Subject: Re: [Dime] [dime] #47: reduction percentages greater than 100 should be ignored

From: Maria Cruz Bartolome <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:02:56 +0000

Hello all,

Once we have defined a default value for the Validity-Duration, I think it is important to do not discard overload report with an invalid value, but use default one.
Take into account reception of a valid OLR by a client is important, and if discarded we should assure that a new valid OLR is received.

Best regards
/MCruz

From: DiME [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Steve Donovan
Sent: lunes, 10 de febrero de 2014 18:59
To: [email-masked]; [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [Dime] [dime] #47: reduction percentages greater than 100 should be ignored

I agree that a clarification is needed on what it means to be "treated as is the OC-Validity-Duration AVP was not present".  It would e better to say:

  "Invalid validity duration values are given the default value".

Steve

On 2/10/14 11:29 AM, [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]> wrote:
Hi Steve,

About the OC-Validity-Reduction AVP values greater than 24 hours, it is said that the default value 5s applies.

I was therefore wondering if it should be also considered as an error and therefore discarded. It is a real open question. Not an issue per se as I'm fine with the existing text. I was reacting on the reason for change explained by Ben.

Regards,

Lionel

De : DiME [mailto:[email-masked]] De la part de Steve Donovan
Envoyé : lundi 10 février 2014 17:59
À : [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
Objet : Re: [Dime] [dime] #47: reduction percentages greater than 100 should be ignored

It is possible, the range defined is zero to 24 hours.  I think the text is correct as it says that a value out of this range should be ignored.

Steve
On 2/10/14 10:50 AM, Ben Campbell wrote:

On Feb 8, 2014, at 10:37 AM, [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]> wrote:

Hi Ben,

OK with this statement.

But if it is agreed, would it mean that the same consideration should apply for the OC-Validity-Duration AVP values?

I'm not sure I follow the question. Is it possible to send an invalid OC-Validity-Duration value?

Lionel

-----Message d'origine-----

De : DiME [mailto:[email-masked]] De la part de dime issue tracker

Envoyé : vendredi 7 février 2014 23:05

À : [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>; [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>

Cc : [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>

Objet : [Dime] [dime] #47: reduction percentages greater than 100 should be ignored

#47: reduction percentages greater than 100 should be ignored

Section 4.7 says " [Reduction-Percentage] Values greater than 100 are

interpreted as 100."

An OLR with an invalid value should be ignored. An invalid value indicates

incorrect behavior on the part of the sender. In this case, it's not safe

to assume we know what the sender really intended.

--

-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Reporter:               |      Owner:  draft-docdt-dime-

 [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>        |  [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>

    Type:  defect       |     Status:  new

Priority:  minor        |  Milestone:

Component:  draft-       |    Version:  1.0

 docdt-dime-ovli        |   Keywords:

Severity:  Active WG    |

 Document               |

-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/trac/ticket/47><http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/trac/ticket/47>

dime <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/><http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/>

_______________________________________________

DiME mailing list

[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.

_______________________________________________

DiME mailing list

[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.