Subject: [DMM] draft-matsushima-spring-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane

From: "Voyer, Daniel" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 15:09:40 +0000

Hi,
This is very good proposal.

On Section 4. Mobile user plane
The core network doesn’t require to be SRv6 – it could be IPv6 only. This demonstrate SRv6 flexibility.

On Section 5.2. Layer-2 Anchor segment
Can you add more explanation to “In downlink, there's no difference between the uplink behavior.”

On section 7. Control plane considerations
The centralized controller should be marked as out-of-scope of this document.

Thx
dan