Subject: [core] Not really about Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-core-etch-01.txt

From: Carsten Bormann <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 15:57:11 +0200

Hi Pascal,

we will be making a draft WG agenda next week.

Could you use the time until then to get some discussion going on the
CoRE mailing list?  We'll need to raise some interest to justify adding
an agenda slot for this; we might be pretty tight this meeting (lots of
drafts are in their finishing phase).  In particular, since you are
addressing the CoRE working group, we'd need to understand why this WG
is the right place to do this work and not a security group such as,
say, TLS (or even SPASM).  There also was a DICE working group that has
been profiling DTLS for CoAP; this work is being published (in AUTH48
right now: draft-ietf-dice-profile-17).

Grüße, Carsten

Pascal Urien wrote:
> 
> Dear Sir
> 
> I would like a short slot on Tuesday july 19 during the core session in
> order to present the draft 
> 
> draft-urien-core-identity-module-coap-00.txt
> 
> which is an experimental proposal for identity modules based on Secure
> Elements, whose expected benefits are the following:
> 
> - Processing of DTLS/TLS stacks needed by CoAP by tamper resistant chips
> - Secure storage of pre-share keys or private keys
> - Trusted simple or mutual authentication between CoAP devices and CoAP
> clients.
> - The device identity is enforced by a non cloneable chip.
> - Trusted cryptographic support.
> - Low power consumption
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Pascal Urien
> 
> 
> 2016-06-24 0:38 GMT+02:00 Carsten Bormann <[email-masked]
> <mailto:[email-masked]>>:
> 
>     This small update should cover #411 (which will now be closed unless we
>     need more work on that example).
> 
>     It also covers an internal todo; in particular the text about ETags in
>     FETCH is new.
> 
>     As usual, please see:
> 
>     https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-core-etch-01
> 
>     and (for the most readable HTML version)
> 
>     https://core-wg.github.io/etch/
> 
>     The authors believe we are now very close to being ready for WGLC, so a
>     quick read and some feedback on this belief would be appreciated.
> 
>     Grüße, Carsten
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     core mailing list
>     [email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core
> 
>