Subject: [Dime] 3588bis question: DIAMETER_INVALID_BIT_IN_HEADER

From: Ben Campbell <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 16:31:20 -0500

Hi,

I notice that 3588bis changed in the description of DIAMETER_INVALID_BIT_IN_HEADER to the following:

> This error is returned when a reserved bit in the Diameter header
>       is set to one (1) or the bits in the Diameter header are set
>       incorrectly.
> 

Wouldn't the usage in the first clause violate this normative statement in section 3?

> These flag bits are reserved for future use, and MUST be set to
>          zero, and ignored by the receiver.
 
Thanks!

Ben.