From fluffy@cisco.com Wed Mar 30 05:13:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cuss@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: cuss@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949DE28C13C for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 05:13:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -110.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F+Dpj4+aB9iv for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 05:13:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ams-iport-2.cisco.com (ams-iport-2.cisco.com [144.254.224.141]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E7128C108 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 05:13:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fluffy@cisco.com; l=79; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1301487300; x=1302696900; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id: to:mime-version; bh=RjOtTYump4SlaE0HOmqM1WbvipnCjO+WEouIitlIrJY=; b=PjSR3h3KMGrlxSG7hARdc0A1PCjSBvcY/YHT5F//Ug4rsReGTBOqLqe1 DcdvOmdjMZsd2PTShydy4EzKWQDgYBIqBy8TurVwZqXHPFQmUYK46uNg1 yy3tbG66tcgTkg6WiHcLH228AAh6WM8c58bhz7BWE67JUXtelyvhTFgOp 4=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap0NAMUdk02Q/khLgWdsb2JhbAAgmDCMfhQBARYmJYhymBKcXIVqBI0G X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,268,1299456000"; d="scan'208";a="23790545" Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by ams-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Mar 2011 12:14:59 +0000 Received: from dhcp-10-61-102-66.cisco.com (dhcp-10-61-102-66.cisco.com [10.61.102.66]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p2UCExrX012366 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:14:59 GMT From: Cullen Jennings Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:14:59 +0200 Message-Id: <6AB461D6-1285-4ECE-8AF8-BAD277C65717@cisco.com> To: Cuss@ietf.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: [cuss] When are we going to meet X-BeenThere: cuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "Call Control UUI for SIP \(cuss\) working group discussion list" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:13:22 -0000 Are we ever going to have a WG meeting to discuss what we are going to do? From keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com Wed Mar 30 05:25:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cuss@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: cuss@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9268828C154 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 05:25:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.004 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.004 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.245, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BHFiWYrLV6-p for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 05:25:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smail2.alcatel.fr (smail2.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.57]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F4D28C121 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 05:25:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.62]) by smail2.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id p2UCNamT005171 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:27:13 +0200 Received: from FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.46]) by FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.62]) with mapi; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:27:09 +0200 From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" To: Cullen Jennings , "Cuss@ietf.org" Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:27:07 +0200 Thread-Topic: [cuss] When are we going to meet Thread-Index: Acvu1CDoMsZRcb9RQqGN4l2LKVmbcgAAX6Hg Message-ID: References: <6AB461D6-1285-4ECE-8AF8-BAD277C65717@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <6AB461D6-1285-4ECE-8AF8-BAD277C65717@cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 155.132.188.80 Subject: Re: [cuss] When are we going to meet X-BeenThere: cuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "Call Control UUI for SIP \(cuss\) working group discussion list" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:25:51 -0000 We've been progressing perfectly well with the mailing list and interim tel= econferences. The chairs summarized the status earlier this week. Why do we need to meet? Keith > -----Original Message----- > From: cuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:cuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Cullen Jennings > Sent: 30 March 2011 13:15 > To: Cuss@ietf.org > Subject: [cuss] When are we going to meet >=20 >=20 > Are we ever going to have a WG meeting to discuss what we are going to do= ? >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > cuss mailing list > cuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cuss From fluffy@cisco.com Wed Mar 30 06:01:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cuss@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: cuss@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E825B3A6B11 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 06:01:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -110.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zE6mvGrdvZQr for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 06:01:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3B73A6AB2 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 06:01:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fluffy@cisco.com; l=1223; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1301490179; x=1302699779; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=yjxADWlZRGY1IN1hFFdZwQD3RTwgQN4dlf5NxI+Bhq8=; b=CedWpkE+8g4gpK4EpOL5y7AdpDdxl53fZ0ieNme22pgCUXh2AnHYmlah RY8uLD4Rz84MDvFuAj6MhJtCszeJ6wKJlU+0XAPW+4akfxKTXtrS3MALN +prUIGHXQeuy4ioF41oxGVlG+/3Ikakyj2wcQX06uPdAVjTuY/L2jfO+5 U=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8DABApk02Q/khLgWdsb2JhbAClUBQBARYmJYh5mACcW4VqBI0G X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,268,1299456000"; d="scan'208";a="81475214" Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Mar 2011 13:02:58 +0000 Received: from dhcp-10-61-102-66.cisco.com (dhcp-10-61-102-66.cisco.com [10.61.102.66]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p2UD2wLl032232; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:02:58 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Cullen Jennings In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:02:58 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <6AB461D6-1285-4ECE-8AF8-BAD277C65717@cisco.com> To: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: "Cuss@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [cuss] When are we going to meet X-BeenThere: cuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "Call Control UUI for SIP \(cuss\) working group discussion list" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:01:24 -0000 Well the set of people that attend these calls has become a narrow = design team - that's fine and allows a WG to move quickly but it does = not build wide consensus. I would guess that far more people are = interested and would show up at a WG meeting - perhaps I am wrong but = sure would be nice to avoid late surprises in WGLC.=20 On Mar 30, 2011, at 14:27 , DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote: > We've been progressing perfectly well with the mailing list and = interim teleconferences. >=20 > The chairs summarized the status earlier this week. >=20 > Why do we need to meet? >=20 > Keith >=20 >> -----Original Message----- >> From: cuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:cuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf = Of >> Cullen Jennings >> Sent: 30 March 2011 13:15 >> To: Cuss@ietf.org >> Subject: [cuss] When are we going to meet >>=20 >>=20 >> Are we ever going to have a WG meeting to discuss what we are going = to do? >>=20 >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> cuss mailing list >> cuss@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cuss Cullen Jennings For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com Wed Mar 30 06:19:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cuss@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: cuss@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D2C3A6AB2 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 06:19:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.239, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NdcIHL7GuWJi for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 06:19:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smail3.alcatel.fr (smail3.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.56]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C992528C147 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 06:18:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.62]) by smail3.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id p2UD9naC014440 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:20:15 +0200 Received: from FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.46]) by FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.62]) with mapi; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:19:37 +0200 From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" To: Cullen Jennings Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:19:35 +0200 Thread-Topic: [cuss] When are we going to meet Thread-Index: Acvu2tE90GnwcQZ7R4q73fP3gArICgAAhNfg Message-ID: References: <6AB461D6-1285-4ECE-8AF8-BAD277C65717@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 155.132.188.83 Cc: "Cuss@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [cuss] When are we going to meet X-BeenThere: cuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "Call Control UUI for SIP \(cuss\) working group discussion list" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:19:12 -0000 Before you start spreading this myth, these calls have not design team meet= ings. They are meetings of the WG. I would also note that the chairs double called the last call because they = were waiting for your potential response, which did not come. We are not interested in progressing work that occurs only in meeting cycle= s. Regards Keith > -----Original Message----- > From: Cullen Jennings [mailto:fluffy@cisco.com] > Sent: 30 March 2011 14:03 > To: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) > Cc: Cuss@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [cuss] When are we going to meet >=20 >=20 > Well the set of people that attend these calls has become a narrow design > team - that's fine and allows a WG to move quickly but it does not build > wide consensus. I would guess that far more people are interested and > would show up at a WG meeting - perhaps I am wrong but sure would be nice > to avoid late surprises in WGLC. >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Mar 30, 2011, at 14:27 , DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote: >=20 > > We've been progressing perfectly well with the mailing list and interim > teleconferences. > > > > The chairs summarized the status earlier this week. > > > > Why do we need to meet? > > > > Keith > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: cuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:cuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf O= f > >> Cullen Jennings > >> Sent: 30 March 2011 13:15 > >> To: Cuss@ietf.org > >> Subject: [cuss] When are we going to meet > >> > >> > >> Are we ever going to have a WG meeting to discuss what we are going to > do? > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> cuss mailing list > >> cuss@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cuss >=20 >=20 > Cullen Jennings > For corporate legal information go to: > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html >=20 From alan.b.johnston@gmail.com Wed Mar 30 06:25:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cuss@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: cuss@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD6228C0F6 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 06:25:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pOy9lWMr0PRz for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 06:25:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C65AE28C131 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 06:25:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ywi6 with SMTP id 6so569831ywi.31 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 06:26:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=EF+IyvpAzMPNZZXVHsqLxcWXztBy47mXMXwzVborg0c=; b=Crtk2GUDqr8uOhBrLVecjcT9exMyylxESph/6g9wChULrPCqtZIuCwX2G6umJc1hhn npOZKV1nKh3R0xqtV9jB517guVcjkgqBERs5HcCgrvukEMDsRrUCZ7oqEZq7r4hlbPkT eIZy5KGZIEX7eUpVgySChEXNcR3xr7khMQbZ4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=B6stSs9gAWiJV2zUpK/h3+/p+eBuPqEnQcLdSMhIZpCO5q6v7WWuqQZ9Xe0nlWnnQg OTIPuwSe3+69vTj38kDzmx9WflUQUv31lkRfrcBpj6EDq3NXv0E7GT2s8ZNI/WkKV8mI ynRRctNVPkYEItoj5TH2oP+DONpAoel+88UgU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.59.72 with SMTP id wn8mr1329347icb.48.1301491616211; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 06:26:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.11.135 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 06:26:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <6AB461D6-1285-4ECE-8AF8-BAD277C65717@cisco.com> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 08:26:56 -0500 Message-ID: From: Alan Johnston To: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "Cuss@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [cuss] When are we going to meet X-BeenThere: cuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "Call Control UUI for SIP \(cuss\) working group discussion list" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:25:19 -0000 And we did meet at IETF-79. We do need to get things moving again with more mailing list discussion. - Alan - On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:19 AM, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote: > Before you start spreading this myth, these calls have not design team meetings. They are meetings of the WG. > > I would also note that the chairs double called the last call because they were waiting for your potential response, which did not come. > > We are not interested in progressing work that occurs only in meeting cycles. > > Regards > > Keith > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Cullen Jennings [mailto:fluffy@cisco.com] >> Sent: 30 March 2011 14:03 >> To: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) >> Cc: Cuss@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [cuss] When are we going to meet >> >> >> Well the set of people that attend these calls has become a narrow design >> team - that's fine and allows a WG to move quickly but it does not build >> wide consensus. I would guess that far more people are interested and >> would show up at a WG meeting - perhaps I am wrong but sure would be nice >> to avoid late surprises in WGLC. >> >> >> >> On Mar 30, 2011, at 14:27 , DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote: >> >> > We've been progressing perfectly well with the mailing list and interim >> teleconferences. >> > >> > The chairs summarized the status earlier this week. >> > >> > Why do we need to meet? >> > >> > Keith >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: cuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:cuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >> >> Cullen Jennings >> >> Sent: 30 March 2011 13:15 >> >> To: Cuss@ietf.org >> >> Subject: [cuss] When are we going to meet >> >> >> >> >> >> Are we ever going to have a WG meeting to discuss what we are going to >> do? >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> cuss mailing list >> >> cuss@ietf.org >> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cuss >> >> >> Cullen Jennings >> For corporate legal information go to: >> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html >> > > _______________________________________________ > cuss mailing list > cuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cuss > From vkg@bell-labs.com Wed Mar 30 06:37:59 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cuss@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: cuss@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B983A6B51 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 06:37:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P7IGRmPOkQhJ for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 06:37:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6303A6B11 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 06:37:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from umail.lucent.com (h135-3-40-63.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id p2UDdaiG007374 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 08:39:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (vkg.lra.lucent.com [135.244.41.21]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id p2UDdZ5n007349 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 08:39:36 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4D933308.1040102@bell-labs.com> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 08:41:28 -0500 From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110307 Fedora/3.1.9-0.39.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cuss@ietf.org References: <6AB461D6-1285-4ECE-8AF8-BAD277C65717@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <6AB461D6-1285-4ECE-8AF8-BAD277C65717@cisco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37 Subject: Re: [cuss] When are we going to meet X-BeenThere: cuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "Call Control UUI for SIP \(cuss\) working group discussion list" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:37:59 -0000 On 03/30/2011 07:14 AM, Cullen Jennings wrote: > Are we ever going to have a WG meeting to discuss what we are going > to do? Cullen: At the last meeting, the WG decided not to meet f2f in Prague. The WG had a virtual meeting on Dec-22-2010, minutes of which are at [0]. After the virtual meeting, the chairs were supposed to call for WGLC on the problem statement draft [3], however, they were remiss in doing so ;-) Therefore the date for WGLC on problem-statement will slip the Dec-2010 date. The chairs will rectify this right after the Prague IETF. The WG reached consensus to proceed with the header approach [1]. Alan has submitted a WG draft and there has been subsequent discussion on it. The next work item is to adopt a draft for the second charter deliverable ("ISDN UUI service application usage specification"). A candidate draft is [2]; a consensus call will go out to adopt a draft for the second charter deliverable soon after Prague. [0] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cuss/current/msg00132.html [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cuss/current/msg00154.html [2] http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-drage-cuss-sip-uui-isdn/ [3] http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-reqs/ Thanks, - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA) Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/