From nobody Wed Dec 2 09:22:28 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietf.org Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67701AC3DB; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 09:22:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Liaison Statement Management Tool To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.11.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151202172210.11479.53532.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 09:22:10 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: Common Control and Measurement Plane Discussion List , JP Vasseur , Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling Discussion List , Alia Atlas , Vishnu Pavan Beeram , Path Computation Element Discussion List Subject: [CCAMP] New Liaison Statement, "In Response to Broadband Forum Liaison: Achieving Packet Network Optimization using DWDM Interfaces" X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 17:22:11 -0000 Title: In Response to Broadband Forum Liaison: Achieving Packet Network Optimization using DWDM Interfaces Submission Date: 2015-12-02 URL of the IETF Web page: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1445/ From: "Daniele Ceccarelli" To: daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com Cc: Alvaro Retana ,Deborah Brungard ,Julien Meuric ,David Sinicrope ,Jonathan Hardwick ,Fatai Zhang ,Path Computation Element Discussion List ,Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling Discussion List ,Vishnu Pavan Beeram ,Alia Atlas ,Daniele Ceccarelli ,Lou Berger ,Common Control and Measurement Plane Discussion List ,JP Vasseur , Response Contacts: Vishnu Pavan Beeram , Lou Berger ,Jonathan Hardwick ,JP Vasseur ,Julien Meuric ,Fatai Zhang Technical Contacts: Purpose: In response Referenced liaison: Achieving Packet Network Optimization using DWDM Interfaces (https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1432/) Body: Hello, The TEAS, PCE and CCAMP Working Groups would like to thank the Broadband Forum for informing us of your effort on packet-optical networks, and providing the IETF with the opportunity to review and comment on your document and its use of our RFCs. We have conducted an initial review where we noted the references to IETF RFCs on GMPLS and PCE for satisfying the control requirements. Below is some preliminary feedback based on this initial review we hope you will find helpful and consider for the document. However, given the recent IETF 94 meeting activity, we regret there was little time to conduct a thorough technical review of the document. We understand the document is in the last call stage of development. If time and the BBF process allows, the CCAMP, PCE and TEAS Working Groups would be happy to conduct a more in depth technical review over the coming weeks. Please let us know if you wish us to proceed with such a review. As the Broadband Forum progresses its work on "Achieving Packet Network Optimization using DWDM Interfaces", we would greatly appreciate if you keep us informed of any gaps you identify in the RFCs that are needed to satisfy these requirements. Feedback from the BBF on existing and progressing CCAMP, PCE and TEAS work would be greatly appreciated and can be provided via the relevant IETF Working Group mailing list without the need for a formal liaison. We look forward to your response and our continued communication on this important area of optical networking. Best Regards, Daniele Ceccarelli & Fatai Zhang - CCAMP Working Group Chairs Jonathan Hardwick, Julien Meuric & Jean-Philippe Vasseur - PCE Working Group Chairs Vishnu Pavan Beeram & Lou Berger - TEAS Working Group Chairs --------------------------- Preliminary Feedback --------------------------- Questions: * In A.2.1, how is the GMPLS communication between the Packet Node and the DWDM Network Element achieved? Is there a specific control interface that is used in your solution? There are a number of possibilities for control channel connectivity available. Perhaps clarifying which are intended would aid understanding and interoperability. * Are there more details on the management and SDN control aspects between the packet network and the optical network? Additional management and SDN control detail might convey a better understanding of the solution configuration and its operation. Comments: * When referring to PCE and related issues, e.g., in [R-26] and [R-27], it seems only stateless PCE (RFC4655) and corresponding PCEP (RFC5440) are included in the current solution. The PCE Working Group is investigating stateful PCE and PCE Initiated LSPs, which are planned to be published in the future. It may be worth specifying which kind of PCE is suggested to be used in the current solution, to differentiate the two. Has RFC 5623 - PCE-based inter-layer MPLS and GMPLS Traffic Engineering been considered? It may be a good reference for this solution. * In section 4.4 when talking about SDN, Openflow is mentioned as a standard protocol to interact between packet nodes and DWDM nodes. PCE Protocol (PCEP) could be considered as another example, as it is currently used in IETF. RFC 3413 about SNMP, and RFC 4208 about GMPLS UNI are also recommended references. * In section 4.5, [R-36] uses the term "North-Bound interface" to refer to the interface between Network Elements and the SDN controller. We noted that some commonly use the same term when referring to the interface between the controller and what sits "above" the controller (e.g. another controller or orchestrator). This could lead to unintended misunderstanding. Perhaps a clarification would help avoid misunderstanding. Attachments: No document has been attached From nobody Wed Dec 9 01:01:19 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619E41B2A91 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 01:01:18 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.199 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NSvrbCa3qZZp for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 01:01:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from sessmg22.ericsson.net (sessmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBB2F1B2A90 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 01:01:10 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: c1b4fb3a-f79df6d0000013b1-8c-5667edd476bb Received: from ESESSHC017.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.69]) by sessmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 0E.BC.05041.4DDE7665; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 10:01:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from ESESSMB301.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.31]) by ESESSHC017.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.69]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 10:01:06 +0100 From: Daniele Ceccarelli To: "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" Thread-Topic: WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 and call for sheperd Thread-Index: AdEo7BBfsEhReFQZQne5RoeE99AfKQJc0ZGA Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 09:01:06 +0000 Message-ID: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812AF6D0F@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> References: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812AECB8B@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> In-Reply-To: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812AECB8B@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.17] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812AF6D0FESESSMB301erics_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmplkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGbHdVffK2/Qwg4XfrS2ezLnB4sDosWTJ T6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujM7Vv9gKlppU/N74l7GBsVmvi5GTQ0LARGLducNMELaYxIV7 69lAbCGBw4wSTWc8uxi5gOxFjBInT89m7mLk4GATsJJ4csgHpEZEQFdi78brzCC2sECyREvj CkaIeIpEe+ciNpByEQEjidkXfEFMFgEViWW/pUFMXgFfiXMr8yEW+Uo8ufCYBcTmFPCTmP38 ATuIzSggKzFh9yKwgcwC4hK3nsyHOlJAYsme88wQtqjEy8f/WEFGSggoSizvl4Moz5c4/Wce K4jNKyAocXLmE5YJjCKzkEyahaRsFpIyiLiexI2pU9ggbG2JZQtfM0PYuhIz/h1iQRZfwMi+ ilG0OLW4ODfdyEgvtSgzubg4P08vL7VkEyMwcg5u+W21g/Hgc8dDjAIcjEo8vB8S0sOEWBPL iitzDzFKcDArifAuew0U4k1JrKxKLcqPLyrNSS0+xCjNwaIkztvM9CBUSCA9sSQ1OzW1ILUI JsvEwSnVwDhZxT8pzJTVpf/KqsfHVJjVJU7vani8eLGB6rvAXbXLe4J3ZaztWmVXvKRf64Py rloXCUah75MnXL3yTc3MIMEq09tfME9KeVNMenQV85Plu/z2fbOo3eweVXUsvfDFHd5/+f91 G+7uZNg4+2Vy54rjTluUd/j07brro/3hxDuP/ZeUtj2VjFNiKc5INNRiLipOBACBp5r4mAIA AA== Archived-At: Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 and call for sheperd X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 09:01:18 -0000 --_000_4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812AF6D0FESESSMB301erics_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable CCAMP, Tomorrow the last call on this document will be closed. This is a pretty simple and straightforward draft but please send a note to= the list also if you reviewed it and think it's ready for being progressed= . Thanks Daniele & Fatai From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Daniele Ceccarelli Sent: venerd=EC 27 novembre 2015 09:22 To: CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org) Subject: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregist= ry-02 and call for sheperd Working group, IETF 94th is now behind and it's time to go on with usual ML work. This starts a two weeks working group last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-sig= nal-type-subregistry-02 The last call end on Friday December 10th. Please send your comments to the= CCAMP mailing list. All the IPR declarations from authors and contributors have been collected = and can be found in the history of the document: https://datatracker.ietf.o= rg/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry/history/ Please note that no IPR was disclosed against this draft. If anyone is willing to be the shepherd of the document, please volunteer. Thanks Daniele & Fatai --_000_4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812AF6D0FESESSMB301erics_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

CCAMP,

 

Tomorrow the last call= on this document will be closed.

This is a pretty simpl= e and straightforward draft but please send a note to the list also if you = reviewed it and think it’s ready for being progressed.


Thanks

Daniele & Fatai

 

 

From: CCAMP [m= ailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Daniele Ceccarelli
Sent: venerd=EC 27 novembre 2015 09:22
To: CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)
Subject: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-su= bregistry-02 and call for sheperd

 

Working group,

 

IETF 94th is now behind and it’s ti= me to go on with usual ML work.

This starts a two weeks working group last call on d= raft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02

The last call end on Friday December 10th= . Please send your comments to the CCAMP mailing list.

 

All the IPR declarations from authors and contributo= rs have been collected and can be found in the history of the document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregist= ry/history/

Please note that no IPR was disclosed against this d= raft.

 

If anyone is willing to be the shepherd of the docum= ent, please volunteer.

 

Thanks

Daniele & Fatai

 

--_000_4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812AF6D0FESESSMB301erics_-- From nobody Wed Dec 9 06:37:04 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD431B2C04 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 06:37:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.509 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OUsL70-zsXz4 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 06:37:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 113331B2C01 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 06:37:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6391; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1449671820; x=1450881420; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=AIJNdsfMh13AY40dgstmMn2ZwSzcXpUCHG0sBRCK4bY=; b=SQ2OifJjomu2KZsvG6ia4Q94yZqUlN+KeKZBZPRIstwnGhvxOt7j5iFW IToNakhmFbROwAjnCxaK/is21Bzsm9eWX1qc0q3qTaq+Qyqq3SSO1VWa0 I09fOLFgfTOURX1e4f1X2ap6T2jEjsegq7GvBUlSU6Lrb2VxfmVW5D9Af M=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0D/AQD6OmhW/5tdJa1egm5MU24GvUMBD?= =?us-ascii?q?YFiI4VsAoElOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqENAEBAQQdEEELEAIBCBEEAQEoBzIUCQgBAQQ?= =?us-ascii?q?BDQUIiCcNv18BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEUBIZVhH2FCAmELwWWaQGFM?= =?us-ascii?q?ogIgWOERJJyg3IBHwEBQoJEgUByhHKBBwEBAQ?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.20,403,1444694400"; d="scan'208,217"; a="53882554" Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Dec 2015 14:36:59 +0000 Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tB9Eb0u0024322 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 9 Dec 2015 14:37:00 GMT Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 08:36:59 -0600 Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 08:36:59 -0600 From: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" To: Daniele Ceccarelli , "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" Thread-Topic: WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 and call for sheperd Thread-Index: AdEo7BBfsEhReFQZQne5RoeE99AfKQJovXyQ Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 14:36:59 +0000 Message-ID: References: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812AECB8B@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> In-Reply-To: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812AECB8B@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.86.251.73] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_d3223d83238b47dbacc7f03f263efe42XCHRCD001ciscocom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 and call for sheperd X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 14:37:03 -0000 --_000_d3223d83238b47dbacc7f03f263efe42XCHRCD001ciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Support (as co-author) Cheers Matt From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Daniele Ceccarelli Sent: Friday, November 27, 2015 3:22 AM To: CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org) Subject: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregist= ry-02 and call for sheperd Working group, IETF 94th is now behind and it's time to go on with usual ML work. This starts a two weeks working group last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-sig= nal-type-subregistry-02 The last call end on Friday December 10th. Please send your comments to the= CCAMP mailing list. All the IPR declarations from authors and contributors have been collected = and can be found in the history of the document: https://datatracker.ietf.o= rg/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry/history/ Please note that no IPR was disclosed against this draft. If anyone is willing to be the shepherd of the document, please volunteer. Thanks Daniele & Fatai --_000_d3223d83238b47dbacc7f03f263efe42XCHRCD001ciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Support (as co-author)

 

Cheers

 

Matt

 

From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] <= b>On Behalf Of Daniele Ceccarelli
Sent: Friday, November 27, 2015 3:22 AM
To: CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org) <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-su= bregistry-02 and call for sheperd

 

Working group,

 

IETF 94th is now behind and it’s ti= me to go on with usual ML work.

This starts a two weeks working group last call on d= raft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02

The last call end on Friday December 10th= . Please send your comments to the CCAMP mailing list.

 

All the IPR declarations from authors and contributo= rs have been collected and can be found in the history of the document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregist= ry/history/

Please note that no IPR was disclosed against this d= raft.

 

If anyone is willing to be the shepherd of the docum= ent, please volunteer.

 

Thanks

Daniele & Fatai

 

--_000_d3223d83238b47dbacc7f03f263efe42XCHRCD001ciscocom_-- From nobody Wed Dec 9 06:57:23 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FBAD1B2C85 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 06:57:22 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.276 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.276 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EkREYN6f7YpK for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 06:57:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14D4D1B2CB5 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 06:55:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by wmvv187 with SMTP id v187so265824302wmv.1 for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 06:55:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KL9iH+kpynWef/Jq94L7t4WW4tTyxCcl0gYBHuuYVuk=; b=1JdjYk2DNgjeL2K59rRJMAD9e+WJ2UJ6Z+XLmpT9QgYgCAPcbtpIqneK7NtiQo46tq PS7YHjmzTkpcBG+/YPDH2oCnVsbfITU228CJh0f8ZIyJdDy7x+tO6yoEUocZnOmrlMHO bqbntiWwl4pUnajjZskMFGzuKwYwYeKWR/kBeou8blAWdFh9RY+5C39WD27D05VkAfM/ 0MRnc1UHZoueaOMVhrT4r3Q0dqkUQZnj5pxeLnKMXBixYXX3CI+KsBFFDcYjaPFeH/QC uMzISF1Op/2aOunpK2GDr0YKyXQtQGuOkANIt0Il7ZNoiDVAuxD5A18P35TUAK06UnyV /ljg== X-Received: by 10.28.170.133 with SMTP id t127mr10965016wme.65.1449672935511; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 06:55:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from McAsterix.local ([92.109.37.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 67sm26661399wmm.6.2015.12.09.06.55.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Dec 2015 06:55:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <566840E5.2080201@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 15:55:33 +0100 From: Huub van Helvoort User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniele Ceccarelli , "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" References: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812AECB8B@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> In-Reply-To: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812AECB8B@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 and call for sheperd X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: huubatwork@gmail.com List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 14:57:22 -0000
Chairs,

If you still need a volunteer, I am willing to shepherd.

Regards, Huub.

IETF 94th is now behind and it’s time to go on with usual ML work.

This starts a two weeks working group last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02

The last call end on Friday December 10th. Please send your comments to the CCAMP mailing list.

 

All the IPR declarations from authors and contributors have been collected and can be found in the history of the document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry/history/

Please note that no IPR was disclosed against this draft.

 

If anyone is willing to be the shepherd of the document, please volunteer.

 

Thanks

Daniele & Fatai


-- 
*****************************************************************
              请记住，你是独一无二的，就像其他每一个人一样
From nobody Wed Dec 9 07:16:29 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54EAD1B2CB5 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 07:16:28 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.509 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Exy_TBbWsUyw for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 07:16:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B87851B2C98 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 07:16:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8764; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1449674185; x=1450883785; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=PPDDzplVtlqiHJvoGlLir/ZT4Ieps3AcGjhNk0e/7aQ=; b=HgJkQl8OflhW2fxFZEV9e/xMM043ztPg8UV6i1uxQsOccraP0hegIu9b ocfB2RzHtnQ+U1kRTsbVGEIlAecvzsRilgecYTK6Gns5GY+HoAV7nrLrx xVLxQ5VMboD51QcjGaKQDqgRuQW+zvo5hr0O07mwm9nrXTQ0sfev/AqXy M=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0D/AQBNRWhW/5hdJa1egm5MU24GuyqCG?= =?us-ascii?q?QENgWIjhWwCgSU4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQ0AQEBBB0QQR0BCBEDAQEBKDkUCQoEARK?= =?us-ascii?q?ILw2/WwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEWBIZVhH2Eew0JhC8FjWaJAwGFMogQg?= =?us-ascii?q?VuERJJyg3IBHwEBQoJEgUByhHKBBwEBAQ?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.20,404,1444694400"; d="scan'208,217"; a="57686472" Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Dec 2015 15:16:24 +0000 Received: from XCH-RTP-017.cisco.com (xch-rtp-017.cisco.com [64.101.220.157]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tB9FGO5Z021615 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 9 Dec 2015 15:16:24 GMT Received: from xch-rtp-018.cisco.com (64.101.220.158) by XCH-RTP-017.cisco.com (64.101.220.157) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 10:16:23 -0500 Received: from xch-rtp-018.cisco.com ([64.101.220.158]) by XCH-RTP-018.cisco.com ([64.101.220.158]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 10:16:23 -0500 From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" To: Daniele Ceccarelli , "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 and call for sheperd Thread-Index: AQHRMpSQsEhReFQZQne5RoeE99AfKQ== Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 15:16:23 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.8.151023 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.89.2.2] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D28DAFB18D15zaliciscocom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 and call for sheperd X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 15:16:28 -0000 --_000_D28DAFB18D15zaliciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi- I have reviewed the document and support this LC (as a co-author). Thanks Regards ... Zafar From: CCAMP > on beha= lf of Daniele Ceccarelli > Date: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 at 4:01 AM To: "ccamp@ietf.org" > Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subre= gistry-02 and call for sheperd CCAMP, Tomorrow the last call on this document will be closed. This is a pretty simple and straightforward draft but please send a note to= the list also if you reviewed it and think it's ready for being progressed= . Thanks Daniele & Fatai From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Daniele Ceccarelli Sent: venerd=EC 27 novembre 2015 09:22 To: CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org) Subject: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregist= ry-02 and call for sheperd Working group, IETF 94th is now behind and it's time to go on with usual ML work. This starts a two weeks working group last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-sig= nal-type-subregistry-02 The last call end on Friday December 10th. Please send your comments to the= CCAMP mailing list. All the IPR declarations from authors and contributors have been collected = and can be found in the history of the document: https://datatracker.ietf.o= rg/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry/history/ Please note that no IPR was disclosed against this draft. If anyone is willing to be the shepherd of the document, please volunteer. Thanks Daniele & Fatai --_000_D28DAFB18D15zaliciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: <35143DBA5A4AB44BB9D760175996B645@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi- 

I have reviewed the document and support this LC (as a co-author).&nbs= p;

Thanks

Regards … Zafar 

From: CCAMP <ccamp-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Daniele = Ceccarelli <daniele.c= eccarelli@ericsson.com>
Date: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 a= t 4:01 AM
To: "ccamp@ietf.org" <cca= mp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call o= n draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 and call for sheperd

CCAMP,

 

Tomorrow the last call= on this document will be closed.

This is a pretty simpl= e and straightforward draft but please send a note to the list also if you = reviewed it and think it’s ready for being progressed.


Thanks

Daniele & Fatai

 

 

From: CCAMP [m= ailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Daniele Ceccarelli
Sent: venerd=EC 27 novembre 2015 09:22
To: CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)
Subject: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-su= bregistry-02 and call for sheperd

 

Working group,

 

IETF 94th is now behind and it’s ti= me to go on with usual ML work.

This starts a two weeks working group last call on d= raft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02

The last call end on Friday December 10th= . Please send your comments to the CCAMP mailing list.

 

All the IPR declarations from authors and contributo= rs have been collected and can be found in the history of the document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregist= ry/history/

Please note that no IPR was disclosed against this d= raft.

 

If anyone is willing to be the shepherd of the docum= ent, please volunteer.

 

Thanks

Daniele & Fatai

 

 --_000_D28DAFB18D15zaliciscocom_-- From nobody Thu Dec 10 15:14:44 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 226751B2DDC for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:14:43 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1tOawQW5ZtHD for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:14:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 827581B2DD4 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:14:12 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-f79296d00000141d-d3-566a0742566d Received: from ESESSHC002.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.24]) by sesbmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 91.1A.05149.2470A665; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 00:14:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from ESESSMB301.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.31]) by ESESSHC002.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.24]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 00:14:10 +0100 From: Daniele Ceccarelli To: "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" Thread-Topic: WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 and call for sheperd Thread-Index: AdEo7BBfsEhReFQZQne5RoeE99AfKQKszpVQ Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 23:14:09 +0000 Message-ID: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812AF8AB6@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> References: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812AECB8B@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> In-Reply-To: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812AECB8B@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.154] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812AF8AB6ESESSMB301erics_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprPIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7hK4Te1aYwfRfahZP5txgsZgx+zKr A5PHzll32T2WLPnJFMAUxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJVxrfkYe8FV84q5t24xNjAuNuxi5OSQEDCR mPjxDBOELSZx4d56ti5GLg4hgcOMEh8fd7GDJIQEFjNKvNsm2MXIwcEmYCXx5JAPSFhEQFdi 78brzCA2s4ChxIULIL2cHMICyRItjSsYIWpSJNo7F7FB2EYSLW/+gtWzCKhKzNr0FWw8r4Cv xJ3eKywQq3wlnlx4DGZzCvhJzH7+AKyGUUBWYsLuRYwQu8Qlbj2ZD3WzgMSSPeeZIWxRiZeP /7FC2EoSi25/ZoKoz5fYevAxE8QuQYmTM5+wTGAUnYVk1CwkZbOQlEHE9SRuTJ3CBmFrSyxb +JoZwtaVmPHvEAuy+AJG9lWMosWpxUm56UZGeqlFmcnFxfl5enmpJZsYgdF2cMtvgx2ML587 HmIU4GBU4uH9oJQZJsSaWFZcmXuIUYKDWUmEt5wtK0yINyWxsiq1KD++qDQntfgQozQHi5I4 bzPTg1AhgfTEktTs1NSC1CKYLBMHp1QD47I2iRUnf/g8OL0whc8s4ctvk4q9q2Zvk8/bIhYh fVDG7YjXV67uDYd2JG+QPf+9P6n03S9FzzkmqeUh5o8iTCMOrOYJnXI/dtMxi5DoPx98m+p9 vttWrF+seN3N/Xu9cVeV/Io21vuvXui9uGdb7lNrrqn+yq2/0HdVIcvTH1dCPPiOsdkcVmIp zkg01GIuKk4EAOgxdbqyAgAA Archived-At: Cc: "huubatwork@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 and call for sheperd X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 23:14:43 -0000 --_000_4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812AF8AB6ESESSMB301erics_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable CCAMP, The WG last call is now closed. We will move forward with the publication p= rocess. Huub will be the shepherd of the document. More info on the draft status can be found at: https://datatracker.ietf.org= /doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry/ Thanks Daniele & Fatai From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Daniele Ceccarelli Sent: venerd=EC 27 novembre 2015 09:22 To: CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org) Subject: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregist= ry-02 and call for sheperd Working group, IETF 94th is now behind and it's time to go on with usual ML work. This starts a two weeks working group last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-sig= nal-type-subregistry-02 The last call end on Friday December 10th. Please send your comments to the= CCAMP mailing list. All the IPR declarations from authors and contributors have been collected = and can be found in the history of the document: https://datatracker.ietf.o= rg/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry/history/ Please note that no IPR was disclosed against this draft. If anyone is willing to be the shepherd of the document, please volunteer. Thanks Daniele & Fatai --_000_4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812AF8AB6ESESSMB301erics_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

CCAMP,

 

The WG last call is no= w closed. We will move forward with the publication process.

 

Huub will be the sheph= erd of the document.

 

More info on the draft= status can be found at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregist= ry/

 

Thanks

Daniele & Fatai

 

From: CCAMP [m= ailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Daniele Ceccarelli
Sent: venerd=EC 27 novembre 2015 09:22
To: CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)
Subject: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-su= bregistry-02 and call for sheperd

 

Working group,

 

IETF 94th is now behind and it’s ti= me to go on with usual ML work.

This starts a two weeks working group last call on d= raft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02

The last call end on Friday December 10th= . Please send your comments to the CCAMP mailing list.

 

All the IPR declarations from authors and contributo= rs have been collected and can be found in the history of the document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregist= ry/history/

Please note that no IPR was disclosed against this d= raft.

 

If anyone is willing to be the shepherd of the docum= ent, please volunteer.

 

Thanks

Daniele & Fatai

 

--_000_4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812AF8AB6ESESSMB301erics_-- From nobody Mon Dec 14 13:34:20 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A551B2F8F for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 13:34:18 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LtQ7XGd3Fdc3 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 13:34:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F5401B2F8E for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 13:34:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id p66so64167537wmp.0 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 13:34:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=w61q1BQDLZ2NBXcuhWTArEQeWIWd4xAgLpzYN8w1pxE=; b=M7p1tN0tPP0DtaAYlnzaX5qCVR/4UGS1yDsUFuMq5KgNZtOAauhaU3Be0DVlac0ItV haBhQ8M8+rU6w1BD00SPOIe7RuBSljOtm+hqNd+lTdzwkgRi+hakn0YwP6CR1SvrRunl pfFB8yNI/3DTBOjbPXqYsi4nWJWQtNjBJeJ0GquGpLHQMV4ZITZMtz9tp7S/ICDdX2C4 xmdasXTJRoJdhdvyqQMlC4pQ6FPYstyBoyaTixBKYVatqs1xdmlFri4Ld3avP1IYKRjA LWgRMMDbdmsj6HEtFgJRObAUYTgyWvcomVXWJTmC/Tj4yPI1U2xdr7yR3+cmwscl17ms H1tw== X-Received: by 10.194.114.164 with SMTP id jh4mr39869788wjb.153.1450128853818; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 13:34:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from McAsterix.local ([92.109.37.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id vu4sm31596034wjc.2.2015.12.14.13.34.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Dec 2015 13:34:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <566F35D3.3070109@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 22:34:11 +0100 From: Huub van Helvoort User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" , ccamp chair References: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812AECB8B@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812AF8AB6@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> In-Reply-To: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812AF8AB6@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Archived-At: Subject: [CCAMP] Document shepherd write-up for draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: huubatwork@gmail.com List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 21:34:18 -0000 Document shepherd write-up for draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02 (1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC? Is this type of RFC indicated in the title page header? This document is requested for publication as a Standards Track document. This is appropriate because the document describes the extension of the IANA maintained "OTN Signal Type" subregistry to the "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Parameters" registry for the OTN signals defined in [RFC4328] and [RFC7139] with additional signal types mentioned in ITU-T G.Sup43. This track is noted in the document header. (2) The IESG approval announcement includes a Document Announcement Write-Up. Please provide such a Document Announcement Write-Up. Recent examples can be found in the "Action" announcements for approved documents. The approval announcement contains the following sections: Technical Summary: The International Telecommunication Union Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) has defined normative OTN Signal Types in G.709. These OTN Signal Types are registered by RFC7139. The ITU-T has also defined non-normative OTN Signal Types in G.Sup43. This document registers these additional OTN Signal Types. Working Group Summary: This document has been reviewed by the CCAMP working group and received some comments at IETF meetings and on the mailing list. There were no problems with consensus for this document. Document Quality: The document is concise and provides proper justification for the extension of the OTN Signal Type registry. Personnel: Huub van Helvoort is the Document Shepherd Deborah Brungard is the Responsible Area Director (3) Briefly describe the review of this document that was performed by the Document Shepherd. If this version of the document is not ready for publication, please explain why the document is being forwarded to the IESG. The document shepherd has reviewed the current revision of the document and has found nits, see (11). After addressing these nits he believes it is ready for publication. (4) Does the document Shepherd have any concerns about the depth or breadth of the reviews that have been performed? No concerns. (5) Do portions of the document need review from a particular or from broader perspective, e.g., security, operational complexity, AAA, DNS, DHCP, XML, or internationalization? If so, describe the review that took place. No such content. (6) Describe any specific concerns or issues that the Document Shepherd has with this document that the Responsible Area Director and/or the IESG should be aware of? For example, perhaps he or she is uncomfortable with certain parts of the document, or has concerns whether there really is a need for it. In any event, if the WG has discussed those issues and has indicated that it still wishes to advance the document, detail those concerns here. No such concerns. (7) Has each author confirmed that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have already been filed. If not, explain why? The WG chairs chased all authors and contributors for statements that they had complied with IETF IPR policy. All responded. (8) Has an IPR disclosure been filed that references this document? If so, summarize any WG discussion and conclusion regarding the IPR disclosures. No disclosures have been made. (9) How solid is the WG consensus behind this document? Does it represent the strong concurrence of a few individuals, with others being silent, or does the WG as a whole understand and agree with it? See (2). There has been a good review and there is good consensus on the document. (10) Has anyone threatened an appeal or otherwise indicated extreme discontent? If so, please summarise the areas of conflict in separate email messages to the Responsible Area Director. (It should be in a separate email because this questionnaire is publicly available.) No threats or discontent. (11) Identify any ID nits the Document Shepherd has found in this document. (See http://www.ietf.org/tools/idnits/ and the Internet-Drafts Checklist). Boilerplate checks are not enough; this check needs to be thorough. Fix nits errors: Security considerations section is not required. In Abstract s/[RFC5226]/RFC 5226/ Fix nits warning: Because G.Sup43 has been approved and published the following change should be made in section 4.2 (this will also align it with the reference present in section 1) OLD: [GSUP.43] ITU-T, "Proposed revision of G.sup43 (for agreement)", February, 2011. NEW: [G.Sup43] ITU-T, Transport of IEEE 10GBASE-R in optical transport networks (OTN), February, 2011. (12) Describe how the document meets any required formal review criteria, such as the MIB Doctor, media type, and URI type reviews. No such reviews needed. (13) Have all references within this document been identified as either normative or informative? All normative references are identified correctly. The Informative Reference has been approved and published. (14) Are there normative references to documents that are not ready for advancement or are otherwise in an unclear state? If such normative references exist, what is the plan for their completion? None such. (15) Are there downward normative references references (see RFC 3967)? If so, list these downward references to support the Area Director in the Last Call procedure. None such. (16) Will publication of this document change the status of any existing RFCs? Are those RFCs listed on the title page header, listed in the abstract, and discussed in the introduction? If the RFCs are not listed in the Abstract and Introduction, explain why, and point to the part of the document where the relationship of this document to the other RFCs is discussed. If this information is not in the document, explain why the WG considers it unnecessary. No issues. (17) Describe the Document Shepherd's review of the IANA considerations section, especially with regard to its consistency with the body of the document. Confirm that all protocol extensions that the document makes are associated with the appropriate reservations in IANA registries. Confirm that any referenced IANA registries have been clearly identified. Confirm that newly created IANA registries include a detailed specification of the initial contents for the registry, that allocations procedures for future registrations are defined, and a reasonable name for the new registry has been suggested (see RFC 5226). The IANA considerations section is the most important part of this document. It is concise and appropriate. (18) List any new IANA registries that require Expert Review for future allocations. Provide any public guidance that the IESG would find useful in selecting the IANA Experts for these new registries. The additional subregistries are identified properly. (19) Describe reviews and automated checks performed by the Document Shepherd to validate sections of the document written in a formal language, such as XML code, BNF rules, MIB definitions, etc. There are no such sections. ------------ Best regards, Huub. From nobody Tue Dec 15 09:08:22 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietf.org Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F8F1A90E5; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 09:08:15 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.11.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151215170815.23477.62866.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 09:08:15 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: ccamp-chairs@ietf.org, ccamp@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-rsvp-te-ext@ietf.org, The IESG , rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [CCAMP] Protocol Action: 'RSVP-TE Signaling Extensions in support of Flexible Grid' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-rsvp-te-ext-05.txt) X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:08:16 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'RSVP-TE Signaling Extensions in support of Flexible Grid' (draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-rsvp-te-ext-05.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Common Control and Measurement Plane Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Alvaro Retana, Alia Atlas and Deborah Brungard. A URL of this Internet Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-rsvp-te-ext/ Technical Summary The International Telecommunication Union Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) extended its Recommendations G.694.1 and G.872 to include a new dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) grid by defining a set of nominal central frequencies, channel spacing's and the concept of "frequency slot". In such an environment, a data plane connection is switched based on allocated, variable-sized frequency ranges within the optical spectrum creating what is known as flexi-grid. This document reflects recommendations defined by the ITU-T and describes the requirements, procedures and protocol extensions for RSVP-TE signaling to set up LSPs in optical networks that support flexi-grid. The I-D using the label definition documented in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farrkingel-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label. Working Group Summary The initial RSVP-TE signaling extensions in support of flexible grid Internet-Draft (I-D) was published in October 2011, after numerous presentations at CCAMP working group (WG) meetings and list discussions it has matured over several versions. Key discussion points included: + Traffic Parameters - Its correct use + Grid Value - To determine how to carry the central frequency & slot width in RSVP-TE + Refined to make it consistent with flexible grid framework and label extension I-Ds - https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk - https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label The issues above were discussed during IETF meetings and on the mailing list and an acceptable (by the CCAMP WG) definitions were established. Overall the document has received broad support from the CCAMP WG during its life. No objection to progression of the I-D (via the CCAMP mailing list or documented in CCAMP WG minutes), and especially at Last Call was recorded. Document Quality The work has had contributions from a large group of people from multiple people both from the ITU-T and IETF. Additionally, the work has had external review from the IDEALIST EU project (http://www.ict-idealist.eu/) that is making multiple inter-operating implementations of a GMPLS control plane for flexible grid. Personnel Daniel King is the document Shepherd Deborah Brungard is the Responsible Area Director From nobody Tue Dec 15 22:33:48 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietf.org Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C281A87B9; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 22:33:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.11.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151216063346.32431.90544.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 22:33:46 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: ccamp@ietf.org Subject: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-lee-ccamp-wson-yang-04.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 06:33:46 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Common Control and Measurement Plane Working Group of the IETF. Title : A Yang Data Model for WSON Optical Networks Authors : Young Lee Dhruv Dhody Xian Zhang Aihua Guo Victor Lopez Daniel King Bin Yeong Yoon Filename : draft-lee-ccamp-wson-yang-04.txt Pages : 17 Date : 2015-12-15 Abstract: This document provides a YANG data model for the routing and wavelength assignment (RWA) TE topology in wavelength switched optical networks (WSONs). The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lee-ccamp-wson-yang/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lee-ccamp-wson-yang-04 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-lee-ccamp-wson-yang-04 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Tue Dec 15 22:36:28 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58D01A8787 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 22:36:27 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8FlV7iRN_M2L for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 22:36:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2972B1A87C1 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 22:36:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CFM91967; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 06:36:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.71) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 06:36:23 +0000 Received: from SZXEMA512-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.140]) by SZXEMA412-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.71]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:36:18 +0800 From: "Zhangxian (Xian)" To: "ccamp@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-lee-ccamp-wson-yang-04.txt Thread-Index: AQHRN8vNysFLJBF0p0SL81pY+34T4p7NKAlA Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 06:36:18 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.66.104.209] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020205.56710668.0098, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.8.140, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 27b28c950311621347f1202c434e5d8b Archived-At: Subject: [CCAMP] FW: I-D Action: draft-lee-ccamp-wson-yang-04.txt X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 06:36:28 -0000 SGksIEFsbCwgDQoNCiAgIFRoaXMgdmVyc2lvbiBmaXhlcyB5YW5nIG1vZHVsZSBleHRyYWN0aW9u IGVycm9yIGlkZW50aWZpZWQgYnkgWUFORyBjb29yZGluYXRvcnMuIE5vIG90aGVyIGNoYW5nZXMg bWFkZS4gDQoNClJlZ2FyZHMsDQpYaWFuIChvbiBiZWhhbGYgb2YgYWxsIGF1dGhvcnMpDQoNCi0t LS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQpGcm9tOiBDQ0FNUCBbbWFpbHRvOmNjYW1wLWJvdW5j ZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmddIE9uIEJlaGFsZiBPZiBpbnRlcm5ldC1kcmFmdHNAaWV0Zi5vcmcNClNlbnQ6 IDIwMTXE6jEy1MIxNsjVIDE0OjM0DQpUbzogaS1kLWFubm91bmNlQGlldGYub3JnDQpDYzogY2Nh bXBAaWV0Zi5vcmcNClN1YmplY3Q6IFtDQ0FNUF0gSS1EIEFjdGlvbjogZHJhZnQtbGVlLWNjYW1w LXdzb24teWFuZy0wNC50eHQNCg0KDQpBIE5ldyBJbnRlcm5ldC1EcmFmdCBpcyBhdmFpbGFibGUg ZnJvbSB0aGUgb24tbGluZSBJbnRlcm5ldC1EcmFmdHMgZGlyZWN0b3JpZXMuDQogVGhpcyBkcmFm dCBpcyBhIHdvcmsgaXRlbSBvZiB0aGUgQ29tbW9uIENvbnRyb2wgYW5kIE1lYXN1cmVtZW50IFBs YW5lIFdvcmtpbmcgR3JvdXAgb2YgdGhlIElFVEYuDQoNCiAgICAgICAgVGl0bGUgICAgICAgICAg IDogQSBZYW5nIERhdGEgTW9kZWwgZm9yIFdTT04gT3B0aWNhbCBOZXR3b3Jrcw0KICAgICAgICBB dXRob3JzICAgICAgICAgOiBZb3VuZyBMZWUNCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgRGhy dXYgRGhvZHkNCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgWGlhbiBaaGFuZw0KICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBBaWh1YSBHdW8NCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgVmlj dG9yIExvcGV6DQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIERhbmllbCBLaW5nDQogICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIEJpbiBZZW9uZyBZb29uDQoJRmlsZW5hbWUgICAgICAgIDogZHJh ZnQtbGVlLWNjYW1wLXdzb24teWFuZy0wNC50eHQNCglQYWdlcyAgICAgICAgICAgOiAxNw0KCURh dGUgICAgICAgICAgICA6IDIwMTUtMTItMTUNCg0KQWJzdHJhY3Q6DQogICBUaGlzIGRvY3VtZW50 IHByb3ZpZGVzIGEgWUFORyBkYXRhIG1vZGVsIGZvciB0aGUgcm91dGluZyBhbmQgd2F2ZWxlbmd0 aA0KYXNzaWdubWVudCAgICAoUldBKSBURSB0b3BvbG9neSBpbiB3YXZlbGVuZ3RoIHN3aXRjaGVk IG9wdGljYWwgbmV0d29ya3MgKFdTT05zKS4NCg0KDQoNCg0KVGhlIElFVEYgZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIg c3RhdHVzIHBhZ2UgZm9yIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQgaXM6DQpodHRwczovL2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYu b3JnL2RvYy9kcmFmdC1sZWUtY2NhbXAtd3Nvbi15YW5nLw0KDQpUaGVyZSdzIGFsc28gYSBodG1s aXplZCB2ZXJzaW9uIGF2YWlsYWJsZSBhdDoNCmh0dHBzOi8vdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaHRtbC9k cmFmdC1sZWUtY2NhbXAtd3Nvbi15YW5nLTA0DQoNCkEgZGlmZiBmcm9tIHRoZSBwcmV2aW91cyB2 ZXJzaW9uIGlzIGF2YWlsYWJsZSBhdDoNCmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL3JmY2RpZmY/dXJs Mj1kcmFmdC1sZWUtY2NhbXAtd3Nvbi15YW5nLTA0DQoNCg0KUGxlYXNlIG5vdGUgdGhhdCBpdCBt YXkgdGFrZSBhIGNvdXBsZSBvZiBtaW51dGVzIGZyb20gdGhlIHRpbWUgb2Ygc3VibWlzc2lvbg0K dW50aWwgdGhlIGh0bWxpemVkIHZlcnNpb24gYW5kIGRpZmYgYXJlIGF2YWlsYWJsZSBhdCB0b29s cy5pZXRmLm9yZy4NCg0KSW50ZXJuZXQtRHJhZnRzIGFyZSBhbHNvIGF2YWlsYWJsZSBieSBhbm9u eW1vdXMgRlRQIGF0Og0KZnRwOi8vZnRwLmlldGYub3JnL2ludGVybmV0LWRyYWZ0cy8NCg0KX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCkNDQU1QIG1haWxp bmcgbGlzdA0KQ0NBTVBAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlz dGluZm8vY2NhbXANCg== From nobody Fri Dec 18 14:26:39 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietf.org Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA2E1B398C; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 14:26:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Liaison Statement Management Tool To: , , , , , , , , , X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.11.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151218222638.30243.60692.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 14:26:38 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: Common Control and Measurement Plane Discussion List , JP Vasseur , Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling Discussion List , Alia Atlas , Vishnu Pavan Beeram , The IETF Chair , Path Computation Element Discussion List , michael.fargano@centurylink.com Subject: [CCAMP] New Liaison Statement, "Achieving Packet Network Optimization using DWDM Interfaces" X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 22:26:38 -0000 Title: Achieving Packet Network Optimization using DWDM Interfaces Submission Date: 2015-12-18 URL of the IETF Web page: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1449/ Please reply by 2016-01-25 From: "Michael Fargano" To: vbeeram@juniper.net, lberger@labn.net,akatlas@gmail.com,aretana@cisco.com,db3546@att.com,jonathan.hardwick@metaswitch.com,jpv@cisco.com,julien.meuric@orange.com,daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com,zhangfatai@huawei.com Cc: Alvaro Retana ,Deborah Brungard ,Julien Meuric ,David Sinicrope ,Jonathan Hardwick ,Fatai Zhang ,Alia Atlas ,Path Computation Element Discussion List ,Vishnu Pavan Beeram ,The IETF Chair ,Daniele Ceccarelli ,Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling Discussion List ,Lou Berger ,Common Control and Measurement Plane Discussion List ,JP Vasseur , Response Contacts: michael.fargano@centurylink.com Technical Contacts: Purpose: For comment Body: Dear IETF Routing Area and Working Group Leaders: Thank you very much for your timely response to our last liaison concerning our document WT-319 Part B, Achieving Packet Network Optimization using DWDM Interfaces – Physically Separated, Logically Separated. We understand the time constraints you faced with IETF94. We appreciate your effort to send us preliminary feedback on the document despite these constraints and your kind offer to do a thorough technical review of our document. We respect the expertise of the IETF Routing Area and graciously accept your offer. We discussed and addressed your preliminary feedback in our recent Puerto Vallarta meeting (Nov 16-20). Attached, please find an updated version of the document for your review and comment. Our next meeting is February 1-6, 2016 in Hong Kong. If possible, we would appreciate your response by January 25, 2016 to help us prepare for our meeting. Please let us know if this time frame is insufficient. We want to again express our appreciation for your continued consideration and support with this important topic. Sincerely, Michael Fargano, Broadband Forum Technical Committee Chair Attachments: Straw Ballot https://www.ietf.org/lib/dt/documents/LIAISON/liaison-2015-12-18-broadband-forum-rtg-ccamp-pce-teas-achieving-packet-network-optimization-using-dwdm-interfaces-attachment-1.pdf Liaison https://www.ietf.org/lib/dt/documents/LIAISON/liaison-2015-12-18-broadband-forum-rtg-ccamp-pce-teas-achieving-packet-network-optimization-using-dwdm-interfaces-attachment-2.pdf