From nobody Thu Sep 10 10:08:00 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5663A0E9D; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:07:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id USAvTCCqpR16; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:07:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD2B13A0E98; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:07:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 51F89F40752; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:07:34 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, dnssd@ietf.org Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: <20200910170734.51F89F40752@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:07:34 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Subject: [dnssd] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8882_on_DNS-Based_Service_Discovery_=28DNS?= =?utf-8?q?-SD=29_Privacy_and_Security_Requirements?= X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:08:00 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8882 Title: DNS-Based Service Discovery (DNS-SD) Privacy and Security Requirements Author: C. Huitema, D. Kaiser Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: September 2020 Mailbox: huitema@huitema.net, daniel.kaiser@uni.lu Pages: 17 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq-08.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8882 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8882 DNS-SD (DNS-based Service Discovery) normally discloses information about devices offering and requesting services. This information includes hostnames, network parameters, and possibly a further description of the corresponding service instance. Especially when mobile devices engage in DNS-based Service Discovery at a public hotspot, serious privacy problems arise. We analyze the requirements of a privacy-respecting discovery service. This document is a product of the Extensions for Scalable DNS Service Discovery Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC From nobody Fri Sep 18 09:23:56 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317433A1117 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:23:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5QDHW-KUqmXD for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:23:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf1-x135.google.com (mail-lf1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 232773A110D for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:23:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x135.google.com with SMTP id y17so6752517lfa.8 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:23:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=umch3ZeebLdmBgOEvaeU9v4aotj44ViDaddRhohTsFw=; b=AjSEHbhHlJZt946H05Ee1kxdQoM5rjmzeEzoXSja0ECamfWuVT2x9gCYTjZ6Y+AIGv XYa7IHEJEj0RxGIONdhJVjDNmD9q2lY2jR+djActdt7ENCLOTRrRKKUuECuiFHUHXmrZ wES4aBRkllGIIYAgnWHosq6MrH6N1PXKyXJaWW1NDed4XypR4oPSp2zPV56haSq1kHey maMUDS3/q6c/Vx4YBNk6wHQyyTNmboT7AkGjzJFxAyRyQKXfp9p5ShPuX7gZ88ES1g7i oWeaKznG0RnpraHkggvKMTEo7lBi1a8YMZlULzBZq3LWq/CcVS/3LUSgH1oHcZeMmDjM ujHg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=umch3ZeebLdmBgOEvaeU9v4aotj44ViDaddRhohTsFw=; b=F17htA3FgBhot0rK63bKdMAuTZCnSVq7Ua8BACMLMZhRToNyRNmfgg7IjHdWkUBwQA Wmuql3W+KHWAdlQ5rSBxqPfH2wLPCcNGK5Em9ua8rC3gbwoEpVa5NRyd53kg4nNmXppt uugQbVi8PKdD732M0KCKDua2WJ1i8AjmHS5IQKNLqC6wiKU+15PRkZgFygIodNPCUe7x ajGx1keaKMlVZP93UWlOFqn7rQY8o5B/NyPoXrVeI+dIVpz0VeOA7PUBXEM8McUqiRl2 BKJRDdzEcfs/4JcehvbVtn1yuTiTcheVk9OaWfgUO8TtW8Mmna5xu1fTGLmgPCjcmIf+ VGZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532p/hheMJISWwY4DzO1TRgOfRG5cLbXesFu3S3TfPFx6x81Bitp QhsHBdCiQCGz6EJokKTQ8Ln+PFx4GNctISK7fhps2C3C X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzkXGkMd5lxJ+/GEgXwMAe/fOtrcW2NaOa1TGWL6BMs/aiYubQ6ncxBlG+uJjNeHnONMIqcOTWaeX7y+JgJcrI= X-Received: by 2002:a19:8906:: with SMTP id l6mr13181466lfd.136.1600446231039; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:23:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: David Schinazi Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:23:36 -0700 Message-ID: To: DNSSD Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000015520e05af98ed92" Archived-At: Subject: [dnssd] DNDSD not meeting at 109? X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:23:55 -0000 --00000000000015520e05af98ed92 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi DNSSD enthusiasts, The chairs haven't seen much activity on here lately, so we're thinking of not scheduling DNSSD at IETF 109. If you think we should have a session, please reply here with the agenda items you had in mind. Thanks, David and Barbara --00000000000015520e05af98ed92 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi DNSSD enthusiasts,

The chairs haven&= #39;t seen much activity on here lately,
so we're thinking of= not scheduling DNSSD at IETF 109.
If you think we should have a = session, please reply here
with the agenda items you had in mind.=

Thanks,
David and Barbara
--00000000000015520e05af98ed92-- From nobody Fri Sep 18 09:35:58 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634273A1120 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:35:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rCHT6XwFcHTI for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:35:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qt1-x830.google.com (mail-qt1-x830.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::830]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08CC63A1024 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:35:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt1-x830.google.com with SMTP id e7so5527890qtj.11 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:35:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=DZaEWjx+sJnwzZHjQMuIbmBcNY6hgasj9PNHvrj1MUs=; b=pWvUUmG4/LiUiTuyIlS7Z87CqsUG2iQ0dzuN609JOdtlsE6WzEAbpCAq4hDOgejmXN EKExH5uvZALdFabuOhN8+H60FAcQircPoFOEyxnhGhs66L/ApY3GWmjPoocaStrRxDg/ OZQ/oMm7UfFRyJZq4/gXes/K3kJSbZxG15uWFr8wtFwwQoXk5sc4SX+4aIASo42z518m 7hxelR5RFeOdPQMInZ/zTwnYtXnlJahXQt9KRoqJuAnx2Ag+uPgSrTjW3HKLJjIvGO9w Zlcv2h0+Ew6eF2ZkxN/4qI8Y6yZMD43xMTBC9peSceOZbe2MwrEqlPPuh5nP6VzczzF4 5T1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=DZaEWjx+sJnwzZHjQMuIbmBcNY6hgasj9PNHvrj1MUs=; b=nRcYNa6MK0GYzPLMZ8jDv2LEspb3H3yFJpnSjsBKRYmR/1T5u6Wj+brHk2okjbjC+W VVTBiVuvsp0XmeGHRnPt6RD5QC1b0Qe0OMLdkr+PCCTb7Jm10KOapO3KJXjnv27Pd62n d2sttwVEWFeL/VbXtLVn41ANmrmggn49+mxMvO2FU9SGBaO6RRGWbKLI5b+EFOKXrOYB oU4ngx+AbDFGu27mUiicyRkJthLRwqf3AbQDcA8rnLZ+R090YCREziLdEDTtsOddMgTq HHqiDFholt1jnLQfrdwri0WYgHs0jsWwsfznsCM+Wy2+5ndjhNXs1fz/Epj5CBWJZAmA O9Lg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531wKrgpim0/UhhN2QgL7v3Ci0gP/gZwDTLgcnFJzt5xHzF1JGC+ XpspvwIUDTs091Uv1rh+8iAOUQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxhokyEnuZlZa1voq8tLHJCGYDJgg+cFEMZeVBA9clLrQS8RFWb4Q/QzWbTaFfH3clpdRiSsg== X-Received: by 2002:aed:2a17:: with SMTP id c23mr35069000qtd.338.1600446953853; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:35:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2601:18b:300:36ee:7d95:d0eb:a13b:19ae]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o26sm2564953qtb.24.2020.09.18.09.35.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:35:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Ted Lemon Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F4F8769A-C7B5-4AB4-AC40-F3540A84DA11" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.0.3.2.33\)) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:35:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: Cc: DNSSD To: David Schinazi References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.0.3.2.33) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [dnssd] DNDSD not meeting at 109? X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:35:56 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_F4F8769A-C7B5-4AB4-AC40-F3540A84DA11 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 On Sep 18, 2020, at 12:23 PM, David Schinazi = wrote: > The chairs haven't seen much activity on here lately, > so we're thinking of not scheduling DNSSD at IETF 109. > If you think we should have a session, please reply here > with the agenda items you had in mind. Actually, we=E2=80=99re doing quite a bit of work, and expect to have = some draft updates and new drafts. We were a bit disappointed that there = was no DNSSD session at IETF 108, given that both Stuart and I had = updates to several drafts, but in fairness we didn=E2=80=99t have time = to discuss them on the mailing list. You should expect to see an update to the srp draft, to the advertising = proxy draft, and a draft on SRP for stub networks. The challenge has been finding time to write drafts in between writing = code, but I think that needs to be a priority for IETF 109, and intend = to have something ready in October for the working group to look at. --Apple-Mail=_F4F8769A-C7B5-4AB4-AC40-F3540A84DA11 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 On = Sep 18, 2020, at 12:23 PM, David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
The chairs haven't seen much activity = on here lately,
so we're thinking of not scheduling = DNSSD at IETF 109.
If you think we should have a = session, please reply here
with the agenda items you had in = mind.

Actually, we=E2=80=99re doing quite a bit of work, and expect = to have some draft updates and new drafts. We were a bit disappointed = that there was no DNSSD session at IETF 108, given that both Stuart and = I had updates to several drafts, but in fairness we didn=E2=80=99t have = time to discuss them on the mailing list.

You should expect to see an update to = the srp draft, to the advertising proxy draft, and a draft on SRP for = stub networks.

The challenge has been finding time to write drafts in = between writing code, but I think that needs to be a priority for IETF = 109, and intend to have something ready in October for the working group = to look at.

= --Apple-Mail=_F4F8769A-C7B5-4AB4-AC40-F3540A84DA11-- From nobody Fri Sep 18 09:53:54 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1137F3A1123 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:53:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.097 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mci0g4ddxdAL for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:53:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf1-x12f.google.com (mail-lf1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96A023A0DF6 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:53:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id x77so6873979lfa.0 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:53:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yG2wrU6HaWLcrP1QI4dF26ecd8rGmr/HccCWu81U08Q=; b=oJSlYNFaq32gw+7RCPCl3vutGyKASDd9E080PlZaFvLHEJE+oA+fC4garGyL21TupW Azza48LzveHQFG6aYN8GtO6ejvD/sjIUmBLQdJrH88Rq3OZJhnW7qhtLs5RirGp9nTwF 5iFi3PQxMpTJT25hlkC2QIHtKW4b0Fd/YHcRSPO3KANKcbRSvBkFgCYvtWFrfxu+KZRy BJHqUErhgfkhzrwxq38XEJSkmAhnTuHZelZSkjsvcVXW8nyqv1EhFYd4UdDjazayJbJM dYzNyOteW7fBs5o7MSR5MjmzdoTAOlS23l529HpQmi1Pe2YPSq4SuDeXfe5enqLcohzc g5hA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yG2wrU6HaWLcrP1QI4dF26ecd8rGmr/HccCWu81U08Q=; b=LN/P+iOl4N/eo1XJ3qmYId5u5tb+zXXZzOFRSSIK8LlqENBzyUkWO+OjX4DhOIPm14 gXuTB3kHHCFzpmCxAybOjKB5tpVSX/oi0Rs0xKNujDffYg1aOgfl/8yc2SuIWttApMEG 13+Gu9G6GXrQk3i4ebcWc8uJcXw9jC7ZzkLS6bsRJoSVVF32lIueGLyf7PimgGFMUY7K z46eve+cZmbwS10W8s9tHCuneraFyhT872M3hZsQcDr5KnNLsk5y4i8l/+mVdJu2pzmt JYgFtTmop7miwcRlGi71yFa81tE3sqfC+vPD3dFggv0fx49ubeI73fbS6YlfqyMcIUw5 ADDg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533vEccCHPx3iZ5BzA0dY8uxrFO4QkVteBVSvgXwGHaLgQu5sd7o SoWjwVKnPTjrrIDAjR+ZRcymhhAAUqq64BybeR6uXexb X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxzWoaz/l2CYfocV3OmUwSyZLlMnOuI7+L93RIpgBMf1v1ZODymCt89iY4FdvBwTid0IjGuFOgwLSsJmkbWQAI= X-Received: by 2002:a19:4319:: with SMTP id q25mr9698284lfa.505.1600448029466; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:53:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Schinazi Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:53:38 -0700 Message-ID: To: Ted Lemon Cc: DNSSD Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000047299405af9958ff" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [dnssd] DNDSD not meeting at 109? X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:53:53 -0000 --00000000000047299405af9958ff Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Ted! I'm glad you're making progress on the code - that's always promising! However, to schedule a meeting we'd prefer concrete agenda items, and those generally start with an individual draft submission followed by discussion on the list. I know that both Stuart and you are very busy these days, but if you could make that happen in the next two weeks (WG scheduling request deadline is 2020-10-02)= , then that would allow us to justify scheduling a meeting. Thanks! David On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 9:35 AM Ted Lemon wrote: > On Sep 18, 2020, at 12:23 PM, David Schinazi > wrote: > > The chairs haven't seen much activity on here lately, > so we're thinking of not scheduling DNSSD at IETF 109. > If you think we should have a session, please reply here > with the agenda items you had in mind. > > > Actually, we=E2=80=99re doing quite a bit of work, and expect to have som= e draft > updates and new drafts. We were a bit disappointed that there was no DNSS= D > session at IETF 108, given that both Stuart and I had updates to several > drafts, but in fairness we didn=E2=80=99t have time to discuss them on th= e mailing > list. > > You should expect to see an update to the srp draft, to the advertising > proxy draft, and a draft on SRP for stub networks. > > The challenge has been finding time to write drafts in between writing > code, but I think that needs to be a priority for IETF 109, and intend to > have something ready in October for the working group to look at. > > --00000000000047299405af9958ff Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks Ted! I'm glad you're making progress on the= code - that's always promising!
However, to schedule a meetin= g we'd prefer concrete agenda items, and those
generally star= t with an individual draft submission followed by discussion on the list.
I know that both Stuart and you are very busy these days, but if y= ou could make that
happen in the next two weeks (WG scheduling re= quest deadline is 2020-10-02),
then that would allow us to = justify scheduling a meeting.

Thanks!
Da= vid

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 9:35 AM Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
= On Sep 18, 2020, at 12:23 PM, David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:=
The chairs haven&#= 39;t seen much activity on here lately,
so we'= ;re thinking of not scheduling DNSSD at IETF 109.
If you think we should have a session, please reply here
with the agenda items you had in mind.
<= /div>
Actually, we=E2=80=99re doing quite a bit of work, and expect= to have some draft updates and new drafts. We were a bit disappointed that= there was no DNSSD session at IETF 108, given that both Stuart and I had u= pdates to several drafts, but in fairness we didn=E2=80=99t have time to di= scuss them on the mailing list.

You should expect = to see an update to the srp draft, to the advertising proxy draft, and a dr= aft on SRP for stub networks.

The challenge has be= en finding time to write drafts in between writing code, but I think that n= eeds to be a priority for IETF 109, and intend to have something ready in O= ctober for the working group to look at.

--00000000000047299405af9958ff--