Subject: [Dime]: A Potential Issue with the New Text for RFC 3558bis

From: "Zeltsan, Zachary \(Zachary\)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:04:56 -0500

I have noticed what appears to be an omission in
draft-ietf-dime-rfc3558bis. 
Whereas RFC 3558 explicitly required IPsec for the client with an option
for TLS, now the TLS is mentioned as an OPTION, but nothing is said
about IPsec. Is IPsec still mandatory? If not, is it still an option? I
strongly believe that the text must be explicit.

Zachary Zeltsan

_______________________________________________
DiME mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime