From nobody Sun Nov 9 22:15:09 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dart@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dart@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C2E1A8917; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 22:15:04 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rOS5rxG9nlrP; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 22:15:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 855731A8932; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 22:14:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.7.2.p1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20141110061448.27206.77771.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 22:14:48 -0800 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dart/VD1XhWw1EnYEG1hD5Vr8U8FIrhs Cc: dart@ietf.org Subject: [Dart] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-09.txt X-BeenThere: dart@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: "\"DiffServ Applied to RTP Transports discussion list\"" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 06:15:04 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the DiffServ Applied to Real-time Transports Working Group of the IETF. Title : Differentiated Services (DiffServ) and Real-time Communication Authors : David Black Paul Jones Filename : draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-09.txt Pages : 27 Date : 2014-11-09 Abstract: This memo describes the interaction between Differentiated Services (DiffServ) network quality of service (QoS) functionality and real- time network communication, including communication based on the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP). DiffServ is based on network nodes applying different forwarding treatments to packets whose IP headers are marked with different DiffServ Code Points (DSCPs). WebRTC applications, as well as some conferencing applications, have begun using the Session Description Protocol (SDP) bundle negotiation mechanism to send multiple traffic streams with different QoS requirements using the same network 5-tuple. The results of using multiple DSCPs to obtain different QoS treatments within a single network 5-tuple (e.g., reordering) have transport protocol interactions, particularly with congestion control functionality. In addition, DSCP markings may be changed or removed between the traffic source and destination. This memo covers the implications of these DiffServ aspects for real-time network communication, including WebRTC. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-09 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-09 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Sun Nov 9 22:16:48 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dart@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dart@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F1A1A891D for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 22:16:46 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.895 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25-kU6b6aVY7 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 22:16:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailuogwhop.emc.com (mailuogwhop.emc.com [168.159.213.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6FAC1A884D for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 22:16:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from maildlpprd04.lss.emc.com (maildlpprd04.lss.emc.com [10.253.24.36]) by mailuogwprd02.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id sAA6GhAN019709 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 01:16:43 -0500 X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd02.lss.emc.com sAA6GhAN019709 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emc.com; s=jan2013; t=1415600203; bh=hcwGLJX1MHNn9rKmioqgFOK4Evg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=oQz7oPpw1umjXviJjXjUisVd3uZpvL4PtgbblsI3gzJYkEmwiK0k3JD6xLhIOmyXn ia8JyoepB4hqaFndooIEr0LvzsxR3w9WsiwDp9aM0ENRJ1pNjPtMgVev/OZWhzZ8DA dMWKsuQGIDvEDjH0TWwmlGilbHRxFieR9N3UR+QY= X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd02.lss.emc.com sAA6GhAN019709 Received: from mailusrhubprd51.lss.emc.com (mailusrhubprd51.lss.emc.com [10.106.48.24]) by maildlpprd04.lss.emc.com (RSA Interceptor) for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 01:16:21 -0500 Received: from mxhub10.corp.emc.com (mxhub10.corp.emc.com [10.254.92.105]) by mailusrhubprd51.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id sAA6GZ2w032294 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 01:16:35 -0500 Received: from MXHUB102.corp.emc.com (10.253.58.15) by mxhub10.corp.emc.com (10.254.92.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.327.1; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 01:16:34 -0500 Received: from MX104CL02.corp.emc.com ([169.254.8.131]) by MXHUB102.corp.emc.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 01:16:35 -0500 From: "Black, David" To: "dart@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Dart] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-09.txt Thread-Index: AQHP/K2y9vRY0BDEmkaYDf8CvSiYK5xZYj3A Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 06:16:34 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20141110061448.27206.77771.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20141110061448.27206.77771.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.13.45.174] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sentrion-Hostname: mailusrhubprd51.lss.emc.com X-RSA-Classifications: DLM_1, public Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dart/CjhkMDxG2Es2Dw2dVD-yMzStJpY Subject: [Dart] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-09.txt X-BeenThere: dart@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "\"DiffServ Applied to RTP Transports discussion list\"" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 06:16:46 -0000 The -09 version contains some minor editorial changes resulting from IESG r= eview. Thanks, --David -----Original Message----- From: Dart [mailto:dart-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf= .org Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 1:15 AM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: dart@ietf.org Subject: [Dart] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-09.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the DiffServ Applied to Real-time Transports = Working Group of the IETF. Title : Differentiated Services (DiffServ) and Real-time = Communication Authors : David Black Paul Jones Filename : draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-09.txt Pages : 27 Date : 2014-11-09 Abstract: This memo describes the interaction between Differentiated Services (DiffServ) network quality of service (QoS) functionality and real- time network communication, including communication based on the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP). DiffServ is based on network nodes applying different forwarding treatments to packets whose IP headers are marked with different DiffServ Code Points (DSCPs). WebRTC applications, as well as some conferencing applications, have begun using the Session Description Protocol (SDP) bundle negotiation mechanism to send multiple traffic streams with different QoS requirements using the same network 5-tuple. The results of using multiple DSCPs to obtain different QoS treatments within a single network 5-tuple (e.g., reordering) have transport protocol interactions, particularly with congestion control functionality. In addition, DSCP markings may be changed or removed between the traffic source and destination. This memo covers the implications of these DiffServ aspects for real-time network communication, including WebRTC. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-09 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-09 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submissio= n until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ Dart mailing list Dart@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dart From nobody Mon Nov 10 11:38:03 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dart@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dart@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06AD51A1A60; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:38:01 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZZqplqUiKIJH; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:37:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55C41AC3AF; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:37:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.7.2.p1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20141110193758.10932.84526.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:37:58 -0800 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dart/l1JgKo01aIix1b-s3g7BbXLn7NA Cc: dart@ietf.org Subject: [Dart] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-10.txt X-BeenThere: dart@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: "\"DiffServ Applied to RTP Transports discussion list\"" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:38:01 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the DiffServ Applied to Real-time Transports Working Group of the IETF. Title : Differentiated Services (DiffServ) and Real-time Communication Authors : David Black Paul Jones Filename : draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-10.txt Pages : 27 Date : 2014-11-10 Abstract: This memo describes the interaction between Differentiated Services (DiffServ) network quality of service (QoS) functionality and real- time network communication, including communication based on the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP). DiffServ is based on network nodes applying different forwarding treatments to packets whose IP headers are marked with different DiffServ Code Points (DSCPs). WebRTC applications, as well as some conferencing applications, have begun using the Session Description Protocol (SDP) bundle negotiation mechanism to send multiple traffic streams with different QoS requirements using the same network 5-tuple. The results of using multiple DSCPs to obtain different QoS treatments within a single network 5-tuple have transport protocol interactions, particularly with congestion control functionality (e.g., reordering). In addition, DSCP markings may be changed or removed between the traffic source and destination. This memo covers the implications of these DiffServ aspects for real-time network communication, including WebRTC. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-10 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-10 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Mon Nov 10 11:40:47 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dart@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dart@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA7E1A701A for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:40:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.895 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bY2S24O3SWfz for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:40:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailuogwhop.emc.com (mailuogwhop.emc.com [168.159.213.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 672D21A1A60 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:40:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from maildlpprd05.lss.emc.com (maildlpprd05.lss.emc.com [10.253.24.37]) by mailuogwprd03.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id sAAJeehS009592 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:40:41 -0500 X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd03.lss.emc.com sAAJeehS009592 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emc.com; s=jan2013; t=1415648441; bh=7BVYXvlXD7uG2UCz9KUMZsTy4aU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=jmnvX6YqawdXidxDtS5skFU9SgK/AI5VRM4tmGB6O9mH2F8XxhlWHwI3LakBwgcME StcuO5Ak1RE7OSw/VpbFMOtjgmqFAZORdixiZXopThmCQh4FTXQKIVcF9UsgWU6/oO jfVAU27J47CYdkij4f+g3OaYtxE5+6tlk/4qNTGI= X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd03.lss.emc.com sAAJeehS009592 Received: from mailusrhubprd53.lss.emc.com (mailusrhubprd53.lss.emc.com [10.106.48.18]) by maildlpprd05.lss.emc.com (RSA Interceptor) for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:40:18 -0500 Received: from mxhub09.corp.emc.com (mxhub09.corp.emc.com [10.254.92.104]) by mailusrhubprd53.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id sAAJeSbR022117 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:40:29 -0500 Received: from MXHUB101.corp.emc.com (10.253.50.15) by mxhub09.corp.emc.com (10.254.92.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.327.1; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:40:28 -0500 Received: from MX104CL02.corp.emc.com ([169.254.8.131]) by MXHUB101.corp.emc.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:40:28 -0500 From: "Black, David" To: "dart@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Dart] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-10.txt Thread-Index: AQHP/R38dc57Qwy4M0CzeA+gjzE2RJxaQd1g Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:40:27 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20141110193758.10932.84526.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20141110193758.10932.84526.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.13.32.160] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sentrion-Hostname: mailusrhubprd53.lss.emc.com X-RSA-Classifications: DLM_1, public Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dart/zAyvnN_rktItb5gbYh9ycDLfK7s Subject: [Dart] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-10.txt X-BeenThere: dart@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "\"DiffServ Applied to RTP Transports discussion list\"" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:40:46 -0000 One final pair of small edits - this -10 version should be good to go to the RFC Editor, Thanks, --David -----Original Message----- From: Dart [mailto:dart-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf= .org Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 2:38 PM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: dart@ietf.org Subject: [Dart] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-10.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the DiffServ Applied to Real-time Transports = Working Group of the IETF. Title : Differentiated Services (DiffServ) and Real-time = Communication Authors : David Black Paul Jones Filename : draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-10.txt Pages : 27 Date : 2014-11-10 Abstract: This memo describes the interaction between Differentiated Services (DiffServ) network quality of service (QoS) functionality and real- time network communication, including communication based on the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP). DiffServ is based on network nodes applying different forwarding treatments to packets whose IP headers are marked with different DiffServ Code Points (DSCPs). WebRTC applications, as well as some conferencing applications, have begun using the Session Description Protocol (SDP) bundle negotiation mechanism to send multiple traffic streams with different QoS requirements using the same network 5-tuple. The results of using multiple DSCPs to obtain different QoS treatments within a single network 5-tuple have transport protocol interactions, particularly with congestion control functionality (e.g., reordering). In addition, DSCP markings may be changed or removed between the traffic source and destination. This memo covers the implications of these DiffServ aspects for real-time network communication, including WebRTC. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-10 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-10 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submissio= n until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ Dart mailing list Dart@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dart From nobody Wed Nov 12 21:07:09 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dart@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dart@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809C01A1B7F for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 21:07:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.895 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cJumKapSHJzj for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 21:06:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailuogwdur.emc.com (mailuogwdur.emc.com [128.221.224.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3734D1A1B5E for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 21:06:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from maildlpprd55.lss.emc.com (maildlpprd55.lss.emc.com [10.106.48.159]) by mailuogwprd52.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id sAD56u8f027321 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 00:06:56 -0500 X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd52.lss.emc.com sAD56u8f027321 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emc.com; s=jan2013; t=1415855217; bh=gVVBOBVEFslkhMNynOA/toZc2j0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=KCzrnAMed7JcKX8YlegRgYo1XblwxqjHS753i+IVgsXW52GWjyB2YK5S8NglRZiQd HU5qc0PUfPAByi0rAnhlwhRH2pagALIlG1hRQ/wpvZ2QeIgCU2uzYJ4mACjs2sCmdo SGvJGqc7GlEksuoaeIAKl9bLkJKudUp+4E+EaM18= X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd52.lss.emc.com sAD56u8f027321 Received: from mailusrhubprd01.lss.emc.com (mailusrhubprd01.lss.emc.com [10.253.24.19]) by maildlpprd55.lss.emc.com (RSA Interceptor) for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 00:06:35 -0500 Received: from mxhub10.corp.emc.com (mxhub10.corp.emc.com [10.254.92.105]) by mailusrhubprd01.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id sAD56hr6017313 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 00:06:44 -0500 Received: from MXHUB101.corp.emc.com (10.253.50.15) by mxhub10.corp.emc.com (10.254.92.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.327.1; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 00:06:43 -0500 Received: from MX104CL02.corp.emc.com ([169.254.8.131]) by MXHUB101.corp.emc.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 00:06:43 -0500 From: "Black, David" To: "dart@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Document Action: 'Differentiated Services (DiffServ) and Real-time Communication' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-10.txt) Thread-Index: AQHP/v2TmMzBA3EG/kCBSRhgOOJ035xd/x0A Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 05:06:41 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20141113045136.23132.69855.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20141113045136.23132.69855.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.13.62.49] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sentrion-Hostname: mailusrhubprd01.lss.emc.com X-RSA-Classifications: public, GIS Solicitation Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dart/ei0DBxs4EHXZxvNpCgEZqc2_f2w Subject: [Dart] FW: Document Action: 'Differentiated Services (DiffServ) and Real-time Communication' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-10.txt) X-BeenThere: dart@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "\"DiffServ Applied to RTP Transports discussion list\"" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 05:07:03 -0000 > The DART working group was formed in April of 2014. The working group > was chartered to focus on a constrained problem and conclude quickly. And we did it - two IETF meeting cycles from start to IESG approval! Many, many thanks to everyone who contributed - it's been a pleasure to work on this draft. Moreover, the one-and-only DART WG meeting in Toronto was the most fun I've had at the front of the room in an IETF WG meeting in a long time. Thank you! --David -----Original Message----- From: IETF-Announce [mailto:ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Th= e IESG Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 11:52 PM To: IETF-Announce Cc: dart mailing list; dart chair; RFC Editor Subject: Document Action: 'Differentiated Services (DiffServ) and Real-time= Communication' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-10.txt) The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Differentiated Services (DiffServ) and Real-time Communication' (draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-10.txt) as Informational RFC This document is the product of the DiffServ Applied to Real-time Transports Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Richard Barnes and Alissa Cooper. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp/ Technical Summary This document describes the interaction between Differentiated Services (DiffServ) network quality of service (QoS) functionality and real-time network communication, including communication based on the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP). DiffServ is based on network nodes applying different forwarding treatments to packets whose IP headers are marked with different DiffServ Code Points (DSCPs). WebRTC applications, as well as some conferencing applications, have begun using the Session Description Protocol (SDP) bundle negotiation mechanism to send multiple traffic streams with different QoS requirements using the same network 5-tuple. Use of different DSCPs to obtain different QoS treatments within a single network 5-tuple, the results (e.g., reordering) may cause transport protocol interactions, particularly with congestion control functionality. In addition, DSCP markings may be changed or removed between the traffic source and destination. This document covers the implications of these DiffServ aspects for real-time network communication, including WebRTC. Working Group Summary The DART working group was formed in April of 2014. The working group was chartered to focus on a constrained problem and conclude quickly. DART adopted this document with very little controversy. While the working group is nominally in the RAI area, it has been effectively a cross-area effort between RAI and TSV. This document resulted in lively discussion among a core group of experts from both areas. In general, the discussion converged quickly, and there were no unresolved controversies. In the shepherd's opinion, the only impediment to consensus was that discussion kept overturning rocks, forcing participants to think about new issues. One notable issue was whether this draft should offer guidance on the interaction between having multiple DSCPs in a stream and the multiple stream optimization work (draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation.) The working group chose to avoid such guidance in this draft, and leave that for the multi-stream draft to solve. Document Quality During the working group last call, we solicited comments from RTCWEB, AVTCORE, MMUSIC, CLUE, TSVWG, and RMCAT. In the shepherd's opinion, it has been well reviewed, and represents a strong consensus. The shepherd does not think it needs any further specific reviews, other than the usual reviews it would receive during the IETF last call process (for example, Gen-ART and SecDir). Since the document does not specify protocol, it will not be directly implemented. However, we expect that at least the RTCWEB working group will incorporate guidance from this document into it's output. Personnel The Document Shepherd is Ben Campbell. The Responsible AD is Richard Barne= s. From nobody Wed Nov 12 21:36:57 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dart@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dart@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2785E1A1B7A for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 21:36:55 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.492 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.492 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mI1cuiSuqgso for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 21:36:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB8831A1B81 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 21:36:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.9.231] (64-129-13-2.static.twtelecom.net [64.129.13.2] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sAD5amFo041665 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Nov 2014 23:36:50 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 64-129-13-2.static.twtelecom.net [64.129.13.2] (may be forged) claimed to be [192.168.9.231] From: Ben Campbell Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-95CDFC20-8FEB-4A1B-B355-B0045C81D2F8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Message-Id: <11E29B6D-36C5-4A81-B176-1EC866F02C6C@nostrum.com> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 19:36:49 -1000 References: <20141113045136.23132.69855.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> To: dart@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp.all@tools.ietf.org X-Mailer: iPad Mail (12B410) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dart/oLcN11XZBEyMQQM6Ybz6zPD7Jo0 Subject: [Dart] Fwd: Document Action: 'Differentiated Services (DiffServ) and Real-time Communication' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-10.txt) X-BeenThere: dart@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "\"DiffServ Applied to RTP Transports discussion list\"" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 05:36:55 -0000 --Apple-Mail-95CDFC20-8FEB-4A1B-B355-B0045C81D2F8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yay! Many thanks to the authors, working group participants, and everyone else wh= o played a part in this! Ben. Begin forwarded message: > Resent-From: wg-alias-bounces@tools.ietf.org > From: The IESG > Date: November 12, 2014 at 6:51:36 PM HST > Resent-To: ben@nostrum.com > To: IETF-Announce > Cc: RFC Editor , dart mailing list , dart chair > Subject: Document Action: 'Differentiated Services (DiffServ) and Real-tim= e Communication' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-10.txt) >=20 > The IESG has approved the following document: > - 'Differentiated Services (DiffServ) and Real-time Communication' > (draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-10.txt) as Informational RFC >=20 > This document is the product of the DiffServ Applied to Real-time > Transports Working Group. >=20 > The IESG contact persons are Richard Barnes and Alissa Cooper. >=20 > A URL of this Internet Draft is: > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp/ >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > Technical Summary >=20 > This document describes the interaction between Differentiated Services > (DiffServ) network quality of service (QoS) functionality and real-time > network communication, including communication based on the Real-time > Transport Protocol (RTP). DiffServ is based on network nodes applying > different forwarding treatments to packets whose IP headers are marked > with different DiffServ Code Points (DSCPs). WebRTC applications, as > well as some conferencing applications, have begun using the Session > Description Protocol (SDP) bundle negotiation mechanism to send multiple > traffic streams with different QoS requirements using the same network > 5-tuple. Use of different DSCPs to obtain different QoS treatments > within a single network 5-tuple, the results (e.g., reordering) may > cause transport protocol interactions, particularly with congestion > control functionality. In addition, DSCP markings may be changed or > removed between the traffic source and destination. This document > covers the implications of these DiffServ aspects for real-time network > communication, including WebRTC. >=20 >=20 > Working Group Summary >=20 > The DART working group was formed in April of 2014. The working group > was chartered to focus on a constrained problem and conclude quickly. > DART adopted this document with very little controversy. >=20 > While the working group is nominally in the RAI area, it has been > effectively a cross-area effort between RAI and TSV. This document > resulted in lively discussion among a core group of experts from both > areas. In general, the discussion converged quickly, and there were no > unresolved controversies. >=20 > In the shepherd's opinion, the only impediment to consensus was that > discussion kept overturning rocks, forcing participants to think about > new issues. One notable issue was whether this draft should offer > guidance on the interaction between having multiple DSCPs in a stream > and the multiple stream optimization work > (draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation.) The working group > chose to avoid such guidance in this draft, and leave that for the > multi-stream draft to solve. >=20 >=20 > Document Quality >=20 > During the working group last call, we solicited comments from RTCWEB, > AVTCORE, MMUSIC, CLUE, TSVWG, and RMCAT. In the shepherd's opinion, it > has been well reviewed, and represents a strong consensus. The shepherd > does not think it needs any further specific reviews, other than the > usual reviews it would receive during the IETF last call process (for > example, Gen-ART and SecDir). >=20 > Since the document does not specify protocol, it will not be directly > implemented. However, we expect that at least the RTCWEB working group > will incorporate guidance from this document into it's output. >=20 >=20 > Personnel >=20 > The Document Shepherd is Ben Campbell. The Responsible AD is Richard Barn= es. >=20 >=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail-95CDFC20-8FEB-4A1B-B355-B0045C81D2F8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yay!

Many tha= nks to the authors, working group participants, and everyone else who played= a part in this!

Ben.

Begin forwarded= message:

Resent-From: wg-alias-bounces@tools.ietf= .org
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Date: November 12, 2014 at 6:= 51:36 PM HST
Resent-To: ben@nos= trum.com
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, d= art mailing list <dart@ietf.org>,= dart chair <dart-chairs@to= ols.ietf.org>
Subject: Document Action: 'Differentiated S= ervices (DiffServ) and Real-time Communication' to Informational RFC (draft-= ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-10.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Differentiated Services (DiffServ) and Real-time Communication'
 (draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-10.txt) as Informational RFC

This document is the product of the DiffServ A= pplied to Real-time
Transports Working Group.

The IESG contact persons are Richard Barnes and Alissa Co= oper.

A URL of this Internet Draft is:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp/



=
Technical Summary

This doc= ument describes the interaction between Differentiated Services
(DiffServ) network quality of service (QoS) functionality and real-time<= /span>
network communication, including communication based on the R= eal-time
Transport Protocol (RTP).  DiffServ is based o= n network nodes applying
different forwarding treatments to p= ackets whose IP headers are marked
with different DiffServ C= ode Points (DSCPs). WebRTC applications, as
well as some con= ferencing applications, have begun using the Session
Descrip= tion Protocol (SDP) bundle negotiation mechanism to send multiple
= traffic streams with different QoS requirements using the same network=
5-tuple.  Use of different DSCPs to obtain different Q= oS treatments
within a single network 5-tuple, the results (= e.g., reordering) may
cause transport protocol interactions,= particularly with congestion
control functionality.  I= n addition, DSCP markings may be changed or
removed between t= he traffic source and destination.  This document
cover= s the implications of these DiffServ aspects for real-time networkcommunication, including WebRTC.


Working Group Summary

The DAR= T working group was formed in April of 2014. The working group
was chartered to focus on a constrained problem and conclude quickly.
DART adopted this document with very little controversy.=

While the working group is nominally in the RAI a= rea, it has been
effectively a cross-area effort between RAI= and TSV. This document
resulted in lively discussion among a= core group of experts from both
areas. In general, the disc= ussion converged quickly, and there were no
unresolved contr= oversies.

In the shepherd's opinion, the on= ly impediment to consensus was that
discussion kept overturn= ing rocks, forcing participants to think about
new issues. O= ne notable issue was whether this draft should offer
guidanc= e on the interaction between having multiple DSCPs in a stream
and the multiple stream optimization work
(draft-ietf-avt= core-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation.) The working group
chose= to avoid such guidance in this draft, and leave that for the
multi-stream draft to solve.


<= span>Document Quality

During the working gr= oup last call, we solicited comments from RTCWEB,
AVTCORE, M= MUSIC, CLUE, TSVWG, and RMCAT. In the shepherd's opinion, it
has been well reviewed, and represents a strong consensus. The shepherd
does not think it needs any further specific reviews, other tha= n the
usual reviews it would receive during the IETF last ca= ll process (for
example, Gen-ART and SecDir).

Since the document does not specify protocol, it will not= be directly
implemented. However, we expect that at least t= he RTCWEB working group
will incorporate guidance from this d= ocument into it's output.


= Personnel

The Document Shepherd is Ben Camp= bell.  The Responsible AD is Richard Barnes.


= --Apple-Mail-95CDFC20-8FEB-4A1B-B355-B0045C81D2F8-- From nobody Wed Nov 12 21:38:09 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dart@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dart@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2A31A1B75; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 20:51:40 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l5AjFWOCFlM6; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 20:51:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 315AE1A1B7D; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 20:51:36 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.7.2.p1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20141113045136.23132.69855.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 20:51:36 -0800 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dart/0qoM7PySyVMHLs7CSVBHNWlbu8k X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 21:38:06 -0800 Cc: dart mailing list , dart chair , RFC Editor Subject: [Dart] Document Action: 'Differentiated Services (DiffServ) and Real-time Communication' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-10.txt) X-BeenThere: dart@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: "\"DiffServ Applied to RTP Transports discussion list\"" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 04:51:40 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Differentiated Services (DiffServ) and Real-time Communication' (draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-10.txt) as Informational RFC This document is the product of the DiffServ Applied to Real-time Transports Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Richard Barnes and Alissa Cooper. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp/ Technical Summary This document describes the interaction between Differentiated Services (DiffServ) network quality of service (QoS) functionality and real-time network communication, including communication based on the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP). DiffServ is based on network nodes applying different forwarding treatments to packets whose IP headers are marked with different DiffServ Code Points (DSCPs). WebRTC applications, as well as some conferencing applications, have begun using the Session Description Protocol (SDP) bundle negotiation mechanism to send multiple traffic streams with different QoS requirements using the same network 5-tuple. Use of different DSCPs to obtain different QoS treatments within a single network 5-tuple, the results (e.g., reordering) may cause transport protocol interactions, particularly with congestion control functionality. In addition, DSCP markings may be changed or removed between the traffic source and destination. This document covers the implications of these DiffServ aspects for real-time network communication, including WebRTC. Working Group Summary The DART working group was formed in April of 2014. The working group was chartered to focus on a constrained problem and conclude quickly. DART adopted this document with very little controversy. While the working group is nominally in the RAI area, it has been effectively a cross-area effort between RAI and TSV. This document resulted in lively discussion among a core group of experts from both areas. In general, the discussion converged quickly, and there were no unresolved controversies. In the shepherd's opinion, the only impediment to consensus was that discussion kept overturning rocks, forcing participants to think about new issues. One notable issue was whether this draft should offer guidance on the interaction between having multiple DSCPs in a stream and the multiple stream optimization work (draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation.) The working group chose to avoid such guidance in this draft, and leave that for the multi-stream draft to solve. Document Quality During the working group last call, we solicited comments from RTCWEB, AVTCORE, MMUSIC, CLUE, TSVWG, and RMCAT. In the shepherd's opinion, it has been well reviewed, and represents a strong consensus. The shepherd does not think it needs any further specific reviews, other than the usual reviews it would receive during the IETF last call process (for example, Gen-ART and SecDir). Since the document does not specify protocol, it will not be directly implemented. However, we expect that at least the RTCWEB working group will incorporate guidance from this document into it's output. Personnel The Document Shepherd is Ben Campbell. The Responsible AD is Richard Barnes. From nobody Thu Nov 13 16:15:55 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dart@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dart@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EACA1A0016; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:15:53 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id drQc8TKoMjvj; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:15:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2B51A0118; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:15:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: IESG Secretary To: IETF Announcement List X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.7.4 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20141114001535.24256.21244.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:15:35 -0800 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dart/_qRig-0_DalZwfEkmv8AfkTSkuo Cc: ben@nostrum.com, dart@ietf.org Subject: [Dart] WG Action: Conclusion of DiffServ Applied to Real-time Transports (dart) X-BeenThere: dart@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: "\"DiffServ Applied to RTP Transports discussion list\"" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:15:54 -0000 The DiffServ Applied to Real-time Transports (dart) working group in the Real-time Applications and Infrastructure has concluded. There are no active WG drafts, and the WG has completed its deliverables. The IESG contact persons are Richard Barnes and Alissa Cooper. The mailing list will be closed.