From mrducky73@outlook.com Thu Dec 8 16:39:02 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85DF129A62 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 16:39:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.75 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outlook.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xyhrHv2haWzJ for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 16:39:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from BAY004-OMC1S4.hotmail.com (bay004-omc1s4.hotmail.com [65.54.190.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 589AA129ADF for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 16:39:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from NAM02-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.54.190.61]) by BAY004-OMC1S4.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Thu, 8 Dec 2016 16:39:01 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=QodKMw5JpRgkfgOezS/3OSBxCH4ExQVP31aDo33prVc=; b=C/2MdPX1fzC/aXiZ1UyGv41oiL1M3mls/ThKHzWy1F7k7DR1d5S6ef17Xlz/Rna/GTb96/g4myExpQHXVlfRQ3Y7UkN2CHJC/yVAO79wxxZ2e7xpSc4Di8B5aOW2q9hNuyylQHnHi8Ac3BGGuaYtMTQX/7p2GnOn0IHFV8P8eJSKWjfb15ykjtpzxjZJQCm0PN4ERmpSzQ9o9HYzX1SME9RXDk3nHDb4OcQVLnwtDYBhX41vMM8tgYp9BeqMIE2esNBOTYPA57VGwhTGY2kiqeY6jDFlHtZfdyPSAnMglCcAFjSUxP6+ATxVJx649XEHw3czIsTw0F83h9DoUBvCNw== Received: from BL2NAM02FT036.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.76.52) by BL2NAM02HT227.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.76.173) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.761.6; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 00:39:00 +0000 Received: from CO1PR06MB207.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.152.76.55) by BL2NAM02FT036.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.77.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.761.6 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 00:38:59 +0000 Received: from CO1PR06MB207.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.7.238]) by CO1PR06MB207.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.7.238]) with mapi id 15.01.0761.018; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 00:38:59 +0000 From: Mark Duckworth To: "clue@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Switching email addresses Thread-Index: AQHSUbQCDka3bVmYNUatuAm6kXHBoQ== Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 00:38:59 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=outlook.com; x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:6B58287510E9BDCFCF9CBEE60FAF207BDF67E3EA9D25AF60DB4A85CA1EFA5943; UpperCasedChecksum:D23104AD8E54A00565484243ED79B2F6DD1F1159629025AA9AB4188C5F40B56F; SizeAsReceived:7140; Count:36 x-tmn: [vPzqVFrGBz2ESMdcNuYGveprwqjVbAlC] x-incomingheadercount: 36 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BL2NAM02HT227; 5:Wr+LgI7/y9T8/FRbUvKDcjb6rxrCmn0FT9OTWlJ1JI4D8z2/qGH6Q4b4iamM1IRlZBaFqlGjzAzYUe00aPcR/h6FEXAjxA1w57pSKQxBJ7wP2VuXxnGiDXnDicqkXc7zBHYn25lRDfcgbLPS7kYdOPrZ9jH0G+SOpLSEcST+SWw=; 24:rHFB5x2Jtm9pp+YRYMAO+Me3xDmY4eZ5go2SGQRpJEn2++1OButAP+nphMf/oD9IxGpwXxAl8GhwehY/WMTFjiLET8PQ2ahyRBBWkytLoNw=; 7:QlTzRiGuhPpJPPPXq247ISqi43qZK7KnSjQAhzF5MjckBzGGGRKIqXt1fM7FacCyqHJhuNhDUA4BfK+bGA/rS5eJq9x6BQYPEE2uchwtmJhVlY2jvQ/jveEPaViq4D+juBXwWsWB+JQjyuV8aSjaqxbHPkz3jxOQiZ/4p7ek4+Gyq6LrMuoz4Yq+plfGJ0nrJ2kIGu6Ze3AcDRIVKobzVXWLn4z3J2i0k2tDsqrRTWbrCV1czbf002thkD7a8LepzGJEECl51pp9mGPCtmI0PEhsUn8usljANqrlzhmjn58RFn2cuVZ8rNKo4zpyvRsTZXd9Q0dhxre3gTN6prmAt+5rRD8rouSu+fPDkDbMDyxHCQz76varHDEBGk5aekyyqgslPE2NWmFOFIGmHLI0+7TYNKW7AvljbUOZEBhr0XX2HSJlNmG3NXmsafxbz2rRFFQWW5pkLtfg7WUFNQLL7A== x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(98900003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BL2NAM02HT227; H:CO1PR06MB207.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1f5073a8-edb5-4c9b-8f81-08d41fcbc43d x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(1601124038)(5061506293)(5061507293)(1603103113)(1603101340)(1601125047); SRVR:BL2NAM02HT227; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(432015012)(82015046); SRVR:BL2NAM02HT227; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BL2NAM02HT227; x-forefront-prvs: 015114592F spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CO1PR06MB2079E55B916284C3A946251A7870CO1PR06MB207namprd_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Dec 2016 00:38:59.6183 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BL2NAM02HT227 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Dec 2016 00:39:01.0481 (UTC) FILETIME=[A2D22590:01D251B4] Archived-At: Subject: [clue] Switching email addresses X-BeenThere: clue@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: CLUE - ControLling mUltiple streams for TElepresence List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 00:41:22 -0000 --_000_CO1PR06MB2079E55B916284C3A946251A7870CO1PR06MB207namprd_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Clueful folks, I am no longer with Polycom, so I am now using a personal email address on = the list - mrducky73@outlook.com. My polycom address is no longer valid. Mark Duckworth --_000_CO1PR06MB2079E55B916284C3A946251A7870CO1PR06MB207namprd_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello Clueful folks,

I am no longer with Polycom, so I am now using a personal email add= ress on the list - mrducky73@outlook.com. My polycom address is no longer v= alid.

Mark Duckworth

--_000_CO1PR06MB2079E55B916284C3A946251A7870CO1PR06MB207namprd_-- From nobody Thu Dec 8 18:40:54 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA3412A0DB for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 18:40:53 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.596 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.net Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rczTSisY2egP for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 18:40:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from resqmta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10ED212A0DA for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 18:40:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from resomta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.102]) by resqmta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id FB6yc3zoMj8tqFB7CcpGFp; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 02:40:50 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20161114; t=1481251250; bh=FNt8fyRcOHS041pcARRmL10TETzfIuCW6HayrWdMq+M=; h=Received:Received:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=G+JfR43akCU8NfjL4JwHP2RRXjKIzUyluRN42ZLV41XGE/dgI38V9lXfFdMp8ny2l Lo2/l3g3PF/vxraFztOpq4Dv0ynJc8CYX27UIe7xo+3x9zYx7fHHKZZnwisOciQN/E wovXIzywa9sJwBP9VPEbVZh528RGptGVtBJf7Kgw6pnTB9+oHuIqx5EOJdCvkrSj6r tloo4hBGrjQtBi5HgKihmOu4c8q6uA6aRGXGLG1D70w9kOHNeJ0SHagn+cye3H3sS0 39FEf0L+z7j/szhLzvtWUJAHzufkm4g4FnYcdq4AbWi5BnBOMmKiaKe8XDlUAw0py+ h0+69WMegfuow== Received: from [192.168.1.110] ([73.186.127.100]) by resomta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id FB7Bc4o9ZSSqwFB7BctK84; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 02:40:50 +0000 To: clue@ietf.org References: From: Paul Kyzivat Message-ID: <13c667e8-087c-1e3c-9ea7-541ff482415e@comcast.net> Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 21:40:49 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfJw7BJyaBD7Fs6amEOTUdZRbbRerT2dUDoA+tr7GzUg0mOdzhq0ymDNlv/PEnSnY6TIAtb7U4jt6f4ECCY6tB0iqJHrZ/bpTeJtY/qod1YY1RrJVni4y pF4guhdH3ZvIcplQOI/W+eUZ3NcbjPLqv0bZeWrQg3aNASzIg8yD/20J Archived-At: Subject: Re: [clue] Switching email addresses X-BeenThere: clue@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: CLUE - ControLling mUltiple streams for TElepresence List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 02:40:53 -0000 On 12/8/16 7:38 PM, Mark Duckworth wrote: > Hello Clueful folks, > > I am no longer with Polycom, so I am now using a personal email address > on the list - mrducky73@outlook.com. My polycom address is no longer valid. We should get Mark's address updated in the framework. Has it already gone through Auth48, or does that happen after it is released from missref? Thanks, Paul From nobody Fri Dec 9 05:35:06 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31BD12944B for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 05:35:04 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.721 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=jTXKTR74; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=UTC160YF Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2mAUKOAgAP55 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 05:35:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3384F12969F for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 05:34:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8456F2094E; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 08:34:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 09 Dec 2016 08:34:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=cfKIsUCVjIIT+tm L33XS3YzGu10=; b=jTXKTR740Tb+TpnSuIvxVEZDZy8RXrZkypY+y1ITTodYd8G 9Q5DuQ6ylfNZdh+dy2qYTzRXgItT3DbyXlUSBVpwuESbcp+Luzsx7fwdOjWL4XaU 1h/hq/z68ffHtYQMVIGd0l1Tuw3pumLP3phO/CtzmjTnvrmpGsJfeuvPEd7Q= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= smtpout; bh=cfKIsUCVjIIT+tmL33XS3YzGu10=; b=UTC160YFkp7nCjTVynmY 5nm+kmcjhcenmfwK/OMkpIgnp7t6wfpNt6K0nCmVovVxjCVF/qhLzYSqaIxSpDfw rP3azwq0vnNWtcHjQGAe5hU1QpXyCjNG+wGivc+aZ/M/NioyA21NTc0DBEPHahnT kuemfR7gmVOt1fbnmh4O7Kc= X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: 1mio7NnxhlLIXK6+K/vC1n/Iu0IRH2WkKHhqPv49RD2s 1481290488 Received: from sjc-alcoop-8819.cisco.com (unknown [128.107.241.190]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E7D7E2478A; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 08:34:47 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) From: Alissa Cooper In-Reply-To: <13c667e8-087c-1e3c-9ea7-541ff482415e@comcast.net> Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 08:34:46 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <13c667e8-087c-1e3c-9ea7-541ff482415e@comcast.net> To: Paul Kyzivat X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Archived-At: Cc: clue@ietf.org Subject: Re: [clue] Switching email addresses X-BeenThere: clue@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: CLUE - ControLling mUltiple streams for TElepresence List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 13:35:05 -0000 > On Dec 8, 2016, at 9:40 PM, Paul Kyzivat = wrote: >=20 > On 12/8/16 7:38 PM, Mark Duckworth wrote: >> Hello Clueful folks, >>=20 >> I am no longer with Polycom, so I am now using a personal email = address >> on the list - mrducky73@outlook.com. My polycom address is no longer = valid. >=20 > We should get Mark's address updated in the framework. Has it already = gone through Auth48, or does that happen after it is released from = missref? Mark can send his updated contact info to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org and = tell them it=E2=80=99s for draft-ietf-clue-framework and they=E2=80=99ll = be able to update it. Alissa >=20 > Thanks, > Paul >=20 > _______________________________________________ > clue mailing list > clue@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clue From nobody Thu Dec 22 12:00:48 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262A8129766 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:00:46 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.721 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=yD5QRyBz; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=XSDHFgG/ Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0ysUyna9WwX2 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:00:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3DFD1295A4 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:00:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B2DB20AF6 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 15:00:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 22 Dec 2016 15:00:44 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=ZMfjNXuZC+EJ8UXwkxG9RUl6Pz4=; b=yD5QRy BzSWO5+UUQUXdvqegNY7TlsYYoTNPQKZPr9RlhNPKo1fbD4M/rubVQ6yo2d+rm4C nir90Bf5b3s1RlWv5nS6tE/TSC+0WDcjagXTNbz6sjOCFuqJojoji7307qmEilsM r0cRWMYay4i25u69mew9FVYg7Wpyhj/rjm3bo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=ZMfjNXuZC+EJ8U XwkxG9RUl6Pz4=; b=XSDHFgG/d9tdxRcnR8aoAPTleiPWy6ErdoYZ/tVHd/ZdLR Mop+ulOXpT0+hdop/OlJa8akz4NGghlHCXeHx0M/enAmZRx8cXZTNBaHT5ucm6Si QQd45CCrHYMphp0oz8a+uh3wcqSFNV4b9A1TlDibESCf22ZgFS6W1e/H53k3U= X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: De0c7WMRz0t8JBB4YG1KNrQYTWKZeRo7y3lWe5SPEOj+ 1482436843 Received: from sjc-alcoop-8812.cisco.com (unknown [128.107.241.181]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6F8BC7E057 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 15:00:43 -0500 (EST) From: Alissa Cooper Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4D3B9D6C-A148-41F0-8783-3E542F83CE6A@cooperw.in> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 15:00:41 -0500 To: CLUE Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Archived-At: Subject: [clue] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-clue-rtp-mapping-10 X-BeenThere: clue@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: CLUE - ControLling mUltiple streams for TElepresence List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 20:00:46 -0000 I have reviewed this document in preparation for IETF last call. I = believe the document is ready for last call and I=E2=80=99ll request it = shortly. Please resolve the nits below as well as the I-D nits together = with any last call comments. Nits: =3D Section 1 =3D s/The proposed solution/The solution/ s/three mapping/three mappings/ =3D Section 4 =3D s/each Media Capture Encodings/each Media Capture Encoding/ s/isAlternately the MCU/Mixer/Alternatively, the MCU/Mixer/ =3D Section 5 =3D s/This CaptureIDis/This CaptureID is/ =3D Section 9 =3D "If further evidence are produced to show that information leakage is significant from audio level indications, then use of encryption needs to be mandated at that time." It's not clear to me if this is talking about deployments of this = specification as a whole and mandating encryption in an RFC update, or = individual deployments where such a decision might be made. It would = help to clarify.= From nobody Thu Dec 22 13:18:32 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: clue@ietf.org Delivered-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A93B12959E; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 13:18:26 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.40.3 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Sender: Message-ID: <148244150608.26135.13003140554574277685.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 13:18:26 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: clue@ietf.org, clue-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-clue-rtp-mapping@ietf.org Subject: [clue] Last Call: (Mapping RTP streams to CLUE Media Captures) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: clue@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: CLUE - ControLling mUltiple streams for TElepresence List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 21:18:26 -0000 The IESG has received a request from the ControLling mUltiple streams for tElepresence WG (clue) to consider the following document: - 'Mapping RTP streams to CLUE Media Captures' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2017-01-12. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document describes how the Real Time transport Protocol (RTP) is used in the context of the CLUE protocol. It also describes the mechanisms and recommended practice for mapping RTP media streams defined in SDP to CLUE Media Captures. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-clue-rtp-mapping/ IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-clue-rtp-mapping/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. From nobody Fri Dec 23 07:12:50 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: clue@ietf.org Delivered-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10877129404; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 07:12:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Vijay Gurbani To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.40.3 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <148250596603.16864.2431028787834430981.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 07:12:46 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: clue@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-clue-rtp-mapping.all@ietf.org Subject: [clue] Review of draft-ietf-clue-rtp-mapping-10 X-BeenThere: clue@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: CLUE - ControLling mUltiple streams for TElepresence List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:12:46 -0000 Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at . Document: draft-ietf-clue-rtp-mapping-?? Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani Review Date: 2016-12-23 IETF LC End Date: 2017-01-12 IESG Telechat date: 2017-01-19 Summary: Ready with nits. Major issues: 0 Minor issues: 0 Nits/editorial comments: - S1: s/source of Media, such as from one or more Capture Devices./source of Media from one or more Capture Devices./ - S1: s/SIP offer answer/SIP Offer/Answer model/ - S1: s/recommendations, for the CLUE architecture, about how/recommendations for the CLUE architecture on how/ - S4: s/have main and slides video sources can/have a primary video source and a slide video source can/ - S5: s/CaptureIDis/CaptureID is/ From nobody Mon Dec 26 22:08:36 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: clue@ietf.org Delivered-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9CB6129415; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 22:08:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "\"IETF Meeting Session Request Tool\"" To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.40.3 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <148281891466.6278.10964168122664458454.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 22:08:34 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: clue@ietf.org, clue-chairs@ietf.org Subject: [clue] clue - Not having a session at IETF 98 X-BeenThere: clue@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: CLUE - ControLling mUltiple streams for TElepresence List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 06:08:34 -0000 Roni Even, a chair of the clue working group, indicated that the clue working group does not plan to hold a session at IETF 98. This message was generated and sent by the IETF Meeting Session Request Tool.