
From nobody Thu May 17 12:49:08 2018
Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD53124235 for <clue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 May 2018 12:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.879
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Ba64WfEBfoq for <clue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 May 2018 12:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95CEF1242EA for <clue@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 May 2018 12:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Svantevit.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w4HJn3Zd080337 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 17 May 2018 14:49:04 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Svantevit.local
To: Simon Pietro Romano <spromano@unina.it>
Cc: clue@ietf.org, Roberta Presta <roberta.presta@unina.it>
References: <a30828ea-1db8-fccd-9c2b-ddc0a1dcb08d@nostrum.com> <8D2EDAF8-014E-477A-AECD-79D944EA4503@unina.it> <ac30c041-b269-484f-023a-0e8723133a5c@nostrum.com> <216405E3-5A89-4FF2-9C89-CEDA03BF6A04@unina.it>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <44289f5d-a44a-3526-641c-6d6b4103f84b@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 14:48:57 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <216405E3-5A89-4FF2-9C89-CEDA03BF6A04@unina.it>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------52CA190CA580D41507CEC5CF"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/clue/0zLMtMuxQaIH0yHeiG2Voxoox78>
Subject: Re: [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-protocol-13
X-BeenThere: clue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: CLUE - ControLling mUltiple streams for TElepresence <clue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/clue>, <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/clue/>
List-Post: <mailto:clue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clue>, <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 19:49:07 -0000

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------52CA190CA580D41507CEC5CF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 4/11/18 12:31 PM, Simon Pietro Romano wrote:
> Hello Adam!
>
> We finally managed to get our review done. Please find our answers 
> in-line, [SPR]-prefixed, as usual.
>
...

> [SPR] We have not yet added this consideration to the draft. I 
> personally believe this makes sense. Do you think we should add this 
> as a general consideration when introducing the overall state machines?

That would probably be an improvement, yes.

...

> [SPR] We will keep this as an Action Point for us, to be fulfilled 
> before submitting the very last version of the draft.


Just a heads up that I'm waiting for the document to incorporate these 
two open items before progressing it. Thanks!

/a

--------------52CA190CA580D41507CEC5CF
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/11/18 12:31 PM, Simon Pietro
      Romano wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:216405E3-5A89-4FF2-9C89-CEDA03BF6A04@unina.it">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      <div dir="auto" style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode:
        space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Hello
        Adam!
        <div class=""><br class="">
        </div>
        <div class="">We finally managed to get our review done. Please
          find our answers in-line, [SPR]-prefixed, as usual.</div>
        <div class="">
          <div class="">
            <div><br>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    ...<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:216405E3-5A89-4FF2-9C89-CEDA03BF6A04@unina.it">
      <div dir="auto" style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode:
        space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
        <div class="">
          <div class="">
            <div>
              <div>[SPR] We have not yet added this consideration to the
                draft. I personally believe this makes sense. Do you
                think we should add this as a general consideration when
                introducing the overall state machines?<br class="">
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    That would probably be an improvement, yes.<br>
    <br>
    ...<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:216405E3-5A89-4FF2-9C89-CEDA03BF6A04@unina.it">
      <div dir="auto" style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode:
        space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
        <div class="">
          <div class="">
            <div>[SPR] We will keep this as an Action Point for us, to
              be fulfilled before submitting the very last version of
              the draft.</div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <br>
    Just a heads up that I'm waiting for the document to incorporate
    these two open items before progressing it. Thanks!<br>
    <br>
    /a<br>
  </body>
</html>

--------------52CA190CA580D41507CEC5CF--


From nobody Thu May 17 19:55:05 2018
Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E23126E64 for <clue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 May 2018 19:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.879
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Td_3ekzbosxw for <clue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 May 2018 19:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F536126BF3 for <clue@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 May 2018 19:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Svantevit.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w4I2svwl050470 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 17 May 2018 21:55:00 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Svantevit.local
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
To: Simon Pietro Romano <spromano@unina.it>
Cc: clue@ietf.org, Roberta Presta <roberta.presta@unina.it>
References: <a30828ea-1db8-fccd-9c2b-ddc0a1dcb08d@nostrum.com> <8D2EDAF8-014E-477A-AECD-79D944EA4503@unina.it> <ac30c041-b269-484f-023a-0e8723133a5c@nostrum.com> <216405E3-5A89-4FF2-9C89-CEDA03BF6A04@unina.it>
Message-ID: <3fdd8d7e-fcc6-7bac-0d03-3873973a875d@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 21:54:52 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <216405E3-5A89-4FF2-9C89-CEDA03BF6A04@unina.it>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------26C6362D5F1EF7AD56714A61"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/clue/tTUPkvrQ0k4VUcVebZzPYe96bYU>
Subject: Re: [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-protocol-13
X-BeenThere: clue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: CLUE - ControLling mUltiple streams for TElepresence <clue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/clue>, <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/clue/>
List-Post: <mailto:clue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clue>, <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 02:55:03 -0000

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------26C6362D5F1EF7AD56714A61
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

[re-sending due to an IETF mailing list server outage]

On 4/11/18 12:31 PM, Simon Pietro Romano wrote:
> Hello Adam!
>
> We finally managed to get our review done. Please find our answers 
> in-line, [SPR]-prefixed, as usual.
>
...

> [SPR] We have not yet added this consideration to the draft. I 
> personally believe this makes sense. Do you think we should add this 
> as a general consideration when introducing the overall state machines?

That would probably be an improvement, yes.

...

> [SPR] We will keep this as an Action Point for us, to be fulfilled 
> before submitting the very last version of the draft.


Just a heads up that I'm waiting for the document to incorporate these 
two open items before progressing it. Thanks!

/a

--------------26C6362D5F1EF7AD56714A61
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">[re-sending due to an IETF mailing list
      server outage]<br>
      <br>
      On 4/11/18 12:31 PM, Simon Pietro Romano wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:216405E3-5A89-4FF2-9C89-CEDA03BF6A04@unina.it">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      <div dir="auto" style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode:
        space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Hello
        Adam!
        <div class=""><br class="">
        </div>
        <div class="">We finally managed to get our review done. Please
          find our answers in-line, [SPR]-prefixed, as usual.</div>
        <div class="">
          <div class="">
            <div><br>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    ...<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:216405E3-5A89-4FF2-9C89-CEDA03BF6A04@unina.it">
      <div dir="auto" style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode:
        space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
        <div class="">
          <div class="">
            <div>
              <div>[SPR] We have not yet added this consideration to the
                draft. I personally believe this makes sense. Do you
                think we should add this as a general consideration when
                introducing the overall state machines?<br class="">
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    That would probably be an improvement, yes.<br>
    <br>
    ...<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:216405E3-5A89-4FF2-9C89-CEDA03BF6A04@unina.it">
      <div dir="auto" style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode:
        space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
        <div class="">
          <div class="">
            <div>[SPR] We will keep this as an Action Point for us, to
              be fulfilled before submitting the very last version of
              the draft.</div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <br>
    Just a heads up that I'm waiting for the document to incorporate
    these two open items before progressing it. Thanks!<br>
    <br>
    /a<br>
  </body>
</html>

--------------26C6362D5F1EF7AD56714A61--


From nobody Tue May 22 21:31:46 2018
Return-Path: <session-request@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: clue@ietf.org
Delivered-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D75D21241F3; Tue, 22 May 2018 21:31:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: IETF Meeting Session Request Tool <session-request@ietf.org>
To: <session-request@ietf.org>
Cc: even.roni@gmail.com, adam@nostrum.com, clue-chairs@ietf.org, clue@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.80.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152704990481.26843.16014660723766371990.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 21:31:44 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/clue/TNSv-gDPgnqns2oyeO4_KgWSMbM>
Subject: [clue] clue - Not having a session at IETF 102
X-BeenThere: clue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: CLUE - ControLling mUltiple streams for TElepresence <clue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/clue>, <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/clue/>
List-Post: <mailto:clue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clue>, <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 04:31:45 -0000

Roni Even, a chair of the clue working group, indicated that the clue working group does not plan to hold a session at IETF 102.

This message was generated and sent by the IETF Meeting Session Request Tool.


