From nobody Wed Mar 4 10:03:46 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A17753A13C1; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:03:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I-_bNgt7SbDq; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:03:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81A493A13BF; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:03:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 8209BF4073B; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:03:21 -0800 (PST) To: mliptak@pm.me, glenzorn@gmail.com X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Cc: warren@kumari.net, iesg@ietf.org, dime@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: <20200304180321.8209BF4073B@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:03:21 -0800 (PST) Archived-At: Subject: [Dime] [Errata Verified] RFC7155 (5994) X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 18:03:45 -0000 The following errata report has been verified for RFC7155, "Diameter Network Access Server Application". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5994 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: Michal Liptak Date Reported: 2020-02-27 Verified by: Warren Kumari (Ops AD) (IESG) Section: .4 Original Text ------------- Redirected-Host-Cache-Time Corrected Text -------------- Redirect-Max-Cache-Time Notes ----- As per RFC 6733 section 8.3.2 [WK: Note that Errata 5993, 5994, 5995 are all related / similar. Readers are encouraged to read all 3 ] -------------------------------------- RFC7155 (draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-14) -------------------------------------- Title : Diameter Network Access Server Application Publication Date : April 2014 Author(s) : G. Zorn, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Diameter Maintenance and Extensions Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Wed Mar 4 10:04:05 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756EF3A13C3; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:04:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T8v9OnPTdwtN; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:04:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E4BA3A13C1; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:04:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 5AE48F4073B; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:03:40 -0800 (PST) To: mliptak@pm.me, glenzorn@gmail.com X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Cc: warren@kumari.net, iesg@ietf.org, dime@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: <20200304180340.5AE48F4073B@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:03:40 -0800 (PST) Archived-At: Subject: [Dime] [Errata Verified] RFC7155 (5993) X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 18:04:03 -0000 The following errata report has been verified for RFC7155, "Diameter Network Access Server Application". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5993 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: Michal Liptak Date Reported: 2020-02-27 Verified by: Warren Kumari (Ops AD) (IESG) Section: GLOBAL Original Text ------------- Redirected-Host* Corrected Text -------------- Redirect-Host* Notes ----- I did not find AVP Redirected-Host defined anywhere, however there is Redirect-Host in RFC 6733 (same with Redirected-Host-Usage) [WK: Note that Errata 5993, 5994, 5995 are all related / similar. Readers are encouraged to read all 3 ] -------------------------------------- RFC7155 (draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-14) -------------------------------------- Title : Diameter Network Access Server Application Publication Date : April 2014 Author(s) : G. Zorn, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Diameter Maintenance and Extensions Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Wed Mar 4 10:04:37 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184B53A13C4; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:04:17 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bz8e-071L4Mi; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:04:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDB093A13C3; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:04:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E20EEF4073B; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:03:53 -0800 (PST) To: mliptak@pm.me, glenzorn@gmail.com X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Cc: warren@kumari.net, iesg@ietf.org, dime@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: <20200304180353.E20EEF4073B@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:03:53 -0800 (PST) Archived-At: Subject: [Dime] [Errata Verified] RFC7155 (5995) X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 18:04:17 -0000 The following errata report has been verified for RFC7155, "Diameter Network Access Server Application". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5995 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: Michal Liptak Date Reported: 2020-02-27 Verified by: Warren Kumari (Ops AD) (IESG) Section: GLOBAL Original Text ------------- Connection-Info Corrected Text -------------- Connect-Info Notes ----- typo in AVP name [WK: Note that Errata 5993, 5994, 5995 are all related / similar. Readers are encouraged to read all 3 ] -------------------------------------- RFC7155 (draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-14) -------------------------------------- Title : Diameter Network Access Server Application Publication Date : April 2014 Author(s) : G. Zorn, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Diameter Maintenance and Extensions Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Mon Mar 9 15:23:16 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dime@ietf.org Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045D73A083B; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 15:23:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: Cc: dime@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.120.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dime@ietf.org Message-ID: <158379258394.5546.18219404074762713660@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 15:23:04 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [Dime] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dime-group-signaling-13.txt X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 22:23:11 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Diameter Maintenance and Extensions WG of the IETF. Title : Diameter Group Signaling Authors : Mark Jones Marco Liebsch Lionel Morand Filename : draft-ietf-dime-group-signaling-13.txt Pages : 26 Date : 2020-03-09 Abstract: In large network deployments, a single Diameter node can support over a million concurrent Diameter sessions. Recent use cases have revealed the need for Diameter nodes to apply the same operation to a large group of Diameter sessions concurrently. The Diameter base protocol commands operate on a single session so these use cases could result in many thousands of command exchanges to enforce the same operation on each session in the group. In order to reduce signaling, it would be desirable to enable bulk operations on all (or part of) the sessions managed by a Diameter node using a single or a few command exchanges. This document specifies the Diameter protocol extensions to achieve this signaling optimization. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-group-signaling/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dime-group-signaling-13 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dime-group-signaling-13 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dime-group-signaling-13 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Sun Mar 15 21:44:47 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C47B33A0A8F; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 21:44:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2LV1FGLo8zT4; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 21:44:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 293BC3A0A8E; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 21:44:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67609203A9D; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 21:44:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N2o21TAG8Gaw; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 21:44:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.18] (unknown [47.144.155.28]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0E90E203A9C; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 21:44:36 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Megan Ferguson In-Reply-To: <20200304180321.8209BF4073B@rfc-editor.org> Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 21:44:32 -0700 Cc: mliptak@pm.me, glenzorn@gmail.com, warren@kumari.net, iesg@ietf.org, dime@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4C5ACCB3-8A8F-4410-A744-30D82928AACC@amsl.com> References: <20200304180321.8209BF4073B@rfc-editor.org> To: RFC System X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Dime] [Errata Verified] RFC7155 (5994) X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 04:44:40 -0000 Greetings, FYI - we updated this errata report to point to Section 3.4. Thank you. RFC Editor/mf On Mar 4, 2020, at 10:03 AM, RFC Errata System = wrote: > The following errata report has been verified for RFC7155, > "Diameter Network Access Server Application".=20 >=20 > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5994 >=20 > -------------------------------------- > Status: Verified > Type: Editorial >=20 > Reported by: Michal Liptak > Date Reported: 2020-02-27 > Verified by: Warren Kumari (Ops AD) (IESG) >=20 > Section: .4 >=20 > Original Text > ------------- > Redirected-Host-Cache-Time >=20 > Corrected Text > -------------- > Redirect-Max-Cache-Time >=20 > Notes > ----- > As per RFC 6733 section 8.3.2 >=20 > [WK: Note that Errata 5993, 5994, 5995 are all related / similar. = Readers are encouraged to read all 3 ] >=20 > -------------------------------------- > RFC7155 (draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-14) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Diameter Network Access Server Application > Publication Date : April 2014 > Author(s) : G. Zorn, Ed. > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Diameter Maintenance and Extensions > Area : Operations and Management > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG >=20 From nobody Tue Mar 24 23:45:46 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA713A044E for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 23:45:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dTDGT59Xa4XB for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 23:45:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C57883A044D for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 23:45:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 7B67EF406DA; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 23:45:32 -0700 (PDT) To: glenzorn@gmail.com, ibagdona@gmail.com, warren@kumari.net, jouni.nospam@gmail.com, lionel.morand@orange.com X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Cc: luke@mewburn.net, dime@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: <20200325064532.7B67EF406DA@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 23:45:32 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Subject: [Dime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7155 (6029) X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 06:45:45 -0000 The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7155, "Diameter Network Access Server Application". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6029 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Luke Mewburn Section: 4.4 Original Text ------------- QoS-Filter-Rule 4.4.9 | | | Corrected Text -------------- QoS-Filter-Rule 4.4.9 | M | V | Notes ----- The row "QoS-Filter-Rule" does not define AVP Flag Rules for "M" or "V": - The V Flag MUST NOT be used for this AVP. - There may be some debate whether the M Flag can be retrospectively added to the MUST column, versus leaving it out (implied "MAY" ?). The changes are consistent with all other AVPs in this RFC. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7155 (draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-14) -------------------------------------- Title : Diameter Network Access Server Application Publication Date : April 2014 Author(s) : G. Zorn, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Diameter Maintenance and Extensions Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG