From dcpel-bounces@ietf.org Mon Nov 20 07:44:58 2006 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gm8W5-0001kD-MH; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:44:53 -0500 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gm8W4-0001jX-Bb for dcpel@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:44:52 -0500 Received: from mail.av.it.pt ([193.136.92.53] helo=av.it.pt) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gm8Vv-000068-OI for dcpel@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:44:52 -0500 Received: from [193.136.93.102] (account vjesus [193.136.93.102] verified) by av.it.pt (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTPSA id 6897733 for dcpel@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:44:30 +0000 Message-ID: <4561A34B.6000609@av.it.pt> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:44:59 +0000 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?V=EDtor_Jesus?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dcpel@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126 Subject: [Dcpel] is DCPEL alive? X-BeenThere: dcpel@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for possible diffserv control plane elements WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dcpel-bounces@ietf.org Dear all, I subscribed to DCPEL some months ago, in the expectation that some work in interdomain QoS would be carried on. But so far I did not see any message. Is this group still active ..and/or.. are there any plans to try to evolve DCPEL to a new IETF WG? my best regards, --vítor jesus ---- Vítor Jesus, MSc Institute of Telecommunications University of Aveiro Aveiro, Portugal Tel: +351-234-377000 http://www.it.av.pt _______________________________________________ Dcpel mailing list Dcpel@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcpel From dcpel-bounces@ietf.org Wed Nov 22 07:44:43 2006 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GmrSw-0001sV-ON; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:44:38 -0500 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GmrSw-0001sQ-7W for dcpel@ietf.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:44:38 -0500 Received: from deprox.docomolab-euro.com ([212.119.9.186]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GmrSq-0004dP-OB for dcpel@ietf.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:44:38 -0500 Received: from 172.27.20.3 by deprox.docomolab-euro.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:44:28 +0100 Received: from deex.docomolab-euro.com ([172.27.10.3]) by DEMAIL.docomolab-euro.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:44:27 +0100 Received: from [172.27.100.96] ([172.27.100.96]) by deex.docomolab-euro.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:44:26 +0100 Message-ID: <4564462A.9050605@docomolab-euro.com> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:44:26 +0100 From: mendes User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?V=EDtor_Jesus?= Subject: Re: [Dcpel] is DCPEL alive? References: <4561A34B.6000609@av.it.pt> In-Reply-To: <4561A34B.6000609@av.it.pt> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Nov 2006 12:44:26.0391 (UTC) FILETIME=[F1A9DA70:01C70E33] X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-7.0.0.1345-3.6.1039-14828.002 X-TM-AS-Result: No--19.248200-0.000000-2 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 538aad3a3c4f01d8b6a6477ca4248793 Cc: dcpel@ietf.org X-BeenThere: dcpel@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for possible diffserv control plane elements WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dcpel-bounces@ietf.org Dear Vitor, I'm afraid that the DCPEL effort didn't got the needed attention from the community and from IETF. From the latter we got a set of questions about its usefulness and relation with other groups. Based on these evidences, my current opinion is that it would be difficult to create a WG based on the drafts that we produced. Mainly not because of the draft, which could be easily improved, but because the IETF is more interested in other topics. Maybe we still can reach our goals, or part of them, indirectly. For instance, currently I'm involved in the study of the use of QoS-NSLP signaling, in the NSIS WG, to implement an inter-domain QoS model. We are also looking at how does this signaling relates to the RACF proposal form ITU-T. Although we cannot achieve all the goals of DCPEL, at least we can try to fulfill some of the requirements described in the DCPE requirements draft (already expired). Cheers Paulo ----------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Paulo Mendes DoCoMo Communications Laboratories Europe GmbH Landsberger Str. 312, 80687 Munich, Germany Tel. +49-89-56824-226, Fax. +49-89-56824-300 http://www.docomoeurolabs.de Vítor Jesus wrote: > Dear all, > > I subscribed to DCPEL some months ago, in the expectation that some > work in interdomain QoS would be carried on. But so far I did not see > any message. > > Is this group still active ..and/or.. are there any plans to try to > evolve DCPEL to a new IETF WG? > > my best regards, > --vítor jesus > > ---- > Vítor Jesus, MSc > Institute of Telecommunications > University of Aveiro > Aveiro, Portugal > Tel: +351-234-377000 > http://www.it.av.pt > > _______________________________________________ > Dcpel mailing list > Dcpel@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcpel > _______________________________________________ Dcpel mailing list Dcpel@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcpel