Subject: Re: [core] #226: Clarify which language addresses intermediaries in general vs. forward proxies specifically

From: "core issue tracker" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:47:29 -0000

#226: Clarify which language addresses intermediaries in general vs. forward
proxies specifically

#choose ticket.new
  #when True
 Peter van der Stok notes:

 In section 5.7 paragraph 2 mentions that coap requests to proxies specify
 the request URI in a different way.
 I assume that “reverse proxies excepted” needs to be added.

 ->

 We need to make a run through the document to find which language is
 specific e.g. to the use of Proxy-Uri, which language addresses
 intermediaries in general (and maybe differentiate between CoAP-CoAP
 intermediaries and protocol mappers), and where specifically CoAP forward
 proxies (in the sense Fielding uses for proxies) are meant.

 This is mostly editorial work, but may raise technical points.
  #end
  #otherwise
    #if changes_body
Changes (by zach@…):

 * owner:  draft-ietf-core-coap@… => hartke@…

    #end
    #if changes_descr
      #if not changes_body and not change.comment and change.author
Description changed by zach@…:
      #end

--
    #end
    #if change.comment

Comment:

    #end
  #end
#end

-- 
-----------------------------+--------------------------
 Reporter:  cabo@…           |       Owner:  hartke@…
     Type:  other technical  |      Status:  new
 Priority:  major            |   Milestone:  post-WGLC-1
Component:  coap             |     Version:  coap-09
 Severity:  In WG Last Call  |  Resolution:
 Keywords:                   |
-----------------------------+--------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/core/trac/ticket/226#comment:1>
core <http://tools.ietf.org/core/>