Subject: Re: [Dime] DOIC Overview of Operation

From: Ben Campbell <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:14:22 -0500

Oops, I was cleaning up some old mail, and comment from a while back that I probably should respond to. Apologies for the tardiness.

On Mar 24, 2014, at 7:49 AM, Jouni Korhonen <[email-masked]> wrote:

>>   DOIC endpoints do not generate new messages to carry DOIC related
>>   information.  Rather, they "piggyback" DOIC information over existing
>>   Diameter messages by inserting new AVPs into existing Diameter
>>   requests and responses.
> 
> JiK: This applies to existing applications or new application where
> DOIC is just a feature on top of one. Nothing prevents us defining a
> DOIC-only application using this spec as the base. This should be
> reflected?

The entirety of the overview text is intended to describe DOIC as it currently exists in the draft. If we later create an application to carry overload reports (perhaps updating DOIC in the process), that would need its own overview text.