Subject: Re: [Cellar] Implementation hints

From: Steve Lhomme <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:25:12 +0200

IMO that's something that doesn't go in specifications (hence the idea
to remove them). IMO it doesn't go in something that goes through the
IETF process either. I think it belongs either on the website or
Github (or both). It might also go with the conformance test files
that Dave has been working on.

It would be good to have one location about tips for muxing/demuxing,
testing, etc.

2017-08-26 18:19 GMT+02:00 Ashley Blewer <[email-masked]>:
> Thanks Reto!
>
> Related aforementioned convo is here, in this PR:
> https://github.com/Matroska-Org/matroska-specification/pull/168
>
> Ashley
>
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Reto Kromer <[email-masked]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> we are currently discussing on Matroska's GitHub (and previously
>> on FLAC's as well) about some implementation hints, that are
>> present in the current specifications, but should be removed, or
>> about hints that were given while discussing the specifications.
>> I guess it would be useful to group these hints in separate,
>> specific documents, instead of archiving them... in the rubbish
>> bin. In my opinion, they can save a lot of time for those who
>> wish to implement the specifications by programming a parser or
>> a player.
>>
>> Best regards, Reto
>>
>>
>> AV Preservation by reto.ch
>> chemin du Suchet 5 | 1024 Ecublens | Switzerland
>> Web: <https://reto.ch> | Twitter: @retoch
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cellar mailing list
>> [email-masked]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cellar mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar
>

-- 
Steve Lhomme
Matroska association Chairman