Subject: [Dime] RFC 4005bis, Issue #19

From: Glen Zorn <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 17:34:39 +0700

The ticket says:

> Section 4.5.8. Tunnel-Assignment-Id AVP
>
> Mark Jones> s/should/SHOULD/g Mark Jones> Last paragraph appears to
> be missing normative statements in the first two sentences. Was this
> intentional?

I have no idea, but I doubt it.  Since this appears to be a purely
editorial change, I think that I can just go ahead & make it.