 Received: from mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.240]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9VH5CUp008168 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:05:17 -0400 Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAB.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAB.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.146]) by mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Fri, 31 Oct 2014 17:04:54 GMT Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.5.237]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAB.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.146]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:04:54 -0400 From: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" To: "draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ro@tools.ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ro-05.txt Thread-Index: Ac/1LMBFfSprdfmYRjad2FmzOzfJtQ== Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 17:04:53 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.70.102.66] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166DAD18MISOUT7MSGUSRDE_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=be/cppzB c=1 sm=1 a=dhB6nF3YHL5t/Ixux6cINA==:17 a] X-AnalysisOut: [=V6GuFoaIdJ8A:10 a=5JaEhQgrMosA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=zQP] X-AnalysisOut: [7CpKOAAAA:8 a=XIqpo32RAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=ccc8i8lWbW] X-AnalysisOut: [QxareQMRoA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=iDqBOVFfFh74sVzVdIQA:9 a=] X-AnalysisOut: [_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 a=NZmYZnP4tuIeO6Fz:21] X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2014051901)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.229.24] Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/93csWfXjd2PeMfN78UQTgnE3IMo Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" , "ccamp-ads@tools.ietf.org" Subject: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ro-05.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 17:05:27 -0000 --_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166DAD18MISOUT7MSGUSRDE_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP) In preparation of this document for Last Call: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ro-= 05.txt? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see R= FCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please answer the ab= ove by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware = of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until= a response has been received from each author and listed contributor. If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author or co= ntributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which= encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an = IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or = discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please s= ee the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wik= i/IntellectualProperty Thank you, CCAMP WG Chairs --_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166DAD18MISOUT7MSGUSRDE_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP)
 
In preparation of this document for Last Call:
 
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-attribut= e-ro-05.txt?
 
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (= see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
 
If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please answer t= he above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are a= ware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage = until a response has been received from each author and listed contributor.
 
If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author = or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules = which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others o= n an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undisc= losed IPR.  For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and= http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/w= iki/IntellectualProperty
 
Thank you,
CCAMP WG Chairs
 
 
 --_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8166DAD18MISOUT7MSGUSRDE_--