Subject: [Dime] rfc3588bis document update

From: Victor Fajardo <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:24:00 -0400

The following is a continuation of 3588bis change summary below.

The latest version of rfc3588bis is now available: 
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-05.txt

The deltas between 04 and 05 versions are as follows:

* 05 includes proposals for 20, 56, 57
* Open issues: 35, 39, 55, 58

#35 and #39 are still open from previous revs. We probably need to get 
this resolved soon. Suggestions on how to do this is described below.
#55 A change in command code allocation process. See editor's note in 
the bis document
#58 Possible error in IANA registration. Should be easily fixed.

Diff's are available at:

* between 05 from 04: 
http://www.opendiameter.org/public/draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-05-from-4.diff.html

Previous diffs and delta histories are below.

regards,
victor

> Hi all,
>
> The latest version of rfc3588bis is now available: 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-04.txt
>
> As a short summary, the change history of this document are as follows:
>
> * 00 and rfc3588 are identical
> * 01 incorporates the changes proposed in 
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-fajardo-dime-diameter-errata-00.txt
> * 02 includes proposals for 32, 36, 44, 49, 41, 40, 31, 26
> * 03 includes proposals for 28, 33, 37, 38, 51, 52, 50 (partially)
> * 04 includes proposals for 34, 50, 54, 53
> * Open issues remain: 35, 39
>
> Suggested approaches for open issues:
>
> #35 - Representation/Encoding of diameter identities (FQDN's). We may 
> need to consult with DNS folks on how to properly support 
> internationalization etc for FQDN names (if needed). This is in 
> addition to the default ascii representation.
>
> #39 - How to do TLS certificate validation against peer names. We may 
> need to consult with security folks on how to properly support sanity 
> checks on certificates; i.e, use of CN, SN etc against a diameter 
> identity.
>
> For easier reading the relevant diffs are:
>
> * between 01 from 3588: 
> http://www.opendiameter.org/public/draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-01-from-rfc3588.diff.html 
>
> * between 02 from 01: 
> http://www.opendiameter.org/public/draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-02-from-1.diff.html 
>
> * between 03 from 02: 
> http://www.opendiameter.org/public/draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-03-from-2.diff.html 
>
> * between 04 from 03: 
> http://www.opendiameter.org/public/draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-04-from-3.diff.html 
>
>
> The issue tracker can be found in: 
> http://www.tschofenig.priv.at:8080/diameter-interop/index
>
> regards,
> victor

_______________________________________________
DiME mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime