Subject: Re: [Cellar] Quick Review of draft-ietf-cellar-ffv1-00

From: Derek Buitenhuis <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 16:39:51 +0100

On 7/28/2017 6:18 PM, Jerome Martinez wrote:
>> Why only SHOULD?
> Why not?
> We would like to avoid AVI compatibility layer (the files in the wild, 
> using a template from Microsoft), and we would like to have a native 
> binding in Matroska.

I was thinking it should be a MUST, because no other alternatives are given
in the document (such as the VFW compatible version), or maybe a reference
to existing VFW-style types added to the document?

- Derek